All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 6, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
59:13
Truth vs. NEW$ PART 1 (5 February 2023) with Brian Davidson and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Folks, The Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I'm Donald Grotton, your host and producer at JD.ConsultantsAtLive.com, and this is February the 5th, Big Five today, and we've got a terrific show with some special guests that are really hot, and Jim Fetzer is our main man, who is the most dangerous man in America.
Why?
Because he's told the truth, and he's published it, and people can't refute it, and they're scared of him.
So that's good, but Jim, why don't you introduce our special guests today?
Well, thank you, Don.
We're delighted to be joined today by Brian Davidson, who's a licensed private investigator in Texas, who's done brilliant work on Buffalo Uvalde and even Sandy Hook, and by Chris Weinert from Florida, who's a longtime commentator on political developments and foreign affairs.
Delighted they're here to join us.
We begin with a balloon fiasco.
Very, very strange events going on here, where exactly what's taking place is not at all obvious.
Chinese balloon could be a dry run to deliver a nuclear EMP device, for example.
Some are concerned.
The high-altitude surveillance balloon traveling across the U.S.
could be a dry run for a nuclear device that could wipe out America's political grid, according to a leading expert.
China's balloon flyover is clearly a provocative and aggressive act, said Air Force Major David Stuckenberg, who once led the DoD EMP Task Force.
Most likely a type of dry run, Mint has sent a strategic message to the U.S.
We must not take this for granted.
He wrote a paper in 2015 that high-altitude balloons would be the easiest way to resource, equip, and launch a nuclear device that would act as an EMP to dismantle the U.S.
power grid.
Though some aspects of balloon equipage are potentially difficult to resource, few elements that are required to create or launch designs are either monitored or regulated.
Indeed, A high-altitude balloon could be designed, created, and launched in a matter of months.
There's nothing to prevent several hundred pounds of weapon material from being delivered to that altitude.
He wrote, The U.S.
needs a deeper understanding of the potential of adversaries to use low-tech strategic delivery options such as balloons.
An unwillingness to exploit noble and less tactical approaches to weapons of mass destruction and weapons of mass delivery, or to cast off Cold War dispositions concerning strategic threats, could, similar to Pearl Harbor, allow an enemy to inflict deep trauma.
The Chinese balloon over St.
Louis said we reported to have a radiation payload.
Very, very troubling.
The Japanese were reminded to use balloons to disseminate chemical and biological weapons during World War II.
A NORA air model shows a Chinese spy balloon is expected to traverse the U.S.
heartland through the Midwest and southern states before heading out to the Atlantic Ocean, passing over the U.S.
Navy base at New Bordeaux, Virginia.
Mine refused to shoot it down, however, but Blinken canceled a trip to Beijing in protest.
Here's a model from weathertiger.substack.com.
Given the sightings of the spy balloon near Kansas City around noon CT, the most likely path it will take this weekend is across the Mississippi Delta and deep south, reaching the southeast coast by Sunday evening.
Probably will be drifting across Florida offshore by Monday.
Author and researcher Andrew Huff tweeted that the Japanese used balloons in World War II to disseminate chemical and biological weapons.
He tweets, the Chinese are testing our response.
Why Montana?
Chemical and biological weapons can be used to incapacitate ICBM crews deep underground via ventilation.
Here's another.
The idea that Chinese need a balloon to conduct reconnaissance on nuclear missile facilities is a false narrative.
They have space vehicles, satellites, and human intel.
It is a test of capability, a test of adversarial response, or a coordinated destruction.
Fogu was an incendiary balloon weapon, Wiki writes, deployed by Japan against the U.S.
during World War II.
It was about 33 feet in diameter, carried a payload of two 11-pound incendiary devices, was a 33-pound anti-personnel bomb, was intended to start large forest fires in the Pacific Northwest.
Between November 44 and April 45, the Japanese launched about 9,300 balloons from sites on Honshu, about 300 of which were found or observed in the U.S., some in Canada and Mexico.
They traveled at high altitude, high-speed currents over the Pacific, today known as the jet stream, using a sophisticated ballast system to control altitude on their three-day flights.
Despite high hopes for operation, they were largely ineffective, Due to damp condition and malfunction, causing only minor damage and six deaths from a single civilian incident in Oregon in 1945.
The Fugu balloon bomb was the first weapon to possess intercontinental range, however, its flight being the longest range of attacks in the history of warfare at the time.
I tweeted, This balloon is passing over nuclear missile silos across the nation.
They use chips made in China.
Could it be neutralizing them and thereby depriving the U.S.
of its ability to launch ICBMs or else turn them into duds?
This is as serious as it gets.
Brian, your thoughts?
Okay, so if I'm understanding this whole balloon situation correctly, we've been messing with high-altitude balloons, getting satellite footage for years and years and years, dating back to 1945, to do other things with balloons.
Here I found an article this morning from The Guardian, dated August Second, 2019, the Pentagon is testing mass surveillance balloons across the United States and it's it's a pretty long article that says the US military is conducting wide area surveillance tests across six Midwest states using experimental high altitude balloons Documents filed with the FCC reveal.
So if you're ever wondering how you get those nice Google Earth, that nice Google Earth footage, when these supposed space satellites are 150 miles above the Earth and yet they see so clearly, maybe it's possible that we've been doing mass surveillance and plotting and getting satellite footage for years using balloons.
So why are we all of a sudden, somebody sees a balloon And maybe we're seeing the same one over Montana that we're seeing the same one other places, but people have been seeing balloons for years and it hasn't hit the mass media.
But all of a sudden, hey, bad China is here and they're doing and they're going to deliver nuclear weapons and they're going to deliver an EMP and China, China, China, China, China, China, China, China.
You know, this feels like a psychological operation.
I'm glad that somebody got some footage of the balloons.
I'm glad that they saw what was there, but blaming it on China when it very well could be one of our own military or our own military subcontractors that had put the balloon up there is one of the only things that makes sense.
Why shoot it down over water?
Why not shoot it?
Oh, is it possible that a civilian, if it shot down over land, is going to roll on out to it and read the writing from Noah on it, you know, and prove that it's not Chinese.
Look, I think the whole thing is dumb.
China can do, you can do a lot with satellite images.
I guess what you're asking is, is China picking up some sort of sophisticated signals intelligence that's going to give them something that they don't already have?
Well, A single spy in the United States using Wireshark and some other things can pick up a lot more information and pass it right back to China just as easy from the ground.
So I have a feeling that we're being played into a system where somebody's trying to start a fight and this whole thing doesn't make any sense to me.
Chris, your thoughts?
Oh yeah, no doubt, I agree.
It does seem to be quite a sensationalized Hegelian stagecraft tactic.
A scare tactic maybe, or an extortion thing like in the Cold War where they have the nuke things and all these test things.
The EMP thing, in my opinion, could be far more dangerous to some than an actual nuclear explosion.
I mean, the way some of these people get locked into these DARPA weapon digital devices, it's pretty amazing.
You know, another thing I'd like to point out is I think this is also an attempt to misdirect the focus of the audience, no doubt, away from certain other things that may be running in tandem in terms of below the surface of war.
But we are, I think, at war in some way, shape or form, whether it's intellectual property or whether it's technologies gone awry or things of that nature.
The COVID-Vax 5G rollout, all in tandem, has seen rather large population centers dying unexpectedly and even people on their own.
The 5G rollout, the DARPA weaponry towers, everywhere they're stationed, they seem to have these mass casualties coming to fruition.
And I think there could be something involved with the Graphene, the Neuralase, the 5G, and the GMO stuff all together, too.
You know, in a factory at Big Pharma, too, and all that stuff.
You know, you're basically going to see a Thriller video break out at Walmart.
And it's pretty bad, you know, because this zombie apocalypse thing seems to be coming to fruition with a lot of people sleepwalking, not even aware of what's going on around them, and focusing on this balloon thing.
This thing seems kind of, I don't know, archaic in terms of military technology, but maybe there's, you know, I guess lesser things that have caused more damage, whether you're talking like infested carrier pigeons or merchant ship rats.
But in my opinion, you're seeing a next level biowarfare weapon and technology rollout of warfare, in my opinion, that just exceeds plague warfare of the medieval times times 10 with the technocratic capacities that are involved here.
And I think this is really nothing but the EMP thing is real.
And if that happens, it could be a major threat to a lot of things.
And I think it's a way for Congress to get a lot more money for their budget, too, from creating this type of fear.
And I don't know.
That's just my opinion there.
What are your thoughts?
Don, yours.
Real quickly, I just want to insert that I did an Always Pursuing Truth show yesterday with Dr. Greg Forbes, a military doctor who was working with the balloons about 20 years ago.
He had a lot to say on my Always Pursuing Truth show.
It's worth adding here.
God bless.
Go ahead, Jim.
Okay, thank you, Don.
We got more on this.
More on this, Don.
U.S.
shoots down Chinese spy balloon.
China threatens a response.
U.S.
military shot down a suspected spy balloon off the Carolina coast Saturday after it traversed sensitive military sites across North America.
Notice, after it traversed sensitive military sites across North America.
China insists it was an accident involving a civilian aircraft and threatened repercussions.
China responded it reserved the right to take further action and criticized the U.S.
for an obvious overreaction and serious violation of international practice.
Its Minister of Foreign Affairs said China will resolutely uphold the relevant company's legitimate rights and interests, at the same time reserving the right to take further action.
Finally issued the order but wanted the balloon downed even earlier.
Advised the best time would be when it was over water.
Military officials determined bringing it down over land from an altitude of 60,000 feet would pose an undue risk of people on the ground.
But that's ludicrous.
It's potentially posing a threat to the national security of the United States.
$330 million now being supplemented massively by invading hordes.
And the idea that you might lose a dozen or a hundred people from shooting it down instead of putting the nation at risk is frankly absurd.
This was not a military calculation.
This was purely political and raises serious questions about the integrity of the whole event.
The presence of the balloon dealt a blow to already strained U.S.-Chinese relations.
They successfully took it down, and I want to compliment our aviators, Biden said.
They decided without doing damage to anyone on the ground, as though that would have been a big deal, would be when it got over water.
They successfully took it down.
Biden added, The officials had told him, let's wait for the safest place to do it, which, frankly, is simply silly.
The giant white orb was spotted Saturday over the Carolinas as it approached the Atlantic coast.
An F-22 fighter jet, we are told, fired a missile at the balloon, puncturing it when it was about six miles off the coast near Myrtle Beach.
Here we have the New York—the anti-New York Times questioning the whole account.
New York Times reports U.S.
shoots down Chinese spy balloon off the coast of the Carolinas, but here's what Mike King has to say.
A saga of the Chinese spy balloon, allowed to traverse the entire United States at a glacial pace before finally being popped, went wall-to-wall on the media.
As Trump and Conservative Incorporate called for the weak character playing the role of Joe Biden to shoot it down, the admin and establishment press had also expressed concern over the ongoing event.
The alleged Secretary of State Antony Blinken cough cough in counseling his planned trip to China caused the surveillance and irresponsible act and clear violation of U.S.
sovereignty and international law.
But why was this balloon such a big deal?
Above 60,000 feet is generally considered, in essence, not law.
To be beyond, National Airspace Enforcement and satellites can do this surveillance work legally anyway.
Even Google Earth is accessible to all.
Surely, every space-capable nation by now has the capability to survey every square inch of each other's territory.
What was all the commotion really about?
And you can see there was a lot going on here.
Much Ado About Nothing, Blinkin' Counseling, Trim, Are We Gonna Start Shooting Down Surveillance Satellites, Too?
Jordan Cruz Shred Biden Over Suspected Chinese Buy Balloon By Comparing Him To Bas West's Weakness.
Why's Biden Letting China Off The Hook?
Asked Jim Jordan.
Biden admin tried to hide Chinese spy balloon from American public.
Biden's weak response to China's surveillance balloon, a green light to bad guys, says Mike Pompeo.
One smells the fishiness of this drama.
The first logical question to ask, who benefited from balloon doom?
The corollary would be, who was left the most damaged by this event?
The answer to that is objectively obvious.
As Trump, the Republicans, and the shrill voice of conservative-incorporated punditry called for the balloon to be popped, The Fall Guy character Joe Biden, who could easily and without repercussions have shot it down very early in its voyage, refused to do anything about it until it had already reached the Atlantic.
The man in the mask came off to Normie Dumb as a late-reacting, pathetically paralyzed spanked ass in the pocket of the Chinese.
Because this had been a White Hat setup, perhaps in collaboration with White Hat Z, who is fighting his own Shanghai Deep State, to lay the groundwork for exposing Biden's status as a deal-making crook beholden to Chinese paymasters, and hence, powerless to confront China.
As GOP mega-Jim Jordan rhetorically asked, why is Biden letting China off the hook?
Another online commentator put it more colorfully, China's got Joe by the balloons.
One month prior to the rigged election of 2020, Q clearly indicated a Biden crime family corrupt and blackmailable past dealing with China and also the Ukraine would be used to take him down in office.
This balloon drama, specifically Biden's strange paralysis regarding it, would certainly fit such a scripted happy ending.
In consecutive Friday posts from his true social account, Trump, whose image now wears quill and non-associate red, white, and blue facial war paint, referenced China and Ukraine.
Two posts from October 2020 told us in advance Trump would lose so Biden could be destroyed as a sitting president.
This being blackmailed by Ukrainian-Chinese oligarchs serving as a triggering event.
Frankly, the idea of Trump deliberately losing to take out Biden is absurd.
Given the damage being done to the United States in the years he's been in office.
Boobus Americanus at the water cooler?
I read the New York Times the day the Biden family shot down that Chinese Y-balloon off the coast of Carolinas.
Boobus Americanus, too.
He should have shot it down in the very beginning.
They already collected the data they wanted.
St.
Sugar, that's what Trump would have done.
Boobus USA!
USA!
USA!
Editor, BalloonTube probably dropped Biden's already slow-dripping approval number down an additional point.
Let's see what the next act is.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, again, the The old boogeyman here is China.
Who says this is Chinese?
Why did we come out?
Our Pentagon does a news conference and says it's Chinese.
Now all of a sudden we know it's Chinese.
They were tracking it the whole time.
And if this thing was at such a level that we could have flown up there with a Cessna and hit it with a handheld laser or a bullet, Anybody could have taken it out, so what's the problem?
Why keep us away from it?
What's the problem?
And again, I feel like this is the classic boogeyman scenario.
Every article, every headline in every state-controlled media newspaper outlet says it's Chinese.
Is it possible that the Chinese are being used as the fall guy for something that's already being set up to take the focus off of a number of other issues?
And of course, big ones include the VAX, big ones include what's been happening in Russia, big ones include what's been going on with Joe Biden and Hunter Biden's laptop, you know, serious issues that we're concerned about.
And now we're worried about a damn balloon.
It just doesn't, nothing about this makes any sense at all, except that it's like a massive voice just saying Chinese, bad China, bad China, bad China.
Anybody who's got a brain on their, on the, in their mind, on their shoulders can understand that everybody's got satellite images of everybody else.
I mean, you could log into Google Earth on your computer and get satellite images and pretty much document every square foot of land here in America.
I can take Google Earth and find historical footage going back years and years and years.
It's there.
There's no big problem with it.
And from the ground, there's all sorts of image capturing systems out there that can be accessed even by me and others, police forces and private investigators.
I can follow your vehicle, find your license plate, track you down.
I know where you've been.
I know where you're going.
This is what we do for a living.
This thing doesn't make any sense to me.
I'm not giving it any credibility.
I really don't even want to talk about it because I just feel like it's a distraction from the most important issues, which is what's really happening in this country.
Really?
Yeah, no doubt.
Great, great points.
You know, like I mentioned earlier, I do think that this is another scare tactic to get a lot of money, whether it's for like cybersecurity or to enhance the already overwhelming digital surveillance or economic surveillance that's currently being subsidized by the taxpayer.
and abused by its government in the private sector.
I have to also say that if you look at the track record of the people that are giving this lie out about China, trying to send us to war with them, they did the same thing with COVID in my opinion, and they were directly responsible for that.
They tried to foist it off on China as well.
I think you're seeing really in his Braley proxy warfare that's trying to be set up here through these failed diplomatic relations and these over sensationalized nothing burgers.
And even the things that are not being talked about, more importantly, like the BRICS and many other things, there's an economic warfare that's going on right now.
It's not only them against us, but even within their own ranks, I think there's some sort of a schism amongst what they're trying to do with the next direction.
Man, I don't know.
I'm saying with a government or a Federal Reserve like this, who the hell needs more enemies?
I don't know why we're trying to get all whipped up against China, in my opinion.
They were basically the people that made our stuff at Walmart a few years ago, and now they seem to have struck a bad vibe somehow.
And I don't think that COVID thing is the thing.
I think that is something entirely different.
I think that was a failed attempt in terms of enforcing the Koh Hong system on the Chinese people through Hong Kong and the David Rockefeller's Red Army, as you might say, whether it's in Moscow or Beijing.
I think we're seeing the same thing happening around the world.
People are starting to wake up to this and maybe they're having a little hard time explaining this in these different regional zones that they have departmentalized the way they do some nation states.
So we're all debt slaves to the same group of bankers, you know, somehow or another.
Everybody's a feudal debt slave in this situation.
And as I mentioned before, the track record of these guys, whether it's the digital surveillance or economic surveillance, or the money that goes behind this in cybersecurity, the fluoride, the nanofluoride that they put on, the BPAs, the GMOs, the COVID facts, the 5G, all this stuff, like I say, this is an act of warfare, more against the citizens, and it's being guised and misdirected as some sort of a conflict with complete strangers, debt slaves, you know, across the world.
Yeah, I don't know.
I think people need to start looking at the big picture of what's going on here in terms of this.
And I'd like to maybe give people a homework assignment if I might while I'm here.
Read or go with audiobook on the U.S.
Money vs. Corporation Currency by Alfred Owen Crozier.
And that was written in 1912, I believe it was, right around right before the institution of the Federal Reserve.
And also look up Louis McFadden's speech as impeachment of the Federal Reserve and of President Hoover.
Things you won't really find too readily around YouTube or Google or anything like that, but you should.
And I think this stuff will start to make a lot more sense.
And certainly this ridiculous Chinese balloon is nothing more than a distraction.
Excellent.
Excellent.
While others share Brian's concern, in particular Jim Stone, I now have solid proof the balloon belonged to the Pentagon and was a wag the gog.
Now I'm proven.
The balloon was self-detonated, not shot down.
If you watch a video up close, the charge on the balloon itself detonated and released a payload.
Then a full 14 frames later, the payload exploded.
Auto-destruct was used to make damn good and ensure the payload sank.
Watch a video of the shoot down.
There should have been an obvious missile trail, complete with finer maneuvering swirlies as it did the final approach on the way to the balloon, and nothing got within a mile of it.
Frame by frame makes it clear there were two explosions 14 video frames apart, a separation charge, and then a payload detonation.
It's totally obvious it self-detonated.
And just like Osama, they buried it at sea.
You mean to tell me they let the thing go all the way across the U.S.
only to shoot it down six miles after it left the American coast?
Did I say six?
Why six?
You should be very suspicious of a story's accuracy when anything comes up.
Here's why.
There's six points on the Israeli star.
Oh.
Meanwhile, here's irrefutable proof the balloon was American.
Here, before the first charge went off, the separation charge to ensure the payload does not stay connected.
14 video frames later, the payload explodes.
Why would auto self-destruct have a separation charge?
To make damn good and sure what was left sank and not kept floating by whatever was left of the balloon.
Obviously, auto-destruct was used.
There was no shoot-down.
If that be the case, it proves the balloon belonged to America's own DoD.
How could China blow it up right when a shoot-down jet approached for a show?
Obviously they did not.
The destruction was perfectly timed by America's own Department of Defense.
I've said it before and I say it again.
The entire charade was to wag the dog to cause Americans to not spread the bust of the Pfizer director.
That story was big enough to need big-time action to shut it down.
New Veritas video release.
Same Pfizer director talks about the Vax wrecking menstrual cycles.
Project Veritas breaking.
Pfizer director concerned over women's reproductive health after COVID vaccinations.
There is something irregular about their menstrual cycles concerning the vaccine shouldn't be interfering with that.
It has to be affecting something hormonal.
The balloon was an American launch distraction hoax, so just like Osama, they buried it at sea.
Could not have been a better distraction from Visor Veritas.
Perfect.
ChatGPT slipped up and gave a probable reason for the recent chip shortage, by the way.
That an enormous pile were taken and put into AI systems to spy on us.
I found this on a website that bans people from mentioning the site, which I used then without giving credit or linking.
Fair is fair.
I asked this.
Okay, but that's for running on a fully trained unit that one person or company was using, but you were using in the capacity that the way a Google search is used for households asking questions across the world.
It would create a ship charting.
OpenAI said, yes, that's correct.
If GP3 and its variants, including CHAT-GPT, were used on a massive scale like a search engine serving billions of requests every day, it would require a significant amount of computing resources.
The demand for hardware would be extremely high and could potentially create a shortage of GPUs, TPUs, or other specialized hardware.
The balloon is a probable hoax launched to distract with a Project Veritas visor bust.
It looks like it's a donated balloon from Google's abandoned Project Loon.
Look it up, I swear.
I think we're being played and the Chinese admission was probably a deep fake.
Meanwhile, huge explosion over Billings, Montana.
The Pentagon says no, but it's not a credible source.
Supposedly done by a fighter jet, and I saw footage looking what appeared to be one coming down.
Well, the balloon is not over Montana anymore.
The Pentagon is saying it did not shoot down the balloon over Montana.
People on the ground say the huge sky explosion was definitely done by the Air Force.
No good video of the actual explosion yet.
Update!
Now the mainstream is saying China targeted the Wyoming nuke sites.
It's not possible to target anything with a balloon.
Balloons just go wherever they go and cannot do predictable missions.
The storyline is stinking worse and worse.
The only way a balloon showed up at a nuke site is if it were launched right by it, and then they predicted it could go the first 50 miles accurately.
Who really launched it?
An abject hoax.
End of discussion.
Here's the Veritas video they're worried about.
I don't know about the menstrual cycle, so... We will have to investigate that down the line.
Yeah.
That is a little strange.
Interactions shouldn't be occurring with alcohol.
It shouldn't?
It shouldn't, no.
But is it?
There's something happening, but we don't know if they're... Well, I mean, you're a urologist, so you must understand, like, what's going on with it, right?
Like... That's why I always say that it's weird.
I hope we don't find out that, like, there's somehow this mRNA, like, using the body, and then, like, Well, there's more to it, but that's enough for us.
Well, there's more to it, but that's enough for us.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, the first story was about somebody saying it was a hoax.
I would tend to agree with them.
It's nothing.
There's nothing here related to the balloon that concerns me.
Like I said, I did take a look at the video that the lady shot from her backyard in Montana.
There's no reason to believe that video is not authentic.
She was asked multiple times by multiple different news agencies if she could run with it.
Twitter did tend to get rid of or at least suppress the video pretty well.
The commentators are like, well, that's interesting.
But I've seen explosions here in Houston over in the air.
I know that they happen all over the place.
I can't always explain them.
I don't know what's going on with it.
I think this would be an interesting question for a pilot that flies at high altitudes to simply ask, do you encounter balloons frequently when you're up there at those altitudes?
And they might say, no, they fly at 60,000.
They fly at different altitudes.
You know, normal jetliner, I think, is between 35 and 50,000 feet.
and And I would think that these satellite balloons with these mega cameras are probably running close to 50 60,000 feet above where the commercial airliners would normally be otherwise there might be a collision.
So I think it's something that the FCC can probably track.
I might pay attention to what MonkeyWorks has to say about it and probably give us some insight into whether or not he can track those or what is really happening with them.
I really, the balloon story just doesn't do it for me.
It doesn't add up, nothing.
Anytime I see the mass media pushing a platform like this, I see just garbage, garbage, garbage.
Now as for the Pfizer stuff, yeah, that's serious stuff.
Look, Those of us who were in the know from the beginning that believed the whole COVID thing was a joke and a hoax, we didn't fall for it right from the very beginning.
Pretty much anybody who understands what a false flag is and who understands how our government operates to deceive us and run psychological operations on the American people pretty much says no to anything that the government comes along and does.
So now it turns out that Pfizer has actually only injected 31% of the United States population and a large majority of those are young people.
There's all sorts of things related to this vaccine and these injections that are hurting people.
The media won't cover it.
The mass media will not do its job.
There's nothing happening out there.
Project Veritas is doing way better work.
And if we had 50 Project Veritas, imagine where we'd be on the truth machine.
So I applaud Project Veritas.
I hope that they continue to get the traction that they need.
But I'm concerned.
I see Twitter suppressing their stories.
I see YouTube continuing to suppress their stories.
I see the typical Google engine machine trying to prevent people from seeing anything that's real out there.
And it's always smoke and mirrors.
It's always look over here while they do this over there.
And I feel the same way about our politicians.
I don't think one of them gives a damn about the United States of America.
I think every one of them are controlled by somebody else.
Chris, your thoughts?
I guess when it comes down to it, these guys get 66% strange number of their advertising revenue from Big Pharma, two-thirds of it, I guess.
And I doubt they're ever going to really come out and talk about, you know, this medically mandated mass genocide that they've forced on, whether it's the COVID 5G rollout, the Vax, whatever else, and many of the other things that they've really gaslighted us with.
Versus a Chinese surveillance balloon, which is pretty much not going to do much harm, I wouldn't think, in terms of the mass scope of the two situations.
Go figure which one they're going to talk about.
Now, I'd also like to suggest the possibility this could have been, given the nature of the surveillance balloon, an effort by Al-Qaeda.
You know, it was definitely ragtag as hell.
It was a Tower 7 trick shot, too, so that was amazing.
You got to tune in to CNN tomorrow and find out who they want us to kill and definitely get back to you there.
It to me seems more like the War of Terror and many of the other things are a resource grab and certainly like an Israeli eugenicide program.
And certainly in the case of the last 20 years prior to COVID taking hold, it was pretty much a A Middle Eastern drone holodomor, I guess would be the way to put it.
You know, where they were drone striking at will, anybody that was a potential al-Qaeda, whatever, anybody that was a resistance to the Ra-Child resource grab, and basically they were an enemy and a terrorist, and certainly relegated to the dustbin of history, and eliminated in most cases under this pretense.
So, amazing to see these people pivot and turn to the COVID thing, and then after that fails, now it's China.
I don't know what else they're going to come up with next.
You know, and really, I don't really want to keep tuning in to CNN to see this is this is pretty important.
And I wonder when the American people are going to start to realize this and certainly maybe do something about it, because I think their contempt for the common man becomes more and more painfully obvious with every new stunt, every obvious hoax, every every shameless gaslighting campaign or relentless shame based peer pressure tactic that they try to apply on every every shameless gaslighting campaign or relentless shame based peer pressure tactic that they try to apply on us with some sensationalized act of violence or
It is an absolute abhorrent joke and I hope that people will come together and realize that a war has been waged and it's certainly not nation versus nation.
Great points.
I think the strongest argument it was a hoax is that the DoD didn't shoot it down immediately.
If it had been of Chinese origin, that would have been the thing to do.
They, in fact, allowed it to transit the entire nation and become a massive distraction.
You got a four-star general who's pretty upset with what's happened here.
Retired four-star general Jack Keane shared his frustration with the current admin on Fox.
Robin, to comment on fighter jets downing the balloon off the Carolina coast, he expressed frustration it took days to destroy.
Senior defense officials said they considered shooting the balloon down, but declined to take kinetic action after Lloyd Austin warned the president about the risk of falling debris, which would have been trivial compared to the threat it posed to national security.
That timeline didn't hold water with Keene.
A Fox News senior strategic analyst believes the military tracked the airship across the Pacific.
In other words, U.S.
had ample time to prop it up before reaching the West Coast.
Here's a part of his interview.
As we're watching this exclusive coverage of this Chinese spy balloon going down there over Surfside Beach, South Carolina, if you could talk to us about what happened in terms of coordinating this to get to this point now, General Keene.
Well, we've had all of our sensors watching this, you know, for some time and certainly our military capability that was going to be involved got alerted.
People have been planning it likely for a couple of days.
I'm assuming the president You know, made a decision within the last 24 hours to take this out.
They probably presented him with a number of options of where the best place to do it.
Certainly heading to the East Coast, which is considerably more populated than Montana was.
It was probably ruled out that they would do anything over land.
If they weren't willing to do it over Montana, they're certainly not going to do it.
On the East Coast of the United States or in transit to the East Coast, and they're taking advantage of obviously doing this safely in terms of civilians.
And it's not a complicated operation, I believe, for the United States military to take a balloon moving at the speed it's moving at and bring it down.
So the coordination to do that and the intelligence to bring all of that together is not a major problem for us at all.
And now, can we recover the sensor package?
That's going to be iffy, given the size of this thing and how much it weighs.
But nonetheless, we finally did what we should have done at the beginning.
Remember, this was approaching the United States over water.
It was approaching the Aleutian Islands over water.
And we had plenty of opportunity To take it down then.
And that's what it should have happened.
We had to be tracking it from mainland China across the Pacific Ocean.
And we had plenty of warning to put together an operation that we are conducting now on the East Coast that should have been done there.
And by the way, we have alert aircraft in Alaska for the principal reason of a penetration coming largely from Russia.
And that's why that aircraft are there.
And they would have been able to respond to this when they approached the United States in the name of the Aleutian Islands.
Now we're doing it on the back door when it's leaving the United States.
It's anti-climatic in that sense, but it still sends a message to China that we're not going to I doubt that very much.
with this nonsense, and hopefully, when our diplomatic team gets back together with China, we really put some cards on the table with them. - I doubt that very much.
Meanwhile, Kevin McCarthy, first, Biden reviews that have entered borders, Now he won't defend our skies.
No doubt a political fallout is going to be massively anti-China.
Meanwhile, the CIA has dropped a bombshell.
China's president has ordered preparedness for invasion of Taiwan by 2017.
CIA Director Burns warns IJP's ambitions should not be underestimated, despite the President saying he's been alarmed by how Russia's military has fared in Ukraine.
This does not mean he's decided to order an invasion in 2020, but is a reminder of how serious and focused is his ambition.
Our assessment at CIA is that Xi's ambition regarding Taiwan should not be underestimated.
Not that the Chinese leader was surprised and upset.
Trying to learn from the very poor performance of the Russian military and its weapons system in the war in Ukraine, which in my opinion is a false description.
The Russian military is beating the hell out of Ukraine.
There's no doubt they have already won the war, because the West and the U.S.
can't even supply the munitions that would be required to continue the war for at least another year or even two.
Read China and Russia signed an agreement for a borderless partnership in February 2022 before the incursion.
Yeah, I think it would be a mistake to underestimate the mutual commitment of this partnership, but it's not a friendship that knows no bounds.
As Byrne spoke, the Pentagon announced a Chinese spy balloon flying over sensitive U.S.
military installations, but decided not to shoot it down because the debris could cause casualties or damage.
Ridiculous!
The competition with China is unique in scale, starting to unfold, you know, in almost every field.
Not just military and ideological, but also economic, technological, from cyberspace to space itself.
It's a global competition in everything.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
ran two war scenarios with China over Taiwan.
The casualties sunk aircraft carriers thousands of dead.
The Pentagon was stunned by the result.
They ran it 24 times to convince American leaders of the devastating consequences of a war that far exceeds the conflict in Ukraine.
Americans are 100% sure the new war is just a matter of time and that it will involve both the U.S.
and Japan.
They gave it the name the First Battle of the Next War to the simulations.
The Center for Strategic and International Studies concluded the Chinese invasion of Taiwan will fail, but at a huge cost to the U.S.
Chinese and Taiwanese soldiers.
Thousands dead, at least two sunk aircraft carriers unleashing Taiwan's navy along with its economy.
The People's Liberation Army planned invasion in 2026 would cause heavy casualties on all sides, namely the U.S., Japan, and Taiwan, though the Allied force led by the U.S.
would emerge victorious.
But a war over Taiwan would leave the victorious in a situation just as crippled as the defeated Chinese.
Their estimate?
The U.S.
Navy would lose up to 20 largest placement warships, about 3,200 soldiers and sailors over three weeks.
China would lose about 10,000 soldiers, 155 military aircraft, and 138 warships.
155 military aircraft, and 138 warships.
Taiwan would lose about 3,500 soldiers and its entire fleet, 26 destroyers and frigates sunk.
Japan would lose more than 100 fighter aircraft and 26 ships.
It said to prevent China from eventually taking control of Taiwan, there must be four constants that emerge.
Taiwan's ground forces must be able to contain the Chinese bridgeheads.
The U.S.
must be able to use its bases in Japan for military hops.
The U.S.
must have long-range anti-ship missiles to strike the PLA Navy from afar.
The U.S.
must fully arm Taiwan before the conflict begins and immediately move it into any theater with its own forces.
In their analysis of the simulation, the experts emphasize the so-called Ukraine model cannot be applied to a Chinese invasion of Taiwan, because with the start of the war, it would not be possible to provide additional supplies to Taiwan from the U.S.
and its allies.
Brian, your thoughts?
Well, I think you got to the heart of the issue there related to the balloon.
It's what's what is going on in China and why are we trying to get involved in this dispute in China related to Taiwan?
I can tell you for certain that ever since Hong Kong took back control of or China took back control of the Hong Kong territory.
I think that was June of 97.
They've been beating the war drums about going back after Taiwan and trying to get return them to the motherland.
And I remember back when I was younger, so prior to 96, everything that I bought cheap goods at the store said made in Taiwan.
Now what does it say?
Made in China.
Taiwan's important.
It's important to China.
But China's got a lot of problems of its own right now.
And I have a feeling that that military strength isn't as strong as we would think it is.
China's major problem is that they're growing out of their youth.
As a result of the one-child policy that permeated their society in the 70s and 80s, they just simply don't have enough young people to take care of and take care of the needs of the older people.
Plus, they've always had terrible, terrible pollution problems over there that cause more people to get sick than you can imagine.
The rivers stink to high heaven.
the place is dirty all over the place.
It's polluted to no end, and that obviously causes sickness and disease.
Now, they have a huge population.
Are they a great military might?
Maybe, maybe not.
I don't know.
I think it's pretty difficult to understand, and they're very careful about spies in China.
They followed pretty much every American that goes over there and they're really careful about controlling and watching and making sure that they don't have any spies over there trying to assess their military right might.
Plus they've got their own internal battles right now related to their Their population, their draconian, heavy-handed tactics related to COVID, welding people into their rooms where they die, the buildings catching on fire, causing protests.
I mean, it's starting to look like the place is coming apart at the seams over there in China, so maybe America's just announcing, hey, it's a good time to attack, or maybe it's a good time to start an engagement of some sort so we're going to have a fake Chinese balloon and we're going to start prepping the American people for the next stage of the war.
You know what this balloon distracted us from?
Bloomberg politics.
U.S.
this is dated February 3rd that's two days ago at 10 56 p.m.
U.S.
is sending Ukraine another 2.1 billion in military aid.
billion.
But we're watching balloons fall from the sky like it's that movie American Beauty where the guy's stupidly sitting in the alley filming a bag caught by the wind.
I mean, this whole thing to me is just a massive psychological operation designed to prep the American people for the need for another war so that the warmongers can continue to gut whatever's left of our machine.
Chris.
Well, yeah, I tell you, man, I wonder how much, if you think about 100 billion to Ukraine directly, how much through Soros and the NGOs for the three or four coups that they try to put forth in Ukraine and surrounding areas and the color revolutions in the early 2000s as well.
I'm Amazing stuff.
You really think about it as well.
Ukraine has lost 40 percent of its population.
They're either gone or dead.
And I tell you, if you think about it, You know what I'm saying?
military contractors could get us to start another civil war over Coke versus Pepsi, while Unilever fuels both sides, doubles its profits, and halves its liabilities, which side would you join and fight to your death for?
You know what I'm saying?
This is something that I think is maybe a little bit simple to explain it, but I think it's the same kind of concept if you think about the forces behind the two offerings, and really who stands to gain and who stands to lose.
So I'd imagine if you did something like that with the Unilever thing, you could probably wipe out 90-95% of the Midwest through the South, Indiana through Georgia all the way west to maybe Kansas within five years.
And maybe Coke would win, but it'd be a tough fight.
But yeah, I'd have to say this is kind of the same thing that you're seeing these PR firms put on McKinsey, Hill & Knowlton, I'd say, I talked about them before a lot.
These guys really create the optics and the justifications, the public support behind these endeavors, these multi-trillion dollar endeavors that we don't have the money for.
We're borrowing to go fight.
So go figure.
We don't have the money to get people off the streets.
We don't have the money to fight abject poverty in the United States, which causes probably more sickness and disease than any of the things that they sensationalize and sell you their solutions for, and that BlackRock has accessorized as well.
You know, they're not interested in that, if you really think about it, unless they're really buying your home through Bright, BlackRock, or Zillow.
And really, they're using our own pensions to fund a lot of these things that they put us into the streets with and to duress with in the first place, whether it's the war on terror, the COVID vax, the All this stuff, if you really think about it.
So I'm seeing an international group of triple agents that are really trying to turn the world's caste system against each other while absolving any sort of accountability or involvement directly with any of this conflict.
They want your kids to go off and fight these battles.
They want your kids to take these vaccines and eat these poison foods while they pretty much wouldn't even take their own offerings.
You know, you look at the Pfizer guy and many other folks that are doing this.
You know, they all justify this stuff under the concept of national security, if you think about it, too.
And that, to me, has become like an abstract art in terms of terminology.
It's like looking at a Rorschach test, you know?
You might see butterflies, but I see the blood spatter from people who fell from Towers 1 and 2, you know?
I mean, people see this thing entirely different, and these guys are using national security to protect their own investments.
Excellent.
own eugenicist engineering devices and many of their depopulating tactics and technologies, which they're developing by stealth and then using them by stealth against the global constituents.
So and it's mostly the ones that refuse to take their economic subjugation, the people that refuse to reside as debt slaves to them.
So this to me, if you really see through the big picture, you can see more what's going on than what they're trying to steer you with on the mainstream media.
Excellent.
Just excellent.
Not to mention the trillions expended to create underground bases and tunnels across the nation and high-speed rail.
Zelensky warns a major Russian offensive is looming.
Surprise, surprise!
Does anyone in the world not know that?
Russia is concentrating its forces.
We all know it's preparing to take revenge, not only against Ukraine, but against every Europe and every world, says a man who's Governing autocratically the most corrupt nation in the world.
A Russian winter offensive has been expected as Moscow reinforces position with 300,000.
In fact, the Ukrainian defense minister claims 500,000 more troops.
Meanwhile, while Russia is yet to launch, Russian and Ukrainian forces have continued to battle out in eastern Donbass, mainly around the Donetsk city of Bakhmut, where the Russians have been slaughtering the Ukrainians they've been losing by a ratio of eight to one, Russian forces have been making gains around the city.
Other Western officials have acknowledged Ukraine has been taking heavy losses and that Russia will take the city.
A future Russian offensive would likely focus on Donetsk.
As a Russian official made clear, their priority is to liberate the Donbass.
The region has been at war since 2014, when the U.S.
backed ousting of former Ukraine President Yanukovych sparked a civil war.
Meanwhile, the Pentagon tells lawmaker Ukraine is unlikely to retake Crimea.
Senior Pentagon officials and U.S.
officials don't think Ukraine has the capability to retake the peninsula, which Russia has controlled since 2014.
Mark Milley said back in November, the probability of Ukraine kicking Russia out of Crimea is not high.
He reiterated on January 20th, I maintain it would be very, very difficult to eject the Russian forces from every inch of Ukrainian-occupied or Russian-occupied territory.
The Ukrainian government was furious with Milley's comments, maintaining kicking Russia out of Crimea is one of their goals.
Even though Ukraine is losing more territory to Russian forces in the east.
Mike Rogers, head of the House Armed Services Committee, declined to discuss the contents of the briefing.
Rogers, however, said the war needs to end this summer.
The U.S.
must rapidly supply its Kiev or upcoming offensive.
The U.S.
might try to put pressure on Zelensky to have a more realistic idea of victory.
That Russia is never going to quit and give up Crimea.
What is doable?
I don't think that's agreed upon yet.
There's going to be some pressure from our government and NATO to convince Zelensky what victory should look like.
That's going to help us more than anything else.
Meanwhile, the U.S.
Federal Reserve is trying to strangle Iraq's economy to hurt Iran and Syria, just the sort of thing we do worldwide endlessly.
Iraq's foreign exchange rate is steadily declining, falling to lows which are severely damaging the Iraqi economy, coming at a time when the Foreign Reserve meant to back the Iraqi Dinar's global position at nearer-term highs.
Starting with the 2003 U.S.
invasion, the central bank of Iraq has remained closely linked to the Federal Reserve.
One of several long-term linkages meant to ensure the U.S.
retained a strong sway over the future Iraqi economy.
The U.S.
regime got in its head that Syria and Iran were using the relatively free economy of Iraq for money laundering—not an unreasonable suspicion, as many Iranians are heavily invested in the Iraqi economy after the damage done to Iran's by U.S.
sanctions.
Much of the harm in Iraq appears, however, inadvertent and related to general U.S.
policy.
Most of the world holds the dollar as a part of its reserve currency.
The exchange rate is thus an important measure of the health of a given currency.
Not so for Iraq.
The Federal Reserve's own data show Iraq's reserves surging to a multi-decade high.
This is absolutely to be expected, as Ukraine were driving up the price of oil, and Iraq's exports are bringing in a lot of cash.
Under ordinary conditions, Iraq's central bank would strengthen the dinar by selling U.S.
dollars.
Concern over money laundering makes this a slow process, however, if you are willing to exchange your dollars for dinars, knowing how hard it can be to exchange them back.
Iraq sending a team of diplomats to the U.S.
to negotiate a more open policy.
No small task, however, since the U.S.
wants to control the flow of dollars in the region.
Leaving the status quo in place, however, seems no solution undercutting Iraq's current government, fueling domestic unrest in a country the U.S.
was hoping to keep us a dependable ally whose policy it could control.
Brian, your thoughts, if we have the time to begin.
Again, we do.
Okay, so I don't have a whole lot of thoughts on what's continuing in the Russia-Ukraine battle except that we're still sending a whole lot of money over there and nobody can really tell where it's going.
If it's true that Ukraine has lost that size of its military, 40% of its population in terms of the military, then they're going to have to rely on more high-tech energy weapons or more high-tech weapons given to them by the United States and other NATO powers.
To continue their struggle against Russia.
I hope Russia continues to grind it out.
They've been doing a good job grinding it out for a long, long time.
I have no desire to continue with this Ukraine war.
I want to see it end.
I'm sorry that our politicians don't see it that way.
But NATO and the US and Western forces are the ones that started all this by threatening Russia on their border with weapons and missiles.
They have the right to defend themselves, just like Israel has the right to defend themselves from what's happening next door.
Now, as for the Iran and Syria, everybody's watching BRICS right now.
BRICS is a big deal.
Will these nations try to leave the U.S.
dollar and the currency behind and break loose to a more mineral-based Currency, I don't know, but it's very interesting to watch how it's happening.
I have a feeling that U.S.
dollar, global dollar dominance and OPEC aren't exactly as attractive as they were back in the 80s and 90s.
Oh, I think the petrodollar is done for BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperative for the future.
Russian rubles at an all-time high and the dollar is going the way of the dinosaur.
Chris, you can begin and then extend further comments after the break.
Yours.
Okay.
Okay, go ahead.
Yes, Feds, you were talking about the Maglev Underground Railroad of the new military-industrial complex.
I almost feel like these guys are, you know, carrying, hoarding a pocketful of Zippos and are watching us rub two sticks together to make fire and keep our families warm and fed.
But, you know, in my opinion, they have the technology to really do away with much of their shakedown rackets that they're putting on, whether it's the carbon thing, the EV thing, many of the stuff.
They have technology far beyond what we're seeing on the monetized market in the public access.
And I think they need to do that either level with us in terms of what they have, whether it's medical technology, life extension, whether it's EVs, whether it's anything like this.
I think there needs to be some degree of disclosure.
Uh, and I think that would be the only way that they can really go forward without really, uh, declaring war on the middle class and the common people, because, uh, they really seem to have taken quite an adversarial, uh, position.
And like you're saying in Iran and Iraq, you know, the money changers, as always, are the ultimate tools of empire, and they are the ones that make or break civilizations and their people within.
So, uh, Yeah, as far as Iran goes, they've been dabbling in zero-point energy lately, talking about that topic a bit.
And many of these are based on knowledge coming from historic artifacts.
So in terms of the Kali Yuga, it might have been right in terms of technology being cyclical.
Interesting stuff.
But you can see what the United States has done, not only in Iraq, Syria, Turkey, Egypt, not only in terms of looting these antiquities and these ancient historic Fascinating.
Don, take us out.
Oh, wow, guys.
Chris and Brian Werbel.
Yes, this is Truth vs. News Incorporated on the 5th of February today.
A lot of hot air in this show, I tell you, but really packed with truth.
I think you'll want to come back for more, right?
▲
Export Selection