All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 23, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
27:14
Sasha Latypova Reveals DoD Control of COVID PLANdemic and mRNA "Vaccine" Bioweapon
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Yeah, that's correct.
And all your articles are free, but you do offer subscriptions for those who want to help support you.
So I want to get that out there and tell my editors to put that on screen here also in the interview.
But I'm sorry to interrupt, Sasha, but go ahead.
Yeah, so when I met Catherine Watt and we started collaborating on this issue, she described the legal structure, which she calls legal cage.
that was built to enable this.
And in reality, you know, so people accuse us of, you know, shilling for Pfizer or helping Pfizer escape liability, or, you know, we do no such thing.
In fact, Pfizer is fully liable here, except, as we just discussed, the government gave them liability protection.
So that's, that's what we describe.
It's the, it's the fact that Pfizer acts like they have no liability because the government And the government, you know, gave this liability protection under a set of what Catherine calls illegal laws or pseudo laws because they're unconstitutional.
They violate our constitution and our rights.
The legal case that's being utilized here is kind of three parts.
There are six statutes and it goes back long in history.
So this was definitely preplanned.
But there are three key parts to it.
So first is the Emergency Use Authorization, which people are more or less familiar with.
And it was introduced in 97, and it was originally very limited in scope only for something that doesn't have any alternative treatment, any option for treatment, which explains why they were suppressing hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.
So it doesn't have any option, a very severe and Terminal conditions such as terminal cancer, for example, and in which case, you know, the position was, well, we should let patients try some novel treatments.
And that was how the emergency use authorization came to be.
Then the second part is something that very few people are familiar with.
It's called other transaction authority.
So other transaction authority is a way for the government to contract with private manufacturers while not following any regulations that would apply to the regulated private manufacturers, such as pharmaceuticals, for example.
So originally this again, OTA was fairly narrow.
It was allowed.
It also allows the government to contract without following normal procurement rules, normal like federal procurement rules.
And again, that allows for secrecy and non-disclosure and not accounting.
Okay, that's OTA and that's just so absurd that this is a loophole for the government to not follow rules.
And then what about the PREP Act?
How does the PREP Act flow into all of this as well?
Oh, so this OTA and then the PREP Act.
PREP Act is something that they put specifically into the clauses of all of the contracts that we use to contract under OTA with private manufacturers to make these so-called vaccines, but also therapeutics and all other COVID response measures.
And PREP Act explicitly says that There, you know, the government tells them that tells Pfizer, for example, you are a covered entity under this prep act under this contract, as long as basically as long as you follow the all the orders or all the rules or, you know, so so language to that, to that, describing this liability waiver.
And this is a clause in every, every one of those contracts.
And so they are allowed to essentially not follow any normal regulatory requirements, not follow informed consent.
Essentially, they can do whatever they like and they have no liabilities, basically how it's written.
Wow.
And that all comes in play together under public health emergency.
It becomes completely bulletproof.
It's like the cage slams down on us and there's Absolutely like no legal way to go after them because they've thought through all of this Well, but what about what about fraud right?
So I know this is part of the argument so fraud Vitiates as they say everything or fraud can invalidate many of these contracts at least I suppose a properly argued in a court of law, but if
If the vaccines are misrepresented, or the efficacy is misrepresented, and the information that goes into the EUA decisions is fraudulent in its origin, then it would seem that this cage could be ripped apart, this outer shell of protection could be dismantled, and you could go after these companies.
Is that something that you're seeing talk about happening, or is that impossible in your view?
Well, originally, I thought it was possible.
And there's been about two years of people attempting to go exactly after this, as you have seen.
So as time goes by, we have huge documentation of fraud.
I myself produced, you know, hundreds of pages of writing, documenting, Providing documents, showing it, showing it in data.
And I know, you know, of about 100 people doing the same thing that I know.
And then of course, you know, it's all it's all documented.
It's all on the on the internet with published.
But the problem is not a single court case has proceeded on the on its merits.
So there have been a few cases that were won based based on the mostly administrative things.
Not a single Judge yet admitted anyone into court with evidence of fraud.
And that should give everyone a big question mark.
Why is this happening?
Right, right.
I mean, is our judicial system completely bought off by pharma?
I don't know if they are bought off by pharma, but they are following the orders that are written into the statutes.
Again, I advise people to read Catherine.
I'm not a lawyer, so I don't want to, you know, watch this.
But she describes how exactly this is done and why the courts are acting this way.
So that was also her finding.
Her investigation process went through looking at the court decisions that were being made through all of this.
As people started protesting right away, obviously, all the overreach, the masking, the mandates, everything else was on the face of it completely unconstitutional.
And it is completely unconstitutional.
So people were rightly protesting and going to court with these complaints.
And she said, when I started looking at the decisions that were being made by the judges, they're signaling to you what framework they're utilizing through their decisions.
And that framework was very loud and clear, is that this is allowed and we need to maintain this because this is coming from the top.
The government decided that this is what they're going to do.
And this is not coming, so the driver of this cartel is not the pharma.
While the pharma are food soldiers, and very important ones, and we need to go after them.
Of course, absolutely.
They need to be prosecuted.
I'm not absolving them.
But I'm saying to defeat this mafia, you need to understand who runs the mafia.
And that is the Pentagon?
It's the Pentagon, the US government, yes.
Okay, talk to us about the DoD, their role in this Operation Warp Speed and this military campaign.
And I'll just say up front, and I'm not attributing this to you, but in my opinion, This is a military bioweapons operation to achieve mass depopulation and genocide.
So that's my take on it.
And it's okay if you disagree with that.
That's totally fine.
I'm here to hear your views, but I just want you to know it's also okay if you share a similar conclusion.
That's fine.
But go ahead and give us your take on it.
Agree or disagree.
Either way.
Oh, I agree.
I also arrived at the same conclusion, ultimately.
So first of all, this is driven by Pentagon.
There may be somebody above Pentagon.
I don't know.
It could be.
But they are definitely doing this.
All of the contracts made for these so-called injections are from DoD.
So DoD is the contracting entity.
DoD Distributes the money to the pharma companies.
It's a humongous amount of money.
Even for Pfizer, it's huge amounts of money.
So the DoD is funding the vaccine companies?
Yes, so they are funding all of the COVID countermeasures, which include vaccines, but they also include therapeutics and other products such as PCR tests and even swabs and masks and even the little cards.
People were getting from CDC when they were getting vaccinated.
They are also property of US government and essentially property of DOD because how the money flows.
Wow.
So yeah, so all of the contracts became available.
I don't remember exactly when I don't know when they came online.
I found them a few months ago.
posted online, they're partially redacted.
But these are the contracts from DoD, BARDA, they sometimes have parallel contracts with HHS, funding COVID countermeasures.
And these include Pfizer's contract, Moderna's contract, and many others.
AstraZeneca, people don't realize, but there are hundreds of manufacturers involved in this, not just Pfizer and Moderna.
Well, this is extraordinary in so many ways.
From what you're saying, the pharmaceutical companies are just proxies for a military operation.
Pharma is providing the injections.
But the Pentagon, which, by the way, the DOD also, because we've interviewed many other guests like Dr. Judy Mikevitz, the Pentagon provided the original bioweapon strain to Wuhan, which was then run through gain-of-function processes in order to produce an ultra-weaponized which was then run through gain-of-function processes in order to produce an ultra-weaponized biological weapon that was then deliberately released
We now know in order to drive people into these vaccine injections, which also came from the DOD, while at the same time the DOD was pushing these injections on their own soldiers, which I would say looks like an operation at the top of the Pentagon to eliminate the United States military which I would say looks like an operation at the top of the Pentagon to eliminate the United States military and to weaken America's national
It's just, it's extraordinary to me, Sasha, that your research and your team and the articles you have on Substack and some of the speeches that you've given and so on are literally documenting, I believe, what I just described.
I mean, you've documented it.
It's extraordinary.
Yeah, and it's coming from their own documents.
None of this is secret, actually.
So this is all has been disclosed.
It's in the documents.
For example, Operation Warp Speed, the chief operating officer is the Department of Defense.
And we were told by the US government that this is, you know, the military is just involved in logistics.
Well, turns out when you examine these structures, there's organizational structures and documents and how things went.
It turns out two thirds of the organization is the Department of Defense, a lot of high ranking generals, and very few people who have any healthcare experience.
And the Department of Defense is in charge of many things, not just logistics, but things like design of clinical trials, structuring these contracts, for example, the contracts are very, they have clauses that are very tightly micromanaging the activities of pharma companies, But they don't include any accountability.
So many people blame me for saying, oh, you know, the good manufacturing practices legally don't apply to these products because they're countermeasures.
But the contracts actually talk about good manufacturing practices as being prerequisite for these products.
So how come I'm saying this?
Well, I'm saying this because while a contract can mention a lot of things, But if it doesn't describe them in an accountable manner, it's just words.
They're just saying stuff.
There are specific ways by which contracts can be made binding or can just put fluff in it.
And the way that the good manufacturing practice is described in these contracts is fluff.
There is no accountability for if The manufacturer does not follow good manufacturing practice, for example.
Right.
So while they're saying it's a good thing, you should do it, it doesn't have any accountability.
And in fact, it puts them explicitly out of scope of the project and says that the U.S.
government is not buying them and not paying for them.
So this is extraordinary what you're uncovering.
And who was the person you mentioned earlier whose substack that you started reading first?
What was her name?
Catherine Watt, W-A-T-T.
I'm sorry, can you say what was her name again, please?
Catherine Watt, W-A-T-T.
Okay, W-A-T-T, Catherine Watt.
Okay, we probably need to reach out and see if we could talk with her as well, but I had Dr. Andrew Huff here in the studio telling us, telling our audience that The CIA and the Pentagon combined forces to hand over the initial SARS-CoV-2 strain to the Wuhan lab, which means that was in part a Pentagon operation.
So they built a bioweapon, they released it, and then they gave themselves immunity under the countermeasures that you've been mentioning, Sasha, countermeasures against the biological attack that they built.
And then they unleash the countermeasures, which are killing people, but there's no immunity, because the countermeasures are supposed to be offered under the emergency, with the logic being that, oh, we're under such a dangerous attack that even if there's risk associated with taking this countermeasure, that risk would be less than the risk of dying from the attack.
But the attacker and the countermeasure provider are one and the same.
It's the Department of Defense.
It's like... Actually... I'm sorry, go ahead.
Yeah, just published an article in my sub stack, which is which talks about the pandemic preparedness as a government, government protection racket.
As you may know, you know, there are tactics run by mafia.
You know, when you go and break the windows of of shops, and then these nice guys from from the organization come around and say, hey, you know, you we can prevent these window breaking if you pay us protection.
And so that's exactly what's happening here.
So the entity that is unleashing these toxins and weapons on people, and then unleashing the propaganda to scare them with, oh, the new emerging viruses, we can protect you from the new emerging viruses if you comply with us, if you are obedient, if you're a good citizen and come and get vaccinated every six months.
And then also, you're absolutely right, and the cash flow, if we follow the cash, so the government extracts money from the people through taxation, they funnel the money to big pharma through vaccine purchases, and often far more vaccines than they ever intend to administer.
The drug companies have legal immunity granted by the government.
The drug companies take a portion of that, they kick it back to members of Congress and the Senate and governors and so on as either campaign contributions or contracts for their family members to be engaged in marketing or research or what have you.
So it's, you're exactly right Sasha, it's a massive cartel, this is a money laundering racket that uses the innocent Bodies of we the people as the vessels for the excuse to engage in this massive money laundering racket where they're actually killing people for profit while Enhancing their own power over the people it's this is a massive criminal operation.
You're you're you're right on the on the target with that Sasha and Yeah, that's correct.
And so that's why I'm saying it's both the pharma and the government, but it's driven by the government because they have more power to provide this sovereign immunity.
So they extend their own sovereign immunity onto the private manufacturers, essentially shielding them from liability in this organization.
But they're both very critical pieces of it.
So both of them are criminals.
Both of them are liable.
Both of them should be prosecuted.
But people need to understand that it's not just a matter of Pfizer being bad and buying off the regulators.
That would be an easy problem, relatively speaking, to solve.
The reason we're all having this difficulty, and not a single court has gone anywhere on this, It's because of what I'm describing is a much, much bigger problem.
It's the government that has merged with private corporations, which is by definition a fascism.
Fascism, straight up.
Yes.
Yeah.
And they are running this, this racket, this complete global racket and killing people.
And yes, it's intentional to, to kill people and also, but also to terrorize people.
Yeah, really good point.
There is a psychological terrorism aspect of all of this.
And, you know, there's another term to describe this as a medical dictatorship.
So the government benefits from this dictatorship by having the assertion of power, control, you know, you must comply or else.
And the pharmaceutical companies, they make all this money, their executives get paid off.
The healthcare sector does really well economically.
Of course, small businesses suffer, but nobody in the government cares about small businesses or individual rights.
But this is a medical dictatorship, and it's just like it ripped right out of 1984, where they have to create this enemy that this never ending war to keep us in this war with an enemy that they themselves invented, by the way, which is the SARS-CoV-2.
They invented it.
They propagandized it through the media.
We would have been much better off, by the way, in my opinion, if all of us had done absolutely nothing.
No masks, no lockdowns, no vaccines, nothing.
If we just did life as usual, we would have had fewer deaths.
We would be far better off now than what we went through.
That's for sure.
Do you agree or disagree with that, by the way?
I'm just curious.
Absolutely.
I think the best strategy to deal... First of all, epidemics always self-extinguish.
If they didn't, we wouldn't be here discussing this.
True.
So pandemics don't happen at all.
Epidemics, if they happen, you know, this clustering, local clustering of diseases, they sometimes happen for a variety of reasons.
They always self-extinguish because, especially when you have a heterogeneous population kind of interacting, you know, healthy people, younger people, older people.
So the younger people actually protect older people because they will interact with the pathogen and the healthy immune system defeats it.
So, that's how the epidemics generally self-extinguish.
So, this pathogen that was released, and I'm sure, yes, of course, it's man-made, the pathogen that was released wasn't even that dangerous.
Even when they were claiming that it was, looking at the data, It didn't look any worse than a flu.
So we would have had probably kind of a bad flu season, which is again not unusual if you look at historical data, which exists for about 100 years now.
So we would have some bad flu season, but after that would be nothing.
It would have gone away.
Well, this is just truly extraordinary and I think what you've said here today is going to open the eyes of so many people to the level of the fraud, the actual literal conspiracy that is behind this and how each of the parties benefits while we the people are utterly being destroyed, maimed, killed.
I mean, exterminated.
Exterminated forevermore.
Some family trees are done because they've lost fertility.
They've had spontaneous abortions.
They've lost even their lives.
They will no longer reproduce.
So this is the pruning, you could say, of the human gene pool, which is overall obviously very devastating to the future of our entire civilization.
Do you have any final thoughts that you want to add here before we wrap this up, Sasha?
I mean, it's been fascinating.
You are, it's critical that people hear you.
And I'll give out your website once more.
Again, I hope you'll join us again.
But what, what's kind of the overall final thought in all of this?
Yeah, I want to tell people that, I mean, just coming back to the good manufacturing practices, that it was bad news, but also some good news, because the majority of these shots turned out to be, you know, either blanks or Something that maybe has a little bit of toxicity, but probably not what was intended.
And so that's why we have this phenomenon of some people saying, well, I had five shots.
In fact, I was just with somebody who is fully masked and had five shots and seems totally fine.
That's how it is.
It's a Russian roulette.
I mean, yeah, you can probably get lucky once in a while with You know, playing it five times.
Well, you can also drive your car at high speed through stoplights and for a while until.
For a while.
Until the odds catch up with you.
Yeah.
Exactly.
So think of it that way.
So some people, you know, you may think, oh, my God, what did I do?
I injected myself.
But if you don't have any adverse events and it's been a while, the most important thing is to stop getting any of these injections.
And by the way, Stop taking any vaccines because we don't have a regulatory body right now.
We have nobody watching over consumer safety.
So I would advise against any injectables at this moment.
Probably start thinking about other drugs that we're getting.
We need some safe supply of pharmaceuticals and that's becoming a huge problem.
But at the moment we have no regulatory body that is looking after consumer safety.
So that's the message for everyone.
Yeah, folks, you're walking through a minefield if you're taking vaccines.
Just as Sasha said, no regulatory authority that's actually functional.
There are no consequences also for lack of quality control in the manufacturing process, which is astonishing to me because, again, if you make peanut butter, if you mess up, you'll be sued.
You could go to jail.
The FDA can seize all your products, all your customer lists.
If you make vitamin C, They can seize all your inventory.
They can force you to issue refunds to everybody who ever bought that vitamin C if one person gets sick.
But if you make a vaccine that kills a million people...
It's perfectly okay under this system.
Nobody's watching out for you except you.
So, Sasha, let me give out your website again.
It's on Substack.com.
Sasha Latipova, L-A-T-Y-P-O-V-A, SashaLatipova.Substack.com.
And I want to thank you, Sasha, for your courage and your intelligence and the scrutiny that you're bringing to this.
I think you're an extraordinary person.
I think you're doing an extraordinary service to humankind.
I'm just honored to have you on.
Thank you so much for joining us.
Thank you very much.
It was a pleasure, because we kind of talked a little bit, but this is a really great interview.
Thank you.
Well, thank you so much, and I hope you'll join us again.
And of course, if you're ever in Texas, you're welcome to come join us in studio as well, if that ever happens, you know, in your travel plans.
But in the meantime, we'll get you back on.
If anything, you want to get out there, you know, you've got a new article, new data set that you think needs to get out, talk to my producers.
We'll get you back on and we'll get the message out there for you.
Thank you so much, Sasha.
Thank you.
I appreciate you.
And for those of you watching, of course, you have our permission to repost this interview on other channels, other platforms.
Of course, I'm Mike Adams, the founder of brighteon.com.
That's our platform.
But again, you can repost it anywhere you want.
And also, by the way, if you want to share this video and you know that Brighteon URLs are banned by many platforms, you can take the URL of this interview on Brighteon and you can replace brighteon.com with freespeechvideos.com and then you can share that.
And so far that is not being censored.
So we have to work around all the censorship here as well.
But thank you all for watching.
Be safe.
God bless you all.
Take care.
A global reset is coming, and that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection