All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 20, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:20:28
Need to Know News (19 October 2022) with David Scorpio and Chris Weinert
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by David Scorpio in Southern California and Chris Weinhart in Western Florida.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know, and there's quite a bit going on here.
Russia's second wave attack on Ukraine now appears imminent.
Biden's waging economic war against China, but actually, really, it's against the United States.
With 300,000 more troops mobilized, a reported 70,000 Belarusian troops ready to join, Russia staging tanks, personnel, and even MiG fighter jets in what appears to be preparation for a second wave assault, Kiev will likely be the target as he seeks to take out the Ukrainian government and bring an end to Zelensky's corrupt regime and its failed chapter of Western expansion in Eastern Europe.
All of this course has been revolving about the attempt to turn Ukraine into a NATO nation in gross violation of all the solemn agreements between Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan with the dissolution of the Soviet Union, which U.S.
has violated again and again and again.
Adding to clues about an imminent attack in Ukraine, China's issued an urgent warning for all of its citizens to evacuate.
As China's official mouthpiece, Global Times, reports, many Chinese nationalists signed up for evacuation assistance to leave the country.
The Foreign Ministry said, given the grave security situation, it calls upon Chinese nationals still in the country to strengthen security precautions and evacuate Ukraine.
Why the sudden evacuation?
Mike Adams infers China knows what's coming, and it wouldn't be a safe place for any civilians once it begins.
Similar evacuation orders have been issued by Egypt, Serbia, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, and Tajikistan, among other nations.
Meanwhile, Biden signed an order criminalizing all support for China's semiconductor industry, which prohibits Americans from even working for those companies, threatening sanctions for companies that provide semiconductor equipment supplies or personnel support to China.
This is pretty weird.
This move is a modern-day equivalent of the energy blockade the U.S.
Navy rolled out against Japan in World War II, denying them access to oil in the South Pacific.
That was designed to force Japan to attack the United States.
See, they have treachery by David John Stennis, if you want further details.
I think he's exactly right.
At that time, the powers that be wanted the U.S.
to fight Japan, but there wasn't enough public support until Pearl Harbor was allowed to take place.
And that's exactly right.
Roosevelt knew it was coming, but did not notify the regional commanders so that he would be caught by surprise.
Thrusting the imperial nation into a corner where they had no choice but to attack the United States and attempt to cripple our navy, where we basically were ordered to stand down to allow Pearl Harbor to take place.
Biden's economic embargo of China's semiconductor industry appears engineered to achieve the same outcome, where China is being forced to attack the United States as a matter of economic survival.
And the Biden-Obama regime is able to steer China into exactly the outcome they want war with the United States.
Frankly, idiotic if that's going on.
Meanwhile, Emmanuel Macron declares that France will not respond with a nuclear strike if there's a nuclear strike on Ukraine by the Russians.
He indicated Moscow detonating a nuclear weapon in Ukraine would not cause Paris to use its nukes, for which he's receiving criticism from those who don't understand the gross threat, the catastrophic outcome of a nuclear war.
Macron was asked, would France consider a tactical strike by Russia as a nuclear strike?
He replied, France has a nuclear doctrine.
It lies in the nation's fundamental interests and are clearly defined.
They wouldn't be questioned should there be a ballistic nuclear attack.
Moreover, the defense minister of the Netherlands criticized him, stating, Part of our deterrence is not to speculate on what kind of response or in what kind of situation he would get.
I'd not comment on different possibilities and say yes or no.
NATO officials were unwilling to give a public statement on Macron's remarks.
Speaking privately, they said it was an alliance policy not to spell out when nukes would be used, that a conventional strike on Russia was a likely response to Moscow using nukes in Ukraine.
He's also attacked by politicians at home.
Former President Holliday said Macron should say as little as possible and be prepared to do as much as possible.
The vice president of the National Assembly's Armed Forces Committee issued a sharp rebuke.
When I heard him speak, I almost fell off my chair.
It's a political mistake.
One of the principles of nuclear dissuasion is that there's uncertainty as to what is considered to be a vital interest.
Macron tweeted, we do not want a world war.
Macron's office said Paris nuclear policy has not changed.
Meanwhile, Belarus says it will host nearly 9,000 Russian troops.
Belarus is right in there with the Russians, and frankly, I think they are on the right side.
The announcement comes after the Belarusian president said Russian forces would deploy with Belarusian soldiers in response to tensions on the southern-western border of the Union State, meaning the combined territory of Russia and Belarus.
Osinko, by the way, the president allowed President Putin to launch an initial part of his invasion of Ukraine from Belarusian territory.
But Belarus has not entered the war.
No sign a decision has been made in Minsk to fight in Ukraine.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, that's a lot to unpack there.
You know, first of all, this whole Ukraine war has not added up to me in a lot of ways since the very start.
That continues to be the case for me.
I'm not quite in the same camp where I think Putin's the good guy and NATO's the bad guy.
This really sort of reeks of a manufactured conflict, and certainly you can make the case that the West, the so-called West, has Uh, you know, cause this conflict, uh, beginning with, you know, George H. W. Bush declaring that NATO will not move one inch to the east when of course there's been five waves of NATO expansion.
And the idea that Ukraine is somehow part of Europe or should be part of NATO is absurd.
Ukraine really is part of Russia.
That's the history of Ukraine.
Uh, the artificial borders of Ukraine were carved out in 1922 by Vladimir Lenin.
So the idea that it's some important country and it's a stalwart of democracy and we have to defend Ukraine, it's absurd.
It's absolutely absurd and there's no interest to the United States regarding Ukraine.
We have no interest there whatsoever.
If we had a government that was actually working for the country, we would not be funding Ukraine, and they would be forced to go to the bargaining table immediately and drop this notion that somehow they're going to be part of NATO and join the EU and join the clergy plan, which is really what they want.
They want Ukraine to be part of the clergy plan and possibly be a sort of new Israel, an Israel 2.0, because, you know, I don't think it's an accident that Ukraine mimics the borders of ancient Khazaria.
I don't think that's an accident.
It's essentially the same borders and unfortunately, you know, I I think that this is a plan a great part of this great reset plan to a pivot to the east to deindustrialize Germany and all that industry will go to China and to India wherever it needs to go and You know, I just don't think that this is an organic situation.
I really don't.
Why, at the very beginning, why didn't Russia simply take out every single Ukrainian military base with an airstrike?
They had total air superiority, especially at the very beginning.
They could have taken out every single base and they know where all the bases are.
How do I know that?
Because Russia built all the bases in Ukraine just about.
They know exactly where they are.
They even have blueprints for the bases.
So they could have done that at the very beginning.
And so it seems that Russia is wanting to play this out slowly.
Giving the West time to retaliate and to resupply Ukraine.
And the parallels between World War II and what's happening now are numerous.
You brought up Pearl Harbor.
Day of Deceit is a great book.
It proves beyond the shadow of a doubt that not only did the Roosevelt administration know that an attack was coming, but they did all they could to exacerbate it and cause it to happen and to force Japan to be in a situation where they had to attack Pearl Harbor.
Yeah, so I just find this thing a very odd and I do think it's part of the great reset plan because, oh gee, now all of a sudden Europe doesn't have enough gas.
Well, that fits the green agenda and it fits the deindustrialization agenda.
So there's so many things that just magically kind of fall into place of this war that I'm very suspicious about the fact that it might very possibly be managed at the top from both sides.
Great comments, Chris.
Yeah, I have to agree with Scorpio.
I think they are the oligarchs are using these proxies and the bricks versus IMF type of theatric in terms of the the global theater.
I think it is kind of like they did with the first Cold War, where they control both sides of the opposition.
And it's a bargaining tactic for the people.
And they use things like this to really ramp up tensions, to ramp up prices, to justify interests like Biden might have in Burisma and the natural gas from Gazprom and many other places there going to Europe.
They're definitely trying to use this nuclear blackmail as a means to really put people into a camp of fear and helplessness so that they just go along and pay taxes for this whole insanity.
That reminds me of an 1812 when Rothschild assembled a group of his banker cohorts in the aristocracy of Europe together in the Congress of Vienna and waged war against popular sovereignty and leadership under those pretenses.
Basically, they wouldn't have anybody up to chance in terms of leadership.
And that's how they ganged up and took out Napoleon in one way, too.
I think that really this whole thing that's going on is part of the One Belt One Road, the CBDC, where they're trying to run out this digital rail system and put complete control over the common man and using things like social credit scores and these economic policies that they're going to put in.
After they crashed the currencies to do so.
So I think it's a problem reaction solution.
And if you read the words of guys like in the World Economic Forum, or even like Kashkari, one of the guys from the Federal Reserve presidents in Minnesota, they talk about bringing in total control through this CBDC cryptocurrency.
And really monitoring everything and using it as a means to control the population by knowing their access to money but food and even democracy and everything else.
So, yeah, I think this is a full fledged war that's been waged on the common man by the aristocracy of Europe, and they're using certainly a complex theater to do so and deliver it.
So, yeah, I think that's kind of what's going on.
As far as the Emmanuel Macron variants, I think he's part of it he's a Rothschild representative, and I think that anybody that's really been opposed to this Rothschild thing like Lukashenko or Orban, even Putin to some extent, are being targeted by by this media apparatus that they have to really villainize them.
And you need both sides of the opposition to create this conflict in the first place.
So I think it's pretty scripted.
And I think this is something that they're just eliminating the common man and their rights to life, liberty, pursuit of happiness by these means.
What a wonderful combination.
Yes, Scorpio.
Yeah, I'd just like to respond.
Great points, Chris.
And of course, you know, you talk about the world of 1812.
Well, what happened in 1811?
Well, gee, the first charter of the Central Bank of the United States expired, and then all of a sudden this war is manufactured.
Around that and other events.
So I think it's just another tell that these wars are planned.
They're a theater.
They call them theaters of war.
And I think, you know, World War One, like you said, was manufactured in the same way.
And unfortunately, I believe World War Two was as well.
I think Adolf Hitler probably went off the reservation at some point and things turned really, really nasty.
What a terrific combination of commentaries.
Love it.
Meanwhile, Trump beats Biden in 2024 hypothetical, and barely anyone cares about January 6th, according to a new Harvard poll.
It doesn't look good for the Democrats at all.
President Trump would beat Biden 45 to 43 with 12% undecided.
Actually, it would be overwhelmingly greater.
Trump would beat VP Harris 49 to 38.
It would be overwhelmingly greater.
They claim Harris would beat DeSantis.
I don't believe that for a second.
We're both Trump and Biden out of the race.
Harris is a brainless twit.
She has no business being in government.
When it comes down to Trump versus DeSantis, Megyn Kelly got it right.
Trump mobs the floor with a Florida governor, though he would win the GOP.
Primary, by a huge margin, were Trump to bow out.
That's what Megyn said when she was on the Rubin Report, that there was no way in which DeSantis could get the nomination if Trump were in, unless he were to step aside and endorse him or depart this earth.
Among Democrats, Biden is a frontrunner with 37, Kamala 13, Hillary 9.
Hilariously, Kamala wins versus Hillary if Joe bows out.
That's pretty fascinating.
Hillary's corruption.
Obviously, Hillary is an evil person, but she's certainly cognitively more evil than Kamala Harris.
The most important issues facing the country are also a huge blow to Democrats, especially their dog-and-pony January 6th show trial, which only a 7% poll thought was the most important issue.
Inflation, the economy, and immigration are the top issues, I agree.
They are the top self-stated voter issues heading into the midterm as well.
83% said countries are on the wrong track, which is historically an indicator of how things are going to turn out during the midterm.
When it comes to what people think Democrat Party leaders care about, the party is seen as disconnected from the top issues that they're most interested in.
January 6th, women's rights, climate change, and guns.
Meanwhile, the top issue is likely to sway voters to Team Red versus Team Blue.
Stopping the teaching of woke ideologies in schools, 43% likely to cause people to vote Republican over Democrat, 33.
Inflation, crime, immigration, also big factors.
A stunning 64% of those polled blame woke politicians for the increase in crime.
After all, they were supporting the absurd position of defunding the police.
Overall, voters are more attracted by the Republican platform than the Democrat.
When it comes to election integrity, voters are more likely to question the legitimacy of the 2020 Biden election than the 2016 Trump election, and yet we got four years of whining and complaining that Trump had stolen the election in 2016 when it was rigged for Hillary.
When it comes to energy, nobody bought Putin's price hike propaganda from the White House.
62% blame Biden for the increasing gas price.
65% think the shift to renewable should be gradual rather than abrupt.
What's more, 65% want the NIMBY-Biden administration to tap domestic resources for cheaper oil rather than ease sanctions on repressive regimes.
And sorry, Greta, just 42% of those polled think climate change is an immediate threat, while 58% said it's either long-term or not really a threat, and they most certainly got it right.
On the student loan forgiveness, 54% said it was wrong for Biden to shell out over $400 billion without congressional authorization while 46% agreed.
Meanwhile, 42% either somewhat or strongly opposed.
58% either somewhat or strongly supported.
No wonder Democrats are starting to panic.
Jill Biden, by the way, was out in Philadelphia at, I believe it was a baseball game, and she was roundly booed, massively booed by the crowd.
You'd think they'd start to get the message.
Scorpio, your thoughts.
Yeah, well, again, a lot to unpack there, Jim.
Well, where do I start?
You know, as far as the student loan forgiveness thing, it's absurd that, you know, Biden can just, you know, by the stroke of a pen, relieve all this debt.
And unfortunately, what it does is it punishes People who went to trade school or went to some kind of low-cost university and didn't rack up hundreds of thousands of dollars of debt.
And unfortunately, what this is doing is it's propping up the bloated skeleton of the university system.
The cost of university has gone up exponentially in literally just one generation.
One of my uncles paid for going to Berkeley by working at a gas station.
Think about that.
Okay?
He was actually able to pay for a modest apartment.
Uh, and tuition by working at a gas station.
And now Berkeley is like $50,000 a year.
So something has really gone astray in the university system.
And this is just allowing the, the, the over cost of going to, um, University to stay afloat.
There needs to be a massive price correction in the cost of the university system.
It's completely insane.
And just like I said, one generation ago, it wasn't that way.
And, um.
You know, the other problem with universities now is that it's no longer a marketplace of ideas.
You're supposed to go to the university to learn how to think, not what to think.
And they've turned it into this sort of unipolar one, you know, version of the world and one way to think, one way to have philosophy.
You're supposed to be exposed to a whole variety, a whole spectrum of beliefs and ideas.
And some of them, some of those ideas should even be unpopular.
And yes, offensive.
Okay, you should be, you should be exposed to some offensive, so called offensive belief systems.
But instead, it's just this, you know, unipolar monoculture that they're creating, essentially creating global citizens and global slaves.
uh so yeah um and you know this whole January 6th thing is a joke uh it's absurd it's a it's a theater of the absurd and I'll tell you these um these guys could really use some help in weaving together a conspiracy theory they should consult some of us conspiracy theorists for some help here because the the theory they've weaved together is not only um you know unbelievable it's not You know, it's an absurd theory that it's just it's like pie-in-the-sky fantasy stuff.
It's ridiculous and essentially calling it an insurrection is insane because it's it amounts to a self-guided tour that was initiated by the Judas goat FBI and intelligence operatives who were at the very front of the line.
And a lot of, you know, just normal people were, uh, you know, tricked into daring to walk inside the building.
That's really all they did.
They took a self-guided tour of the Capitol building, and I guess a few knickknacks were taken, and things like that.
But nothing major happened.
You know, an insurrection, if it was an insurrection, those people would have been, you know, like, maybe, uh, shot, or, uh, killed, or, uh, tried, and then hung.
Uh, you know, the whole...
The definition of words is not being used properly here at all.
Not even close.
And it also shows you the disdain these people have for the common person.
How offended they were that, you know, the Hoi Poloi dared to step foot in their sacred temple of democracy.
And there is some footage of Nancy Pelosi, which I think is fake.
She's just play acting, you know, on the phone all worried.
Apparently someone defecated on the floor of the Capitol building.
Which I don't think happened, but it is funny.
And I don't know, is that a crime to defecate in the Capitol building?
Probably.
But it's not a capital offense, so to speak.
Good play on words there.
And, you know, lastly about the election, unfortunately, I think that the Democrats are going to hold on to power.
They're going to cheat.
We're already seeing early voting happening in Georgia, as well as this mail-in voting scam.
I mean, the election's three weeks away and people are voting already?
It's insane.
The reason they're doing it is that way they can have plenty of time to cheat and change the votes, have dead people vote, send five or six ballots to Democrats and have them fill them out and take them to different polling stations or mail them out from different zip codes.
So, you know, unfortunately, I think the Democrats are going to hold on to power through cheating.
And lastly, I guess one last thing I want to bring up about the school system is, yeah, this teaching of, you know, critical race theory and all the other garbage and pushing homosexuality and all kinds of weird sexual predilections on the youth.
That aside, that's bad enough.
Now they're talking about requiring the CDC, requiring the COVID shot to attend schools.
Making little children take a toxic Jewish injection that it's designed to destroy your health slowly over time and probably make people infertile as well.
That's the real thing here now.
Now they really are going after the children.
They want to either, you know, immobilize them, make them sick or turn them into homosexual.
And that's our leadership.
That's the people that are running the show right now.
And they truly do hate us and they truly do want you dead.
Oh, spot on.
And if they get it on this required for kids, then they're immune from any liability, no matter what.
Yeah, you often see this type of behavior at the end of every empire where they debaucherize the youth and go after them in such a way and target them and really try to use them to destroy their traditions and cultures.
And this is probably no different than anything you've seen in history.
It's just the same group of people that are behind this blueprint.
So yeah, this family bloodline has existed throughout Europe for many, many years and has now infiltrated the United States.
And it's doing what it's doing, I feel, to us.
And I really think that, you know, when you think about things like, you know, the January 6th thing, why aren't they looking into the 2020 election or 9-11 or the COVID hysteria or the vaccine rollouts or any of the shit they could arguably have a there there with?
Instead, they go for this complete sensationalized theater.
It's almost like a parlor game.
And people get roped back into picking a side and playing these little tricks in these games and playing by the rules of these games, more importantly, as they get ripped off and hoodwinked.
Yeah, I think that you're really seeing them show their true cards.
As far as Biden giving away $400 billion on student loans, the student loans were the number one asset on the Fed's books about six months ago, so I don't know what he's really doing with his quote-unquote nest egg there.
He's given billions to Ukraine, trillions for this COVID witch hunt and all this shit, and hasn't even addressed the concept of providing livable wages for actual workers.
You know, the fight for $15 is a disgrace.
You know, there's the middle class that's getting absolutely hammered and unable to not only afford tuitions, but even food and energy.
So and most of this is done on behest of him and his cabal really ramping up the tensions and the prices on most of these offerings.
So, you know, you're really seeing this come into fruition.
It's almost like time repeats itself and history repeats itself.
And, you know, I think as far as the Trump and the DeSantis thing, I think they're really trying to split the popular sovereignty that's coming into the RNC, the energy, let's say, towards the offerings of the Republicans, because they have been by far the more sensible of the two parties in the last four to eight years because they have been by far the more sensible of the two parties in the last four to
So if you can split up the support between DeSantis and Trump and really turn them to oppose each other, it really makes a situation like they did in 1912 with Wilson coming in Yeah, I don't think they're going to get away with it.
I anticipate Trump is going to run with DeSantis, but those were both extremely good commentaries.
Meanwhile, DOJ continuing to go after all of Trump's associates and supporters, his strongest allies, recommending Steve Bannon be sentenced to six months in prison.
The DOJ is recommending former Trump advisor and War Room host Steve Bannon get six months in jail and a $200,000 fine for defying the January 6th Committee, which was, of course, just a pure propaganda show trial.
Everyone understands it was just a Get Trump exhibition for public relations.
Bannon was convicted of contempt of Congress for refusing to comply with a subpoena.
DOJ claimed Bannon pursued a bad faith strategy of defiance and contempt, flouted the committee's authority, and ignored the subpoena's demands.
This is quite ridiculous and further substantiates the weaponization of the Department of Justice.
Part of the reason for subpoenaing him in the first place is he predicted all hell is going to break loose tomorrow, something almost everyone was saying at the time.
This would be on January 5th.
Anti-Trump neocon Liz Cheney and Democrat Bennie Thompson, the chair, had celebrated his conviction in a joint statement.
The conviction of Steve Bannon is a victory for the rule of law and an important affirmation of the Select Committee's work.
Bannon is scheduled to be sentenced on October 21st, one year to the day after he was held in contempt by the House.
Here we have the doc.
This is embarrassing stuff, very bad, and no one gives a damn.
It's not moving the needle in terms of the midterm.
Scorpio.
No, it's not, because the agenda that the so-called left, they're not really even the left, they're simply communists and technocrats, the agenda they have is extremely unpopular, it doesn't benefit anybody in the country, and this whole January 6th thing has been truly
A soviet style um show trial essentially and you know the idea that Steve Bannon is going to get six months for a misdemeanor this is a misdemeanor charge against him and a lot of these liberal um well they're not even really liberals these these essentially what amounts to state worshiping fascists Um, want him to go to jail more than six months.
They want the judge to, uh, go beyond the recommended maximum sentence.
They want him to see, you know, real jail time, like years in jail for simply refusing to show up to answer a bunch of goofy questions.
And, you know, when I say fascist, I don't mean the kind of fascism that existed in, in Mussolini's Italy, because at least in, in Italy, uh, under Mussolini, At least, I'm not advocating for it, but at least the corporations were supposed to benefit the nation, okay?
Now we have corporations that have absolutely no loyalty whatsoever.
They're truly international behemoths that have no loyalty whatsoever to this country, and that's who these state-worshipping fascists are loyal to.
International corporations that truly are working to bring down the United States of America as we know it.
No question about it.
Sad to say.
Chris?
Yeah, I'd like to ask, when's the last time you heard anybody in Congress pass a decent law or a good law that actually served the democratic constituency of this country?
I haven't really heard of too many.
I've heard of one actually recently, a guy named Alex Mooney.
He's talking about stopping the printing presses and stopping the Fed from just giving away all this money, arguably which is used as dark operations money and paying these operatives and these systems managers for the House of Rothschild to deliver us into this Controlled opposition theatrics that we call our political theater.
So I think really that's a good way to start is to stop these guys from having the free control and free reign over the ability to print money and the ability to wage war clandestinely.
I think if there is a sound money system, I think it'd be a lot more difficult for these selected officials to pull the bullshit they do and to create the amount of debt that they do when it's actually coming due and required to be paid in the way that it normally would be.
So, um, I don't know.
It's maybe it's too far gone now to go back to that, but I almost think that it's something that's going to have to happen.
And if a reset is going to happen, might as well make it a good one.
That's that's truly, you know, organic and serving the people instead of something that's just going to put us into further, uh, technocratic feudalism, but you know, in service to the house of Rothschild.
Nice, nice points.
Can I make one comment?
Well, of course.
Yeah, you know, Chris is talking about money and, you know, that really is the root of the problem here.
There's this unlimited ability to print all the money they want.
It's not connected to anything.
And, you know, you can say what you want about so-called Nazi Germany, but one thing they did that was absolute genius was to tie the value of money to the value of labor.
And once you do that, so many of the shenanigans fall to the wayside.
And we're in a situation now where we have runaway inflation above 25%.
This 8% idea we have 8% inflation is absurd.
It's at least 25%.
I think it's 50% in some areas.
But wages aren't even going up while inflation is skyrocketing.
So if you had The value of money tied to the value of labor, those kind of problems go away.
But you'll never see that happen because it would essentially get rid of the power they have to manipulate the economy at will.
Plus automation, Schofield.
Plus they have automation.
They're replacing labor with robots.
So, I mean, that's really a transition you're seeing for the first time in a long time, if not ever.
So really, the human labor has been the pinnacle of most democratic processes.
Now it is rendered obsolete because you have automation and you can use basically this corporate oligarchy to control the value of labor, like you said.
It's amazing.
Yeah, I agree with you.
Great point.
I think, just looking at the big picture, the economy is destined to collapse, spiraling inflation.
There's no way out of it, given the scenario.
I see this as an economic death spiral.
Meanwhile.
Yeah, well, I think what we're going to see is a controlled demolition.
And I think magically they're going to roll out UBI.
Here's some help for the working man.
We're going to give you UBI as inflation skyrockets out of control.
The thing is, guys, they can't stop the inflation.
And I think Chris is right about the automation.
But the other thing they're doing simultaneously is they're flooding this country with foreign workers to an extent we've never seen before.
And I'm telling you, you know, as bad as illegal immigration is, to some degree, it's a red herring because they're allowing a million people a year to come in legally.
Usually from non-white countries, okay?
And each one of those million people can bring up to 10 family members over time.
It's called chain migration.
So that is unsustainable, and that causes inflation, and it destroys the value of labor.
Great, great addendum.
Excellent, Scorpio Chris.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Check this out.
Carrie Lake calling it like it is.
Here's 150 examples of Democrats denying election results.
Oh wow, look at this.
This is from Joe Biden's press secretary.
Reminder, Brian Kemp stole the gubernatorial election from Georgians and Stacey Abrams.
Democrats saying that.
Is that an election denier?
Oh, look at this.
Just heard Republican Ryan Costello said it would be difficult for Stacey Abrams to win because she lost her state bid, but yet she's still claiming she never lost.
This is outrageous.
Hillary Clinton.
Trump is an illegitimate president.
Is she an election denier?
This one says, was the 2016 election legitimate?
It now definitely is a question worth asking.
That's the Los Angeles Times.
So it's okay for Democrats to question elections, but it's not okay for Republicans.
It's a crock of BS.
Every one of you knows it.
We have our freedom of speech and we're not going to relinquish it to a bunch of fake news.
If you want a copy of these, I'm sure that Anthony would help you get a copy and help you learn how to be journalists.
But look it up.
It's been happening for a long time.
Since 2000, people have questioned the legitimacy of our elections.
And all we're asking is that in the future we don't have that have to happen anymore.
When I'm governor, excuse me, When I'm governor, we're going to make sure we have honest elections.
We want the Democrats, the Independents, and the Republicans to all know that their vote counted.
We want fair, honest, and transparent elections, and we're going to deliver that for the people.
But just remember, guys, This is one page after Hillary Clinton says George W. Bush was selected president, not elected.
So let's start.
If you're going to start throwing around terms like election denier, let's remember who the other election deniers were.
Hillary Clinton and all the Democrats.
This is so good.
I want to add it's like this is such a babe.
It's like Sarah Palin with brains.
I mean, this woman is spectacular.
Scorpio, just your thoughts based on those impressions.
Yeah, that's some great speech there, and I like what you're saying.
Of course, you know, it's a one-way street.
All this stuff is a one-way street, you know, because essentially what we have is a fully weaponized media.
The enemy war transmissions, known as mainstream media, is a weapon of war and a weapon of mind control and a method of social control and social engineering.
That's all it is.
Now, I liked your speech.
Saying all the right things there, but it's all in the context of these Democrats are terrible, but us Republicans were good.
You know, I don't, I'm at the point where I just don't trust any politician at this point.
I like what she's saying, but there's so many of these infiltrators who act like, you know, they have to have a steam valve to keep us thinking that we have a real system and that it's not just perpetually controlled by the same people.
And, you know, The state governors do have a lot of power, but I haven't heard any of these politicians talk about some really important things like, hey, this injection was toxic.
It was done on purpose to depopulate the planet and kill people.
9-11.
9-11 was done by deep state entities and Israel to draw America into war.
I haven't heard anyone say that.
I haven't heard any of these politicians, so-called conservatives, say, hey, I want to stop funding Israel.
I want to stop funding Ukraine.
And I want a one-year moratorium on immigration until we get things settled here in our country.
We need to put all the resources of America to America.
But I haven't heard any politicians say that, and I don't think you're going to hear that.
Because, honestly, I do believe that the election system is a fraud, and we're not going to see a political solution to what we face right now by electing the right people to office.
That's just my opinion.
Chris?
Yeah, I agree with Scorpio.
I think we're almost going to have to go beyond the offerings of the controlled CFR, AIPAC blast candidates.
Where were these people, you know, 10, 20 years ago, or even two years ago?
When all this stuff is going on, you know, when the chips are down and when they're talking about black sites and drone strikes and, you know, COVID and vaccines and all this bullshit, you know, so I'd have to say it's almost too little too late for the, uh, the, the appeal to that sensibility.
I almost think that people are going to have to take this thing into their own hands.
And I agree 100% with Scorpio about the MSM creating these Gollum enterprises, whether you're talking 9-11 or Sandy hoax or climate change or COVID or the hollow hoax, any of this stuff.
You know, they call anybody that questions this a denier, just like they do with the election deniers.
It's absolutely part of the process.
It's a guilt-based, shame-set, self-censorship tactic that they use.
They understand it.
And I have to say also, why don't they use blockchain for voting?
You know, instead, they're really trying to use it to manage and track down debt and money, instead of actually democracy, which I think would be a better experiment if you're really trying things out to begin with, you know, have a have an open source, public accessible blockchain, where you can see everybody, maybe not who they are personally, but you can see their their registration number and their vote and take it from there, I think would really eliminate a lot of the meddling that goes on by the private sector and even the government forces that are doing what they're doing.
What a great idea.
Sure.
Sure.
Scorpio.
Yeah.
Excellent points, Chris.
And, you know, I like what you said.
And why not go back to paper ballots?
You vote on the day of the election.
This idea that you get three weeks to vote.
It's just so they can cheat.
And why not have paper ballots where you have to actually show up on the day of the election.
And, you know, employers are required to give you the day off to vote, whatever, and have representatives from both parties count the votes and go from there.
These voting machines are a joke.
They're connected to the internet, guys.
Once somebody's connected to the internet, it can be changed and altered, obviously.
So they try to use this whole, you know, idea.
It's all so complicated.
You know, you can't understand it.
It's very complicated, just like COVID, just like climate change.
And I like your point, Chris, about the term denier.
Because it triggers in people's minds the concept of, you're a Holocaust denier, you're a climate denier, you're an election denier.
That's why they use that term, because it has a deep-seated effect on people's minds through, what, 60 years of propaganda.
Yeah, it's almost like a Stanford experiment, where they can understand, like, they could callous people against those people and say, oh, they're one of those, and really diminish their sentiments or their opinion or observations to really the dustbin of history.
Yes, don't look at the man behind the curtain!
And the idea that the voting machines program should be proprietary is absurd.
I mean, it's the simplest possible program.
They take a number in and add a new, add one to it to produce a new number in plus one.
There's nothing surprising about it.
If they're proprietary, they don't want you to see that because you're doing something a whole lot more than it ought to be doing and cheating you of the weight of your vote.
Yeah, 10 mail-in ballots.
Yeah, you know, I know people that have received five mail-in ballots here in California, and I've actually heard stories from real people that actually saw people kind of nearby voting areas that were paying people to vote a certain way.
And you can see by stretching it out, you made a great point about time.
You could have the same guy come in different days with different names and vote again and again and again.
Maybe even if it's just once a day, you could do it in three weeks.
What, 20 times?
I mean, how outrageous is that?
Well, and you have voting factories where people, you know, are all day long casting ballots, putting them in the mail from different zip codes.
It's simple.
Yeah, back in the 1840s, the Democrats were doing that.
Even in Boss Tweed's time, in like Tammany and many other places, they would actually pay people drugs, you know, they'd pay them in bottles of booze to go in and disguise themselves to vote twice, three, four or five times under fake names.
There you go.
Sensational.
Meanwhile...
This is playing with fire.
Could Xpark, a lab-generated pandemic expert, slam a Boston lab where CITUS have created a new deadly COVID strain with an 80% kill rate.
Get that!
80% kill rate!
A hybrid virus combining Omicron with the original Wuhan strain that killed 80% of mice in their study.
A leading scientist in the Israeli government said this should be totally forbidden.
It's playing with fire.
Gain-of-function research is thought to be at the center of COVID's origin, but the practice has been largely restricted in the U.S.
Dr. Richard Ebright at Rutgers said this research is a clear example of gain-of-function.
If we're to avoid a next lab-generated pandemic, it's imperative oversight of enhanced potential pandemic pathogen research be strengthened.
Here they have how they made the strain, they remove the spike from the Omicron, they attach it to the original Wuhan, They infected the mic with a hybrid, and 80% of them were dead.
Meanwhile, they've even got to wear air-supplied full-body suits to protect themselves.
Here you have 80% of the mice who die.
How awful!
None died from the milder Omicron alone, researchers at Boston University's National Emerging Infectious Diseases Lab found.
In the new research, which has not been peer-reviewed, those from Florida and Boston extracted Omicron's spike, a eunuch structure that binds and invades human cells with mutations on spike protein that make it so infectious and attached it to the original wild-type strain in Wuhan.
They looked at how mice My God, Scorpio!
against the new hybrid strain compared to the original Omicron.
When a similar group of rodents were exposed to the standard, however, they all survived and experienced only mild symptoms.
Writing in the paper, they said, in mice, while Omicron causes mild non-fatal infection, the Omicron-esque carrying virus infects severe disease with a mortality rate of 80%.
My God, Scorpio, what in the hell is going on here?
Well, the whistleblower here, I guess, is Richard Ebright, who looks Jewish to me just from his appearance.
So that puts him in a doubt right there in my mind.
Jim, I think what we're being subjected to is fear porn.
We're supposed to be afraid at all time.
If they have something that has an 80% kill rate, I just don't believe it.
Because, you know, I'm not sure exactly what happened with COVID.
I don't have Exact proof of what happened.
But one thing's for sure, whatever it was amounted to a strong flu season.
That's really all it was.
And people who were already on death's door ended up dying.
They jibbed up the results and, you know, just made up a bunch of statistics and said it was science.
But believe it, you know, you're a little person.
Just believe the science.
And, you know, that's a new tactic here.
It's always have some kind of science that's not replicatable.
You know, just like climate change.
Well, we have these computer models.
See right here, it's proof.
You can't actually see the data yourself and you can't replicate it.
Just trust us, it happened.
Same thing with this ridiculous... We've knocked a...
Asteroid off of its orbit.
Uh, here's a grainy black and white video to show you as proof, but you can't verify it.
Sorry.
You're a little person.
You just trust the signs.
Don't look at the man behind the curtain.
And so I think that's just, you know, part of this whole thing.
We have all these labs creating these super duper, super scary strains so that we can keep the goyim cattle afraid because people who are afraid and in fear mode are much more susceptible to mind control and, um, Essentially, manipulation.
And I think, unfortunately, we're seeing that being conducted both from the mainstream media, the enemy war transmissions, known as the mainstream media, and even agents within the so-called alternative media.
You know, and one of the most notable players just had a billion dollar judgment against him.
And he's saying we're at the verge of a nuclear war.
I don't believe that either.
Nice.
Very nice, Chris.
Well, as far as that Emmanuel Macron variant or whatever you're calling it, you give these guys enough time, they will find ways to kill us.
Soft kills are hard.
And yeah, the fear and the illusion of safety have often been the alibis of tyrants.
I would have to say this is no different.
They are trying to condition helplessness and really they are breaching their oaths of duty in office and really, more importantly, the trust of the common man.
If you really look at the track record of these people, it is absolutely atrocious.
Like I said, Congress maybe has a 10% approval rating, and yet people blindly revert back to following these poor leaders that have not only deceived us, but betrayed us at best.
So, yeah, it's amazing how they're trying to condition the people into this helplessness and really trying to rescind and remove any legal or social recourse.
I mean, look at that mainstream media.
They are such accessories to this mass genocide, and they haven't even been scrutinized or questioned.
You know, like we're talking in the last segment about deniers.
That's something hard to deny, isn't it?
Nice.
Nice.
Very.
Excellent.
Meanwhile, vaccine hesitancy is one of WHO's top 10 global threats, but flu shot data tells a different story.
The World Health Organization proposed 10 threats to global health, such as air pollution, noncommunicable diseases, global influenza, Ebola, other high-threat pathogens, weak primary health care, and HIV.
Among them, Vaccine hesitancy was also mentioned, which many might find surprising, even perverse.
The elevation of this issue to a global health threat is a rather political approach.
From this perspective, it should not be acceptable to the public.
Just as consumers evaluate the quality of products they purchase, people want to know the vaccines they're getting are good in quality and efficacy.
If a vaccine proved to be effective, while there are minimal side effects, most wouldn't hesitate.
Further, VAX is just one of the preventive measures aimed at protecting vaccine recipients against diseases.
Vaccine protection effects depend on the functional immune system in the vaccinated people's bodies.
There are many other ways to achieve the same outcome, such as boosting an individual's innate immunity.
The term vaccine hesitancy, moreover, is not scientific.
Rather, it's a term of politics.
It's become a label to be used to attack people, or described as vaccine hesitant and also labeled anti-science.
This is irrational and should not be promoted, especially by such an authoritative international health organization as the WHO.
One example is whose promotion of the human papillomavirus, the HPV, in the name of eliminating cervical cancer on a global scale.
Prior to the development of cervical cancer, however, there are already precancerous cells in many females, which can be caused by various internal mechanisms of the body.
Vaccination alone cannot prevent the development of all cervical cancers.
Therefore, WHO's proposal to eliminate cervical through HPV vaccination is unscientific and sounds more like a marketing campaign for the vaccine products.
Currently, the most commonly used method of influenza vaccine is the egg-based approach, where flu viruses are grown and replicate themselves, then isolate, purified, and inactivated before being added to the formation to produce vaccines.
Although cost-effective, it's prone to mutations, which can lower their efficacy and cause potential problems, such as weakening the immune system.
Here you have these LAIV versus inactivated flu vaccine changes in T-cells.
What do we have?
When implementing flu vaccine, the more responses from T-cells and B-cells, the better.
From the graph below, we can see among children aged five to nine in terms of T-cell, inactivated flu vaccines are less effective than live attenuated flu vaccines.
Here we have the changes in T-cells.
Furthermore, vaccines are not a panacea that work for everyone or every age group.
This graph shows the change of the T-cells in children and adults after the immunization with one dose of LAIV.
We can see that although the same type of flu vaccine were administered in terms of T-cell response, they're more effective in children age 5 to 9 than in adults.
Therefore, we can conclude these flu vaccines have varying effects on different age groups.
The same vac may not have the same protection from everyone.
Age, gender, body mass, response to vacs are all involved.
So when designing vacs policies, there should be an adjustment for different age groups and different body types and other relevant variables.
This further illustrates that people should have self-determination for vaccine based on their own individual factors.
Although LAIVs are more effective than inactive flu vaccine, they're not as widely promoted as inactivated vaccines due to their side effects.
Thus, the next generation are expected to have better stimulation of T cells through new technologies such as the DNA recombinant technology.
An example is one from Wayeth Lab, which is a T-cell activating vaccine based on the H5N1 flu strain produced by Wayeth.
However, it also induces a higher incidence and degree of mutation Even if the virus strains used in the production are not grown from eggs, there are still mutations at important hemagglutinin receptor binding sites.
During this virus screening process, mutations concerning gene segments are introduced, and this changes the strain's replication capability.
In the 1970s, T.W.
Hoskins and colleagues observed a phenomenon in a British boarding school for the first time.
That was flu vaccination in prior season can reduce the efficacy of a vaccine in the new season.
Known as Hoskins effect, academics have explored for decades and scratching their head, the general public is unaware.
As shown here, within 14 days of flu, around 40% of people who had been previously vaxxed were nevertheless infected with the flu virus again.
The percentage in which individuals who got vaxxed and became hospitalized was 9%, while only 4% for the hospitalized patients who were un-vaxxed.
Thus, the flu vaccine doesn't always reduce disease severity or prevent critical illness, as the public has led to believe, which is driven by annual flu vaccination campaigns and public relations efforts.
Many believe the benefits of flu vax outweigh its drawbacks.
That's why they promote it.
But there have always been questions about their efficacy.
Currently, the CDC recommends those over the age of six get seasonal flu vaccines.
However, What are the impact of these flu vacs on our community?
According to Frontiers in Immunology, a human cohort vaccine study has been conducted since 2016-17 flu season with adult over age 18 and teenage 12-18 year participants who are vaccinated annually for the flu.
Their immune responses to repeated annual vaccination is tested.
The participants are enrolled without having received the seasonal flu vax.
In the teenage pop, the inhibition was relatively adequate.
However, it came down in the following flu season, also in the adult.
While the study wasn't rigorous and the sample size was small, the factor of underlying medical condition was not included.
Many of them already had respiratory, cardiovascular, and or neurological conditions.
Still, while it wasn't stratified, it showed in this paper how many people, whether vaccinated or not, have underlying medical conditions, thus very biased, drawing more conclusions than the data can suggest.
In summary, Objective evaluation of vaccine efficacy and safety are critical to provide unbiased information to the public.
An international organization or health regulators should avoid politicizing the people who carefully evaluate their choice of vaccinations.
Vaccine hesitancy is a political label that should be abandoned by health agencies and international organizations like the WHO.
Scorpio.
Well, interesting article, a lot of flawed thinking in it though.
Look, guys, vaccines are a fraud, pure and simple.
Vaccines are a hoax.
Jews have been at the forefront of the vaccine industry and vaccine science since the beginning with Jonas Salk and his miracle polio vaccine.
a huge psyop, a huge way to introduce the idea that the only way we can deal with disease is vaccines.
And I think we need to abandon the whole paradigm of this because there's much better ways to help people.
Most notably working on increasing the strength of people's natural immunity through a variety of means, including proper diet exercise and a healthy lifestyle.
Let's not forget that vaccines are a huge business.
You know, in all of these conspiracies, there's always an element of money at one layer of the onion.
You know, just like with 9-11, with the short selling of airline stocks, they're always making money from every single one of these scams they pull.
And this idea of vaccine hesitancy is really laughable because, you know, it's again, it's a psychological tool because it implies, well, you're just hesitant.
You're going to get the vaccine, but you're just a little hesitant about it.
But the reality is, is that what I see in real life is a lot of people who have vaccine regret, they regret taking that COVID shot, because they know that something's not right with their health now.
And You know, the idea, the whole idea of a flu shot is so absurd.
If you think about it, like, there's these guys in white coats in a laboratory, and they're going to predict what the next flu strain is going to look like.
We're going to use computer models and decide, you know, even though it's supposedly happening at random through nature and, you know, just variations of the so-called virus, we're going to predict what that'll be, and we're going to make this magical solution that we're going to inject into you, and it's going to protect you from the flu.
And guys, you know, It's really, it really is possible that the initial wave of COVID may have indeed been started with the previous year's flu vaccine.
That's possible.
I'm not saying I believe it for a fact, but it's possibly because I know, I've actually asked people who said, Oh, I know someone who died of COVID.
And I'm like, Oh, really?
Every single one of them when I asked them, well, did that person, were they in the habit of taking a flu shot?
Every single time.
Yes, they took their flu shot every year.
So there is some kind of correlation between the flu shot in the initial wave of COVID.
And the idea now with flu shots, they're going to start using these mRNA flu shots.
So they know that the jig is up on the on the COVID vaccine.
So they're going to give you the COVID vaccine and call it a flu shot.
Okay, that's what they're going to do.
And so depopulation is the name of the game.
And once you give government agencies and fraudulent agencies like the WHO, the power to mandate An injection of any kind that bypasses the blood-brain barrier in your body, the natural, the biggest part of your immune system, which is your skin, so that things can't go directly into your blood system.
Once you give government that kind of control, they can put anything under the sun in that witch's brew they call a vaccine, and inject you with it, and God only knows what's going to happen to you.
We have to remember at all times depopulation is a big part of the agenda.
So, you know, it's a fool's errand to believe and accept the idea that you need any kind of injection mandated by the state.
And of course, you know, the whole concept of mandate is meaningless.
A mandate doesn't mean anything.
It was a legal trick to make you think the government had some kind of authority.
A mandate means nothing.
It's not a law.
It's just some guy signing a piece of paper trying to trick you into thinking They had the power to make you do something.
Great points, Scorpio.
Terrific.
Chris?
Yeah, you know, it's kind of funny.
These Rothschilds and Rockefellers and all these aristocracy bankers and whatnot, they always have this proclivity to collect things like plague fleas for hobbies and fun, how to depopulate the common man.
You know, and I got to wonder how they developed such this contempt for the common man.
And it's really probably something that's derived from their own self-conscious guilt of knowing that they've dispossessed systematically for hundreds, if not thousands of years.
the entire human species in the manner which they have in systematically in the ways they have and justified it through our version of history so.
Yeah, it really doesn't surprise me that these guys are using these inversions and this type of you know sorcery against it to try to put to turn your doubt into fear or fear into doubt or things like that to make you question what's real and buy what's fake.
The term hesitancy, you know, I mean, why not have such commitment and blind faith to the will and testimony of these psychopaths that are providing this entire theater?
You know, have they provided any research to us?
Any data?
No, not a chance.
Have they censored anybody that's been victimized or injured by this?
Absolutely.
And anybody that's questioned this, they've called them deniers.
So I'd have to say it's almost like them being on the winning side of the witch hunt.
And really, at some point in time, you know, the public perception is going to have to turn and start to scrutinize these people that are putting this bullshit out.
Yes, yes, yes.
Absolutely.
Good stuff.
Meanwhile, show trial.
Alex Jones' case wasn't decided on its merits.
Henry Mackow, Professor James Fetzer above, who's facing a $450,000 penalty for his book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, says truth is no defense in 2022 America.
Alex Jones and his lawyers did not even try to use it, which reveals Jones may be in on a charade designed to stifle dissent.
Why didn't Alex Jones use truth as his defense?
Great question, Henry.
Robert Barnes, who was actually in the courtroom in Austin during the first of the three trials, bear in mind none of these cases involved jury determination of the facts.
All of them were decided on procedural grounds.
Found it to be unlike any trial to ever experience with three cameras in operation.
One focused directly on the jury.
He thought it looked like a made-for-TV movie.
I think he got it right.
He has also observed improprieties in the second of these trials.
Notice Jones has been censored from explaining that he only covered Sandy Hook less than 1% of the time.
They almost never denied that it happened, that if you unmute value to it, it would be 1,000th of 1%, a tiny fraction of a billion.
I sought to intervene in all three of Alex's defamation trials in order to point out, in no case related to Sandy Hook, has there been a jury finding that anybody died.
I was not surprised I was opposed by the plaintiffs, whom I regard as frauds who are milking the system for money, but also by the defendants.
And I've even reached out to Norm Padas, one of his attorneys, and volunteered to be an expert witness on his behalf, to no avail.
I also sought to intervene in the Remington case, where again I was opposed by both sides.
You might think Remington would have fought against a $73 million settlement, but it appears the insurance companies are making an investment in anticipation the outcome will be insurance for every legal gun owned, which is going to render them huge profits in the multi-billions.
Once again, the case was not decided on its merits, but on the basis of stipulations or agreements.
I had released my edited book Nobody Dies at Sandy Hook as a FEMA drill to promote gun control as a PDF when Amazon.com banned it after having been on sale less than a month.
In Wisconsin, a lawsuit was brought for an alleged defamation of one of the alleged parents known as Leonard Posner, whom I declared from the beginning to be a legal fiction for publishing that an incomplete death certificate with no file number, town, or state certification was fake.
The scan of the document had been shared by the plaintiff himself with a colleague of mine, Kelly Watt, with whom he had had over 100 hours of conversation.
The document on its face was no more authentic than a driver's license with no number and no state seal.
A complete version, with file number, town, and state certifications, which was attached to the complaint, however, was claimed to be not materially different, which made the case legally absurd from scratch.
Because I knew the strength of the evidence I'd amassed through collaborative research with a dozen other experts, including five other PhDs, where we determined the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students there, and that it had been a two-day FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
I regard this as an opportunity to present the evidence to the public through the judicial system and thereby establish the facts of a massive fraud.
It would turn out that Wisconsin has a rather peculiar summary judgment protocol allowing the court to determine whether or not alleged facts are or are not reasonable, where they may be set aside as though they did not exist if the judge, based upon his own subjective opinion, determines them to be unreasonable, which would entitle him to discount the abundant and compelling proof that I submitted in my defense.
Here I've gone all the way to the Supreme Court and my petition, alas, has been denied.
The court systematically precluded or discounted my evidence, including the reports of two forensic document experts, where the plaintiff and I could not have been more at odds on the facts.
I maintained it had been a FEMA drill for which I had published the manual where nobody died, while the plaintiff alleged that his son, Dume, referred to as NP, had died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012 of multiple gunshot wounds on the basis of the perverse SJ methodology used in Wisconsin.
The circuit court either ruled out my evidence as inadmissible or declared it to be unhelpful, and thereby found there to be no disputed facts, which would have instead required a jury trial to resolve, and ruled that I had defamed the plaintiff.
The trial for damages, analogous to the three of Alex Jones, which, unlike mine, are being televised, awarded 450 in damages.
I took my case to the Court of Appeal District 4, it upheld the circuit court, and in consecutive paragraphs declared that it was reasonable to believe that Adam Lanza shot his mother and 20 kids and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary, and that it was unreasonable to believe it had been a FEMA drill where nobody died, in spite of my evidence, which included an FBI Consolidated Crime Report for 2012.
Given the absurdity of the SGA procedure in Wisconsin, I submitted a petition pro se to the U.S.
Supreme Court and supplemented it with an application for a stay because Leonard Posner was moving to take my blog, jamesfetzer.org, and the Sandy Hook book to satisfy the $450,000 award.
In Wisconsin, monetary rewards can only be satisfied by money.
Well, intellectual property, such as blogs and books, are not, but the circuit court nevertheless gave them to the plaintiff.
The timing was striking since a conversation on conversion occurred on July 28, 2022, the morning of which, during the first Alex Jones trial for damages, My name and those of other Sandy Hook skeptics, Sophia Smallstorm, James Tracy, and Wilf McHalbuck would be taken in vain.
But if someone wanted to learn what that batshit crazy fencer had to say about Sandy Hook, they could no longer access my blog because it had already been taken.
My SCOTUS case would fare no better.
It was sent to conference on 28 September.
On 3 October, I'd learned it had been denied.
My application for a stay did not catch up with a petition and would likewise be denied the following week, even though it makes a powerful case for getting rid of certiorari, including satisfying the four criteria that are the basis for electing cases for our highest court to review.
My ongoing research on Sandy Hook has further confirmed it was indeed a FEMA mass casualty exercise, as the manual declared.
It was on the schedule to be conducted at Sandy Hook Elementary on 14 December 2012, on the Connecticut branch of FEMA's own schedule.
I believe Wisconsin was chosen to sue me because the SJA protocols put the facts of the case under the control of the judge.
No jury required, and it worked.
So in none of these cases, including my own, was there a jury determination a mass shooting took place at Sandy Hook Elementary on 14 December 2012.
I've done my best to expose the truth in collaboration with over a dozen other experts, but to no avail.
It appears to me that the U.S.
judiciary system, up to and including the U.S.
Supreme Court, has been compromised and that we no longer live in a constitutional republic.
Sad to say.
Scorpio, your thoughts?
Well, Jim, you know, this is a further indication that we don't live in a democracy and that some of the elements of the system that we are supposed to believe are legit are indeed not.
They're captured and have been weaponized against us.
And look, you know, Jim, even if every single word of your book is completely wrong, And you're completely off base on the whole thing, which I seriously doubt.
Even if that's the case, you have the right to write a book and to sell it, because it's not like you have the power to make anybody read it or force people to buy it.
You know, it's absurd.
And the idea that hurt feelings, that's what this all comes down to, is that hurt feelings equal millions or even now a billion dollars.
Uh, which I don't believe the Alex Jones thing at all, but the very idea that that is somehow a concept is absurd.
And there's so many problems with this Alex Jones show trial.
Uh, for example, You know, the, the, um, Alex Jones attorney accidentally sent, uh, you know, uh, the, a whole bundle of emails with confidential information to the opposing side.
Like how did that happen?
We're supposed to even believe that, but he sends all these emails to the opposing side.
And then the judge says, well, you can keep those emails and use them however you want.
And Hey, let's forward them over to the January 6th committee.
Cause that way we can connect all this together in this giant conspiracy against democracy.
You know, this is all so absurd, and the idea we're supposed to believe it is real, it's becoming, you know, an exercise in complete fantasy to think that these things are real.
And, of course, the objective, again, is to scare us.
That's always the objective, to scare people from daring to voice your opinion.
And, of course, we're going to see the same strategy here, or we are seeing the same strategy, as the Holocaust.
You have to censor because it won't stand up to critical research and to critical thinking any more than the Holocaust will.
You know, people actually go to jail in Europe if they question the Holocaust.
Well, what about the fact that, uh, gee, there was wooden doors that weren't even sealed at the bottom, uh, in the gas chambers.
Uh, what about that?
What, you know, I mean, come on, what about the fact that the Germans were having a huge fuel shortage and they're going to waste fuel burning bodies?
Come on, this is all completely absurd.
And it does not stand up to critical research.
That's why it has to be censored.
And that's the whole point of this Alex Jones ridiculous trial.
And Jim, it's interesting how your trial, your plight has gotten no Mainstream media attention from the, you know, from the national news or anything like that.
But Alex Jones has been on the news night after night after night, you know, beating the drum, drilling this home.
Yet Alex Jones is still doing a show.
He's still selling magic penis pills, making lots of money, and he's not been shut down.
It's not going to be shut down until it's time for him to retire.
And remove him from the stage.
So, you know, and the other thing that's amazing about the Alex Jones trial is that Alex Jones never even mentioned that couple by name during his shows.
Yet somehow he's liable to these people for hurt feelings.
You know, come on.
This is absurd.
And since when does hearsay get admitted into court?
Like, they said in court, well, I was threatened.
Alex Jones fans were emailing me and coming to my house and threatening me.
Well, there's no proof any of this.
It's hearsay.
You know, I can make up something.
It's not admissible in court, yet all this was taken as absolute fact.
It's just further indication this is a show trial.
They weren't following any of the so-called rules of a court.
All that went right out the window.
And the bottom line is hurt feelings equal big money now.
Wonderful, wonderful Scorpio.
Chris?
Yeah, I think that Alex Jones has always been kind of a useful idiot or maybe even a wisely placed type of person to lead the opposition in terms of conspiracy theories and questioning the official narrative.
He's always provided 80-90% truth and maybe 10-20% strong opinion.
And I think that maybe it could be even a ploy to enhance his long-term street credential type of thing, as well as to establish a legal precedent To scare the hell out of anyone from ever questioning and scrutinizing the official narrative.
It's almost like, you know, they're going to start passing notes of attainder and taking everything you could potentially own for questioning this type of stuff.
And I think that's a big part of why this Bar Association, the judges, the lawyers are all in on this.
And I think they really gift wrapped Alex Jones in terms of this trial for this type of judgment.
I almost wonder if his lawyers were like tanking it for the sake of him getting a mistrial for their lack of service to him as a client.
So yeah, I don't know.
I just have my doubts about this whole thing.
I think it was absolutely like Scorpio says, a way to distract from real people that are questioning this.
That it actually do have more valid points and they're willing to present them to the court of law.
And in your case, Pets, the judge wouldn't even want to hear it, wouldn't even let it into deposition, right?
So, I mean, you didn't even have your data, your information, your research presented to a jury.
It was just the judge decided, nope.
And it's all at the same time that the Jones is going through this mock trial.
So, even the judgment itself, a billion dollars is absurd.
And I think it's absolutely part of the process too.
Very, very nice.
Great package, you guys.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
The Supreme Court is a rotting corpse.
Three legit cases, then they slip in a couple travesties that are beyond the pale.
Libra is supposed to mean lack of partisanship.
Justice should be blind in deciding cases.
Nothing is farther from the truth.
Judges are political appointees, plain and simple.
Biggest farce going.
How do you feel about Alex Jones possibly being part of a huge conspiracy?
where he's part of the charade.
That's why I have great concerns that we got lies like Norm Pattis.
Soon there'll be no courts and judges.
We'll all be judged by electronic devices neatly slipped under our skin.
Boggling, Jim, boggling.
Mike, final thoughts.
Scorpio, yours.
Well, I agree with the emailer's point about SCOTUS.
You know, SCOTUS here, they hand over this, you know, this Roe versus Wade, you know, overturn right at the beginning of the midterm election fights, you know, I'm sure.
I've always found that the timing of that to be awfully suspicious.
And, you know, all these, these stupid conservatives thought, well, this is great.
We're going to get, we're finally getting rid of abortion.
This is wonderful.
But, you know, I think it should go back to the states personally.
That part of it is good, but the timing of it is all really screwy.
And the idea that, you know, this pushing abortion restriction is a loser.
I'm personally against abortion, but it's a big loser.
You're not going to stop abortion through The law, you can only do it through some kind of moral standing, some kind of moral code that the public chooses to live by.
So it's a big loser for the Republicans pushing that.
All it's done is activate all the the hardcore libs that think they're losing their rights to an abortion.
And, you know, so I agree that the whole SCOTUS thing is a joke.
They wouldn't take your case, of course, because it's kryptonite.
They can't let any a notion come that that's sandy hook might have been a scam or a government job because the whole house of cards starts to collapse once you see that then what about 911 what about you know 100 other things so they can't let any of that ever come to to the public's understanding that.
That's why there's this big push to scare everybody and the big Alex Jones Show trial for a billion dollars.
It's a joke and it's all designed to scare us.
And of course, you know, Alex Jones is now he's he's trying to get people commits.
We're on the edge of a nuclear war.
Any day now that bombs are going to start dropping here by some, you know, magic penis pills and some iodine, you know, and you know, some stored food, you know, again, making money through fear.
Chris.
Yeah, it is kind of scary how they do control the dialogue and really, really distract you with absurdities.
And then when they lose interest or really get exposed as absurdities and they distract you with additional absurdities, all while completely avoiding the crucial aspects of the conversation.
Like, say, what Scorpio says with the abortion thing, you know, they never tell you what they're doing with stem cells or fetal cells or any of this stuff.
They don't say anything about how big of an industry that is towards vaccines or even stem cell treatment or things like that.
There is a whole nother level of commerce and economy and facts and data that are completely just skewed away from from these controlled opposition dialogues.
And I think that that is very much part of of why the media is there to really focus the distraction on something that they feel is suitable and certainly not incriminating as this would be.
Let me say that I've been looking forward to today's show because I wanted to bring together David Scorpio and Chris Weinhart as a dynamic combination for.
Frankly, it doesn't get any better than this.
Every one of their comments was spot-on, articulate, clear, forceful, penetrating, just sensational.
My own thoughts, I simply add, we've already seen the weaponization of the Department of Justice and the FBI to go after the political opponents of the Biden administration.
This is a behavior typical of a banana republic.
What has in the past distinguished America has been its adherence to the rule of law, the concept of equal justice under law, and the right to a trial by jury.
I'm very sad to say that based on the experience you've just been hearing, not only Alex Jones, but me myself, that no longer appears to be the case.
The Supreme Court had every reason to take mine, not because it involved me, but because it involved an abusive summary judgment procedure in Wisconsin that affects Hundreds or thousands of residents here who are not getting their right to a trial by jury because the judge is allowed to make up his own mind about it, no matter what the facts might be.
Not only that, but other states have similar procedures.
I have a colleague in Massachusetts Who told me theirs is just like Wisconsin.
There's even a federal board or committee that reviews federal claims for federal employees that has a similar character.
Well, they're all wrong.
Every one of them is wrong, and I teed it up for the Supreme Court to clean it all out.
Not only that, but it turns out by a peculiar set of circumstances, among the first 10 amendments, only one has not been affirmed by the Supreme Court to apply to all 50 states.
That is the Seventh Amendment, or right to a trial by jury.
Plus, a retired professor of law has explained to me that the greatest problem with the American judicial system today is the abuse of summary judgment.
I gave the Supreme Court the opportunity.
I teed it up.
They're going to hit it out of the park.
That they declined to even take the petition tells me we're in a very bad way.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends, your family, the people you love.
We do not know how much time we have left, whether it's nuclear war, a new wave, whatever.
Spend those precious moments with people you love.
▲
Export Selection