Need to Know News (27 October 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to give you all the news you need to know.
Some doozies.
Five signs a war between Russia and NATO is about to spiral out of control.
A dirty bomb?
There's been a lot of chatter about the possibility Russia could start using tactical nukes, but in fact it looks as though it's the Ukrainians who are planning to detonate a dirty bomb and to blame it on Russia.
Russia's defense chief has alleged Ukraine is preparing a provocation involving a radioactive device.
Just today, Vladimir Putin asserted Russia has no intention to use nuclear weapons in Ukraine, just underlined.
Second, the 101st Airborne has been deployed to Eastern Europe, where they can enter Ukraine on short notice.
This is rather striking.
Screaming Eagle commanders have told CBS they're always ready to fight.
They're there to defend NATO territory, and if the fighting escalates or there's an attack on NATO, they're prepared to cross the border into Ukraine, which would be very, very bad news.
Third, a million rounds of ammunition The U.S.
that now provide Ukraine with over a million rounds of howitzer ammunition, including 903,000 standard 155-millimeter rounds, 3,000 M982 Excalibur guided rounds, 7,000 remote anti-armor mine system projectiles, and 180,000 remote anti-armor mine system projectiles, and 180,000 105-millimeter howitzer shells.
And it appears more will be on the way.
There's an aid package in Congress for another $50 billion for Ukraine, but the American people are left paying the bill in sucking hind tit.
Number four.
Iranian troops in Ukraine A lot of mercenaries from Western Asia have been fighting in Ukraine for the Ukrainians.
I've heard estimates up to 70 percent.
And now it may be that Iranian troops have actually entered Ukraine in an effort to help the Russians.
The U.S.
government claims Russian attacks are employing unmanned aerial vehicles purchased from Tehran to carry out strikes against Ukrainian targets from bases in the Crimea.
This conflict, thus, is becoming more of a world war with each passing day.
Also, the Iranians have been getting rather aggressive lately with an exercise called Mighty Iran on the border with Azerbaijan, including practicing crossings of the Aras River, which defines a large part of the border between the two states.
Fifth, relentless bombing of power infrastructure.
The Russians have taken the gloves off and are relentlessly bombing electric infrastructure all over Ukraine, which threatens to create a humanitarian crisis because winter is rapidly approaching.
Both sides just continue to escalate matters, and it's just a question of how soon someone pushes a bit too far.
It's difficult to see a peaceful way out because Washington refused to engage in diplomacy in Ukraine.
Only we'll be satisfied if Russia is forced out.
The Biden admin seems completely opposed to peace talks with Russia, which appears to be a tragic mistake.
Someone's bound to be tempted to use nukes.
Once it happens, our world will never be the same again.
Unfortunately, our leaders don't seem to grasp.
We could literally be on the brink of a nuclear conflict.
But rather, appear determined to win the battle on the global chessboard, where they can't even see the bigger picture.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, it's getting more and more exciting by the day, of course.
People need to hear that Ukraine, the leadership of Ukraine, is the political leadership of NATO.
Ukraine is a puppet, and we've gone over this in the 14th and 16th Colorado Revolutions.
This is a takeover.
So, will NATO escalate the war in a defensive Pose.
I think they will.
I think that they have to try a false flag attack, blame Russia for it.
And for NATO, or at least the ones who are on that side of the political persuasion for total war and not to sacrifice Ukraine, then they're going to have a false flag.
Nuclear attack of some kind or another to blame Russia and to demand that NATO exercise their collective self-defense aspect of their treaty and engage directly against Russia.
Now, when that happens, we also have the 101st Airborne.
On the border.
So we'll have a real-world test of who the Commander-in-Chief really is and an opportunity for those officers, all of whom are trained to disobey an illegal order.
So we'll see what the interior conversations are like with who's going to follow The orders and if the American flag will be thrown into that on the will of the officers involved.
And we do have the possibility as well of a bricks led revolt because the nations of the world are tired of the Federal Reserve and the UK.
And the EU central bank's domination of being economic parasites.
The ruble is now linked to gold and we may find some sort of a demonstration of that preference in the coming days.
And people also need to know that whatever you hear out of a prime minister or a president, they're just puppets.
They're just script readers.
They're just order followers of whatever the shadowy families and power behind them Very nice, Brian.
Well, I completely agree with that assessment there, Carl.
You know, Tulsi said something very interesting last night on the Tucker Carlson Show after Tucker pointed out that some people had sent some Letters to high-level bureaucrats saying that they wanted to see negotiations for peace.
Of course, that was immediately rejected.
And so, let me point out that as far as I know, there's no elected Democrat anywhere that supports peace.
They've all gone with their globalist supporters and bankers.
I am concerned that these people are going to get their war.
They're going to do it one way or another.
And hopefully they're going to do it pretty fast.
But I think that they've got the elections in the bag.
They already know that they're going to cheat their way through it just like they did before.
On another note, I heard a Ukrainian person in an interview the other day on YouTube basically saying they're going to extreme lengths with the media and the propaganda to make the Ukrainians hate the Russians, which they don't.
So it's being set up all on every level.
And then, of course, on top of that, you've got Finland And Switzerland and there's buzz that NATO's setting themselves up to place weapons on the borders pointed towards Russia in this situation.
So I'm concerned about the situation.
I do think that we're going to have a war.
I don't think there's anything any of us can do to stop it.
The warmongers are in play and Tulsi pointed that out astutely on Fox News last night.
I don't know what it all means, but I do think that they've got to have their war or we're going to have our crash.
Or maybe they just want their war to get their great reset.
It's gonna happen.
I'm terribly worried that you got that exactly right.
It was some 50 members of the House who wrote.
Now, it's ironic that the Democrat Party used to be an anti-war party, even if Democrat presidents had covertly promoted wars like Woodrow Wilson and FDR and even LBJ.
But the party was officially an anti-war party, and now it's become completely the opposite.
Bizarre evolution, but then the Republican Party has now become a populist party.
Meanwhile, documents reveal NATO was rehearsing for an amphibious assault on eastern Ukraine using Ukrainian naval bases acquired in agreement with the UK.
In other words, They were setting up for some kind of military action against Ukraine, which appears to have been another reason why Vladimir Putin had to act on the 24th of February.
Codenamed Polaris 21, the large-scale simulation aimed to mobilize all components of the French Navy, including the latest generation assets, land and air, from the French Army and Air Force, As well as combat ships from France's partner nations, the U.S., Spain, Greece, Italy, and the United Kingdom in a NATO wartime exercise from 18 November to December 3rd of 2021.
Built as a laboratory for tomorrow's warfare, Polaris 21 was reconducted around what was termed high-spectrum military actions, corresponding to future actions of the French Navy in a hardened strategic context.
In turn, it completed the preparation for a naval air group for its next operational deployment, which began in February of 2022.
The technical name described as MIKUR, the Russian Federation, is the main threat in the simulation.
MIKUR is a huge country straddling North Asia and Europe that forms a federation of 16 autonomous regions with no direct access to the Mediterranean and more.
McCure's foreign policy is expansionist.
Leader McCure, that would be Vladimir Putin, seeks to reaffirm his country as a major player on the world stage after years of self-effacement from the U.S.
superpower.
Moscow, the capital of McCure, is today essential in the resolution of the crisis of Murkmania, which of course would be Ukraine, which could lead to a civil war at any time.
President Putin, again, does not hesitate to challenge Western countries, which he blames for the overthrow of the Volodymyr Zelensky regime in 2011 and for Otsila against the independence of Russia in 2015, no doubt referring to the coup of 2014 that drove out the Russia-friendly president and installed a Western puppet.
The file goes on to describe, almost autonomous, the government of also Ukraine does not really care because there's hardly any exchange with the rest of the country because of the catharsis community, the latter completely infiltrated by the mafias that take advantage of its geographical location outside direct control of Mercure.
We have more described here.
At this point, there are three notable elements worth observing in relation to this.
A.
The first involves a Western refusal to even recognize the result of the referendum held in Korea in 2014, which saw the locals vote overwhelmingly in favor of rejoining Russia.
Second, deals with a naval agreement between Ukraine and the UK signed on June 21, 2021, calling for the UK to sell two Reverby Shandown-class mine hunters to Ukraine and produce eight small-missile warships.
The agreement also calls for the UK to construct a new naval base on the Black Sea as a primary base for the Ukrainian Navy and a base on the Sea of Azov.
It provides for the sale of missiles to Ukraine and for training and support thereof.
Third, the last is an incident involving a UK warship HMS Defender at the Black Sea on June 23, 2021, just two days after signing that naval agreement.
Wikipedia recalls the incident as follows.
On 23 June 2021, a UK HMS Defender undertook a Freedom of Navigation patrol through disputed waters around the Crimean Peninsula.
They were in waters Russia declares to be its own.
In an account partially contradicted by the UK government, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation said they fired warning shots from Coast Guard patrol boats, dropped bombs from a Sukhoi Su-24 attack aircraft in the path of the Defender after it allegedly strayed for about 20 minutes as far as three kilometers or two miles into the waters off the coast of Crimea, which were Russian waters after its annexation in 2014.
Which appears to have been completely in accordance with international law.
The UK military denied warning shots were fired, said the ship was in innocent passage through Ukraine's territorial sea, later clarifying heavy guns were fired three miles astern could not be considered to be warning shots.
Meanwhile, secret docks relating to the passage was discovered at a bus stop in Canton on the 27th of June, revealing that the Royal Navy considered different hypothetical reactions from Russia in response to the ship's passage Was prepared for the possibility Russia might respond aggressively to what thus appears to be a deliberate provocation.
So what are the implications viewed through the prism of the Russian Federation's initiating the special military operation?
The West never recognized the reattachment at Crimea to Russia.
It was therefore likely that, unlike what's transpiring off the western coast of Syria, American post-cedar reconnaissance flight would have gained in frequency to probe the coast off the peninsula and supervise movements of ships based in Sevastopol.
The West never recognized the naval agreement between Ukraine and the UK was to act as a tripwire.
These Ukrainian naval bases in the Black and Azov Sea were going to be used as hubs for NATO ships to prepare amphibious assaults on the port cities of Odessa and Mariupol while Kiev was massing ground troops on the Western front lines.
And Moscow ignored the quickly developing situation.
It would have been forced to confront a circumstance that would have impeded its ability not only to prevent genocide on its doorstep, but to preserve its own territorial integrity.
With NATO warships allowed to roam in the area, time was of the essence.
Moscow could not afford not to act.
The Polaris simulation, under these circumstances, was likely designed to prepare to engage the Russian fleet before it got the chance, as it did in Syria, to create a buffer zone in order to confront the incoming NATO fleet and thwart its amphibious operation.
This could help explain Polaris 21's stated goal of winning the war before the war.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, that's a damning document.
So apparently what NATO had wanted to do is to orchestrate some sort of a false flag narrative to invade and to re-secure the Donbass.
So the Donbass is the southeastern part of Ukraine and wanted independence after the 14 and 16 Code Revolutions put in a NATO puppet in the western part of the country.
So the irony for Russia is is that they have to defend that area similar to to prevent it from being taken over similar to how The Soviet Union took over Eastern European countries and then shelled them out for the oligarchs to go ahead and manage as a buffer zone in a criminal empire.
And I like that war game narrative that because that's exactly what we suffer under.
You get some sick oligarch who is writing narratives and then that.
Go through the speeches of the political leaders and into corporate media talking points and then into our public education textbooks.
That's all that were ever sold or narratives.
And it is that ridiculous.
And by the way, in Crimea in 14, they did vote about 95% to 97%, I believe, all in favor of attaching themselves politically to Russia and the Donbass area, those four regions.
We're 90% plus in the vote.
And remember, all the people want and all that Americans say is that, okay, if you want democracy, then have democracy.
Go ahead and reaffirm however way you want to do it.
Because if the truth is told, most people know that Ukraine has been taken over as a puppet state to the evil empire of the West, and it's all paid for by American taxpayers.
So we'll see.
We need to get this breakthrough for the general public to see what's going on, because once that occurs, then the empire is over.
Yes, yes, it does describe a deliberate military provocation against Russia that would have, in my mind, completely warranted the intervention in Ukraine, even if that had been the sole reason when there were many more.
Brian, yours.
Well, they've been telegraphing this move for quite a while with the Russian propaganda going back even to 2016 and the false flag related to Donald Trump working with the Russians.
So, they're planning on doing it.
They were telegraphing 9-11 to completely reshape society.
Now, they're planning on this to completely reshape society and set up the global reset.
Just so you know, I was reading a really interesting article from the Saker, S-A-K-E-R blog by Fred Reed the other day, and he just basically spends a couple of pages outlining what a massive attack on the United States Might look like and he basically is making the point that America is very fragile and we don't notice how it works so smoothly
Because when a local catastrophe occurs, the rest of the country steps in to remedy things.
But if there were multiple local catastrophes, we would first lose our transportation infrastructure.
The water and the electrical grids would go down as a result.
The cities and the suburbs and the towns couldn't feed themselves because we rely on such a constant and heavy influx of food and gas from the other regions.
So the question is, What will the day after a serious nuclear conflict look like and what will the weeks that follow look like?
At this point in time, I'm going to agree with Paul Craig Roberts and Carl and yourself that this is going to happen.
They're telegraphing it unless there's some massive change to and the warmongers are extracted, which I don't believe there's going to be anybody that comes in and saves us from this.
We can expect an attack that's going to take down many large cities and many large areas.
It's not trying to cause concern, but just preparation.
The article states that they've been planning it for a long time.
All the indicators are that they've been planning it for a long time.
And what our job is to do is to sit back and think about what the effects of this type of program are going to look like in our community and how the digital currencies are going to change things and how freedom of speech is going to be affected.
So I don't think there's much we can do for about it now, except for just to prepare.
Yes, and it appears that Democrats want to have the war as an excuse to forego the midterm elections that are going to dismantle them as a viable political party, to the detriment of the United States and the rest of the world, just to promote their own security.
Meanwhile, just as an indication of how things are going politically in favor of the Republicans and drastically against the Democrats, Oz odds of winning soar after historic Fetterman debate meltdown.
It was unbelievable.
The Fetterman campaign may have just watched what remained of his prospects at Pennsylvania circle the drain after tonight's sole debate between him and Senate candidate Dr. Oz.
Fetterman, who suffered a stroke days before the main primary, cast a vote ...from a hospital bed, appeared unable to put together nearly a single coherent sentence throughout the entire debate, while TV veteran Dr. Oz deftly and surgically sliced and diced his way through an hour of questioning, using Fetterman as a lifeless, sparing dummy for the majority of the debate.
Recovering from his stroke, Fetterman's answer ranged between somewhat inept and completely incomprehensible.
The ugly performance started right from the beginning with Fetterman bidding viewers goodnight as part of his opening statement.
Here it was.
Fetterman opens the debate.
He's asked why he'd make a good candidate for the United States Senate, and he said, hi, good night, everybody.
It only got worse.
Fetterman was able to coherently respond to an allegation he hadn't paid his taxes.
Here's how it went.
Oz has said you've not paid your taxes.
How do you respond?
Fetterman.
It was helping two students 17 years ago to help them buy their own homes.
They forehand didn't pay the bills and got our paint, and it has never been an issue in any of the campaign before.
Literally, word for word, what he said.
Obviously, once again, non-responsive to the question.
He was also unable to provide reasons for not releasing his medical records, an obvious concern since he's recovering from a stroke.
Here's how he handled it.
Moderator.
Why haven't you released your medical records?
Fetterman, my doctors believe I'm ready to be served.
Ready to be served?
Moderator, why won't you release the records?
Fetterman, my doctor believes I'm fit to be serving and I believe that is where I'm standing.
Not even those sentences are coherent, clearly.
Besides, it's not the doctors who need to be convinced, it's the public.
He also seemed to take an inordinate amount of time in grasping and responding to questions as they were asked.
Moderator, are they in a Biden policy position you disagree with?
Silence, silence, silence, silence.
By the way, I believe he had an earpiece and he was being given answers through the earpiece, but it was a calamity.
He tried to take several jabs at Oz.
None of them landed.
Fetterman.
Dr. Oz loves free money, and when it's half a million dollars and one of his down on the ranch in Florida, whether it's a $50 tax break, you know about his farm in Montgomery County, again, completely incoherent.
It culminated with him attempting a square statement from 2018 where he said he was against fracking, with statements he made in 2022 where he claimed to be pro-fracking.
Here's one comment about it.
Oh my God.
His campaign manager similarly had a meltdown in the spin room, dropping the F-bomb, trying to convince the media that his campaign had not completely melted down, claiming, he took it to Dr. Oz pretty effing hard tonight, he said.
No one bought it.
Well, those that don't like curse words just skip.
But no amount of spin was able to convince social media the debate was a success.
Here's just a tiny fraction.
I can't impress upon you how much of a disaster this debate is.
I've never seen anything like it.
This race is completely and totally over, said Clay Travis of Clay & Buck.
How in the world in a country of 330 million people could John Fetterman be in the running for one of 100 seats in the world's greatest deliberative body?
of eight was hard to watch.
How in the world in a country of 330 million people could John Fetterman be in the running for one of 100 seats in the world's greatest deliberative body?
This is embarrassing.
Just so we're all clear, that was Fetterman with weeks of prep and specialized computer assistance throughout.
So what you just saw is the very, very best Fetterman can do, which is terrifying, said Stephen Miller, senior advisor to President Trump.
Donald Jr.
called it worse than any of us could have ever imagined.
Here's Trump Jr.
adding, at this point the moderator is filibustering to make sure he doesn't get any more questions.
I think that four in a row to Dr. Oz.
Even today's partisan hack media can't cover it for Fetterman being brain dead.
The reaction in the predicted voting market after the debate was stark.
As noted by Stephen Ratner, the former head of the Obama auto task force, New York Times op-ed author and economic analyst for Morning Joe, the prediction market quickly moved against Vetterman post-debate.
And up for Oz!
Just look how the red goes up, the blue goes down.
It's all over.
Let's take a look at just a smidgen of this just to get the flavor of it.
The Senate race now expected.
He chose money over his conscience.
My opponent, John Fetterman, by his own admission grew up in luxury and privilege.
Insult stealing the spotlight while voters want to voice on the issues.
I'm thinking about women's rights.
Unity of the people.
I'm looking for civility.
I think public health.
That is most important.
Our leaders are not leaders at all.
Tonight, Lieutenant Governor John Fetterman and Dr. Mehmet Oz face to face for the first and only time.
Both men looking to prove they have what it takes to represent the people of Pennsylvania.
Send Dr. Oz back to New Jersey.
I stand for Pennsylvania values and I'm proud of it.
Live from the ABC 27 studios in Harrisburg, this is the Pennsylvania U.S.
Senate debate.
Welcome to Debate Night in America.
I'm Leland Vittert from NewsNation.
The stakes tonight could not be higher, not only for the Keystone State, but for the country.
Control of the U.S.
Senate for either party runs through Pennsylvania.
Dennis Owens, WHTM political reporter and anchor here in Harrisburg, along with Lisa Sylvester from WPXI in Pittsburgh, will moderate tonight's debate.
We want to welcome our viewers watching tonight from across the country on NewsNation.
Voters can watch this debate in all 67 Pennsylvania counties on nine television stations serving the Commonwealth.
Before we get started, let's go over tonight's rules.
Mr. Fetterman, Mr. Oz, you will have 60 seconds to answer each question.
If there's a follow-up question or rebuttal, you will have up to 30 seconds.
Each candidate will also have 90 seconds for a closing statement.
When your time is up, you'll hear this bell.
Gentlemen, thank you for being here.
Dennis and Lisa.
Thank you, Leland.
Good evening, candidates who moments ago just met for the first time.
We're happy to have you here.
Welcome to our audience watching at home, on air, online, and on NewsNation.
And we encourage everyone who is watching tonight to share your thoughts on social media.
Remember to use the hashtag, PASenateDebate.
And you may notice these large monitors that are behind us.
This is part of our closed captioning system.
It was requested by John Fetterman to help him process the questions that we are asking him tonight and approved by both campaigns and both candidates can see the monitors.
One of the screens will show only the questions being asked tonight.
The second screen will caption the questions and responses from the MEDOCS.
We have live, experienced captioners in studio to ensure we are as accurate as possible in what's sure to be a fast-paced program.
And just to note, for those of you using closed captioning at home, the captions you see are not tied to the captions that the candidates will see here tonight.
Thank you, Lisa.
With that, let's get started.
Mr. Fetterman, we're going to begin with you.
Your political experience includes serving as the mayor of Braddock, a small borough near Pittsburgh, And one term as Lieutenant Governor.
You're running for a seat that could decide the balance of power in Washington.
What qualifies you to be a U.S.
Senator?
You have 60 seconds.
Hi, good night everybody.
I'm running to serve Pennsylvania.
He's running to use Pennsylvania.
Here's a man that spent more than $20 million of his own money to try to buy that seat.
Also having to talk about something called the Oz Rule.
That if he's on TV, he's lying.
He did that during his career on his TV show.
He's done that during his campaign about lying about our record here.
And he's also lying probably during this debate.
And let's also talk about the elephant in the room.
I had a stroke.
He's never let me forget that.
And I might miss some words during this debate, mush two words together, but it knocked me down, but I'm going to keep coming back up.
And this campaign is all about, to me, is about fighting for everyone in Pennsylvania that ever got knocked down that needs to get back up Thank you very much, Mr. Fetterman.
Mr. Oz, you are a doctor, a businessman, and television personality, but this is your first run for elected office.
What qualifies you to be a U.S.
Senator from Pennsylvania?
You have 60 seconds.
I'm running for the U.S.
Senate because Washington keeps getting it wrong with extreme positions.
I want to bring civility, balance, all the things that you want to see because you've been telling it to me on the campaign trail.
And by doing that, we can bring us together in a way that has not been done of late.
Democrats, Republicans talking to each other.
John Fetterman takes everything to an extreme and those extreme positions hurt us all.
Let's take crime as an example because it's been such a big problem.
Maureen Faulkner accompanied me today to the studio.
You know that her husband, who was a police officer in Philadelphia, was brutally murdered.
John Fetterman, during this crime wave, has been trying to get as many murderers convicted and sentenced to life in prison out of jail as possible, including people who are similar to the man who murdered her husband.
He does it without the rest of the parole board agreeing.
He's doing it without the families on board.
These radical positions extend beyond crime to wanting to legalize all drugs, to open the border, to raising our taxes.
I want Washington to be civil again.
We need it to be less radical.
John Fetterman, unfortunately, would bring that.
Mr. Oz, thank you.
Lisa?
All right, gentlemen.
On to the economy.
Pennsylvanians are struggling to put food on the table and gas in their cars.
Our next star, Emerson College, The Hill Poll shows the economy and inflation are the biggest concerns for voters.
39% of them listed that as the top issue.
Beginning with you, Mr. Oz, you have blamed President Biden and reckless Democratic spending for the inflation crisis.
But voters would like to hear your specific plan to cut spending.
Please explain in 60 seconds.
Well, if you ask the U.S.
government, they'll tell you.
They have 4% waste and fraud.
Now, I've traveled over the Commonwealth and spoken to countless people.
There was a lady in Beaver County at a county fair who told me, with fear in her heart, that she wanted to provide food for her son's highly nutritious chicken she wanted.
She couldn't afford it anymore.
That's a big problem.
If we've got 4% waste and fraud, we ought to be able to take care of that.
John Fetterman's, however, response continually is to raise taxes.
He raised taxes as mayor, he tried to raise taxes as a lieutenant governor, 46%.
That's a big tax rate.
He supported Joe Biden's recent tax rate increase, and he's done that without paying his own taxes 67 times.
I'll say that again.
He hasn't paid his own taxes 67 times, but he's raising mine and yours.
Those are radical positions.
They're extreme.
They're out of touch with the values of Pennsylvanians.
And I can make the difficult decisions, as you do in the operating room as a surgeon.
I'll make them cutting our budget as well, to make sure we don't have to raise taxes on a population already desperately in pain from the high inflation rate.
Mr. Fetterman, I will allow a 15-second rebuttal.
He has specifically said you have not paid your taxes and that you want to raise taxes on Americans.
How do you respond?
Absolutely, the Oz rule.
Of course, he's lying.
It was helping two students 17 years ago to help them, you know, buy their own homes.
They didn't pay the bills and it got her paid and it has never been an issue in any of the campaign before.
It was all about non-profit.
All right, thank you, Mr. Fetterman.
Continuing with... I mean, how bad is that?
The guy was incoherent, didn't answer, I think, even a single question directly, and whatever he did have to say was incoherent.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, I got three general observations.
One is that as a retired professional school teacher, I would place Fetterman's command of the English language about at the fourth grade level.
So that's the first thing.
You would be worried about this person's ability to do any type of a job.
You would be concerned if he is cognitively capable.
But, you know, part of it is ironic justice because the second point is that, whatever, it doesn't matter.
I mean, what do you want?
A smooth liar like Mitt Romney, maybe, to sell the bullshit with a little more smoothness?
Is that what you want?
Even if we devolve down into the idiocracy-style level of government, they're all just script readers and liars.
Now, Oz.
I did look at his website, and he's just an empty platitude piece of shit just like the rest of them.
A professional medical doctor who isn't on our side.
I read what he has on his website regarding COVID.
It's what it says, just read one sentence.
Response to COVID-19.
Dr. Oz is a world-class heart surgeon who holds numerous patents and has written hundreds of original peer-reviewed publications.
He knows the truth, the data, and the science about combating COVID, and understands how it really affects you and your family.
It doesn't say anything, it's just empty platitudes from that guy.
And then into the debate, oh, if you really want some real hitters, look at the medical professionals who are standing up against the narrative.
Carl B. Hermit Blocks bought any of these new shows.
I offer my summation of the most damning evidence proving COVID-19 fraud, that this professional awe should be all over, and essays from Dr. Kirsch, who has, I think we got it wrong, is the name of his vest.
Uh, essay.
Now for that debate, there's a beautiful intro concise right to it, and you have Fetterman with just elementary school level insults and empty rhetoric.
Oz has this empty platitudes.
He did reference a real issue, which is crime, is that you do have the Democrats attempting to push us into this back to the future dystopian type reality of crime on the seat on the streets, but yet, you know, he goes back to a stealing make America great again by having this catchphrase of civil again.
So for Oz to say that the problem with inflation is that we have a 4% waste and fraud, as if it's an honest system we just need to get back to because that was civil, and then just go ahead and tugging on people's heartstrings saying this poor woman can't afford to put a chicken in her pot.
So, interesting political theater.
Well, Carl, you're being pretty severe on Oz.
I mean, you got a binary choice, Oz or Federman.
Oz may be flawed, but Federman, my God, what a catastrophe.
Brian, your thoughts?
I think one of the interesting observations to make is that when ABC News 7 out of Philadelphia released their poll, they had 22,505 responses.
And it was just simple question of who won the debate.
23% said Fetterman did.
I don't think there's any human being anywhere that would agree that 23% that Fetterman won the debate.
So it already tells me that either there's 23% of those 22,000 responses were bots or, well, let's just put it like this.
It's a good thing that there's lots of mail-in voting happening in Pennsylvania, and it happened earlier, prior to these debates.
This will probably be the last time a Democrat schedules a debate, or at least a liberal news network schedules a debate with a Republican.
On an interesting note, on Monday, Pennsylvania's Secretary of State, Lee Chapman, revealed that there's likely going to be delays in posting the results from the state's midterm elections.
Surprise, surprise!
Look, the Democrats can't win without cheating, and they're not even hiding it anymore.
YouTube has already been working overtime, wiping as many of the copies of the full debate from YouTube as possible.
Fetterman makes Biden look good.
I hate to say it, it's that bad.
It's just completely cringeworthy.
The whole thing is a joke.
So, you know, there's not a whole lot you can say about this except that turn the channel or read a book.
Carl, go ahead.
And it's also important to point out that Fetterman is the choice of the Democratic Party leadership.
This is a Senate seat, okay?
This is the only one in this election, and the Democrats had the opportunity to lean on Fetterman and choose somebody else, but at this point, you know, it's just tragic comic.
Maybe that is the part.
That they're just going ahead and trying to dumb us down to the furthest Homer Simpson and Spongebob level conceivable.
At his best, before the stroke, he came across as an oaf and a brute, and he looked like a homeless guy.
That he should have been a candidate is ridiculous, beyond ridiculous.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Yes, Pelosi, when I hear people talk about inflation, as I heard it there, we have to change that subject.
Indeed they do.
Indeed they do.
Because if we have the election, if it's anything remotely on us, they're going to go down big time.
Meanwhile, early voting and mail ballot turnouts point to a 2020 replay.
In other words, stealing again.
Nationwide early voting vote by mail turnout trends for the 2022 election reflect a pattern similar to that of the pandemic-skewered 2020 election.
As a result, it may take several days after the polls close for the results to be confirmed in key states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, and Michigan.
In-person early voting and vote-by-mail have grown increasingly popular.
They became mainstream in the 2020 election when more than 101 million Americans cast early in-person votes or vote-by-mail better When more than 101 million in-person or vote-by-mail votes were cast, who knows how many Americans cast them?
It could have been quite a few.
The 2022 early vote invoked by mail is expected to easily have clipped the record for midterms set in 2018 when more than 5 million voted.
The total this year may come close to matching the number cast before Election Day in 2020.
According to the University of Florida's United States Election Project, as of October 23rd, more than 7.46 million had already cast their midterm ballots.
Of those 7.46, nearly 1.65 were cast in person on the 27 states, where early voting periods range from 4 to 45 days before the election.
By the week's end, another 18 will open polls, beginning with seven states on October 24 just past, including Florida, Texas, Colorado, ending with New York and New Jersey just a few days hence on October 29.
More than 5.8 million mail ballots of 41.52 million requested have been returned, according to U.S.
Election Project.
All 50 states offer voting by mail or absentee ballot options.
Nine states, California, Colorado, Nevada, and New Jersey included, send mail ballots to every registered voter.
Not all states wrote down early votes in mail by political affiliation.
In Kansas, North Carolina, and New Mexico, 138,406 Democrats are 40.5%, and 112.47% and 32.8% Republicans voted early in person.
There's much more going on where Georgia is including a record midterm first-day voting turnout of 131,000, twice as high as the 71,000 first-day early voting in 2018.
Nearly matching 136,739 who showed up first-day early voting in 2020.
Georgia, which does not provide party affiliations, reported that more than 31% of requested mail-in ballots had been returned.
Of the 17 states providing party affiliation, 51.3% came from registered Democrats, 30% by registered Republicans.
Florida, where in-person begins October 24th, just passed, and ends November 5th, has registered the largest vote-by-mail turnout thus far, with more than 1.16 million of 4.23 million requests that mail ballots already filed.
Registered Democrats cast 42.2 of the mail ballot and Republicans 38.2.
Nearly 20% were cast by non-affiliated.
Florida Governor DeSantis in early October signed an executive order allowing four southwest Florida counties that remain devastated in Hurricane Ian's wake more flexibility to expand in-person voting by mail, including three more days of early in-person voting.
The only state coming close to the 1.16 who returned by mail in Florida is California, where all 21.87 million registered voters get ballots in the mail.
As of October 23rd, nearly 1.08 million had returned.
Of those, nearly half were mailed in by Democrats, while 28% from registered Republicans.
Mind you, even though they're coming from Democrats, that does not mean they're therefore voting Democrat.
Mail-in ballot requests and returns have significantly increased over 2018 numbers.
Election officials in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin report, which are among the nine states that do not allow mail-in ballots to be counted until Election Day.
They take longer to count and process.
Their envelopes must be opened, inspected, and prepared.
Thus, the prospect of a repeat of 2020 in these key states, when election results were then not available for several days, laying the foundation for election fraud claimed by the Trump campaign and other Republican officials, which is an odd thing to say since Hillary is already claiming the 2024 election is going to be stolen.
Meanwhile, breaking in Pennsylvania.
Surprise, surprise.
Democrat officials made up 240,000 ballots to unverified voters, for whom they had neither a Social Security nor a driver's license number.
Fifteen Republican state representatives sent a letter to the acting Secretary of the Commonwealth, Lee Chapman, after the discovery they should never have been sent out to the voters.
Deputy Secretary Jonathan Mark testified before the Pennsylvania House back in September that counties are responsible to verify the voter ID.
The counties argued this was nonsense.
The ID must be verified before a ballot is even sent out.
According to Pennsylvania law, these ballots must now be set aside.
They can't be counted in the November 8th election until a voter produces an ID.
You can bet very few of these counties will set those ballots aside.
This is how Democrats cheat.
Carl, your thoughts?
You're muted.
Sorry.
OK, so fascinating stories for Pelosi to come out and say, we're changing the subject.
So you need to know how these leaders work.
They get leadership meetings and then they talk about what are the talking points we're going to roll out.
So imagine the meeting among the Democratic leaderships and they're saying, what are we going to say about inflation?
And the one that got the votes was just tell them to change the subject, man.
That's the best we got.
I mean, what were the losers?
We don't have time for this.
Was that the number two choice?
Or is it not important compared to LGTBS plus issues?
So they have nothing.
They're totally bankrupt.
And we're just an Emperor's New Clothes moment away.
From the complete destruction, the historic destruction, that the Democrat Party will not exist after this election, even if we were to go ahead and hold it.
And that said, of course they have to try to cheat.
They're going to.
They have to.
If they lose control, then The voters, the public, is going to demand that the Democrats be held accountable for their lies and crimes.
So I'm with Brian, it's going to be the same as in 2020.
And speaking of Pennsylvania with Ozzie Fetterman and why, with all respect out of the choice, is that Oz is just a tool, is that the Pennsylvania State Legislature had a hearing over 2020 irregularities and one of the state legislators testified Just in front of the state legislature and caused the crowd to gasp in disbelief when they stopped their voting at like two or three o'clock in the morning and then they recounted.
There's an 85 second testimony on YouTube and I'll put it in the show notes but it is called crowd gasps after learning a spike of votes and PA had 600k votes for Biden and only 3200 for Trump.
Okay, so they resumed counting, the official story is, and they get 600,000 votes for Biden, 3,000 for Trump, a 2,000 to 1 ratio.
The odds that that wasn't phony is a number with approximately 60 zeros behind it to 1.
If Oz wanted the truth, he would say exactly what I'm saying here, Is that the 2020 Pennsylvania election was stolen from Trump and given to Biden and that is mathematically certain by those odds.
To flesh this out a little bit of how you can't have 600,000 votes for one guy and 3,000 for another, it is more likely that someone would win the super lotto four times in a row rather than that being fraud.
We're told that the earth is four and a half billion years old.
If I said, pick a random second from those four and a half billion years, I wrote an article about this if you want to get it.
It's just called election fraud, odds, colon, and then there's a one with, I don't know, 50 or 60 zeros behind it.
So, in the whole age of the Earth, being four and a half billion years old, that's 1.64 trillion days.
The number of seconds is 141.7 quadrillion.
So, just with the evidence that Oz is ignoring in Pennsylvania, it's more likely that a person would say, okay, I'm gonna pick accurately Brian?
correctly, one two thousandth of one second in the whole history of Earth, that's more likely to occur than for that Pennsylvania number to be correct.
And just that funny story at the end that it's the same state, Pennsylvania, just mailing out a quarter of a million fake ballots.
Brian.
Well, there's reports that are already beginning to come out, even one here by Jim Sinclair, who's a reporter down here in Texas, that there are several reports in Texas about voting machines changing votes from Democrats to Republicans.
You remember the Georgia water main.
We remember all sorts of things that went on with the last election that just absolutely infuriated those of us who give a damn about it.
Look, we lost heart last time they installed Biden.
The puppet?
Don't be surprised if they do it again.
I mean, seven million early votes?
Come on.
It's not even November 8th and they're already pumping it up as much as possible.
So by changing Republicans to Democrats, reconfiguring the machines, running the mail-in ballots, mail trucks carrying actual real ballots going up in flames, which happened in Georgia two days ago.
I mean, there's Look, they're going to play the whole game.
The only question is, is there any force that will have the power to stop them?
And I simply don't know.
I don't believe that there is one after what happened in the last election.
I think we've lost control.
And I'm sorry, but I just, I just can't find the good guys anymore.
I don't know if they still exist.
I'm sorry that that's a dire situation and it does look like it may be a repeat of 2020.
Meanwhile, a Fox News reporter used facts that call out Biden's falsehoods on the economy, and then the press secretary ends the questioning.
Fox News reporter Jackie Heinrich directly called out a Biden admin who reported falsehoods about the economy.
As the election season heats up, Biden's claims repeatedly his policies have resulted in record deficit reduction And a record number of jobs created.
But the truth is, deficit reduction and job creation are a result of the economy returning to pre-pandemic normalcy.
The CBO projects the federal budget deficit will shrink to $1 trillion in 2022.
It was $2.8 trillion last year.
it was 2.8 trillion last year, that the annual shortfall would average 1.6 trillion from 2023 to 2032.
The deficit continues to decrease as a percentage of gross domestic product this year, as spending related to the coronavirus pandemic wanes.
Meanwhile, despite Biden claiming he created 10 million jobs, that job growth is related to people returning to the workforce.
Those are not newly created jobs.
In fact, As of the latest jobs report, there are only 514,000 more jobs today than in February 2020 before the pandemic.
After pointing out the facts that Biden is neither Lord the Devil nor created millions of jobs, Heinrich asked Karine Jean-Pierre why Americans should take him seriously.
How are people supposed to take this kind of messaging on their most important issue seriously when some of this feels like smoke and mirrors she has?
Jean-Pierre didn't answer the question, but stumped Biden and the Democrats claiming the American Rescue Plan, which economists agree overheated the economy, put us in a place where the economy turned back on and attacked Republicans for opposing Biden's inflationary agenda.
Meanwhile, Hillary's already charging that the Republicans plan to steal a 2024 election.
Two full years before a single ballot has been cast, the 2016 presidential loser is already in full-blown denial of the 2024 outcome.
The bitter Democrat recently posted a dire warning of yet another vast right-wing conspiracy.
It's time—this time—it's to steal the White House in 2024.
In her own words, right-wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential election.
A former first lady added that this diabolical plan, which apparently only she is aware of, is not a secret.
Hillary is hardly a novice, after all, when it comes to making outlandish claims.
Her video message was posted by the leftist activist group Indivisible, which describes itself as an organization committed to rebuild our democracy and defeat the Trump agenda.
In her address, she said what she was about to say is keeping me up at night.
This conspiracy, she asserted, means the 2024 election will not hinge on the nation's popular vote or the anachronistic electoral college, but rather on state legislatures.
Here she's tweeting, right-wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the next presidential election.
In supporting Indivisible's Project Crew fundraiser, she stated her belief the drive to steal would come from Republican-controlled state government.
Without a shred of evidence, Hillary stretched her credibility even further, adding the right-wing-controlled Supreme Court could be ready to give state legislatures the authority to overrule presidential elections.
The audacity of her candidate for president's claim is startling.
Her party and liberal media allies harp continuously about election deniers, which has come to mean virtually any Republican not serving on the January 6th House Select Committee.
To question an election as a member of the GOP is to be a traitor or insurrectionist.
That is a given.
But for Democrats, including your own repeated laments that 2016 was stolen from her, it's merely defending democracy.
Two years in advance of an election, the left is already floating wild conspiracy theories covering events and outcomes that have yet to occur.
Will the legacy media call Hillary Clinton out for repeated lies and election denial?
Don't hold your breath.
Carl.
Well first with propaganda Pierre.
Try to spin reducing the federal deficit to just a trillion dollars a year.
And not mentioning and not putting into context how tragic comic this is.
So the Fox reporter, good for her for saying something.
But we need to get a grasp on how big a trillion dollars is as a federal budget deficit.
The whole total federal debt didn't exceed a trillion until 1982.
Okay, so this tragic, comic, exponential debt growth.
Carl B. Herman blogspot any of these shows, the looting trillions.
It's fundamental fraud to create what we use for money as debt owed back to the oligarchs with interest.
It's going to create that exponential debt.
And then for Hillary Clinton, yeah, she's funny.
That's all that they ever do is they're going to blame the other side for what they've already done.
And corporate media has to be criminally complicit because you're not going to get any ethical reporter like an ethical scholar saying, whoa, whoa, whoa, Madam Secretary Clinton, and then force her to answer pointed questions to reveal all she's doing is talking about a narrative and or what their party has already done for a criminal election.
Broad and the big picture is that it's getting so ridiculous.
We need to have some kind of a breakthrough for patriots to see some possibility through the midterm election.
If we even get that far or else.
Patriots are going to have to come together and we're going to have to somehow up our game.
I don't know how, I don't know with what resources, but we're going to have to invent something if the Democrats just go ahead and steal another election in two weeks.
Indeed, Brian.
Well, you can't let the water get clear enough to be able to see through it, so you've got to go and muddy it up with accusations and counter accusations.
I mean, Look, Hillary Clinton's old enough to have been the one at Tammany Hall saying, I don't care how you vote, I care who counts the votes, and vote early and vote often, which is what we're doing with the mail-in ballots.
Accusing conservatives of what they're doing is old play for the left-wingers, and why do they always call us right-wing extremists?
And I never hear the words left-wing extremists We're the election deniers, but they're not.
Carrie Lake, Donald Trump.
Look, there's lots of good things that are starting to break through, but it's too little too late.
The system is down.
Prepare for the future.
By the way, I took a close look at that video of Hillary Clinton.
I didn't think it looked right at all.
It looked to me like a deep fake.
I remember her being in really bad health a long time ago.
And I think it might be something that maybe somebody can put down in the comments to prove that she is actually who she is, because I have some deep concerns that they're going to try to place Hillary Clinton because she's part of that, or at least her name, the Clinton machine, is part of the cabal.
They're going to try to place her in the place of Biden, put her back up against Trump in 2024 and rig it again.
Who else do they have?
John Fetterman?
What else do they have?
Who do they have?
Beto?
Somebody tell me which Democrat they're going to run, because something's terribly wrong with what's happening in the Democrat Party, and it's just all a big fraud and a lie.
I've already demonstrated, documented Hillary using six or eight different body doubles, even in the national debate with both Bernie Sanders and with Donald Trump.
It's astounding.
You can find it on Deception Galore.
Check it out.
Meanwhile, Nicholas Cruz, a Parkland school shooter, avoids a death penalty for killing 17.
Florida school shooter will be sentenced alive without parole for the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School.
The jury's recommendation came after seven hours of deliberation over two days.
In a three-month trial that includes graphic videos, photos, and testimonies from the massacre and its aftermath, including wrenching testimony from victims' families and a tour of the still-blood-splattered building.
Right.
Under Florida's law, death sentence requires an unanimous vote.
They couldn't get it.
Cruz's hair and kip largely sat hunched over, staring at the table as the recommendations were read.
Rumblings grew from the families, other relatives of the victims as life sentences were announced.
Many shook their head, looked angry, or covered their eyes.
The conditions came after Cruz pled guilty.
They never proved he did it, and they could not have, because it was a staged event.
He pled guilty to all murder charges, so they didn't have to prove it.
We are beyond disappointed with the outcome, said Lori Shadoff, parent of Alyssa Shadoff, one of those cruisers alleged to have killed.
We have a jury system for a reason, they let us down, Dr. Elin Androv, Alyssa's father, added.
Cruz, 24, now, gunned down 14 students and 3 staff on February 14, 2018, or so we have been told.
The fact is, it was a holiday, Valentine's Day, and they sent the 3,500 students home early at 1 o'clock.
They only left a few dozen behind to play the role of crisis student actors.
Melissa McNeil, Cruise's lead public defender, jurors not to recommend a death sentence, which would change absolutely nothing.
Nicklaus is a brain damaged, broken, mentally ill person through no fault of his own, describing Cruise's mother as having poisoned her son while he was still in the womb.
He was doomed from the womb.
And in a civilized, humane society, we kill brain-damaged, mentally ill, broken people, do we?
I hope not.
Michael Satz, the lead prosecutor at Notre Cruz, said he picked Valentine's Day because he wanted to ruin it for everyone.
This is just utter bullshit, based upon my research, where I brought together a group of experts again, and we established this was all fabricated and fake, and it was staged in order to promote the March for Our Lives, held just weeks later, when it requires a permit process that has to occur 180 days in advance.
In order to close streets in Washington, D.C.
In other words, they were already permitting for this event back in October.
We have verified that that is how it happened.
So in the amount of time you had between the Parkland shooting and the grand event with hundreds of t-shirts and other products in Washington, D.C., it wouldn't have been enough time to organize a bake sale at a local church.
You can tell by the evidence you've been hearing.
The plan was goal-directed, calculated purposeful.
It was a systematic massacre.
Completely bullshit.
He carried out his plan and he told everybody what it was.
They found his phone and cell phone with three cell phone videos.
One he made on February the 11th.
My name is Nick.
I'm going to be the next Google shooter.
My goal is to go at least 20 with an AR and a couple of tracer rounds.
Yeah, this is just embarrassingly bad.
Let me illustrate.
This is actually from a classroom at Marjory Stone Duggan High School.
Here you see a training dummy, a black trained dummy, with no head, no arms, on a pool of fake blood.
This is supposed to be one of the victims of Nicholas Cruz.
It's ridiculous.
Now listen to the children give their fake cries.
No sense.
One's worried about her bottled water.
Another's on her iPod.
You got a kid pulling his pots.
You got police rushing in and out.
Or should I say, there are actors in police uniforms because, believe it or not, Well, you might think the Parkland police got their Johnny on the spot.
Parkland gave up some police force around 2010.
They did not have any Parkland cops at the time this event took place.
They were actors dressed as policemen.
Check it out.
*crying* Oh wow, your hands are here?
Shh don't ape ou!
Get the water bottle quem you get my phone.
Get the bottle you shit!
Ahhh!
Okay let's go!
Come on, fall!
I don't think so.
Oh! Oh!
Oh!
Oh!
Let's go, let's go, let's go.
Come on, you're on the wall.
On the wall.
On the wall.
Up.
My god.
Oh my god.
Oh my god.
I mean, it's so bad.
I mean, it's so bad.
Carl, your thoughts?
So these school shootings are a narrative in order for gun confiscation.
These are opponents who are stealing elections and they want us disarmed.
This is the foundation of the American country.
It happened in 1775 and that war went hot with our own government attempting an illegal gun confiscation by illegal military forces at the time.
And that was from our own government as well.
So I also want to put into context that the same people who are pushing these narratives of school shootings, these are the same people who run a rogue state empire.
And part of my contribution as a scholar is to document how their choices annually kill millions, harm billions, and loot trillions So these are murderous criminals against humanities and war criminals attempting to sell you a story that anybody with any rational appreciation would take a look at the material of Professor Fetzer and other scholars to be able to look and say, yeah, those are legitimate questions.
And it certainly would appear that this is a staged event, given the documentation that anybody can go ahead and observe.
This is American Revolution 2.0, and while we do need a breakthrough, we can stand in the strongest place possible with what we do control, what we think, and what we say, and what we do, and please use it to demand arrests of these psychopaths, not any further obedience to their corruption.
Brian?
Well, look, we all know it's a false flag among This audience, there was one Monday.
Are you guys aware of that?
That there was a school shooting in St.
Louis on Monday.
The gunman had an AR-15 style weapon, a manifesto.
He was carrying over 600 rounds of ammunition on him.
And it was cycled out of the news within one and a half hours.
I wonder what went wrong.
Supposedly three dead and seven injured.
Shooter was killed in a shootout.
um drove out of state to purchase his weapon and wrote a manifesto saying he wanted to be the big national big next national shooter so the question is what's the goal and obviously they've got a team running around setting up these shootings in places with dilapidated neighborhoods similar to Uvalde and helping build new schools in exchange for allowing them to set up their machine
I don't know anymore if the goal is just simply to take the weapons out of our hands and make us powerless or to actually promote the murder.
Of citizens, because that is exactly what the purpose of taking the guns out of people's hands are, is to allow the criminals to go wild and take whatever they want, including your life.
And if you take a look at that combined with COVID vaccines and the other things that are out there that are working on killing us, it seems to me that the bigger, larger agenda here is simply depopulation.
And as we give up our guns, we become an easier target for depopulation.
As we take the vaxxes, we become an easier target for depopulation.
Funeral director's report released a couple days ago showed 95% of the corpses had received COVID vaccinations within two weeks of the death.
That was actually put out there by the Epoch Times.
So, I'm concerned.
You know, I don't believe that these shootings are real.
I haven't even taken the time to analyze To analyze St.
Louis.
I just heard about it today, frankly, because, again, it was cycled out of the news for some reason.
Somebody decided not to run with it.
And, you know, God help us.
God help us, there's so much bullshit out there.
We're drowning in the manure.
Unreal.
Unreal.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
Live-need-to-know-at-gmail.com.
The ongoing evidence suggests that vaxxers steal, spewing large amounts of the genetic-created spike protein that causes illness and severe respiratory issues in some, which gets them into ERs who immediately incubate them and kill them, or purposely misdiagnose a problem and let them go home and die from blood clots from the death jabs they stupidly got.
In the meantime, few are awake.
Few comprehend the huge, huge monstrosity that is the Jew death machine.
Will enough wake up?
I sincerely doubt it.
Given the amounts of gullible sap still zombie-walking into their own oblivion, I can safely say, for the record, that in a very short time, the Jews will have won by eradicating most of the moron goyim from the earth.
In a way, it's tragic, and yet, in another way, it's Darwinian and sadly inevitable that those who are not mentally fitted up to smell the Jew rat are dying by trusting the Jew rats who poison them, or trusting the disguised Shaboskoyim-Sayanim doctors in allowing themselves to be euthanized.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Carl, yours.
I appreciate our audience, as usual, for the integrity of what you think and what you say and what you do.
It may seem that we have little that we can move with this, but, you know, use what you can to affect what you got.
And I think what we said just before the section is that we need help from friends in high places and whatever you may believe in or exercise for a philosophical, spiritual, or religious background.
It's time to do that now!
As usual, I do want to point out with that commenter, I agree with the principle of what that person is talking about.
The people who are of the Jewish religion, who are the criminals, the religious claims that they make is as relevant to be Jewish as it is for Biden and Clinton and Obama.
Claiming to be Christian is just a camouflage to go ahead and hide what they do.
So, as we've talked about in this show, we have less than two weeks until the midterms, and I think that something big is going to happen between now and then, so just keep your head, keep with the facts, and I'm at 95% that what we're seeing will have a positive breakthrough, but in order to get to that positive breakthrough, the sheep will have to be demonstrated with the ridiculous
rigged casino, that is our economy.
So I would expect some sort of a major economic crash.
And also, so that people can fully feel the weight of the American military empire, that's going to have to be exposed.
So one way or another, we're going to have a very scary false flag nuclear related event.
Brian.
Well, there was an article in the sensor receptor news the other day, which I don't know how much I trust the source yet, but it has a lot of video of micro machinery that exists.
It claims to be inside the Pfizer COVID vaccine, and they claim to have videotaped coordinated micro scale construction of actual Biological material and micro machinery that happens directly in a study environment under 200 times scale optical imagery.
I saw the video.
I think it looks legitimate.
I'm pretty convinced that the vaccine is part of the death machinery that they're putting out there.
I don't know what other false flags they're going to throw at us.
I suspect it may be a Project Blue Beam.
Just watch Netflix to see what's coming and you'll see whatever they're putting out there is they're telegraphing something that's going to be taking place.
Man, you just got to prepare.
You got to keep your mind straight and your heart straight and keep reading, looking for other sources of truth because there's not a whole lot out there right now.
Things are very, very confusing and they're very, very difficult to follow.
So, keep your head up though.
At the end of the day, we're the ones that make the change.
So, don't be afraid to put a comment down there and help us go in the right direction if you see something incorrect about what we said.
Well, excellent comments from Carl and Brian again and again.
I so appreciate their contributions.
Their objective standards of reason and rationality, such as when my petition was submitted to the Supreme Court, It was objectively appropriate for the Supreme Court to evaluate it, to take it under consideration, because it raised issues that represent a conflict between the highest courts of two states.
It represent questions about summary judgment protocols, not only in Wisconsin, but in other states.
It required the court to take action, or at least invited the opportunity to affirm The applicability of the Seventh Amendment to all 50 states, which, oddly enough, it has never done.
So their failure to do so, indicated by the divergence between what should have happened and what did happen, there was a hidden hand.
There were suppressed variables.
There were other factors at work.
Similarly, as we approach the midterm, historically, the party in power has lost a lot of seats in the midterm.
This year, it's expected to be historic We're going to lose on an unprecedented scale.
Newt Gimbrich estimating as much as seven seats in the Senate, 50 seats in the House.
All the polls are going in that direction.
Look at any individual case, whether it's Carrie Lake in Arizona, whether it's Dr. Oz in Pennsylvania, Hershel Walker down in Georgia, Ron Johnson here in Wisconsin.
The Wisconsin—the Republicans have a better candidate.
They have more support.
And on every single issue, the Democrats are to be despised, whether it's migration, inflation, the economy, gas prices.
It's all horrific, absolutely horrific.
So indeed, objectively, we know there's going to be a massive victory for the Republicans unless it's stolen.
And you can measure the divergence between what should happen and what does happen as an indication of the degree of corruption, manipulation of the outcome that's entered the system.
I'm sorry to say that the observation we've heard today Both Carl and Brian, but also other reported sources, indicate the Democrats are going to try to abdicate 2020.
Bad news for America.
How long we're going to take it is yet to be determined.
Meanwhile, the threat of nuclear war remains so.
Spend all time you can with your friends and people you love and care about.
Take the weekend to show affection, because literally we do not know how much time we have left.