All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 27, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
57:56
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (26 February 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Truth Versus News on February the 26th, 2023.
And it's quite the day here.
I guess, actually about 30 years ago today, 9-11 was, not 9-11, but the Twin Towers were attacked and a small bomb that went off and they're celebrating that today.
So that was 30 years ago and other things have been happening more recently and we're sure glad to have our whole crew back here.
Jim was Coming back from having a little stint in the hospital there.
And we have Scott, who just arrived back from Iran.
And we have Brian Davidson, who's on top of everything.
So we've got a great crew here.
So let's just see what we have here going over, especially into the United Nations.
Right, Jim?
You got it, Don.
Turns out that The U.N.
has voted to have Russia leave Ukraine when Russia is all but mopping up the war.
I mean, this is ridiculous.
It suggests to me the irrelevance of the United Nations.
The U.N.
General Assembly Thursday called for ending the war in Ukraine, demanding Russia's immediate withdrawal from the country.
At its resumed 11th emergency special session, the world body adopted a new resolution calling for an end to the war only hours before the conflict entered its second year.
The results were 141 member states in favor and only seven against—Belarus, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, that would be North Korea, Eritrea, Mali, Nicaragua, Russia, and Syria.
Among the 32 obsessions were China, India, and Pakistan.
By the terms of the resolution, the Assembly reiterated the demand Russia immediately, completely, and unconditionally withdraw from the territories of Ukraine and cease all hostilities.
The Assembly, through the resolution, earned Member State to cooperate in a spirit of solidarity to address the global impact of the war on food, security, energy, finance, environment, and nuclear safety.
The resurrected session had met Wednesday to begin debating the resolution.
With the General Assembly presencing for a full year, the 193-member Assembly, the Secretary General, and the international community have been consistent and vocal in our calls to end this war.
The Resolution reaffirmed the Assembly's commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of Ukraine, emphasizing the need to ensure accountability for the most serious crimes under international law committed in Ukraine, which were, may I say, committed by the Ukrainians, not by the Russians.
They rejected two amendments proposed by Belarus, which would have altered several of the resolution provisions, and in a second have the Assembly called on member states to refrain from sending weapons to the zone of conflict.
You might have thought that would be high priority.
At the outset of the resumed session, the Assembly said it's a new chapter of history.
The world is facing stark choices about who we are as an international community.
Days after the 24-Feb-2022 invasion, Security Council members had voted to allow the General Assembly to convene the 11th Emergency Special Session after Russia had vetoed a resolution that would condemn the invasion.
In line, the Assembly is able to take up international peace and security members when the Council fails to do so.
Scott, your thoughts?
I mean, this, in my opinion, is useless because Russia had good reason for intruding into Ukraine that the General Assembly is not acknowledging.
Well, it shows such hypocrisy and pettiness and cowardice and stupidity and the UN being bribed and controlled by the CIA.
This is a demonstration of disgusting hypocrisy because precisely where was the UN when all sorts of real crimes against humanity were being
I mean, where was the United Nations, for example, in a vote to determine that the 9-11 events actually were not done by a bunch of Muslims in planes, but in fact seemed to be a coordinated effort by the United States, CIA, Mossad, British intelligence?
Where was an investigation of the world's body into that matter that destroyed much of the world?
Where was the UN at that?
I mean, Nebesny has done a pretty good job so far in his arguments, but I'll add a couple things to it.
But that's the real cornerstone of the mayhem, chaos, bloodshed, and hell on earth that has been unleashed, including in the United States.
I would say the hell on earth began in the United States with the Patriot Act and this hyper-police state.
You know, again, I remember Susan Lindauer, I interviewed again last week, had been thrown in jail for a year.
Because of her opposition to the Iraq War, and was then never charged, and everything was secretly disposed of.
That was the Patriot Act, throwing an American in to jail for a year on a military base, and that was the unleashing of it.
Where was the UN when we looked at so many other issues, like Iraq and Libya and Syria?
The UN has been conveniently used as a cloak of invisibility for the moral accountability of George Bush and the rest of them when they invaded and slaughtered Iraq using all sorts of, you know, depleted uranium, and they used that in Libya too.
Where was the United Nations on any of these fundamental global changing human rights matters?
Nowhere to be seen!
So, a bunch of mud hut living countries picking out insects from their grass skirts.
These countries represent the United Nations?
I don't think so.
You know, Russia, we all know, was forced into stopping a Operation Barbarossa 2.0 when the West was planning a massive invasion.
And they thwarted it and beat it back and have been beating it back ever since.
And their pieces on the chessboard far outnumber those of the Ukrainians.
I personally think they've played too soft.
I think they could have wrapped this up in under six months, and, you know, there's something to be said about a quick amputation rather than a slow, gnawing, sawing amputation, and, you know, but we'll see how this goes.
I understand some of their concerns about public relations, but nevertheless, Russia has essentially won this, and it's wrapping it all up.
What is interesting is this whole
This whole World War 4, which implements diplomatic warfare, economic warfare, kinetic warfare, and information warfare, has resulted in the absolute defeat of the United States, inevitably, because all of the European nations are growing increasingly sour and feel like prostitutes being used by their
So, Europe is going to incline away from the United States, either slowly or violently by revolution.
Pakistan and India, which are not always friendly, they're siding with Russia.
in massive deaths and freezing next winter.
So Europe is going to incline away from the United States, either slowly or violently by revolution.
Pakistan and India, which are not always friendly, they're siding with Russia, China's siding with Russia, Iran is siding with Russia.
With Iran, China, and Russia as the center of gravity in Central Asia, you've captured the heartland, and they can simply press outward.
They control the masses of the minerals and the oil reserves.
So the United States is finding itself increasingly isolated.
And I think this UN vote is a laughable demonstration of, you know, ineptitude.
And I think the real thing that we're going to see in this coming year, Jim, are some major political upheavals in the United States as the petrodollar crashes, Joe Biden falls flat on his face once again, and probably will either be removed and replaced by Gavin Newsom.
I think they'll take out Kamala Harris, I think, will take her out, put in Gavin Newsom, then take out Joe Biden and try and put Gavin Newsom in as his replacement to avoid running him in 2024.
And they may start a war with China and Russia and Iran simultaneously to create sufficient smoke to do all these operations, Jim. - Well, I think the electronic voting machines are the monkey wrench in American democracy that are undermining everything that should be taking place.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, Jim's exactly right about the elections.
And just to do a little flashback on the United Nations, does anybody remember how Donald Trump handled the United Nations?
All three times that he went up in front of the UN General Assembly, he basically said, the future does not belong to globalists, it belongs to the patriots of each country out there.
And I am going to pull us out of these Paris climate accords.
I'm going to pull us out of this UN nuclear deal.
They had to get rid of Trump.
They had to.
He was raising an army of Make America Great Again people.
And now, so they've switched back to their war machine under the Biden puppet.
They switched back to putting more troops into Syria.
Remember, that was a silent war that was being fought for years since 2018.
The Washington Post published an article back in 2018 about what we were really doing, and we basically had about 4,000 special forces guys that were all armed to the hilt in Syria, and they were basically resisting, setting up a resistance to Iran back at the day.
So, back to the United Nations.
Look, the protesters in New York City came out on February 18th, and what did they chant?
There was thousands of them, and they chanted, Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Nuremberg, and they placed white flowers at the entrance to the United Nations General Assembly because of all the medical-related deaths that had come up.
I firmly believe the United Nations is the machine used by the globalists that all of these people in the United Nations are corrupt and rotten.
I would rather see every country one for all and instead of a, hey, let's put together the United Nations to put it all together, why don't we all just protect our own interests and stay out of other people's business, which is the American way and the CIA's way.
I think that times are changing, but Jim is exactly right.
We're not going to be able to reset the clock.
Either we're going to fall or we're going to fix the election.
To me, it's that simple.
And fall, to me, means the petrodollar falls and these globalist organizations take over and convert us into a digital currency.
I'd rather see it get rebuilt from the inside out, but that's going to take a Congress and an America that has a different face and a different makeup than we currently have with all these Let me just say one thing on Syria and Iran.
Having been to Iran, and I know the people and the culture, it's been a major psyop by the Zionists in this country to portray Iran as a force of negative harm in Syria, when quite the opposite is true.
And I'm not an apologist for Iran or Russia.
But I am a champion for truth, and I will fight to the death for the truth.
And the truth is, Iran has stepped into Syria because the United States, under John Kerry and Barack Obama, had used the Saudi Arabian-Qatari-Wahhabi menace, which are the fanatical, boy-raping, beheading lunatics that are hopped up on Captagon, that have been used from the earliest days in Yugoslavia to Libya and in Syria.
They were pushing for an overthrow of Bashar Assad.
The Iranians, which have a Shia population, and the Iranians that were supported by Syria in 1979 and numerous other times, have stepped into their community.
And defended them against the Wahhabists that were used to attempt to overthrow Bashar Assad.
The United States that has then inserted itself into Syria and, you know, been engaging in all sorts of militarism, is in complete contradiction to the original mission that was presented to the American people, which is, we're fighting ISIS, we're fighting al-Nusra and Daesh.
Bullshit!
We've been supporting and financing and training these bastards, and Lloyd Austin has been at the point of that.
So the Iranians have went in to defeat the very enemy that we say we're fighting, but we're actually using as a proxy to do political regime change in Syria.
And the massive destruction that's been done in Syria is one of the greatest war crimes and crimes against humanity.
That whole area The entire country of Syria was essentially the white people of the Middle East.
There were more Christians living up there, a lot of Russian diaspora.
So Iran has stepped into Syria.
Syria is not a bunch of lunatics, and neither are the Iranians.
So, you know, that has to be understood and reoriented because it's a massive propaganda campaign that keeps us, well, we're fighting them over there so they don't come here.
We're fighting the Iranians.
We are on the wrong side of history fighting the Iranians.
They are not the lunatics that are going around trying to spread a Wahhabist gospel where either you're a Muslim or you're killed.
That is not Iran.
That is the Madrasas of Saudi Arabia and some of these other lunatics that are brainwashed to that.
But it's not Iran, and we have had eclismic errors of policy.
Based on this Zionist-inspired propaganda that has penetrated the deepest, deepest levels of Americana, including much of the conservatives and Republicans and Trump supporters.
And Trump made a critical error, too, by this nonsense of, well, we're staying there to keep the oil.
Well then you become a freaking pirate.
It's not your oil, it's Syria's oil, and we are robber barons being used to do this.
And I'm just amazed that no one has the sense of there is universal karma when it comes to reaping what you've sown in this world.
And I, you know, every day I'm reminded this country is being paid back for the sins and the evil that we've unleashed upon the world.
So we have to begin to retrench and pull back from these misguided philosophies, starting with the animosity of Iran towards the West.
There is no animosity of Iran towards the West.
Jim?
Yep, yep.
I think you got all that right, Scott.
Wagner fighters are continuing to prevail.
Before the outbreak, about a hundred people lived in Brkhovka, located north of Artemikovsk, also known as Bakhmut, and adjacent to the previously liberated Petrko-Savicka.
The control of the village was claimed by the head of Wagner, completely under our control, Came on February 23rd, the bomb up ongoing.
Here you can see roughly the cities, but this is a crucial battleground right here around Bakhmut that is costing the Ukrainians massively.
Yellen says the U.S.
is going to send $10 billion more to Ukraine.
How the Secretary of the Treasury has the authority to do this is beyond me.
The U.S.
has given Kiev at least $13 billion in budgetary aid, economic assistance, and going directly to the government.
A lot of it has been money laundered.
According to a summary of a $45 billion package approved in December, $13 billion was allocated for economic and budgetary assistance.
Meanwhile, Putin has had to suspend participation in the last remaining nuclear arms treaty with the United States.
On Thursday, he declared participation in the new START treaty would be suspended.
He stressed this was not a withdrawal, but rather a suspension, which imperils the last remaining pillar of arms control between the U.S.
and Russia.
Putin said Russia's nuclear energy company Rosatom must also ensure the country's readiness to test nuclear weapons if needed.
If the U.S.
were to test, then Russia will do so as well.
But Putin means by doing it, tensions between the U.S.
and Russia have been steadily rising, as Biden made the decision to double down on our support for Ukraine, everything pointing toward a nuclear Armageddon.
The end of this treaty could mean all bets are off.
The treaty itself, admittedly, was not overly effective.
Set up by the Obama admin, it didn't actually prevent Russia from beefing up its nuclear arsenal.
What's concerning is that Russia is making a statement by pulling out of the deal.
It signaled Putin has had enough of the games being played by America and the West as we continue to funnel hundreds of billions into the proxy war.
It's also a warning to Washington that Russia has put new ground-based strategic nuclear weapons on combat duty.
If West Elite does not conceal their goal, which is to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia, it means to finish us forever.
And grow a local conflict into a global opposition, he observed.
This is exactly how we understand it all.
We will react accordingly.
Because in this case, we're talking about the existence of our country.
If this is truly how Putin feels, we could be closer to seeing an all-out nuclear war than ever before.
I think that's correct.
Meanwhile, China is meeting American hegemony head-on in a scathing essay.
Beijing's foreign ministry has blasted Washington's continued attempts at world domination.
The essay was widely shared throughout Chinese state media, probably the harshest they've ever published as far as Washington is concerned.
coincide with President Putin's recent address attacking the U.S.
across a broad spectrum, including Washington's multi-pronged effort to achieve and maintain exclusive dominance over the entire planet.
This, of course, includes military action, such as Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as interference on internal political affairs in countries in the form of coups, revolutions, and assassinations.
Yes, they discuss the Arab Spring, U.S.
interference in Latin America, including the coup in Chile.
It condemned how Washington weaponizes democracy, forces countries to take sides, branding the U.S.
of Cuba and of Venezuela and other cover revolutions, such as in Ukraine, Georgia, and Kazakhstan.
It condemned how Washington weaponizes democracy, forces countries to take sides, branding the US a country characterized by violence and expansion that crushes its opponents with sanctions and economic coercion, claiming the US dollar to be the main source of instability and uncertainty in the world economy.
Never has China's foreign ministry launched such a blistering attack on the U.S.
For many years, despite Washington's turn toward hostility toward Beijing, China has been overwhelmingly restrained, holding to the belief that America can be engaged with, that somehow the country can be brought to reason, and that a U.S.-China bilateral relationship can be improved and stabilized.
That belief could not have been more wrong, however, after two years in office.
The Biden admin has shown itself to be more belligerent and hawkish on China than Trump and his colleagues had ever been.
Ties have gone from one new low to another.
The Biden presidency transforming U.S.
policy from America vs. Trumpian grievances over trade to an all-encompassing campaign for military and strategic commitment containment, which has dramatically escalated tensions.
The Biden admin has repeatedly claimed it wants guardrails and lines of communication with Beijing, but its actions have shown its real intentions, from allowing Nancy Pelosi's highly provocative visit to Taiwan, to stoking paranoia over a balloon, to forcing countries to cut off supplies at China's entire semiconductor industry.
The conclusion at which Beijing has finally arrived is when it comes to the U.S., there is no serious dialogue to be had.
It is a waste of time.
China faces a belligerent, hegemonic, bad-faith actor who seeks to contain it and strategically crush it at all costs.
The U.S.
is thereby forcing a change in China's foreign policy.
China's philosophy in the past has been to avoid confrontation with Washington, to seek cooperation, prevent Americans from moving toward policies like Cold War containment and blocking its economic development.
This is why even when the U.S.
was turning hostile, China remained ambivalent.
China now recognizes its best bet is not appeasing Washington, but its continued development of prosperity, which depends on sustaining a multipolar world where American power is diluted.
China has formally identified American hegemony as the biggest source of instability, chaos, inequality, and conflict in the world, mirroring comments of Vladimir Putin.
As such, The U.S.
has no interest in accepting or coming to terms with the rise of any other country that challenges its monopoly on global power, leaving its hegemony to be some sort of divine ride, leaving scant hope for stability.
It will do whatever it can to contain China and break up its integration with the global economy.
While this does not mean Beijing will do anything reckless or risk-prone, it does mean it has finally awakened to the challenge it faces and is no longer, after decades of cordial ties, starry eyes or deluded about the true nature of the American regime.
Wow is that powerful, Scott.
Well, it is powerful.
It's a justification for a future onward kinetic information diplomatic economic offensive against the United States.
It's unrestricted warfare, written in 1998, was essentially a declaration of asymmetric operations against the U.S.
But this is more of a coming to terms With the mental, emotional disintegration that's occurring in the United States.
I think we as Americans have a particular sensitivity to the internal dysfunctions, the internal mental dysfunctions and schizophrenia and hypocrisy that is afflicting the country, while the rest of the nations are slow to the upkeep.
They want to believe that America is just going through a temporary political sickness rather than A chronic, death-oriented disease, impending death, and we are towards an impending death.
You see this politically, you see it socially, you see it The China paper is powerful.
I've read it.
whether it's because of the COVID-19 vax or a combination of that and the wokeism and the schizophrenia and the perversion and the anti-family policies and the sexual dysfunction, all of which rot the core of a country and a person.
That's happening in America.
So the China paper is powerful.
I've read it.
It's a wonderful encapsulation, essentially, of the historical crimes and malice that the U.S. has experienced.
has done over the last 30 years, particularly the last 20 years.
And they do a good job of listing history.
The Russians do it too.
I think all, even India, they all have a very succinct encapsulation of history.
Here's what has happened over the last 20, 30 years.
America never does that, of course.
We topple our statues.
We try and forget history.
We shout it out.
We cover our ears.
We pretend it is the now and the future, and we're the bastions of democracy.
We're the Captain America's defending human rights.
We have to go fight them over there so that we don't fight them here.
All that nonsense has caused the other nations To kind of, in a bafflement, look around saying, what are they talking about?
What movie are they on?
Where are they?
And they've been very patient.
And I've said this ad nauseum for the past few years.
America is behaving like a drunken mongoloid at a party, knocking over tables and, you know, vomiting all over people.
And they're finally going, okay, enough.
And you're seeing, I think you're going to see a quickening of China, Russia, Iran, India, other South American nations.
They're going to quicken in their coagulation, not in a communist, you know, equality for all these nations.
No, there is a tiered qualification based on economic, military, you know, might.
But you are going to see a coalition, a confederacy, an alliance assemble for the preservation of self-sovereignty.
And you could instantly see sanctions and reverse economic isolationism being applied to America, to Britain, to Israel, to Israel, to any of these nations that are trying to continue this color revolution agenda against all nations who aren't America.
The real writing on the wall, Jim, is that...
China, Russia recognize the United States' goal is to use Ukraine as a cancer to metastasize into Russia and to bleed and crumble and wither Russia from within through a guerrilla war of mongoloid, retard zombies that have been brain-altered in MK-ALTRA programs
And then use the debilitated Russia to generate the economic might to recapture, of course, Saudi Arabia, then do a domino effect against Iran.
Israel is preparing for that.
They're going to try and do an Iraq 2.0 in the next six months.
And then after toppling Iran, they would then, you know, smother and surround China.
And wither it down and break that up and turn that into a bunch of rice paddies.
That's their 10-year plan.
And I think Russia and China and other nations know that based on history.
And subsequently, they are rising up to defend against it.
They're not going to go quietly into the night.
And the U.S.
seems unable to really understand.
This is approaching a kinetic confrontation, and then you go into the next dimension of, okay, on a kinetic level, what happens?
Are you going to march a bunch of transgender rainbow flag marines against the North Koreans and the Chinese or the Russian spetsnaz?
I don't think they're going to survive very long there.
Are you going to assume that you have superior technology to the Russians?
I don't think so.
The Russians have pretty much said, we cannot be militarily defeated, and I would agree with that.
So on a military technological level, We really don't have the capability of pursuing this political policy, and if we think we're going to go nuclear, well then, now we're entering another phase.
I think this China presentation is really going to be used by other nations, copied and pasted by other nations to justify their own political isolationism from the West, reunification with Russia, Iran, Central Asia, Brian?
locus of power.
And, you know, that that's also going to be used to strip Europe in different European countries away from this slavery to the US, which, again, the Nord Stream pipeline has facilitated, Jim.
Brian.
You know, I feel like the child who is watching his father decide that he wants to go have his midlife crisis and cheat on his wife.
This country is not acting like it ought to act, okay?
The people can see it.
They feel it.
We're watching our father, this country, Absolutely go off the rails in terms of a midlife crisis.
And so far so that China is going to lecture us on how to run our show?
That's insanity!
China is a terrible communist regime who literally controls their population with an iron fist, jails Falun Gong Religious people takes their DNA and extracts their organs and sells them to global oligarchs.
China is off the rails in terms of control.
But remember, the way to control the world is with pallets of money, Barack Obama, or bags of money to every politician in the game, as long as they succumb to U.S.
involvement.
That's how we do it.
There's nothing righteous about our leadership anymore in terms of this world.
If I had my way, we'd sprinkle the world with revolvers.
Let every citizen have one.
And let every country figure out how to set up their own constitution.
That's the problem with China.
The people cannot fight back.
They are literally under the iron grip of China.
And China's lecturing us about our behavior?
I am offended.
I'm offended.
Unfortunately, we're in a bad spot.
China's been banging the war drum since 1997, July 1st of 1997, to go take Taiwan back.
China now has a huge And we depend on China for our cheap Chinese goods.
Don't get me wrong.
I enjoy my cheap Chinese goods, but I'm ashamed of the fact that I know what they come from.
I've seen that place.
I've been there.
Back in 1997, I was there.
I know who they are.
I understand what they are.
And I gotta tell you, I'm just sick about this.
At least during Vietnam, we had the balls to send our own people in.
Unlike this proxy work bullshit that's going on in Ukraine.
Now I wouldn't send a single American child to go die for these, this oligarchical pissing match that's going on in Ukraine.
I would not, nobody, nobody to die in that ridiculous mess over there.
And those people now we're saying they're going to fight to the last soul.
Well, why do you think the UN General Assembly is coming out against it?
They're literally willing to destroy the entire population so that some very silly people with a lot of money can control the machine.
We have to take our nation back.
We have to.
It's a limited amount of time that we have and it all comes down to whether or not we will grow up and act like big boys and control our own elections.
The irrelevance of the United Nations could not be further confirmed than by this development.
France, Britain, and Germany handed Ukraine's dismemberment plan to Zelensky.
You're forgetting territories.
You're starting negotiations with Russia.
In other words, they lost.
A bombshell publication by the Wall Street Journal reveals France, Germany, and Britain serve Zelensky a plan to dismember Ukraine, asking him to immediately begin capitulation negotiations with Russia, even if it means he hands over territory to Moscow, such as the Donbass.
It was also preceded by a Wall Street article warning Kiev that the Battle of Bakhmut is costing Ukraine dearly and may undermine a West's trust in Zelensky himself by causing turmoil inside the country.
By a diabolical coincidence, the Wall Street Journal article looks like a War News 247 article dated the 16th of February.
Westerners eyeing the Ukrainian Army's swing counteroffensive as a last chance to push back Russian forces, but what NATO officials are proposing leads to a frozen conflict, which, if accepted, will at some point thaw again, and it's not at all certain Russia will accept it.
Signed officials from France, Germany, and Britain The Wall Street Journal reports that the NATO-Ukraine relationship could lead Kyiv to peace talks, even with occupied territories.
Germany, France, and Britain see strengthening NATO ties with Ukraine as a way to encourage Kyiv to open peace talks with Russia, even if Moscow's occupation of Ukrainian territory continues.
France and Germany support the initiative.
The three countries believe it's a way to give the Ukrainian government an incentive to start talks with Russia to wit by giving Ukraine wider access to advanced military equipment, weapons, and munitions.
The officials noted, however, any decision on when or under what condition peace talks would begin rests with Ukraine.
Earlier observed that the West should give Ukraine weapons systems, including fighter jets, that would give it a decisive advantage on the battlefield.
I don't think so.
According to the Wall Street Journal, these public statements are at odds with private doubts expressed by British and German politicians about whether Ukraine could succeed in ousting the Russians from Crimea.
We keep saying Russia should win, but what does that mean?
If the war continues for a long time at this intensity, the losses for Ukraine will become unbearable.
And no one believes that they will be able to recover Crimea.
This week, Biden and other leaders called for unity in the face of Russian aggression.
The official declined to comment on Ukraine's proposed security pact with NATO.
Sources cited said French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz told Zelensky he should start looking at the possibility of opening peace talks when they meet in Paris later this month.
Macron also told him even mortal enemies such as France and Germany made peace after World War II.
Macron told Zelensky he had been a great wartime leader, but he would have to make tough decisions.
General Pavel, President-elect of the Czech Republic and a former NATO commander, told the Munich Conference, we may end up in a situation where the liberation of certain parts of Ukrainian territory may cause more loss of life than society could bear.
There may be a point where Ukrainians may begin to consider another outcome.
So what does Zelensky get in return?
NATO weapons for Ukraine, but not Article 5?
The fact in question would not include any commitment to deploy NATO troops in Ukraine, nor will it offer Kyiv the protection of Article 5 on collective defense.
But sources say it will provide Ukraine with a military means to deter future Russian attacks.
Frankly, I think this is all very unlikely.
The NATO summit must make clear to Ukraine Give Zelensky a political victory he can prevent domestically as an incentive for negotiations.
Russia's wars have a tendency to freeze and then unfreeze, which is why Ukraine will need more guarantees from us.
Confidence in Zelensky will be shaken if the Ukrainian Armed Forces Group in Bakhmut is surrounded and suffers impressive losses.
Mind you, that is taking place as we speak.
We keep repeating that Russia mustn't win, but what does that mean?
If the war is on long enough, with this intensity Ukraine's losses will become unbearable.
Tolstoy tweets, the battle for Bakhmut caused Ukraine clearly it can undermine confidence in Zelensky not only in the West but inside the country.
The Wall Street Journal also recalled the words of Zelensky who promised not to surrender Bakhmut.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, Zelensky is a war criminal and needs to be treated like a war criminal.
He needs to be captured and dragged and prosecuted in a Hitler bunker sort of way, or he needs to be executed and replaced with a military leadership like MacArthur or Patton or some sort of top-level general that can, you know, impose political decisions for Ukraine.
But Zelensky cannot be allowed, in my opinion, to survive this.
He is responsible for the war crimes against the people of Donbass, of Lugansk, Donetsk, against Crimea, terroristic attacks against Crimea.
Zelensky needs to be charged and prosecuted and executed as a war criminal, period.
And anything short of that is sowing the seeds of future Zelensky's and future operations against Russia and any other country.
It would be my counsel, because, you know, Zelensky's a whore.
He's originally ran off to do negotiations with Russia.
He was stopped by Boris Johnson, and as an obedient whore that he is, he went back to the pimp whorehouse and started pushing out his own soldiers to this meat grinder, and they've been ground up ever since.
The West has always counted on the compassion of Putin and the Russians.
They have always made their political calculations based upon the dependable compassion of the Russians.
As ironic as that sounds, it is a granite-hard reality.
Brian, pick up, and then we'll catch Scott.
Thank you.
Well, Scott, yeah, which Zelensky, I don't know if you can see this, but there's Zelensky and there's Zelensky's body double right there heading up the stairs with Joe Biden.
So if you think this guy is protected from on high by the Prince of Darkness himself, you're crazy.
This guy is clearly a puppet installed for a puppet puppet regime as a puppet by Western power structures and Zionist power structures in order to try to break down and dilute Russian's power because Russia's gaining so much traction over there.
And if you if you still believe the media, let's just talk about how they've changed over the years.
So before the Ukraine crisis, the Guardian wrote, welcome to Ukraine, the most corrupt nation in Europe.
After the Ukraine crisis, the fight for Ukraine is a fight for liberal ideals.
Writers.
Ukraine's neo-Nazi problem before the Ukraine crisis, after.
For foreign fighters, Ukraine offers purpose, commodity, and a cause.
Vox.
Prior to Ukraine, the proxy war starting, a Ukrainian comedian-turned-president is embroiled in Trump's impeachment mess.
Post CNN, Ukrainians are giving two lessons in democracy that Americans have forgotten.
I could go on and on and on.
It is so clear that Western media is nothing more than the puppets being controlled by the puppeteers.
There is nothing that's true or right about what's happening in Ukraine at all.
The entire thing has to stop.
It's an absolute joke and whether they'll hang Zelensky or his clone, I don't know.
But I have a feeling that the Ukrainian people have had enough of being sacrificed and having their children being sacrificed.
Right now, what's happening over there is that letters are going viral from parents to Zelensky.
Zelensky's clearly... He's worse than a whore, Scott.
He's worse than a whore.
He's a faggot whore.
Now, I understand a girl that's got to earn some money.
I get it.
Single moms, that whole thing.
But these guys just do it just to be depraved because they're depraved.
I mean, there is nothing left in these guys.
And I can just see Nancy Pelosi delivering the $10 billion, getting on her little nightie to sit down with Zelensky or go to bed.
This is This is a joke that they're sacrificing real human beings to bullets and bombs over these clowns.
That's all I'm going to say about it.
Well said.
Scott, did you want to add a few?
Well, I just wanted to finish.
It seems someone doesn't like that I've exposed The variable is the West's intelligence services has depended upon the compaction of Russia to make these political calculations and overtures and cartoonish exaggerations.
But, you know, inevitably, I think you're going to see Russia completely close the gap.
But this.
Oh.
I think those are very subtle and discerning observations of Scott about the compassion of Russia being taken for granted.
Here we have a fascinating report from Soshi Shimatsu, who writes for Rants, that the chemical weaponry ignited in East Palestine was actually destined for Ukraine.
In this chemistry-based analysis, the findings on the ground suppressed under orders from higher-ups are examined.
The chlorine-based compound inside the five-spec tanker cars was falsely described as vinyl chloride, when it's actually vinyl-lead chloride.
The tactical objective is to fell Polish civilians, not render them dead in less than an hour.
Though many will surely die from poisoned lung tissue in sufficient number to muster a NATO declaration of war against Russia and Belarus.
The giveaway, leaving no doubt, was a mid-air detection of phosgene in the black cloud over the railside burn pit.
It should be noted the author was enrolled in the then world-leading organic chemistry program at Purdue.
This is interesting stuff.
I won't go into it in all the detail it deserves, but it turns out that, according to his analysis, we're talking about chemical warfare and that it was destined to be used on the Polish people, to be blamed on Russia, The questions are, why were five tanker calls filled with a volatile chemical weapon precursor being transported toward the eastern seaboard?
What was the final destination of the chemical payload?
Was the chemical carload to be deployed for military use during warfare in blatant violation of the international treaty banning chemical weapons?
Which battle zone was targeted for the massive chemical warfare attack?
The use of chemical weapons is a gross violation of international law, a crime against humanity.
The principal suspects are President Biden, Vice President Harris, Secretary of Defense Austin, CIA Chief Burns, and their underlings.
The mainstream media has disclaimed all kinds of facts about the matter that are extremely serious, where the cargo was misidentified in a criminal cover-up, Evidently for reasons of planned covert military and intelligence operation in blatant violation of International Chemical Weapons Treaty against the manufacturer, storage, deployment, and use of lethal chemicals in warfare or domestic turmoil.
The source of the cargo in Madison, Illinois, was a shutdown uranium rod production facility of the infamous Dow Chemical Company of Agent Orange notoriety, more recently operating under the cover name of Speck True Light.
Since the mid-1990s, the radioactive site, located across the Mississippi from St.
Louis, has been under a cleanup effort by the EPA, which has resisted designating the huge mess as a permanent hazardous waste dump, even though it clearly is one.
The question that arises, where was the lethal cargo to be delivered?
The Norfolk Southern destination was just across the state line in Conway, Pennsylvania, but that was not the end of the journey.
The Conway Rail Yard, operated by Norfolk Southern for more than a century, is a messy switching facility, the largest in the U.S.
until the 1980s.
It's safe to conclude the suspect pipe tankers, along with other chemical haulers, We're at the rear of the train for the purpose of decoupling and route transfer in a completely different direction from the boxcar filled with foodstuff for the upper Mississippi region.
Since the Madison, Illinois site was a large-scale EPA holding center, it would have made zero sense to move the sensitive cargo hundreds of miles to a densely populated region a mere 25 miles from Pittsburgh.
On arrival at the Edgewood facility, the vinyl chloride play line could have been readily weaponized into pure chlorine or a far more likely or less lethal phosgene for injection into canisters for attachment to bombs and artillery shells.
The sole explanation for this blatant and secretive violation of global governments is quite typical of the many illegal international black ops that have involved Joe Biden, the main sponsor of the NATO-U.S.
military aid to Zelensky.
A mysterious chlorine gas attack in western Ukraine and against NATO-allied Poland, with televised CNN, BBC, ABC seeing the chemical burns inflicted on thousands of Polish citizens, would have provoked NATO war authorization on the ground of protecting the civilians.
It looks to him as though that's what's going on.
Here's a bona fide sign in East Palestine.
Welcome, President Trump.
And fuck Joe Biden.
Scott, your thoughts?
Nope, Scott's not here.
Ryan, your thoughts?
I obviously have some computer problems.
I'm sick about it.
I'm sick about it.
Look, talk about a conspiracy theory.
Like they meant for this to happen.
That's what the author is saying.
They meant to send all these chemicals in or some crazy spy versus spy thing took place and somebody crashed the train that was meant for Ukraine in East Palestine right in the midst of America.
Now, Just so you understand how bad it is, here's your local high school fountain.
You can see the water thing has a cover on it that says, Danger, do not operate.
But that's okay.
The drinking water is 100% safe.
The gas lighting is at an all-time high with what's taking place in East Palestine.
And if I was there, I would have grabbed my car keys and gotten the hell out of town as soon as possible to save my body and save my family and save my life.
I don't care if the dogs and cats remain, whatever, that's fine.
But that place has turned into a toxic waste dump right in the middle of America.
And I have Nobody to blame except for our federal government.
There's no way I believe that competent people decided to light this train crash on fire.
No way I believe that.
Were they deceived?
Were they manipulated?
Were they controlled?
I just don't believe it.
The number one rule is get people the hell away from the spell.
Number two rule, do not introduce a spark.
Polyvinyl chloride.
And it turns out this was this toxic.
So look, I don't know who, I think that what the problem is fundamentally is that they're getting tired of competing with the people.
They're getting tired of it.
And they'd rather just kill us off.
They can't suppress us anymore.
The internet is too difficult to control, although they're doing a very good job.
So just kill us.
Just kill us.
They don't like what we have to say, take us out.
And I think that they really believe that they have that level of power.
Brian, I wish I could say you're wrong, but we have further confirmation right here.
Even the governor, DeWine, has toxic railroad ties.
Very disturbing.
DeWine has refused to issue a disaster declaration that would send much-needed federal resources to East Palestine and draw attention to the Norfolk Southern accident.
He also failed to ensure the railroad giant paid the price for two other derailments in his state earlier this year.
His failure to act raised question about his management of the crisis and the influence of his close ties to Norfolk Southern's Ohio lobbying firm, which just so happens to be at the center of what federal prosecutors are calling likely the largest bribery money laundering scheme ever perpetrated against the people of the state of Ohio.
Well, DeWine is at the center of it.
Norfolk Southern and the Political Action Committee have donated more than $20,000 to DeWine's gubernatorial campaigns.
They also deliver $165,000 to political committees supporting DeWine.
What's more, DeWine has a very close relationship with Norfolk Southern's lobbyists in Columbus.
Dan McCarthy, DeWine's legislative director from January 2019 to September 2021, Previously served as president of Norfolk Southern's Ohio lobbying firm, The Success Group, from 1994 to 2020.
The rail company has had The Success Group on retainer since at least 2009.
They've been exceptionally successful in blocking state legislation under DeWine's watch that would have increased safety on the railroads.
The firm's lobbyist last year on a bill to mandate a minimum of two-person train crews on all trains.
The legislation died at the end of the year when the previous legislative session came to a close.
He's also been successful in greasing the wheels for a proposed $1.6 billion sale of the city of Cincinnati's publicly owned railroad The wine has not raised concerns about the proposed privatization efforts, which critics say could lead the city to lose out on perpetual lease payments.
Ohio State Senator Bill Blessing, a Republican from Cincinnati, wrote in a recent op-ed, long term, I believe that owning and leasing the railroad would provide a better value for the city than the sale into its proceeds may generate.
But it's pretty obvious where DeWine stands.
Partners for Progress funneled $300,000 of dark money backing DeWine's 2018 campaign, put $100,000 into a failed effort to elect his daughter to a local prosecutor position, It turns out this is all taking place.
A First Energy scandal, said Craig Holman in Ethic.
Lobbyists at Public Citizen raised red flags about the entire exchange between the company and the lobbying firm and DeWine.
There's more to it here, but the point I would like to make is this is all very nasty stuff, and it now appears they want to transport the spill all the way down to Houston for reasons unknown, which sounds like a completely ludicrous idea.
Don, I think you've got to take us off, and when we return, we'll pick it up with Scott.
Yeah, I'm so sorry that we're running out of time on this.
Hot hour here on February 26th.
This is really something.
You want to come back for the second hour because it's tremendous here.
Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I'll run a producer at JD.ConsultantsAtLive.com.
Urge you to watch and share this important show because I don't think you're going to get this anywhere else and you need this.
So get it.
▲
Export Selection