All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 22, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:44
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (21 August 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks.
This is Truth vs. News here on August the 21st.
We're right in the middle of talking about the pandemic and the shots and other problems.
And I guess, Holly, you want to have your say here, right?
Well, I just wanted to say it's become more and more obvious that this, you know, best case scenario, this was an opportunity to create more and more victims or a bit more and more business ventures for the pharmaceutical industry, the people who actually have lived through it, who are suffering from major complications or death from what has happened over the past couple of years.
They need all of this for the biometric tracking that they want to institute.
So if you've got people who are critically ill and need to have their heart monitored 24-7 because suddenly they've got heart problems, this provides an opportunity to do so as well.
And I'm sure insurance will accommodate that.
And just regarding the article that Jim read about the woman who said, who possibly contracted somehow the Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, that's also known as mad cow disease, prion disease of the brain, or Kuru.
And that's probably why a lot of that information has been scrubbed, as you had mentioned before.
Yeah, because while it should be very rare, it appears that with a vax, it's not so rare at all.
And I think that's what they're trying to conceal.
Don has put up a lovely photograph of someone with monkey box.
We sure appreciate that, Don.
Meanwhile, Monkeypox vaccine virtues signaling more bug eating, depopulation rhetoric, and tribal politics distracting from 13 more sudden deaths.
Good timing, Don!
Another week, another Democrat politician repeating the official cult of COVID slogan after testing positive.
Stacey Abrams, no less.
This morning, I took my daily COVID test and tested positive.
Before my speech, I tested negative.
Today, I'm experiencing mild symptoms and I'm grateful to have been vaccinated and boosted.
What happy horseshit is that?
Biden won't be able to speak in complete sentences at all by 2014, meaning Democrats need an heir apparent.
Kamala or Buttigieg would essentially be gifting the GOP the White House in 2024.
An openly homosexual male can't win the White House, particularly as Americans are more loudly opposing that agenda.
That leaves hyper-partisan Gavin Newsom, aka Gruesome Newsom, and retreads like Bernie Sanders and Amy Klobuchar as their only realistic options.
But the semi-fresh face that makes sense is Abrams.
She's unlikely to beat Georgia Governor Brian Kemp in their forthcoming rematch in November once she loses.
Expect Democrats have propped Abrams up as a 2024 presidential candidate.
COVID is still an effective campaign tool in 2022, but it's becoming less fashionable by the day.
The CDC basically slapped all the most loyal COVID cultists in the face last week.
When it issued new COVID-19 guidance, it says, CDC's COVID prevention recommendation no longer differentiate based on person vaccination status because breakthrough infections occur, though they are generally mild.
The CDC also eliminate quarantining from its guidelines and de-emphasize social distancing, but it still recommends endless booster injections to make sure they're killing as many as they can.
The diehard cultists, being the 107 million who've already received at least one booster shot, and those willing to do anything to keep jobs, will continue receiving more gene therapy every few months until they die.
But monkeypox is a new hip disease, and the social dynamics surrounding its vaccine are playing out the exact same way as so-called COVID vaccines did in 2021 through today.
Going to get my monkey pox vaccine tweets read.
Hope no one thinks I'm gay or anything.
Go get your monkey pox.
Saju Matthew MD MPH.
I just got my monkey pox.
Very organized.
I got the regular subcutaneous injection.
You get a free rapid HIV test after they give out free COVID test kits and condoms.
Side effects to shot can be pain at injection site and fever second in four weeks.
Subtly undermine how this is primarily a gay disease.
We're also likely to start seeing I got my polio vaccine post soon.
The UK declared a polio outbook in June.
The problem is the declaration came as the government was also admitting there were no reported cases of polio.
Nevertheless, they commenced on an urgent polio booster vaccine rollout for last week, despite admitting they've no new wild cases since 2003.
How absurd is this?
The British Health Security Agency also admitted their primary concern with polio is a vaccine-derived virus.
In other words, they're admitting nearly all the new polio cases in the world are caused by the polio vaccine.
But our coercing British parents to get their kids vaccinated with the injections that cause the vaccine-derived polio.
The jokes literally write themselves, yet a majority of the Western world fails to understand the punchline.
The goals are fear and compliance to eliminate all the low-hanging fruit populations.
It's only a matter of time before the COVID blog is covering daily monkeypox and polio vaccine deaths and adverse reactions as well.
Meanwhile, a massless Fauci lecture's crowd of masked people about wearing masks.
Just when you thought Fauci would go away, After his wishy-washy retirement last month, Fauci was at the Fred Hutchison Cancer Center in Seattle.
That's your territory, Don, on August 9th.
Well, I hope you turned out to see him.
He accepted the Hutch Award, named after former Major League Baseball player and manager Fred Hutchison, who died of lung cancer in 1964.
The award has been presented annually to the MLB Major League Baseball player who best exemplifies a fighting spirit and competitive desire, Mr. Hutchinson.
It was begun in 1965 with baseball greats like Sandy Koufax, Mickey Mantle, Willie McCovey, and Johnny Bench among the recipients.
But any and all credibility and prestige the award may have had was erased last week when Fauci was given the 2022 Hutch Award instead of a baseball player.
Fauci sat down with his friend at Hutch's and cancer center virologist and director Dr. Larry Corey for a two-hour conversation.
A large chunk of which centered around so-called COVID-19.
He first regurgitated the safe and effective fallacy, then said some people don't want a shot simply because we are telling them to get vaccinated.
He also told a roomful of masked people how important masks are in public settings while not wearing a mask himself in a public setting.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, of course, I like to think Fauci, after due process of law, is executed in the most, well, perhaps death by a million injections.
Let him feel what millions of people have suffered at his maniacy.
I think all of this, you know, is inevitably showing a society that is so devolved, so mentally retarded, so They're perversely ignorant and sick and and comfortable in their lobotomized state that they're rushing headlong like lemmings into oblivion by altering their body with a genetic modifying DNA RNA.
A program that has nothing to do with eliminating coughs or colds or flu, but everything to do to re-engineer your body with spike proteins endlessly coming out.
This is the death, the death jab.
Somebody sent me a very interesting email that said the reason for the Georgia Guidestones being blown up was because they have achieved their purpose.
They have eliminated the population that they forecasted, predicted, and wanted to eliminate with this jab.
So they blew up the evidence.
That's a very plausible explanation.
But, you know, the death that's going to be coming, the mental breakdown, the slowing of this, I mean, people are going to become subhumans as this vaccine really degenerates the body and mind.
So I think we're going to witness, you know, in a sense, an annihilation of the West and the statistics that show, you know, children are 1,400% more likely to die if they're vaccinated than if they're unvaccinated is appalling.
So this and the monkey box thing, you want to eliminate monkey box, stop homosexual sodomy, outlaw sodomy, and you'll stop all the monkey box spreading.
And, you know, I mean, This whole monkey pox thing is, you know, who are getting it?
Homosexuals and fornicators and those who live with lascivious sexual depravity.
Well, they deserve the pox and the death and the disease they get for that kind of moral rebellion.
Jim?
Well, they're far removed from eliminating $7.5 billion, which would be necessary to get to $500 million.
I believe it was a lightning strike, and if one wants to regard that as the hand of God, I'm not going to argue with them about it, but it was well-deserved.
And once it was partially destroyed, they took it all down.
Don, your thoughts?
Yeah, real quickly, a bulletin here from CNN News last night.
The monkey pox has been created into a panic or into an emergency in King County.
I'm in Seattle in King County right here and I think we've had a couple cases here and there's 1,400 cases I guess in all of America with 7.9 billion people and so it's a real emergency but uh and so no this is it's according to science it's all about political science and control they can't let go of that control it got you It's very similar.
It's political science indeed, Don.
Not political science per se, but science politicized.
Holly, your thoughts?
It's very similar.
I think that's why they rolled out Fauci again, because they were so successful with the AIDS and HIV scare and the panic that they rolled a cause.
They made mainstream news and families believe that everyone was going to have AIDS by the year two It was just gonna be like some common thing like it was all over the TV and Oprah and Fauci rolled it out.
He was instrumental behind that.
Then we've done videos about this and shows about You know, all the ways in which they tortured and murdered people under the guise of like, you know, AIDS treatment and HIV treatment and the way that they're able to control and just terrorize people.
And I remember the tail end of it just as a little kid being terrified of like getting AIDS or HIV from someone and like, you know, touching someone's Band-Aid or something I got by accident, like being scared of getting AIDS.
So I think they rolled him out just because he was so successful.
That was such a successful operation.
Terrorizing people that they had to do this again and of course they're going to do this again with polio just because they were successful in terrorizing people over that as well and it is a litmus test basically at this point like a would you believe and there are going to be people who will believe and will sign up no matter what.
And remember, it was a great achievement to eradicate polio.
So the only way they can have polio back is by bringing it back from residual samples they had in laboratories.
There's no possible way this could be a natural phenomenon.
Stunning stuff!
Meanwhile, 20% of electric vehicle owners couldn't charge their EVs at public charging stations.
How about that?
As a Biden admin pushes electric vehicles, thousands of EV owners report they couldn't charge their electric cars at public charging stations, according to a new poll.
J.D.
Power, a consumer research data and analytics firm, released its second annual U.S.
electric vehicle experience public charging study on Wednesday.
They interviewed 11,554 electric vehicle and plug-in hybrid vehicle owners from January through June of 2022.
They found 20% of electric vehicle owners couldn't charge their EVs at public charging stations.
The study finds that one out of every five respondents ended up not charging their vehicles during their visit, J.D.
Power reported.
Of those who didn't charge, 72% indicated it was due to the station malfunctioning or being out of service.
Kent Gruber, Executive Director of Global Automotive at J.D.
Power, said in a statement, not only is the availability of public charging still an obstacle, but EV owners continue to be faced with charging station equipment that is inoperable.
This week, the New York Times published an article titled, Frustrating Hassle Holding Electric Cars Back, Broken Chargers.
Owners of battery-powered cars sometimes struggle to refuel on long trips because public chargers don't work or malfunction while cars are plugged in, the Times article read.
There are an estimated 41,000 public EV charging stations in the U.S.
President Biden authorized Wayne $7.5 billion to expand the charging infrastructure to hit a target of 500,000 electric vehicle charging stations by 2030.
Gruber pointed out that just adding stations isn't the answer.
The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program will lead to a sizable growth in the availability of EV charging stations, but just adding stations isn't the answer.
Stations need to be added to areas where there are current gaps in heavily traveled routes and in high-density areas for people who don't have access to residential charging, but most importantly, Designed with things for users to do while charging, regardless of the use case.
They're going to have endless hours on their hands waiting for their damn car to be charged.
Despite supply chain issues, electric vehicle sales, including plug-in hydrants, spiked 41% in the first half of 2022, compared to the same time frame last year, according to Urban Science.
EVs represent 6.2% of all U.S.
car sales in the first six months of 2022 versus 3.6% in 2021.
The JV Power Study did not reveal the exact reason as to why the remaining 28% of EV owners couldn't charge their cars.
A possible reason is they may not have charged their cars at a public charging station.
It could be lengthy wait times.
This is going to drive people out of their skulls when they discover they've got to spend hours to charge when they could spend five minutes replenishing their gas tank.
In March, a woman posted a video of a long line of Tesla owners waiting to charge their vehicles in Louisiana.
The woman who took the video spoke to one of the EV owners, and he said it normally takes 30 minutes to charge, but the demand was so high it took over an hour to charge one car.
In November 2019, a video of a massive line of Tesla automobiles in line went viral.
Scott, your thoughts?
I can't wait to see that line and just have my head out the window and cackle and laugh at them.
Flip them the middle finger sign of diplomacy.
They deserve what they're getting.
These morons who rush to electric cars not to save the environment because of their arrogant virtue signaling.
I'm better than you.
I'm so enlightened and healthy and I'm doing something to protect the environment from climate change.
All this nonsense.
When you look at the practical engineering realities of Electric cars.
We don't have the grid.
We don't have the infrastructure.
We don't have the means of This sort of capacity and what you're describing I think is the inevitability We just had a power again power outages all over the place power outage today in California for over an hour so this is only going to get worse and And quite frankly, again, all of these people who got these shots, you're going to see a marked degeneration of their intellectual capacities.
And as people become stupider, society and the infrastructure of civilization is going to be running down, breaking down, and no one's going to be able to, you know, manage it.
So I really think we're going to go We're gonna go pretty low, but it'll come back up.
But I think this electric car thing is a laughable joke.
Jim?
Well, think of the devastation when the electric grid goes down and everything is frozen because everything's gone electric to go green.
I mean, it's just absurd.
The stupidity is monumental.
Hawley, your thoughts?
Well, I've seen some information, big push to get all these electric vehicles out there.
Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, which was just a big opportunity to print a bunch of money and invest in the green infrastructure, pushes a lot of this stupid electric vehicle nonsense.
In theory, electric vehicles could be useful in some ways, but the ones that they're running right now, it can't even compare to the combustible engines.
So the batteries and everything like that, and you've got to use coal-fired plants to charge these batteries, and you're looking at the lithium and all the different Rare earth minerals that need to be mined from third world countries in order to make these batteries, which the more that you charge it, the less charge it has, like a cell phone battery or something like that.
So it's absolutely ridiculous in and of itself.
But we're also seeing central banks, Bank of Australia just put out their intention to support electric vehicles.
They're no longer going to offer car loans for combustible engines, for diesel engines or petrol in Australia.
They're only going to offer car loans for electric vehicles now.
So people are being forced to start to have to buy this crap.
And we've seen Ford and GM trying to commit to electric vehicles by 2025.
I mean, that's in a couple of years.
And the technology that they're putting out right now completely sucks.
So it's obviously that they're just trying to get people not be able to travel outside of their, you know, local community or local zone and just control people's means of travel at this point.
That's a very important point.
It drastically reduces your mobility.
So if you consider your freedom to travel as a very important component thereof, you're going to be dramatically restricted.
I've long felt electric cars would be good for a second vehicle to use around town, but the idea For a long trip to take electric vehicle is completely stupid beyond belief, and the amount of time it takes charging, people are spending all their time in convenience stores, restaurants, they're getting fat on fast food, they're going out of their minds because what used to take five minutes now takes hours, their trips are being expanded Vastly, instead of two to three hours, they're now seven or eight.
Think about it.
The effects of damage done to your life by electric vehicles is overwhelming.
Just, yeah, Don.
Overwhelming.
Meanwhile, Electric vehicle subsidies take cash from ordinary Americans to benefit the rich.
Here's another reason.
The Inflation Reduction Act, which is not going to reduce inflation, includes hidden subsidies for electric vehicles.
We heard a lot from Democrats, Joe Biden, the media, and environmentalists about how great the Inflation Reduction Act will be for climate change.
Curiously, it was crickets over the new law's central claim that it will reduce inflation.
It won't.
But one thing this massive tax-and-spend behemoth will do, aside from unleashing 87,000 new IRS agents on middle-class taxpayers and small business owners, is extend direct subsidies for electric vehicles.
Meanwhile, Californians are being asked to conserve electricity ahead of the heat wave, where Scott just reported a brownout.
Direct federal subsidies for EVs under a law passed in 2010 amounted to $7,500 per vehicle, but this subsidy phased out once a manufacturer produced 200,000 cars.
Tesla hit that limit in 2018, which phased the subsidy out by January of 2020.
GM was three months behind Tesla.
Toyota just hit the limit this year.
But the IRA extends these subsidies indefinitely, though it places new limits on the price of the vehicles and income levels needed to qualify.
The focus on the Direct EV subsidy misses far larger financial shifts that benefit the wealthy at the expense of average Americans.
By some estimates, federal and state policies heap as much as $50,000 in additional support per EV.
How does this work?
Is it even legal?
The first program, little understood by the public, is the Corporate Average Fuel Economy, CAFE Standards, administered by the Department of Transportation.
The CAFE Standards are part of a Byzantine system that mandates fuel mileage for the fleets of vehicles offered by auto manufacturers.
If GM, for example, sells too many popular trucks and SUVs, it must smell enough small fuel-sipping cars or be penalized.
This fuel mileage penalty was on track to more than double to a billion annually when the Trump administration, in one of its last acts, delayed the increase.
But a year ago, the Biden admin moved to impose higher CAFE penalties on automakers for prior model years.
Cafe Vitalize is a 95% of consumers who buy gasoline and diesel-powered vehicles who must pay about an additional $400 for an average car or more than $1,000 for a high-end pickup truck, in effect handing over the money to EV buyers.
Tesla argued in favor of this increase.
A substantial portion of Tesla's profits come from cafe credits Tesla sells to other automakers.
In 2021, Tesla earned $1.465 billion from regulatory credits alone.
While CAFE is legal, two other programs have dubious origins, rendering them vulnerable to legal challenge.
Here we have, by the way, a 2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E charging at a Ford dealer in Wexford, Pennsylvania on May 6, 2021.
Major automakers wrote a letter to Congress Monday, June 30, 2022, to lift the cap on the number of tax credits available to buyers of qualifying hybrid and fully electric vehicles.
But of course, The first is EPA's CO2 credits for advanced technology vehicles.
In 2012, the Obama EPA invented an unlawful levy on vehicles powered by hydrocarbons while shifting credits to EVs.
But this rule was premised on EVs being zero-emission vehicles, which they are not.
Electricity doesn't come from a plug in the wall.
It's generated mostly by natural gas, coal, and nuclear power.
How about that?
Further, EVs themselves are quite energy intensive to manufacture, especially the batteries.
Which typically feature elements mined in areas that look up looking like moonscapes, so they use children, some as young as six, to extract the needed minerals such as cobalt.
The EPA accounts for none of this, pretending that EVs spring up fully formed like Venus at her birth.
The bottom line is that this sub-Rosa regulation shovels up to $5,000 per vehicle to EVs, all paid for by the buyers of conventionally powered vehicles.
The second Obama-era EPA regulation, again, made up without statutory backing, tests EVs for their equivalent gas mileage in perfect laboratory conditions, running EVs at 70 degrees, no light, no heater, no radio, no air conditioning.
From that unrealistic fuel economy test, batteries lose a notorious amount of power in the cold, for example.
The EPA then applies a 6.7 multiplier for the EV fleet cafe standards.
This further subsidizes EV likely to far more than $10,000 per vehicle, according to some analysts.
EPA's tests for gasoline and diesel include operating on the road in both 90 and 20 degree weather, With air conditioning, lights, or heater.
In other words, realistic conditions.
Finally, when all the inputs for EVs are considered, from power pants to transmission line to charging station, the equivalent cost is closer at $19 per gallon over a 10-year, 120,000-mile EV lifetime.
Of course, that looks at all costs, most of which are not borne by the EV owner.
Guess who's on the hook for the rest?
This is far in excess of the claimed $1.7 to $3 per gallon equivalent.
As a result, we're likely to soon hear Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg claim EVs have achieved cost parity with vehicles using gas or diesel.
Don't be fooled.
They haven't.
And EVs may never reach parity.
If they enjoyed parity, they'd need none of the massive system a federal state supports most of the hidden from the public.
The last example of how this works.
On August 5th, Ford wrote to the U.S.
Senate urging passage of the IRA.
On August 8th, the IRA passed the Senate granting a $7,500 subsidy on EVs.
On August 9th, Ford raised the price of its FEF 150 Lightning EV pickup truck by $8,500, a thousand more than the new subsidy.
So guess who's going to benefit?
Scott, your thoughts.
Well, every one of these laws that the government is trying to pass with regards to climate change should be challenged on religious grounds.
The state shall not create or endorse a religion, and climate change is a religion.
It's not a scientific fact.
It is not based on data.
It is a pure hysterical religion of fanatics, anti-God, worshiping the creation more than the creator types.
They fall into this delusional hysteria like a bunch of druids holding candles around some outlander scene from the beginning of that series.
Worshipping the environment.
Worshipping themselves.
Dancing around thinking that they're, you know, special and climate change.
It's all nonsense.
There is no climate change.
There's a little change in the summer.
There's a little change in the winter.
There's a little change in between.
It's called seasonal.
Yeah, you got dry spells.
You got wet spells.
Funny, the only climate change I see are these chemtrails and all sorts of other funny business with the weather manipulation.
But there's no natural climate change that's being caused by combustion, or factories, or any of that stuff.
I mean, I've seen some of the statistics that say the Earth has actually cooled since 1945.
So there is no industrial correlation to climate change.
It is all a religion, a religion to worship the environment and control people's behavior, control what they eat.
We want you to eat bugs because the cows fart too much.
We want you to wear burlap because We don't want, you know, factories doing cotton ginning or all this nonsense.
It's all religious hysteria and fanaticism, and the high priests are these people like Butt Gage, the homosexual guy in charge of whatever he is in charge of.
And all this other fanaticism.
It's a theft.
It's a Ponzi scheme.
It's a pyramid scam.
It's a religion that the state shouldn't be behind.
And all of this makes us look like a bunch of laughing stock.
The Russians aren't pursuing this nonsense.
The Iranians aren't.
The Chinese aren't.
The Chinese are a little dirty anyway.
I mean, you go over to that country and it's full of smog in the air, but they don't really have any sensitivity to it.
But there is no climate change.
All of that is a hysterical war of propaganda.
It's a psychological operation to manipulate people using fear.
And quite frankly, anybody that spouts off climate change should be yelled at and said, you ought to be ashamed of yourself for being so stupid, Jim.
Nice.
Very nice point, Scott.
I think, having got away with COVID, when there was no increase in deaths from the pandemic, I think they feel they can sell the public anything they want, and they're, by and large, right on it.
Holly, your thought?
Bully.
They bully people into it, too.
Too.
Holly?
Yeah, it's about, you know, compliance, and it's about bullying, and it's about psychological warfare, as Scott knows, and it's about appeal, appealing to, you know, a lot of it is pushed by women, I'm gonna say, like, the whole climate change and all this sort of stuff, and like, wanting to save the planet.
Like, I understand, like, pollution and actually, you know, poisoning.
If we want to get involved with pollution and cleanup, look at our food supply.
Look at how we are being poisoned.
Look at the number of people who have, like, diabetes and obesity.
Just look how sick people are here in the United States and tie that in with Pollution.
It should be a national security threat.
The fact that our food supply is tainted at this point, which no one wants to talk about.
So if we want to address issues of our planet and actually cleaning up what is going on, let's talk about pollution.
Because the same people that are completely fine with poisoning us right now are telling us to restrict where we go and flying around in their private chats, telling us that our carbon credits have to be counted.
And Bill Gates talking about we have to reduce our carbon Consumption to zero.
Hey, we're carbon based life form.
So obviously the target is us here at this point.
Just like Jim said, if they can target us with medical misinformation, they can throw any kind of scientific information at us as well and expect us to laugh it up.
It is incredible, absolutely incredible.
Remember this too, Jim, a lot of guys are thrown in jail for environmental violations.
I know, I've talked to the guys in jail, CEOs of paint companies that were thrown in jail for like Three, four years because of some environmental law that they, you know, didn't fit or match.
And these are CEOs of companies!
These aren't criminals.
They're using these environmental laws to throw guys in jail and destroy businesses.
That's where it really gets dangerous.
Scott, I think you got it exactly right.
I want to I've got a story to add here, Don, that I'll round it out, because the one story I have won't require as much time, but it's perfect to fit in.
May we pause and I'll add it?
Just pause, Don.
I'm going to pause, okay?
Go ahead.
Well, we got a story that fits your agenda, Scott.
What exactly is behind the UN and WEF insects' food agenda?
The two most prominent one-world government nodes in the UN and WEF have been aggressively pushing the bug food agenda for close to a decade now.
This is absolutely unbelievable.
From the World Economic Forum, good grub, why we might be eating insects soon.
A 2013 article from the UN website.
The latest buzz, eating insects can help tackle food insecurity, says FAQ.
The book, Edible Insects, Future Prospects for Food and Feed Security, stresses not just the nutritional value of insects, right, but also the benefits insect farming could have on the environment and addressing the rapidly increasing demand for food worldwide.
Last year from the WEF website.
Why we need to give insects the role they deserve in our food system.
Right.
Evolution hasn't had it there.
So we're going to mess with evolution.
By 2050, the world's food supply will need to feed another 2 billion people.
Not the way depopulation is taking place.
Not a chance.
2 billion fewer than today.
I have no doubt.
Insect farming for food and animal feed could offer an environmentally friendly solution.
A source of protein and fertilizer emerging technologies could help bring insects back into the food system at scale.
The CI run Hollywood and MSN have been deployed to normalize insects as food.
Cult, Pupper, Puppet and Rockefeller asset Bill Gates is also pushing the bug-grub scheme, which perfectly jives with all other things eugenics, death-backs, and technocratic dystopia.
All of these slots perfectly into Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and the Club of Rome's long-standing PSYOP, climate change.
So why bugs?
What exactly is in these alleged sustainable high-protein food sources that makes them so important to the cult's agenda?
Insects contain a natural structural component in their exoskeletons called chitin.
This fibrous polysaccharide happens to be extremely toxic to humans.
There it is.
Specifically, chitin triggers inflammation and immune responses to wit.
Chitin, a potential allergy-promoting pathogen associated molecular pattern as a linear polymer, goes on to describe mammalians are potential hosts for chitin-containing protozoa, fungi, anthropods, and nematodes.
However, they do not synthesize chitin, and it's considered a potential target for recognition by the mammalian immune system.
Chitin is sent primarily in the lungs or gut, where it activates a variety of innate, eosinophils, macrophages, and adaptive immune cells.
Chitin induces cytokine production, leukocyte recruitment, and alternative macrophage activation.
All bad news.
This sounds similar to some of the spike protein effects.
It also sounds like chitin is a kind of pathogen that could easily exacerbate veins.
A conclusion of the research study, chitin and its effects on inflammatory and immune responses is rather measured, considering the various deeply troubling findings it reports.
The significance of chitin in derivatives on immune response has not been fully appreciated.
They are reflective of not only chitin, but also chitinases and chitinase-like proteins during natural or experimental exposure, each with their own mechanism to induce and regulate immune responses, which are vastly negative.
Perhaps the interactions are in fact well enough understood by the UNWF Gates and Hall as mechanisms of the death-max spike proteins that have been well understood before the rollout of CyOp19.
In a rat study to determine as if chitosan, a linear polysaccharide made up of chitin is safe to consume, the following was found.
There were no histological changes with the observed decreases in vitamin level.
However, they were significant enough to suggest maltritional inadequacy.
The long-term effects of vitamin A and vitamin E deficiency are well known, 63 and it is unknown what deficiency-related effects would have been observed had these decreased levels been maintained for a longer period of time.
When circulating levels of vitamin E specifically are depleted, tissue damage can occur.
Vitamin E depletion in humans has subsequently been correlated with anemia, disruption of normal growth, decreased responses to infection and chitosan.
NTP tox 9330 in pregnancy-concerned vitamin A is essential in numerous biological processes and pathways, including growth, vision, immune function, and metabolism.
Severe vitamin A deficiency results in disruption of normal tissue function.
Associated with, get this, childhood blindness, anemia, depressed responses to infection, VAD during a severe infection may result in death.
While the long-term effects of vitamin deficiency in rodents are not as well understood, The available literature on humans suggests decreases in the A&E observed in this study may be detrimental over time.
Basically, consuming insects will result in depletion of vitamins.
Humans exposed to modified mRNA gene therapy are all in varying degrees affected with the death vax, inducing veins that will especially be susceptible to chitin-rich diets.
The study also reveals the following.
The absolute relative thymus weights of 3% and 9% males and 9% females were significantly decreased relative to those control groups.
The thymus is extremely sensitive to toxic components and similar stressors.
An alternation in thymus rate can be an indicator of apoptosis and organ atrophy in response to a toxin insult.
That means that chitin and chitosan-rich diets are toxic and potentially result in the slow death of organs.
As if that were not enough, it's possible chitosan exposure may have induced the increased rate of seizures observed in the study.
Published in Nature entitled, Chitin Induces Accumulation of Innate Immune Cells Associated with Allergy, that it triggers allergic airway inflammation and possible asthma.
What could happen to a person suffering from COVID and the death bags if they were on a heavy insect diet?
What would happen to a person who developed asthma, inflammation, immunocompromised, vitamin depletion from an insect-heavy diet if they contracted COVID and or received a spike protein-inducing injection?
What would happen to that person?
What would happen is they, the cyop flow into and out of each other.
Altering diet in conjunction with never-ending modified mRNA injection would certainly over time increase depopulation, especially when the insects are genetically modified, as are their eaters.
Insect-rich diets could very well have sad zendies.
It's always the same elitist cabal of usual suspect pushing the same agendas for their fourth industrial most human techno-communist revolution.
Do not comply.
Scott, your thoughts?
One quick thing.
I think the word is chitin instead of chitin in my knowledge.
Okay, good.
Go for chitin.
Scott?
Well, it's a very well produced research report, Jim.
The exoskeleton of insects having immune deficiency and vitamin deficiency and other things that inevitably lead to sickness and death is exactly what they're pushing and it is Uh, you know, those who are going to do it are the stupid and the susceptible who've all gotten this vaccine.
I mean, we really are going to see an annihilation of the idiots.
We're going to see an extermination and an extinction level event.
of the retarded brainless morons that got this vaccine and eat bugs.
I mean, talk about, could you round up the stupid people in the world and say, here's where they are better than this?
Who wants to eat bugs and who wants to get a DNA modifying vaccine?
So, you know, obviously, This is a civil war event too.
If you try and push people to eat bugs, you're going to get killed by people who don't want to eat bugs and aren't going to take it and they're not going to be pushed around.
I'm waiting for the country, maybe it's going to be in Dominican Republic or Russia or Fiji or somewhere, saying Come to our nation and eat steak and pork and chicken and tortillas and sit out in the sun and, you know, don't get any vaccines and live like a healthy human being.
I don't want to go to that country, not the retardville that is currently called the United States of America, full of the stupidest, sickest people ever in the history of humanity.
I want to go to the nations and say, we're done with the climate change religion.
We're done with the insect eating.
We're done with the electric cars.
We're done with all of this sodomite, lesbian, gay, transgender, monkey, fox agenda.
All those sick perverts and lunatics.
Let him stay in the United States.
But for the country of real human beings, real people who want to live according to God and nature, come to this land.
I think that's where it's going to lead.
Maybe it'll be America.
Maybe it'll be a conservative revolution that Ron DeSantis kicks off.
But whatever happens, there are some people that will die fighting before they eat crickets, and I'll be one of them, Jim.
Just for those who may not know, exoskeleton means the skeleton external to the body.
We are in dough.
We have a skeleton internal to our body, but that's why bugs are crunchy.
You're crunching on their exoskeleton if you're eating bugs, which I do not recommend.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, just a quick search.
I just, I was looking up chitin and chitosan, which is a chemical compound of chitin that they're making.
And I just saw chitosan nanoparticles for drug delivery and all this crazy stuff.
So there's probably a lot of stuff in the pipeline where manufacturing bugs for all kinds of drug delivery and all kinds of weird stuff.
So just marketing this to people.
And then I've seen people post on Twitter and some other platforms in Canada that if you see a food or a snack labeled sustainable, they've been finding cricket flour just added into the mix.
So if you see something labeled sustainable, there might be some bugs mixed in there.
And then, you know, to get back into like the tainted food supply, this is a national security issue, a national security threat, I think.
And, you know, mixing bugs in without people's consent could be part of it, as well as like the GMO foods and everything that in the glyphosate, all the poisons that they've been putting in our foods for decades now, just expecting us to just, you know, everyone to just have cancer and just deal with it.
Meanwhile, as we have discussed before, Putin has said that he wants Russia to be the organic food capital of the world and to be exporting organic food and export.
Actually, I just saw a news article that said that they're offering a million rubles to every Russian woman that has 10 or more children.
I'm there!
Yeah, there you go, Scott.
So get on the first flight over.
Hopefully she's got some help with 10 kids, and you too, Scott, but best of luck to anyone who wants that million rubles right now.
A woman who has 10 or more children?
Wow, that's a lot.
God bless her.
All really excellent, Holly.
Meanwhile, Kevin Barrett had me on his show Friday, True's Jihad Radio, to talk about my lawsuit in Sandy Hook, to my utter astonishment, Kevin, Seems to believe that the Sandy Hook was real, the kids really did die.
He even said he thought I had damaged the truth movement with my support for Sandy Hook, but the proof it was fraudulent is overwhelming.
This is a photograph sent around the world that was supposed to be a policewoman escorting kids to safety during the mass shooting.
Well, there was a second photograph taken minutes earlier, where you see all these parents standing around, hands in their pockets, arms folded, while the policewoman rearranges the kids to get a better shot.
Look at the earlier photograph at the bottom, where you got a little girl in a pink sweater and a short skirt.
They move the little boy number one up to the front of the line in a dark sweater and blue jeans to get a better shot.
Look in between boy number one and boy number two in the lower photograph, and you have parents who are casually looking on, leading me to refer to this photograph as lounging at the massacre.
Falso in uno, falso in omnibus is a Latin phrase meaning false in one thing, false in everything.
At Common Law, it's a legal principle a witness who testifies falsely about one matter is not credible to testify about any matter.
Can anyone doubt that the photo set around the world was staged?
And if it was staged, the rest of the event was also staged?
It's insulting we're being played again and again.
The fraud is obvious on its face.
Meanwhile, they took my blog.
On the 27th of July, I was reporting about the Sandy Hook trial, which Alex Jones was calling out as a murder of due process.
I was surprised they renewed a desire to take to satisfy a financial judgment against me of $1.1 million Because in Wisconsin, only financial resources can satisfy a financial judgment.
My blog is not a financial resource.
There's no way Noah Posner, Leonard Posner, could obtain any financial benefit from my blog.
It turned out it became obvious the following day when they switched to the Wisconsin Circuit Court why they'd done it, because during the Alex Jones trial they were going to start taking my name in vain on 28 July.
They wanted to make sure that once they began referring to me as batshit crazy, no one could go to my blog to find out what I had to say about Sandy Hook.
They even wound up on the 10th of August having nothing found there, but then reverted later in the day to the circuit court records.
They've even accessed my Amazon.com site where you can see numerous of my books and look below at the photographs of me on with Sean Hannity of me in Athens where I was invited to appear on a television show that ran three and a half hours and was broadcast worldwide by satellite about 9-11.
Or me in San Francisco with the Oakland Bay Bridge and Treasure Island in the background.
What did they do?
They, on the very same day, the 28th of July, they substitute me in Athens with a court of appeals decision rejecting my appeal.
And me in San Francisco with a court order warranting a permanent injection against me reaffirming the sentences for which I was sued.
Nevertheless, and they do not mention this, they don't want the public to know, I have a petition before the Supreme Court of the United States.
Notice here, July 7th, distributed for conference on September 28th, 2022.
Here's all the steps I've had to go through to reach this point, where they were filtering out cases along the way.
Litigants and interest groups at the top.
I had 90 days within the denial of the Wisconsin Supreme Court to file, which I did.
The prevailer, that would be Posner, had 30 days to file a response.
He did not do that.
Then a petitioner, I would have had more time to file a reply.
There was the opportunity for an amicus, and one amicus brief was filed, broadening the issues of false flags generally.
And if you look at the second block, the Chief Justice was already drafting an initial discuss list and distributing it to the rest of the chambers.
The CERT pool, the clerk of the court, has signed the petitions of participating chambers, which they assigned randomly to clerks.
Clerk submitted memos to the chief justice.
Within each justice chamber, clerks reviewed and marked up.
Now we're at the top of the third discussed list.
Back to the clerk of the court collecting all the documents, distributing to the justice chambers.
The associate justices place cases on the discuss list.
Any case that fails to make this list is summarily denied and the lower court ruling stands.
I made the cut.
Now, on the 28th of September, I'm in this block.
All the justices meet in which they vote to either grant or deny certiorari.
At least four votes are necessary for a case to proceed to the merit stage.
I expect my case is gonna prevail because it meets four criteria that are used by the Supreme Court to select cases.
Number one, it's a publicly significant case.
This has to do with summary judgment procedures that are grossly biased and enable the judge to decide whether or not evidence counts or is unreasonable and can be set aside.
But because I'm a high profile defendant, Because of Sandy Hook, this is of great public interest.
Number two, it's legally significant because it has to do with a summary judgment in Wisconsin, which is grossly biased against defendants.
Gives enormous power to the judge that's completely inappropriate.
In the third place, it contradicts with other states.
The highest court of Texas, for example.
My summary judgment would have involved Assuming all the claims I made, that nobody died, that it was a FEMA drill, that we have the FBI report and all that, as true.
And then the plaintiff would be asked if he agreed with that, and if he did not, there would be disputed facts that had to be sent to a jury.
But in Wisconsin, the judge could simply find all of my submissions unreasonable and set them aside, and thereby deny my right to a jury trial.
And fourth of all, Is there a major legal or factual mistake here?
And the mistake, of course, is denying my right to a jury trial when there were disputed facts.
I think it's virtually a slam dunk.
This case is going to be taken up by the Supreme Court, especially because it turns out that, as a retired professor of law explained to me, the abuse of summary judgment is a major problem affecting the judicial system in the United States.
I've teed it up for the court to Knock it out of the park.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it comes down to a judge saying, this is a fact.
And you're saying, this is not a fact.
And I've got evidence that proves it's not a fact.
And I'm submitting this evidence to the court to show that this is not a fact.
And you can't have justice based on false falsity, lies, things that aren't facts.
And the judge saying, no, I'm going to determine it.
That's where the Supreme Court comes in.
It's a violation of your rights.
It's a violation of everything associated with even the concept of justice in the judicial process.
So, you know, you will prevail, Jim.
I'm astounded that Kevin Barrett would have a dismissive attitude towards the Sandy Hook because he was so prominent in the criticism of 9-11 being a false flag.
And the overwhelming evidence of that...
Well, if you're going to call 9-11 a false flag and false and didn't happen the way that it's been presented, how can you not make the same similar an analytical, logical, reasonable assessment of Sandy Hook, especially given all of the overwhelming evidence, the photographic evidence, the crisis actors, the guy holding his gun upside down by the magazine and then shows up with his wife on Bill Moyers, the impossibility of shooting bullets into the wall, the fact that the school was closed,
The windows were... the school rooms were full with boxes.
I mean, you know this better than anyone.
And on and on and on and on.
And every car being parked exactly the same way as if a ballet did it.
This was not a real event.
The facts prove that it wasn't a real event.
And it deserves to be completely exposed.
And I don't have time for cowards or stupid people, but anyone that calls Sandy Hook, you know, real is an idiot or a coward.
And we can't survive as a society in that kind of an atmosphere.
And we certainly can't if that's what the judicial system is devolved into.
Now it's full-on civil war.
Now it's law of the jungle.
Now it's old West all over again, because if a judge could come in and say this, you know, I'm not going to let proof come in that shows this was false, then you're on the side of lies and falsity, Judge, and you're unworthy, and that robe ought to be stripped off you, and you ought to be hung with it, Jim.
You can find my colleague Kevin Barrett on my Bitchute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Holly, you have about two minutes to sum up.
Well, I just wanted to say I look forward to listening to that interview.
I know I've heard you on his show before, so it'll be fascinating to listen to.
And I do hope the Supreme Court picks up your case because I think it's a, it's a fascinating argument and the, uh, the angle that you have very much different from, you know, a lot of people are dismissive of any of these cases, especially because of like the, the Alex Jones case and everything that went through that.
And it's kind of a, that's what people think of when they hear about these cases and your case is very different.
And, uh, I think it would be a fantastic opportunity for the Supreme Court to pick it up and I do hope the current Supreme Court picks up your case because I do think that they will look at your case through that lens, which it needs to be looked at as far as evidence is concerned.
And like you said, there's so many other cases, regardless, not even connected to what specifically you're talking about in your case, but are connected to the idea of like the summary judgment and also how judges as a whole, especially a lot of these Obama appointed judges, have been dismissive of evidence presented and just ruling however they want to.
That's become a huge problem here in the United States.
So it would be a tremendous opportunity for the Supreme Court to pick that up.
So best of luck, Jim, with that.
And a fraud's being perpetrated on the people because they're pretending that previous cases have decided that kids died in Sandy Hook.
None of these cases, including Alex Jones, were decided on the merits.
They were all decided on procedural grounds.
And mine, which came the closest, was superseded by the abusive use of this protocol, the summary judgment methodology.
It allows a judge, on the basis of his subjective opinion, to decide facts.
It is outrageous.
I will know by October 3rd.
And Posner ought to be charged with perjury because he raised his hand and swore that everything was true and he lied.
Everything that he said or he was behind was fraud upon the court and perjury because it didn't happen.
Yeah, I introduced that as a counterclaim and even that it was an imposter pretending to be Leonard Posner and the judge had no interest and bifurcated the case.
So I would only be allowed to pursue my counterclaims after the original case was settled and it never came.
I never had the chance.
Don, yours.
Take us out.
Oh, wow.
What an hour this has been.
Wrapping it up with the most significant case, I think, the most prominent case about the Sandy Hook book.
We're right in the center of all the action here.
And the action has been pretty hot today, hasn't it?
On Truth vs. News here on August the 21st of the month here.
So share this widely, folks.
I really do appreciate your support and comments and things.
So you out there are really what we're doing this for, and I appreciate it when you share it widely.
▲
Export Selection