Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 27, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:13:28

Need to Know News (26 September 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Here we go.
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joel Senn, still in Houston, Texas, and Carl Herman, still in San Ramon, California.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with Russia mobilizing 300,000, promising only defensive use of nukes—actually, Russia has a whole lot of sophisticated weapons that are non-nuclear—while the Western leaders, who appear to be psychopaths, beg for their own annihilation.
	Russia's partial mobilization brings about 300,000 to be trained and put into service in the conflict in Ukraine.
	I think they need them just to Pacify all the areas that they've already taken control.
	It's well known now that Ukraine's military offensives are being run by NATO troops using NATO satellites, training in gear.
	Russia, in other words, is already fighting NATO.
	Russia realizes the West will not be satisfied anything short of the complete obliteration of Russia, which of course it will not allow.
	Four Donbass republics are voting in a referendum to officially become part of Russia.
	The Ukrainian government threatens up to five years in prison for anyone who even votes in the election, proving they have no interest in democracy or self-determination.
	Nevertheless, they're taking place.
	From what I hear, the residents are very happy to be voting.
	and it's highly likely they will join Russia.
	Once that's established, Russia will consider an attack against them as attacks on Russia itself.
	That will trigger a defensive response from Russia, which may include every type of weapon available.
	While Putin's mentioned or others, the use of nukes, Honestly, I don't think they actually need them, but it's a way of getting the point across.
	Western media, which lie now more than Pravda ever did, claim it's Putin threatening the use of nukes, but he's talking about them as a defensive measure and thereby calling for a Western preemptive nuclear strike.
	What's troubling here is that the West seems to abandon the mutually assured destruction posture of the past to adopt one of nuclear primacy.
	In other words, that we could attack Russia and they would lose more than we would lose, which would be regarded as a victory, a form of insanity.
	I encourage everyone to watch again Stanley Kubrick's brilliant film, Which I regard as the most important ever produced Dr. Strangelove.
	While Putin appears to be acting rationally in his own nation's self-interest, Western leaders are behaving like psychopaths, even psychotics, utterly disconnected from reason and reality.
	There seems zero recognition Among the leaders of Germany, the UK, or even the USA, that provoking Russia into a nuclear exchange would go horribly wrong for the West and probably spill the end of Western civilization.
	It's like we're wearing highly flammable clothing at the birthday party of a spoiled brat and the parents just gave him a flamethrower.
	What do you think is going to happen next?
	Translated into reality, we're already suffering under the economic devastation of the West's anti-Russian sanctions, some referring to them as suicide sanctions.
	The idea of a first nuclear strike against Russia is ludicrous.
	Provoking Russia into a nuclear exchange when they have the best anti-ICM missile systems is like getting into a gunfight with an opponent carrying the world's best ballistic shield.
	Another suicide wish.
	At this point, every informed person should be prepared for a nuclear war.
	Understanding is being provoked by USA and NATO out of desperation.
	Fortunately, Putin is far more measured and patient and rational than any Western leader.
	He won't strike out, but if forced to, in order to defend Russia, he will use them.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes!
	Well, exciting other news in Russia.
	Snowden is now a Russian citizen.
	So the guy who defected after sharing all of the CIA's dirty laundry in 2013 is now officially a Russian.
	I salute you, Mr. Snowden.
	Yeah, getting back to the Russian elections, Alex Kristofor has a great analysis of that on his BitChute channel.
	Which is the official Alex Kristofor channel, and he says that they had three days of voting in the four different provinces.
	The requirement was from the Russian government that you must have 50% voter turnout to prove that this is a legitimate election.
	As of day two, Two of the provinces have had 45% voter participation with another full day to go, and the other two have in excess of 71, like 75 and the other 77% turnout, so you can pretty much guess which way the vote are.
	He said the people over there are just absolutely giddy about the chance of being protected by Russia from these NATO Nazis, so that's interesting news.
	And then we also have the The Ziolinski effect, where world leaders who hug this stupid Zio puppet end up being so toxic that they get knocked out of office.
	So we have BoJo in the UK, we have Macron who stole his election outright from Le Pen, and then when they had primary, I mean House Parliament elections, lost his leadership, so now Le Pen has more power because he can't get anything passed without her approval, and so she will be the next leader of France.
	And then we have Sweden, where they just overthrew their left-wing government that was trying to get them weaseled into NATO for some oddball reason, like being neutral for the last 150 years has not been a good idea for Sweden.
	Okay, and then over the weekend, we have the Italian Giorgio Melone, who is elected preem, and the very first thing she did is, I want to pledge my allegiance to the State of Israel, because Israel's done the most wonderful thing with that So whatever.
	Yeah, she's a conservative.
	Yeah, she's going to really help Italy a lot.
	But you can tell her party went from 4% vote to 28%, giving her the largest percentage of the dozen different political parties in Italy.
	So she's the de facto leader and will certainly be sworn in.
	You know, it's another little dose of the Ziolinsky poison because people in Europe are starting to realize it's fixing to get really freaking cold and we got no way of warming our house.
	The stupidity of the West in relation to Russia, the sanctions, has been mind-boggling.
	Carl?
	So we are in the fog of war, and the advantage of us at Need to Know News is at least we know we're in the war.
	We know there's a war out there.
	It's World War III on one side.
	We have the US, UK, and NATO, and their puppets and allies, and they are engaged in a color revolutionized Empire, including Ukraine, with the color revolutions in 14 and 16.
	And just as that article says, Zelensky will say, you know, you can't even fucking vote in that election in the Donbass otherwise we'll put you in prison for five years.
	And Putin's peace deal, remember, was just no NATO for Ukraine and independence for Donbass.
	That obviously is unacceptable terms for the empire.
	And the other side, so we have the Empire on one side, arming Ukraine and willing to fight to the last Ukrainian there, versus Russia and...
	Ooh, is the question!
	We can see from the political backlash that Joe points to that it looks like that more people are standing up against the Empire, you know, but we shall see.
	It is greatly still in the fog of war.
	So the only thing that we are in charge of, again, is what we think, what we say, and what we do, so continue to make it count.
	Yes, yes, yes, and it's going to work out much, much worse for Ukraine than if they'd only accepted the initial proposal of Putin and agreed to not join NATO and stop attacking the Donbass.
	Meanwhile, climate activists are going out of their way to oust a Trump-appointed David Malpass from the World Bank, even though he's been doing quite a good job, it would appear.
	Originally appointed by Trump to head the World Bank, the U.S.
	is the largest shareholder, traditionally appoints the president.
	His five-year term sets through the spring of 2024.
	The left has been trying to push him out for over a year.
	He's regarded as an uncooperative holdover.
	The World Bank has rebuffed calls for the institution to stop financing fossil fuel projects.
	Last year, over 70 NGOs issued a joint demand for him to be replaced for not demanding an end.
	Former Vice President Al Gore, now a far-left climate activist, says we need to get rid of that leadership.
	It's ridiculous to have a climate denier the head of the World Bank.
	I say it's ludicrous to have someone who was once vice president to buy into the climate change myth.
	The statements don't seem to have pacified those seeking his ouster, but he's observed that greenhouse gas emissions are coming from man-made sources, including fossil fuels, methane, agricultural uses, and industrial use, and we're working to change that.
	But that's not the same thing as concluding that they're making a difference to the temperature of Earth, which appears to be provably false.
	Officials know replacing Malpass would be messy.
	They're unsure how they could even orchestrate it.
	Some Biden officials have gone so far as gaming out potential replacement, including Gore himself and John Kerry, now Biden's climate envoy.
	They certainly are sufficiently corrupt and hypocritical to play the role.
	The irony of calling for an end to fossil fuel financing while Europe's on the edge of an economic crisis because of the lack of funding for oil and gas, and the U.S.
	is still reeling from record high gas prices, is lost on Malpass's critics.
	Meanwhile, Breitbart News reports, We witnessed a furious reaction when the head of the World Bank declined to immediately swear an oath of loyalty to the left's position on climate change.
	There's a firestorm here.
	The usual suspects are pressure groups for the transfer of money and authority into government hands, calling for his head.
	Al Gore announced it's ridiculous to have him there.
	In reality, the campaign against Mountbass is what is ridiculous.
	Under the leadership of David Malpass, the World Bank Group doubled its climate finance, published an ambitious climate change action plan, initiated country-level diagnostics to support countries' climate and development goals.
	He clarified later, saying he's not a denier.
	He agrees about greenhouse gas emissions are coming from man-made sources, but he says, too, that they're contributing to climate change.
	That's a dubious proposition, depending on its interpretation.
	Similarly, it's not the job of the controller of the currency, by the way, to address climate change.
	It's one of America's primary bank regulators, along with the FDIC and the Federal Reserve.
	Absurdly, it has an office charged to assess climate change risk.
	Because the Biden admin has adopted the left-wing view that regulators should discourage financing of fossil fuels under the guise that it creates a risk for banks of incurring losses once the U.S.
	inevitably rejects energy that produces emissions that are accused of contributing to climate change.
	There's nothing inevitable about this, however.
	It's an option won among many.
	It's not been written into the laws or regulations of the United States at this point in time.
	There's no consensus among the public that this should be the goal.
	There's been virtually no public deliberation about the matter, which is astonishing given its political use by the left.
	Even among those who agree climate change poses serious challenges, there's no necessity or agreement that abandoning fossil fuels is the right response.
	Americans may well decide the cost of abandoning fossil fuels are likely to be greater than the cost of developing new technologies to reduce our emissions and adopting to a world with changing climate.
	Linemakers have twice rejected the views financial regulators should enforce climate change as an agenda or priority on the banking system.
	Next, the rejection of Sarah Bloom Raskin at the Federal Reserve, a prominent advocate who's using the concept of transition risk to pressure banks out of funding fossil fuels.
	Fortunately, Joe Manchin Showing his sanity on this occasion, and every Republican senator realized regulating climate through supervising bank stances was a bad idea.
	This did not stop Biden from appointing China-educated ESG proponent as the chief climate risk officer of the OCC, which is not a position subject to Senate confirmation.
	The Biden admin, led by radical academic theory, is attempting to conduct stealth regulation of the U.S.
	economy by starving industries it doesn't like to finance, which ought to worry everyone.
	The ridiculous spectacle of Representative Hashiba Taleb, a member of the Squad, Demanding a House hearing the leaders of our biggest bank pledge to end financing new fossil fuels is incredibly embarrassing.
	Fortunately, they refused to do so, with Jamie Dimon, the head of JPMorgan Chase, colorfully explaining this would put America on the road to hell.
	She responded to their refusal by threatening the banks with regulations to force them to comply.
	This is especially disturbing when we're witnessing events as Europe is plunging into a deep recession because it did not invest enough in fossil fuel infrastructure, allowing itself to become dependent on Russian natural gas, which would have been a good deal if only they were willing to pay in rubles and hadn't sanctioned themselves out of the Enormous supply of Russian gas coming cheaply directly from Russia.
	We're only a few months away from the spike to a record high in gas prices.
	The last thing the global economy needs now is less investment in oil and gas.
	Yet that's what each of these events are trying to bring about.
	If anything, the real transition risk has turned out to be the fact that the U.S.
	and European economies tried too early The World Bank has an absolutely horrible record on the environment.
	They're the ones that finance the asset stripping of every major third world country on the planet, including all the rapes of Africa and the Rainforest of Brazil.
	So the fact that this guy's in that position at all just indicates that he's a little bit nefarious to begin with.
	And being only a lukewarmest instead of a total warmest advocate is no salvation for the guy.
	He knows absolutely bum, freaking nothing about climate.
	He won't stand up to these people.
	He just won't roll over as far as they want him to.
	And getting back to some more little things about Italy, yeah, their former prime minister was a guy named Draghi.
	He was the one that bumped out.
	He was a Goldman Sachs guy, and they forced him onto the Italian people.
	He's the one that said, yeah, I'll go along with all these NATO sanctions, and that's what's crippling all of Europe.
	But then we also have the Unelected Prime Minister of the whole entire EU, which is Ursula van der Looney, spelled L-E-Y-E-N, but if you pronounce it Looney because she's Looney as a bat.
	She said before the Italian elections, if they don't pick the right Prime Minister, we have tools Yeah, she certainly has a tool.
	Her tool is the European Central Bank, headed by Cristina Legrande, who said that she will just not finance anything in Italy if they don't pick the right prime minister.
	So you want to know how extortion works?
	It works with freaking bankers!
	That's really shameful, Carl.
	Trying to think of some pun with the Prime Minister with a tool like Big Mike or in New Zealand.
	Because I don't know about that woman you were referencing.
	She is a tool, we will say at least that.
	So the article is interesting.
	It's cancel culture on the surface, which is what Our opponents have to have, they have to have total censorship, they have to have total message control because they are Orwellian liars.
	So this David Malpass guy of the World Bank, well Joe's right, the World Bank is like the IMF or the UN or NATO or the WEF, any of these organizations.
	They're criminal and their purpose is not to alleviate poverty.
	purposes to virtue signal while you have official policies of poverty and mostly just to control humans as human resources in order to extract the maximum profit from the natural resources that the U.S. acquires through Wars for Freedom.
	And this David Malpass guy, so he was the CEO of Bear Stearns before Bear Stearns went under and then was purchased by J.P. Morgan, I believe, after the crash, This guy has written for Forbes.
	He's written for the Wall Street Journal.
	And if you don't stand up for the truth, as Joe was saying, then he's a tool, too.
	The fundamental idea of this revolution is the banksters will constrict us through their economic system and is propped up by the Federal Reserve, all the central banks, and it's creating what we use for money as a debt owed back to the banksters.
	And that's why we have an exponential growth in aggregate debt.
	It's the Orwellian opposite.
	But then again, this guy was the chief economic advisor for Trump in 16.
	So if Trump is acting as a white hat, could this guy be a white hat?
	Could he be as honest as other Trump appointees and just poison?
	Fog of war, who knows?
	But we can be certain that we the people have an opportunity to speak up for what is true and we have to reject consent to these monsters and all these organizations.
	They're psychopathic criminals and to stand for their arrests rather than more of their bullshit.
	And to appreciate how these pieces fit together, as Carl frequently recommends, read John Perkins' Confessions of an Economic Hitman, for how the World Bank and the IMF exploit third-world countries, developing nations to make them colonial resources for the big banks of the United States and the transnationals.
	Meanwhile, Hillary compares Trump to Hitler and his supporters and Nazis.
	What a gal!
	Hillary Clinton likened him.
	I remember as a young student, you know, trying to figure out how people got basically drawn in by Hitler.
	How did that happen?
	I'd watch newsreels.
	I'd see this guy standing up there, ranting and raving, and people shouting and raising their arms.
	I thought, what happened to these people?
	She said, Friday, at the Texas Tribune Festival, mimicking a Nazi sigil salute.
	You saw the rally in Ohio the other night, she continued.
	Trump is there ranting and raving for more than an hour and you have these rows of young men with their arms raised?
	I thought, what is going on?
	While there are known reports of attendees at Trump's rally for J.D.
	Vance, there were attendees with their index fingers pointed at the ceiling.
	Some have taken that as a reference to a QAnon theory, others that it may just have been about being number one.
	My fellow citizen Trump said, this incredible journey we're on together is only just begun.
	It's time to start talking about greatness for our country again.
	We are one movement, one people, one family, and one glorious American nation.
	One of Trump's representatives called the finger-pointing a dopey conspiracy as usual.
	Trump spokesman Taylor Bowditch said the media is working hand-in-hand with the Democrats weeks before an election.
	Meanwhile, and I find this report even more disturbing because we can count on Hillary to be anti-Trump.
	Something she will never go over.
	She'll go to her grave condemning Trump for stealing the election of 2016.
	Mitch McConnell, in a new book entitled Uncheck the Untold Story Behind Congress Botched Impeachments of Donald Trump, claims that Mitch McConnell was all for getting rid of Trump.
	While McConnell is ready to be done with Trump, his party at scene was not.
	Mitch McConnell called Trump crazy after the Capitol attack as though he were no more discerning.
	This is moronic.
	The book excerpts provided by the Washington Post put Mitch McConnell in AOC or Adam Kinzinger territory with his melodramatic reaction to the events of January 6th.
	They described him as stunned at what Raughters had done at the Capitol, illustrating a man overcome with emotion at the trauma his aides experienced.
	While the Senate Republican leader may have been prepared to move on, it became clear the GOP didn't have the votes to convict Trump, despite efforts by Liz Cheney to convince him to take action in short order and circumvent the due process.
	She pressed him in a series of phone calls to bring the Senate back from a congressional recess before the Trump inauguration and quickly convict Trump before he left office.
	The result was his promise.
	We've all known that Trump is crazy, but Donald told him, I'm done with him.
	I will never speak to him again.
	Dan LeBlanc tweeted, We don't disagree on the substance, we just disagree on the tactics, McConnell told Cheney as they conferred about how to free the GOP from Trump's iron grip.
	Let's just ignore him.
	Republicans would follow his lead, she insisted.
	And besides, Trump still posed an ongoing threat to the country.
	On that last point, McConnell did not disagree.
	We don't disagree on the substance.
	We just disagree on the tactics.
	Let's just ignore him.
	The latest book on the events alleges McConnell admitted he was exhilarated that Trump had totally discredited himself over the entire ordeal.
	He also took joy that Trump seemingly had committed political suicide.
	I feel exhilarated by the fact that this fellow finally totally discredited himself.
	McConnell said he put a gun to his head and pulled the trigger.
	Couldn't have happened at a better time.
	McConnell, it seems, according to a New York Times column, thought the Democrats are going to take care of this son of a bitch for us.
	Washington Post tweets, Hours after a mob ransacked the Capitol on January 6, then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell described himself as exhilarated about the potential damage to then-President Donald Trump.
	I'll tell you who's damaged by these revelations, and it is not Donald Trump, Joe.
	Yes, well the first story, Hillary Clinton.
	Yeah, Reptillery as she's more famously known.
	She was named after Sir Edmund Hillary who climbed Mount Everest in 1953 when she was six years old.
	She wrote a letter to NASA when she was a little girl saying she wanted to be an astronaut.
	Only problem was there was not a single U.S.
	astronaut until she was 15 years old.
	The woman can't stop lying.
	She's 100% lies.
	She thought that their 15 to 20% boat rigging systems with Dominion in 2016 was going to be enough to coast her past Donald Trump.
	Didn't work.
	Mitch McConnell, what a dirtbag rhino he is.
	I can't wait for the Crimes Against Humanity trials because this SOB is first in line and I would be happy to volunteer for the firing squad that executes any of these rotten SOBs.
	I will happily do it.
	Let's convict him in a military tribunal and I volunteer to take a shot.
	Rather than Trump shooting himself in the head, I think McConnell just slit his own throat.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Yeah, exactly.
	We'll start at that second story first, then.
	Yeah, everything that he said is interestingly enough projection, so I find it humorous that it's McConnell who, when the truth comes out, will be totally discredited in his political suicide, and he shot himself.
	In the head, and perhaps he even will if the truth comes out.
	So, McConnell, anybody who rises up to political leadership is just going to be a minion to evil.
	I witnessed this over 18 years as a volunteer with results.org.
	We worked all the way up to two UN summits for heads of state, the 1990 World Summit for Children, and the 1997 microcredit summit that Bill Clinton refused to go to, but he said, Hillary instead, who promised everything and then delivered nothing.
	So McConnell to rise up into the Senate, it means that he's willing to take the agenda talking points, and he becomes an effective liar.
	He goes on the Sunday morning political talk shows, and he's able to sell this stuff well, and so, you know, he gets a committee chair, and then he rises up, and then the pay-to-play kickbacks start moving in for him.
	So, for Hillary to equate that people in an audience for Trump with their fingers up in the air, I don't even know what that communicates, and do you guys even know what that was supposed to mean?
	No, I didn't catch it at the time.
	I'm sure it was obvious in the context, but I do not know.
	Yeah, yeah.
	Well, for her to be able to say that, I mean, that's all that she ever does.
	She pretends to... She just virtue signals.
	She's not going to solve anybody's problem.
	She is just a witch spellcasting, and all she deals with is hate.
	And, man, that's leadership that we have in the Empire.
	She's one of the most miserable human beings to ever deface Earth.
	Joe.
	Yes.
	And we have an enormous means of racketeering with these people where they're able to bribe politicians that play the game with book deals.
	And Mitch McConnell's The Long Game, which is going to be released in May, is funded by Random House.
	So we don't have any problem connecting the dots between all the crooked publishers owned by the banking monopolists I have read that Random House is a CIA proprietary.
	I don't doubt it.
	all these worthless books that nobody's going to buy or read that are nothing but loss leaders because they don't care about that.
	All they care about is playing the long game.
	F these people.
	I have read that Random House is a CIA proprietary.
	I don't doubt it.
	Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
	Clint Ehrlich tweets, they said NATO expansion wouldn't be escalatory if...
	It was.
	They said giving Ukraine long-range weapons wouldn't be escalatory.
	It was.
	Now they promise Putin is bluffing.
	Do you trust them to protect Russia and our people?
	This is not a bluff.
	Meanwhile, only 1.3% of Americans got the bivalent boosters.
	What a failure.
	No one wants the boosters that were tested on exactly eight mice and zero human beings.
	An incredibly uplifting Wall Street Journal article.
	Apparently the hype by Boosters tested on eight mice.
	They're not finding as much reception as the vaccine promoters were hoping.
	Of 330 million Americans, only 4.4 got the vax.
	This works out to 1.3% of the population.
	The Journal gives a lot of reason nobody's taking the boosters.
	People are tired of them.
	Most had COVID despite boosters, etc.
	It doesn't mention the eight mice on which the boosters were tested.
	Health authorities are trying to get more info out, but it's not working well.
	They had looked to the new rounded doses as an opportunity to improve boosting rates, saying people who were open to vaccination but hadn't got a booster might want a retooled shot.
	If we do a good job with getting information out, it might help people make a more realistic risk assessment, said Jennifer Dallat, the director of the Arkansas Department of Health.
	Maybe call it Omicron Plus?
	Ms.
	Dallat must instead admit the vaccine is a scam and does not work.
	Meanwhile, Ryan Morgenstern has a new book debuting in October.
	That Dr. Fauci mocked ass-backward diners for taking off their masks at the table.
	An inside account included by former White House spokesman Brian Morgenstern calls Fauci awful and an egomaniac.
	In January 2020, Fauci said the virus was nothing to worry about for the American people.
	Then in the months that followed, he said people should not wear masks and that they were in effect by June or July.
	Change is soon.
	Everyone should be concerned.
	Should wear multiple masks and googles.
	Goggles!
	I vividly recall my blood boiling during an infuriating meeting in the Roosevelt Room when Fauci laughed about his own goggle comment, making it clear how cynical he was that he could get people to believe anything.
	He went on to laugh about how ass-backwards it was people enter a restaurant wearing a mask, then sat down and conversed without a mask.
	Of course, he wasn't saying things to that effect publicly, just laughing privately at the American rubes he was fooling.
	The practice of wearing masks into businesses but not while eating or drinking was mandated by local orders across the U.S.
	in mid-2020.
	Indoor tables were even spaced to allow social distancing.
	Fauci, about the time of that meeting, urged restaurant goers to wear masks while seated, recommending masking while awaiting your waiter in a Comedy Central interview.
	But his colorful derision of people who obeyed mask rules without sufficient zeal is new.
	While he laughed at his own goggle remark, he offered more serious impressions when he made the recommendation to NBC News Chief Medical Correspondent Dr. Jennifer Ashton.
	If you have goggles or an eye shield, you should use it, he said.
	Asked if eye protection would be formally recommended.
	He said it might, if you really want perfect protection of the mucosal surfaces.
	Fauci, 81, will retire in December, we are told, after 38 years of doing massive damage to the United States.
	And by the way, I understand he's not actually an infectious disease expert.
	He's rather an expert in bioweapons, and that's no doubt what we have with a jab.
	While widely respected among Democrats as a public health icon, he's also enormously distrusted by Republicans, allies of Trump, and anyone who's paying attention to the medical data.
	He faced accusations of hypocrisy when he sat maskless with a friend and his wife at a National Park Stadium after throwing out the opening pitch, violating his own mask mandates in Senate hearings, He's cashed with Rand Paul over funding for Gain of Function, which was unquestionably taking place, but which he was denying had taken place at the time.
	Morgan Stern co-authored the book with his wife, Teresa, who is a press official for Operation Warp Speed.
	The book pairs antidotes from the Trump era with food and drink recipes.
	The Fauci chapter is paired with recipes for opening day burgers paired with beer.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, interesting comment from sock puppet Psaki over the weekend.
	She said that if the Democrats try to tie themselves to FJB, they're going to looge hugely.
	And they're talking six seats in the Senate, which will be not enough to override vetoes, but it'll certainly be enough to hamstring the SOB.
	And over 40 seats in the House, which will destroy the stolen four-seat advantage that Pelosi has in the House.
	And the Republicans, there's enough of them with at least a functional set of gonads that said that they are going to have major hearings and they're going to drag Fauci in there and we will get enough criminal evidence.
	In addition, I'm talking with several attorneys in Texas who are working on indictments and he's prime suspect number one for worldwide genocide, so expect there to be some subpoenas and some depositions and who knows, hopefully some arrests and that little garden gnome genocidal maniac.
	Yeah, very good.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Our opponents are threatening World War 3, and in order for we the people to get the sheeple past the finish line to see the real world so that they're not subject to the threat of civil war, I think that they do need to be scared about World War 3 and to see the facts as we've laid it out here, at least.
	We also need some sort of a financial collapse for the sheeple to see this predatory rigged casino of a financial system that we have.
	And those two together will damn forever.
	Corporate media, Hollywood, and public education as these propaganda pushers.
	For the second story, the idea of being shot forever.
	I mean, that's great.
	That's a great stat that people were rejecting that.
	What's Fauci gonna say about that?
	That the people refusing the shot are anti-rodent.
	They're against the most successful mammal in world history.
	They're mouse racists.
	You know, Fauci is a psychopath and his behavior, I mean, it's mocked with evil villains in drama.
	And that's really what he is behind the scenes.
	He's just going to be cackling like Kamala with that.
	Carl B. Herman, Black Spot, any of these shows.
	I have a paragraph with the essay, My Best Shot, that's sufficient evidence to damn these people to indictments, and I include links to a couple other good ones.
	Think We Got It Wrong by Steve Kirsch, and 50 Reasons to Give Your Kid the COVID Vaccine by another person whose name I forget right now.
	My best shot.
	Joe?
	Yeah, one additional thing on those eight mice.
	Yeah, they gave them the jab and then the mice contacted COVID, but it wasn't as bad as if they wouldn't have had the jab.
	And then they killed the mice so there would be no long-term studies for what the other immune deficiency vulnerabilities would have been for these lab rats.
	So now they want you to be the lab rat so they can do the real experiment that they want to do, which is exterminating human beings.
	These people are demonic.
	You got it exactly right.
	It's a human extermination experiment.
	Meanwhile, 24 GOP attorneys general warned Visa, American Express, and MasterCard about using a code that identifies purchases at gun stores.
	AGs from 24 states sent a letter threatening to take action over a new merchant code for gun stores.
	It caused the International Organization for Standardization recently to vote to create the code.
	All three credit card companies said they have already adopted the standard.
	The Republican Attorneys General of 24 states are threatening to marshal the full scope of our lawful authority as Visa, MX, and MasterCard adopt a new merchant category code created for guns and ammunition.
	AG sent a letter to the CEOs of the company.
	All three payment processors have already adopted the code.
	They weren't tracking the data could lead to misuse, intentional or not.
	Creating and tracking this data only matters if your institutions are considering using that information to take further harmful action, like infringing upon consumer privacy, inhibiting constitutionally protected purchases by selectively restricting the use of your payment systems, or otherwise withholding your financial services from targeted, disfavored merchants.
	Gun rights advocates, including the NRA, have expressed concerns about creating a gun registration list and putting gun owners at risk.
	Visa referred to a statement it issued.
	Many misunderstand what that means and are, in turn, advocating the use of MCC to track gun sales as a potential tool for combating gun violence, Visa wrote.
	That's not what merchant codes are designed for, nor should they be.
	MCCs already exist for hundreds of different businesses, including beauty salons, bookstores, newsstands, bowling alleys, bakeries, among others.
	The company said that when police or other networks process a transaction, they don't have visibility over the items that are actually being purchased.
	In a separate statement, MasterCard said it respects individuals' rights and that the creation would not cause a company to deviate from its principles.
	American Express did not respond.
	The letter was signed by attorneys general from Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Wyoming.
	Sorry to say my state, Wisconsin, not there.
	But then again, it has a Democrat attorney general, and he doesn't care about the second or the fourth or any other amendments.
	Joe.
	Yes, well, on TNT Radio on Saturday night, the program that was on directly before us, they were interviewing Catherine Austin Fitz, who I met at the Secret Space Conference in Bastrop, and I think it was like 2016.
	But anyhow, I got a great chance to talk to her at that event.
	She was saying that the only way to defeat these SOBs is to use as much cash as possible.
	Take your cash out of the bank, Buy everything with cash.
	Do not use your credit card except in emergencies.
	And never load a QR code into your phone.
	They can't do the digital banking system if they don't have enough people subscribing to the QR codes.
	And as far as how this stuff operates, they're going to give you a social credit score based on a whole bunch of different things.
	So anything you can do to reduce your parameters, like having them not being able to constantly track you, is a viable thing to do.
	Turn off your cell phone, except when you're using it.
	Unplug it so that it can't be backfeeding signals into your smart meter or the computer in your car.
	Place your cell phone in a metal coffee can, which is a Faraday cage, and don't open it again until you need it.
	I get my Google tracking every month, and it goes, uh, you've been to Dallas, Fort Worth, San Antonio, Austin, uh, Beaumont, and Baytown, and you've traveled 50 miles this month.
	And I go, yeah, you figure out how I did it, Google, you SOBs.
	Well, the problem, Joe, is then you don't get incoming calls.
	I mean, you know, you can control your outgo, but how do you... Your incoming calls will show up as missed, and you'll also pick them up as text.
	And who cares?
	How many important... You know, we did... I lived my whole entire life with nothing but a beeper for about 10 years, and then cell phones for the last 20.
	But before then, you had to look for a cell phone if you needed it.
	You can learn how to not live this way.
	You don't have to have calls unless it's an emergency.
	Catherine Austin Fitz is brilliant and has had great insight on a whole range of issues, Carl.
	So our opponents do want the guns all to be tracked of course and they want a cashless society and they want no gasoline engines so that at a later date the authorities can, maybe President Kamala Harris could tell you that the chip to your electric car has been turned off and the chip in your social credit scorecard has also been turned off until
	You comply by turning in your child-massacring assault rifles, guns, and ammo, and then we'll turn your chips back on and you'll be welcome to rejoin society.
	That's the totalitarian control that these people want, and our response is the Great Awakening and to demand their arrests.
	Yeah, the idea of all this being digital and the digital dollar is the road to slavery.
	It's a use of technology to deny freedom to human beings.
	Meanwhile, Alex Jones is in the second of his three trials for damages.
	I'm done saying I'm sorry, Alex Jones.
	Tell Sandy Hook family's in court.
	Alex Jones' initial day for damages for years of lying about the Sandy Hook shootings ended in chaos and by this way, this is written by Elizabeth Williamson.
	She came to cover my trial for damages.
	She's written a book attacking Alex Jones and me that's grossly misleading.
	She says, for example, in relation to my allegations that nobody died at Sandy Hook, I had no proof.
	Ignoring the fact that it was the court that excluded all of my evidence on the grounds it was unreasonable, which is why I'm before the United States Supreme Court today.
	She has reckless disregard for facts, confronted with a harming done by repeatedly lying, and this is her interpretation, with Robbie Parker, whose daughter Emily, we are told, died in the massacre.
	Jones erupted in a rant that drew a contempt threat from Judge Bellis.
	Is this a struggle session?
	Are we in China?
	I've already said I'm sorry, and I'm done saying I'm sorry, he responded.
	We're in China.
	They have these extended events where a person is purging themselves of their false claims of the past.
	According to the state, frequently this occurs before they're shot in the back of the head with a small caliber weapon.
	Jones was set up by Chris Mattai, a lawyer for the families, who pointed to Robbie Parker, whose performance, when he came out of the building all smiling and jocular, then saw the assembled press hyperventilated again into character, and then began in a solemn tone of voice, talking about the death of his daughter the preceding day, but having the presence of mind to remind everyone of her donation website, Was actually in the courtroom.
	He's here.
	He's real, isn't he?
	And for years, you put a target on his back, didn't you?
	Just like you have every single parent and loved one sitting here.
	Well, of course, this is not only begging the question by assuming it was real.
	And by the way, I sought to intervene in all three of these Alex Jones cases to point out that there's never been a judicial determination that anybody died at Sandy Hook, and in addition, while Robbie Parker as a person is real, his having lost a daughter, I guarantee you, 100% is fake.
	By the end of the day, she, Barbara Bellis, Warren Joines, and Norm Pattis as attorneys, she'd enforce a zero-tolerance policy for ignoring her orders about decorum in the classroom.
	Pattis had repeatedly objected.
	As his client shouted, you can expect a contempt hearing if anybody steps out of line, and Mr. Jones, same thing.
	No, I didn't.
	Why don't you show a little respect, Mr. Joan, which I said you have families here that lost children, sisters, wives, moms, except that's all baking.
	The question taking for granted was not determined during this trial or any other.
	Jones, according to Elizabeth Williamson, spread lies that the whole thing was a government pretext for gun control, which of course is absolutely true.
	Last year, Jones lost four separate defamation lawsuits by the families Their sweeping victories had motioned these three trials to determine how much he must pay in the first.
	A jury awarded Scott Lewis and Neil Hesselin, parents of Jesse Lewis, nearly 50 mil.
	Let me point the absurdity of this.
	Neil Hesselin claimed he held his dying son, Jesse, in his arms.
	But Wayne Carver, the medical examiner, testified the parents were not allowed to see their children, even after they were deceased, and only identified them in the basis of photographs.
	Even as simple and obvious as an argument like that was not made on behalf of Alex Jones.
	In the current trial, the second of three, families of eight have sued.
	Jones' efforts to defend himself were punctuated by violations of the judge's order.
	As his testimony got underway, he sought to gas at trial in political terms, saying the most important thing to him is crushing the globalists.
	At other times, he professed scant knowledge of attacks on the families at trial of the judge that other InfoWars staff members had made on his show, and said he did not recall things he said as recently as the previous day.
	Paté pointed out Jones had given a news conference outside the courthouse, watched the trial online, maligned it on his show as a kangaroo court.
	At one point, Paté began to question Jones by saying, there's going to be another mass shooting, isn't there?
	Jones interrupted.
	Are you saying I'm going to shoot people like it's my fault?
	People think I killed the kids and that's my answer to you.
	Meanwhile, The trial continues.
	But it's just a trial for damages.
	People misunderstand what's going on here.
	In my trial for damages, Kevin Barrett was present.
	He captured it perfectly in an article published on UNZ.com entitled, The Legal Lynching of a Truth Seeker, Jim Fetzer Stalinist Style Show Trial.
	Check it out.
	Captures what happened to me and some very similar what's happening to Alex Jones, Joe.
	Yeah, so I watched his trial in Austin, which is absolutely a kangaroo court show trial, and I've watched little segments of this one, and they're insufferable.
	The judges are obviously acting, and they're overacting, and they're overt.
	The whole way through, it's like he's got terrible legal representation because I guess he's so toxic.
	That none of the lawyers want to discredit their future careers.
	So he's ending up with the bottom of the barrel defense lawyers.
	So that's part of the problem.
	But the highlight was in the trial in Austin, one of the guys said, the plaintiff's attorney said, you claim that the government's run by a whole bunch of pedophiles.
	He goes, like Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein.
	And the guy goes, ah.
	So, you know, you got to give kudos for Jones to be able to stand up to these savage, repeated beatings from an economic standpoint and just from an emotional standpoint.
	To have to go to court and be berated constantly by these judges and news media and the rotten attorneys that are all involved, you know.
	He's got reasons to discredit him, but by and large, you have to say that he's done far more positive than negative.
	So my hat's off to you, Alex.
	Good luck.
	Carl.
	So we have a reporter from the New York Times.
	The New York Times is criminally complicit in the ongoing crimes against humanity for U.S.
	policy centered in war, debt, and poverty.
	Carl B. Herbeck Black Spot documentation for all these claims are just on any of those pages for the news shows.
	We got Robbie Parker, exactly as Jim said.
	You know, what are the odds that a father who had his daughter shot and killed the day before would be yucking it up?
	And then, you know, before he walks up to the mic, he turns back and says, I feel terrible supporting this.
	And then he hyperventilates, as Jim said, to get into character.
	So if you haven't seen that video, look it up for yourself and then, you know, come to your own conclusions.
	So Alex, you know, yeah, I got to recognize Alex as being the probably the number one contributor to my being able to see the breadth of the topics of our opponents controlling their empire.
	But then somewhere around 2016, 2017, Alex became a captured and controlled opposition asset.
	And that is demonstrated here.
	So for whatever reason, he took a deal and he is going to look ridiculous because they want the sheeple just to react negatively to anybody challenging any official story.
	And so they created Alex as just a caricature so that people won't look at any of the documentation such as with Jim.
	I wrote an article at the time of Jim's show trial, but the long reach of the arm deleted that from the internet.
	I do have a second one up that does talk about, you know, I caught a couple of data points that the moms averaged 36 years of age given birth.
	When you take a look at the data and you figure out the odds of that being true, it's a number with like, I forget how many it is, zeros behind it, 40 or 50.
	It's more likely that you would win the Super Lottery twice in a row than it is for those women to have been the mothers of those alleged children.
	I also found that This other guy looked at satellite pictures and he found that over the area of Sandy Hook, I'll just read it here, this is the title of the article that has the mother's things too, twice daily satellite photos over Sandy Hook show chemtrails only once from 2010 to 2017.
	On the morning of the shooting event, those 5,840 to one odds combined with the mother's averaging 36 years of birth to victim children equal 637.6 trillion to one odds that Sandy Hook was false flag attacked.
	So there's an abundance of evidence.
	That was a brilliant article then, and it remains a brilliant article today, Kyle.
	Well done.
	Meanwhile, what they aren't telling people about EVs.
	Everyone knows, or everyone has heard, EVs are the vehicles for solving what is said to be the climate crisis.
	An interesting thing to say, given EVs that are being produced are much more powerful than they need to be to get people from point A to point B. That requires huge batteries to store all the electricity to make them go very fast, very quickly.
	You'd think that would be discouraged or even banned if there really were a crisis looming, being caused by the emission of carbon dioxide, after all.
	More of the latter is being emitted than necessary by the utility plants generating almost all the electricity that powers overpowered EVs.
	Does anyone need to get to 60 in 2.9 seconds or even 6?
	If there is a crisis, that is, yet practically every EV on the market is designed specifically to use more power than necessary for bare minimum or even economy car equivalent basic transportation needs.
	This tells you something about the true nature of the crisis and those who claim there is one.
	If a ship on the open sea sprang a leak and were sinking, would you open more holes beneath the waterline?
	There are other things about EVZ they are telling you as well.
	Practically every article gushing about them will report that it's possible to fast charge an EV in about 30 minutes.
	Some will gushingly report that soon you'll be able to do it in less than 15.
	What they never tell you is you cannot do this at home, because homes do not have the capacity to fast charge Which requires, on a 240 volt outlet, the best you can do is around 8 to 9 hours.
	That's a dryer type outlet.
	You'll never be able to fast charge an EV at home, not without completely rewiring your home to commercial grade capacity.
	That means you'll always have to drive whoever the fast charger is and wait.
	This means spending time getting to and from the fast charger, meaning spending more time fast charging.
	30 minutes of fast charge end up being that power plus however long it took to drive there plus the wait.
	And that 15 minutes soon they also gush about?
	They do not tell you what might be faster, it is less.
	That is not a full recharge, just enough to get going again.
	But not very far before you'll need to stop and wait and charge again.
	Speaking of which, a fast charge is never a full charge.
	Whenever you read an article gushing about EVs and a miracle of taking at least five times as long to fast charge versus five minutes it takes to refuel a non-EV, you'll never encounter the disclaimer the fast charge is only 80% charged.
	In other words, You wind up with 20% less charge than a full charge, which means 20% less range, which means having to stop again 20% sooner.
	The reason why you cannot, well, should not fast charge an EV to fully charge is because it's hard on the battery, which is the most expensive part of an EV.
	There's also an increased fire risk.
	So EVs and fast chargers are set up to deliver 80% charge fast and the rest slow.
	The 20% loss of charge range, assuming you don't have time to wait for a full slow charge, is probably not a huge deal.
	If you aren't going far, have the time to stop and wait again.
	But if you're on a long trip, you'll be stopping and waiting more than you've been led to believe.
	Speaking of that, the further you drive, the shorter the service life of your EV battery.
	Joe, yours.
	Oh yeah, the problem is you have a certain number of chemical impurities in almost any of the elements that you're using to manufacture these phony baloney inco-trickets, and those cause dendrites, which are little crystals that build up between the plates that are necessary to make batteries work, and those cause short circuits.
	And so, by rapidly charging, you're increasing the rate just exactly like they say, and you're quickly destroying your battery.
	Now another thing that happened in UK is that it's illegal for you to have a home charging station unless you have a smart meter and the smart meter will determine when you're allowed to charge your car and it will use your car to recharge the grid when the grid doesn't have enough available energy somewhere else.
	So the bottom line is you don't have an automobile you have a storage battery for the electric grid that can't handle what it's got in the way of load and so And that's just going to be compounded the more and more electric vehicles are put on the road.
	We also have the governor of California that said everybody has to drive an EV and then the next day said you can't charge your EV.
	So this is where they're planning on taking us because you have a very predictable range and you have service stations that were funded strictly through user fees that didn't require thousands and thousands of dollars for each location for government subsidies.
	...and are subject to vandalism, which we will see an enormous amount in the near future, where the plug-in cables are going to be stolen.
	And it used to be that you could go very easily online and find problems about EVs, including fires and the long lines waiting to recharge at these various charging stations.
	But YouTube has pulled another little stunt.
	For a long time, you used to have to put in https youtube.com slash watch question mark v equals and then you could put in the code for the site.
	Then they shortened it to just y-o-u-t-u dot b-e slash and then the and that made it a real short url.
	Now they've gone back to adding two full lines of ridiculous gibberish for anything that you want to send to somebody.
	So if you don't know how to swipe and put it down in your browser and then re-swipe it back up, or if your computer's not letting you do that, you have a really laborious task of trying to forward information to anybody else.
	Just another way of them constricting us.
	Excellent point, Joe.
	I'd wondered about that, seeing these oddities in the different URLs you've just explained.
	Carl.
	Our opponents do want us all connected to the one ring to rule them all grid.
	So they want to destroy gas engines.
	They want everything to be a modern electric engine that is going to be accessible by chip control so that they can remotely just turn your car off.
	Or better yet, as soon as you get into the car, they'll just lock the doors and then drive you to the nearest station to process domestic violent extremists, DVEs.
	That said, I do have a BMW fully electric i3 2019.
	It gets 175 miles to a charge.
	We just have a 110 volt charger in the garage.
	I just use it as a commute car and that 110 volt will recharge six miles an hour To the BMW.
	It is quiet.
	It is quick.
	I mean, plus it's a BMW overall.
	It's the best engineered car that I have ever had.
	Now, all that aside with my love of my little commute car.
	Wanttoknow.info.
	Go to that site.
	It's run by a retired State Department official at the top.
	Go to the energy section and you'll find an abundance of demonstrations that our psychopathic leaders, of course, are suppressing other energy expressions.
	And one of the ones that is one of my favorites is Stan Myers.
	M-E-Y-E-R.
	He was on the news when I was a teenager of having developed a dune buggy in San Diego that ran completely off of water.
	And on the news shows that I saw at the time, they had UC San Diego professors go on the news and say, yeah, we looked at the engine.
	It's just water.
	It's running on water.
	And then, of course, shortly thereafter, that inventor died mysteriously of being poisoned, his garage was burned, and his stuff was taken.
	Yes, of course.
	Needless to say.
	Surprise, surprise.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or contra, live.
	Need to know at gmail.com.
	Live.
	Need to know at gmail.com.
	Dear Jim, I have to side with Joe Olson on the evaluation of Donald Trump.
	In an election of Trump versus any Democrat, I would vote for Trump, despite having voted third party in the last two.
	The abuse of Trump and his voters and the awfulness of Biden in the leadership of the Democratic Party should be self-evident.
	That being said, some facts.
	In the 922 Fox interview with Trump by Sean Hannity, Trump takes issue with Biden saying that the pandemic is over, stating there are still way too many deaths.
	He's also completely proud of the vaccines and the speed at which they were brought to market.
	Given that this is the worst attack on not just the American populace, but the world people, it is not just that Trump is not strategic.
	It's that he refuses to take responsibility for his extreme error in the emergency executive order that allowed the havoc, death, and injury to be applied to the American people.
	Trump also spoke negatively of Putin-Russia vis-a-vis the Ukraine and stated that he was the best president in dealing with Russia.
	If pulling out of at least one sensible arms agreement is best, then the scale is inverse.
	Reagan and JFK did better.
	Reverence Paul Craig Roberts on our nation going in the direction of war and threats of war versus peace.
	I also watched Putin in a recent subtitle speech downloaded from the Global Research Site.
	I do not consider Putin necessarily on a high moral plane, given the COVID shot in Russia and apparently draconian measures on CBD oil and the drug war, but the speech was utterly unlike anything I have seen with our presidents or senators, etc., in the media.
	Putin stood without a podium, just a microphone, and took questions from not entirely supportive, if not somewhat hostile, ordinary-looking press folks, and responded candidly and without ego.
	His body language and voice indicated this, along with the English subtitles, made this clear.
	We have nothing like this in our so-called elected representatives at the federal level, especially the presidency.
	If we can't see Trump as part of the bullshit with his support of Israel, stealing Syria's oil, Julian Assange, the shots above all, aggression with respect to Russia, etc., etc., you're missing a big effing part of the puzzle.
	Is Biden worse?
	Of course.
	Given the same overall agenda and open borders, FBI against the stolen election being questioned, etc.
	But we are being abused and manipulated on all sides.
	Keep up the great work, you and your guests.
	Continue to educate and heart peace.
	Bernie.
	Meanwhile, final thoughts.
	Joe, yours.
	Yes, well, I have some final thoughts about DJT, but I will put those down in the comment sections.
	My other final thoughts were on the program that we had at TNT Radio this weekend.
	We had the guest was a pediatrician named Michelle Perreault, and one of the things that's really bothered me is the CDC vaccine schedules for infants up to five months old.
	Absolutely shocking!
	So, I was looking online for some material on that.
	I came across a seven-minute long video with Del Bigtree and a doctor named Dr. Susanna Humphreys and it was about the
	Hepatitis B shot that's required the moment of birth and vitamin K. And while she was discussing this, she started talking about her internship she did down in Nicaragua with a bunch of midwives and they would plop these babies out on the table and they would let them sit there for a while until the umbilical cord quit contracting.
	And she goes, well, why do you do that?
	You're supposed to just put a clamp on both sides and cut through it with a pair of scissors.
	And the midwives went, no, no, no, no, no.
	Great video, you need to see it.
	It's in an article.
	But, well, anyhow, that subject came up on the TNT Discussion, and afterwards, John O'Sullivan and I were both really excited about that, because it's a problem that people are not really well aware of.
	And so, he said, well, why don't you write an article?
	And I said, well, why don't I just research and see if an article's already been written?
	Well, he got the fire lit under him.
	He researched the article.
	He found three UK references about how terrible it was to cut umbilical cords right after birth, and I found one at clevelandclinic.org, what you should know about cord clamping after birth.
	And bottom line is the head has about 30% of the blood of a baby, and as it's going through the cervix, it's like a rubber ball.
	It's squeezed, and it pushes the baby's blood back up through the umbilical cord into the placenta.
	And then the baby pops out, and then the placenta, as it's being forced through the cervix, pushes the blood back into the baby.
	And that blood is stem cell blood, and that's what the baby needs to be able to prepare any damage that happened during birth.
	And so here's something from an article that I wrote called Body Electric Secrets.
	This is at Principia Scientific.
	The search was on for cells that could be used to convert the needed stem cell inventory for injury repair.
	The unlikely feedstock for regeneration turned out to be red blood cells.
	To maximize hemoglobin content, red blood cells do not have a nucleus.
	Upon receiving the repair signal, the red blood cells first form a blastema at the injury site and then eject hemoglobin, form a nucleus, and then begin to form the needed bone, marrow, nerves, muscle, and skin for replacement limb.
	They've been poisoning our babies by stealing their stem cell blood since 1899 when a guy got the patent for umbilical cord clamps in order to reduce the amount of blood that was on the sheets in the hospital.
	This is a 120-year-old, absolutely barbaric procedure that needs to end immediately, and we're doing our part to make sure people are very well aware of this.
	Brilliant!
	What a sensational find, Joe.
	I gotta congratulate you.
	That is fantastic.
	I had no idea, Carl.
	Yeah, all the ways that we're tortured and poisoned.
	Great catch and pass, partner.
	So, Bernie, as our audience writing in, thank you so much for everyone for your engagement in this great awakening.
	So, the idea of who is this guy Trump and what was he really doing, what did he know, that is in the fog of war.
	I thought that he played great defense for the factless Russiagate that was paid for by Hillary.
	He played great defense against the factless and crimeless impeachments.
	With the election fraud of 2020 and January 6, either this was a trap similar to in military strategy where you draw your forces back to allow your overeager opponents to step in, surround them, cut them off, And then you force their surrender and you know who they are because those are the ones who entered into the trap.
	Maybe that's what's going on.
	I don't know.
	But certainly we can conclude safely that this is a game that is way above our heads on the playing field.
	And just be proud of what you do have for sure, which is what you think.
	Excellent comments from Joe and Carl.
	what you do.
	There is chatter that something big was going to happen on the 24th.
	Nothing that is really broken to the surface unless whatever happened in China is just a prelude of what's to come.
	But we'll see what's going on this week.
	Again, way out of our hands.
	Excellent comments from Joe and Carl, Joe and addendum go.
	Yes, just to follow up on that.
	John wrote an article called Umbilical Cord Clamping, The Hidden Medical Abuse, which he summarizes three of the articles that he has linked as footnotes in And in the comments, I link the interview with Dale Bigtree and Dr. Susanna Humphreys, as well as the article that's at clevelandclinic.org.
	So this material is very easily findable.
	If you are a mother or a grandmother, you know anybody that's fixing to be a mother, they need to know this information so that they can tell the hospital Give the baby five minutes to restore the stem cells that are being in this wasted placenta so that the baby has the full necessary toolkit to be able to solve the medical injuries that may have occurred during birth and also have a functional immune system right from the get-go.
	And do not give my baby a vitamin K shot or a hepatitis B shot ever.
	Joe, I think you're spot on, and I'll bet it affects intelligence level, too, by being deprived of the oxygen from the blood.
	I mean, that's what red blood does.
	It provides oxygen to the cells of the body.
	It's horrible.
	It makes the white of blood die, and it's irreplaceable.
	This is one of the problems with the COVID vaccine.
	With the blue babies, they turn around and give them a transfusion from some stranger.
	What the hell is wrong with medicine?
	I can't believe it.
	That's a wonderful point.
	Those are all so good.
	I'm going to let it go with that.
	I have lots to say but other occasion to say it about Alex Jones and electric cars and the whole bit.
	We're being played so massively.
	I congratulate Carl and Joe once again for a wonderful contribution going far beyond the scope of the stories to deepen and enrich in what we're presenting you on a daily basis, what you need to know.
	Spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you care about, because we do not know how much time we have left.

▲