All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 20, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:22:55
Need to Know News (20 October 2022) with Carl Herman and Brian Davidson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Brian Davidson in Houston, Texas.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with Putin bringing in martial law in the annexed Ukrainian territories.
Actually, they were done by a referendum, all in accordance with international law.
There are fears, according to the Daily Mail, that it'll move to a full warfaring and detonate a nuke over the Black Sea.
I think that's highly unlikely.
Russia is not going to be using nukes unless it has no alternative.
They have massive advantages on the ground, conventional weapons, stuff that'll do the job without them.
Meanwhile, General Armagaddon evacuates 60,000 people before the Battle of Curzon.
He announced a decision shortly after Russia's new commander in Ukraine said the situation in Kherson is tense, that those living there need to be resettled to protect the lives of civilians and our service members.
This is because it appears Ukraine is massively bombarding the region, including a hydroelectric project there that if they destroy, it would flood the region.
I believe that's what's going on.
The administration evacuation got underway as a Russian official overseeing Kherson said up to 60,000 people would be moving.
Speculation was that he might be preparing for some kind of nuclear show of force, but I've already explained why I do not believe that's likely at all.
You have civilians boarding coaches and ferries out of Kherson.
There's more about it, the evacuation taking place.
Armed Forces Minister James Hippe did little to dampen fears we discussed with Mr. Wallace is having beyond belief.
That would be in the UK, presumably, or Brussels.
Under treaties governing the use of nukes, Russia is supposed to inform the U.S.
before carrying out nuclear drills.
To avoid the risk, a test is mistaken for an actual launch.
Here's Liz Truss defeating over defense cuts yesterday after senior ministers threatened to quit.
It would turn out that she made a surprising resignation from office yesterday about more coming.
Meanwhile, NATO is carrying out exercises involving its own nuclear forces with long-range bombers, fighters, and refueling planes in the skies above Belgium, the North Sea, and the UK.
Here's sorting through a residential building hit by a Russian kamikaze drone.
Apparently, Russia has obtained At least 2,400 from Iran.
Interestingly, Iran would have a more sophisticated weapon than Russia in any category, but it appears in this one specifically that they do, and I'm glad to see it.
Experts have speculated he might carry out the first open-air test of a nuke since the 1960s.
I think that's highly, highly unlikely.
Meanwhile, Carl, your thoughts?
Well, that's an interesting story.
This is from the Daily Mail.
That's in the UK.
UK is part of NATO, and that's part of the bad guys.
So they're going to always spin things in such a way that's going to demonize Russia.
So the Ukrainians and NATO are facing a big loss in Ukraine.
And the threat to that is that any revelation of truth could expose what we saw for quid pro Joe with his billion dollars of aid and Burisma and Hunter.
It could expose bio labs, it could expose human trafficking.
Our opponents, the leaders of NATO, the ones pretending to wear the white hats who are actually the black hats, are going to be desperate and I would predict that there is going to be some sort of a false flag nuclear attack to blame Russia.
Our opponents cannot back down.
If they lose in one area and one huge area of truth is exposed, then it's game over for all of them because they're In this Orwellian reality where it is the U.S.
and the U.K.
and NATO who are the gangster imperial nation and if they're caught then it's all done.
Brian, actually it's amazing Carl.
We had almost exactly the same thoughts about this article and we didn't collaborate at all to discuss it.
Look, I I totally, completely agree with Carl that what they're doing here is trying to set up Huton for, oh look at the mad, maniacal Russian dictator has set off a nuclear weapon and now we were right and he was wrong and we should all join together as a world and go and destroy Russia and take over, at least replace Putin, which is part of their problem.
I think that's exactly what the story is about.
And I was gonna bring up the exact same thing about the fact that it came from Daily Mail.
I went and actually perused a lot of the comments and I found obviously that they were originating from the UK and every comment that originated from the UK almost seemed like a bot in its representation It's unbalanced representation of support for Ukraine and hostility toward Russia.
And those that were from Russia were commenting actually had a modicum of balance.
I completely agree.
I think Russia has all it takes to do what it needs to do in Ukraine to protect its interests, and it has plenty of military to pull it off.
But so why are Western powers out there indicating that there's going to be a nuclear attack unless it's to telegraph this is how we're going to finally put Russia down?
So I think it all makes sense.
Or they're going to perpetrate a false flag themselves.
In fact, we have reports that there's evidence of the use of tactical nukes in Ukraine already by the Ukrainians, undoubtedly supplied by the U.S., if that sounds startling to anyone.
I'd observed that I interviewed Christopher Busby, who's an internationally renowned expert on cancer, health, and war, who traveled to Fallujah to sort out what had been the cause of an outbreak of genetic abnormalities, no brain, two heads,
Intestines outside of the body, missing arms and legs, which you expected would be the result of the use of depleted uranium in anti-tank missiles, because depleted uranium is the densest material known to man and is very effective for that role, but was surprised to discover it was from enriched uranium caused by a new class of tactical nukes that the United States was already using in Iraq.
So that's back in 2003, think about it.
This is very bad and reflects terribly on the United States.
Meanwhile, a third of Ukraine's power stations have been destroyed as the World Health Organization warns of a brutal winter ahead.
Between the missile and drone strikes, there have been massive blockouts all over the country.
Zelensky said that the Russian forces acted insidiously, killing civilians, hitting houses and infrastructure.
That's actually the practice of the Ukrainians.
Due to the Russian missile terror, energy workers have to limit the supply of electricity so the entire system works stably.
It ain't gonna work stably.
Ukraine's second largest city of Kharkov, near the Russian border, was also hit in a major attack on its energy infrastructure.
This threatened the power grid in a city with a pre-war bomb of one and a half million.
Two Russian regions of Belgorod and Kursk, meanwhile, said their population had been terrorized by shelling attacks from the Ukrainian side of the border.
Here's NetBlock tweeting, confirmed.
Metrics show Internet disruption in multiple regions of Ukraine amid reports of Russian missile attacks targeting energy and infrastructure.
Live network data indicates also high impact in several different cities.
These new waves of Russian attack on Ukraine's energy come amid a WHO warning for Ukraine and perhaps all of Europe.
WHO regional director said that the organization anticipates and prepares for the challenges of a brutal winner.
He remarked that the risk of COVID, frostbite, hypothermia, pneumonia, stroke, and heart attack will likely increase among Ukrainians who are living precariously, whether in substandard shelters without access to heating or by regularly moving to different locations.
Here's Matthew Luxmore tweeting, Another day in Ukraine and another barrage of Russian missiles targeting energy infrastructure across the country, with Sotomayr out of water, electricity and Dnipro power station reportedly hit.
Anti-defense systems have shot at least one of the missiles down.
The destruction of houses and lack of access to fuel or electricity due to damaged infrastructure could become a matter of life or death if people are unable to heat their homes.
Yes, indeed.
No doubt about it.
Despite billions in humanitarian inflowing into Kiev from Western governments, the degradation of the infrastructure could take years to fix, especially amid threatening wartime conditions and the logistic challenges of getting parts to make Fair Access.
Carl.
Well first, a little context in Carl B. Herman Blockspot, any of these shows, I wrote a white paper that Congressman Kucinich leveraged for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney that documents 40 pages, about 200 plus footnotes of the war crimes committed by the U.S.
in that illegal war of aggression, formerly known as on terror.
What we use history for is we establish a background and therefore the voices in the present that are the same lying war criminals of the past should be discounted from any connection to reality other than propaganda.
So Zelensky is the current puppet, 14 and 16, color revolution put in a NATO puppet, NATO promise not one inch to the east further, and they reneged on that entirely.
So this is Empire, and Empire is the name of the game as usual.
Over 240 armed attacks have occurred since World War II by nations.
The U.S.
has started over 200 of them, so this is just the gangster empire as usual.
I have heard chatter coming out of Ukraine that the Zelensky government is saying that they are concerned about Concerned about vigilante justice against pro-Russian forces in Kiev.
So that means is that they're looking for assassination squads to, uh, to get rid of anybody who is pro-Russian.
And, um, the real risk that I see is that because Zelensky is just a puppet for NATO and they are, our opponents cannot lose.
So they will go scorched earth.
They will empty Ukraine.
They will fight to the last Ukrainian, and they will leave a desert before they risk defeat.
And we have reports of them taking elderly kids, putting them on the front line, shooting them if they seek the desert.
Brian?
Well, I haven't read Israel style propaganda like that in quite a while.
War is hell, gentlemen.
It's been around for a long, long time, especially in that particular region.
Wah, wah.
Some power stations are down and they're not going to have enough electricity.
That's the nature of the beast.
Unfortunately, the people of Ukraine are simply puppets in all of this.
And I do feel bad for them.
They are people.
They don't deserve to freeze and caught in the middle of The simple fact that they couldn't control their government and they allowed it to get out of control.
This is what American citizens will probably be going through in the next five to ten years.
The same sort of trials and tribulations.
At least those people have thick enough skins to be able to get through it alive, for the most part.
I doubt we do.
Yes, yes.
I think you're right, Brian.
It's very sobering.
Meanwhile, early 2022 voting outpaces normal midterm election numbers comparable to 2018.
I frankly believe everyone is fed up with Biden and the damage that Democrats are doing.
But early voting also provides opportunities to steal elections by flooding them with illegal ballots.
About 2.7 million have already voted in more than a dozen states that allow early voting, on a par with a record during the 2018 midterm elections.
2,353,531 voted via mail-in ballots.
midterm elections, 2,353,531 voted via mail-in ballots, 337,852 cast them in person.
It's clear that we're above the 2018 midterm at the same point in time where states where we have comparable data, said Michael McDonald at the University of Florida.
We can see the sorts of indicators suggesting we're in for a high turnout election, much like we had in 2018.
And 2018 was the highest midterm turnout rate since 1914.
Florida is leading the way so far, the data shows, quite remarkable, considering early voting is going on in other states and, of course, having been hit by the hurricane, I thought it was going to be a major problem.
The Santa's signed an executive order that allows hurricane-ian hit areas more flexibility to request and cast ballots, adding three days to early voting, rescinding certain voting requirements in several western coastal counties.
He encouraged people to vote by mail.
Between 2006 and 2018, in-person voting on Election Day decreased by about 20 percent, from 80 percent to 60, voters increasingly favoring early mail-in voting and early in-person voting.
McDonald's said recent trends might be a sign of things to come.
What we're observing is some have changed their behavior.
They're either voting early or they're voting sooner.
Those are both things we saw in 2020.
People not only voting by mail in person at greater frequency than they had in the past, but also voting earlier in prior presidential.
Republicans have argued, with considerable justification, that vote-by-mail leads to increased chances of fraud, while former President Carter, former White House official James Baker, warned in 2005 that absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud, which the Democrats know full well.
State and local jurisdictions should prohibit a person from handling absentee ballots other than the voter and acknowledge family member of the U.S.
Postal Service or other legitimate shipper or election officials.
The Carter-Baker Commission report said the practice in some states of allowing candidates or party workers to pick up and deliver should be eliminated.
No doubt about it.
The Nish Nisusa with his 2,000 mules drove the point home how they can stop ballot boxes when they have these drop-in facilities at 2 a.m.
and steal elections.
Carl?
And we also have the documentary Selection.
So with the 2020 being stolen and Trump won somewhere between a 3 to 1 to 4 to 1 margin, so that means is that the Blackhats are able to take And triple to quadruple the number of votes that Biden received.
So without that history being accountable, then we're subject to the same distortions in the midterm elections, which I like what Brian stated, is that the future of this country is that it will devolve into some sort of a civil war or a takeover by another nation, unless we do have friends in high places.
People have to see the level of the corruption, and because the level of the corruption is literally with every captured agency, our corporate media, and our education system, the challenge is daunting.
Carter and Baker, that's just the typical virtue signaling of pretending to care, pretending that they have it in charge.
And the Epoch Times is interesting, is that they'll go ahead and put some light on good stories, and then they're going to pretend, though, that these commissions are other than virtue signaling, CYA, damage control, while they steal the elections in the background.
Brian?
It's funny you mentioned the Epoch Times there.
I find the story to smell funny.
It's only October 20th.
The election's not until the 8th of November, yet we've got fully 2.7 million early votes in.
So that's, let's see, there's 300 million people in the United States.
Okay, so that's 1% of the people have already voted early.
Maybe, maybe not.
I don't know.
It seems like an unusually high number and it wouldn't surprise me if a lot of those early votes were just different branches of their organization that manage how they handle the elections.
You know, what we're going to see out of this, and this is something that is going to be relatively predictable about this, is that there's going to be a lot of A lot of concerns about cheating that arise from this particular set of midterms.
And what it's going to do is it's going to put the Democrats and the federal bureaucracy in Washington in a position where they can demand that the feds oversee the integrity of the elections instead of the states or the counties or the local areas.
And so Biden actually signed an executive order.
It's the Executive Order 14019 that That basically makes federal agencies write up a plan for how they're going to ensure and police the integrity of elections.
So just as I predicted, I think they're going to cheat as much as they possibly can.
There's no perp walks anyway, so why not?
Nobody's ever been punished for cheating seriously in one of these elections, and I don't see it happening again.
Let's just see if it works.
I don't know.
And of course, federalizing the election is a blatant violation of the Constitution.
I don't see... It would be so obvious that a federalized electoral system would favor the incumbent who controls the federal government.
That would be truly outrageous, would I?
But nothing by the Democrats.
That's certainly something they'd like to pull off, if only they could.
Meanwhile, a new national poll shows exactly why the Democrats consider DeSantis a threat to their power.
A new national poll reflects he's against Charlie Crist in the upcoming midterm election for governor.
Crist being a former Republican governor who switched parties to Ron during the last election as Santis defeated Democrat Andrew Gillum by a narrow four-tenths of one percent, but that was before he became a rock star in the GOP.
Catapulted to the forefront of the national scene during the pandemic with his bold stance against Biden and Tony the Rat in COVID tyranny.
Despite a constant barrage of attacks from Democrats and fake news, he stood his ground and refused to enforce lockdowns, banned masks, and vaccine mandates.
A new Harvard-Harris poll shows why the Democrats worry about DeSantis has turned into pure terror.
It asked how they felt about prominent politicians with very favorable, favorable, unfavorable, extremely unfavorable, never heard of them or no opinion.
The results show DeSantis holds the highest net popularity of any major American politician.
The top in order were DeSantis at plus six, former Vice President Pence plus four, South Carolina Republican Senator Tim Scott at plus three, and former President Trump at an even zero.
After nearly two years of nonstop smears, DeSantis has emerged as the most popular elected official in the entire country.
Regardless of political affiliation.
Meanwhile, Jen Psaki is shocked that her poll results undermine the Dems' narrative about election deniers.
Holy moly.
She tweeted, referring to the latest New York Times-Seneca College poll.
Here's her tweet.
Holy moly, a CNN New York Time poll, more than a third of independent voters, smaller but noteworthy contingent of Democrats, say they were open to supporting candidates who reject the legitimacy of the 2020 election as they focus on economic issues.
Indeed, the poll discovered nearly 40% of registered voters are open to candidates who challenge the legitimacy of 2020.
On demographic lines, 71% of Republicans, 37% of Independents, and 12% of Democrats were open.
Meanwhile, 71% of registered voters believe American democracy is under a threat, as opposed to only 21% who do not.
The results suggest American voters are susceptible to Democrat rhetoric, Claiming Republicans are threatening American democracy, but they also prove that when the rubber meets the road.
Voters are apathetic to that alleged threat or do not believe that questioning election outcomes endangers democracy.
It also shows voters care most about other issues, the economy, inflation, and crime.
I don't believe that their opinion on whether or not the election was quote-unquote stolen is important.
I'm far more concerned about their stance on policies that actually matter, one independent voter replied.
Perhaps the greatest irony of the poll is that respondents who said they believe democracy is under threat were more likely to attribute that threat to Democrats than to Republicans.
The poll undermines a tri-Democrat narrative that mega-Republicans pose an existential threat to democracy because they do not accept the results of elections.
Clearly, a significant portion of the electorate disagrees.
And mind the way, just to pick up on a couple of specific cases, Fetterman, who's running against Dr. Oz in Pennsylvania, and whose prospects appear to be increasingly bleak, he suffered from a stroke, he was always a peculiar candidate anyway, looked like a homeless guy, he needs to have a massive teleprompter or cue cards to address any issue, otherwise he fumbles around.
Even he admits Defunding the police was absurd.
John Fetterman, Democrat running for Senate from Pennsylvania, said, talk about defunding the police was always absurd.
It was always absurd to defund the police, he said, from my own experience.
I'd say any time you have fewer police, you're going to have more crime.
I just feel that police are always going to be a critical part of the conversation and are critical to being successful.
They are the most important tool to make the streets safer.
I think that's the core of it, having them not be treated in a way that's antagonistic.
The most effective recipe is a police department understand what they have to do, what they need to do, make things safer, not at the expense of the community feeling they're over police.
I think it's critical in any conversation to really begin to beat back the crime.
Meanwhile, the Arizona Democrat candidate Katie Hobbs, who was interviewed on CNN, fumbled so badly, he wouldn't even post the interview.
They wouldn't even post the interview.
And catch this.
We've seen the evolving of this whole performative kind of politics from Sarah Palin to what we have now, Carrie Lake.
Carrie Lake does seem like she has the Trumpian ability to just deny reality and be forceful about it.
This sort of performative representation rather than actual representation.
I suspect that's what Arizonans like with Carrie Lake.
It's ironic that they accuse Arizona's Carrie Lake of performative politics when that's all the Democrats have.
Like, Americans and Arizonans, they're tied to the left's empty promises, all these elitist policies, the woke identity politics.
And so is Tulsi Gabbard, by the way.
Last week, she announced she's leaving the Democrat Party, and tonight she is endorsing Arizona's Republican gubernatorial candidate Carrie Lake, the former Democratic Congresswoman and 2020 presidential contender and newly declared independent Tulsi Gabbard joins us now live from an event for Carrie Lake.
Tulsi, tell me about tonight and what drove you to endorse Carrie Lake tonight?
Well, I'm here in Phoenix joining hundreds of people who've come out in support of Carrie Lake tonight.
Supposedly, there was supposed to be a debate, but her opponent, Katie Hobbs, is refusing to debate her and stand toe-to-toe to compare their policies.
And I think this is really indicative of the national problem that we're seeing with the current Democratic Party is, rather than actually have a debate in the marketplace of ideas with the American people, where people can actually make an informed decision, they either refuse to be a part of the conversation, or they throw out lies and smears and attacks seeking to undermine the credibility of anyone who dares to challenge their narrative.
This is the sort of thing that led me to leave the Democrat Party, because, in my experience, and also the policies and actions we're seeing coming out of this administration and this so-called woke, fanatical ideologues who are controlling the party, is they're against free speech.
They're against democracy.
They're against freedom of religion.
They're against the very principles of this country, our God-given rights enshrined in our Constitution, and, meanwhile, they are pushing us Further and further towards the brink of nuclear war that threatens the very existence of the American people and the world.
There are so many things that we don't have time to get into in detail here, but ultimately it comes down to people in power who don't believe in and who are actively undermining the foundational principles of this country, and that is not something that I can be aligned with.
Well, Katie Hobbs was on CNN, and this was a very telling moment from her.
Watch.
Carrie Lake has made it clear time and time again that she's not interested in having substantive, in-depth conversations about the issues that matter to Arizonans.
She only wants a scenario where she can control the dialogue.
There is a lot more ability to have a conversation with you without her interruptions and shouting.
She's only interested in creating a spectacle.
Tulsi, that's their lingo, creating a spectacle, which in this case just means being a better politician.
Yeah, again, it's about what you're communicating to the people.
And what I've heard from Carrie Lake is the same thing that I shared with my constituents when I ran for Congress.
She is going through the most rigorous job interview process ever, letting the people of Arizona know, hey, I am here applying for a job from you.
You are my boss.
Not some corporate special interest, not some big partisan party boss.
She's made it clear that her accountability is to the people of Arizona.
And she's laid out a very broad and thoroughly thought-out platform and what she plans to do as governor, should they elect her.
Let me just say this Carrie Lake is a pistol.
She had a press conference where she laid out 150 examples of Democrats denying the legitimacy of elections.
She's terrific.
She's on a fast trajectory.
I still regard Tulsi as a dark horse to run with Trump in 2024, though my prediction would be it will be DeSantis.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, these are great stories.
Thank you, Jim, for putting them all together.
For the first story, for DeSantis, you know, anybody who speaks a little bit of the truth is going to be uplifted by the American public.
A leader means, one definition is, you simply go first.
And to stand up against COVID, you would need to stand up against, I think, the first remark that anybody would make from an objective place of the most important data is that any experimental medical product is illegal.
That's Federal Title 21.
That's the Nuremberg Code.
Carl B. Hermann blockspot any of these shows.
The essay, My Best Shot, and I have other essays that document the criminal fraud.
Now, these leaders aren't going so far as to say the magic words that these are crimes requiring arrests and the lethality of this As well, is something that spars the call for arrest.
Second story, so lying sack of spin pissacky.
Again, you're going to get these people who put on an air of being an expert, a government insider, as if the government is the honest one and not the perpetrator of these crimes.
And the good news from that is that the spin To attempt to have the American public blame MAGA Republicans from that polling data.
It indicates that Americans are more concerned about the unhinged Democrats.
For Fetterman saying defunding the police was a bad idea.
That's good.
That's good.
They're going to have to back that up all the way.
But what we really have is in 2020, that was the real insurrection.
Where in these Democrat run cities, you had Antifa literally create an insurrection in areas where they created their own type of government, engaged in murder and arson.
And the Democrats allowed just a simple catch and release program.
To allow them to go back and terrorize the streets and justify the election fraud of basement Biden not having to go out and campaign and scaring people away from any type of public participation because they might meet Antifa.
And for Katie Hobbs, a candidate for governor refusing to debate.
This is, I think we have a candidate who is actually worse than the actor playing Biden and cackling Kamala.
She couldn't even read very well.
I mean, she reads better than Fetterman, but not by much.
She's just reading a little script, and there's going to be no enthusiasm for that, or similar to Biden.
And for Tulsi, I mean, good for her that she's doing something.
Again, it's a little bit too little unless you go all the way to say that these are crimes.
Again, I think that the new frame that I like to put on this is what Brian said earlier, is that what is going on in Ukraine today is going to come home to roost in the United States unless we get justice by then.
And we'll deserve it.
Well, regarding four key Senate races, I do think Oz is going to defeat Vetterman.
I mean, he's just a sinking ship.
Kerry Lake is going to wipe out Katie Hobbs.
We got Ron Johnson, Wisconsin, going to take down Mandela Barnes.
He's got a six or eight point lead already.
And Herschel Walper, I believe, is going to pull it out in Georgia over this guy, Warnock, who is just as shabby as they come.
Brian, your thoughts.
Alex, I like your selection of stories right there.
It does give us the best comparison and contrast in terms of what do some of the younger, fresher, conservative faces look like and what do they say or what do they at least parrot versus what's being said by the puppets on the left-hand side.
Look, these people are put into a position simply because they can be controlled.
Definitely, that's true on the left.
On the right, remember what happened to Marjorie Taylor Greene?
I mean, she was the first outspoken conservative Politician that managed to get into a position like that and boy didn't take them didn't take the DC bureaucracy long to shut her down.
I imagine that the same thing's going to happen with anybody that gets any of these fresh young newer faces coming down on the right.
We'll see how it all goes.
What it shows to me is that there is a Massive contrast between what's happening and what we have to select from in terms of conservative mindsets in America versus what's happening and what we have to select from from the liberal minds in America.
The woke left just can't produce a working mind.
They have to depend upon propaganda and the media to support them and prop them up versus on the right hand side, at least We can think in a straight line and think like a middle-class American family ought to think.
So I'm excited about what we see, but whether or not that's going to end up changing anything and these people are going to be any more than puppets, I think remains to be seen.
Carl?
You know one of the things that the left has attempted to do is to paint always the hope that the progressives will somehow make inroads against the more centrist liberals or so that's what they've attempted to do and you have the squad of AOC and Bernie Sanders but I think that's played out and I think that the desperation and the acknowledgement on the left that they're just being played and they're not going to get any progressive
policies whatsoever and that they are being lied to.
And then you're absolutely right.
The rhetoric from the left, there is no leadership is just stultifying bullshit.
Yeah, and as a AOC being attacked by her own constituents was very striking.
We'll be back in a moment, but this is a very surprising development in the UK, where the new PM is stepping down.
Shocking.
She's coming out.
outlets listening.
I came into office at a time of great economic and international instability.
tea.
Families and businesses were worried about how to pay their bills.
Putin's illegal war in Ukraine threatens the security of our whole continent.
And our country has been held back for too long by low economic growth.
I was elected by the Conservative Party with a mandate to change this.
We delivered on energy bills and on cutting national insurance.
And we set out a vision for a low-tax, high-growth economy that would take advantage of the freedoms of Brexit.
I recognise though, given the situation, I cannot deliver the mandate on which I was elected by the Conservative Party.
I have therefore spoken to His Majesty the King to notify him that I am resigning as Leader of the Conservative Party.
This morning I met the Chairman of the 1922 Committee, Sir Graham Brady.
We've agreed that there will be a leadership election to be completed within the next week.
This will ensure that we remain on a path to deliver our fiscal plans and maintain our country's economic stability and national security.
I will remain as Prime Minister until a successor has been chosen.
Thank you.
I've been told that the Rothschilds weren't happy because she proposed a tax cut for the middle class, and that was too much.
Now, the king is a principal advocate of the Great Reset and the New World Order, which is disgusting all by itself.
I've always regarded Charles as a mediocrity and a wimp.
He appears to have made the decision for Princess Diana to be taken out.
It's quite grotesque that he's even in that position.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, it is grotesque.
And the more that people know, the more that they can see is that this is just the seed of evil.
So this was weird to me.
So for her to say that she's quitting because she can't deliver, you know, that's a disconnect.
She didn't explain that.
There's no connection for that.
So something else is going on in the background where She expressed even a little bit of duping delight there to smile and smirk.
So, you know, as a professional scholar with 45 years engagement of our most important issues, the idea of low economic growth, well, okay, it's because you have this parasitical central bank and the looting trillions in any of these documents.
If you go back for the most discussed aspect in American Congress has been who gets to create what we use for money is right there second historically after the issue of slavery.
So, we copy the Federal Reserve System from the Bank of England system, which is a private corporation hijacking the legal right to create what is created for money as a debt owed back to the oligarchs, and that creates an escalating curve of exponential debt.
So, until people can get their hands wrapped around this idea that we create what is used for money as a negative number, added forever, There's no way out of that trap without implicating these parasites at the top.
And then she spins this thing of Putin's illegal war on Ukraine.
Yeah, and that's going to be the opposite of reality, too.
So, man, it's like everybody in the UK and the US and really around the world have the opportunity to grasp these facts.
And the contest will be if enough people can stand and have the integrity for the truth to break through, we have a chance.
Otherwise, we're just going to slather, be slathered in another layer of bullshit.
Nice points, Carl.
Brian.
I don't know what's going on over in England and I don't, I frankly don't give any weight to anything that happens over there whatsoever because I can't trust anybody or anything that comes out of there.
I haven't seen a Donald Trump type character in Europe in a long, long time.
Somebody at least who was honest.
So I don't know what we're getting in terms of this resignation.
I don't know what's happening and there's just not a lot I can say about that when I just simply can't figure out if it's good or bad.
I don't know.
Fair enough, Ryan.
Fair enough.
Meanwhile, Putin rejects mandatory COVID jabs as Russia sees record deaths.
Vladimir Putin said he was opposed to mandatory vax from Russians, urged the jab-skeptical population to get inoculated nevertheless.
These are, by the way, with Russian-made or Russian variants of the vax, so far as I can tell.
Russia has reported 669 coronavirus deaths over the past 24 hours.
In mid-June, Russia saw a spike in a third wave allegedly driven by the highly transmissible Delta variant.
Although free jabs have been available since December, only around 15% of the population has received at least one dose, which I like.
That's commendable.
The slow uptake prompted the mayor of Moscow to order mandatory jobs for service sector employees, and more than a dozen regions in Russia have followed suit.
The widening policy prompted concerns that Russians eventually would be required to be vaccinated, which Putin shot down while fielding questions in his annual phone-in session.
I do not support mandatory vaccination.
Still, Putin called on Russians to get vaxxed.
It is necessary to listen, not that we will understand little about this since Brad rumored, but to special us.
Ask Wendy if he supported a new lockdown.
He said regional authorities were instead promoting localized vacs and other measures to avoid introducing quarantines.
In Moscow, the epicenter of the outbreak, the mayor, ordered businesses to send home at least 30% of unvaccinated employees in restaurants and only allow patrons inside who've been vaxxed or infected in the past six months.
The second-worst hotspot, St.
Petersburg, has avoided imposing strict restrictions.
In Friday, it's due to host a Euro 2020 quarterfinal, drawing hundreds of supporters from abroad.
Dozens of Finland supporters were in the city after they traveled there.
Nationwide infections grew by 21,042, bringing the Russian case load to more than 5.5 million, the fifth highest in the world.
If a person is sick without a vaccine, then the consequences can be very serious, he said, which bothers me tremendously because he's got it wrong.
Surveys show Russians are particularly skeptical of the country's home-grown jabs, Sputnik V, 5-Vac Corona, Covivac, and the one-dose Sputnik Light.
Putin said the four home-grown vacs were better than foreign alternatives, naming AstraZeneca and Pfizer, and he himself had been vaccinated with Sputnik V.
His plea to get vaccinated came after the Kremlin conceded its target of vaccinating 60% by autumn will not make it.
Critics say the third wave has been spurred by a failure to lockdown, a measure taken in the first wave last spring but avoided this time by Russian authorities to support a struggling economy in what was clearly a wise decision.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, it's interesting mixed messages again.
So, again, you know, Jim, you're right to criticize Putin because he's not calling out the obvious areas of fraud and the so-called COVID test.
Again, Carl B. Hermann Bloch spotted any of these shows, the document Why Best Shot.
CDC, WHO, and over 100 different international health agencies all admit that the test is designed with generic flu stock, because all these agencies also admit they have never isolated anything from COVID-19.
The flu disappeared by 99-plus percent as they're counting COVID.
So, for any type of reporter to not mention these facts, any type of a leader, including DeSantis, not to mention that this is a flu test that is a PCR test that is oversampled to create false positives that the founder of the test said can't be used for the purpose of this diagnosis, and then not to say, oh, it's just coincidence that the flu disappeared 99%.
So, this is a PSYOP and In this fog of war, it is hard to know what's going on, but we did see the propaganda in that article, especially saying, kind of a hint, saying that, you know, Russia should have locked down.
Yeah, sure they should have.
So we'll see what develops as stories unfold further on this.
Brian?
Well, that particular article has a date on it that goes back to 2021, so we were a little bit less clear about how bad of a PSYOP COVID really was.
I don't even like to think about the idea of COVID as a virus.
Like, we've had viruses in the past.
I think of it more as a depopulation platform that's being used to help the globalists achieve their goals.
Now, whether or not Putin is a globalist, whether or not he supports depopulation, I don't know.
I simply don't understand if Russia is truly acting independently in the best interest of its citizens, or if all these world leaders who support the jab are part of the same structure that's Planning a long-term massive killing off of the older people that are costing each of these economic systems so much money in terms of medical expenses and others.
As for the issue of COVID, well now here in America they're talking about making it mandatory to get kids into school to have the COVID jab.
Ah, there's no science, real science, capital S, to support this Whatsoever.
It's all, to me, part of a game designed to all the weak in society.
Oh, you're absolutely right.
The idea of making it mandated or even getting on the schedule for kids they have to have, it's just outrageous.
It turns out for the pharmaceutical companies, if the COVID shot were to be mandated for children, they have no liability, no matter who, how many die or are disabled as a consequence.
So it's very high priority on their agenda.
Meanwhile, the EU made shady deals with, it says here the EU, but it was actually the UN to hide information.
A high-up official of the UN has admitted the group worked directly with Google to make sure resources related to climate change the UN wanted to push would appear at the top of search engines.
Melissa Fleming, Secretary for Global Communication at the UN, sought to justify this by saying Google and other platforms routinely do it as a way to ensure the correct science was what was being promoted.
Fleming told the World Economic Forum that the UN was ultimately shocked at how much incredibly distorted posts there were about climate change, meaning actual information that there was no correlation between CO2 and the temperature of the Earth, for example.
This was before the UN struck the deal with Google to alter search results more to their liking.
As Fleming explained, we own the science, and we think that the world should know it, and the platforms themselves also do.
Back in April, the UN announced it was partnering with Google to push authoritative information, meaning their preferred propaganda.
To all internet users who entered a search for climate change.
All this was being done to fight misinformation according to the UN and Google.
In addition to producing its standard search engine results, Google would feature various information panels about the effects and causes of climate change Provide people with specific action they can take to tackle the climate crisis, no doubt by buying EVs, electric vehicles, for example.
While Google and the UN might be taking the situation lightly, there are other organizations and individuals who are not.
The Internet Accountability Project is among them.
The group's founder and president recently spoke with a daily caller and said, this is a latest example of big tech colluding with their liberal allies in government to stifle dissent and promote their radical social agenda.
Google has a monopoly on search, so this will have a real impact as consumers don't have viable alternatives.
This isn't the first direct action Google has taken to push specific scientific claims about climate change back in October of 2021.
Both Google and social media video platform YouTube instituted a new policy removing all ads on content that denied what they take to be the scientific consensus, or shall we say, the view they want to promote about climate change.
The company said at the time it was necessary because their advertisers didn't want the projects they were pushing associated with content that promoted what they called climate denial.
This is dangerous stuff.
As Mark Murano has observed, a senior staff writer for a senator who worked on the Environment and Public Works Committee, who's a publisher of Climate Depot, as he explained, the public health bureaucracy and the climate community have become political lobbying organizations, and they are using the science to support their preferred policies.
Adding, These shady deals between tech monopolies like Google and corrupt government organizations like the United Nations to stomp out dissenting opinions make the need for Congress to pass antitrust reform all the more necessary.
The sooner, the better.
Carl, your thoughts?
It's important for people to understand and to reframe the UN as a central criminal organization.
It's not there for any other reason.
It was created by the victors of World War II to extend the empire, the hidden empire, best communicated, in my opinion, by John Perkins and his economic Hitmen books.
So this woman, Fleming, the Secretary of Global Communications, saying that she needs the correct science and we own the science.
Yeah, bitch.
In 1990, I participated in a UN summit for heads of state where the world leaders agreed to fully fund the end of poverty.
Poverty has killed, since 1990 and on through today, approximately a million children every month.
These leaders that she's supposed to communicate the most important issues all promised the tactical solutions that would be an investment of less than 1% of the developed nation's incomes, but that hones in on the grab of the winners of World War II having their corporations around the world Yep.
raping resources and using human resources to maximize the profit from their natural resources.
So the UN is good with condoning these Orwellian illegal wars and the ongoing slaughter of children who are basically pawns on this table in the empire.
Yep.
Good stuff, Brian.
When I was a kid, climate science was clean up after yourselves and don't pollute the environment, which I think everybody could agree with back then.
After that, somewhere along the line, somebody changed the narrative to climate science.
Global warming, you know, look, we could have discussions about it all day long.
I'm not convinced that we were dealing with significant global changes as a result of mankind's activities.
I think anybody who does some mathematics can figure out that a simple volcano can put out more troublesome pollutant molecules into the environment than All the cars in Los Angeles and the world combined.
Now I've been to China.
The place is dirty as hell.
The air is dirty as hell.
It's disgusting and gross and I absolutely believe in keeping a clean environment and having controls in place but I don't necessarily believe that's going to result in the melting of the ice caps and global warming and Catastrophes and more hurricanes.
So I think the whole thing is bunk, but it's promoted by Google.
Therefore, it must be true.
You know, to me, Google feels like I'm being buried alive.
Like I'm sitting in a grave and Google's just sort of dropping dirt on my body while it's still living and breathing.
Guys, we have to have a mind that transcends and goes beyond the grave of Google.
We have to be able to get out of that mentally and start thinking for ourselves.
And I think America's lost so much of its critical thinking skills to television-style brainwashing that we just simply don't have the heart or the soul to do it anymore.
Think of what we used to read Back in the day.
Think of the language and the sentence structure.
Think of the deep thought.
Nietzsche and others.
The only representative we have of that style of mental level these days is Jordan Peterson.
He's the only one that's left and even he isn't exactly on those guys' level.
Google needs to go away.
We need to find something else and work with something else.
I don't trust it.
I think it's a propaganda machine and I think it's just simply there to bury your mind in garbage.
I suspect Google is an asset of the CIA.
They can't afford to allow Google to let all points of view be heard.
There was a golden era from around 1990 to 2005 when you really could find every point of view on any subject and it was fantastic.
And it led to all kinds of discoveries, sharpening your mind, realizing what's really going on.
They had to suppress it.
It was too much freedom of thought.
It was promoting too many actions by The big change was 9-11.
that they were being played by their government and the powers that be.
They couldn't tolerate, they had to bring about a change.
I'm rather convinced.
The big change was 9/11.
We all saw it on television and it was shortly thereafter that many of us began to say, wait a second, this doesn't make any sense.
And we'd hit the internet to try to figure it out.
We'd find people that said, hey, this doesn't make any sense.
That was the first explosion of a massive opening of the mine.
Only a few mines were broken loose as a result of that.
But that was a very special event, September 11, 2001, in terms of what happened thereafter with the internet and why they had to shut it down.
I think that's very astute of you, my friend.
Very astute.
Meanwhile, John Roberts as Chief Justice with Clara Thomas runs the show.
Very interesting.
Conservative Clarence Thomas is the one who holds the most power in the Supreme Court, notwithstanding John Roberts is the Chief Justice.
As the Court returned this week after a normal recess, many outlets covered this topic.
He's the longest-tenured justice currently serving, having been appointed in 1991 by George H.W.
Bush.
While he used to be a quiet force on the high court, famously going an entire decade without a single question during an oral argument, he has changed his tone.
James Rosamer wrote about it.
When the court tweaked its argument format during the pandemic, Thomas began speaking up.
He now interrogates the lawyers during nearly every case, often marking the terrain on which the case will be fought.
Many of the justices are now deferring to Thomas to begin each argument before they decide to jump in and ask whatever questions they may have.
The rationale is Thomas is a stickler for politeness, dislikes interrupting the advocates or his colleagues.
It seems to be much more than mere politeness, however.
It's also symbolic of the fact that he's risen in importance on the Supreme Court to what is perhaps the most powerful position.
Even though he doesn't have the title.
It's been quite the journey for Roberts on the bench.
Thomas described himself in just his second term as proudly and unapologetically irrelevant and anachronistic.
Rosenberg wrote back then, back then his commitment to originalism, the idea that the Constitution's language should be interpreted solely according to how the words were understood when they were written, Made him an ideological oddity even among conservatives, and his no-compromise approach alienated moderates like former Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.
Now as he enters his 32nd term, his critics surely still see him as an act from history, but he could not be more relevant.
Law courts, elite appellate law firms, Republican congressional offices are stacked with former Thomas clerks.
Under President Donald Trump, no other justice had as many clerks appointed to the federal judiciary or to senior administrative positions.
Today, Gorda has transformed into a bench that considers originalism the default mode of constitutional interpretation.
It has become commonplace at the Supreme Court to lean on obscure 19th century documents and appeal to the nation's deep-seated traditions.
Today, the court has transformed.
It's taken Thomas years to plant the seeds, but that long, hard, and sometimes quiet work has been paying off.
Many of the court's recent controversial decisions, including on abortion, sending it back to the states, and gun rights, upholding the Second Amendment, were issued on the back of what Thomas believes.
For conservatives who like his views, this is a sign of good times ahead.
For others who aren't on board, it's quite the opposite.
Carl?
Well, it is a fascinating article.
We have, first, to understand that SCOTUS is captured just like any other agency.
They have it.
They've evaded all of the questions for the 2020 election fraud.
They refuse to have anything to say on the Orwellian show trial from Jim's case.
And you have Thomas, who was appointed by the CIA criminal and one of the leaders for the assassination of JFK, Bush Daddy.
So, that said, the idea in the article of originalism You have a virtue signaling that the United States Constitution is the limit of government, when we know in the real world application, it's just empty virtue signaling and then they go ahead and go beyond the limits of government each and every time.
But we have had cases where you have a glimmer of hope.
After 45 years engagement in civic activism, I have no hope.
We need some sort of a breakthrough that is unimaginable and to shatter the illusion of this criminality.
But we'll see what happens.
Maybe we'll get some incremental improvement.
You know, I'm as open as anybody else to something happening that would be for the good.
And yet the history commands is don't anticipate anything other than an ongoing show of virtue signaling covering the criminality of the empire.
When Thomas was appointed, count me unimpressed, Anita Hill no doubt spoke the truth.
Turns out local video stores reported that Thomas had an addiction to pornography.
He rented hundreds and hundreds of porno videos.
Since the death of Scalia, which I'm convinced was a murder because he was too much of a constitutionalist, however, it appears to me that Thomas has stepped up to take much of his role, for which I commend him.
I do think these more recent Decisions, even though I believe Roe v. Wade was the wisest decision the court has ever made, in sending it back to the states on the ground that the Constitution didn't give the Supreme Court jurisdiction may very well have been the proper interpretation of the law.
So even in that case, I find it difficult to dispute.
And in other ways, I think the new court is doing a good job, with the exception that The petition I submitted was a perfect opportunity to affirm the Seventh Amendment for all the states, and it was a failure, which I'm given to understand was the responsibility of the Chief Justice John Roberts, that he handled Sandy Hook-related cases and did not want them to move forward.
Brian?
Well, politicians that are the highest in the land are controlled.
The Supreme Court being any different?
You don't think that there's people out there that have control over who gets these nominations and how we muscle our politicians in Congress to support these nominations for these people?
Look, I'm glad Thomas is getting older.
Maybe he's not afraid to kick against the goads much and he's able to Come along and start to resist and start to think in a straight line.
Wonderful, but he's just one cog in a very big, very powerful machine that's obviously very partisan and controlled.
I don't think even if he says the most amazing things ever, Since the Declaration of Independence, it doesn't mean things will change.
So congratulations, Judge Clarence Thomas.
Maybe you're redeeming yourself for years and years of being silent when you shouldn't have, but too little too late.
The Supreme Court no longer means what it ought to mean to America.
We sure value the well-formed opinions from everyone here.
Wonderful.
Meanwhile, Peter Strzok, Makes the absurd claim 9-11 is nothing compared to January 6.
I mean, give me a break.
In a statement often repeated by Democrats wanting to weaponize January 6, fired agent Peter Straub, who was instrumental in the Russiagate fiasco, called September 11, 2001, a tragedy, but nothing compared to January 6.
I think that's right.
If you look at the scale in terms of a threat to democracy, 9-11 was a tragedy.
We lost thousands of lives.
We still mourn to this day.
But when you look at something as an attack on democracy, something that could bring about a fundamental change to American governance, 9-11 is nothing compared to January 6th.
He called on his former employee, the FBI, to get on a war footing under President Joe Biden.
The fact the FBI can arrest the government if they're not on the same war footing we were in the weeks and months and years after 9-11, shame on everyone.
Strzok played a key role in both the squash Hillary Clinton email probe and the allegation of Russian collusion.
Both rebuked by Republicans as attempts to keep former President Trump from being elected, if not force his ouster once he took office.
He still believes in the January 6th narrative and endeavors to tarnish Trump.
This is just embarrassing.
He continues to say, I suspect if we were to hear more, this sort of thing gives a lot of observers who've been in the FBI a little concern whether the same urgency and approach is what we need now.
Trump denounced a partisan probe of January 6th as deep state and a cancer, purposely destroying our nation.
It was during the Trump administration the deep state corruption and pure hatred of our country was fully exposed.
No longer just a nasty misconcept or idea.
This is yet another great achievement.
But something must now be done to rid us of this cancer that is purposefully destroying our nation.
There is far more danger from within than anything coming from outside.
We must join together and make America great again.
Americans on Twitter also denounced Strzok's comments.
Peter Strzok is trending.
A good thing to remember, he framed the president for treason, was caught, was never raided, was never prosecuted, and retired with a full pension.
The relationship between Peter Strzok and morality reality never has been a strong one.
Trisha Flanagan tweeted with a photo of Strzok from his infamous appearance before Congress.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, Peter Strzok is right.
9-11 is nothing compared to January 6th, and I'll tell you why.
So, on 9-11, what we have is the Patriot Act, we have the War on Terror, and TSA Crotchfields.
But that is nothing compared to January 6, because January 6, what we had is we had the stopping of the evidence about ready to be presented to a joint session of Congress with a global audience to be able to demonstrate the 2020 election fraud.
You have the demonization, and ultimately, they're going to leverage that to the arrest of Trump.
As a DVE, a domestic violent extremist and election denier, and you have the instigation of the One People's Party to normalize communism, and for drag queen Crotchfields also to be normalized.
So, Strzok is right.
Seriously, though, is that the beauty of the possibility for freedom Out of this, the silver lining with this ridiculous amped up parody that can't get any more tragic comic is that these people have to go ahead and push in this direction to demonize their political opponents and to push people into this one people's rainbow unicorn party.
And the test and the opportunity for Americans is to reject it, to flip the script, and to demand the rest of the corrupt officials at the FBI It's such a sign of Democrat corruption that they take no effort to remedy these blatant defects, violations of the law.
I mean, it's just outrageous.
Brian?
I remember being a child and I had an older or have an older brother and he I remember we were watching some big time wrestling VHS tape or something like that and he tried to convince me that it was it was real.
I remember watching it and thinking, oh, that's that's just wow.
I don't really believe that.
And then, of course, later on, it was admitted it's all fake, but the fans didn't care.
My brother kept watching it.
Because he didn't care that it was fake.
It was good entertainment.
We are literally right there with politics and the media.
The article was about January 6th.
How crazy!
People that believe that January 6th happened, like MSNBC parroted, are the people that were the children that Didn't realize pro wrestling was fake.
That is how bad we've gotten today.
That we're watching pro wrestling on a national stage and pretending that it's real?
This is ridiculous.
Our society deserves to fall.
I'm sorry.
Until we can stand up and At least figure out the difference between pro wrestling or 9-11 and January 6th.
We don't have a chance.
That's a sensational comparison, Brian.
I commend you.
You're spot on.
Pro wrestling, indeed, on a national scale.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Meanwhile, The ongoing evidence suggests that the vacs are still spewing huge amounts of the genetically created spike protein that causes the illness and severe respiratory issues in some, which gets them into ERs, who immediately intubate them and kill them, or purposely misdiagnose the problem and let them go home and die from blood clots from the death jabs they purposely got.
In the meanwhile, few are awake.
Few comprehend the huge monstrosity that is the Jew death machine.
Will enough wake up?
I sincerely doubt it.
Given the amounts of gullible sap still zombie-walking into their own oblivion, I can safely say for the record that in a very short time the Jews will have won by eradicating most of the moron goyim from the earth.
In a way it's tragic, and yet in another way it's Darwinian and sadly inevitable that those who are not mentally fit enough to smell the Jew rat are dying by trusting the Jew rats who poison them, or trusting the disgusting Shabos Goyim saying him doctors and allowing themselves to be euthanized.
Final thoughts.
I like the spirit of that comment, and just to go ahead and clarify where I see all this is that the people who say that they're Jewish, who are the really evil ones, they're just hiding behind that as a cover.
They're really mafia, gangsters, Khazarians, and they're no more related to ordinary Jews than The Bush and the Clintons are Christians.
It's just a cover story.
So I want to tag team on Brian's analogy for wrestling.
So when Trump became a candidate in 2016, I was one of the leading writers just to go ahead and mock him based upon how Trump chose to spend part of his free time in the wrestling event Battle of the Billionaires.
So, as somebody who is looking for political leadership, I saw Trump as a guy who would say, okay, so I'm watching Battle of the Billionaires with the highlights on the tape, and this is a guy who's exposed in violent cosplay to tackle a fellow billionaire, pretend to violently beat him up while he's on the ground, and then for the winner to, which of course, Trump,
Had to win because the loser had his head shaved in the middle of the wrestling ring at the end of the performance.
So from that point, I concluded that Trump was just another actor playing a role.
Now, that said, is that people who are involved and into the enemy camp are perfect if they choose to turn.
So Trump would be abundantly powerful to be able to get anything that he learned and then to be swung as a white hat asset, which I'm still at 95% is what's going on behind the scenes with the show.
And that said...
The severity, the danger of the facts of the articles place us in this most critical place where we could be wiped out.
There may be no show next week because there may be a global thermonuclear war between now and then.
We don't know.
And the only place that we can manage is our own thoughts, words, and actions to stand for truth, to stand for justice, to refuse to accept this clown show, and to call out the lies.
We do need a breakthrough to win this by all appearances, and I'll stand there, and we'll see what develops.
Brian, your final thoughts?
Carla, I do believe you're absolutely right.
We need a breakthrough.
I mean, there's, I feel so overwhelmed with all of the propaganda and all of the twisted things.
I can't, I just can't feel where we're going to be three to five years from now, but I don't, I still sleep like a baby because there's more to life than politics and there's more to life going on right here in my house and around my house and with my family.
There's more going on right here and more important stuff than what's happening on this national stage.
I had put together this big long list of things that I believe which I was going to go over.
But I don't think it's even necessary anymore to do that because you've got to figure it out for yourself.
And I think that's what the battle's all about.
And I think that's what the struggle is all about.
Being able to break out of the system and look at the things that we thought we believed or we thought we knew for sure and figure out what the truth is behind the scenes.
I still believe that there is Something going on in America that isn't what it seems.
But can I prove it?
I don't know.
I don't know.
So I look at all these stories and the insanity of the world today.
Yes, it's like big-time wrestling.
It's weird.
I don't understand it.
But hopefully we can break out.
And all that matters to me really, long play, is Is that I can live with myself and understand that I'm doing the best I can to figure it out and understand it.
That's my final thought.
Wonderful comments today from Carl and from Brian.
Wonderful stuff.
I'm terribly concerned that it may be the case that Chief Justice is compromised, is being controlled.
Remember, we had the Texas case.
It was a Chief Justice that denied the Texas case that represent four key swing states in terms of the theft of the election.
It was a Chief Justice who rejected it.
I did not anticipate that he would have a key role in my Sandy Hook case.
But there's so much to it.
It exposed the Obama administration, Joe Biden, Eric Holder, the governor of Connecticut, the Connecticut State Police, the whole community of Newtown, as having bought into a massive scam on the American people deliberately years in the planning.
They appear to have invested so much time and effort with the Alex Jones Show trials, and have no doubt, these are show trials, Where I sought to intervene to set him on the straight and narrow by observing there's never been a judicial determination that anyone died at Sandy Hawk.
Where I was opposed not only by the plaintiffs, but by the defendants.
I offered to be an expert witness for Alex Jones.
Robert Barnes has said he was in the courtroom in Austin.
Three cameras, one focused on the jury.
Looked at him like a made-for-TV movie.
I have no doubt he got it right.
A billion dollars for having an opinion?
They're treating Alex Jones like a piñata.
They're beating him up as an exemplar of someone who thought outside the box.
And he only did it for a minuscule percent of time.
Mostly when he talked about Sandy Hook, which was less than 1% of the time, he was affirming it was real.
They went after him for this minuscule and then charged him this gargantuan.
It's absurd, just absurd on its face.
My case, Because it raised substantial legal issues about summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin, about the right to a trial by jury, about making summary judgment standards uniform through all 50 of the states, by formally declaring what historically oddly has never been done, that the right to a trial by jury applies to all 50 of the states.
It was served up on a silver platter.
They should have taken it, knocked it out of the park.
That they did not do so, in my opinion, is a stunning indictment of the Supreme Court.
The petition may not have been flawless, but it was very clear, very powerful, laid out the issues.
I don't know how they could have had a pro se submission that was better in effect.
And there have been cases in the past where pro se appellates have made a significant difference with regard to, you know, the Miranda warnings, for example.
Gideon was a plaintiff before the Supreme Court who was pro se, and it made a big difference.
This one, too.
Something is wrong.
And if the report I've been given, that it was the Chief Justice who is managing, handling Sandy Hook, They didn't want to have my case come up and then undo everything they'd accomplished through this massive propaganda blitz with Alex Jones.
I mean, what would it do if people actually looked at the case and said, my God, there's something going on here.
After all, they couldn't let it happen.
Therefore, I'm sad to say, Brian, I think has arrived.
The Supreme Court has been so severely compromised.
We have no idea what we can expect in the future.
We know at least some of it will not be good, let's hope.
The majority does something to benefit the people under the law, which has been the most distinctive trait of America among all nations of the world, which is now sadly being lost, torn to shreds, eviscerated.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love and care about.
We do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection