All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 11, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
02:55:35
The Sane Asylum #42 - 10 September 2022 - 9/11 Memorial Roundtable Jim Fetzer & Big Names!
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
you are listening to speak free radio the free speech internet radio
you are listening to speak free radio the free speech internet radio the same asylum with Giuseppe the G man.
Huh. ...
Who want to twist the people's wrists.
They're watching every move we make.
Welcome to episode number 42 of the Sane Asylum in its new Saturday time slot, We covered that last week.
So, 9, 10, 20, 22 today.
9-10-2022 today, 21 years ago, was the last normal day, September 10, 2001, that any of us experienced as the synagogue of Satan, the Talmudic parasite, launched an attack on the the Talmudic parasite, launched an attack on the United States on September 11, 2001.
That has changed our lives to the detriment of our freedoms, of our families, of every aspect of the United States from these vile Jews and their attack on America.
And of assembled today, what I consider one of probably the greatest panel of experts for a roundtable ever assembled.
Gee, too bad we couldn't get Richard Gate.
Joking of course, he's an obloviating gatekeeping fool.
But what we do have is, let me bring them all in.
Professor Jim Fetzer, Dennis Camino, Joe Olson, John Kaminsky, Frederick C. Blackburn, and Russ Winter.
I've been fans of all these gentlemen for years and years.
And the only positive element to coming back to the media that I really never wanted to come back to was I got to meet all these guys.
I considered them all my friends.
So welcome gentlemen.
This is a lot of people so what I'm gonna do is I'm gonna start with each one of you and introduce you guys and then we'll freeform it after that.
So let's start with Jim Fetzer.
Jim, what are your thoughts opening statement on the fact that 21 years ago Was the last normal day any of us ever lived.
And tomorrow is the 21st anniversary of that despicable attack on America by Israel.
Well, it's stunning, Giuseppe, but they had to steal the 2020 election in Florida to get Cheney and Bush in to bring us 9-11 and the Patriot Act.
This was indeed an Israeli act with complicity of the neocons and the DoD, most of whom were dual U.S.-Israeli citizens, and the Mossad.
It originated with Bibi Netanyahu and Ehud Olmert in the 1980s trying to figure out a way to bring American forces into the Middle East.
To use them to take out the modern Arab states that served as a counterbalance to Israel's domination of the entire region.
So, the bottom line is that was what 9-11 was all about.
Wow, brilliant.
Thank you, Jim.
Next, John Kaminsky.
Followed this guy's career for decades, and he's now on Speak Free Radio Mondays and Thursdays with his excellent show from 5 to 7 p.m.
Eastern.
Kaminsky goes ballistic.
Welcome, John, and what is your opening statement for this roundtable today?
The Day America Died.
That's your book, correct, John?
23 years old, or 20 years old.
I've been following it ever since.
I've been trying to catch Fetzer for about 15 years.
I finally caught up to him.
I wanted to say something about Fetzer first.
He's a Minnesota guy, but I got a Wisconsin name for him.
Alan the Horse Amici.
Do you remember him?
Sure, the great fullback who later went out to the Baltimore Colts.
When one of these disasters happens, we give the ball to Fetzer, and he never fails to advance the whole thing, and now all these things are sitting on Murat's books.
Tremendous.
accounts that have earned him, he's still alive.
That's what we have to be thankful for, because most people who do that sort of thing don't last this long.
And we're really glad that you're still around, because your meticulous analysis of all of these lies that have been put forth by this government that's trying to kill us are just unparalleled and remarkable.
And it's like I say, I've been trying to, I've had your phone number for a number of years.
Zan Overall gave it to me a long time ago, but I forgot the question I was going to ask you, so I never did call.
But it's a pleasure to be with you all.
I've never met Dennis or Joe, and I know Russ because we had a great talk the other night, but I'm certainly glad to be here, and thanks, Giuseppe, for inviting me.
And John, Jim Fetzer would be a great guest for your show, and we can certainly make that arrangement.
Next up, the great Russ Winter, another man who has, he described himself as used to be one of the pajama people, and now he has, every morning there's a dozen or so websites I go to that are must-read to get the feel for the day, and one of them is winterwatch.net.
Russ, welcome, and what's your opening statement on the fact that 21 years ago, Was our last normal day.
Am I coming through?
Yeah, you sound great.
Okay, the day America died, it's a hard one to beat.
That's pretty much it because it's just been all downhill since they pulled this atrocity off.
It really has.
It's a seminal event of our lifetime.
I think it is the number one factor that's turned things south and kind of ruined the country.
So that's, I'd pretty much echo what John said.
Yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Thanks.
That's a great opening statement, Russ.
Next we'll go to the brilliant Frederick C. Blackburn, who wrote an article shortly after 9-11 called, uh, We're All Palestinians Life, and he was living the American dream, and suddenly It turned into a nightmare for him personally for being a hero and a truth teller and he has a phenomenal show every Wednesday 8 to 10 p.m.
on Speak Free Radio called Blackbird 9's Breakfast Club and he's coming to us live from Blackjack Mountain in the Appalachians.
So welcome Frederick and what is your opening statement?
Greetings all!
Happy Saturday.
First, it is an honor and a privilege to be with you gentlemen, big fans of all your work.
Thank you for keeping me sane during those great troll wars after 9-11 when you're just surrounded by all that Bad misinformation and disinformation.
Yeah, you guys were out there connecting the dots and gathering the data dots and keeping people like me sane.
So I really appreciate everything you've all have done.
And it's just an honor to be here on the anniversary of Suspend the Laws of Physics Day.
I mean, it's like a 9-11.
It's like everything changed, including the laws of physics.
So hopefully you get to talk a little bit about that.
Back to you.
Wow, great opening statement.
Our next member of this stellar roundtable panel is a gentleman who greatly contributed to Jim's edited book with Mike Palachuk, America Nuked on 9-11, Dennis Camino, who has been a whistleblower, a truth teller against the traitorously controlled federal government for decades, and they tried to take him out a few times.
So welcome, Dennis, and what's your opening statement?
Wow, I can't really match everything that you guys have all done so far.
I mean, it is quite an honor to be on a panel like this today.
And going back to Jim Fetzer's work, he has been the quintessential aggregator of truth for so long, at least since I've been working with him, that to be quite frank about it, I don't think there's anybody that It holds a candle to his record relative to how far he's advanced the truth bar relative to our sick and depraved society that's collapsing.
So I really got to hand it to Mr. Fetzer across everything.
And all of you gentlemen, really, I don't know Mr. Kaminsky and Mr. Olson very well.
And this is really an honor to be with Mr. Winter today.
And to be quite frank about it, Frederick Blackburn, he's another pinnacle of truth that I've listened to quite a few of his shows.
So I really can't tell you all how much I'm very pleased to be with all of you today on this show.
It's quite an honor, it really is.
And an honor to have you part of it, Dennis.
Your body of work has just been phenomenal.
Sadly, so much of it has wiped out of the internet.
And another man who's had a lot of his work wiped out is the rising star of TNT Radio and Joe Olson, retired engineer, who's just done an amazing job of breaking down how, as Blackbird9 said moments ago, how the laws of physics were suspended that day.
And so Joe, welcome, and what's your opening statement?
Yes, well, we had the 21st century open with 21 years later, the crime of the century, and it's led to every other crime.
As part of my homework for today's show, I listened to Forbidden Truth, 9-1-1, The science at 21 years which is produced by architects and engineers for 9-1-1 truth I listened to most of that last night and then I also listened to an interview with SGT report with Honaker the lawyer for 9-1-1 truth guy named Nick and And Richard Gage.
I've met Richard Gage three times, so there's no secrets there.
But something that they did add that we need to make sure is in the mix today was the anthrax attack, which was part of the same system to force every member of Congress to go along with the War Powers Act, which avoided actually declaring war and gave them unlimited war for the whole last 21 years.
And along with that we could probably throw in a little bit about Wellstone because he was one of the holdouts that they figured a way around.
So that's what we'll be dealing with.
I did a really great presentation yesterday.
Jim was on for the first hour.
It was Giuseppe and I for the second hour.
I'm not going to repeat any of that material because I've got even more material than what we discussed yesterday.
So that's where we'll start is adding on to what we did yesterday and people need to see that to That's a great point, and Russ took the time to go through an excellent documentary, and we can play some clips there.
But why don't we start now.
Jim, you do such an excellent job of succinctly describing what went on that day, September 11, 2001, so why don't I turn it over to you to tell us what happened after your decades of research, and then we'll let everybody go around and comment on your summary.
Well, that's very kind, Giuseppe.
I'm very touched by John Kaminsky and Dennis' remarks.
I mean, if I benefited, it's been because I do collaborative research, you know, founding scholars for 9-11 Truth in December 2005, bringing together hundreds of experts from around the world.
Among the very best have been Dennis Camino and now Joe Olson in terms of the Nuclear demolition of the Twin Towers.
Dennis wrote a brilliant piece for me, for my blog, on the volcano of lies related to 9-11.
What the country needs to understand is that the enormity of the deception was so great.
Osama bin Laden was our man in Afghanistan.
He was instrumental in bringing Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen.
They used to drive out Soviet helicopters and planes.
He was an officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman.
He was visited by an official in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death on the 15th of December 2001 of his medical maladies.
It's tough to get dialysis machines into those caves in Afghanistan.
There were local obituaries.
CNN and Fox caught up with his death on the 26th of December, reported.
David Ray Griffin has published a book about it.
Osama bin Laden dead or alive.
Barack Obama found it politically expedient to resuscitate him and have him die again in a fabricated raid in a compound in John has been extremely good at exposing a whole lot of this, as have the others here.
triumphal re-election as the man who got the most dangerous man in the world.
The fraud, the lies and deception perpetrated by the American government has just been dumbfounding.
John has been extremely good in exposing a whole lot of this, as have the others here.
I'm just really delighted to be with this particular group.
And I think that the Shanksville case is so blatant.
You had a 10 by 20 hole for a plane that had 125 foot wingspan and tail that stood 44 feet over the tail, where the two reporters on the scene said the eerie aspect of the crash site was there was no sign any plane to crash there, which was because no plane to crash there.
Pilots actually discovered Flight 93 was subsequently over Champaign-Urbana, Illinois, It didn't crash at all.
Flight 11, North Tower, wasn't even in the air, nor was Flight 77 at the Pentagon.
And with regard to 175, pilots also established it was over Harrisburg and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, after it allegedly hit the Nassau Tower.
And I obtained from the FAA registration records showing the physical planes used for those two flights, 93 and 175.
Weren't even formally deregistered until 28 September 2005, so how can planes that weren't even in the air have crashed on 9-11, and how can planes that crashed on 9-11 have still been in the air four years later?
The enormity of this scam boggles the mind.
Wow, that's a great point.
John Kaminsky, your thoughts on what the great Jim Fetzer laid out as the overview of what actually happened 21 years and a day ago?
Oh my God, I have so many questions to ask him, it's just, it's too much.
At some point though, and I might as well do it now, this isn't about Jim, but this is the greatest story about 9-11 ever written.
And it was written in 2003 by an Australian guitarist named Gerard Holmgren.
You remember that one, Jim?
Yes, yes, yes.
One of the wildest stories circulating about September 11th and one that has attracted something of a cult following amongst conspiracy buffs is that it was carried out by 19 fanatical Arab hijackers masterminded by an evil genius named Osama Bin Laden with no apparent motivation other than they hate our freedoms.
Never a group of people to be bothered by facts.
The perpetrators of this cartoon fantasy have constructed an elaborately woven web of delusions and unsubstantiated hearsay in order to promote this garbage across the internet and the media to the extent that the number of otherwise rational people have fallen under its spell.
Normally I don't even bother debunking this kind of junk, but the effect that this paranoid myth is beginning to have requires a little rational analysis in order to consign it to the same rubbish bin as all such silly conspiracy theories.
These crackpots even contend that the extremist Bush regime was caught unawares by the attacks, had no hand in organizing them, and actually would have stopped them if they had been able.
Blindly ignoring the stand-down of the U.S.
Air Force, the insider trading on airline stocks linked to the CIA, the complicit behavior of Bush on the morning of the attacks, the controlled demolition of the WTC, the firing of a missile in the Pentagon, and a host of other documented proofs that the Bush regime was behind the attacks, The conspiracy theorists stuck doggedly to a silly story about 19 Arab hijackers somehow managing to commandeer four planes and simultaneously fly them around U.S.
airspace for nearly two hours, crashing them into important buildings without the U.S.
intelligence service having any idea that it was coming and without the Air Force knowing what to do.
And everything that has been done since then is reflected in that story uh and and it's it's uh somebody said something earlier about about 9-11 being the greatest crime ever but i think it's been exceeded by covid at this point or it's certainly uh and it's like for for The majority of the American people that buy into this, even though it's fading now, but to have... It was the same with 9-11.
It's like people were stunned in the silence for two years.
And the same thing has happened with COVID.
People are starting to come out of it now.
But these people have never been defeated in their lives.
Through all the world wars, all the things.
And it's up to us to stop them.
And we haven't done it yet, but I know we're all trying to.
That is a great point.
Russ Winner, your thoughts on what Jim and John shared?
You're muted.
You're muted, brother.
Well, let's see.
Russ is not coming through.
How about now, Russ?
He's not muted on my end.
Well, let's move on to Dennis Camino while we get Russ's audio set up.
Dennis, your thoughts on what Jim and John said?
Actually, I want to expound on Gerard Holmgren's work, and I want to drag into this same exemplary work Nick Collarstrom, who had a very in-depth dialogue with Mr. Holmgren about the
The fact that these alleged victims on these flights were completely fabricated, and that was a very long, you know, back and forth between those two gentlemen that actually really needs to be published as part of a book, and I don't know if it's included in any of Mr. Fetcher's work, but I sincerely hope that it is, because it's pivotal to the point that they took guys like even Mike Rivero, whose other name is John Wankus,
And made him into a victim on Flight 77, and he's still alive and breathing in Hawaii, I got my check, working for the Central Intelligence Agency, pushing all this information.
So, I mean, it's astonishing, you know, 21 years later, the degree of success that these people basically, out of Langley in London, and to some extent Haifa, you know, where the, I call them the Moose economy gang is located.
Uh, where these guys, uh, perpetrate this, uh, this crap and keep it going.
Today, if you were to ask, uh, you know, nine out of 10 people on the street, even though we had a great deal of success about a decade ago, getting through, I'd have to say that probably eight out of, eight out of those 10 would, would support the original story.
So even if they know that something's wrong with it, I'm going to go ahead and pass the hat to, uh, Don't worry.
Mr. Olson, if he wants to go ahead and expand.
Well, let's go back to Russ and see if we can hear Russ now.
Russ, I saw you change.
I'm coming to the speaker.
You hear me okay?
Yep.
I'm good now.
Okay.
The problem is a lot of this stuff has been – now we're getting an echo.
Don't worry.
You're good enough.
I hear it.
Okay.
We're getting these – the people have pretty much been deep-sixed on the imagery and what happened in this event.
There's not that much that I can really find anymore on 9-11.
It's just all narrative.
And so what I try to do is go back into the basics, and I've kind of used this one documentary.
It's not very well named.
The name of it is The New Pearl Harbor.
It's not a really good name, but it's brilliantly done.
And I don't worry about solving everything.
I mean, I listen to Jim and Joe talk about the idea of it being nuked, which actually makes sense to me, but I don't try to answer that part of it.
What I try to do is look at it from A point of view of what are you seeing?
What are you seeing before your very eyes?
Now, the problem is that very few people have actually seen the pulverization, the dustification of this building.
And maybe I'd like to start my little part by just showing that from the documentary... What clip would you like me to play, Russ?
What time?
It's labeled pulverization.
Part 3, that would be at 53 minutes.
Part three.
Okay, so part three, that would be at 53 minutes.
Let's just look at this because this is what people need to see.
And just ask the question, could planes and office fires cause this?
Of course not!
There's too much energy, there's too much power behind this explosion.
It just evaporates this building, somehow.
I know that Jim and Joe have gone there, and I can't agree with the analysis about what it takes to vaporize steel and concrete.
It takes a lot of energy to do that.
So that's a good starting point.
Let's have a look at that.
Okay, alright, here we go.
There's just too many people to this topic.
Okay, here we go.
Let's see if this works.
Pulverization.
Somebody's... There we go.
Somebody's...
There we go.
...of all the contents of the Twin Towers, beginning with the concrete floors.
Had a simple gravitational collapse occurred, one would expect to find 110 floors pretty much stacked up on each other, like it happens in regular collapses.
In the case of the Twin Towers, instead, practically all the concrete from the 110 floors of both buildings was literally pulverized.
What happened to the concrete?
The concrete was pulverized, and I was down here, and it was... It was off the counter, two, three inches thick.
The concrete was just pulverized.
What do you think of this?
No idea.
What your guess is?
The concrete wasn't the only part of the buildings that was pulverized during the collapses.
We're talking here about 43,600 windows, 600,000 square feet of glass, 200,000 tons of structural steel, 5 million square feet of gypsum, 6 acres of marble, and 425,000 cubic yards 6 acres of marble, and 425,000 cubic yards of concrete, turned in good heart into a cloud.
And then there were the contents of 110 floors of office space from each tower.
It's hard to picture literally thousands of computers, desks, chairs, telephones, printers, and other office furnishings, floor over floor over floor, all enclosed in one building.
This was one of the trading rooms of the World Trade Center.
Had the floors simply collapsed on each other, all these things would have later emerged from the rubble, definitely crushed and torn, but still recognizable.
Almost none of that was found.
There wasn't much that you could say You could describe.
Everything was dust and metal.
There was no typewriters, there was no chairs, there was no nothing.
Everything had been crushed.
Everything was pulverized.
There was, you know, there were no desks.
There were no phones.
There were, you know, maybe now and then you find a fragment of something, but basically everything was just pulverized.
There wasn't a computer screen, a laptop.
There was no office.
I mean, it was, you know, two 110-story buildings.
An office.
You don't find a chair.
You don't find a telephone, a computer.
The biggest piece of a telephone I found was half of the keypad, and it was about this big.
It was devastation.
There wasn't one thing that resembled an office building, and this was the biggest office building in the world.
I haven't seen a door, I haven't seen a phone, I haven't seen a computer.
I haven't seen a doorknob.
I think that stands out.
Another thing that stands out is the complete absence of filing cabinets from the rubble.
With two towers filled with offices from top to bottom, there should have been thousands of them, of every shape, size, and color.
Only one was found, and it was definitely not in good condition.
That's good, Jeff.
That'd be right there.
Okay, what a great clip, Russ.
This is your trivium theory.
This is the trivium method of any rational human being watching that has got to automatically... you go with the starting point of just starting whittling the narrative down.
An office fire didn't cause that.
That's the starting point, okay?
To the narrative.
We don't have to solve it all.
We don't have to say exactly what happened.
But we have to eliminate the narrative.
So any rational human being is going to say, an office fire didn't cause that.
The whole narrative falls apart just by looking at this pulverization.
That's a great point.
And Frederick C. Blackburn, one of your excellent phrases is the laws of physics were suspended that day.
So your thoughts on what we just saw and listened to from first responders seeing nothing but powder, you know, and where were the doorknobs?
Where were the filing cabinets?
If the lying story of NIST and And all the mainstream globalist publications like Popular Mechanics went out of their way to promulgate this ridiculous lie.
So your thoughts, Frederick?
Well, great comments from everyone, by the way.
But, you know, from my background as an engineer, I'm a communications or I was a communications engineer, but we still had to take all of the basic engineering classes.
You had to take your statics, dynamics, physics, thermodynamics, you know, all of that.
And so I'm sitting there watching that on 9-11 and just going into this cognitive dissonance of It doesn't work that way.
That can't happen.
It's just like if you dropped an apple in front of me and it went up instead of down.
You know, it was just that, you know, especially when we get to WTC7, you know, the Solomon Building, and watching that free fall, it's like that can't happen that way.
And of course, with me, the impossible cell phone calls was the second.
I was just like, okay, as we say here in North Cackalacky, oh hell no!
Is everybody else seeing what I'm seeing?
You know, immediately the old Sherlock Holmes line comes to mind when it says, you know, when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.
And, you know, they're going, OK, that's all impossible.
And these are all these people are showing up like we'd find out later.
You know, who they were, but you had all of these bigwigs, experts, you know, on these type of things, showing up and immediately pointing the finger at al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, right?
And, you know, the buildings haven't even collapsed yet, and, you know, you've got Ehud Barak, Bibi Nady-Yahoo, Jerome Hauer, all of these experts saying, oh yes, this is obviously the work of, you know, Osama bin Laden.
And then, you know, Just a month after, not even a month later, you have this BBC article of an interview with us on Bin Laden saying, I didn't do it.
You know, you should look inside the American government, you know, if you want to find out who did that.
And so it's like, okay, he had full bragging rights.
If he had just stood down the entire U.S.
military and it was a real terrorist, right?
He'd be out there crowing from the rooftops going nanny nanny boo boo.
I've, you know, defeated you completely.
I've demoralized you, right?
And so, you know, it's like that.
OK, this is obviously a false flag, you know, to get something going.
So now my next year was all about, OK, if that's impossible, Then what really happened and who had the motive, the means, the opportunity, and who benefited?
And that's when I really went down the rabbit hole of learning about our special friends, the Chicken Swingers, and their global ambitions.
So back to you.
Well, that's great.
Dennis, your thoughts on the clip Russ just played, which is everything was pulverized, and if the lies of NIST and Popular Mechanics were to be believed, would have found doorknobs, would have found filing cabinets, would have found all kinds of things that, you know, would have been bent out of shape, but wouldn't have been vaporized.
So, your thoughts, Dennis?
Yeah, I mean, that was a very good clip.
I mean, it kind of sums up a lot of things in a way that you really can't deny.
I mean, how can
Any rational mind come to the conclusion that the absence of all of these components that were in the buildings would be a normal event strictly from a collapse, you know, from structural fires weakening attachment points for the floors and therefore allowing it to allegedly pancake down, which we know that's bullshit because the aggregate stack that would have been at the very bottom would have been many, many stories higher than what we saw.
I mean, the mere fact that there was so much stuff just completely eliminated, actually changed into another form of matter, not completely destroyed.
You can't destroy matter, you can only convert it.
So the conversion process changed a lot of things.
I'm going to drag a little bit of Judy Woods in here, though I don't support very much of her hypothesis at all.
Because some of the photography that was presented by one of her associates, who presented in Victoria when we were there in 2012, had very good photography that showed what I would consider, for lack of a better term, the integration of matter into other objects where pieces of wood were embedded in steel, but not in the way that you would normally find it.
In other words, pieces of wood We're structurally integrated into steel and what I consider to be matter phasing where molecular components of atoms themselves are interlaced by force and that force being the nuclear detonation.
And you can see evidence of this at nuclear detonations where you see these vertical stripes around detonation sites.
And what that is, that's the alteration of time and matter from the blast.
And it's a visible phenomenon that nobody really talks about.
But after I worked at White Sands and got a much greater handle on nuclear effects when I was at the Nuclear Effects Lab there, I understood it with a lot more clarity than the average person.
So we have a situation that points to nuclear destruction of the towers, not fire, not collapse, not boogeyman, not 19 guys with box cutters flying aircraft into the things.
And the most striking thing about this is that the people that pulled this off, the chicken swingers and Langley and all the intelligence agencies that did it, they knew that the American public was completely bereft of the capability of analysis to even get a grip on the basic fundamentals of the physics I've got another one!
Well, we've got plenty more, but let's get to Joel's first.
This is right in his bailiwick, which is as an engineer.
up a lot more time but it's pretty that clip really summed up a lot of stuff i'm glad that you guys played it very good idea to do that i've got another one well we got plenty more but let's get to joelson first this is right in his bailiwick which is uh as a as an engineer how did those things get vaporized joe well i i recommend everybody go to oh piss on you you stupid dan uh Nuclear weapons workers.
I love the way tablets, if you just breathe on them wrong... Okay.
Veterans, I mean AtomicVeterans.info.
This is the U.S.
government site where they are offering veterans that witnessed atomic blasts from 1945 through 1962, $75,000.
Energy employees, $400,000.
Downwinders, $50,000.
1962, $75,000.
Energy employees, $400,000.
Downwinders, $50,000.
And uranium workers, $150,000.
Now, there was tens of thousands of U.S.
soldiers that were forced, under order, to witness nuclear blasts.
And the first thing they report was an enormous flash of light because light moves at the speed of light.
Then the next thing they reported was a shockwave.
Because the shockwave was hypersonic, it was the next thing that hit their face.
The next thing they heard was an enormous roar because the shockwave was faster than the soundwave, and the next thing they felt was a heatwave.
So that's what was going off in the basement of the building, and that was Directed up through the core of the building.
And so that's what caused the fragmentation because it exceeded the detonation velocity of all of the materials inside the building.
That's what the shockwave did.
So it vaporized or pulverized the whole entire core of the building and all of the floors for the building.
We're braced on the outside walls, which is a Vanderbilt truss we'll get to in just a second, and the interior core with 50 concrete elevator shafts and three concrete stairway shafts, and when you pulverize that whole entire core of the building, the building starts to fall from the inside, and if it does, it pulls the center section of the floor down on all four sides, which pulls the walls that are connected to the floors down on top of them, and then
That forms a triangular compression section with the floor underneath and as the walls fall in on that, it compresses that floor down and that gives you those little squib lines directly beneath the failing floors all the way down the face of the building.
That was not planted charges doing that.
That was compressed air blowing out the windows and then blowing out the sides of the building.
Now, we mentioned yesterday, FEMA, 403 underline CHT.
This is the World Trade Center 1 and 2 building material.
This is the way the exterior of the building was built, and I had sent this to Giuseppe.
I don't know if he can bring these up better, but these are three-story tall panels.
You have a 14 by 14-inch square box column that were like 18 inches between them, all the way around the core of the building, or the exterior of the building.
Just one second, Joe.
Is that the PDF you sent me?
You want me to display that?
Yes, and this is diagram 2-6.
Okay.
That's the FEMA 403 PDF?
Yes, yes.
And go to figure 2-3.
It's on page 2-6.
Partial Elevation of Exterior Bearing Frame Showing Modules.
Okay, figure 2-6.
Okay, there's 2... Let's see.
There's 2-3, 2-4... We should have done our homework, Giuseppe.
What were we doing last night?
Here we go.
Okay.
There we go.
There you go, Joe.
Now, that's not the one.
Figure 2-3.
I think you're 2-3.
Oh, 2-3.
Oh, 2-3.
Let's say renumbers.
Here we go.
There it is, there it is.
Okay, yeah.
Now, you notice that's a square box column.
It's 1'2", 14 inches on a side all the way around.
The exterior side of those box columns vary in thickness depending on the amount of height in the building.
But then you also see adjacent to that, you see two three-story, what they call waffle panels.
The horizontal segments are 52-inch high, 2-inch thick.
Welded, I mean plate steel, which are called spandrel sections.
Those take the floor loads from the floor joists tying into them, and they also resist lateral movement of the building.
And they were built in three-story sections, swung over.
You see the little square box that has four holes in the bottom?
They had hand holes so they could reach in there and bolt those vertical columns together at each floor, or in between each floor, and then they had drilled holes in the spandrel section so they could bolt the spandrel sections together, and then scroll down to the next picture.
Two floor?
Yeah, this shows the wind load on the exteriors.
This shows the tapered sections where they combined the box column loads down into the bottom of the basement of the building so they had room to walk between the columns.
That's where they aggregated the columns.
Continue to scroll down a little bit, because this is important details.
Okay, this is your floor joist.
They're connected to the center concrete reinforced stairwells and elevator shafts.
And on the exterior wall, they're welded top and bottom to the exterior wall.
That's the second photo that shows the floor joists, and it shows the connections.
You can pull this FEMA 403 up on your own and review it later, but let's scroll down a little bit further because there's another one that's really important to show.
This shows how the buildings were swung into place.
This shows the building floor plan.
And the second drawing is the one that shows the hatch structure that supported the antenna on top of the building.
Continue to scroll down.
This is the overall site footprint.
I'm looking for the one that's impact damage, which is figure number 215.
So if we can just scroll down to that a little bit quicker.
Review this at your own leisure.
It's got a lot of good information about how the building was actually constructed.
The rest of the thing, when they start telling you... Okay, now this is it.
Now, you notice where the hole is in the building?
Scroll down just a little bit.
Scroll down just a little bit, Giuseppe.
There, okay.
Now, the different colorations—whoa, whoa, whoa, back up—the different colorations indicate the three-story tall wall panels that were, like I said, bolted top and bottom, bolted side to side, and then welded to And notice that there's two square sections where those waffled panels are missing right in the middle.
That's to make it look like plane engines hit there.
And if you look at the next scroll down, and you'll see the, uh, oh, scroll back up, you can see the damage.
Yeah, so that is not a normal failure plane for the way the building was constructed.
Those segments had the splice bolts cut out, the end bolts cut out, and the floor joists sections cut out, and they had blast charges that were put on them that blew those two wall panels out in both of the buildings to give you that roadrunner image.
And then if you look at the damage that goes across this photo, you can see it strikes from the left to the right.
That's where the missile impact hit the columns and bent the columns as it raced along, and you can see that they're bent in that particular direction.
So you had two things that created the hole in the side of the building.
One was the elimination of all of the supports for two different waffle panels, which then had shake charges on them, Blow them out away from the face of the building, and then you had the missile strike.
And Steve Dyack and I had a heated debate with Jim Fetzer on this five or six years ago, and he showed photos of those panels laying next to the St.
John's Trinity Orthodox Church next to the towers and the splice bolts and the end bolt holes were clearly visible with no shear at all.
So this indicates what the art students were doing with their pre-planning.
They were in there cutting all those bolts and making those wall panels where they could fire charge them out away from the building to create the two holes necessary.
And that's the number one smoking gun on that particular bit of evidence.
Wow.
Excellent, Joe.
Excellent.
Excellent.
I guess we're having some... Yeah, that was really good.
Jim Fetzer, bring it back to you.
And then I guess, I think it'd be good to go to Russ's next clip.
And I apologize to the speak-free radio audience.
The audio side might be dead air.
It shouldn't be.
It's all on according to what I'm looking at as far as the virtual mixer voice meter.
I don't know if Paul English is around.
Maybe he can jump in, but this should all be going out.
I don't understand.
I'm seeing signals here, so it's odd.
OK, Jim.
I think you've got to go to Russ's clip, Giuseppe.
I mean, that was a sensational original he showed.
I expect something equally impressive right now.
Yeah.
Russ, which one would you... Let's go with Ejecta.
Ejecta, part three.
It's about less than three minutes.
Hard-hitting.
Okay, let me find... So that's at 35.09.
Okay, let me find that.
Okay, let me find that.
35.09.
35.09.
Okay, here we go.
External structure all around the towers.
The spread of debris in a large radius around each tower.
What we see is an outward explosion of material beyond the perimeters of each footprint. - All right.
That's your office fire, dude.
Major chunks of the buildings were found.
This means that parts of the structure were ejected laterally at a distance twice as large as the width of the tower itself.
Large, multi-ton beams were hurled hundreds of yards laterally.
Gravity works vertically, not laterally.
The debunkers contend that the material ejected laterally was only the aluminum foil covering the structure, not the steel beams themselves.
These elements are there.
You can tell me about the trees that make several tons.
No, it's not the trees that make several tons, it's just the pavement that was expected on the trees.
Joe just covered this.
Perfect.
Yes, they are there.
These are just very light things that have been flying, like my friend and my friend.
Here.
Curant is mistaken.
The chunks of material being hurtled hundreds of feet away are not just aluminum covering.
They are the same prefabricated blocks of steel structure used to build the two towers.
In this case, A person who had remained attached to a block of column fallen can give us an idea of the structural pieces being detached from the building.
Several large chunks of structure ended up embedded in buildings nearby.
Okay.
David Chandler of Architects and Engineers has calculated the energy needed to hurdle some of these chunks of structure to such a distance from the buildings.
Using special software we can analyze motion on video clips frame by frame.
I have placed markers on each frame so we can track a particular projectile.
From the markers we can get a data table and plot various wraps.
The data here shows that the object we were tracking was shot horizontally at over 70 miles per hour.
The energy needed to hurl a four-ton girder at this speed is comparable to the energy needed to hurl a 200-pound cannonball three miles.
That's it.
Given that the falling upper sections of the towers had no additional energy to destroy the healthy structure below, where did the energy to hurdle these large chunks of structure at such a distance from the towers come from?
That's it.
Good.
Hey, I understand why we're not being heard on Speak Free Radio Audio because the station feed that is typically began in clean feed, it disappeared, and I don't know how to reload that.
I mean, that comes from the Paul English stuff, so hopefully Paul will come back and connect that, but in the meantime, go to the Twitch site and And, okay, so this is – it's always fun with technology.
All right, so let's go to Jim Fetzer then.
And, Jim – what the heck?
That's not what I want.
All right, let's do this then and go.
Okay, Jim, so your thoughts on that latest clip.
Let me go.
There we go.
There we go.
Well, it's all terrific stuff.
It's raw evidence.
And I think Dennis did a brilliant job early on.
I think he was among the very first to sort out how the The amount of force that was required was nothing that could come from conventional explosives, DNT, certainly not from nanothermite.
That the directed energy hypothesis Judy Wood has advanced is inexplicable in accounting for the massive blowout in every direction in these huge, up to 300-ton steel assemblies 600 feet into the Winter Garden.
Which means we really have very few alternative explanations for the massive source of energy, but where mini-nuke in the sub-basement turns out to account for the phenomena that are observable, basically destroying the inner tube, the 47 massive core columns from the bottom out, and then the outer tube from the top down.
Joe, I think you might want to mute there, my friend.
Dennis, I'd like to...
Oh yeah, I wanted to bring up the fact that, you know, Mr. Olson kind of triggered the discussion I had with Steve Dyack about the missile strikes on the building that were used to augment the appearance of the outside of the building.
In other words, I had surmised that it charges blue sections of the building out to create the artifice of the aircraft strike.
And when I did close analysis of the bending of the outside facade of the buildings.
The only conclusion I could come to is that a missile came from essentially left to right, and because of the way the metal was twisted and bent in one specific direction.
And Diak and I got in heated arguments over this.
Not saying that he was dissing what I was saying, but I pored over those entry slots for several I'd have to say at least several weeks, five, six weeks, looking at, you know, inch by inch analysis of that and came to the conclusion that the cruise missiles actually did the strikes.
And then the audio that was heard on the streets of New York City was the typical Williams 731 turbojet engine that were in Glickums, although they were also probably also the same engine in the Alcoms at the airport.
had in their inventory, but it was a two-method thing of charges inside the building, as Mr. Olson stated is correct, and cruise missiles striking the building to additionally damage the building in a way and cruise missiles striking the building to additionally damage the building in a way that would additionally change the degree of shaping
So people on the street heard the high-pitched screech of the Williams turbo fans.
They didn't hear the low-pitched growl that RB211s or any of the the high bypass turbofans would make wound up at full throttle coming at these buildings.
That audio was absent, but what was present was the audio that suggests to me that absolute proof of cruise missile strikes creating some of the damage on these buildings was apparent.
So, I mean, I wanted to reinforce what Mr. Olson said about the work he had done with DEAC to come to the conclusion about how the openings were formed, because it wasn't aircraft that did this.
It was charged by virtue of the Mossad agents, including the Asian woman that was part of that group that was photographed going in and out and living in tents in the building.
placing the charges to create the blowout sections predominantly.
They weren't in there to put the charges in to destroy the building.
They were in there to create the shapes of the aircraft entry.
That was what their purpose and life was.
But go ahead and push it further if you would.
John Kaminsky, your thoughts on that?
Oh, thank you.
I'm ready to burst here.
We've had like 16 segments, and only one of them was focused on the proper target.
And that was Frederick.
Frederick is the only one Who mentioned the who instead of the how.
And that was the reason the 9-11 skeptics movement failed.
Because we got so tied up in the technical aspects of what happened that what was lost due to Jewish control of the media, the politicians, the universities, and all the others, what was lost was who did it.
And that's how they escaped.
And that's how America has gone down the tubes to the COVID epidemic.
Because if we had solved the 9-11, who did it, the COVID never would have happened because all of those people would have been arrested by now.
John, let me... Yeah, I just want to reinforce, I mean, the striking aspect of Judy Wood and Dues and of architects and engineers is they wouldn't talk about who was responsible and why.
which meant that their pseudo explanations for how it was done, which they insisted had to be done first, really were inadequate and meaningless to the American public without that historical context, that this was really an op in order to draw American forces into the Middle East, that that this was really an op in order to draw American forces into the Middle East, that these dual U.S.
And even that Dick Cheney was the executive director in the underground bunker, That was all lost to the American people, precisely as you say.
The propaganda effort was brilliant to create these divergent points of view to distract from the central issue, where only Scholars really was emphatic about this, having been an Israeli op with the complicity of the CIA and the neocons and the DOD.
I think you're making a very important central point about understanding what happened here and why We failed to expose the truth.
You're allowed to interrupt me at any time.
I now reside in Wisconsin, so I love that comparison to Wisconsin backfield there.
Let me get an anecdotal on that.
Hold it, hold it, hold it.
I need to throw this out before everybody escapes from it.
The who and not the how.
It's about the who.
And this takes me back to Jim Fetzer, prior to 9-11, doing assassination science and checking him out on the Kennedy assassination.
And I failed to notice, who was that Jewish leader who Kennedy got involved with arguing about the nukes in Israel?
David Ben-Gurion.
As I was going through his analysis of the Kennedy assassination, I failed to see the name of David Ben-Gurion, and he was one of the leading candidates for the Thank you for being implicated in the assassination.
So that got me suspicious of James Fetzer, and after 9-11 happened, he was amongst the crowd doing the analysis, and I was always suspicious that he was Mossad, because I just wasn't hearing enough about the Jews until the Kallistrom book came out, and that, like, obliterated all of that in my mind, and I was greatly relieved and went on about my business.
The big question that Fetzer was involved with all this time is still alive.
Were there planes or were there no planes?
And for the 20th anniversary, I brought up the web theory again, because I have to tell you a little bit of my web theory story.
Back in the day, I was one of the first ones out the gate when 9-11 was a hoax.
And I got myself an interview on one of the biggest radio stations in the country, I think it's WLS in Cincinnati, Bill Boshears, goes to 37 states.
And I was like the first one coming out and saying, all is not right with this story.
There were no Arab terrorists, et cetera, et cetera.
But I wasn't prepared for the next guest on the show to be Rosalie Grebel who said, oh no, there were no planes and it completely blew me away and knocked me off my pins.
I didn't really know how to respond to it.
Now that has dragged on for 20 years where it's like I brought up Rosalie in last year's 9-11 story
And Ed Kendrick, Rediscover 9-11, he's been in the battle for a long time, and Susan Clark as well, they jumped all over me and said, oh no, this was proven in 2013 that Dov Zakheim had invented this special plane that could fly 500 miles an hour and penetrate the building without leaving any debris on the outside!
That would be the first time I ever saw one of those, because I've watched dozens of those crash films, and I've never seen one that left no debris on the outside.
Now, back to Fetzer.
Fetzer, somewhere along the line, came up with like a knife cutting into butter, or a knife cutting into cake.
That thing went into the building.
And so that could very well mean that that wasn't really a plane, that that was a video, and that triggered Especially with the WebFairy and her crowd, triggered a years-long debate on whether there was or wasn't.
So I said all that to say this, Professor Fetzer, were there planes or were there not planes?
Well, it's fascinating.
Two of the planes weren't even in the air, John.
Right.
Yes, I know that.
I'm talking about the south tower.
You're talking about how they faked it in New York.
And in fact, it was Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds who kept after me for a year and a half to look at the evidence.
about the plane disappearing into the building, which is a blatant violation of Newton's laws.
I mean, it's a physical impossibility.
And then we had the nose-out phenomenon.
Right, Simon Shaq, yeah.
And we had three theories that were viable of how it was fake.
One was CGI Rosalie, then Ace Baker suggested it was compositing in the 17 seconds before the video was actually broadcast.
And then the third came from Richard D. Hall that it was a holographic projection.
I thought that was cool.
In fact, I believed that until he said he wasn't true.
Well, no, but the fact is his later views were inferior to his earlier, so I declare it is true, and it's Fetzer theory if it's no longer Richard Hall's theory, because that's how it was done, John.
I have gone through this in great detail.
So Richard Hall's first theory is right?
Yes, absolutely.
That's the one that was most appealing to me, and Ed Kendrick has beat me to death.
No, no, no.
Richard Hall's earlier theory is right.
It explains the impossible entry.
It explains the impossible speed.
It explains why radar showed the plane that was projecting the image 1,200 feet to the side.
It explains the impossible speed because a real 767 wouldn't come apart.
It's the only explanation that works.
I've got a page from Australian military manual showing the airborne holographic projector, and it turns out now, though some insisted, you had to have a solid object to cloak, you know, be cloaked by the hologram.
The military technology is decades ahead of what the public learns, and we only in the last few years learned they can use air molecules as a temporary screen for these projections, John, and that's exactly how it was done.
I'm with you on that one, like with all the others, I'm with you on that.
It's why you passed through the building like the knife through butter and why you got the nose out, that was a hand-eye coordination.
It's otherwise been explicable because the nose of these planes is the most fragile.
There's no possible way the nose could have actually passed through the building.
And we've got it, and if you count the number of frames, it passes its whole length into the building in the same number of frames it passes its whole length through air, which is obviously absurd unless a massive 500,000 ton steel and concrete building provides no more resistance to the trajectory of an aircraft in flight than air.
So, yeah, it was the earlier theory that got it right, and I say if he'd given it up, I adopted it.
Say it's now the Fetzer theory.
It's the best one.
I don't get why Richard Hall would abandon a brilliant analysis of what happened.
We'll tell you what, gentlemen.
Just one second, Russ.
What the gentlemen are talking about is that seminal video that most have seen if they look into 9-11, where the plane Which, a typical plane, if it hits a goose in the air, there's a huge dent in the nose.
It's just pressurized aluminum.
It's not strong.
So the fact that they show a video of the plane slicing through the building and coming out the other end, undamaged, is just absurd.
And so, let's get, we haven't heard from Frederick Blackburn, and then go to Dennis, and then Joel.
So Frederick, how about that video?
It's just absurd.
Once again, defies the laws of physics.
Right and you know one of the things and I'm always reminded of is the Mark Twain quote of it's easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled and just how powerful cognitive dissonance is when you get this worldview and then it starts falling apart and it's like how much are you willing To believe your own eyes versus going along with the crowd, you know, group conformity, etc.
And every year, once I got in down this rabbit hole, I would literally line up.
Okay, here's the original story.
The 19 radical Muslim hijackers who totally thwarted this thing and, you know, all the security.
and they had planes and they did this and then they had these magic cell phone calls and then every year I just say okay what have we completely disproven it's physically impossible can't happen and then every it's like how much of this story stands up and I went through the you know whole lineage of okay Hijackers, too improbable, too unpredictable.
No hijackers.
Radio control planes, more logical.
And you had that whole train of thought.
But then you just start really looking into talking to all these pilots who have researched saying, you can't fly a plane like that.
The plane won't do that.
And then if it hit the building, it's going to splat like a mosquito on your windshield.
And so I'm really at that point of, Yeah, how fake and gay was this whole thing?
This was just bad Hollywood script and there was no hijackers and there probably weren't even any planes in the clip.
But yeah, they all agreed on the same story and had really good graphics.
But it doesn't hold up, and it's so refreshing to hear you guys questioning the plane thing, too, because I'm like, you know, is it that bad?
Did we really fall for it this much that it's taken us 20 years to finally say, not only were there no hijackers, but there weren't any planes, and we need to focus on who did this.
Back to you.
Exactly right.
Dennis Camino, your thoughts on how that mystery plane sliced through the building and came out the other end like a hot knife through butter.
Oh, that was pretty good.
I thought that the best part was where the about 75 feet, if not more, of the fuselage when it came out with the nose not even blunted, just turned into vapor and disappeared.
It just dissipated.
They did a fade to black then.
I just remember that the broadcast just went to fade to black because they had the hand-eye coordination problem.
The nose out was exposing the whole host.
So they faded to black.
You're giving the most historic live video coverage purportedly and they fade to black?
I mean, it's absurd.
Well, they made a mistake and then because they couldn't fix it right away, the only thing they could do is move that black bar up to cover the mistake.
But there would have been, you know, probably You know, 50 tons of aircraft wreckage in the street with bodies and stuff and there wasn't.
But in addition to this, the most apparent thing when we look at the imagery is when you use a camera because it has a frame rate is it is it samples.
The charge-coupled device, which is the element in the camera for a digital camera, it creates what's called a Moire effect, M-O-I-R-E effect, when you look at a grid.
And you see this in a lot of stuff that you shoot yourself, where if you take a picture of a screen or a vertical column and stuff, you'll see this Moire effect that's very apparent because of the way the camera works.
And the imagery that they showed us on 9-11, there was no more effect because they were using charge-coupled devices according to the technology that was available.
And the flat gray surface that was the World Trade Center was completely without any of that.
It was completely void of it, which was another clue that it was artificial.
It wasn't real at all.
But the most damning evidence here is that there would have been visible if you showed a slowed down version of the entry of the aircraft.
You would have seen shockwave propagation through the face of the building, even though it wasn't one flat surface.
It was a composite of structures.
But you would have seen impact shockwave propagation move through, away from the building, from the center of the impact.
You mean if it had been real, Dennis?
You mean if it had been real?
Yes, if it were.
But clearly it was all artificial.
The engine disappears and reappears.
Part of the tail appears and reappears.
So much of the imagery was so flawed.
And even the entry point of the aircraft, there's one diagram that shows the entry being more to the center of the building.
But when we look at the stuff that we saw presented to us with the bakery, the CGI, the engine literally tears through the edge of the building.
Well, the engine is significantly inboard.
It's 24 feet from the center line of the fuselage.
And for that to have happened, the airplane would have been almost to the point of where maybe 50, 60 feet of the wing would have been completely not penetrating at all based on that, for the engine to fly through the building right on the very edge of it.
So there were so many problems with the actual imagery that we saw that indicated it was CGI.
It was a holographic projection for some elements of it, but it wasn't reality.
The total lack of the more effect from how a charge coupled device scans to create an image, looking at a structure that was basically vertical lines based on the exoskeleton of the building was completely absent.
It was just a gray flat surface, which was almost featureless and it was complete nonsense.
So, I'm gonna pass it to the rest of you gentlemen and let you talk.
I gotta dive in here.
Can I dive in?
Sure, go ahead.
Okay, the starting point of how you process this, in my mind, is you concentrate on the biggest lies that this narrative has, which is that commercial aircrafts were used Allegedly hijacked so once you get once you can eliminate that Then you pretty much win the pajama people over because you can show that there's no way a commercial aircraft could have been flown into that building and the proof of it was put was done brilliantly by
The documentary.
You go to part one.
We should watch this because there's people here that don't know what the heck we're talking about.
They're still at the basics, right?
Sure, we can do that.
So we're talking about the Maximum Operating Limit Speed at Low Altitude.
It's called VMO.
Part one.
About 128.30.
And you could probably I've got, I've got, I've got part, you sent me the links for part two and part three.
Are we talking about?
Can I jump in for a moment, just for a brief second?
I wanted to mention the fact that Rusty Amor and Rob Balsamo did a piece that was actually aired on television, showing multiple attempts.
And by the way, other pilots, professional pilots tried to do this.
And when you're moving an aircraft 150 knots beyond its maximum speed, which is about 350 tops down at that elevation.
Oh, there it is.
There's one.
There's no way that you can make a control input quick enough to alter the aircraft's path.
You know what the good news is?
I have the clip of those guys flying the simulators.
so we can actually look at it.
This is attempting to hit the Twin Towers.
It's not a piece of cake.
It's really damn hard.
Osamo said they tried 25 times, and he was able to do it once.
You've got to be able to visualize it.
I have part one, Russ.
Where do you want me to go?
Maximum operating limit speed at low altitudes, VMO, starting at 12830.
Russ Wittenberg.
Russ Wittenberg is in this clip.
You probably don't have to do the whole eight and a half minutes, but let's just get the idea here.
And we're going to completely eliminate the idea of a commercial aircraft.
As we know, a person can easily run at top speed through normal air, but he cannot do the same in a much thicker medium like water.
If he were to be pushed at the same speeds in the thicker fluid, he would probably lose his arms and legs due to the excessive resistance he encounters.
The same thing can happen to airplanes if they are pushed beyond their designed structural limits.
At 30,000 feet, the air is very thin, and the airplane can easily travel beyond 500 miles an hour without encountering much resistance.
As soon as it starts descending, however, the atmosphere gets thicker and thicker, and the plane needs to reduce the speed accordingly in order to preserve its structural integrity.
Below 10,000 feet in altitude, speeds around 250 miles per hour are recommended.
In fact, each airplane has a specific maximum operating velocity, called VMO, which should never be exceeded at low altitudes.
Never means never for a reason.
Should the VMO be exceeded, a phenomenon called flutter can occur, which can quickly cause irreversible damage.
The flutter phenomenon can affect any kind of airplane, from large military bombers to small single-engine airplanes.
Once the VMO is exceeded, not only are the wings and the ailerons at risk, but also the fuselage begins suffering from the air pressure caused by the speed.
This is what happened to an Air China 747 which exceeded the maximum operating speed, or VMO, in the desperate effort to recover from an engine failure.
For the first time, Captain Ho takes manual control of the plane.
Airspeed 270!
280!
The plane is about to exceed its maximum speed.
Approaching VMO!
The stress of the dive tears the landing gear doors off the plane.
Emergency!
Emergency!
Luckily, the pilots were able to regain control of the plane and perform an emergency landing.
Wow!
The damage caused by the excess velocity was visible all over the plane.
The maximum operating speed for a 767, two of the four hijacked airplanes, is 414 miles per hour.
For the other two airplanes, the 757s, the VMO is even less, 402 mph.
Yet on 9/11, all four airplanes were flown at speeds close to or beyond 500 miles per hour near sea level, without suffering any visible structural damage, while remaining perfectly under control all the way into their targets.
Holy shit!
American 11 hit high up in the North Tower, around the 93rd floor, going pretty astonishing rate of speed, almost 500 miles an hour.
Here comes a very large target, descending rapidly, very fast.
Diving very steeply and very fast.
He's really moving.
He was moving fast.
United Flight 175, streaking through the skies over New York at more than 600 miles an hour, barely missed colliding with another commercial flight.
The back of my neck stands up when we talk about the hijackings.
We watched the speed, very high rate of speed.
I believe it was about 600 knots southbound, which was extremely unusual for an air carrier.
According to the NTSB, during the descent from 12,000 to 6,000 feet, the aircraft ground speed remained between 500 and 520 knots.
It then impacted World Trade Center Tower 2 at approximately 510 knots ground speed.
510 knots ground speed.
510 knots is 586 miles per hour.
That's almost 200 miles per hour beyond the maximum operating velocity of a 767. seven.
American 77 also impressed the air traffic controllers for the speed in approaching Washington.
It was an unidentified plane to the southwest of Dulles moving at a very high rate of speed.
I slid over to the controller on my left and I asked him, do you see an unidentified plane there southwest of Dulles?
And his response was, yes.
Oh my gosh, yes!
Look how fast he is!
Full throttle.
Full out.
The plane made its circular descent at about 350 miles an hour.
Huh, we just lost that.
Okay, I guess I gotta figure that out.
Well, I think he got the idea.
It made a circular turn at 320 miles an hour.
Yeah, he's maneuvering it.
Not only that, they're making big turns, aerobatics, flying 200 miles over the VMO.
So let's just eliminate Let's just eliminate the idea of a commercial aircraft being used here.
It's total nonsense.
And all the derivatives!
You've got all these derivative lies.
You've got the big lies and you've got all kinds of derivative lies.
It just collapses.
What more do you need to know?
I mean, who even cares?
I mean, sure, they could fly something into the building.
They could have used a drone.
They could have used a missile.
They could have used holograms.
But that pales in significance to the fact that they could not fly a commercial aircraft into that building.
Period.
That's really all you need to know.
The NTSB recreation showed the aircraft in coordinated flight without any rudder use whatsoever in that turn.
That's impossible.
Cannot be done.
No way in hell could it ever happen.
So that whole thing was triggered by Fetzer's observation of the knife cutting through a piece of cake going into the building.
Impossible.
You know, Fetzer's theory is as good as any, but the main one is you can't fly a commercial aircraft in the building.
Period.
Right.
I don't know if I can take credit for originating any of this because I've been collaborating with so many, but Dennis has been completely brilliant on these issues, and his italic analysis of the Pentagon is unparalleled and has proven to be exactly right that it was an unmanned aerial vehicle, a Global Hawk, Fired a missile into the building that no plane hit the Pentagon just as no plane crashed in Shanksville and the two in New York were fake.
So what you get with no plane theory is that flight 11 didn't hit the North Tower, 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, 93 didn't crash in Shanksville and 175 didn't hit the South for all of which are provable.
Doesn't mean you don't have any images of planes, and that's what throw people when you talk about no planes.
They think that means there were not even any planes to be seen.
They actually flew a plane toward the Pentagon and then swerved over it.
Dick Cheney was involved in all of that, John.
No hijackers, no planes, no Todd Beamer.
Yeah, yeah.
Would you guys like to look at the hijacker clip?
Yes, sure.
Let's watch.
Let's just keep rolling with this.
Okay, let me find that one.
I was going to mention that the ACARS data shows these aircraft, the United Aircraft, were still with ACARS beacons operating for more than an hour after the destruction.
That's pretty good electronics when it can impact a building and be destroyed and still be working.
We'll be transmitting to a ground station after it's been blown up.
Russ, are you talking about no hijackers at 1 hour 16?
Okay, let me get that.
Yep, this is only three minutes.
This will have a strong impact.
Short and sweet.
All right.
Go ahead, Dennis, while I'm queuing this up.
Oh, yeah.
The thing that, you know, like I said, we published a 9-11 ACARS document with Ballingers original printouts from the teletype from these aircraft.
And it's still up.
By the way, he logs the primary visitors to the site, Central Intelligence Agency, Mossad, Boeing aircraft.
You know, but, you know, why would they want to look at that paper?
You know, it's a white paper.
It talks about 9-11 ACARS data still working after the destruction of the aircraft involved.
So, I mean, why would the CIA want to look at it?
Why would Boeing look at it?
Why would the Mossad go in there?
Why did we trap their IP addresses as visitors for that website?
Why did we do that?
You know, there's one thing I want to add about that VMO section that we didn't get to see, but it's worth mentioning, is that they called Boeing and talked to the Boeing spokesman and asked them if they could fly these planes at those speeds at sea level, and the lady just laughed.
No way.
About 350 knots.
Yeah.
I think that 350 number is highly optimistic because the BMACs that I saw on both types of those planes, those use high bypass turbojets where only 10% of the air goes through the jet.
The rest of it's just a shrouded thing.
Oh, you get compressor stalling way before you get there.
Oh yeah, well, not only that, the engines themselves will rip the wings off the plane long before you start getting fluttering damage.
So that's the other factor.
I can't pull it up right now and read you the exact page numbers because my tablet's not working that well, but the Boeing information I saw was about 280 max at a thousand foot for both of those airframes.
So that reduces what you're claiming is a VO John wants to throw a word in edgewise.
their own website.
Yeah, even more.
But that's okay.
That's a trivial thing.
As far as that's all worded edgewise.
Go ahead.
Go ahead, John Kaminsky.
We're still doing Howl, and we need to do Who.
It's like 23... Oh, Jon, we gotta look at these Howls.
I'm telling you.
The pajama person has to know what's going on.
You have to know who you're lying to before you know who lied to you.
We can't spend 30 hours talking ju-ju-ju.
We know who did it.
That stuff was available instantly.
Exactly.
You gotta wake people up to what happened.
We lost!
We lost the game!
We lost the game because we didn't focus on the whole thing.
We had Silverstein and the fraud on the insurance.
We had the New York judges that were all Jewish.
They got away!
We had the New York prosecutors.
I know it!
I know it!
John, you're not incorrect.
We had the dancing Israelis.
Yeah, you're not incorrect.
But we just can't focus three hours on saying... Well, yeah, we're doing all of it.
Yes, we can.
It's ridiculous.
Okay, let's go to the next clip, fellas.
Hold on.
Excellent point, John.
Here's the next clip about the so-called hijackers.
Here we go.
Imagine a plane to plunge from the skies onto the roofs of the building.
Why would anyone suggest to stay away from the external ring, in particular, unless he knew in advance what was going to happen?
While we were asked to believe that 19 Islamic terrorists were responsible for the hijackings, no one has ever produced a single image of these alleged terrorists boarding the four hijacked airplanes.
All major airports in the world have security cameras practically everywhere, covering every public area of the airport 24 hours a day.
But the only image of the terrorists released after 9-11 was this shot from a security camera showing alleged hijackers Abdulaziz Alomari and Mohammed Atta going through a security checkpoint.
The two men, however, are not boarding flight American 11 from Boston to Los Angeles, but a previous connecting flight from Portland, Maine to Boston in the early hours of September 11.
Only in 2005 were some images of the terrorists in one of the three airports released.
They showed the group that allegedly hijacked Flight 77 passing through security checks at Washington Dulles.
But the timestamp, which is always embedded in security camera recordings, was either cropped out or absent altogether.
This means that the video could have been shot at any time prior to 9-11, possibly during a dry run the terrorists did along the same routes.
In fact, the 9-11 Commission has stated that many of the terrorists, including Atta, Sheikhi, Jarrah, Hanjour, Hazmi, took cross-country surveillance flights early in the summer.
There is another element that makes these images suspicious.
In 2001, most security cameras functioned as time-lapse photography, recording an average of one frame per second.
This video instead is a continuous recording, similar to those obtained with regular consumer-type camcorders.
In any case, the fact remains that in ten years, we have never seen a single image proving that the 19 alleged terrorists boarded the hijacked airplanes.
That's good.
That's good, Giuseppe.
oddity.
The 9-11 Commission wrote that.
That's good.
That's good, Giuseppe.
Okay.
Let's talk about the multiple financial crimes.
First of all, on September 10th, you had Rummy get in front of the Pentagon and say they're missing $2.3 trillion, and we're going to get to the bottom of it the very next day.
All of those records were hit by the missiles that hit the Pentagon building.
We had the Cantor Fitzgerald that was having a final sale on bonds that had been $330 million of bonds called Operation Hammer that had been issued to the Bush gang in order to Assets stripped Russia after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the same way that Armand Hammer and J.P.
Morgan ripped off Russia in the Bolshevik Revolution.
Then we had Building 7 that had all of the original evidence for the Enron.com and the Soros oil for food frauds going over in Iraq.
All of those materials were also destroyed because the building that hosts the The SDNY Attorney General's office with all of that original material in it.
So this is an enormous crime.
And then we had Silverstein with his double indemnity for terrorists on the buildings, and that was all exposed.
So we're well aware of who, who, who, and we can talk about how, how, how until enough people realize This did not happen the way we were told.
And then they can start looking for who actually did it and who's been lying to us because the news media and the government are controlled by this same particular group.
And they're the only ones that had the power to be able to pull all these multiple scams on us over and over and over.
Yeah.
Osama bin Laden did not have the ability to pulverize that building.
So that pretty much answers John's challenge.
What?
That answers my challenge?
No, your challenge is that who did it, and so part of your answer to your challenge is a process of elimination, and the pulverization of the building could not have been caused by Osama bin Laden.
He didn't have the capability to do that.
Only one group of people did, the CIA, the Mossad, and your usual suspects.
You're absolutely correct.
So why aren't we talking about that?
MI6.
MI6.
Because I think first what you have to do is lay the groundwork of what actually occurred because most people don't know.
The buildings were knocked down.
Well, they were more than knocked down.
They're pulverized.
They killed a lot of people, supposedly.
There's a lot.
There's extreme ground and underground temperature.
That couldn't have been created by guys living in caves.
I don't think we need to know every aspect of the technique in order to... Yeah, but it's a process of elimination.
It's a process of elimination.
Sherlock Holmes.
Hold Blackbird.
Hold Blackbird back into that.
Blackbird, get back in there.
They found DNA from 1,500 different people scattered across buildings all over New York.
So you can't say that supposedly 3,000 people died.
There's plenty of people we know are not around, and there was plenty of people making phone calls, and there were plenty of people diving headfirst out of the buildings.
People died in those buildings, and the official number is probably correct, so let's don't I'm not talking about the victims.
We know who the victims are.
It's the perpetrators.
We want to talk about the perpetrators.
Who is responsible?
Who pushed the buttons?
You guys are being huge anti-Semites blaming these Khazars for doing what they did.
People who use the term Khazars are unable to use the term Jews.
Well, no, anybody that adopts a religion isn't necessarily derivative of what the original religion was.
I'm not trying to whitewash Jews.
I'm just saying that these guys are predominantly Khazars.
They never were Jews.
They weren't Judean Jews.
He means they're not descendants of the tribe of Judah, that they're Khazarians who came to Israel, and most of Israel is Khazarians, and therefore not even Semites.
That's exactly what I'm saying.
Palestinians are Semites.
Israel is the greatest practitioner of anti-Semitism in the world today.
You're right.
You hit it right on the head.
Can I tell a quick anecdotal story that kind of relates to this?
Sure.
What I ran into?
Sure, go ahead.
I was talking, when I first got wind of all this stuff, I was talking with two Canadian women, kind of at a restaurant, it's been an hour, and they were very interested in this topic.
And I was talking about a lot of the hows and, you know, some of this stuff, and they were very convinced.
They were really kind of into the topic.
And finally they asked me, they said, well, who did it?
Who do you think did it?
I said, well, it's the Cheney crew and Rumsfeld and the Mossad and the Israelis.
And they immediately, it's like a trance.
It's like a frigging trance just went off.
They just immediately shut me off.
Oh, you're one of those guys.
And just got up and walked out after picking my brain for 59 minutes on the how of everything.
So there's a real difficulty.
Was that a reason for you to stop?
Well, I've never stopped.
This hasn't ever stopped me.
But you have to be kind of delicate about how you go about it.
No, that's wrong.
That's wrong.
You need to confront people over and over again so that they finally get the message.
And they still don't have the message!
Let me interject for a second.
Let me jump in that Jim Fetzer, the great one, has to leave now.
We want to thank you, Jim.
He has a scheduled conflict.
And if you can make it back, we're going until 5.
We absolutely will do this regularly, John Kaminsky.
And I would like to just interject, and let's hear from Frederick.
We haven't heard from him in a while.
Everyone is right.
John is right.
And Russ and Joe are right.
And somehow, this all ties to this entrancement and entrainment about the lies of the Holocaust, right?
Just like those Canadian women, oh my God, you're an anti-Semite.
Somehow, in the weak mind of the normie, They believe all the lies of the Jew.
My favorite six-word proverb is Russian, which is, fish swim, birds fly, Jews lie.
So everything leads to that, but until you can somehow snap them out of that entrancement, which is what Joe and Russ are talking about.
So all you guys are right.
And with that being said, let's go to Frederick C. Blackburn, who we have not heard from in a while.
Frederick, your thoughts.
Oh, I hate to see Dr. Fetzer having to leave.
It's great working with you again, sir.
Yeah, so many great points.
I just wanted to throw in a couple of interesting timelines that I went through with this, because one of the things when they released the speed of the planes That basically backed up everything we in the telecommunications industry, the ones of us that were still telling the truth, were saying about it was impossible for circa 2001 cell phones to ever even
You know make a connection with a cell phone tower at those altitudes much less at those speeds at that time the technology you couldn't be going down the highway and have a cell phone call going and get out of range of one cell tower and have it reliably handshake over and keep the call up, you would always have to drop the call and reconnect to the local cell tower, right?
So that just proves that all these cell phone calls were impossible.
And it was during the Massari trial that they finally had to concede that, oh, the cell phone calls physically can't be made, so how do you get all this dialogue from the planes?
And they said, oh, it was, we said cell phone calls, we meant that it was, you know, air phones off the back of the seats, right?
And then we came back with, well, those planes didn't have those air phones installed, right?
And so the response was, you're an anti-Semite.
Yeah, I mean, that was the rationale of this.
Okay, yeah, that's physically impossible.
All this part of the, you know, big production just completely goes out the window.
The, you know, Dear Barbara Olsen story, the Mark Bingham story, all of that.
All the derivatives, all these huge derivative lies.
That's exactly right.
So I just love that, you know, showing the airspeeds, and yeah, that's proof that not only the planes couldn't do it, but the cell phones definitely couldn't do it either.
Okay, we've got a four-minute segment on the cell phones.
They don't work.
The pattern of the antennas on the ground, it's a cardioid shape, it's a disc, and you can't get signal interaction with the MDS levels required at those speeds.
And those altitudes, the path losses are too great.
You just can't do it.
Right.
And, you know, the terrifying part of that was before I got blacklisted in February 2003, right before the run up to Iraq, based on other big lies we could do a show on, was, you know, I am in these classrooms with, you know, I am in these classrooms with, you know, the best and the brightest at the NSA, the CIA, FBI, military intelligence, naval intelligence, all the major vendors.
And it's like, okay, if anybody on this planet should know that that's physically impossible, it should be you people.
And it's just this, oh, you know, we see nothing.
You know, we're not going to challenge that, you know, and it was just.
Yeah, how powerful the programming was and people, you know, literally threatened to kill me over these issues, you know, because, you know, you're not a patriot, you know, how dare you challenge the official story?
And the other aspect I'll let you brought up about, you know, the trillions missing from Donald Rumsfeld, you know, and 2.3 trillion dollars missing and the next day These magic plane does this impossible corkscrew to completely bypass all the top brass.
If the plane, quote, quote, had gone direct, it would have taken out the top brass of the Pentagon.
Instead, it went all the way around and took out the accounting department, right?
Right.
I always thought that was very curious.
The reinforced part of the building.
Yeah.
Anyway, so those are just some of the things that I wrote down while you were going through all your great anecdotes.
Shall we look at the cell phone part of the documentary?
Yep, I have it queued up.
Here we go.
Cell phones could not have placed those calls from the airplanes in flight.
Minutes after the fourth plane had crashed in Pennsylvania, news was already circulating that several passengers had made calls with their cell phones from the hijacked airplanes.
We are being hijacked.
We are being hijacked.
Those frightening words were uttered by a passenger aboard United Flight 93, who was able to call emergency personnel on his cell phone before the plane crashed in Western Pennsylvania.
And tonight we're getting reports of cell phone calls from at least three of those four flights.
On the second flight that came out of Boston, that was the second flight of the day, and also went into one of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center, there was a businessman who got off two cell phone calls to his father.
CNN commentator Barbara Olson, wife of U.S.
Solicitor General Ted Olson.
She reportedly called her husband twice on a mobile phone to tell him her plane was being hijacked.
The problem is that in 2001, it was practically impossible to make a call with a cell phone from an airplane at cruising altitudes.
The whole idea behind cellular phones is that they use low-power transmitters, both to keep the cost of the units down and to preserve battery life.
It is up to the receiving towers on the ground to pick up and boost their signal before they route it through the system.
It is commonly thought that beyond 10,000 feet in altitude, most cell phones become useless.
Passenger planes normally cruise at 30,000 feet and beyond.
The editors of Popular Mechanics, however, maintain that cell phones do work from cruising airplanes, even at maximum altitudes.
David Dunbar.
With regard to the cell phones, we did what any reporter would do.
We talked to experts in the field, and in fact, cell phones do work at that altitude, up to 35,000 feet and higher.
In 2001?
In 2001, and it might be instructive for you to talk to some of the cell phone experts.
Instead of talking to experts, Japanese television decided to take matters into their own hands.
In 2003, they conducted an on-camera experiment near Ontario, Canada, to verify the actual reach of cell phones from different altitudes.
The cellular phone system used in the experiment in Canada is the one used in the United States.
Three cell phones, each from different telephone companies, were used.
The experiment begins at a thousand feet.
The results were the same with the other two.
Next we went up to 4,000 feet.
- Okay. - The results were the same with the other two.
Next we went up to 4,000 feet.
Then... - Nope, not on B. - Company B's phone stopped working at 4,000 feet.
And when the aircraft rose to 6,000 feet, Company A's phone also became useless.
At 8,000 feet, none of the three cell phones worked anymore.
No service on A, no service on B, no service on C. In other words, at an altitude of 35,000 feet, cell phones would have been totally useless.
There is another problem besides altitude that makes calling from a cell phone unthinkable from a cruising airplane, and that is speed.
Calling from an aircraft with a cell phone would be like calling from a car traveling at 500 miles per hour.
The connection would continuously need to be transferred from one receiving station to the next, and then to the next, and again to the next.
The transfer procedure between two receiving stations is called hand-off, and it relies on continuous triangulations between the receiving towers in order to establish the exact position of the caller.
As the mobile unit approaches the hand-off zone, the first tower senses the weakening of the signal and prepares to transfer the call to the second.
When the second tower senses the signal is strong enough to take over, the hand-off procedure is initiated.
If everything goes well, the call is rerouted into the system by the new receiving station.
But the speed by which an airplane approaches and crosses over the handoff zone is so high that the towers wouldn't have the time to complete the handoff procedure.
The call would be dropped, and the person would need to dial the number from scratch.
If one considers the altitude and the speed problems combined, it should be clear that the chances of having an actual conversation with a cell phone from a cruising airplane are practically nil.
Even after 2001, both altitude and speed problems remain.
In 2005, the Washington Post wrote, Most cell phones can't reach a station from beyond 10,000 feet.
Another technical hurdle is to find a way that cell phone calls would be handed off from one cell tower to another on the ground when an aircraft is traveling at 500 miles an hour.
And even 10 years after 9-11, people who try to use their cell phone from cruising altitudes are bound to get the same results.
Wow, there you go.
I mean, just to know... Boom!
There goes a whole bunch of moral lies and derivative stories, just like that.
Key Dudeny was the guy who first discovered that, a Canadian guy who could fly a plane and took a cell phone up to 2,500 feet and couldn't get any service.
The thing is, I've tested it myself, you know, I've flown all kinds of different types of aircraft and once you get above like 2,500, 3,000 feet, Your connection time is limited to two or three seconds.
You're not going to have a conversation.
And then furthermore, the towers are looking for a 6 dB differential between all the other adjacent towers to hand it to that tower that's getting the 6 dB stronger signal.
And that's impossible based on the fact that millions of towers down there on the ground, if they were seeing the signal at all, would see approximately the same signal level.
And the network can't say, well, I can't use this rule anymore.
I'm going to just hand it to the one that's just incrementally more powerful.
It doesn't work like that.
That's why it can't happen.
What about all bad connections today on the ground?
On a telegram, yeah.
Russ is right about these tangential things that were affected by the way things happen.
But, you know, I've been saying this for 20 years, and I guess many of you have heard it.
Too many times, and it's happened again with COVID because among the many rash statements I've made is that COVID was not possible without 9-11.
They never would have got away with COVID if they hadn't got away with 9-11.
The reason they didn't get away with 9-11 is because the Jews own the media, the politicians, the universities, and just Completely control our reality.
We are controlled by a foreign power.
I don't care what you want to call it.
Not to mention your paychecks, if you open your mouth and say anything.
If you're a government employee, you're a pilot.
By the way, pilots have been trying to speak out about this, that they're under threat of being fired.
There's lawsuits going on now because they know that they got myocarditis and they're getting killed.
Better fired than die, yeah.
But if they open their mouth, they're going to lose their paycheck.
A lot of people are reluctant to do that.
I think, you know, many thousands of people have run into that.
There's hope on that horizon, however, with recent court rulings that you can sue your employer now for having done that.
So that's a moderate step in the right direction, but it's like our whole society is going south because the Jews control it all and they want it to go south.
Yeah, it's all on purpose.
It is all on purpose.
I'm still not speaking to most of my family because they've been jabbed and voted for Biden.
What am I going to say to them?
If you say, oh, I can't talk about that because people aren't going to like me.
I'm going to lose this, that, and the other thing.
Hell, we've already lost our country.
So you can't not say you can't talk about the Jews because it means everything.
It's the whole ballgame.
And despite the penalties involved, if you think you're going to survive this by placating the Jews by not talking about them, you are sadly mistaken and you're not looking at the trend that has been straight downhill since, I guess, the Kennedy assassination or maybe since the Federal Reserve.
It's like they control everything.
Can you think of something that the Jews don't control that aren't able to exert pressure on?
It's certainly not the free press.
There's nothing that they don't control.
Exactly.
And the whole point is now, you know, 21 years later...
Actually, we've got to go back to maybe even 1913, which was really when the death blow was delivered, and JFK's assassination was really much more pivotal than 9-11, in the sense that the absurdity of what they did, and it was a demonstration, not to us, not to the citizens, but to all the politicos, this is what will happen to you if you step out of line.
That was why they did it so publicly.
That's what I liked about Mike Gaddy.
There's this whole thing going around that I didn't like Mike Gaddy.
I learned a lot from Mike Gaddy that this Jewish control of reality stemmed from before the 1776.
Absolutely.
They came in with Alexander Hamilton and we've been living a lie ever since that we're a free country when in fact we've been controlled by the central bank.
Historical note, you got the half of the Jews in Europe in the 17th century were Sabbatean Frankist.
You think that just disappeared?
Right.
That's a great point.
Went into the ether?
I don't think so.
That was really a nasty, evil metal process.
That kind of filters into it too.
The interest rates in France, I was reading E. Michael Jones' gigantic book, 1,200 pages, and the interest rates in France prior to Napoleon were like 60-70% to the point where they had interest on the interest.
The Sabbatean Frankists, to give you people that aren't familiar with this concept, really invented kompromat.
They really had that down to a T. Compromising people and infiltration and spy networks and I think that the Rothschilds just stepped right into that network because they had spies all over Europe and the Rothschilds were able to utilize that as part of their power grab, their money power grab.
And that didn't just go away.
Have you seen the photo of the big Rothschild pointing his finger at the King Charles's chest?
Yeah.
Yeah.
Telling him what to do?
Sure, they've got the goods on him.
Oh, well, they've ruled England since the 1600s.
The height of the experiment is the Rothschilds.
I mean, let's get to the point here.
They run it all.
They own it all.
They control everything.
And they're not even really Jews.
They're friggin' Khazars.
They're not even Jews.
They're frogs.
But they're in charge of everything.
They run it all.
Well, there's no denying that.
That's why we have to talk about it, as dangerous as it is.
Because if we don't talk about it, we know we've lost.
And that's what happened to the 9-11 skeptics movement.
The big groups were infiltrated by Jews.
People were prevented from talking about Israel.
I know a lot of people who... 9-11 Truth and We Are Change both had Jews in the higher echelons, uh, who said you can talk about anything you want, but you can't talk about Israel, which guaranteed that we were never going to solve the problem and get to prosecuting the people who committed these crimes.
And we're well down that road now with COVID killing.
How many millions of people have died from the COVID vaccine already?
It's going to get worse and we've really lost the battle, but, uh, I don't suggest any of us quit.
Uh, I mean, we should be a thorn in their ass until we draw our last breath.
Quitting is not an option.
Yes, exactly right.
And the Khazars hate every religion, including the Jews, and they lied to the Jews about the safety of the Pfizer vaccine, which is the only one that was issued in Israel, and now they're giving them boosters, and now their death rates, their unexplained cause death rates, are matching the same ones in the West.
So, a lot of Jews are going to wake up to realize that they've been in bed with an enemy that hates them as much as they hate The other Abrahamic religions on the planet.
And these people are evil beyond imagination.
And once we get enough of the Jews to say, I'm a traditional Jew and I don't agree with the Khazar branch of the Talmud, maybe they will join us and we can overthrow this whole bunch of shit.
Because it takes a lot of lieutenants that think they're part of the system in order for these generals to operate.
And once you knock out the lieutenant class, You exactly focused on exactly it.
you know, the whole thing is going to cripple.
And we're only talking about 1,500 people worldwide that are in the upper control branch, but probably 10 or 100,000 people that need to spend the rest of their life in solitary confinement.
But we've got a very minor number of people doing this enormous genocide and creating every war for the last 1,000 years.
You exactly focused on exactly it.
You zeroed in on the pinnacle in, what, 20 seconds?
You just laid it out.
It's exactly the only hope we've got.
It's all we've got.
I have two thoughts about that.
I tried that in around 2006.
It was a miserable failure.
I'm trying that again.
Horace Mahler just wrote a book, The Wanderer's Redemption.
It's about Gilad Osman trying to become a human being after being a Jew.
And it's going to be my next review coming up as a complex book.
It's going to take a while.
And I would love to believe that was possible.
I would love it.
But I'm not sure that it is, given the history of what the Jews have done to every culture that they've come into and plundered.
And it's like you don't have to go, you can go back as far as you want, but you don't have to go very far back because you see what has happened with the rise of the international bankers in the 1600s, Russ has written about this, where They came to America.
They infiltrated China.
They had both Mao Zedong and Sun Yat-sen operated by different factions of Jews.
They went to Russia.
Benjamin Schiff funded 1,600 Jews from Brooklyn, sent them to Russia, and they killed A hundred million Russians who were Christians.
And so that's their track record.
World War II, England had a king.
They suckered him into marrying an American divorcee he had to leave.
That enabled a feeble-minded king to come in and a Jew, Winston Churchill, to join with a Jew, Franklin Roosevelt, and the Jew, Joseph Stalin, to gang up on Hitler, who really only wanted to restore Germany as best he could.
And he didn't realize That he couldn't do that in a world that was completely controlled by Jews and they destroyed him.
So this is the track record we're dealing with.
There's no conciliation with these people.
They've got their mind made up.
All the vaccine makers are Jewish except for Gilead, of which George Bush is an investor, but he may be a Jew as well.
And it's like, You can't pretend that you don't have to deal with this problem, and if you keep using Khazarian Mafia and differentiating between Sephardics and Ashkenazim, you're just fooling yourself and maybe extending your life a little longer, but you're not improving your product.
Well, for purposes of our discussion today, 9-11, I will just come right out and say that there was an element, I think it was Israeli intelligence, Sure.
Israeli intelligent, playing a major role, especially in New York City.
Sure.
And the placement of some of these rascals like the Air Force staff, The entire White House staff.
Yeah, the entire White House staff.
They just placed these guys or compromised them or something.
I mean, Tommy Meyer, General Tommy Meyer, and they all get promoted.
They're incompetent.
They make huge mistakes in terms of taking down the defense supposedly against these hijacked, you know, these imaginary hijacked planes.
And they get promoted.
Can I jump in real quick here?
You know, most people don't even mention the fact that the two E-4B airborne command posts were owned and operated by the Israeli Air Force on 9-11.
They were under lease to them.
The Israeli Air Force controlled those two 747s, one over Arlington and the other one over New York City, that are not on radar records, but we see them on cameras.
They're right there in your face, and the Israeli Air Force was driving them.
It wasn't U.S.
Air Force personnel.
There may have been Air Force personnel involved, but the U.S.
Air Force was not in charge of those two E-4Bs that were running the whole show.
That's the crux of it.
Nobody even mentions it.
Go into that a little bit.
That's interesting.
I've never heard this.
It's the truth.
There was a female liaison general.
First, tell me what the terms mean.
What do you mean, the terms?
E-R-B.
I don't understand the terms.
These aircraft that were the doomsday aircraft, one over Langley and the other one over New York City, they're on cameras.
They don't show up on any radar records.
They're not on any RADIES-84 data at all.
But they're orbiting right over New York City and over Ireland.
So that's the control center of this whole operation, right?
They were running the whole operation and they were under control of Israeli Air Force personnel on 9-11.
It's a fact.
They weren't being controlled by American pilots.
If they had passengers on planes that they kind of diverted, what do you think would happen to those people?
I think that was subterfuge and a bullshit story just to take you down a rabbit hole.
I've considered that too.
I've considered two options that they actually got a hold of some planes with some people in it.
Like the C.C.
Jones story, you know, where she says it's a frame.
It almost kind of sounds like she's on the ground being forced into making this phone call to her husband.
There's certain elements that kind of It's the Woody Box story at Cleveland Airport where several planes landed.
They consolidated the passengers of two planes.
One of the planes flew to Stewart Airport on the Hudson.
I don't know where the people went.
There's been speculation that they crashed the plane into the Atlantic, but that story goes nowhere.
But the Social Security death index is important to consider because there's almost no Uh, people died on 9-11, according to the Social Security Death Index.
And you can't even look at it today, they won't even let you look at it.
I can believe that, like everything else.
But, uh, um... Are we going to election, Chippy?
Okay, fellas, we're at the top of the hour break, so everybody can go hit the restroom.
And we'll be back in about four minutes with the final hour of this phenomenal roundtable, so... Thank you, sir.
Please stay tuned for the final hour.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons of the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read American Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
You are listening to Speak Free Radio, the free speech internet radio platform.
Horseless carriages in the news.
Note number one.
Lovely local lady, Maria Spinelli, was pissed off because she had to wait so damn long for her renewed driver's license to arrive in the mail.
Finally, the irate woman contacted her local newspaper and spoke with the consumer advocate columnist there.
In turn, the scribbling do-gooder promptly buzzed the Florida DMV.
And guess what?
Maria's license to drive was in the mail the next day.
And so, Ms.
Spinelli now has a legal Florida driver's license with all the rights and privileges contained therein, including 1.
The right to ram into cars, trucks, ambulances, and school buses.
2.
The right to run over and flatline cyclists like me.
3.
The right to confuse the gas pedal for the brake and crash through grocery stores, post office walls, and fly-off piers.
And 4.
Even the right to drive on the road now and then.
Maria Spinelli is 93.
Do gooder, do badder, do deather, you decide.
Note number two.
Some old-timer, let's call him Orville D. Mincha, rambled on in the paper the other day, and I must say, most pleasantly, did he ramble.
In the letter to the Ed, the man opined about seniors behind the wheel.
I was hoping for some good, old-fashioned, down-home common sense and some straightforward, clear thoughts from this gentleman.
But, in part, the senior spaketh thusly.
Spunky!
Spunky is often used to describe those who still drive past 90.
One woman told me about her father, who was in the 90-plus category and is still a good driver.
She did caution me, however, if you see him on the open road, I would advise not driving in front of him or behind him.
It is assumed that the above was spoken with a good-natured grin followed by a mirthful chuckle.
If so, then why am I not grinning and mirthfully chuckling?
Note number three.
Meanwhile, over on the wrong coast, an elderly woman Plowed right through the front door of the public grocery store.
Witnesses said the lady's car appeared to be going at least 50 miles per hour when it blasted into the building, sending people and potato chips flying in all directions.
Although one shopper was pinned beneath the car and a few others got their hair messed up a bit, it was only by the grace of God and some really fleet feet that more folks were not moderately squashed or critically killed.
As for the woman, Well, it's hardly worth noting that she still has hardly a clue about what happened.
Contacted at the home, her husband stated that his confused wife, who of course was not injured in the least, was trying to put the pieces together.
With a little luck, the lady will be at it again today or tomorrow, exercising her God-given right to infuse the gas pedal for the break a dozen times a day as she crashes through walls and windows and scatters bricks, body parts, and cornflakes in every direction.
In 1920, Henry Ford began publishing articles in his newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, which would end up being published as a four-volume set of books which would end up being published as a four-volume set of books entitled The
This four-volume set spanned over 1,000 pages, comprising of 80 articles, and in 2012, Andrew Carrington Hitchcock published an extract of each one of these articles in his book, The Synagogue of Satan, Updated, Expanded and Uncensored.
In 2020, 100 years after Henry Ford started publishing The International Jew, Andrew Carrington Hitchcock, Blackbird 9 and Golden Pipe Wrench began recording a 12-part series on this four-volume set.
Money Free Publishing are now proud to offer this groundbreaking 12-part series containing over 11 hours of audio content on one of the most astonishing and controversial series of books ever published.
We hope you find it as interesting to listen to as we found it to produce.
Yours, ACH, BB and GPW.
Music by Ben Thede
Music by Ben Thede Don't want to twist the people's wrists.
They're watching every move we make.
We're all included on their list.
Welcome back to the third and final hour of the new Saturday edition of the Sane Asylum.
I'm your host Giuseppe, and today we are joined by a remarkable roundtable addressing 9-11.
And ever since I came back to the independent media three and a half years ago, I've been asking this question, where's the warrior class?
What happened to the military people who swore an oath to the Constitution, an oath to protect this nation, when we were so viciously attacked by the satanic, cancerous parasite residing in Israel?
Feeding here on this nation and living here as dual citizen traders.
So let's go around the panel and answer that question.
Why did the military allow this to happen and why did they participate in it?
And let's start with Frederick C. Blackburn.
We haven't heard from you in a while, Frederick.
First off, for everybody who's not familiar with my work, I am the son of a military veteran who was one of those Southern boys who, after Pearl Harbor, lied about his age to go fight the evil, you know, and fight the Great War, right?
And then he stayed in.
went into the Navy and did medical evac in the Atlantic Theater and then stayed in, went into the Air Force, and then retired at the Air Force.
And so I was talking about White Sands, and that was actually his last station before we came back to North Cackalackie.
But anyway, so I come at this as, you know, I thought I was part of that military system, and I was training our military and our intelligence agencies.
And to see them just turn the literal blind eye, right, that's part of that symbolism, of the blatantly obvious.
It's like you're supposed to be the ones understanding what I'm seeing, right?
And one of my favorites is my client at the NSA, no such agency, General Michael Hayden.
And yeah, every time I see him in his Air Force uniform, I just want to, you know, strangle his little, you know, pencil neck.
Because, yeah, he was the one who got put in by Bill Clinton, and we now know that Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton are completely compromised by Unit 269, Jeffrey Epstein, and Robert Maxwell, and Ghislaine Maxwell, and that whole blackmail operation.
So Bill Clinton puts in General Michael Hayden, and here comes Bush, you know, Bush Jr., and he keeps Hayden at the NSA, as does Barack Obama, right?
And during that tenure, you know, he went from the NSA to the CIA and then go to work for the Chertoff group with Michael dancing Israeli Chertoffs.
And the thing is, I was contracted to develop a series of classes and teach them about the convergence technologies of moving the telephone company and the computer networks into a converged network, right?
And then how to do the new information or intelligence gathering on that type of information.
It's kind of basically take an echelon and putting it onto the Internet, right?
And so the event That changed the world.
Because, you know, a year before 9-11, I was already, you know, talking to people about what I'm seeing from the telcos that they are scooping up everything.
They're exploiting the holes in the CALEA software and mandates to do this surveillance.
And I'm just seeing they're sweeping up everything.
And so I was still running for office and things like that, heavily into politics.
And then 9-11 happens and guess how many changes the NSA and all these other groups requested of our curriculum?
Zero, right?
Because it was working exactly how they wanted it to work.
So no changes were made.
We had it exactly like they wanted it.
And then, you know, I fought this battle for years of exposing the NSA, Illegal Electronic Surveillance, with The telcos, and that was all under General Hayden, and the only person who didn't go along with it was the Quest CEO, Joseph Naccio, and they put him in prison on trumped-up insider trading laws.
And in my research, the reason why everybody went along with this is just how infiltrated our telecommunication grids, the ISPs, the telcos, et cetera, are with all these Unit 8200 graduates from Israel.
And so when I'm sitting there going, you guys are breaking the law, and instead of saying, oh, we didn't investigate this, it's you're blacklisted.
And so I, you know, next thing I know, I'm living out of my car.
But just watching the career of Michael Hayden, knowing that, you know, he was in on this electronic surveillance from the beginning.
It was working exactly like they wanted it before 9-11.
The only person that stood up to him was Joseph Nacho.
They took him out.
And then when we finally proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that they were doing the illegal electronic surveillance, Obama's first act as president was to forgive them and call them all heroes, because they stepped up to 9-11, right?
So that is the infuriating part of just how compromised our systems are, you know, the government systems, the military, etc.
So back to you.
Wow, that is highly discouraging.
So let's go to John Kaminsky.
What do you think of all that?
That Jew cancer has eaten into everything, essentially.
It goes way back.
I'll tell you, it was Russ Winter's story that kind of triggered me about a year ago when he talked about the Hyksos.
Invading Egypt and taking it over for like 500 years, and Abraham and Joseph were part of this Hyksos invasion of Egypt, which changed the nature of the country, introduced monotheism to the world, and is a spawn of the devil that has bedeviled us down to the present day.
And it's like... Yeah, and Joseph is basically an economic hitman.
Right, right, I remember that.
Tell us about that story a little bit.
Oh God, I mean, I should quote from the Bible.
Every time I do something like this, I have a lot of Christian followers, so I lose more followers when I read stories like this.
I know, plus you live in Europe, so I understand that part as well.
But yeah, Joseph was basically the economic hitman that got together the Keep on going, and I'll read you the biblical quote.
Yeah, it was, well, it was Abraham who peddled his wife to Pharaoh, who got in goods with the Pharaoh.
And then using the same techniques that they use today, they managed to commandeer the wealth of the whole country, started starving people.
And there's this part, I forgot which book of the Bible it is, but just before they left, they said they borrowed everyone's jewelry and then left the country.
And.
And that goes back on to the 9-1-1.
Yeah.
Just to get back on the 911 subject, we also have two Israeli demolition teams, one arrested in a van full of explosives in the Holland Tunnel, and the other planning charges at the suspension bridge anchors on one of the banks of the Hudson.
We also had Giuliani, who dismissed charges against those two.
He busted all five of the Italian crime families in New York to make it safe for the Jewish crime families in New York.
And then he impounded all the material from all of the World Trade Center sites and had it armed guard and monitored all the way over to fresh kill landfills where it was sorted out and sent to China so it could be recycled.
So nobody could find out the levels of isotopes that were inside those building materials from the nuclear bombs that were there.
So yeah, the whole thing is unbelievable.
So let me read from Genesis so you can see what looters these people are.
You're absolutely right.
What you just described is another looting operation, right?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
So here we go.
This is Genesis 41.8.
This is right out of the good book, okay?
This is referring to Joseph.
So he gathered all the food of these seven years, which occurred in the land of Egypt, and placed the food in the cities.
He placed in every city the food from its surrounding fields, in Genesis 41, 13.
Now there was no food in all the land, because the famine was very severe, so that the land of Egypt, the land of Canaan, languished because of the famine.
Next verse.
Joseph gathered all the money that was found in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan for the grain which was bought.
And Joseph brought the money into the Pharaoh's house.
When the money was all spent in the land of Egypt and in the land of Canaan, all the Egyptians, all the Egyptians, clearly states that, came to Joseph and said, Give us food, for why should we die in your presence?
For our money is gone.
Then Joseph said, Give up your livestock and I will give you food for your livestock since your money is gone.
When that year had ended, they came to him the next year and said to him, We will not hide from my Lord that our money is all spent and the cattle are all my Lord's.
There's nothing left for my Lord except our bodies and our land.
Why should we die before your eyes when both we and our land?
Buy us and our land for food, and we and our land will be slaves to Pharaoh.
So give us seed that we may live and not die, and the land may not be desolate.
So Joseph bought all the land of Egypt for the Pharaoh, for every Egyptian sold his field, because the famine was severe upon them.
Thus the land became Pharaoh's.
Then Joseph said to the people, Behold, I today have brought you and your land for the Pharaoh.
Now, here's a seed for you, so you may go sow the land.
Is that not what's happening in America today?
That's the whole economic hitman script right there.
Yeah, it is.
Anyway, that was a great story.
That's when I first got tuned into Winter Watch, and then I read that story about, was it Allen Ginsberg?
Back in what you call your fertile period a few years ago, there were all these brilliant stories about the Frankfurt School and...
And it's a great site, anyway.
Well, kind of tying into this infiltration, there's a good article on Edward Mandelhaus.
Yeah.
That was basically a kind of a crypto-infiltrator that got a hold of Wilson.
You got Harry Dexter White, which is a, you know, dissident Jew.
Roosevelt.
You got James Angleton, who's basically a Zionist agent with the CIA.
And the list goes on and on and on.
So it's, there's quite a history to this.
Chertoff.
Chertoff springs to mind.
Yeah.
He's back.
He's back with Biden now, but we've, we've never had a president like Biden.
I mean, he's just completely feeble minded, except maybe, uh, maybe James Buchanan or one of those other ones that was just, uh, a cipher in office.
So Joe Olson made a great point, which was let's kind of circle back to 911.
And my question for everyone on the panel, and we'll start with John Kaminsky and then continue to move around is, so tomorrow's the 21st anniversary's, It's going to be the same maudlin song and dance of, you know, these terrorists, blah, blah, blah, all the typical bullshit.
So what can we do in the independent media to somehow wake people up enough to see that 9-11 really delivered COVID?
They're all being perpetrated as very sophisticated fifth-generational attacks on all first-world white Europeans primarily.
But, you know, how do we wake them up, John, this year?
I'm going to read quite a bit of this on my show on Monday, which is coming up on the 12th, which I tried to call the 11th, but it didn't work.
And an aspect of the 9-11 discussion that we've already had is – is being draped all over the internet these days when they point out these little segments of pictures of all the people in the media, all the people in the Congress, with all these Jewish stars next to their name.
It's like I'm sure you've seen them come flying by all over the place.
And as far as the 9-11 who goes, because we spent way too much time talking about the how, in my opinion, the who included The Jewish judges after the fact, that included Chertoff, who let all the Israelis go.
It included Zelikow, who formed the Cain Commission after the event, more than a year after the event, that never mentioned Building 7.
It included all the journalists who were in the pay of Israel and the Wall Street Jews.
It's hard to keep track of them all.
It included the five Israelis who testified on Israeli TV that they were sent to document the event.
And I mean, we don't need any more evidence that it was a Jewish operation, the whole thing.
And we don't really need any more evidence that we're a Jewish country now.
And as are Russia and China, also Jewish countries, run by the international bankers, Who are all amalgamating us into one central country.
And it's going to be the Jewish world government.
It already is.
And if we can't make people understand that with the copious examples that we have, we have no hope.
And to use synonyms like Khazarian Mafia really bothers me a lot.
It's like taking the heat off the central problem.
And it's not the same as saying that all the Jews in the world are evil, because they're not.
But they're all covering up for the process that is unfolding and has been unfolding for at least 400 years.
on the entire world and it's like if we don't address that forthrightly, we have no shot at maintaining our independent existences.
We will not be allowed to remain individuals.
And that's important to me.
I don't know if it's important to you, but it's important to me.
Let me say one more thing.
By using some kind of softening synonym for who these people are, you're allowing them to escape from their responsibility for all this trauma that they're imposing on us.
Those are hard to dispute points.
Dennis Camino, your thoughts and then we'll continue on through everybody still remaining.
Well, I want to speak to what Mr. Kaminsky just said so eloquently.
And really, I have to agree with him 150% even.
I mean, two times over.
And my assertion about the Kazarian nature of it wasn't to whitewash the role of the Jews.
Let's get real here.
The Jews have been evil pieces of scum all the way back to the very beginning of when they first emerged, which was however they came into existence.
When some lizard crapped on a rock and it turned into one of them.
But really, we're dealing with a monolithic deal, which is what Kaminsky is saying.
It's the truth.
Even though not all Jews are intrinsically evil, the root problem here is that so many of them work as a monolithic force to reinforce the killing of Goyim and people that are not Jews, and pushing this agenda, which has been going on More than 400 years, even.
I mean, it probably goes back to biblical times, where they tried to enslave mankind at a very early age.
Every place they stopped, yeah.
Yeah, and I mean, they've only been thrown out of 109 nations so far.
I mean, I don't understand, other than the Holohawks being the cover that allows Goyim to close their eyes and look the other way and not look at what they are.
Because the hundred, you know, The 100,000 plus, you know, I enumerated the exact number on the show not too long ago, but it slips my mind right this second, is not 6 million.
But Americans believe the 6 million shit.
Americans believe everything their Jew handlers tell them.
Americans are even willing to take a lethal shot Because their Jewish handlers tell them to do it because it's the right thing to do to protect the rest of us because us unvaccinated people are the threat.
You know what I'm saying?
We're the threat because we might actually survive when the people at the Jabber have no fucking clue that they're going to be the ones that are going to go to the mortuary first.
But what we have here is such a monolithic Uh, force that we're dealing with that, uh, that, uh, as Mr. Kaminsky's statement is really correct.
I'm not trying to whitewash or give them any absolution for what they are.
Jews are evil bastards.
Let's, let's put it right out there.
And, uh, and whether every single Jew on the planet is an evil son of a bitch and a bastard is, uh, is irrelevant.
What is relevant is they are in control.
They they've been in control for literally thousands of years.
If you go all the way back, I mean, And what you said about the amalgamation of power is true, because Russia is a Jewish construct, China is a Jewish-controlled system, the United States is completely 100% Jewish-controlled, even though Jews are disproportionately the vast minority in this country, yet Goyim willingly relinquished control to them for some ungodly reason.
So we're in a position now where our only possible hope Is to get enough people awake to what these Jews really are and what a quintessential threat to all mankind they exist as.
Because if we don't wake enough people up, then we might as well consign ourselves to the very sad fate that we're dead men walking, every single one of us.
Because, you know, I refuse to give up.
I mean, I'll fight them till my last breath, but there's a lot of people out there that gave up long before they were born.
They get their adherence to religion to give Jewish people cover, you know, and let's be honest about Christianity.
Time after time after time, Christianity says Jews are this, they're the chosen ones, we can't touch them with a 10-foot pole, and you're an anti-Semite if you say anything about them.
And that's utter horseshit!
And our biggest threat right now is Christians who are pushing this Jewish supremacy crap down our throat and making everybody be anesthetized and close their eyes to the evil, the quintessential global evil that they are.
I mean, let's be honest here.
I mean, we've got enough enemies with the Jews as it is, let alone to have to factor in all the shabbos, goyim, and the idiots that believe that they're a chosen group that's superior to the rest of us, when in fact, you know, for the most part, the ones that exist today spent 12 centuries in Khazaria butt-buggering each other and turning into the psychopath that they really are, which actually enhanced their lethality much more than it was.
Those are great points, Dennis.
And Frederic C. Blackburn, on your brilliant show that runs Wednesdays 8 to 10 p.m.
Eastern, Blackbird 9 Breakfast Club, you have outlined exactly the gaslighting PSYOP from a Jew who created the fictional narrative of the Holocaust, and what is his name, and your thoughts on what John and Dennis have just shared with us.
Right, you just hit it on the head with the psychological warfare.
Like I always say, the problem with psychological warfare is it works.
And so, you know, once we have realized that we have been attacked, you know, we have figured out who had the motive, means, opportunity, and that these people are playing the long game, and so you have to start looking at your enemy's tactics, their objectives, and their endgame.
And then you realize that their endgame is your annihilation, your genocide.
This is an existential event that we're looking at here by their own admission.
When you go in and study what they have to say, they say, we are Amalek.
It's three mitzvahs, not just one mitzvah, three mitzvahs that we be blotted out, right?
So, you have seen this Zabatian-Francus movement move through Zionism, move through Communism, move through global philanthropy, and that is the most hideous, is to see people like George Soros, etc., you know,
Come in with these NGO groups and just destroy nations under the guise of equality, diversity, war refugees, responsibility to protect, etc.
And any locals who try to stand up to that are immediately haters and anti-semites and they use the holocaust and so to me the key to 9-11 truth is expose the holocaust for the big lie it is because that holocaust has kept the 9-11 truth movement shackled For 20 years, because that was the whole thing.
As soon as you start proving the Big Live 9-11, you're an anti-Semite, and you are worse than a Holocaust denier.
And so it's like, fine, let's talk Holocaust.
And so that's why I strive to say, look at the long game.
They just created the Six Guerrilla Fantasy to cover up what they were doing in the Armenian Genocide, the Holodomor, and the Bolshevik Red Terror, and the Spanish Civil War.
You know, this is their playbook, and when you learn their playbook, it doesn't change.
Their rules are in stone.
They have more technology now, dirtier tricks, but it's still the same playbook.
And so, to me, the key to 9-11 truth is expose the Holohos for what it is, and the COVID for what it is.
And the Rothschilds.
Yeah.
So, back to you.
Welcome back, Dr. Jim Fetzer.
We're glad you're here.
Hold on, Joe.
The Rothschilds took over northern India in 1760.
They ran the illegal opium trade for 150 years until 1945 when the war was over.
They created the opium wars and killed 100 million Chinese.
The Chinese are not going to forget that.
And the Russians are not going to forget what happened under the Bolshevik Revolution.
But I've got a TNT radio program that I'm doing about an hour.
I've got to grab a late lunch.
Just want to remind people of three articles that I highly recommend.
One of them is one that I wrote at Veterans Today called Unequivocal 9-1-1 Nukes.
My reader suggested that I read an article called the Palmer Report with three 90 minute videos.
DO's 45 PowerPoint slides.
This is posted at Veterans Today.
It's breathtaking.
Solving Nuclear 9-1-1, the Palmer Report.
And they missed a few of the available isotopes on the building materials.
We discussed that yesterday with Giuseppe.
So I wrote another article called Exposing the NIST Jenga Game, where I go through all this material.
But in addition to that, they burnt a hole 100 feet deep in the granite bedrock under the building.
And I didn't mention last night that you also Gentlemen, had a wonderful time.
sodium in granite along with the other carbonate materials.
And so that gives you available of 150 available isotopes to absorb gamma ray radiation, create isotopes that are radioactive for the 30 days or 90 days after the collapse of the buildings that it was still 2,500 degrees hot.
So, gentlemen, had a wonderful time.
I'm ready to go grab some lunch and do two more hours of international radio.
Thanks so much.
Nice to meet you, Joe.
We appreciate it.
And Jim, welcome back.
Dr. Jim Fetzer.
And right before you came back, I put the question to the panel that, you know, tomorrow is the 21st anniversary of the Israeli attack on the United States.
And, you know, what's it going to take?
We're going to see the same maudlin.
These 19 terrorists, the maudlin bullshit over the mass media, the globalist media.
What's it gonna take to wake people up?
And you came in to hear Frederick saying, gotta hammer the Holocaust.
I completely agree.
But what's your take, Jim?
How, somehow, can we wake up the normies to understand by next anniversary, the 22nd anniversary, what really went on?
Well, I like a lot of what we did early on, showing the incoherence of the explanations that have been given the official narrative account.
I myself was astonished when you begin to look into the Holocaust, how effortlessly it falls apart.
I mean, there's nothing there.
It's only supported by force, by propaganda, by censorship.
John was saying how he was so relieved when Nick's book came out.
He's talking about breaking the spell, because Nick invited me to write the introduction.
And I published that as a separate piece entitled, The Holocaust Narrative, Politics, Trump, Science.
And I break it down into the three key theses of the Holocaust in the narrower sense, as opposed to the whole war being viewed as a holocaust.
We're obviously millions died, but the specific thesis that six million Jews were put to death in gas chambers using Zyklon B, they were using Zyklon B to kill body lice because it was spreading typhus and dysentery in the camps, but that was to preserve the health of the inmates.
Because these were labor camps and you can't get work out of a corpse.
The whole business about the six million is utter propaganda.
We had stories in the international press of six million Jews in fear of loss of their lives or dire straits.
We get it in 1890, all before the Nuremberg trial.
And it appears to have no historical basis whatsoever, but be rooted in a disputed passage of Leviticus that's interpreted to mean The Chosen People can return to the Promised Land only when they're minus six million who've been consumed in the flame, but even that requires interpolation, because there was no word in the original Hebrew for six million.
And of course, the International Committee of the Red Cross was keeping copious, detailed records of the age, the sex, the ethnicity, the religion, the cause of death of all of the inmates, and they recalibrated their total In 1993, 296,081, none of whom died from being put to death in a gas chamber.
I think that's pretty stunning stuff, but the American people have avoidance.
They're not wanting to look at the evidence that's the problem.
Once you lay it all out, Anyone who takes a look, and I think this is true of 9-11, and it's also true of Sandy Hook, for example.
But people don't want to look at the evidence.
It's that cognitive dissonance phenomenon.
So I really was liking all the incoherence in the official account about the speed, the possible speed of the flights of the planes exceeding their maximum velocity that they couldn't do it.
And even the NTSB was going along with it.
I mean, how insulting is that?
So you got the corruption of the agencies.
It's like with COVID.
We got the corruption of the very agencies that are supposed to be protecting us, the CDC, the FDA, the NIH, even the WHO.
They're all bought and sold by big pharma.
I mean, it's just outrageous what's going on here, and it seems in relation to 9-11.
The FTSB was right in their pitching.
You had FTSB at Shanksville.
No plane crash at Shanksville.
It was obvious.
It's not a secret.
You look at the evidence, it's blatant.
But the NTSB was going along with a program, going along with these planes, exceeding their maximum velocity, hitting the towers.
I mean, it's just ridiculous.
It's absurd, and it's a monster lie by the American government to deceive the American people.
Really disgusting.
Great points.
Russ Winner, your thoughts?
Okay, well we've established two target groups.
One target group needs the how, I'm just telling you that.
Those are people that don't know the truth of the situation.
They're the ones that need to see this NTSB report on the VMO, the hows, the details, because that's how you open their eyes.
They're not, until their eyes are open, they're not going to have any idea who's, they don't even ask the question, who, because they don't think there's a crime.
If you don't think there's a crime, there's no who, who done it.
So you've got to have, you have to establish the how, and that's focused on the people that don't know the truth of 9-11.
That's by far your largest group of people.
And then once they get there, then there's another group of people, and John eloquently addressed it, that's your 9-11 architects for truth, engineers for truth.
Come on, they should know better.
They need to start looking for the who.
That's the group that needs to start looking at the who.
Not the 99% that have no idea there was even a crime committed.
I agree, yeah.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
When I engaged Richard Gage about this very issue, he said it was part of their charter that they can only look at the physics of the situation and cannot address the politics.
And that's by design to create a group that really is not going to move the ball down the field.
Because what they're facing, you know, what they're facing in terms of real politics and the reality situation is what I ran into the Canadian women.
They're going to lose their credibility.
It's just the way it is because of the trance.
I think that they play a role in going after the people that don't have any idea what the crime is, that there's a crime committed.
They play an important role in that.
But some of them have to independently start addressing these issues bravely.
Russ, it's not even that there's a crime committed.
It's that there are anomalies here, physical impossibilities.
What we've been told cannot be true.
Yeah, but the how tells you the crime.
The anomalies tell you that there's a crime.
They are in very short order.
I agree.
But I mean, just explain these absurd... this plane disappearing into the building with no collision effects and the nose out.
I mean, what could be more blatant?
Dennis, what are your thoughts on this?
You know, what's really sad is that, you know, I've mentioned this on about a billion shows already, but as you increase the speed of a wide body jet, the drag coefficient goes up by the cube.
Now, if you have a math or science background, you come to understand that infinite thrust ultimately won't push that machine faster.
Assuming it had the capability to withstand the forces on it, which it can't, it's going to fall apart.
And my assertion of the 350 was euphemistically a theoretical number relative to the fact that long before you get the 350, you compressor stall.
And when you lose thrust, then you're down, you're out, you're gone.
And you couldn't have possibly maneuvered to do that nice circuitous turn to relocate the target, which was the reinforced section at the Pentagon, at that speed without compressor stalling and then losing control and crashing because of no power.
And you couldn't fly at 400 knots, you couldn't fly at 500 knots, 600 miles an hour, whatever.
And at grass level!
The other thing that most people don't realize is that you can't, nobody in the rest of this group is a pilot, but I'm a pilot with experience for more than 45 years.
And I'm going to tell you that it's impossible to get an airliner to go below a certain altitude once you get in ground effect with infinite amount of power spooled up, trying to go as fast as you can, because the lift that the wing generates will lift you out of ground effect automatically.
Your horizontal stabilizer will not allow you to push that nose down to go further into it.
It can't happen.
The attack on the Pentagon is even more preposterous in a lot of ways than the Twin Towers.
It's just ground level.
They're skirting the ground.
Just burning the grass off the lawn.
It's impossible.
They couldn't have flown at that speed, at that altitude, without climbing out of ground effect.
It's impossible.
But furthermore, there's a big girder right in the middle of the entry hole, it's concrete, it's almost a foot across, hanging down in the friggin' hole!
How can that be there?
How can it still be?
It's impossible!
Dennis, just listening to you making all these extremely clear, precise points reflect the fact that the ignorance of the American people, they are so dumbed down, they have no scientific understanding, they're totally gullible, They don't have the ability to comprehend even elementary physical arguments, like there have to be collision effects, that the plane cannot just effortlessly pass through its own length into the building in the same number of frames it passed through its own length.
The American people have been dumbed down, and I think ultimately that's what we're up against.
The people who are capable of thinking things through understand what happened, and the rest, which is by far the majority, it's beyond them.
Well, the Tavistock Institute in London made it important to make what I call indoctrination centers.
They're not schools.
They're brainwashing facilities.
That's all they are.
And what they've done Over my entire lifetime, which is 70 friggin' years already, has taken people and turned them into something that has no critical thinking capability of any kind.
And furthermore, even if they detect something that doesn't smell right, they'll reject it because of their years of conditioning in these chambers that we call schools, which are anything but a school.
There's no knowledge imparted there.
It's ridiculous.
And that's what we're up against.
We're not up against just cognitive dissonance.
We're up against decades and decades of mental conditioning that makes people reject logic.
That's what we're up against.
Yeah, that's the trance.
That's the trance effect, too.
I have a couple of other 9-11 notes, but I wanted to ask Jim Fetzer, what's the latest on the Posner situation?
That's quite a shift in years, my friend.
I know, I know.
I just care.
Well, listen, they took my blog, JamesVetcher.org, and the book, Nobody Dotted Sandy Hook, and an improper taking order issued by the judge in violation of the statutes in Wisconsin, There's this $450,000 judgment for the defamation compounded by $650,000 for a reported contempt of court.
And the statutes in Wisconsin say a monetary judgment can only be satisfied by a monetary award.
Intellectual property, blogs, books, are not money.
So the law says you have to give it to a receiver, and the receiver has to then figure out its value, and then that value can be assessed against the monetary judgment.
Instead of doing that, the judge has arbitrarily said, they're going to give me $100,000 against my judgment by giving it to Bosner, and then he's going to really make it unavailable to the public, which is improper.
This shows us an abusive process, and this whole thing is fraudulent.
And they took it, John.
On the 28th of July, just as during the Alex Jones trial, they were attacking those of us who were prominent Sandy Hook scabdicks.
Sophia Smallshorm, James Tracy, Wilking Halbig.
But me especially, when they read this letter, they had a producer read a part of a letter from James From what Paul Joseph Watson to Alex Jones saying, we gotta stay as far as possible away from that batshit crazy fencer.
Well, as soon as they start saying that someone's gonna want to wonder what this batshit crazy guy had to say, but they can't get there because he's now directed The blog, JamesRetro.org, to the documents about the taking order, and he's got no interest in marketing the book.
He's spent his whole life suppressing all this stuff.
He's taken down 1,500 videos from YouTube dealing with Sandy Hook, which meant I had an argument based on estoppel.
His behavior was now contradicting his original position.
He wasn't legally entitled to this.
So I was denied by the court my appeals, and I sent one to the Supreme Court because I'm already there, to the justice who has a Seventh Circuit in which Wisconsin is a part, Amy Coney Barrett, and she declined it.
Well, if you know enough about the Supreme Court rules, you have the opportunity to send it to another justice.
And if they don't approve it, it's got to be shared with every member of the court.
Well, this appeal lays out all the Seventh Amendment aspects of my petition before the court already for the obnusive summary judgment procedure, so that either way... I've sent it now to Neil Gorsuch, and if he approves it, we're good.
And if he doesn't, then the whole court gets the additional arguments I have there about the seven.
Which ironically, John, you'll find this very interesting.
Of the first ten amendments, the Supreme Court has issued rulings that implement the other nine for all 50 states, but not the seven.
And because the summary judgment procedure in Wisconsin allows a judge to exercise his subjective opinion about facts, See, I mean, in my case, there could not have been more disputed facts.
I'm arguing the FEMA drill, nobody died.
Here's the manual.
FBI, nobody died in Newtown 2012 for murder and non-negligent.
Then you got the plaintiff who's saying, no, no, no, he had a son who died.
Here's his death certificate, blah, blah, blah.
They could not be at greater odds.
So the judge, based on his entitlement in Wisconsin to exercise his subjective opinion, Simply declared that none of my facts were reasonable, so that he claimed there was no disputed facts so he could rule by summary judgment of 450,000.
And John, I even had two forensic document examiners he just set aside who were supporting me.
And that's how, in courts of law, they decided on the authenticity of documents.
You bring an expert document... Well, these were two unrebutted document experts on my side.
This just shows the corruption of the summary judgment in Wisconsin.
So, my case is much broader.
It's not just me.
And, of course, I'm asking the reverse.
The ultimate step right, straight down summary judgment in Wisconsin, and actually throughout all 50 states.
Who was that?
I don't know who that was.
That was me.
Russ wanted me to play a clip.
I have it set up now.
There's a little levity.
You just gotta see this.
Oh, I had more questions, but okay, if you must.
Okay.
I wanted to say something.
I wanted the update, which we got, and I wanted to say something about 9-11 because we're running out of time.
Sure, go ahead.
December 27th, 2001, Mike Rupert, who was the guy who drove the 9-11 skeptics movement for the first couple of years, got up in Brooklyn and said, Israel had nothing to do with it.
I remember that.
On December 27th, 2011.
And he led the skeptics movement pretty much early on until the second and third waves came along.
And, uh, and he wound up, uh, he wound up being suicided, uh, up in Idaho much later.
Uh, and nobody could really understand exactly what happened, except he seemed to be worried about, uh, about global warming.
And that was the excuse they use for a suicide.
And like I say, he was the one who He was the one who drove the 9-11 skeptics movement early on.
Well, his book Crossing the Rumicon, all based on publicly available sources, established that Dick Cheney had been the executive director from that underground bunker on 9-11.
Yeah, exactly.
He made a monumental contribution.
He did.
Why in the world he would deny that Israel was the driving, motivating force behind it is beyond me.
Well, it was beyond everybody, yeah.
Anyway, go ahead, Russ.
Sorry to interrupt you.
Just a little levity to add to prove the point about the intellectual level of the average dude.
What's this?
And this is the question, what country is the Queen of England from to a man on the street in New York?
Is that a man?
Um, I definitely don't know.
Give me your best guess.
I guess a country.
What is the country again?
Do you know what country the Panama Canal is in?
No.
You have to guess.
What do you think?
It sounds like it's a country.
Europe?
Yes.
Do you know how many moons the Earth has?
Around how many if you had to guess?
Two?
Yes.
Do you know what time this is?
5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 245.
Yes.
Do you know what country the Great Wall of China is in?
Country?
Yeah.
Maybe you have to guess.
Japanese?
Yes.
Do you know what the third month of each year is?
Ain't that leap year or some shit?
Yeah.
Do you know what 15% of 100 is?
Fuck.
Around what it is, if you have to guess.
Probably like 75.
I don't know.
Name all the months.
September, January, February, March, April, May, June, July, August.
Yes.
Do you know what 7 plus 7 plus 7 is?
28.
No, no, no.
I'm bugging.
14 plus 7.
I don't know.
What do we call a shape with five sides?
Is it an octagon?
Wait, that's six.
That's eight.
Octagon is eight.
Is it a stop sign?
Oh, holy cow, boys and gentlemen.
I hate to be a racist, but did you see the number of these people?
Those were trick questions, Ross.
What's your name, Ross?
Oh my god!
That was humiliating!
That was awful!
It kind of proves our point.
That's what we're up against.
Yeah, that's right.
Well, I want to thank everybody.
We're coming down to the final five, six, seven minutes.
So let's go around this exemplary panel and get the final thoughts on 21 years ago.
It really, our lives were forever taken down a toxic sewer, thanks to the international Jews.
So let's start with Jim.
Jim, your final thoughts.
Well, we've been living with the consequence that the Patriot Act consolidated 35 independent agencies within the U.S.
government to create one behemoth that appears to have been modeled after the STASI, the Department of Homeland Security.
It's well known if you have smaller independent units conducting an investigation, you're far more likely to ferret out the truth when it's all In one coherent agency, you get the suppression of minority views, you don't get real research, you get fabricated, predetermined conclusions, and that's what we've been getting from our government ever since.
So our number one task before us would be to dismantle Homeland Security and return to the original 35 separate organizations.
I highly recommend we do that.
That's great.
Let's move now to John Kaminsky whose show KGB Kaminsky Goes Ballistic is on twice a week Mondays and Thursdays 5 to 7 p.m.
Eastern and it is a phenomenal show and so John your final thoughts.
I'm reading some of The Day America Died on the show Monday night, but my final thought is that when you die, what you've done for yourself doesn't really matter.
It's what you've done for other people that is the only thing that counts, and I'm proud to be in a group that recognizes that and has been working hard to fulfill those requirements for most of their lives, if not all their lives.
Well stated, good sir.
Russ Winner, your final thoughts on, thank you so much everybody for being on this.
You know, these guys make, these guys, these crime syndicates, Kazarians, whatever you want to call them, Jews, they make a lot of mistakes.
They really do.
They're not, it's not as bright as we were led to believe.
And I can see that every day kind of looking at different stage deceptions.
9-11 is fertile ground.
And so, I just think we preached the hows on that.
I really do, to the people that don't know the truth.
The people that do know the truth need to grow a pair.
You know, encourage them to grow a pair.
That's kind of my final message.
There's a lot of fertile ground to work with if we bring this to people's attention.
We did this great tonight.
I think we did a really good job early on, at least the first hour or two.
Of bringing these anomalies to people's attention.
They're glaring.
They're just right in your face.
True that.
Well, thank you so much, Russ.
Final thoughts from Dennis Camino.
And again, thanks everybody.
And one note that we did run into some virtual audio source sharing issues, but the entire MP3 that I recorded right here on my system will be put up at the podcast section of Speak Free Radio.
And so if you prefer audio, you'll be able to hear everything.
So that will be up there shortly after the show ends.
Dennis Camino, your final thoughts.
Does the Twitch link work?
Twitch link will work, and actually Russ, I'm putting things up at my own website now, rtiedmedia.com is a permanent, so I'll send you that link shortly after the show, I'll put it up there.
Yeah, could you send me a link as well so I can ship it around?
Absolutely, we'll give it to everybody.
I'm going to bed here in a minute, it's 11 o'clock.
There you go, Dennis, your final thoughts.
Oh, my turn?
Yes, your turn, Dennis.
Go ahead.
Oh, I was going to say I was in an ER on the second of the month because of COPD issues with the forest fires out here.
And I was preaching to the four people in the emergency room about 9-11 truth and I made one get physically ill enough to where she had to leave the room because she couldn't handle the truth.
Way to go!
We talked about this, but I agree with Mr. Kaminsky and, you know, Russ and John and Jim and Blackbird9 and Giuseppe.
It's been an honor to do this show with you, and I hope we actually make some people wake up and snap out of their trance.
But thank you, gentlemen, very much for all the truth that you brought here today.
A pleasure to be with you today.
Yeah, I like conversations like this.
Me too.
And the final word goes to Frederick C. Blackburn, Blackbird 9.
Take us out, Frederick.
Just like to thank you, gentlemen, again for having me on.
It has been an honor to be on this panel on the 21st anniversary of Suspend the Laws of Physics Day.
And like I said during the first anniversary back in 2002 of Suspend the Laws of Physics Day, we are all Palestinians now.
Wake up, level up, and party up.
Back to you.
Well, there you go.
That is exactly right.
We are all Palestinians now.
And despite the daunting odds, sometimes it feels like we're from the Lord of the Ring books and movies.
We're like the Fellowship of the Ring with just a long shot.
But you know what?
The one thing we have is truth on our side.
And all of us have to hope that someday we can break this hypnotic spell that so many normies are under.
And somehow we can wake enough people up to get to that 5 to 10 to 15 percent echelon you need to actually change the government out to people like us.
And so we'll just keep up, keep on keeping on, even though, you know, we understand we're the underdog in all this.
But you know what?
Sometimes underdogs can prevail.
And even if you look at the, well, there you go.
Here we are.
That'll end it.
And I want to thank everybody.
What an honor to be on with John Kaminski, Jim Fetzer, Frederick C. Blackburn, Dennis Camino, Russ Winter, Joe Olson, and goodnight everybody.
See you tomorrow on the St.
▲
Export Selection