All Episodes
Previous Next
Oct. 17, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:10
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (16 October 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and David Kenney
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back folks this is Tooth Vs. News on October the 16th and we're in the middle of a hot discussion about all kinds of things including PayPal and the world events and things that are really going making us going down right now so Jim what else do you have to offer?
Well, let's see, Don, where things stand.
Turns out Louisiana is divesting $794 million from BlackRock to protect their funds from ESG investing.
BlackRock, ESG, environmental, social, and governance investing strategies.
BlackRock has urged companies to embrace net zero, ESG, which would harm the state's fossil fuel industry.
Louisiana, of course, is a top 10 crude oil producing state, third largest producer of natural gas in the United States.
The move forms part of a growing anti-ESG push by Republican politicians, which culminates in actions such as Florida passing a resolution to no longer allow ESG consideration to be used by fund managers for its $228 billion pension fund.
Texas Puccini list of fund managers, including BlackRite, Credit Suisse, UBS, and others, slated for potential divestment from its pension fund due to their strong ESG credentials and support for zero investing and advocacy.
Basically, it sounds like promoting green energy and You know, gender transition and the like.
BlackRock, as the largest global investment management company and the leading voice on climate change and energy transition-related themes, which are all based on pseudoscience, have been definitively refuted as false.
It's founded at the center of many of these efforts.
Louisiana's Attorney General, for example, accused BlackRock of acting with mixed motives to pursue anti-fossil fuel and net-zero energy agenda.
BlackRock responded, hitting back at misconceptions and what it claimed were inaccurate statements, that their climate focus is aligned with their fiduciary duty to identify short- and long-term trends in the global economy that may affect our clients' investments.
Blackrock's letter also implied the recent anti-ESG initiatives may ultimately work against investors' financial interests, stating the firm is disturbed by the emerging trend of political initiatives that sacrifice pension plan access to high-quality investments and thereby jeopardize pensioners' financial returns.
That sounds like trying to turn the argument around.
The ISG investing threatens our democracy, however, adding he's convinced it's a threat to our founding principles of democracy, economic freedom, and individual liberty.
That's the Attorney General of Louisiana.
According to the letter, Treasury has already divested $564 million and plan to liquidate the rest over time.
I think this is a good thing.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I think you're seeing an overall re-evaluation of Black Rock on a variety of levels.
I mean, there's so much sinister storytelling about Black Rock, purposefully trying to break people out of their homes and buy up homes and fill them with Newly arriving immigrants and all sorts of a constriction of money and power and melting away of the middle class.
And I think, quite honestly, there's been a lot of studies and documentaries on Black Rock that indicate its insidious nature in undermining American values and backing the mega Uh, Walmarts and other, uh, you know, economic corporations, which has inevitably destroyed the Republic of the United States by making us an oligarchy rather than a republic.
And, uh, the corporate greed was also part of the global expansion plan and the war on terror.
Francis Fugiyama, the end of history.
All of this is wrapped together in megalomaniac, centralized Government-corporate partnership power, but I think that's coming apart.
Jim?
David?
Well, you know, I like the line that said, all of a sudden it's going to put a buffer on pension access, meaning getting your money back.
You know, I've seen this scheme unfold with the state of California.
I've told you about You know, Public Policy 21, I've told you about AB 312, which was just a plan to move pension funds down into Mexico.
And, you know, this environmental, this social, this governance, engineering, this green world that we're all struggling to get into, I get the objective of having a symbiotic relationship with the earth to a certain extent, You know, just activities like that to keep our humanity, keep ourselves healthy.
I think helps.
I advocate Tai Chi, I advocate yoga, I advocate just activities like that to keep our humanity, to keep ourselves healthy.
But this love of money and this greed is overwhelming.
And I believe we're entering into a new era where politics are essentially driven simply on the goal of finance.
Where public policy, like you were saying earlier, Jim, with respect to the trans movement, that all these hospitals are adopting it, you know, the insurance is rewarding it because it's economic opportunity.
So we're getting into very Unethical, you know, I think, illegal aspects or schemes that are just focused on acquiring money at the expense of people.
And it is truly disheartening because it's, you know, you said it earlier with First Timothy 4.15, where love money is the root of all evil, and I think that's absolutely it.
It goes back to education.
solution.
And, you know, even last week, I think the point was, how do you educate some kids from MS-13 that just came across the border?
Well, you know, give me two weeks, give me a couple books and, you know, give me an opportunity.
I might be able to do that.
Maybe not, but hell, I'm, you know, I'm willing to give it a try.
But, you know, ultimately, education has an aspirational content to it.
It has an inspirational component.
And that's what learning is all about.
Aspiration, inspiration.
And it's not about degeneracy.
And if we don't take our schools back, if we don't refocus our educational institutions on, not on finance, we have to move away from finance and move closer to the truth.
Hug the truth, love the truth, enjoy the truth, and you'll have a nice supernatural relationship.
I think it's a, there's a real problem with the teachers unions.
Go ahead.
Have an education system, not an indoctrination system.
And exactly how to think and what to think of what to do, but given the skill sets to be successful in their own way.
Okay.
Yep.
We agree.
Meanwhile, ABC host asked an expert about the Democrats' midterm chances and is unhappy when smacked with reality.
If polls are close, it's a Republican win.
On a recent episode of the Rubin Report, in which senior national correspondent Terry Moran delivered some bad news about the Democrat prospects in next month's midterm.
Less than a month ago, Democrats were feeling pretty hopeful about their chances.
Do you still get that sense, said the host, Martha Raddatz.
Nope.
I think the air went out of that balloon, Moran answered without hesitation.
Look, the economy is so tough with so many food prices, rent spiking, they got retirement funds, they're laboring.
I just think the economic headwinds are tough, and Biden is.
He just doesn't have the oomph as a candidate anymore.
People don't really want him around.
He can't really make his case.
I don't think the Democrats are in any better place.
He went on to explain why he believed people should not believe public opinion pors anymore either.
In this country and others, polls are broken, right?
He said.
It's clear.
Lots of people on the right don't answer anymore.
They're worse in 2020 than they were in 2016.
And you look at the polls, if it's close, it's a Republican win.
That's interesting because, you know, you don't get a lot of good analyses, obviously, out of mainstream media, said Rubin himself.
The corporate press always want to frame everything through, how can we sort of save the Democrats?
But here's Moran basically being like, the economy's so banged up, Biden doesn't have oomph, right?
This thing is so screwed up.
Absolutely.
More CBS poll.
GOP turns tide on Dems' momentum in the midterms.
Here's Trump tweeting, why didn't the unselected committee ask me to testify months ago?
Why did they wait till the very end, the last moment of the last meeting?
And of course, the answer is, so it would be closer to the midterms.
Republicans have stayed off a Democrat run this summer, seeing the house, GOP house, which actually shrinked for three months until the latest CBS News battleground tracker poll.
Republicans now projected to hold 224 House seats and the Democrats 211.
The top issues are also in Republicans' favor.
Economy, 80% inflation, 76.
Crime, 68.
Lead among likely voters, a near majority of likely, 48%.
Said the Democrats, economic policies have been harmful, only 28% helpful.
Abortion remains important, but the poll shows a five-point decline in those who say abortion is a very important issue.
Also, 68% said Biden should do more to curb inflation.
65%, the economy is getting worse.
45%, Biden's policy bears a great deal of responsibility for the economy.
Another quarter, some 8%.
No responsibility.
Plurality say Republican policy would help the economy 42% compared to 33% who think they would harm a majority of both Republicans and Democrats.
55% and 54% respectively consider the opposition party extreme.
CBS analysis shows younger voters, along a Democrat voting bloc, less enthusiastic about voting in these midterms.
Among the patterns we've observed, younger people don't seem as likely to turn out as they did in 2018.
The group did turn out just four years ago, helping along a blue wave.
So, suppose they do show up.
Replicating 2018 turnout pattern would mean under 45 voters go to about a third, Combine that with current voters' preference, you get an estimate that puts the Democrats ahead at about 219 seats.
That would make the House control a toss-up and mean Democrats have a chance to narrowly save their majority.
But Republicans have the momentum on their side.
On the flip, are there indications that Republicans could expand their lead from here?
Yes.
Several knife-edge House races within a point of 50% for it may very well break heavily toward one party, which is typically what happens in a wave.
This year wouldn't take much change for that to happen.
One way it could occur is Republicans' current advantage on turnout grows a bit larger.
What if more Democrat voters, disappointed with Biden and the state of the economy, decide to sit it out?
Suppose their turnout ends up six points lower than Republican.
A plausible scenario, since the Republican voters are six points more likely than Democrats to report they're definitely voting.
Assuming current vote preferences, it would flip several more seats, put the GOP ahead with 233 seats, a complete reversal from the majority Democrats won four years ago.
And that 20-seat gain would very much be in line with how the party out of power performs in a typical midterm.
I tell you, it's going to be much, much worse for the Democrats if we're allowed to vote much, much worse.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, the, you know, the Republicans are notorious for shooting themselves in the, in the foot.
They are not leading and charging as they should.
Some of the Trump candidates, Trump endorsed candidates, Are saying the right things.
We don't have any business being in Ukraine.
We shouldn't be giving our money to Ukraine.
We shouldn't be worshipping this climate change.
We shouldn't be shutting down our society in this COVID-19 hysteria, which the Democrats destroyed our Bill of Rights.
Very few Republicans are speaking that way, but the ones who are, are overwhelmingly supported and winning.
The milquetoast Mitch McConnell establishment, loosey-goosey, limp-wrested, average Republicans that don't talk with a militancy and a fury.
They just kind of tread along.
They'll be lucky if they get voted in, but it won't be because of their talent or their intellect.
It will be because of people's disgruntled rejection of Biden and the Democrat agenda.
So Republicans are failing by really not acting.
They're playing it so safe, like, well, maybe we just will keep quiet and hope and we'll win.
Well, that's a very dangerous bet, because at the end of the road, at the end of the time, unless you get in and really punch and be loud and be abrasive, You're not going to wake some people up and scare the hell out of them to say, you want to return to this?
Because the Democrats are going to do it and worse next time.
So yes, I hope and pray that the Democrats are completely washed out like the garbage they are when this tide of election comes in in November, but I don't have a lot of faith because the Republicans are not striking.
They're like little soft drum, you know, just tapping, not banging as they showed the war drum.
No, they're just kind of tapping.
That's unnerving to me.
Uh, but the other thing to watch is, like you said, if we're allowed to vote, Jim, the Democrats may engage in massive election suppression, fraud, false flag attacks.
I've said before they may assassinate Biden and Harris.
They may do a nuclear strike.
They may do all sorts of things to try and trigger a traumatic experience in the American public to say, well, we have to go into martial law.
We have to suspend the elections.
I won't be surprised if they do that.
I won't recognize it.
I won't abide by it.
Right there, you'll be the declaration of civil war, essentially, if they come in and try and stop the election.
Why would they do that?
Because they know their time is short.
They know that The American people, for the most part, have been simmering And their rage has been simmering, and their violent fury to overthrow a fake president has been simmering, and they're going to unleash it in the ballot box when they vote.
And if the Democrats try and stop that, you could see that expressed in a variety of other ways.
So I think the Democrats are going to try and suspend the elections by all means possible, because they know their political lives will end in a massive sort of polite French revolution, but if they do interfere and they do pull something, then their political lives will end in a very real violent French revolution.
I don't doubt that because I think everybody has caught on to the fact that this is no longer a free republic, and you have no further to look than Merrick Garland, the FBI, going against the president, raiding Mar-a-Lago, going up to PTA meetings, arresting ladies who stand up against the LGB agenda, the weaponized arresting ladies who stand up against the LGB agenda, the weaponized FBI against the American It will only get worse
And all of this other, you know, stuff, the COVID and the forced vaccinations and all of that, I think, are going to lead to a tremendous clash.
But we'll see if there is an election this November.
Jim?
David?
Yeah, I really think, based on the trajectory of the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, The United States of America is at a wilting point.
There's no vision that is a year out, is two years out, is four years out, is six years out, is ten years out, except more of the rhetoric of Donald Trump, which we're going to be hearing about You know, the election hoax, which I, you know, I, I, I, I believe there was an elect, I believe the election was stolen.
But that doesn't mean I want to hear about it for the next four years.
And, and I believe he was harassed by the FBI, but that doesn't mean I want to hear about it for the next four years.
I'd like to see Some some vision for America.
Someone who has a vision of, you know, green paths, of a healthy environment, of a strong social system, people helping one another, you know, People being able to afford and buy homes and buy automobiles and ride their bikes on weekends and play in sports and do all the things that we did as kids and as young adults and as adults.
And that vision of America has gone into the tank.
Now the vision of America is wars in the streets.
It's hand-to-hand combat with different cultures attacking one another.
The dismantling of America seems to be the biggest vision that everyone sees, and it's just the wrong direction.
America has such a wonderful history.
It has such an appealing ethical and moral compass to it, and I just think it would be nice to see someone with a vision who can preach a message of support Preach a message of helping.
Preach a method of working together and actually collaborating on things.
And that's gone in our society.
It's just nothing but rancor, protests, reciprocal recriminations.
It's just an America that's falling into the trash can.
Well, we have an economy that's falling apart.
We have external foreign relations that are just at the worst point that they've been since the 1960s.
No, it's just a pity.
And it's a pity because we have within the parties themselves, when we have leaders like Nancy Pelosi, when we have leaders like Kevin McCarthy, I mean, they have no vision.
These people have virtually no vision.
I remember when Newt Gingrich had the Contract for America, and there was recently another thing for the Something for America or the Pledge to America or whatever, big rhetoric of the Republican Party.
But there wasn't, there's no promise in it.
You know, I yearn for that promise.
I yearn for, you know, for example, let's make America the most educated planet on the earth.
I mean, the most educated society on the earth.
Let's struggle and let's work on something like that.
But this absence of looking forward and seeing anything other but the prospect of mutual nuclear annihilation, War in the Southeast Asia and in the Southeast Asia Sea.
I mean, we look at the threat to Taiwan and China imposing its will on Taiwan is really the absolute worst that we can imagine.
When we think about American democracy and what it stands for.
So this promise of America, this great expectation of having a future and having a good prosperous future has just gone by the wayside.
Everybody is struggling to pay gas, to pay their bills, to pay their insurance bills, to pay their utility bills.
You think it's bad here?
Just imagine what's taking place in Europe and you've got people like He's got virtually no vision except a mirror in front of himself.
And you've got people like Boris Johnson, who's been booted out of Britain.
And then you have the new finance guy who's tossed out within 30 days because he's a bloody socialist.
So when I think about America, And I think about what the parties have to offer.
I see nothing but degeneracy from the Democrats, and I see no hope from the Republicans.
Well, that's pretty distressing.
Scott, you want to add?
Let me just say one thing.
We may have the story.
Do we have the story on Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez being accosted by her own voters?
No, no, go ahead.
That is a significant paradigm shift, politically speaking.
You have Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez going to an auditorium, and her own Democrat backers stood up and bellowed at her, roared with, you have betrayed what you came into office, you were supposed to be against war, you're supposed to be against this military juggernaut, and you've sold yourself and become that which you said you opposed.
Her own people were rising up saying, you have us on the brink of nuclear war, nothing else matters.
Tucker Carlson had this excerpt.
RT.com had this excerpt.
So you have Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, you know, who just doesn't get it.
She's telling people, you're being rude.
These guys are roaring at her, how she has betrayed everything that they hold dear and have put them on the brink of nuclear war with Russia.
They're furious!
They have a right to be furious!
They want to live in the America David Kennedy's describing!
And this tells you that a lot of people in this country may be turning against their Democrats and may be turning against them and not voting.
I don't think David understands the power of being non-Democrat.
Non-open borders, you want closed borders.
Against inflation, you want to have a reasonable economy.
Not going to war in Ukraine, for God's sake.
Having a rule of law, having a strong Second Amendment.
Getting rid of the January 6th Committee, which is all happy horseshit.
There's a whole lot of virtue, David, right in those simple platform positions all by themselves.
Your thoughts?
No, I get that.
But there's constant Struggling in each of those issues.
There's not an element of that that has any buy-in for the Democrats.
That's just a simple idea.
How about the notion of peace?
How about the notion of joy?
How about the notion of protecting family rights?
How about the expectation of working and buying a house, buying a car?
Let's get back to the America that we knew about, we grew up with, not this Not this you're scared to step out of your own house because you're going to get either killed by a virus or killed by your neighbor.
That's just not a good feeling.
You got that right.
Meanwhile, here we have serious Joe Biden.
This is very nice.
The Washington commanders have updated their injury report.
Joe Biden is out indefinitely with dementia.
This is a John Raab report treating politics in Washington as though it were the NFL.
The Washington commanders have updated their injury report.
Joe Biden is out indefinitely with dementia.
Kamala Harris has been placed on injured reserve with an unspecified cognitive disorder.
Adding to the train's hubble, Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre was sent down to the practice squad after failing to explain the chaos at the southern border.
The commander's entire offensive line is facing a leaked suspension for trying to ram through an order to dump fossil fuels or replace them with windmills.
Owner Dan Snyder has been subpoenaed to testify before a joint session of the House Energy and State Psychosis Committees.
The commanders appear mired in another dismal season.
Fiends are growing less and less.
However, warnings have been posted that the stadium protests, or the urging of protests, will be viewed as acts of domestic terrorism.
Ticket prices have risen 20% over the past several months.
The team states this is owing to recent Russian military action near Kiev.
After last season's implementation of mandated hiring quotas, a source told the Washington Post, even the human resources and staff training departments are filled with people who don't know what their job entails.
It's trickled down to other new hires.
The building is basically filled with milling gaggles of the clueless.
The Bermuda grass at FedEx Field is brown and brittle as a result of the drought brought on by climate change, which causes both freezing and hot weather conditions.
Team doctors are now screening all players for mental health issues using the American Psychiatric Associate list of 300 defined conditions.
So far, 19 players have been diagnosed with borderline personality and or oppositional defiance disorder.
Five of the players are retained attorneys and are suing the team and the doctors for medical malpractice, since none of the 300 psychiatric conditions is diagnosed by a physical test of any kind.
A consultant was brought in to conduct required seminars in critical race theory.
After two sessions, the consultant was physically attacked by several players in a hallway outside the cafeteria.
Team Meal Steve threw another assault last week when steak was replaced with soy.
A vegan chef was treated for injuries at Walter Reed.
Rumors are circulating someone placed a controversial pamphlet in Team Wrestling Room in the last 24 hours.
The brochure describes, step by step, the exact surgical procedure for a man undergoing full transition, including a claim that actual removal of the penis and testicles is involved.
The NFL is investigating.
Commissioner Roy Goodell has called the pamphlet incendiary and basically racist.
And he told the New York Times, if we find that a player was responsible, he'll be banned for life.
No questions asked, no appeal possible.
This is America.
Yep.
God, I think John Rappaport has a vision.
Well, we are the laughingstock of the world by having a zombie-walking retard, child-molesting pedophile with a son who's a drug addict and a traitor who sold America down for $30 million to the Chinese Communist Party, that have actively engaged in the development of biochemical labs in Ukraine, that have used Ukraine for human trafficking and money laundering.
The Biden family is a derelict, racketeering criminal group that ought to be after due process of law, of course, charged with treason and executed for treason.
So Biden is president.
I've said this for a long time.
Every nation is looking, just shaking its head, going, God is cursing that nation with every form of wickedness and perversion and disgust.
And Joe Biden is the president, is the perfect emblem of all of that.
That's why the Saudi Arabians are turning away from the United States and inclining more into Russia because they see their sovereignty and their safety rooted in Russia.
They won't be attacked if they join with Russia because Russia will be served as the interlocutor between Iran and Saudi Arabia.
And I said this on Press TV, it represents a wonderful opportunity for tensions to be eased on various fronts, the Yemen war and others.
But all nations are turning away from the United States.
India, As well, and I think Europe is again going to turn away from the United States when they recognize that the United States is extorting them by destroying the Nord Stream pipeline and charging them four times as much for gas.
Everything we seem to be doing on the foreign policy and domestic policy is a form of national suicide, Jim.
Our boss is as dumb as they get.
David, your thoughts?
Well, yeah, it goes back, you know, it goes, I hate to give you my political stand, but, or my platitude, but it's peace and joy.
But I do want to say that, you know, I think what, I think what, what we're having delivered to us by President Biden is nothing but extortion of our enemies and friends.
You know, we used to have We've had great relations with China.
We've had great relations with Taiwan.
We've had positive relations on an international level that have resulted in feelings of security and Safety and security by the American people.
This, every day we wake up, I look at Fox News every morning, I'm waiting for a nuclear blast over in the Ukraine.
You know, it's just, that's the, you know, we have biochemical warfare, we have a threat of nuclear war, we have lockdowns, we have the coronavirus.
I mean, I've about given up on this country, you know.
And I'm just hoping for a new breath of fresh air.
And I don't see it from our corporations.
I don't see it from our banking institutions.
I think that the dementia of President Biden and the cognitive disorder of Kamala Harris is just going to send us down into the rat hole over the next two years.
I will say that the leaders are programmed to take us down.
These are not our leaders.
These are people that are paid off by the big boys, the WEF and others to bring us down.
It's called the Cloward-Pippen scheme that we shared last week so well.
That's what's happening, folks.
This is a program that's been in place for decades.
Yes, yes, yes.
Sorry to say.
Meanwhile, popular athletic clothing brands turn out to have high levels of hormone-disrupting chemical BPA.
This is bizarre.
Sports bras, athletic shirts made by global sports brands, contain dangerous levels of estrogen-mimicking chemical bisphenol A, commonly known as BPA, posing a risk of people's health.
BPA, an endocrine-disrupting chemical that upsets a body's functioning through blocking or mimicking hormones, is linked to developmental and health problems, mostly for young children.
For adults, studies find they result in health problems.
Experts connect to obesity, diabetes, ADHD, and other ailments.
The CEH sent legal notices to Athletica, Pink, ASICS, The North Face, Brooks, All-in-Motion Nike, and FILA Relarting Sports Bras, and The North Face, Brooks, Mizuno, Athletica, New Balance, and Reebok for its active wear shirt collection.
Testing showed that individual wearers were exposed to 20 times the safe limit as permitted under California law.
It can be absorbed through the skin and end up in the bloodstream after handling receipt papers for seconds or just a few minutes.
Sports bras and athletic shirts are worn for hours at a time, and your mitt has sweat in them.
So it's concerning to find such high levels in our clothing.
They may have also discovered in polyester-based clothing with spandex, including socks made for infants.
Even low levels of exposure during pregnancy have been associated with a variety of health problems in offspring.
Resulting abnormal development growth can increase the likelihood of developing breast or ovarian cancer later in life.
California's Proposition 65, enacted in California in November of 1986, requires the state to maintain a list of chemicals known to cause cancer or reproductive toxicity and businesses operating to provide warning on products containing such chemicals.
The list now includes 900 naturally occurring and synthetic chemicals, including additives and ingredients in pesticide, common household product, food, dyes, and solvents.
Penalties can reach up to $2,500 per incident per day.
The proposed maximum allowable dose of EPA is 3 micrograms per day.
However, detractors of the legislation have said Proposition 65 warnings inspire terror, apathy, or confusion.
They say the state's designated benign plants, such as aloe vera in the toxic list that includes a deadly chemical benzene, Raising questions about the validity of the warnings for the average consumer.
They've become so ubiquitous, they've lost their meaning, and consumers tend to ignore them.
Meanwhile, Alaska's snow crab season has been cancelled for the first time ever, where officials are perplexed by a mysterious disappearance of, get this, one billion crabs.
The mysterious disappearance is occurring for the first time in history, cancelling the entire 2022-2023 snow crab season.
The stock is estimated to be below the Department of Fish and Game regulatory standards for opening a fishery.
For the second year in a row, they cancelled the Bristol Bay Red King Harvest Crab for the 2022-2023 season.
There's been a sudden dramatic plunge in crab stocks in the region.
Miranda Westfall, an area management biologist, noted the conservation organization had seen the largest pulse of small crab we've ever seen in the history of fishery in 2018.
However, the Fish and Game of Alaska said there was a whopping 92% decrease in snow crab abundance from 2018 to 2021.
2018 to 2021.
Last year's harvest with 5.6 million pounds is smallest in more than 40 years.
An estimated a billion snow crabs have mysteriously disappeared.
That was really unexpected.
I don't think anyone saw this coming.
The Seattle Times reported, scientists are still reaching the causes of the snow crab population collapse, which likely includes increased windation as well as stress from the warmer winter that caused the crab's metabolism to increase and could have led to starvation.
That's nonsense!
I'll tell you my suspicion.
It has to do with Fukushima.
The cancellation could cause the state's economy 200 mil.
Management of Bering snow crab now focused on conservation and rebuilding.
In 83, there was a similar crash, wiping out a massive amount of the population of Alaskan king crabs.
Then they were perplexed and blame factors ranged from parasitic disease to increased losses to predatory fish to overfishing.
Yeah, I think that's interesting.
I agree with you, Jim.
will contribute to the ever-growing food shortage has been felt worldwide.
Perhaps that's the point.
Scott, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think that's interesting.
I agree with you, Jim.
I think Fukushima and the nuclear disaster has poisoned the waters and the ecosystem to a large degree.
And, you know, again, it's also suspicious because these environmental issues are, of course, used as gasoline on the fires of the environmental fanatics that are, again, pushing the new religion of climate change to again, pushing the new religion of climate change to To justify people eating bugs.
We're living in dirt and really degrading our entire civilization to the Dark Ages, and it's going to be coming down to a fundamental fight for life and existence.
Do you want to live In a cave with candlelight eating bugs?
Or are you willing to stand up and fight and die to overthrow these climate religious zealots to preserve our right to live with, live and burn fossil fuels, oil, natural gas, develop nuclear technology, which is, you know, a better technology.
But Fukushima was, you know, many, many, you've known this too, many speculated it was an intentional targeted attack by the Israelis.
So I wouldn't put that past him, Jim.
And I wouldn't put the WEF or Rothschilds away from devastating sea life, you know, any source of food.
They're out to do it.
They could have a diabolical solution that devastated the crab harvest.
David?
Yeah, this is a, you know, I like the observation that Fukushima maybe the salmon, Pacific cod, halibut, rockfish, and mackerel that are abundant in the area to see if they've been impacted as well.
But obviously, you know, the snow crab that is in the Bering Sea and gets into the Aleutian Islands and all the fishing and everybody looks forward to it The programs are great.
You know, this is really, it's not just an environmental effect.
The question I have is, is it really believable?
Maybe we're just being sold another ton of bullshit, but I don't think so.
The exposure, the environmental aspects, Fukushima, all those things have something to do with it, but I just think it's a great loss, and it's just, we're looking at this continual degradation of everything in our world, and I just see it happening at a precipitous pace.
Well, I think when you got the destruction of, you know, 100 food processing plants and all this, this is an extension of the depopulation program to bring about mass starvation, and it's moving forward very aggressively.
Meanwhile, DeSantis slams the light sentence given to Nicholas Cruz in the murder of 17.
I think if you have a death penalty, there's a case where you're massacring a student with premeditation and utter disregard.
You deserve the death penalty, said DeSantis.
He seems not to know what really happened there.
This was another staged event.
I've actually written to him with evidence, with proof, that it was fake.
The Senate's Democratic opponent for governor, Charlie Crist, agreed.
There are crimes for which the only death penalty is death.
The Bargland families and community deserve that degree of justice.
These events involve bringing in the whole community.
They're paid off big time.
The school released the students at 1 p.m.
because it was a holiday, Valentine's Day.
There were 3,500 students there, but only a few dozen stayed behind to function as student crisis actors.
They went through the evidence.
Some of the jurors just felt the appropriate sentence was life rather than death.
More than one juror was actually involved.
Cruz will formally receive his life sentence on November 1st.
Here's some of the things that DeSantis doesn't seem to know.
They were so sloppy they forgot to put up the obituaries for the students.
It was an event on February 14, 2018.
Well, only Alice Levinson, who is 84 years old and obviously not a student at Marjory Stoneman Douglas, was posted as having died on that day.
We have a video from inside one of the classrooms where they use a black training dummy with no head and no arms on a pool of fake blood.
You look at this event and you'll see the whole thing is completely fake.
check it out
Let's go, let's go, let's go.
Let's go, let's go.
I make a few points before I play it again.
You got a kid pulling his pots.
You got a girl whirled about a bottle of water.
Another's on her iPod.
You got people in police uniform going in and out.
You think, wow, those Parkland cops are really Johnny on the spot.
Except Parkland gave up his police for it around 2010.
Those are actors in police uniforms.
And of course, the fact that using a training dummy with no head and no arms on a pool of fake blood, you got a student Phonely holding his arm.
This is all absolutely fake.
The girls are doing their best to pretend they're scared, but it's phony as it could be.
*crying* Oh, come on.
Oh, oh, oh.
Let's go, let's go, let's go.
Come on, run, run.
Oh, go on.
Oh, my God.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's disgusting to me to even be an American.
We live in a government, in a country where they play these theatrical mind control games and psyops to intimidate people and steal their Second Amendment.
You've done the Groundbreaking work, Jim, of course, on many of these operations in Florida.
The Pulse nightclub, which was exposed as a fraud.
Of course, the Boston Marathon bombing, another fraud.
The Sandy Hook shooting, another fraud.
This theatrical at the Stoneman School, another fraud where allegedly people are shot with bullets and then miraculously on crutches with little band-aids on.
Yeah, you get hit with a 5-5-6 round, it's going to shatter and blow your leg off.
It's going to have to be amputated.
Your bones are going to be shattered.
It is a sign of the severe mental sickness in this country And, you know, until I can't see any other way than, you know, people, pioneers and real information warriors standing up exposing this for what it is.
And I know there's a lot of criticism about Alex Jones being a secret mason, which I wouldn't doubt.
He certainly puts his finger to the lips when he says these things are seen as lies.
So, we are surrounded by evil, led by evil, saturated by evil, and it is a sign of the times, and we have to break out of it by all means necessary.
Jim?
David, your thoughts?
You know, to be honest with you, I'm really kind of...
Mystically confused by Sandy Hook, Parkland, the nightclub, the Parkland shooting.
I think these, you know, I Jim, I have not studied this stuff in depth.
I'd be happy to undertake and to lead an investigation that would examine all the forensic evidence, but I noted in your publication that there's been no real conclusive judicial findings.
Um, and I find that a little bit disturbing so I don't have, I don't have nor do I want to put my place myself in the position of either advocating or attacking the validity of the work, I think.
You know, Alex Jones getting hit with a nine, I think was nine hundred fifty six million or something like that.
Some ungodly claim.
You know, just it just tells me that this whole series of events that we have, we have a Baldy, Parkland, Sandy Hook, all these different events.
We have FEMA drills, Air Force apparently reports of Air Force jets flying in and then departing from Evaldi and stuff.
They just raised the specter of they're not true events.
And it's really disturbing to me because if this is what we're being fed by our news media, this is what we're being fed by our government, it's nothing but as Don's holding out political theater.
It's very disturbing to me. - And I guarantee you it is Don.
Meanwhile, here we have the latest about Alex Jones.
Henry Mankow published Why Didn't Alex Defend Himself, claiming it was the truth.
He asked me to respond.
Professor James Fetzer is facing a $450,000 penalty for his book Nobody Died on Sandy Hook says truth is no defense in 2022 America.
Alex Jones and his lawyer did not even try to use it, which reveals Jones may be in on a charade designed to stifle dissent.
Why didn't Alex Jones use truth as his defense?
Great question, Henry.
Robert Barnes, who was actually in the courtroom in Austin during the first of the three trials, bear in mind none of these cases involved jury determinations of the facts.
All of them were decided on procedural grounds and found it to be unlikely, unlike any trial he'd ever experienced with three cameras in operation, one of which was focused directly on the jury.
He thought it looked like a made-for-TV movie.
I think he got it right.
He also observed improprieties in the second of these trials.
Notice Jones had been censored from explaining that he only covered Sandy Hook less than 1% of the time, that he almost never denied that it happened, that if you imbued value to it, it would be a thousandth of 1% a tiny fraction of a billion.
I sought to intervene in all three of Alex Jones' defamation trials to point out that, in no case related to Sandy Hook, has there been a jury finding that anybody died at Sandy Hook.
I was not surprised I was opposed by the plaintiffs, whom I regard as frauds, who are milking the system for money, but also by the defendants.
I even reached out to Norm Padas, one of his attorneys, and volunteered to be an expert witness on his behalf, to no avail.
I also sought to intervene in the Remington case, where again I was opposed by both sides.
You'd think Remington had put up a fight against a $73 million settlement, but it appears the insurance companies are making an investment in anticipation the outcome will be insurance for every legal gun owned, which is going to render them huge profits in the multi-billions.
Once again, the case was not decided on its merits, but on the basis of stimulations or agreements.
I'd released my edited book, Nobody Died in Sandy Hook, as a PDF when Amazon banned it after it had been on sale less than a month.
In Wisconsin, a lawsuit was brought for an alleged defamation of one of the alleged parents, known as Leonard Posner, whom I declared from the beginning to be a legal fiction, for publishing that an incomplete test certificate with no file number, town, or state certification was fake.
The scan of the documents had been shared by the plaintiff himself with a colleague of mine, Kelly Watt, with whom he had over 100 hours of conversation.
The document on his face was no more authentic than a driver's license with no number and no state seal.
A complete version with file number, town and state certification, which was attached to the complaint, however, was claimed to be not materially different, which made the case legally absurd from scratch.
Because of the strength of the evidence, I had to master collaborative research with a dozen other experts, including 500 PhDs, where we determined the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students there, and that it had been a two-day FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
I regard this as an opportunity to present the evidence to the public through the judicial system and thereby establish the facts of a massive fraud.
It would turn out Wisconsin has a rather peculiar summary judgment protocol allowing the court to determine whether or not alleged facts are or are not reasonable, where they may be set aside as though they did not exist if the judge, based upon his own subjective opinion, determines them to be unreasonable, which would entitle him to discount the abundant and compelling proof that I submitted in my defense.
Here's a Supreme Court docket where my petition was indeed distributed for a conference on the 7th, where an application for a stay was distributed as well, but both the petition and the application were denied.
The court systematically precluded or discounted my evidence, including the report of two forensic document experts, where the plaintiff and I could not have been more at odds on the facts.
I maintained it was a FEMA manual for which I'd published a manual where nobody died, while the plaintiff alleged that his son, whom he referred to as N.P., had died at Sandy Hook on 14 December 2012 of multiple gunshot wounds.
On the basis of perverse summary judgment methodology, the circuit court either ruled out my evidence as inadmissible or declared it to be unhelpful and therefore found there to be no disputed facts, which would instead have required a jury trial to resolve, and ruled that I had defamed the plaintiff.
The trial for damages, analogous to the three of Alex Jones, which, unlike mine, are being televised, awarded 450,000 damages, which I took my case to the Court of Appeals District 4 and upheld the circuit court, and in consecutive paragraphs, declared it was reasonable to believe Adam Lonsday shot his mother and 20 kids and six adults at San Diego Elementary, and that it was unreasonable to believe it had been a FEMA drill where nobody died in spite of my evidence, Which included an FBI Consolidated Crime Report for 2012.
Given the absurdity of the summary judgment procedure in Wisconsin, I substituted a petition pro se to the U.S.
Supreme Court, supplemented with an application for a stay, because Leonard Posner was moving to take my blog, jamesfetzer.org, and the Sandy Hook book to satisfy the $450,000 award in Wisconsin, Monetary rewards can only be satisfied by money, which intellectual property and such as blogs and books are not, but the circuit court nonetheless gave them to the plaintiff.
The timing was striking, since the conversion occurred on 28 July 2022, the morning of which, during the first Alex Jones trial for damages, my name and those of other Sandiwick skeptics, Sophia Smallstorm, James Tracy, and Wolfgang Helbig, would be taken in vain.
But if someone wanted to learn what that batshit crazy fencer had to say about Sandy Hook, they could no longer access my blog because it had already been taken.
My SCOTUS case would fare no better.
It was sent to conference on 28 September, and on 3 October I learned it had been denied.
My application for a stay did not catch up with the petition and would likewise be denied the following week, even though it makes a powerful case for granting a writ of certiorari, including satisfying the four criteria.
That are the basis for lacking cases for our highest court to review.
My ongoing research on Sandy Hook has further confirmed it was indeed a FEMA mass casualty exercise, as Emanuel declared.
It was on the schedule to be conducted at Sandy Hook Elementary School on 14 December 2012, on the Connecticut branch of the FEMA agenda attached.
I believe Wisconsin was chosen to sue because its protocols put the facts of the case under the control of the judge.
No jury required.
And it worked!
Here you see the actual schedule from the Connecticut branch of the FEMA for the Sand Duke Elementary exercise on 14 December.
So in none of these cases, including my own, was there a jury determination that a mass shooting took place at Sand Duke Elementary on 14 December 2012.
I've done my best to expose the truth in collaboration with over a dozen other experts, but to no avail.
It appears to me that the U.S.
judicial system, up to and including the U.S.
Supreme Court, has been compromised and that we no longer live in a constitutional republic.
Sad to say.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, Alex Jones, if he was an honorable and honest man, would have had his attorney say, Mr. Jones, what did you base your opinion and your words upon?
And he could have said, funny you asked that, this is what I based it on.
I based it on, number one, that Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill, based on this.
I based it on this and this.
He should have went down your book and listed 50 different subjects for three different vantage points.
That would have compiled the defining substance of the facts that could not be refuted.
Is it true that the school was shut down, Mr. Witness or prosecutor or whoever?
The school was shut down?
All the cars were parked in the same direction?
On and on and on and on and on and on and on!
You laid out all of the evidence, Jim, in your book, and Alex Jones, I think, is a treacherous coward and a liar and a hypocrite when he puts his finger to his mouth and he does something like this, and he does not say, the authority of my position on Sandy Hook was developed by Dr. James Spencer in his astoundingly well-researched book.
He was a former professor, and I found nothing disagreeable in his facts.
And it was on these facts that I determined this entire event was fraudulent.
He didn't do that.
And that tells me he's a spy, and a liar, and a mason, and everything foul in between.
And he is a limited hangout, because a man of truth would have held up the truth to say, this is why I made this decision.
And you tell me which facts in his book are wrong.
Because if the fact is right, then everything that they said happened is a lie, and it's a fraud on this court.
And I demand the court, sua sponte, to determine, because there should be no case whatsoever.
Jim?
This is a book, this is a bible, this is, this is it.
How can they say that this is not helpful?
This is, they haven't refuted anything in here.
It's unrefutable, I think.
It's just, Rock solid, Jim.
David, your thoughts?
Yeah, my thoughts are, you know, I've been in a similar position.
I put together a petition.
I put together a case in the Superior Court regarding school bonds in the County of Los Angeles.
All of a sudden, it got advanced into school bonds taking place in L.A.
County, in Ventura County, San Luis Obispo County, and Santa Barbara.
When I went to the Court of Appeal, I then got an adverse decision, but they kind of recognized that what I was saying was accurate, but I couldn't get jurisdiction because the service on the defendants was prohibited because of the fact that there was COVID going on and people weren't at schools and they couldn't be served and so on and so forth.
So, I then decided to take it to the California Supreme Court.
I put in I did every county in the defendants were every county.
There are 58 counties in California, so I did all every county that had school bonds pending and I named the county as a defendant and also the.
The school districts that were promoting the bonds.
It was a simple case.
It was none of the districts When I filed the case, I filed a request for judicial notice.
And the request for judicial notice was a compendium of 20 years of cases where only two or three out of literally thousands of bonds had complied with Education Code 15272.
So I filed that as a request for judicial notice.
In addition, I filed my moving papers for an injunction.
I submitted it.
I got this wonderful decision from the Supreme Court that said, we're going to recognize your facts as true, which was a great relief.
And I thought I was waiting for the next paragraph, which didn't arrive.
About a week later, I got the letter that said, your application for a hearing has been denied.
So the only thing I can say is I know the feeling.
Oh, wow.
Don, take us out.
Oh.
I don't want to take us out on that kind of a note.
I mean, this book is something else, and it's got to stand.
I mean, it stands strong.
You stand strong.
We stand strong in the truth, and that's what's important here.
It's October the 16th on Truth vs. News, Incorporated.
We've got three weeks to go to that election, if we're going to have it, and other things are going to happen this week.
I think we're going to have a big, well, there's going to be some financial Anyway, hang on to your hats, folks, and get ready to come back next week.
Hopefully, we'll still be here and it'll be another, hopefully, a very informative and more pleasant show.
This was heavy.
▲
Export Selection