All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 21, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
25:12
Dr. Sam Bailey | Project Veritas and the "VIRUS"
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
A few weeks ago my inbox lit up with Project Veritas and the subject lines.
Usually this is a reliable indicator that a contrived narrative or even a gaslighting operation is being allowed to spread over social media.
While most of my audience could see that the Veritas interview was not even remotely close to providing evidence of a virus, they were rightly concerned that millions of viewers were swallowing the nonsense wholesale.
The episode certainly highlighted how deeply ingrained the belief in the virus is.
In this video we'll take a look at the implications of this belief system and how many of those in the freedom community remain slaves on the plantation, operating within globalist and state-ordained paradigms.
However, there has been a positive development.
Our small group exposing virology's fraud has noticed a change in the air with a recent surge in interest in the no-virus work.
As far as we are concerned, the virus model and germ theory have been completely dismantled.
It's just a matter of time until it becomes more widely known.
If there ever was a devil, the state is in, and you worship it with all your heart and soul.
You pray to it to solve every problem, to satisfy all your needs, to smite your enemies and to shower its blessings upon you.
You worship what Nietzsche called the coldest of all cold monsters, and you hate those of us who don't.
To you, the greatest sin is disobeying your God.
Breaking the law, you call it.
As if anyone could possibly have any moral obligation to obey the arbitrary commands and demands of the corrupt, lying, delusional megalomaniacs who infest this despicable town.
It's time for a quick flashback.
We're not going back far.
In fact, only a week to my last video, Taking Away Your Chickens.
At the start of the video, I gave an overview of Chapter 7 of Virus Mania, Avian Flu and Not a Glimmer of Proof, and the claim that the fictional bird flu could threaten the entire Earth.
These were preposterous claims, even for people who think that pathogenic viruses exist.
Nothing of the sort eventuated, of course, but like other scandemics, such as swine flu and SARS-1, it was building up to the greatest fraud of all, COVID-19.
None of these required the existence of an actual virus.
They simply relied on marketing campaigns, whether it came from Big Pharma, mainstream media, or government-funded institutions.
During the COVID era, the virus gaslighting has been in full swing, with the plotlines including Chinese Bat Caves, Wuhan Wet Markets, Lab Leaks, Gain of Function, and most recently, Project Veritas helping promote the term Directed Evolution.
Sadly, even many in the freedom community continue to swallow the stuff, after only partially waking up to the degree of propaganda going on in the past three years.
Directed evolution appears to be the latest attempt at virus product placement, and many have taken the bait, crying that they've caught them trying to create euphemisms for gain of function.
After all, this came from the mouth of Pfizer executive, Dr Jordan Walker.
And he must be a source of truth, right?
I'll acknowledge that it is crafty using the term evolution, an unfalsifiable hypothesis itself, to imply that a quote virus exists.
Combined with the word directed, it would appear to the uninitiated that a non-existent microbe is being engineered in whatever way they like.
An additional, and unlikely to be purely coincidental factor, is that the term also has other implications, with a 2009 St. Louis University School of Law publication stating, "For transhumanists, directed evolution is likened to the holy grail." Now, while transhumanist genetic engineering is a pipe dream, you've got to hand it to them.
If you're going to make up a narrative, it's a good idea to throw in as many distractions as possible.
Keep in mind that if you attempt to upload a no-virus video by me or Andy Kaufman or Tom Cowan onto a big tech platform, it will usually be shut down in a few minutes.
And you may even lose your account.
But somehow, Project Veritas COVID-19 videos are allowed to reach tens of millions of users on big tech platforms within 24 hours.
Not only that, but their directed evolution story was picked up by the Fox Network.
Now, that footage shows a Pfizer executive called Jordan Tristan Walker.
He is, according to the documents Project Veritas posted, Pfizer's, quote, Director of Research and Development for Strategic Operations and mRNA Scientific Planning.
He's just two reports removed from the CEO of Pfizer, Albert Bourla.
His name is Jordan Walker once again.
Here he is.
Walker may as well be a paid actor.
One of the things we're exploring is, like, why don't we just mutate ourselves so we can create undefined vaccines, right?
So we have to do that.
If we're going to do that, though, there's a risk of, like, as you could imagine, no one wants to be having a pharma company mutating f***ing viruses.
Walker may as well be a paid actor.
He has presented exactly zero evidence that SARS-CoV-2 exists, let alone that it mutates or can be engineered.
We have spent years critiquing the scientific papers and systematically explaining why the virologists have no evidence that any such pathogenic particles exist.
And yet, apparently Walker's little cafe presentation is enough to convince Tucker Carlson, and presumably most of his followers, that this is a smoking gun.
Pfizer's thinking about mutating COVID?
We're not gonna say it to the public.
We're quoting.
One of the things we're exploring is why don't we just mutate it ourselves so we can preemptively develop new vaccines?
Now, what does that sound like?
Does that sound familiar?
Well, it sounds a lot like the gain-of-function research you read about.
The research that was occurring at the Wuhan lab just before COVID broke out of the lab and overturned the world and wrecked the U.S.
economy.
No doubt you spotted the propaganda imagery added for good measure.
At this point we would ask, Tucker Carlson provides his scientific evidence for this narrative.
It is clear that this contrived gain-of-function gaslighting is an industry-approved story to dupe those who "know" something was wrong with the other official story.
There are a couple more clips I would like to highlight.
The first is the claim that this story is being suppressed.
Consider the news that did not break today.
Except it did break, as not only was it allowed to spread over Twitter and YouTube, but ironically Tucker Carlson is on Fox, a mainstream network that is one of the biggest of all time and an integral part of the globalist media empire.
Additionally, many of the mainstream media outlets have been covering the story in a frenzy of fact-check pieces.
This one from Newsweek concludes that, We currently rate the claims that Pfizer is mutating COVID As unverified.
They need to keep their audience guessing, right?
Manipulating COVID viruses for profit, imperiling potentially the entire world.
Ah, imperiling the whole world.
As Bill Gates has also warned us.
Bioweapons.
That's a really bad thing that we shouldn't have technology for that.
Sounds like the excuse for bringing in the biosecurity surveillance state Exactly as the technocracy has prescribed.
Here, Project Veritas and Tucker Carlson lend a hand to the promulgation of contagion mythology.
Once again, if either can provide a scientific experiment demonstrating contagion between organisms via a natural exposure route, we would love to see it.
These examples are illustrative because they show that while people get distracted with the talking points that are given to them, they fail to deal with the biggest issue of all.
That is the existence of an actual virus.
The perpetrators of the fraud are not concerned about whether people think that viruses Spring out of animal reservoirs, or leak from laboratories, or are potential bioweapons.
With regard to COVID-19, those are all stories that have been promoted in mainstream media since early 2020, and even before that.
Some of them are pseudo-censored, but investigative journalist Eric Coppolino has documented several of these key corporate media articles in the chronology for COVID in SARS-CoV-2.
Check the link in the description.
It is clear that these background stories were being planted in advance.
The point is that all permitted narratives lead back to the quote virus and it is a smoke screen that keeps people on the plantation.
Talking about viruses in ambush interviews, calling something an institute of virology or filing a patent that features the word virus is not evidence of a virus.
Those of us that take the issue seriously, go straight to the available scientific literature, study it carefully and then point out that there is no evidence of an infectious disease causing particle as they have claimed.
However, many of those that have worked out that the public health officials, epidemiologists, vaccinologists and doctors are deceiving them, do not appear to investigate or understand virology.
The danger of being trapped in the paradigm of an IT is that IT allows debates about face masks, biosecurity, treatment protocols and of course vaccines.
We have gone through the virology material with a fine-tooth comb to reveal that there is no evidence for IT.
Anarchist philosopher and author Larkin Rose wrote that the most dangerous superstition was belief in the authority of the state.
And for many people, belief in the virus stems from a belief in the state and their associated institutions, including universities.
While they may criticize some individuals occupying these state positions and want to see different actors in their seats, They all espouse the same base ideology involving fraudulent germ theory and allopathy.
Even those that hate Fauci don't seem to realize that he is one of the high priests of virology.
Because I represent science.
They attack his promotions of some quote antiviral drugs but do not question his promotions of the HIV AIDS model and other cornerstones of virology.
In New Zealand While people despised the former prime murderer, Jacinda Ardern, she was still bold enough to declare that the government was the one source of truth.
We will continue to be your single source of truth.
Now, where have we seen that before?
Joseph Stalin.
Belief in the invented authority of the state causes most people to obediently follow all of the immoral nonsense that springs out of it.
Hating the messenger is another pointless pastime as they follow the messenger's orders anyway.
As Larkin Rose wrote, their god is state authority.
They are under an illusion that the debate is centred on Democrat vs Republican or Labour vs Conservative.
Anarchists, such as my family, Do not partake in the pointless voting rituals or play homage to the sociopaths that run these scams.
The same issue is at the heart of the virus scam.
Just as they need people to believe in the illusion of state authority, they need them to believe in the illusion of viruses.
As we have pointed out previously, some in the freedom community do know there are major problems with virology, but continue to push the virus narrative because they think it is tactically wiser to focus on a narrower topic, such as disputing the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, or the alleged effectiveness of face masks.
But this is the same illusion as going to the state voting booth.
Why even enter into these downstream issues when it is a contrived paradigm?
The whole thing is fraudulent to the core.
Is the idea to keep drip-feeding the truth so you don't scare the audience away?
I think I'm just going to get a little squirrel to come over to me here.
I don't want to make any big sudden movements.
I'll frighten him away!
I have even seen evidence that leading freedom figures who are exposing the non-health aspects of globalism and population control are actively avoiding the virus existence issue.
It was surprising enough to know that they are aware of the debate, but even more surprising that they choose to gatekeep this information.
To us this is a huge mistake because it goes far beyond the fraud of COVID-19 and will only help prolong the damage that is being done to humanity.
The contagion myth helps propagate unnecessary and filthy practices such as childhood vaccinations.
All the while preventing people from learning about the true causes of illness and how to cure themselves.
The no virus argument is by far the most heavily censored of them all, and for good reason.
It doesn't just destroy the COVID-19 narrative, it destroys all of the narratives that my virus mania co-authors have been warning about for the past few decades.
While people are debating the various distraction aspects of COVID-19, whether it be epidemiology, Face masks or mRNA vaccines.
The wider agenda marches on unhindered in the background.
As the COVID narrative is wound down, a release valve has been opened in the form of a quote, alternative narrative that it was related to gain-of-function work involving magical thinking and viruses.
The people buying into this think the flares and chaff are coming from Wonder Woman's invisible jet.
When we pointed out a long time ago that The invisible jet doesn't exist.
Like the virus, it's simply an imaginary concept that came from a man's mind.
It doesn't matter how many countermeasures are launched at Team No Virus, we don't take our attention off the fraud taking place upstream.
I do not claim to know all the details about the Project Veritas operation or speak as to their motivations.
However, I can see the effects of their actions and they are one of the vehicles keeping millions of people entrapped in the virus paradigm.
While making them think they have found the truth.
For example, Brian O'Shea reported on the Project Veritas incident with Pfizer executive Jordan Walker by stating: "Essentially Dr. Walker said a lot that I think we all suspected, but now we can be pretty sure we knew." This instantly became by far his biggest substat post of all time and was reposted by other independent media outlets.
Unfortunately, this type of coverage springs from reliance on Project Veritas sensationalism rather than any knowledge of virology.
It all comes down to a simple matter.
If viruses exist, why don't the virologists show us a paper that a. follows the scientific method, b. has valid controls, and c. utilizes a methodology that is sufficient to show the existence of a virus.
We are not talking about people getting sick, genetic sequences and proteins asserted to be viral, electron micrographs with arrows declaring that a vesicle is a virus.
We are not talking about genetic assembly exercises from mixed samples, observations of cell death in test tubes or the detection of an enzyme.
None of these require the existence of viruses and all of these aspects and more have been dealt with at length by ourselves and others.
We're talking about the starkly missing evidence that contagious submicroscopic particles cause disease in organisms.
A claim has been made that there are replication-competent obligate intracellular parasites with a genome contained inside a shell.
It's a very specific claim and in return we expect there to be specific foundational evidence.
We have gone back through the historical documents, starting with the first ever alleged virus to be discovered in the late 1800s, Tobacco Mosaic Virus.
Ivernosky didn't perform any control experiments or demonstrate an infectious particle.
And despite the fact that there had been astounding developments in technology by late 2019, none of the papers that came out of Wuhan had valid controls or demonstrated the existence of an infectious particle either.
Like Ibanoski's imagined tobacco mosaic virus, SARS-CoV-2 was a construct that did not exist in nature.
And to avoid ambiguity, it did not exist in a lab either.
We sometimes get challenged by individuals who claim that the virus existence issue doesn't matter.
Although, this has never come from anyone that demonstrates a deep knowledge of virology.
Those who have performed detailed investigations into its history, such as the Perth Group, Stefan Lenker, my husband Mark, Andy Kaufman and Mike Stone, have all revealed numerous instances where fictional pathogenic viruses have been used to control populations, create false demand for pharmaceutical products and transfer billions of dollars from the unsuspecting public to a select minority.
Wasn't 2020 a wake-up call?
That it was the belief in a virus alone that was enough to shut down almost the entire world?
When New Zealand went into one of the severest lockdowns in March 2020, it was reported that approximately 90% of the public agreed that it was the right thing to do, never mind that it was illegal even on their own terms at the time.
The reason they could pull it off was belief in the virus and the state.
Similarly, when they rolled out the toxic bomb laden Cominati vaccine in New Zealand in 2021, people would say that they got the shots because they wanted to keep their jobs or be able to travel or whatever other reason made it seem justified.
But ultimately, whatever excuse they told themselves or others they had been convinced by the quote "authorities" that there was a virus.
I'm yet to meet anyone in the No Virus camp who would accept the poison needle or go along with any of the associated nonsense.
I can't get here to see me.
I'm not here to take.
I'd rather stay in here.
These guys are not letting me film my merchandise.
Oh, you can leave that right here.
I'll talk to you outside.
And you can film, so that's fine.
Why can't I purchase the merchandise?
If they don't want you here, then they can ask you to leave.
They have open to the public.
Yep.
I didn't violate any law.
Okay, but if they don't want you in here... I have a medical condition that exempts you from wearing a mask.
Okay, then show them to me outside.
Well, I don't have to prove anything to you.
Why are you shaking so bad about this?
I'm a little nervous talking to a police officer.
Well, this isn't a big deal, so let's talk about it outside.
If they don't want you here, you're trespassing.
No, this isn't private property.
I have a public right of way.
It's not private property?
They open their door to the public.
Okay, but they don't want you here.
That creates a public right-of-way.
They can't just choose who to serve and who not to serve.
It's discrimination.
Sir, do you want to be escorted out?
I don't want to be escorted out.
Okay, then put your stuff here and talk to me outside.
You're supposed to protect my rights.
Yup, and that's what I'm doing right now.
That's why I want to talk to you outside.
I feel like this officer is not really respecting my position.
He's going to force me not to come back in after this.
Perfect.
So, can I just have your name and badge number?
Yes, yes, yes.
We'll get it outside.
We're going to do that outside.
It's M-F-U-L-U-H-L... Up here.
You want it?
You can have it.
Let's go.
2-9-0... Hey, hey, don't push me.
Don't push me.
Hey, hey.
Stop pushing me, man.
You're not going outside.
You don't have a reason to use force.
I didn't use force.
Believe me, if I used force, you would know.
No store can make a policy that violates the law.
Okay, sir, do you have any idea that we're in an epidemic?
No city can make a policy that violates the law.
What's it say right there on the door, sir?
Just read that to me.
That is not law.
What's it say on the door, though?
It is law.
What if they put on the door that you had to wear lipstick to enter?
Can you not read it?
What's it say on the door?
I can read.
Okay, what does it say?
I'm asking you, what does it say?
I'll read it to you.
All customers are required to wear a mask covering both mouth and nose when entering the store.
Were you doing that?
What if they put on their... Were you doing that?
You're not answering any of my questions.
Were you doing that?
No.
Okay.
What if they put on there you had to wear lipstick to enter?
Okay.
Would you be here kicking me out if I wasn't wearing lipstick?
No, but we're not in Fantasyland either, okay?
I'm not in Fantasyland either.
What if everybody walked in the store and said, I'm not wearing a mask because I have alopecia?
Is it your job to enforce the law?
I am.
Tell me, what law am I violating?
The executive order is not a law.
It's not passed by the legislature.
You have no authority to uphold an executive order.
So tell me what law that I'm violating.
You're trespassing.
You're not complying with a store policy, so therefore you can't be in the store.
These stores that are telling you that you can't come in, they are breaking the law.
And when they tell you that it's their store policy, it doesn't make it lawful.
The government knows that it can't make these laws, so it's using the stores as the law enforcement to do so, by design.
- Wow, you gotta dance around like that.
- You know, it'd really help if you take off the mask.
- Have fun leaving, guys.
- I would say.
- But I'm outside. - The governor made a law, the governor's new law, the governor's mandate.
It is not possible.
It is not possible and it did not happen.
Thanks for fighting for our rights officer.
Great job.
Like most countries around the world, New Zealanders accepted their own enslavement, and most even went along with a two-tier society without a whimper.
So you basically said this is going to be like, almost like you probably don't see it like this, the two different classes of people if you're vaccinated or if you're unvaccinated, you have all these rights if you are vaccinated.
That is what it is, so yep, yep.
While the average person has no idea that questioning the existence of viruses is even a thing, Those in the so-called freedom community should know better.
If you follow Project Veritas, or Tucker Carlson, or Joe Rogan, or Dale Bigtree, consider asking them why they keep asserting that there is a virus.
Ask them why all their advisors and guests don't talk about the monumental scientific fraud and checkered history of virology.
Ask them why scientists who had nothing more than cellular debris in test tubes were given Nobel Prizes for telling the world they had found viruses.
The good news is that we've noticed a change in the air recently and the no virus position is starting to hit critical mass.
The cat is out of the bag and now we're about to enter the next phase with the question Who is prepared to step up and defend the pseudoscience of virologists?
Who is going to claim that they followed the scientific method and performed valid control experiments?
The virus is an imagined construct that has a very real effect as a potent tool of fear.
Those that are wielding it are damaging humanity, whether intentionally or not.
We encourage anyone doing so to consider a move away from this and into our world.
One where we don't pay homage to corrupted science or pray to false gods.
▲
Export Selection