All Episodes
Previous Next
Nov. 18, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:34:11
Need to Know News (17 November 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Some stories very distressing out of Canada.
Young girls are eager To reach a point where they can legally request euthanasia.
They can't afford housing.
Their lives are miserable.
Here you have a St.
Catharines man saying he'll choose medically assisted death over homelessness.
Unbelievable.
Lawrence South.
Southern.
Tweet.
People are euthanizing themselves in Canada because they can't afford housing literally.
Is this why you're bringing in Maid for the Mentally Ill so you can save more money for foreign countries by killing Canadians in need of support?
Justin Trudeau!
We've arrived in Indonesia.
I start off announcing new support for Ukraine.
500 million in military assistance.
Stunning.
Meanwhile, a NATO rogue breaks out as Zelensky wants to insist that Russians fired on Poland when it's obviously not the case.
Zelensky said he had no doubt that the missile was not of Ukrainian origin, when it's very obvious it was of Ukrainian origin.
His statements have worked at least one Kiev-based diplomat from a NATO country.
This is getting ridiculous.
The Ukrainians are destroying our confidence in them.
Nobody is blaming Ukraine, and they're openly lying.
This is more destructive than the missile.
NATO countries were called to an emergency last night after the missile had landed in a Polish village.
This is a couple days ago, but now it's simmering over.
Kremlin denied responsibility.
Not only was the missile not theirs, their weapons hadn't been targeted anywhere near the Polish border.
NATO, U.S., Warsaw, all suggesting the missile had been fired from Russia now believe it was rather from Ukraine as a defensive measure.
Even Stoltenberg, the Secretary General, said, our preliminary analysis indicates it was likely caused by Ukrainian air defense.
He said the responsibility still lies with Russia.
How the hell he reaches that conclusion is anybody's guess.
Ukraine has a right to shoot down missiles targeting Ukraine.
Poland's president also said they believe the missile was most likely a Russian-made S-300 from the 1970s.
No evidence it was launched from Russia, and indeed it's not even in the Russian arsenal today, but in the Ukrainian.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first, that first story epitomizes a lot of the state of the world.
As I have commented, I was a key volunteer for results.org.
We helped create two UN summits for heads of state, including the 1990 World Summit for Children, where whoever was the PM of Canada at that time solemnly promised to end poverty, as these nations have promised to do since 1969.
And they don't.
They're heartless.
They're somehow without empathy.
So, on top of this, for Trudeau to promise another $500 billion to Ukraine while people in his own country are threatening a government-assisted suicide for poverty, When we have all the technical solutions and we would really love to be unleashed to solve the problem of poverty.
If you want to get a hint of what we can do with the top technology of having a city which would work for everyone, check out the Venus Project by Jacques Fresco, a near contemporary of my mentor Buckminster Fuller.
Check out some of their videos.
Ending poverty is entirely doable.
That's been 45 years of my life.
For Zelensky, I read something today that Zelensky said.
Today, Thursday, he was acting confused and stressed and he said, nobody knows where those missiles are from.
So remember, this is an actor.
Now he's acting confused.
When, as a president, when you say shit, you need to be, well, we have Biden, so who am I to talk?
Lecture to other countries.
And the whole premise to this is that Russia invaded because 14,000 of the Donbass had been killed by Ukrainian artillery after they refused to accept the NATO puppets from the 14 and 16 color revolutions.
And Putin's peace demands, there's just two!
One, no NATO for Ukraine.
Two, Donbass shall be a democracy where they get to choose.
They can be independent if they want, and they've already indicated that.
So why don't we just have independent people go in there and talk to the people of Ukraine and find out how they really feel and how they would vote if they were given a fair election.
They already did vote.
Yeah.
Brian?
Well, on the 1st story, the Kevorkian method seems to be gaining its traction again as the economy goes downhill and people find themselves desperate.
I know I paid our electric bill the other day and couldn't believe what is going on with it.
It's becoming very difficult to continue to just fuel up your vehicles and heat your home and get the food in the refrigerator, much less pay all the other bills that are out there.
It doesn't surprise me.
I keep a little apparatus down.
I have a boat under the tallest bridge in Houston and, you know, we get about a jumper every quarter.
The number seems to be going up, though.
The last two years, we've seen a real spike.
It seems like every other time I go down there, one of the boners says, oh, we had another jumper the other day.
So it's becoming commonplace.
Even down here in Houston, which is one of the best economies in America, I can't imagine the pain that other people are going through and the trouble.
You get older, you work your whole life trying to save and create enough money to be able to get through your hardest years, and then you get to something like today and your money just doesn't go as far as it used to.
It's painful.
You know, I guess that's why I'm hoping to see a recovery to the economy, but I don't see it coming anytime soon.
As for the missile story in Ukraine, just another false flag, no different than anything else that we dealt with with these guys.
I did see a Chiron pop across Fox News earlier as I was trying to get a feel for what was going on out there that said Said that Ukraine's in a position to negotiate peace with the Russians.
Hey, maybe the Russians have done it right.
I think it's a little too early to tell, but maybe, I mean, they're obviously getting desperate if they're going to try to pull off a false flag as egregious as this.
I mean, if you look at Ukraine, you got Russia over here and you got Poland over here.
The missile made it into Poland.
It would have had to go over Belarus to get into Poland.
The whole thing is just a joke and they lie to us.
They insist that they control the media.
They're doing a good job of it.
But unfortunately, there's enough alternative media out there that are exposing and covering it that it's just too hard for them to hide their lies right now.
Yeah, I think it indicates Zelensky's losing control.
He's trying to reassert it through this ridiculous claim.
Meanwhile, Trump's speech was not encouraging.
It was a disaster, a mess, lacked anything at all exciting or subversive to the current regime.
Investor Watch blog by Chris Black, which is why, thankfully, even extreme online Trump partisans like Nick Fuentes are slamming it.
The only can make his 2024 campaign feasible if the Department of Justice were to attempt to arrest him.
The speech was so low energy, Jeb Bush's Mexican son called it low energy.
Hashtag Sleepy Donnie.
Trump spoke like a rape survivor.
The most obvious problem is that Trump didn't make America great again.
In my opinion, he didn't make himself seem great again.
The fundamental problems were still there at the end of the presidency.
Now, this is overly negative, in my opinion.
Trump did not feed any of these problems.
The nihilism, soulless culture, loss of racial cohesion, total dissolution of white American identity, absence of religion, rampant consumerism, incredibly corrupt establishment, CIA, FBI, Deep State, a media full of traitors, an education sector that's corrupting America's youth.
Never did he acknowledge the depth and severity of what's destroying America and the West.
He never got remotely close.
But most right-wingers do not understand any of this.
For them, far more relevant is that throughout his presidency, all the organs that have run rampant since were either dormant or actively growing.
Not only did he Not make America great again, and this is decidedly more negative than I myself would assess.
He didn't protect it against real and present cancers developing.
He did nothing against BLM, nothing against the WEF, nothing against BlackRock, nothing against Soros, nothing against Big Tech.
It's fitting, then, his speech announcing his return focused overwhelmingly on economic matters.
And it pleases die-hard supporters.
The train-stream right-winger tragedy is they understand almost nothing of the world around him.
I'm not so sure about that.
They do not understand identity, soul, consumerism, liberty, power.
Thus they have no way to recognize the various forces destroying everything about him.
Here's a dear colleague, a woman, very perceptive.
There's talk that the Trump who gave the recent speech announcing is not the real Trump, but a body double.
Take another look.
The speech making Trump looks younger and thinner.
Smooth and tan face.
No big double chin.
Straight instead of arched bushy eyebrows.
That's a tell.
Thinner nose.
Modified and darker hairstyle.
I've been looking at photos of the real Trump, presumably or of the real Trump, alongside clips from the speech, and it looks to me as though the speech making Trump is indeed a double, but a very good one.
He did use a double on a trip to Afghanistan to wish the troops a happy Thanksgiving.
Melonia is known to have used a double before as well.
Not easy to research.
If you Google Trump and look at the images, some seem to be him and others the double.
So, if so, then the Trump double is out and about making rounds in public.
Now let's see what we have here.
In order to make America great and glorious again, I am tonight announcing my candidacy for President of the United States.
That looks an awful lot like Donald.
Thank you, Chris.
Thank you.
All of you.
Thank you.
Thank you.
So many incredible friends and family here tonight, It's such a beautiful thing.
Some people say, how do you speak before so many people all the time?
When there's love in the room, it's really easy, if you want to know the truth.
I'll just say my own critique was the following.
I thought he should come up with full guns blazing against the theft of the 2022 midterms tied into 2020.
I thought he should denounce the facts and acknowledge he was wrong about Warfstreet to get his candidacy a ship of state.
Right and in a smooth path.
I think that investment watchdog was far too severe.
He made the economy robust.
He gave us energy independence.
He shut down the border.
The lowest earning wage earners were seeing their wages rise at the highest rate.
He gave America a lot and he called out the fake news.
So I think Trump still has a lot to give to the country, but I thought it was not a strong start.
Carl?
Trump's presidency, I really can describe it as the calm before the storm that we are in now.
The speech, I thought it was, you know, nice platitudes as far as that goes, but the main thing is that this is a psy-op, and that nobody of intelligence and integrity, nobody honoring their oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, which he took as president, would gloss over and just, like,
2020 and 2022 demonstrated that we have no elections and that we, as the United States, are dropping faster than the Roman Empire.
And to not address that, as you said, Jim, he should go on the offensive, but he didn't.
So, for whatever reason, we're witnessing a sigh-out.
There are a lot of analyses to decode what he said, because people give this analysis of Trump speaking in code.
And while I salute all the patriots working in the background, for ordinary Americans, it really is, as Brian said, Ever!
We are under attack here, and we're going to have to take matters into our own hands, a la Gandhi and Dr. King, unless these white hats emerge.
And I still am that they're back there.
Home improvement and cleanup projects always take longer than you think, but oh my god, we can't wait anymore.
As I said, I'm individually compelled to do more because that's what we see in the facts of the destruction of the United States.
For body doubles, yes.
Happens all the time.
Historically that has a long history of that.
We know that Biden isn't Biden because the previous Biden had a different shaped skull structure and he had unattached dangly earlobes and this Biden has attached earlobes so the Biden we see isn't real.
And for Trump he does have at least one body double, the golfer.
That guy is definitely pudgier And the guy who gives some of the speeches with the hat pulled low, that guy, he's one of the body doubles.
Very talented actor, but definitely not Biden.
So, again, we're looking at the fog of war.
I thought this was the real guy, but Brian, what is your thought?
You know, I think it's Trump.
A little bit older.
Maybe a little bit wiser.
Look, there's two worlds of thought in the conspiracy community about Donald Trump.
One is that he's operating some sort of 4G chess maneuvers in the background, using some sort of military organization to set up a fall of the cabal.
And then there's the mainstream view that you'll hear parroted on Fox News and other media outlets.
I hope it's not the second of the two that's real.
I would like to believe that Donald Trump has something up his sleeve.
I just haven't seen anything.
And when it comes to the article, yeah, it was a little bit harsh, but It's true.
He didn't do the things he could do.
Now, I tend to believe that he was unable to accomplish those lofty goals that he was talking about back in 2016, such as draining the swamp, because the simple fact of the matter is he didn't have the firepower in terms of personnel to help him.
I think that all the people that were there that were really on board with his program had been gutted and driven out and overwhelmed with Back pressure from the permanent bureaucracy that's in place inside Washington, and he was just simply unable to really make progress.
He made good speeches.
He got his base really wound up between 2016 and 2020.
Did a good job, but we never saw a perp walk.
Get an attorney general that's going to do something for the nation.
Get some prosecutions in place.
Show us that something is going on.
Instead, absolutely nothing happened of consequence.
Nobody got prosecuted.
The false flags, Russian disinformation, all that crap just continue to roll out of control.
With one dart after another being fired at Trump and the mainstream media falling in line.
Look, I still am of the belief that there's three parties, two of which are very much the same.
The Republicans and the Democrats are pretty much the same and they are hardcore anti-Trump.
And then you've got your MAGA movement, which is Trump, Carrie Lake, and all the hundreds of thousands of people that attend his rallies every year that really want to believe that he's capable of making a change.
As for the speech itself, I drank.
I couldn't listen to it.
I'm tired.
I want to see some progress.
I want to see some asses get kicked, and I want to see the old fiery Trump that beat the hell out of people for doing wrong to this country.
I was talking to my brother, sort of chatting with him while it was all going on, and he said, hey, I like this Trump.
He's not going to cause as many waves.
He's not going to hurt as many people.
If he does get power, he'll be able to get things done.
Well, I don't know what to say.
It's just I'm numb about the whole thing.
Why?
All he said was paper ballot.
All I remember him saying that was evident was paper ballots and Mars.
Like who the hell thinks a trip to Mars is important?
How is that going to gain him any political?
What the hell is he talking about?
Look, I just don't know what to say.
I still support him because there's no other alternative.
I'd love to see a Trump carry leg ticket if that is possible.
I just don't know.
I think it'll be interesting to see who picks as his running mate.
Other than that, I'm going to lay back and play dead.
Carl?
Well, we know for sure that the speech was a feint compared with the facts that he could have bombed the whole nation and the world with.
So, they chose to hold back.
Alrighty.
Well, looking at the world, if you want to give him the benefit of the doubt, the White House has the benefit of the doubt, which I certainly do.
What we have and what we can confirm is that we have had these two years since Biden has taken office to be able to contrast those four years under Trump and the ideals of the American public and even the very promises in the Constitution and the hope in the Declaration of Independence.
But, you know, this is two years of the storm, of the shit show, the shitty clown show, and something has to break.
Yes, yes.
Well, when he said the American people hadn't yet figured out how much damage Biden's doing to the country, that seemed to me to miss a boat so wildly that that was the most disillusioning observation he made.
The public voted for the Republicans.
The public voted MAGA.
The count didn't reflect it.
He has to know that.
So I was very troubled he didn't make a point of it.
That would have made a huge difference in my opinion.
Meanwhile, Arizona GOP accused Maricopa County of voter suppression.
It was much more than that.
The state's election has been plagued with many issues.
25% of the vote tabulation machines weren't working on election day.
Officials claim it was a printer setting issue, but it was nothing like that.
Maricopa say they've identified and fixed it, but, you know, this was trivial.
This was plausible deniability.
Arizona gubernatorial candidate Carrie Leak urges voters to submit any information they have on issues they had with ballots or voting.
She's not going to let it go.
The Republican Party has partnered with Big Data polling to conduct exit polling following the 22 midterms, indicating that Republican votes were disproportionately and negatively impacted while voting in GOP strongholds.
Exit polling shows a low of 10% to a high of 10%.
Of total is Election Day drop-offs.
To be clear, that's defined as a voter who is physically delivering their mail-in ballot to a polling station on Election Day, while his story of publicly reported information showing a 13% drop-off rate Correlates with our exit polling data.
And, of course, we know again now that it wasn't reflected in the outcome.
Once again, Arizona elections are the laughingstock of America.
Voter suppression raised its ugly head in Arizona in Maricopa County.
She'd appeared on TV numerous times to discuss a deteriorating faith, Arizonans, really Americans, in their political system.
But look at this, just as an indication of how massively it was read.
Carrie Lake has 1.11 million followers on Twitter.
Katie Hobbs, 148,000.
Facebook, Carrie Lake, 214,000.
Katie Hobbs, 148,000.
Facebook, Carrie Lee, 214,000.
Katie Hobbs, 11.
That's a form of voting right there.
Overwhelming preference for Carrie Lake.
No way she lost to Katie Hobbs.
No way.
And I believe it's so blatant that Maricopa is going to become a study case in the theft of an election.
It's going to be exposed, I'm convinced.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm at 95% that all of this is gonna come out, but it hasn't come out yet.
So, as a recently retired U.S.
history teacher and AP U.S.
government teacher, I've documented what professors at Stanford and Princeton have put online on YouTube videos demonstrating that these electronic voting machines are designed to steal elections.
And the very presence of those machines Given what they are with this secret black box code that the election companies say is proprietary property, we can't share.
It's accounting code!
These guys are just psychopathic liars.
But we'll see if Kerry is going to be controlled opposition because the data that That you shared for people who are technical enough to understand it, you would say, why by golly on its face, that data alone would confirm that you shouldn't you shouldn't certify those results.
But it's much more than that.
The very presence of those machines are there and you have slam dunk evidence that you could provide that we haven't seen yet that would demonstrate that we have the 20 And the 22 elections.
You have the evidence to be able to verify this for the audience.
2000 mules and the movie Selection.
Highly recommend it.
That'll walk you through what you need to know.
In 2020, when we get the data, The ratio of voting for Trump would be somewhere between 3 to 1 to 4 to 1 in the 22 election.
That ratio for the Republican candidates is going to be even higher than that.
Just take a look at the numbers with.
Brian?
and Carrie Lake to Katie Hobbs, that's like a 10 to 1 ratio.
So we'll see, we still need the breakthrough.
All we need is the truth and then we'll be okay.
But until we get there, we may have the truth of a thermonuclear global war.
- Brian.
- Well, do I?
Look, I'm not going to believe that anybody's going to bust any election fraud until I see somebody actually get prosecuted.
I don't think that can happen as long as George Soros and these powerful people are able to put these prosecutors into the position that they're in.
The attorney generals, the state AGs.
I just don't see a prosecution taking place.
I will remind you of what Carrie Lake said back in July.
Let me quote this.
We're working behind the scenes.
You're gonna get caught.
We've got eyes.
We've got ears.
And we have lawyers all over.
And our law enforcement is on top of it.
We're going after people who stole our vote.
We're watching you.
You're being watched.
And there will be hell to pay.
Now, that's what she said in July.
So here we are, November.
We just In her own place, Maricopa County, her own backyard, one of the most egregious, ugly steals of the entire election process took place there next to Pennsylvania and Fetterman and all the other garbage elections that took place.
I mean, it's ridiculous.
Until I see that somebody's being prosecuted, I don't give a damn anymore.
I'm starting to fall into the side of, guys, just live your life, do the best you can, keep saying what needs to be said, exercise your free speech as long as you get it, but don't get your hopes up because I just don't have any reason to believe that anybody's going to fix the problem.
And Donald Trump announcing that part of his presidential thing of Paper ballots?
How is he going to pull that off?
How?
How?
He can't do anything.
He never has been able to do anything important.
How is he going to pull that off?
Probably just another empty political promise.
I'm a little bit concerned about the situation.
Yeah, and if we don't have the paper ballots in place, how does he get in the position to put in paper ballots?
I mean, you know.
Those who control the corrupt machinery retain their power by leaving the corrupt machinery in place, so they have no motivation whatsoever to circumvent it or to do away with it.
I agree with you.
We have to see the lawsuit.
We have to see some action on this front, Brian, I agree, in order to take it seriously.
We have hope, but let's see some reality, some action.
Carl?
As Phil Gee said, Godlewski or something like that, he says you can't outvote election fraud.
And that is the key thing that patriots were looking for in Trump's speech but didn't receive.
Yeah, I wish he should have said a whole lot more on this score in my opinion.
Disappointed.
Meanwhile, here's Fat Pants Al talking about Eric, the epicenter of voter fraud.
If you want to know how it's done, I think she's nailed it.
ERICA is a membership organization ostensibly created for voter roll maintenance, but in reality, it's a massive data-gathering operation adding bogus voters to the system of every member state.
Millions of inactive, ineligible, and phantom voters with undeliverable addresses appear on member states' voter rolls.
These names are used for mailing ballot fraud, ballot box stuffing, and machine adjustments in real time.
There's the bottom line.
Eric was started in 2012 using straws phones donated through the Pew Charitable Trust, conceived and organized by a highly unethical leftist by the name of David Becker, He's spent his life attempting to defeat the conservative agenda in the United States.
He played a role in Wisconsin fraud in 2020.
He's been openly named by Michael Gabelman, former Wisconsin Supreme Court justice, author of the Wisconsin Election Review, exposing what was going on.
Others have termed him a partisan progressive, but if you look at what Gableman has to say, you can decide for yourself what to call him.
As you may or may not know, states are required to maintain their voter rolls.
Becker played all of this.
He beguiled state election officials using language of plausible deniability to provide an easy and relatively cheap way to do it.
He counted on the fact that they were so busy, they'd take advantage of something they thought would make their lives easier.
He was correct.
Seven states joined right off.
In the meanwhile, there was a perfectly good, actually viable— Voter Roll Maintenance System known as Kansas Crosscheck.
It was free to its members.
So using a Soros-funded, Obama-appointed judge, they trumped up a case about imaginary voter suppression brought by the ACLU, which seems to be in concert here.
Crosscheck was shut down.
New members came pouring in to air it.
They let from 7 to 31 members stay.
Today there are 33.
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.
Sad to say where Louisiana got out thanks to the actions of citizen activists in July of 2022.
To understand the damage it done, you must understand the very construct it was designed for fraud and data gathering, not maintenance of rolls.
Member states have to turn over all their voter roll data, old and new, motor vehicle records, public service records.
Eric takes all the lists, adds USPS data, Social Security.
All this information on every person living in each state is stored in Eric's massive AI system.
Whether you're a voter or not, a citizen or not, your name and personal data are stored with Eric.
In order to return forgetting all that data, Eric remembers the states received four lists, who moved, who died, who is adjudicated ineligible from felony convictions or mental incompetence, and who is eligible but unregistered to vote, EBU.
States must solicit at least 90% of the EBUs at least every 60 days, providing them with voter registration information.
The rules disallow any name being marked as to citizenship.
In other words, you cannot know whether these really are citizens or not.
So there you can have illegals being in the country just having a name they can use to put on a ballot.
Make them count for the Democrat Party, regardless of citizen status or political preference.
Florida has actually, and this surprises me, removed the checkbook for citizenship from its driver's license app.
The law requires that sensitive data be kept private, but it turns out Eric has been sharing with Zuckerberg Group the Center for Election Integrity and anywhere else it can be used for fraud.
Eric's own website brags about bringing in new voters, Nowhere do you find a word about how many ineligible voters have been cleared from the rolls.
That just wasn't the purpose.
I will say again, the design and operations for bloating, not clearing the voter malls.
Recently, I've noticed their own bylaws no longer appear on their website.
Millions of names who may never vote end up on the rolls, so they can be used for the purpose of casting fraudulent ballots.
There are people who have moved from the state, chose not to vote, or died.
The who-moved-and-died are the richest lists for fake ballot submission.
The phantom names show up on requests for mailing ballots, mailing lists from state election officials, and even the CVRs, counted vote records after an election.
Many of these quite probably were the stuff put into Dropboxes in the midnight to 3 a.m.
Mule Show.
The bloated voter rolls are obviously in the records of each state from the 2020 election.
According to a report from the U.S.
Election Assistance Commission, itself a liberal group, the numbers are as follows.
Over 50 percent AVERIC members have voter rolls that contain more names than their entire voting age population.
Look at this.
Illinois, 108.
Michigan, 108.
Maine, 107.
Kentucky, 107.
Delaware, 104.
These are more on the voter rolls than are eligible to vote in the various states.
In a recent weekend symposium, A moment of truth.
Activists from 48 of the 50 states reported on their state's major problems with electoral integrity.
Every Eric member reported problems with hugely bloated voter rolls.
Many reported state officials were unwilling to discuss the issue, even openly hostile to the subject of clean elections.
Activists told stories of being stonewalled by legislators, deprived of information legally theirs, even jailings and fatal accidents.
The dark passion for fraud runs deep.
The entire broadcast of A Moment for Truth is available on Brombo.
If it's not, well, you know what may have happened.
So goes much that as truth today, it disappears.
Eric was called by name many times in the two days of the broadcast.
The Honorable Michael Gableman went into the role of Eric in some detail.
Despite the obvious connection to voter fraud, its leading role was somehow sidelined or ignored.
For many months, late 2021, first half 2022, no one wanted to talk about it at all.
Those who had written against it in 2016 and 17 suddenly supported it.
Others tried to hush discussion and debate.
It seemed to me, many including me, The word had gone out, Eric was off-limits.
That only made me more certain Eric was where we should be looking, even above machines, ballot harvesters, or mules.
Florida for America and the People's Audit have proven thousands of undeliberal addresses on the rolls of their counties to which addresses ballots were mailed and from which they were returned voted.
They can show fake street names being added to the rolls and removed after ballots were voted from those addresses.
These ordinary citizens gave up jobs, dipped deeply into personal savings, walked miles at Canvas, spent hours over spreadsheets.
The fruit of their labor was presented to the Statehouse in Tallahassee.
They bought a page in a local paper displaying the facts to call attention to the plight of Florida voters.
That paper refused to print it because the editor said they didn't have the facts.
When they presented the proof to their county officials, they were called liars, with the evidence in boxes full of yellow return mail label where ballots had been sent in plain sight.
A press conference was called especially to accuse them of presenting the truth.
That particular supervisor of election even went so far as to submit their names to DeSantis, new election crimes division, as having dealt in disinformation.
And I now wonder why it turns out that Florida was allowed to have a fair election Maybe it was to offset how much they'd already uncovered as not to confirm it.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, the election results in Florida show a more accurate representation of what the voters wanted, I'm sure.
So, for Eric, yeah, definitely.
It is a data gathering tool started 10 years ago and funded by George Soros, according to the article, which would mean that it's a tool for the oligarchs to use.
Now, we have the documentary's 2,000 mules to be able to demonstrate how this data is used and manipulated And part of that was reflected in Eric's data having over 100% of the total possible number of voters for those states.
Now, if Trump is being used, if he does have integrity, used by the White House and or has integrity, then when he came into office, he damn well knows about these tricks.
So either They set this up as a sting operation, not once, but twice.
Now, so if that's the case, then something has to break.
We got to get this party rolling, otherwise we're just, America is just going to continue to have more of 666.
I mean BBB, Build Back Better.
And those activists, That's exactly what happens.
45 years experience in civic activism.
Most recently, in the 2020 election, you have similar testimony documented by attorney Sidney Powell and 250 pages of affidavits that I read.
And Carl B. Herman, Blogspot, go to any of these news shows.
And for two years, I challenged Hayward Unified School District on their health.
Well, I do think Eric is playing a major role here.
refusal to answer obfuscation and lies.
And finally, they put me on paid administrative leave.
They had no justification to do anything more than that, but they had to shut me up because that's how dirty they are.
And that's how weak they look when you face them with a question that they can't answer.
Well, I do think Eric is playing a major role here.
Brian, your thoughts.
Well, it's sophomoric and obvious, and obviously I'm a little bit down on elections, but let me just remind you that Joe Biden got 81 million votes. - We didn't, look, we didn't deal with this two years ago.
We didn't deal with it now.
What makes anybody believe we're going to deal with it going forward?
And what makes anybody believe that there's a candidate with the power to be able to?
I mean, Kevin McCarthy, oh wonderful, we have the House!
Hooray, hooray, hooray!
The Republicans are still the Republicans, and the Democrats are still the Democrats, and they still are the ones that set the agenda for what things are going to be changed in this country.
And if Joe Biden got 81 million votes two years ago when he is half-brain-dead, now he's full-brain-dead, and he's going to get another... what's to keep him from getting 100 million?
What does it matter?
The fundamental problem is that we are not what we've been taught, and we're angry.
We've been taught that we're a representational republic.
It's a lie!
It doesn't exist anymore.
It's not true.
If it was true, I'd have some hope.
But I just don't believe it's true anymore.
So what in the hell are we?
Where are we going?
And how do we change the trajectory?
I think it's time to sit down at the drawing board and decide.
What parts of the Declaration of Independence we need to be paying attention to?
And what parts of the Constitution we need to be paying attention to?
Like, time for the drawing board.
No prosecutions.
No blood in the streets.
Nobody goes to jail.
Nobody's a criminal.
Who cares?
And without law and order, man, we're in trouble.
Big trouble.
And until I see a park walk, I'm not going to believe a damn thing about white hats or anything else.
I'm just going to try to play along and enjoy the ride the best I can.
A grim assessment, but well-founded, alas.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
There you have it.
We have taken the house.
This shows 219.
I think it'll wind up 221.
Nancy Pelosi is stabbing down a speaker.
We're all grateful for that.
Meanwhile, FBI admits they found nothing in the raid on Trump's Mar-a-Lago home.
The FBI suddenly and quietly has admitted they found nothing in the raid.
Perhaps the fact the midterm was over has something to do with this.
Leading up to 2022, there was nothing but leaks and speculation, as absurd as that Trump was trying to sell U.S.
nuclear secrets.
Now that the Democrats have stolen the election, it was all a big nothing burger.
In August, an FBI team headed by a Russian collusion hoax specialist raided Trump's Florida home, claiming he'd stolen classified material.
The liberal media and name sources claim this material was the most sensitive our country has, and that Trump was trying to sell it to Saudi Arabia, Russia, and China.
What a joke!
It's incredibly stupid!
But that was before the midterm, when it could hurt Republicans.
Now everything's safe and secure for the Democrats.
The Washington Post dumped this interesting tidbit.
The review has not found any apparent business advantage that ties the classified info in Trump's possession.
FBI interviews also do not point to any nefarious effort by Trump to leverage seller-used government secrets.
Instead, he seemed motivated by a more basic desire not to give up what he believed was his property.
So, no nuclear secrets or intel assets?
How shocking!
People familiar caution the investigation is ongoing, no final determination made.
Possible additional data could emerge, changing their understanding of his motivation.
But they said the evidence collected over all these months indicates a primary explanation for potentially criminal conduct was Trump's ego and intransigence.
If you remember, this all came about because the National Archive claimed Trump had taken material.
When he left the White House, they said belonged to them.
He turned this stuff over, but the archives claimed there was more.
The FBI raided Mar-a-Lago to get it.
Trump took documents related to him, confirmed by the Washington Post.
It was never all of the crazy shit the liberal media made it out to be.
In fact, before the raid had even occurred, both the archives and the FBI knew what was personal information.
Yet the FBI made it out to be an act of treason, fed the liberal media explosive leaks to fuel hysterical headlines.
Now, why would the FBI do something like that?
Aren't they supposed to be an unbiased, objective, nonpartisan law enforcement agency?
The easy answer, of course, is Biden has weaponized the DOJ against his political enemies, and the FBI was already pretty corrupt before that.
The raid was a political move to discredit Trump and damage Republicans before the midterm Democrats were bracing for an ass whipping in.
As it turned out, Democrats had more tricks up their sleeve to rig the midterm, but this was one component.
Now that they've successfully stolen the election, it's okay to tell the truth that the Trump raid was not that big a deal.
Meanwhile, Woman bashes her father at his funeral as a Trump-supporting racist.
Trump derangement syndrome is alive and well, and this far-left liberal woman who trashed her father during his own funeral proved the left hates the former president even more than they love their own family members.
The woman Delivering a speech at his funeral, note, she doesn't miss him because he's a racist, misogynist, xenophobic, Trump-loving, CIS, straight, white male, and that's all he's ever been to her.
She goes on to say she doesn't feel any need to respect him, even in death, because, according to her, he disrespected and disregarded the lives and deaths of entire communities of people with his ideology.
You are everything I aspired not to be, and I refuse to stand up here and sing the praises of the man who is a paradigm of white supremacy.
This sad display of our leftism has infiltrated and corrupted the minds of the youth expands even beyond the funeral.
The radical young woman posted videos on TikTok laughing about her father's death, even singing about having a racist father.
In other videos, she describes herself as a black supremacist and argues there's no way she could be racist in the way the white person could be.
This is the effect of heavy indoctrination at public schools throughout America and left-wing controlled social media platforms.
Absolutely stunning!
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, first, with that map of the House, Brian's right is that there's nothing to feel encouraged about.
What we have, by all on its surface observation, is that we have the RINO Republicans in charge, the party of Jeb Bush and Liz Cheney, and then we have the Biden-Obamas and other Other people.
Kamala.
Gotta throw her in there when we talk about the Democrats.
So there's nothing to be looking forward to.
There's nothing to be inspired by.
This is the hero's journey.
The death part of it.
We're all, it seems, lost.
The FBI, in context, these are the people who participated in the assassinations of Dr. King, perhaps the best spoken American holding up the highest ideals.
They were involved in the assassinations of Robert Kennedy, who would have been president in 68, and of his president brother, who was assassinated in 1963.
Now, an armed raid on Mar-a-Lago, so we got to get the picture here.
This is the Washington Post telling us that, oh yeah, that armed FBI raid that was based upon this National Archives guy who said, yeah, maybe he has something.
He might.
He might have something.
So it really seems like what the Washington Post is doing as corporate media is just mocking Trump, mocking patriots, and just putting it in our faces.
And on its surface, they have every right to do it.
They're just dominating us.
And plus, that would be an important CYA move to begin telegraphing that, you know, mistakes were made, but it was made on the best intelligence we had on the time.
Now, that poor woman...
My Tools is a professional historian who really knows what's going on, but we have on its face, we do have somebody demonstrating Trump Derangement Syndrome.
And I do have a lot of compassion for human beings, that human beings are tortured, they're lied to, they're poisoned.
You can hear my dog is very upset about it.
And they're lied to, to the extreme.
Now, that said, it might be that this woman has chosen to join the cult.
That very well may be because she demonstrated she was excellent at bringing together all the talking points that you hear from the most deranged elements of the left.
How embarrassing.
Brian?
Well, let's just re-evaluate the whole situation to get this in context.
The very reason that We believed.
I can see.
Okay, nevermind.
The very reason we believed in Donald Trump was because he was always being attacked.
We knew that they were afraid of him.
They did the Mar-a-Lago raid.
They did all these different fake attacks on Donald Trump.
So we had reason to believe that the apparatus was horrified of him, horrified of something that he had on them, horrified of some way that he would get them.
What are they most afraid of?
They're not afraid of us.
They're afraid of losing power.
So they believed that Donald Trump had the power to hurt them or take away their power or would continue to take away their power.
So they continued to conjure up these attacks on President Trump, and that's why we believed in him.
Now they're telling us that Mar-a-Lago was a false flag.
Okay, it was just another false flag.
They're going to continue with the false flags as long as they feel threatened.
But when you see them stop, When you see them not care and not pay attention to it anymore, that's when you can probably believe that he's powerless and he's hurting.
He said nothing the other day in his speech that would have attacked or even rubbed their fur the wrong way.
I don't feel like they're threatened by him anymore, and that therefore is what makes me believe that he just simply doesn't have the same power that he used to.
As for Trump derangement syndrome, look, kids get angry when they cannot align what they What they're being taught with what they're experiencing in reality.
That causes a conflict in their brain.
They don't know how to fix it, and they act out.
They say crazy things.
They say stupid things, and they tend to overplay the hand that their educators are giving them.
These kids will grow out of it.
They'll understand.
Thank God the father was a Trumper.
At least he provided some balance.
Because otherwise she would have been so far off the cliff.
Which, obviously, maybe she was.
But fundamentally what I'm saying is...
Until kids get a taste of the real world, until they get a taste of being broke and not being able to pay their bills and understanding that they've got to work with their employers, that they've got to be wanted.
I mean, take a look at what's going on at Twitter.
All these babies are crying because they don't have their cushy jobs anymore.
Look, the real world is coming, folks.
It's coming harder and faster than you can imagine.
And it's here.
So you better get prepared.
Start reading your sales books.
Go back to How to Win Friends and Influence People.
Go back to whatever you can.
Great comments, Ryan.
Spot on.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson says it's time to end electronic voting machines.
extra dollars because we're in big trouble economically if we can't do this.
Great comments, Brian.
Spot on.
Meanwhile, Tucker Carlson says it's time to end electronic voting machines.
Amen to that.
Fox News out demanded a cessation of the use of computerized voting machine Tuesday night after roughly one fifth of the devices in Arizona had glitches.
At least 20% of the tabulation machines had issues, prompting Republicans to file a lawsuit to demand longer voting hours of a request that was denied by the judge.
Carlson said he was sorry for Brett and Martha, but it will be a very late and tense night for you both.
He said it made the problem clear.
The country is divided into many areas.
Pennsylvania is one.
Nevada is another.
You should anticipate close election results.
People need to believe in the reliability thereof and their capacity to have faith in the election process.
Voters should not use voting equipment electronic to cast ballots.
Regardless of where it comes from, it erodes people's faith in the system.
This is a genuine threat to democracy.
Republican candidates for governor berated Maricopa County for their mistakes, saying, I hope it's not malicious intent, then vowed to enhance Arizona's election system if elected.
In 2020, Arizona was a close call for former President Trump.
We're not taking democracy seriously if we utilize electronic voting machines or do not require photo identification of vote.
We could hold safe elections, but we choose not to, because a tiny minority dislikes them actually benefits from them massively politically.
He said there would be periods when everyone fears instability, because one side doesn't believe the result is accurate.
We've seen it from both sides.
If anything good comes out of this, Tucker said, let us hope it's a demise of electronic voting machines.
France does not use them because they cherish democracy.
Demand ID.
Then let's just call it a day.
Everyone's confident of the election result, and the weather is becoming colder.
I really hope it happens.
Carl, your thoughts.
Sorry.
I had to go get my dog earlier.
So first, that picture, that is the pudgy, golf, hat-wearing Trump that I think is different from what I think was the real Trump in that speech that we were just talking about.
So that picture is something worth taking a look at.
Now, for Tucker, him reporting on the 20% of the tabulation machine errors, I mean, thank God that he's speaking up.
I mean, compared to the other bullshitter and obfuscators claiming on NSNBC that it was an even more secure election than 2020.
Compared to that, that's great.
But compared to what he should be saying, he's only talking about 20% of the power that he could.
Maybe that's similar to what Trump's speech was about.
So, if you really wanted to have a secure election, there's been a lot of thought that's gone into this for 2,000 years, and as somebody who teaches, or taught, as retired now, how to operate an election, some of the components would be, is you have to have a paper
And part of what destroys the integrity of elections in the United States is that the voting day should be a national holiday and these results should be locally counted.
In a transparent system, it should be a community party and we should be getting the students involved in the counting so that they can see and then upgrade the system to higher and higher transparency.
And, you know, Tucker could just show the video of the Democrats boarding up the windows and not allowing to be counted, not allowing anybody to come in and see what they were doing.
The ridiculous 3 a.m.
excuses in 2020 to stop the counting and then to recount it with mathematical impossible odds.
I mean, Tucker could have reported on that, but he didn't.
So it's just another day of hinting at the truth and controlled opposition.
But I sure hope that these drip, drip, drips turn into a flood.
Let us hope.
Brian?
Well, you got to get your municipality or your county or whatever to buy the system first and invest in it.
Is that against the state law?
Does the state regulate how the voting is going to take place?
Are we going to somehow get a federal law that's going to fix this?
Where is it going to happen?
On what level?
I could go down and work in my county and do it.
And they'd say, well, we just spent $13 million on all this voting equipment.
And, you know, we're going to stick this way.
Okay.
I've got to have some clout on the city council or I've got to have a better system.
Fundamentally, There needs to be a system out there that cannot be cheated and must be implemented.
And I hate to say it, but this is the one place where the federal law might make some actual sense.
What else has the federal government done for us?
It certainly hasn't protected our borders.
It certainly hasn't given us stable currency.
It certainly hasn't given us anything but laws and regulations and tax structures.
What else?
If it can't protect our vote, what can it protect?
It can't protect our borders!
Can it protect our vote?
I don't have any confidence in the FBI to save me from federal crimes.
I don't have any confidence in the federal government to tell me what's true or what's not true.
I don't have any confidence in the EPA or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
I just don't, I just don't see how they help.
So we got to break this down and either solve it on a localized basis or we got to fix it on a federal basis.
And fixing it on a federal basis is going to take a tidal wave of power in order to get it done.
So I don't know what to tell you where to start, but probably at your own county's level, these discussions can just start taking place.
Yeah, the answer so obviously is paper ballots and hand counts.
I mean, it's not a complicated problem to solve if you're willing to do it.
Meanwhile, Trump scores a major victory in a family feud.
The New York Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit from Mary Trump.
In recent years, we've seen Democrats launch endless attacks against Trump.
Pelosi, the J-6, Biden's DOJ, Brady, Mar-a-Lago, New York AG going after his business.
But that's only for starters.
One of his only family members turned against him and leveled attacks in 2020 to try to sell a book.
When it didn't work, she launched a lawsuit against her own family.
She may be regretting it now.
Former President Trump won dismissal of a multi-million dollar fraud lawsuit filed by his niece, Mary, who accused him and his siblings of defrauding her of her minority share of the family business.
It's encouraging to see one frivolous suit after another be tossed, Trump attorney Alina Haba said in a statement.
I'm happy the Trump family can put this ridiculous case to rest.
Mary not only turned on Donald, but his other siblings.
Mary, his niece, had long attacked her uncle, seemingly for media attention.
Her book, aimed at attacking the 45th President, seemed to fail to interest readers, however.
So she sued him and other family members over a stake in the family business.
But New York Supreme Court Justice Robert Reed threw it out.
Another big win for Trump.
Most of the lawsuits against him just don't stick.
We've seen other desperate characters try to drag him into court.
They not only lost, but were forced to pay his legal bills.
Will that be the case for Mary, too, who seems dead set on dragging the family through the mud?
The victory comes just hours before his big announcement, which we now know He is running again for president in 2024.
We have to wonder what hope Democrats have with their other lawsuits and cases.
They've been using and abusing their political power to derail him since 2016.
Even Obama tried to stop him, launching FBI investigations against him.
But again and again, the left has failed.
If a literal family member's attacks on Trump collapse, what hope does Letitia James, the New York Attorney General, have?
Perhaps they should try to beat him fair and square.
Doubt it'll work.
Take away?
A New York judge tossed out Mary Trump's lawsuit against her own family.
She had sued Donald and others for a stake in the family business.
Previously, she tried to slander her uncle in a book that also failed.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, on its surface, it seems that Mary Trump is now down to just taking tips from that speech of that woman's funeral speech against her dad.
She might want to save some of those talking points up for later.
That said, so for Trump to get into the position of being a New York City billionaire, he has behind him tremendous experience of the dark and of the light.
So who knows how that has influenced how he has been used and what he's doing now and what he'll do in the future.
You know, the guy is what, 76, something like that.
So it's a long story and people perhaps one day we'll see all that past in retrospect, hopefully as a white hat agent, but we're all still in the dark.
So who knows?
Right.
Right.
Yeah, just like I said before, when the attacks on Donald Trump stop, you know he's no longer a threat.
If they continue and they continue to grow, then you know that he's threatening the apparatus.
I hope they throw the world at him.
I mean, the guy has withstood so much, so long, so well.
I gotta tip my hat to the guy.
He's made it through some of the most difficult things that any person can imagine in the last six or seven years.
He's amazing.
He's a great guy.
It's wonderful.
What's motivating him?
Let's just hope it's the future of America the right way, because, again, once you see the stops begin to slow down and the attacks stop, then you know that he's no longer a threat to them.
I think they're being refreshed, Brian.
I think you can count on it.
They still fear him more than any other political figure on the horizon.
Yale Law School withdraws from perverse U.S.
News rankings.
This is a peculiar development.
Yale Law School in Harvard has now joined it, will no longer participate in U.S.
News & World Report law school rankings.
Yale, which held the number one spot for the past three decades, will be the first top 14 school to part ways.
Over the last few years, U.S.
news has begun to adopt metrics that have become increasingly damaging to the profession.
They're making it harder and harder for other law schools to do the right thing.
He describes their rankings as profoundly flawed and fundamentally at odds with the institutional values of Yale Law School.
According to the statement, the metrics considered de-incentivize law schools from introducing programs to increase accessibility and dissuades institutions from supporting public interest careers.
According to the magazine's website, the rankings are determined by a series of metrics, including graduate employment rate, placement of students, faculty resources, Academic achievement of entering students and the opinions of law schools, lawyers, and judges, and overall program quality.
I believe in giving people a chance to change and listen to critique, but we have been talking to U.S.
News about these problems, and nothing has changed.
Yale Law is not the first to remove itself from their ranking.
Last June, Columbia announced it would no longer participate in the undergraduate ranking system.
After an article written by Columbia Mad Professor Richard Thaddeus alleging Columbia was misrepresenting the data reported in the magazine.
That article, by the way, appeared to me to have merit, that they were shading the situation to get a higher ranking.
Gherkin told the news that Yale Law's decision to withdraw was not influenced by the Columbia scandal.
He shared she believes deans at other schools had engaged in conversation about flaws with the U.S.
News & Report ranking system, but that Yale's decision was an entirely independent one.
Our mission is to bring the most talented schools and students in the country here.
And to provide the leadership they need.
We're just focused on our mission, as we've always been.
U.S.
news has no effect thereupon.
She explained the decision was made after consultation with faculty and students.
She emphasized the community response to the announcement had been overwhelmingly positive.
In an email to the news, Professor Ian Ayers wrote, faculty members were overwhelmingly supportive.
This is a proud day for the school.
The U.S.
news ranking makes it harder for law schools to take action on need-based aid and public service without paying an undeserved price.
Hillary Browning, class of 25, noted some students believe the dean's decision was made in anticipation of a potential drop in the ratings.
I want to emphasize, we've never made policies based on rankings.
We're really just focused on scholarship, leadership, and don't pay attention.
Kasato Kimura, 25, wrote in an email she fully supports Yale withdrawing from the ranking, which in her opinion employed metrics that inevitably hurt low-income students.
The ranking system incentivizes law schools to admit students who can pay for law school without taking on loans over students who may need financial aid.
It also incentivizes law schools to fund resources and support private law career options rather than public interest law.
Camille does not anticipate Yale's withdrawal will impact its prestige and reputation.
She believes Yale will continue to make data publicly available that would otherwise be published on the school ranking list.
She emphasized it should be all the more prestigious for its decision to withdraw.
I believe this decision affirms Yale Law's commitment to increasing access to law school and addressing some of the systemic barriers to law school.
That's a reputation I would be proud for Yale Law to have, where Yale Law School, which has historically been ranked number one in the country among all law schools, was founded in 1824.
Carl, your thoughts?
That is an interesting story.
So, for Yale, Yale is the University of Skull and Bones.
It's going to be at the heart of the evil organization, the evil empire's power.
And that, our university system, filters down into the public education system and Carl B. Herman.
Blogspot, any of these news shows, I document that public education.
I wrote an 11-part article series called Public Education Bullshit to Train Stupefied Work Animals.
All you got to do is look into the approved textbooks and you can find abundant lies that just takes a little bit of time to prove and I have done that.
So perhaps This the point is to bring attention of this rating system that most people have heard about, but that this is another inversion of reality and that the colleges at the top of the list, they're going to be captured agencies to be able to filter in the propaganda and the major talking points of the empire.
The U.S.
News and World Report is owned by Mort Zuckerman.
the narrative that keeps the empire going.
The US News and World Report is owned by Mort Zuckerman.
He's another billionaire who has ties to Israel and he's a commenter on usually left-wing topics.
So anybody who rises up into power, like Donald Trump or anybody else, has seen enough of the dark side to know that it is there.
So I'm not really sure what's going on here, but the U.S.
News & World Report, probably many of us in the audience, I know that our family has, have referenced their list for universities, and they also have lists that I think is automobiles and states and hospitals, and that's what they do.
Two of the top universities from the Claremont Colleges in Southern California, the professors at the Claremont Colleges independently sought me out and asked me to write papers for their international conferences, which I was happy to provide for them.
Well, it's peculiar.
I mean, as a professional academician for all those years, I always thought the U.S.
News and World Report rankings were perfectly reasonable.
One could always argue about the fine-tuning.
And I don't understand why Yale, which is historically been number one, would want to withdraw unless they thought they were going to suffer a drop in the ranking and for reasons that they didn't like.
I mean, that's the only explanation makes sense to me, Brian.
Well, this is an area that's a little bit outside my wheelhouse since I largely consider myself to be self-educated.
I got a theology degree while I was young.
No big deal.
Nobody's ever asked to see it in my entire life.
I'm approaching 50 years old.
And I'm not kidding.
Never in my entire life.
And I'm approaching 50 years old.
Basically, when I decided that it was time to be done with my sixth year of college, I decided that it was time to learn business, and so I went down to Barnes & Noble and the local library, and I sat down and I started reading books.
And what I realized was that I got more education from reading business books at the library than I got from all those years in college studying Greek and Hebrew.
It didn't make it, you know, look, this is America.
If you want to be successful, you can be successful.
Seriously, all it takes is a library card.
You just need to sit down and read and learn and then have the guts to go out there and put what you know into action.
It's nice the idea that we've got all these academics out there trying to tell us how to live lives, but let's face it.
Academics are not business people.
They're not out there people putting together their own living.
It's the entrepreneurs that will.
And by the way, should the government be financing any of this stuff?
I think not.
Should they be reimbursing any of this stuff?
I say no.
What's the difference between me taking out a loan to buy a truck to start a trucking company or me going to college and sitting through a bunch of years of classes for the same cost?
They're both an investment in my future.
They're both an investment in the work that I want to do and my ability to earn income.
Look, at the end of the day, your educators are not going to teach you how to make money.
You're going to have to learn on your own.
Bottom line.
Now, if you want to be in a profession like being a lawyer or being a doctor or being an academic or whatever, more power to you.
You can go through the system and you can take on the debt.
But if you're a rugged American that has any guts about you, you can go out and start your own business for above $36,000 in late fees at the local library.
So I don't give a damn about these academic institutions.
Well, you've done a commendable job, Brian.
You're doing great work.
Meanwhile, Box Chief Rupert Murdoch won't back Trump in 2024, may even go with a Democrat.
That sounds pretty loopy to me.
New reports indicate Fox Corp Chairman Rupert Murdoch is refusing to back Donald Trump in the 2024 and may back a Democrat candidate instead.
Why in the world is beyond me?
He's responded to the midterm disaster befalling the GOP by telling Trump the failure of his candidates to carry a red wave to fruition has put an end to the former president's political career.
But that's just ridiculous.
The election was obviously stolen, and Rupert Murdoch surely does that to be the fact.
There have been conversations during which Rupert made it clear to Donald, we cannot back another run for the White House.
They also suggested Murdoch's son, Lockheed, chief exec of Fox, has indicated the media outlet would get behind Florida Governor Ron DeSantis instead.
The shocking report advises should 2024 come down to a rematch between Biden and Trump, the organization would remain neutral.
But if the Democrats were to go a different route, they'd be open to backing another Democrat candidate.
The New York Post and Wall Street Journal, two media outlets owned by him, appear to be pushing the get-off-the-Trump-team narrative following the midterm.
The Journal has run six separate op-eds critical of Trump, one titled, Trump is the Republican Party's Biggest Loser, which frankly is about as absurd as it gets.
The editorial board notes he's suffered electoral setbacks in nearly every election cycle since his surprise victory in 2016.
But don't they understand how elections are run in America and how elections are stolen?
The Post, meanwhile, has two covers mocking the Republican leader as Humpty Dumpty, another suggesting DeSantis is de-future of the GOP.
Here we have young GOP star DeSantis romps to victory in Florida.
De-future!
Murdoch appears to have gone full Never Trump-er, throwing his weight behind DeSantis.
But can he honestly name one Democrat who would be a superior president in 2024?
The newspaper notes the stars would have to align almost perfectly for Fox to support a non-Biden Democrat.
A lot of things would have to fall into place for that to happen.
Joe would not be running.
The Democrats would have to have a new strong candidate whose name would not be Kamala.
That said, this isn't exactly news out of left field.
A political insider reported in 2017 that he'd instructed the late Roger Ailes to tilt to anyone but Trump.
Jenna Ellis tweeted, why does anyone still watch Fox?
We're not going back a Democrat over Trump.
Sounds a lot like Karl Rove and his super PAC.
These people aren't conservatives.
They're just Trump haters.
And they think they can tell you who the new POTUS should be.
Meanwhile, Karl, your thoughts.
Fascinating as well.
So Fox News is corporate media, so these are going to be controlled.
Opposition and that's demonstrated by their views on they won't call out the lie-started illegal wars of aggression.
They mock people who question 9-11 and they support the too big to fail banks and they're looting Carl Beaker with Black Spot.
Any of these new shows just start reading and I'll document the Inversion of reality that Fox presents.
Now Murdoch, he's a propagandist, so he's going to be supporting the RINOs and the controlled tools of Jeb Bush, Liz Cheney, and Mitt Romney.
And they're going to, therefore, because their strategy includes a basic move of divide to conquer, they need to propagandize, demonize, and even criminalize any of the MAGA people.
And you see what they attempted to do to Trump to initiate massive lawfare against the man.
So I think that that is about as extreme as you can get for Murdoch, the head of Fox, to say that if Trump And to get to the place where he would be in control for the presidency, which would mean he would have to win those primary elections on those crooked voting machines, so I don't think that's going to happen to begin with.
But for him to say that he would back a Democrat over Trump, well, that just is laying those cards out on the table.
Yes, yes.
Brian?
Oh, it just goes to show that Fox has Look, the Republicans and the Democrats have joined together against Trump.
The Republican, the talking arm of the Republican side of our government is Fox News, and the talking arm of the Democrat side of our government are all the rest of them combined.
So, apparently they've all made peace.
And I think part of that peace negotiation is going to be the end of anybody that's going to be pro-Trump over the next couple of years.
So it wouldn't surprise me.
I was really curious to find out why Tucker Carlson hadn't been on.
Personally, they replaced him on Monday with Tulsi and on Tuesday with, I forgot his name, different guy.
But I was like, this is a strange time for them to take him off the air.
He's like the only guy I'm willing to tune into just to hear what he's got to say.
Because you can get some nuggets of truth from somebody like him.
Sometimes you can get some nuggets of truth out of Laura Ingram and I like Mark Levin, too.
I mean, he talks a really good game.
But what you're going to find here is that all the news systems are going to just coagulate into one big nasty trash bag of information and garbage.
So you're going to have to learn to educate yourself.
Like I said, the library, alternative news sources, learn.
There is no better time than right now to set up a new company.
There is so much opportunity out there.
Why?
If you're not dead, there's no reason in the world you can't use your cell phone to try to make a sale with some product somewhere somehow.
Get strong first, then you can help with the bigger problems.
Yep, good, good, good.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live needtoknowatgmail.com.
James Wood sums it up nicely.
Final thought on the election?
One side elected a dead guy, a brain-damaged guy, and has engineered the worst economy and border catastrophe in a century.
Its leader can't read a teleprompter nor answer a question coherently.
Yet the other side still lost.
The end.
Volkswagen Conspiracy's Virtual Conference 2022 is going to take place on the 3rd and 4th of December.
24 speakers, 26 presentations over the two days.
Learn more.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Carl, yours.
Well, first, I want to acknowledge our audience members.
Thank you for your intellectual integrity and moral courage through these difficult times.
If you take a look at anything real that we do and use with our hands, you do test these things and you do put anything under a stress test to see how it's going to perform and how it performs under stress is important.
And we're all under the stress of standing for our nation and the truth.
So, James Woods, yeah, that is good.
And I appreciate what he's done over the years to communicate the facts in such a brief little one-inch punch that he contributes to our understanding.
And yes, we do have exactly It is an Emperor's New Clothes condition.
It is an inverted reality.
And yes, part of what we're doing as patriots Uh, here at Need to Know News and and multiplied 1000 times where people are standing up and speaking up and it's to encourage us to keep moving forward because we have two possible outcomes.
One is we lose and we have 666 and will be put into education.
The other outcome is the Great Awakening.
And they'll arrest Trump on something and convict him.
And soon there'll be a law passed, which which if you praise MAGA or Trump in any way, then it'll be called Trumpism denialism.
They'll come up with something like that and make it a crime like to question the Holocaust.
The other outcome is the Great Awakening.
And that is just truth, justice and the synergy of unleashing human creativity, which will be beyond our imagination.
We can imagine the brightness of the future if we can shake off these parasites and we just need to shine light on them.
Now, how we do that in this condition?
We're moving step by step forward, figuring out the way as best we can.
And I like what Brian had said earlier, is that, yeah, you know, for me personally, It's now, this is the second week after the midterms.
If patriots don't act on this, if white hats in control in the background don't act on this, then we're going to have to go to the drawing board and figure out what we can do.
And I already have plans that I've started to send out.
I'm going to write an article.
And what I'm personally going to do is leverage my strengths in San Ramon, California.
I'm going to be in communication with our city mayor, attorney, city council.
The school district, and I think there are a couple others on that list, and I'm going to attack based upon the descent into illegal health orders based upon my experience of what I've learned engaging in my school district for 2 years.
And I may expand that out into other areas.
I may go for the election fraud.
I don't know.
I might want to keep it simple, but.
If something doesn't break, then we're going to have to somehow reformulate and get stronger because there's no option to... because we're not going to take 666.
Brian, your final thoughts?
Well, my final thoughts are pretty straightforward.
I'm planning to make my future better personally, so that I can survive whatever's coming right now.
That's where I'm putting probably 60% of my energy, is new planning, new business opportunities, new ways to increase my business and make more money.
It's the nature of where we're at.
We can't expect the government to come and save us.
It's not going to happen.
It's never going to happen.
It was never meant to happen this way.
This is America.
If you want to make it, you got to sit down and buckle up and work hard until you make it.
I'm just remembering, I'm going back to the basics.
I'm literally going back to the days after college where I decided I wanted to set up my first business, re-evaluating that information, how to talk to people, how to create the sales scripts and make the calls and build the business.
It's literally a great time to do that.
I think there's a lot of opportunity out there.
And my final thought is, don't worry about what you can't change.
We can sit around and bloviate about this government situation all day long.
We've got to sit out the next two years.
Turn off the TV, get a couple of audiobooks, put some new books on your desk, and start up a new business.
It's easier than ever right now.
Words of wisdom from Brian Davidson and Carl Herman as well.
Wonderful commentaries.
I fear for our nation's future.
There was never a situation where the Democrats were in greater risk of losing their grip on political power in the United States.
Everything was working against them.
A terrible president, obviously incompetent, a vice president who's an airhead, a terrible economy, open borders, rising crime, threats of nuclear war.
Nothing has gone right.
And yet, They managed to survive by the skin of their teeth through massive election theft and voter fraud.
It's appalling!
That what we think of as what's supposed to be the world's greatest democratic republic is another failure.
We can't even do honest voting.
We've given up paper ballots and hand counts for machines that enable our greatest legacy, our right to cast a vote, to determine the future of our own government.
Up to machines and politicians who are taking it from us and using us as mere bombs.
Eric illustrates the problem completely, in my opinion.
The only figure who can actually straighten it out is Donald Trump.
They still fear him.
The attacks persist.
They dodged a bullet, but they're worried he's still here.
They're going to try somehow to preclude him running again in 2024.
I do believe, Maricopa County, the situation there is so manifestly absurd.
There's so much evidence the election was rigged that there's a real prospect with a brainy, gutsy woman like Carrie Lake carrying the banner for honest elections to have it overturned and set right.
And since Mike Masters has not conceded either, that could also make a difference to the Senate, if the Republicans can gain control of the Senate as well, even by the narrowest of majorities, provided, of course, that Hershel Walker should pull it through in Georgia.
Perhaps the nation can right the ship of state and we can make progress moving forward.
Otherwise, I fear we're going down hard.
Not a pleasant prospect.
Brian's advice, very pragmatic and practical.
Take care of the family.
Be concerned for yourself.
Don't worry about things you can't do anything about, but by God, it's worth knowing what the hell is going on and taking the measures you can take to protect yourself.
So, I would like to say the future is bright.
It was going to be.
If we'd taken five seats in the Senate and 45 or 50 in the House, that was what should have happened.
So you see, the measure of corruption, the difference between how it ought to have come out legitimately and how it actually did, that is not reassuring.
The Democrats are as corrupt as any party in America has ever been.
We must get rid of them.
We must unload the garbage.
This is political chicanery of a magnitude never before seen in the United States of America.
It ain't gonna be easy if we can do it at all, but I fear for the future of our nation if we cannot.
That's the challenge ahead.
Spend as much time as you can with your friends, your family.
We do not know when the next missile strike might hit, the next pandemic.
We might all be in lockdown.
Meanwhile, we'll be back with more of the news you need to know.
▲
Export Selection