All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 26, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:44
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (25 September 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and David Kenney
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome, folks, to Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I'm Donald Reiner, producer at JD.ConsultantsAtLive.com.
Been doing shows since 05.05, Cinco de Mayo 2005, and we're still producing shows that are really wonderful here for people, and we have the best people to do this here on the 25th of September, three quarters of the way through this year, and boy, golly, it's been a rough year, and I might need to put up a new background here.
So, We might be heading into rough times, but we have the best people here.
We have Jim Fetzer, Most Dangerous Mind in America, who is very famously written and edited this book, and also this very important book, and 40 others.
And he's a man of the year.
And we have Scott Bennett, the military intelligence officer who's a psyops person who knows a lot.
And he wrote a heck of a book under duress in prison for uncovering terrorist financing that we were supporting.
And then we also have David Kinney, an attorney out of California who's doing work with the school boards, uncovering the scandals with the finances and things that were just something else.
We've got a lot to talk about.
Let's just go over to Russia.
Let's start over there and see if there's anything happening over there, Jim.
Well, the fact is, Don, that Russia's mobilizing 300,000 and has declared they are not going to be inhibited from using nuclear weapons if, in fact, the existence of Russia is threatened.
Mike Adams is posting this, but it appears to be spot on.
Russia's recent partial mobilization will call up 300,000 reservists in the next few months.
It's well known now that Ukraine's military offensives are being run by NATO troops with NATO satellite training in gear.
In essence, Russia is already fighting NATO in a continental war.
And Russia has come to the realization Western nations are not going to be satisfied with anything less than the complete obliteration of Russia as a sovereign nation.
Ukraine's own government is threatening up to a five-year prison sentence for anyone who even votes in the elections that are taking place in the Donbass region.
Where Russia is now undertaking referenda, proving Ukraine has zero interest in democracy or self-determination.
These votes are taking place.
Highly likely the Republic will join Russia, making them part of Russian territory.
Once that is established, Russia will regard any attack against these newly joined regions as an attack on Russia itself, which could trigger defensive responses from Russia, including every type of weapon available for Russia's national defense, including nuclear.
Western media, which lies more vehemently than Pravda ever did, claims this is Putin threatening the first use of nukes.
That's a lie, of course, but it's a convenient lie for use by Western media to call for a preemptive nuclear strike against Russia.
It's a very dangerous development, because if Russia takes that seriously, classical game theory would require Putin to strike first in order to preempt the anticipated preemptive strike, as we find ourselves in a rapidly escalating feedback loop, which could lead to a nuclear disaster.
Especially given Biden appears to be actively wanting to start World War III prior to the midterm election to allow him to declare a national war footing and postpone the ballot box or divert it to mail-in ballots where the Democrats are long practiced in stealing elections.
Even worse, while Putin appears to be acting rationally, Western leaders are behaving like psychopaths.
They do not even acknowledge that their own economic sanctions have unleashed the catastrophic economic misery and energy crisis that they now imminently face, including mass famine and industrial collapse.
There's zero recognition among the leaders of Germany, the UK, or the USA that provoking Russia into a nuclear exchange would go horribly wrong for the West and would likely spell the end of Western civilization.
In classic game theory, analysts talk about two scorpions in a jar, each capable of striking each other to death, even if struck themselves.
The reality is, we, the people, are trapped in that jar with a bunch of psychopathic scorpions who possess powerful weapons.
It's like we're all wearing highly flammable clothing at the birthday party of a spoiled brat child whose parents have given him a flamethrower.
Translated into reality, we're already suffering under the economic devastation of the West's attempted anti-Russian sanctions, and now Western influencers are begging the Pentagon to authorize first-strike nuclear warfare with Russia.
A nation that has 20 to 30 years more advanced anti-air defense systems and ICBMs with hyperglide vehicles that could evade every defensive system currently possessed by NATO, including the United States.
It's another suicide wish, but exactly what the Western media and governments are begging for.
Every informed person must be preparing for nuclear war, understanding it's being desperately provoked by the U.S.
and NATO.
Russia doesn't want nuclear war.
Fortunately for humanity, Putin is far more measured and patient than any Western leader.
He will not irrationally lash out with nuclear weapon for political purposes.
The same, alas, however, cannot be said of Western nations and their insane, deranged leaders.
Hey, they said NATO expansion wouldn't be escalatory.
It was.
They said giving Ukraine long-range weapons wouldn't be escalatory.
It was.
Now they promise Putin is bluffing.
Do you trust them?
Scott, your thoughts?
No way.
Well, the entire, the entire puzzle has been thrown up in the air and is reassembling into a much different picture now, and I think the diplomatic The military, the intel, the media battlefields are taking shape.
On the diplomatic battlefield, Lavrov gave an excellent speech at the United Nations, in which he gave a summary of the past 50 years, or since World War II, what the democracies, what the UN, what the EU, actually what the EU and what NATO has done in the killing and murder and destruction of civilization, rather than the propaganda of the opposite.
You gave a very well-reasoned and easy-to-follow speech on this.
I would encourage people to watch it on YouTube.
Lavrov's full speech at the United Nations.
Very well done.
The only deficit they have, and I've said this again and again, is that the Russians need to directly speak to the European and the American people.
That it is their leaders, their tyrants, their fascist fake fraudulent overlords cut out in the image of Klaus Schwab and George Soros and Buffett and the rest of these pedophile billionaires.
That are pursuing a climate change-induced COVID-19 death jab to destroy the population, to reduce Europe into a burlap-wearing, bug-eating, subhuman society, and like it, and own nothing, and like it.
This is the opposite of what our ancestors Clawed and fought to build and what we have enjoyed up until now.
So civilization itself is being burned and destroyed by these lunatics.
The question is will the people in America and Canada and Australia and Britain and Germany and France rise up and overthrow by any means necessary these tyrants.
So Lavrov and the Russians Have kind of insinuated, but they haven't done it in the real hammer throwing 1984 Apple Macintosh advertisement way that they need to.
So I'm going to keep saying that because that's the way to shatter the glass and awaken the masses into recognizing Russia does not want to shut off the gas or the fuel or the fertilizer to people, so they've, you know, declined a little bit on the diplomatic field.
The battlefield, of course, the 300,000 reservists being mobilized, we all know what that's about.
This is about taking people who have had military service, specifically combat service, and putting them back in uniform, greasing up their weapons, going through their training for about a month to get back in the orientation of military discipline and service and life,
In order to put them as a second defense as Russia acquires, absorbs, welcomes back the areas of Donetsk and Lugansk and Donbass areas back into the Russian territory.
So Russia is going to do that by referendum.
It's having its extra soldiers as a buttress because then you could see the UN foolish or the EU and NATO foolishly thinking that they can, you know, take more aggressive action.
There's a lot of intel reports and the US and the CIA and their satellites are watching with great scrutiny every piece of Russian weaponry on the battlefield.
So the US is smothering Russia with observatory and intelligence factoring processes.
So that's being fed to Ukraine.
Of course, they're fighting this to the last Ukrainians.
So the Ukrainians are being thrown like cannon fodder towards the Russians.
The Russians most likely are going to, this week, quickly absorb Lugansk and Donetsk and the Donbass's Russia.
And then one artillery shell, one bomb, one bullet that comes into those territories will be met with overwhelming, absolute destructive force, including nuclear weapons.
Now, Now, nuclear weapons are not Hiroshima type of bombs.
These are small-scale nuclear weapons that could be used to decimate like a 10-football field area.
Remember Trump did it in Afghanistan, the mother of all bombs.
Russia will do the same thing to the military components in Ukraine.
I don't even think there's going to be an if.
I think they're just going to instantly ratchet up the conflict.
They're going to take Odessa.
They're going to solidify their position and they're going to annihilate the Ukrainian military and any other mercenaries that are there before the winter time sets in.
And they'll also probably engage in, you know, massive cyber operations, cutting off fuel, cutting off everything, including to the European Union, as a final battle tactic and say, have you had enough yet?
Are you ready for peace talks now?
And I'll finish it by saying this, Jim, Peterson, you know, the Canadian philosopher guy, Thank you, thank you very much.
Jordan Peterson, who's a philosopher, he had a debate with the English guy who was critical to Trump, Pierce Morgan, and he said, look, if I was Putin, this is what I would do.
I would shut off all the power, all the oil, all the fuel, all the fertilizer instantly at the first cold snap.
Now when Jordan Peterson says that, who is really appreciated by most conservatives, Tucker has him on all the time and all that, when Jordan Peterson says, I know what I would do, I would shut off everything, and Pierce Morgan is stuck in a loop of emotional, but we're democracy, we're America, we're Britain, we're supposed to be better than everyone else.
No, you're an idiot and you're worse than everyone else.
So Peterson Has drawn a line in the sand that I think is going to become very, very public and reverberate far and wide that the conservatives in America and Britain and Australia and Europe all side with the points of Russia, not with the EU tyranny and the idiot club of pedophiles like Macron and Trudeau and Schultz and Boris Johnson and Liz Truss and all these other morons
They're all, I think, going to be rejected as winter and darkness sets in.
Enlightenment will come to the European and the American people.
Jim?
Thanks, Scott.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, it's interesting.
I spent yesterday cronying out the series of events in the Ukraine, going back hundreds of years.
And of course, I exhausted myself with the confusion, the empires and the, you know, the chessboard going on over there.
So then I started it, you know, going back to World War Two.
And then I was following it through the first, I think it's Azarov government, and the second Azarov government, 2012 and 2014, respectively.
And you had, of course, you've got the European Union over here on the left, and you've got the The Eurasian coalition, which is essentially Belarus-Russia joining Asian partners and trying to work their communist agenda over in
You've got what we'll call the East and you've got what's supposed to be capitalism over the West.
But it's interesting because when I was listening or when I was reviewing the information, I was studying the Euromaidan and the revolution of dignity.
Spare me on that.
Which is nothing but the Obama administration and Biden administration digging their hands into the CIA and apparently doing whatever they could do to disrupt the Ukraine, get it to join the European Union.
So as I looked at this underplay of events, it became clear to me that we have two competing political philosophies.
We have a political philosophy of authoritarianism issuing from the EU.
And we have a political philosophy of communism coming from, of course, Russia and China on the eastern side.
So, taking those two things into consideration, it became abundantly clear to me that we are at the brink of nuclear war in the Ukraine.
And we've got people like Joe Biden, who has no idea what he's doing.
We've got Ron Klain, his Chief of Staff, who served as the, I guess it was the Chief of Staff for his Ebola response, who, as a result of that, gave us the COVID response.
So I've just lost total and complete faith in any government, especially the United States government, including that with the EU.
Erika von der Leyen apparently appeared on the stage with Nancy Pelosi and was booed the other day at a globalist convention.
Okay.
So, you know, if people are listening to Piers Morgan for their political philosophy, you know, it just goes to show you we're digging at the very bottom of the barrel.
But the one thing I want to point out, and Jim, I think you hit the nail on the head last week when you said, you know, no, David, no, this is Putin trying to engage in a war against the New World Order.
And I'm inclined to agree with that.
But what concerns me is the escalation that's taking effect.
It's gone from From just this overwhelming, you know, first this invasion of Kiev, which turns out to really be a move on the Donbass.
And then we get the hyper-political rhetoric, which I think to a certain extent is going to, now finally, is going to concede on Luhansk and Donetsk and let the Donbass region go into Russia.
And I think the hyperbole of third world war is nothing but political propaganda to assist in recognition that they're going to concede the Donbass.
And the threat of nuclear war is going to be the meltdown point, or it's going to be the relief valve to explain that, well, let's just take things as they are, which goes back to what I've said.
We've lost, what, a half a million lives in the Ukraine?
I don't know what the number is, but I know it's astronomical.
So my thinking, in sum, is the following.
I don't trust our political leaders right now.
They have their own best interests at heart.
They don't care about the common man and the good of the common people.
That's just my take on it.
Well, I don't think there's any doubt about it, David.
I think you're... Yeah, Scott, go ahead.
Well, let me just add one thing, too.
It's always important to remember this is not a six-month conflict.
This is not even eight months or eight years conflict, even though it goes back to 2014, the illegal coup d'etat that spontaneously triggered The rejections of the Ukrainian sections in Eastern Ukraine and Crimea, rejecting the coup government that was the American puppets.
This even goes back longer than that, 30 years.
This has been 30 years of brainwashing, MK-Ultra, drug-induced hypnosis to transform the Ukrainian mind into Nazis.
Russell Bentley, I was just on a program with him this morning and you know he's talking a lot about what's actually going on in the ground and a lot of the buildings that are bombed that you see on the New York Post cover and these Italian newspapers are not bombed by Russians, they're bombed by Ukrainians.
The propaganda, the CIA and the Mossad, they take these photographs and they reverse it 100%.
They have photos and videos of the mobilization in Ukraine, snatching people off the streets.
It's not Russia.
Russia is not enduring protests of people not wanting to go.
Russia has declared students won't be mobilized.
It's only reservists.
So the propaganda is enormous.
For eight years in particular, the Eastern Ukrainian people of Donetsk and Lugansk and Donbass and Crimea have endured genocide.
They've had their water shut off in Crimea.
The Russians saved them from that.
They have had their little girls and daughters pulled out of villages and raped and shot by Ukrainian Nazis.
They've had their apartment buildings and their children and their roads and their public markets bombed and artillery shelled by Ukrainian Nazi thug fanatics covered in tattoos of Bandera and Hitler and the swastika and everything.
This is being done and encouraged by America, and that's why at this moment I am more ashamed and disgusted with America than ever before, because we are on the side of evil.
And some of the reports too, I won't get too graphic, but I think it requires a little bit of revelation and the graphicness of the tortures that these Ukrainians have been doing against Russians.
They would, the Ukrainian Nazis, We'll capture, you know, Russians and Russian civilians in Mariupol and Kursan and Kharkov, right?
They've captured these civilians, these people, or Russian soldiers, and they will take, among many other tortures that they'll do with electric shocks to the genitals, they'll take building foam, you know, like the built tubes of building foam caulking that you caulk windows and stuff with and tile with,
Well, they'll ram that into a part of the body that's not meant for that sort of insertion and push into the body cavity this expanding foam to rupture and destroy the internal organs of people.
This is what the America government is funding.
This is what the American CIA and the Israeli Mossad and the British intelligence are funding and financing and training.
These sort of torture practices.
So, Talk about a crime against humanity.
Talk about a Nuremberg trial.
Talk about a time and an idea that is right.
I think it is all coming to a climactic head and the U.S.
has been leading this torture and of course Joe Biden is at the head of it.
And Trump allowed a lot of it to be done too.
He didn't step in and stop this because of the Russian, you know, hoax and all that other jazz.
But Ukraine will, I think, go down in history as one of the worst atrocities since, you know, even worse than World War II, I would say, Jim.
Well, apart from my reservations about holding Trump responsible for what's going on in Ukraine, I agree with everything else.
Meanwhile, Russia responds to America's plan to win World War II, where the government is no longer designing weapons to prevent World War III, but is now seeking to win World War III.
This is very detailed.
I just want to pick out some key aspects.
Whereas both the Soviet Union and the United States used to design their strategy to prevent a third world war, which neither side could win, and where much of the world would be destroyed, the government has shifted away from the mutually assured destruction strategy and replaced it with a nuclear primacy strategy, where Russia will be totally destroyed But the U.S.
only partially destroyed and emerging after has been sufficiently strong to hold unchallengeable sway over the rest of the planet, which is completely lunatic.
U.S.
military technologies are being discussed in many different prestigious publications, including the Bulletin of the American Scientist.
Because of improvements in the killing power of U.S.
submarine-launched ballistic missiles, those subs now patrol with more than three times the number of warheads needed to destroy the entire fleet of Russian land-based missiles in their silos.
Of course, if it's true, then Russians were in a terrifying situation as recently as 2017.
Compared to the 353 miles to the 1,000, that is to say the Kremlin, Ukraine is only 353 miles from Moscow, five minutes flight time.
Compared to 1,131 miles from Washington of Cuba, which terrified JFK, in preparation for Russia's special military operation, Russia has been introducing new weapons systems specifically designed to prevent nuclear primacy. Russia has been introducing new weapons systems specifically designed to Among the main, the Sarmat ICBM, or Satan-2, the world's most terrifying weapon,
because it'll be virtually impossible to detect and track carrying dozens of precision-targeted huge nuclear bombs unstoppable by any existing technology, having a range of over 11,000 miles, which covers the entire U.S. infrastructure.
empire, just a few U.S.
Satan 2s could destroy all of the United States and its vassal nations.
A Princeton group of scholars had produced an estimate of how World War III might proceed, which they labeled Plan A.
Which as of now has nearly 4 million views and 5,000 viewer comments, assuming the war would proceed in gradual steps of mutual escalation, ignoring that the U.S.
no longer is following the mad meta-strategy, that they are now adopting nuclear primacy instead.
The Princeton estimates are highly unrealistic, not describing the actual, unprecedentedly brief war that World War II in our era would entail, which would be predicated on initiating a blitz nuclear attack by the U.S., a war driven by the nuclear primacy metastrategy, a war to decapitate Russia's command and control in its first strike within a mere 10 minutes of a blitz launch.
How would a decapitated Russia be able to respond at all?
Only by means of a dead-hand system that would automatically launch whatever would survive of its retaliatory capacities after that first decapitating nuclear blitz.
The fact is that Sarmat, the Satan 2, works into that strategy.
It's already a great propaganda success on the part of American regime that although they started the war by grabbing Ukraine in February 2014, Russia has got the blame when responding to the coup by the special military hop.
Eric Zuss's new book, America's Empire of Evil, Hitler's Posthumous Victory and Why the Social Sciences Need to Change, is how America took the world over after World War II to enslave it to U.S.
and Allied billionaires.
Their cartel exceeds the world's wealth by controlling, if not only their news media, but their social sciences and duping the public.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I think it represents A very serious debilitating psychological emotional fracturing in the American mind and the government politicians mind and in the military mind.
I look at this from a PSYOP perspective and I look and I see people unable to face the truth.
People unable to, with cold surgical rationality, examine the game board.
And really come to a sense of reality of where things are, what the position is.
The Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, Biden, his entire team, the Press Secretary of Biden.
I don't dislike them because they're Democrats.
I dislike them because I think they are retards, scumbags, liars, traitors, and mentally incompetent, unable to get beyond their pathological narcissism and their obsession with
Virtue signaling and we're better than everyone else because we drive electric cars and we worship the environment and all of these other narcissistic pathologies and you see it permeating the American military intelligence and government strata.
You see it elsewhere too, such as these Christian association of churches that are like the Mormons running all of these centers south of the border or just around the border to bring in these immigrants and disperse them throughout the world, throughout the country.
They have the same pathology.
I felt so good when I did this, when I sent these people and united them.
It's not about what's in the interest of the country, it's about I felt so good.
That's something that people really have to develop an instinct for, because it shows a terrible narcissism that these fools
uh in the church religious establishment that are facilitating the illegal and alien entry and others they're so consumed with their own feelings and they are so which which indicates a misery deep inside of them that they're desperate to alleviate themselves from by doing these false activities of virtue at the cost of the rest of the society
It's your daughter who's going to suffer when you get a hundred Mexicans being brought in combined with Haitians and San Salvadorans and all the rest of the people.
When you have a hundred people come into your daughter's classroom, which before it was 30, that's going to happen because of these virtue signalers.
So domestically we're suffering from the virtue signal and internationally we're suffering from the virtue signaling with these people thinking, well we'll we represent ideals.
Morals.
Values.
The rainbow flag LGBT European value?
That's not a value.
That's nothing natural.
That's nothing godly.
That's sinful, sinister, and psychopathic.
Destroying and perverting through homosexual this and wokeism and hormone blockers and every other derivative of evil that comes from This pathological delusion.
This is manifesting in the military intelligence strategy towards Russia.
A country you don't mess with.
A country that doesn't bluff.
A country that doesn't lie.
I'm not just saying this.
Scott Ritter has talked about this.
Many other people that know Russia, who've been to Russia, know this.
They are a blunt, solid people in culture of tradition.
They are not moved.
They've endured this for a thousand years.
Ukraine is the birthplace of the Russian people and culture over a thousand years.
It didn't just happen in the 1950s.
So we are making moves on the chessboard and fanatically throwing our feathers around and engaging in emotional nonsense and self-delusion and lying to ourselves.
We're lying to ourselves And thinking that, you know, this chessboard move that we're making, we're going to do this, that they are trying to persuade themselves that this move is going to be victorious, like cutting off all the oil and fertilizer and gas of Europe.
That works out well.
That's going to work out real well in January and February, when you have the Great Ice Age again.
But they still are in this loop, and that's the most dangerous and striking thing.
I don't know if it's COVID-19 vaccine induced, or if it's a combination of things, or wokeism, and this whole perfect storm, this tornado of shrapnel and glass and metallic fragments that is shredding the common sense of American political leaders, Democrats, of course, some rhino retard Republicans and sodomites like Lindsey Graham are all on board this, as well as Ursula von Leyden and Macron and all these people.
They are being shredded by the fragments in their own delusion and these tornadoes in their minds that the Russians are just going, okay, your move, our move, your move, our move.
The West and NATO and the European Union are all going to be destroyed by their own hands, and that might trigger such a desperation that they set off a nuclear event, that they try and blame the Russians, that they assassinate Joe Biden or try and set off a nuclear event in the United States and say, it was the Russians who did it, now we need to mobilize for war.
I could see that sort of Samson option being exercised in the West, but out of that, I have no doubt Russia will not be the one who is destroyed.
They've stood by for a thousand years.
It is the West and their woke military that look like Barbie dolls with beards.
They're the ones who are going to fall apart and be destroyed if they engage in a larger military conflict with Russia.
Well, the catch, I think, is that even limited use of nukes is going to bring about a nuclear winter that's going to decimate about a third of the world's population, Scott.
You're absolutely right, though.
The insanity being displayed, no common sense, unless you assume the objective is to bring about a nuclear war, and then it all fits.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I mean, I don't want to sound too woke here, but I think you have to have a cisgender nuclear policy that considers climate change and advances the LGBTQ agenda, because I think that's much more important than nuclear war.
And being facetious, but that's it.
You know, it seems to me to be the main analysis.
I mean, you got Blinken.
Anthony Blinken, in my opinion, just has no vision whatsoever.
He sits with a cabinet of, from my standpoint, Empty suits.
Lloyd Austin pushing this LGBTQ, especially as it came out with regard to the article on the Air Force, where if you're a white male and you have Judeo-Christian values, the Air Force is not for you.
Hang on there.
I just don't think that's correct under our Constitution.
But what would I know?
But I think that Scott's right.
These tornadoes that are taking place in the brains of these people, they really don't get it.
I mean, they're talking about catastrophic nuclear war.
And they're also talking about LGBTQ, cisgender, all these things that just, from my standpoint, don't make sense.
And it leads to, you know, it's like argumentum ad absurdum.
It's just to the point that it takes you down a pathway where you end up with things that are not reasonable, that don't make sense on their face.
And they're pushing this as a truth for people to accept, just like they're pushing the notion that one-third of the population of the world can be wiped out by a nuclear exchange.
That thing, that's okay, because the other two-thirds get to live after that, until of course you get into a cisgender nuclear policy and then you get rid of the next half.
So I just don't think that I think that our universities, our educators, our statesmen are really doing what's in the best interest of the people.
I think that they're doing what's in the best interest of a few billionaires.
Not a few, but a number of billionaires.
I think they're sold out to the corporations, I think they're sold out to Big Pharma, and I think they're sold out to Big Ed.
I'm sitting here just stunned, absolutely stunned, that we're seeing in the Ukraine, we're seeing NATO and the United States engage with Russia in a A theater that's likely to expand to, you know, like a drive-in where it's just gonna be people coming in from all over the world getting involved in this fight.
And I just don't think that's good for anybody, especially the citizens of the United States.
Well, it's certainly not good for human beings and other living things.
Don, your thought?
You're muted.
Two things.
From last week, Scott, I asked about our cabinet and leaders about is everybody incompetent and or you could name somebody who's not and you couldn't.
So it looks like they're all blinking and all and all bad.
So we don't have a cabinet worthwhile here.
And also talking about climate change and stuff.
When in the world has climate not changed?
Climate change is up again.
We're about to try to Do sword fights with windmills and stuff.
It's just ridiculous.
The whole thing is just a mind game, and we just don't have it in this country.
Well, it's even worse than ignorance.
Ignorance can be healed with humility and an openness of mind to bring in truth, but this is worse than ignorance.
This is hostility towards truth.
And you see this in uh you know the school the public school teachers pushing in the homosexual rainbow flag transgenderism agenda love is love i heard my niece say that and i almost flipped out uh because of the propaganda component of that but
One of the things to watch and to add to your depth of understanding of the pathological insanity of these woke ones is that conservative guy who went out and did a documentary on, What is a Woman?
Fox and Tucker had him on talking about it.
And I think it's titled like, What is a Woman?
Or, you know, can you define what a woman is?
He goes around and he interviews people.
Don, I'm telling you.
You see this guy.
He's very sharp.
He's married.
He's got children.
And he goes up and he interviews people.
He says, well, can you tell me what a woman is?
And he goes up to these lesbian, transgender, transvestite lunatics that look at something out of a Frankenstein movie.
He goes up to them and says, can you tell me what a woman is?
Oh, yes.
A woman is whoever wants to be a woman.
And he said, oh, can you tell me what a cat is?
And the transgender just goes, I shouldn't have talked to you.
And he walks off.
Right?
And he does this to other people, sitting down in these erudite Harvard-trained, Princeton-trained, you know, academics, professors, and they're, you know, sitting down with him in an office, and he says, well, can you tell me what a woman is?
And the professor's, well, and it's very weird.
I mean, I picked this stuff up How they talk in their monotone.
There's nothing to see here.
All will work out.
And anyone who wants to believe in a woman is a woman.
And he says, well, but how do you define it?
I mean, what about your physical technology and stuff like that?
And this professor is saying, you just don't understand.
You just don't understand.
You don't get it.
And they're talking in this hypnosis.
And I know what that is all about.
So you see a hypnotic self-delusion permeating the decision-making analytical capabilities of people that are supposed to be the highest rung of educators, and they are so deluded and so arrogant That they're just saying, oh, you just don't understand.
You don't get it.
You're not woke.
You're not enlightened.
That, to me, as I've said before, is going to be the implosion of Western civilization.
It is a cancer.
It is a crime against humanity, as Putin said.
And we have to have a civil war, in a sense, not a violent one, but a civil war that says all of the people that push that lunatic nonsense, you're gone.
You're out.
You don't teach my kid.
I don't even want you in my town.
And if you're not done by sunset, you're going to be swinging from a tree.
That's how healthy societies respond to cancers.
I'll end it there, Jim.
Yeah, let me just, yeah, just jump in real quick.
You know, I saw that same series or the same program that Scott was talking about.
I think it's What is a Woman, and I thought it was pretty brilliant.
But what became clear to me was everyone said, well, you know, gender's assigned at birth, gender's assigned at birth.
And I'm going like, no, gender is observed at the time of birth.
It's not an assignment.
It's an observation.
Now, admittedly, you're going to have some anomalies.
I get that.
I understand that there are problems at times.
But to say it's an assignment by society is incorrect.
I think it's an observation, simply stated.
Yes, yes.
Meanwhile...
Famous climate activists seem to out-trump appointed David Malpass from the World Bank.
Why?
Because he doesn't buy their nonsense that man-made burning of fossil fuels is rapidly and dangerously warming the planet.
Over 70 non-government organizations issued a joint demand for Malpass to be replaced for not submitting to their demands for an end to fossil fuel financing.
Officials know replacing Malpass would be a messy process, or unsure how or even if the U.S.
can orchestrate a disaster.
Some Biden officials have gone as far as gaming out potential replacements, including Al Gore and former Secretary of State John Kerry.
Biden's thinking isn't known.
The irony of calling for an end to fossil fuel financing while Europe's on the edge of an economic crisis because of a lack of funding for oil and natural gas, and the U.S.
economy is still reeling from record high gas prices, is lost on Malpass's critics.
Meanwhile, from Breitbart Newsdesk, we witness a furious reaction when the head of the World Bank declined to immediately swear an oath of loyalty to the left's position on climate change.
It set off an international firestorm.
In reality, the campaign against Malpass is what is ridiculous.
As the World Bank pointed out after the climate extremists began wailing for blood, Under the leadership of David Malpass, the World Bank Group doubled its climate finance He's not a denier.
He agrees greenhouse gas emissions are coming from man-made sources, including fossil fuel, methane, agriculture, use, and industrial.
to support countries' climate and developmental goals.
He's not a denier.
He agrees greenhouse gas emissions are coming from man-made sources, including fossil fuel, methane, agriculture use, and industrial.
He also agrees they're contributing to climate change, much of which, by the way, appears to be false, because there's no evidence, really, no objective scientific evidence that establishes that the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere affects the temperature of the earth over 600 million years of earth's history.
There's nothing inevitable about a transition away from fossil fuels either.
This is one among many options for addressing climate change.
It's not one written into the laws or regulations of the United States, for example.
There's no consensus among the American people this should be a goal.
There's been virtually no public deliberation about the matter.
Even those who agree climate change poses serious challenges in how we produce energy.
There's no logical necessity to agree that abandoning fossil fuels is the required response.
Indeed, Americans may decide the cost of abandoning fossil fuels are likely to be greater than the cost of developing new technologies to reduce our emissions and adapting to a world with a changing climate.
I think that's all very sensible, and we have so much going on here.
Let me pause for us to discuss that before turning to other stories, or our extended discussion of the first two issues, nuclear war and all that are so huge that they've consumed a lot of time, but I think deservedly, justifiably so.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I think you're right, Jim.
It does deserve a lot of time because these things are wound up in a lot of different things.
Mental delusion.
And again, one of the core trappings of mental delusion is climate change.
The climate change ideology is a religion.
It is not a management or stewardship of the Earth's environment, of clean water, clean skies, It is not the responsible custodianship of the earth and its environment and our animal kingdom and the fish and all the rest of that.
That is what normal people like us want.
We want clean air and water and smogless skies.
However, this is not that.
This is an attempt to have a spiritual paradigm shift forcibly manifested by economic violence.
Economic violence is physical violence in slow motion.
I got that from Russell Bentley.
And it's absolutely true.
This is violence being imposed upon the people of America and Europe and elsewhere using the chicken little threat of climate change.
And this is the new religion of the woke.
It's not scientific analytics.
It's not mathematical, statistical observances of temperature changes or sea changes or anything like that.
They conveniently keep all the data and the statistical models out and instead they get loud, they get hysterical in order to bully the half-wit simpletons like this World Bank guy that Trump appointed who's been around into regurgitating their propaganda.
And that's where we have to rise up and fearlessly proclaim this is a false religion.
It's got nothing to do with managing the world's resources.
It's got everything to do with managing man!
Managing man in a destructive way, the same way that abortion and birth control and the population reduction is also wrapped up in this.
This is an inhuman, demonic, evil religious agenda that sees man as an enemy.
It has hatred for man by picking people who hate themselves And masquerading them in a nice three-piece suit and a climate change board of professors and pushing this through like Ursula von Leyden.
We will remove all of the fossil fuels and then you'll freeze and you'll be dead because you don't have anything else to to heat your homes.
So we're at this paradigm shift where we really have to divorce ourselves violently Physically and intellectually from these fools that are running off the cliff of reality and trying to force you off with them.
How do you respond to that?
You kill and defend anything that's trying to kill you.
Jim?
Yeah, even if there really were a causal connection between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature of the Earth, you've got to figure out how to deal with it in a systematic, rational, gradual fashion.
This rush to green energy without thinking things through, without even appreciating the amount of devastation To the environment that takes place and child labor and the cost of reducing electricity to make these cars, where replacing a battery runs $27,000 per battery.
It's not being thought through and it's a recipe for catastrophe.
David.
Yeah, it's, you know, I remember Al Gore's 2006 film.
It was directed by David Guggenheim about how to Yeah, inconvenient truth.
And it turned out to be, in my estimation, a left turn when you needed to make a right.
But let's go back to Mount Paso with the World Bank.
I like the fact that someone is actually speaking what they think, rather than what they're supposed to think.
So I like the fact that the president of the World Bank is charting his own course.
This reminds me of a, it was a JPEG or a short film, I forget what it was, but it showed the Sun on its trajectory in the Milky Way.
So here's the Sun on its trajectory, and it's like it's going straight, and the planets are behind it, and they're in this corkscrew orbit, okay?
held to the sun because of their gravitational because of its gravitational pull but then you see how each one's in a corkscrew orbit around the sun just as the the moon is in a corkscrew orbit around the earth and i just have never forgotten that that jpeg or whatever you call the uh uh the short film but This goes back to what I've said.
You've got the World Bank, of course, which is a source of funds.
And then you've got the North American Development Bank, which is a source of funds for the development of North America.
And then you've got the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank, which is a source of funds for infrastructure.
So all these banks fund these 16 areas of critical infrastructure that we see Even in Canada and Mexico.
And the fact that the World Bank is objecting to these infrastructure movements that are along the climate change or on the woke agenda, they're part of that quote, greening of America, which in my opinion, when you see the terms economic development, all that's talking about is increasing taxes on the working people,
Taking the taxes and extricating from them as much money as possible to support the wealthy.
So I just see the greening of America.
I love Charles Reich's book back in the 70s or 80s, whenever it was, but the left has taken that book.
Especially people like Antonio Viragosa, and just have exploited this whole climate change, this symbiotic development that we're supposed to have with the Earth.
And I get that.
I get Mother Earth is Mother Earth, and let's not offend it.
But the illusions that people create, or that they try to convince others, like the rising seas, Ice age, the overheating, you know, I've been hearing this for the last 20 years, and every year, I just remember when I was a kid, I remember when the temperature got to 111, 112, you know, and now if it gets to 106, everybody's crying wolf, it's the end of the world.
So I just, you know, I don't like people like Al Gore.
I distrust John Kerry.
I've already said John Kerry at Northeastern University said, what's this?
Yeah, I think those are very good points, David.
I couldn't agree more.
You're the first ones to graduate in a borderless world.
This is just globalism at its best and at its worst. - Yeah, I think those are very good points, David.
I couldn't agree more.
Meanwhile, we'll squeeze in a couple more stories here.
Hillary compares Trump to Hitler and his supporters to Nazis.
What else would we expect?
This woman's had a vendetta against Donald Trump since he took her out.
I believe she's been responsible for almost all of these terrorist-like attacks on Trump, including the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
Hillary likened former President Trump supporters to Nazis and Trump to Hitler.
I remember as a young student, you know, trying to figure out how people get basically drawn in by Hitler.
How did that happen?
I'd watch newsreel.
I'd see this guy standing up there, ranting and raving, people shouting and raising their arms.
I thought, what happened to these people?
It was that Friday at the Texas Tribute Festival in Austin.
You saw the rally in Ohio the other day.
Trump is there ranting and raving for more than an hour, and you have these rows of young men with their arms raised.
I thought, what is going on?
While there are known reports of attendees at Trump's rally for J.D.
Vance, there were attendees with their index fingers pointed up to the ceiling.
Some have taken it in reference to a QAnon conspiracy, while others that question may have been about being number one.
My fellow citizens, he said, this incredible journey we're on together has only just begun.
It's time to start talking about greatness for our country again.
We are one movement, one people, one family, one glorious American nation.
One of Trump's representatives called the finger-pointing a dopey conspiracy as usual.
Tom Trotsman said the media is working hand-in-hand with the Democrats weeks before an election.
Meanwhile, Mitch McConnell is reported in a new book to have Express complete disenchantment with Trump in relation to the Capitol riots.
This is very disturbing because evidently Mitch McConnell is considering voting to convict Trump in the impeachment trial over the upset of the protest at the Capitol.
The revelation surfaced in an excerpt published from an upcoming book, Unchecked, the untold story behind Congress' botched impeachment of Donald Trump by politicals Rachel Bade and Washington Post's Karoum Demirajan.
Explained the vote to convict Trump would represent one of the most pivotal of his career, the authors indicate McConnell was all but certain the GOP would purge itself of the then-president.
While McConnell was ready to be done with Trump, the party, it seemed, was not.
McConnell called Trump crazy after the Capitol attack, the new book says.
He said he's done with Trump, stunned at what marauders had done at the Capitol, illustrating a man overcome with emotion at the trauma his age experienced.
And while he may have been prepared to move on, it became clear that GOP didn't have the votes to convict Trump, despite efforts by Liz Cheney to convince him to take action in short order, circumventing due process.
The result was a promise.
We've all known that Trump is crazy, McConnell told him.
I'm done with him.
I'll never speak to him again.
Let's just ignore him.
Book details McConnell's decision not to convict Trump.
The latest book Squares with another previously published effort alleging McConnell admitted he was exhilarated that Trump had totally discredited himself.
He also took joy that Trump had seemingly committed political suicide.
I feel exhilarated by the fact that this fellow finally totally discredited himself, McConnell said.
He put a gun to his head and pulled the trigger.
Couldn't have happened at a better time.
McConnell, it seems, according to a column by the authors, thought the Democrats are going to take care of the son of a bitch for us.
This is all outrageous, and we want everyone's views, and we'll get them after we return from our break.
Thank you for joining us during the first hour.
We've lost our host, Don Gron, but we're confident he'll be back.
He's here now.
Don, take us out.
I think I'm back, but I had an awful time.
Anyway, Truth vs. News here on the 25th.
Yeah, I hope the first hour was good.
I bet you the second hour was good.
Okay, Todd, we'll ask you again, my friend.
We'll be right back after this break.
▲
Export Selection