All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 1, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:01:25
Need to Know News (30 August 2022) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fentzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joel Senn in Houston.
Our other compatriots are otherwise engaged.
Meanwhile, it's a sensation that's gone unnoticed.
The U.N.
in effect canceled Ukraine.
In New York, an event happened with a meaning.
It may yet remain unclear, but it appears the world is burying Ukraine and that Russia is winning the battle for the hearts and minds of the people.
Crimea, Donbass, and other territories that are no longer Ukraine.
Only 54 UN members from 193 countries signed a statement directed against Russia, which was prepared by Britain By Britain, the curator of the Ukrainian drama.
The shameful document was announced by the permanent representative of Ukraine to the UN, Sergey Kostasov.
Having listed the countries that supported the statement, which included criticism of Moscow and called for Russia to immediately cease hostilities, he said on behalf of the signatories, We remain committed to the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of Ukraine with its internationally recognized borders, except, of course, for Crimea, Donbass, and other territories that are no longer Ukraine.
He actually announced the victory and triumph of Russia thereby.
First, because we're talking about less than a third of U.S.
member states, more than two-thirds refuse to support Kiev and its Western masters.
Second, this testifies to the appalling isolation of the West, not of Russia.
It's full of wonderful states like Albania, Andorra, Guatemala, Liechtenstein, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Georgia, Moldova, San Marino, Marshall Islands, Palau, and the Federated States of Micronesia.
Third, Practically no major and influential country outside the narrow Western club has come out against Russia.
Neither China, nor India, nor Pakistan, with Bangladesh, nor Indonesia, nor Saudi Arabia, Iran, nor Egypt, nor Algeria, nor Morocco, nor Nigeria, nor South Africa, nor Brazil, Argentina, or Mexico.
The collapse of the Western politics in all its glory is here on display.
With regard to the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, only Singapore supported this statement.
Of the eight members of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, all supported Russia.
Of the 11 members of Mercosur, South American Common Market, only one participated in the shameful show of the defense of Ukraine, Colombia.
An old U.S.
client with a brutal tradition of suppressing its people.
No one from the African Union, the successor of the Organization of African Union, which includes 55 states, betrayed Russia from the League of Arab States, in which 22 members are too.
Thus, the whole of Africa and the whole Arab world is on the side of Russia.
All of South America except for Colombia.
All of Central, except for Guatemala.
South Asia is all for Russia.
Southeast Asia, too, except for Singapore.
Really stunning stuff.
In East Asia, Ukraine is supported by U.S.-occupied Japan and South Korea.
However, the latter behaves in such a way it does not oblige it to do anything, intends to maintain its economic ties with Russia, and Japan does not want to sever them completely.
They have someone to take an example from, as recently crawled in Beijing, the countries in which 85% of the world population live if not impose sanctions against Russia.
So what is this, if not the complete collapse of the West's policy of isolating Russia, which in fact led to the fact that he isolated himself?
After all, the situation for Westerners is actually even worse.
Not for pressure and intimidation.
It would be supported by even fewer countries.
Hungary, for example, would definitely not be among the signatories.
It was the realization of this immutable fact that prompted Russia's permanent representative to the UN to declare Western countries will not be able to prevent the imminent fiasco of the Kiev regime.
Why does Russia have so many friends in the world so clearly manifest in this case?
Two main reasons.
First, the world is not blind and sees perfectly well.
It is not Russia but Kiev and the West behind it that are dragging out the war in Ukraine in every possible way.
And, of course, the world also knows the brutal methods the Ukrainians are using to wage it.
Second, perhaps more important, virtually the entire non-Western world has realized Ukraine is a special case.
We are really talking about a Russia-led uprising of countries striving for sovereignty against the suffocating hegemony of the West, which wants to continue to plunder the rest of the world with neocolonial methods.
It's a little scary to lead such an uprising yourself.
Most of the countries that are victims of Western hegemony have neither the strength nor the resources to do it, but they have the courage to support Russia politically and economically.
That is why most wish Moscow a victory.
More or less, clearly understand, you're guessing, the Russians are fighting in Ukraine for the freedom of all, including Ukrainians captured by terrorists.
Understand Russia's policy, by the way, did not appear immediately.
A previous General Assembly resolution, aggression against Ukraine, condemning Russia, was supported by 141 states in early March.
But today, the same is only supported by 54, almost three times smaller and mostly of the caliber of North Macedonia.
This can mean only one thing.
Russia is winning not only in Ukraine, but also in the battle for the hearts and minds of people throughout the world.
Joe, I think that's a wonderful report.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well they threw every bit of weight they had behind this particular puppet.
I was shocked today when I was listening to Alex Cristopo about Solinsky.
One, the Profile in Courage Award, the JFK Profile in Courage Award back in April of this year.
I was absolutely shocked that they have demeaned their award, and I'm sure that JFK is rolling in his grave over that.
But then also, they make a big claim about, over the last two days, that there's been this enormous offensive in the Kursan area.
And Alex said that they managed to move the battle line forward about four kilometers, and they didn't take over a village as claimed.
They took over a street that has houses on both sides of it for about a city block or two.
So the gains that they're claiming are so dramatic are absolutely laughable.
And Colonel McGregor was interviewing with Daniel Napolitano, Judge Napolitano.
And he said that Biden has just said that the only way there'll be peace is if there is a complete surrender and removal of forces by the Russian army.
It ain't going to happen.
They've already taken 25 percent of the country.
It looks like they're going to go ahead and take Odessa and that'll make it about 33 percent of the country.
And then they'll let Hungary and Poland fight over the remains of Ukraine.
It's an absolute 100 percent dead state.
As McGregor says, they've already lost the leading edge of their whole entire military force, probably as many as 100,000 casualties and prisoners.
So they have the main portion of their force is like decimated, undersupplied.
And then just today, because of the repeated shelling of the Zaporozhye nuclear power plant, they have disconnected all of Ukraine, Western Ukraine, from the power grid, which means it's going to be blackouts and nothing but limited emergency generator which means it's going to be blackouts and nothing but limited emergency generator locations All of their trains are electric, so you can expect that to shut down.
All of their domestic energy production is going to be shut down.
So, bottom line is, the country's going to grind to a complete Stone Age halt in the next two days anyway.
So, you reap what you sow.
And in the meantime, Europe is completely crumbling.
Gas is um or electricity excuse me was um less than a hundred dollars per megawatt hour and now it's over a thousand dollars so they've had a tenfold increase just in the last uh 30 days in electricity prices in Europe and that will cripple whatever they've got in the way of industries and then if you add to that the restrictions they're going to have on winter heating And it's all by the stupid decisions of their leaders, for example, not to buy gas in rubles.
I mean, Joe, how dumb can you get?
This is cutting off your nose to spite your face.
It's tragic to watch.
And it's all by the stupid decisions of their leaders, for example, not to buy gas in rubles.
I mean, Joe, how dumb can you get?
This is cutting off your nose to spite your face.
Things that are going to cost lots of lives and not mere disfigurement.
Stunning.
Thank you.
Meanwhile, EU wants to resume buying Russian gas.
Bulgaria rethinks its stance after rejecting Moscow's ruble payment demand back in April.
The minister stressed, we're only talking about the own contract, we will not re-sign or negotiate a new contract.
They're considering holding talks with the energy giant on resuming Russian natural gas imports.
The minister, Rosen, has told Dover there are still no active talks with Gazprom, but we've given an indication we want to start negotiations or continue them to clarify some controversial terms in the contract.
According to Hristov, Sofia is seeking to extend the deadline to supply the remaining volume of gas under the contract until 2023.
In April, Bulgaria had rejected ruble for gas introduced by Russia in response to Western sanctions.
Under the new regs, buyers from countries that impose restrictions on Russia are obliged to pay in rubles.
Sophia's refusal has prompted Gazprom to halt fuel sales to its Bulgarian partner.
Meanwhile, public opinion there is vehemently against getting involved in the conflict in Ukraine.
They do not see the value of being in the EU.
Public opinion is growing ever more anti-American with justification.
The Bulgarian government is working with the U.S.
and NATO to convince the public they should endure insults to their identity and sovereignty to continue to enjoy gay rights, negrophilia, and being told what to do by Jews.
Is that how democracy is supposed to work?
Embattled Balkans creep closer to Russia, reports a Western American conservative.
The Los Angeles Times, meanwhile, has reported even a limited nuclear war could kill a third of the world's population.
This is so important to appreciate, because it's been thought that you could have a limited nuclear war, but in fact the scale would be massive.
As escalating tensions revive old fears of nuclear war, some students actually studying the matter are warning even limited scale exchanges between nations.
In that case, they were thinking of India and Pakistan, but consider Russia and Ukraine could have worldwide mass death.
A nuclear conflict with less than 3% of the world's stockpile could kill a third of the world's population.
Remember, the world's population is 8 billion.
According to a new international study out of Rutgers, a large nuclear between Russia and the U.S.
could kill three-fourths of the world's population, six billion in the same time frame.
It's really a cautionary tale.
Any use of nukes could be catastrophic for the world, said Alan Roebuck, a distinguished professor at Rutgers Department of Environmental Studies.
Robach and others have previously projected tremendous disruption to climate and food supply.
This is the first time they've calculated the potential extent of the famine that would result in how many would actually die.
The detonation of even just a tiny fraction of the nuclear weapons available in the world would spark massive firestorms, rapidly sunblock soot into the atmosphere, touching off a sudden cooling.
Researchers use climate models to calculate how much smoke would reach the stratosphere, where no precipitation occurs to wash it away, and how it would change temperature, perception, and sunlight.
Then they calculate the effects it would have on the production of crops and how fish would fare in the ocean.
They projected tens of millions of immediate fatalities would be followed by hundreds of millions of starvation deaths around the globe.
That's without taking into account the effect of increased ultraviolet radiation on crops due to the destruction of the ozone layer.
By the heating of the stratosphere.
Such an effect would likely worsen the result, in my opinion.
Our work is an existential threat to nuclear weapons that shows you can't use them.
If you do, you're like a suicide bomber.
You're trying to attack someone else, but you will die of starvation.
The data is being released on the heels of a growing consensus that the threat of nuclear war is greater than ever.
The general public needs to understand the enormity of the danger we face, the immediacy of the threat, and the urgency of eliminating these weapons before they eliminate us.
And get this, Joe, in the UK, Well, our wonderful friend Liz Truss is on fire.
British Foreign Secretary vows to use nuclear weapons if necessary.
Well done.
Well done for that de-escalation, Liz Truss.
Fantastic.
That's exactly what was needed.
We already have the threat of the Zaporozhian nuclear power plant.
But no, Truss has to throw her two pennies into this.
And she says, I think it's an important duty of the Prime Minister.
I'm ready to do it, she said.
Oh my God.
Someone shut that stupid bat up.
Wow.
Well, let's hear some sense from one of Russia's officials.
That's Maria Zaharova.
In her Telegram channel, she said, This is the perfect start to a new Austin Powers series.
Now the role of man of mystery of international proportions is played by a woman.
Joe, your thoughts?
Static, baby.
Yeah, Otruss is a real piece of work, isn't she?
Yeah, the problem with nuclear weapons is that no side's going to give up until they think they've won, and so you'll end up having a nuclear exchange that will be like an endless chain reaction.
They're going to keep launching against each other and saying, well, if we hit them one more time, maybe they won't hit us.
And the problem is, is that it's not just whatever goofy atmospheric models they come up with, which are completely concocted computer crap, but we know that radiation causes DNA damage.
It also causes a suppression of the immune system.
So this is something that's not going to benefit any life forms on the planet, number one.
Number two, Ukraine gave up all of their nuclear weapons when the Soviet Union collapsed and they got control of the nuclear weapons.
Which was a very large stockpile that was in, in their territorial jurisdiction, they gave them up with the agreements to be protected by non nuclear means, and so that means if there's a nuclear war that starts, it's only going to be.
The major powers that do it, and Russia's already said they will not use first strike nuclear weapons, but the United States never did agree to that because we always think we can get away with firing off a few H-bombs and nobody will stop us.
It's like megalomaniacs with, you know, nuclear weapons is a terrible combination.
Yes.
Oh, Joe, yes.
And you're absolutely right.
No one's going to give them up.
No one's going to give them up.
Meanwhile, Russia deploys air defenses in Syria's Deir ez-Zor after the U.S.
strikes on Iranian forces.
This is after a U.S.
strike.
The Russian military has deployed in what appears to be a response to recent U.S.
strikes against Iranian-backed forces.
A video showing at least Panzer S short-range air defense system has serviced online.
The Panzer S1 was designed to provide point air defense, a military, industrial, and administrative installation against aircraft, helicopter, precision munitions, cruise missiles, and drones.
Here you see it.
It's quite a versatile Weapons system really very very impressive.
A confrontation between Iranian-backed forces and the U.S.
broke out on August 15 when two coalition bases in the northeast and southeast came under attack.
The U.S.
responded with a series of strikes targeting the positions of Iranian-backed forces between August 23 and 25.
Iranian-backed forces hit back by attacking three bases at the consulate, the SDF, and the Deir al-Zor.
Both sides sustained casualties.
The deployment of air defense here indicates the Russian military is planning to expand its presence, possibly to detour the U.S.-led coalition.
Russia was apparently triggered by the U.S.-led recent strikes on Iranian-based forces.
The newly deployed air defense will greatly limit the movement of coalition warplanes, especially combat drones, attack helicopters, and gunships.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, the U.S.
has been occupying the oil-rich production area on the eastern side of Syria since the takeover in 2014 and installation of ISIS under Obama, and Trump did absolutely nothing about it.
Syria's domestic oil production is about 88,000 barrels per day, but the United States has been stealing 66,000 barrels per day and shipping it through Turkey.
in Iraq in order to get it on the international market in our name and I'm really disappointed that we're still doing that and that's why they still have a refugee problem and that's why they cannot rebuild their country.
In addition, the eastern side of the country was the most productive agricultural region so they also end up having food issues in Syria so pretty unexplainable and Undesirable position for the United States to be in.
And Israel claimed that their missile strikes recently destroyed over a thousand Iranian missiles that had been stockpiled in Syria.
Whether that's true or not, who knows?
But Regardless, the day will come when missiles will rain on Tel Aviv that the Iron Shield will not stop.
And as far as I'm concerned, there's a group of people that deserve to get the wrath of God coming down on them.
Joe, I can't think of a single good reason to disagree.
Meanwhile, Biden likens a mega movement to semi-fascism.
How absurd is this?
Biden attempted to rile up the faithful when he threw out incendiary remarks against his Republican opposition.
The Democrat likened the mega-movement to semi-fascism.
This is only the latest attempt to smear the GOP with some sort of committee-approved branding to make it stick.
It ain't gonna work.
Not long ago it was Ultra Mega that died a quick death.
This is just the latest bummer sticker.
Speaking to Democratic fundraisers in Maryland, he foresaw the death knell of an extreme mega philosophy claimed as not just Trump before digging up the old fascist Attack.
Republicans did not take it lying down.
Nathan Brand, a spokesman for the RNC, called it despicable.
He hardly stopped there.
He noticed Biden forced taxpayers away from their jobs, moved money from working class to Ivy League lawyers, launched a recession, plunging Americans into a struggle to pay for gas and groceries, Biden didn't stop there either.
Previewing what'll be the Democrats' calling card through November and beyond, he asked if the audience would choose to move the country forward or back.
With a state of the economy, perhaps he should have been more specific.
He batted himself on the back for a laundry list of accomplishments.
Most of them involve legislation intended to make things happen and make things better, as opposed to moves that have actually established any results.
He boasted of White House effort to prevent gun violence, increase spending on infrastructure, prop up domestic computer chip manufacturing, increase veterans benefits, bring down costs and tackle climate change, all of which are noble, but with virtually no tangible results.
The endless effort by the White House to brand Republicans with anything that'll stick is not going to erase the failures of the Biden admin and Congressional Democrats.
Meanwhile, Jean Pierre insists mega-Republicans are the definition of fascism, but she doesn't even know the meaning of the word.
White House Press Secretary Corinne Jean-Pierre defended Biden's words of the U.S.
fascism to describe mega-Republicans, insisting the President's opponents are the very definition they're of.
I was very clear when laying out and defying what mega-Republicans are done.
You look at the definition of fascism, and you think what they're doing in attacking our democracy, what they're doing in taking away our freedoms, wanting to take away our rights, our voting rights, I mean, that is what that is.
It's very clear, and that's why Biden made that powerful speech.
On the news and why it matters, however, Blaze TV host Sarah Gonzalez took a look at the definition of fascism and concluded that a press secretary had not done her homework.
I can't think of anything that describes the left any better.
Look at what they're doing in just a simple fact of labeling people who are, quote, Trump supporters or anyone with a conservative value.
Identifying, labeling, then the category.
You know, some of us just ignore that person.
They have nefarious purpose, what they're doing with these labels.
Trump, conservative, small buzzwords.
Watch the video clip to see more.
Here we have the largest and, of course, the actual definitions that a totalitarian system may use violence to suppress the opposition and won't take no for an answer.
Words to that effect, Joe.
The definition clearly, as she observed, fits the left, not the mega movement.
Well, the father of fascism was Mussolini, and he said fascism should properly be called corporatism, for it is a merger of corporate and government interests.
Yeah, that's exactly what it is.
But to be honest, there is no difference between communism, fascism, Marxism, Nazism, progressivism, socialism, or any of the others.
They're all rebranded feudalism.
As I've said before, you only have two systems of social organization.
Either you have private property rights, free speech rights, and government by consent, or you do not.
And under any of those other systems, you do not have private property, free speech, or government by informed consent.
So basically, these People are all wrapping themselves in the wrong flag and they're projecting because absolutely everything they have done is 100% fascist, including weaponizing of every branch of the government.
This just up at the conservative treehouse.
Kash Patel confirmed seized documents from Mar-a-Lago raid were evidence showing DOJ and FBI corruption in the Trump-Russia probe.
So here we've had A corrupt DOJ and a corrupt FBI that has been after Donald Trump for six years, and we got this useless sock puppet up there telling us that we're semi-fascists?
Well, guess what?
You're total fascists, and we reject all forms of fascism, including the FJB style.
What a great ad, Joe!
Excellent!
Very, very good.
Meanwhile, Here's a Ben Garrison cartoon that hits the nail right on the head.
Here we got the ultra million dollar defamation case like a laser cutting up toward Alex Jones strapped down on a table representing free speech.
Do you expect me to talk?
And the New World Order replies, No, Mr. Jones, we expect you to shut up.
Joe, it all fits.
It all goes together.
Meanwhile, solved.
The mystery of America's first pandemic locked down.
The possibility was already in the air in early March 2020, and a handful of well-connected tech entrepreneurs with no experience in infectious disease, epidemiology, immunology, pandemic history were in charge of coming up with a plan.
Possibly the lockdowns, never attempted in the history of pandemic on this scale, was already in the air.
It had been floating around for 15 years, but China was the first to try it, and claimed fraudulently to have had enormous success.
Incredibly, the U.S.
was set to try it out too.
If it ain't Trump on board, it was going to take some doing.
The federal government had quarantine powers since 1944.
That was known.
How expansive could it be?
Thanks to journalistic accounts now, we have a better idea of what went on before the dreadful press conference of March 16, 2020, with Donald Trump, Anthony Fauci, and Deborah Birx announcing the lockdowns.
Along that came a flyer with tiny print, which the ever-trusting print apparently knew nothing.
Bars, restaurants, food courts, gyms, other indoor-outdoor venues where groups congregate should be closed.
Has anything like this ever happened?
I can't think of a case.
It shuts down only the places where people can congregate, but also everywhere they might congregate.
Churches, AA meetings, civic clubs, libraries, museums, homes.
And this happened under Trump's watch.
There ought to be a word to describe something more extreme than totalitarianism.
There are a number in Trump's circle who provide panicked and confused enough to embrace the idea, but who actually wrote the words on the sheet?
We cannot say for sure, but Trump's son-in-law, Jared Kushner, played an important role.
He enlisted two close friends from college to help, Nate Turner and Adam Boehler.
Both are graduates of the Wharton School, like Trump.
Jared somehow believed they knew something about pandemics because they worked in the healthcare industry, so he called them.
Well, we're headed to 60 billion.
U.S.
International Development Financial Corporation still does.
It's only one that throws contracts and cash the big shots in the industry.
Previously, U.S.
had landmark health delivery, which meaning new business and finance, not public health.
As for Turner, he's a serial entrepreneur who got to start selling snakes, literally selling snakes, from his parents' garage.
He founded an agency for advertising, sold to Google 10 years later, Invite Media, for more than 70 mil.
His company, Flatiron, oncology-related electronic record software, sold to Roche in 2018 for $1.9 billion.
He's a clever guy at making millions.
He's now a billionaire investor at an implausibly young age and Google-owned.
The book Nightmare Scenario explains what happened, yeah.
We're going to turn a broad into a room in a basement, start calling people.
Over the weekend, I put together recommendations circulating with Burks and Fauci.
They went, before they presented them to Trump, they wanted a shutdown in-person education, close indoor dining, rest in bars, cancel travel.
Berks and Fauci saw them as a critical pause that would buy them time to better understand the pandemic.
Shutting down flights was not enough.
More would have to be done.
Oler, Kushner, Berks, Fauci, and other aide present Trump with a recommendation days later, anxious over what he might say.
Kushner had been preparing Trump for the possibility they were going to need to take more draconian actions.
This is not a speculation.
Kushner tells a similar story in his new book.
On the way to the White House early the next morning, March 12, my billionaire investor brother Josh called from New York City describing worrisome signs.
The city had canceled its St.
Patrick's Day parade.
Thousands were self-quarantining.
Millions were leaving the city.
When I told him I was asked to jump in, he made a suggestion.
Call Adam.
Call Adam.
Why not?
A public health?
Why not, for example, as an alternative, call a public health scientist?
Someone with expertise with viruses?
A medical doctor?
Someone with actual knowledge?
No.
It was entirely a crony operation.
Privileged fools about to take over the private lives of hundreds of millions.
Bowler was a perfect person to help, because he had the skills to overcome the fierce rivalries in the healthcare team.
Bowler and I huddled in my office, sketching out how we could help with testing and supplies.
We called our mutual friend and successful healthcare interpreter, Nat Turner.
As we dealt with shorting cotton swabs and supplies, we faced another problem, the need to develop public health guidelines.
Stop right there and think about it.
They needed guidelines for the rest of us to follow.
For reasons of politics and public relations, after all, they surely are the masters of the press.
Given that people were confused and concerned, Birx and Fossey have been discussing the need for federal standards to understand what to do to be safe and slow the spread.
They insisted they would help prevent hospitals from becoming overwhelmed.
Despite all the talk over the past week, no one had taken steps to produce a document when Nate Turner flagged the issue.
So it's Nate Turner who pointed out no one had issued any word.
Good call, dude.
Someone needs to get right on that.
Just open up a Google Doc and get to work on writing out the federal plan for the whole country.
And you have a two-hour deadline.
I asked him to coordinate with Derek Lyons, produce a draft.
Dr. Stan Gottlieb, former head of the FDA, renowned public health expert.
I've been trying to persuade him to come back into government.
We called him.
He was grateful we were preparing guidelines.
They should go a bit further than you're comfortable with, he said.
When we feel you're doing more than you should, that's a sign you're doing them right.
Brilliant.
This whole scene truly boggles the mind.
Phone calls, rushed doc, friends of friends, pharma executives, people in the know.
The result was a doc that shut down the U.S.
and the world, all banged up by rank amateurs with ungodly privilege with nary a thought of asking disinterested experts.
Whatever they type would affect the live 333 million coast-to-coast.
Do they think?
Do they even care?
The result?
Trump agreed to the guidelines which led to the most momentous lockdown decision in the history of public health, even in all of human history.
It locked down hospitals, nursing homes, every commercial establishment in the country except those deemed essential.
Holmes even took a hit.
No more than 10 can come to your home for dinner.
So let's get this straight.
The decision, which wrecked every life in the U.S.
and all over the world, and eventually caused the loss of a presidency in the Congress, was made by a handful of well-connected interpreters with zero experience in infectious disease, epidemiology, immunology, pandemic history, or anything other than management and business classes at the Wharton School.
With close Google connections.
And they did this in cooperation with one named board member of Big Pharma, which ended up making billions from mandate vaccines forced on the American people.
And Google made a mint.
Apparently this is the true story.
The world was wracked by a literal snake salesman, the Google-funded inventor of DoorDash for medicine, a big-pharma exec, some bureaucrat who lived off of age, largesse, an octogenarian media star who'd been in government for 40 years, plus the son-in-law of an easily bamboozled name-brand purveyor who imagined his year as a CEO that he could shut down the country and then turn it back on.
They constituted a plethora of elites who scammed their way to the top and deployed their newfound power in grossly immoral ways and wrecked the country and others.
Now, there's more to this story.
While they were deliberating, the DHHS had already issued a lockdown order marked as classified, so it was already in the cards.
Maybe the bozos only believed they were in charge when the real power was higher up.
It's like a kaleidoscope that never stops turning.
What we know now is already enough of a scandal.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes.
Well, the top of that scandal pyramid was Alex Azar, who got a degree in, let's see, 1988 from Dartmouth.
Ooh, he's Ivy League.
In economics, and then he got a Yale law degree.
Whoo!
He's Ivy League in 1991.
Then he was the top lobbyist for 10 years for Eli Lilly, and then they made him president of Eli Lilly.
So do you think he's going to do anything that hurts Eli Lilly?
Mmm, doubtful.
I can't tell you how dehumanizing it was for the government to tell us that 90% of the people in the country were non-essential.
It was just the most horrible feeling of my life to walk around and go, There's nothing you can do.
I mean, the government can take anything they want, they can put you in a box, they can put a mask on your face, they can come in, break down your door and jab you.
You have absolutely no rights as a human being in this country at all.
It was absolutely...
Shattering!
And that's why I went to every lockdown rally that I could go to and every Open Texas rally.
I attended probably 30 of them in the 18-month period where we were still enduring this mindless crap.
And I wore a mask reluctantly one or two times for no more than 10 or 15 minutes before I took it off and said, the hell with your mask, I'm not ever wearing one.
So, matter of fact, the funny thing was, They wouldn't let you in the grocery store without a mask.
So on 4th of July, since they weren't allowing fireworks in 2020, I said, well, I'll wear a mask, but I'll just loop it around my ears and put it on top of my head.
So I walked into the grocery store, did all of my shopping, got up to the checkout stand.
The guy says, nice mask.
I go, yeah, well, it does as much good on top of my head as it does on the front of my face.
And he goes, I know, isn't it stupid?
It was like, you know, a lot of people knew how stupid it was.
It's just amazing the level of sheepiness in this country.
It's just like, well, okay, you're the government and I'm non-essential, so I'll just go back to grazing and hope that I'm the last sheep you kill.
It's crazy.
Absolutely crazy.
It is, Joe.
I can't tell you how many are because I probably should explain that the masks do no good and actually do a lot of harm.
Mine just promised never to let an election be stolen again, so which election is he talking about?
Haven't we been told for the last two years the elections are safe and secure and beyond corruption?
We've been told anyone who questions our electoral integrity is a threat to democracy and leading the American people down a path of lies.
Strange then that President Biden told a group of rally goers that Democrats have plans to make sure no one, no one ever has the opportunity to steal an election again.
If we elected two more senators, we gave the House and Democrats, we're going to get a lot of unfinished business done.
Folks, look, we'll codify Wolfie Wade, we'll ban assault weapons, we'll protect Social Security, we'll pass universal pre-care, we'll just restore the childhood tax credit, we'll protect voting rights, we'll pass election reform and make sure no one, no one ever has the opportunity to steal an election again.
Meanwhile, Trump has raised millions off the FBI's recent raid.
According to reports, he's benefiting greatly—and in more ways than one.
The Washington Post's Jeff Dawsey and Isaac Ornsdorf claimed Wednesday Trump's political action to save America made a million in just a couple of days—two days, citing two people familiar with the data.
They say the daily hauls soared from the usual level of $200,000 to $300,000.
Both reported the donation continued above average for several more days, that the number of donors in the average donations have increased.
Save America has collected more than $100 million since Trump's term ended in January of 2021.
The financial windfall also offers a clear indication Trump is benefiting politically from the information he's being looked into by the DOJ for possible violations of the Espionage Act.
Trump and his followers have frequently bragged the search warrant will harm Biden and unite Republicans in email, social media, and right-wing media pieces.
Those who are not automatically full-throated in protecting Trump made sympathetic words in response to the search, including Mitch McConnell and even former Vice President Mike Pence.
Liz Cheney, however, whom Trump made a top target for replacement, was soundly defeated by Wyoming primary voters.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, we have a really totally defective election system in this country.
Turns out that Hillary Clinton won Texas.
But it's not the popular vote in Texas that decides who the primary winner is.
It's the caucuses and the committee meetings that they hold after that.
So, after the polls close in Texas at 7 o'clock, people are gathered at the polling place and they separate them by Democrats and Republicans so we don't get into fistfights.
Uh, they each pick delegates to go to the state convention.
At the state convention, they pick the primary winner.
So what happened was in Texas, there was an enormous outpouring of people with a high tribal Element in their social culture, and they decided it was time for not the first woman president, but the first black president.
So they overrode the vote that Reptillery had in Texas, where she won the Texas voting primary, but she did not win the caucuses.
And when the state convention met, we gave the prize to Obama.
And there were several states where that happened.
So, you know, if you want to complain about something, you can go back all the way to 2008, talk about stolen elections.
Although it looks like they've been stolen throughout the country's history.
So, you know, that's a whole different subject.
But moving forward, if you think donating to Trump is going to solve your problem, yeah, this just popped up yesterday at truenewsamerica.com.
SCOTUS crushes attempt to rig midterms by Texas RINOs.
And so we have a whole list of these RINOs that signed a lawsuit Demanding that there be no independents and no libertarians allowed on the 2022 ballot in Texas.
And that affected 23 seats where these people had gotten enough signatures and qualified to be candidates on the ballots.
And here we have our rhinos, which includes my former U.S. Congressman, which I got redistricted out of his district, Michael McCall.
And it also includes our Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick.
So if you think by donating to the RNC that you're in some way helping democracy, you're not.
You're feeding an absolute monstrous beast.
And I wouldn't give money to Donald Trump because it gets filtered through the prince and princess cushy accounts and they end up skimming a bunch off of themselves.
So the whole process of, you know, supporting a political candidate at this point is untrustworthy because, just like you mentioned, there's things about Trump that are not completely trustworthy, even though, you know, like they say, the lesser of two evils is still evil, so.
I don't care if the lesser of two evils is still evil.
It's still the lesser, Joe, and you better get that through your skull because I don't like all this trashing of Trump.
I do not.
I attended three of his rallies and stood in line for 12 hours to go to him.
I voted for him twice and is the only Republican and the only Democrat that I ever voted for, because I never voted for anybody but a third party candidate my whole entire life.
I can be disappointed with the man's failure, and especially since he hasn't apologized for a single one of them.
That's the part that pisses me off.
I'm hoping he's going to come around, Joe.
And that was commendable of you.
I had voted twice for Bill Clinton.
I voted twice for Barack Obama.
But when Donald Trump came into the scene, he was a whole fresh breath of air.
And I have reservations.
But I'm telling you, if you look out there, there's he and DeSantis are the two who can straighten this shit out.
And I anticipate they're going to run together in 2024.
I voted twice for Ross Perot, three times for Ron Paul, and three times for Ralph Nader.
So there you go.
I put my guys up.
I love it, Joe.
I voted for John Anderson in 1980 instead of voting for Ronald Reagan.
And I voted for, what was his name?
I voted for John Anderson in 1980 instead of voting for Ronald Reagan.
And I voted for, what was his name?
Dr. Spock in my first election in 1972.
I voted for Dr. Spock instead of voting for Nixon or McGovern.
So, you know, I'm way back on this thing as far as being independent.
I love it, Joe.
I love it.
My thought was this.
If you're going to support a candidate, You know, they're all flawed.
There are no flawless candidates out there.
But in my opinion, it's Trump and DeSantis who can make a difference here.
So even if some is going to be skimmed off, as you say, that's not a reason, in my opinion, to not support them.
I love your history of voting.
That's fascinating.
Meanwhile, we have quite a remarkable piece by Mary Maxwell, who's both a PhD and an LLB.
Error quorum nobis in the Bushmaster case.
This is the San Diego case where I sought to intervene but was denied.
I have the impression the gun industry is now in the clutches of the U.S.
government.
In a recent case in which a gun manufacturer was sued for its part in a school shootout, the party settled for 73 mil.
I've now approached the Connecticut court to petition a writ of error quorum nobis.
My motive for taking the action is almost nothing to do with gun rights, but with truth rights.
We citizens have a right to see that the court is not yet another area of our life where lying runs rampant.
Note!
This procedure for asking for a writ is many centuries old.
Someone alerts the court, actually the king, to the fact the court has been defrauded.
The phrase error quorum nobis means there's an error in the things before us.
The Latin word for us, nobis, refers to the royal we, the king.
To the Connecticut Superior Court Waterbury, August 19, from Mary Maxwell.
In regard to the February 2022 settlement of Donna Soto versus Bushmaster Firearms, this is a petition respectfully submitted for writ of vericorum novus.
This refers to a common law writ for federal law Protected by the All Writs Act of 1911, as expressed at 28 U.S.C.
1651 as, the Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdiction and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.
In regard to fraud upon the court, the President's Hazel Atlas Glass v. Atwood, Justice Robert Jackson wrote back in 1944, More fraud is more odious than an attempt to subvert the administration of justice.
The court is unanimous in condemning the transaction disclosed by this record.
The resources of the law are ample to undo the wrong and to pursue the wrongdoer.
Remedies are available to purge recreat officers from the tribunals on whom the fraud was practiced.
Finally, to nullify the judgment if the fraud procured it, such a proceeding is required by settled federal law.
Earlier in 1827, Justice Story said, Every court must be presumed to exercise those powers belonging to it, which are necessary for the promotion of public justice.
And we do not doubt that this court possesses a power to reinstate any cause dismissed by Ms.
State.
The case at hand is a settlement of approximately $73 million, approved by the Connecticut Superior Court, brought by the estates of nine persons who allegedly died Who, on December 14, 2012, at the hands of a man using a gun known as a Bushmaster, manufactured by Remington Arms.
The Supreme Court first rejected the case as federal law gives manufacturers of guns some protection for the consequences of how that gun gets used.
However, on appeal, the Connecticut Supreme Court granted Soto et al.
the right to sue under the provision of a state consumer law dealing with the way a product is marketed.
In this instance, it was ruled the Bushmaster was marketed to young at-risk males.
The way in which I see the court as having been defrauded is the case was not genuinely adversarial.
The court was used as a backdrop for what is known as a PSYOP.
I believe the shooting never occurred and the entire story of the Sandy Hook Elementary School Massacre, 20 children and six educators, is a story concocted by various persons somewhat like a false flag.
I have authored the book, unreality Sandy Hook messes minds based on researching the case.
The following very odd things that occurred during the eight-year life of Soto v. Bushmaster suggests it was never adversarial and that both the plaintiffs and the defendant were in on it.
First, the party being sued, Remington Bushmaster did not seek discovery or cross-examine any witnesses.
2.
Although other guns were allegedly found at the scene at 6 hours and a clock, the defendant Bushmaster did not attempt to say that those guns did the killing.
3.
Although a Bushmaster gun is extremely noisy, its sound cannot be heard on the school's audio for December 14, 2012, yet the defendant did not present this negative evidence. 4.
Although a helicopter camera had shown, close to the time of the event, that a man had put a rifle in the trunk of a car and thus it was not carried into the school, Bushmaster did not offer this rebuttal of the plaintiff's claim.
Five.
When James Fetzer moved to intervene in this case to show that no one died, the defendant, Bushmaster, who would benefit from Fetzer's presentation, opposed his request.
Six.
For no apparent reason, Bushmaster requested the school records of the 20 children.
This gave the plaintiffs an opportunity to ask the court to protect the privacy of the alleged child victims.
Hence, in contrast to the public's right to see such records, the court granted the request that they be sealed.
17 oddly 17 of the allegedly bereaved families did not join this very lucrative case, and one teacher allegedly wounded by the gun, Natalie Hammond, withdrew her name.
Why?
That's it's far from a fight between two parties.
This lawsuit was more like a Soviet show trial.
It fulfilled objectives certain factions are attempting to achieve, namely the weakening of both our Second Amendment right to bear arms and our First Amendment right to free speech.
I identify four other likely objectives of the trial.
To intimidate citizens from continuing to shout false flag.
To dissuade manufacturers from gun making.
To cause persons who are skeptical of Sandy Hook to feel confused and frustrated.
And to make it appear that courts are under someone's control.
Of course, that last is unbearable for any person who understands America's claim to greatness is based upon the rule of law.
A kinetic woman named Maureen Crowley surrendered her opinion on social media that the Sandy Hook psyop involved not only Homeland Security, the FBI, and FEMA, but also organized crime.
If this is so, everyone, including judges, may be frightened into silence.
Therefore, it is a public duty of citizens to protect court personnel.
That is why I am here petitioning for a writ of error, quorum nobis.
In his online book, Sandy Hook Truth, Memo de Potus, the late whistleblower David Steele said, I manage a pulse-like event for Central Intelligence in my capacity as a clandestine operation officer stationed overseas.
I have personal experience with legalized lying, whereby ostensible orders from the highest authority mandate lying to the court and lying to the media and the public in support of national security objectives.
Individuals ordered to lie are offered both full immunity and severe penalties if they fail to lie as ordered.
Sidney Powell's 2014 book, License to Lie, is about the Department of Justice lies.
But there it is, the prosecutors are granted immunity.
Lying to court is dramatically opposed to achieving justice.
Truth is of very great value, and we need Connecticut court to act now to protect it in England.
Writ for the correction of error can be granted only if this king has signed.
Fiat justae ruet saliam.
Let justice be done, even if the heavens fall.
Some words of inspiration as follows.
No man is wise at all times or is without his blind side.
Desiderius Erasmus in The Alchemist, 1497.
All truths wait in all things.
They neither hasten their own delivery nor resist it.
Only what proves itself to every man and woman is so.
Only what nobody denies is so.
Walt Whitman, I celebrate myself 1855.
It is written that my house is a house of prayer, but you have made it a Den of Thieves, Matthew 21, 13, King James Version.
Very respectfully yours, Mary Maxwell, PhD, LLB.
Joe, I like that.
Your thoughts?
Very sound reasoning, but you know, how far is it going to go?
Turns out the $73 million settlement was not by Bushmaster, which had already declared bankruptcy, but by the four insurance companies that had jointly signed on to insure guns.
And you can guarantee what the insurance companies are thinking is, Gee, if we can just force everybody in the country to have insurance for every one of their guns, we'll collect an enormous amount of premiums.
And now we can already show that we've got a deficit that we need to make up.
So this gives us something to amateurize the cost for that new insurance that everybody's going to have to renew every year.
So that's where they're headed with this particular nefarious runaround on the Second Amendment.
And I don't know what to say.
What part of shall not be infringed can you not Not break.
These people are absolutely horrible human beings, and I'm sorry, but I don't find anything of value anywhere in the New England area.
Joe, that was just sensational.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail to broercon to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
I was at two local music concert in Vail last night.
Not one person seen in a mask, and there were 3,000 people there.
As back as normal as we get.
Not wearing a mask, he meant.
and if he was given an autopsy, he would likely be blamed on that new thing called sudden adult death syndrome or whatever the hell they use as a current term.
I was at two local music concert in Vail last night, not one person seen in a mass and there were 3000 people there.
As back as normal as we get, not wearing a mask, he meant everybody was having a great time.
Halfway through the drummer collapsed and convulsions or seizure.
Don't know there's a difference.
The concert ended right there as an ambulance showed up a few minutes later.
The band's leader owns a club that requires vaccine certification to enter as soon as the vax was available.
It's pretty safe to say everyone in his band took the shot.
Hard to say if it was related to the vax.
I should have read them in the opposite order.
Because he's saying, we'll never know since autopsies now are apparently verboten.
What in the name of all that's holy, unholy, or someplace in between is this country becoming?
So someone can call some law enforcement agency and suck them out an innocent person without consequences?
That could easily be proven to be attempted murder, could it not?
How many times, how many ways can we cross a Rubicon and still live under the illusion of a sane society?
Madness has become the norm, and common sense wrapped in rational thinking and humanness has taken second, maybe even third place.
Someone wanted to get me killed, representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, response to being swatted two nights in a row.
Quickly, she jumped out of bed, got dressed, Walked to the front door.
By instinct, she reached for a gun, though something told her to put it down.
The decision to not take her gun may have saved her life.
At her front porch were five police officers with their guns ready.
They told the confused promised woman they were responding to a report of a fatal shooting at her house.
A man shot five times in a bathtub, with a woman and children still at the residence, indicating violence could escalate.
Meanwhile, remember, all but one of my books are still available, even though they've been banned by Amazon.com.
Check out Moonrock Books.
While you cannot get Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, you can get And Nobody Died in Boston, either.
You can get From Orlando to Dallas and Beyond.
You can get Political Theater in Charlottesville.
You can get The Parkland Puzzle, How the Pieces Fit Together.
You can get And I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
Check it out.
These are books you don't want to miss.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes, well, it's another day in paradise.
It looks like the starter on my van just decided to quit, so I think I'll be calling the tow service here in a little while.
Oh well, life goes on.
Anyhow, Joe, you're doing a sensational job and I want to compliment you profoundly for that observation about the insurance companies.
I not only sought to intervene in the Bushmaster case and was rejected by both sides.
I sought to intervene in all three of the Alex Jones cases and was also rejected by both sides.
But I think you put your finger on it.
The insurance companies are willing to shell out $73 million because they're setting a precedent.
They want every gun owner to have to have gun insurance, and they're going to make billions.
It's a modest investment.
It's like Larry Silverstein.
He revised the insurance coverage for the World Trade Center when it came into possession just six weeks before 9-11.
And because, purportedly, two plane attacks, he claimed double indemnity and was awarded over $4.5 billion for a $114 million investment.
I think you've hit the nail right on the head, Joe.
These insurance companies know where their bread is buttered.
They want to make big bucks off of this.
And the best way to move forward is to support the hoax of Sandy Hook.
I commend you, my friend.
Brilliant.
And needless to add, if we have intermittent differences about one particular figure, Donald J. Trump, so is the whole country, right?
I continue to believe he's our best hope for the future of regaining some sanity, restoring America, saving America.
I stand with Trump, notwithstanding his flaws.
Understand, the man is flawed, but he's a great hero, and he believes in America, and it's All too god-awful obvious that Democrats do not.
Don't let yourself be played.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, friends, your loved ones, because we do not know how much time we have left.
We're hoping Joe gets his starter fix and will rejoin us tomorrow for another installment of Need to Know.
▲
Export Selection