All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 3, 2023 - Jim Fetzer
58:18
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (2 January 2023) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks, to Truth Vs. News, Incorporated, for a new year, 2023, January the 2nd.
And I'm Donald Glattner, producer at JD.Consultants.Live.
And golly, we've got a heck of a show here for the first show of the new year.
And we've got the best people, of course, are back to do us wonders here.
We've got Jim Fetzer, who's the most dangerous mind in America, writing Fantastic books here.
JFK and Sandy Hook and other things.
And just a wonder to behold.
He's just doing great with all his shows.
And Scott Bennett, who's a military intelligence expert, who knows what's going on behind the scenes.
And I guess he's got lots to share that most people won't get except right here.
And Holly Seeliger, she's just, her smile and her intellect is just a blessing for our show.
So we appreciate Hurry on comments.
So Jim, I guess we're getting ready for wartime here and it looks like who can you believe in war?
I've heard all kinds of things about what's going on back there in Ukraine and Russia.
Well, you can count that the Russians are beating the hell out of the Ukrainians in the last 24 hours or so.
They fired over 400 missiles into Ukraine.
They're taking heavy hits.
Massive missile attack on the energy, military, industrial infrastructure.
Disrupting the production of ammunition, repair of military equipment, movement of reserve troops.
As a result of bombing, the railway transport network, foreign military equipment was blocked in areas of Western Ukraine far from the front.
There's a whole lot going on.
We have here the firing of one of their missiles that is unstoppable.
Here you have, oddly enough, it seems like hand-to-hand combat in the trenches.
You'd think this were World War I. The Russian Ministry of Defense spokesman reported up to 60 Ukrainian servicemen killed by artillery fire in one area.
In another, they lost at least 40 soldiers.
In another, more than 30 Ukrainian soldiers were killed in all kinds of vehicles, missiles, artillery.
Here's 170 soldiers, two Tomas, four other vehicles in the direction of Donetsk, 80 Ukrainian soldiers, a tank, four Tomas, five other vehicles.
Hundreds of Americans are reported to be in Ukraine, by the way.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has alleged up to hundreds of American servicemen are deployed in Ukraine.
That U.S.
soldiers, military advisors, and intel officers have long been direct participants.
Sitting down with Russia's Channel One, he spoke at length about Washington's deep involvement in the hostilities, which has steadily grown despite repeated assurances from American leaders that U.S.
personnel would have no role in the fighting.
Dozens, maybe even hundreds, of American troops are in Ukraine.
They were there even before the coup of 2014.
CIA officers occupied at least one floor in the Security Service of Ukraine building.
We blame U.S.
military attaché based in Ukraine that provided significant advice to Ukrainian authorities.
Military specialists are obviously engaged not only in making visits to the Ministry of Defense, but provide direct advisory services.
Separate teams of U.S.
specialists, created after American lawmakers demanded a more robust mechanism for tracking billions in lethal aid, has traveled to Ukraine to monitor the flow of Western arms into the country.
Given Ukraine is receiving more and more and better Western weapons, he observed, Russian forces are now formulating plans to disrupt the armed shipments.
Railway line bridges and tunnels are being considered as targets, make these difficulties more difficult or ideally to stop them altogether.
We went on to argue that Western states declared war on Russia nearly a decade ago, after the 2014 Euromaidan revolution.
The collective West, headed by nuclear power, the United States, is at war with us.
This war was declared quite a long time ago, after the coup d'etat in Ukraine, orchestrated by the United States and backed by the European Union.
So far, Washington has authorized more than $20 billion in direct military aid this year, not counting the separate Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative and billions more in economic and humanitarian assistance, where U.S.
officials claim these policies will continue with as much aid as long as it takes.
Very disturbing.
Here's one report over having shot down numerous Ukrainian fighter planes, two MiGs, one Su-24, and an Su-25.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, the practical reality is the Russians have an overwhelming amount of firepower and weaponry and personnel So it is just a matter of, you know, the calendar and the timeline for the complete crushing annihilation of Ukraine.
And I think you're going to see that very, very soon.
Russia has been proceeding surgically, but now it's upping the tempo.
You know, I'm amazed that they haven't really accentuated more of the information warfare to try and Cultivate an internal domestic upheaval or a coup d'etat against Zelensky, a military command center that takes over like a Pinochet or like a MacArthur did in Japan.
That's what Ukraine needs is a military cabal to take over that is going to be dedicated to making Ukraine neutral.
And, you know, the practical realities of the war, this is winding down.
Russia's already won.
And Ukraine is nothing left.
There's so much other stuff in the background that is enormously disturbing and filthy and corrupt on so many different levels that we could spend a whole two hours going through Ukraine and FTX and the Hunter Biden story and the biochemical labs and, you know, the cultivation of Ukraine as a NATO weapon launching point against Russia, dating back to the 1990s.
I've been reviewing all of the old documents that I had when I was in Washington about the history of Russia
And I won't go into this comment on it, Jim, perhaps we can do it with a bonus with Dawn, but the history of the Russian experience is completely, it's an amazing thing to behold, and I was alive back then, you know, I know Dawn and you were, I'm not sure if Holly was, she's a little young one, cutie pie that she is, but I was a young undergraduate at the time and I saw this unfold.
We're responsible for this complete Uh, annihilation of positive Russian-American relations, and Ukraine has always been part of this.
Now the pendulum is swinging back, and I wouldn't be surprised if the pendulum swings back and crashes into Poland, crashes into Ramstein, and just totally knocks NATO down like the house of cards it is.
It was able to get away with Bosnia and Yugoslavia bombing in the 1999 campaign.
It was able to get away with that because of Russia's difficulties and disintegration.
But this is not 1999 and Russia is not the Soviet Union and America certainly isn't what we were in 1999.
So I think the entire tables are about to change And 2023 is going to be the year that marks a rapid disintegration, erosion, and collapse of American influence overseas.
Jim?
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think Scott's right.
I was just thinking about some of the history of what we've seen since like the fall of the Soviet Union.
It seems like a lot of Democrat presidents, whether you're talking about in, you know, 1999 under Clinton, or 2014, we saw under the Obama-Biden administration, what was going on in Ukraine, Russia is basically considered
The United States is at war with Russia since 2014 and Scott's done an amazing job talking about the the bio labs that have been placed in that general area and so Russia's keenly aware of how the United States has been slowly building this up and I'm kind of surprised Russia's Exhibited amazing restraint as far as what they are, you know, the targeted attacks.
They've, they've stepped it up this year.
they've warned the United States and warned Ukraine, all this money laundering for a while now that these targeted attacks would go after infrastructure and trying to go after, you know, exactly what was it, $45 billion that the ominous bill recently is sending over to Ukraine.
And that includes all the different weapons, the tanks that were blown up.
Jim, you shared an excellent article talking about how these certain areas, whether you're talking about trains and munitions factories are being hit right now by Russia.
And I think that they're showing tremendous tremendous restraint as far as their technological capabilities.
I mean, they could have decimated Ukraine in a week if they wanted to.
The fact that they've shown restraint is just making the United States actually look, and NATO, NATO's basically destroyed at this point.
I mean, they've got egg all over their face with how this has turned into a kragmire within even just a year.
Good, good, good.
Meanwhile, we have a really disturbing story by Michael Chesedofsky of Global Research about how there was a plan in 1945 to wipe the Soviet Union off the map targeting 66 major cities with 204 atomic bombs.
This is completely appalling.
It seems to me Russia can have no trust in the United States whatsoever.
This is just stunning stuff.
He writes, the world is at a dangerous crossroad.
We're no longer dealing with a hypothetical scenario of nuclear war, but it's real.
He has a book about, or the World War III scenario, the dangers of nuclear war.
While one can conceptualize the loss of life and devastation from present modern-day wars, including Ukraine, Iraq, Syria, and Yemen, it is impossible to fully comprehend the devastation that might result from a third world war using new technologies until it occurs and becomes a reality.
The U.S.
admin has endorsed the empty nuclear strike in the name of world peace.
Absurd!
Many nukes are said to be harmless to surrounding civilian populations.
And, since the George W. Bush administration, preemptive nuclear war has been portrayed as a humanitarian undertaking.
The Fording article, published in 2017, questions the history of the Cold War, bearing on recent developments, where our threats against Russia for using nuclear weapons predate a Cold War.
First, formulate when we and then the Soviet Union were still allies.
The secret plan to bomb 66 Soviet cities was released in mid-1945, two weeks after the formal surrender of Japan.
Had the U.S.
decided not to develop nukes for use against the Soviet Union, the nuclear arms race would not have taken place.
Neither the Soviet Union nor the People's Republic of China would have developed nuclear capabilities as a means of deterrence against the United States had it not been for the Manhattan Project.
Flash forward to 2022.
President Biden does not have the floggiest ideas to the consequences of nuclear war.
Biden's announcement that the U.S.
will use nuclear weapons against non-nuclear threats and the knowledge U.S.
nukes are deployed close to Russia are forcing Putin to abandon his no-first-use-of-nuclear-weapons pledge.
In other words, unlike the 20th century Cold War, today there's a hair-trigger on nuclear war.
Jen Stoltenberg, U.N.
Secretary General, says, I fear the war in Ukraine will spiral out of control and become a major war between NATO and Russia.
If things go wrong, they can go horribly wrong.
Paul Craig Roberts, just a couple of weeks ago, massive amounts of money have been allocated by Biden to feed the weapon industry, including the Pentagon's $1.3 trillion nuclear weapons program, first launched under Obama.
Humanity is at a dangerous crossroads.
Nuclear war has become a multi-billion dollar undertaking which fills the pockets of U.S.
defense contractors.
Get this.
What is at stake is the privatization of nuclear war.
The use of nuclear weapons against Russia is currently on the drawing board of the Pentagon.
U.S.-NATO war games are being carried out on Russia's doorstep.
A first-strike preemptive nuclear attack on Russia is not excluded.
Fidel Castro even observed back in 2010, if a nuclear war—in a nuclear war, the collateral damage would be the life of all humanity.
Let us have the courage to proclaim all nuclear and conventional weapons, everything used to make war, must disappear.
Nice thought.
The use of nukes against Russia and the Soviet Union, however, has been on the drawing board since September 15, 1945.
The intent of the Manhattan Project was to wage nuclear war against the Soviet Union.
What's now happening in Ukraine has serious geopolitical implications that could lead us into a World War III scenario.
It's important a peace process be initiated with a view to preventing escalation.
That was a statement by Michael Shandofsky, Global Research on Hiroshima Day, August 6, 2021, updated December 11, 2022.
Here it is.
White the Soviet Union off the map.
A U.S.
nuclear attack against USSR planned during World War II.
According to secretly classified docs, dated September 15, 1945, the Pentagon envisioned blowing up the Soviet Union.
All major cities were included on a list of 66 strategic targets.
Six atom bombs would be used to attack the districts of the largest cities, including Moscow, Leninbad, Tashkent, Kiev, Kharkov, and Odessa.
The Pentagon thought a total of 204 would be required to wipe the Soviet Union off the map.
The undertaking, the optimum number required would be on the order of 466, can you believe?
A single nuke dropped on Hiroshima resulted in the immediate death of 100,000 in the first seven seconds.
Imagine what would have happened if 204 had been dropped on major cities of the Soviet Union, as outlined in the secret U.S.
plan formulated for that purpose.
The document outlining this diabolical agenda was released in September 1945, barely a month after the bombing of Hiroshika and Nagasaki on the 6th and 9th of August.
The secret plan, dated September 15, two weeks after the surrender of Japan on September 2 aboard the USS Missouri, had been formulated at an earlier period, even when America and the Soviet Union were allies.
It's worth noting Stahl was first informed through official channel by Harry Truman of the Manhattan Project in Potsdam on July 24, 1945, barely two weeks before dropping on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
The Manhattan Project was launched in 1939, two years prior to America's entry into World War II in December of 1941 following Pearl Harbor.
The Kremlin was fully aware of this secret Manhattan Project as early as 1942.
Were the August 45 Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks used by the Pentagon to evaluate the viability of a much larger attack on the Soviet Union with more than 204 atomic bombs?
The key documents to bomb 66 cities were finalized five to six weeks after Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
On September 15, 1945, Norstad sent a copy of the estimate to General Leslie Groves, head of the Manhattan Project, the guy who would be in charge of producing whatever bombs the U.S.
Army Air Force might want.
The classification was high, top secret limited, about as high as it went during World War II, reporting Alex Wellerstein the first atomic stockpile requirements, September 1945.
The Kremlin was aware of the plan to bomb 66 Soviet cities.
The documents confirm the U.S.
was involved in planning a genocide against the Soviet Union.
Let's cut to the chase.
How many bombs did the U.S.
Army Air Force request of the Atomic General?
Well, there were maybe one, maybe two bombs worth of visible material, and at a minimum, they wanted 123.
Ideally, they'd like 466.
Just a little over a month after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, they provided a handy-dandy chart identifying how many bombs they wanted.
Neither the Soviet Union nor the People's Republic would have developed nuclear capabilities against the United States, which had already formulated plans to annihilate the Soviet Union, where the Soviet Union itself had lost 26 million alone during World War II.
The targeted cities The initial list was updated in the course of the Cold War to include some 1,200 cities in the USSR and Soviet bloc countries of Eastern Europe.
These bombs were more powerful than those dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Here you see the general idea.
The millions of pages of classified and declassified talks on U.S.
nuclear policy beyond and after the Cold War, beyond the comprehension of any individual.
The following talks address a number of key problems.
First use of nuclear weapon, effects of nuclear weapon, early Cold War, preventive war thinking, constraints on nuclear weapon use, possible outcomes.
Scott, this is all devastating stuff.
I have the whole article on my blog at jameshfetzer.org, but you get the idea.
Your thoughts?
Well, that article is accurate, but RT has actually done a documentary on that whole plan, so his article is following up to what RT's already published.
I was part of a documentary that talked about this It was called The Road to Fascism, I believe, or Fascism.
You can go to RT.com and look it up.
It's one of the documentaries.
And it laid out exactly what you're describing, Jim.
There were multiple plants, in fact, multiple named operations, like four or five, under different names, where Churchill and Truman were actively
Planning for a massive annihilation of Russia using bombers, using missiles, and it became so impractical because ultimately they would have had to bomb and destroy, you know, like 70 percent of the land mass to destroy the communist people that were on there.
And I mean, it was just utterly ridiculous.
And they were doing this, planning this This operation against Russia when Russia was an ally with the allied powers against Germany and they had also formulated a plan to try and use German POWs to reincorporate them into the military to use against the Soviet Union.
This was an active plan and it was a It was, I mean, a tremendous betrayal in a sense.
Russia that had lost 20 million people in World War II, and they were actively conspiring to do this.
It never happened.
It never got off the ground.
But these are things that Russia knows about.
This documentary that Russia did on fascism explores and exposes every aspect and more of this whole plan.
And that's what they have been accustomed to.
So their intrepidation, their suspicion towards the West is not unfounded.
And in particular, if you look at between 1990 and, you know, now 2000, in 1990 to 2000, right when the Soviet Union collapsed, Russia and Yeltsin ran to the United States, came to the United States Congress, Russia and Yeltsin ran to the United States, came to Nine standing ovations were given by the Congress to Yeltsin because he was saying, I love America.
We want to be allies with America, not just partners, not just friends.
We want to be allies with America.
It was a gushing, prodigal son moment.
And Clinton and George Bush had set up some agreements and had started the ball rolling in a positive direction, but Bill Clinton came in and totally threw the bowling ball into another lane, and he assigned Al Gore and Strobe Talbot, who was a Time Magazine writer, and Lauren Summers, who was a Harvard professor,
Clinton gave these three knuckleheads the charge over transitioning the Soviet Union into a free market economy, and instead of cultivating grassroots entrepreneurship, and instead of cultivating what Tocqueville would have said and the founding fathers from the ground up, Bill Clinton and Al Gore and the CIA and all these parties threw money at big government.
So, they just kept pumping up big government, and the artificiality of the IMF loans inflated the ruble to the point in 1998 the ruble collapsed and lost 75% of its value in I think it was a matter of days.
The whole economy of Russia came crashing down.
And all the while, we were promising that NATO, you know, we created an alliance that Russia and America would come in and they would discuss any NATO operations, and then America completely betrayed Russia and expanded NATO,
Instead of setting up the former Eastern Bloc countries as neutral countries, they immediately swallowed them into NATO, and then we bombed Yugoslavia in 1999, which is a fascinating story in itself, too, because
Bosnia and Moldova, you had Muslim terrorists from Saudi Arabia coming in to Serbia Moldova area from 1992 to 1995 and did rape and pillage that would turn you pale.
And that's why Milosevic went in and did his own ethnic cleansing to push these Muslim Wahhabis with their Saudi Arabian green flag with the sword out.
They had done a genocide against the non-Muslims.
And we forget that.
We were never told that, in fact.
And we started bombing Under NATO, which is supposed to be a defensive organization, no, we start going on the aggressive and bombing and destroying these areas, Serbia and such, and of course we did it to Libya and elsewhere.
So all of this has accrued and developed and built up in Russia, and it was because of the betrayal in the 1990s that Russia completely lost all appetite for anything American, because
They sensed that we betrayed them, we lied to them, we destroyed their economy, we were trying to amputate their industries, we completely were trying to take over with, you know, share bank, corrupt shares and banking of industries, all sorts of things.
And that's why President Putin rose up and began building Russia up one brick at a time.
And they've never forgotten that.
And we've never abandoned that.
We've always been in a Cold War mentality against Russia, and they know it.
And this has now been recently confirmed by Angela Merkel and Chirac of France admitting that the Minsk agreements were meant to buy time for further military aggressive developments against Russia.
So all the cards are on the table.
And Russia is going, okay, nothing you've said is true and honest.
You can't be trusted, America.
You can't be trusted, Macron, France, Germany, Britain.
You've waged a cold war against us.
You betrayed us in the 90s.
You've continually expanded NATO.
And now we're completely on our own, so they're putting up a new wall, they're turning to the east, we're helping by destroying the Nord Stream 2 pipeline to try and make Germany addicted to Western natural gas, which I think is going to blow up in all kinds of civil war, because the winner has really not even got in yet.
But all of these things have translated into a complete collapse of any friendly or amicable relationship with Russia.
Lavrov has confirmed this.
All of the Russian leadership has confirmed that the U.S. has been embarking on this Lindsey Graham assassination, murder, and destruction agenda against Russia.
And on top of that, we're doing it with wokeism, LGBT, homosexuality, transgenderism as our human rights that we're seeking to infect the Russian bloodline like a disease.
And that's why they're saying, no, you're done.
You're not the America of Ronald Reagan or Uncle Sam.
You are a degenerate, schizophrenic monstrosity filled with sexually transmitted diseases, woke-ism, COVID-19 insanity, and we want nothing to do with you.
Jim?
Holly.
Well, I think Scott's right.
We've been talking about this for a couple years on the show now just about the depravity that we see here in the US.
So, I mean, we don't really have anything to stand on as far as, you know, culturally or morally or Financially, I think you have to think about BRICS and how there's a big financial shift that's going on right now as well.
So the de-dollarization, which is really scary for us here in the United States because we rely on US dollar as being the Federal Reserve, the global reserve currency.
And we're seeing that shifting away further and further.
So what do we have if we don't have the money?
I mean, I think that's why we're seeing so much printing and giving this out to Ukraine, because we're going to see slowly more and more countries are going to want to accept US dollars.
And our name is Mudd, basically, as Scott said, with all the different ways in which the United States and NATO has broken their agreements and with these border states and we can't prop up Poland and Ukraine and expect that these countries are going to be able to hold off what is going on with Russia as far as how much they've suffered since the collapse of the Soviet Union had to rebuild.
basically from the ground up in so many ways.
While the United States, we've gotten involved into all these different military issues and spreading ourselves way too thin, and we're getting hollowed out from the inside.
So especially with de-dollarization coming up, if you think inflation is bad, wait until all these other countries are joining this BRICS union, and we don't have the OPEC-backed dollar anymore.
Yes, yes, yes.
You got all that right.
Absolutely right.
Meanwhile...
House GOP find damning evidence of implicating Nancy Pelosi—surprise, surprise—into January 6.
The congressional investigation into events at the Capitol two years ago has never found a way to bring charges against then-President Trump.
Finding fault is the sole reason the committee was brought into existence.
He was supposed to have incited the crowd to unruly behavior and thereby promoted an insurrection.
Those who were present saw peaceful crowds who were there to protest the results of the 2020 election.
Former President Trump is on record announcing for the crowds to remain peaceful as they asserted their freedom from protests and election outcome, but he's been accused of orchestrating those who went beyond the law.
The pundit reveals GOP House members found text and email from Pelosi's cabinet proving they forcefully decreased January 6th security measures despite objections from the Capitol Police and the sergeants-at-arms.
Rogan O'Hudley posted a text message from Pelosi's staff, secretly editing the January 6th security plan for the Capitol, and then telling the House Sergeant-at-Arms to please act surprised when the final draft was published.
The Sergeant-at-Arms responded, I am startled to the request, showing his willingness to play along.
This is more evidence that they were planned in advance.
Here's the text.
Translation.
Pelosi's text was directly weakening January 6th security and didn't want anyone to know.
Breaking!
GOP House Representative released bombshell reports showing Pelosi staff at regular meetings setting up January 6th security to help revise plans.
Turned down a request from the USCP, that would be Capitol Police, and asked Sgt.
Ormes for more funding to National Guard.
It was a setup.
D.C.
Drano is on the war room with Steve Bannon discussing how House representatives found texts and emails from Pelosi staffers.
President Trump requested additional National Guard the day before, actually on January 4th.
Pelosi turned him down.
During the same time, Pelosi, perhaps the most dishonest politician of our time, organized a film crew to come to the U.S.
and film her that day as if she knew something big was going to happen.
In the last hours of the 2022 House section, the January 6th Committee withdrew subpoenas in addition to former President Trump and other witnesses.
The Times reports the lawmakers claimed they'd run out of time.
The committee is set to dissolve on January 3rd, tomorrow, when the new House will be sworn in.
It waited until October to issue the subpoena, who promptly sued the panel to block it.
Meanwhile, this explosive story is spreading fast.
House GOP members found text and email from Pelosi's staff proving they forcefully decreased January 6th's security measure despite objections from Capitol Police and Sergeant-at-Arms It was a setup, and they got caught.
The panel had directed Trump to produce an extensive list of documents and communications related to nearly every effort of his effort to invalidate the 2020 election.
The Trump suit made it highly unlikely he would ever testify, given the committee's end date, so waiting until October to issue the subpoena made the point moot.
One would assume the House is familiar with the calendar and timely factors.
In such proceedings, therefore, we're aware that issuing the subpoena would come to nothing.
However, Bernie Thompson, Democrat of Mississippi, felt the need to explain in an official letter.
As you know, the Select Committee has concluded its hearings, released its final report, and will soon reach its end.
In light of the imminent end, we can no longer pursue the specific information covered by the subpoena.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, this will be interesting to see how it comes out.
Are they going to investigate Pelosi?
Are they going to prosecute Pelosi and her staff members?
They certainly should be brought up in part of this.
The question is going to be Kevin McCarthy.
Is he going to be the House Speaker or is he not?
And I don't have any faith in McCarthy.
I think he's a limp-wristed coward made from the Mitch McConnell model.
But, you know, we'll see.
I'm always comically refreshed with that old fantasy people were throwing about that Donald Trump was suddenly going to be voted as the Speaker of the House.
Well, where did that go?
Uh, you know, that's part of this whole fantasy unfolding of possibilities.
But, you know, I think January 6th and the committee itself and all of their shenanigans that they've done from the overthrow of Donald Trump, the coup d'etat, their conspiracy with Twitter.
Their conspiracy with the FBI and the Department of Justice and Twitter and these other social media companies to suppress freedom of speech, to act as agents of the United States government, to hide from the American people information that would have been key to their voting decisions.
All of this indicates an absolutely bankrupt police state kleptocracy of moral idiots that is currently what we have in Washington, D.C.
This is going, I think this is going to be the year of Americans really throwing down the gauntlet and declaring, you know, an absolute revolution, a secession, a refusal to be part of a union where this a refusal to be part of a union where this Washington, D.C., district has any political power.
I think Washington, D.C.
really needs to be and has to be cut off completely and some kind of a new translation of the American Republic and what the founding fathers wanted needs to occur.
And we see this most recently, the despicable betrayal, The despicable betrayal, an episode of this most recently that shows just how badly the entire American society has suffered is because of the National Guard in Texas being flown to all sorts of places overseas.
And as a result, they can't act as guardians of the Texas border and as such guardians for the remainder of 50 states in America to stop an invasion that's coming up from every shithole country south of the border.
Tucker Carlson had Abbott and his flimsy, faggoty, limp-wristed response was exactly that.
So, I think the American people really have to rise up and overthrow these leaders by all means necessary or else, you know, the government is going to break up into a patchwork of Indian tribes and the Federal Republic is done.
and the immigration invasion that's being facilitated by Washington DC and Joe Biden and aided and abetted by the omissions, the lack of acting by Abbott and others to treat this as a military invasion is a confirmation.
So it's hard to understand and define why it's happening, but the only thing is it is happening.
And what do we do about it?
Nothing short of revolution, I think, is going to fix it, Jim.
And even that's questionable.
Go ahead.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think we're seeing more and more like these different enclaves, these different states, even cities that are collapsing right now.
And people are moving across the United States to conservative areas and areas where still a bit more fiscal responsibility and local oversight.
And then areas where they're just taking federal money, just printing out money and handing people money, just hand over fist right now.
And Watching the collapse around us we're seeing and I think people have realized there really is no You know, they throw this democracy word around, but we realize that Congress and this recent election with Carrie Lake, everything like that, shows that there's really nothing that people can do as far as our electoral system.
People are, even the average person's disheartened at this point, so we're going to see a greater, greater distrust of the central and federal government here in the United States, just as we're being frosted, you know, with these attempts of a world war.
I think we're We're at some very precarious moment right now as a whole nation.
Oh, I think that's right.
Less trust in government, less confidence in the existence of a real democracy.
This is very interesting.
Melania's transcripts just came out and admit she distrusted Donald Trump's closest advisors well before January 6th.
She may have had a keener sense of what was going on than Donald.
The January 6th Committee winding up.
The issue continues to dominate headlines.
Trump has maintained his innocence.
Former First Lady Melania has remained mostly silent.
Many wonder what were her thoughts about January 6th.
As it turns out, she had a strong reaction before the riots.
According to an insider report from ex-White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham, Mrs. Trump distrusted many of her husband's inner circle.
Melania was wary of President's top advisors, including Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, and Jenna Ellis.
These were those leading the charge with the 2020 election.
It seems she thought they were leading him in the wrong direction and only telling him what he wanted to hear.
Specifically, she called out Trump Chief of Staff Mark Manos.
Well, the first lady was very angry at Meadows, both for his treatment of Grisham and for giving access to people who were maybe harmful to the president, giving him bad advice.
And Mrs. Trump never liked it when people would tell Trump what he wanted to hear rather than the truth or the reality of the situation.
And she felt that Meadows was always just playing into his hand.
All this comes courtesy of the newly released transcript of Gresham's made depositions, which may come as a surprise to Trump supporters.
On top of that, Mrs. Trump wasn't sure about Donald Jr.' 's wife, Kimberly Guilfoyle, who was also an advisor.
She never trusted they were doing things in the best interest of their Don Jr.' 's father.
She was also disappointed, according to Grisham, in the First Lady for not reacting to the riots.
Grisham texted to ask if she wanted a tweet.
There was no place for lawlessness and violence during the riots.
But Melania refused without explanation.
At which point Grisham said she decided to resign.
I just, I mean, it was kind of like a nephew.
I mean, I'm sorry for the transcript person, but I was so, so disappointed in her.
I was more disappointed in her than I'd ever, ever been because she had a chance to take a leadership role.
And I know for a fact she was amazing at influencing her husband sometimes with these kinds of things, you know.
The most intriguing part is that the First Lady didn't trust Donald's inner circle, and she didn't believe they were leading him in the right direction.
This week the January 6th Committee withdrew their subpoena, saying that it was no longer needed.
Melania was never asked to testify, so this is her first we're hearing of her pre-January 6th feelings toward her husband and his advisor, and it casts the situation in a slightly different light.
Takeaways?
January 6th transcripts from former White House Press Secretary Schiffer E. Jeffries have come out.
They detail former First Lady Melania's feelings about her husband's advisors.
She didn't trust many of them and believed they gave him bad advice.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, she certainly confirms what we were all feeling, the bad advice to Donald Trump.
Look, his advisors, I'm unapologetically disgusted by everybody they had around him.
John Bolton, Blix, Jeff Sessions, Mike Pompeo.
These people are absolute fools.
Establishment neocons, Zionist, endless warmongering fools that had the stupidity and the audacity to pull Trump out of the JCPOA agreement, which could have been a renaissance of Iranian-Russian-American relations.
He could have done with Iran what he did appear to do with Kim Jong-un in North Korea, but these people around him were very bad.
And ultimately, that is the fault of Trump.
If you're the commander-in-chief, you are judged by the company you keep.
He was responsible for these people and not getting better people.
And that's That's the great tragedy, is Trump could have had a lot of better people.
I sent him a memo in December of 2017 explaining all of the shell game and the corruption and all that stuff that was happening with UBS and terrorist financing and the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton State Department, all of the stuff that could have been used and uncovered, and they did nothing.
Whether it was Pat Cipollone or other people close to him.
And that same report, of course, went to Representative Mike Pompeo when he was in the House, and it went to Senator Jeff Sessions when he was a senator.
And I've got the video and the records to prove it.
And I was also back in Washington, D.C.
in November 2020 with Pat Berge and Tori and Millie and Gavin and Pat Byrne and Joe Flynn and Rudy Giuliani and a whole host of people and Sidney Powell.
Uh, and I presented to them my briefing, which was on the AFL-CIO working in tandem with the Senior Executive Service to cause disruption operations, and those disruption operations manifested as part of the January 6th event.
They, they knew about that in November of 2020, before Thanksgiving.
We gave that to Trump.
We went to Various close people.
We went to an ambassador who his wife was very friendly with Melania.
In fact, he had invited or introduced Melania to Donald Trump.
Paolo was his name.
We went to him.
We presented him all sorts of materials.
None of this stuff was acted upon.
Did Donald Trump personally see it?
I would expect he did.
But nothing was done.
And because nothing was done at the time, in November of 2020, at a time where he could have Headed off and stopped a lot of the disruption.
He could have aggressively engaged in countermeasures against this coup d'etat.
Everything fell against him.
And this is something that was a long time coming.
So how it all is going to fold out, I don't know.
It's still coming out more and more, the corruption they did.
But this betrayal of Donald Trump had happened for six months before January 6th.
And Meadows and everybody around him contributed to the collapse of Trump's presidency.
And he could have and should have, the day after the election, I mean before the election, ...determined all the foreign interference.
And I've said before, in a nutshell, Union Bank of Switzerland entered into a partnership with the Chinese Communist Party and created UBS Securities LLC, a limited liability corporation, in 2010.
And they evolved that from 2010 onward.
And Union Bank of Switzerland and the Chinese Communist Party purchased ES&S voting machines and Dominion voting machines.
Uh, and the reward for UBS doing that partnership was China gave them 100% ownership of the Chinese Communist Party UBS entity they created on December 1st, 2020.
So as a result of The conspiracy against Donald Trump, the Union Bank of Switzerland being used to buy the voting machines and change the voting machines in concert with all sorts of other election fraud tactics and operations.
UBS and the Chinese Communist Party should be recognized as a foreign interference agent.
I gave that to Gozar, I gave it to many other people.
How it all comes out, we've yet to see, but I've presented the truth and their failure to act on it has really led to this tsunami of wreckage that we've been suffering ever since under the walking retard Joe Biden and the rest of these fascist Democrats that now have us on the brink of a potential nuclear war, which may be part of their plan to distract everybody and try and start from scratch.
Jim?
Wow.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I just think that Scott's done excellent work as far as, um, revealing all of this over the past few years and, um, all of his work with, uh, RT and other, uh, news outlets showing the corruption and having all the evidence of this and all the people that he worked with and being there at the time.
And, uh, we have all the evidence that we need and it's, I dunno, it's just hard for me to really comment at this point because it, it's just disheartening.
Because it's like we've we've talked about this ad nauseum for so long as far as as far as the corruption and I think all of it's really meant to just create a chilling effect for anyone who has any sort of even just a qualm with what is going on and and where our tax dollars are going any sort of you know any sort of discussion I think that's exactly right.
as a threat to our democracy, to use that term again, and a threat to the establishment.
So it's really just supposed to make people feel like they can't even leave their homes or protest or anything like that or have any sort of redress of grievances as a citizen at this point.
So the chilling effect is just extreme.
I think that's exactly right.
Meanwhile, Trump's last tweets from two years ago blow up the January 6th committee's claims. - Yes.
If the Republicans in Congress were serious about draining the swamp or reining in the Department of Injustice, they'd have elected Marjorie Taylor Greene as the new Speaker of the House.
She has more stones than any of the rest of them.
I think that's right.
Green along with Matt Gaetz of Florida and Louie Gohmert of Texas are the only members of Congress who have visited the imprisoned January Sixers in their disgusting jail conditions for the past 22 months.
Most elected people probably think Trump was actually trying to lead an insurrection.
Unfortunately for them, Trump's Twitter account has been reinstated.
Trump hasn't tweeted in the days since Elon Musk reinstated his account, which is too bad.
I love being treats.
Plus, Trump's true social is mostly garbage, and I refuse to get an account there.
If you have a Twitter account, you're going to follow America's real president, at real Donald Trump.
I suspect he'll start using the platform again during the campaign, no matter what he says now.
Why wouldn't he use it to get his message out to more people?
Plus, the media can't resist talking about it every time he tweets.
He'll be back.
In the meanwhile, what's interesting about the Twitter account is when he said his last few before the liberal-owned Twitter permanently banned him.
After the January 6th Liz Cheney Committee in the media was banned the last 22 months, lying to the American people about that day, it's hard to cut through the noise and remember what actually happened.
He sent the following two tweets within one hour of the first FBI breaking a window at the Capitol while disguised as a member of Antifa.
Please support our Capitol Police and law enforcement.
They are truly on the side of our country.
Stay peaceful.
And I am asking for everyone at the Capitol to remain peaceful.
No violence.
Remember, we are the party of law and order.
Respect the law and our great men and women in blue.
Thank you.
Wait, wait, I thought the January 6th committee told us Trump was trying to choke out a Secret Service agent so he could steal the presidential limo and hang Mike Pence before declaring himself a dictator for life.
Nope.
Trump was calling for peace less than an hour after things started to intensify in the papal.
No wonder Twitter banned his account and blocked anyone from reading it for two years.
Don't forget, the Antifa FBI dudes dressed up as Trump supporters started clashing with police on the stand before Trump's speech had even concluded.
That means Trump was calling for peace at what, about 45 minutes after the whole shundig got underway?
Some insurrection!
While Republicans refuse to push back against these garbage insurrection claims, the FBI is still to this very day arresting January 6th protesters.
The same day I'm typing, the FBI's Joint Terrorism Task Force just arrested a man named Menachem Cohen.
This Jewish Trump supporter was arrested by a SWAT team because 22 months ago he paraded in the Capitol for about 20 minutes and briefly interrupted a Senate meeting.
Those are misdemeanor charges.
The Joint Terrorism Task Force tracked him down, discovered he'd swiped his debit card at a 7-Eleven in Maryland on January 6th, 22 months since he allegedly committed these misdemeanors.
Previously deported child molesters and Muslim terrorists are sneaking across our southern border right now, but the FBI is reading 7-Eleven receipts that charge Trump supporters with misdemeanor parading charges.
And look what popped up.
Donald J. Trump.
I'm asking for everyone at the U.S.
Capitol to remain peaceful.
No violence.
Remember, we are the party of law and order.
Respect the law and our great men and women in blue.
Thank you.
Donald J. Trump.
Please support our Capitol police and law enforcement.
They are truly on this side of our country.
Stay peaceful.
Both tweeted on January 6, 2021.
How bad is that?
Scott, your thoughts.
Well, it was a psychological operation designed to falsely portray Trump supporters as reckless lunatic maniacs wearing buffalo horns and breaking windows and engaging in all sorts of activity, which has never been part of the conservative it was a psychological operation designed to falsely portray Trump supporters as reckless lunatic American conservatives and Republicans don't break windows.
They don't engage in lawlessness.
They're not violent people, except if they need to overthrow tyrants and foreign invasions.
The left and the lunatics and the schizophrenics and the sexually transmitted LGBT homosexuals and the climate change and the lesbians and the feminist radicals, that whole cohort of rabid dogs and hyenas and jackals, they engage in that kind of that whole cohort of rabid dogs and hyenas and jackals, they engage in that kind They hate God.
They hate their family.
They hate everything, and that's why they are so exuberant in their energies and their passion.
And they're also lobotomized, thinking, what, a Democrat-Communist world is going to take away their self-hatred and suffering?
That really is at root of the conflict that exists in the Democrat heart and mind.
But they engaged in a psychological warfare operation.
They pretended that they were Trump supporters.
They wore MAGA hats.
And they did this insurrection operation, and it was aided and abetted by actions by the police.
Police opening up the gates, letting people in, letting people in the door.
Well, if you let people into a facility, it's not closed off.
Then you engage in the alleged shooting of the naval girl.
I can't remember her name off the top of my head.
Which, judging from the forensic of that shooting, I determined was a false flag.
Because I've never seen anyone shot in the neck with a bullet and just fall serenely backwards onto her backpack and lay there not moving.
No blood coming out of her fingers.
No blood spurting on the floor.
No blood coming out of her neck and saturating her clothes.
She's just sitting there kind of like in a daze.
And then they pick her up and move her and there's one little silver dollar blotch of blood on the marble.
Uh, and all sorts of other very strange things were happening with the people during that, you know, that shooting of that woman, Ashley something, I think her name was or whatever.
Ashley Babbitt.
Thank you, Ashley Babbitt.
So the Ashley Babbitt shooting, based on the science and the forensics and the absence of blood and things that we've traditionally used to calibrate a shooting, didn't happen.
So, what was behind all of that?
I always just come to the blood, the blood, the blood, and the absence of it, and the absence of a person's body, you know, grabbing their throat.
None of that occurred.
So, this entire situation that occurred on the Capitol grounds was a psychological operation.
It was a fake.
And, you know, that all has to come out.
But again, we're dealing In a twilight world where there's no truth, there's no truth in the media, there's no truth in our politicians, and I think, you know, it's leading to a society where people are just completely divorcing themselves from anything to do with American politics, because they have no authority.
Jim?
Yeah, thank you, Scott.
Holly, would you like to begin a comment, and then we'll pick it up back with you after the break?
Well, I just want to say quickly that I think it's just more proof that there are certain types of protests that are allowed and certain topics that you can protest, you know, if it's a civil or if it's for, you know, the liberal agenda.
But if you're wanting to know about elections or where your tax dollars are going or something like that as a citizen, you're not allowed to protest that type of issue.
Fair enough.
that type of issue. - Fair enough, Don, take us out. - Now let's make one more comment about the Ashley Babbitt thing.
Who was the shooter?
And why was he not really prosecuted at all?
And it looks like there's some pictorial evidence that it might be Schumer who was the shooter.
Anyway, Truth vs. News here.
This is the first hour of New Year, January 2nd, 2023.
And what a year we're getting off to.
It's really quite, well, historic.
Part 10's not good, so hopefully we'll get back and get the rest of it straightened out here as we go to break here.
▲
Export Selection