All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 24, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:12:10
Transcending the PLANdemic Narrative - Andrew Kaufman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
It's amazing how welcome I feel in this organization, and it was really touching to be honored last night, so I want to express my gratitude for all of the grassroots work that you've done.
All of the self-education and all of the action that you've taken.
And I kind of geared today's presentation to try and give my impression about the efforts that will move us into the new paradigm.
So the title of my talk is called Transcending the Plandemic Narrative.
And first I'm going to discuss the fallacies and the manipulation and the lies that we've been exposed to during this narrative and with a special focus on science and health.
And I'm going to transition and to help educate what is actually true.
How do you figure out what is true and what are the next steps that you can take to become a health sovereign?
And what I'm doing to try and promote this through my efforts.
So let's get started.
So we have another false narrative, one of many that we face in our society at the present time.
But the focus of my presentation today is in the realm of public health.
And what we have, of course, is another round of the false germ theory and virus theory that has been used to bring about fear and manipulation.
And fear is one of the primary drivers of this coercion of the tyranny that we faced.
And you can see how the idea that an invisible particle can invade your body at any time And not only make you sick, but actually threaten your very existence is a very scary proposition.
And it leaves us in a place where we have no ability to control our health.
And we are dependent on the so-called white-coated priests of the allopathic system to come and rescue us and bring us back to life.
But of course, this is not really what's going on.
So, I want to talk about The main fallacy behind the virus lie, which is circular reasoning, and there's a cute little cartoon there that helps you get the point.
But I want to read some more, tell you a little bit more seriously about what's circular reasoning, and this is something that's been known about, obviously, for quite a long time, and we've all encountered it.
cocktail party discussions and family debates, but in this instance, it's being used for manipulation of the world population.
Now, this is also called begging the question, and there's a Latin term for it, Petitio Principii.
But if we go to Dr. Robert Coleman, who wrote What is Circular Reasoning?
in 2006, and I quote, the fallacy of circular reasoning occurs When the conclusion of an argument is essentially the same as one of the premises of the argument.
So your starting assumptions are the same as your conclusions, and there's no rigor in the process of bringing about novel conclusions.
We can also look back to 1905, to James Welton, who wrote the Manual of Logic, Volume 2, Who wrote, to beg the question is to attempt to support a claim with a premise that itself restates or presupposes the claim.
So start off with the claim, and then restate it at the end, and there's your circular argument.
So we can apply this to many aspects of science and medicine, but today I want to specifically look at virus isolation and metagenomics.
And I know that you're a very well educated audience on these topics.
And I know many of you probably attended Dr. Cowan's lecture yesterday where he expanded upon some of the details here.
But I want to show you that the starting premise essentially is that the sick individual has a virus present in their body.
And this is a presupposition without any proof or evidence to support it, but it is the starting point.
And the second premise is that viruses cause the so-called CPEs or cytopathic effects in the cell culture.
Once again, there's been no clear evidence that that is the case, but that is the starting point.
So then, what you do is you take a source where you know the virus is, a sample from the patient, you run it through the cell culture process where you put additives in there, You don't perform control experiments.
And then, a la magic, you observe CPEs.
And of course, the only way you can interpret those is based on your original premise, which is they're caused by the virus.
And that brings you back to your starting point.
So you see, you haven't made any progress here.
All you've done is restated your claim.
Now the same can be said with so-called deep metagenomic sequencing, also sometimes referred to as the in-silico genome.
And here you have a similar premise.
Number one is the same, right, that viruses are present in the patient.
And then secondly, and this is really very arbitrary, that viruses have a genome of a certain length.
Now when it comes to alleged coronaviruses, they say it's 30,000 Base pairs.
So they're going to find something of that length, even though it's completely made up.
So what do they do?
Once again, they take a sample from the patient where they assume there's a virus present, and they further assume, actually, that it's an RNA virus.
They don't even look for DNA viruses at all, as if that wouldn't be even a possibility from their point of view.
So they take the RNA out, But the thing is, there's no strand of RNA that represents the complete genome of an organism in their sample.
All they have are little fragments of RNA.
And the provenance, or the origin of those fragments, is unknown.
But that doesn't stop them.
And what they do is they amplify those fragments using PCR.
Which also compounds the problem because it creates new sequences that didn't even exist in the original sample because of the way that they're using PCR with over amplification.
And then what they do is they sequence all those little tiny little strands and fragments of RNA 150 bases long or less.
So we're talking about pieces of 150 in length when they say the whole genome is 30,000.
So you can see it's a very tiny percentage.
Now, when they do this sequence, they find out, in the SARS-CoV-2 experiment, that they had over 56 million of these unique fragments.
And not knowing where any single one of those 56 million came from.
But what do they do?
Well, they use a computer.
They put those sequences as data, typing them into the computer.
I'm sure it's automated, but you get the point.
And then, the computer puts these things together like a puzzle and makes over a million solutions.
And there's no way to know if any of these solutions represent anything in reality, and I would say that they absolutely do not.
But they just arbitrarily take one out of those million that happens to have matched their premise that the genome is 30,000 base pairs long.
So they took the longest one the computer spit out out of those million-plus sequences and said, This is the genome.
And once again, they've restated their premise that there is a virus in the sample and that there's a genome of 30,000 base pairs.
And it doesn't matter that it was created out of thin air in a computer.
So we have to learn to recognize these types of errors in logic because once we can recognize this, we don't have to get caught up in the details We can see through the false arguments.
And there are many other methods that they use to trick the establishment into believing certain false ideas and premises.
And one that I'm going to talk more about later in this lecture is the lack of applying the scientific method when it is appropriate to apply.
And to determine disease causation, that is certainly the gold standard and really the only known way to determine that causal relationship.
But they also use computer models.
Now, computer models, like I mentioned with the genome, are a way to simulate any reality that you can imagine.
And I actually have experience doing this in the biotech industry, so-called molecular modeling, where they would have a target protein, Like, I was working on inhibitors of thrombin, which is a clotting factor in the blood.
So, in other words, they were trying to develop new blood thinners.
And we would take this model in the computer, and it was very fancy.
It had, like, stereoscopic glasses, and you could see the molecule in 3D.
You could do all these energy calculations and simulations.
But every time you did one of these procedures, you had to make all these assumptions.
You had to put energy parameters, you had to put bond angle parameters, all these things.
Now, how do you know that any of this represents reality?
So what happens is they go through this process.
Now, in drug design, there's accountability because they have to design a molecule that thins the blood and then they can test it and say, does it actually do that?
And what they find is that actually it doesn't, if it's just used based on the model.
Now the models over the last couple of years were primarily used to generate fear.
We all remember Neil Ferguson's predictions from the computer model of tens or hundreds of millions of deaths.
And that sudden fear was used to manipulate people.
So, computer models are also the basis of other fear narratives, such as the global warming narrative, where there's no real evidence from nature, there's no data, or there's very limited data, and they can put anything they want into these computer models and essentially create any outcome that they desire by tweaking the models.
Now of course we have the myth of contagion and this is a big one because this is what is the basis of many of the tyrannical policies and especially of collectivism.
Now how many of you in the audience are familiar with collectivism, the philosophy?
All right, so not enough of you.
This should be a household word, and it's essentially a philosophy that is contrasted with individualism, which is really the foundation of the spirit of our nation.
And collectivism is the philosophy that is behind communism.
And what it states is that the good of the collective, of the community... Can we put those back on?
Please?
I'm boring enough, we don't need to put people to sleep in the dark.
I'm sorry, where was I?
So, collectivism is the idea that the collective, which is ill-defined, right?
It could be like the block in your neighborhood, right?
It could be your city, it could be some abstract concept, but the The safety, the benefit, the welfare of the collective supersedes that of the individual members of that collective.
And this is where the idea comes that you need to wear a mask to protect me, or to protect grandma.
Whereas, under individualism, which we're much more oriented towards naturally, it would be, if I feel it's too risky to go out, that I could get sick, I will stay home.
Right?
I won't take that risk.
Unless I feel comfortable taking that risk.
Or if I want to wear PPE to protect myself, I'll do that.
But I'm not going to worry about anyone else.
Okay?
So you can see though, that if we take the collectivist philosophy, that our individual liberties will quickly erode into nothing.
And we'll be forced to comply with whatever the leaders of the collective determine is best for the collective.
And this is how countries fall into totalitarian regimes.
So this has been played out through social distancing, where strategically people are supposed to remain the minimum of six feet apart, which is almost precisely the length that our human biofields extend out from our bodies, the electromagnetic which is almost precisely the length that our human biofields extend out from
So that means that we can't get close enough to other people to actually have those fields interact and exchange information, which is what we need because, as humans, we are social creatures.
We need, you know, to be in each other's proximity, we need physical touch, right?
We need to have bonds and communities.
And these policies are taking that away, rendering us something other than human.
Now, of course, masks have been a horrible, horrible intervention, and it makes me slightly nauseated whenever I see someone.
Even at this conference, I've seen some of the staff wearing them, and it's hard to see because of what it represents.
And it represents, on one hand, The initiation into this new slavery surveillance system and something that I do not want to be initiated into.
Of course, it also has the problem of blocking your ability to breathe, which is problematic in and of itself.
Now, of course, the so-called vaccines fit into this paradigm as well because Even though there's no possible way it could have achieved this, and now we even have Pfizer itself admitting that it couldn't stop any spread or transmission, which of course doesn't exist anyway.
But it's that collectivist philosophy, right, that you have to get this injection to protect others, not yourself.
Because if it was just about protecting yourself, there would be no requirement.
It would be your personal choice.
So a big part of this agenda, and in my opinion, this is the ultimate end goal, really, of what we faced the last couple of years, is to establish health passports, digital IDs that contain personal information about us.
And this has been established everywhere, practically in the world.
Even in New York State, there was something called, I believe, the Excelsior Pass, which I don't know if How many people signed up?
And largely, we've been very fortunate that so far, there hasn't been mass participation in these systems.
And many of them are essentially defunct at this point, but they are waiting with this technology to reinitiate this.
But the idea is that you wouldn't just have information about this particular situation, your COVID vaccine status, but you would have information about every infectious So you get tested for gonorrhea and hepatitis and syphilis and all these things, and then that information would be on there.
And then they would also do genetic testing, and maybe that you have a mutation that has a risk of developing, you know, cancer or a neurologic disease.
And then based on that information, you would, you know, have access or be restricted from access to various goods and services.
Right?
Like, for example, if you had, let's say, a gene that gave you a predisposition toward cancer, then you might be prevented from buying processed food.
You might be prevented from buying alcohol or tobacco.
And you might say that could be a good thing, but doesn't it have to be the individual's choice whether they want to improve their health or whether they want to continue to poison themselves?
Right?
This technology facilitates and provides a mechanism of accountability for the collectivist policies, especially if it expands to contain the especially if it expands to contain the CBDC, the central bank digital currency.
Now, I know that we heard from Catherine Austin Fitz last night about this topic, and this is the ultimate way to hold you accountable for any health decisions that you make.
It can turn on and off, Your access to your funds and your ability to purchase goods and services and it's instantaneous and very difficult to work around until black markets might develop if this system comes to be.
Of course this will be used to restrict your access to virtually everything in society, right?
And we've seen that happen.
All over the world, the last two years, even without these digital IDs.
And it will be much, much easier to implement.
And of course, they're going to include social credit stores as well.
And according to a whistleblower from Silicon Valley, they already have all of the software running and each of you has a social credit score already.
And they just have not revealed it to us and put it out to the public.
We have a very horrible agenda that directly works against the goals of this organization with Codex Alimentarius.
And this is something that's supported by the globalist agencies, the United Nations, the World Health Organization, of course, the World Economic Forum.
And, of course, if you go and look on the website and superficially read, it sounds like they have good intention.
They want to make sure that Everyone has access to food and has standards to make sure food is healthy and safe.
But that's not what it's about at all.
It's about restricting your access to any food other than what the government wants you to have.
So this is the policy that is behind, for example, going and testing the chickens in people's backyards for bird flu.
And then When they use that false test and show it's positive, they kill all those chickens.
And then they prevent people from raising their own livestock for food.
And this is also going to include growing medicinal herbs.
It's also going to include regular agriculture.
The goal is that you will be completely dependent on the commerce system and the government to meet all of your basic needs, and that you won't have any ability to do that independently.
So essentially, it will put homesteads completely out of business.
And that's the goal.
So let's go a little bit past policies and philosophies and get into the false science.
And I'm going to go through several hypotheses, ideas, proposals.
They're often called theories, incorrectly.
And let you know which of these are outright false, and then I'm going to, after that, talk about what is actually known to be true.
So, firstly, I want to say that the idea that science is consensus-based, where everyone agrees, is anti-scientific.
It's the complete opposite of what science is supposed to be.
In science, you're supposed to always challenge the mainstream.
Because if you can't prove it wrong, then it stands.
But if you can, then you will not be held subject to false information and false understanding.
So, the scientific truth does not come from government agencies.
It doesn't come from academic scientists who are put on a pedestal.
It comes from nature.
And I'll get more into that in just a moment.
Premise number two.
Disease comes from a foreign invader and spreads from person to person.
Every experiment that has been done to try and provide evidence to support this claim has not come up with any positive results whatsoever.
Number three.
Health comes from a pill.
There is no such health condition that could be characterized as a deficiency of a man-made pharmaceutical.
Even the medical establishment itself has published their own data in the Journal of the American Medical Association, showing approximately 150,000 deaths every year from taking prescription drugs as prescribed.
So not accidentally taking too much, not intentionally overdosing, and it doesn't include vaccines or chemotherapy.
So you know that you could probably triple the numbers.
Okay?
This is accepted in the mainstream, but the knowledge has not permeated through society.
Number four.
It's your bad genes or bad luck that made you sick.
That's not true.
It's probably your own actions.
You may not be aware of it.
It's good.
I'm not saying you're bad because you made yourself sick.
I'm saying if you made yourself sick, you can make yourself well.
However, if it comes from bad genes that you happen to be born with, or bad luck that's just, we don't know.
We have no idea what causes diabetes, right?
We have no idea what causes this or that.
That leaves you helpless.
There's nothing you can do about it.
All you can do is go to the system and beg them for help.
Number five.
The body makes bad mistakes.
So, it makes too little hormone.
It makes too much hormone.
Right?
This organ no longer works, like your appendix.
Right?
And we know better, as scientists or doctors, that your body doesn't make enough, so we're gonna make a synthetic version and give it to you to fix your body, because your body's broken.
And that's simply not the way Nature works.
When your body makes less of a hormone, there's a damn good reason for that.
And if you interfere with it, you're going to perpetuate rather than ameliorate the problem.
Number six, the body fails with age.
Dementia is inevitable.
Arthritis is just wear and tear from living.
Wrinkles, cellulite, skin atrophy, loss of vitality.
You're destined to have this and to essentially deteriorate over your lifespan.
And it's not aging that causes that.
It is the accumulation of toxicity over the lifetime.
And you can take steps To prevent it, ideally, if you're young.
And if you're already in this condition, you can make major reversals in this.
I think you've all seen some images of 75-year-old bodybuilders and athletes and people who have taken that to task.
And we're all capable of doing that.
If it's not working properly, simply cut it out of the body.
Now, to perform a surgical procedure and have your insurance cover it and have it be paid for, there is no agency that approves surgical procedures.
Now, we can, of course, criticize that the FDA doesn't really determine that these pharmaceuticals are safe and effective, but at least they do something.
For surgical procedures, there's nothing involved at all.
And so, many, many of the surgical procedures that they do Either have no proof that they're beneficial, or there's actually proof that they're not beneficial.
For example, knee arthroscopies, which are one of the most common procedures done by orthopedists, very lucrative because they're very quick, easy to do right in the office, you don't have to go in the OR and spend a lot of time, and you can churn them out.
It's been shown in placebo-controlled trials.
That there's zero benefit.
Yet, it's still done.
I guarantee that if any of you went to the local orthopedist right now, this afternoon, and said that your knee was really hurting you, they would offer you an arthroscopy.
Now, they also take things out of the body.
One of the most common operations is the removal of the gallbladder, the cholecystectomy.
Is it that the gallbladder just stopped working and it's dead weight and you need to get rid of it?
Do you think nature works that way?
So I've worked with many individuals who've had the gallbladder surgery and it didn't stop the problem.
In fact, it made it worse because now they're missing part of the system that's the solution to the problem that they were having.
Here's what the establishment says.
Natural remedies don't work and are silly and dangerous.
Now, this is really fascinating because even in their own literature, there's a wealth of evidence that they are effective.
So, for example, I'll give you, because this is an incredible example, and this is why I recently offer this as a medicinal product, a Spagyric Cilantro Tincture, because cilantro has been studied extensively in animals and in humans, and it has amazing properties.
So, they poison lab animals with lead, and other heavy metals cause damage and then give cilantro, and not only does it remove the metals, but it reverses the damage.
This is amazing.
Why isn't every doctor using cilantro?
It is shown to reduce seizures in epileptics.
It's shown to improve memory in dementia patients.
It's shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes.
just from a little plant that anyone could grow on their windowsill.
Detoxification is a joke.
Right?
Now there are many people in the natural health space who exploit detoxification as a business model where they give you tons of supplements and say that it's for detox.
But over the last five years when I've been studying natural healing outcomes, Whenever I see amazing results from some kind of protocol, it is almost always a form of detoxification.
So this is an extremely powerful method to regain your health and allow the body to heal.
And the last one I'm going to talk about today is really a doozy.
and it originally entered into the collective consciousness during the AIDS era.
And this is the asymptomatic carrier, the idea that you're perfectly healthy and you feel well, but yet some invalid arbitrary test says you have something in your body that's bad, and so now you become sick and dangerous to and so now you become sick and dangerous to society, even though you're perfectly healthy.
So I want to get into what are the truths that we actually know, and how does this relate to science, and how do you navigate all of this information.
So this is a quote from Isaac Asimov, science does not promise absolute truth.
Absolutely true.
Nor does it consider that such a thing necessarily exists.
That is in the realm of spirituality, not science.
Science does not even promise that everything in the universe is amenable to the scientific process, of course.
We can't apply the scientific method to prove the existence of God, for example.
And many things that we observe in nature are extremely difficult or impossible to design scientific experiments to learn more about.
So we have to understand the limitations of our collective ability to understand the natural world.
To know what we know, we know.
And to know what we do not know, we do not know.
That is true knowledge.
And stated another way from a chemistry professor I had in college, you don't know what you know till you know what you don't know.
And this is very, very important because when you don't know things and you assume them to be true, you can be led down many wrong paths, as many of us have in our life.
So, I'm going to say what we know, according to my best opinion, and what we do not know and how those are related.
So, one thing we know is that science is based on nature.
And that belief, opinion, agreement, consensus have nothing to do with science.
The proof is in nature, right?
If we determine or we hypothesize that clouds are caused by people, children playing on their swing set.
Right?
We can do an experiment and we can determine if that is true or false using the scientific method.
The body is a self-healing machine.
And this is something that we all know and have observed in our lifetime but we have not generalized it to a property of our amazing bodies.
But if we have a laceration on our skin, we can watch it and amazingly the body just repairs it all on its own.
We don't have to do one thing to make that happen.
We haven't created any devices that can do that.
This is a miracle of nature and we have to harness that miracle in order to achieve our optimal health and vitality.
Everything needed for optimal health is available in nature, and that's how it was designed, and that we don't need man-made technologies, chemicals, or other things to achieve health.
Now, sometimes those things may be beneficial, but they're not necessary, because they are not part of nature, and nature has provided everything for us to achieve our optimal functioning and embodiment on this realm.
Now, the law of cause and effect is very important.
It's one of the seven hermetic principles, which many of these apply to science and medicine and help you discern the topic.
So, every cause has an effect and every effect has a cause.
And there are some things that are very important, like, for example, a cause must precede the effect.
It can't occur after the effect.
And that will help you debunk a lot of things just by knowing that law of temporality.
Number five.
And this one may surprise some of you, but humans actually are capable of living between 120 and 150 years.
Now, I don't know if that is the normal human lifespan.
However, there have been populations, small clusters of populations mostly, all over the Earth.
That you can even find information about this from old New York Times articles, where in these communities people live to those ages.
And it's not known at present what distinguishes those communities, you know, what is the fountain of youth, if such a thing exists.
But certainly this is a goal that we could have as we learn to take better care of ourselves and realize that that's our true potential.
Not 80 years old.
Number 6.
Many, if not all, chronic health conditions are caused by man-made toxins and poisons.
Number 7.
We, as individual men and women, are capable of learning and managing our own health.
We do not need to be dependent on experts or others.
Number 8.
DNA is not the blueprint for all life functions.
And we don't really know what is.
But this is an area that could be fascinating to learn about.
And I believe that we can do scientific experiments to get closer and closer to understanding that.
But it's a simple mathematics, as Dr. Cowan pointed out yesterday.
There aren't nearly enough genes to provide all the information to code the proteins in our body.
So it has to come from somewhere else.
Number nine, humans have extrasensory abilities.
And this is something we also intuitively know, because we know that when someone is coming, sneaking up from behind us, If the breeze is running the wrong way and we can't smell them, and there's noise interfering with our ability to hear them, we still perceive their presence.
And this has actually been validated in experiments, some of them done by Rupert Sheldrake, someone who's definitely worth looking into.
We also know about remote viewing.
That was actually a secret government research program at Stanford University, and once enough years had passed since the program was terminated, That through Freedom of Information Act, some of the principles of that research disclosed publicly about it.
What's going on?
And there are even courses that you can go to where you can learn how to do remote viewing.
And what that is is that you can be here And you can essentially, in your mind, visualize what is going on somewhere else on the Earth, no matter how far away it is.
And, for example, this government used this to locate a fallen plane that was carrying top-secret information in Africa.
And what they did is they had an approximate, like, 100-mile radius of where the plane went down.
They put up maps in California where these remote viewers were working.
And they sat around and they did this technique and then they pointed on the map.
And then the soldiers went there and there was the plane.
I want to know there are probably abilities that we have that even haven't been characterized to my knowledge or to your knowledge.
But we have much more potential than we realize.
And I think that the forces that have been leading the world stage have purposely blinded us from these abilities in order that we are easier to control and manipulate.
This is from one of my most important spiritual mentors, The pursuit of truth is your spiritual journey.
And this is how we can start to look at health, biology, and other broader issues in order to avoid being controlled and manipulated, and in order to exert our own authority, autonomy, and sovereignty over the lives of ourselves and our families.
And so, for me, the overarching goals and ideals would be truth, justice, and most importantly, action.
Because us sitting around and talking about this is good, but not good enough.
We have to go back to our lives and we have to embody these principles.
We have to take action, and that's the way change will move in the right direction.
So, we need to stop participating in their system.
So, Stop consuming media from the television, the mainstream, public health agencies.
We need to cancel health insurance.
Stop paying them.
Now, that might be scary for some people because you can envision a situation where you might need the hospital.
Right?
Now, for me, that situation is if my finger is detached from my body and I need someone to reattach it.
If I break a bone and it's so bad it's sticking out of my skin.
Like, those are the situations I would consider going to the hospital.
If I was unconscious, someone might drag me there, of course.
But when you get to the hospital, you are still in control.
So firstly, don't sign anything, especially anything financial, because when you guarantee to pay whatever they ask, that's how you get bankrupt.
That's how your credit goes down the tank.
Because if you ask them like this, say, oh, I'd be happy to sign as financial guarantor.
How much is it going to cost?
They'll say, we have no idea.
Could be $5,000.
Could be $100,000.
Could be $200,000.
Right?
So how can you sign a document when you don't know what you're agreeing to?
Now, if you don't sign, they're still going to take care of you, because if you have a bone sticking out of your body, or your finger is in a jar, then they realize it's not good public relations to turn you away.
So, just stick with it.
Be brave.
Don't let them intimidate you.
And this goes for what they're going to do when you're there, too.
So you might go in there, I want a hand surgeon to reattach my finger, please.
Right?
And they'll say, oh, how about a COVID test?
How about your flu shot?
Right?
You say no.
How about antibiotics?
You can say no to that, too.
How about food?
You're going to eat their poison hospital food?
No, you can say no.
Besides, if you have an injury like that, you'll be wanting to water fast, because that is going to accelerate the healing.
So, you have to be vigilant.
You might need an advocate there with you to block, because nurses might just come in there and pop something in your IV without you knowing.
You have the right, and you can put them on notice, that if they do anything against your consent, that they will be sued, and they will be reported to the licensing authorities and the government agencies, and don't let them intimidate you.
Now, the gentleman who plugged in my computer didn't plug it into the computer, so let me fix this before we run out of juice.
Thank you.
So, So, number three, we need to stop taking pharmaceuticals and vaccines.
And you might think that that's difficult, but it can be done.
And once you get rid of those poisons, then you can allow your body to properly heal and reverse the condition that you were suppressing with those drugs.
And we need to stop going for checkups and stop going for screenings and lab tests because there's never been a proven benefit and that's their way to get you in, to get you to do more and more and more and spend more and more and more.
So, if we're going to exit the system, then we have the responsibility to learn for ourselves what to do.
And this is really where much of my effort is geared towards.
So, in order to take on this, what might seem like a monumental task to someone who's not a trained health professional, and I know that I have a little bit of an advantage here, you have to believe in yourself and your ability to understand and your ability to become healthy.
And that is actually part of the treatment itself.
Because if you can envision yourself returning to health, increasing your vitality, then that will actually come to fruition.
Whereas if you envision yourself as destined to be miserable and sickly, your life, that will also come true.
So you need to start out with this belief and this confidence in yourself and then you need to learn.
You need to learn about nutrition, about detoxification, about Psycho-spiritual issues like trauma, addictions, toxic relationships, existential issues, being comfortable with death, which is part of life.
We cannot escape.
You need to learn what medical supplies to keep in your home to handle any issue, so that you don't have to think, oh, I need to go to the hospital or the urgent care.
Instead, you could say, I can take care of this here.
I have the supplies ready to go.
Once you have this knowledge, you need to start eating real food.
Now, I know I'm preaching to the choir about this one here, but for all of those listening in the virtual space, it's time to make that change and start eating real food.
You need to engage in contemplation.
This is time that you spend with yourself in silence and stillness.
It could be in prayer.
It could be in meditation.
It could just be being.
But this gives space for insight to develop, for connection with nature.
And it is paramount in order to be able to move forward to gain the perspective and the confidence.
Gratitude.
We need to always think about what it is that we are grateful for.
And this flips us from the pessimism, right?
From the loss of hope.
So we need to express gratitude extensively.
If you're overwhelmed with this, there are professionals that can help you get started.
Don't be afraid to reach out to them, but make sure that you're reaching out to someone who is really committed to these ideals.
Discernment.
is a very important skill that you must develop and when it comes to science you have to understand the experiment and how it's done and what it can determine in order to see if the conclusions drawn represent circular reasoning or represent true knowledge.
The scientific method is extremely important in finding the truth when it comes to explaining the cause of a natural phenomenon.
And that could be an illness.
And the scientific method involves some very important aspects that you have to have an independent variable.
And that is the thing that you think causes the phenomenon.
Right?
So that would be the kids playing in the swing set causing rain.
Right?
The independent variable are the kids playing in the swing set.
So, you have to do a control experiment where you take that variable out to make sure there's not something else in the experiment that is bringing about the dependent variable or the phenomenon, like the rain.
Okay?
You have to have... Now, not every type of knowledge is amenable to the scientific method because it's not always about a cause and effect relationship.
There are many things that are descriptive.
Pleomorphism, for example, where you can see these microbial cells changing forms.
Now, you can just observe that carefully and describe it.
And that is valuable knowledge.
But when you do that, you have to be careful that you're not influencing the behavior of those organisms while you're observing them.
You want to be a passive observer.
And that can be very challenging.
And Tom talked about that a lot yesterday.
You have to be suspicious of animal models, especially when they're genetically modified animals, because that's not what's in nature.
Any analytical methods you use have to be validated, and you have to check that and do your due diligence.
So someone was telling me about using some kind of electric device that could tell that the pH inside your cells, in your interstitium, just from this device that was outside the body, is some kind of electronic scan.
So I asked them, I said, has it been validated where it's compared to a gold standard?
Because validation is, does it do what they say it does?
And you can measure the pH by putting a micropipette or microelectrode right into a cell.
So when they do this technique, compare it against that, does it match?
Never done.
So you could just take that analytical method and throw it right out the window and ignore it.
It's not valid.
That's like all of the tests for infectious disease are like that.
You have to be very, very careful of statistical analysis.
We've all seen Bill Gates' favorite book, How to Lie with Statistics.
Realize that statistics gives you probabilities, not certainties.
Probabilities.
So, it can be very useful.
You need to stick to simple tests, regressions, tests of proportion, t-tests, very simple things.
You need to be aware that correlation does not prove causation.
And be very skeptical of anything with a statistical analysis.
That's how all the antidepressants came to be.
Pseudoscience is when you give the appearance that you're using science, but you're not.
And this describes the entire field of virology.
Logic fallacy is something that you need to be aware of.
First written about by Aristotle.
And we talked about circular reasoning as one of those fallacies, but some other examples are ad hominem.
You know, he just wants to make money off you.
He's associated with the Freemasons.
He's controlled opposition.
You appeal to authority.
He's not even a virologist.
The CDC director said it was true, so it must be.
A hundred years of medical experts can't be wrong.
All fallacies.
The Straw Man Fallacy.
Well, if viruses aren't real, then how do you explain herpes?
Separate question.
Burden of Proof Fallacy.
Tell me the proof for your theory that viruses don't exist.
No, it's the other way around.
You're the one who made a theory claiming that viruses do exist.
And I'm disproving you.
And you have to prove your claim.
Root Cause Analysis is key.
Understand the root cause of your health problem tells you how to address it.
Without understanding that, you get it wrong every time.
So, I want to just highlight some things in the last couple of minutes that I'm doing to try to bring about this paradigm shift through my own efforts.
So, one is I'm trying to reach the public and give them an introduction And hopefully some inspiration to look into these issues.
And this is why I collaborated with Marcy Cravat to make a documentary film.
And this is very accessible even to a mainstream audience.
It's not hardcore rabbit hole diving.
I also do a lot of, you know, interviews and put out just general information to the public.
And that is to introduce them to this idea so that they will hopefully become curious and look more into it.
But then I also go deeper for people who have that curiosity and want to learn.
So I'm curating information in a library form.
And people can have access to this and we're adding things all the time and it's not just an archive of my media.
This includes anything that I think is important for the historical record or for your understanding of health and disease.
And I also have a platform where I bring scientists and health professionals other than me, who have valuable knowledge, and we produce educational webinars that are also going to be archived in perpetuity.
And this is really the basis of doing the new science to uncover truths about nature and health.
And Gerald Pollack has been an amazing pioneer when it comes to the role of water In biology.
And I've had many other scientists, John Stuart Reid, Amanda Volner, Eileen McKusick, has been given a webinar on this program.
So, very important information.
I also have developed courses in my own teaching.
And this is my biggest venture that I've done.
I spent over a year working tirelessly on this curriculum, and it's a very comprehensive course.
And it doesn't just teach detox, by the way.
It really encompasses most of the natural healing topics that I have said were important to learn about.
And this is a way that people can learn this knowledge so that they can take charge of their own health issues.
And then I break this down into workshops as well, where it's one topic.
And I'm creating a series of these.
I've done one on water.
I have one coming up on heavy metal.
Detoxification.
And I'm going to go through, you know, many, many more.
And I love to teach.
And I'm also teaching the next generation of physicians who are leaving allopathic medicine and going into the true medicine.
Thank you.
So this is Dr. Grayson Dart, who came to me.
Fresh out of his family medicine residency and has been just an amazing, enthusiastic individual and has
really in such a short time mastered this material and I am looking to expand this and I'm also taking on health coaches where they do an apprenticeship with me for a year before they can go out on their own and they participate in all of our protocols and meetings and are supervised and this is a new educational model that I'm bringing about and then I
Also, I'm trying to conduct some original research.
I'm working on a clinical trial of structured water versus unstructured water in water fasting, looking at those outcomes.
I am planning to do chemical analyses of bodily secretions during illness to see if we find certain toxins with certain diseases.
And I am trying to collaborate with Dr. Pollack on testing various substances to look at their effect on the EZ zone of water because it's been found that poisonous substances and pharmaceuticals actually shrink the size of the EZ zone.
In other words, unstructure or denature the water.
And that's probably like one drug is a local anesthetic.
Lidocaine does this, and that's probably why the nerves can't function to detect the pain.
So to wrap up, I want to bring up another Hermetic Law, the Law of Correspondence, as above, so below.
Because this is the principle that is going to lead to this grand paradigm shift.
from our current tyrannical surveillance health system of poisoning people to one based on nature, autonomy, and true health and vitality.
And it's that when we each take individual action in our own domains with ourselves and with our family, it doesn't stop there because the The summation of all those individual efforts are reflected through the holographic mirror into the larger society.
And you'll see that once this change is ignited, it will sweep the rest of the way forward.
And that's what we all need to understand, that we don't need to go out and convince everybody, but we need to take action in our own life, and when others observe that, it will spread and have this Amazing effect that we desire.
So, thank you.
So taking all this information into account, I give you a task, one task above all, and that is to become your own health authority.
Thank you.
We have time for a couple of questions, if anybody wants to come up.
Are you ready?
I'm ready.
Okay.
Thank you.
And, um, I realize there's an area that I don't understand.
Okay.
I'm kind of going with not believing in germ theory.
You know, got sucked into you and Tom early.
And, uh, but there's things I don't understand.
Like, I don't really understand bacteria, the difference between bacteria and germs.
So, and things like, so I've been drinking my urine since you...
Would anyone like to see a demonstration?
Since you interviewed Amanda.
So what is the difference between what's in urine and what's in our stool?
Why is it toxic?
I don't quite understand bacteria.
Yeah, I don't know if you can explain that a little more.
Well, bacteria are single-cell organisms that don't have a nucleus and they're ubiquitous in nature.
Any surface I touch in this room will have bacteria.
Any part of your body, it'll be there.
It generally performs a saprophytic function in nature.
Nature's recyclers, reducing dead material to their constituent elements.
How's that?
So how are they related to disease?
Are you only saying they're there to clean up?
Absolutely.
Okay.
So what is in stool that's dangerous?
The stuff your body's trying to get rid of.
So how's that different than urine?
Well, urine is also stuff that your body's trying to get rid of.
And to be honest with you, I'm not, I haven't seen real scientific results from urine therapy to say that it does what a lot of people claim it does.
I'm definitely open to that, but I don't, I don't really know the answer.
I mean, what, what I know is in urine is salt.
Water, urea, basically.
Yeah.
Not quite.
Hi.
Thank you for today.
It was fantastic.
I have a sister who is an epileptic, and she's been that way since she was four, and she is 45.
She's been on phenobarbital her whole, basically, life.
Recently, she's been experiencing extreme grandma seizures, so much so that they're about to do a study.
I feel like the medical world is killing her.
So you mentioned cilantro, and I'm like ready to go buy a garden of cilantro and drop it on her door today in North Carolina.
But, you know, how do you take someone who is not really where I'm at on this journey of healing and health and being whole in your body, mind, and spirit?
I think she's open to it.
But if I say, you should stop taking phenobarbital, don't go get that brain surgery that they're recommending, and let's just take some cilantro.
I'm just concerned.
What would the dosing be?
How much would you need to take?
Do you eat all of it?
I'm not here as your doctor today.
Correct.
But let me tell you that it's not just as simple as you have one condition, you just take one substance and magically you're healed.
That's not how it works.
You have to understand how the body heals itself and support those healing mechanisms, which is really what cilantro is doing.
And so, you know, to deal with a complicated lifelong situation would require a full consultation to get all of the, you know, information.
But let me address the other part of it about trying to convince your loved ones that they can actually get better by stepping away from the main medical system.
And this also comes from Neil Kramer, who I mentioned earlier, that he said to me, he said, Andrew, Got to let them live.
Got to let them die.
And it's just the simple truth that it's not your decision.
It's their decision.
You can give them information.
You can let them know that you're a resource.
If you ever want to consider outside the box, I know of some things that I think have really been effective.
You can let them know that.
But when this comes to my own family, I don't have the ability to even convince my own family, even though I'm in this somewhat Public position, right?
To do anything different.
And so, the policy that I think is the best with respect to this is that, and probably most of the people in your life already know that you're a resource for natural healing or for natural nutrition or other things.
And if they want to know about that, just let them come to you.
Do you have a recommendation, though, for cilantro?
I am still very curious.
The instructions are on the bottle.
They're on my website.
There's lots of information.
There's a whole module about metal detox and cilantro in my detox course.
So just go to my website and you'll find all the answers.
You're welcome.
Thank you, Andrew.
I wonder if we If we could make room for collectivism as well as individualism rather than a dichotomy there.
You mentioned the communities where people live to 120 or 150 are communities and not individual people here and there.
I think we really need each other.
I give people hugs for me and for you.
I wonder if when we look at terrain, it's the internal terrain and our own choices as well as the external terrain is people living next to a trash incinerator getting cancer.
And so I wonder if we can allow for that and incorporate that understanding of how we consider each other and our individuality into terrain theory.
Yeah, that's a really interesting philosophical question, so thanks for bringing this up.
So I don't mean to imply by saying that collectivism is something that we need to be aware of and avoid, that that implies that we should not be part of communities.
Because remember, I also said it's our human nature to be social creatures, to cooperate and collaborate with each other.
But we don't have to have a collectivist philosophy to do that.
Because if all the members of the community come together, representing their own self-interests, that will actually is the only thing that can represent the self-interest of that community.
Right?
It's not an arbitrary definition that the community is some entity and it needs this at your expense.
But rather, when the members of the community come together and cooperate, by representing their own self-interest, because what's in your self-interest is most likely in the interest of the community.
And if there's a conflict, Then you can join a different community.
Thank you.
You're welcome.
Thank you for your work.
I have to tell you that since the whole pandemic began, your voice and your speaking, your information has been super helpful to me, to my wife, to our circle that have followed you.
So thank you for that.
And for anyone, you know, there's not many rooms where I would talk about this in public, but for anyone who is interested in the benefits and potential therapeutic benefits of urine, there's a really good book called Your Own Perfect Medicine by Martha Christie.
Your Own Perfect Medicine.
And there are extensive medical studies done at leading Healthcare institutions by physicians and peer-reviewed journals throughout the early part of the 20th century into the middle 20th century, showing the amazing effectiveness of urine in all sorts of medical conditions.
It's unbelievable.
So, may I interrupt for a second?
Because when you say there are peer-reviewed studies from medical institutions, that makes me very skeptical.
Okay.
But, so, have you read the methods of those experiments?
Yeah, it's in the book and the studies are there.
How are they done?
What was the experimental design?
So I would suggest to go back and re-read it and apply the scientific method to the analysis.
Did they do a control group?
Did they have an independent variable?
That's the only thing that was different in the experiment.
Did they have enough people to determine the outcome?
What was the outcome?
Surviving or not?
Or was it a lab marker?
Right?
So the details of the experiment are what the only thing that you can look at to determine is that valid or is it not valid?
And I'd be happy to look at it if you can get me that information.
I'm unfamiliar with that particular book.
Oh, sure.
I'd be happy to send it in.
It's worth checking out from my standpoint.
Absolutely.
Thank you.
You're welcome.
Dr. Kauffman, can you give me a Kauffman-esque way of explaining to my friends who kinda, you know, the ones that still hang with me and don't call me a crazy conspiracy theorist, but they say, okay, Katie, you say viruses aren't real and you say, We have a detoxification and regeneration system and not an immune system.
How do you explain the specific experience that I've had where my kid gets sick and then my next kid gets sick and then I get sick?
Or chickenpox moved through my family?
Yeah, so this is a straw man argument.
Yeah, thank you.
It has nothing to do with whether viruses are real or not.
Right.
Because obviously disease is real, right?
Now we may misunderstand it because really what we think of as disease is really healing.
That's really what our body's doing.
We call it disease because we're uncomfortable.
And we're, you know, we're told that's what it is, right?
But... I'm sorry, I lost myself for a second.
Well, so specifically, like, I got sick, my kid got sick, and I say, uh, duh, residents, like, I don't know what to say.
So, well, it's very simple.
So you say, okay, so you got sick.
Did you see a virus with your eyes?
Do you know that a virus caused it?
How do you know?
But Katie, what did?
Is the question.
That's a separate question.
That is the question I'm asking you.
We don't know.
We don't know.
Okay.
I mean, we, you know, if you, if you look at the last hundred years of medical research, almost all of the experiments about the cause of disease were related to germs.
And the establishment accepted that that was the cause, so they didn't need to look for any other alternative causes.
Now, with some illnesses, we do have a clear, you know, causal relationship.
Like, for example, mesothelioma is caused by asbestos exposure.
We know that exposure to benzene will cause leukemia, right?
We know that sugar can cause dementia.
So we do understand this for some things, but not for everything.
And it's because we haven't actually done the experiments yet.
So, I know it's hard to, like, not know, but you have to understand, it's just, it's a separate argument.
So first, there's one thing, like, are there viruses?
You can't even actually get to do viruses cause anything until you first establish that they exist, right?
Because how do you test if something is the cause of something if you don't actually have it, right?
If it's not real.
You can't.
So, I know it's hard to have this discussion, but you have to say, hey, listen, I want to have that discussion second, but first, let's have this discussion.
How do you know that viruses are real?
You've been told this, but have you seen the proof yourself?
Have you ever looked for it?
Do you know how you would even go about it?
Ask them, how do you think you would find it?
And if they say, I'm not a scientist, say, well, you found other things that exist, right?
You know that, you know, mushrooms exist.
How did you discover that?
And because that's actually the scientific method also.
Right?
Like I'm in a discussion, Tom and Mark Bailey and myself right now, we're in a discussion with some freedom medical folks who believe in viruses and we're trying to like actually have like a, you know, a Zoom call, but we've been exchanging these.
We've been, we've been trying to do this for a long time.
So, but, but this is typical of what happens, right?
So, you know, so we say, listen, we, In order to say that a virus is a cause, you just have to show first that it's actually been discovered.
And we just want you to give us the proof of that.
And what do they come back with, of course?
You know, oh, it's so complicated and decades of research has to be considered.
And it's like, no.
To show something exists, you just need one experiment.
Right?
Look, there it is.
I found it.
Right?
You exist.
You're real.
Right?
I can reach out and touch you, if you let me.
And we can observe what you do in nature, right?
You're real.
It's that simple.
That's all you need to do to find something.
So then they have to be willing to sort of rest in the place of not knowing, for sure, and give up belief.
Yeah.
Do you know what the future of the universe is?
How do you live with yourself every day without knowing that?
Right.
Thank you.
Thank you so much, everybody, for your questions.
Thank you, Dr. Kaufman.
▲
Export Selection