All Episodes
Jan. 21, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
02:56:34
Sandy Hook: The Real Truth (2013)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Aldous Huxley, a man haunted by a vision of hell on earth.
A searing social critic, Mr. Huxley, 27 years ago wrote Brave New World, a novel that predicted that someday the entire world would live under a frightful dictatorship.
Today, Mr. Huxley says that his fictional world of horror is probably just around the corner for all of us.
We'll find out why in a moment.
Please take these.
One thing that's becoming somewhat of a concern and that is misinformation is being posted on social media sites.
It is important to know that we have discussed with federal authorities that these These issues are crimes.
They will be investigated statewide and federally and prosecution will take place when people perpetrating this information are identified.
Again, all information relative to this case is coming from these microphones, and any information coming from other sources cannot be confirmed, and in many cases it's been found is inaccurate.
There is truth.
There is no truth. - Look.
To be in a minority at one doesn't make you mad.
It can be a matter.
I understand how.
I don't understand why.
The police responded to a shooting at 9:40, roughly 9:40 a.m.
Eastern Time.
Of course, the shooter was in fact in the main office of the school.
Again, unconfirmed reports of two shooters.
We do reports now.
We can confirm that one shooter has been killed, another perhaps at large.
Adam Lanza's mother, sadly, was killed by him.
Why did she need to have these three weapons?
Why does she need to have these three weapons legally purchased, including this semi-automatic Bushmaster?
Why would a woman, teacher at a kindergarten, need these weapons in her home, allowing, therefore, a clearly deranged son to take them and commit this atrocity?
A gun buyback that forced law-abiding citizens to surrender their firearms in a nationwide roundup and meltdown of all semi-automatic firearms and pump-action rifles and shotguns.
640,000 ordinary conventional firearms confiscated and destroyed.
Armed robberies have skyrocketed, up 69%.
Assaults involving guns rose 28%.
Gun murders increased 19%.
And a new phenomenon?
Home invasions jumped 21%.
19% and a new phenomenon home invasions jumped 21% I was in the Philippines physically the day Ferdinand Marcos declared martial law made himself a dictator and the first thing that dictator did he gave the people of the Philippines two weeks to turn in all their guns or it was the death penalty Now why would a dictator do that?
Why would he make his number one priority when he took over as dictator to disarm the public?
A professor strikes a nerve here and across the country over his claim that the Newtown massacre was a hoax.
Tonight, CBS 12 confronts him and his conspiracy theory.
Tonight, Florida Atlantic University is distancing itself from its media professor and his controversial comments, but the professor himself is defending his comments and explaining himself.
On December 14th, 2012, the world was shocked and captivated to hear the news of the second most deadly mass shooting in U.S.
history, next to the massacre at Virginia Tech University.
What made this crime specifically horrifying was that it happened at an elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut called Sandy Hook, and a majority of the victims were between 6 and 7 years old.
The news of the shooting spread like wildfire, and media sources were eager to get the story out to the public and try to answer some of the many questions and curiosities the public wanted to know.
Many so-called credible sources for creating the news were later found to have reported false stories, which in turn has led to much confusion as to what really happened in the morning hours of December 14th.
A vast amount of the public remain skeptical of the official story, and this film takes an investigative look into many curiosities which surround the Sandy Hook shooting.
It is entirely up to you on what to believe, and the topics discussed in this presentation are encouraged to be studied further, so that you may come to your own rational conclusion.
Please watch with an open mind, and a journalistic approach, and you will find that the information presented contains much fact, which in doing your own research into these issues, should reveal a similar outcome.
It's time to take a deep look into one of the most infamous crimes in modern history.
Before we begin our investigation, it is important to understand the official story we have been told by the media and authorities involving the case.
Never before has there been as much confusion in regards to a news story, and this is because several mainstream media outlets published misinformation in their initial reports during the first few days of the investigation.
This has in turn led to confusion amongst the public and those interested in learning the details of the event.
The misinformation that was released was so abundant that a vast amount of people do not know what to believe in regards to the shooting and the truth of what really happened has remained shrouded in mystery and elusiveness.
The authorities have claimed that anyone caught posting misinformation in relation to this case will be investigated and prosecuted.
However, none is more guilty of this than the sources of mainstream media reporting on the events in Newtown.
The official narrative we have been told begins at some point before 9.30 a.m.
on Friday, December 14, 2012, when 20-year-old Adam Lanza shot his mother in the head four times while she was in her bed sleeping.
He used his mother's .22-caliber Marlin rifle and then equipped himself with other guns his mother owned Which consisted of a Bushmaster XM-15 rifle, 10mm Glock 20SF handgun, a 9mm SIG Sauer handgun, and a shotgun.
He left the gun he used to kill his mother with at home, and proceeded his killing spree by taking his mother's car and driving to Sandy Hook Elementary School.
At approximately 9.35am, he arrived at the school and shot his way through the glass of the front door, gaining entrance into the school.
Many teachers and students heard the commotion over the intercom as this happened during their morning announcements.
Two staff members, Principal Don Hochsprung and the school psychologist, Mary Sherlock, heard the gunshots and immediately left the meeting they were in to investigate the source.
They encountered the gunman and were then shot and killed.
The intercom remained on during the announcements, which alerted the school of what was happening.
Lanza then proceeded to a first-grade classroom and killed the teacher, Lauren Russo, and killed 15 of the 16 students that were in the room.
The sole survivor, a six-year-old girl, survived by pretending to be dead and was the first child to escape the building.
Lanza then entered another first-grade classroom, and the teacher, Victoria Soto, told him the kids were in the auditorium.
A group of kids came out from their hiding spot and ran for the door.
Many of them were killed, however a few escaped and together with a bus driver, fled the school to a nearby home, which belonged to Eugene Rolson.
Victoria Salto, tried to save some of the children and jumped in front of Lanza.
She was killed instantly, as well as several children.
Six children escaped from the cupboards they were hiding in after the shooting.
Lenza then proceeded down the hallways of the school, killing two more teachers.
The shooting ended at some point between 9.46 a.m.
and 9.49 a.m.
after shooting somewhere between 50 and 100 rounds.
After being spotted by a police officer, Lenza pulled out one of his handguns and shot himself in the front of his head, ending the killing spree and his own life.
And that is the official story that we have been told as of January 2013.
With just a scratch upon the surface of this story, it doesn't take much for someone to start to see the many anomalies and discrepancies that exist.
There also exists a great division between the people who believe the official story we have been told, and those who do not believe the story.
This division nearly runs parallel to those who think that guns should be banned and prohibited, and those who do not.
This factor alone makes this incident one of important significance and may have a greater impact on all of our lives, more so than one might think possible.
Before we discuss this issue, however, we must first understand the reasons in which so many people do not believe the official story on the events which happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School.
The report definitively says that the police have somebody else in custody.
And that there's a body?
I don't know if you have a computer, but can you pull this story up?
Is there a way we could talk about it?
I mean, I feel like this is incredibly important.
I don't have access to it right now.
Okay, that's fine.
In the story, just to briefly detail, it does say that there is a second shooter that is in custody and that the SWAT team had been sent to his house And that there was a body inside.
Now that was published on your site, and the source, like, what I would like to determine, if, if... I have no ill will for being banned from Facebook.
That's not my issue here.
My issue is that I would like the source information on where it initially came from.
And why?
Why exactly?
And I believe you guys as journalists should ask these questions as well.
Why is the story changing?
Why is it no longer of concern?
And...
Do you not see exactly what's going on here?
I mean I feel like maybe you might be coming to some of the same conclusions I feel a lot of people are right now and it's just important to ask these questions.
I'm not sure what you're referring to.
What conclusions are that?
Well the conclusion here is that I can't come to one because at one moment I see a story that says that they have a second suspect in custody And that the SWAT is at his house, and then at the next moment, that link is no longer.
So, I now have, you know, dozens and dozens of people online that saw the original story and now do not see the link.
So this is quickly becoming something.
Becoming something.
I don't know what it is, but it's becoming something.
So, it's very important that we communicate here and really understand exactly what's going on.
Because this is very important information, and there are a number of sources, as I'm sure you're receiving, that also point to a second shooter theory for this story.
So, this is very critical that we, that we analyze this very, very responsibly.
Would you not agree?
I think that, you know, again, what happens is as stories break, especially something as big as what happened on Friday in Connecticut, as these stories break, sometimes especially something as big as what happened on Friday in Connecticut, as these stories break, sometimes information gets out there And a number of things play into that.
I mean, it just doesn't make sense.
Nothing makes sense.
In fact, if you really look at all the multiple sources and you line up all the information, there's even a live scanner feed from the event where two shadows are passing a gym.
I mean, I don't know if you've heard this.
But I can provide you with the information, I don't know if you want it, but there is a scanner feed, and there are two shadows running past a gym, reported by a teacher, they then put it on the scanner, and then there are multiple people running off and, like, running.
Well, they have an individual in custody who they're talking to, and I am told they are looking at this person as possibly a second shooter.
Now that changes the dynamic here a little bit, which goes from, if in fact this turns out to be confirmed, it goes from a lone gunman scenario where somebody has this argument with society and wants to take revenge against the most defenseless people in society.
Um, to a team of individuals have gotten together and conspired to do something like this.
I have reports that a teacher saw two shadows running past the building, past the gym, which would be the rear.
Two shadows running past the building, past the gym, which would be the rear.
I base, we're shooting.
Yeah, we got them.
They're coming at me, down past white.
Come up the driveway, left side.
That's six, this is it.
I don't know.
I got already on the case.
I got him proned out.
For that unit, be aware that we could have a second unit.
Check that for school, for the party in custody, before you're going to want to do any checking.
9-2, we got one back down.
Clear.
Clear.
We're We're suspect now Probably gonna last - Five, five, five, five.
We ran down to the firehouse.
There's a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on.
They did walk a guy out of the woods.
I saw him walk a guy out earlier with handcuffs.
He walked by us and said he didn't do it.
It was a grown man?
A grown man, yeah.
He's sitting in the front of the police car over there now.
So, I mean... He didn't have a gun?
No.
I didn't see any gun.
Just had him handcuffed.
And he walked by us and looked into parents' eyes and said I didn't do it.
How was he dressed?
camo pants with a dark jacket.
6-7 St. Hoke School.
Callers indicating she thinks there's someone shooting in the building.
Units responding to the Sandy Hook School.
The front glass has been broken close to the school.
They're unsure why.
I want you to see the individual I have on the phone continuing to hear what he believes to be done.
is responding to San Diego School at this time.
The shooting appears to have stopped.
It is silent at this time.
The school is in lockdown.
I have reports that the teacher saw two shots running past the building, past the gym, which would be the rear.
Alright, base.
We're shooting.
Yeah, we got them.
They're coming at me.
I'm gonna point.
Come up the driveway, left side.
We've got six, this is it.
I don't know, I've got a party on the street.
I've got him thrown down the street.
For that unit, be aware that we could have a second unit.
Thank you.
For school, for the party in custody, before it's been a one.
We'll continue to check.
9-2, we've got one.
Back down.
Back down.
Weird.
Weird.
Something's back down.
Probably to the left, huh?
Car's responded.
Shooter's apparently still shooting.
In the office area at 12 Dixons, right?
I don't f**k out.
I have found out.
I've got a phone out. - Alright, here you're seven.
We're in the front of the room.
We're cool.
This is a party in custody.
This is what you're going to want to do.
We've got to go.
- I'm making the room. - 9-8. - I prefer school to the party in custody. - I wouldn't be in a one. - We'll continue to check. - We gotta go. - 9-8. - I got a line here.
Let's get in one second. - 8-8.
Okay, shots were fired about three minutes ago.
We have a sergeant from Newtown.
I've seen unknown if the shooter is looking...
As for the building, we're not secure, so we can't have anybody aim up by him.
Negative on description.
Okay, shots were fired about three minutes ago.
Quiet at the time.
Thank you, we got one.
Back down.
8-3-1.
Copy.
Clear.
Clear.
3-1.
Coming.
Clear.
We're in the suspect now.
We know that, as we mentioned, one shooter is confirmed dead They do believe there may have been a second shooter.
They say they have cleared the school, so I'm imagining that search may go beyond, well beyond the school district, looking for a potential person at large.
Exactly.
And perhaps the deceased shooter will be the lead as to who the second person is, if in fact there is a second person.
I don't know if that's a lot of hit.
New contact reporting.
One suspect down.
The building has now been cleared.
B-5, be advised, we do have multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotguns.
A-2 is proceeding to the scene on request of the police department.
You can see that police find a long gun of some type in the trunk of the black vehicle that's been cordoned off at the elementary school all day long today.
It's entirely possible the car belongs to the shooting suspect.
Police are seen clearing the gun's chamber.
At least one cartridge comes out of the gun.
This just shows there is still much to learn about what happened today and police are still very much in the middle of what will surely be a lengthy investigation.
But again, some type of long gun has just been found in the last half hour in the trunk of the black vehicle that's been currently taped off outside of Sandy Hook Elementary School.
We were able to confirm, NBC News earlier, that the suspect had driven to the school in his mother's vehicle.
That vehicle that we've seen has been cordoned off all day, and now we see that gun pulled out of the trunk there.
Two other guns were found in the school, next to, near the shooter, who is also dead.
But you said it was the long rifle that was used?
Yes.
You said the long rifle was discovered in the trunk?
Is that correct, sir?
The people that are not already at the scene or nearby respond to Troop A. The last report was that there was one suspect that potentially was still at large.
So I want them to set up at A in case we need to deploy them somewhere else.
I'll do that.
Go ahead.
What's your status at that residence?
We're evacuating each side across the street, and they're securing.
Brother, were people in bed?
If we do that, just arrive at the gate, we're evacuating each side.
Danbury's reporting a possible vehicle, purple van, two occupants with a possible ski mask, that may be involved in this incident.
Exit 8 heading down Stoney Hill, towards the center.
Connecticut 770, Yankee Sierra Whiskey, 770, YSW, short direction.
May be involved in this incident.
Also, we're getting reports of one of them may be wearing a nun outfit.
Heading towards Danbury, Stony Hill.
Purple Inn, unknown theme.
Homes around are evacuated.
Terminus up.
I was last seen at Stony Hill by, uh, I did a... Blowing right now.
You're being transported momentarily.
Multiple people in the van had masks.
One was dressed, uh, what appeared to be a nun outfit.
Yeah, Roger.
Sergeant Stratton got off the phone with Pat Burke and he said that they're using Griffin.
I just confirmed that.
He was standing behind me.
Is 10-8-9 available to go on Route 8 and make a post?
Take a post for this purple van?
Yeah.
I'll continue to Griffin.
I'll continue to stay at Griffin.
We'll figure it out.
And 10-8-9, stay a post for that vehicle.
Alright, Roger that.
I'll try to get more information on that, on this band.
To all the families, first responders, to the community of Newtown, clergy, to the community of Newtown, clergy, guests.
For our light and momentary troubles are achieving for us an eternal glory that far outweighs them all.
So we fix our eyes, not on what is seen, But, on what is unsafe?
As we have reviewed in the police audio recordings, several suspects were identified, three in which were detained, one who was killed, and the two suspects authorities were searching for in the purple van.
That makes a total of six suspects, one in which we know to be Adam Lanza, as he was reported as suspect down inside the building at approximately 9.53 AM.
We have seen few reports on the identities of the other five suspects.
However, the Los Angeles Times reported that one of the parents was briefly taken into custody because he had ran around the school to look for his daughter.
This individual has been identified as Chris Manfredonia and claims he was at the school to help out Victoria Soto's class in making gingerbread houses.
In another report by CNN, Diane Laikada was supposed to attend the school to help build gingerbread houses in her son Aidan's class, whom was also a student of Victoria Soto.
She asked her husband Robert to go instead, and he had planned to be at the school for 2 p.m. to help with his son's project.
What makes this situation curious is that if the gingerbread house session was planned at 2 p.m. near the end of the school day, then why was Chris Manfredonia taken into custody at 9.44 in the morning?
Perhaps there were multiple sessions planned for parents to attend, which could indicate that Victoria Soto's class was planning on making gingerbread houses for a majority, if not all, of the school day.
Chris Manfredonia had to have been the first suspect announced on the police scanner, because suspects 2 and 3 were seen running away from the police behind the school and into the woods, which was clearly caught on video by a news helicopter.
In the video, we can clearly see two people running from authorities, and officers documented this fact on the police audio by using the terms them and their.
We've got those running past the building, past the gym, which would be on the rear side base.
They're shooting.
Yeah, we got them.
They're coming at me, down past one.
I'm coming up the driveway on the left side.
That's six, this is one.
I don't know.
I've already got it.
I've got it cloned out.
For that unit, be aware that we could have a second unit.
Right there in front of the school.
To the party in custody.
4-3-0-1.
Do we got one back down?
- Okay.
- Okay.
- All right, so we got one back down. - Back down. - Clear.
Clear, something's back down. - Probably to the left hand.
- Five, got the five on this one. - This comes from a couple of sources.
That he was definitely dressed in black.
But, one of the sources is saying, only one, that he was dressed as a member of the clergy.
That he actually, they thought he was a minister.
I was last seen in Stony Hill by, uh, Agent 8.
People in the van had mass, one was dressed up, what appeared to be a nun's outfit.
This comes from a couple of sources.
That he was definitely dressed in black.
But one of the sources is saying, only one, that he was dressed as a member of the clergy.
That he actually, they thought he was a minister.
But anyway, he was dressed in black with the body armor.
He came in with a Glock semi-automatic pistol and a six-hour semi-automatic pistol.
And he also somehow got into the school, the civilian version of the M16 rifle.
An assault rifle.
The Newtown B is the local newspaper for the small town of Newtown, Connecticut.
Due to the small town nature of the community, it is likely that the newspaper had a somewhat close relationship to Sandy Hook Elementary School.
Most schools have several articles published in their newspaper, and it is highly possible that Sandy Hook was no exception.
In an article written by the Newtown Bee on the day of the shooting, it clearly stated that Sandy Hook principal Don Hochsprung Don Hawksprung told the Bee that a masked man entered the school with a rifle and started shooting multiple shots, more than she could count, and it went on and on.
This testimony indicates that she was a witness to the crime.
It would make sense that she would have witnessed the crime seeing as she is the principal and she was inside the school during the shooting.
However, Don Hawksprung was the first victim killed at the school and it is impossible to get a verbal testimony from someone who has been pronounced dead.
The Newtown Bee has since posted a statement apologizing for the mistake and error they had published.
However, due to the description of the killer given by whoever the reporter talked to, it would seem that the witness did see something of importance and was one of the very few witnesses who actually got a glimpse of the killer.
It truly is remarkable that the local newspaper could make such a drastic error in their publication.
And this has left countless people scratching their heads and confused in what to believe.
Due to the gag order put in place restricting people for questioning victims and witnesses, it has been quite hard to get any real straight answers or facts.
2-Y-A-T-E-F-O-O-R-8-7-2-Y-E-O.
Possible suspect here.
Rodea Operator.
He's a licensed gunman in Connecticut as well.
My name is Godia, R-O-D-I-A, Christopher A. August 6th, 69. At 10:05 69. At 10:05 AM on on the police scanner recording, we hear an officer reading a license plate number, 872 Yankee Echo Oscar, YEO, and identifies the vehicle as a possible suspect vehicle.
A few moments later, we hear the name Christopher A. Rodia amid some scrambling, and the birth date, August 6, 1969.
After hearing this portion of the audio, many people believed that the name given was whom the vehicle belonged to.
This has led to many theories which depict Christopher Rodia as one of the suspects that was led out of the woods in handcuffs, and a possible second shooter.
However, upon further investigation, we discover that this is not the case, as Rodia claimed he was pulled over in his mother's vehicle about an hour's drive away from Sandy Hook Elementary School.
The officer present with Rodea at the time has verified this fact, and what we are actually hearing is the officer reporting the identity of Rodea during that traffic stop.
The officer reading the plate number is a different officer altogether, and the officer reporting on Rodea is actually the officer whom had Rodea pulled over for a parking violation, Detective Vincent O'Banner.
Let's listen to the audio recording again, so you can hear the difference in the officer's voices.
Two officers reporting two separate events, which has led to many conspiracy theories and much confusion.
8-7-2.
Y-A-C-E-F-O, Alaska.
8-7-2.
Y-E-O.
Possible suspect is... Rodea.
Operator.
Last name is Rodea.
R-O-D-I-A.
Prison for a page, August 6th, 69.
Prison for a page, August August 6th, 69.
about the two suspects that were apprehended from the woods.
There was also no update given to the public in regards to the suspects in the purple van.
We have seen undisputable evidence that suspects were detained, but we have not been given an official explanation on the identities of the individuals that were taken into custody.
It only makes sense that the people that were apprehended, aside from Chris Manfredonia, Were people that the authorities do not want us to know about.
Seeing as there were so many suspects in this case, it would almost appear that it was a conspiracy, or a group of individuals, or a team involved.
Since we know that some members of this team were apprehended, and their identities were not revealed to the public, it is to my belief that these people were federal agents of some sort in which Newtown authorities were not aware of being on the scene.
This would explain why they were detained and their identities have remained unknown to the public.
Agents of the intelligence community, such as the CIA and the FBI, have various aliases and identities, and this is because if they ever get caught during a highly classified mission, they have an alias they can use to avoid giving up their true identities and intentions.
Fake IDs, passports, and other documentation are created.
to maintain the highest amount of secrecy possible, and these agencies have even been known to work hand in hand with criminal organizations, especially in regards to highly classified operations.
Members of gangs and crime syndicates are perfect candidates, as they are expendable, already maintain a secret profile and lifestyle, are ruthless and often kill without remorse, and they keep their mouth shut to avoid disclosure and to remain rooted within the criminal world.
These double agents are highly trained professionals and many of the CIA's most influential agents doubled as organized or independent criminals.
This topic will be discussed in greater detail at a later point during this presentation.
However, it is important that we take a look into the accused perpetrator of the crime, Adam Lanza, and how he plays an important role in the grand scheme of things.
Just as in many other mass killings, we have been painted a detailed portrait of a lone gunman suffering psychological problems and lashing out at societies in ways similar to military operations.
We have been told that Lanza was suffering from mental illness and is likely the cause of his attack on the school.
Let's take a closer look into the life of Adam Lanza.
Let's take a closer look into the life of Adam Lanza.
Let's take a closer look into the life of Adam Lanza.
This is where he lived, an affluent street in a beautiful New England town, a place where people are comfortable with keeping guns at home.
His mother and father were divorced, but in a statement, his father Peter said, No words can truly express how heartbroken we are.
We are in a state of disbelief and trying to find whatever answers we can.
We, too, are asking why.
His aunt said the family had no idea of how disturbed he was.
If he needed help, I know they would have gotten it for him.
Because they were the type of parents, even when they were married, as well as being separated, If kids had a need, they would definitely fill it.
In Adam Lanza's road, people described their community as close, but he wasn't part of it.
I was probably on the bus with him every day for years, but he wasn't really the type to stand out or notice, but then again, it's a long period of time, but you're... there's a lot of people on the bus and you don't really take notice of everybody.
So he really kept himself to himself?
That's... yes.
And there was no indication that somebody from your own street was going to do something like that?
None at all.
It's so interesting, Wolf, that about three years ago, back in 2009, it's really the last time we have any hard record of any classes he took, any courses he was enrolled in.
After that, right at the time that the divorce was finalized, it seems that Adam Lanza simply fell off the face of the earth.
There is no record of anything that he did, what he may have accomplished, who he met with.
We've had a very difficult time even finding friends who knew him from the period 2009 on.
So, he existed, but he existed in a world that really nobody knows about, Wolf.
It's a mystery, and all the reporters have been asking around if anybody knows them on the block, and nobody knows them, which is odd for this neighborhood.
It's very odd, because a lot of people in this neighborhood know each other, and if they don't know each other, they know of somebody.
I don't remember Adam, except when he was a child.
And even someone we spoke to who lived just two doors down from the Lanza said they had very little information about the family and didn't really know Adam Lanza.
What's so crazy about Adam Lanza is he appears to have fallen off the grid.
There are basically three years that are unaccounted for.
The last time there's any record of him was back in 2009 when he was A student at a local university here, and he was taking several classes there.
But after that, 2009, he just sort of falls away.
So nobody really knows or understands what he was doing over the last couple of years.
Law enforcement officials examining the computer taken from Adam Lanza's home are hoping to find any clue that can explain his actions.
What are authorities looking for on these drives?
Documents, emails, instant messages, any type of chats, any type of pictures, any types of documents that would involve plans or lists or things like that.
When you look at his intent to destroy those drives, what does your gut tell you was on his computer?
Obviously incriminating evidence, without a question.
Reports say the hard drive was smashed to bits, but Venema says there's still an outside chance of recovery.
And I want to ask you something that Pete Williams, our Pete Williams, reported first on Saturday.
He said there had been some kind of an altercation at Sandy Hook Elementary School the day before the shootings, and that it was believed Adam Lanza might have been involved in that altercation with up to four teachers or administrators.
Can you shed any light on that?
That's been spoken about a great deal during the number of press conferences that we've had and we've been able to look at that and find out that there was no report of any altercation involving the shooter, the suspect if you will, at all at that facility.
A majority of the misinformation produced by the authorities and the media have involved the Lanza family in an attempt to sell the public on the lone gunman psychologically disturbed story.
Some examples of the reports that were later determined to be untrue include arresting Adam's brother in New Jersey and claiming that he was the guilty suspect.
Claims that Nancy Lanza was a kindergarten teacher at Sandy Hook Elementary School and that her body had been found inside of the school.
Reports that stated Adam would regularly attend shooting range sessions with his mother.
Statements claiming that Adam had entered the school the day before and got into a dispute with four teachers, three of whom he killed during the attack, and countless other examples of the authorities and media reporting misleading information in relation to the case.
There has also been several witnesses that have been proven to have lied during statements and interviews, or it's because they have told the truth and the powers behind the scene have put out information that contradicts these victims and witness accounts.
Because of those implications, it makes it especially hard to filter out good information from bad information.
However, it does not take a rocket scientist to see that things just don't add up to the official story.
The more one looks into the details surrounding the shooting, the stranger the story becomes, and the harder it is to believe that someone like Adam Lanza suddenly snapped, killing his own mother and targeting an elementary school to commit mass murder.
As we have seen from several reports, Adam and Nancy Lanza live rather secluded lives, and hardly anyone can provide us with valuable information which may explain the motive behind the crime.
Instead, we have been given an abundance of false information, which has caused many people to question the sources of this information.
Some people have accepted the official story, taking the bait hook, line, and sinker.
However, it is the ones who remain skeptical and independent research that have provided us with the most relevant information.
When Adam's brother was arrested as a suspect of the crime, the media reported that he was likely arrested because Adam had his brother's identification on him.
However, Ryan has stated that he had not seen his brother in a few years prior.
The school nurse, Sally Cox, claimed in the following interview that she knew Nancy Lanza and Adam, and that Nancy worked at the school, information which was later found to be untrue.
Sally also originally claimed that she was face-to-face with the shooter and made eye contact, yet later claimed that she hid under her desk and saw the killer's feet enter the office and then leave.
Why would such a vital witness be telling us conflicting stories unless she was covering up for something or she is telling the truth and was later discredited using false information?
As we shall soon see, it would seem more likely that she is lying and providing false information herself and she is not the only one guilty of misleading the public into believing certain aspects of this case.
The mother of the shooter in this case The mother of the shooter is also dead.
She is a teacher at the school.
So dead.
She is a teacher at the school.
And state police also confirming today that neither Lanza or his mother had any connection to that school.
And as I walked down the streets of Newtown to get to this location, not far from Sandy Hook Elementary, I happened to run across a woman who had tears in her eyes.
And she was being led by two younger women.
And I asked if she was okay.
It turns out, She was the school nurse at Sandy Hook Elementary and was for 15 years.
She described the gunmen coming into her office.
They met eyes, she jumped under her desk, and he inexplicably just walked out.
Just absolutely chilling, horrifying details that are emerging here in Newtown tonight.
But I did ask if It was known around this school that this young man, apparently a kindergarten teacher's son, was an issue.
Whether he had any problems.
And she said, not at all.
And I asked if she knew the suspect's mother.
And she said she did, and that she was an absolutely loving person, and a very caring, experienced kindergarten teacher.
Just the kind of person you would want with your five-year-old children.
And state police also confirming today that neither Lanza or his mother had any connection to that school.
Neither Lanza or his mother had any connection to that school.
And we are told that the mother of the suspected shooter, who is also dead at the scene, was also killed.
She is a teacher, and she was also killed at that school, according to our law enforcement sources.
According to our law enforcement sources.
And we are joined now by another survivor of this tragedy, the school nurse, Sally Cox.
Thank you for coming in this morning.
And I know this is difficult, but take us back to that moment.
When did you first know something had gone wrong?
Hearing loud popping noise.
I mean, just something I've never heard in my life.
And your mind doesn't think that it could be that.
But when the secretary called out to me, with terror in her voice, it just told me there was something terrible happening.
And that's when you went under the desk?
My computer desk, yes.
And while you're under there, you actually see the feet of the shooter?
There's an opening in the back for wiring and as I was crouching down I could just I could see my doorway because you in the office you enter the office and then into my office and when I heard the door close you know and he probably walked in and I was looking and I saw I could see him from the knees down see the legs right in front of you 20 feet away
She described the gunman coming into her office.
They met eyes, she jumped under her desk, and he inexplicably just walked out.
"The End"
"This continues to be a very complex investigation, and there's a lot of contradictory information out there, but there is some new information this morning from a couple of federal officials and state officials.
They say now that there were actually four handguns recovered inside the school, not just two as we were initially told.
Four handguns and apparently only handguns that were taken into the school.
We knew that Adam Lanza, the man said to be the gunman here, also had a assault-style, AR-15-style rifle that he had taken to the school that was in the car he drove there, his mother's car.
But we've been told by several officials that he left that in the car.
You said it was the long rifle that was used?
Yes.
Yes.
Don't go on record.
It's supposed to be still in the car.
It's not correct.
It's not correct, sir.
Oh, no.
...long gun of some type in the trunk of the black vehicle that's been cordoned off at the elementary school all day long today.
It's entirely possible the car belongs to the shooting suspect.
Police are seen clearing the gun's chamber.
At least one cartridge comes out of the gun.
This just shows there is still much to learn about what happened today, and police are still very much in the middle.
Did everybody hear the question?
No.
Uh, uh.
No.
Given what I deal with all the time is this one over the top.
I've been at this for a third of a century.
My sensibilities may not be the average man, but this probably is the worst I have seen or the worst That I know of any of my colleagues haven't seen.
And that all the more makes me proud and grateful to our staff who, to a man, have just behaved most professionally and strongly.
And I hope I hope they and I hope the people of Newtown don't have a crash on their head later.
The staging area for the emergency services and victims of the Sandy Hook shooting was set up at the local firehouse, which is located less than half a kilometer away from the school.
By reviewing aerial footage and images of the scene, we can see that there were hardly any emergency vehicles located at the school itself.
Instead, the ambulances and emergency services, including the media, were assembled at the firehouse on Riverside Road.
During an emergency situation, especially one of this magnitude, It would make sense to have the ambulances near the location where the injured parties can be removed and brought to a hospital quickly.
However, in this instance, the vehicles were located at a location that was considerable distance from the crime.
What makes this even more curious is that if we take a closer look at the staging area at the firehouse, we can clearly see that all of the necessary emergency vehicles were boxed in and unable to leave the staging area.
This would mean that any injured parties, survivors, or victims would need to be taken out of the school all the way to the firehouse.
If someone suffered a serious life-threatening injury, there is a high possibility that they could die during the time it would take to transport them to the nearest ambulance or medical team.
According to the official story, being promoted by the media and authorities, there was only two injuries sustained from the attack.
And both injured parties were teachers at the school.
The first with injuries was the lead teacher at the school, 40-year-old Natalie Hammond, who was shot in the arm and leg while she had her back against the door trying to keep it closed to keep the gunman from entering.
The shooter shot through the door, apparently, which is how she received her injuries.
One would think that the injuries received would be much more severe since her entire body was pressed against the door, but perhaps she got lucky and received minimal damage from the incident.
The second wounded in the attack has for some reason remained unnamed, as this unidentified adult perhaps does not want to have their identity revealed.
Upon further analysis of the police audio recording, we hear an officer reporting that he has a victim with a foot injury, and that he is taking her to the hospital.
This can only mean that this person with the foot injury, also a minor wound, must be the unidentified adult.
Why they wish to remain unknown to the public is a curious factor, and may have some significance to the case.
Roger.
Go ahead.
Alright, just to take a call, we have one fellow in room one who has received each other to the foot, speaking unsubstant of any other injuries.
High fives for the ambulance.
It would seem that anyone who may have witnessed the suspect was killed in the two classrooms that were attacked, with the exception of the little girl who escaped the event by pretending to be dead.
All other people in the two classrooms were killed.
What is strange about this fact is that the surviving child has also remained unidentified, making her the second unidentified person involved in the case.
Since the attack, this child's family is now suing the state for $100 million for the reason that their child has received psychological damages from the incident.
$100 million is a massive amount of money.
And it is to my belief that the amount of money is so large because there is more reasons behind the family suing the state than just psychological damages caused by the event.
Perhaps the family knows more than what is being told by the media and authorities, and this could be why the child's name and family have sued for such a large amount and has remained unidentified.
A lawyer for a six-year-old who survived the Sandy Hook Elementary Massacre is suing the state of Connecticut for $100 million.
Her attorney says she is traumatized after hearing the screaming, cursing, gunshots, and losing friends.
He's filed a $100 million claim with the state claims commissioner.
That is the first step before you can sue the state.
What good does it do to sue the state when no one really anticipated a tragedy like this happening?
We knew it was going to happen again, and we know it's going to happen again now, so we have to push the state to make their actions work, and we have to compensate those who were victims.
The attorney is not releasing the name of his client.
The State Claims Commission will review the case before any decision is made on whether she can sue the state.
It would seem that the survivors and witnesses received minimal damages, and for the most part, have wished to remain anonymous, quite possibly to avoid anyone from asking them questions about what they saw happen inside of the school.
In this video, we see a victim being taken to an ambulance at the firehouse.
Strangely, there is only one paramedic transporting the stretcher, which is not the way paramedics are trained to transport the wounded.
There should always be two paramedics transporting, but this is a minor observation compared to how important this video clip is overall.
This is the only known video footage of a victim from Sandy Hook, and since we know that the unnamed victim with the wounded foot was taken to the hospital by a police officer, this can only mean that the person on this stretcher is actually Natalie Hammond.
If this is indeed Natalie Hammond, then why does there appear to be no injury to her arms?
Official reports claim that she was shot in the arm and the leg, yet we do not see any blood or bandages whatsoever on this person.
Perhaps most important to note, is that Natalie Hammond is 40 years old, and the woman on this stretcher is much older than 40 years of age.
This victim on the stretcher is NOT Natalie Hammond, and I have spent several days searching for a photograph or an image of Natalie Hammond, and was not able to find a single picture.
On the Sandy Hook website, it says that she lives with her husband and daughter Kayla in nearby Southbury, and it seems that there is no social profiles or even graduation portraits from the university and colleges she attended.
It would almost seem that Natalie Hammond does not exist whatsoever.
This piece of evidence alone proves that we have been lied to by government officials as to what really happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School, and is worth much further investigation.
I hope they and I hope the people of Newtown don't have a crash on their head later.
It was just magnificent!
It's insane!
It's sectional, and it sticks together with Velcro, and then they stake it to the ground, and electricity and lights and heat appear.
And it's from the Department of Emergency Management, and I think it came from the Army, but I'm not sure.
I think it's these things that they use to set up.
We did not bring the bodies and the families into contact.
We took pictures of them, of their facial features.
It's easier on the families when you do that.
There is a time and a place for up close and personal in the grieving process.
To accomplish this, we felt it would be best to do it this way.
You can sort of, uh, you can control the situation depending on your photographer, and I have very good photographers, uh, but, uh... You can control...
It's got to be hard not to have been able to actually see her.
photographers.
Do you know the difference between the time of death between the daughter?
It's got to be hard not to have been able to actually see her.
Well, at first I thought that and I had questioned maybe wanting to see her.
Being a parent myself, I know for a fact that I would want to see my child physically before laying them to rest.
It seems quite odd that the parents of the deceased children did not see their child post-mortem to say their last goodbyes.
The funerals for the child victims were held very quickly after the shooting, and one would think that with the amount of deceased involved in this scenario, it would take much longer for them to be processed.
However, this is not the case.
If we take a look at the images of the bodies that were taken out of the school, we notice that there is no adult-sized objects, and nearly all of them look the exact same size.
They do not even look like bodies, but rather neatly wrapped packages of supplies or fabric.
There is also no blood, and everything seems untouched and perfectly placed.
What makes this observation even more compelling Is that on the police audio, we hear an officer state that he had received the confirmation that bodies would be taken to Griffin Hospital.
And then we get notification from Griffin Hospital that they have received no notification whatsoever.
It is as if nobody was actually brought to a hospital at all, aside from the confirmation of receiving the unidentified foot wound victim earlier in the recording.
Alright, um, confirm with Troop A what hospital in our area that we could secure.
I think he had that information well.
Yeah well I just started this track and got off the phone with Pat Berg and he said that they're using Griffin.
And just confirmed it.
He was standing behind me.
Is 10-8-9 available to go on Route 8 and make a post?
Take a post for this purple van?
Yeah.
I'll continue to Griffin.
I'll send some things to that Griffin.
We'll figure it out.
And 1089 is there a post for that vehicle.
Fine.
For the major, I'm en route to Griffin Hospital.
48, Roger.
There is no confirmation that any victims are coming down here.
None.
So we need to figure out what's the truth they're going to.
So we need to figure out what's the truth they're going to.
So we need to figure out what's the truth they're going to.
So we need to figure out what's the truth they're going to.
So we need to figure out what's the truth they're going to.
So we need to figure out what's the truth they're going to.
So we need to figure out what's the truth they're going to.
In this picture, we see Obama sitting with members of the Parker family after the shooting.
This photograph has become a topic of interest amongst the public, because many people believe that the girl in the red dress is actually Emily Parker, one of the victims who is said to have died during the Sandy Hook shooting.
And many people believe that she is also still alive, just like Kathy Gobert's daughter, Lily.
And even the principal, Dawn Hochsprung, who apparently gave an interview to her local paper the day of the shooting.
Officials claim that the girl in the red dress is actually Emily's sister.
However, many still doubt this official claim.
What adds to people's belief that Emily Parker may still be alive is the reaction from her father when he went on television to discuss the loss of his daughter.
He acts very strange and is seen smiling before he begins to speak to the press.
So we'll see if Robbie Parker, I think he's going to come back to the microphones now.
And make a statement.
Looks like the family is there.
They're getting ready to make to come to the microphone.
So we'll listen in.
- I'm gonna go in there. - Okay. - My name's Robbie Parker.
My family is one of the families that lost a child yesterday in the Sandy The Huck Elementary School shooting for which none fit.
With so many living victims apparently surfacing after the crime, it has led people to wonder if anyone really died at all.
Could this whole thing have been staged and premeditated well in advance?
Was this entire thing a covert government operation?
And if so, why would they want to do something like this?
These are but a few of the questions people are asking due to the many inconsistencies that have been found within this case.
It's very hard to get any real answers at this time, because of the gag order that was put in place.
However, many of the answers that seem to be available point towards a massive deception that continues to unfold, and is quite possibly the sloppiest government-induced operation to ever unfold.
Due to the people's mistrust in the official story, it has led many people to be doing their own research, to try and find the answers as to what really happened.
And if this whole thing was planned from the start, who is responsible, and why have they deceived us on such a large scale?
The following evidence proves that the events at Sandy Hook Elementary were planned in advance, and that the people involved in the operation have been lying to us about the information we have been given.
The victims of the Sandy Hook tragedy are either still alive, living on a program similar to witness protection, or they truly did die and are the victims of their own government's hand.
The following information should help you decide which scenario you believe to be true.
Hey, I've got a few things to show you.
Okay, um, let me show you what we're...
looking at here okay see this see this post okay what I did see this is dated December 3rd what I did was I went and I started as you can see and I started I ran a search just for the word Sandy Hook on Google okay and then I went down and I started looking from the beginning
I started looking for dates in Anything older than December 14th.
And you won't find much.
I only found a few.
I went through 24 pages.
So I kept searching and when I got to the 34th page, I found this one here.
Dated December 11th.
Want to see it?
United Way extends most sincere condolences and prayers to all these families affected by the devastating events in Newton/Sandyville, Connecticut.
Published December 11, 2012.
Want to see it?
This was published December 11, 2012 on Google.
Google search engine, pick this up.
This page was done and available to the internet on December the 11th.
Sandy Hook did not happen until the 14th.
This is a Facebook page that has since been removed from the Internet, which was created as a tribute to Vicki Soto, the teacher who was killed protecting the kids in her classroom. which was created as a tribute to Vicki Soto, the As we can see, it is an official Facebook page, and several people left comments on it.
Upon closer investigation, it was discovered that the page was actually created on December 10th, four days prior to the Sandy Hook shooting.
Anyone who has a minimal understanding of the internet knows that once something is published, the date can be found on the webpage using various methods, and the published date cannot be changed on Facebook, in emails, Google, YouTube, or any other similar websites.
As we can see, this Facebook page was clearly started on December 10th, just as many other pages have been recently discovered to have been published at some point before the date of the crime, December 14th.
let's take a look at this one okay this is the sandy hook elementary victims fund okay and if you come here of course this was created of course after the uh um the uh the uh shootings there and the you know the movie they made up about the kids getting shot in um sandy hook of course it was made after that date right you know they wouldn't
they wouldn't make this you know just like the other one you know they wouldn't do it right but They wouldn't, definitely wouldn't have it stated on here, right, that it was before.
Well, let's come down here to the About on this page.
About this page, okay, and it goes on into it, right?
Well, look, it was cleaned on the day before the massacre.
This URL, let me show you.
This right here.
This was created the day before the shooting.
It's this website here, or actually it's a video, okay?
And it's a video, Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute for Newton.
It was published on VIMO, okay?
See, there's the URL right there.
There's the date it was published, when it was uploaded, that's the upload date.
You can't change the upload dates on Vimeo.
Okay, now if you go over to look at the video, I'll play just a little bit here for you.
See right here, it even says one month it even says one month ago.
See right here it even says one month ago.
And there you go.
And there you go.
Look at there.
Ooh, look at there.
Look, November 10th, 2012.
Look.
November 10, 2012.
It says right there.
It says right there.
It was uploaded November 10th, 2012 on Saturday at 11.36 a.m.
It was uploaded.
November 10, 2012.
On Saturday at 11.36 a.m.
The New York Times.
Amen.
Amen.
The entire state of Connecticut.
I think it's really important.
The entire state of Connecticut.
Project Longevity will send a powerful message to those who would harm their fellow citizens.
That such acts will not be tolerated.
That they will be swiftly met with clear, predictable consequences.
But also, but also, that help is available to all those who wish to break the cycle of violence and gang activity.
And although, as Dana mentioned, Connecticut has experienced an overall decrease in violent crime rates over the last year, Shootings and homicides remain all too common in cities like Bridgeport, Hartford, and right here in New Haven.
In many cases, the victims, as he indicated, of these crimes are children, and they are young people.
The future of these communities.
I'm confident that Project on Germany will enable us to bring new resources and make fresh perspectives.
And in Oxford, police are preparing for the what if.
We've seen the horrors of Columbine and Virginia Tech.
And today, state police ran through what they would do if what happened there happened here.
Fox 61's Jim Altman has more on the training troopers hope they'll never have to use.
By air and on the ground.
First responders are taking aim at reality.
The blood is fake, but the lesson is real at Oxford High School.
Today the state police staged an active shooter drill on a grand scale.
In the back of your mind, you always have Columbine.
This is an opportunity for the Connecticut State Police to take the training that we have and integrate it with other first responding agencies.
In a real event, we would have these resources deployed.
From students and teachers to local police, everyone in town is playing a vital piece in the puzzle.
The scenario, two armed men have stormed the building, injured students, and have hostages.
We joined the state police's highly trained TAC team as they search for the assailants.
The 21st century police and the first responders are trained now to react to the situation.
To not only react, but to actively get involved in stopping the aggression.
This is the largest exercise of its kind ever put on in the state.
Over 150 police, EMS, and firefighters.
It's about everybody coming together, working together, and making everything go well, and make sure everybody that is involved in the incident is safe.
And today, through this chaos, the goal is cohesion.
It went almost flawless.
There were a couple bumps in the road, and you expect that in any drill situation, but it's a learning experience.
A 067 received one in custody.
In Oxford, Jim Altman, Fox 61.
And a big bomb, explosion went off.
Oh, my God.
It definitely felt real.
- He was like, "Help me." - As people were trying to respond to a terrible tragedy, it got my own emotions going about something like this. -
What happened this morning is this November 11th.
It was Veterans Day and we had a domestic terrorist incident.
You know, we had a congressman representative out here, you know, just giving a speech and thanking everybody for the service, you know, civilians and military alike.
and a bomb happened to go off.
And from there, it was pure chaos until individuals and units started arriving and taking control of the scene.
Hey, guys, please don't cross these lines.
Everybody see the corner.
Roger, roger.
Thank you.
Well, initially, University of Colorado Health Science Center and Chute Campus came to us, and they wanted to conduct a joint training between their emergency room residents and our paramedic students.
Thank you.
The community calls were in conjunction with the University of Colorado Anschutz Campus.
They wanted to test and train some of their personnel in the response of blast and fragmentation injuries, something they don't see on a daily basis.
We already had the residents in place, then it was just a matter of contacting all the different local agencies, bringing them together, identifying the people that wanted to play, identifying the different resources that were necessary that would really respond to a situation like this and inviting them out.
Then it was all logistics after that.
I think what first struck me was the realism of the scenario.
The number of victims, the odors, etc.
all lent a great deal of realism to this exercise.
So it was very easy, I think, for all the participants to forget that it was an exercise and to react as if it were a real incident.
Now check this out.
This is very eerie.
On December 14, 2012, both the Department of Homeland Security and FEMA were conducting a course entitled, and you can see it here, Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters.
You can see right here, this is from the State of Connecticut, the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection, Emergency Management and Homeland Security, I'm not making this up.
As a matter of fact, I will provide the link to not only this site but also the link that we're going to go to from this site so you can get a screen capture and you can record it before they take this down.
But you can see right here it was scheduled for December 14th.
The very day of the Sandy Hook tragedy from 9 a.m.
to 4 p.m.
the exact same time and the exact same general vicinity and we'll talk about exactly where that was in a second but it's FEMA L-366 that's the course number planning for the needs of children in disasters when you click on this link right here It takes you to this page.
The goal of this course, it says, is to enable participants to improve their community's mitigation and emergency operations plan specifically regarding the needs of children.
The course will provide them with the information needed to address the unique needs of children prior to, during, and following disasters.
Where was this class to meet?
We'll take a look at this down here.
Location, 2800 Main Street, Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Now where does that take you?
This is Bridgeport, Connecticut.
Peg A is the location in which FEMA would conduct their course on the same day, at the same time the shootings occurred.
The two locations were connected by the same road, a mere 20 minutes drive to the north.
Let's zoom out.
Keep in mind that Peg A is the location of the FEMA course and Peg B is Newtown, Connecticut and the location of Sandy Hook Elementary School.
Tell me what you guys think.
Is this just a mere coincidence?
And we clicked on the, this is in the state of Connecticut, the Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection Emergency Management and Homeland Security.
And additional information, the course will be held at the Shady Hook Fire Department address below 18 Riverside Road, Sandy Hook Court.
Earlier today, a tragedy of unspeakable terms played itself out in this community.
Lieutenant Governor and I have been spoken to in an attempt that we might be prepared for something like this playing itself out in our state.
I hope the people of Newtown don't have a crash on their head later.
Tomorrow, many students will head back to school, but not those in Giles County.
An online article has police and school officials there worried about safety.
WDBJ 7's Elizabeth Harrington here tonight with those details, Elizabeth.
Tommy, the Giles County Sheriff says they take everything seriously, even though this article did not contain a direct threat, it did raise a lot of concerns.
The article is entitled, The Next School Massacre Target?
It's posted on a website that caters to conspiracy theories and UFOs.
We have to take this.
It's serious information.
The article connects the Colorado movie theater shooting to last month's shooting in Connecticut and then to Narrows.
The author uses a scene in the latest Batman movie that shows a map of attack sites.
One is called Sandy Hook, the other is Narrows.
The author writes that it's plausible schools in Narrows, Virginia might be in danger.
We just want to emphasize No threat has been made to any school system here in Dallas County.
But police aren't taking any chances.
On Tuesday, police issued a reverse 911 call to parents about the article.
Sheriff Morgan Milliron says his office has received many calls.
If I was a parent and I did not know about this, I would be upset.
And you can't blame a parent for being upset.
Giles County also canceled school on Wednesday.
Instead, it will be a teacher work day, but there will be plenty of police.
Sheriff's going to be at school.
We have some investigators.
I'll be at one of the schools, and we're going to brief all the teachers and staff.
When students return on Thursday, there will be extra patrols around all five schools in Giles County.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
There has been no mention of the second suspect in the woods.
However, this still does not explain why they were running from the police and both of them were taken into custody.
Also, there has been no mention of the suspects in the van and why police were looking for it so intently.
The tactical officer detained in the woods still remains a mystery and is proof enough that there were special agents present at the school within just a few minutes of anyone knowing what was going on.
This is quite common, it seems.
when government is questioned for involvement in high-profile crimes that don't seem to add up.
We're probably going to let it.
Newtown reporting.
One suspect down.
The building has not been cleared.
D-5, DMI, you should have multiple weapons, including long rifles and shotguns.
Stand by as units in front of the school will conduct an interior search this time.
Stand by for that.
Stand by as units in front of the school will conduct an interior search this time.
The life of that.
Unit, proceed to the scene.
We're live for that.
We're live for that.
I'd like some legal representation.
These police officers have not allowed me to have any.
I don't know what this is all about.
I work in that building.
Naturally, if I work in that building, yes, sir.
No, they're taking me in because of the fact that I live in Missouri.
I'm just a taxi.
You got another something up with him?
Well, check this out.
During college, he spent two summers as an intern at the Central Intelligence Agency.
Although he technically had no formal journalistic education, he opted to pursue a career in journalism rather than stay with the agency after school.
Having been a self-proclaimed news junkie since, you know, forever.
Remembering back on Channel One a long time ago.
In the schools.
Well, this cat's a CIA front man.
Anderson Cooper.
The other thing, Alex, that is so, I find, idiotic about a lot of these conspiracy theories is, you know, nothing remains secret for very long.
So it's not as if, I mean, the government can't keep, you know, things that are actually classified information secret for very long.
There's so many people who leak stuff.
So the idea that somehow, like, the news media is in cahoots with the government and that there were secret meetings to hire crisis actors to get them there I mean, it's just so ludicrous.
Did you notice a common... I mean, was there a common strain when you were looking into these conspiracy theories regarding Sandy Hook?
Yeah, there absolutely is.
At least the vast majority of them.
And there's different variations, you know, whether it was directly an Obama administration plot or agents, you know, loosely tied with the liberal movement or even George Soros.
The common thread among all of these is that the tragedy was a false flag operation in order to make the country willing to give up their guns.
So, in other words, this tragedy would happen, and then we would have a discussion about gun control, as we are now, and then it would lay the groundwork for the government to come in and take guns, possibly for some kind of future, you know, tyrannical regime.
And, I mean, Jonathan, did... I guess the Internet has kind of allowed all this stuff to kind of ignite in a way that it never has before.
I mean, there have always been conspiracy theories.
It goes back for very long.
This has just allowed more isolated people to find each other, right?
Yeah, absolutely.
One of the chapters in my book, I talk about how the internet has turbocharged the conspiracy theory movement, because the big challenge for conspiracy theorists used to be getting the word out, because respectable journalists wouldn't touch their stories.
But now, conspiracy theorists, usually they don't even bother trying to go to the mainstream media.
They just publish it on their website, and they can create their own little echo chambers of paranoid individuals who all share the same distrust.
And by the way, just to correct something, it is true that the majority of the Sandy Hook conspiracy theories revolve around the idea of gun control.
But there is a large contingent that believe that this was somehow an Israeli false flag operation.
Press TV, which is a Iranian-controlled dialogue.
Why would the Israelis get involved in this?
Well, the idea is that it was a Mossad operation, and it's the same people who believe that Anders Breivik was actually secretly somehow a Mossad agent.
These are people who have identified evil in the universe.
They've picked who their evildoer is.
They think it's the Jews.
They think it's Israel.
And so they find some way to trace any evil act, whether it's 9-11, whether it's the 2008 financial crisis.
They find some way to believe that all the evil was caused by this one group of actors who they hate.
They find some way to believe that all the evil is caused by this one group of actors who they hate.
Many professional analysts, private investigators, independent researchers, and journalists have used all of their resources to find and journalists have used all of their resources to find any paper trail, documentation, online profiles, or records of public activity in regards to the life and existence of Adam Lanza.
And to this date, it appears that none exist, at least within the last few years of his life.
It's almost as if he disappeared a few years ago and suddenly showed up to town again to do the shooting.
There is no online profiles, bank accounts, registrations for schools, cell phone accounts, or any other evidence that could determine his activities in the past few years.
Adam's name was also omitted from his mother's obituary, which is said to be because it would offend the families in Newtown, but is something worth pointing out, and adds to the mystery of Adam Lanza.
The only proof we have that he did exist comes from early school photos when he was much younger, students that went to school with him and claimed he was the loner type and always carried around a briefcase, and a conversation between his aunt and his mother, which apparently exists on his mother's Facebook account.
It would appear that his mother had an account, but he did not, although it is claimed that he could assemble a computer in seconds, and exceeded in communications and computer-related studies.
It is also claimed that Adam and his mother would regularly attend a shooting range, and that his mother was a gun enthusiast.
However, a determined journalist visited every gun range in the surrounding area, and found no records whatsoever of Nancy ever being registered.
It has also been stated that all of the firearms that were used in the shooting were registered to his mother, However, there was an assault weapon ban in Connecticut, which means that if it were registered, she would be in possession of an illegal firearm.
The weapons used were also common weapons seen used by law enforcement and people in the military, not commonly found in public possession for the most part.
On the police audio recording, we hear an officer report he found long rifles and shotguns inside of the school, and adding the additional reports of two to four handguns found inside of the school, and the shotgun that was found in the trunk, We are left with a total of over six guns, and that is only the guns that we know were reported or identified.
D-5.
Be advised, you should have multiple weapons, including one rifle and shotgun.
It seems that guns were planted inside of the school, and it is to my opinion that there is much more to the life of Adam and Nancy Lanza than we are being told.
It seems like they were set up as patsies for the crime.
And whoever is responsible likely destroyed the hard drive on the computer because of incriminating evidence which could reveal what really happened.
Did Adam Lanza really kill his mother?
Or was she killed by someone else, part of the group of suspects police were searching for?
Could Adam have possibly been killed prior and brought to the school and planted as a patsy?
These are questions that I have been asking myself and would explain many of the anomalies such as reports from federal and local officials that are now said to be false according to the official story.
This next testimony seems to tie into this theory, as if it were a team executing a carefully planned operation involving several suspects.
I heard that diaper to the boys, drinking down the sidewalk, and running in one tunnel, the other one to stop.
They were running across the front of the firehouse.
And a black car had pulled up to the firehouse and the little boys were running screaming, one of them, on a skateboard.
And I saw the police department go up, like seven or eight police cars went up within 45 seconds, like a bunch of shots going off.
And, um, the little boys were running and then a gentleman came up the road looking for his two little boys.
So, I don't know if they found them.
I hope they did.
But, um, they were scared to death.
So, they must have gotten out of the school and took off and ran down the sidewalk because they were screaming down the sidewalk.
And there, all this, all the police started coming, and that's about it.
Then I, you know, all this has been going on since.
Your son forgot something on Friday morning, so you went up to the school.
And when you got there, you knew something was amiss, to say the least.
Yes.
What did you see?
There were like eight or ten kids who were, you know, running basically towards the firehouse.
And, uh, I, you know, obviously thought that was odd.
But when I got out of the car and started walking towards the building, I noticed a car, you know, in the, uh, drop-off area in front of the entrance.
Like, a black hatchback had all the doors open and, like, black sweatshirts strewn around it.
And again, I thought, well, that's really odd.
You know, you don't usually see that.
Um, at the school, and then I walked to the doorway, and there was another mom standing there, and all the while I'm thinking to myself, the building is so quiet, and why is it so quiet?
And, uh, I said to her, is something going on?
And she goes, I don't know, but look, and she pointed, and I looked, and, um, next to the door, where there's a buzzer, you have to buzz in to the building, the whole plate glass window to the right of the door, was shattered and there was glass everywhere.
And we looked at that and we said, well, this is really strange.
And as soon as those words kind of came out of our mouth, we started hearing gunshots.
I knew that it was gunfire, but, you know, I didn't, I just ran.
The black vehicle this parent saw must have been the suspect vehicle, as it was parked exactly where she described seeing the black vehicle with all of the doors open.
After a moment, she said she heard shooting after first noticing that the glass on the front doors had been shattered, which would indicate that the sound from inside of the school could be heard much easier, since she did not hear the intercom with the gunshots and screaming.
It must have been some time after the initial shooting began.
She also claimed to have seen multiple jackets indicating more than one person, and could have been used to hide the guns before entering the school.
Because all of the doors were open, it would indicate that whoever exited the vehicle, did so in a hurry, and did not take the time to close the door behind them.
Since all of the doors were open, and multiple jackets were witnessed, this would indicate more than one person, or a group of people.
What is very strange about this, is that just like so many other aspects of this case, the doors opened are not seen in any photographs, and has not been mentioned by anyone as holding relevance to the multiple suspects involved.
Instead, the media and government continue to promote their story of a lone gunman, and that no other suspects were involved.
A tax document has recently surfaced belonging to Nancy Lanza, and on the list we can see that a Honda Civic is listed indicating that she was making payments on a Honda Civic vehicle.
Another document which has also surfaced shows that Christopher Rodia owned a 99 Chevrolet, which is proof that the vehicle did not belong to Rodia.
It is likely that the Lanza vehicle was stolen after Nancy had been murdered, and was driven to the school with Adam inside as the patsy, likely drugged in order to transport him to the scene of the crime more easily.
Perhaps these suspects had to bring Adam inside of the school, and did not have an extra hand available to close the doors behind them.
If video surveillance was released, it would help answer many questions, but so far, none have been released to the public.
It would also reveal if Adam truly killed himself, or if he was shot by another individual.
Standby, a few minutes in front of the school, we're conducting an interior search this time.
You're live for now.
This would also explain why Dr. Carver ordered that the body of Adam be kept for DNA analysis before it could be claimed by his father.
This would allow time to detoxify and remove any signs of foul play.
What makes this even more curious is that the Genealogy Bank's website claims that Adam Lanza died on Thursday, December 13th under the Social Security Death Index.
This is indeed Adam Lanza's profile, and if we look at Nancy's profile, we see that she died on the date of the crime.
December 14th.
Even Emily Parker's profile states her death to be on December 14th, but Adams claims that he died before the incident occurred.
If this date of death is correct, according to the findings of an autopsy, then this verifies that he was killed prior to the attack and was planted on the scene as a patsy, along with all the extra guns, his mother murdered, and all records on the computer destroyed.
The tactical officer that was reported by the Newtown Beat Was likely a part of the operation and the others caught fleeing the scene were likely involved in the operation as well.
Upon further analysis of the helicopter footage, I came to notice the third person running, stop and start walking through the woods, looking back, and seeming to follow the other person.
It's to my belief that this person is not a police officer, but another member of the team, fleeing from the scene.
On the police scanner, we hear the officer chasing, and two suspects are detained, likely the two people that were veered to the right.
The third person who ran straight is likely the suspect that police said was potentially still at large later in the audio recording, as he did not initially get caught.
Of the 18 people that are not already at the scene or nearby, respond to Troop A. Last report was that there was one suspect that potentially was still at large.
So I want them to set up at A in case we need to deploy them somewhere else.
The article also mentions the officer detained had a gun and the suspect that was identified by a witness coming out of the woods was seen sitting in the front of the police car and not the back.
They did walk a guy out of the woods.
I saw him walk a guy out earlier with handcuffs.
He walked by us and said he didn't do it.
It was a grown man?
A grown man, yeah.
He's sitting in the front of the police car over there now.
So, I mean... He didn't have a gun?
No.
I didn't see anything.
I just had him handcuffed.
And he walked by us and looked into parents' eyes and said I didn't do it.
How was he dressed?
Camo pants with a dark jacket They did walk a guy out of the woods I saw him walk a guy out earlier with handcuffs.
He walked by us and said he didn't do it.
It was a grown man?
A grown man, yeah.
He's sitting in the front of the police car over there now.
So, I mean... He didn't have a gun?
No.
I didn't see any gun.
Just had him handcuffed.
And he walked by us and looked into parents' eyes and said I didn't do it.
How was he dressed?
Camo pants with a dark jacket.
Now, why would a suspect be kept in the front seat of a police vehicle after being arrested?
Unless he was some sort of government agent or someone in law enforcement.
All of these anomalies seem to point to a highly top secret carefully planned out operation and would also explain why so many of the media's reports that were claimed to come from federal and local officials were later claimed to be false.
This method would divert people's attention and keep them focused on aspects of the case that would lead to dead ends or stray them from the truth.
To destroy all of the evidence, the crime scenes, both the school and the Lanza home have been seized indefinitely, and all records relating to the crime have been sealed by the courts.
Sandy Hook Elementary School is also scheduled to be torn down.
The ones who control the media also control the courts, and have access to any records and information the rest of the people are withheld from, making it hard for anyone to find out what really happened.
Because of this, we may never know the truth, so it is important we continue to ask questions and demand explanations.
These suspects, along with the first responders in the building, were likely all together, which would also explain why the first responders in the building were telling the other officers to stay clear, shots have stopped, and all is quiet in the building, to allow time for the others to get away, and so they had time inside to plant the guns in Adam, who was shot to ensure the Patsy could never tell what happened.
Even the medical crews were told to stay clear, not only because there were very few injured in the attack, but also to allow everything to be set up without a hitch, and to avoid any key members of the operation to fall under suspicion.
As we have seen before, such as the instance of Lee Harvey Oswald, local authorities are not aware of agents' identities, and if anyone were to become aware of their identifications, they are kept quiet by bribes and threats.
This is so that the truth is never leaked to the public.
This would explain why the local authorities' stories changed so much and media sources were fed false information.
A majority of these reports came from federal sources, so the news and media broadcasters must have thought it was official information.
This continues to be a very complex investigation and there's a lot of contradictory information out there, but there is some new information this morning from a couple of federal officials and state officials.
They say now that there were actually four handguns recovered inside the school, not just two, as we were initially told.
Thank you, Governor.
To all the families First responders to the community of Newtown.
Clergy.
Guests.
Guests.
Just this year, Sandy Hook Elementary Sandy Hook Elementary School put into place a security plan, making it mandatory for visitors to
ring a doorbell and only be let in if staff recognize them through the video monitor.
And if staff didn't recognize the visitor, he or she needed to present picture ID, sign in, and only then would be let into the school.
Every time we went to the school, you always had to press a button and they'd ask who you are to come in.
There was a masked man came in and just started shooting.
I don't know how we came in because every time you go in you have to ring a bell and they can see you from the office and they know who you are and they let you in.
So I don't know if it was somebody they knew.
When the events of Columbine took place, video surveillance from the school's cameras were later released to the public.
After this event, security became a much more important matter, and a majority of schools installed many new security precautions to avoid future shootings, and make students and parents feel more comfortable about the safety of their school.
This is not only common in schools, as many businesses and public establishments have also implemented security cameras, such as shopping malls, department stores, libraries, and movie theaters.
To this date, we have not been shown any video footage from the security cameras that were installed at Sandy Hook, which would show exactly what happened.
Another incident in where we have not seen any video evidence is the Aurora shooting involving James Holmes.
In similar fashion, witnesses described multiple suspects as proven on police scanner audio recordings, and details on what the public were told about the case remain highly questionable.
Both the father of James Holmes and Adam Lanza have been indirectly linked to the massive Libor scandal, perhaps the largest banking fraud ever to unfold.
The father of James Holmes has been attributed to creating algorithms which were used to uncover the LIBOR scandal.
And the father of Adam Lanza is the tax director for General Electric, a corporation that paid no taxes last year.
And three employees from the department overseen by Lanza were convicted and sent to prison on October 18th, 2012 for their part in the LIBOR banking scheme.
Many people believe the Aurora shooting and the Sandy Hook shooting are related.
And along with the Sikh Temple shooting, Where a lone gunman was announced and multiple suspects were reported by witnesses, are all part of a planned series of shooting events in 2012, to push legislation to ban guns and disarm the public.
Because of the multiple suspects witnessed in these three shootings, and the reference to three strike zones on the Batman map, with Sandy Hook clearly listed, people have begun to connect the dots.
Strangely, the props and map creator for The Dark Knight Rises was from Newtown and died in April of 2012 in a head-on collision, despite rumors of him being an excellent driver.
Many people find his death suspicious and is just another aspect in a long list of coincidence or conspiracy in regards to all of this.
The Dark Knight Rises
The Dark Knight Rises
The first word was chilling.
It only got worse.
They're reporting multiple fatalities involved in the shooting at the elementary school.
With each new report, the horror deepened.
Reports say the number of dead closer to 30 than to 20.
The most popular conspiracy theory regarding the Sandy Hook case claims that crisis actors were used in a majority of the roles and played characters involved in the incident. - Thank you.
These claims state that no one actually died in the event and that the entire thing was a false flag operation set up in an attempt to intensify gun control or ban firearms altogether.
These speculations have created a huge uproar in mainstream media, and have caused an outright attack on anyone and all people who are questioning the official story.
These claims reveal companies such as VisionBox, which specialize in actors that are available for active shooter and emergency drill-type situations.
VisionBox is based out of Denver, Colorado, and is the leading actor studio in the area.
These actors are professionally trained to bring an aspect of realism to full-scale exercises and specialize in criminal and victims' behavior.
Roles played by these actors include shooters, victims, civilians and bystanders, journalists and media reporters, employees, witnesses, and many other key positions in emergency-type scenarios.
Sandy Hook Elementary also practiced emergency exercises in previous months.
As the principal, Don Hochsprung, posted tweets about these drills as early as October 17th.
In these drills, the children and teachers were taught to exit the school in single file, and to meet outside, as shown in this picture.
Connecticut State Police were also quite trained in active shooter drills, as we have seen, and because there is only one picture of students actually exiting the school, Showing just a handful of students out of the said 456 that attended the school.
People believe that the entire incident was planned beforehand and was a full-scale drill type scenario.
We have not seen any footage from either security cameras or news coverage showing anyone actually leaving the school.
If we examine the footage we do have, it would appear that there is a lack of commotion within the vicinity of the school grounds.
There is very little emergency vehicles near the building itself, And as we know the staging area was down the road at the firehouse to keep people away from the school and essentially away from seeing what was going on.
It is to my belief that the first responders to the scene were controlling the situation entirely by keeping as many people away from the scene of the crime as possible so that there could be less witnesses to what really happened inside and outside of the school.
There are so many reasons why people do not believe the official story
And some of these include the constantly changing news reports and information regarding the case, the lack of photo and video evidence of the bodies and security footage from inside and outside of the school, the various tweets, fundraisers, tributes, and videos that were posted before the shooting, multiple suspects and obvious evidence of a group of people involved, the lack of information on Adam and Nancy Lanza, and the conflicting statements and strange behavior of some of the parties involved in this case.
The mom told me that there was over a hundred shots inside the school.
A hundred shots?
Over a hundred shots.
More than one shooter, or?
Just one, no.
Just one shooter.
More than one shooter, or?
Just one, no.
So you talked to the person who called 9-1-1?
Yes, and she said that there was hundreds of shots.
Hundreds of shots?
That's what she said.
The state police have been managing the dissemination of information from the school there.
We have received some additional information, but at this point in time, I'm not in a position to disclose that.
Do you have any information on the fact that more than two dozen people were shot and killed at the school?
I can't verify that information.
And the 14 were children?
I cannot verify that information.
I'm going to again refer you to the state police who are going to take charge of the situation there, given the gravity and the impact on that community.
And as we said, they will be giving a press conference.
We've been led to believe that they will be giving a press conference at 1 p.m.
and will have the latest facts and figures and updates.
We would suggest that that be the resource for any further detailed information.
When you saw those children on your yard, did you have any idea that something was wrong?
I had no idea.
I thought they were doing a skit or maybe they were cub scouts or girl scouts and they were just practicing.
I thought I heard some gunshots.
Sometimes I hear a deer hunter shooting and it's boom boom.
These were very staccato shots.
They were very quick.
And I thought, how obnoxious.
Why would a hunter do that?
But I didn't think much of it.
I really didn't.
I didn't think much of it.
When you saw those children on your yard, did you have any idea that something was wrong?
I had no idea.
I thought they were doing a skit or maybe they were cub scouts or girl scouts and they were just practicing because they were sitting so nicely.
But then I saw a man in a very agitated way saying it's going to be alright.
He kept raising his voice and I thought that was so strange and I came to the children and they were crying and wailing and mortified and there was a school bus driver with them And I invited them into the house and she said there had been an incident at the school.
I had no idea what it was.
Jane, what did you see that morning?
I looked down and I saw six children and I thought I was curious of why they were on my lawn.
And I thought they were Cub Scouts or some children from the school doing a play.
They were sitting, they were sitting in a regular fashion and they, Something was askew because I saw this man talking in a very loud voice to them, saying, it's all right, it's all right.
And I'm wondering, why was he talking so harshly to them?
And I just kept walking, and I came, and I saw them, and they were weeping.
And they looked very frightened.
And they almost looked out of breath.
And they were just sitting right here.
And they were sitting in a nice little way.
Like in a circle, like in a little reading group.
I couldn't imagine what happened to them.
And the teacher said, the bus driver said, there's been an incident.
So I said, come on inside, come on inside.
And we walked up my driveway.
Then they talked more and the boy said, oh no, it was a big gun and a small gun.
And then I knew.
Jane took in many of the children during the Sandy Hook shooting.
I was going to breakfast at a local diner and I was ready to get into my car and I looked down toward the end of my lawn and I saw six children.
And I was astounded at what they said.
They said I can't go back to the school.
I can't go back to the school.
I don't have a teacher.
I don't have a teacher.
And then the other boy said, Mrs. Soto, my teacher's been shot.
I could not fathom this.
I could not imagine what they were talking about.
I did not I did not correct them or ask them any questions.
I let them keep talking and they kept talking.
I did not correct them or ask them any questions.
I let them keep talking.
Some lady came looking for her son.
I hope he's not one of the children.
She said, I heard you had six kids here.
I said, I took him to the firehouse.
I said, I took him to the firehouse.
At what point do you reunite or do the kids get reunited with their parents?
Explain to me what that moment was like.
Oh.
When their parents came, I was so happy. - Okay.
Their parents is what they needed.
That was their lifeline after a day of blackness.
They were with their teacher, the other guide and their wife, and that teacher had been destroyed and assassinated.
What's left?
Their parents.
That's the only thing that's left.
And their parents came to the house.
My arms were not long enough to put around them.
Friends and parents say Huxprung was passionate and dedicated, tough but caring, and one said the kids loved her.
The principal who, God bless her, lost her life was just a very special person.
And all the parents knew that.
Wolf Blitzer, CNN, Newtown, Connecticut.
There has been a great deal of speculation in regards to some of these crisis actors' claims, and some specific people have been mentioned, such as the Phelps family, actually being actors from Florida, belonging to the Sexton family.
There is a resemblance when looking at photographs and comparing it to the Phelps video.
And several other people have also been associated with other look-alikes.
Some of these claims are simply ludicrous, however, and mainstream media has wasted no time in ridiculing these claims, targeting anyone who questions the authenticity of the information being stated by the news and mainstream media.
By using the crisis actor theory as their ammunition, they have caused a large division amongst the public, As many people are quite disturbed over these claims and have now formed the opinion that anyone who disagrees with the official story lacks empathy and has no respect for the families or the victims of the crime.
And also simultaneously diverts the attention of people who notice that the facts don't add up and begin to question the authority in these matters.
By promoting the crisis actor story, media is also deterring people from questioning the multiple suspects that are involved.
And if people believe that nobody died, and it was all planned out, they do not concern themselves with the realities of this being an incident in where actual lives were lost, and that someone or a group of people are guilty of the crime.
Many people who know victims of the shooting, residents of Newtown, and others associated with people involved in the events at Sandy Hook, have become extremely offended by the allegations that actors were used, and that no one actually died and felt suffering.
The media has used this opportunity to ridicule all people that do not believe in what we have been told, and have attributed conspiracy theorists with having mental illnesses, lacking empathy, and classified as the Lunatic Fringe, as I've heard it called.
Because of these implications, petitions were started addressing the White House with a request to ban all conspiracy theory videos and articles in relation to the Sandy Hook conspiracy, and likely all materials that question these types of events and government in general.
If this proves successful, Our right to express our own thoughts and opinions, freedom of speech, and essentially other freedoms in life may also be in jeopardy.
We would be forced to accept the lies and deceit spewed forth by government-controlled media sources, and anyone caught questioning the totalitarian empire would be criminally punished, and the term thought criminal will no longer be used in relation to fictitious works, but in fact it would be our reality and our way of life.
The media has been using attacks on conspiracy theorists in an attempt to divide and conquer a commonly used tactic in intelligence and military operations.
It is important to note that we have discussed with federal authorities that these These issues are crimes.
They will be investigated statewide and federally and prosecution will take place when people perpetrating this information are identified.
Again, all information relative to this case is coming from these microphones and any information coming from other sources cannot be confirmed and in many cases it's been found is inaccurate.
So I simply, uh, that's the newest twist today, uh, that we want to make sure that's perfectly clear that social media websites that contain information relative to this case are not being posted by the Connecticut State Police, are not being posted by the Newtown Police, are not being posted by any authorities in this case.
So any of that information and people that are putting that information up there in any manner I have looked at this case from various perspectives and find it very hard to believe that everybody involved in this incident are actors, as I have seen so many genuine grievances over the loss of loved ones, friends and family.
Many of these people were in shock at the time, and many testimonies I have seen are highly questionable and deceptive.
However, those account for a small minority in comparison to the amount of people affected by this tragedy.
There are simply too many people involved or associated in this event for it to be all faked, and a large amount of people would have confessed or said something to provide concrete evidence that this whole thing was faked.
I do believe, however, that we are not being told all of the details, and that certain government factions had advanced knowledge of this attack and carefully planned for the shooting, setting everything up, and using Adam Lanza as the patsy.
The media has purposefully reported false details to confuse us and are using the actor theory to discredit anyone who is aware that there has been a massive cover-up.
I am sure that the high-ups in the CIA, FBI, and the ATF have had a part to play in all of this because of the obvious media tampering, secrecy, and the unidentified suspects that were detained.
It is entirely up to you what to believe in all of this, and it is highly encouraged to study these topics on your own, so that you may come to your own consensus.
The truth of the matter is, that we are heading into dangerous times, and the Sandy Hook shooting is just the beginning of this monumental period in human history.
It is more important now, more than ever before, to be aware of what is happening, and about to unfold, And those who are bright enough to see it will have the necessary knowledge to help bring resolution to the many problems we face as a society.
The families and lives that were affected by the Newtown shooting deserve the proper justice for the loss of their loved ones.
And it is important that we try to show the world what is really going on and where all of this is leading.
The growing conspiracy theories about the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, If you don't know about this, you are going to be stunned.
We were in Newtown last night, and a number of residents have been inundated with hateful messages, crank calls, by people who believe they are part of a government and media conspiracy surrounding the shootings.
Now, it's not just Some internet extremists alleging these conspiracies.
This is a guy named James Tracy, a tenured associate professor at Florida Atlantic University, a public school that's taxpayer-funded.
Now, as we told you first on Friday, Professor Tracy claims the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary did not happen as reported and may not have happened at all.
Here's what he wrote originally on his personal blog, and I quote, One is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place, at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation's news media have described.
As we told you Friday, normally we wouldn't dignify these types of remarks by covering them, but James Tracy is a tenured professor at a public university.
And these claims by him and others online have begun to cause deep distress to victims' families.
You had 20 families that were mourning that buried children.
Are you concerned about that at all?
Well, I think that the entire country mourned about Sandy Hook.
And yet, once again, the investigation that journalistic institutions should have actually carried out never took place, as far as I'm concerned.
There's a lot of emotion involved with something like this.
Is there anything that you want to say to that person at home that's going to throw their shoe at the TV and say, this guy is a total nut?
Well, I think that we need to, as a society, look at things more carefully.
Perhaps we as a society have been conditioned to be do.
Like all reporters, I believe in free speech and Professor Tracy has the right to say whatever But as a teacher at a public university, we think he should be accountable for the things he says, and be willing to defend them.
So about that, Tracy makes the case, if you want to call it a case, that news organizations and the government may have worked together to dupe you, the public, in order to gain support for gun control law.
Instead of seeing it as the fog of war or just incorrect reporting early on, have you seen a theme of why people believe that the media and the government are in cahoots to hire actors and make up killings?
And we're looking at that very carefully.
Do you have any people being paid by the CIA?
Do you have any people being paid by the CIA?
who are contributing to a major circulation American journal.
We do have people who submit pieces to American journals.
Do you have any people paid by the CIA who are working for television networks?
This, I think, gets into the kind of, uh, getting into the details, Mr. Chairman, that I'd like to get into in an executive session.
Uh, at CBS, uh, we, uh, had been contacted by the CIA.
As a matter of fact, by the time I became the head of the whole news and public affairs operation in 1954, the ships had been established, and I was told about them and asked if I'd carry on with them.
We have quite a lot of detailed information, uh, and we will We will evaluate it and we will include any evidence of wrongdoing or any evidence of impropriety in our final report and make recommendations.
Do you have any people being paid by the CIA who are contributing to the National News Services, AP and UPI.
Well, again, I think we're getting into the kind of detail, Mr. Chairman, that I'd prefer to handle in an executive session.
So I want you to see this.
Breaking.
Police respond to report of school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut.
Few other details available.
7.25 a.m. December 14th.
Senator, do you think that you named the news organization?
That remains to be decided.
I think it was entirely in order for our correspondents at that time to make use of the CIA chief's station and other members of the executive staff of CIA as sources of information which were useful in their assessments of world conditions.
Will that continue today?
Well, yeah, I would think probably for a reporter it would continue today, but because of all of the revelations of the period of the 1970s, it seems to me that a reporter's got to be much more circumspect in doing it now, or he runs the risk of at least being looked at with considerable disfavor by the public.
I think you've got to be much more careful about it.
I think you've got to be much more careful about it.
Here's where the little bit of truth comes in.
Conspiracy theorists, and most likely you, can agree.
And this is how, this is, if I'm Satan, this is how I do it every single time.
I just take a little bit of truth, and go, well, that, yeah, that's, I know that.
I know.
I know.
But let me ask you this.
Is it at least possible?
You know, you really know what happened on 9-11?
And I start taking just little bits of facts, and I start mixing them with out-and-out lies.
Provable lies!
But then I tell you, yeah, can you really trust that news organization to tell you the truth?
I know they say that's wrong, but can you trust them?
And now you find yourself in the exact situation that that kid was in.
Isolated.
Alone.
Not knowing who to trust.
Everybody is against you.
And you just want to feel something again.
Something real again.
That's what happened.
And as a society, we are being led right down that rabbit hole.
And we're being led down that rabbit hole by people who are telling you right now, and not in the government, You can trust me.
I'm your friend.
I'm the friend of the Constitution.
According to the secret reports, Antonio Veciana, a leader of anti-Castro Cubans directed by the CIA, saw Oswald talking to a senior CIA agent he knew by the cover name, Boris Bishop.
Viziana provided enough information for House investigators to compile this sketch of the agent who met Oswald.
Could it have been Phillips?
Investigators believe it was.
Phillips denied under oath that he knew Oswald, but House investigators did not believe him and wanted him charged with perjury.
The government declined to prosecute, leaving investigators furious.
The director of the CIA in 1963 was John McComb.
He caused a sensation among committee staffers when he admitted there was an agent using the cover name Bishop.
But a secret memo reveals he was allowed to reverse his testimony.
A CIA lawyer wrote the committee.
I should inform you that he had been in error.
In summary, Mr. McCone withdraws his statements on this point.
The man who fingered Maurice Bishop, Antonio Viciana, was shot in the head soon after testifying, but survived.
Frightened, he will no longer talk about the case.
We caught up with him in Florida.
They wounded me in the head.
He tried to kill me.
You know why?
I don't know, but maybe I know.
Maybe I know.
Did they tell you?
No.
David Adly Phillips died of cancer in 1988.
David Adley Phillips died of cancer in 1988.
Investigators believe Phillips was angry at JFK for botching the Cuban Bay of Pigs operation.
The second explosive revelation in the sealed documents also links the CIA directly to Oswald.
While living in Dallas, Oswald was befriended by Russian-born George D'Amore and S.H.I.E.L.D.
Investigators determined he was a contract agent for the CIA in Central America and the Caribbean.
In 1977, moments before he was to be interviewed by house investigators, Demore and Shield blew his brains out with a 20-gauge shotgun.
House investigators believe he was a crucial link between the CIA and Lee Harvey Oswald.
There is no question that the sealed JFK files are extremely embarrassing for the CIA.
House investigators have told Inside Edition that the agency did not fully cooperate in their investigation, and that the CIA had final say in the report that the House Assassinations Committee made public.
Thus, the public report makes no mention of the CIA's links with Lee Harvey Oswald.
But the secret documents are another story.
Thank you.
Mr. Speaker.
The last nail is being driven into the coffin of the American Republic, yet Congress remains in total denial as our liberties are rapidly fading before our eyes.
The process is propelled by unwarranted fear and ignorance as to the true meaning of liberty.
It is driven by economic myths, fallacies, and irrational good intentions.
The rule of law is constantly rejected and authoritarian answers are offered as panaceas for all our problems.
Runaway welfarism is used to benefit the rich at the expense of the middle class.
Who would have ever thought that the current generation and Congress would stand idly by and watch such a rapid disintegration of the American Republic?
Characteristic of this epic event is the casual acceptance by the people and the political leaders of the unitary presidency, which is equivalent to granting dictatorial powers to the president.
Our presidents can now, on their own, order assassinations, including American citizens, operate secret military tribunals, engage in torture, Enforce indefinite imprisonments without due process.
Order searches and seizures without proper warrants, gutting the Fourth Amendment.
Ignore the 60-day rule for reporting to the Congress the nature of any military operation as required by a war power resolution.
Continue the Patriot Act abuses without oversight.
Wage war at will.
Treat all Americans as suspected terrorists at airports with TSA groping and nude x-ray.
And the Federal Reserve accommodates by counterfeiting the funds needed and not paid for by taxation and borrowing, permitting runaway spending, endless debt, and special interest bailouts.
And all of this is not enough.
People should be on the television,
on the radio, as much as we possibly can, and telling these youngsters that it's long to carry a gun, and if you have information about people who are carrying guns, you've got to share that with Chief Thomas and with his people as well.
Amen.
I've also asked the school board.
We need to make a part of every day some kind of anti-violence, anti-gun message.
Every day, every school, at every level.
One thing that I think is clear with young people and with adults as well is that we just have to be repetitive about this.
It's not enough to simply have a catchy ad on a Monday and then only do it every Monday.
We need to do this every day of the week and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.
We need to do this every day of the week and just really brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way.
By targeting the groups that are responsible for violence throughout this city and eventually the entire state of Connecticut, I think it's really important, the entire state of Connecticut, Project Longevity will send a powerful message to those who will harm their fellow citizens that such acts will not be tolerated.
America's top law enforcement official found in contempt of Congress.
The resolution is agreed to.
Thursday, the Republican-controlled U.S.
House of Representatives reprimanded Attorney General Eric Holder for failing to release internal Justice Department documents related to a botched government investigation into gun running.
Known as Fast and Furious, the plan allowed thousands of weapons to be purchased in the United States and smuggled into Mexico, in the hope it would lead authorities to the leaders of Mexican drug cartels.
But most of those guns went missing.
Many are believed to have found their way to drug gangs, and two were found at the site of a shootout that killed Brian Terry, a U.S.
Border Patrol agent.
Fast and furious, the Department of Justice's permitted sale of more than 2,000 weapons that fell into the hands of the Mexican drug cartels was both reckless and inexcusable.
We still have unanswered questions.
Did Lanny Brewer know better than what was represented in the February the 4th letter?
Was he privy to either of these two memos, the July 5th, 2010?
He said he was briefed April 2010.
And by the way, what office does Laney Brewer hold in the Department of Justice?
He's the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division.
And why would Lanny Brewer, knowing as he did back in April 2010 about Operation Fast and Furious, allow a letter that went out on the department's stationery, February 4th, 2011, why would he let a letter that was false Represent the position of the Department of Justice.
Well, first off, the briefing, the Blue and AAG Brewer brief, that was about wide receiver.
That wasn't about fast and furious.
By the way, do you know the differences between wide receiver and fast and furious?
You mean, do I know the... They're different operations.
Right.
And so, do you know the differences, factual differences between wide receiver and fast and furious?
Well, I mean, there are a number of differences, both I think in scope, both in terms of time.
The Bush administration was the one that started wide receiver.
The Obama administration is where Fast and Furious began.
Does it surprise you that these boxes Five boxes represent just what one gun dealer gave us voluntarily.
Well, in fact, this seems to be all the information you have responsive to our subpoena.
Does it cause you to think that, in fact, we believe you are withholding documents?
We believe that, in fact, there is more production.
So my final question, and you can answer all of them for as long as the chairman wants, Is do you today have documents responsive to the lawful request of the Oversight Committee that have not yet been granted?
All right, well let me go back to my first answer that I was not... Well, mine's pretty easy.
Mine's a yes or no, and then the others you're going to go on for a while.
I'll get to that.
The... Would you please get to it first?
With regard to Gary Grindler, he was not provided with a detailed analysis of Fast and Furious.
He was given information about the... Mr. Chairman, Mr. Chairman, this... I asked earlier that the Attorney General be placed under oath.
I was denied that.
But what I will make the point is that it is not productive For anyone to come before this committee and tell us what somebody else didn't know.
That is exactly how the legislative liaison behind the Attorney General, Mr. Weiss, came and gave false testimony to my committee.
False because people who are still working for the Attorney General knowingly gave him misleading information in addition to the U.S.
Attorney and no action has been taken.
The Mexican government complains that they were not informed about the Fast and Furious operation.
Did you authorize this operation?
And was President Calderon properly informed about it?
Well, first of all, I did not authorize it.
Eric Holder, the Attorney General, did not authorize it.
He's been very clear that our policy is to catch gun runners and put them into jail.
So what he's done is he's assigned an IG, an Inspector General, Well, we don't have all the facts.
That's why the IG is in business.
You were not even informed about it?
Absolutely not.
This is a pretty big government, the United States government.
I've got a lot of moving parts.
They were hoping that President Obama would hear her words tonight if we could get them read on air.
So she gave me a letter, and unfortunately there were too many people at the wake for me to get up to actually see the family, so the letter was passed back to me.
But this is what she wrote, and if you could read it, because I can't.
The family gave permission?
The family told me to bring it to you.
He says, my name is Natalie Barden, and I wanted to tell the President that only police officers in the military should get guns.
If people want to do it as a sport, then they could go to a shooting range, and the guns would not be able to leave there.
That's what she wants President Obama to hear.
Yeah, this is what the question she wanted to ask him.
What was it like spending time with President Obama?
Was that helpful for you all?
To be honest, it was a little less fruitful than we were hoping.
James and our daughter Natalie had a few things that they were hoping to express to him out of concern for the way this the fact that this situation happened at all and how we can maybe hopefully stop this from happening again.
My daughter Natalie was was interested in Asking him if he could pass some kind of legislation so that the only people that had guns were military personnel and law enforcement and if people needed guns for sport that they could go to a range and the guns would have to stay there.
That was my 10 year old daughter.
That was all her own original thought.
That was all her own original thought.
They are as determined as ever.
Mr. Chairman, the small arms and light weapons are truly weapons of mass destruction.
The United Nations conspiring with the majority of its members to do what they've already done to their own citizens.
Deny you your firearm freedom.
In New York, right here in our own shores, we've got a Trojan horse.
They want to set U.S.
firearms policy.
They want to take the decision away from the U.S.
electorate and undermine our Constitution.
That's really their ultimate agenda, to bring the United States down from the pinnacle of freedom to simply being another one of these socialist states where the government controls everything.
And just who are these gun grabbers?
Countries like Japan.
We strictly punish and control the possession and the use of small arms by civilians.
Britain and Australia.
Firearm owners in Australia must also demonstrate a genuine reason for ownership.
The Netherlands.
It's my firm conviction that the illicit trade cannot be tackled without involving the legal arms trade.
And Canada, led by its former Minister of Justice, Alan Rock.
Registration is the cornerstone of the entire strategy.
Alan Rock is now Canada's voice at the United Nations.
His anti-gun agenda is now front and center at the world stage.
That's scary.
Scary because the United Nations continues to get away with what it does best.
It's a stealth operation.
Secretly scheming behind closed doors to outlaw your guns.
We must not wait until 2006.
Accountable to no one.
He wouldn't get elected to the UN.
And that's the really scary thing.
How the hell do you get rid of a U.N.
bureaucrat?
These are the biggest human rights violators in the world and they're trying to tell people in the United States that we shouldn't have certain civil liberties.
But the U.N.
is not pushing its agenda alone.
There's a propaganda machine working every day, targeting the NRA and gun ownership as evil.
It's called IANSA, the International Action Network on Small Arms.
This is not about military small arms.
This is not about rocket launchers.
What they're really after is my Winchester hunting rifle.
Just log on to IANTS's website, and you'll see it's made up of more than 500 anti-gun NGOs, or non-governmental organizations.
They are absolutely awesome, in terms of the power they have.
There's a tower and a plot that is being engineered right here in London, in that building behind me, where I answer is headquartered.
Imagine, nearly 230 years after the American Revolution, there are still forces at work here on British soil, determined to trample on your freedoms.
In fact, there's 20,000 gun laws on the books.
And thanks to one of them in Texas, that restricted carrying a concealed weapon, Susanna Hoppe...
Let her tell her story.
Back in 1991, I was with my parents at a local restaurant.
And we had just finished eating when a madman drove his truck through the window and very methodically began executing people.
And he wasn't spraying bullets.
He had complete control over the situation.
He was simply walking from one person to the next, taking aim, pulling the trigger.
And this guy kept shooting.
And you're thinking, what could it be?
Is it a robbery?
That's the first thing that generally comes to mind.
And he keeps shooting.
It took me a good 45 seconds to realize that this man wasn't there to commit a robbery.
He wasn't there for a hit.
He was there to simply shoot as many people as he possibly could.
When I finally realized what was occurring, I thought, I got him.
And I reached for my purse.
He was maybe 12 feet away.
You know, is it possible my gun could have jammed?
Sure.
Is it possible I could have missed?
Sure.
But I can tell you I've hit much smaller targets at much greater distances.
But then I realized that a couple of months earlier I had made the stupidest decision of my life.
I took my gun out of my purse and left it in my car.
Because as you well know, in the state of Texas, it's sometimes a felony offense to carry a gun in your purse.
My father at that point said, I've got to do something.
I've got to do something.
He's going to kill everybody in here.
And he rushed the man.
No way.
This guy turned, shot him in the chest.
He went down, was obviously mortally wounded.
For whatever reason, that made the man change directions and go off to my left.
Shortly thereafter, someone at the back of the restaurant broke out a window.
When I saw what looked like an opportunity to escape, I turned around and I grabbed my mother by the shirt and I said, come on, come on, we've got to run, we've got to get out of here.
And then my feet grew wings and I was out the back window.
As soon as I got out, I realized that my mother had not followed me out.
And as I learned from the police officers, she had crawled over to where my father was and cradled him until the guy got back around to her.
Put the gun to her head, she looked up at him, put her head down, and he pulled the trigger.
My parents had just had their 47th wedding anniversary.
She wasn't going anywhere.
You might think Susanna would be in favor of stricter gun control laws.
You'd be wrong.
She actually had a gun with her that afternoon, but in the days before right-to-carry legislation, the law required that she leave it in her car.
I was angry at myself for having made what I realize now was an incredibly stupid decision to obey a bad law and allow my family to get killed.
And I was mad at my legislature because I absolutely felt that they had legislated me out of the right to protect myself and my family.
Just one final statement.
I've been sitting here getting more and more fed up with all of this talk About these pieces of machinery having no legitimate sporting purpose.
No legitimate hunting purpose.
People, that is not the point of the Second Amendment.
The Second Amendment is not about duck hunting.
And I know I'm not going to make very many friends saying this, but it's about all rights, all of our rights, To be able to protect ourselves from all of you guys up there.
I'd give up my gun when everybody else does.
Doesn't that make sense?
Doesn't that make sense?
I mean, if there were guns here, would you be the only person without one?
So do you carry guns routinely at home?
I mean, you have a gun at home?
Yeah, it's legal in the United States.
It's part of our constitution.
You know, the right to bear arms is because that's the last form of defense against tyranny.
Not to hunt, but hunt.
It's to protect yourself from the police.
And do you see any link between that and these sorts of incidents?
No.
Nah, not really.
You know what I'm saying?
If somebody wants to kill people, you know, they don't need a gun to do it.
For a man who is a, who is a patriot, who purports to love his country, that was quite a shocking disrespect to your president.
Let me put it in official CNN, Piers Morgan interview terms, shall I?
Yes.
My limey friend.
Yes.
Anybody that wants to disarm me can drop dead.
Anybody that wants to make me unarmed and helpless, people that want to literally create the proven There are places where more innocents are killed called gun-free zones.
We're going to beat you.
We're going to vote you out of office or suck on my machine gun.
You can take it whichever way you like.
As much as I'd love to suck on your machine gun, the whole point of your defense is that a lot of people do drop dead precisely because you are armed to the teeth.
And you'd like everybody else to be.
Not true at all.
80 people... Break this down, see you're so rich.
No, you write this down.
80 people a day die in America from gunshots.
And 75 of them to 78 of them, statistics by the Uniform Crime Report by the FBI and the UN Study on Violent Crime, 78 of those 80 are let out of their cages by corrupt judges and prosecutors who know that recidivism is out of control, know that they'll commit the crimes again, And they let them walk through plea bargaining, early release, and programs.
Kiss my ass!
Where you have the most armed citizens in America, you have the lowest violent crime rate.
Where you have the worst gun control, you have the highest crime rate.
Peers, choose one!
Do you want a lot of crime?
We have it.
Gun-free zones.
Do you want less crime?
We have that.
More people with concealed weapons permit.
Why do you guys resist that statistic?
Well, don't say you guys.
It's you guys!
You are not playing the devil's advocate.
I can play any advocate I like.
You're doing a great job.
You're playing the idiot's advocate here.
More guns equals less crime.
Period.
Unless I'm wrong.
And I don't want to kiss your ass at this point, if you don't mind.
Unless I'm wrong with your argument.
Well, you're basically saying that, you know, 90% of the gun crime comes from people... 96% of the way, but go ahead.
But they still have to get access to firearms.
If you had your way, there would be 10 times as many firearms, right?
You want everyone in America to own a gun?
Not at all.
I've never said that.
What's your position?
I gotta tell you.
What is your position?
And I hope you don't edit this out.
Whenever I've done interviews with guys that are inclined to be anti-gun, they always go, well I knew you wanted everybody to have a machine gun!
Nugent wants all the deer dead!
What does Nugent want?
Not even close.
What do you want?
What I want is the Second Amendment.
We the people, free individuals to have the right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.
Find fault with that.
And now with Jeffrey Ventura and our live studio audience, gun control.
This is something I've been very animated about all this year with all the various gun outrages, especially the appalling thing at the cinema in Colorado.
Why is it that Americans, to me it seems, so many Americans, cannot divorce their right to defend themselves with a gun to the apparent right to go and buy 6,000 rounds of ammunition, high-powered assault weapons, and go and murder Americans?
Well, the best thing I can tell you, Piers, is this.
Mexico has strict gun control.
You cannot own a gun in Mexico.
And they had 20,000 people dead last year in the drug cartel wars.
Mexico has a very particular problem involving drugs.
I can cite you Britain.
All right.
Well, let me just throw it back at you.
In Britain, for example, an average of 35 people a year are murdered with guns.
In Germany, it's about 40 to 50.
France, the same.
Spain, the same.
Italy.
There's a pattern here.
America, 11,000 to 12,000 a year.
This country has more guns than anybody else and more gun murders.
It's inarguable, isn't it?
No, not at all.
Because I was in the Philippines.
Physically, the day Ferdinand Marcos declared martial law and made himself a dictator, and the first thing that dictator did, he gave the people of the Philippines two weeks to turn in all their guns or it was the death penalty.
Now why would a dictator do that?
Why would he make his number one priority when he took over as dictator to disarm the public?
The Second Amendment is there, and it was put in there not for hunting and fishing, like they like to say.
Because back when they did it, if you didn't hunt or fish, you didn't eat.
It was put in there so the citizens would have the ability, if their government became oppressive, they could defend themselves against oppressive government.
And I think that overrules all the gun deaths because, let's remember something, a gun is simply a tool.
I have a gun safe at home, and I've never come home and heard those guns going off on their own.
People kill people.
Alright, how many people here die because of car accidents of drunk driving?
Do we go to the Ford Motor Company and tell them stop making these automobiles because people get drunk and kill people in cars?
That's a fast argument.
It's a what?
It's a facile argument.
There's no equivalence between drunk driving and lethal firearms.
Wait a minute.
A car is a 2,000 pound projectile that can go 100 miles an hour.
I have no problem.
With an American believing that their right under the Constitution is that they can defend themselves, especially in their own home, if they're being attacked and they have a weapon.
It's also against government.
I have a big problem with a disturbed young man, as we saw in Colorado, being able to buy 6,000 rounds of ammunition and a high-powered assault weapon, and go into a movie theatre and blow away 70 Americans.
I have a big problem with that.
And nobody else in America, in high office, seems to share that big problem.
Well, I'll tell you what, Piers.
I have a conceal and carry license.
Had I been in there, I would have taken this guy out before he could have killed that many people.
Well, I think that, again... But because, let's remember, police can't stop crimes.
Police show up after they're over.
Remember that.
So when you talk about me not being able, if there would have been a legitimate conceal and carry in that theater, quite possibly they could have taken this guy out and saved people's lives.
Or you could have had the gunfight at the O.K.
Corral in there and lost even more lives, couldn't he?
That's what could happen.
Anyway, let's take a break.
Well, what roll of the dice would you like?
You'd prefer to be unarmed?
How many people here think I make crackpot points?
One.
How many think I make sensible points?
You're in a minority, my good friend.
You're the minority.
Let's...
I said you made some sensible points.
Let's get another audience question from Jared...
Albert Pike was a U.S. administration.
attorney, confederate officer, writer, and is considered to be the father of modern Freemasonry.
If you are unsure of what Freemasonry is, it is a fraternal organization or secret society in which almost every town and city has a lodge.
Members of these lodges include many important figures involved in the community, such as bankers, government officials, law enforcement, judges, lawyers, and many other positions of importance in relation to the maintaining and control over a community.
Chances are, if you look around your own community, you will find a Masonic Lodge with links to the town's history and development.
Because of his contributions to Freemasonry, Albert Pike is highly regarded and has a monument at Judiciary Square in Washington.
In 1871, Pike wrote a letter to Guseppe Mazzini, whom has been accredited for founding the Sicilian Mafia and was a 33rd degree Freemason in Italy.
In this letter, Pike described a vision that he had, and in great detail described three world wars.
Many people believe that this letter was actually a plan set out to be followed by initiates, in order to create a one world government system, deeply rooted in Freemasonry.
The details of each war have unfolded exactly as Pike had described, which has led many people to confirm that the first two wars were planned beforehand, and that a third world war, and the bloodiest and most destructive of them all, has yet to take place.
Because of the astonishing accuracy to this letter, which was written well before any wars were termed World Wars, it is important to consider this when taking a look at what is happening in our world today.
According to Pike's letter, the First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Tsars in Russia, and of making that country a fortress of atheistic communism.
The divergences caused by the agentur, or agents of the Illuminati, between the British and Germanic empires will be used to foment this war.
At the end of the war, communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.
Pike went on to say, The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the fascists and the political Zionists.
This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel and Palestine.
During the Second World War, international communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would then be restrained and held in check until the time we would need it for the final social cataclysm.
The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the Agentur of the Illuminati between the political Zionists and the leaders of the Islamic world.
The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam, the Muslim Arabic world, and political Zionism, the state of Israel, mutually destroy each other.
Meanwhile, the other nations, once more divided on this issue, will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual, and economical exhaustion.
We shall unleash the nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm, which in all its horror, ...will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery, and the most bloody turmoil.
Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration.
will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out of the public view.
This manifestation will result from the general reactionary moment, which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.
It would seem that in order to ensure that revolutionaries do not gain the upper hand in regards to this final war, the world government system, or the United Nations, has been on a mission to slowly disarm the people in many countries so that there is no threat by the public against those in government and law enforcement.
It is to my belief that when the United Nations tries to enforce a gun ban in the United States and Canada, it will be a major factor in the start of this Third World War.
Thank you.
Many people see past the lies and the deception and are not willing to allow a government that manufactures weapons and actively engages itself in war and terrorist events to leave them defenseless by disarming them.
If a gun ban proves successful, then who would be left with the guns?
The answer to this question is sadly the same infrastructure which has contributed to a majority of the evil that exists on this planet.
And to allow these criminals exclusive access to these weapons is to officially give up our rights and freedoms in the name of martial law.
And the world empire, known as the United Nations, would continue to gain its stronghold in this real-life game of risk.
The same organization involved in the active shooter drills and emergency services training, FEMA, has taken the precautionary steps to prepare themselves for a public retaliation against government And are fully prepared to kill as many people as needed to ensure the continuance of government and world policy.
This little new cut road divided this field.
And the right side of the road was filled with, which I thought was portable toilets.
I never looked at them that close.
Same in color, maybe black, but which was an odd color.
And I was sitting there going over my notes and a van pulled alongside of me and it turned out to be the property owner.
And he greeted me and he was by himself and so we had a good little dialogue there and I asked him about the field of black boxes.
What were they?
Because I'd never seen anything like that.
And his statement was that if he told me, I would be one of few people in Madison, Georgia that knew about him.
And he says they're disposable coffins, I believe he told me.
He says there's a hundred, at that time he said there was 125,000 there.
They were stacked, he told me, 15 high.
I asked him who owned them and he stated that the CDC owned them and that they were leasing the land, leasing his land for storage.
And he said his brother worked with the CDC in Atlanta and had been asked by the CDC to do a three-year extension to place temporary morgues all across the nation.
And he said his brother worked with the CDC in Atlanta and had been asked for a few years.
The question, of course, that keeps coming back to my mind that keeps coming back to my mind is this.
Obviously, politics in themselves are not evil.
Television is not, in itself, evil.
Atomic energy is not evil.
And yet, you seem to fear that it will be used in an evil way.
Why is it that the right people will not, in your estimation, use them?
Why is it that the wrong people will use these various devices and for the wrong motives?
Well, I think one of the reasons is that these are all instruments for obtaining power, and obviously the passion for power is one of the most moving passions that exist in man, and after all, democracies are based on the proposition that power is very dangerous, and that it's extremely important not to let any one man or any one small group have too much power for too long a time, after what are the
British and American constitutions accept devices for limiting power.
And all these new devices are extremely efficient instruments for the imposition of power by small groups over larger masses.
Columbine.
Virginia Tech.
Tucson.
Aurora.
Fort Hood.
Oak Creek.
Newtown.
Newtown.
How many more?
How many more?
How many more colleges?
How many more classrooms?
How many more movie theaters?
How many more houses of faith?
How many more shopping malls?
How many more street corners?
How many more?
How many more?
Enough.
Enough.
Demand a plan.
Right now.
As a mom.
As a dad.
As a friend.
As a husband.
As a wife.
As an American.
As a human being.
For the children of Sandy Hook.
Demand a plan.
No more lists of names.
It's not too soon.
It's too late.
Now is the time.
Before we all know someone who loved someone on that list.
No more lists.
No more... Who they might have been.
No more... If we had just done something yesterday.
It's time.
We can do better than this.
We can do better than this.
It's time.
It's time.
It's time for our leaders to act.
Demand a plan.
Right now.
Right now.
You!
Demand it!
Enough.
Enough.
Northwoods.
Gulf of Conkin.
Gladio.
Kent State.
Ruby Ridge.
Waco.
Oklahoma City.
The World Trade Center.
The Pentagon.
Shanksville.
Hurricane Katrina.
Fast and Furious.
How many more?
How many more?
How many more false flags?
How many more?
How many more government buildings?
How many more innocent people?
How many more?
How many more?
What has been the number one cause of unnatural death in history?
Democide, or death by government, has killed 290 million people on record.
290 million people.
Killed.
Killed.
290 million.
290 million people killed.
Killed.
290 million.
Killed by government.
The government.
The number one killer in history is democide.
Democide.
Democide.
Death by government.
Look it up.
Go look it up.
In the 20th century, government murdered four times as many people as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined.
USSR, 61,911,000 people killed.
USSR, 61,911,000 people killed.
Hitler's Germany, nearly 21 million people killed.
Japan's imperialism, nearly 6 million people killed.
Western colonization, killed over 50 million people.
Pol Pot's Cambodia, funded by the U.S.
government, 2 million people killed.
China's Communist Party, as many as 76 million people killed between 1949 and 1987.
And the list goes on and on.
We're talking to Mike Powers today, who has previous law enforcement background.
Among other things, military backgrounds.
And we're trying to get to what we do know versus what we have been told.
And we have a right to do that.
Because there are those of us who do not trust the criminal element of the U.S.
government.
And there is a criminal element of the U.S.
government.
The evidence handling protocols and procedures that were used in this situation from beginning to end have drawn questionable opinions from professionals from all over the industry, from law enforcement to the gun industry to, you know, anybody out there that just knows what's right in front of them when they see it.
And there's a couple of the other points we're going to address when we get to it, especially about that evidence handling procedure and some of the way the media has portrayed this presents some very dangerous things in our opinions, which is why we're here today.
The alleged attacker appeared at the school wearing a mask to conceal his identity.
So to this point, what we have is the quote-unquote official story, which unfortunately, no pun intended, is shot full of holes.
There has been no conclusive evidence to prove that Adam Lanza ever existed on multiple different public records resources sites.
We've had no luck whatsoever in locating anything to indicate that he was ever actually a real person.
We've found tons on his brother Ryan.
But nothing on Adam himself, and there's an interesting anomaly that takes place in 2009 where Adam, kind of like according to the media, drops right off the face of the planet, no longer has an electronic footprint.
So many of the other just blatant, dishonest inconsistencies that come up in these things, because as we know, this is the information age.
People have access to the internet, people have access to public record search sites that, you know, $24.95 a month, and you can background anybody, anything, anywhere.
Um, Adam is an enigma at best.
Uh, the individual just completely has no indication of ever having been anywhere.
Uh, and that's kind of what initially drew myself and my colleagues' attention to this situation was, as it immediately began, the first thing that we thought was, oh my God, not again.
Cannot believe this.
Does this just keep happening?
And that's what initially spurred the desire to investigate this, because the story started to change so many times, because there were so many inconsistencies, because none of this stuff added up.
Uh, which only redoubles all of our opinions in this matter of how could this individual walk into an enclosed space with an unsuppressed carbine and fire off, according to, again, Connecticut State Police Lt.
J. Paul Vance, quote, hundreds.
He fired hundreds of rounds in the school and was still carrying on his person hundreds more that he had not discharged.
And, you know, essentially you're talking about a 165 decibel or better.
Uh, percussive impact on the human nervous system inside an enclosed space like that, and that's simply just not possible.
The disorienting effects.
I actually had two telephone interviews with two doctors of audiology yesterday, and this is, this is, this is the level that we take our investigation to.
I'm not going to assess it based on my own personal information, my own personal level of training.
I'm going to take this to industry professionals who have doctrines in these matters to make sure that my information is correct in both of those doctors of audiology have indicated that the impact on the cochlear tube of the inner ear Would be devastating under those conditions.
That the individual would lose balance.
He would lose cognitive ability just from the sheer shock of the incident.
So it's all of these things.
It's not just one isolated thing.
It's not just one minor detail.
It's the entire pile of all of the details from all the different directions.
And that's why one of the main reasons we're committed to this, and this is what we told our elected officials we called, that if this is to be, The catalyst that fundamentally changes this nation at its core constitutionally and strips away 250 years of right, privilege, and tradition that we're not going to go down without a fight.
In order for him to be in full compliance with the story and actually carrying those hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of rounds, what that indicates to me is that he would have to have magazine pouches on both sides at the best.
So, this kid is about 20, 120 pounds.
He's allegedly autistic or has some form of developmental disability that they still haven't gotten completely specific on yet, but they've alluded to Asperger's.
They say that he came into the building approximately carrying and wearing his body weight and kit and ammunition and everything else, weapons and whatnot.
He had four handguns.
Well, then he had two handguns.
Well, then he had a rifle.
Then he had two handguns and a rifle.
Then he had one pistol and a rifle.
They can't make up their mind.
Now, I'll point your listeners back to the tragedies of, say, the D.C. sniper.
The very moment they took the D.C. sniper into custody, within minutes, the media had pictures of the AR-15 rifle out.
The guy's hanging it through his pinky fingers.
This was the monster.
This was the beast.
You've not seen a single picture of any of the weapons, of any of the kit.
This is also to tie into Aurora, Colorado, James Egan Holmes, all of these other most recent incidents, with the exception of Jared Lee Locker, because they said he only had one weapon, a Glock 9mm pistol, so of course they could take stock of just that.
But the two disturbing, the most disturbing issues we have right now, and Aurora actually directly ties into this because there's equally as many questions to ask there.
Both in evidence handling procedures, the official story, how in each one of these scenarios that's played out all the way back through the Sikh temple and all these other mass shooting incidents that eyewitnesses have reported multiple shooters.
All of them have reported multiple shooters.
The literal definition of insanity is attempting the same process multiple times and expecting a different result, but we're not getting different results.
We're getting solid, conclusive evidence, and in the investigative field, that's called incontestable.
Export Selection