All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 17, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:11:16
Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (16 August 2022) with Joe Olson and Mike Cunningham
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer with a Texas Tuesday with a different pair of Texans.
We got Joe Olson in Houston and Mike Cunningham in Austin.
Very much in the tradition we have pioneered with Michael Ivey.
We begin with a world on the brink of a nuclear catastrophe.
Russia is warning that Ukraine has been bombarding the European largest nuclear power plant.
It appears to be an attempt to create a catastrophe similar to Chernobyl that they want to blame on Russia.
But since the attacks are coming from Ukraine, that's going to be a tough road to haul.
Nevertheless, the Ukrainians appear to be completely unscrupulous.
It wouldn't surprise me whatsoever if they were to persist in this attempt.
The Zaporizhzhya plant, located in the Russian-controlled Ukrainian city of Energodar, has been subjected to a series of attacks over the past few weeks, where Kiev has been launching artillery and drone strikes on the facility.
I asked both sides to cooperate, said the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Allow for a mission of the IAEA to proceed.
The UN Secretary General called for any military activities around the plant and, as a Security Council was holding a meeting, the facility, the Russian Foreign Ministry's Deputy Spokesman said, The facility must not be used as part of any military operation.
Instead, urgent agreement is needed at a technical level on a safe perimeter of demilitarization to ensure the safety of the area.
That actually was from the UN.
China urged all parties to sit down and negotiate.
Meanwhile, most German howitzers in Ukraine are out of order.
Of the 15, 5 of the 15 supplied are still operational.
Only 5.
10 of the 15 are out of whack.
Not surprising.
In an interview with a German news outlet, a German Bundestag member, Markus Faber, who had recently visited Ukraine, was surprised to learn that only five of these German-made howitzers, which you can bet since German military equipment is excellent, were quite high caliber, are still functioning.
That Kiev has requested more spare parts.
It was optimistic it could get them back into working order.
I find that highly unlikely.
He noted while Germany had already supplied Ukraine with spare part packages, not all of them were the right ones.
Germany has supplied Kyiv with 10 PZH-2000 howitzers, another five by the Netherlands.
Meanwhile, German arms manufacturer Krauss-Maffei Wigman struck a deal in late July that would see him provide Ukraine with some 100 howitzers.
Not really a good idea.
Germany has previously supplied Ukraine with thousands of portable anti-tank and anti-air missiles, tens of thousands of anti-tank mines, and millions of rounds of ammunition.
Moscow has repeatedly warned the West against sending weapons to Kyiv, saying it only prolongs the conflict and increases the number of casualties.
Here's a weapon the Russians are using that is going for a staggering number of casualties in the Ukrainian armed forces.
This is like a series of simultaneous or near simultaneous explosions along a line of troops.
Quite devastating.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, amazingly enough, there's overwhelming evidence that the Ukrainians are shelling not only the nuclear plant at Zaporizhia, whatever it is, but also the dam that supplies the cooling water and either one of them would be catastrophic because if they knock out the cooling supply you'll end up with a Fukushima there.
And if they hit the plant itself, you'll end up with a Chernobyl there.
So bottom line is they'll poison a probably 400 or 500 mile diameter area.
And then because of prevailing winds, some of that will blow back across Europe.
So who's in charge of this crap?
The Russians have repeatedly asked the UN to send in inspectors to verify that the shots are being fired by Ukraine, and the UN refuses.
But what the UN has done is they'd say, well, if we want this to stop.
What we need to do is put a DMZ around the nuclear power plant That way we'll have a 50 mile radius where the Russians are not allowed to enter, and we'll be able to do whatever mischief we want to and still blame it on the Russians.
Absolute crap.
It's a stupid proposal by people that are so disingenuous, it's completely transparent.
So the other thing is that the latest that I've heard is that the United States provided like 16 HIMAR missile launch systems to Ukraine.
The Russians purchased one, knocked out seven.
So half of what we sent there is already gone.
And then it looks like we've knocked out the major supply depot for the missiles that are fed into that system.
So the actual missile itself has been destroyed about a billion dollars worth than just one airstrike.
So Ukraine is losing this war big time.
And they know they're losing it big time.
And anybody that's following what Zio Linsky's been spouting out knows that the end is near, that he's probably going to be flipped by a coup pretty soon, which is probably what's going to happen in the United States.
Probably somebody's going to say that the hair sniffer has got to go.
So...
Well, it's just moronic in the West to continue to supply all these weapons.
It makes them co-belligerents.
Russia could legitimately attack all the NATO nations, even the United States.
It's just irresponsible in the extreme.
Mike, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think it's going to be a manipulated endless war, and that's what they're headed towards doing.
Very similar to, I guess, when General Dynamics and all them were going back in 1963 and wanted to change the presidency and got in Johnson.
And they were basically almost broken the next year that they get all the large contracts for the government to build up stuff in Vietnam.
You need to follow the money and then wherever the money ends up, that's where you find out who your real culprits are.
Well, I think Russia's progressing so rapidly, there's no way this is going to be an endless war.
I think Poland has claims on one part of Ukraine, Russia claims on another.
I don't think it'll drag out for more than a year myself, my personal estimate.
Meanwhile, when I was saying endless war, I was just saying that there's no real end in sight for victories for what we're doing.
So we're actually kind of like beating our heads against a wall.
Kind of like we did in Vietnam, and we've done in similar ways.
We fight a war not to win it.
Well, we're not officially at war.
I mean, but we've made ourselves a coalition.
There's been no declaration.
I mean, it's one of these anomalous situations, but the more it will escalate itself, the worse it's going to be.
Russia has all the cards in this deck.
I have.
Complete confidence in their ability.
Meanwhile, the DOG is keeping the affidavit sealed and fueling a red wave.
It's been a week since the raid.
Yesterday was the deadline for them to announce they'd release the affidavit.
They're not going to do it.
In my opinion, this is just bullshit.
They've actually been caught with their pants down.
of an ongoing law enforcement investigation implicate national security that support keeping the affidavit sealed.
In my opinion, this is just bullshit.
They've actually been caught with their pants down.
If they had anything on Trump, they would have leaked it already.
For those following me, meaning the author, this confirms our narrative that Trump is the one advocating transparency.
The Deep State wants to hide and deceive.
If they found something, we would have heard about it already.
The fact they don't want the public to see the probable cause indicates they didn't find what they were looking for to justify the raid.
If they had a legitimate cause, they'd release it, because it's up to fuel their narrative and public image, which has gone completely off the rail.
Instead, they use powerful misleading language and suggest Trump's a national security threat.
They're going to use this as a media narrative all the way to the midterms.
If he were, in fact, having committed any criminal acts, the FBI would have leaked it.
They would have moved already.
It proves they have nothing.
It was all political theater.
The American people have been rightfully demanding an explanation.
It's been a week now.
We've got nothing but a big middle finger from Biden's DOJ.
At this point, Trump is still in complete command of the situation.
A public response has been significantly beneficial to Trump.
He took that true social Yesterday, to echo the author's sentiment with a series of truths, only one topic on the menu, the Mar-a-Lago raid and how it's garnered support and energized an already highly motivated Trump base.
I believe it's actually expanded.
FBI rate boost at mega voting fury, he tweeted.
More.
2022 red wave was losing steam.
The Mar-a-Lago rate changed everything for voters.
I don't actually believe it was losing any steam.
Another.
Republicans could win many additional seats, both in the House and Senate, because of the backlash over the rate.
Polls are showing some lost Republican territory over the last few weeks had been more than made up with the unannounced break-in by the FBI, which could never have happened.
Trump agreeing all this has only produced net positive for Megan and has been detrimental to the DNC.
The deep state knows if an America first, we get a filibuster proof.
Supermajorities, they are finished.
Trump is winning this exchange handily.
So much so I can't help but think that he had this under his control the entire time, almost like it was a trap.
Meanwhile, Mike Turner explains Congress needs to see the FBI search affidavit.
He told Newsmax Monday that the DOJ and FBI need to show Congress, if not the Republicans, the affidavit.
They should have a pretty high bar for this on with Greta Van Susteren.
This has to rise to the level of immediate national security for them to go into his home and yet realize the warrant was authorized on a Friday.
They waited all the way to Monday.
That suggests there was no urgency about it, that it was all political theater.
The release documents contain a list of the items taken, but the affidavit used to get to sign the warrant is still under seal.
Turner said, given the past treatment of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, regarding a similar accusation, and that Trump is a political rival to Joe Biden, and that he helped stop Attorney General Merrick Garland's appointment to the Supreme Court, More information is required for a bipartisan group to understand the urgency of the action.
They don't want to release the affidavit, but they can release that affidavit to us, and they need to do that.
Tell us what you were looking for, what you found.
Does this actually rise to the level of an immediate national security threat, or is it merely abusive discretion on behalf of Attorney General Garland?
I think we know the answer to that.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I figured out what the FBI's sources and methods are.
Their sources are the Grimm Brothers, and their methods are fairy tales.
The reason they can't release this affidavit is because it's going to tell us who the mole was that was in the Trump camp, and I'm betting it's Prince Cushy and his lovely bride, Princess Cushy.
The Mossad agents that stabbed him in the back repeatedly and whose felony convicted father Trump pardoned on his way out the door.
Yeah, interesting little bit of information at the conservative treehouse Tucker Carlson reacts to the FBI raid on Trump's Yeah, amazing!
Didn't know, nobody's ever mentioned it, but a guy in 2016 put a tweet out that said that the Democratic voters don't need to get up and get dressed and go to the polls.
They can just vote for Hillary on Twitter.
And nothing happened for four years, but as soon as Trump left office, the DOJ went to the same Richard Reinhart magistrate, Epstein defender, that's in charge of issuing the fake warrant on the PDJ seizures.
He issued an arrest warrant for a felony for interfering with voting, and the guy's being convicted of it, and nobody's even talking about it.
Four years afterwards, a silly tweet!
They can't prove that a single boat was ever swung by that, and yet we've got hundreds of thousands of boats showing up in the middle of the night at a half dozen different locations all across the country.
We got 54,000 mules shipping Well done, Joe.
Well done.
Dropbox in the country, and the FBI can't seem to find a single damn thing.
You want to hear a great rant about how horrible the FBI is?
Jim and I had it on Friday, and we edited out just the rant part.
It's 27 minutes long.
It's what you don't know.
FBI is not what you think on BitChute.
So far, 2,800 views in seven hours.
Kids, it's going viral.
Well done, Joe.
Well done.
Mike, your thoughts?
Yeah.
If you look at page three of the seven-page document that they released, on page three, they have very specific identification of the address, have very specific identification of how many bedrooms, how many bathrooms, and stuff like that.
Then when you go to page four, it's almost a fishing exposition.
They say they're going to try to get anything that has any kind of clarification for secret, top secret or whatever on top.
But then I think it's item three on that on that page for it states that they want to get every document was written by the president or on a stationary or whatever from from January 20th of 1917 2017 until the day he left office.
So, basically, what they've asked for is every single paper he's ever touched.
That is too general for a search warrant and should be thrown out on appeals because it has to have the specificity and they just went in there.
And also, I believe that they went into rooms that they didn't even identify and into private areas in which had no way that you could store documents.
Also, in that same classification, they were looking for storage places to store stuff.
Never identifying it, you could actually say any place is a place of storage.
So they have that search warrant is very troublesome of what they even released.
I think a good lawyer on appeals should be able to throw that all out under MAP-B Ohio and several other cases.
Oh, Mike, you're 100% correct.
It was unconstitutionally vague.
If they actually found something, it would be inadmissible in a court of law as a fruit of a poisonous tree.
You nailed it exactly right.
Just outrageous and disgusting.
Meanwhile, why was the former president's estate raided?
With all the uninvestigated and unpunished crimes of Hillary and the Clintons, with all the uninvestigated inside trading Pelosi's committed, with all the known crimes of the Biden family, Trump gets raided?
Cynthia McKinney asks?
A wonderful person.
I know her and admire her.
In a press conference on Wednesday, 10 August, President Trump said Monday, two days earlier, more than 30 FBI agents had raided his residence.
He was suggesting they might have used the opportunity to plant evidence against him.
And why not?
It's clear it was not about a bunch of documents he might have taken from the White House.
It was much more, and it's not over.
The attorney general is intimated never before in the DOJ 152-year history has such an extensive investigation as a former president being carried out.
These are dark times for our nation, former President Trump declared.
He compared the event to an assault that could only take place in broken third-world countries.
I think he's got it right.
The president of Palm Beach Freedom Institute, Paula Quinoy, called the Mar-a-Lago raid the desperate act of a corrupt establishment.
The former president remains a potent political force, claiming the 2020 election were stolen.
We know they were stolen.
We've seen the proof.
This is not debatable.
And it's insulting when the newspapers claim, when Trump talks about the stolen election, that he's making a false assertion or that he's lying.
He is speaking the truth.
The media are the prevaricators.
Trump's 2016 election win took many by surprise.
How can the public elect such a clown was the mainstream media reaction.
He's been lambasted in ways no U.S.
president has ever been in relation to international diplomacy and the media.
Is it because he, against all odds, against past and present, want to be world-trended, not a globalist, but a staunch nationalist?
This is a time of the globalists.
No more left, right, socialism, communists, democrats, republicans.
Only globalists and anti-globalists.
The WEF-driven global agenda under the Great Reset and UN Agenda 2030 drives short of one world order, control of the entire Earth, controlled by a tiny elite.
Klaus Schwab has made it clear we have the means to improve the state of the world.
What he really means to say is we, the small but important group, have the power to impose our will upon the world.
This is one of the corporate financial giants of the sort of BlackRock, Vanguard, State Street, more Wall Street titans and private billionaire oligarchs concept.
The WEF generously funding by then represents our powerful interests around the globe.
This one world globalist concept is diametrically opposed to the world vision of Donald Trump.
He's a nationalist all to make America great again.
He wants the U.S.
to continue a leading role in the world.
Contrary to what the media have been indoctrinating, however, not as a sole empire, but as a key player in a multipolar world.
During the 75th session of the UN Assembly, Trump called upon leaders of all countries, recommending them to do likewise, make strong, independent, autonomous, sovereign nations.
This is not a globalist view.
It is a view liked by most countries and most of the people around the world.
What everyone knows, one world order would be one world tyranny.
Most don't dare to say so because the media slandered Trump, and openly admitting a sovereign nationalist opinion would be looked upon as utterly shameful.
It's no coincidence, therefore, that just two days after the raid, the former president was also subpoenaed to appear by the New York State Attorney General Letitia James for a six-hour deposition on his real estate business practices.
Except for stating his name, he invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, which was the appropriate thing to do.
You can't actually pick and choose.
You've got to take it for all other questions or not take it at all.
What's interesting is not the deposition, but two apparently independent parallel events against a former president, a raid of his residence, and a six-hour deposition by the New York Attorney General.
They'll be blown out of proportion by the media in an attempt to diminish his power and chances to run again in 2024.
But it ain't gonna work.
Although Trump said he would announce in September of 2024, the recent video looks like Trump is already on his campaign trail.
In fact, the reasons for deferring once you announce are kinds of laws that snap in.
If election were held today, Trump would beat Biden by a landslide of 45-32, a margin of 40%.
It's clear this legal fiasco has no doubt more to come.
Our last-ditch efforts to prevent the globalist House of Cards from further disintegrating.
The crumbling globalist cult will do whatever it can to prevent Trump from running again in 2024.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, I missed it on Saturday, but the founder of True the Vote, Katherine Englebright, and her internet sleuth, Greg Phillips, had a program called The Pit.
It's on Right Side News, and so if you didn't see it on Saturday, it's currently under a paywall with their service, but she sent me an email saying that she expected it to be released soon, and then it'll be Yeah, very interesting information.
Just more evidence from the people that brought you 2,000 mules when there was actually 54,000 mules.
And yeah, very interesting information.
And the downside is that they passed a law where federal elections have to retain voting records for 22 months after the election.
Why they need to flush it two months before the next election, nobody knows.
But apparently there's just a limited amount of storage capacity.
You know, they got unlimited capacity to store every email you ever sent to your grandma and every phone conversation you ever had with your grandkids, but they don't have the ability to store election information for more than 22 months.
Joe, I think you got that exactly right.
Mike, your thoughts?
Remember, they're going to flush every bit of evidence of the crimes that they committed in 2020.
And, you know, it'll be unprosecutable at that point.
So that's what they're doing.
They're running out the clock.
These are dirty SOBs.
Joe, I think you got that exactly right.
Mike, your thoughts?
Yeah, I'm thinking that you mentioned before when we talked about the court of public opinion and all this all this trial and all this evidence.
And stuff is really to convict somebody in the court of public opinion, not necessarily in court, because all the information would be thrown out.
So as if the general public is manipulated as we speak and voting has been manipulated, no one really seems to care, then it all falls in line.
The best thing to do if you can't win election is to take out the person before they even have the election.
And if that doesn't work, we'll try at the election box.
This is just the beginning.
Oh, I think you're exactly right, Mike.
And one of the great contributions of Donald Trump was to call it the fake news.
So today, many fewer Americans are open to being played by these media reports.
They see through the bullshit they are.
Meanwhile, this is profoundly disturbing.
Biden planning to protect us from cash beginning December 13th.
Some of America's smartest men, including Robert Kiyosaki, investment guru and author of the personal finance book Rich Dad Poor Dad, has some choice word for Executive Order 14067.
It would behoove you to listen.
He calls it the most treasonous act in U.S.
history, the creation of a central bank digital currency, or CBDC, communism in its purest form, encouraging Americans to stay away.
He's joined by Jim Rickards, another economist, investor, former CIA official, calling a step toward the end of cash, the greenback, in circulation since the founding fathers.
The new digital tokens can be turned off if the government doesn't like what you're doing, what you're saying, who you're talking with, who you're meeting, where you're going.
Rickards has four decades of experience on Wall Street.
It's Bitcoin's evil cousin, Rickards described it, that the singular event called C-Day will take place on December 13, 2022, and will disrupt traditional financial system of the United States.
When it happens, paper money will be worthless.
The U.S.
dollar is going to crash.
Consumer spending and access to basic needs are going to be restricted.
People with too much money are going to be penalized.
It's called ensuring responsible development of digital assets.
Any future dollar payment system should be designed in a way that's consistent with United States priorities and democratic values, including privacy protection, ensuring the global financial system has appropriate transparency, connectivity, platform, and architectural interoperability.
But they're emphasizing energy efficiency.
What that means is a smaller number of transactions.
It means you don't convert a currency from one form to another.
You don't actually have cash.
It has to be recorded electronically.
It's all done electronically, which means we are going to be screwed.
Rickards, thanks to Section 4 calling for urgent research, I believe the U.S.
dollar, the standard of the world since 1792, is going to be replaced by the digital dollar.
I call it Biden bucks because I want them to take full credit for what I consider to be crimes.
This is not like money in your online bank account.
No, it's new and different.
Every digital dollar will be a programmable token like Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies, but there's a big difference.
Cryptocurrencies are decentralized.
Instead, if it plays out the way I see it, Biden Bucks will have the full backing of the U.S.
Federal Reserve.
They will replace cash we have now and soon be the sole mandatory currency of the United States.
In this climate of fear Biden is creating over the possibility of Trump making a comeback, he has a Fed in his corner.
When Biden bucks are rolled out, many experts believe they will begin the year of total government control and surveillance, Rickards said.
It's not hyperbole.
This will dramatically expand the power and influence of the federal government, acting as a new type of spyware.
With Biden bucks, the government will be able to force you to comply with its agenda, because if you don't, they will turn off your money.
This won't be like freezing a bank account.
It'll be much easier and much worse.
Just think what this will mean if Biden gets his way or whoever is behind this plot.
You want to keep your internal combustion engine?
Your digital dollar suddenly won't pay for gas.
You'll be forced to buy electric.
Rickards calls it the tip of the fascist iceberg.
America will become a surveillance state like China and North Korea.
Is this scare talk?
No.
It's just Executive Order 14067, which Biden signed already on March 9th of 2022 by the authority vested in me as president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States.
Look it up.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, this is gonna be a Chinese social credit system on steroids, kids.
Yeah, you will be a completely un-person.
Not only will you not have any banking, you won't have any means of transportation, you won't have any food or water, you won't even have a house!
You'll own nothing and you'll be living under a bridge until you starve to death.
Yeah, this is the future they want for you.
And you can't eat enough bugs to survive in that environment.
So, are you going to stand up against this crap or are you just going to quietly whimper your way into your death hole?
It's your responsibility as a human being to fight against this daily until we defeat these people.
Joe, I just can't see allowing this to happen.
If they steal the midterms, I think a civil war is inevitable.
Mike, your thoughts?
Yeah, the best way to control would be through the economy, and they would just run the economy into the ground.
We've seen this happen on a smaller scale, like in Lebanon.
Lebanon, originally about two years ago, before they had their original crisis, was about 1500 pounds or lira to a dollar.
And now they are projecting that in the next couple of weeks, it may reach as much as 70,000 or 80,000.
And then when you go to an ATM machine, you cannot, you can't even get your money out.
So the control of money controls the people.
And if they can't get what they want, They'll make you subservient.
Very similar to like the Mark of the Beast or 666 in the Bible projections.
Very good.
Very good.
Very troubling indeed.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Check this out.
There's a distinction between national security and criminal cases, and in this instance, it seems to me from the public reporting and the Attorney General's conduct that this is going on pursuant to a national security investigation, which takes it out of the criminal division and into the national security division where I used to work.
And the receipts that are now becoming publicly available show vague descriptions of things because the government is likely going to come in and say some of this stuff was classified.
But it doesn't seem to be the case when Donald Trump issued sweeping declassification orders on multiple occasions, both as president on multiple times.
So that's going to be a distinction that we need to watch for.
And it's incumbent upon the government, the DOJ, to tell us what happened.
OK, so you just touched on something that I want to dig into here with you.
Which is the declassification process and what your position was at the time and whether or not you were involved because we know there's a procedure that has to take place.
The president can't just, you know, sort of wave over a bunch of boxes and say this is all declassified.
Can you take us through the process where these documents were declassified by this president?
Yeah, so the normal process, and I was the Deputy, you know, there's multiple occasions, but I think I was serving as Deputy Director of National Intelligence.
If we needed to declassify through the normal chain of command for lower-level employees, we'd have to go through a rigorous process to do that procedurally.
But the President of the United States is and always been the ultimate unilateral classification authority to classify and declassify.
If he says something is declassified, that's it.
Then it's declassified.
He issued a strong statement in October of 2020 declassifying all Russiagate all Hillary Clinton documents, and that's up on, you know, publicly available.
And then at the end of his administration in December and January, he felt so much more information needed to be classified.
He declassified whole sets of documents that should have come out.
Now, the GSA has since come out, the Government Service Administration, said they mistakenly packed some boxes and moved them to Mar-a-Lago.
That's not on the president.
That's on the National Archives to sort that material out.
They cannot prosecute him for intentionally, even if it was classified, which is highly unlikely that he should be sweeping orders, like we went through with the Hillary Clinton saga.
They'll never meet the burden of intent because the president didn't pack it up and take it himself.
The GSA has said they did it and they made a mistake, and that should have been really the end of it.
It should have been a cordial subpoena where, at most, where they said, OK, we just need this and we'll get the rest back to you.
I mean, President Obama and President Clinton still have classified materials in their possession in their homes that they have not released to this day, per the National Archives.
So are you saying that these particular documents that were at Mar-a-Lago were all declassified in that December-January period of what year?
I'm saying, well, the end of 2020 and early 2021, before the President lost something, whole sets of documents were.
You know, I don't know what was chipped down there because I wasn't the GSA people moving those documents.
Only they do.
They packed them.
They admitted that they packed them, which is their job, and transported them there and stored them somewhere.
So the GSA can provide a lot more clarity to us on how and what was moved.
And the GSA could have worked with the Department of Justice.
That would have been my move as a national security prosecutor who brought terrorism cases all the time.
This is an extreme national security measure taken for what seems to be a wholly unnecessary national security approach.
Alright, so you're saying the GSA packed these boxes, they've already admitted that they sent some of them there in error.
So then when in June, when they went in with the subpoena and they collected the boxes, apparently then, you know, According to one line of this story, somebody said, no, there's actually more here, and you need to come back for what is here, because it shouldn't be here.
Do you think that is what happened?
And the Secret Service individual was involved in that, is one of the storylines that we're pursuing.
Yeah, I don't know who that individual is, but I think it was clear from President Trump's statements that I believe he put out on Truth Social that he invited whoever was there in June or whatever date we're talking about to look and have whatever they want and come back, and I'm paraphrasing, to see whatever they needed.
So if that was the case, which it seems to be because the DOJ has not controverted that statement, then they could have come back because of the voluntary cooperation.
I don't know, I don't have any details outside of media reporting in terms of that incident.
Yeah.
But again, it seems to be, you know, there's a different way to treat people regarding classified information if your name Hillary Clinton or James Comey versus if your name is Donald Trump.
And it's just not the even hands way to do it.
It's not how we used to do it.
So do you know if there was interaction between the former president Trump and these investigators after that June 3rd when he came in and said, hey, let me know if you need anything.
You know, we're here to cooperate.
Were there subsequent attempts?
Excuse me, you know, Mr. President, we need to get those boxes.
Please send them by this date.
Were there efforts out there to have these things retrieved in a much more less intrusive manner?
I don't know.
I can't speak to that.
I wasn't a witness to any of that or part of the conversation.
But you know who got cleared up really fast?
The Department of Justice by saying we tried on this date and this date and this date because they're going to have the documentation.
They had FBI agents with them and the GSA would have been there with them because they're responsible for the custodians of the document movement.
They have records as well.
These aren't classified records.
They could put them out.
They can put them out overnight if they want.
They can put out the underlying information in a warrant if they want it, but they're choosing not to.
And for the Attorney General to come in heavy-handed last night and say, I personally signed off on the warrant, that's not the role of the Attorney General to tell the American public that.
We know that.
The role of the Attorney General is to tell us why, in this case, was it so necessary?
And that gets me to the point of this whole conversation about nuclear information.
Okay, let's just say that's the case.
They waited two years to go seize this information?
Or, and if they get away with the two-year mark, how about the warrant was issued on Friday and they executed on Monday, so it was so sensitive they took the weekend off.
I, as a national security prosecutor, would get these warrants and execute them the next minute.
And I think you'll find every national security prosecutor will tell you the same.
Cash Patel, who is a former Department of Defense chief of staff, makes impeccable points.
I think it's just devastating and displays the political corruption of this entire effort.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, one of the things that Tucker Carlson mentioned in this little diatribe that's at the Conservative Treehouse was that the government classifies everything.
I mean, everything is a state secret.
So in 2011, Panetta made a big point about, we're going to declassify a whole bunch of documents from World War I. What was one of the documents that was classified in 1917?
How to make invisible ink.
Like, that's something that, like Tucker said, you can go to any magic shop and buy it for your grade schooler as a prank gift.
It's ridiculous that for a hundred years our government kept secret how to make invisible ink.
That's how stupid these SOBs are, and that's how stupid Stupid, they think we are.
It's unbelievable.
Yeah, we had Seth Rich murdered because he downloaded the DNC files and sent them to WikiLeaks, but instead of investigating it, they turned it loose to CrowdStrike, and CrowdStrike said, oh gee, we found out who's released those emails.
It's Guccifer 2.0, and we used the Vault 7 CIA material to make sure the fingerprints pointed to Russia, so we could say, Russia, Russia, Russia!
Oh, well, Gooseverse 2.0's in jail.
More documents have been released.
Oh, gee, let's create Fancy Bear.
Oh, Russia, Russia, Russia!
Oh, Fancy Bear?
Uh, he died.
Uh, let's create Cozy Bear.
They created...
Three fake online personalities to variously describe the leaks from WikiLeaks that we know came from the DNC, and the two MS-13 gang members that shot and only wounded Seth Rich went down to get their money from some insider FBI guy in Virginia, and they both got shot just a couple hours after Seth Rich did.
So, you know, If the FBI really wanted to solve a single damn crime in this country, there's hundreds of them they could solve.
We could have a great country, but we don't have that kind of an FBI.
No, I'm sorry to say we don't.
Mike, your thoughts?
Yeah, I was listening to what the person was saying, and when they're talking about the GSA pact of things, how in the world could Trump be in trouble for packing secret materials that was packed by the government in the first place?
That just shows the sincerity and insincerity of this political hack job.
If he had packed it personally, there may be a lot more to this, but considering that fact, Trump shouldn't even be involved.
I agree.
I agree.
That's exactly right.
How much more we're about to learn, it's fascinating, really fascinating.
Meanwhile, the death business is booming in the age of vaccines.
Unlike when funeral homes and hospitals were empty during the pandemic, the death business is booming in the age of vaccines.
The pandemic was a fraud, but the facts is very real and very deadly.
In fact, the aftermath, destruction and death after being injected, is far more severe than anyone could have predicted.
Except for those behind it all, who have a master plan to wipe out As many as 7.5 billion of Earth's occupants.
While the fact-checkers are hard at work to get the official narrative out, others are sounding the alarm about the shots and what they are doing to humanity.
North America's leading provider of funeral, cremation, and cemetery service says business is booming ever since the COVID vaccines were introduced.
Cirrus Corporation International, which handles some 450,000 corpses per year, saw massive increasing earnings, according to a report from Natural News.
Funerals are a solid but slow growth business, and the trend toward cremations hasn't helped, writes Alex Berenson on his Substack.
But between 2019 and 2021, SEI's earnings per share more than doubled from $1.09 to $4.57.
At first, SEI blamed the COVID pull-forward event.
What this means is because people who were already close to death died in large numbers supposedly due to COVID, the death count in future years will be less, balancing things out.
When it did not happen as expected, however, outsiders like Berenson came to the conclusion the death tolls were not because of COVID, but rather because of the shots introduced as the cure.
Lucky for Service Corporation and its investors, bull forward isn't turning out to be a problem.
Americans are still dying at rates well above normal, even as COVID becomes a minimal part of business.
Couple related articles?
Live insurance payouts skyrocket 258% as post-vaccine deaths rapidly accelerate another.
New data from live insurance companies confirm Americans are dying in unusually large numbers.
I think that COVID cases on a national basis is just not material to our numbers, meaning COVID doesn't matter.
So as we tried to point out yesterday, we're experiencing elevated numbers of consumers.
A phrase, elevated numbers of consumers is a bizarre way to say there are more dead bodies that need funerals, burials, and cremation than normal.
They're getting lots and lots of cash and profits while the vaccine manufacturers escape liability for death and injury.
And the plan for more injections and more vaccines continue as a ruling class tries to convince everyone to be injected for monkey pox and now vaccine-derived polio.
Meanwhile, many have refrained from the rollout, but get this.
Watch this.
Watch this.
Listen to what they said, your government wants you dead, with booster jabs that last forever more.
It's beginning to look a lot like genocide, with every jab you take.
But the only thing you'll see if you're watching BBC is that the shit's all fake.
Boris has said that he'd rather you dead as soon as you possibly can.
If you don't comply, he'll give you a fine and drag you away in a van.
He'll make sure you won't be spending Christmas with your nan.
It's beginning to look a lot like genocide in every hospital.
But the nurses dance all day, while the doctors count their pay.
And there's no one there to take your call.
It's beginning to look a lot like genocide.
They're jabbing kids in school.
But if you're out of luck, Big Pharma doesn't give a fuck.
And it's all your fault.
Big Pharma doesn't give a fuck.
Roll up your sleeve and we'll make you believe that this shot will do you no harm.
We'll keep making boosters shots until you buy the bomb.
It's beginning to look a lot like genocide.
When you turn on TV, they're driving.
They're dropping down like flies because the government lies one day.
We'll see these bastards swing.
I think that's pretty terrific and hits the nail right on the head.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, the quadrupled first family are both having COVID relapses.
They've had COVID and COVID and COVID.
So it's like, yeah, this week, the new CDC COVID guidance agency admitting that it was wrong.
Yeah, they changed their guidance.
It's like, well, you don't need to wear a mask.
You don't need social distance.
You don't need to have contact tracing.
You don't need to take a jab.
Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine are great.
What else can they possibly backtrack on?
Yeah, it's ridiculous.
They still need to be prosecuted and there's a great effort going on with Dr.
Richard Fleming, and we've got an article of his posted at Principia Scientific, along with the new CDC COVID guidance article.
And then here's another one that's at Principia Scientific.
15% of fully vaccinated Americans now have serious health problems.
So, you know, healthy people are not good customers for the drug industry, so they would rather you be sick and crippled your whole life, because that's their customer base.
And so we're participating in a system that has been evil since it was taken over by the Rockefellers and the Carnegie's with the Flexner Report in 1910.
So you figured out how many years they've been lying to you about wonderful modern medicine.
Joe, you make many excellent points.
Meanwhile, The New York Times fears the FBI raid will re-elect Donald Trump.
After years of hesitancy to embrace the reality of Trump's massive popularity, some of Trump's opponents are finally starting to see the writing on the wall that the mega king is likely to win again in 2024.
What's making it sink in for even the leftist New York Times is the engulfing feeling that Friday's FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago could have implication for 2024.
By making Trump even more of a superstar to the American people and, most importantly, to the voters.
The move by the FBI to raid Trump is seen as highly political by Republicans and independents, which is likely enough to help him win.
Even the left sees it now.
While Merrick Garland has done nothing to even attempt to reduce a skyrocketing violent crime all around us in major cities, he's used his office to declare white supremacy the greatest domestic threat.
No one likes corrupt police action.
Even the bubble dwellers in Washington are getting blowback on their treatment of Trump and his supporters, saying they're scrambling for cover, even while they have a firm grasp on their haughty disdain for the people of the American Republic.
Check out a Fox coverage of 61-year-old David Brooks, whom the New York Times calls a conservative writer, and asks what he's trying to conserve.
The New York Times columnist David Brooks worried Thursday the FBI's raid of former President Trump Mar-a-Lago will help his chances for electoral victory in 2024.
He further argued Trump's central message is societal elites are ruining America, And that there's a lot of truth in that.
Why is Donald Trump so powerful, he asked?
How did he come to dominate one of two major parties and get himself elected president?
He answers, it's Trump's narrative.
Powerful stories that ring true to tens of millions, the main being America is being ruined by corrupt coastal elites.
He argued, the FBI raid has united the Republican Party.
Several weeks ago, about half of Republican voters were ready to move on from Trump.
According to a New York Times Senate College poll this week, however, the entire party seems to be rallying behind him.
Brooks' characterization of the GOP and Trump standing prior to the raid is not consistent with the majority of polls, however, which, according to RealClearPolitics, shows Trump having a 27.8% lead over his next potential primary challenger, Ron DeSantis.
Trump-endorsed candidates have also been achieving key wins in primaries across the country.
The Times columnist expressed concern the FBI raid would make Republicans more likely to vote in the 2022 midterms.
According to a Trafalgar Group Convention of State Action survey, 83% of likely Republican voters said the FBI search made them more motivated to vote.
Brooks said he fears a prosecution imprisonment of Trump during an election would constitute the most likely path to a complete Democrat breakdown.
Why is Donald Trump?
We got all this.
He continued, according to this narrative, there's an interlocking network of highly educated Americans who make up what the Trumpians call the regime.
Washington power players, liberal media, big foundations, elite universities, woke corporations.
These people are corrupt, condescending, and immoral, and looking out only for themselves.
They are out to get Trump because Trump is a mercy who stands up to them.
They are not only out to get Trump, they are out to get you.
That's exactly right.
He admits this narrative has a core of truth to it, that highly educated metropolitan elites have become something of a self-enclosed Brahmin class.
He argues, however, that Trumpian propaganda turns what is the unfortunate social chasm into a venomous conspiracy theory.
His political career has been kept afloat by elite scorn.
The more elite scorn him, the more Republicans love him.
Joe, I'm telling you, fascinating what's going on here.
And Mike, I'm glad to say, is rejoining us.
Go ahead, Joe.
Oh, I was wondering why he dropped out in the previous segment.
Yeah, there's just so much evil.
It's just unbelievable with these folks.
And they've got a lot to cover up.
And Unfortunately for them, we're pulling a number of different threads that are going to end up leaving this emperor very naked in the very near future.
So, you know, just keep pulling for the A-Team because we've got to pull this out of the bag to save humanity and our unborn grandchildren.
Mike, you can pick up on any of the above, including the musical.
It's beginning to look a lot like genocide and the report of David Brooks of the New York Times that he thinks that raid is going to help Trump get reelected.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, I do believe especially when you go back and look at the way they handle this, and obviously it's it's it's created such a thing.
They wouldn't stand up in court that A logical person would actually probably get more mad.
And since other people are already mad at Trump, I think what's going to do is energize the Trump base to be a lot stronger in one way.
Also, I think you're going to end up getting a lot of very liberal people that may not necessarily like what's going on with the current president to actually agree to.
So you may end, especially people are civil libertarians.
This idea, if it could happen to him, it could happen to anybody.
And when you go and you look back at our Fourth Amendment and the history of the Fourth Amendment and the how the English used to treat people, they would just go in and grab.
They would go for no reason at all and grab papers.
That's that's something that the United States has stood for since 1791, December 15th.
So when we passed the first 10 amendments, that's one of the founding things.
So that's going to be very important.
The genocide part.
We're having a mini revival of COVID here, here in our part of Central Texas.
In many schools, some schools opened last week, our school opened last week, some schools opened up today.
Some schools, there's a tremendous amount of people having COVID, and many of these people have already had two shots, as many boosters as you could get, done everything that they said, And then, as it's still changing, I'm really beginning to wonder if that genocide thing isn't something that we probably need to talk much more about.
I know Taiwan, not only are they facing, you know, the Chinese army, but they're back on everybody wearing face masks and everything else, you know, to try to do this.
So, I think that's one good way you can control people is to keep them in their house, and that's probably not healthy for you either, and keep you all masked up.
All those are really bad.
Great points.
Yes, absolutely.
Meanwhile, In less than three weeks, states can begin destroying their 2022 election evidence.
It's time to petition the records we kept.
Joe was raising this point earlier.
The 2020 election was arguably the most damaging event in American history, certainly the most horrific of modern times.
The Constitution was discarded as villainous.
Power-hungry people planned and stole the election.
They worked hard to cover it up.
Took the Democrats under senile candidate a lot of help to steal.
It could never have been done without the assistance of the corrupt media, corrupt big tech, corrupt Trump haters, and the DOJ, GOP, and corrupt DOJ and corrupt FBI.
Many individuals and state governments was involved.
Trump tried to stop this deal, but he and his team never had a chance.
No honest American knew how corrupt and criminal numerous institutions across our nation had become.
When some tried to get to the bottom of the crime, they were blocked.
In some situations, with machine data, for example, all the info on the machines was erased.
With all the crimes, no criminals were charged.
Good Americans who protested were charged with false crimes.
America has been turned upside down.
Slowly and now quickly, the times come when election will be in the history books.
In less than three weeks, all information related to the 2020 election can be destroyed forevermore.
The law states must be kept for 22 months.
That's less than 24, which would be two years.
All those records can be destroyed.
22 months after the 2020 election will be September 3rd.
It's up to America to petition our courts to have all the information saved for historical purposes.
More and more information is uncovered every day.
The election was stolen because it never should have been certified.
Please work to keep the records maintained into the future until forensic audits and legitimate recounts can be performed.
Meanwhile, Justice Robert tried to flip conservatives on Roe v. Wade.
Last week, we learned, before the court issued its final decision on Dobbs, Chief Justice Robert tried to reach a compromise that would have upheld Roe v. Wade while nevertheless approving the Mississippi abortion law.
His efforts were scuttled by the leak of the draft opinion.
How great is that?
Some pro-abortion activists at the court leaked the draft to hope to put pressure to keep Roe in place, and the leak did the exact opposite.
You have to admit, that's pretty funny.
According to CNN, multiple sources said the chief was only trying to persuade Kavanaugh and Barrett to change their position when the draft was leaked.
It poiled his efforts, cementing the conservative justice decision to stick with her original vote.
CNN sources claim the justices were aware the draft opinion had been leaked before Politico published it on May 2nd.
Roberts issued a scathing statement calling the leak a betrayal of the confidence of the court intended to undermine the integrity of our operation.
But from CNN's report, one can't help but wonder if one reason he was so livid was it undermined his ongoing discussion against fellow conservatives to uphold Roe.
While he eventually voted with the other five to uphold the Mississippi law, he joined the liberals on the bench in opposing the majority to overturn Roe.
In his concurring opinion with Dobbs, Rob said overturning Roe is a serious jolt to the legal system.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well I've been very involved in the political system in Texas for my whole entire life.
I did a bit shoot video with a local videography.
It's at https bit.ly, which I think stands for library, backslash Joe, J-O-E with a capital J, case sensitive, O-L-S-O-N.
One, and that's on voter fraud in the state of Texas, which I'm very knowledgeable about and have been for over 10 years.
Then I also did number two, which is on the rampant amount of criminal corruption, including over $200 million of secreted funds to be in an illegal $1 billion Disney monorail.
Project that was proposed in 1989 in Houston so very involved in that in the political corruption there and then like I mentioned the program that we did on Friday when Miriam wasn't available at the first part of the program, I used my extra time to rant about the FBI.
And in my closing remarks, I'm going to go ahead and finish describing that, which will be at that same website, bit.ly backslash Joe Olson. And this will be number three when we post it later this week or first of next week. Mike, your thoughts? Yeah, I really want to go off on this one. - Yeah.
I'm kind of sick and tired of having a lot of people say their one thing and do something else.
We have six people on the Supreme Court who are allegedly Catholic or Roman Catholic.
Then when you have the Chief Justice, who is Roman Catholic, advocating for abortion, even though that's not a principal part of his Church beliefs and then trying to flip a couple other allegedly Catholic people the same way.
This is ridiculous.
We need to start looking at Republicans that aren't Republicans.
Today, we have an election out in Wyoming with Lynne Cheney, and it looks like Lynne Cheney will probably not go for a fourth term.
And we need to probably start looking at people to actually stand up.
So if you vote for somebody because of their beliefs, They should actually participate in those beliefs and not believe something else.
You can't have a deal like Mitt Romney that kind of changes his mind on everything.
And you can't really.
That's one thing that you could say about some of our former presidents, Reagan and some other people, even our 45, that they pretty much stay with what they believe.
But the idea of trying to flip votes and it doesn't make much sense when you think about it, because If they can go ahead and ruin the sanctity of life at the beginning, they can ruin the sanctity of life in the middle, they can ruin the sanctity of life at the end.
We're going to be no different than it was in Nazi Germany.
We need to actually try to uphold the idea of life, and life doesn't just begin, you know, after you're born.
It has to start beforehand.
I'll reserve my comments about yours to my final thoughts.
Meanwhile, here we are.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, Broercon, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
The Wood of the Holy, Jerry Barini, writes, As someone who's carefully examined and questioned the news that is most lavishly accepted as real or true, I assume you noted the suspicious nature of the Anne Hex story.
Not that we need further proof of sinister forces and the wit of the holly at work, starting at 115.
Why is a woman we were told was in a coma and after that told was no longer viable trying to escape the goons loading her into an ambulance?
Yes, people kill themselves and people have horrible accidents stipulated.
But as you know, suicides and accidents are often murders.
Do I care because a particular person is, was a celebrity?
No.
I care because almost nothing is as it seems.
I don't know that the woman being forced into that ambulance was, in fact, Anne Hecht.
I don't know if Ann Hegg was in the car.
We're told she crashed.
After decades of movie and TV fiery crashes in which vehicles contain no drivers, it's reasonable to assume that the car might have been remotely controlled.
We don't know whether it contained someone or did not.
Meanwhile, Andrew Cuomo, Beverly, writes, The only reason Cuomo is speaking out against the FBI raid is because he fears the same might be done to him.
If that happened, the FBI would definitely find damning evidence.
Cuomo is a P.O.S.
and a murderer.
If there's any justice in the world, he will at least be sued in civil court by families of all those nursing home residents who were intentionally killed by Cuomo's orders to send COVID patients to nursing homes.
We should criminally prosecute for this, as well as for intentionally killing COVID patients by hearing doctors use ventilators and deny life-saving treatment.
Side note, glad to see Dennis Camino didn't stay angry with you too long and is back on the show.
Meanwhile, my petition before the Supreme Court is going to a conference on the 20th of September.
Look at the July 7th entry there under Proceedings and Orders.
What that means is it's got a very good chance of being heard by the Supreme Court.
This is a flowchart for paid but also unpaid cases.
Litigants have 90 days from their final decline, as I was declined by the Wisconsin Supreme Court to file.
Then the petitioner who won, you know, that would be Posner, has the opportunity to file a response, which he declined to do.
Then I would have had the opportunity to file a reply, but since he did not respond, no necessity for that.
Meanwhile, interest groups could handle or file amicus briefs, one did in my case, broadening to discuss false flags in general.
The Chief Justice then, and we're talking about the top of the second column, drafts an initial discuss list and distributes them to the rest of the chambers.
For members of the CIRC pool, the Clerk of the Court randomly assigns petitions to participating Chambers within the Chambers randomly assigned to Clerks.
Clerks submit memos to the Chief Justice's Chambers and distribute the completed memos to all the participants.
Within each Justice's Chamber, Clerks review and make up the memos with additional comments and recommendations.
Top of Column 3, the Discuss List and Conference.
The court collects all the documents and distributes them to the justices chambers.
Associate justices place cases on the discuss list.
Any case that fails to make this list is summarily denied in the lower court ruling stance.
I have made the cut.
Meanwhile, next to last, all the justices meet in a private conference in which they vote to either grant or deny certiorari.
Four votes are necessary, a minimum of four, to proceed.
That's going to take place on the 28th of September, I should know, by the 3rd of October, whether or not my case is going before the court, I believe it will happen.
If you want to learn more about it, check out GiveSendGo.com.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes.
Well, and mention of the little rant that I had on Friday with Jim.
I've read thousand, at least a thousand history books.
And so I'm not just, you know, shooting from the hip on this stuff, but I was pretty excited on Friday.
So I decided that we'd go ahead and edit out the articles that were discussed and just use my comments because that was relevant to history that people don't know about the FBI.
And so just a quick little refresher.
Here's the stuff that I'm going to be discussing to add to that.
And that is the mafia, the CIA and George Bush by Pete Bruton.
This is discussed in my part two about Houston corruption.
That was published in 1992.
The Very Best Men by Evan Thomas.
This is the early history of the CIA.
Every one of the early guys in the CIA was from the poison Ivy League colleges.
Yeah, because those are the boys you can really count on.
Those are the families that we really need to make sure are nurtured and protected by our federal government.
That was issued in 19, or copyrighted in 1995.
Then we had Puppet Masters, The Secret Life of J. Edgar Hoover.
That's by Richard Hack, and that was published in 2004.
That's the one that I mentioned, two documented cases of treason on the part of Hoover against the OSS and against the operations during World War II.
And if FDR would have been a legitimate president that was interested in stopping the war, he'd have put that guy in front of a military tribunal, frog-marched him over to the Spanish Embassy where he busted the OSS trying to get the codes for the Enigma machine, and shot the SOB right there on the sidewalk in front of the Spanish Embassy.
It's a lesson to every other traitor in the America.
But that didn't happen.
Moving along, we had the Teapot Dump scandal written by Leighton McCartney in 2008.
That's Warren G. Hardy.
You're going to be shocked.
That's all I can say.
You'll just be shocked.
Then we had Devil's Chessboard by David Talbott in 2016.
Further, more evidence was released on the CIA, so that's why we need to update that.
And then a little offside shoot is Target Patent by Robert Wilcox, which was published in 2008.
The OSS killed Patent because Patent was going to come back and expose the crimes of the CRF Eisenhower, who was a member from 1924, the same time that Hoover was appointed to be head of the FBI.
So he was a deep state trader from day one.
And I'll be discussing a little bit more about the crimes of these SOBs at that particular time.
So that's all for now, kids.
Mike, your final thought?
I'd like to conclude by looking back at what's taking place there at Mar-a-Lago and the alleged illegal search and seizure of his property.
And I think this is the foreshadowing of some drastic things that are going to come.
And also look at what you're talking about with the coins.
The two things are basically going to control us Probably also with the advent of maybe monkeypox or another offshoot of this COVID.
We're having some dark days ahead of us.
We need to try to wake up and really try to change what's going on.
Well, special thanks to Joe Olson from Houston, Mike Cunningham from Austin for excellent commentary, often bringing in additional issues over and beyond the stories we're covering directly.
In response to Mike's observation about the Supreme Court, but they also apply to the FBI, the Department of Justice, the executive branch of the government, we must draw a distinction between subjective beliefs or convictions and role responsibilities.
If you are a police officer, you have the role responsibility to enforce the law, even if you disagree with the law personally.
If you're a pharmacist, you have the role responsibility to fulfill prescriptions that are legal even if you don't like, for example, it might be a day after abortion pill.
If you're a member of the Supreme Court, You are obligated to make your rulings based upon the Constitution and cases and how they apply properly, not on the basis of your subjective opinion.
So even if you are a Roman Catholic, that does not mean that you ought to be ruling as you would on the basis of your subjective opinion.
You must fulfill your role responsibility under the law.
I've explained on many occasions why I believe Roe was properly decided, why Roe is the only ethical and proper decision because it allows every woman to make the decision based on her own personal circumstances.
No one under Roe is required to get an abortion, but under the pro-life position, you may be required to carry a term, an unwanted fetus turning women into reproductive slaves.
I feel as strongly about this as I possibly could.
I have dealt with this issue for 35 years with classes of students who never cease to astonish me with how many varieties of birth control they discovered or how many reasons why some woman might be in a position where she needed an abortion and deservedly so.
I just therefore emphasize we all have our right to our personal opinion, which I respect in each and every case.
And very often for good, even excellent reasons, but we must never lose sight of that role responsibility.
The reason the FBI raid is questionable is because the FBI was acting on subjective beliefs about political issues and not on the basis of the law.
It was outrageous, and when the court or the Department of Justice or teachers or cops Violate their oath, their role responsibility.
We're in trouble one way or another, sometimes large, sometimes small.
So here we are.
Let me simply encourage you at the end of another Texas Tuesday to spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, the people you love, because we do not know how much time we have left.
Thanks for being here today.
▲
Export Selection