All Episodes
Previous Next
March 10, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:57
Need to Know News (9 March 2023) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with a Wagner boss saying that the Bachmut fighters don't even have any ammunition.
We've been reporting this.
It means the war essentially is over.
Bachmut has been the decisive event.
The head of Russia's Wagner mercenary group, spearheading the longest battle of the intervention in Ukraine, has complained his forces lack ammunition, blaming possible betrayal.
No, it's a Wagner group.
He complained the Russian reservists meant to deploy to Bakhmut have been diverted and promised by the military days late in arriving.
We're trying to understand what the reasons are.
The usual bureaucracy or betrayal.
Bakhmut had become the bloodiest and longest-running battle in Russia's intervention in Ukraine.
The one in the list suggests this city holds little strategic significance.
But Zelensky declared he would never surrender Bakhmut.
Observers say both sides are seeking to exhaust each other to limit their ability to mount any further offensive.
With Russian forces gaining encirclement of the city, the U.S.
Space Institute, with a study of war, says Ukrainian forces may have initiated a strategic retreat.
This is what I have from other sources, that Russia has surrounded the city and that there is only one access route for Ukraine.
The Kremlin claimed last year to have annexed the eastern Donetsk city where Bakhmut is located and has made its complete capture a military priority.
Meanwhile, Lawmakers have quietly given weapon firms a bailout for unproven inflation burden.
This is insulting beyond belief.
The defense industry spent most of 2022 exploiting inflation as a justification for more military spending and succeeded when Congress allocated $45 billion more than the president had requested.
But it's less known is that Congress quietly slipped contractors yet another form of inflation relief in the form of the annual defense policy bill.
They authorize potential sweeping price increases in response to any cost growth companies experience due solely to economic inflation.
In effect, Congress is covering financial losses for huge companies, Lockheed Martin, for example, worth over $22 billion.
To make matters worse, they crafted the inflation bailout for the defense industry behind closed doors.
None of the versions of the bill included the provision means few House or Senate negotiators have added it to the legislative text, particularly problematic since the Senate already rejected a similar proposal last fall.
The Pentagon wasn't convinced that events industry needed sweeping inflation relief, so its acquisition chief asked them for proof inflation was causing them problems where they failed to produce the data.
The proposal was unjustified, but also, over-beyond, it contradicted both federal contracting law and Pentagon guidance.
Industry didn't even have data showing the companies were trying to seek financial relief.
All they had, the means, which were designed to be a safety net, the existing law, there's no evidence companies were even using that.
Despite all of these considerations, lawmakers transformed the law to enable price increases for Pentagon-required contracts.
The new law has no restrictions on when they may ask for increases.
The only requirement the costs exceed the original agreed-upon price.
That means they can now claim cost increase for any reason.
The new law will require the Pentagon to revisit its position, but the Pentagon already stated in October it had no present intent to enact such a policy.
This is quite bizarre.
The law thus authorizes contract price increases.
Hopefully the Biden administration will reject the unprecedented waiver expenditure.
Regardless, House and Senate negotiated both a fast one in this defense bill, advancing an unjustified financial bailout, contradicting Pentagon guidelines, circumventing congressional deliberation.
The authorization without evidence of inflation is a terrible setback for transparent policymaking at best, and at worst, offers contracts profit insurance.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, as you always, we're in the fog of war, so it's hard to be able to tell exactly what's going on, and that said, by all appearances, Russia is going to be the good guy in that conflict, and how do we know?
Well, anybody who the U.S.
and the U.K.
and NATO say is bad is probably the opposite, and we know that from the history, and I'll give a link to my usual 11-part series, U.S.
Illegal, to go through and to document as a retired U.S.
history teacher that the U.S.
routinely violates treaties In the present, we know Zelensky is a bad guy.
He makes it illegal to oppose him in the media or politically, and this is an intervention by the Russia military because, since 2014, Zelensky and the US and the UK and NATO have bombed the Donbass through artillery fire, killing 14,000.
So, those are bad.
Those are wars of aggression and war crimes within that war, so...
I hope that the good guys get the ammo that they need in order to close this thing up.
For the arms money, yeah, see, because the rest of the world isn't fooled by this bullshit.
When you poll the people of the world, and this is in the U.S.
Illegal Series, more than twice the number of people say the U.S.
is the most dangerous nation to world peace compared to any other country.
The U.S.
has had over 200 military interventions for democracy, for freedom, for whatever.
Since World War II, and that's killed over 30 million people, and this is exactly what Ike worried about in the first draft of his famous speech was the military-industrial-congressional complex.
Took congressional out because they thought that might be too direct.
And regarding the excuse of inflation, that's just bullshit in order to loot more money.
We're lied to about inflation.
We, the people, Shadowstats.com, take a look at how the definition of inflation has been altered twice in order for the people to think it isn't as bad as it is, and then when they're just funneling money to their business partners, then they go ahead and say some bullshit reason.
Oh yeah, we got to give them more this time because inflation.
Brian, your thoughts?
Okay, the first one is what's going on in Doc Moots out of ammunition.
Yeah, I'll believe that when I see it.
They must be burning a whole lot, being that they're not doing a very good job defending themselves.
In the meantime, Lukashenko attacked Zelensky verbally.
While talking about the airfield explosion that took place in Mount... Mount Kiz... Well, the airfield explosion on February 25th.
Lukashenko called Zelensky a nit.
He's a nit.
He keeps running around Belarus, sending in his people and asking, let's sign a non-aggression pact.
Let's make a deal.
We don't have any mutual complaints.
And what Lukashenko is saying is, hey, we're not attacking, so why are you out there Trying to raise hell.
So, Zelensky's just playing it up, playing it up, playing it up, and I imagine that's part of the ammo shortage.
It's just more of the money laundering operation.
Something else is happening on that front over in the country of Georgia.
Tbilisi has been engulfed in protest, and the demonstrators, the quote-unquote demonstrators, are in favor of abandoning a new bill that would basically ban foreign agents from working there.
So basically what they're saying is, let's go ahead and send in the Antifa protests into Georgia so that we don't have to kick out all of the Americans and all the CIA operatives that are operating over here.
And let's protest against these foreign agents so that, or against banning the foreign agents from working inside the country so that We can continue sending in our people to stir things up and start another front to the Ukraine and Russia war.
As for the nepotism and the lawmakers on the bailout, obviously it's proof of corruption and Partisanship and nepotism.
Everybody wants to get rich in the ammo game and the arms game.
And just so you know, this is, these government contractors, this is just a revolving door of criminals and illegitimate federal government agencies operating in these different positions.
For instance, let's talk about Scott Gottlieb.
He was the commissioner in charge of regulating Pfizer.
Oh, he was the commissioner in charge of the FDA, and now he's in charge of regulating regulation for Pfizer.
So here you got a government official that's now working for Pfizer.
You've got Stephen Hahn, FDA commissioner in charge of regulating Moderna, and now he's currently the chief medical officer of Flagship Pioneering, which is a venture capital firm at Moderna.
James C. Smith, CEO of Reuters, in charge of informing people about the COVID-19 vaccines, and now he's a current member of the board of directors at Pfizer, Anthony Fauci, director under the National Institutes of Health, and now the funder of bioweapons research and gain of function at coronavirus Wuhan Institute of Virology.
So we know that these people all get their positions because of their influence.
We know that their lobbyists are obviously some of the most powerful people in DC, why wouldn't you go lobby for Very good.
Very good.
on whatever grounds, if you control all these politicians, they do what you say, they're in your pocket.
And we know that these politicians are controlled anyway.
Just take a look at January 6th.
Yep.
Very good.
Very good.
Meanwhile, the five biggest lies exposed by Tucker Carlson bombshell revelations of the January 6th video.
Political Insider reported Tucker was poised to release portions of over 41,000 hours.
as far as They are lying, he reported.
We know because we've been looking at the tape.
Monday, he released select segments which proved, yes, they were lying, as he and many other conservatives had been predicting.
Here are some takeaways.
Simon Atiba tweets, Tucker Tonight begins releasing Capitol surveillance video from the January 6th showing that most of the protesters were very peaceful and were being held by the police.
Democrats in the media have desperately sought to make Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick, the face of the violent insurrection, repeatedly portraying his death as a result of a bloodthirsty mob.
We knew this was fake news because his death was ruled by a medical examiner to be from natural causes, not hastened by an injury.
What we did not know was how deep the false narrative ran.
Surveillance video released by Tucker shows that claim that his death was hastened by a blow to the head with a fire extinguisher were false, totally fabricated.
The videos show him walking around the premises normally, guiding Trump supporters out of the building wearing a helmet, walking through the building healthy, alert, unharmed, after he was supposedly murdered by the mob.
Quite a feat.
This day overturns a single most powerful and politically useful lie Democrats told us about January 6th.
Great price tweets!
Never-before-changed January 6 footage show Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick walking around the building after the Time media outlets claimed he was killed by protesters.
The J6 committee had access to his statement but refused to release it.
Meanwhile, Jacob Chansley, known as the QAnon Shaman, sentenced to 41 months in prison.
Tucker showed that he, who became the face of the insurrection, was doing little more than walking around the Capitol with a police escort.
They never attempted to arrest him, serving years behind bars.
The footage does not show an insurrection or a riot in progress.
Instead, it shows police escorting protesters through the building, including the now-infamous QAnon schema.
He showed video clips.
Police officers were so distraught over his actions, they were seeking to open locked doors for him to continue his tour.
At one point, nine officers were in the vicinity and not one tried to apprehend him.
Remember when the Sixth Committee accused lawmakers of conducting a reconnaissance tour prior to the riot?
Well, that didn't happen either.
Political Insider wrote last year that Representative Barry Loudermilk had been accused of leading one of the tours.
Despite the fact that the Capitol Police contradicted those claims, the highly partisan committee continued to push a debunked conspiracy theory to plant seeds of doubt.
Tucker showed footage of Loudermilk giving a tour in a Congressional building down the street, not the Capitol.
To constituents, none of whom were linked to the so-called insurrection.
Great Price tweets, never-before-seen January 6 footage completely exonerates Congressman Barry Loudermilk of allowing January 6 rioters to do a reconnaissance mission the day before.
They also released footage showing Josh Hawley running out of the complex, allegedly fleeing from the mob.
It was meant to embarrass him and led to laughter and derision from those in attendance when shown.
The problem, Tucker showed the video, only had shown Hall.
He was actually among the last to leave the room.
Numerous lawmakers in the Volklip were shown scampering across the hall, being ushered away by the Capitol Police.
The clip was propaganda, not evidence, Tucker explained.
Propaganda, not evidence.
Also, footage shows Ray Epps, whom the committee only reluctantly interviewed, lied during his testimony.
Epps was on the ground for at least 30 minutes after he had told the House Select Committee he'd already headed back to his hotel.
He was the leader of Oath Keepers, seen on video the day before January 6th, telling a crowd to go into the Capitol.
He was at the center of What are here described as unproven, but which I regard as fully substantiated accusations.
The FBI had informants or plants in the crowd.
Tomorrow we need to get into the Capitol, into the Capitol scene, telling rally goers.
Some around him replied, no, and began chanting fed, fed, fed.
Oddly enough, the committee had little interest in charging abs.
He was one of three who have been removed from the FBI's Capitol Violence Most Wanted list without any explanation.
Compare that to the nearly four-year sentence for the QAnon shaman.
House Republicans need to haul every member of the committee before Congress to testify why they lied to the American people.
Here's Kyle Becker tweeting, Everybody knows the Democrats are liars, but damn, they're getting exposed tonight with all this January 6th footage.
Every single member of the partisan January 6th committee should be held in contempt of Congress.
The farce is over.
The hoax has been exposed.
Actions must be taken and the GOP must never rest until the truth is fully revealed.
Until those who are charged with insurrection are exonerated.
Not all.
There was a handful of thugs in the crowd, but Democrats and the media used those thugs as a springboard to prosecute and harass many innocent people.
And for that, they are scum and must be held accountable.
Carl, your thoughts?
This is a significant step forward for this.
Even bigger lies, of course, are that Biden got 81 million votes and that another bigger lie that should be emphasized is that January 6th was for the presentation of evidence of election fraud and the false flag stopped the presentation of evidence.
So the bigger lie is that January 6th was an insurrection, but by the ones who stole the election.
And a bigger lie is that they weren't thugs.
They were mercenaries.
Those are going to be Antifa and feds.
Those were the ones who were leading the violence.
And but, you know, of course, the bigger question is who let them in the magnetically sealed doors?
Those are the most secure doors on the planet.
And somebody had to order and then have those be open from a central location on the inside.
Otherwise, it wouldn't have happened.
This investigation needs to keep going until we have arrests, until we have demonstrated election fraud in 2022 and going back, and that January 6th was the false flag to cover that up.
Brian.
Well, don't get your hopes up that all of a sudden Congress is going to convict themselves of a crime.
I, I, I, I.
That's not going to happen.
To me, something feels funny about this Tucker Carlson release.
Anyway, what are you distracting us from?
I'm going to try to get to that a little bit later.
But, you know, this is sort of the release the murder hornet situation.
We've got a big emergency.
We're going to root out the corruption in D.C.
Congress is going to look into it.
We're going to get to the bottom of it.
Let me remind you that Tucker Carlson, he had some text messages that were revealed during the Dominion lawsuit.
Let me just read a couple of these text messages.
I don't think there's evidence of voter fraud that swung the election.
There is info here Brian, we can't quite hear you.
You're turning too far away.
Oh, sorry.
Tucker Carlson's texts were revealed during the Dominion lawsuit.
The text said, I don't think there's evidence of voter fraud that swung the election.
Another one says, certainly not evidence that the election was stolen.
Yep.
All true, but it's bad for the country to have this much doubt and suspicion.
This is exactly why people believe in conspiracies.
We need some sort of audit to settle it to the extent it can be settled.
Is anyone suggesting that?
So, I don't trust Tucker Carlson.
I think this is a distraction.
I don't know why they've chosen to do it.
It certainly is damning, and I'm glad that the information's coming out for all the normies, but all of us in this community have known that January 6th was a big Worldwide Wrestling Federation show since the very, very beginning.
I think what's most important about what's going on here is that, you know, what's good is that there's a conversation that's beginning to be seeded and beginning to grow.
And the conversation is with the normies out there that are your normal voting citizens.
And you just can't avoid the fact all the Trump supporters knew it was stolen.
Everybody knew Joe Biden didn't get 81 million votes.
You'd have to be an absolute idiot to know or to believe that Joe Biden got 81 million votes because 81 million people just hated Donald Trump and therefore went out to the polls when he was the best economic president we had had in a long, long time.
But the real fundamental problem is you still can't have a conversation about it.
Tucker Carlson's doing something very good for America, and the fact that we're allowed to start having a conversation about it, but they're going to cycle this back out of the news.
They're going to sweep it under the rug, just like they've done with everything else.
There's not going to be anybody that goes to jail over this.
Oh, and by the way, a lot of focus on the QAnon shaman.
Okay, so let's go ahead and discredit this guy.
Dresses up like a shaman, looks like an idiot, walks into the Capitol, trounces through without his shirt on and a big stupid hat and horns.
Doesn't that feel like a setup?
Doesn't that feel like a false flag?
It feels like a false flag to me.
Like, oh, let's take all these guys that believe in transparency and government and believe there's a real conspiracy going on and believe that there is that actual military force behind the scenes that wants to free America from the burden of these captors and let's dress them up like a QAnon shaman and Fascinating, Brian.
Fascinating.
Here we have more.
arrest him and put him away.
I don't trust it.
I don't buy it.
I think the whole thing's a show.
And I think it's just a big fraud and a bunch of bullshit.
Fascinating, Brian.
Fascinating.
Here we have more.
To wit, Chuck Schumer calls on Fox to stop Tucker from hearing any more January 6 footage.
Except Majority Leader Schumer called on Fox, Sig-Zag, to prevent Tucker from hearing any more of the previously suppressed footage.
Kevin McCarthy gave Tucker access to thousands of hours, some of which shattered the insurrection narrative and provide potentially exculpatory evidence for Jacob Chansley, the so-called QAnon shaman.
Schumer took to the floor to give an angry and indignant speech, denouncing Tucker for broadcasting the footage.
Last night, millions of Americans tuned in to one of the most shameful hours we've ever seen on cable television, he lamented.
He blasted Tucker for depicting the violent insurrection as a peaceful sightseeing tour.
With contempt for the facts, disregard for the risks, knowing full well he was lying, lying to his audience, Fox News host Tucker Carlson ran a lengthy segment last night, arguing the January 6th Capitol attack was not a violent insurrection.
The senator accused him of diving deep into the waters of conspiracy and cherry-picking from the thousands of hours of January 6th footage.
Some of the new video featured on Tucker revealed that the partisan committee itself used cherry-picked footage to further a false narrative.
One such clip featured Senator Josh Hawley seemingly running from the Capitol by himself.
It was used to paint him as a hypocrite, running away like a coward, when insurrectionists reach the Capitol.
In fact, as the unedited footage shows, he was among dozens of lawmakers who was hurried out of the building at the time.
The surveillance footage we reviewed shows that famous clip was a sham, edited deceptively by the January 6th Committee, Tucker declared.
In fact, Hawley was at the back of the pack.
The coward tape was a lie, one of many from the January 6th Committee.
The Vigilant Fog tweet similarly.
The surveillance footage we reviewed shows a famous clip was a sham, edited deceptively by the January 6th Committee.
The clip was propaganda, not evidence.
Schumer, nevertheless, chastised Tucker for countering the official narrative.
Mr. Carlson told the bold-faced lie that the Capitol attack, which we all saw with our own eyes, was somehow not an attack at all.
He sought to argue it was nothing more than a peaceful sightseeing tour.
Can you imagine?
I and many others who are in the Capitol and millions and millions of Americans are furious at Tucker and Kevin McCarthy.
He said the lives of a stabbard colleague, reporter, police, and countless others were put in danger by the Trump protesters.
To say January 6th was not violent is a lie, is a lie pure and simple.
Adding ominously, Tucker is coming back tonight with another segment.
Fox should tell him not to.
Fox News.
Rupert Murdoch.
Tell Tucker not to run a second segment of Lies.
You know it's a lie.
He also slammed the treacherous House Speaker.
St.
McCarthy is every bit as culpable for giving Tucker the Capitol security footage.
It looked like a mistake from the very beginning, but after last night, it looked like a disaster.
He's enabled a big lie and eroded away our precious democracy, talking about the widespread belief the 2020 election was rigged.
What a low point for Speaker McCarthy.
What a low point for Fox News.
As American Greatness Julie Kelly reported, the media, Justice Department, leading Democrats, January 6th Select Committee, claimed Sutnick died as a result of scuffles with protesters, but Tucker played a never-besorne video of Sutnick walking around inside after the alleged attack where he appears to be healthy.
Schumer sought to shame Fox for allowing footage that contradicts the official false narrative to be aired.
I repeat, Schumer attempted to shame Fox News for allowing footage that contradicts the official false narrative to be aired.
That ought to be commended, obviously, not condemned.
Nonviolent?
Ask the Sitnik family, he said.
It makes me sick thinking about what his family must be going through.
The senator said the airing of the new footage was an insult to everyone who cares about our democracy and wishes to preserve the dream of our founders in our age and our day.
Schumer said every senator should call on Fox and Mr. Carlson for defending the insurrectionists.
I'm disappointed in anger by Speaker McCarthy's decision.
He proclaimed, I condemn Mr. Carlson for defending the enemies of democracy.
He concluded, once again, urging Fox to order Tucker to cease propagating the big lie on his network and to level with our viewers about the truth.
The Columbia Bugle tweeted, they're freaking out big time.
Senator Schumer went down to the Senate floor this morning to condemn Tucker's January 6th tape segment last night.
Culver Fox and Rupert Murdoch to stop Tucker from releasing another report.
Update.
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told reporters it was a mistake for Carlson to show the previously censored January 6 footage, which in my opinion is a profound indictment of Mitch McConnell.
I find his action disgusting.
Carl, I think it's great that those guys are talking.
Keep on talking.
Schumer has given a good demonstration about how to rise to power in American politics.
I've noticed this for well over 30 years is that they got to go into in front of the media and then they pitch their narrative and narratives is all that they have.
And the narratives of Schumer include, oh, of course the elections are honest unless Trump wins them.
And then you got to say Russia, Russia.
Russia, and that the Dem orders are for the safety of the country and we're acting.
It is the job of the President to protect the people.
That's a big lie.
No, the oath of office is to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
But instead they say it's for our protection and he just wants the U.S.
empire for business as usual.
And us, on the other hand, we're pointing out and what Tucker was able to do is demonstrate definitive lies that the video evidence does show everybody.
And we got to go further.
to show that January 6th was false flag attack, the election was fraudulent, and that the U.S. empire can't be allowed to go on with business as usual because it's a lying, rooting illegal rogue state empire.
Brian.
Well, obviously, Schuber's just trying to prevent mass cognitive dissidence among the staunch Democrat supporters, And again, not that it really matters.
You haven't fixed the election problem.
So, did they release the January 6th footage at this particular time to try to take the teeth out of it from Trump's campaigns?
Or did Trump force, somehow force, Tucker Carlson and Fox News to cover This particular issue, I don't know.
I don't know how they cut a deal with Trump and they know that Trump's going to be the next president, not going to be able to stop it.
So they're going to give us this little victory, not that it even matters.
I don't know.
I'm more worried about some other things that I've been seeing.
I'll give you a Here's a tweet that went out from Tracy Beans.
Stunning remarks from Jen Easterly, the head of CISA, which is the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
And this was part of her testimony before one of the courts.
She says, one could argue that we're in the business of protecting critical infrastructure.
And the most critical infrastructure is our cognitive infrastructure, Easterly said.
We now live in a world where people talk about alternative facts post-truth, which I think is really, really dangerous if people get to pick their own facts.
Now, that's a $3.5 billion agency with over 2,500 employees that is there to protect my mental health by protecting the critical infrastructure of the internet.
This is your government at work for you.
So, you know, I don't really care what Murder hornets they release in terms of the talking points.
The only thing that matters to me is whether they're going to fix the election system and start letting us elect our own leaders.
Because all this chatter is just a bunch of bullshit wasting my time.
Okay, I agree, absolutely.
We've got to fix the electoral system or none of this is going to make any difference.
It's only going to be kind of an irritant to some and a source of joy for others.
Meanwhile, there's going to be a 9-11 debate on Einstein's birthday, March 14, between Michael Schirmer And yours truly.
Schirmer has a Ph.D.
in the history of science from Claremont.
I have a Ph.D.
in the philosophy of science from Indiana.
He got his B.S.
from Pepperdine.
I'm my bachelor's from Princeton.
He's a founder of Skeptic Magazine as I was a founder of Scholars for 9-11 True.
He has 6,199 Google citations.
I have 4,202.
He has a Hirsch index of 29, mine 34.
The Hirsch index indicates your influence in the community, where an index of 29 means he has 29 articles that have at least 29 citations apiece.
mine 34.
The Harris Index indicates your influence in the community, where an index of 29 means he has 29 articles that have at least 29 citations apiece, I 34 with at least 34.
What's curious about all this is that he's showing reluctance to actually join in the debate, where if Shermer does not show up, then the plan is to use clips where Shermer has expressed his views about 9-11 in order for me to respond.
This will be on Tuesday the 14th.
I shall update as we proceed.
Meanwhile, Canadians start crazy insurrection talk as election intel reports leak.
Insurrection alert in Canada?
According to the BBC, our neighbors have become the latest Western nation to sound the alarm over concern of foreign election interference.
It is definitely treason for anyone to think it's true, because as we all know, we have the safest and most secure elections ever.
Canadian PM Trudeau is every bit as loved and legitimate as a leader as Joe Biden is here in America.
Trudeau would also like all Canadians to ignore the racist and false leaks from Canada's main intelligence agency, which whoop China has been meddling in their elections.
The story is difficult to cover for a number of reasons, but to boil it down, Someone in the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, which is rather like Canada's FBI-CIA, has been leaking intel reports from 2019 and 2021, proving that China has almost certainly interfered in the Canadian election these years, which resulted in Trudeau's Liberal Party remaining in power.
In a curious development, Canadians are mad about something for once.
It turns out our notoriously polite neighbors don't actually like to do it all.
Who could?
And the fact that he's now stonewalling a public inquiry has voters crying foul.
It's tough to piece it all together because British and Canadian press are almost total propaganda.
Almost nothing they say can be taken at face value.
And forget about the American media covering the story.
The implications are just too on-the-nose and obvious.
They can't cover it.
As nearly as we can tell from the small amount of leaked intel, the Chinese Communist Party got its meathooks into Justin Trudeau back in 2014.
That's when the CCP made its first million-dollar donation to the Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation in Canada.
In 2019, Communist China loved Trudeau so much, they put their thumb on the scale in Canada and put the Liberals in power.
When they realized that the 2019 election had been stolen—this is the intelligence service—they were so alarmed, they went to the Liberal Party and told them to withdraw Trudeau as their choice for PM.
They believed he was totally compromised.
China interfered in the 2021 election in favor of the Liberals again, according to the Canadian Intelligence Service.
By 2022, there were three Chinese police stations set up in the Greater Toronto Area, the most populous region in Canada.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police is now investigating to figure out how a bunch of foreign cops just showed up in the populous area nobody noticed.
And of course, we all remember that Trudeau basically turned Canada into a dictatorship last year with himself as Supreme Ruler.
The trucker protests resulted in the biggest and most violent crackdown on civil rights in Canadian history.
Trudeau seized bank accounts and property of any who opposed him, had cops reign over little old lady with police horses, His lockdown and vaccine mandates were so strict, Trudeau was arresting Christian pastors and priests, all but forcibly injecting people with COVID.
That's—it wasn't a good look, because Trudeau had basically gone from being a total joke to being someone indistinguishable from the Chinese Communist Party in terms of ruthlessness and brutality against his own people.
A Commissioner of Canadian Elections seemed to be confirming the reports from the Intel Service.
she notes canada elections received 159 complaints in 2019 about chinese meddling received at least 16 in 2021 trudeau is pumping the brakes and refusing to allow public inquiry He says anyone who believes a few media reports that have leaked is a racist against the Chinese people.
Gee, we wonder why Justin Trudeau doesn't want a full public investigation to take place.
65% of Canadian voters are calling for a full and completely transparent probe.
So far, Trudeau has managed to hold out.
We shouldn't worry about Chinese election collusion putting an unpopular jerk in power in Canada.
After all, nothing like that could ever happen right here in America, right?
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, wow, first of all, for Michael Shermer, he's not going to accept it.
Wouldn't it be fun if he did?
It'll be good either way to get his taped clips.
Maybe about three years ago, I watched Shermer debate Graham Hancock and Randall Carlson on ancient apocalyptic events, namely a large meteor impact event on Earth That changed things significantly.
And that was on the Joe Rogan Show.
Jim, have you ever tried to get on Joe Rogan?
I was suggested for Rogan, but he didn't bite.
So, you know, I would love to go on with him.
Yeah, that would be great if you were on that one.
So we'll see what happens.
Either way, it's going to be great.
Either just playing his clips, but he's going to be a coward and he's not going to show up.
For what's happening in Canada, that's great progress.
Justin Castrator is being discovered as being a puppet and he's refusing to investigate what might have happened with China.
I wonder if he's just going to say it's a small fringe minority holding unacceptable views who don't share our values.
That's what he said against the protest by the Canadian truckers and the Canadian public who took action against the forced injections of experimental medical products upon Canadians.
So we'll see.
Of course, Turdo is an agent of Klaus Schwab and the WEF.
He's just another puppet up there.
But until we get some sort of a breakthrough and the Canadian people, similar to the American people, similar to the Europeans, we have to be stronger at rejecting these psychopaths.
Well, I really hope to see how the Canadian citizens rise up against this system, which is obviously cheating them out of their voices.
I have a feeling that what's really on the plate in Canada is centralized banking and digital currency, aka Social credit score systems to be able to control the population.
Look at how they had to crack down on the truckers.
That's such a big deal about how they did that.
They shut down their bank accounts, all because they stood up in protest.
Against their government.
So I have a feeling that Trudeau's been cozying up to the Chinese for a long time.
They really liked the idea of total social control.
I don't know if our listenership knows how bad it is over in China, but you literally can't get on the bus without having a pass on your phone that says that you're okay to travel on this bus.
You've got to have your COVID tests.
You've got to go in here and go in there to have your testing done to make sure that you're clean.
They will even weld you into your apartment if you disobey them or just take you off to a concentration camp where you disappear forever and your organs are sold while you're still alive.
So I am absolutely against China's Terrible human rights situation.
I'm absolutely against what they've done, but I think the globalists adore it.
They love it.
They love the model.
They love the policy, and they want to control the architecture, the communication architecture, the internet architecture, the people's architecture, and their surveillance.
Oh my God, there's cameras.
There's more cameras in China than people, I believe, which is just insane to think of that level of social control.
Plus, they can turn off your bank account and prevent you from traveling.
Just basically throw you in jail.
So it's bad what's happening in China.
Carl.
And one of the things our opponents really like about China is the labor rate of approximately four hours per dollar.
And the Chinese people have adopted well, you know, a lot of them were jumping out of the buildings to commit suicide.
But ever since they put those suicide nets up around the building, that's helped a lot.
They have a very famous program over there called, I believe it's called 996 or something like that.
But in reality, you work six days a week, nine hours a day at least, 996 is sort of their thing.
That's how much you have to work over there compared to us Westerners.
So I'm sure the government would love to see that level of production out of us as slaves in factories.
It's a good way to do it, social credit score systems.
Serious, serious shit, you guys.
Meanwhile, The United States is in conflict with countries who are doing things we know they're, in fact, not doing.
On Feb.
4, the U.S.
military shot down a Kleine's balloon they claimed was a surveillance device.
The unprecedented kinetic action was followed by three more objects being shot down over Canada and the U.S.
The conflict that followed derailed potential and necessary Sino-American diplomacy.
But Washington knows three crucial things.
The surveillance balloon was not intentionally sent over American airspace.
The next three objects were not even spying.
And even if they had been spying, China would only be doing what the U.S.
does every day.
There was no need for a conflict.
Biden admitted that three later objects were shot down were most likely research balloon not spy craft.
As for the balloon the U.S.
believed was spying, they knew all along China had not deliberately sent it over American airspace.
And they knew the intended destination was never the United States.
Officials are now examining the possibility China didn't intend to penetrate the American heartland with the airborne surveillance device.
The U.S.
monitored the flight path, taking it to Guam when strong winds appeared to have pushed the balloon south into the continental United States.
The U.S.
initiated a potentially dangerous conflict with a country for doing something they knew the country wasn't doing.
And even if China had sent a spy balloon, the government knows they do that to China every day—three times a day, actually.
Retired Ambassador Chas Freeman, who accompanied Nixon in China in 1972, told me the U.S.
mounts about three reconnaissance missions a day by air or sea along China's borders, staying just outside the 12-mile limit, but alarming the Chinese, who routinely intercept our flights and protest our perceived provocations.
The U.S.
has not balloons, but satellites that spy on China.
Robert Windrum on NBC calls Washington's appetite for China's secrets insatiable, saying spying on the People's Republic has been one of the NSA's top priorities since it was established in 1952.
They have balloons too.
On Feb 13, China's foreign ministry said the U.S.
had blown high-altitude balloons through its airspace more than 10 times since it started in 2022.
U.S.
balloons regularly fly through other countries' airspace without permission.
And in Feb of 2022, Politico revealed the Pentagon is working on high-altitude inflatables that would fly at between 60,000 and 90,000 feet and be added to the Pentagon's extensive surveillance network.
Way back in October of 2022, Colombian President Gustavo Petro asked the U.S.
Secretary of State to keep Cuba off the list of state sponsors of international terrorism.
Blinken defended the Cuban listing the same day, however, when it becomes clear that We have clear, clear requirements.
Responding to what happened to Cuba is an injustice, Petro disagrees.
Mexican President Obrado agrees.
He said the world must unite to defend the independence and sovereignty of Cuba, never ever treated as a terrorist country, or put its profoundly humane people in government on a blacklist of supposed terrorists.
The United States agrees.
Even though Biden has insisted on keeping Cuba on the list, they know Cuba is not actually a sponsor of terrorism.
William Leo Grand, professor of government at American U and a specialist, told me the region's resistance to the American strangulation of Cuba was preventing Washington from engaging Latin American cooperation on a range of other issues.
Deputy NSA advisor Ben Rhodes said U.S.
policy on Cuba had become an albatross around the neck of the U.S., crippling our policy in the hemisphere.
So Obama ordered a review of the designation in an act of extreme historical understatement.
He told Congress, the government of Cuba has not provided any support for international terrorism during the preceding six months, has provided assurance it will not support acts of international terrorism in the future.
John Kerry thus declared, any remaining concerns and disagreements fall outside the criteria for designation as a state sponsor of terrorism.
The State Department issued an assessment.
Cuba meets the criteria established for rescission.
In May of 2015, Obama removed Cuba from the State Sponsor of Terrorism list.
Cuba's foreign ministry announced the government recognized a just decision made by the President of the United States to remove Cuba, that it never deserved to belong on the list in the first place.
Cuba was placed there back in 1982 as an act of hypocrisy and exceptionalism.
President Reagan locked Cuba on the list for arming revolutionary left-wing movements in Latin America, while Reagan was arming the right-wing opponents.
He declared supporting those groups was self-defense, waged secret proxy wars, armed and supported counter-revolutionary forces in El Salvador and Nicaragua.
Leo Grandis said the U.S.-backed counter-revolutionary forces are guilty of far worse terrorist attacks on civilians than the Cuban-backed forces.
Still, on January 11, 2021, the Trump admin thrust Cuba back onto the list.
Biden promised while campaigning he'd promptly reverse the failed Trump policy.
Instead, two months after, White House spokesman Jen Psaki announced Cuban policy shift is not among President Biden's top priorities and left them on the list.
Cuba remains there, even though Washington knows Havana is not a state sponsor of terrorism.
The pattern is the same with Iran.
The Obama admin signed the JCPOA nuclear agreement, maybe the way to end the conflict.
Trump admin illegally pulled out of the deal, renewed the conflict, and Biden has continued Trump-filled policy.
The Biden admin knows that Trump-era policy or keeping alive is a mistake.
Blinken called the Trump admin decision to pull out of the agreement a disastrous mistake.
Biden, while campaigning, said Trump recklessly tossed away a policy that worked to keep America safe, replacing it with one that has worsened the threat.
He promised to offer Tehran a credible path back to diplomacy, but he has not done it.
Instead, the State Department declares negotiations are not our focus.
Iran continues us to be the recipient of American sanctions, threats, assassinations, and sabotage, even though we know Iran is not building a nuclear bomb.
The 2007 and 2011 National Intel Estimate both concluded with high confidence Iran was not building a bomb.
You don't have to go back that far to find American admissions that they are continuing the conflict for doing things they know Iran is not doing.
The 2022 Department of Defense Nuclear Posture Review made the stunning admission that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon, nor that it has even made a decision to pursue them.
The nuclear posture makes the admission not once, but twice.
It says, Iran does not currently pose a nuclear threat.
It continues to develop capabilities that would enable it to produce a nuclear weapon, should it make the decision to do so.
It then lays out the truth.
Iran does not today possess a nuclear weapon, and we currently believe it is not pursuing one.
That was true four months ago, and it remains true today.
On February 25th, CIA Director Burns said, to the best of our knowledge, we don't believe the Supreme Leader has made a decision to resume the weaponization program.
As with its Cuba policy, the U.S.
continues to engage in conflict with Iran for doing something they know Iran is not doing.
In the case of Iran, that escalating self-defeating policy is potentially very dangerous.
In all three cases—China, Cuba, and Iran—the U.S.
has engaged in a hostile and sometimes dangerous conflict with countries for doing what Washington knew all along they weren't doing.
Carl.
Well, we have the lies and crimes du jour, of course, and that story was another opportunity just to say, oh yeah, China's bad.
They're the bad guys.
Because we're the good guys.
They're the...
For Cuba, oh, to point out that, yeah, the U.S.
will routinely spy on everybody, of course, and in the year 2000, I was paying attention at the time with paperwork we were managing with the Chinese government, and there was an incident where the U.S.
had wandered into Chinese airspace with their spy craft, and a Chinese fighter jet came up A couple of them, and one of them buzzed a little too close to the much larger jet engine US spy plane, got sucked into the exhaust of the jet a little bit or so the story was told to us over And as a result of that, the paperwork, all paperwork, was delayed for about a year.
The Chinese pilot was killed.
The American aircraft was disabled and had a forced landing.
And as a result of that, the paperwork, all paperwork, was delayed for about a year.
The Chinese government just pushed everything back for a year in retaliation for that incident.
For Cuba, yeah, this is part of the paper for U.S. Illinois.
illegal.
In the 1898 war on Spain, the U.S.
made a similar proposition to the people of Cuba and the people of the Philippines saying, Fight for us, we'll give you freedom after we've won.
And of course they bit, and of course they didn't get freedom.
In both places, the Philippines and Cuba, what they got was a puppet dictator.
And in Cuba, Senator John F. Kennedy, in his run for president, he wrote some brilliant documentation To be able to demonstrate to the American people that this was a puppet regime of the US.
He didn't go so far to call it that, but he certainly demonstrated it.
And Havana was the playboy resort for the rich and famous before Las Vegas.
And of course, when that government, that puppet government for the oligarchs got overthrown by Castro, then Cuba became a terrorist nation and anybody who brought up the topic was a communist-loving terrorist supporter.
For Iran, yeah, just go to U.S.
Illegal and I wrote a 40-page white paper as well.
The history of Iran is that they were targeted beginning in 1953 in Operation Ajax to overthrow their democracy when the Iranians were complaining that they should have more than 15% profit from their own Oil and of course the US and the British oil company oligarchs said now you can't have 15% and Iran said, oh, well, we can nationalize you.
Operation Ajax was the response and we had the puppet Shah put in and eventually when that puppet was no longer able to perform and Iran did not accept a new puppet, then of course Iran became terrorists and that's been going on ever since.
They attempted to get another puppet, Saddam, to invade and attack and overthrow Iran from 80 to 88, killing about a million Iranians, supplying our puppet Iraq Saddam with intelligence and weapons.
But, you know, this is just business as usual for the U.S.
If we have a puppet, then everything is good.
We praise their democracy.
If we don't have a puppet, then we attack with the military if we need to.
Brian.
Oh, and Carl, we're the biggest puppet of them all.
I mean, look at the interests of the globalists that our leaders serve, not the people.
Puppets everywhere.
Who's Castro?
Who's Trudeau?
Is Trudeau related to Castro?
They're trying to do the same globalist agenda no matter where you go.
Every component of that article has a similar thread rolling right through it.
Problem?
Reaction.
Solution.
Every time we have a false flag shooting, what's the very next thing that pops up?
The gun bills.
The gun bills.
It's all about control.
They've got to control us.
They're doing everything they can to control us.
Cuba has one of the most powerful internet censorship programs in the nation.
I'm sure Canada would love to have that same program.
Like father, like son.
And if you look around, it's everywhere that you see these globalists interfering on the global stage, using their puppet regimes, using the puppets that are installed in those puppet regimes, to get the globalist agenda done with the Problem Reaction Solution Playbook.
It's all the same.
Very good.
Meanwhile, I was set for a full slate at 2024 Republican Whole Foods, but I say it won't make a damn bit of difference if we still have electronic voting machines.
Thank you.
The party's abuzz with speculation it'll be a 2024 candidate.
With Florida Governor DeSantis, Donald Trump, Mike Pence visiting Iowa, it's clear the Republican Party is gearing up for a heated race.
DeSantis is scheduled to make an appearance in Iowa next week, joining Trump and former U.N.
Ambassador Nikki Haley.
DeSantis is promoting his new book, The Courage to Be Free.
The visit has sparked rumors of a potential DeSantis 2024 campaign.
He's been a vocal supporter of Trump and his policies.
Trump will be speaking in Des Moines on March 13th about his education policy.
Nikki Haley will be returning to host two town halls.
Former Vice President Pence is also scheduled for March 18th.
Pence made comments suggesting he may be planning a 2024 run, suggesting in an interview with NBC, I'm confident we'll have better choices than my old running mate.
He also suggested Trump is not civil or respectful enough to lead the country, claimed Americans want to see us and our policies return to the kind of civility and respect Americans once showed every other day.
The Republican Party is abuzz as to who.
Meanwhile, Democrats warn anyone watching unedited January 6 footage could arrive at unapproved conclusions.
This is the Babylon Bee.
Mitch McConnell, another Democrat senator, agreed.
I'm terrified right now, he said.
What if everyone starts thinking we're lying frauds?
I'm not saying we are, but it would be terrible if people came to such a scary and unapproved conclusion.
Experts also weighed in.
Warning that if unapproved opinions are allowed to spread, it may lead to unapproved leaders being elected for unapproved reasons.
As experts, we wouldn't approve of this, said one expert.
At publishing time, Democrats released findings from the intel community saying the January 6th tapes were unapproved Russian disinformation.
Democrat leaders have issued the dire warning, saying anyone who watches the unedited clips of the footage runs the risk of arriving at a conclusion that hasn't been approved by the Democrat leaders.
This is a very dangerous situation, said Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer.
We're working hard every day to make sure Americans all have the correct opinions, with thousands of hours of footage being given to the public with no filter.
We're in grave danger of some people not agreeing with us, or worse, not giving us more and more unchecked power.
This is an existential threat to democracy.
The Babylon Bee is also promoting Carlos Rinaldo Jr.
Experts believe he saved over 3.8 million lives by heroically wearing a mask alone while in the car.
Is he a hero or a superhero?
You decide, Carl.
Well first, with the RNC, if they don't address election fraud, then they're just going back into their role as the puppet on the right arm side of the one American illegal rogue state-lying empire.
And those list of candidates, except for Trump, certainly aren't going to be speaking up about election fraud.
And for the Babylon Bee, Yeah, they do give a bit of a bright spot in taking a look at the humor.
We do need to have it go beyond the role of a court jester.
So, if you take a look into recent history, you had Comedy Central providing the sharpest analysis of American foreign policy via Jon Stewart a few years ago, and he didn't go far enough by calling out the crimes.
You have, I believe it was MSNBC during the Bush-Cheney era, they had ESPN analyst Keith Olbermann, who has since gone stark fucking craven mad, but he was one of the sharpest voices to be able to skewer Bush and Cheney.
So, we still need some kind of a breakthrough.
The American public have to go so far where that first part of the Babylon Bee is that they do have to see that this is a criminal fraud and demand arrest.
We have to withdraw consent from these psychopaths because there's no hope in being able to vote your way out of election fraud or for anything other than for a culling from these psychopaths.
Well, again, the Babylon Bee strikes again with what appears to be satire, but it's actually about as real as you can get.
Again, let me quote this Tracy Bean's tweet.
Jen Easterly, the head of the CIS, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency.
One could argue that we're in the business of protecting critical infrastructure, and the most critical infrastructure is our cognitive infrastructure.
The most critical is the way we think.
That is what they consider to be the most critical infrastructure in America.
Our minds.
I think there was an old quote.
I can't remember who it was that said that.
Our job will be complete when the Americans are deceived about absolutely everything that they believe.
William Casey.
Damn brilliant.
And you know what?
I'm getting the feeling that just about everything they do is just a bunch of bullshit for reaning us down towards this path of total dominance by these globalists.
They have to be stopped.
Fascinating.
And I do agree that Babylon B is not really just satire, it's actually nailing... hitting the nail right on the head.
Meanwhile, resistance is fertile.
3D-printed sperm box gives sperm bionic accuracy.
Your run of the mill sperm just doesn't cut it anymore now that German researchers from the Institute of Integrative Neuroscience at IFW Dresden have begun 3D-printing sperm bots.
In the increasingly popular nanotech trend of using 3D-printing to create tiny medical devices, the German research team has created micromotors to give poorly swimming sperm the chance to get to the egg for fertilization.
With about one-third of fertility issues tied to the male partner, low motility of sperm can be a crucial factor.
To tackle the issue, the IMW Dresden team theorized the invention of sperm bots that could carry sperm to the oocyte with great speed.
Then, to turn the theory into a physical reality, they had to rely on one of the few machines capable of printing at the nanoscale.
Using NanoScribe's photonic professional GT system, The team 3D printed small metal helix shapes which can be controlled with a rotating magnetic field and, when magnetically slipped around a poorly swimming sperm, carry it to its destination.
Nanoscribe 2-photon polymerization process 3D prints objects at the nano and micro scale by focusing the dual-photon laser at a resin bath.
First creating the helices from the photopolymer, the team was then capable to coat the prints in a thin metallic layer to enable magnetic control.
The research, published in ACS Journal Nanoletters, has proven successful in the lab.
Just watch the bionic sperm in action below.
And here you see it, screwing its way into the egg.
Here you see a close-up, an artistic rendering.
While the printed motor worked well in the lab, the researchers have their sights set on using humans, though it may be some time before we see actual human trials.
Once we see the technique practiced with humans, though, not only could the sperm bombs help with poor sperm motility and creating offspring, but it could aid the processes of in vitro fertilization and artificial insemination.
This study is just one among a growing number of looking into the fabrication of small, formidable treatments, many of which use similar 3D printing methods.
An experiment by ETH Zurich, for example, saw researchers 3D print helix shapes that can be used to deliver doses of medicine to a targeted location within the human body.
At the University of Sheffield, scientists have developed a different approach for 3D printing devices for guiding nerve repairs.
This latest report proves the devices may be getting smaller, but the nano-printing industry is only getting bigger.
Carl.
Impressive developments in technology.
And if we can unleash our best ideas to improve the quality of life for human beings, we'll be in great shape.
But of course, those do get suppressed.
I do recommend www.wanttoknow.info.
I'll put a link and you can explore there with the suppressed technologies.
I would be more excited if we had a demand for research and a supply of research for optimal human health.
Because some of the things that could be done very easily, cheaply, they would be investments that would pay off tenfold, would be locally grown organic food.
And we certainly have the technology to do that.
There is a very promising research as well with vertical farms.
Why not promote that we have more exercise?
And truth!
It is damning to human health that we have this environment of lies and debt.
So if you want the human population to increase and to thrive and to be healthy, we need the context to do that.
As just by itself, you know, they have that little line in there saying, say, we can use technology like this to deliver medicines.
So that's kind of on the vein of Bill Gates wanting to put the vaccines into our food.
Brian.
I have no problem seeing technology like that work, assuming it's Proper and affordable if a couple wants to use something like that to have a baby.
Uh, you know, I obviously would be concerned about introducing.
metals into the zygote.
Something doesn't feel quite right about that.
And doing the operation of making sure which sperm fertilizes which egg at what time seems to be a little bit ambitious to me.
But hey, I guess in theory, It's a cool article.
I don't really know what to say about it, except that human beings have been properly procreating for years.
We just need to want to do it more, and we have to turn off our porn and start paying attention to our partners.
Yes, well, the jab is intended to endorse infertility, so I think what can be done to increase it is all to the good.
Meanwhile, The White House gives International Women of Courage Award to…a male!
Yesterday was International Women's Day in honor of the occasion the First Lady, Dr. of Education Jill Biden, EDD, and Secretary of State Anthony Blinken, ABJD, co-hosted the 2023 International Women of Courage Award Ceremony at the White House Because Biden wanted to bring the stories of these incredible women to the biggest stage we could, and that is, of course, the White House.
To Clark Kareen Jean-Pierre, BSNPA, the White House Press Secretary, who also spoke at the ceremony.
According to the official Department of State press release, the recipients are a group of 11 extraordinary women from around the world, We're working to build a brighter future for all.
Now in its 17th year, the Secretary of State IWOC Award recognized women from around the globe who have demonstrated exceptional courage, strength, and leadership in advocating for peace, justice, human rights, gender equity, and equality, and the empowerment of women and girls in all their diversity, often at great personal risk and sacrifice.
A quick reading confirmed that, indeed, the recipients do live up to their outstanding description.
Oh, wait!
A deeper reading of the press release, and then the ceremony itself revealed the Biden White House doofus.
Yeah, yeah, I know, again.
Because one of the recipients, Albert Ruda, is a man.
Oh, sure, Ruda.
Who is assigned the sex of male at birth in Argentina, but who now identifies as a woman, has had and is having some medical procedures and chemical interventions, and presents as a woman.
But DNA is forever.
Biological sex refers to the physical features of a human body or anatomy.
Gender identity, reverse to one's internal sense of being, may align more toward being a male, female, or anywhere in between.
Some who identify as non-binary may not have an internal sense of being a male or female at all.
Sex reassignment surgery involves changing a person's anatomy.
Whether a person identifies as a male or female shouldn't change after surgery, and it doesn't change their genetics either.
Whatever set of chromosomes a person has when they are born cannot be changed.
This is because chromosomes are in all the cells that make up our body.
To change a person's chromosomes would mean changing trillions of cells.
There aren't any technologies, and probably won't be in the future, that can change a chromosome in all of a person's cells.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Carl, yours.
Well, thanks to our audience members.
We need to have enough of us who are acting in integrity with what we think and what we say and what we do in order to win this AMRA 2.0 World War III.
And for the comment on the Woman's Award, all our opponents are going to do is they're going to virtue signal while they're doing the exact opposite.
They have a war on women.
They have a war on human beings.
They're pushing this agenda that you need to somehow change.
You need surgery.
You need to I think we have moved into a place where we can see victory.
somehow insufficient and needs to be augmented.
And this is just steps more from the psychopaths who want to denigrate us into a slave race.
But I do want to share for my final comment is that I think we have moved into a place where we can see victory.
I may be speaking too soon for some of you, but I'll say this month, this month we will have a big breakthrough with the coming of spring, Something is going to break.
Something big on the criminal scale is going to be, it's not going to go back.
It's going to be the Emperor's New Clothes.
We shall see how this plays out.
And there's no place to rest on that.
We still need to go full force with what we can to think, say, and take actions for a truth and for the arrest of these psychopaths.
But I'm feeling strong that this is going to be the month for a breakthrough.
Brian, your final thoughts?
The Great Reset Is really just a vast behavior modification program.
They need to control us.
They need to shut us up.
They need to put the protesters down so that they can put their things into play.
That is just going to simply give them more control.
In order to do that, they're going to have to rely on their catastrophes.
The Great Reset, the globalists, they all rely on catastrophes to push new laws and dupe us into believing that we need some new government program to solve our problem.
And so, from The Guardian, this was just a couple days ago, February 25th, The U.S.
is averaging one chemical accident every two days.
This is a list of those accidents that's been indexed.
You can go right on down the list.
January 10th, January 17th, January 19th, January 22nd, 28th, 30th, 1st, 2nd, 3rd of February.
All these different cities, all these different Chemical, transportation-related catastrophes rolling out one after another after another.
Oh my God, we need more government.
More government, more government, more government.
You know what?
I'm about as done with the government and I'm about as done with NATO as I can possibly be.
I think we need more independent mind minded men and women and families to take care of our independent minded neighborhoods to take care of our independent minded counties with our independent minded sheriffs.
I think we need less government and we need more independent-minded education and programs.
I wish we could shut all this government intervention down and go back to the way it used to be, where a community came together, put together a school, decided what institutions they wanted to fund within their community, paid their taxes to the community, and then solved their problems on a local level.
I know we wouldn't have all of our normal solutions, but I seriously believe that the answer is not Changing it from the top down.
The answer is changing it from the inside out, starting with your house, and then your neighbors, and then your community, and then your counties.
Well, it's wonderful to have independent-minded commentators like Carl Herman and Brian Davidson here with me today.
I was rather taken aback by Brian's qualifications about Tucker's expose, which seems to me to be on the up and up.
Now, It could have been done in a different way.
I agree it was odd to give to one journalist the opportunity to conduct this exposé.
I do believe all the footage ought to be given to every journalist in the world.
But it's indispensable to rational thought generally and to scientific reasoning specifically to base your reasoning on all the available relevant evidence.
There can be no doubt the January 6th committee was a scam.
It was a fraud.
It was presenting a little tiny portion of the evidence to create a predetermined conclusion, and that is blowing up in their face.
That's my take.
We'll see how this all plays out.
But I have profound respect for Brian and his reservations.
Cause me pause.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends, your neighbor, the people you love and care about.
We still do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection