All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 4, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
01:21:52
Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (3 January 2023) with Joe Biden and Brian Davdison
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, welcoming you to another Texas Tuesday with Joel Olson and Brian Davidson, both in Houston, Texas.
They're here to share with you everything you need to know, the latest developments, and we're going to continue to update, by the way, about the Speaker of the House, where an historic vote is taking place.
There's a significant development here from a historical perspective as to what's going on in Ukraine.
Professor Michael Oshutadzovsky from Global Research has published about America's 1945 plan to wipe the Soviet Union off the map to attack 66 major cities with 204 atomic bombs.
Something we planned long, long ago.
Moscow learned of the plan.
How can they trust the United States?
The world is at a dangerous crossroads, he observes.
Nuclear war threatens the future of humanity.
We're no longer dealing with a hypothetical scenario.
The threat now is real.
While one can conceptualize the loss of life and destruction from present-day wars, including Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, it's impossible to fully comprehend the devastation from a third world war using new technologies and advanced weapons until it becomes a reality.
The U.S.
has endorsed preemptive nuclear war in the name of world peace, making the world safer.
Simply insane.
The justification for launching a military option could potentially result in a nuclear holocaust.
Many nukes are said to be harmless to the surrounding population.
Since George W. Bush, preemptive nuclear war has been portrayed as a humanitarian undertaking.
How absurd is that?
But it turns out U.S.
nuclear threats against Russia far predate the Cold War.
They were first formulated at the height of World War II under the Manhattan Project, when the U.S.
and Soviet Union were still allies.
The secret plan to bomb 66 Soviet cities was released in mid-September 1945, two weeks after the formal surrender of Japan.
Had the U.S.
decided to not develop nuclear weapons for use against the Soviet Union, the nuclear arms race would not have taken place.
Neither the Soviet Union or the People's Republic of China would have developed nukes as a form of deterrence.
Flash forward to 2022.
Joe Biden does not have the foggiest ideas the consequences of nuclear war.
Biden's announcement that the U.S.
will use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear threats and denies U.S.
nuclear weapons are deployed close to Russia are forcing Putin to abandon his no-first-use-of-nuclear-weapons pledge.
In other words, unlike in the 20th century, today there's a hair trigger on nuclear war.
Jen Seltenberg, NATO Secretary General, now says, I fear the war in Ukraine will spiral out of control and become a major war between NATO and Russia.
If things go wrong, they can go horribly wrong.
Paul Craig Roberts recently observed, Massive amounts of money have been allocated by the Biden admin to feed the weapons industry, including a $1.3 trillion nuclear weapons program that the Pentagon first launched under Obama.
Humanity is at a dangerous crossroads.
Nuclear war has become a multi-billion dollar undertaking which fills the pockets of U.S.
defense contractors.
Get this.
What is at stake is the outright privatization of nuclear war.
The use of nukes against Russia is currently on the drawing board of the Pentagon.
U.S.-NATO war games are being carried out on Russia's doorstep.
A first-strike preemptive nuclear attack on Russia is not excluded, nor may I add, a first-strike preemptive attack by Russia on the West is not precluded either.
We put it on the table.
In the words of Fidel Castro back in 2010, In a nuclear war, the collateral damage would be the life of all humanity.
Let us have the courage to proclaim that all nuclear and conventional weapons, everything used to make war, must disappear.
Nice start.
The use of nukes against Russia and the Soviet has been on the drawing board since September 15, 1945.
The intent of the Manhattan Project, which began in 1939, was to wage nuclear war against the Soviets.
What's now happening in Ukraine has serious geopolitical implications and could lead us to a World War III scenario for real.
It's important a peace process be initiated with a view to preventing escalation.
Here's an article Cieszyndowski first published in 2017, but well worth reviewing.
According to a secret declassified doc dated September 15, 1945, the Pentagon had envisioned blowing up the Soviet Union.
All major cities were included in a list of 66 strategic targets.
Here we have square miles and the number of bombs.
Six were to be used to destroy each of the larger cities, including Moscow, Leningrad, Tashkent, Kiev, Kharkov, and Odessa.
That is to say, six bombs on a piece.
The Pentagon estimated a total of 204 would be required to wipe the Soviet Union off the map.
Stunning!
To undertake the optimum number of bombs was on the order of 466.
A single atomic bomb dropped on Hiroshima resulted in the immediate death of 100,000 in the first seven seconds.
Imagine what would have happened if 204 atomic bombs had been dropped on major cities of the Soviet Union, as outlined in the American plan, which was released in September 1945, barely a month after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the 6th and the 9th of August 1945.
The secret plan had been formulated at an earlier period, roughly at the height of the Cold War, when America and the Soviet Union remained close allies.
It's worth noting Stahl was first informed through official channel by Harry Truman of the Manhattan Project at the Potsdam Conference on 24 July 1945, only two weeks before Hiroshima.
The Manhattan Project was launched in 1939, two years prior to America's entry into World War II following the attack on Pearl Harbor, September 7, 1941.
The Kremlin was fully aware of the Manhattan Project as early as 1942.
Were the August 1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks used by the Pentagon to evaluate the viability of a far larger attack on the Soviet Union?
The key documents that bombed 66 cities were finalized five to six weeks after the Japan bombings.
On September 15, 1945, Nordstadt sent a copy of the estimate to General Leslie Groves, still head of the Manhattan Project, and the guy who, for a short term anyway, would be in charge of producing whatever bombs the U.S.
Army Air Force might want.
As you can guess, the classification was Top Secret Limited.
About as high as it went in World War II, though we have higher classification today, coming from Alex Wellerstein's The First Atomic Stockpile Requirements, dated September of 1945.
The documentation confirms the U.S.
was involved in planning genocide against the Soviet Union.
Let's cut to the chase.
How many bombs did the U.S.
Army Air Force request of the Atomic General when there were maybe one or two bombs worth of visible material on hand at a minimum?
They wanted 123.
Ideally, they'd like 466.
This is a little over a month after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
They even had a chart spelling out the number of bombs they wanted.
Neither the Soviet Union nor the People's Republic of China would have developed nuclear capabilities as a form of deterrence had the U.S.
not already formulated plans to annihilate the Soviet Union.
Notably, the Soviet Union lost 26 million during World War II.
The initial list of 66 cities was updated in the course of the Cold War, 1956, to include, get this, 1,200 cities in the USSR and the Soviet Bloc.
The bombs slated were more powerful in terms of explosive capabilities than those dropped on the Japanese cities.
Here's more about it.
Millions of pages of classified and declassified docs on U.S.
nuclear policy during and after the Cold War are beyond the comprehension of any one individual or even a U.S.
government organization.
The following docs, first published the first time, address a number of key problems, such as the first use of nuclear weapons, the effects of nuclear weapons, early Cold War preventative war thinking, constraints on nuclear weapon use, and possible outcomes of nuclear war.
Joe, very disturbing.
How can the Russians possibly trust the U.S.
when they know our history of betrayal and plans to annihilate the totality of the Soviet Union?
Six HIMARS fired at Russian locations in a town that's in the Domaz called M-A-K-I-I-V-K-A.
I'm not even going to try to pronounce it, but bottom line is, the Ukrainians said they killed 400 Russians.
The Russians said they had 63 men lost, so that's pretty savage.
They were able to shoot down two of the incoming missiles, but the only way those missiles got through is, number one, they're very high price precision weapons by the United States.
And they were given all of the information necessary to know where the air defenses were and where their best likely targets were.
So this is a proxy war that these assholes have been trying to set us up for for a long time.
I just hope that somehow Putin is able to avoid the temptation to push the button.
And I hope that we have somebody with a brain that can keep the button out of Joe Biden's hands.
But let's just put this stuff in historical perspective.
Wrote a great article at Canada Free Press many, many moons ago called The Vacuum Under the Soturo Sombrero.
The book, Battleground Atlantic, provides a history of the Japanese submarine, I-30, I-52, on its way to the French port of Lorraine with a cargo of 228 tons of tin, molybdenum, and tungsten, 54 tons of rubber, and 2 tons of gold.
The gold was to purchase a Messerschmitt Me 262 jet airplane and the new V-2 rockets and materials for a Genzia, G-E-N-Z-A, I, Bakudan, B-A-K-U-D-A-N, are bomb for now.
Uh, both the German and Japan had nuclear bomb programs, both realized that have a workable fission bomb would not be ready in time to prevent defeat.
Hitler had tons of radioactive but non-usable U-35 that could make a dirty bomb and salt this earth weapon would contaminate large areas for a century or more.
Hitler was not willing to use it himself, but he was willing to sell it to his ally in the east.
On June 24th, 1945, Japanese Oh, 1944.
Japanese U-52 was on the surface exchanging a German harbor pilot with a, from U-530 when they were attacked by Avengers and sunk.
Okay, then the Japanese, or at the end of the war, the Germans had U... Let me find my notes real quick.
U-234 surrendered on May 15, 1945, with 560 kilograms of uranium oxide.
And that's where we got the material to manufacture the three bombs that were used, one in Trimity and two in Japan.
But today I got an email from Jeremy Nell, and he has this guy named...
Michael Palmer, who was formerly an MD in Germany for 20 years, he got fed up with the medical system, went and got a degree in chemistry and was working at University of Waterloo, and he came up with a hypothesis that Nagasaki and Hiroshima were not blown up by nuclear bombs.
They were blown up with conventional incendiary bombs.
Well, guess what?
May, uh, March 9th, 1945, Curtis LeMay did the first firebombing of Tokyo, and he had 330 B-29 bombers, and they firebombed the hell out of Tokyo, and they burnt 16 square miles.
And for those of you that don't know what 16 square miles converts to, the square root is 4.
So they burnt a four mile by four mile area with 330 B-52s and this clown's telling me that you could do the same amount of damage in Hiroshima but you could only use one plane to do it.
It's like give me a freaking break.
So I'm trying to set up a debate with this clown because there's a bunch of people that don't believe that nuclear weapons are really real.
But let's just fast forward to The bombs that were set off November 1952, the first hydrogen bomb.
The bomb that dropped on Hiroshima was supposed to be 15 kilotons.
It had a yield of about 8.
The one that was dropped on Nagasaki was supposed to have 15 kilotons.
It had a yield of about 10.
The two bombs were different.
Uranium and Hiroshima with a gun trigger and an implosion device in Nagasaki with plutonium.
So there was two different types of radioactive fission bulb material and two different trigger systems.
But by 1952 they developed the hydrogen bomb and they were able to do a 10,000 Kill a ton of TNT using plutonium 239.
So I'd be happy to do a little bit further discussion on this, but we're going to have a debate someday with these clowns that go, there's no such thing as a nuclear weapon.
I knew two sailors that were under orders at the end of World War II to stand on the deck of their boats in their boxer shorts and a pair of flip flops.
And they were given a set of welder's goggles so they could witness the bikini blasts.
And both of them said their faces were just blistered red and their whole body was blistered red.
And both of them died of leukemia about 20 years later.
So, the U.S.
government has an Atomic Veterans Compensation Program.
Look it up!
It's atomicveterans.org, because they recognize that they've been caught with their hand in the nuclear cookie jar, and the fact that they would do that to their Yeah, that's where they use our own armed forces as guinea pigs.
It's outrageous, and it's happened again and again and again.
Brian?
Well, I'd like to point out how hypocritical it is that the United States, we acknowledge Israel's right to defend itself, but we deny Russia exactly the same right under exactly the same circumstances.
AP poll, AP article I looked up.
Let me quote this.
Putin insists he had no choice but to send troops into Ukraine because it threatened Russia's security, an assertion condemned by the West, which says Moscow bears full responsibility.
Two days later, the same newspaper.
Israel says an Iranian presence on its northern frontier is a red line that justifies its strikes on facilities and weapons inside of Syria.
So I'd like to ask any educated human being, what is the difference?
So why does...
Why does Israel have the right to defend itself?
What, because of the close proximity of its neighbors?
Why does the United States have the right to defend itself from Cuba under the same exact circumstances?
To me, it's just the most hypocritical position that the United States can have, that Russia doesn't have the right to defend itself.
What, because we're the United States and NATO and It's all set up under a big organized front.
I think it's ridiculous.
I think Russia should defend itself.
They should do everything they can to defend itself, and I don't blame them if they do defend themselves.
Now, on the second story, I think you need, everything you need to know about that second story comes out just a couple days before Christmas.
Zelensky cut a deal with BlackRock Yes, that's the BlackRock to rebuild Ukraine right after he had been allocated the $1.4 trillion.
So BlackRock and a US military contractor is now going to help rebuild Ukraine, in theory, using the $1.4 trillion that we sent to Ukraine.
Now, how much of that money is going to get funneled back to the warmongers here in town and all of the United States-based vendors that are going to get a piece of that action?
That explains a whole lot about what really has happened under these circumstances.
And I think it's all just disgusting.
I'm sick of it.
Very disturbing, yes, yes.
We do all agree.
Meanwhile, surprise, surprise, it appears Nancy Pelosi was involved in weakening security at the Capitol, and of course we know Donald Trump offered to provide At least 5,000 troops provide security two days before on the 4th of January, which was declined.
House GOP find damning text and email evidence implicating Nancy Pelosi.
And by the way, we have a vote going on right now for the Speaker of the House, the Republican Speaker of the House.
Kevin McCarthy did not prevail on the first ballot, and it looks as though Jim Jordan is gaining support.
The Congressional investigation into events at the Capitol on January 6th found a way to bring charges against then-President Donald Trump.
Finding fault with Trump was the sole reason for the committee on the investigation, claiming he incited the crowd to unruly behavior and thereby caused an insurrection.
Those who were president in Washington that day saw peaceful crowds who were there to protest the results of the 2020 election.
Former President Trump is on record announcing for the crowds to remain peaceful, as he asserted their freedom to protest an election result.
But the president hasn't been accused of orchestrating those who went outside the law.
Because the facts and video do not add up.
It has been suspected there was a plan among Trump haters and Democrats to cast a blame on him for anything that went amiss, whether incidental or planned.
For the past two years, we've seen those accusations fly far and wide.
But as the 2022 session ends and the committee will be disbanded, the tide is turning.
The advent of the new Republican-held bosses is a dawn of new information about the day.
Gateway Brother reports now their discovered communication proved there was a plot afoot to intentionally limit security in the event it was needed on January 6th.
House GOP members found text and email from Pelosi staffers proving they forcefully decreased J6 security measures despite objection from Capitol Police and Sgt.
Ed Orms.
Rogan Handley posted a text from Pelosi's staff secretly editing the J6 security plan for the Capitol, and then telling the House Sergeant-at-Arms a police act surprised when the final draft was published.
I'm startled to the request, showing his willingness to play along.
More evidence that the disruptions were planned in advance.
Here's Rogan O'Hadley tweeting, nothing to see here.
Translation, Pelosi's staff was directly weakening J6 security and didn't want anyone to know.
Here's more.
We're making Terry's edits to the Electoral College DC, and if you don't mind, I'll send it up to you and Jenna as a heads up, so please act surprised.
He adds, I'm startled.
More.
GOB reps release bombshell report showing Pelosi staff had regular meetings setting up J6 security, help revise plans and turn down requests from U.S.
Capitol Police and House Sergeant-at-Arms for more funding to National Guard.
It was a setup.
C.C.
Drano is on a war room with Bannon Friday, discussing the texts and emails from Pelosi staffers that have been revealed.
President Trump requested additional National Guard protection for the Capitol that day, but Pelosi turned him down.
During the same time, Pelosi, perhaps the most dishonest politician of our time, organized a film crew to come to the Capitol and film her that day as though she knew something big was going to happen.
In the last hours of the 2022 House session, the J6 Committee withdrew subpoenas it had issued to Trump and other witnesses.
The New York Times reported the lawmakers claimed they'd run out of time after two years to obtain Trump documents and testimony.
It's set to resolve today, January 3rd, when the new House is sworn in, and as I say, they're voting on their new Speaker now.
It waited until October to issue the subpoena to Trump, who promptly sued to block it.
Here's Rogan O'Hanley tweeting, This explosive story is spreading fast.
House GOP found text and email from Pelosi staffers proving they forcibly decreased J6 security measures despite objection from Capitol Police and Sergeants at Arms.
It was a setup and they got caught.
The panel had directed Trump to produce an extensive list of docs and communications related to nearly every aspect of his effort to invalidate the 2020 election between November 3rd of 2020 and January 6th of 2021.
But Trump's suit made it highly unlikely to ever testify, so waiting until October to issue the subpoena made the point moot.
One would assume a House committee is familiar with the calendar and timely factors, and therefore were aware issuance of the subpoena would no longer matter.
However, Bernie Thompson Wednesday was the chair of the J6 committee about the need to explain in an official letter to Trump's legal team.
As you may know, the Select Committee has concluded its hearings, released its final report, and will soon reach its end.
In light of the imminent end, the select committee can no longer pursue the specific information covered by the subpoenas.
Hermit Hillen, one of Trump's lawyers, celebrated the development.
After my firm filed suit on separation of powers to block J6, an illegitimate subpoena to President Trump, over his activities while president, the committee waived the white flag and withdrew the subpoena.
A committee spokeswoman declined to comment.
Thompson is sending similar letters.
Two witnesses also subpoenaed a nearly identical set to Doug Mastriano, Republican nominee for Pennsylvania governor.
Mastriano has been a central figure in Trump's effort to overturn the results of the 2020 election in Pennsylvania.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well isn't it amazing?
Nancy Pelosi's average salary over the last 20 years was $72,000 per year.
Her average net worth increase was $9.4 million every year for the last 20 years.
So explain that to us sometime while you're trying to do your accounting class.
Uh, maybe we should, uh, audit her tax returns.
That'd be interesting.
But then, uh, we have a rhino here in the Houston area named Dan Crenshaw, which we call...
Patch I McCain and he's just launched personal attacks against the petty McCarthy holdouts in a seething rant on the congressional floor just popped up at AW News and so I hadn't had a chance American Wire hadn't had a chance to read through it but yeah I can't wait for McCartney to lose because that guy has been a 100% weasel just like the
Paul Ryan before him, and the Trey Gowdy before him, and the other weasels that we've had, Bonner, the cry-boy Bonner.
Every one of the speakers that the Republicans have put up has been an absolute, 100% rhino loser, and they've never done anything for the American people.
So, yeah, Jim Jordan would be one of my favorite picks.
Matt Getz wouldn't be bad.
You know, there's several of them.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, even though she's saying she's voting for McCartney.
Part of that has to do with money.
And part of the reason why McCartney has some money is because he got $2.5 million from the FDX bagman, Sam Bagman Freed.
He's as corrupt as they get.
And McConnell got $25 million from FTX.
So you want to know how the system works and how they grease the wheels up there?
This is how, kids.
We've got a wonderful Supreme Court case coming up in three days where they're going to decide if 386 members of Congress violated their oath to the Constitution by not allowing evidence to be presented of conflicting electors in the 2020 election.
Brian?
Well, as for the January 6th false flag, everybody in our audience knows that it was clearly a staged setup.
And I guess in my mind, For all those Trump detractors out there, the only question is why bother with all of this charade if Trump's not somehow a threat to the Uniparty?
And obviously the Uniparty was new about it.
They were obviously involved in it.
And so, hey, I tend to support anybody who threatens the Uniparty.
I tend to support anybody who threatens the Democrats.
And anytime I can see something like this developing, Jim Jordan is a threat because he would change the direction of this country.
They just finished up their vote about 15 minutes ago, and it looks like there were 19 holdouts among the Republicans, which means McCarthy has lost.
This second round of voting.
But the question is, what are the 19 holding out for?
Because it's unlikely that it's going to be turned back around so that it's Jordan.
I'd love to see it if it's Jordan.
I think he would change the entire direction of everything that's happening here.
But what exactly are the 19 holding out for?
What do they need McCarthy?
And by the way, do you trust McCarthy and the Uniparty to Actually hold up any end of their deal when they're fighting with the Republican holdouts or the ultra-conservative rebels, according to ABC News, is what we're being called now because we're against them.
It's very rare it goes beyond the first vote.
That was calamitous for McCarthy.
The holdouts are supporting Jordan.
Brian, I'd been watching this before I came on, and we want to see how it goes.
The further it goes, the less likely McCarthy's going to survive, and the more likely that it's going to be an alternative.
And I think we would all like that it be Jordan.
Well, there's a Hakeem, a guy from New York, a black guy from New York who also is getting a lot of votes.
I think it will be Jordan or Jeffries in all probability at this point.
Well, the Democrats are unanimously behind Jeffries of New York.
They're unanimously behind him.
I don't know how it's going to shake out.
All I know is that until I see a perp walk, until I see somebody get arrested, or somebody get charged with something, or until I see something change, I just don't have a lot of hope for the Uniparty.
I think the whole system needs to be burnt down.
Are you saying Jeffrey says a Democrat?
Oh, Democrats rallied behind the minority leader, Representative Hakeem Jeffries of New York, for both of the Republican votes.
In other words, the Democrats didn't want to see McCarthy, and they don't want to see Jordan, so they're trying to convince the Republicans that we need to put in Hakeem Jeffries.
Ah, so Jeffries isn't even a Republican.
Wow.
Well, no, no, he is a Republican, but he's just like Liz Cheney.
He's a Republican that's just like... He's a rhino.
Right.
Hey, let's have a rhino.
Hey, if you guys aren't going to support a House Speaker that is a Republican, then support one that takes both sides.
Yeah, I'm glad for that clarification, Brian.
I think that increases the chance that Jim Jordan is going to come through.
Meanwhile, we have a report from Melania as to how she felt about it, distrusting Donald's closest advisors.
This is from her press secretary.
Catch this.
With January 6th winding up and dominating the headlines, former first lady Melania has remained mostly silent.
What were her thoughts About January 6th.
It turns out she had a strong reaction before the January 6th events.
The ex-White House West Secretary, Stephanie Grisham, Mrs. Trump, distrusted many of her husband's inner circle.
Apparently, she was wary of his top advisors, including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Paul, and Jenna Ellis.
They were the people leading the charge and challenging the 2020 election.
It seemed the First Lady thought Donald's advisers were leading him in the wrong direction, only telling him what he wanted to hear.
Specifically, she called Trump's chief of staff Mark Meadows, which I regard as highly appropriate.
A First Lady was very angry at Meadows, both for his treatment of Grisham and for giving access to people who are maybe harmful to the President, giving him bad advice, according to Grisham.
And Mrs. Trump never liked it when people would tell Trump what he wanted to hear rather than the truth or the reality of the situation.
She felt Meadows was always just playing into his hands.
That all comes courtesy of a newly released transcript of Grisham's May depositions, though they may come as a surprise to Trump supporters.
On top of that, Melania wasn't sure about Donald Jr.' 's wife, Kimberly Guilfoyle, who was also an advisor.
She apparently never trusted that they were doing things in the best interests of their Don Jr.' 's father.
In other parts of Grisham testimony, she was disappointed in the First Lady for not reacting to the riots on January 6.
She texted Melania to ask if she wanted a tweet.
There was no place for lawlessness and violence during the riots, but she refused without explanation, at which point Grisham said she, Grisham, her press secretary, decided to resign.
I just, I mean, I was kind of just like, F you.
I mean, I'm sorry for the transgender person, but I was so, so disappointed in her.
I was even, I was more disappointed in her than I'd ever, ever been because she had a chance to make a, take a leadership role.
And I know for a fact, she was amazing at influencing her husband, sometimes with these kinds of things, you know.
The most intriguing part is the First Lady didn't trust Donald's inner circle and didn't believe they were leading him in the right direction.
This week, the J6 Committee withdrew their subpoena, saying they no longer needed his testimony, purportedly because their time had run out.
Melania was never asked to testify, so this is a first we're hearing of her pre-J6 feeling toward her husband and advisor, and casts the situation in a slightly different light.
Key takeaways?
J6 transcripts from horrible White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham have come out, detail Melania Trump's feelings about her husband's advisor.
He didn't trust many of them and believed they gave him bad advice.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, I gotta agree with Melania on that.
I didn't trust very many of Trump's advisors, and I think that all gave him bad advice.
So there.
Yeah, it's a real dilemma because he had a cabinet full of Goldman Sachs and CFR people in.
I don't think that the public was served very well at all.
So even though the rhetoric was there and the enthusiasm and the speaking presentation, who I saw in person three different times, was there, the substance was never as what it should have been.
And so that was something that I found very disappointing.
But, you know, we're moving forward.
Who knows what's going to happen in 2024, but if we don't correct the boat rigging system, it won't matter who the candidate is, because anybody good is not going to be able to win.
Ask Carrie Lake.
Oh, Joe, I couldn't agree more.
Brian.
Well, they're all controlled on some level.
It's just a question of who is paying the salary in terms of, not just the salary, but in terms of all the perks and the benefits that come their way for the lobbyists, from the lobbyists.
Look, when it comes to Trump and Melania, I remember an article that I thought rang very true.
I mean, I think it was Sebastian Gorka or maybe it was Judge, I can't remember his name.
But Trump was trying to put his cabinet together very early on in 2017.
And he was being blocked on every different level by all these people who were burying all these good people inside the bureaucracy of the different federal government.
He couldn't get his FBI pick.
He couldn't get his vice presidential picks.
He couldn't get any of his picks for any of the offices that he wanted to fill.
Attorney General, anything else.
And he had to compromise each time with the RINOs.
And so, I believed that Trump would have been a lot more effective as a leader had he been able to get the people that he wanted in the positions that he needed.
But it was blocked by a bureaucracy and a system managed by these guys that just simply would not allow that glass ceiling to be penetrated and these people to go to work for Donald Trump.
So when Trump first came in, everybody who wanted to put in was considered toxic and set to the side.
And he always got second stringers or even third stringers or sometimes fourth stringers.
So there's a problem with the presidency.
And the problem is, if you're not their man, you're not going to get your picks.
And that's what was happening with Trump right from the very beginning.
It doesn't surprise me Melania saw it.
It doesn't surprise me that he took all these second stringers that were already sold out.
And it doesn't surprise me, because he had to fill the positions.
And I believe the same thing about the Supreme Court and the same thing about your secretaries of state.
Even on a state level, Trump could not influence it because he was an outsider.
He was rejected by the political class in D.C.
and they didn't give him anything that he was wanting in order to turn this country around.
Brian, I think that's spot on.
I think that's really quite brilliant and exactly what was going on and why we need to be a bit more forgiving of Trump than some of us may be inclined to be.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Check this out.
The rules are simple.
They lie to us.
We know they're lying.
They know we know they're lying, but they keep lying to us and we keep pretending to believe them.
Elena Gorokhova, Plato, the Kabbalists, and the Long Lawyers.
Our self-selected leaders base their philosophy and lies on Plato and his Republic, the origin of many of the totalitarian doctrines that now plague the world.
Plato's totalitarian state, ruled by the elite and instructed in the Kabbalah, Plato's Republic provided the basis for future Illuminati projects, including communism, the elimination of marriage and the family, compulsory education, the use of eugenics by the state, the employment of deceptive propaganda methods, lies, and lying.
9-11, London 7-7, Inside Jobs, and the global warming swindle provide the text for the global police state in top-down control of all aspects of our lives, depopulation to protect the environment.
Wow, what an inventory.
Meanwhile, family doctor who faced backlash for vaccinating children and causing adverse reaction dies suddenly.
An Australian family doctor who got threats from anti-vaxxers after two children experienced adverse reaction to the COVID shots he administered has died suddenly.
Hong Kong-born Dr. Wilson Chin, who studied medicine in Britain for 14 years, ran a COVID and under-12 age COVID vax clinic on the Gold Coast, died just days before Christmas.
The death of Dr. Chin was confirmed by Pacific Vines Med Center's director, Dion Raju.
In an interview, he stated that medical issues and not mental health related was the cause of death.
No doubt it was the vax!
Here we have Died Suddenly Twee, the young doctor died suddenly right before Christmas.
Dr. Weon Chin ran Pacific Pines Med Center, the COVID vax clinic on the Gold Coast.
His doctor told news sources that his dad was sun and at an unexpected age, an inappropriate death.
Looking real cheerful from giving the vax to others, Isis Magnet came around to haunt him.
Earlier, he made headlines after he broke down in tears in a video revealing he'd had death tracks from anti-vaxxers, following the rumor two girls who fainted after treatment at Pacific Pines had actually died.
According to Chen, it was just a normal occurrence of fainting having nothing to do with a vax.
The Hong Kong doctor in an earlier interview broke down in tears because of the abuse he was receiving after the rumors spread.
That two girls at his clinic collapsed and began to scream and then later died.
He, during an interview, stated the case was unrelated to the VAX and was a simple veining episode.
But after this, the center became a major target of abuse, which forced them to immediately halt the VAX program for children under 12.
He eventually made a statement on the local news channel saying, The death threats and threat from those out there are not worth us jeopardizing the safety of our staff.
According to a statement by the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, Dr. Chin received abuse and threats that claimed the vaccine center was poisoning kids and that the doctor was a kid killer.
I think he died of his own vax.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well he fainted suddenly, so that's all we have to worry about that guy.
Yeah, and just like the sports folks that are dropping dead left and right, at some point the evidence becomes irrepressible.
And I think we've already reached critical mass as far as people being aware of the pharmaceutical mafia.
So hopefully more of that shit will get exposed and more will get overturned.
Another thing, there was a great video that was done 10 years ago when Alex Jones interviewed Dr. John Coleman.
who's author of the book Committee of 300.
And you want to know how this thing's been so fucked up for about 500 years?
It's the Committee of 300.
They're like the core group that's behind Bilderberg and Atlantic Council and CFR and Trilateral and the WEF and the WHO and the UN and...
and they absolutely have their fingers in every pie and everything that's screwed up goes back to this same 300 families of pedophile oligarchs.
And amazingly enough, Alanis Morissette was doing an announcement for the Toronto Film Festival for a documentary called Jagged.
J-A-G-G-E-D.
It's an hour-long documentary about pedophilia in the music industry, and she said that she kept rationalizing to herself that, sure, she was only 15 years old, but she consented to have sex with all of these music industry executives until finally she got to the point where she Lost her denial and she said, they're all pedophiles.
They're worse than the Hollywood pedophiles because it's every one of them.
So there you go, kids.
That's what your entertainment industry is.
I've read that same report, Joe.
Very shocking that I have no doubt every word of it is true.
Ryan.
Well, you know, I'm starting to develop a bit of a heart On this issue of the vaccines that I didn't have before, and that's because I just spent the last week with my dad who drives a bus in Arizona.
Uh, just on the side for some extra retirement money, and he was.
He was forced to get the job.
Not being as advanced in conspiracy theory as I am.
And he took it, and he didn't really worry about it.
But then on this visit, he's worried, he's scared, he's concerned very much.
And, you know, the media thinks that we're stupid, and the mainstream media has continued to push this idea of sudden adult death syndrome.
I've been looking all over and finally found a few Twitter threads that I thought were valuable about how to purge this vax from your system.
I don't know if it can be completely purged from the bloodstream.
I just know that there are some ways to reduce its efficacy in terms of its ability to kill people.
I've been looking into some of those to try to help him out.
There's some fasting that takes place.
There's some different types of Substances that are perfectly legal that bonded this from the natural medicine arena that will help you purge this stuff from your systems.
But look, you got to understand that not everybody is on our same level and they go out and they get the jab.
They don't understand what's going on.
They can't see everything that's been happening and now they've got to walk around and they see what they saw on Monday Night Football last night, which is a perfectly healthy 26 year old athlete getting hit in the chest and Virtually dying, I guess.
I guess they were able to bring him back, but this is terrible what's been happening with athletes.
There's athletes talking about all the different athletes that are dying.
Some estimate over a thousand of perfectly healthy athletes dying on the field.
And the media is gaslighting us with this sudden adult death syndrome and children need to have their hearts checked because of all the anxiety that came as a result of COVID.
All the other crap that they're trying to feed the public to justify what everybody's beginning to see.
And look, Twitter seems to be dying down again about all this vaccine conspiracy.
It was up for a few days while Musk was in charge and now it seems to be that people are relaxing and people are losing their platforms a lot more.
I'm having to go and actually look for the information again.
So we had a few days of light on the darkness but it seems to be dying back again and that doesn't surprise anybody that's in our community to know that it was a short-term sort of flash in the pan in terms of we got some light shed on the situation.
I don't know how long it's going to last, hopefully much longer.
But until you're one of us, you're not going to be able to find it out.
And the only way to become one of us is to start digging in on your own and coming to your own conclusions and your own facts while erasing everything that the mainstream media and our educational system has programmed into your mind.
The bill's owner had made a big point of having all those players vaxxed.
Actually, and I'm convinced this was from the vax, and he's probably dead, but they're doing their best to cover it up.
They're claiming he had a head injury, but he didn't have a head injury.
He just dropped completely flat out on the playing field.
And it was so traumatic for the audience.
They called the game.
They postponed the game.
That is significant.
That's gained a huge amount of publicity.
I think there's a chance it could represent a moment of awakening for the public, Brian.
So this is, I think, not insignificant.
Meanwhile, a case I had been deliberately avoiding I think now has sufficient interest to report.
Link between Idaho murder suspect and one of his four victims.
These are the four young people who were stabbed to death.
In Idaho for no explicable reason.
The shocking murders of students Kaylee Conclave, 21, her lifelong best friend Madison Mogan, 21, another roommate Zanuck Kernoodle, 20, and Kernoodle's boyfriend Ethan Chaplin, 20.
Resulted in an investigation that finally bore fruit.
In the early days, Stephen Conclaves, who's the father of Kaylee, stated he felt a bit defeated and frustrated by the lack of transparency from police, telling ABC he was watching a football game when my whole world was turned upside down.
Kaylee, by the way, is in the right here, the second from the right.
I almost think they look like twins, but it's she who appears to have been the target.
Brian Kohlberg, 28, was arrested in Pennsylvania for the murders.
He was arrested in the Poconos in connection, a grad student at Washington State, less than 10 miles away from the University of Idaho.
He was arrested on four counts of first degree murder and burglary.
Well, Congo vowed to be in court when Goldberger is returned to Idaho to face murder charges.
This guy's gonna have to look me in the eye multiple times and I'm gonna be looking for the truth.
That's really what I'm gonna be looking for.
Now, there's a person, a name, someone could specifically look for and see if there's any connection.
They're just trying to figure it out.
The guy's gonna have to look at my eyes.
Now connections are becoming the gun to light about Kohlberg and the four deceased.
He said he was beginning to see links between Brian Kohlberg and his daughter.
He said no one in the family knows or recognizes this subject, but in the hours since they learned his name, they're starting to see connections they aren't ready to discuss yet.
He hasn't stated what those links are.
Now there's a person named, they're just trying to figure it out.
More is coming to light.
After he first returned, after the murders, Colberg returned to teaching at the University of Washington, according to students in his class, acted as if nothing had happened after the killings took place.
Later, he drove 2,000 miles from Idaho to Pennsylvania, hideout at his parents' Pocono home.
Police were on his tail during the cross-country road trip and followed him to Olbrightsville, PA, where he was ultimately apprehended.
While he was under surveillance, police witnessed him appearing to try and avoid leaving more DNA or fingerprints by taking protective measures in public.
He even wore gloves when he entered a grocery store, according to a friend of one of the officers assigned to follow him.
He was allegedly stalking the students in the week leading up to the murders.
He's not stupid, and has been very careful.
It's alleged that he was stalking them with their cell phone location matching up on several locations.
Not sure if they ever interacted, but his cell phone ping followed their every move for weeks.
The anonymous source and those who live close to him in Pennsylvania are shocked, but there were signs all was not well.
I've been so invested in this case last six weeks to find out how close he is to us that one of our friends found him and arrested him is just crazy.
In the past, he was known to be a problem.
Kohlberg memorably harassed female staff at Seven Star Brewing Company near his hometown, where NBC... Sternberg told NBC employees labeled Kohlberg in their system as a guy who makes creepy comments, and what's called a staffer a bitch for spurring his advances.
Kohlberg would have two or three beers and get just a little too comfortable.
His behavior was so upsetting, the brewery owner approached his patrons about it.
Kolbeck decided to behavior but never showed up at the bar again.
Let me add, my understanding is he was a student of criminology working on a PhD, and I believe he was trying to pull off a perfect murder so that it would enhance his authority in addressing his issues.
Something like that.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, and the disgusting thing is, at his undergraduate college, there was a woman who's, quote, the world expert on serial killers.
Now, I find it a little bit perverse to have classes and something like that, and I really don't think that, you know, glorifying those people in any way is an appropriate method of law enforcement.
But I saw a video the other day of a guy that claims to have been his roommate, and he said that the guy called him up and said, Oh, I finally did it.
You're gonna find out I'm gonna be really famous.
And it's like, okay, whatever.
But supposedly, the police in Moscow, Idaho, which I'm sure is a coincidence, said that they've gotten over 400 leads that they're following up.
And so Uh, it looks like they've got a slam dunk on him.
They've got DNA evidence, which, if you stab four people, it's pretty hard to not leave DNA evidence, because if there's any amount of resistance at all, there's going to be some hair or some scratches and flesh under the fingernails, and as morose as it is to have to be a crime investigator,
Uh, it's thankful that they're able to do that, and then with all of the, uh, 23andMe and, you know, My Ancestry and all the other databases, along with all the criminal databases that they've accumulated with DNA, it was not really hard to figure out who that particular DNA suspect is with about a 99.999%
Uh certainty so I'm pretty sure that they got the the guy and all of the profile stuff fits the damaged Hyundai that was in the park and lost the one that they were looking for uh in his behavior patterns and the fact that he'd been studying how to commit the perfect crime and he thought he'd figured it out but he just missed a couple of little items that you know
I don't trust anything the mainstream media tells us, whether this is a real story or not.
I still don't trust them to tell us anything that's true or anything that's right related to the story.
All I can tell you is that Boy, it sure seems interesting how the new thing is fear, fear, fear, fear, fear, lock your doors, keep the bad white man out of your neighborhood.
Let's take a picture of him wearing a bulletproof vest.
Let's remind everybody of how much he looks like other serial killers that have been out there.
I don't know what to think.
I wasn't there.
I haven't looked at the police files.
I don't know what happened inside that house.
I haven't done any of the research on the family, but I do.
Smell something strange about this one.
I can't really put my finger on it until I take the time to research it, but I do think that now that they've made this arrest that I am going to take a look at it and try to figure it out from the bottom of the top.
It may turn out to be true that this guy went in there with a knife and killed all these people floor by floor, two per floor, up six floors is my understanding of it, and then got away with it for this long.
It may all turn out to be true, but My instincts tell me just from looking at that propaganda fear picture that something smells funny.
And, you know, we're supposed to be worried about this when 70 people are killed every weekend in Chicago on black-on-black crime.
But this, this is the big story because a white person or some white people got killed.
I don't know.
I think it smells funny.
I think it feels fishy.
But I'm not going to know it until I actually sit down and do the research.
And even then, I may never know.
And if the father thinks he has some connection with his daughter, that's going to be very significant, too, Brian.
I appreciate every word you just said about it.
I think you're right.
Meanwhile, Mary Maxwell, who has both a PhD and an LLB, has become a student of Sandy Hook.
She's published a book about it on reality and how Sandy Hook messes minds.
Here she just published a piece about how the Sandy Hook children can sue once they reach the age of 18.
And I'll tell you, these photographs are all phony and fake, and many of them represented, it appears, the parents themselves when they were children.
There are about a half a dozen that represent real people, but none of them died at Sandy Hook.
Mary Maxwell.
This article looks at the harm done to children in Newtown and the surrounding who were coerced to lie about the false massacre at S.H.E.S.
I begin with a premise.
The event of December 14, 2012 was a hoax arranged by governmental authorities and perhaps by McGrews.
If I'm wrong about it, the material here could still be useful regarding children coerced to lie about other things.
I'm sure all children get fed with various falsehoods.
There are socially acceptable examples that tooth fairy will reward you for losing a tooth, and natural ones is when parents tell the kids the family is more successful or admirable than it may actually be.
In school, including college, the younger are fed all sorts of information that may or may not be true.
For now, I shall not attempt to reprimand the purveyors of myths and ideology.
In the Sandy Hook case, where a hoax has occurred, the parents or community leaders may falsely tell children that it really happened and the kid, if young enough, will automatically believe it.
Eventually, however, the adults will have to teach the kid to positively purvey the lie.
So far, this is not something actionable in court.
But let's focus on a child and become aware that no massacre took place.
She may have read on the internet that it was a hoax and mentioned it to her parents, scout leader, or neighbors.
They tell her she must not say such a thing.
From this point on, she's in a dilemma.
She does not want to shut up about the subject, but knows it will not go well if she blathers about it at the dinner table or in her high school class.
Note, she may be told, as part of the peer pressure, that local loyalty demands that everyone keep the massacre story alive and has given new hope for gun control throughout the nation.
How to redress the wrong?
This article is about taking legal action against the wrongdoing of coercing a child to lie.
Regarding Sandy Hook, there may be many ways for kids to get a resolution.
The adults could apologize.
The whole town could meet to express their dissatisfaction with having to be party to a lie and like that.
For all I know, such things may come about any day now, and then we wouldn't need court involvement.
But maybe that day is not ready to dawn, so let's explore the law.
Courts have a responsibility for sorting out disputes between parties.
Those disputes are called civil actions, lawsuits.
The other famous job is to be the venue for prosecution by the government of anyone who has committed a crime.
In regard to teaching a child to lie, a prosecution is possible in Connecticut.
The relevant crime in that state's law is child abuse.
Chapter 939, Offenses Against a Person, Section 5321 says, Any person who willfully or unlawfully permits a child under the age of 16 years to be placed in such a situation that life or limb of such child is endangered, the health of such child is likely to be endangered, or The morals of such child are likely to be impaired.
Or does any act likely to impair the health or morals of any such child?
Such person shall be sent to a term of imprisonment of which five years of the sentence imposed may not be suspended.
And ours is a minute of a five-year sentence.
Thus, if teachers told Johnny to lie about Sandy Hook, they could be accused of having done an act likely to impair the morals of Johnny.
Imagine the child saying, I want to tell the truth, and the adult saying, no, that would be wrong.
Anyway, here I'm recommending a lawsuit, not a prosecution.
Civil Action The Tort of I.E.D.
A judicial system is tacked with bringing justice between a plaintiff, a complainer, and a defendant.
As in, I didn't do it.
The law of torts provides a damaged person will get damages, compensation.
Certain torts are well-established.
Trespass, assault, liable theft.
No matter, they may also be criminalized.
I.E.D.
is the abbreviation for the tort of infliction of emotional distress.
There are two kinds of infliction of emotional distress, intentional and negligent.
An example of negligent is where a speeding motorist kills a pedestrian and almost hits another.
That other might get PTSD or lifelong anxiety as a consequence.
No one would say the driver meant it to happen.
The damage will be said to have been caused by his negligence or recklessness.
The civil action I'm proposing for the grown-up kids of Sandy Hook is of the negligence type.
I think the host designers had enough on their mind just to plan it, but did not go so far as to think about the moral damage that would be done to children coerced to lie.
I shall now sketch a make-believe lawsuit filed by three plaintiffs.
The social situation in Connecticut today is such that perhaps no lawyer would be willing to represent them.
In this case, they could file their own as a pro se litigant, meaning for himself, and therefore you can't have these three filing together just once.
It costs the pro se litigant $400 to file in a federal court.
A penalist person could get that fee way by submitting a form in papuras.
In the example I've concocted, a lawyer has assumed it's not a pro bono or pro se case.
The venue is a U.S.
District Court.
I'll use fictional names for the plaintiff.
It could be any child who was a student at San Diego and suffered emotional distress from having to lie about the fake massacre.
Since I'm proposing plaintiffs here, I've just heard 18 or 19 in 2022.
They would have been second graders, age 8 or 9, when the hoax took place 10 years ago in 2012.
Instead of blaming the parents, I blame the creators of the hoax, including media, plus a priest who taught the lie from the pulpit.
Note, in the initial plea, plaintiffs do not submit evidence, nor do they argue any points of law.
They simply make known what has happened and what relief they seek.
Thus, United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, Jim Anxiety, Dina Depression, and Bruce Humiliation plaintiffs.
Against Linda Lubitsch, Director of FEMA for the New England State, Bobby Blueberg, Attorney General of Connecticut, Gary Bull, official in charge of the Mandy Brook Fire Station, all in both their official capacity and their private capacity, Rupert Murderly, head of the News-A-Million and Reverend Holly Shmoley, defendants.
Jury trial demanded.
One.
Introduction.
An active shooter drill was scheduled to take place on the campus of the abandoned Mandy Brook School and its local firehouse on December 13th and 14th, 2012.
It was run by a combination of local, state, and federal government.
The government secretly planned to create a drama in which a 20-year-old boy loaded with guns would be said to have entered the school by breaking a glass door and shot 21st graders and six staff.
The actual student families and teacher were subsequently told to uphold this false story.
They were threatened with harm if they spoke out.
Two, jurisdiction and venue.
This is a federal case because the direction of the activity was likely led by Federal Emergency Management, FEMA.
If a trial is held, the venue would be some distance from Mandy Brook District, owing to complicated involvement of local officials, civilians, and churches.
Third, the parties.
The plaintiffs are three children who, on December 14, 2012, were in school at a location at which Mandy Brooks' students had been sent when their normal campus was closed for repairs.
The defendants are three persons who held government positions on the day plus one, a media corporation, and one who heads that corporation, plus a clergyman.
Four, statute of limitations.
Connecticut statute of limitations for civil action is two or three years.
It should begin to toll when the injured party reaches a legal age 18 pursuing.
Under Connecticut state law, a cause of action may begin when the injury is discovered or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been discovered.
Fifth, injury.
These children were ages 8 and 9 in December 2012.
Their teachers, parents, and neighbors assured them that the story of the killing, as reported in the newspapers and TV, had a good purpose, and they must play along with it.
Over the years, Jim, Dean, and Bruce, now 18 and 19, have been reading in social media that many folks ridicule the Mandy Brooks School, and some friends are angry with them for participating in the lie.
The whole experience has been embarrassing and caused them depression, nervousness, and suicidal thoughts.
Their future careers and marriages will no doubt be marred by it all.
6.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF The plaintiffs asked for declaratory relief by the court declaring that the Mandy Brooke Massacre was not genuine and for $60,000 each trebled as punitive damages, sworn and signed.
My motives?
I wrote the above case as appendix for my 2021 book on Reality Sandy Hook Messes Minds.
I mainly wanted to load up on ammo in my attempt to knock the massacre story.
I also hoped my book would reach some students of Sandy Hook who want to try it in a civil action.
And I want to intimidate those who think they can get away with such a hoax.
On later reflection, I see they can also function as a statement about the wrongness in controlling the minds of the young in such a way as to screw up their intellect.
This seems to be going on in many ways, not just about a particular lie.
Our overlords Maybe the same who organized a hoax for Connecticut or Florida or wherever seem to feel no prick of conscience about this.
It's as though they own everyone's brain and would like it to turn us into robots.
That should give extra urgency to a lawsuit at this time.
The above suit is asking for a legal ruling on the cause of emotional distress, which is already a tort.
But how did that tort and the other torts get established?
Over time, the common law is built up by court cases where actual injustices of the world seek redress.
It's also possible for a state legislature to enact a statute granting the right to sue for some new tort.
But for now, it would be enough for even one of my named plaintiffs, Jim Anxiety, Dina Depression, or Bruce Humiliation, to go on record with her claim to have suffered anxiety, depression, or humiliation in some emotional distress by having to live a lie.
A possible defense.
Wouldn't it be funny if the defendants, FEMA, an attorney general, a fire chief, newspaper priest, tried to fight off the complaint by saying this Sandy Hook Massacre really did take place?
What a hoot!
That would lead to the plaintiffs exercising their well-established right to discovery, and the court would have to oblige by sending subpoenas to witnesses.
This includes the very people who have given an investigator Wolfgang Helbig, a former state trooper, the cold shoulder.
He had sought, for example, an answer to the question, was the Sandy Hook School condemned for asbestos and therefore unoccupied in December of 2012?
Even by using his clear right under Connecticut's Freedom of Information Law, Holbein got nowhere.
The discovery would also bring a subpoena to the door of Leonard Posner.
He recently won 450,000 damages from Professor Jim Fetzer by suing Fetzer for defaming him.
What did the defaming consist of?
It consisted of Posner being called a liar indirectly by Fetzer's statement in a book that the Posner child's death certificate was fake.
In a court for defamation, Fetzer was not permitted by the judge to submit affidavits he'd obtained from forensic experts doubting the authenticity of the child's death certificate.
An Amazon pulled Fetzer's book.
I think you can see the courts have refused to let light shine on the Sandy Hook matter.
A 19-year-old could make it all happen.
A Robert Steele shocker!
One further defense could be brought forward.
Instead of pleading that they should not have to pay the plaintiffs for suffering in regard to a lie they could ban together, even the priest in the newspaper ought to say, yes, it was a lie, but we did it for the good of the nation.
Recall the words of the late Robert David Steele.
You can find this in my book on reality.
He said he'd managed a false flag operation overseas when he was a CIA agent.
I quote him.
I have personal experience with legalized lying, whereby ostensible orders from the highest authorities mandate lying to the court and lying to the media and the public, in support of national security objectives.
Individuals ordered to lie are offered both full immunity and severe penalties if they fail to lie as ordered.
One more thought.
Although I gear this article to an 18-year-old's lawsuit, there are plenty of adults, including CIA agents, who can sue for emotional distress—I-E-D—caused by having to watch false flags happen in the U.S., often with real deaths, not hoaxes, and to be prevented from revealing it.
Below is a link to my book.
On reality, Sandy Hook misses mines.
In addition, here's Then Shall Your Light Shine Forth from Mendelssohn's Oratorio Elijah, sung by St.
Olaf's Choir.
Meanwhile, Joe, your thoughts?
Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill to promote gun control by Jim Fetzer, editor, and Mike Palachuk, editor, on Alibris.
Apparently the book is still available.
I think I got a copy from Jim at the JFK Conference, so it's on my list of stuff to read, but I've been following the developments on a daily basis as the news kept unfolding on this, and Jim and I've had a lot of discussions on it, so my book is in the Fetzer FEMA Did It Camp, so.
Brian.
Well, this is, I read this article when it was first posted on your blog, and I thought about it for a little while.
And I thought about the hundreds of thousands of children that go missing every day.
And I thought about the people who were talking about what's happening to the kids on the border that are being crossed through.
And I thought about the problems that are happening all over the world in terms of the abuse of children, things that go back beyond the Franklin affair, way back, way back, Pizzagate, all those different things.
And, you know, I can tell you one thing that I know about this big demonic bear that operates these false flags, and that's that they have no conscience.
They have no life.
Words don't work with them.
They have no soul.
They'll all die and go to hell, as far as I know, because there's no redemption, no repentance at all for something like this.
I just feel that they've gone too far with all this now.
I feel for these kids.
I understand that.
Maybe they've been manipulated.
Maybe they're part of the monarch butterfly program that we saw so prevalent in in Uvalde with the mind control.
I can see all these different events having the types of ramifications, which is why I think something like this would simply result in the poisoning or death or plane crashes of the people that are involved, including the lawyers, including everybody else.
So I.
I just think that there's bigger, better hills to die on, and I think we're getting a lot of momentum on lots of other issues.
Sandy Hook seems to be the fortress that they've set up to defend themselves with, the one place where it became so obvious that it was a false flag, that it's just clear to the entire community.
But finding a court that will hear the argument, it sounds like a death sentence to me.
It sounds like a death sentence on the whole issue for all these kids because they can always use carrots and sticks, poisons and riches.
They can always cut another check to settle it.
I just I fear for something like this.
If it were to break, I'd be all in support of it.
But I tell you, I just think that a lot of people will get killed over it.
And they haven't they don't I don't think they kill people that are part of these operations.
I just don't believe that.
I believe it's all fake.
It's all propaganda.
It's all.
But I worry that the handlers would go that far to protect themselves from the sort of information getting out.
Well, it's like Hollywood.
You can't actually be shooting up.
Your actors, you know, you got Rambo going in to save the POWs in the Vietnam prison camp, and you see bombs exploding, bodies flying.
You wouldn't get any actors to sign up.
I mean, if you actually killed crisis actors you recruited for these false flags, who the hell is going to do it?
They get into it because they're paid for it.
They actually audition for it.
They have a script.
They have a contract.
They get benefits.
They don't pay taxes.
They get money to go to college.
But you're so right.
I mean, it could be that, you know, they're going to be willing to take somebody out if they cross the line.
So I appreciate the sobriety of your observation, Brian, and you know this case so very well.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Here's a comment.
The day will come when the Sandy Hook fraud will be fully revealed, but it will not be soon.
It may take many decades from now to happen, but it will happen.
It was one of the most stupidly insane things to ever happen in the entire history of the U.S.
I surmise most of us living today will be long deceased.
By the way, the President of the United States at the time, Obama, thought the Sandy Hook hoax was hilarious.
And I dare say, some of those who are reported to be dead did sing at the Super Bowl.
One here, by the way, It was supposed to be Richardson—actually, her real name is Lenny Urbana—who had a very distinctive birthmark across her forehead.
I have the video of her singing, and there's no doubt about it, that is the same person.
But most of these were other students and not among the alleged deceased.
Meanwhile, let's have our final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes, well Jim and I did a great, almost two hour long interview today with John O'Sullivan about Principia Scientific and our radio program that's been going on for a year now at TNT Radio.
And our upcoming guest is going to be one of the most remarkable pilots I've ever discovered, Captain Corrine Pettit.
She's certified in Airbus 350, Boeing 777, Airbus 330, Boeing 747-400 and 200, Boeing 767, Boeing 757, Boeing 37 and Boeing 727.
Airbus 330, Boeing 747-400 and 200, Boeing 767, Boeing 757, Boeing 37 and Boeing 727.
And she was getting a Ph.D. in airline safety and was invited to a senior pilots conference with the directors of Delta Airlines.
And they said the reason our airline is so safe is because we take feedback from our pilots.
And she goes, well, I guess what?
I just wrote a Ph.D. thesis on some of the safety problems we have here at Delta.
And they went, fire that woman.
Unbelievable story, and we're going to be talking to her, and then I found their story from a website called Maximus Aviation, and they just had another one on the conflicts between Southwest Airlines and Boeing, and the certification of the 737 MAX What a total scandal!
The FAA is completely captured by the airline industry, the pilots union, and the airline manufacturing companies.
And whenever Boeing has a problem with the FAA, they just call up the DoD, and the DoD goes, hey, that's one of our primary contractors.
You can't mess with them.
Leave them alone.
And the FAA goes, oh, OK.
And a perfect example is the FCC allowed installation of 5G radar.
And they were, I mean, 5G telecom and they were putting those in at airports where it's in the same frequency as the ground terrain radar for approach systems.
And if you just set the dial on your altimeter based on the barometric pressure reading, it can be off vertically over 100 feet in the length of a runway because it's a very crude barometric system and it changes depending on wind flow and blah, blah, blah.
and the length of the runway.
Bottom line, it's completely undependable.
And under low visibility conditions, if you don't have ground tracking radar, you can crash your planes.
And the FAA did nothing until the first half dozen of those towers were installed and the pilots were going, our radars are going haywire.
And the FAA went, oh, we got a problem here.
So they got an emergency 60-day restraint on the FCC, and then they got the FCC to say, OK, well, we'll designate certain airports as being strategically important, and we won't put cell towers on their runways.
But the rest of the country is still open, and the FAA just rolled over on it.
Absolutely insane the way these captured government agencies that are there to protect the public Do not do their jobs.
Oh, Joe, you said a mouthful.
100% correct.
Brian, your final thoughts?
Well, it's the first show of the new year for me, and I'm glad to be here.
This year, I'm going to be focusing on some things that are maybe a little more esoteric in nature.
I'm going to be taking a look at the connections between that I can find and try to do some original research related to the Illuminati, Zionists and the Jesuits, especially how the Jesuits interact with the Zionists and how the Illuminati manages itself along with the Committee of 300 and all the other conspiracy related organizations that we assign people to.
I really want to get to the bottom of it.
I believe that there's four or five people that are so completely powerful in this world That they literally arrange the events with massive apparatuses underneath them.
Some of them may be Jewish.
Some of them may be in the Vatican.
Some of them may be independent billionaires and even possibly even more powerful than that.
But I want to get to the bottom of it.
I want to find out who's really running the show this year.
So I'm going to be taking a look at Peer Bright.
Black Pope going to be taking a look at Zionism and who's really running the show there and try to get to the bottom of it so that we can identify our real foe.
I believe the real foe happens to be a spiritual foe.
But there are people that I believe are controlled that are part of it that are trying to usher in their new Lord of Light, their new Master of Light.
And I think that they're creating a lot of energy out there to try to bring that together.
They're defeated already, in my mind, but I think it'll be interesting to make the attempt to try to expose the agenda behind it.
Well, Joe and Brian are just a sensational combination for Texas Tuesdays, making these very special editions of Need to Know.
We have developments in two regions that are very different but very consequential.
The Ukrainians, using Elon Musk's satellite system, hit a building where many Russian troops were stored.
There are at least 65 dead.
The number is likely to grow much higher.
The Russian may have to respond by taking out the satellites, and if that happens, all hell is going to break loose.
The other, on a lesser scale but still significant, Kevin McCarthy seems to be in deep trouble.
It appears he will not be elected Speaker of the House.
I was looking just now for an update, and I am hopeful that it's going to go in the direction of Jim Jordan.
That would be a hell of a way to start the new year, 2023, on a positive note.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends, those you love, your family.
We still do not know how much time we have left, and we're unlikely to know until it happens.
Don't waste a precious moment.
▲
Export Selection