All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 3, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:55:59
The Raw Deal (2 September 2022)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I need somebody.
Help!
Not just anybody.
Help!
You know I need someone.
Help!
When I was young, so much younger than today.
I never needed anybody's help in any way But now these days are gone, I'm not so self-assured Now I find the gemmine, I've opened up the doors Help me if you can, I'm feeling down And I do appreciate you being round Help me get my feet back on the ground
Won't you please, please help me Well, this is Jim Fetzer, your host on The Raw Deal.
all.
Since the Democrats can't campaign on the state of the economy, on the security of the border, on their foreign affairs successes, on their ability to contain inflation or taxes or food shortages or gas prices or whatever, they have to change the subject.
Therefore, given their favorite target is Donald J. Trump, The nation was subjected to what has to have been the most despicable speech ever presented by a president of the United States to the American people.
It was stunning, even breathtaking in its condemnation of half of the nation.
Who supported, voted for Donald Trump, who would, if there were any justice in the world, be president of the United States today, rather than the imposter who was delivering the speech.
The New York Times has become nothing but a sop for the left wing and sought to give its best spin.
Live updates.
Biden calls on America to resist threats to democracy.
The president condemned Trump-led extremism and casts the midterm elections as a battle for the soul of the nation.
They have to change the subject.
Klein warns that American values are under assault by Trump-led extremism.
Philadelphia.
President Biden traveled to Independence Hall on Thursday to warn that America's Democrat values are under assault by forces of extremism loyal to former President Donald J. Trump, using a primetime address to define the midterm elections as a battle for the soul of this nation.
By the way, incidentally, it was equally insulting to be attacking The conservatives and the Republicans and the Trump supporters in the first place, but in the second from Independence Hall in Philadelphia, the birthplace of democracy.
And in the third place, the White House had billed this as a nonpartisan speech, but clearly it was a campaign message delivered with just a Gusto and disgust.
It was as repulsive as any speech I've ever seen given by any American political figure and disgraced the office that he pretends to hold.
The speech was intended to deliver a dark message about threats to the fabric of the country's democracy.
But aid said Mr. Biden sought to strike a balance Just two months before elections, that will determine control of Congress, seeking to offer a sense of optimism about the future and urging Americans to fight back against extremism.
Quote, Donald Trump and the mega Republicans represent extremism that threatens the very foundations of our Republic, Mr. Biden said, noting not all Republicans follow Trump's ideology.
But there's no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven, and intimidated by Donald Trump and the mega Republicans.
And that is a threat to this country.
No, it's not!
Hillary Clinton trying to steal the election of 2016.
No, it's not the FBI and the DOJ going after him in Crossfire Hurricane.
No, it's not the Department of Justice turning into a weaponized agency of the Democratic Party.
No, it's not the FBI conducting a raid on the former president's home.
And even taking confidential attorney-client communications they've acknowledged they have.
No, none of that is a threat to democracy, nor 87,000 new IRS agents that are going to be fully harmed.
No, no, no.
None of that represents a threat, nor sending endless supplies to Kiev where the real neo-Nazis exist.
None of that, nor giving away our oil, depleting our strategic petroleum reserves, selling millions of barrels to China.
No, none of that is a threat to our democracy.
Just listen to this pompous blowhard speaking, using the airwaves of the nation to deliver A mega authoritarian speech.
This is just as disgusting as it gets.
Completely repulsive.
Citing the extraordinary experiment of self-government represented by the American Constitution, which, by the way, he's been violating right and left.
Mr. Biden said history tells us a blind loyalty to a single leader and a willingness to engage in political violence is fatal to democracy.
That's what he's been promoting.
He knows damn well and what the Democrats have been doing.
Including the encouragement of lawlessness, a revolving door, DA's supported by George Soyles, the riots, the looting, the arson, which they did not only not condemn, they actually supported and encouraged, defunding the police.
Can anyone imagine a more sorry state of a political party in the United States than the one presently headed by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris?
With a speaker, the House Nancy Pelosi, who in collusion with Muriel Bowser, the mayor of D.C.
and the Capitol Police and the FBI, staged the phony events of January 6th.
Now there's a real threat to democracy.
The New York Times continues.
The stakes are high for the president and his political advisers, who believe they must cast the midterms as nothing less than an existential choice for voters.
Between Mr. Biden's agenda and a return to the extremism of mega Republicans who have enabled Mr. Trump's ideology.
Mr. Biden plunged into the cultural issues his party believes could help galvanize Democratic voters by bringing up reproductive rights and fears the Supreme Court could undo gay marriage.
Megaforces are determined to take this country backward, Mr. Biden said.
Backward to an America where there's no right to choose, no right to privacy, no right to contraception, no right to marry who you love.
Just absurd.
Don't as a straw man, you exaggerate your opponent's position to make it easier to attack.
And hope that the public won't even notice that these issues are all fabrications, exaggerations, and have no solid basis in fact, in history, or even in law.
The focus on threats to democracy, The Times continues, is a return to an issue that Mr. Biden said drove him to run for the presidency.
After watching white supremacists march through Charlottesville, Virginia in 2017?
Let me say, Mr. Biden has been driven to run for the presidency three different times, only beginning in South Carolina did he win a single primary or a single caucus.
He'd lost every single one.
Why?
Because he's in utter mediocrity, because he has nothing to offer the nation.
And his mental state is so grossly deteriorated that we have an individual non-compos mentis.
He is mentally incompetent.
That's just what the Democrats wanted.
Someone who had no cognition, no conscience, no scruples, no morality, no principles,
They needed a stooge to be the fall guy for the destruction of America, which they've been undertaking apace since his first day in office when he canceled the XL pipeline and initiated permits to drill on federal lands, where among the great achievements of his predecessor was making America energy independent.
Well, he's done his best with great success to make us Wholly dependent on foreign sources, and now his incompetence, his disgraceful conduct in office is such that the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Qatar don't want to have anything to do with the United States, and why should they?
They, unlike the United States, have some principles.
They, unlike the United States, have some sense of pride.
They Unlike the United States actually care about real issues and not just swindling the American people as this Biden administration has been doing from the beginning.
Times continues.
Since taking office, he has often said the United States and its allies are engaged in a long-running struggle between autocracy and democracy that will determine the fate of the rules-based order indeed.
And you could not have a more autocratic government than you find with Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Schumer.
Mr. Biden spoke—listen to this—to several hundred spectators, even for this primetime speech.
He could only get a couple hundred.
I'll bet most of them were even paid.
Seated in front of Independence Hall in Philadelphia, where the country's political institutions were born and just steps from the Liberty Bell.
In his remarks, Mr. Biden made it clear that he believes political violence and election denial espoused by the former president and his allies have damaged America's reputation abroad.
Well, there's no doubt that we have turned into a banana republic.
We stole the election.
Zucbox used to pay Some $420 million at $10 a ballot, $42 million fake ballots.
We have the 2,000 mules.
There are actually some 58,000 mules, not just 2,000.
Mike Lindell had a three-day marathon by saying all the different ways the election was stolen.
And now he's weaponized the FBI and the Department of Justice to go after his political opponents.
Remember, this guy, Or at the very least, the Democratic Party has to come up against what's widely expected to be Donald Trump as a nominee in 2024.
This is what they do in third world countries.
This is what makes the United States today a banana republic.
We have lost the adherence to law and order.
We have lost the objective rule of law.
We have totally politicized our own Federal Department of Justice and federal investigative agencies.
This is no better than what you would get in any of those countries we've condemned for so long, often indeed actually on faulty grounds.
But if you wanted to attack Cuba and Castro for being an authoritarian, If you wanted to attack Venezuela for having an authoritarian regime, or Chile, or Iran, or Iraq, you're doing so on equally specious grounds because Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are just as authoritarian and just as vicious to their enemies.
They haven't quite resorted to the firing squad yet, but stand by.
We can't tell exactly what's coming next, but when you hire 87 new IRS agents and vast stocks of weapons, a lot of us are concerned that that is in the offing.
So it's certainly true that the president, not a former president, the president, Joe Biden and his allies have damaged America's reputation abroad.
We have become an international joke.
No one takes the United States seriously.
Immigrants can walk across our border with impunity and the press secretary to the president denies it's a case when it's a fact.
We are being lied to on every front by every ally of the Biden administration because the truth Is a killer.
The truth exposes them as hypocrites, phonies, and frauds.
The truth exposes them as derelict in their duty, as committing violences, violation of the Constitution of the United States, violation of federal law.
On the right, on the left, every single day it's getting worse.
The President, The Times continues, Have sought to avoid casting the conflict as a purely partisan one, according to White House officials familiar with the speak.
Right.
But he called on Americans to go to the polls in November and reject Republican candidates who've signed on to the former president's brand of politics.
Why would he say that?
Because in just the primaries we've had, eight of the 10 Republicans who voted to impeach Trump lost.
Trump has like a 97% endorsement record for candidates he's endorsed who have prevailed in the primaries.
Sarah Palin being the latest to fail to meet that cut, which I find rather surprising in a tribute to the fact that she was running against a person, a Native American, possibly even an Eskimo, who was her alternative candidate.
There's something funny about Alaska that deserves further scrutiny.
But Trump is having such vast success, the Democrats know he is going to clean their clock again, and it's going to happen already in November in the midterms.
So they're trying to change the narrative.
They're trying to recast who's playing the part of the good guy and who's playing the part of the bad.
Times continues.
Mr. Biden has been planning the speech since early this summer, according to a Democrat official familiar with the president's thinking.
The official asked for anonymity to discuss private conversation with Mr. Biden, said the president has been concerned that the forces had animated the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol are not fading away.
Indeed, this is another aside.
It appears the evidence is growing that the reason the FBI conducted the raid on Mar-a-Lago was because they felt Trump had evidence implicating the FBI in Crossfire Hurricane, where they subverted the law, deceived the FISA court, got authorization for wiretaps on Trump's own office and his campaign, and pursued relentlessly the attempt to undermine his administration.
The FBI is worried it's going to be called out.
So this was basically a CYA operation.
It was not legitimate.
And I believe, perhaps as early as today, the judge who's hearing the appeals for a special master to be appointed to sort all this out, which is being forcefully opposed by the Department of Justice, will indeed take the obvious and appropriate step of appointing a special master.
If there were ever a case in the history of the United States that warrants a special master, this is it.
Times continues.
Recently, however, the president has grown more motivated to deliver it because of persistent And notice they introduce false claims of election fraud, except there's nothing false about them, as voters prepare to go to the polls in the midterms, a White House official said.
In several recent speeches, Mr. Biden has replaced his usual calls for unity with sharp condemnations of mega extremists, saying Republicans have embraced semi-fascism.
How absurd is that?
This is a president who said he was here to unify the country.
Republicans have cited the president's language as evidence he's fallen short of his promise to bring the country together.
That's talking about Biden.
Biden has pitted neighbors against each other, labeled half of America a fascist, tarnished any idea of his promise of unity, said Emma Vaughan, a spokeswoman for the Republican National Committee, in a statement.
Where she's got it exactly right.
Now listen to some of the comments about the speech as it was being delivered.
Maggie Haberman.
Trump was the unifying force for Democrats in 2020.
Without him, their own divisions become clearer.
Katie Edmondson.
It'll be interesting to see if any Democrats in tough races elevate or echo the themes of Biden's speech in the coming days.
But it's worth noting that in many public posts, a generic congressional Democrat is running several points ahead of the president at this stage of the cycle, meaning other Democrats are faring better than Biden, who's an anchor on the Democrats across the board.
Michael Scherer.
It's hard to say how these speeches are received, but my sense is that to the extent it is watched, It will be cheered by his supporters and condemned by his detractors, whether it actually persuades anyone.
It may help set the stage for some debates over the next nine weeks or not.
Time will tell.
Leslie Lerner.
It is so striking that Biden didn't mention abortion in a speech where he's imploring people to vote, vote, vote.
It's the issue that Democrats want to talk about.
And one that polling and recent special election show energizes their supporters and swing voters.
Peter Baker.
It's also worth noting that most Americans aren't listening.
The three main broadcast networks declined to carry the speech.
Instead, they're showing Law and Order, Young Sheldon and a game show called Press Your Luck with an episode titled Zombie Apocalypse Ready.
Another from Peter Baker.
Of course, that half the country are more precisely somewhat less than half is not the audience Biden is really speaking to tonight.
He harbors little if any hope of winning over Trump supporters, but is focusing on reassembling the 51% coalition that voted for him and against Trump.
Less than two years later.
Except that's only the official narrative.
It's not the fact.
Trump won overwhelmingly.
Sidney Powell released a voting map.
The country was red from coast to coast.
Both California and Minnesota had gone red.
He had 410 electoral votes by an honest count.
Exactly as I was predicting with regard to California and Minnesota.
Lisa Lerr.
I was chatting with a few Democrat candidates today.
They didn't think running against Trump is harmful, but I got the sense they'd like to hear Biden talk more about the central issues voters care about, which include the economy and, since the Supreme Court ruling, abortion rights.
Zoland Cano-Jones, Biden's senior advisor, released a memo outlining the White House messaging strategy in the weeks ahead.
They said they would call out the extremist views by mega Republicans and celebrate Biden's recent legislative achievement.
That memo is almost a blueprint for the speech.
Indeed.
Meanwhile, the Babylon Bee responded.
Biden condemns fascism in speech while also debuting attractive new mustache.
Yes.
Guess whose mustache Biden was debuting?
Philadelphia.
In a speech tonight, Joe Biden condemned fascism and extremism while also debuting a delightful little mustachioed look.
Reporters oohed and aahed over his fashionable new facial hair look as the president ranted about people he disagrees with needing to be condemned as terrorists in order to fight fascism.
It's a good look for him, said an Entertainment Tonight reporter on the red carpet.
I know they say, don't wear that kind of mustache before Labor Day, but I really think he pulls that off.
It's kind of a classic look, vaguely European, perhaps 1930s or 40s, Germanic maybe?
Really inspired.
The one who owns the youth gains the future, shouting Biden, pounding on his towering lectern, as he said before, giant banners lit up in blood red.
To conquer a nation, you must first disarm its citizens.
He got really worked up here, screaming and holding his arm at a 45 degree angle to the sky.
Finally, he concluded his speech by defending democracy and contemning fascism with a powerful line.
We must employ the final solution to exterminate those vermin who would oppose our glorious Third Republic.
Those gathered cheered with thunderous applause.
Carl Herman sent the following.
America tunes out.
Most networks skipped Joe Biden's hate-filled speech, CNN, and MSNBC cover.
ABC ran Press Your Luck, CBS went with a Young Sheldon rerun, NBC with a Law & Order replay.
CNN and MSNBC carried the address, as did news division streaming channels, but Fox stuck with Tucker Carlson and his critique of the speech as it was happening, Deadline reports.
The speech was carried live by few TV outlets.
Only CNN and MSNBC ran the remarks live.
ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, PBS, Fox News and Fox Business did not air it, the New York Post confirms.
And well, they should not have.
This was, without any doubt, Out on its own, a complete outlier, by far the most repulsive and despicable speech ever delivered by a president of the United States to the American people, much less one who had stolen an election, who is conducting a fake authoritarian administration, violating the Constitution right and left,
Making demands the American people are not obligated to follow, hiring 87,000 more IRS agents, arming the government to the teeth.
This is just as disgusting as it gets.
I'll be right back after this break.
Thank you.
Hello.
Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light on a dark world.
Revolution Radio, Freedom Substance dot com, the number one listener supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution Radio.
Hey, everyone.
It's Barbara Jean Lindsay, The Cosmic Oracle.
If you have questions about your past lives or future plans, need answers from the cosmos about your love life or career, or just want to keep your finger on the pulse of the planet, check out my show, The Cosmic Oracle, here on Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Then they sued to shut me up, and the Wisconsin courts played along.
I have the proof and the law on my side.
What I don't have is the money.
They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada—take guns and pose tyranny.
It's on the way with Remington's help.
First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
GiveSendGo.com funding Fetzer.
Check it out.
This is for all the marbles.
Was it a conspiracy?
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of the library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
Thank you.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m.
Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zen Garcia at FreedomStitch.com, the people station.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners or chatters are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
- You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener supported radio, and now we return you to your host. - And every single and now we return you to your host. - And every single day we get more confirmation of the profundity of the corruption of the Here's an example.
Conflict of interest questions arise amid Biden's student loan forgiveness program.
Earlier this month, Biden threw a bone to his base when he announced a new program to forgive student loan debts and pass a bill on to everyday taxpayers like you and me.
The program weighs $10,000 to $20,000 of student debt per individual who earns under $125,000 per year.
Only individuals who receive Pell Grants to attend college will be eligible for the $20,000 in loan forgiveness.
As I recall, the Pell are really for black students, disadvantaged students, so that's another form of discrimination they're practicing in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Not to mention Martin Luther King Jr.' 's vision of America, where we are judged on the basis of the content of our character and not the color of our skin.
You talk about wanting to move backwards?
Biden is doing exactly that.
He wants to return to segregation, only this time The class that's being discriminated against happens to be white Americans, most of whom are job holders, law-abiding, responsible taxpayers.
That's the Biden target population.
According to the White House, this agenda will provide relief to everyday Americans who are struggling with student loans.
However, the alleged relief may vanish for those living in any of the 13 states that tax forgiven debts.
Despite the rhetoric from Biden and his age, questions about the present potential conflict of interest in the higher education department have now come up.
An underlying motive behind Biden's student loan forgiveness program?
When the president waived student loan debt for tens of millions of Americans, he failed to address the root cause of such expensive prices in higher education.
Both Republicans and even some Democrats have acknowledged as much.
Because Biden doesn't address these costs and simply waives a percentage of existing student loans, higher education institutions are now encouraged to increase, not lower, their future prizes.
This could lead to even more rounds of debt forgiveness, which would ultimately increase the capital within the nation's higher education system.
This is a reality of Joe Biden's student loan bailout.
According to government data tracker Open Secrets, Biden's 2020 presidential campaign received more than $64 million from the higher education industry.
That is much more money than other Democrats received.
In light of this, Critics of the current admin are questioning whether this student loan forgiveness program is truly about Biden or helping Americans instead of pleasing left-wing lobbyists.
Had Biden worked with Congress to pass his student loan forgiveness program, the underlying factors behind student loan debt might have been addressed.
The present recent executive order, however, only means the cycle is bound to repeat itself Sooner or later.
Whether Biden's executive or is designed to score points with his base or please his donors, everyday Americans are the ones getting the short end of the stick.
Lance Gooden tweets, 13% of Americans are eligible for Joe Biden's student loan bailout.
The remaining 87% will get a $2,503.22 bill per person.
The remaining 80 cents per person.
The White House has not explained how it expects people to take on student loans from bills that other borrowers ran up, especially amid the ongoing inflation and recession crises.
Meanwhile, Mike Pence walks back a report that he'll testify to the January 6th committee.
Former Vice President Pence walked back the report he would testify, according to Newsmax.
Pence recently told the Washington Times, which unlike the New York version of the similar name, is a responsible newspaper, that he would consider testifying before the committee if he were to be invited.
If the committee wanted to extend a formal invitation, I would consider it, but we would reflect very carefully on my obligations to preserve the separation of powers and the constitutional framework that I served in.
Hence acknowledged in a statement a partisan nature of the committee, saying it has squandered an opportunity to really thoughtfully examine what took place that day and where the failings were.
He added it would be unprecedented for a vice president to be summoned to Congress to testify, but that if an invitation were extended, he would have to consider it and his role as vice president during that time.
The committee had been under criticism since its conception, being attacked as a partisan witch hunt, since House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy was denied his choice of Republican representative serving on the select committee.
Jim Jordan and Jim Holt from Ohio and Indiana would have held their feet to the fire and made sure they didn't get away with all the lunacy, the lack of cross-examination, the fact that it's a purely partisan enterprise and not even remotely adversarial or nonpartisan.
He then refused sending anyone to oversee the committee, leaving the Democrats to rally Sir President of RINO's Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger Liz Cheney is the biggest rhino to fall, being opposed by a Trump-endorsed nominee in Wyoming.
The theater show reached its Michael Bay movie moment when one former Trump White House special assistant to the chief of staff, ...said that she overheard from the deputy chief of staff, Tony Ornato, that on January 6, Trump lunged at the Secret Service and tried to take over the car's wheel when they would not bring him back to the Capitol building.
We know, of course, that was complete nonsense, and we have multiple, multiple Secret Service agents willing to testify under oath that it did not happen.
This is the kind of ludicrous bullshit that's being rubber stamped by the January 6th committee.
Just disgusting.
Meanwhile, and we contemplate the role of Mark Zuckerberg in putting up the Zuck box to finance all those mules and bring about as many as 40 million fake ballots.
I mean, it's just disgusting beyond belief.
Senators are making demands after Zuckerberg's FBI Hunter Biden admission when he was on the air with Joe Rogan.
Two senators are demanding all communication about Hunter's laptop between the FBI and Facebook following a bombshell admission from Meta CEO Zuckerberg that FBI officials told him in late 2020 There would be reports that were actually Russian disinformation, in other words, implying he should censor it, not allow it to be discussed on Facebook.
Senator Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson on August 29 sent a letter to Zuckerberg saying that in October 2020, when the New York Post published articles based on evidence from Hunter's laptop, Many news and social media organizations inappropriately rushed a censor and discredit the initial reporting and falsely labeled it as disinformation.
In an August 25th podcast interview with Joe Rogan, Zuckerberg said Facebook actively reduced the reach of posts and articles regarding Hunter's laptop.
Which contained messages and emails about the younger Biden's overseas business dealings, as well as communication with his family, including President Joe Biden, regarding those deals.
Earlier this year, legacy news outlets ultimately reported that the laptop was real, not Russian disinformation.
Basically, the background here is the FBI, I think, basically came to us.
Some folks on our team was like, hey, just so you know, you should be on high alert.
We thought that there was a lot of Russian propaganda in the 2016 election.
We have it on notice that basically there's about to be some kind of dump that's similar to that.
So just be vigilant, Zuckerberg told Rogan.
The two Republicans Demanded Zuckerberg hand over any relevant information or communication by September 12th.
This is the second.
That's 10 days hence.
You recently appeared to indicate that the reason Facebook made the unwise decision to censor articles about Hunter's laptop was based off an alert from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, as senators wrote, referencing Zuckerberg's interview with Rogan.
Whistleblowers have also alleged that Senator Johnson, of whom I am very proud, that local FBI leadership instructed its employees not to look at the Hunter Biden laptop immediately after the FBI had obtained it, the senators stated.
Americans deserve to know whether the FBI used Facebook as part of their alleged plan to discredit information about Hunter Biden.
Congress And the American people require clarity with respect to the extent the FBI communicated with Facebook during the 2020 election about Hunter Biden-related information, they said.
Over the weekend, the FBI responded to Zuckerberg's comment and stated that it provided a general warning to Facebook and other social media firms.
It didn't include a call to action, the bureau stated.
That, of course, I add, is to preserve plausible deniability.
This is the FBI, an agency of the federal government, interfering with private social media organizations in blatant violation of the First Amendment, which imposes constraints upon the federal government that the federal government may not Violate freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assembly, freedom of religion, and here it was blatantly doing so.
A further reason why the United States is no longer taken seriously and has been reduced to the status of a third world banana republic.
The FBI, and this is according to the statement from the agency, Cannot ask our direct companies to take action on information received, but that's exactly what they did.
Meanwhile, Meta, the parent company of Facebook, issued a statement saying the FBI shared general warnings about the election and didn't mention Hunter Biden.
According to the senator's letter, Zuckerberg's revelation that Facebook took steps to censor information about Hunter on its platform Based on the FBI's guidance, raises even more questions about the FBI's actions regarding Hunter Biden's laptop.
As you may know, whistleblowers have recently alleged to Senator Grassley that in August 2020, FBI officials initiated a scheme to downplay derogatory information on Hunter for the purpose of shutting down investigative activity relating to his potential criminal exposure by labeling it disinformation.
Facebook had not responded to requests for comment by press time.
Here is a recent poll, unscientific, yes, but striking nonetheless.
Is Biden the worst thing to happen to America?
Yes, he is.
98%.
No, he isn't.
2%.
Just disgusting beyond belief.
Meanwhile, Steve Kirsch reports vaccines are taking an average of five months to kill people.
The CDC has been hiding the Social Security Administration death master file.
I got it from a whistleblower.
This shows deaths are taking five months from the jab to happen.
That's why it's hard to see.
Executive summary.
We've always assumed the vaccine kills you quickly in the first two weeks, because that's when people notice the Association reported to Avers.
This is still true.
It does kill some people quickly.
However, most of the deaths from the vaccine are happening an average of five months from the last dose or the second dose.
It may be getting shorter the more shots you get, but there are arguments both ways, since there can be survivor bias.
But this explains why the life insurance companies got off the charts, all-cause mortality peaks for people under 60 in the third and fourth quarter, rather than right after the shots rolled out.
The five-month delay is also consistent with death reports, where people are developing new aggressive cancers that are killing them over a five to six-month period.
So when you hear of a death from stroke, cardiac arrest, heart attack, cancer, suicide, Happening around five months after VAX, it could very well be a vaccine related to death.
The data from the Social Security Administration death master file, ages 18 to 55.
I got this chart from a whistleblower who works for HHS.
This is data you are not supposed to see.
The mortality increased 60% at peak is huge.
That sort of increase can only be caused by something novel that affected massive numbers of people.
There's only one possibility that fits the data—the COVID vax.
The peak is September 9, 2021.
Here's a graph.
Here's a graph, stunning stop.
This graph, which is not publicly available, is from the U.S.
Social Security Death Master File.
It compares deaths from 2021 to deaths in 2020.
You simply cannot get such a rise in deaths like that unless something very deadly is affecting massive numbers of people.
This explains why insurance companies all over the world were seeing massive death spikes in Q3 and Q4 of 2021, The vaccine was simply taking an average of five months for the most recent injection to kill people, the peak here being September 9th, 2021.
The peak, then, for daily vaccine doses was April 12th.
Guess what?
Five months earlier.
The most obvious conclusion is that the vaccine takes an average of five months to kill people after the second dose.
The second peak In December 2021, we'll result in life insurance companies having spikes in Q1 and Q2 of 2022.
Here's what UK professor Norman Fenton said.
That's how science works.
Awake?
What if VAX is taking five months to kill people?
This would explain the US data, he writes.
This makes perfect sense and fits with all the anecdotal evidence.
Alternative hypotheses?
If someone has a better explanation for the data, I'd love to hear it.
If any fact checker wants to challenge me on this, you can use a contact form and let's have a recorded conversation.
Let me mention as an aside, it turns out the fact checkers were paid for by Big Pharma.
Surprise, surprise!
The vast majority of fact-checkers were fact-checking on behalf of Big Pharma.
No wonder they rejected all the negative data as being false or misinformation.
They were paid to do exactly that.
The CDC doesn't want to talk about this.
They also won't tell us why they aren't showing us the data.
For sure, The New York Times and rest of the mainstream media will ignore it and won't ask any questions.
Maybe Tucker will talk about it.
Summary.
It was wrong to assume that most of the vax-related deaths were happening shortly after vaccination.
Some are, but most are not.
It's just that they were easier to notice when there was temporal proximity to the jabs.
If someone you know died around five months after vaccination, you should definitely have a proper autopsy done, as described in my earlier interview with Ryan Cole.
Quite significant.
Now get this, how telling is this?
U.S.
ranks last among 46 countries in trust in media, Reuters Institute report finds.
Just 29% of people surveyed in the U.S.
said they trust the news, compared to 45% in Canada and 54% in Brazil.
The United States ranks last in media trust at 29%.
Among 92,000 news consumers surveyed in 46 countries, a report released Wednesday found That's worse than Poland, worse than the Philippines, worse than Peru.
Finland leads at 65%.
The annual digital news report from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism in Oxford also found some improvement in trust in nearly all the countries surveyed, probably thanks to COVID coverage.
But not in the US, where the low rating was flat year to year.
One explanation, not necessarily the only, is the extreme political polarization in the US.
This study, like many others, had extremely high levels of distrust.
75% of those who identified as being on the right thought coverage of their views was unfair.
And of course, they've got it right.
Local news, both print and broadcast, fare better than national.
However, the findings for struggling local print outlets were not all good.
Interest in local news and willingness to pay for it was not strong.
Only 21% in the U.S.
said that they pay for news online.
Of those who do, 31% said they pay for the New York Times, 24% the Washington Post, only 23% for the site of a local or regional paper.
The most popular local news topic by a wide margin, 62%, was the weather.
Staples of local news coverage like politics, 33%, and education, 16%, lagged.
Those surveys indicated a preference For local broadcast, 52%, as a source over newspapers, 16%.
The proportion that access selected local topics in the last week is in 38 markets.
This is pretty fascinating compared to Norway, the US, Chile, the UK.
From the Reuters survey, the study raised several questions for me.
What definition of trust is being used and what strategies could U.S.
news outlets pursue to improve the situation?
By email, I received detailed answers to both from Rasmus Kius Nielsen, director of the Institute and among the authors of the report.
We leave it to the respondent to define what trust means for them, Nielsen wrote.
And ask a general question about trust in news without specifying means of delivery.
The term is intuitively meaningful to people.
At least we've never had anyone query it.
The basic survey question is, I think you can trust most news most of the time.
Follow-ups show us that users give us a higher trust rating to news they themselves consume and a lower rating to news on social media.
Nielsen suggested three potential solutions to the low trust level in the US.
Many Americans do not feel that news organizations are covering people like them fairly.
And those who say the news media are treating them less fairly are less likely to trust the news.
And here we have the survey, the proportion in Northern Europe, Western Europe, Southern Europe, Northern Europe, Finland, 65%.
Denmark, 59%.
Norway, 57%.
Ireland, 53%.
Sweden, 50%.
UK, 36%.
Western Europe, Netherlands, 59%.
Belgium, 54%.
Germany, 53%.
Switzerland, 51%.
Austria, 46%.
France, 30%.
They go on down all the way to North America.
Canada, 45%.
Western Europe, Netherlands, 59, Belgium, 54, Germany, 53, Switzerland, 51, Austria, 46, France, 30.
They go on down all the way to North America, Canada, 45%, U.S., 29.
This includes, for example, younger people, young women in particular, Black Americans and Hispanics.
More inclusive treatment of their concern will help, he said.
With a wall of fire, the change in trust will take a while, given how long these groups have felt left out. . given how long these groups have felt left out. .
was it a conspiracy
Did you know that the police in Boston were broadcasting, this is a drill, this is a drill, on bullhordes during the marathon?
That the Boston Globe was tweeting that a demonstration bomb would be set off during the marathon for the benefit of bomb squad activities.
And that one would be set off in one minute in front of a library, which happened as the Globe had announced.
Peering through the smoke, you could see bodies with missing arms and legs.
But there was no blood.
The blood only showed up later and came out of a tube.
They used amputee actors and a studio-quality smoke machine.
Don't let yourself be played.
Check out And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
If you think for one second that the Capitol will ever treat us fairly, you are lying to yourself. - Yeah.
Because we know who they are and what they do.
This is what they do, and we must fight back.
You can torture us and bomb us.
Fire is catching.
And if we burn, you burn with us!
Good evening.
Are you awake yet?
I hope.
We've tried and we've tried for years and years to use passive resistance and loud voices to make a change.
But time is over.
Your governments around the world have no other goal than to decimate your entire existence at the hands of the bankers and the elites.
The war is coming and it's your choice to decide if you want to be a warrior or a victim.
Denial is not a choice anymore.
Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Not giving up.
Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio. Revolution Radio.
Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Then they sued to shut me up, and the Wisconsin courts played along.
I have the proof and the law on my side.
What I don't have is the money.
They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
Take guns, impose tyranny.
It's on the way with Remington's help.
First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
Give Cengo.com funding Fetzer.
Check it out.
This is for all the marbles.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Just to complete the Reuters Institute review of trust in government before I turn to a report here that mainstream media is targeting Biden for giving a polarized speech flanked by U.S. moderators.
Marines, which I find a heartening sign.
Political partisans, especially on the right, trust the news much less and also do not feel news organizations Cover their views fairly.
News media may be able to respond to this concern.
Perhaps we have an example here.
The question is what compromise that might entail on, for example, calling out unsubstantiated election allegations of election fraud, except they are substantiated.
How can anyone at this point continue to claim they're unsubstantiated?
This is discrediting in and of itself.
And how could any attempt to appeal more to those on the political right, often older white Americans, combined with attempts to appeal to younger and more diverse audiences, who are often more liberal?
It is a clear option, but there may be trade-offs in choices here.
Interested in any partisans, including conservatives, at least say they prefer a range of views, 74%, And neutral treatment of issues 66% rather than reports that simply reinforce their views.
Third, just one in five Americans identify going directly to a news site or news app as their main way of getting news online, underlining the weak connection news media have with much of the public.
As we have shown elsewhere, trust is often in part about familiarity.
It's hard to see how news media can win people's trust if they often have only a few fleeting points of contact with them, frequently mediated by social media, an environment people generally do not associate with trustworthy news.
The fact of the matter is, I say as an aside, the alternative news is far more reliable than the mainstream.
The work, however good, does not speak for itself if people rarely see it.
At least, for those parts of the media where people's opinion of the brands in question would improve if they got to know them better, based their perception more on personal experience and less on stereotypes or cues taken from often highly partisan voices, it seemed to me some of the U.S.
news media have basically a communications and marketing problem.
The study validates other often observed problems publishers confront.
There's a sizable cohort now who avoid news altogether.
Either they don't have time or find it depressing, or alternatively find it less misleading.
Is it Will Rogers who observed that you're better not to know anything about a subject than to have false beliefs which are engendered by the newspapers?
A larger percentage, 51, is not concerned about the financial circumstances of the media, compared to 31% who say they're aware the business is less profitable than it once was.
Nielsen's comments have echoes in other analyses of the challenges for local news.
Tom Rosenstahl, executive director of the American Press Institute, soon departing to become a professor at the University of Maryland, Told me late last year, newspapers are weak in demographics like younger readers and conservatives.
The very news audience categories are still growing.
Meanwhile, we have more.
Including how Biden is showing a blatant disregard for the Second Amendment, but I'm going to defer that for a brand new report here, September 2nd.
The Epoch Times, which I highly recommend, very reliable, one of the very best sources out there.
I also highly recommend Zero Hedge, by the way.
President, here's the title, here's the heading.
Mainstream media reporters target Biden for giving polarizing speech flank by U.S.
Marines.
President Joe Biden received backlash from corporate news reporters Thursday night after he delivered a polarizing campaign-style speech flanked by two U.S.
Marines.
During the speech, the president attacked tens of millions of people who voted for former President Donald Trump, describing them as extremists.
Whatever you think of this speech, the military is supposed to be apolitical.
CNN host Breonna Keller, whose husband serves in the U.S.
Army, wrote on Twitter, positioning Marines in uniform behind President Biden for a political speech flies in the face of that.
It's wrong when Democrats do it.
It's wrong when Republicans do it.
CNN chief national affairs correspondent Jeff Zellery wrote, There's nothing unusual or wrong with a president delivering a political speech.
It's inherent in the job description.
But doing it against a backdrop of two Marines standing at attention in the Marine band is a break with White House tradition.
The Marines behind Biden was weird, said ABC News producer Jeffrey Cook.
If Trump did that, every damn operative I follow would be freaking the F out.
CBS News senior White House correspondent O'Keefe noted the unusual optics.
Like or loathe what he said tonight, it should be noted.
The president spoke tonight on the grounds of a national park flanked by U.S.
Marines and took direct specific aim at his predecessor and members of the Republican Party.
Another thing we don't see every day.
The White House Thursday claimed the president's speech would be optimistic and not political.
However, Biden called on voters to unite against mega Republicans and Trump, alleging they are a threat to democracy.
Some Republicans and other commentators also criticized Biden for standing directly in front of a dark blood red black drop during his speech and crop photos of the president were being shared.
GOP Senate candidate J.D.
Vance wrote that he couldn't believe the red backdrop image with Biden was a real photograph.
It depicts the president of our nation as he took to the airwaves and spoke about his fellow citizens as if they were sewer rats, he wrote on social media.
That, I think, by the way, captures it exactly right.
Some compared the image to communist or Nazi propaganda.
Every time I think Biden and Cruz can't be dumber, they outdo themselves, said Barstool Sports Chief Executive David Portnoy.
Seriously, who gives a speech warning people about how dangerous Republicans are to democracy while having a background that looks like the Soviet Union and Hitler had a baby?
This blood red setting and negative complaining about political opponents means one thing.
Joe Biden is really nervous that Donald Trump is going to run again, wrote Richard Grinnell, a former ambassador and acting director of national intelligence in the Trump administration.
He's got it exactly right.
This is an act of desperation.
Now, I'm going to open the lines to callers, but I'm going to finish with one more story here.
So Mitchell can have you take your call and have you ready to go when I complete this report.
The number, of course, 540-352-4452.
540-352-4452.
Once again, Biden shows blatant disregard for the Second Amendment.
As I say, he doesn't care about the Constitution.
He doesn't give a damn about your rights.
He's in the same category with W, who described the Constitution as just a goddamn piece of paper.
President Biden took the stage yesterday afternoon in his home state of Pennsylvania.
This is prior to his speech that evening in Philadelphia.
Also home to a key swing, U.S.
Senate battled this year and addressed a crowd gathered in Wilkes-Barre to tout his Safer America plan.
A notable part of the plan, which the White House highlighted in a subsequent tweet, is a measure to ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.
In addition, it will ban the manufacture, sale, or possession of un-serialized firearms, often referred to as ghost guns.
Here's a tweet from President Biden.
I am determined to ban assault weapons in this country.
I did it before and we will do it again.
And by the way, as an aside, it made a negligible difference to the rate of crime.
The overwhelming majority of crimes that involve guns are done with handguns, over 95%.
And among those done with rifles, it's only a lesser percentage that involve the AR-15.
Not only that, but there's a whole lot of propaganda out there that the founding fathers didn't contemplate.
Military-style weapons when they wrote the Second Amendment.
Well, that's historically absurd.
They had exactly military, not just military-style, but military weapons in mind.
They wanted the United States to be composed of a vast citizen soldiers who could give them to the aid of the nation in response to an invasion by a foreign power after all.
We just want our independence from the British.
And they did it because we had citizen soldiers who were armed with military weapons, or to oppose a tyrannical government.
And that's what we have with Biden.
This is why they want to take the guns.
Remember, as Mel observed, the party must command the guns so that guns do not command the party.
Following his remarks, Biden reminded everyone of the Bipartisan Saver Communities Act that he signed into law in the wake of the Uvalde tragedy.
By the way, the Uvalde tragedy was completely fabricated, just as phony as Buffalo, just as phony as what happened in Charlottesville, what happened in Las Vegas, what happened in Parkland, what happened in Sandy Hook.
I'm telling you, they've been writing one scam after another against the American people, fabricating events in order to instill fear into a target audience in order to make us more easy to manipulate, to promote their political agenda of taking away our guns.
But after promoting defunding the police, after supporting the massive riots during the Summer of Love, which involved looting, arson, killing, The Democrats have totally discredited themselves and the idea that Biden would come out and say he's not for defunding the police, he wants to fund them is too little, too late.
The American people know the truth.
They see the writing on the wall.
Here's another tweet from Biden.
Earlier this summer, I signed the Bipartisan Safer Communities Act into law.
Law enforcement supported it.
Teachers supported it.
Victims supported it.
Young people supported it.
The NRA and the vast majority of congressional Republicans voted against it.
That's because they believe in the Second Amendment.
NRA spokesman Lars Nilsson told the American Liberty News, this is Joe Biden's crime crisis.
It's raging through our country because of reluctance by the president and his allies to take violent criminals off the street.
Biden's Justice Department Has allowed criminals to roam free throughout Baltimore, Philadelphia, Chicago, New York, San Francisco, and other cities large and small without fear of prosecution or punishment.
Americans know the no cash bail and revolving door justice system supported by soft on crime leaders are the real problem.
Instead of focusing on criminals who commit crimes, the president continues to propose draconian measures that only affect law-abiding Americans.
Remember, if you took every gun from every law-abiding citizen, you would not have taken one gun from a criminal.
Not one.
How stupid can you get?
Meanwhile, NRA tweets.
Joe Biden once again gets a free pass using this extremely dangerous rhetoric.
Is Biden threatening to use F-15 fighter jets against Americans?
You need something a little more than a gun, Biden can be heard saying in the clip of last night's speech posted above.
I'm not talking now about the speech of last night, but previous.
American Liberty News contributor Peter Roth said last week Democrats don't want to be seen as soft on crime.
Too late.
And Biden's rhetoric last night reaffirmed those remarks.
Another tweet.
President Biden.
Folks turn on the news and see kids being gunned down in schools, a neighbor losing loved ones to fentanyl and violence walking our streets.
Families want to feel safe again.
My Safer America Plan will strengthen public safety by investing in effective community policing.
This is such rubbish giving their past practice of defunding the police.
Remember, actions speak louder than words.
Biden may have a lot of words, but his actions betray him.
Absolutely disgusting.
Bear in mind now, I've opened the lines to callers, and we do have Among the most popular, Paul in California joined the conversation.
Paul, your thoughts?
How do you like our country now, huh?
You know, you gotta hand it to these people.
They reminded me, I didn't watch or listen to the speech, but I saw images and it reminded me of that time I was walking around the red light district in Amsterdam.
Only difference being is, you know, you're not going to get no satisfaction out of this.
Oh, Paul, it was just, it was just so repulsive.
I could hardly believe I, uh, I was watching Tucker while it was going down and he'd switched back and forth, but I like this, uh, You know, mainstream reporting attacking him for the backdrop, blood red and with the two Marines at attention.
That's a very effective attack on the imagery.
That was being projected here.
It was truly repulsive.
And then the Babylon Bee has a satirical piece rooted in fact, which is the case for all successful satires condemning while Biden condemns fascism speech while debuting an attractive new mustache.
And you know exactly what that mustache looked like.
Yeah, so you got somebody else saying hello here.
Go ahead, Paul.
I know not who that, oh, we got, yeah, it's probably Bruce from Texas.
Go ahead, Paul.
No, it's Brian from Missouri.
Go ahead.
I'll jump in later.
Go ahead and take a look at them.
Okay.
Brian, go ahead.
Join the conversation.
Well, I just wanted to point out, you know, I called, was it a week ago, and my son had a funeral he had to go to, my daughter.
Her boyfriend died in the middle of the night, and now my son has to go to another funeral, another 20-some year old that died unexpectedly.
So, you know, from my end, I'm just seeing so much of it.
As far as Palin and Alaska, to me, I cannot imagine anyone voting for a Democrat.
As soon as I hear that, you know, someone Trump-endorsed didn't get that seat, I'm thinking Dominion voting machines, and I just have a question whether Alaska is on those machines, because I would think of that state as being full of Very conservative people.
I can't imagine anyone voting for a Democrat right now.
So that's what I had to say.
Well, I agree with you.
I think there's something very fishy about what's going on in Alaska.
And of course, a suppressed premise you didn't cite is that those who are dying on the right and left are all vats.
I have no doubt, Brian, that was really the point you wanted to make.
Yes.
I mean, it's tragic.
It's absolutely tragic.
Oh, here it is.
We got a note from, I think, Mitchell that ranked voting was the key to Palin loss.
In other words, they have this odd system that they should not have used, in my opinion, where you rank the voters who you rank first, second, and third, then they can use that to manipulate the outcome.
Mitchell, I'll bet that's exactly right.
Did you want to comment on that, Mitchell?
Paul, I'm coming back to you.
Go ahead.
Mitchell, are you there?
Yeah.
Yeah, I'm here, Jim.
Yeah.
Yeah, that ranked voting deal.
That's what was the key to the Palin loss and the Democrat win.
It was.
How many candidates were there then on the Alaska ballot?
I'm not sure if it was five.
Yeah, I'm not sure.
It's just maddening.
You know, you have to understand these are private corporate Yeah.
The selection of a prime of a candidate in a primary is a is a private club function.
Yeah.
I got to admit, Sarah, when Sarah Palin ran with John McCain, I had no enthusiasm for John McCain, but I thought she was pretty snazzy.
You know, Sarah Palin for all of her shortcomings has a lot of virtues.
Let me return to Paul, by the way.
Paul, your further thoughts?
Well, I don't know.
I'm just feeling a little grim this morning, realizing what's ahead of us.
You know, nothing's changed since I first started calling in, you know, whatever it was five, six years ago.
There's no political way out of this.
They're going to Foment a revolution and a racial war.
And, you know, even though it's what they want, it's still a reality.
I mean, I heard another caller on another show just tell me something I didn't know before, but, you know, they keep dropping in these Africans or these Somalis in everywhere.
And, you know, I can only go based upon what I've read and heard, but Somalis are particularly low brow, low class, low IQ Negro, you know, from Africa.
They're dropping them in Grand Forks, North Dakota, of all places, right?
And of course, they have no place there.
There's nothing they're going to contribute.
They're totally subsidized.
You know, they're doing this everywhere.
You know, this is a racial war.
And since they can't fit into society, they're not going to have any jobs.
They're going to resort to crime.
Many have described, and I think this is an invasion, that they're setting up for these millions to actually wreak havoc across the nation and, you know, divert resources we need to direct against the national government of tyranny of Biden.
But we're going to have to fight this rearguard action against all these immigrants they're bringing in to consume our resources and wreak havoc in our communities.
Can you imagine a single more irresponsible action by a president of the United States in allowing 4.9 million illegal immigrants to enter the country in the first 18 months in office?
I question any count.
In other words, how are they counting?
How have they tabulated this number?
So I don't know whether it's inflated or not or hyperbole, but I don't believe any statistics that are coming from the news of the government, as you know, That I am right to hold that position and to say that it's irresponsible.
That doesn't, that's not half of it, Jim.
You know, this is an agenda.
The government is our enemy.
Okay.
There's no other way to look at it.
They have made it clear.
They're our enemy.
The government represents the enemy.
They're not our friend.
We don't need to vote for anybody that's serving the government.
There's no amount of changing seats of Republicans or Democrats going to make one damn bit of difference.
As long as their mechanisms of power remain in place, as long as they can issue money to infinity, right, out of nothing, and tell us that it's a debt and that we owe them, as long as they can inflate the currency, as long as they can control the information, the news media, you know there's only one answer.
And unfortunately, he's gone.
Okay, but maybe somebody else can come along, and essentially, you know, probably more than one leader, to unite us in what we have to do, the task ahead.
It's not going to be pretty, but the bottom line is they're forcing the issue.
This cannot continue.
And all this non-prosecution of crime, all it's doing is revealing to the, shall we say, the naive white eyes, the behavior of these blacks and browns.
Because you're not going to go commit crime and you wouldn't have done so at any age, right?
Most white people and most agents who are higher IQ and decent, right?
And have properly functioned cortexes.
They're not going to go out and do crime because it's immoral and they wouldn't feel good about it.
But niggers and Mexicans go do this because they're sub-human.
They're 70, 75, 80 IQ.
They're basically sub-human savage animals.
I got to object to your use of the N-word.
Just don't use it.
It's unacceptable, you know, and just don't use that.
You can make all your points without resorting to terms that are widely viewed as racist slurs.
You can make all your points.
I even have a book on the evolution of intelligence that points out the extreme difference in racial groups, while whites overall have an average of 100 IQ, that Asians have an IQ of around 110, and that Jews remarkably about 118, that African Americans only about 80.
This is well established by objective IQ tests.
And I review the data and explain how this is a function of evolution.
They got there by way of evolution, and that's how they'll get out.
We're about to hit the break, Paul.
I want you to stick around and pick up on our conversations right after.
Music playing Listen to Revolution Radio at freedomslips.com.
We'll be right back after this message.
Management would like to take a moment to thank the listeners and hosts for all their support as this made Revolution Radio one of the biggest platforms for free speech in an ever-growing dark world of censorship.
Unfortunately, this platform for free speech has never been free.
We need the support of the people.
It is the people like you, yes, you, that keeps the station in the front lines of the battle against tyranny and oppression.
Please help support Revolution Radio so free speech will not be silenced in a world that seems to be going deaf to the real truth.
With your support, we will be able to become an even bigger pillar of light in a dark world.
Revolution Radio, Freedom Substance.com, the number one listener-supported radio station on the planet.
Revolution.
Radio, radio, radio, radio.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, oh.
Join Revolution Radio every Wednesday, 8 p.m. Eastern.
Eastern Time on Studio B for Momentary Zen with host Zeng Garcia at FreedomSledge.com, the people station.
Even the government admits that 9-11 was a conspiracy.
But did you know that it was an inside job?
That Osama had nothing to do with it?
That the Twin Towers were blown apart by a sophisticated arrangement of mini or micro nukes?
That Building 7 collapsed seven hours later because of explosives planted in the building?
Barry Jennings was there.
He heard them go off and felt himself stepping over dead people.
The U.S.
Geological Survey conducted studies of dust gathered from 35 locations in Lower Manhattan and found elements that would not have been there had this not been a nuclear event.
Ironically, that means the government's own evidence contradicts the government's official position.
9-11 was brought to us compliments of the CIA, the neocons in the Department of Defense, and the Mossad.
Don't let yourself be played.
Read America Nuked on 9-11.
Available at moonrockbooks.com.
That's moonrockbooks.com.
The opinions expressed on this radio station, its programs, and its website by the hosts, guests, and call-in listeners, or chatters, are solely the opinions of the original source who expressed them.
They do not necessarily represent the opinions of Revolution Radio and freedomslips.com, its staff, or affiliates.
You're listening to Revolution Radio, freedomslips.com, 100% listener-supported radio, and now we return you to your host.
Well, Paul, during the break, Richel made some comments here suggesting you may be over, you know, racializing the problem that there are categories of whites, for example, often called white trash, who are just as irresponsible often called white trash, who are just as irresponsible as blacks in the United States.
And they commit, you know, really colossally stupid and inappropriate and wrongful and criminal actions.
Mitchell, would you like to?
Hang on a minute Mitchell.
Hey Paul, how you doing my friend?
I just I just wanted to tell you my friend that my cousin.
I'll tell you what.
Maybe he his skin was.
Maybe he was a Caucasian by birth.
But um.
He was not a very good person.
Well, I know, but I'm just saying that culture and upbringing and, you know, behavior without consequences is what I think destroyed my cousin and turned him into, you know, white trash.
And I mean, I just see that as a common thread with the way The way a lot of people are raised, but I just wanted to point that out.
You know, it's I met now.
I'm not saying I met good people of.
I've met good people of of all races.
I've met OK.
Paul, Paul, Paul, Paul.
I've asked you repeatedly not to tread when I someone else is speaking.
I do not want you talking over them.
Paul.
He's not.
He wasn't done.
Go ahead.
I just wanted to say, Paul, you know, I really feel bad because, you know, Bank of America is not willing to exploit me these days, but they're going to give low interest loans to the black and Latino community.
But they're not willing to exploit white people.
I don't know the deal.
But anyway, I was just trying to change the topic a little bit, but you know, this is, I think people are people individually.
Go ahead, Paul.
That's an absurd statement.
I can't believe you're making it.
You're not educated on the issues.
No, it's inherent.
It's innate.
What part of the word inherent or innate do you not understand?
Have you not looked at the issue?
Have you not listened to Jared Taylor of American Renaissance?
Have you not listened to Colin Flaherty?
Have you not understood what's going on?
These are well-known physiological anatomical differences between the races and behavior.
Culture is created by a race.
Culture is a construct.
Many decades ago, the Jews tried to tell us a lie that race was a social construct.
A stupid Jew lie.
No.
Culture is a racial construct, okay?
There isn't any way that we behave the same because of the way we're raised.
There's a case in Ohio right now, maybe you've heard of it, 17-year-old Ethan Liming was stomped to death by three blacks.
I'd love to say the N-word, but Jim's going to be offended, so I won't, okay?
Three blacks stomped him to death.
Have you heard about the case, Mitch, or Jim, have you heard about it?
Yeah, I've heard about it.
Okay, so it's rare that we hear about these things.
Did you hear about the Wichita Massacre, the Wichita Five, either one of you?
Tell us about it, Paul.
Okay, well, see, you haven't heard about it.
Why?
Because they hide these crimes.
Two black brothers, the Carr brothers, known criminal felons, kidnapped and killed five whites.
One of them survived.
The woman survived.
She was shot in the back of the head, like all the others, after they sexually abused them at their apartment and then drove them around to the various ATMs and had them withdraw money from their account.
then they took him to a snowy field.
Charlie Manson was white.
What?
I mean, look, there's bad people.
Did you just tell me Charles Manson is white?
Is Charles Manson white?
Hell, I don't know.
Oh, is he Jewish?
Is that not white?
I mean, I don't know.
I don't care.
I know bad people.
Can you just...
He's appealing to Wild Math.
Paul, you can have the floor, but I'm just saying you're swiping everybody.
Insert foot in mouth.
You know, that's like Colin Flair used to talk about a lot of these blacks when they're confronted with their behavior, with group black behavior, criminal behavior.
They go, oh, white people do it too.
And he always said the same thing.
Send me the videos.
Send me the videos.
They never did.
You know why?
Because they don't exist.
I live it, Paul.
I live it.
I see white people acting in criminal gangs all the time and in all this stuff.
I mean, understand, we are all mixed together.
We are all of different intelligence levels.
And it's such a mix.
That we end up using.
What are you talking about?
I'm saying, Paul, that you're judging everybody with a wide swath.
Everybody is categorized first by religion or race, then by religion.
And that is just completely false.
That's my opinion.
And the data bears out the racial reality.
That's what I'm doing.
I got a feeling.
All respect to you, Mitch, but you're not educated on this topic.
And when you get the education and your eyes are open, you will see quite clearly what's being done and why.
Okay?
They call these people weapons, biological weapons, for a reason.
Okay?
I can read you a comment online.
I won't do it now, but there's a very lengthy comment that makes the perfect point using everything in reverse.
Talked about how everybody knows what lovely neighbors they are.
Everybody knows how the real estate values go up when they move in.
Everybody knows how the schools get better when they come in.
So on and so forth.
Making every single reverse comment, and it states so clearly.
But here, just let me read you this one.
This is from one of these many videos that I watch.
And again, I watched at least 30 or 40 Colin Flaherty videos, okay?
He's gone now.
His channel's taken down.
But on World Truth Video, you go to certain channels, and you can watch this behavior.
Hundreds and hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of videos.
You can see it, okay?
A cell phone camera is truth, all right?
Well, here's this one comment of this one video.
Three months ago, our neighbor, an adult Spanish woman of Castilian descent, she looks a little bit European, walked to the corner store in the middle of the afternoon.
While standing in line, two young black males Get this.
I do not care what anyone says.
This is one thing for certain.
sudden they started beating her senseless.
As she lay on the ground, semi-conscious, one of them, of the two entitled blacks, exited the store yelling loudly, that's what you get for being white.
Okay.
Now, get this.
I do not care what anyone says.
This is one thing for certain.
The Jews and their Zog white government are funding the genocide of our people.
Now, this one wasn't captured on a cell phone camera, but you can watch this behavior over and over and over again.
And guess what, Mitch?
It doesn't matter how many points you make about how many low-class whites you know.
The video evidence is not out there, or for sure, the Jews would run with it and post it over and over, and it would also be all over YouTube, and it's not.
And statistically, the crime stats bear this out.
Whites don't burglarize black homes.
Whites don't carjack blacks.
Whites don't rape black women and so on and so on and so on.
Every category of crime, whites and Asians do not commit against minorities.
It's only 100 percent the reverse.
And you better wake up and stop this.
Oh, I know.
Some words are bad.
Oh, we're all mixed together.
It sounds like faggoty bullshit to me.
I'm sorry.
I'd like to comment on all this if I could get a chance when everybody's done.
Go ahead, Brian.
What I want to point out is the ancient Egyptians were black.
Okay?
Queen Nefertiti was a black woman.
Brian, we're getting feedback.
Brian, we're getting feedback.
You gotta turn off your whatever.
When you talk, you know, you're getting the show come on.
Then continue.
I don't have anything to turn off.
Go ahead.
But anyway, The ancient Egyptians were black, and they were at a very high level of consciousness.
They were practicing the Kundalini Yoga thing that I do, that Christ was doing.
The problem was, the dark, it destroyed their culture, their civilization.
They always hate, and they never forget.
They never forgave the black Egyptians for what they had, who they were, And they had been they've been destroying them for 2000 years.
And what you're seeing now is the result of what the Jews did to the black people, the the ancient Egyptian culture.
That's what it is.
It again goes back to our enemies.
And you have to look at it from that standpoint.
In fact, when Napoleon's troops were in ancient or in Egypt, and they saw the Sphinx, which had Negroid features, they defaced it.
That's where the defacing of the Sphinx comes from because they just couldn't comprehend how, you know, he had black features.
They were blacks.
So it's the truth, Paul.
You can say, oh my God, that they were highly advanced black people.
If you want to get angry about all this, again, get angry at your Jews, because they're the ones responsible for what's happened to black people.
Okay?
It goes all back to them again.
It's an absurd argument to say, be mad at Jews, because they're the ones...
It's a reality.
They're here, okay?
They're a physical and racial threat to our society.
They don't have any place.
They don't contribute anything.
Every time a black person flips a switch, right, or turns a faucet on, or gets in their car and drives anywhere, picks up a telephone, it's not because they had any hand in inventing that technology.
They can't even lick a stamp and put it on an envelope because they didn't have paper.
And they probably would still have never invented paper to this day, much less a paper clip or a cardboard box.
They're mostly completely useless in any advanced society, okay?
That's why they were brought here as slaves, and they should have been shipped back.
And they had a plan to ship them all back, but of course it was thwarted by you-know-who.
Their civilization, when it came to consciousness, was much more advanced than ours.
They understood all that.
It's completely retarded.
And if you believe it, you're retarded.
Oh no, I'm not retarded.
You need to do what I do and then you can go to these places.
You can go to the Akashic Records.
In Egypt, ancient Egypt, and look at this stuff.
You can see out of your third eye these things, okay?
I've done meditations where I've been in ancient Egypt and seen them and seen how advanced they are.
The reason they wore that gold cobra over their third eye was that helped bring up the divine energy so they could see better out of their third eye.
The reason they wore a gold band on their arm was to help bring up Kundalini energy so that they could see things.
They were highly advanced.
The pyramids were like Tesla technology.
They had electroplating.
Brian, Brian, Brian, Brian, Brian, listen.
There were ancient civilizations that were magnificent, Mesopotamian, Babylonian, Egyptian.
You made a very telling point.
Paul doesn't appreciate sufficiently the difference between genetic and cultural evolution.
My whole book, The Evolution of Intelligence, is dedicated to explaining the difference between genetic and cultural evolution.
About 60% of our behaviors are genetically based, but the other 40% are not.
In my opinion, therefore, he's giving an exaggerated version, and he's discounting the kinds of arguments you and Mitchell are making.
So be it.
Paul has gone, you know, he has his views.
I respect his right to have those views.
Even when we disagree, he's entitled to them.
Here's another report that's right on topic, and I wish we hadn't been diverted into the racial aspect, because what's going on with Biden is so significant.
Newt Gingrich.
Biden.
Yeah, I'll bring in Mitchell.
Biden committing greatest ever act of aggression by an American president against his own people.
Listen to this.
As President Joe Biden excoriates millions of Americans as mega-Republicans, extremists, semi-fascists, and threats to democracy, something he's likely to do again in his so-called Soul of the Nation speech.
You know, as he was talking about a speech the day before, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Biden's sneering insults stem from terror.
Gingrich, speaking on Fox Wednesday night, the night before this speech, Noted more than 70 million Americans voted for Trump in the last election.
To have a president of the United States characterize half of his country in the way that Joe Biden does is the greatest act of aggression by an American president against his own people that we have ever seen.
It's truly an astonishing moment.
It doesn't fit any of our prior history, Gingrich said.
And I keep telling my friends, do not assume anything based on past precedent, because you're now dealing with people who are terrified.
I mean, if you're the senior FBI, or you're the White House, and you're looking at the potential of a Republican-controlled House and Senate, and you realize all your emails, all your meetings, everything you've been doing could suddenly become public, then your entire career could be destroyed, and you might end up in jail.
I mean, You're going to do everything you can to try to guarantee the Republicans can't win this fall because you're terrified of what a Republican Congress would be like.
I think he's got it exactly right.
Republican congressional leaders, including House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, have promised to hold hearings on the Hunter Biden, Joe Biden-influenced peddling allegations, among others, that Republicans take back.
I think this is right.
Mitchell, I know you have something to add here.
I want to just go a little further with it because I think it's right spot on.
McCarthy has also told Attorney General Garland to preserve your documents and clear your calendar in preparation for an anticipated Republican probe of what McCarthy called the potentially weaponized Justice Department and FBI.
Gingrich said the Biden-Garland Justice Department is the most corrupt in all of American history.
You have corruption from the Attorney General to the head of the FBI to senior elements of the FBI.
You have collusion from a wide range of the intelligence community.
You had, I think it was, 50-some intelligence senior officials who signed a letter last year that we now know is a total lie, none of whom have recounted.
I fully expect the Justice Department to indict President Trump in a DC court, a district where he got 5.6% of the vote.
So by 19 to 1, the jury is likely to be against him.
I think this is an all-out effort.
I just heard Zuckerberg, the founder of Facebook, say that the FBI asked him to suppress a Hunter Biden laptop story for the three or four weeks before the election in 2020.
At the time, by the way, when some 80% of Americans say if they had known how corrupt Hunter was and through him his father, they probably would have voted against Joe Biden.
So I have no idea what's going to happen next.
I'm an historian by training and I tell everybody, you have to assume that nothing you know tells you anything about how corrupt and how sick this is going to get.
Because you have fanatics who represent a secular religion who are determined to destroy not just Trump, but Trump's followers, and they would do almost anything.
We have no way of knowing what the next six months or two years are going to carry.
I think that's absolutely spot on.
Now, Mitchell, I want to bring you back in.
I know you have a further thought about Paul and these racial differences, but go ahead and address any of the above.
Yours, Mitchell.
Hey, thank you, Jim.
I mean, I'll be honest with you.
I agree with Paul.
I agree with Paul on the the aspect that, you know, Middle Eastern And African cultures haven't done jack shit over the time of history as far as advancing real science and technology appears.
You know, but I have to, I have to err to say that what we see today in the transgenderism world is the Is the possibility I guess is what these people lost years ago is the that.
The ability to twist the mind of a person individual, whether it is to keep them tied down in a culture.
And in one spot, basically a static cultures for a millennium.
Or.
The advancement of the curiosity, you know, of the West, of the European culture.
You know, I really see that difference.
And, you know, I there, you know, I can understand why people would think that.
But I also believe that, you know, we are all essentially a blank slate.
And that, you know, we can learn or we can be turned into idiots.
Mitchell, I appreciate all that.
We do have another caller.
2-3-1 area code.
2-3-1.
Please give us your name and your state and join us.
Your first name and your state and join us.
2-3-1.
Yes, it's Ken from Michigan.
Go ahead, Ken.
Go ahead.
Yeah, I want to recall that That Newt Gingrich said that President Trump was not part of the club, that's why there's so much resentment for him, and the more I see how things are unfolding, the more I know that President Trump is a friend of ours, and he's the least racist president we've ever had, and he's really a man for the truth, so I see that unfolding more and more.
Is really a very astute political commentator.
I have found him again and again offering very perceptive insights now.
Alex Jones invited Donald Trump to denounce the vaccine admitted made a colossal blunder and he actually did the opposite, basically reaffirming that he believed in warp speed.
I'm very, very troubled by this.
I have myself emphasized many times that I would like Trump.
I agree with you about Trump in the sense that I still believe he's our greatest hope, but this troubles me profoundly.
And he still needs to do that.
But the State of the Union is describing his response to Alex Jones as screwing the pooch, meaning he's committed a blunder that he cannot undo.
I agree with you about Trump in the sense that I still believe he's our greatest hope, but this troubles me profoundly.
Your thoughts?
Well, I think that, you know, just like with Bobby Kennedy, he wouldn't have him in his administration because he was anti-vax.
But, I mean, we've all been vaccinated and it's one of those things that we know that we're not going to get vaccinated no matter what he tells us to do, you know, because we have the knowledge about the vaccine.
And that's the way I feel about it.
When you turn on the TV set, you know, the mainstream media propaganda machine, they constantly are rolling out the vaccines, people wearing masks, they're amping up a new variant or get your flu shot.
You know, I wouldn't touch any of it, but that's the way you have to play politics with the getting the votes, you know, same with the races.
Brian, go ahead, add further thoughts of yours.
Well, what I was thinking when they said Biden thought about writing that stupid speech somewhere in the summer and my thoughts were, well, when they have to put up on this teleprompter, breathe in and breathe out, how is he going to get the energy to, you breathe in and breathe out, how is he going to get the energy to, So I just had to add that.
Mitchell, I'd be glad for you to have further thoughts of yours.
Well, Jim, you know, We are amazing animals and we have a soul component to us, but that doesn't mean we're born in a box and we can learn and we can get out of that box.
You know the.
The use of technology and the Ad hoc use of technology, tools, learning, all kinds of mechanical and industrial trades of the third worlds show that they have the capacity and the intelligence to learn.
However, they were so stuck in their cultures and so stuck in Islam that there is no future.
It's just worship.
It's just is.
And that's, you know, that's why we haven't seen the advancement of the world until, well, until Western society got out from under the monarchies.
But that's my view.
We have about a minute left.
Yeah, I know.
It's very, very brief.
Brian, did you want to add a final thought of your own?
Yeah, real quick, you know, all this technology, you know, we've had these advancements in technology and what do we get?
5G towers, you know, all this stuff that's really harmful for us.
So I think I would have rather lived in ancient Egypt where we didn't have all that stuff to worry about.
So that's just my final thought.
Or the American Indians, you know, they didn't have to worry about this kind of stuff.
So they just live their lives and we're happy.
So anyway.
Yeah, the American Indians have been among the most abused groups in the history of the world.
Let me just close by saying I think that Biden committed a calamity.
He committed treason against the United States and the American people last night.
I believe this speech is going to reverberate very badly, negatively against Biden and the Democrats, and they deserve our content.
They have abused their position.
They've been irresponsible, derelict, violating the Constitution, violating the laws of the United States, which it is their solemn oath to enforce.
This is as despicable an action as has ever occurred in the history of this once great nation, and let us hope it can be returned to its former state.
Thank you all for being here.
▲
Export Selection