All Episodes
Dec. 27, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:08:30
Need to Know News (26 December 2022) with Carl Herman and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Chris Weiner in Fort Myer, Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know, and there's a whole lot going on.
For example, the Kremlin assesses Zelensky-Biden meeting.
The spokesman insists both leaders are reluctant to address Moscow's concern, no doubt.
Washington seemed intent on waging a proxy war against Russia using Ukraine as its tool, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has observed.
No question about it.
Of course, we are following the meeting, getting acquainted with all the incoming information.
Neither President Biden nor Zelensky uttered any words that could be construed as, so to speak, potential readiness to take heed of Russia's concerns.
He lamented the U.S.
has failed to warn his Ukrainian colleagues against shelling residential areas in Donbass.
According to him, the U.S.
is continuing to wage war against Russia to the last Ukrainian.
Late on Wednesday, Russia's ambassador also accused Washington of waging a proxy war with the manic idea of defeating the Russians on the battlefield, which ain't gonna happen.
Zelensky arrived in Washington for his first official visit.
During his meeting with Biden, the president said he would back Kiev for as long as it takes.
He also confirmed handing over Patriot air defense batteries and other military aid, which, however, requires American soldiers to man.
Zelensky's Hollywood-style U.S.
visit, a proxy war promotion, according to Moscow, no doubt about it, it was outrageous.
Russia's ambassador is accused of the proxy war, as we've observed.
The Hollywood-style trip to Washington by the head of the Kiev regime is confirmed.
The administration's conciliatory statements about a lack of intention to start a confrontation with Russia are empty words.
Washington is throwing all its colossal resources, weapons, and intelligence capabilities at Kiev in pursuit of the ridiculous—I say ridiculous—idea of defeating Russia.
The ambassador noted the U.S.
plans to provide Patriot missiles.
Warning Such weapons and their crews, which will be American, are legitimate targets for the Russian military.
He slammed growing speculation of deliveries of ATACMS missiles and long-range drone attack drones.
What was essentially announced to applause and sarcastic smirks was a need to continue the proxy war against our country until a complete victory.
Moscow is sought to have wielded common sense at all levels, stressing shipments of increasingly modern and long-range weapons and other provocative action by the U.S.
and allies are leading to escalation with consequences impossible to even imagine.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, this is just political theater.
And this is covering what the U.S.
and the U.K.
and NATO always do.
They get puppets like Zelensky.
And Ukraine's government is just ridiculous.
They have made it illegal to criticize Zelensky.
The political opposition media was shut down.
The political opponents have been jailed.
So, it's just the usual bullshit theater, and the best way for me to describe, as a now-retired AP U.S.
government teacher, is the U.S.
is an illegal, lying, looting, rogue state empire.
And the propaganda for this particular war is to cover The puppet of the Ukraine, the bombing of the Donbass by Ukraine to keep the country together, and then Zelensky comes here for the theater, and the assumption is that the U.S.
is good, and that really is the central claim that the entire world sees as false.
The U.S., the U.K., and NATO, they are the neocolonial masters.
They're lying about this war the same that they have lied about every other war.
Yes, yes.
West is lying that it's good.
It is a looter of resources, both natural and human.
Yes, yes.
Chris, your thoughts?
Well, it's kind of amazing to think that the taxpayers fund all this, you know, the research and development for these products they're shipping off in mass to the tune of billions and hundreds of billions of dollars to the Ukraine.
And They pay for the military products, the U.S.
taxpayers I'm talking about, at military contractor prices.
So you might remember $500 hammers, things like that.
Not only do they give away defense secrets, intellectual property, and obsolete equipment to secure the private kickbacks of our so-called public servants.
That, to me, is maybe a big red flag or a major hiccup, but I'm just kind of picky, I guess.
Also, they're funding into this AIPAC CFR theater, which basically seems to play nations against nations, races against races, religions against religions, and politics against politics.
Yeah, as long as the lower caste system clashes amongst themselves, these guys are all shits and giggles, because they're going to create this theater for us to really fight and struggle over, live and die for, and they're going to just basically take the resources and run us into early graves.
I like that, Chris.
Shits and giggles, indeed.
Meanwhile, no common language for peace talks.
Embarrassingly bad, but the U.S.
seems to have no interest whatsoever.
In recent days, several significant military and political events have taken place in Russia, which determine the interim results of military ops and outline the future direction of Russian foreign policy.
As for the situation on the battlefield, the Russian army is focused on taking control of the full territory of the Donetsk People's Republic.
The situation on the front lines, currently extended for 815 kilometers, has been stabilized.
In a speech on December 22nd, President Putin, for the first time, called the conflict in Ukraine a war, not a special military op.
At the same time, he confirmed Russia's desire to end the conflict as soon as possible.
And, of course, on Russian terms.
A year ago, Russia proposed the U.S.
and NATO signed security guarantees, including the exclusion of further NATO expansion to the east, and set limits to the deployment of military bases and weapons in Europe and countries of the former USSR.
Moscow's initiative, however, received no support from Washington.
On December 23rd, the Director of the North American Department of the Russian Foreign Ministry announced the conditions that must be met to return to negotiations.
No negotiation until the supply of weapons to Kiev and its financing stop, until Western military personnel, mercenaries, and instructors are withdrawn, and until the realities on the battlefield defined by Russia are recognized.
The Russian diplomat stressed under the cover of loud claims of absence of aggressive intent in adherence to the Minsk agreements, the West rearmed the Ukrainian army and supported Kiev in its intention to capture and destroy the Donbass.
There is thus no trust left in the United States or the West.
Meanwhile, Zelensky's been on a Christmas tour to his Western partners, making for more money, more weapons for his war-torn countries in exchange for photos and PR campaigns of Western leaders.
Biden said he was ready to seek a just peace with Russia, but it contains a new package of military support as part of his peace plan, including the Patriot air defenses.
Putin has already called such a decision an attempt to prolong the conflict that Russia would snap the matriots like seeds.
Meanwhile, Lindsey Graham says Ukraine war will only end if Putin is taken out.
This is as absurd as it gets.
Lindsey Graham has called for the Russian president to be assassinated, saying the only way the war in Ukraine could end is if Russia breaks and someone takes Putin out.
This might invite someone to take Lindsey Graham out.
How does this war end?
When Russia breaks and they take Putin out, anything short of that, the war is going to continue.
He also said, the U.S.
is in it to win it, and the only way we're going to win it is to break the Russian military and have somebody in Russia take Putin out to give the Russian people a new lease on life.
Well, thank you, Lindsey Graham, but the Russian people are very happy with Vladimir Putin.
He's been a far better leader than anything the Democrats have been able to provide or anything you yourself have contributed.
Dave DeCamp tweets, Lindsey Graham says the only way the war in Ukraine will end is if Russia breaks and someone takes Putin out.
The hawkish senator made similar comments back in March, asked if there were a Brutus in Russia who would kill Putin.
In his comments, Graham also said the Biden admin should send Ukraine the advance and long-range weapons Kiev has been asking for.
When asked to what extent the U.S.
should continue to support Ukraine, he said, completely all in without equivocation, the U.S.
needs to provide Ukraine with longer-range weapons to help dislodge Russia from areas of eastern Ukraine, including Crimea.
He said if Ukraine had larger drones, such as Reapers and Grey Eagles, Ukraine could kill tons of Russians without losing any Ukrainians in the process.
Ukraine has asked for Grey Eagles, which can fly for about 30 hours and can carry powerful Hellfire missiles, but the Biden admin has held off sending them so far.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, so the US, the UK, and NATO have a history of projecting a conversation of how they demonstrate Russian political, kind of their personality, but really it's projection.
We've all heard this for years, where an American pundit will say, the Russians only understand one thing.
And, but that's US, UK, and NATO.
Remember, because Putin's peace terms from the beginning, there's just two of them, and they're completely reasonable, and the rest of the world sees this.
One is no NATO for Ukraine, and they've already promised that a million times.
And then the other one is independence For Donbass that means that they get to vote to determine their future and they already have 95 to 99 percent decided that they wanted to ally themselves with Russia and that might be that since the 14 and the 16 color revolutions the Ukrainian puppets have shelled Donbass with artillery That have killed approximately 14,000 in the Donbass.
And then finally, Lindsey Schutzen Giggles Graham, he's echoing the same talking points that we heard for taking Saddam out.
And that was 20 years ago, that was in the little baby bushes war.
And we had that constantly muttered.
So these people are just psychopathic war criminals.
And in 2023, Patriots are going to be engaged in campaigns to reveal these people and to take action that they be arrested for these illegal wars of aggression and executed for them.
Yes.
Chris?
Yeah, not to mention Chavez, Maduro, Gaddafi, and even Trump to a lesser extent.
I'll throw you a bone for Christmas there, Fetz.
These guys have often, Lindsey Graham talked about taking these guys out and that they had no constitutional right to be Democratic leaders, things like this.
Some of the most absurdity based statements you'll ever hear, and you can't believe that it's actually a dialogue that goes on amongst our so-called political leaders and public servants.
You have to look at most of their operations and their events as mass depopulation events, in my opinion, things that have no reasonable or real basis or justification to force these conflicts onto people, whether it's Ukraine or global citizens or whatever.
They're really trying to force people into picking a side and fighting.
And basically, you know, you should pick a side that's not being offered by the APAC CFR or Big Jew, whatever you want to call it.
But, you know, you almost have to think outside the binary psychology and the programming that they expect you to react with in terms of them imposing terror and fear upon you.
So, you know, they really try to steer you towards the corrals of the greatest common denominators.
The greater goods, the lesser of two evils, but it's still evil.
You really got to think about that and never lose sight of that.
You know, you can you can really choose a third option that's not being offered by these guys.
And I think that most of this theater is being created, in my opinion, to keep the financial Ponzi schemes going on.
You know, the Fed and Fraction Reserve systems that came after World War Two, the Bretton Woods stuff that they had to come off of.
You know, Russia and China are trying to force an actual.
ledger-based economy onto these people.
So it's really not going well with these guys that have been using crypto scams and CBDCs and derivatives and many other instruments of economic sorcery to gain great wealth and to obtain all the resources of the world.
So yeah, great points, Carl.
They're using the US, UK, UN, NATO business model, even the WHO and the CDC type of model, the IMF World Bank type of model, to impose this type of control, to make people's and nation's compliance contention or funding contention upon their compliance.
Sorry, I got a little bit ahead of my mouth there.
But anyways, yeah, they really want to create this binary type of history and repeat it—a Cold War 2.0, if you will.
And beneath the fog of this war, in my opinion, they're going to use that opportunity to target all dissidents—anybody that's really called them out for the truth and held them accountable, or tried to at least.
So really, it's important that people realize this and pick a right side, not one that's being offered by these guys.
Yes, yes, yes.
very well said chris meanwhile after hillary compares zielinski to a world war ii legend critics bounce on her reference to the great winston churchill Ukrainian President Zelensky's visit to the White House has been mired in controversy from the start.
Many Americans don't like the U.S.
riding giant checks to aid Ukraine, especially when many citizens are struggling financially themselves.
And when Hillary made a questionable comparison, the social media erupted.
For the most part, Zelensky is viewed as a hero among the left, the war-mongering left, primarily for resisting the Russian onslaught, and the Biden admin hasn't been afraid to hand over mountains of cash.
During Zelensky's visit, Biden said they'd continue to do everything they can to add the war effort, which isn't exactly what the rest of us here in the country wanted to hear.
Unsurprisingly, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton lauded the visit and actually compared Zelensky with one of the most legendary figures of history, which marked a reaction.
It started when she told CNN, this was historic.
Some people have compared it to Winston Churchill who came 81 years ago and basically asked the U.S.
to stand with him after we'd been attacked, and we did.
So there were a lot of points Zelensky made that were quite resonant with any of us who know how hard our struggle for freedom and the cost we pay to defend it actually has been.
Hillary ain't the only one to make such a comparison, but the media seized on it.
It ain't flying well.
Even a news source from Ukraine questioned the comparison, highlighting the significant differences.
For example, Churchill stayed for weeks, Zelensky only one day.
Also, others made note of Zelensky's clothing, which one Twitter user compared to Churchill.
Eli David tweets, he is dressed like that because his country is in the middle of the war.
Cut the bullshit.
Here for comparison is Churchill addressing the Congress 81 years ago in December 1941 at the brink of World War II.
Dressed properly and respectfully.
Representative Bishop cited Pelosi-Zelensky-Churchill comparison, where she brought the battle for democracy into the argument.
Biden requested $37 billion for Ukraine.
The bill allocates $47 billion, bringing the total aid to over $100 billion.
Zelensky will address Congress tonight and ask for even more dollars.
Meanwhile, Pelosi is comparing him to Churchill, saying democracy is on the line.
Just outrageous.
The latest tranche of U.S.
funding would be the biggest American infusion of assistance yet to Ukraine, even above Biden's $37 billion.
The guys handed over our beautiful Ukrainian flag with their signatures for us to pass on, Zelensky said.
We're not in an easy situation.
The enemy is increasing its army.
Other people are braver and need more powerful weapons.
Our people are braver and need more powerful weapons.
We'll pass it on from the boys to the Congress to the President of the United States.
A Twitter user wrote, Another difference is Churchill wasn't a dictator.
I can sympathize with the people of Ukraine, but don't support sending funds or supplies.
Many simply point out the clear and vast difference between World War II and the current Prussia-Ukraine conflict, especially with regard to America's role.
World War II was actually a true world war.
America had been dragged in after Pearl Harbor.
The Nazis weren't merely threatening one country, but the entire Earth.
Everyone's way of life was at stake.
Churchill's involvement in that historic war is dramatically different than Zelensky's.
The visit to the White House was also different.
But with Hillary Pelosi and many mainstream press members promoting it, expect more leftists to elevate Zelensky to Churchill's position, whether he deserves it or not.
Hillary, Nancy members are now comparing Zelensky to Churchill.
Critics respond and point out major differences.
Many Americans don't support continuing sending funds to Ukraine.
Absolutely right.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, so first with Churchill being great.
Um, no, no.
If we had the spirit of Gandhi here, he would say that Churchill, what is the major impediments and who wanted to hold the human beings within the claimed colonial empire of the UK as slaves to the UK with those resources, the natural resources going to the benefit of the UK, the human resources being worked to death.
I was just trying to look up a paper that I had written.
It was the first one that I came across which attempted to quantify the value of the colonial empire from Britain.
And the number 37 trillion in India pops up, but that's just from memory and I couldn't quite find it.
I'll see if I can find it there.
So, Churchill, and then you go to World War I. Churchill was one of the leading authors of that war.
20 million killed.
Both of my granddaddies lied into that war.
Totally unnecessary.
So these people are just sadists and psychopaths.
And probably Satanist is the best description, because they do have these festivals of death, where there is no justification other than they just get off of this, and as Chris was talking about it, a depopulation program.
And World War I, which Churchill was one of the architects for, that's about 20 million dead.
So, Churchill is not great.
This is all political theater, but we need a breakthrough so that people can see what the rest of the world can see.
Gross.
Well, in the eyes of these psychopathic murderers that control the media and control the narrative of history, They call these people great, and they ascribe greatness to these people, and it's really a role model for the youth to really see and be deceived by, and to even steer themselves into justifying behaving in similar manners for the next generation, in my opinion.
So when you get to Winnie the Pooh, that kind of strikes me in the nerve.
I really dislike this guy and what he did.
I think that if you look into the Atlantic Charter Conference of January 21st of 1941, you'll see that they brokered the terms of World War I or World War II and the creation of Pearl Harbor and the United States entry into the war.
This was all basically for a mass depopulation event, and you know how many people they took out.
It's way more than six million that they often refer to in terms of our Hollywood recognition of World War Two.
So speaking of World War Two and the Pearl Harbor thing, I forgot to mention a couple of shows ago when we were talking with Joe about this, that the FBI actually trained the U.S. Army, the Navy and the Marines at Pearl Harbor.
Knowing it was going on, they actually recorded and documented these events in techno color the first time using that in color films.
So, yeah, it's historically documented.
You'll hear these documentaries on history talk about that, but when you start to tie all these facts together and put them together, it really creates a pretty awful narrative for these people that seem to be trying to send us to early graves.
And, you know, something I want to talk about too is You know, the holidays are here, and there's a lot of people that are homeless, and it's sad to see, you know, how they're using these things like Ukraine as an extortion tactic to not only push people out of their homes, but to make them have to choose between feeding their family or heating their homes, things like this.
It's an extortion tactic to increase the cost of energy and to ascertain unlimited emergency crisis funding, in my opinion.
So they often try to pull at the heartstrings of patriots.
They know that fanatics really maintain a surgical focus when it comes to their research.
And, you know, they could really recite the official narratives quite well, like they were programmed to do.
But they never really seem to think outside the box.
And they're the first ones to volunteer to put you into a box.
So, you know, the lockdowns, these war situations, the fog of war and the two greater goods, like I mentioned, you really got to be cautious of falling into the traps that the media lays for you and the offerings that seem to be presented.
So I don't buy into the funding Ukraine.
I don't buy into the narrative of World War Two.
I'm kind of skeptical by nature, though.
Well, it's all ridiculous.
A comparison, absolutely outrageous.
Nothing to it.
Look at Bretton Woods, Fats.
Sorry to cut in on you.
Bretton Woods to the London Gold Pool, if you really think about the IOU financial systems these guys create.
And they really try to take the world over with the UN business models, the IMF, the World Bank thing, like I mentioned, the World Economic Forum, like you mentioned all the time, the CDC, the WHO.
They've taken over the medical industry.
They've taken over the pharmaceutical industry, the economic industries, education.
It's quite a stranglehold that they put on programming our children, and it really needs to be brought up and talked about more in a public focus, in my opinion.
Sorry to cut in on Jim.
No, I appreciate that, Chris.
Excellent ad, and I'm happy you did.
Meanwhile, an Arizona judge has ruled in the Kerry-Luke lawsuit, unfortunately.
He's made a very inappropriate and unjustified ruling.
An Arizona judge ruled against Carrie Lake, affirming the election of Katie Hobbs as Arizona governor-elect.
The court found no clear convincing evidence misconduct happened in the 2022 general election comparing Katie Hobbs' election.
Just stunning!
Arizona Superior Court Judge Peter Thompson said he ordered Hobbs side to file a statement of costs and motion for sanctions.
Lake vowed to appeal, as well she should.
My election case replied the world with evidence that proves our election were run outside of the law.
She did.
The judge did not rule in our favor.
Alas!
However, for the sake of restoring faith and honesty in our election, I will appeal his ruling.
Which she ought to do.
Absolutely.
100%.
Hobbs, who is currently Secretary of State and in that capacity oversaw the election of herself against her competitor, which is an outrageous conflict of interest that should have nullified the election to begin with, Certified the result of the election on December 5th, showing Lake lost by 17,000 votes.
Thompson ruled earlier only two of ten claims brought by Lake could go to trial.
Including her claim about intentional interference with ballot printers and chain of custody problems, which were there in spades.
The judge credited Lakes Key witness Mark Sonnenklaar in Heather Honey, but rejected the claim that intentional misconduct happened.
He must be blind!
Sonnenklaar, an election attorney with the Republican National Committee, testified tabulars failed to accept ballots at multiple locations.
Court credits the personal observation of Most Mr. Solnicklair and does not doubt his knowledge or veracity.
But the court cannot follow Mr. Solnicklair to ascribe intentional misconduct to any party, proving he is either mentally incompetent or grossly biased.
Everyone at plaintiff's witnesses, and for that matter defendants, was asked about any personal knowledge of both intentional misconduct and intentional misconduct to impact the 2022 general election.
Every witness disclaimed any personal knowledge.
The court cannot accept speculation or conjecture and place a clear and convincing evidence.
Thompson's ruling came after a two-day trial in a mess Arizona Corp group.
Lake insisted molestias intent was proven by her witnesses.
We provided expert testimony.
We provided experts.
The other side brought in activists to try to save face.
They admitted they'd known about these valid problems.
Her lawyers proved without a shadow of a doubt that it was malicious intent that caused disruption so great, it changed the results of the election.
We demand fair, honest, transparent election.
We will get them.
And I pray so hard for this judge.
Abba Kahanna, a lawyer representing Hobbs, told the courtroom Lake's attorneys had not established whether Britain's problems were intentional acts that would have changed the race's outcome had they not occurred.
He claimed they were based on hearsay, speculation, and theatrics.
But that's false!
The guy in charge of the election said they changed the settings on the machines!
What we got instead was just loose threads and gasping plot holes.
We know now her story was a work of fiction.
Outrageous!
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the only way that that attorney could make that statement for Hobbs is by lying, and she had to lie, as you just said, Jim.
It was the number one expert said that the only way that you could change that 19 inches and 20 inches thing is intentionally.
That happened on the day of the election, so that is intentional fraud.
Once we get the real numbers, Kerry Lake will have won, I'm going to say, closer to 80%.
And going to 2020, when we get that truth, that's going to be closer to 75%.
It's just Orwellian ridiculous, and the documentation to be able to demonstrate that these electronic voting machines that have turned election day into election month are fraudulent as an AP.
U.S.
government teacher and regular U.S.
history teacher, for 20 years I showed documentaries, mostly over YouTube, Princeton and Stanford professors demonstrating to the public, not only to their students, but to the general public, that the purpose of these voting machines is to steal elections and having them
Destroys the definition of an election and that's now very well documented in selection code and the documentary 2000 mules demonstrates another way that one of several that they're stealing elections and.
I think that's all that I need to say about that.
We'll see what happens on the appeal.
We do have January 6th as an important day coming up.
SCOTUS is going to be having a conference on the Brunson case to see what goes forth with that.
And I'm still hanging on the last possible day that I'm thinking that we could have a breakthrough that would be poetic.
Still is Christmas, but it's in the Eastern Orthodox Christmas, which will be on January 7th.
But after that, fuck it.
I'm not holding out for any other dates after that one.
Yeah, don't hold your breath, Carl.
Chris, your thoughts?
Yeah, I would just like to remind everybody that today is Kwanzaa, so we got that hope.
Yeah, anyways, I think when judges are starting to abandon the notion of justice, whether you're talking the Sandy Hoax thing, the Arizona thing, the Trump thing, the January 6th thing, go on and on.
Pick any case, because it seems to be running wild.
You've got to look at many of the qui bonos that are involved with these type of situations, because these seem to be not only preemptive strikes against the truth in terms of the war against reality, but also it seems to be a preemptive strike to dissuade people from resisting or to have some sort of logical or realistic but also it seems to be a preemptive strike to dissuade people from And they do have the truth to their side.
They know the truth.
But this reality that they're presented with is quite contrary to what the truth might be.
So we're seeing that type of conflict that's being created in the minds and hearts of every single person that's watching this go on.
And I have to say, it's a war.
It's a war against humanity in the fight for the truth.
So 90% of all wars are psychological.
And I have to say that truth is often the first casualty of war.
So we have to stand up for the truth.
We have to bear witness.
We have to remember.
We have to really understand that these are preemptive destruction of constitutions.
Constitutional repercussions, I should say.
I can't even read my own handwriting here.
But really, it's something that they put in place so that people will not do what they should be ethically, morally, and constitutionally You know, as far as standing up to a tyrannical government, a total misappropriation of justice, a complete and total Ponzi scheme, a scam, a deception.
People are really just forced to fall in line with this thing because, you know, the compliance is convenient and it's something that requires a lot of diligence in terms of standing up and fighting for the truth.
And really, the deep state is taking such measures, using the national security apparatus, the legal structures, and the media, and these legal precedents, to really subvert any attempts for the citizens to gain recourse here.
Sorry, I'm a little tongue-tied there, but you get the point.
No, Chris.
Chris, Chris.
Fabulous.
Yeah, Carl.
And one point with what Chris is talking about, about upholding the Constitution, what are the purpose of administering an oath like I had?
Yeah, right.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
That's supposed to be that you solemnly swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
But that completely failed.
My attempt to evoke that oath with Hayward Unified School District and 100 teaching colleagues only resulted in the tragic comic opposite where one of my U.S. history teacher colleagues specifically instructed the rest of the staff via email how to block my emails if I use that phrase of our oath.
I've never taken that oath personally, Carl, but I'm taking that duty.
How shabby.
Yeah.
Very good, Chris.
Very good.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
The next pandemic, the global elites like Bill Gates are already planning for.
It may already be here, and it will be much deadlier than COVID-19.
Here's how to prepare.
Look at the history.
SARS-1 in 2002, then the West Nile virus, 2002.
H1N with swine flu, 2009.
MERS, 2020.
Ebola, 2013. Zinc at 2016.
COVID-19.
SARS-CoV-2.
2020.
2002.
What?
What's next?
Very good question.
Meanwhile, Senate passes 12 gun controls.
They were all buried in this massive, massive bill.
Watch our video.
On Capitol, gun owners of America strongly objecting to the omnibus government funding bill on your behalf because it's infested with Second Amendment infringements.
A swamp loves to pass infringement when no one is looking, and holidays are the perfect cover to ram through unwanted spending and gun control.
That's why it's all the more important for you to stay vigilant this Christmas and contact your elected primary senators to tell them to vote against this atrocity.
Too late.
Unfortunately, 12 gun control items just passed the Senate with the help of 18 Republican turncoats.
Blunt of Missouri, Boozman of Arkansas, Capito, West Virginia, Collins of Maine, Cornyn of Texas, Cotton of Arizona, Graham of South Carolina, Inhofe, Oklahoma, McConnell, Kentucky, Moran, Kansas, Murkowski, Alaska, Portman, Ohio, Romney of Utah, Rounds of South Dakota, Shelby of Alabama, Tune of South Dakota wicker a minute.
Mississippi and Yonge of Indiana.
Bad, bad.
Just yesterday, political-reported Democrats and state legislatures are preparing to ram red-flag gun laws when the session begins in January.
What's worse, the Biden admin will be handing out millions of dollars to reward states who pass the red-flag gun confiscations law.
All that money coming from a new $700 million grant Congress has just voted upon.
Any vote will help Biden to bribe your home state legislature to pass gun confiscation laws.
A done deal.
We're asking you to send an email, but it's really too late.
Here's what we have in the bill that's already been passed.
Massey 14.1 ATF budget increase to facilitate his pistol ban.
50% increase ATF's NTC budget to maintain the illegal nearly billion dollar A record gun registry.
700 plus million funding to bribe state to pass red flag gun confiscations law.
Directing VA medical centers to utilize confiscation orders on vulnerable veterans.
Department of Education pushing safe storage of parent firearms.
Funding for VA to maintain gun storage mats to keep tabs on where veterans keep their guns.
New annual compensation for families of deceased ATF agent could be an indication of upcoming gun confiscation.
Gun control earmarks for orchid healing circles and more.
Dickey violation galore while CDC suppresses self-defense statistics.
Programs discouraging women from exercising their Second Amendment rights.
Anti-gun community violence intervention initiatives.
Violent anti-government ideology and domestic radicalization research.
Just discussing.
It's an outrage many Republican senators already voted for this anti-gun monstrosity.
Quite frankly, it's outrageous any legislator sworn to uphold the Constitution and the Second Amendment would even consider passing a 4,155-page, $1.7 trillion appropriation bill with so many gun control provisions.
You can learn about more in our analysis here.
Truly, our Founding Father would be ashamed of this lame-duck Congress.
Each gun control must be struck from the final document to respect the Second Amendment.
But it's already happened.
It's already passed.
Carla, your thoughts?
It is passed, because really what they're passing is, or attempting to pass, is the Great Reset, and they have to do this.
Carl B. Herman talks about any of these shows, is that the exponential growth curve of debt, we have a mechanical system of mathematical certainty of creating what we use for money as debt, a negative number that is added together, and that is why we get with this mathematical, mechanical certainty, this exponential growth curve.
They do need another pandemic, because with Viewing us as a work animal species, they want to have the legal right to be able to tell us that we need to be shot for our own good, and they're going to do that to cull and control the herd.
That 4,000 plus page, 1.7 trillion dollar bill is just bullshit!
And I read that only one Democrat voted against it, and that was AOC, but that is just some Theatrical vote.
I don't know what she's going to use with that, but I don't care.
And it is so tragic comic.
It is similar to the collapse of the Roman Empire.
And indeed, the wealth disparity is greater in the United States than it ever was in the Roman Empire before its collapse.
Any of these shows, the looting trillion section, the top 1% of Rich people own more assets on Earth than the bottom 99%, so they'd better try to get our guns, because when we get the flip-over point and the American public wake up, then we'll be using those guns for the arrests of these psychopathic criminals.
Yes, yes.
Devoutly to be wished.
Wow, I got a lot of thoughts there.
Great points there, Carl.
Yeah, I remember back in the 2000s when they came up with the swine flu and the military had justified the research and development of this as a means to slim and take down the population of China if they ever had to go to war with them.
There was a concept of haplotargeting through biowarfare.
And in many cases, these are the mutations that became what they would call COVID, I would think.
They used these outbreaks that they unleashed, in my opinion, to dupe the victims into a far more dangerous proposition than the VAX.
If you look into the research on nanotechnology, graphene oxide, mRNA recombinants, they obviously grossly obfuscated the risks of getting COVID.
They greatly obfuscated and grossly exaggerated the odds of infliction.
They negligently ignored field data.
They basically censored people that tried to provide their own personal instances.
They recklessly administered these toxins and continue to do so to two-thirds of the world's population under this whole bullshit fiasco.
So, I mean, that's kind of a big deal, and they really want you to focus on some war or some bullshit that's a relevant distraction in their minds.
But I think we need to focus on this, and I think that it's also tied to them pushing to take the guns away, because obviously the realization of these instances would quickly lead to the end of their musical chair fiascos, whether it's economically, medically, whatever, when the shit hits the fan because of that.
You know, these guys are going to get called out and be held accountable, I would hope, for some of their herd thinner operations like the Vax and even some of their shakedown rackets like the carbon tax or the whole global warming thing or the wokeism or the LGBTQ things.
Many of the other things they've done to try to erode not only the social, moral and ethical standards of society, but also try to really hijack the youth and steer them into some sort of debauchery that seems to be Satanistic at best.
Yes, yes, yes.
Again, well said.
Meanwhile... The FBI's response to the Twitter files is not going over well.
The FBI responded to revelations with the Twitter files that the Federal Law Enforcement Agency worked with a social media platform to categorize Hunter's laptop as Russian disinformation and hurling accusations about conspiracy theories.
Joel Berry tweets, How are actual screenshots of FBI communication with Twitter employees asking them to censor people a conspiracy theory?
Here's the FBI statement, It's unfortunate that conspiracy theorists and others are feeding the American public misinformation with the sole purpose of attempting to discredit the agency.
No.
I think the agency has discredited itself.
How ridiculous.
Here's Michael Schellenberger.
FBI calls Twitter files misinfo, but doesn't deny that it had Hunter's laptop since December of 2019.
Told Twitter a hack and leak involving Hunter may occur in October 2020.
Was spying on Giuliani when it gave a copy of the laptop hard drive to the New York Post.
Glenn Greenwald.
Anyone who questions the FBI or finds it disturbing their partnering with Big Tech on what should and should not be permitted to be said on the Internet is a hateful, crazy, unhinged, anti-American conspiracy theorist, says the FBI.
Glenn Greenwald again.
Yes.
Meanwhile, Trump holds a 24-point lead in a hypothetical 2024 Republican primary.
This is big.
The survey asked whether they would prefer in 2024 to choose between Trump, DeSantis, Mike Pence, and others.
Here is the survey.
Trump 51%, plus 24 over DeSantis at 27, Pence at 10, Cruz 4, Haley 4, Cheney 3, Sununu 1, Youngkin 1.
at 27, Pence at 10, Cruz 4, Haley 4, Cheney 3, Sununu 1, Youngkin 1.
Pretty devastating.
When asked the same question with Trump out of contention, DeSantis takes the lead with 45.
Pence does not come close, garnering only 23.
Another 14 Ted Cruz, 18 choosing somebody else.
Notably, Biden does not enjoy as much support from the Democrat base as Trump does from the Republican base.
Only 37% of Democrats said they wanted to see Biden as their nominee in 2024.
This coincides with a recent McLaughlin and Associates survey showing Trump holding a double-digit advantage, 15 points over DeSantis, his closest competitor, as Breitbart reported.
McLaughlin and associates sampled 480 likely GOP primary, found 48% support Trump in his 2024 bid.
It's a 15-point advantage over his closest potential competitor, DeSantis of Florida, whom 23% support.
Former Vice President Pence sits in third place with just 5%, followed by Liz Cheney with 4%.
Another 3% backed former U.S.
Ambassador to the U.N.
Nikki Haley.
2% behind Mitt Romney, the GOP's failed presidential nominee in 2012.
No other candidate has more than 1% support.
Similarly, a recent Harvard-capped Harris poll showed Trump leading the hypothetical field by double digits.
Trump is the only Republican who's formally announced a 2024 bid.
Strong speculation surrounds the Santas, prompting rumors of a civil war between him and the former president.
Rumors he has wholly dismissed.
We just finished the election, the Santas said.
People need to chill out a little bit on some of this stuff.
But there is reason to believe that DeSantis actually is going to run in 2024, including a book deal coming out, which of course is a necessity for candidates for the highest office in the land.
Carl?
Well, first, the FBI, so their statement, that is the most...
They're trying to hit back, but it's funny because what they actually said was an ad hominem attack, and then the FBI lied.
They called it misinformation, huh?
The Twitter files are misinformation, huh?
Seems like pretty good documentation of censorship, and I would ask the people at the FBI and everybody that has an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic, to recognize that the Twitter files have demonstrated That the U.S.
has had a Ministry of Truth, and the Ministry of Truth is really centered around the Joe Biden-Kamala Harris One People's Party of the United States that embraces the rainbow unicorns, LGTBS, and really it's a choice of whether people are okay with that, if you're okay
With that, supplanting the United States Constitution and having this dictatorship of these rainbow fanatics, okay, we're here to offer that choice.
And we're here to make damn sure that the people who want that type of environment are separated from this planet because we're going to win this planet for limited government under the Constitution and under inalienable rights.
Well said, Chris.
Well, yeah, in the age of information, I think that the deep state's really running out of the ability to continue using their lead pipe diplomacy that they've relied on in the past.
And I think that their analytics are probably hemorrhaging in terms of the official narrative and the amount of credibility that it seems to be losing on a daily basis.
So this whole iron fist and velvet glove tactic they've resorted to in the past, I don't think they're going to really velvet glove their way out of this.
And the iron fist is seeming pretty obvious to the onlookers that are watching this go down on a daily basis.
So, yeah, if you think about the number of times the ADL, the FBI and the CIA have waged wars against the constituency, you can go back to just the past 30 years and look at like the Pat Con operations or Operation Chaos in the 50s and 60s or, you know, the War of Terror in the 2000s.
The JTTF setting up a lot of domestic citizens under this concept of terrorism, the COVID thing, the election questioning and...
Anybody looking at Israel the wrong way, anybody that questions the UN or the WHO or the CDC, the Federal Reserve, any of these things, they are targets by these institutions, it seems.
And they're trying to make what, in my opinion, seems to be what is understood not need to be discussed.
So, I think that people really need to stand up and hold their ground and hold this trench here because, you know, it's really one to live and die on, in my opinion, in terms of the political will of the people.
You know, I also want to say, as far as, like, DeSantis goes, DC makes damn sure that there's no money whatsoever behind anybody that does the right thing for humanity, from what I've seen, at least.
And I've only been around for close to 50 years, so maybe it goes back a ways where they might have erred on the side of humanity, but I can't think of one in my lifetime.
So, yeah, the DNC does have quite an embarrassment of riches compared... I'm sorry, the RNC has an embarrassment of riches compared to the DNC, but that's really not saying much, I guess.
So...
Yeah, I don't know.
As far as these political polls and things like that go, I think that really you're going to have to start from the ground up with radical localism to really start taking back the local stuff first.
And from there, we could start to run out the corruption in state and federal governments because it is very rampant.
And I don't think this theater that they're putting on for us is really real or effective.
And it's so far from the truth.
I think at some point in time, you know, it has to come out.
I'm worried that American people are so brainwashed at this point in time that they're incapable of doing the right thing.
Meanwhile, we have a federal judge saying school hiding kids' gender transition doesn't shock the conscience.
This is incredible!
This decision shocks the conscience!
A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit for Massachusetts parents who accuse public school officials of hiding their children's gender transition from them.
U.S.
District Judge Mark Mastriantini, an Obama appointee—surprise, surprise!—criticized Ludlow public school officials for allegedly hiding the pair of siblings' gender transition from their parents.
But he said the official's action does not shock the conscience.
While the court is apprehensive about the alleged policy and actions of the Ludlow Public Schools with regard to parental notification, it cannot conclude the decision to withhold information about the children from their parents meets the conscious, shocking legal standard of Massachusetts, he wrote in his ruling.
Well, that's because he can be very lenient about what does or doesn't shock him.
I find it shocking.
Back in April, parents Stephen Foote and Melissa Silvestri filed a lawsuit in mass federal court against staff members at Paul R. Baird Middle School, as well as the elected school committee in the town of Ludlow, just east of Springfield, Massachusetts.
School officials impermissibly inserted themselves into the private realm of their family, Violating their right to make decisions regarding their child's upbringing, mental health, and well-being.
The parents claim school officials failed to inform them their two children, an 11-year-old girl and a 12-year-old boy, were transitioning to a gender under the one corresponding to their biological sex.
So they're turning their girl into a boy and their boy into a girl.
My God!
The 11-year-old girl allegedly mailed staff at 2021 and announced she wanted to go by a cluster of new pronouns.
I am genderqueer.
My new name will be R blah blah blah.
If you deadname me or use any pronoun I'm uncomfortable with, I will politely tell you.
A list of programs you can use are she, he, he, him, they, their, they, fair, er, er, er, wow.
Please use only the ones I've listed, not the other ones.
I don't like them.
The girl wrote.
Afterward, a school counselor allegedly sent an email to staff, ordering them not to tell their parents about the gender identity change.
Or, Bob, he is still in the process of telling his parents, requesting school staff refer to him as B, and you see she, her pronouns with her parents and in written emails and letters home.
This is beyond a point of absurdity.
Meanwhile, the girl's 12-year-old brother asked school staff to use female pronouns from him and also hide that information from his parents.
They said in court they'd previously asked school staff not to have private conversation with their kids about gender.
However, they discovered the superintendent, the principal, guidance counselor, and teachers all ignored that request and were using their children's new pronouns.
Later, the school even fired a teacher, Bonnie Manchester, 48, for telling the girl's dad that she was transitioning to genderqueer.
In his ruling this month, throwing out the parents' lawsuit, Mastriani pointed out the requirement in mass for school officials not to discriminate against students on the basis of gender identity.
He also cited difficulties the issue presents and competing interests involved.
How absurd.
And get this, Marine Corps urged to ban gender identifiers for superiors.
This is insulting!
The U.S.
Marines may ban recruits from the respectful culture of addressing senior officers and drill instructors as sir or ma'am.
In a newly released academic report, the University of Pittsburgh recently recommended dropping those words to avoid misgendering and offending senior addressees.
This is to absolutely F the Marine Corps.
This is just beyond belief.
Graham Allen tweets, Marines may ban use of Sir or Ma'am to avoid offending superiors.
We are no longer a serious country.
Our enemies are laughing at us.
Absolute disgrace.
The recommendations seen as woke by conservatives assert the traditional way of addressing superiors in the Marines as a deterrent to gender integration.
Man, oh man, this is just outrageous.
Employing gender-neutral identifiers eliminates the possibility of misgendering drill instructors, which can unintentionally offend or cause discord.
To who?
The study said, adding that the use of gender-neutral identifiers within the Marines undermines the importance of respecting those in authority regardless of their gender.
What horseshit!
A two-year study first commissioned by the Corps in 2020 further said other military outfits such as the Army, Navy, and Coast Guard have adopted gender-neutral identifiers.
Instead of saying ma'am or sir, recruits should refer to their drill instructor using the rank or roles by their NAAS name.
Outrageous!
The study which introduced the need for gender-neutral salutation concluded that change in how some areas are addressed would make the two genders feel more comfortable, as though that were important, as opposed to creating an efficient fighting machine to defend the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.
The 738-page proposal is one of six recommendations to be put before the Marines' Entry-Level Training Advisory Council.
According to Chief of Staff for the Marine Corps Training and Education Command, Colonel Howard Hall, it's being considered by the service.
However, there's been some pushback to the change, which is only seen by some as another policy grounded in wokeness, but also as another step the U.S.
would take to be the laughingstock in the world.
Reported by the Marine Corps Times, I'll express several concerns about the proposal, which he believes will create unnecessary confusion among adults.
All of a sudden we change something and recruits start coming in using different identifiers.
It's not something we would change overnight again.
We have a history of sir, ma'am, sir, ma'am.
If we change something at the root level, how do we make the corresponding change of the Fleet Marine Force?
He also fears a sudden change is going to take great effort to achieve.
What is inculcating in our young recruits that will or will not be reinforced when they graduate and enter the Fleet Marine Force?
So again, we want to avoid any quick fix solutions that introduce perturbation down the line.
Senator Tom Cotton also spoke against this suggestion on Twitter, highlighting how it will worsen the military recruitment crisis the country continues to face.
This type of toxic wokeness will make our military's recruiting crisis worse.
Amen.
He's absolutely right.
This is just outrageous.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the first story Ludlow, Massachusetts, is just to the east of Springfield on I-90s, about 45 miles to the west of where we used to live in Framingham for a couple of years.
And for that story, for them not to inform the parents that their two children We're changing the gender identities of their pronouns, at least.
There may have been more to that.
So what does that mean?
That means for Ludlow Unified School District, the idea of fluidity of gender and to normalize this transgenderism has become so normalized, you can't even tell the parents that it's more normal for children to go back and forth with he, she, and all those other names.
It's just absolutely crazy that they would normalize that and insofar as to fire a teacher.
So, we'll see what moves forward with the long legal practice with that, but that's what it tells me as a 38-year teacher in the classroom for them to normalize it and just not tell the parents.
That means that it's just completely normal.
And for the story of the Marine Corps, I think Jim, as a retired Marine captain, would be representative of those officers By saying, I'm going out on a limb here Jim, by saying that you wouldn't be offended if the men and women under your management just assumed your identity as a as a sir.
Yes, yes, yes.
Well, I got one more.
I would like to see if the Marine Corps is all in on this, you know, because they would come to our campus to recruit.
Now, I would, if this were the deal, I would love to have a Marine Corps recruitment personnel come into my classroom and say, boys and girls, I'm Sergeant Smith of the United States Marine Corps.
My pronouns are he and him.
I think they ought to roll that out and see how that affects their numbers.
Chris?
Well, less than 50 years ago, the testosterone rates in men were probably 50% higher than they are now.
So, back in the day, they used to have a man's man, now they have a person's person.
It's amazing to see that these type of targets on the civilians, whether they're from industrial externalities or military population control things, it's to be seen and maybe to be discussed later.
But I think it's part of the satanic agenda, in my opinion, to focus on the hermaphroditic.
Even in past empires, they've done this with eunuchs and castrati and things like that.
They've often tried to confuse the cultural roles of men and women to obfuscate those.
Uh, if you think about the amount of money that was in things like the Steinem Revolution or the suffragette movements, uh, it kind of makes this stuff, uh, makes those look kind of primitive compared to the levels of funding and the amount of precise tactics that they're using to target kids who are mostly subjected to these mutations, like I said, by industrial externalities or military population control weapons.
So, uh, yeah, I think the Ludlow, uh, I guess you'd call it masquerade would be a way of putting it.
You know, I used to think the Ludlow masquerade when I heard Ludlow, but, uh, Yeah, it reminds me of in the past, like say, where a certain group has has gone into certain empires and tried to turn out the common citizen to make the only viable economic alternative for their children to be turned out into predation or things like this.
Some sort of perversion.
They ran the brothels, the bathhouses of Rome.
You can probably guess what I'm talking about.
So in my opinion, there seems to be something going on in terms of like hormone and testosterone disruptions.
As I mentioned, they're creating a whole generation of puzzlers.
In my opinion, you were talking about in a widespread basis that the public being brainwashed.
I think it's almost more like they've been chemically castrated, because there's certainly some sort of a confusion that's going on, and it's beyond what you would see in past history, in terms of, like, say, they mentioned in operas, talking about a fused state, you know, where people are wide awake yet fast asleep, and they're in a stupor, or some sort of focus, or A mission of love or a highly conditioned servant, something like that.
In my opinion, this is far beyond that what is going on here in terms of them targeting children and confusing them at vulnerable ages, and certainly trying to coach them into these type of perversion, say, political demographics, too.
Because there's people that fall into these categories and the LGBTQ thing that they're trying to create an entire political demographic with this alternative.
And they pretty much can understand how to target these people and how to mobilize them by emotions and face of half truce and things like that.
So, yeah, I think there's a lot going on here in terms of that and what they're doing.
And I think it's it's no accident or no coincidence, I should say.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from Hughes.
Send fan mail, PORACON, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
A new Twitter dub regarding the FBI and other federal alphabet agencies.
New Twitter files released on Christmas Eve exposes FBI denials about political censorship operation.
Despite the FBI's denials and evidence that the nation's premier law enforcement agency colluded with big tech platform Twitter to unconstitutionally censor American political speech, a brand new Twitter file dump shows the FBI did just that.
The Christmas Eve revelation suggests the FBI acted as a doorman to the vast program of social media surveillance and censorship.
Tiabi says more government agencies were involved, from the State Department to the Pentagon to the CIA.
Tiabi said the process is far bigger than the reported 80 members of the Foreign Influence Task Force that was referred to in previous disclosures.
Tiabi said Twitter worked with so many agencies, the executives at the company lost track.
Again.
And we the people seem to have no remedy, no way to stop it.
It's sickening.
I went up to Charlottesville back in 2018 to check out the town I lived in for 20 years.
It had two restaurants in, and the first coffeehouse ever, the Rosebud Bean, after the stage craziness in 2017.
No one there wanted to talk about it.
The town had morphed into a yippy high-tech crap hole, but the Robert E. Lee statue was still there.
Now it's gone.
It's a wonder they didn't burn down Monticello or the Rotunda.
What was once a beautiful college town had disappeared.
And the Black Fox over in Belmont, an original old Charlottesville neighbor who were belligerent and pissed at us whites.
Personal experience when I asked for directions because all the yuppies and high tech infiltrators had driven up the property taxes.
What a loss.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Yours.
Carl.
We had a new Twitter dump today on COVID to demonstrate the official lies about that. - Yeah.
Carl B. Herman, Blogspot, as a scholar, I do what I can to explain, document, and prove that these are indeed lies and crimes, and I can tabulate The damages in this.
This is annually.
They kill millions from these policies.
They harm billions and they loot trillions.
And these are all explained, documented, and proved.
And that's all that I can do.
We need some sort of a breakthrough.
I can point to the two destinations.
One is going to be the Great Awakening.
Where we have truth, arrest, and an unleashment of technology that has been suppressed, and probably this Star Trek-like future, or the shits and giggles Great Reset, where they're going to tell us that you're going to own nothing and live in a pod and be happy about that.
So people have only what they think and what they say and what they do.
Manage it well.
We are going to need some help with this.
We're going to have to create something or Have friends in high places give us a hand about this.
You can say that again.
Chris?
Yeah, well, you know, I almost think that, in my opinion, that this Twitter thing seems to be, in my opinion, a Masonic, Judeo-Masonic ritual, something where they sacrifice it to the temple altar to allow the bigger culprits to avoid any sort of deep scrutiny, and it serves as a measure of
Of the impression of diligence, and maybe not perhaps the diligence they're fully needing, let's say in terms of like, say, YouTube, PayPal, Patreon, Google, and the amount of scrubbing that they've done in terms of covering up the stuff.
Election, COVID, go on and on.
Biggest thing in the last 50 years, 100 years, you know, Google's the new guard and Fangs as well.
These are all DARPA developments.
These are all Wall Street janitors.
And if you ask me, I think that really the Twitter files are a way to release limited hangouts to establish a credibility for them.
Knowing that the metrics in terms of people knowing what's going on and talking about it, the word on the street or the word on the internet is getting too loud for them to really just keep going with the narrative through the mainstream.
They need to have somebody in the corner of the people.
And I almost think that some of the people they're placing there seem to be Insiders that are now lending the optic of being outsiders.
So we'll have to see how they turn turn out.
But I think it's really a tactic to harness the righteous outrage of the public to like you, in my opinion, you know, to keep people on the edge of their seat or in their couches, but certainly not to get off their ass and do anything about it.
So while they rob us blind and surveil us all and do it under the guise of national security, persecute anybody that's trying to use their constitutional rights for recourse and to assemble They've preemptively gone after all this with these these things, you know, and it's all all tied together in my opinion.
So it seems to me you need an Act 5 and to get there you got to have Acts 1 through 4 and this maybe seems to be leading towards Act 5.
So we'll see how this all plays out.
Fascinating.
Colin, Chris, again and again have come through like champions.
They've made penetrating, very brilliant observations.
Two of the stories today actually affect me personally.
When I was denied tenure at my first appointment as an assistant professor at the University of Kentucky, I was hired by the University of Virginia to be a visiting associate professor, in effect granting me the rank to which I'd been deprived.
The University of Virginia at the time was the number one public university in the United States.
Kentucky was not.
Years later, Virginia would bring me back as a visiting full professor.
It was a wonderful school.
Thomas Jefferson regard founding the University of Virginia as among his most important contributions to American life.
To see it, This dismissed and decayed and give up the statue and all this other despicable stuff is just revolting.
And, of course, as Carl observed, as a former Marine Corps officer who served as a series commander with 15 DIs and 300 recruits under my command going through the training cycle, I can tell you this idea of abandoning sir and ma'am would decimate recruit training.
It would reduce it to nothing.
The Marine Corps isn't a touchy-feely organization.
The Marine Corps is dedicated to fighting wars and killing lives of the enemy.
If you want to do it in a single stroke, decimate the United States Marine Corps.
Go ahead with this woke ideology because you're going to have half the Marines saying to hell with it.
If you want to turn the United States into a messy pile of shit, this is the way to do it.
Woke ideology is destroying America, and it's going to be permanent if it isn't ended now.
Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends.
We do not know, with the West revoking Russia, if it's an all-out fight.
We're going to be gone.
They are going to survive.
Mark my words.
Don't waste a minute you can spend with people you love and care for.
Export Selection