All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 9, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:16:38
Need to Know News TRIPLE TEXAS TUESDAY (9 Aug 2022) w/ Joe Olson, Virginia Young, and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, and today on Texas Tuesday, our cup runneth over.
We have boundless joy.
We're not only joined by Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, but by Virginia Curry from Spring.
So we have three Texans today to take on the issues, which are very, very serious.
The FBI raided Mar-a-Lago as part of an investigation into classified material.
The president confirmed his home was under siege by a large group of agents who even broke into his safe.
Some 30 agents?
These are dark times for our nation as my beautiful home is currently under siege, raided, and occupied by a large group of FBI agents, Trump confirmed.
The investigation is focused on boxes of materials, some 15, from the National Archives.
They're saying Trump should not have taken with him from the White House that they included classified information.
They even broke into his safe.
Trump didn't say what they were looking for, just that his home was under siege.
The 15 boxes reportedly contain classified information.
I doubt that very much.
They just appear to have been memorabilia for the most part, but it turns out there's a law that he cannot alter them or destroy them, even if they're trifling.
The search focused on the part of the club where his office and personal quarters were headed.
Here he is at Trump Tower after announcing the FBI had raided his home.
They even broke into my safe.
It began Monday morning, took several hours.
I After working and cooperating with the relevant government agencies, this unannounced raid on my home was not necessary or appropriate.
Trump called it prosecutorial misconduct, the weaponization of the justice system, and an attack by radical left Democrats who desperately don't want me to run for president in 2024, especially based on recent polls, and it will likewise do anything to stop Republicans and Conservatives in the upcoming midterm elections.
I think he got it exactly right.
The DOJ didn't say whether Merrick Garland had personally authorized, but it's inconceivable it could have happened without his approval.
A search warrant does not mean that criminal charges were near or expected, but required court authorization.
Eric Trump told Fox there was nothing in the safe, confirmed the raid was tied to the National Archives, he called it outrageous, and it has to have come from POTUS and or someone in the White House.
Trump's Mar-a-Lago home where agents were investigating where he took them when he left with a statement that he's made I stood up to America's bureaucratic corruption.
I restored power to the people and truly delivered for our country like we have never seen before.
The establishment hated it.
Now, as they watch my endorsed candidates win big victories and see my dominance in all the polls, they are trying to stop me and the Republican Party once more.
The lawlessness, political persecution, and witch-hunt must be exposed and stopped.
I will continue to fight for the great American people.
A fine statement.
Trump was not at home at the time.
He was rather in New York.
He usually spends August at his golf club in Bedminster, New Jersey, but Trump was actually in New York City.
The National Archives asked Trump to examine whether he had violated a federal law.
The National Archives asked the DOJ to examine whether the former president violated federal law.
No doubt these were Democrat appointees who are pushing for this to embarrass Trump.
There are multiple statutes governing classified information punishable by up to five years of crime to remove and retain them in an unauthorized location.
No doubt his home, however, would have been an authorized location.
Among the correspondence he had apparently included with North Korean Jim Jong-un, which Trump had described as beautiful letters, and a handwritten one that Barack Obama had left behind for his successor, some Republicans were immediately critical.
Using government power to persecute political opponents is something we've seen many times from Third World Marxist dictatorships, but never before in America, wrote Marco Rubio.
These were boxes outside the White House before having been moved.
The Presidential Record Act requires the White House to preserve all memos, letters, email, and papers the President touched and send them to the archives.
But Trump had the odd habit of ripping up papers when he's done with them, what some aides call his unofficial filing system.
This may be the source of the problem.
Fragments collected from the Oval Office and the White House private residence were sent to the Records Management Office across the street and reassembled.
The former president reportedly also flushed some records.
Maggie Hagerman, a New York Times correspondent, claims in her upcoming book that Trump would give records the royal flush.
She even included a photograph reporting to show one such record at the bottom of a commode.
Joe, your thoughts first.
Oh, this is absolutely ridiculous.
From 1956 to 1971, the FBI conducted what was called counterintelpro, where they infiltrated and set up people forever.
And then we've got a long history of what they did with the 9-1-1 stuff.
There's a great series of stuff at Conservative Treehouse, and I'm not sure if it's on the reading list for today or not, but we'll definitely cover that.
But one thing they didn't mention was the Karas Massari, who was arrested August 16, 2001.
He was hijacker number 20.
They covered that up.
And then we also have them framing during the Trump administration.
Roger Stone, George Papadopoulos, Manford, Carter Page, Steve Bannon, Uh, they busted Project Veritas, and what everybody's saying is that they're trying to get a conviction against Trump to keep him from being able to run, based on 18 U.S.C.
2071, which says if you're convicted, you're disqualified from any office.
And next on the list, guaranteed, is DeSantis, because if he makes a single peep, they'll claim that he was, uh, interfering with the investigation.
And the curious thing is, Bruce Reinhart, Who was an AAG in the Florida region from 1996 until 2008 quit the US Attorney's Office in order to be a process.
Plaintiff's defendant for Epstein and the rest of his gang.
And then after he finished that, somebody in the White House not only did they put the head guy that was in charge of dismissing all the Epstein stuff, Alex Acosta, in his Department of Labor, but they also had this guy put in and he was sworn into office on March 19, 2018.
So I'm guessing that this was a Prince Cushy pick that I think Jared and Ivanka are the ones who keep picking these backstabbers to put in office so that they can turn around and stab Trump repeatedly.
It's insane.
Well said, Joe.
Virginia, your thoughts?
Can I just say what he said?
No.
Agreed.
Yeah.
What are they, what are they looking for?
I mean, are they, what are they, what are they slipping in?
I, if they can go in to, to our, uh, the presidents, the former president, wherever you want, uh, house, what's next?
This is, this is unreal.
Unprecedented.
Terrifying.
It absolutely is.
Michael, you want to add on this story?
Yeah, they've assassinated presidents before, but in my memory, I can't recall any FBI raid on president's private residence.
You know, this is just an example, a blatant example, of we have a Zionist-occupied government.
Both the FBI and the Justice Department are completely occupied.
They don't work for the American people.
Whatever Trump's downside has been, and it has been a really big one, their continued attempt to convict him over something over January 6th.
And now stuff like this is just an in-your-face example of how the powers that be are desperate to not to see him in the White House again.
I think they did their best to control what he did in his four years, but it must have set back their agenda so significantly that they rigged the 2020 election like it's never been done before.
But I guess they're afraid they can't do it again.
And the last thing, there was a terrific rant by Dan Bongino on Fox last night, calling this, and I'm quoting, third world bullshit.
And he knew that he was not supposed to use that word on broadcast TV, but he said it again, third word bullshit.
And he's right, that's exactly what you would expect from a banana republic being run by a third world Marxist dictator.
Except now there's no dictator on top.
We have this team of Marxist dictators running what we nostalgically call the Biden administration with a completely incompetent addled front man for president.
I watched Dan Bongino on Jesse Watters.
They brought in Jonathan Turley.
Tucker wasn't there, but his sub brought in other experts, including Alan Dershowitz, Sean Hannity, too.
It was really quite remarkable.
Coverage by Fox about this.
Meanwhile, the FBI raid designed to stop him from running in 2022.
Paul Joseph Watson.
The FBI raid is specifically designed to stop him from running again, legal experts have concluded.
The Biden regime dubiously claimed it had no advanced knowledge of the raid, which has overwhelmingly been characterized as politically motivated.
According to legal experts, it clearly intended to be part of an effort to charge him with mishandling White House records.
Which could stop him from being able to run again.
If Trump were convicted under this federal statute, he'd be prohibited from holding any office, including that of president, said a former federal prosecutor, Nima Rahmani.
That would be huge.
Here's the very statute to which Joe was alluding, 18 U.S.
Code 207-1.
Notice in the second part, anyone who having the custody should willfully or unlawfully conceal, remove, mutilate, obliterate, falsify, or destroy shall be fined or imprisoned for not more than three years and forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.
Just imagine How the Democrats have scrounged around to find this.
The provision mandates, just as I said, which would eliminate him from facing off against anyone other than Biden, the Democrats, would not be so stupid.
While Trump took 15 boxes at docks, they were returned in January this year.
Agents were looking to see if Trump had held on to any other presidential documents, though the safe they broke in was reportedly empty.
Now, that's very significant.
If he'd already returned them, that makes this whole business all the more dubious.
Legal Observers claims the feds could build a case that Trump deliberately destroyed records.
The fact there's no evidence seemingly doesn't matter given how lawless the Department of Justice has now become.
In other words, they could trump up a case against Trump.
His lawyers told him about the law requiring him to preserve so he was on notice.
Others have pointed out, while the raid has nothing to do with January 6th, the feds weaponized by the Democrats could have been on a fishing expedition.
If evidence comes out that sheds light on Trump's involvement in the Capitol riot, that would absolutely become part of the January 6th.
Here we have Alan Dershowitz, by the way, addressing the legal aspects.
Huh.
Huh.
Let me see if I can fix that.
It should be playing.
I'm kind of surprised it's not.
It was playing, but there was no sound.
Yeah, I noticed, but I've got to share sound on, so there should be sound.
However, we'll see.
Now and then we get an oddity.
Let's go back and... - Well, while we're playing with that, everybody has heard the word skiff.
before.
Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility.
That's where you're required to keep stuff that has national security clearances.
And Trump had one of those facilities at Mar-a-Lago, and he was in New York, so he had most of his Secret Service staff with him.
They arranged And what about Pelosi?
thing, knowing that he'd cooperated and returned a whole bunch of stuff in January and was trying every way possible to conform with them.
But he also had on-site storage that met their requirements.
And what his excuse was is that some of this stuff was going to be turned over to his presidential library, like Obama destroyed tens of thousands of pages of his presidential material.
And what about Pelosi tearing a presidential speech, a State of the Union speech in half in front of the whole nation?
That's not destroying evidence?
Give me a break.
These people are just wall-to-wall criminals.
Those are wonderful points, Joe.
Now, what Dershowitz said in the clip we're not hearing was, there are standard procedures.
You don't use a warrant if a subpoena would suffice.
There was nothing about this document that was urgent and that there was a belief that he was about to destroy records, which is highly dubious.
He was not even there.
He could not have been about to destroy records that it had to go to a subpoena.
Instead, just asked him to bring in whatever they wanted.
So Dershowitz felt this was outrageous.
Virginia.
Oh, most definitely.
And that's a good point.
I hadn't thought about that, Joe.
Like you said, this just continues to just add up to more corruption.
There's no way he was going to destroy documents.
You know, the mention of the subpoena, none of it adds up.
And my concern is most Americans, I know how it made me feel, is just going to sit there in shock.
Okay, and then of course you're left to assume, and this is what they do, the psyops.
They just want to plant the seed of doubt.
We already have issues with people who don't want to get out and vote because they're overwhelmed.
I hear that all the time, and this just plants that seed of doubt.
It's no doubt an attack to be sure that he doesn't run in 2024, or if he does, they'll be able to sway things just enough.
Yeah.
Hopefully it's going to stir up people, wake them up more and, and get out there, not just vote, but get involved.
I mean, educate yourself, get involved with the elections.
Oh, that's going to have a huge energizing effect on conservatives all over the nation.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, I don't have anything to add to what I said earlier.
It's just astounding that they're resorting to these third world Marxist dictatorship tactics to pin something, anything, on Trump so he can't be a threat for 2024.
Very good.
Joe's contrast cases with Obama and Hillary are very stunning.
Meanwhile, DeSantis slams the weaponization of the federal agencies for the raid.
Governor DeSantis came out with a blistering response to the FBI raid.
The raid of MAL is another escalation in the weaponization of federal agencies against their regime's political opponents, while people like Hunter Biden get treated with kid gloves.
Now the regime is getting another 87,000 IRS agents to wield against their adversaries, Banana Republic.
I observe there are only 29,000 border agents, but they're gonna have 87,000 IRS?
DeSantis tweeted exactly what just said.
Kevin McCarthy tweeted.
Attorney General Garland, preserve your documents and clear your calendar.
I've seen enough.
The Department of Justice has reached an intolerable state of weaponized politicalization.
When Republicans take back the House, we will conduct immediate oversight of this department, follow the facts, and leave no stone unturned.
Attorney General Garland, preserve your documents and clear your calendar.
House Judiciary, GOP, if they can do it to a former president, imagine what they can do to you.
Cassandra writes, FBI raiding Trump.
Effing obscene.
The Justice Department serves a Democratic Party existing to arm left narratives and quash the right.
The left wants you to fear serving in a Republican administration.
They want you to fear voting Republican.
Another.
This is not just an expodus.
Trump is the current leading candidate for the Republican spot at 24.
Biden says he'll seek re-election, so his AG is rating Biden's likely opponent for the same type of crimes Hillary has not subpoenaed and not rated.
Third world.
Manny Johnson.
Dan Bongino goes off on the FBI raid on Donald Trump.
This is some third world bullshit.
If the DOJ has the goods on Trump, then charge him.
him but raiding is home for a violation of the presidential records act on the anniversary of nixon's resignation spells like partisan bullshit and abuse of power jonathan turley mike emmanuel just reported sources indicate the safe was opened by a safe cracker but was found empty That only highlights questions of any evidence of direct involvement by Trump in any intention, effort, or concealment.
Another.
That is why, again, we cannot assume that criminal charges are inevitable after such a raid.
On MSNBC, a host said the orange jumpsuit may be coming.
That's rather premature given the history of prosecutions in this area and the absence of confirmed evidence.
Moments ago, Donald Trump, still banned by Twitter, published a statement on Truth Social in which he explained what had been going on, that this could only take place in broken third-world countries.
He's probably right.
He also claimed the Fed President was unannounced, and the reason was politically motivated.
As TechnoFog notes, The politics of the search cannot be ignored.
If the New York Times is to be believed, Trump's purported crime—the delay of returning materials—could have been resolved in a manner not involving raiding his home and breaking open his personal safe.
No doubt a search is an escalation by a desperate regime confronted by its own failures at home and abroad.
This doesn't necessarily mean there wasn't some other reason for the surge.
Could it have to do with the DOJ January 6th probe?
Maybe not, but it may be too soon to tell.
Last week, there was reporting a federal grand jury investigator had issued subpoenas to White House counsel Pat Cipollone and his top deputy Patrick Philbin.
According to the author, it's possible the roadmap for the DOJ has come from the January 6th Committee, which has poured out the thin gruel of purported criminal charges alleging he and others, including Attorney John Eastman, could be charged with obstruction of an official proceeding or conspiracy to defraud the government.
Each count would amount to the criminalization of politics.
Meanwhile, we're still waiting for an official comment, but this tweet is of interest.
Steve Herman.
The former president of the United States did not handle classified documents properly.
I watched him do it.
I watched him go through documents, throw some away, rip some up, and put some in his pocket.
No comment yet from either the DOJ or the FBI in Miami.
Joe, yours.
Yeah, amazing.
Sandy Bergler, who was high up in the Clinton administration, goes to the National Archive for day after day after day and stuffs documents in his pants and walks out with them, and he gets a slap on the wrist.
So, you know, it's pretty ridiculous.
And this morning, Our resident president decided that he would sign the Chips and Science Act because we all need chips and we all need a little bit of science.
And so now we've got the funding in place for the 87,000 additional IRS agents.
And how are they going to pay for them?
Well, we've probably got a hundred thousand liberal arts students that have been communist indoctrinated that all they need to do is have an algorithm change at the IRS that says, oh, you donated to Trump?
Well, we're going to have to investigate your returns.
And then they'll send this little army of brown shirts out to browbeat every middle class American.
Alex Christopher, who's the Greek guy that does Durand occasionally, but he also has a daily spot that is occasionally on YouTube, but they take him down and block him once in a while.
He's got a spot daily on Bitshoot, and he goes into the overwhelming evidence that Ukraine is about to collapse, that Poland is taking the north half of Ukraine, that Russia's going to take all of the eastern half of it, so there will be no Ukraine left.
He doesn't use the Z because they banned the letter Z because it was painted on Russian tanks when they first entered the war zone in February, so he calls it Elinsky.
I call him what he really is, Zylinski, because he's a Zionist.
Yeah, it's pretty ridiculous.
And then, you know, they're also having the problem of the sudden death syndrome is popping up without no way of repressing it.
So if they can't steal the election in 2020, they'll just make sure that there's some national catastrophe if we have to start a war with China, or we'll start one with Iran, or we'll start one with Russia.
Somehow, there'll be a national emergency and we won't be able to see the new Congress in January so that there will be no hearings and this is the end of America as you knew it.
Fine 250 years, but it's done, folks.
Virginia.
Well, what it brings to mind and stirs up in me as a parent of vaccine-injured children, and I was Injured myself.
We wanted the data on Bears data.
This is years ago, decades of data.
And when parents requested it officially, suddenly it had disappeared.
And I'm here thinking of all the many times that we've watched data, actual necessary, you know, paperwork that should be available to the public disappear.
And here they're going after Trump when, like you said, he could have just had the record subpoenaed.
Too much.
Too many questions.
It's overwhelming to even think about that they're trying to pull this off.
At the very least, it's a distraction, but I think it's much more than that.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's clear.
Whatever offense Trump may have committed is trivial by comparison to those of others, such as Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, and even Sandy Berger.
Michael?
Joe brought up the subject of splitting up of Ukraine.
And I'm sure you guys saw that there's been a call now by an official.
I don't know how many of them, but definitely one that's high profile.
of an official of the Republic of the Donbass after they've been liberated from the Zionist regime in Ukraine.
He wants a referendum on being annexed by Russia, just like happened with the Crimea after 2014.
That's an interesting development.
And I don't really have anything else to say about, you know, the FBI and the Justice Department are showing themselves to be blatantly partisan Marxist operations.
That's right.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Get this, Donkey Pox, the disease destroying America, Tim Tubbs, anti-democracy, advocate of rigged election, rejects honest election outcomes, anti-Russian, violently racist, penchant for myth-telling, uses false flag to promote unconstitutional political agendas, Generalized gender confusion.
Extremely belligerent.
Incapable of rational discussion or acceptance of actual facts.
Prefers fiction over reality.
Highly informed.
Extremely susceptible to political lies and propaganda.
Elevates political party above country.
Blind trust and acceptance of incoherent, demented party officials.
I think they got that exactly right.
Meanwhile, Toyota is offering to buy back electric vehicles after issuing a startling warning to stop driving the SUV immediately.
Why?
Because their vehicles have wheels that are falling off of the car.
Toyota said the cause was a mystery, but is looking into the glitch.
They haven't found a solution and are offering to buy back the SUV from their owners.
We know our customers have many choices.
We have reached our loyalty and are supporting them through this recall.
If a customer does not want to pursue the provided options, we will offer to repurchase their vehicle.
Meanwhile, a fan of electric car takes one on the road and ends up exposing how bad they are.
Now she won't buy one.
Plan B for owners who want to keep a vehicle they may never be able to drive is to have free use of another Toyota in such time as Toyota figure out what went wrong and how to fix it.
Get this.
Toyot offers a buyback recall BZ4X fully electric SUV from customers.
A headline rider's dream.
Toyot's first ever full EV recall to the buyback offered literally because the wheels keep falling off.
How can a carmaker get something so basic so wrong?
As a part of that deal, Toyota will pay $5,000 toward an owner's car payment or as a partial refund and extend the factory warranty for whatever length necessary.
The offer for those who don't sell their vehicle back includes free EV charging once they get the vehicle back and the cost of gasoline from their loaner.
It was unclear how owners of the vehicle, the price starts at $43,215, would handle dealer markups.
In June, the company announced all 2,700 of its new electric SUVs were a danger to their drivers, with only 260 having been delivered in the U.S.
After low mileage use, all of the hub bolts on the wheel can loosen to the point where the wheel can detach from the vehicle.
If a wheel detaches from the vehicle while driving, needless to say, it could result in a loss of vehicle control risk, increasing the risk of a crash.
Who knew?
The cause of the issue and the driving patterns are still under investigation.
No one should drive until the remedy is performed.
Toyota has somehow gone from the best-built cars in the world to the hubbles loose in which we call a wheel to fall off.
And almost two months later, we still don't know how to fix it.
Notice a related article.
E-Scooter Bike Battery Sparks Apartment Blaze, Kills Woman and Child, Leaves Father in Critical Condition.
This is our modern electric car technology joke.
Yeah, well, General Motors had such a problem with their Chevy Bolts that they decided that they would just send a notice to all owners.
You're not allowed to park your Bolt inside a garage, and you're certainly not allowed to charge it inside an enclosed space because they wanted to limit the amount of subrogation suits they got against homeowners insurances for burning people's houses down and the possible murder charges for their cars.
Toyota's had a problem with the Greenies forcing their way into their auto production line.
They didn't like the fact that they were using petroleum-based insulation on their wiring harnesses, so they got them to switch to environmentally-friendly soy-based.
Well, guess what?
Rodents love soy, so now they have a problem with rats coming in and eating your wiring harness out, costing you $5,000 to rewire your damn car after you just bought it.
And then they also came up and said, you know, we don't like oil-based paints because Because they use oil.
So Toyota willingly bent over and put in water-based paint.
Guess what?
Water's everywhere.
It starts raining, next thing you know, you don't have any paint on your car.
This is insane green technology, and I guarantee you won't have to look too far before they find out that they wanted to have soy lug bolts put on the car instead of, you know, having metallic ones.
These people are insane.
You cannot deal with this level of insanity.
I can't believe Toyota would fall for it, Virginia.
Well, this is definitely not my level of expertise, but it reminds me of This is actually kind of hard when you were mentioning the mother and child that blew up because a friend of ours blew up in the back of a Tesla in the woodlands, Dr. Bill Varner and his friend, and they went round and round claiming he must have been trying to put it on the autopilot because they were both in the back seat.
Well, we all believe, of course, he was trying to get out the back.
And that they couldn't get out.
And it took 30,000 gallons of water.
And I don't remember how many hours and how many police trucks.
And, you know, the theory is there was a cracked battery.
So I'm not a fan of this technology in the first place to begin with.
And it's got far too many problems.
And we tend to rush in.
The money, follow the money.
And they could care less about the lives.
Yeah.
What a tragic story.
Michael?
That statement by Toyota in that article sounds like satire from the Babylon Bee.
If a wheel comes off the vehicle while driving, it could result in loss of vehicle control.
Yeah.
Who would have guessed?
Don't they have think tanks that talk about these things?
Yeah, electric cars.
I had a conversation with a friend this morning.
We were walking the dog, and she's hot to buy an electrical vehicle.
She's a woke person.
She said, and it was something that she said I didn't know, the government is giving a $7,500 tax credit.
I'm talking tax credit, not a deduction for the purchase of electric vehicles.
And that, you know, that amounts to Giving the car companies, the car companies being subsidized by our tax dollars again to the amount of $7,500 per sale of every purchase of an electric vehicle.
It's ridiculous.
They make no sense on numerous grounds.
Energy returned on energy invested.
You know, it's inherently inefficient to burn natural hydrocarbons to generate electricity.
But we we do that because it's so convenient to use around our homes for various small uses, but burning the fuel to generate electricity and then transmitting it to the point of use loses something like, maybe Joe knows this number, 30 or 40 percent of the original energy from the hydrocarbons.
And they're dangerous, like Virginia was saying, that these unpredictable batteries can explode in the wreck.
The way they're being designed is that the whole undercarriage of the car is like a four-inch slab of lithium batteries, and they can explode.
The lithium mines use child labor.
The battery life is a lot shorter than that of a gasoline-powered engine.
And this whole Bullshit about electrical vehicles as being sold to the public as another leg of the Great Reset world, one world government.
It's like an interim measure to prevent eventually the ownership of all private vehicles.
At first, only the well-off is going to be able to afford them, but following that, I intuit that they'll put a moratorium on the sale of any gasoline-powered vehicles, so that'll wipe out like 80% of the populace won't be able to own a private vehicle anymore.
And when you mention subsidies, I'm convinced the government is covertly subsidizing the gas companies to bring down the price of gas, which was killing them politically.
All bet they're shelling out a trillion dollars in taxpayer money without allowing the public to know that's where it's going, to artificially deflate the price of gas, and to give the companies themselves a bonanza as long as they won't tell the public what's going on.
Yeah, it's all funny money now.
We're in that stage where when there's a collapsing government, what they do is loot the treasury.
Yes, yes.
Virginia, did you have a further thought?
No, same.
I agree.
I was just thinking about how our friend never even made it out of his neighborhood.
This wasn't an issue of an accident, you know, in the case of this car blowing.
He was leaving.
He was a few blocks from his home in his neighborhood.
A real tale of misery.
If you thought electric vehicles were bad, wait till you see what Klaus Schwab has planned for drivers next.
Just exactly as Michael was suggesting.
The tactic of a siege is probably as old as warfare itself.
In a siege, instead of defending the enemy through direct confrontation, you surround and deny them access to vital resources such as food, water, and other essential supplies.
The opponents then weaken until they surrender or become less able to effectively defend themselves.
You may not realize it, but we're under siege from an invading army.
World Economic Forum acolytes were installed in governments throughout the Western world.
They are methodically subduing the population by bureaucratically throttling the resource and freedom we've taken for granted.
Now the World Economic Forum has announced another restriction they have planned for us, denying us the autonomy that the ownership of automobiles provides.
The WEF published a paper last week calling for the end of wasteful private car ownership.
The WEF argued that communal sharing of cars would lessen global demands for precious metals and fossil fuels.
It's not enough to force us into expensive, inefficient electric cars.
They want us to capitulate on our property rights That are the basis of a stable and prosperous society.
They smugly propose they will encourage us to submit going from owning to using.
F them!
They actually suggest because a car is not driven constantly there's no need to own one.
The average car or van in England is driven just 4% of the time.
But that 4% of the time makes all the difference in the world.
The key, the automobile, is mobility.
It represents freedom and the capacity to travel.
It's indispensable to human health.
The WEF argued for people to sell their car, work, or share them, because car-sharing platforms like GetAround and BlueSG have already seized that opportunity, where you pay per hour used.
Just one step of many in their scheme to deny people the perks and privileges elites would continue to enjoy for themselves.
The establishment would live in luxury, their reward for controlling the rest of us.
What's especially insulting is when would-be dictators like Klaus Schwab claim they're launching this reckless power grab to serve the community.
Here he declares at a WEF meeting, the future is built by us, by a powerful community, as you hear in this room.
Functionaries at the WF use an invented emergency of climate change—it's all a fabrication—to deprive us of our liberty and standard of living.
We see the same top-down pressure to limit us in our potential with a Biden administration and their anti-energy policies designed to impoverish Americans.
We see the same top-down pressure in Canada, where the WEF agenda contributor Justin Trudeau wants to disarm the population before they can rise against his tyranny.
We see the same top-down pressure apply to farmers in the Netherlands, where the government plans to destroy agriculture by arbitrary bans on fertilizer.
The farmers, at least, are fighting back.
They need to now or there'll be nothing left to fight for.
We're on the threshold of a dystopian nightmare called the Great Reset.
It's Marxism with a spiffy new brand name.
The WF want us to lower expectations to all accept their pillaging of our society.
But like most sane people, I will not eat the bugs, no matter how many Celebrity Puff Pieces the establishment runs about it.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, how does the transportation affect the First Amendment?
Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, like you have to ride a bicycle to church.
Yeah, if you can get three or four of your friends together and that's all you can ever do.
That's the whole purpose of this.
And to petition the governments to redress their grievances, yeah, if you can get three or four of your friends together and that's all you can ever do.
That's the whole purpose of this.
They don't want you to have the ability of transportation to increase the amount of participation you have in your own government and your own society.
It's absolutely outrageous.
And there's also another amendment I think it's the fourth as far as seizing a property.
What they're going to try to do is make your property invaluable because you won't be able to buy fuel for it.
You won't be able to sell it and so basically that's seizing property by default and another method.
These people are absolute 100% fascist war criminals, baby raping cannibals, and they need to be removed from this society completely.
Susan, Virginia.
I can be Susan.
I've been Victoria.
Agreed.
Agreed.
We'll let you pick your, we'll let you pick your pronoun in just a few minutes.
Oh, there we go.
I am going to go with she.
Sorry.
Just so you know, you're not going to get.
Yeah, well, they're coming at us from all sides.
Like you said, the World Economic Forum.
This is communism.
It's been here.
They've had their foot in the door for a long time, more than a foot.
You know, I think people are waking up, though.
And if we don't get involved, you know, here we are.
This has been going on for a long time.
The push against our food supply, our education system, the whole nine yards.
I think that article pretty well covered it, you know, the bulk of it there.
The 45 goals of communism, it's just spells it right out.
And they're, they're, you know, infiltrating and, and here we are, we're not going to own anything and we're going to be happy.
And they are well on their way.
Yeah, I'm just so sick of these totalitarians using the term fossil fuels as if they actually came from the detritus of past organic material and claiming that burning hydrocarbons is causing a climate disaster. I'm just so sick of these totalitarians using the term Detritus of past organic material and claiming that burning hydrocarbons is causing a climate disaster.
You know, they never gave up on that lie.
They just have.
They started it way back in the 70s with Rockefeller and Rothschild think tanks, and they figure it's the perfect thing to bring in their new slavery system.
So they just never give up.
You know, Vladimir Putin, several months ago, used the correct term to characterize this Zionist occupied West, and the term was an empire of lies.
Joe used the phrase, baby raping criminals.
And that reminds me of Mitchell Henderson, a frequent commenter on the Jeff Rents show, never uses plain terms like Biden or the Biden administration.
Whenever he wants to refer to them, he always uses the phrase, the pedophile Marxist Biden regime.
And he says it about a dozen times in the course of an hour.
And Jim, I thought the Fifth Amendment was just self-incrimination.
The Fifth Amendment protects the right of private property in two ways.
First, it states that a person may not be deprived of property by the government without due process or fair procedures.
So there you go.
That's in the Fifth?
It's in, yeah, that's what this says, you know, I'm reading pbs.org.
I thought that was a 7th amendment.
Very interesting, Joe.
Meanwhile, Musings, my guest is Michael Baxter.
This is from Pat Shannon.
Deep State Slams free speech pioneer Alex Jones, my thoughts.
In Silence on Lands, Hannibal Lecter asks Clarice Starling of the killer Buffalo Bill, what does he do, this man you seek?
To which Starling answers ascertainably, he kills women.
No, Lecter replies emphatically, that is incidental.
Bill's killings are merely a byproduct of his true yearning to covet.
Jones was incidental, an incidental casualty in the deep state war on free speech, its covetous desire to silence all discussion that contradicts White House talking points and the dogmatic view of the mainstream media.
A farcical trial was never about Alex Jones, not really, and certainly not Sandy Hook.
It could have been you or me, but Jones, the biggest and wealthiest kid in the room, made an appetizing target.
His fame and influence in the free speech community put crosshairs on his back, of which he was aware, in prosecuting Jones.
The Deep State delivered an unadulterated message to persons who dare question official narratives.
No longer will we simply cancel and deplatform you.
We'll sue you into bankruptcy and poverty.
The Deep State case against him was open and shut.
He was found guilty before setting foot in a courtroom.
He wasn't leaving court unscathed.
Even if his horrible legal representation had magically produced evidence, a smoking gun that plainly and unequivocally proved beyond all other exclusions that crisis actors were used at Sandy Hook, the court would still have found him liable for damages.
I've seen articles trouncing his defense team, and they were among the most incompetent imaginable.
What defense attorney worth his salt accidentally sends the prosecution privilege information?
In the end, he could have had OJ's dream team, however, and still been found guilty.
Not because he committed a crime, because of the kind of message that now reverberates through the free speech community.
A deep state the liberal lunatics and the woke masses will tolerate no dissension.
Conform or else.
Don't question the authority.
For Jones, the most immediate authorities were a slanderous prosecutor and the most biased judge in the history of the American legal system.
They worked as a team, playing off each other while overruling almost every objection raised by Jones' lawyers.
The prosecution was allowed to enter into evidence statements made about opposing COVID-19 lockdowns.
How exactly does COVID relate to Sandy Hook?
Lawyers for Jones asked the question but were shut down by the deep state judge.
In short, Jones was wrongly maligned for practicing his constitutionally protected right of free speech.
He expressed opinions and views and he certainly didn't kill anyone at Sandy Hook.
I hope a court of appeals nullifies a judgment against him, but I'm not holding my breath, and neither should Alex.
Here are some comments.
Lemonfrog, I agree.
Alex Jones is participating as PSYOP.
I could see it clearly with the show they put on this week.
Suspected at all times.
I figured out Jones during the Ebola crap during the early 2000s, he pushed the Ebola scare for the better part of a year or even a year.
He worked tirelessly to fear porn people on that.
Remember when he had neon green on every thumbnail?
It went on and on and on and on.
I started thinking, hmm, after a while, and it unsucked.
That was before all this COVID crap, which tells you AJ has been read in the whole time.
I realized he was trying to gin up the Ebola crap, and then he was suspect from there on.
Now, Sandy Hook, this whole thing is bullshit, and it sinks to high heaven.
They taught everybody to shut up and say nothing.
Connect dots.
But what do you surmise is his motivation for participating in a psyop?
Are you saying he's not a true anti-globalist?
It's not possible he's actually fooled by claims of deadly viruses because he hasn't spent the time it requires to research that thoroughly?
I'm not familiar with neon green on every thumbnail.
What's that referring to?
Lemon frog.
AJ's motivation for trying to start a psychological herd reaction of fear of a pandemic.
There's money and power in pandemics.
He was either paid, went to the club, or blackmailed.
No, he was not fooled.
The Ebola scare never got liftoff, but AJ did everything in his power to ignite that liftoff.
I noticed it at the time.
Moreover, absolutely.
People need to avoid him.
He's a likable guy.
All con men are.
Charm is the required skill or talent of con men.
I once took a class to be a bank teller.
He does a list of things to watch for when customers might be up to something.
The number one thing is charm.
Now, I know AJ doesn't have classic charm, Connect dots.
I know that he said on there that relatives have been an intelligence, both his father and he have been targets of recruitment efforts, but I find it hard to believe he isn't genuinely a freedom-loving patriot.
Very hard to believe.
And instinctively, I can't believe he's trying to get rich or seeking power.
Lemon frog.
Oh, I'm sure they Epstein him with a kind like long time ago.
I suppose we part of a Stratford, which is some kind of Intel group.
The whole Sandy Hook trial was a giant housekeeping arrangement for the fraudulent criminal controllers to get everything through lies and deceit theater.
They have been exposed relentlessly.
I've never heard of Stratford.
How do you hear about it?
It's Strat4.
I spelled it wrong.
People figured out that was part of it by some bonus.
This is a long time now.
Enabled vet money.
It's under his veneer.
With his muscle cars.
House in Lake Travis.
Wine drinking tours.
Constant upgrading of his facilities.
This guy may have started as an arrogant narcissist crusader for light, truth and the American way.
But once he got a taste of the good life, he couldn't go back.
Meanwhile, here's some very interesting stuff.
Now, this is Robert Barnes talking about the trial here.
Let me see if I can find a good place to pick up.
Doesn't realize.
Is if they can do it to Alex Jones, then they can do it to Alex Berenson, they can do it to anybody else.
Because their legal theory is extraordinary, and what they've done is they've stripped him of his ability to present a defense.
I'll give other examples as we transition to Alex Jones' case.
In Texas law, an apology is mitigation of damages under Texas law.
We went through it a little bit on one of our live streams during the week.
The judge told the jury exactly the opposite.
Not only that, in order to seek punitive damages, you have to make a timely request under Texas law.
To my knowledge, the plaintiffs never did.
Yet somehow, punitive damages are back in the case.
Yet somehow, Jones is not allowed to talk about his apology.
In fact, what became clear is we're supposed to be having a trial just on damages.
Damages is the plaintiffs get up and say, I heard Alex Jones say these things.
It caused me this kind of emotional pain.
Here's the proof of that emotional pain.
Here's why I'm asking for X amount.
That's all it is because the punitive damages is separate.
It's not part of this.
It's part of this trial, but it's not part of this part of the jury trial.
It has to be separated because they don't want one piece of evidence to inflame another piece of evidence.
And so, and what they're doing is they're the plaintiffs are combining the two because they want the damages as emotional distress, because in Texas punitive damages are capped at 3 million.
So they want 150 million to be emotional distress damages, not punitive damages, because then they're not capped.
And so that's all that's supposed to be happening.
Anybody who watched the trial this week heard almost none of that.
Instead, the judge is allowing them, even though she's defaulted Alex Jones, and this trial is supposed to be just on damages, she's allowing the plaintiffs to present their merits case as if Well, but not allowing Jones to defend himself.
And the reason is, it's not only a show trial, it's literally a show trial.
I was in the courtroom, the plaintiff's lawyer started hopping around like a bunny rabbit, going, Bobby Barnes!
Bobby Barnes!
Bobby Barnes!
The guy's nuts.
The guy's a loon.
I gotta put him on my straitjacket for Christmas list.
And so they were so obsessed, they had Owen Schroeder.
Do you know Robert Barnes is here in the courtroom?
These people are berserk.
Tells you how much they've obsessed about the court of public opinion.
But I was sitting there, I was stunned.
I'd never seen this before.
There are three movie cameras in the room.
And not only are there three movie cameras, one of them is staring down the jury.
This is literally made for movies.
This is a show trial for a show.
Literally for a show.
They are staging this trial for a show.
To be on Netflix or HBO, wherever it's gonna be.
I believe it's the Leaving Neverland production company that did a hit piece on Michael Jackson.
That they could get away with because he's dead.
Now, how do they get away with it here?
By presenting all of these things within the courtroom.
They are completely immune.
Now, let's say the judge allowed Alex Jones to present a defense.
Really fascinating stuff.
then they have to include that in their movie.
They don't have to as long as it's not presented.
So they have complete legal immunity for allowing the lies about Alex Jones from the courtroom to be repeated later on and cannot be sued because they're just republishing what the court was in court.
That's why the judge is literally doing a show trial for a show.
Really fascinating stuff.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes.
Well, there was that warning that you started this program, this segment off with about being charming.
And I apologize.
I will stop being charming.
Apparently that's a real negative thing to be doing.
Jones made a huge number of mistakes in this.
First of all, he knew that Travis County, which is where Austin is located, is an extremely liberal hotspot.
He knew that there was no way he was going to get a fair judge, much less a fair jury, and that particular jurisdiction should have applied immediately for a change of venue.
But, you know, water it out.
Water under the bridge.
So now he's stuck with the judges that committed all kinds of atrocities.
He has a definite case for the Appeals Court, but I've researched that a little bit more since yesterday.
Texas has 14 different appellate court zones.
Austin is the center of one of them.
San Antonio is the center of another.
They're like diagonal slices, which means that they pick up three or four counties that are mostly rural and probably conservative.
But they're going to be outvoted by the populations of San Antonio, Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth and Houston, which are dominated by, quote, liberals or at least Democrats.
And so there's no chance he's going to be able to win his case at the appellate court, although they will have to sidestep a whole bunch of violations of the state constitution to do that.
But then the next thing is going to happen is to go to the state Supreme Court.
All of the judges in Texas are elected unless they die in office and they have a interim appointment by the governor.
So the five Supreme Court justices are elected statewide in Texas, Indiana.
Wow.
Well, I definitely think it's a show, Charles, and designed to tell us we all have to just sit down and shut up.
that this will certainly be overturned on appeal.
So don't start spending your money yet, kids, unless you just want to go out and buy a couple of Powerball tickets, because that's a better chance of winning.
Virginia.
Wow.
Well, I definitely think it's a show, Charles, and designed to tell us we all have to just sit down and shut up.
I mean, think twice before you say anything, which means we just have to keep talking. - Okay.
I've been censored so many times and I think about what happens, what I see happen to doctors behind closed doors.
This sort of thing goes on with them.
It doesn't make public eye.
They just, they're just harassed, harassed into submission.
And, you know, if you speak up at all about what's going on, not just COVID, but long before COVID, but now we have COVID and we can't get a, we can't get a court date.
You know, parents are losing their, their children, people are losing their, you know, their siblings and their best friends.
And this is, this is insanity.
This is insanity.
It's an outrage.
Oh, I couldn't agree more, Michael.
I liked those comments that you chose to read at the show there, Jim.
There are a lot of anomalies involved in this trial as regards proper procedure, as Joe was pointing out and as Barnes was pointing out.
And I agree with what everybody said.
You know, there's professional TV studio movie cameras in the courtroom, and they're recording everything as if it's going to become a big documentary, just like they do with other major events.
They made a Hollywood movie, what was it called?
Boston Strong, about the Boston bombing.
They made a movie about Flight 93 over Ohio.
They're all total lies, of course, but they're made to the highest Hollywood standards, strictly for the purpose of brainwashing the populace.
Yes, I think we got all of one mind about this.
Outrageous.
Meanwhile, a dear colleague of mine also involved in Sandy Hook research, Wolfgang Halberg, now appears to be bankrupt.
He was featured by Alex, who kept his distance from me.
During a video deposition in Connecticut, for example, he asserted he'd never read Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, where I brought together 13 experts Including six PhDs, and we established the school had been closed by 2008, that there were no students there, and that it was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control, where we even found the manual, which I included as Appendix A.
Among this week's revelations from the Travis County Courthouse, which airs on radio and online, raked in a whopping $800,000 gross revenue in a single day.
Jones finances draw scrutiny in light of the jury's $4.1 million verdict for compensatory, now compounded with $44 million more in punitive.
Florida Figure Wolfgang Helder teamed up with Jones following the 2012 purported massacre to spread out Landy's series about the shooting and basically allege the victims' families had constructed an elaborate hoax
Well, if Alex had brought me in as an expert witness, I could have substantiated everything there, that it was an elaborate hoax, that the families were involved, that the families are synthetic, most of them are not even married to one another, has not filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection.
They took a misdemeanor allegation against Wolfgang and hauled him out of his house at 3.30 in the morning, rather analogous to the raid on the Trump compound at Mar-a-Lago.
They had him march like two miles so that when they took his mugshot, seen here, he would look all disheveled.
Well, they certainly succeeded.
Bankston is now bringing up Wolfgang Halbig, notorious Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist.
Karpovich says Halbig had the credentials to question this event and did have several questions.
More on Halbig here.
He hates when I share this story, no doubt, because he's falsifying.
Wolfgang, whom I know well, is a former Florida State trooper, a former U.S.
Customs agent, a former principal of a school, and a nationally recognized school safety expert.
He's also 75 years old.
Following the purported shooting, and notice how they always take for granted it was real, he made multiple appearances on InfoWars to talk about the massacre.
And I guarantee you what Wolfgang was saying is more accurate than anything you're getting from this author or the mainstream media.
InfoWars boosted his profile, spread his claims that killing were staged, which they were.
Halbeck tormented Sandy Hook families by releasing their personal information and emailing the photographs, which he claimed were their dead children all grown up.
He does have photographs that do, he has claimed, appear to be a lot of the Sandy Hook kids all grown up.
Helbig's bankruptcy paints a portrait of a dire financial situation.
Estimates of $225, but $785 in liabilities.
but 785 in liabilities, trivial compared to my own where I have over 1.1 in liabilities.
I'll big list his wife as a co-debtor.
Among his assets are a Chevy Tahoe of 2012, a 2015 Volvo SUV with malfunctioning air conditioning, a wedding band, and $925 in a Chase bank account.
Stunning stuff!
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, like we mentioned yesterday, we're going to have to come up with some new conspiracies because all of the old ones proved out to be true.
I've been following Jim for a very, very long time.
I've spent an enormous amount of time researching a whole bunch of different conspiracy theories.
And like I mentioned after a program yesterday, the only two that I don't believe in now at this point is Flat Earth.
Sorry, it's round.
And nuclear bombs don't exist.
Sorry, they do.
So other than that, almost every other conceivable conspiracy has proven to be true.
And Jim and I got to meet in 2018 at the JFK conference in Dallas.
It's a three-day long conference, so we got to share a meal every day, and I got to listen to all of his participation in the conference.
And Great number of speakers and unequivocal proof that there was at least nine shooters from six different locations that day.
And if they can get away with that 50 something years later and still covering it up, it's like why wouldn't they lie about Sandy Hook?
It's a it's a walk in the park compared to what they did to JFK.
Yeah, it was actually eight for me, but you're on the right track, Virginia.
Oh goodness, this is loaded.
I again that that that Right out of the Marxist playbook, and they just want to break us down to say, hey, you're going to want communism by the time we're done with you.
Yeah, no, we just got to keep pushing.
This is this is just unreal.
It's just unreal.
I follow him, but I have not followed.
I followed Sandy Hook at the beginning in particular.
I don't know if anyone noticed the overhead live and you you're the expert.
I'm not, but I happen to be watching the news and I don't believe what I see, but there was an overhead.
Um helicopter taking live film and that film disappeared immediately.
I saw it for the second and that was it and it was never reported again.
Um people running around outside, people in black, you know a variety of and I was like well there's definitely not one person In this, whatever's going on, and then the film disappears.
So yeah, I've been censored numerous times on the vaccine issue.
I've seen what they can do.
I've had a helicopter flying over my house while I'm trying to do a simple interview with ABC.
So I know better.
Then to believe, uh, mainstream media, but I have that personal experience.
And so I just keep telling people over and over again, you cannot believe mainstream media, but they do want to get into your head and they do it.
You know, they do it and they, they do it well enough that we're sitting here having to have these discussions.
I think the message is you cannot challenge an official narrative or you're going to be dragged into court and bankrupt.
Michael.
Yeah, I agree with everything you guys just said.
I have a lot of respect for Wolfgang because it's it's my understanding that he never backed down from his position, did he?
Or do you know?
Yeah, yeah, that that's why I respect him as opposed to other people who got scared and just did their best to apologize and say they were wrong.
Without naming names.
You know, that article was written like it was the fall of some crazy conspiracy theorist.
But just the filing of bankruptcy is a defensive measure.
And it could help him retain his home and basic living situation.
So I guess that's all I got to say about it.
I got a lot of respect for Wolfgang.
Yeah, Wolfgang and I traveled together to Newtown in 2014 and made the rounds, and we were not welcome with open arms.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, broacontolive, needtoknowatgmail.com.
Live, needtoknowatgmail.com.
Meanwhile, my petition is on the docket of the Supreme Court.
I originally believed it was a First and Second Amendment case, as summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin allowed the judge to decide whether or not my facts were reasonable and exclude them if, in his subjective opinion, they were not.
As you will see from my petition, which you can download to your own desktop, the Court of Appeals for the District of Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
In other states, such as Texas, however, the case against me would have been tossed or sent to a jury for determination of the disputed facts.
But in Wisconsin, the court could in effect determine the facts, regardless of my evidence.
It turns out this is a national problem, and I'm teeing up the case for SCOTUS to make summary judgment protocols uniform throughout the nation.
I believe they are going to do just that and set things right.
Meanwhile, here you can see the Supreme Court docket.
Notice here, distributed for conference on 29 September 2002.
That's when they'll decide on the cases that have reached this far.
And you'll see how far it's reached.
It's already here where they have the conference.
So I've already gone through all these stages here to be on the cusp of being accepted if four or more judges decide they would like to hear my case, and I believe they are going to do so, and I look forward to a reversal that would enable me to get the book out to the public for free once again.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes, well, there's absolutely two must-see videos up at Bitshoot, both of them posted by Tim Truth.
One of them is CDC and FDA are complicit in the injecting of millions with neurotoxic ethylmercury.
That includes a lot of information with Dr. Andrew Wakefield.
Absolutely stunning.
It's a little over an hour long, and then an 11-minute long video with Christine Northrup.
This pandemic is an ongoing felony genocide program, and she's got a way of bringing this whole thing down.
And then two weeks ago, we posted a three-minute segment about Joe Olson as a visionary, and it was a news clip from me on December 13, 1989, presenting the Tour de Force for City Planning at City Council, where I have been completely ignored for the last 25 years.
And this goes into the criminal background of all the things that happened during my pursuit of a functional rail system in Houston, and it was the intro To what today the guy a videographer taped me last week and today he just sent me the copy.
I've had a chance to look at it but it will probably be about an hour long.
We'll have it up on Jim's BitChute channel.
You're not going to believe the amount of corruption in Harris County.
In city government, state government, the Port Authority and NASA, the justice system, unbelievable levels of corruption just over and over and over.
So you've got a pedigree because you took a blue pill, I mean a red pill, a couple of years ago.
I was red-pilled in 1972.
You'll be stunned when you find all the information.
Virginia, your final thoughts?
Oh goodness, a final thought.
I'll keep it short, though.
Okay, well, this, as you mentioned earlier, this brought up a lot of memories, having followed the, before the Vax documentary came out, followed what happened to Dr. Andrew Wakefield.
And this is happening in every area, every area of government, but every area of our daily lives, you know, our food supply, our water supply, our transportation and whatnot.
So, communication.
So, I've been involved with the vaccine issue.
I knew that the pandemic was coming because of personal experience and the pushback in medicine.
Now I'm thinking as I'm watching all of this, and thank you for letting me sit in, I'm going to do a little more digging, but I'd like to mention to check out Zero 5G as well, and Zero Geoengineering, because the same thing is in Big Tech.
Exact same issues that are playing out everywhere.
And free speech is probably one of our greatest tools, our greatest weapons.
That's what they're after.
And we're not going to have that much longer if we don't all get together and push back.
I think you got that right.
Virginia, Michael, your final thoughts.
This is a quote from Dr. Mike Yadin, the former vice president and chief science officer for the Pfizer Corporation, who has become One of the best whistleblowers out there.
It goes like this.
The powers that be, I'll call them the perpetrators, the people who are running this global crime.
It's a global crime to take over all of humanity.
They pretend that there's a serious new respiratory viral threat.
That's what they did.
In my opinion, there never was any new health threat whatsoever.
Part of the criminal beauty of this is that it can't go wrong because there are no moving parts.
The only moving part has been the PCR test.
So the initial thing was an exaggerated health threat.
Some people believe that there's a new virus, and if so, then it's not any more serious than any influenza, because flu vanished at the same time by sheer coincidence.
Personally, I've come to the conclusion, and I'll credit Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, and their colleagues.
Over time, I realized that I could no longer maintain my understanding of respiratory viruses as I thought I knew them.
And then I learned a new bit of information, and it completely collapsed the possibility that respiratory viruses, as described, exist at all.
They don't.
And now this is me.
That's the end of the quote from and this is me.
The statement viruses don't exist is so outside the box of everything we've been told about illness and disease that most people will immediately dismiss it.
Such is the power of the beliefs we hold.
But a better way to say it is that the extracellular vesicles that have been called viruses do not have the properties attributed to them of being contagious and causing diseases and infection.
So it would be more accurate to say that viruses, as defined by orthodox viral theory, do not exist.
When one comes to understand this and you look around you and you realize that all the people around you are living in fear of tiny invisible entities that do not in fact exist, it makes for a very surreal world.
Indeed it does.
Special thanks to Joe Olson, Virginia Young, and Michael Ivey for making this a triple Texas Tuesday.
Excellent comments all through.
I must say the First Amendment is as vital to what it means to be an American as any.
If you can't criticize your government, what the hell is it all about?
Sir Colin Popper has emphasized our most effective instrument in discovering the truth is open, critical discussion, unfettered, non-reliance upon authority, tackling the authorities who are so often wrong, especially about any issue that's controversial and politically significant.
Six of my books have been banned.
I've repeatedly brought together the best experts to sort out what really happened.
But Amazon has banned those on Sandy Hook, the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Parkland, Charlottesville, even the moon landing.
There's something going on here, and it's not because the groups of experts I bring together get it wrong.
Think about it.
You're being deprived of your most important resource in life, namely the ability to figure out the difference between the true and the false, black and white, up and down.
They want you just to take their word for it.
Don't be played.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends and family because, literally, we do not know how much time we have left.
Thanks for being here.
▲
Export Selection