All Episodes
Previous Next
July 16, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:07:38
Our Future Is At Stake: The Climate Agenda’s True Power - Corey Lynn
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to DICKIT!
This is Edge with my co-host, Corey Lynn of Corey Stiggs.
How are you doing today, Corey?
Doing pretty good.
Scrambling a bit, just like you.
Yep.
Same here.
Same here.
Juggling quite a bit, as I imagine most people out there listening are as well these days, right?
So much going on and so many projects.
My head's like spinning on a swivel trying to keep up with the news and get all this work done at the same time.
It's crazy.
Yeah, yeah, and we've got a lot to cover today.
Another reason why we're kind of scrambling.
So you did this huge report about our future is at stake, the climate agenda's true power, and the Supreme Court ruling on the EPA.
And so we're going to talk in depth about that and then also kind of some real world applications of this whole climate hoax agenda and how it's playing out around the world from the Netherlands to Germany and Italy and Poland and Spain and Sri Lanka, everywhere.
So yeah, we've got a lot to get into.
Yes, we do.
Yeah, they're gunning hard.
So I think our listeners know full well that the climate agenda is a complete hoax.
But it's being used and has been used for decades for their cover story to pull off all kinds of agendas.
And one of the biggest ones is food, in my opinion, is food.
Isn't it amazing the spins they put on stuff under the guise of climate?
It's really unbelievable.
Well, in reality, what they're doing...
Is the complete opposite.
Instead of saving the environment and saving the planet and we're going to be doomed and we're going to die that we've been hearing for 100 years.
They're actually doing the damage to the environment.
They're trying to take out the farmers.
They're trying to ruin our food supply, not just the food supply chain, but plant life itself.
And, you know, let's remove carbon emissions from the air because it's it's evil and it's terrible and it's going to kill us all.
Meanwhile, we're decreasing the level that our plants are getting so they can bring it all indoors and control it all.
And this is a huge agenda for their new food hubs, Indoor, i.e.
Indoor Vertical Farming, that's being rolled out across the globe.
And we're seeing that, which we'll get into in a bit, in real time right now, you know, pretty much across the board, just at sort of different stages of it.
So, without going too much into this Supreme Court ruling against the EPA, because I realize tons of news outlets already covered this, but there was a lot of misinformation and spin, and some people thought this was a massive win, some people thought this was a huge loss.
So I read kind of in between but lean more towards it wasn't exactly a huge win, because it didn't remove the regulating power of the EPA.
However, it did put the kibosh on them trying to create do this whole shift over into a new energy system, because that falls under the, you know, Congress.
Congress needs to decide that and make these, these laws, which Congress should have unraveled.
Undone what was done years ago when they allowed these greenhouse gas emissions to go through through Supreme Court.
It was never actually created by Congress and Congress should have come back in and undone that so So it did not prevent their ability to regulate it did prevent the ability to
For the EPA to state they have the authority to start saying, you know, we're going to change the emissions to the point where we're going to reduce it to such a level that it's going to force all of the remaining coal mines that we haven't already taken out.
To shut down because they're going to have to switch over to new, you know, natural gas, solar and wind.
And so there were some really good little jabs in here by Roberts in the, in the opinion.
And, of course, I have all that linked in here.
And so for me, the biggest takeaway is basically revealing through this Supreme Court ruling that which we already know, which the 400 plus three letter agencies have all gone rogue, long gone rogue.
And there's a whole shadow government operating and they're skirting right around the Constitution and Congress and they're rolling out their own little rules and regulations.
And so we saw that.
With the overreach with the previous cases against OSHA with their trying to mandate millions of Americans during COVID as far as obtaining a COVID vaccine, gene therapy, or undergo weekly medical testing and all that good stuff.
So they shut OSHA down for that.
They also shut the CDC down I love this sentence.
We found the statute's language a wafer-thin reed on which to rest such a measure, given the sheer scope of the CDC's claimed authority, its unprecedented nature, and the fact that Congress had failed to extend the moratorium after previously having done so.
So that was in regard to, I'm sure everyone recalls, The whole moratorium situation that was going on back then.
And I mean, the CDC overstepped in so many ways, as did OSHA.
But in the meantime, if you recall, Edge, that dragged this nightmare out for probably a year before it even made it to the Supreme Court.
So they were getting away with this for a long time.
Right.
Yeah.
This um so that's basically what it did is it shined a light on that uh and so Congress and where Congress is at right right now where it stands as far as getting the votes and whatnot highly unlikely they're going to get anything shut down on the emissions in general right now but The Democrats are working on a whole plan.
You know, they've been trying to work on their whole Green New Deal and figure out what plans they can come up with to push all this forward.
And so I'll get into it further down, but I just want people to realize that there's a lot of stuff rolling out on a state level as well.
And people need to be paying attention on a local level because there are ways they can get around some of this stuff through state regulations, subsidies, you know, pilot programs where they're moving this stuff forward.
They're getting corporations involved, in particular, the automotive industry.
So this, yeah, what you're showing here, these are great solutions.
So great job on the sites that I pulled these from.
I linked them all in here where we have, you know, over 60 years.
I mean, it really goes back 100.
I just grabbed a handful to show the spread of the doom and gloom con job that they've been saying.
And I started with 1969.
Um, where they talk about how everyone's, you know, everyone's gonna die, and that the planet's gonna come to an end.
And, and in a lot of cases, they'll say, if we don't tackle this in 10 years, There won't be an Earth anymore, and everything's gonna melt, and first it was the ice storms, you know, and the ice age, and now it's the global warming, and they're just all over the place.
And they keep recycling the same damn news story, and people keep falling for it.
Oh yeah.
It's unbelievable.
Because they've just really indoctrinated an entire generation through the school systems as, you know, this is science now.
This is, you know, incorporated into all facets of the education system.
And so, you know, as these children who were raised up through the system become adults, then they're just, you know, now activists and they're now teaching other people the same climate hoax garbage, fake science, the same kind of fake science that we've seen And witnessed in real time, as you were just referring to, with the entire COVID agenda.
So, I mean, it's just really now, like, a climate cult.
And, you know, if you question it, you're just basically... Against the environment!
You're totally against Earth!
How dare you, you polluter!
Right, and it's like speaking to a brick wall with these people because it is so cultish with their belief systems, you know, and so even if you just face them with facts on how ridiculous, you know, cutting, you know, carbon or nitrogen is, and how if you look at what that really means in real world context, all you have to do is see countries like Sri Lanka or what's happening in the Netherlands, right?
Right, exactly.
And so, I mean, as far back, we got 1972.
UN Environment Protection Boss warns we have 10 years to stop the catastrophe.
You know, an environmental, 1982, an environmental catastrophe as irreversible as any nuclear holocaust.
And then, and then most recently in 2019, the UN, only 11 years left to prevent irreversible damage.
It's just, the fear porn is ridiculous.
So, you know, back when they were trying to put this in, I want to say it was like around, I don't know, it kind of carried on between like 07 and 2009, I believe.
And you had like 700 scientists who dissented from this, who were absolutely against the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC, and all the global warming claims by Al Gore and all that.
It's a man-made impact.
And so, of course, we need to get rid of man because the impact's too great.
So they had, you know, 52 paid off faux scientists that construct this narrative.
And eventually this gets passed through the Supreme Court to approve these greenhouse, it was carbon dioxide and five other greenhouse gases.
And it's an it's just it's the whole thing's freaking insane.
So this could have been undone.
It wasn't.
And, you know, we'll see what comes this November.
What's what's going to happen here.
But I'm not I'm sorry, I'm not overly optimistic.
Um, just, just to do with rigging, you know, I surely think we have the votes, but even, even so there's a lot of Republicans that are not stepping up to the plate that like this all needs to be completely ratified, torn apart from, from the ground up through local level, state level, get rid of all these damn climate coalitions and agencies and consultants and, um,
Yeah, and we've got, we already know that, going back to the rigging and everything, we already know that the Biden regime has mandated that 600 federal agencies make voter registration and voter turnout for the Democrats, of course.
A top priority and submit plans to the regime on how these 600 agencies, federal agencies, are now going to be political activists and weaponized to maintain the power of the regime.
So we already know what we're up against.
It's just so very important that we turn out in such overwhelming numbers that, you know, despite all their schemes and tactics that we know they're enforcing, Uh, that we, uh, you know, we turn out and we, um, over overwhelm them.
Right.
And the other thing is, is legislators need to get on the damn ball.
You know what?
So you look back at what Trump did a lot of what he did with, um, I mean, he went right for the jugular of the environmentalists and look, I'm not saying we don't need to protect and care for the environmentalists.
I'm like a tree hugger.
I get that.
But what these people are doing is, is complete.
It's a complete bogusness, lies.
There's no science behind any of it.
No, it's a power grab.
It's completely a power grab.
That's all it's about.
I think traditionally, conservatives have always been conservationists.
We care about the environment.
We care about hunting, fishing, taking care of I would say that it's just been weaponized.
It's been weaponized as far as making it a power grab to control industry.
WWF, Sierra Club, all of them.
Yeah.
So you look at what Trump did, though, and he tried to reverse a lot of this.
And one of the first things that happened when Biden got in, you know, like when it came to the state parks, when it came to the waters, right, the whole Clean Water Act, that's a whole other scandal.
And he got targeted big time.
But he didn't care.
He stood up to him and he He did what was right to ensure that the people had access to land and water and various things that these guys were trying to strip away and control.
And and that is what we need from our legislators on every level to stop with.
This charade or this concern over being pointed at or called names because they don't care about the environment.
Like, we're way beyond that at this point.
So I just, you know, I included this one little thing in here, the whole TED Talk with Gates, because it irks me that For what, over a decade now, because I believe this was from 2010, you will have every single mainstream news and fact-checking site saying that anyone who says this is a conspiracy theorist, that Bill Gates never said anything about depopulating.
I beg to differ.
There's no way to spin this.
No way at all.
So he's literally showing a diagram of CO2 and the temperature increase and the negative effects.
And then he goes into a, did I not include the second one in here?
I just realized I didn't include the second one in here.
Where did that go?
Shoot, I'm going to have to go back in and add it.
OK, so there's four categories that he brings up and in them, People is one of them.
And he's like, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
And then he says, he says, the global population is at 6.8 billion people and heading up to about 9 billion.
And if we do a really great job on new vaccines, healthcare, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 to 15%.
We're talking numbers.
There's really no way to spin that to say that people are spinning it.
You know what I mean?
Yeah, it's ridiculous.
And darn it.
I'm so frustrated that I put I put the wrong image up in the wrong spot.
So I got to go back in and add that other chart now.
Yeah, they did try to spin it by saying, look, we were talking about how, like, say, in third world countries, people have multiple children because the survival rate is so low, but if we can bring up the survival rate, people will have fewer children.
No, no, not buying it.
Not buying it.
Yeah, then, yeah, unbelievable.
Okay, so.
So look past the con to see the reality.
If you have not gotten, and I still have to finish reading it, Alex Epstein just put out a book called Fossil Future.
Highly recommend people get that.
I extracted some of the charts out of his book here where he makes very, very good points.
Talking about, you know, specifically on CO2, So he points out that as of 2021, CO2 levels were at 420 parts per million, so PPMs, or 0.042% of the atmosphere.
parts per million, so PPMs, or 0.042% of the atmosphere.
And if plants reach 120 to 150 PPM of CO2, most will die.
And so we're already pretty low.
And it and you know, the fact is, the more CO2, the more plant growth.
And so exactly, exactly.
And not only do we need that for food, but we need it for oxygen and everything else, you know, it's a beautiful cycle, the world was created on and they're trying to destroy it.
So while claiming we're the ones destroying it.
It's just insanity.
It's complete insanity.
All one needs to do is look at these charts to see the game.
So this chart underneath that one was not out of his book.
I pulled that one off the internet.
So this is showing the actual decline, the 140 million year decline in CO2 and how low we're actually getting Survival threshold for vegetation.
We're darn near right at that.
Yeah.
And that's, you know, but all of this is under the guise of global warming.
It's causing temperature increases.
And, you know, if, if we increase one and a half degrees, we're all going to blow up or as Nancy Pelosi would say, the earth is going to burn.
Well, the earth is burning all right because of massive civil unrest because of the tyrannical overlords who are trying to take control of every part of industry and every part of our lives.
Right.
And so their main thing is they say that this is causing a temperature increase, right?
So if you look at this chart, the next one down, Over the past 170 years, there's been a minimal one degree greenhouse effect, while emissions have been accelerated.
So there is no true warming effect happening.
And if you look at this chart that he put together, and you look at the CO2 versus the temperatures, There's only a couple of points where there's actual any correlation at all.
And where there is correlation, CO2, the temperature rose first, not CO2.
Yeah, and from everything that I've researched, I actually think we're headed for a major cooling cycle.
And it has absolutely nothing to do with CO2, and it has much, much more to do with the sun and its cycles.
So, yeah, I think that the Earth naturally goes through cycles, and I think that it's mainly due to the sun's cycles, which makes total sense.
And they're trying to transform that into it's man-made, it's our fault, and therefore they have to control everything that we do.
It's called climate change.
The climate's been changing for millions of years.
That is natural, but they're trying to take the term and make it seem like it's a dangerous thing and that we're the cause of it.
Right.
So I was just showing the overview of the U.S.
greenhouse gas emissions in 2020.
This is straight from the EPA site, showing 5,981 million metric tons of CO2 equivalent.
And then we have Bill Gates down here saying, they're working on this project where they're removing a trillion tons of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere by absorbing it down into the ocean.
So that's his goal.
Yeah, and he's also trying to block out the sun and various other things, nefarious activities.
I mean, these people, the hubris of these just megalomaniacs who are trying to play God, it's sickening to watch.
Yep, so the next three charts, pretty cool.
As we show the more fossil use, you'll see, because their whole thing, their whole concept, right?
Their whole scare tactic is, That this is causing temperatures to rise.
This is destroying our planet.
It's destroying our food.
The Earth is going to burn.
We're all going to die.
Or back years ago when they said it was the Ice Age.
Either way, it's human impact and we're all going to die.
That's their claim.
And that there's going to be massive storms and there's going to be catastrophic events and there's going to be droughts.
And so we need to bring the food indoors to vertical indoor growing that we control and manage.
So here we have more fossil fuel use, plummeting climate-related disaster deaths.
Isn't that interesting?
Going back a hundred years.
Then we have the more fossil fuel use, far fewer drought-related deaths.
Then we have fewer storm-related deaths.
Why?
Because it's the most economical, accessible, affordable, beneficial form of fuel.
Well, I want to see some charts.
It's keeping all our lights on and giving us, it's powering every single industry.
And by switching over to unaffordable, unrealistic solar and Wind and some of these other concepts they're wanting to roll out, like building the whole infrastructure of charging stations across the country, which every state is getting money to do, because that was in the infrastructure bill.
So they're putting the cart before the horse on that one.
And Congress all agreed to that.
It's insanity.
So where are they getting their electricity from?
Hmm.
Right?
Yeah, I want to see the deaths related to strangling a country's economy, restricting their access to fuel and food sources.
Right, and heating and cooling.
So how many people are going to die because half or a third of their farmland has been restricted in the country?
How many people are going to die because of the fuel shortages that are How many people are going to freeze to death?
Let's remove the farms but then let's build up tons of houses and bring a bunch of people in and let's produce more power in the area.
So how's that switching up emissions?
There's no logic behind their Rationale, you know, there's there's absolutely no logic there.
And when they put all of this out, they just all they do is they they damn fossil fuels, but they don't show intentionally don't show any data.
Don't show both sides of it.
Don't show how it could all work together.
Look, I'm not saying that solar is necessarily a bad thing, but it can't be the thing and they can't take away our other options.
Absolutely.
It could be a great added benefit to things as a backup.
Right, right.
I mean, you could look at what's happening in Germany, you know, with their already rationing energy.
And so, I mean, you can't just like strangle fossil fuels and imagine that a country is going to be able to Completely convert to these green sort of forms of energy without the human cost of people suffering over it.
It's going to be absolutely devastating because it's just not possible for an entire country to run on these types of systems.
The technology does not exist to be able to make that possible yet.
Right.
And they know that.
And that's that's sadly, that's why they're pushing it.
So so we've got this battle between states fighting for and against climate change agendas.
And I'm not going to go through all this.
People can come in and read it.
But it's just it's really important to pay attention to what's going on in your state.
Because, for example, California, you know, densely populated was like thirty nine, forty million people.
They've been trying to set the standards for the country when it comes to emissions, and they've been getting these special waivers and whatnot from EPA and in creating a lower emissions than other states have.
But then that's causing it to have a ripple effect and create standards.
And so they're doing that now with electric vehicles, with all kinds of stuff that they're trying to roll out.
Of course, we have Governor Kate Brown.
out of Oregon, all about, you know, moving forward with this no matter what.
And then we have states that are fighting against it.
We've actually got a case.
So in West Virginia, Attorney General Patrick Morrissey, who was just involved in this case against the EPA, he vows to continue challenging Biden's climate agenda and has a big issue with the Securities and Exchange Commission's proposal requiring publicly traded companies he vows to continue challenging Biden's climate agenda and has a big issue with the Securities and Exchange Commission's proposal requiring I
I think that's a very viable argument, um, that definitely should be taken to court and they've had, uh, 20 other states have joined in on this 42 page letter against the SEC.
So we've got some cases like this going on and, um, and then while at the same time, we've got the Democrats that immediately prepared this letter, which I have linked in here to the, um, The Michael Regan, the administrator of the EPA, signed by 30 Democrats, they did this actually the day before the Supreme Court ruling came out, where they're trying to push the EPA to act rapidly on 11 different actions.
And in it, they're even pushing for the whole electric vehicle thing.
Well, I think they're going to run into a problem on that one.
So With the electric vehicles, it's actually way further down in here, but I'll just ramble about it.
Okay.
So the problem there is it's creating an entirely new industry.
So you remember the infrastructure bill that I did the breakdown on?
Yeah.
So I went back through because I knew they had put in $7.5 billion towards the electric charging stations across the country.
And I knew they put another $7.5 billion into like buses and ferries and ports and electrifying them and all that kind of stuff.
And they, they did do studies.
So I had to go back and like go through that 2700 page wonderful document and find this because I wanted to make sure that they hadn't included any verbiage That made it, that was like clear cut, you know, saying by 2030, we are going to make sure that all manufacturing, you know, manufacturers in the auto industry are now producing electric vehicles and we're setting these standards and yadda yadda.
No, what they're doing is they've, they're in the process of building the studies for it.
So I listed those in here and.
So what it tells me is, if the EPA, who's trying to use two executive orders from Biden right now, and being pushed by the Democrats to push this agenda forward, that they're going to hit the same roadblock they just did with this.
Because ultimately, that's creating a whole new industry to where you are now telling That industry, what they have to produce and what they have to stop producing.
And so I think they're going to hit a bump in the road on that one.
That might slow that down a bit.
But in the meantime, these jackasses all signed this infrastructure bill, which is absolutely hellacious because it's moving toward the smart control grid.
And like I said, they're they're building up the charging station.
So if they were in agreement with that, Are you know what's what's Congress going to do?
Are they going to be willing to say at some point?
Okay.
Yeah, we do think we should move completely to electric vehicles and just take away the option of gas altogether.
So we need to stay on top of all of our legislators.
Like I said locally too because California is pushing their own little thing and then you get the auto dealers who are getting behind Newsom and All on board with this, right?
Because they're getting millions and billions in grants and subsidies to roll these programs out.
So they're all being bought up to push this forward.
So then, of course, we have, you know, the gas prices increasing and the whole situation with the oil and, well, let's shut down the pipelines and let's put a block on Alaska and let's not produce our own oil here.
Instead, let's just pull from the strategic reserves edge.
Let's just export while we're at it.
Why not completely drain us and export 5 million barrels to China, India and Europe?
Right.
I mean, if people can't see the intentional destruction happening, if there's even 1% of this country that still thinks Biden should be president and that things are going good... No, they have straight up admitted that they want pain at the gas pump so that people are forced to buy electric vehicles.
This is All intentional.
And the fact that Biden is even the resident of the White House is because he is sold out to China, in particular with this whole gas situation, with Hunter's deals with China, and then now siphoning off our strategic oil supply.
To countries like China and, you know, some of those companies being connected to Hunter's deals.
It's so painfully obvious.
And I think everybody sees it.
That's why Biden's poll numbers are in the 20s at this point, I believe.
And it's, you know, that's why I believe there will be a red tsunami in November.
However, they know that as well.
And we know they're up to the same old dirty tricks.
Right.
To try to maintain power because they have a lot riding here.
A lot.
I mean.
Oh yeah.
And the reason they want to move to electric is, you know, should be obvious by now, but they want the vehicle to everything.
That's their language.
Vehicle to everything.
They want you dialed in to the internet, into homes, into buildings, into streetlights, which they're putting in the LED facial recognition, biometrics everywhere.
They want you completely plugged in.
They're going to have kill switches on them.
And they want, you know, more drivers off the road.
They want less drivers.
They want bike paths.
They want to roll out the autonomous.
You got numerous states rolling out autonomous trucks right now.
And some are having accidents.
Imagine that!
And I believe that what they're going to do is, while they're rolling out these autonomous trucks and fleets, and these test pilot programs that are wonderful taxpayer dollars, well, at this point, you know, they're just printing money and paying for this, that they will, because electric trucks and vehicles, they're more expensive, like a huge, you know, semi, you build an electric one, it's like double the cost of a regular one.
So I think, This is just my suspicion.
They're kind of simultaneously piloting these so they can gather the data, because they always have to, you know, build their little data and make up their proof and make sure they can tweak and change things.
So it sounds good.
And then they'll eventually roll those into electric as well.
But in the meantime, they want to get that data in place while they're also pushing the automakers to push for more electric vehicles.
I think that eventually what they would like is all autonomous vehicles one day in the future.
And if you want to get a ride somewhere, you know, you have to have a good social credit score and there'll probably be some scannable or chip in us that just dupe scans when the car pulls up to pick us up to take us somewhere.
Right, right.
You only get to travel if you're a good global citizen.
That's right.
And no one's going to see what's happening with supply chains or behind the scenes because it'll be autonomous vehicles driving, doing any of that transporting.
So I do think that's their goal in the long run.
And we need to seriously put the kibosh on all that.
And that's why it's so important to get out and fight against this now before it keeps moving further along.
Um, so, so bringing us down to the Netherlands, um, I did cover, there was a really good 15 minute interview in here on Facts Matter with a Dutch Member of Parliament where he just says it.
He just, did you watch that Ed?
No, I didn't see that.
Oh, it was great.
He just says it exactly.
In fact, I should have pulled up the dang video so we could have rolled a couple of minutes of it.
But he's literally calling out the WVF, the Great Reset, the Sustainable Goals, you know, and he's explaining about this.
What's going on here is this old, ridiculous rule from the 1990s that the EU introduced called NATURA 2000 guidelines.
It focused on selected areas in Europe that were picked for preservation of certain forms of vegetation.
He says more nitrogen oxide in the Netherlands would not be a problem for nature It would be a problem for maintaining the specific vegetation goals that were set, you know back in the 90s He said but politicians are just unwilling to address the EU and state that this is ridiculous These are this this is an old guideline.
We're no longer gonna uphold this And even faced with food shortages and supply chain issues they're like just They're just shitting on their farmers right now.
And so it all has to do with nitrogen oxide, of course, you know, climate and environmental.
It's the same thing like the WWF does and BLM and...
Sierra Club.
They all do it here.
They do it all over with confiscating land and making things more difficult for people.
So they shut down or they sell out.
And so he says that they're literally saying that they want to buy up the farms and they want to build homes there.
It's absolutely insane.
Yep, exactly.
Absolutely insane.
We know It's absolutely diabolical what they're doing.
They're intentionally destroying a major part of the food supply, not just in the Netherlands, but around the world.
Right.
And it's all by design with the excuse that they're actually, and they're admitting this, going to build homes or centers for migrants.
And their food hubs!
Let's not forget their food hubs because another lens is involved in this whole vertical indoor growing as well.
Yeah, yeah.
So, do you want me to jump into some of the real world implications of what this disastrous climate hoax agenda is doing?
Yeah, I just want to say one sentence that he says here, you know, towards the end of this interview.
He says, this is the single most existential fight in the history of civilization.
They want to be ready in 2030.
The globalist takeover.
We have eight years to fight this.
Let's do it together.
Because he's saying, Let me just explain real quick.
What he said is, in order for this To, you know, the protesting and everything is one thing, he said, but what needs to happen is the farmers literally need to stop providing all the shops food, stop with the meat, stop with the cheese, stop with, you know, stop with all of it.
So that when the people walk into these places that live there and the politicians to go to do shopping and there's like nothing on the shelves, they're like, oh my God, oh my God, we got to do something.
But it's like, until it punches them in the face, He feels like they're not, they're just not going to bend on it.
Right.
And that is absolutely happening.
I've seen video after video of empty store shelves and of blockades of these, you know, centers where, you know, food distribution centers and things like that.
So it's absolutely happening.
The update on, I know you were looking into some other countries and what's going on kind of along these same lines.
Yeah, yeah.
So, I mean, there's been massive uprisings, not just in the Netherlands, but just really around the world.
But particularly with regards to the farmer uprisings, you know, there's been uprisings in Germany, particularly, as well as some in Poland and Spain and some protests in Canada, all in support of the farmers and with the understanding that this is actually Right, the anti-farming regulations are coming to the entire globe and in many ways have already been implemented.
But the Netherland farmers have inspired support and solidarity from farmers in neighboring countries who are also devastated by these climate restrictions, particularly Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain.
And they're rising up and strong numbers against these types of restrictions.
Farmers in Germany have partnered with the Netherlands farmers to form a blockade on the border of the two countries.
I mean, there's just video after video of these protests that are happening, not just in the Netherlands, but particularly in Germany and other places as well.
Speaking of Germany, and these kinds of climate mandates, we're looking at, and this also has to do with the oil and the sanctions and everything, right?
So, I mean, we're looking at energy restrictions and rationing already happening in Germany, and here we are in the summertime.
What's going to happen in winter when energy rationing Um, continues, um, but yeah, and this is, again, I would like to see the numbers on how many people are actually going to die from being cold if energy rationing continues and gets worse, which I suspect it will.
And, um, so, yeah, it's, it's really, uh, difficult.
Yeah, I've seen this.
Wait, scroll back down.
A little further.
Okay, wait, wait, wait.
He says, if only Germany had built more nuclear power instead of building unreliable green wind and solar power.
Oops!
They've been shutting down nuclear reactors instead.
And that tells you everything you need to know.
This really isn't about green energy that's sustainable and that can work.
It's really about controlling the population.
They don't care.
And they're rationing hot water, dimming street lights, shutting down swimming pools to save energy, and yeah.
Yeah, it's going to be dangerous.
It's going to be dangerous if they continue to ration the energy.
But yeah, so there's a lot of uprisings going on in response to and in solidarity with the Netherlands.
But let's talk about Sri Lanka for a second because The uprising that we've seen just recently and watched unfold in Sri Lanka, that's mostly due to the devastating climate hoax mandates imposed by their leaders and promoted by the World Economic Forum.
In 2018, the Sri Lankan PM wrote an article that was posted on the World Economic Forum of, this is how I will make my country rich by 2025.
And what have we seen with Sri Lanka?
You know, we've seen this regime completely transform the country's economy from, you know, being self-sustaining to just completely collapsing.
And just like what we're seeing with the Netherlands, Sri Lanka's, they imposed regulations to cut nitrogen, particularly in the farming sector, which decreased farming production.
By 40 to 50 percent.
And while India has no problem buying Russian oil, Sri Lanka's got a massive fuel shortage.
So this is what the ESG standards, the Environmental Social Governance Standards, have done to Sri Lanka.
They have almost perfect ESG scoring according to the World Economic Forum at 98.1 rated by the World Economic Forum, but the reality is that their inflation is at 55%.
is at 55%.
Food prices have risen 80%.
The transportation prices have risen 80%.
The country's gone bankrupt.
The people are desperate and they've risen up to overthrow their government.
So, I mean, this is the reality of what these environmental social governance standards do when you try to completely transform The economy based on these ridiculous climate hoax standards.
Right.
And so they, just like with all their other crap that they do, they, they're calling it, they're creating the problem and then calling it a problem that they created.
And then they're going to come in and save the day with their new form of money, their new food hubs and their new, um, Energy systems, and in the meantime, millions of people will suffer and die because of this.
And all you have to do is look at the statistics to see that we have a longer life expectancy, that things have gotten Tremendously better over the last, you know, 50, 100 years here.
They've been continuously getting better, and yet they make it sound like we're in total destruction and the Earth's gonna die right now.
Well, yeah it is, because you assholes are creating this mess!
Exactly, exactly.
And we're seeing this play out in Italy as well.
In Italy, it's not just the farmers who are rising up, it's actually the taxi drivers Who are rising up as well.
Italy is facing this major debt crisis, okay, following all of the COVID stuff, right, over the past two and a half years or so.
And so Italy's facing this major debt crisis.
They desperately need a bailout from the EU in the form of COVID, you know, money, basically.
Right.
But that money comes with strings attached.
In order to get the billions in euros from the EU, the PM is pushing reforms on the transportation sector that are promoted by the World Economic Forum to enable Uber to take over the transportation industry and kill the taxi business.
The taxi drivers in Italy have been rising up in huge force, just total civil unrest over there in Italy due to this.
The Italian PM Draghi, I believe is how you pronounce his name, he is this globalist banker.
I mean, just like we've seen with the Netherlands.
What is his name?
Brut.
I can't remember his name, but how he's an absolute world economic forum globalist.
Same thing with Draghi.
He's a globalist bankster.
He was a member of the board of the Bank of International Settlements.
He was the president of the European Central Bank.
He also worked for the World Bank.
So Draghi was installed as this prime minister.
Literally, and specifically, to form a new technocratic government.
Okay?
So, long story short, the country is going the way of Sri Lanka, it looks like to me, facing economic ruin.
Citizens have had enough, and they're rising up.
And Draghi faced a no-confidence vote this week, but he actually won that no-confidence vote.
But his coalition is collapsing, and he's expected to resign.
So, and we're seeing a lot of, we've talked about this, you know, off the air, just this real shake-up happening with world leaders.
Israel, you know, Boris Johnson, Draghi, then also obviously what happened in Japan, although he wasn't the acting president, but he was, you know, a very important leader with Shinzo Abe in Japan.
Right.
Yeah.
But before we get to what's going on in Japan and China, I have to mention this.
I mean, we're just talking about a populist uprising everywhere.
And in France, we just got word about Emmanuel Macron's vaccine passport scheme being defeated in Parliament.
And I don't know if you saw this viral video here, No, this was news to me.
Finally, a piece of good information here.
Even though we know they're rolling out biometrics and all these other things they're going to try and get us through.
Yeah, yeah.
So this is Parliament after the vaccine passport was defeated.
I mean, it was just uproarious, boisterous cheering with the defeat of this vaccine passport scheme.
So, yeah, it's really great to see the populace uprising Everywhere, and holding back this complete tyranny, globalist takeover.
But we should talk about, you know, Japan a little bit, and what's happening with Japan and China, because, you know, everybody's obviously at this point heard about Shinzo Abe's assassination.
And really the fallout of that, or the, not necessarily fallout, but the repercussions of that, Um, you know, and what they mean.
So, you know, Shinzo Abe, since he was assassinated, his political party won a supermajority in the parliamentary elections.
And that may have implications as far as their amending their constitution, because with the supermajority,
This conservative coalition that Abe supported and was very outspoken about amending their pacifist post-World War II constitution in favor of more of a military, pro-military constitution to defend themselves and Taiwan against Chinese aggression.
So, tell me your thoughts.
I know that we We you've had some you know kind of theories about this and well, I don't know if I'd call it a theory I just there's an observation I made that's sticking in the back of my head.
That's gonna sound very kind of conspiracy-ish But hey, what's wrong with conspiracies right there's a million of them rolling right now and well most of them are true so I Just something I happened to notice, and I'm going to tell you flat out right now, I have more questions than answers because I'm not, I'm not an expert of geopolitics.
I do not, I'm not great at following, um, you know, I can hardly keep up with this country, let alone everything going on in other countries and especially pertaining to their elections.
So I don't have a lot of knowledge in this area.
I'm just going to say that I noticed, you know, we had that week where there, it was like, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, all these things happening back to back.
And at one point when I it was late at night and I was looking at when he had been shot and oh my gosh so a couple hours late I'm working on my report a couple hours later I go in see if there's an update and pretty much from the from the get-go they said You know, he was showing no vital signs.
I mean, it was, it was like, I believe he was shot like in the neck and the chest area and there was really no vital signs.
And so when it's being reported here, you know, they're reporting it, they're calling it Eastern Time.
So it was like 1030 at night Eastern Time when that shot happened.
And then it wasn't until 4.03am that they pronounced his death.
And that number was sticking in my head.
And I'm like, there's something about this timestamp.
So I go back and look.
So 48 hours earlier, over here in Georgia, There was an explosion that everyone's fully aware of that some mistakenly called it, uh, you know, lightning.
That lightning could never do that.
But, uh, to me right off the bat, it looked like some sort of, you know, it was professional explosion.
This to me, it looked like some deep state thing.
I have no idea why.
You're talking about the Guidestones.
I'm talking about the Guidestones.
Yeah.
I remember that timestamp.
It was at 4.03 AM that the Georgia Guidestones were.
Yep.
Right.
So one tablet, right, and it was Hindi.
And so India, and I'm looking at this, and I'm going, why would they just, you know, if they're going to explode this, and then immediately, FBI's all over it.
Mainstream news is covering it.
They're talking about what's even on the tablets and everything.
And then they flatten it, level it, and take it out of there.
And I'm like, wow, if that wasn't a deep state op, I don't know what was.
But what was the intention?
I don't know.
And so the next day, then we've got I know a lot of people think it was White Hat.
Sorry, I do not think that.
I didn't from the second I saw the footage.
So the next day, Boris Johnson resigns, that whole thing going on.
And then the next day, at 4.03 a.m.
exactly, is when they pronounced his death, like five and a half hours later, after he was showing no vital signs and was shot.
So I just was looking at the whole Indo-Pacific thing that, you know, Obby was very instrumental in creating um and you start looking at headlines and you got Bloomberg and others saying oh this is his legacy is the Indo-Pacific and and you look at the strategy report that came out in February by the U.S.
And they're raving about Bush and Obama and all the people that were so helpful with this Indo-Pacific.
And they even gave kudos to Trump, but no mention of Abiy in there, even though they're calling this his legacy, that he created this and spoke in front of parliament with India.
And so I'm looking at that.
And then I realized, oh, my gosh, Japan has elections in like three days.
What is going on?
Like I said, I have more questions than answers here.
I'm just looking at some of the facts lining up and some interesting things.
And I don't know enough about his party or, you know, quite frankly, what's going on over there to be able to give a whole lot of input on this.
But I find it, I just find it all, the timing of it all. - No.
Very interesting.
And I'm looking at it going, okay, I know this sounds like completely crazy, which is why I would never write it up.
But I'm happy to talk about it.
At 4.03, we have some sort of military up over here and an explosion.
And then shot at 10.30 at night and well, Eastern Time.
Remember, Eastern Time.
And then 403 pronounced dead.
Now, why was it necessary for Mainstream News to cover the Guidestones in the manner that they did and to make sure like the whole world knew about this and knew and then show and get the video out immediately showing the timestamp on it and then?
Right, like that might have been a trigger or some kind of code.
Yeah.
Why did we wait until exactly 4.03am to pronounce the death?
I just find this, I don't know.
Yeah, very interesting.
It could be a total coincidence, but given everything else going on during those three days, right in a row, I find it I find it very interesting.
Yeah, that is very interesting.
Here's another interesting tidbit, and where my head is at, is that the CCP warned Shinzo Abe about, you know, talks of defending Taiwan.
And in these warnings prior to Shinzo Abe's death, they actually said, you know, anyone who dares to return to the old path of militarization and challenge the bottom line of the Chinese people will surely run into a bloodbath.
This was in reference to Shinzo Abe's initiative to militarize Japan, which now with a supermajority they may be able to do.
And with their potential defense of Taiwan over Chinese aggression.
So, seems like China has definitely a motive there.
I know that the Chinese had really celebrated Abe's death.
And, you know, after that assassination happened.
But I also know that the shooter, he confessed about, and it all has to do with this sort of Connection with the shooter and Abe to this group called the Moonies as far as the motivation for killing Abe, but I don't know.
And then I also know about the connection of the Moonies to Trump and other conservative leaders.
However, you know, it seems like the mainstream media is really pushing that angle, the Moonies cult narrative.
And so that just kind of tells me maybe a misdirection.
What are your thoughts on that?
That, yeah, I mean, I haven't read all this and followed up on all this, so I don't know, but if mainstream news is covering it in that fashion, there's a very good chance it's misdirection.
Right, right, right.
Yeah, yeah, it's interesting.
But meanwhile in China, I mean, speaking of continued unrest, we've seen footage coming out of China recently.
This has been actually an ongoing thing, but the Bank of China, they froze accounts, and this was about like 1.5 billion dollars worth of deposits back in April, And this was all, basically, they just explained to the customers that they were, quote, upgrading their internal systems, and these people haven't heard anything since.
So, meanwhile, they're just fed up and they stormed, customers stormed, One of the banks of China in a major city.
So I mean, even China is having a major social unrest as well.
And, you know, this is the type of stuff that we can just expect to be coming down the pipe for us if these continued, you know, climate hoax mandates Continue for us.
I mean, and we know that they want full control of the, of the banking system through CBDCs.
So, you know, this is actually, you know, kind of melts into the last thing we were going to talk about, which was something that the World Economic Forum posted just a couple of days ago.
Just talking about how this crisis that they've created with all these Russian sanctions now gives them the excuse for CBDCs, right?
Yep, yep.
They're saying, you know, well, decentralized just, you know, We might need to centralize this, guys, so we can start covering sanctions with these bad actors better, because this kind of financial system isn't going to work.
And so we really need to think more about blockchain, but how we're going to do that.
So if everyone remembers, back when I did my book, and I kept talking about how they were going to use blockchain, and they were going to centralize it, and everyone kept arguing with me saying, no, it's going to be decentralized.
Blockchain is decentralized.
You don't understand blockchain.
And maybe I don't understand it to the degree most people do.
I'm sure I don't.
But what I do understand is these people are going for full control.
So they're going to figure out how to centralize all of this so they have full control over it.
And now they're using the narrative, of course, like just like they're using with the narrative of Russia for everything, for fuel, even though we only import 8%.
comes from Russia over here in the US, but Biden will just keep repeating all because of Russia.
This is why our gas prices are high and buy that crap.
So, so yeah, so they're using the wars, Russia, Ukraine.
It's perfect cover.
It's perfect cover for them.
These people, man, I'm telling you, they're just unbelievable.
Unbelievable with their narratives.
And it's so darn transparent.
I just wish it could be this transparent to everyone else, you know?
Yeah.
So they just, they want to roll into the blockchain.
And while the, whereas the crypto is kind of good, it really doesn't give us the ability to track these people and sanction them in the way we need to.
And this could be dangerous.
And then they even talk about, hang on, I got a keyword so I can find it over here.
They talk about the aid, so they say, this same technology can also play a central role in the post-conflict rebuilding process.
When recovery begins, there will Yep, yep.
to be transfers to citizens to aid in rebuilding.
And CBDCs would be a way to do this in a targeted, efficient way.
Boom!
You will owe nothing and be happy, and we are now controlling all your funds.
Yep, yep.
I love this part here.
The CBDCs will optimize the process of freezing rogue state assets since the issuer retains control of the currency at all times.
Yep.
In this sense, we were reserves held by the Russian Central Bank denominated in CBDC US dollars.
The US Federal Reserve could freeze those assets and technically prevent them from being spent.
This means that the access to CBDC networks is controlled, making the process of sanctioning a rogue actor both faster and wider reaching.
Okay, rogue actors!
Okay, so what is going... Let's just take that logic for a second and put it in a domestic sense, like what happened with the truckers in Canada with their assets being frozen, like what's happening in China with assets being frozen.
Let's say the government turns on its own people and considers More than half the population to be terrorists and decides that they're rogue assets and that their assets need to be frozen.
Mm hmm.
That's exactly where this is going.
Exactly where it's going.
They're just they're laying out the framework here and and kudos to the person who emailed me this.
So if you're listening, thank you.
I don't want to say names because I never know if people want their name said or not.
Yeah, so it's the writing's on the wall.
I mean, my God.
So Here's the thing.
I do believe that, well, at this point in the game, there should be no excuse that every legislator out there should be fully aware of the climate hoax and what's really going on here.
But who knows?
Maybe some of them aren't so much.
People need to get information charts and whatnot in their faces on a local level.
We need to start removing these subsidies and these pilot programs.
You can do this on a local level.
I mean, we also obviously need to hit Congress.
But I think at this point, it's a waiting game to see what shakes out this November.
And we need to start, you know, protecting citizens from this complete Um, removing all options and forcing us into these other industries that will ultimately, ultimately impact everyone from business owners down to citizens down to children, you know?
Right.
When you don't have food or fuel, it's going to affect everyone.
Yeah, that'll do it.
Yeah.
It's time.
It's time to take a stand.
This is the last stand.
We all have to do something.
Do our part, get out and vote, contact our representatives, whatever you can do.
We all have to do something to stop this evil and absolutely destructive agenda.
Stop using credit cards and debit cards as much as possible and use cash because it's giving billions and billions and billions to the ones that are trying to roll out the CBDCs, American Express and Visa, or American Express.
Well, they're probably involved too.
But Visa and MasterCard, main ones that have already piloted the programs on the CBDCs.
Because look, they got to roll these all through wallets and digital systems.
And they're two of the biggest systems.
It's a real easy shift for them to do.
So these people are making like over $110 billion a year just in fees off of us.
Stop feeding them.
Yeah.
Use cash as much as you can.
So important.
Good point.
Good point.
All right, guys.
I think that wraps it up for today, so please be sure to share this podcast.
We are on BitChute, Foxhole, GabTV, iHeartRadio, Odyssey, Pilled, Rumble, SoundCloud, Spotify, Stitcher, TuneIn, and YouTube, and we'll see you back next time right here on Dig It.
But one quick note, next week we will not be here, but we will pick back up the following week.
Oh yeah, I forgot.
▲
Export Selection