All Episodes
Previous Next
July 12, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
51:35
Catastrophic Massacre - Outcomes of Injecting Babies - CHD with Jessica Rose
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Good morning, CHD.
Hello, world.
Welcome, welcome, welcome.
It's Friday, July the 8th, 2022.
All right.
Now, some of you have seen that because you're on text alert that we do have Jessica Rose on today.
Catastrophic massacre injecting babies.
We're going to talk about fertility as infertility and fertility, whatever, as well.
But I need to warn you, this show is going to be distressing.
They're the facts.
We have no time to sugarcoat this issue.
And if we can save one baby from just doing one show, Talking Truth, then we've done a good thing.
So, everybody, brace up.
We will end with Riley, with Riley's wrap-up, so she will give you lots of hope at the end of it.
But let's get through this.
Let's bring on the most amazing, one of my favourite people in the whole world, Jessica Rose.
Jessica, it's so good to see you.
I find it so wild to hear you say that, because you're still my hero.
I literally have seen your movies like hundreds of times.
And now I'm like, it's really, really nice to be here again.
Well, we love having you and our people absolutely love you because you're so brave and you go out there and you really put your amazing brain and warm the world.
And that's the people like you is what's going to end this situation.
So, Jessica, let's get straight onto it.
The babies.
Let's talk about the babies first before we go on to fertility.
I'll hand straight over to you.
Okay, so for those of you who are not aware of how I'm approaching the last two years, I'm analyzing VAERS data, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.
So, I was meant to speak at the latest VRBPAC committee meeting to decide whether or not it was a good idea to inject six-month-old babies to four-year-olds or five-year-olds.
With either the Moderna or the Pfizer products, I didn't get to speak.
So, you know, in lieu of that, among other things, I decided to start posting, uh, it sounds really like gross.
I don't know the other, another word to say it, but, um, baby death cards on Twitter, because I'm very new to Twitter.
I don't know much about it, but I know that there's a huge reach.
And I'm not going for shock value because I'm not that kind of person.
This is literally VAERS data verbatim copy and pasted from the website with the age of child and or babies, the symptoms, the write-up, the back slot when it's available, And the mode of injection, which is usually intramuscular, and the number of days that the child expired following the injection, which is sometimes available.
What kind of symptoms are we seeing, Jessica?
Well, that's the point.
I pick the ones where if you're a parent and you have a child or you want to have one one day, you would probably look at these and go, What?
That's not right.
That doesn't make any sense.
For example, one of the most recent ones I posted, there were no symptoms.
There was no write-up.
It was death.
Cause of death, dot dot, death.
I mean, in what world is that acceptable?
It was a seven-year-old girl who got injected, and the number of days post-injection that she expired is not known, which to me, after everything that I've seen, probably means, well, it either means that data is not being collected properly, or it happened immediately and they didn't want to report it.
So, that's her.
Reported cause of death, death.
I mean, what?
Did she have a heart attack?
Did she have, you know, did she have pre-existing conditions?
There's so many questions.
No autopsy's gonna be done.
I mean, okay, it might be up to the parents to make sure that that happens, but I can tell you one thing, they're not looking to do autopsies with any kind of frequency on the people who are dying in the context of these injections.
So, I mean, it's shocking and alarming.
And by the way, I just want to remind everyone, these reports were filed to VAERS.
That means these babies got injected, these young kids got injected before June 15th, when they decided unanimously, 21 to zero, to inject babies and up to four and five-year-olds with this crap.
There were 2,000 reports in VAERS, just under 2,000 reports of zero to five-year-olds ranging in a variety of adverse events, including death, before June 15th.
So these things, they're so-called EUA authorized now, and they're trying to get them on the childhood schedule, which means that the liability will be gone completely But they weren't EUA approved, they weren't FDA approved, they weren't... You can't put this stuff into people that young before, you know, they make up at least the fake meeting with the fake data and say that you can by EUA.
I'm being litigious now, but you know what I mean.
So, and I know for a fact that in Canada there's a doctor named Christopher Sun who admittedly Injected over 500 babies with this crap.
And not only was he not reprimanded, he was probably rewarded.
Nothing was done to him.
He wasn't allowed to be... Listen to what I'm about to say to you.
He wasn't allowed, medically, ethically, morally, whatever word you want to use, to be doing this.
But he did anyway.
He used his expertise, his medical licensing, he used everything To his own whatever.
He claims it was for the advantage of the children, but it was not.
And at the same time, if you write a medical exemption letter for somebody who has an actual allergy to PEG, for example, or if you prescribe an FDA approved drug with no known side effects, With no problems for 70 years used in pregnant women, just because it's off-label in the context of COVID, you lose your medical license.
Tell me where that computes by anybody's definition, even the people who are really far into the narrative.
How does that make any sense?
Because here's the thing, if something happens to those babies, Who's responsible?
Who has to take care of them?
If your baby has a febrile seizure when they're eight months old, in temporal proximity to the shot, maybe they're counter-indicated with the other injections that your baby's being forced to take in the United States.
We don't have the data!
It's so irresponsible, and I'll answer the question.
The parents are the ones who have to pick up the mess.
You're on your own if your child gets injured by these products.
I guarantee you.
Yeah, you are and I can tell you that for a fact because I've been through it.
A couple of things, by the way, if you have, I've said this on Mary's show and I'm going to say it again at this point, if you have a teenage girl or son and you think it's a good idea for them to be babysitting vaccinated babies, do not, do not let them do it because we have had so many stories of them being blamed when the babies have a seizure or they die or whatever.
So do not do it.
Yes, it's the most dangerous profession to be in right now, babysitting, vaccinating babies.
Wow, I didn't even know that was a thing.
Yes, it's a no-no.
Right, I want to talk to you about Okay, babies are dying, and that is barbaric.
But we're also seeing blood clots and pericardial myocarditis, according to Megan Redshaw's VAERS weekly report.
We're seeing that in that age group as well.
This is my question for you.
If they report to VAERS that the baby has a blood clot, and that's reported, then the baby dies, do they come back and say baby died?
Or is it just, do we know how many people with injuries then go on to die?
No.
No, and this is the scary part.
I mean, there's such a... First of all, there's a huge lag in the database that's already not in the front end.
That's number one.
Number two, the number of people, including the zero-year-olds, the very young ones, that end up dying following having filed a VAERS report.
For example, like you said, for a blood clot, the percentage of the ones who actually file a second time to update That VAERS entry to death, first of all, it's unknown.
Second of all, if I was going to guess, I'd say the rate is really low.
So we're still just seeing a fraction of the actual deaths.
There are some VAERS reports that actually, they have expired, but there's no listed, you know, died equals Y, like the field entry for having died is empty.
So there are incongruities here, but it's a really good point because, I mean, especially in the mid-ranged people now who are suffering from myocarditis and the young teenagers, like, if you have a myocarditis event or a cardiac event or a heart attack, God forbid, you go in for your next shot and you die suddenly, which it seems to be happening a lot.
It's insane.
How many of those reports are actually written down as death?
Or are they going to remain forever in VAERS as myocarditis, for example?
I don't know.
I was absolutely shocked.
I'm sorry, we're jumping all over the place now.
I was absolutely shocked with the Pfizer, when they were uncovering these Pfizer things.
When these people died, they would write things like, whatever age died, but had a history of depression or had a history of something.
So that made it okay for them.
The explanations of why they died was Shocking to me.
And Mary and I were talking about, you have to be so careful.
If you've got health insurance and stuff and they're asking you, do you suffer a little bit from depression or whatever, that will go down when you die from your Pfizer shot of the reason why you died.
And think about the death certificates.
I mean, I don't know very much about that, but I do know that there's a list.
Like, I think there are five things, up to five things that you can fill out, and the top one is the reason you died, like the cause of death.
So imagine, like, the information that you have is coming from bears and you have death.
Like, that doesn't tell us anything!
Do an autopsy?
I don't know.
It's very frustrating because, I mean, we're not talking about something, you know, I don't even know how to phrase what I'm trying to think.
Let me turn it on its side.
We're talking about something so insane right now, like it's normal, for example.
Myocarditis in teenagers.
What?
What are we even talking about here?
I mean, The numbers of people who have died already, the number of people who had died last January, were enough people to put this to a stop according to the old rules.
Just to remind everyone, I mean, and it's just, you know, I'm segueing mentally right now into this whole fertility crisis thing because I've been giving a lot of presentations about this, and I'm only showing data and presenting, like, papers, what people are finding in their labs.
And this is only the stuff that's allowed to be published.
And it's not looking very good.
And, I mean, even if we're all wrong, and even if we find out, phew, you know, it doesn't integrate into the human genome, boy, we got off lucky there.
The fact that we're having to find out after we put this crap into six billion people or however many people have accepted a dose, it's not right.
We need to find out the answers to these questions that affect all of us before, especially if it has to do with fertility.
So what are you saying?
Talk me through fertility.
What's the data on that?
What are we saying?
Well, first of all, we'll just go back to what they told us about the biodistribution.
We were told that this junk stays in your arm, like around the injection site, right?
Or in the local draining lymph node.
No, no, no, no.
Not only does it head to the ovaries and the brain and the heart and the liver and the spleen and the testes and everywhere else, according to their own data and a FOIA request of a study in Japan, It also accumulates in the ovaries.
These were studies done in animals.
They terminated the animals after 48 hours, and the curve was still going up.
So we don't know how long and to what levels these lipid nanoparticles, which are the carriers for this modified mRNA, are going to accumulate.
And we also don't know what effect that's going to have on the ovaries.
We don't know what effect the production of massive amounts of modified spike protein is going to have on the ovaries.
So that's number one.
We were told a lie.
And they either knew, like I said before, or they didn't know, and either way, what the hell?
Number two.
We were told that this stuff doesn't reverse transcribe.
We're also still being told that it doesn't integrate.
I think that paper's on the way.
There's a paper that pretty much, in my opinion, definitively shows, with great controls and great lab work, that this stuff reverse transcribes.
Which means the modified RNA goes into the DNA form, which means it's potentially able, if there's an integrase component, to integrate into our genome.
I don't want to go there yet, because that hasn't been shown.
But the important thing to know is that the reverse transcriptase, which is the enzyme that allows for this, you know, RNA to DNA, you know, process, is implicated in embryogenesis.
It's called Line 1.
And there's a Nature paper that was published.
This is separate from COVID.
This is just how Line 1 is.
If the expression levels are either a little bit too high or a little bit too low, at the time of embryogenesis, it will cause termination of that process.
So if you just put those two things together, you have a beautiful research question.
Is this potentially causing disruptions in embryogenesis?
We need to find out.
We needed to find out before.
Number three.
There's a recent paper that came out.
I'm just going to look at my presentation because I don't want to misquote myself.
And I want to read the title of the paper for everyone so you can go read it.
It's called SARS-CoV-2 infection of the human ovarian cells, a potential negative impact on female fertility.
This was published a few days ago, I think, in a journal called Cells, and it shows definitively that two They're called cumulus O forest cells, which are implicated in follicular development, oocyte maturation, and granulosa cells, which are closely associated with the developing female game meat.
These are both infectable via ACE2 with the spike.
And so the implications again, because what does the modified mRNA encode?
It encodes the spike.
So we don't know.
There's something that a lot of people need to understand.
This spike protein that the virus itself uses to infect cells, it does other things.
This is a receptor, the spike is a receptor, and it's cognate receptor is the thing that it binds to.
I always imagine this as like a magnet, like they're like, and they kind of like come together Electrostatically, because they fit, for lack of a better word.
But a number of things happen besides all this, you know, like, oh, let's, let's break off our fur and clear each site and like poke a hole in the cell and invade the cell.
So other stuff happens, which are called downstream signaling events on the side of the cell.
So when a receptor is found, it sends a signal into the cell, like transmembrally, to tell all these other things to do something.
So all these other things that it's telling it to do are doing what they do.
I know I'm being vague here, but my point is, if you activate these cells in certain ways via these receptors bound to the spike protein, In a very large amount of cells, because the spike is going to be ubiquitous, right?
Because that's the programming.
It's body cells produce this modified spike protein in copious amounts wherever it is.
So it biodistributes everywhere.
It's everywhere.
Producing it's blah blah blah your body's making all this spike protein so everywhere where it can potentially embed then binding is going on then there's also the potential for For other effects to to occur and this is this is Completely apart from all the inflammation, but we need we don't need to go there.
So Those are just some New, very new pieces of evidence that have come out that really paint a frightening potential story on the relationship between these products and human fertility.
So, I haven't even mentioned what we're seeing in VAERS, and I guess everybody... I want to hear that, but I've got a couple of questions for you as well, but let's just talk about that, and I also want you to comment on the Pfizer dumping of the data.
Just talk to us about that and what you're seeing in VAERS.
I mean, two huge subjects, where do you start?
So, yeah, the Pfizer is continuing to be honestly dishonest and release You know, their data slowly over a period of eight months due to a court order to do so.
And I mean, the most recent dump, I'm not paying too much attention to that right now, but I have looked at it and it's just more of a lot of convoluted nonsense, for lack of a better word.
They even sent files with pictures of The product boxes unfolded, so it would, you know, when you got the boxes, if you're working at the place where they fold the boxes to put the stuff in, you know how?
So they think that this is what's interesting to the people who have FOIA requested them to release safety data.
That's my point.
I don't give a crap how you fold your goddamn boxes, you know what I mean?
I want to know How many adverse events occurred, for example?
And that's slowly trickling in, but you need to convert the file.
First of all, you need to sift through the files.
They're all in different types.
The main ones concerning adverse events are PDF files, and so you have to convert those into some kind of usable spreadsheet format, so it's a pain.
It's really not as easy as it sounds.
Me and my My nerdy group are working on that, them more so than I am.
But the most important document that has been released was the very first one, the one that I've written so many sub stocks on.
that shows that they didn't do any genotoxicity or mutagenicity studies.
Their fertility and pregnancy studies are ridiculous.
There's only a little bit of pregnancy data in one of the tables in this document at the beginning.
I mean, I'll read you what they show, but it's still kind of Weird what they present.
Like, they say pregnancy cases dot dot.
There were 270 mother cases, and of those, 238, which is 88%, have no outcome reported.
238, which is 88%, have no outcome reported.
So does that mean that they all had a spontaneous abortion?
Does it mean that they didn't collect the data?
Does it mean that they dropped out?
It's just stupid that they don't indicate what happened.
It's irresponsible because this is very important.
And of the 23 remaining that we know about that we have reports on, or of the remainder that we have reports on, 8.5% of them had a spontaneous abortion.
So, you know, is that 8.5% of the 12% remainder?
I mean, we don't know.
So this is what I mean by the, like, I'm confused by this.
I don't know if everybody is, but I find it obnoxious how it's reported.
It's deceptive.
I mean, the whole thing is deceptive, for sure.
There's no doubt about that.
You can see that in the fact that they use like four different ways to describe a miscarriage.
Right, I want to tell people, so you have pledged on Twitter that you're going to, what you're going to do, you're posting dead babies, correct?
Yeah, I'm calling them baby death cards.
You know, it's just the title of the PowerPoint file from where I produce these every day.
They're literally just copy and paste reports from VAERS.
The age, the product, the vac slot if possible, the write-up, which is what the person who filed the report writes, and the The VAERS ID, of course.
So yeah, this one here, this was one of the longer time frames that I chose, because I'm going for variety as well, of an eight-year-old.
Believe it or not, when I say that, I mean that 14 days is a long time for the child to have expired following the injection.
And by the way, this is following exposure to the first dose.
So There's actually a symptom list here.
If you can't read it, it says abdominal pain, cardiac arrest in a seven, or I'm sorry, an eight-year-old, dyspnea.
Pardon me.
I can't even read that.
Two weeks of agonizing pain for that child.
Exactly.
That's the point.
So, that's the other thing that people need to realize.
Like, I've been I'm quoted as saying that there are worse things than death.
And I really, really stand by that because, I mean, death is the end of suffering and it's hard for the people left behind.
But I mean, I can't imagine what the parents are going through, especially the ones who don't connect the injection to the suffering of their child, because the doctors, for the most part, aren't making this connection.
And so they're like, I have no idea how to treat your child.
So they're treated for their symptoms or, you know, band-aid solutions with prescription drugs.
But, I mean, this part really gets me.
Until the medical professionals start at least admitting the possibility that there's a connection, we can't acknowledge the potential problem and therefore we can't solve it.
We have to admit that there's a possibility and a probability in many cases.
I mean, We use the Bradford Hill criteria to establish causality.
Who uses this?
Okay?
All your trusted three-letter organizations use this criteria and they're satisfied.
I've satisfied all 10 with data and papers and published peer-reviewed material.
There's no doubt in my mind that these products are causing a huge percentage of the adverse events that are being not only reported but experienced.
So it's not a stretch for a medical professional, if they were up to date, to at least accept that if you inject someone with something, I don't care what it is, if you inject them with something and they're having something odd happen that never happened to them before, that in some cases, many cases, is debilitating to them a day later.
I mean, hello?
Is anybody home?
I mean, let's explore the possibilities here, at least.
OK, this is a question that everyone's asking at the moment, and I very much doubt you'll be able to answer it, but let's see.
Let's put it this way.
I know someone who is completely up to date on the COVID shots, just had a load of shingles, and has had a shingles shot.
And I don't even know what people have these days.
But every week, she's like, oh, arm's a bit sore.
But anyway, on she goes.
And she's really healthy.
What I'm trying to say is, how come some people drop and some don't?
You could ask the same question.
How come my son had a seizure following the MMR and others don't?
What is going on out there?
I'm not going to ask you to speculate and say some are saline or some are not, and that's all going around and stuff.
But there are people that seem to just... I know Andy Wakefield says there's this big bar of tequila.
I could drop at the first one.
You could drop at the end.
She's not drinking tequila, everybody watching.
That is water.
Oh, it's water.
It does look like it, though, right?
It does a bit, as I said that, and you were joking there.
I work.
She's not living in this country.
She's in a different time zone, so if she was, then, you know, whatever.
Anyway, my question is... I can't get off the alcohol conversation.
I had Catherine Austin Fitz once guggling down with a wine glass, but it was water as well.
All right.
I'm all for it, man.
How do some people...
What is it going on when some people are OK seemingly?
I mean, everyone's going to drop eventually if you continue.
You cannot continue to keep... That's why I worry about the military, Jessica.
I worry about them so much because they're being pumped in the whole time.
They're coming out with mRNA flu shots.
Everything's going to be mRNA.
People are... There's way more deaths ahead, correct?
Yeah.
Yeah, there's a paper that just came out in Science that has this multivalent nightmare thing, but let's not talk about that because that's frightening.
Listen, the best answer I can give you is, I don't know yet.
And nobody does.
And it's really a beautiful question because when I look around, I'm an observer, and I look around when I go outside and I'm like, everybody seems okay.
You know?
And it's like, okay.
All right, you know, I'm assessing the data as I see it, but there's so many possible explanations.
One of the ones I still feel strongly about is, well, it's two things.
Actually, there's a list of things, but the way that you get injected is really important.
If you get intramuscular for reals, like if someone doesn't aspirate, and what that means is pull back on the plunger a little bit before they fully inject to see if there's blood or not, that's really important.
Because if there's blood, it means you're in the circulatory system, and when you inject, that's gonna go everywhere the blood goes.
So you're gonna get like a really fancy high dose.
So it's possible that the people who are doing really bad with this have that, But I think it's a combination of things.
I think it has a lot to do with your current or your immune state, your immune age at the time of injection, which doesn't have to do with age.
It has to do with how you're doing immunologically.
Like if you have a lot of allergies, for example, you're in a completely different immune state than someone who's not, you know, allergized all the time.
So it really depends on that.
It does depend on age, of course, that's obvious.
I don't think it depends on gender.
I think it also depends a lot on the quality of the product that you're being given.
Because I know for a fact that these things aren't being handled properly.
Like, you know how you always hear, oh, minus 70, they have to be kept in minus 70 freezers until you administer it.
It's like, you know how expensive a minus 70 freezer is and how few people have one?
You know?
So it's not just that.
It's not just the manufacturing and the, you know, the shipping.
It's the administration.
And I also know for a fact that these products aren't being administered properly because here's another thing.
In my investigation into the children, the really young ones, the number one reported adverse event was wrong dose administered.
And written very clearly in the symptom text file was, whoops, I forgot to dilute it.
It's insane.
So if you're giving at least double the dose to a baby, In this group of babies, I mean, I would expect that they would have problems where the other ones might not.
So there's all these things that it could be.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I cut myself off.
The quality of the modified mRNA.
So I had a theory going back way back when that it's better if you don't have intact mRNA.
Like if it's degraded inside your lipid nanoparticle or whatever, because then it won't be translated by your body, your host cell, into the complete spike protein.
However, and then it wouldn't do the damage that the spike does, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
However, I'm not so sure about that anymore because, and here's my very scary recent work, There's something called an amyloidogenic protein.
An amyloid is like a stringy, fibrous protein in the body that isn't degraded easily, if at all.
If you've ever heard of the word prion disease, Prion proteins are these ones that aren't degradable, which is the biggest problem.
So when they misfold and they create these plaques, it's heavily associated with Alzheimer's disease.
So these aren't exactly that, but they cause what we know as amyloid plaques.
And these amyloid plaques are, they're really stable and they're hard to break down and they can happen anywhere in the body.
Heart, tissue, wherever you want to think about.
And the problem with that is, is that wherever these amyloid plaques decide to inhabit, let's say, the properties of the cells that they, in effect, replace are lost.
So if this happens in the myocardium of the heart, for example, the whole thing about the heart is this muscly, flexible, beady thing, right?
So imagine you're full of amyloid plaques, these tight, not stretchy fibers.
They're not like the heart cells.
They're like, you know, like a shoelace.
You can't stretch a shoelace, right?
So the heart becomes not able to beat.
So you see where I'm going with this.
The problem with the spike protein now, a number of publications have come out recently that confirm that the spike protein is full of these types of proteins, which means that there's potential for the production of these amyloid proteins and subsequent plaques wherever these proteins are, which would be everywhere.
And cause subsequent problems.
Now, the scary part about this is what we're seeing clinically.
So you can have a hypothetical idea and it can be beautiful and blah, blah, blah.
But if you don't have anything to support it in like the human being, it's not really worth anything.
And this is still, it's still, you know, circumstantial.
However, It's so beautiful the way that it ties together the systemic nature of the damage of these products that we're seeing in the people that we're seeing it in.
The neurological, the cardiovascular, the hepatological, the myocarditis could very well be amyloid cardiomyopathy or cardiac amyloidosis.
I'm sorry, I got the names wrong.
So, I'm very scared that that's what's happening.
And so what I said before was it would be better if you didn't have intact product, but it could actually be worse, which could exactly be the difference between what we're seeing clinically I don't know yet.
So this is again, this is the stuff where we need to go back to the bench and find out really fast because amyloidosis is not a diagnosis you want to get.
It doesn't have a good prognosis.
And I'm scared because I mean, everyone's hearing about people, this is not a respiratory illness.
I think everyone can agree on that, right?
This has something to do with with clotting disorders, thrombocytopenia, et cetera, et cetera.
And it's very possible that amyloid plaques distributed along, you know, the entire circulatory system, the neurological pathways, everything could in fact be causing, you know, all these, even the micro clots in the brain could be causing the neurological problems.
Like, there's more to this story, but yeah, that was a long rant.
No, no.
I mean, listen, this is really important.
Everybody listening, you have to follow Jessica Rose on Substack.
What happens?
You get an email.
It just comes popping into your email address, whatever you call these things.
And there it is.
And let's pull up that article that we were going to show.
This is the one.
Is this the one?
This is your latest, is it?
No, but it's a good one to show.
Wow, it's a lot of information.
So, molecular mimicry is just how it sounds.
It's like when something mimics something else molecularly.
So, when I was talking about binding earlier, a molecular mimic could pose as the thing that binds to the other thing and activate all these downstream signaling events.
Actually, that's a beautiful way to put this, because all of these subsequent activities in the human being that are highly regulated, useful for specific purposes, especially immunologically, like you don't want pro-inflammatory cytokines, which are molecules that like
Make everything inflamed, like it gives you fever, like a fever is a good thing when you're sick because it literally burns the shit out of the pathogen that's trying to attack you.
But you don't want that happening all the time, right?
So these are highly regulated, when we need them kinds of things.
So imagine you had a molecule that came along.
Imagine even worse still.
You had one injected into your body that had the ability to fire up some of these processes that are highly, highly regulated and only meant to be going on when you need them, for example, maybe an allergic response.
And what about autoimmunity?
What if you have something where you have a situation where You have a molecule that instigates an auto-reaction, like a reaction against your body's own cells.
I mean, this is something we're seeing a lot in bears right now, like the autoimmune conditions associated immunological reactions.
It's off the charts.
There's so much more.
I mean, that's why I love you.
I love to get your stuff in my inbox.
So just once again, Twitter.
Bring up Twitter, Sawyer.
O'Reilly, there's Twitter there.
OK, everybody, follow on Twitter and share those VAERS dead babies.
We have to do that.
It might just grab the attention of one mother who's about to give birth.
Yeah, that's what I want to do.
And just to kind of nail down, because you asked me about the Pfizer and the VAERS thing, this kind of ties them together in a weird way.
That VRBPAC meeting that I mentioned before, where they were deciding on whether to inject zero to four or five-year-olds, both Pfizer and Moderna presented half-assed, we only have two days to prepare this data sets, which, I mean, I recommend you watch Dr. Claire Craig's presentation of this data, because she says it best.
She's been on everyone's show lately, including The High Wire, describing how horrible and how this is horrible data.
It is.
It's horrific.
So I made a placard for each of those data sets of a very approachable and understandable way to know from each of these You should stay away from them regarding your babies.
So, according to their data, both of them, which kind of support each other, which is scary.
These are both mRNA products, remember.
One in 71 and one in 82.
I think I got those numbers right.
Infants age 6 to 23 months.
I focused on the really young ones.
Suffered, not will, this is their data, suffered a severe adverse event in the context of their product.
Okay?
So you had this placard taped outside of your pediatrician's office.
It's orange, you know, there's a lot of orange and there's a picture of a mother with a baby.
I did that on purpose because I want people to look at it and I want it to speak to them.
And you saw That your baby has a 1 in 72 or 71, I can't remember, chance of experiencing a severe adverse event if they get injected.
Would you turn around?
I would hope so, because that's a really, really good chance, if you ask me.
And that's only what they showed us.
Don't forget that.
This is what they admitted to.
And I can imagine that it's worse than that, even still.
Yeah, and I want to stress the fact that your babies don't need this crap.
They're fine.
They never were affected by COVID.
This is a scam to get this on the childhood vaccination schedule to eliminate liability forever.
If you doubt what Jessica's saying, please go and visit a family that has a vaccine-free baby and you will be absolutely bowled over about the unbelievable health, intelligence, advanced... I mean, that's how babies are supposed to be!
Check out the unvaccinated baby, the vaccine-free baby, and that's really all the research you need to do.
And especially find those families that vaccinated, same parent, and then stopped.
Unbelievable difference.
Right, so we've done Twitter.
Substack, everybody.
Follow this substack and you will get this.
As Jessica knows it, she puts it in your box.
And also you've got a website.
What's the website?
There, Jessica's Universe.
So I give updates on VAERS on this, like I take stand-alone adverse events like Kreutzfeldt-Jakob disease, which is a prion disease, which I mean, yeah, that's a whole other episode.
Deaths, spontaneous abortions, thrombotic events, disabilities.
Anyway, I break it down so you can see how the numbers are going up every week.
And I also have some analyses there.
I have publications there with regard to VAERS.
I have most of my interviews.
Oh my gosh, I haven't updated that in forever.
If you're a volunteer and you're technically minded, contact Jessica.
She needs help.
I really, really need help.
But I'm very difficult at relinquishing duties.
I like to be in control of my ship.
I know.
I understand that.
All right.
Now, listen, I've got one final question, then Riley's going to wrap up this show.
And my final question is, what is it going to take to stop the massacre?
What is it going to take?
One by one, guys.
I'm not a drama queen and I'm not unrealistic.
And I don't know if we're going to win.
I don't even want to say that.
But it doesn't mean we don't all have to try.
And the more We speak, and the less afraid you are, and the more you stand in what you know is right, the easier things get for you personally, and the more people see that, and it ripples.
So one by one, like, keep it local, keep it real, keep it truthful.
Yeah, I think that's how, so.
And say no.
Just say no.
It's such a simple thing.
Oh, absolutely.
Don't, don't, don't, don't, don't, don't, no, no, no.
Jessica, I'm so grateful that you came on.
I know how busy you are.
And please do come back, because our people love you.
I can't believe it's been 45 minutes!
I know.
Sorry, it was supposed to be a half-hour show.
To everybody listening, I know you're sending lots of love to Jessica.
And Jessica, thank you so much.
These people are going to follow you.
We all are going to follow you and hang on your every word.
Keep doing what you're doing.
And all my prayer warriors are going to pray protection over you.
And we love you.
So thank you so much, Jessica, for your time and your bravery and courage.
We can't thank you.
There's no words to thank you for what you're doing.
So thank you.
Right back at you.
I love you more.
All right, well, it's nice to have love going around, isn't it, everybody?
All right, we're going to bring in, for me, I'll see everybody on the roundtable later.
We have Dr. Tess Laurie coming on.
Yes, we do.
We have her from the World Council for Health.
And to everybody else, Riley's coming on now with some great news.
We have a new host on Saturday morning.
His name is Alex Weber, and you're going to love him.
He's just Yummy, yummy, yummy, great comedian.
We need a comedian, so we're bringing him on on Saturday.
Jessica, you and I are out now, and I will see you soon.
Everyone have a great weekend.
For those in the round table, I'll see you later.
Here's Riley for you.
Good morning, CHD family.
Happy Friday.
These subjects can get really heavy.
So let's bring the energy back up here.
Let's bring the spirit back alive so that we can be strong and we can fight this together.
On a serious note, it is so lovely to have Dr. Jessica Rose join us today.
Not only is she a data analyst with a PhD, but she's also an amazing surfer.
She is a Renaissance woman and so important to our movement.
So thank you so much, Jessica, for coming on.
And thank you to the viewers for the love.
I see it in the comments.
Thank you so much.
All right, it's time for our CHDTV Weekly Wrap-Up.
As Polly mentioned, we have exciting news for you.
Tomorrow, we are announcing our new Good Morning CHD host, Alex Weber.
He will be hosting Saturdays weekly, so you can continue to be updated on the weekend.
He's a former American Ninja Warrior, so like Jessica, he has many talents.
He'll be providing us with a bit of much-needed humor at the end of each week.
And speaking of humor, tune in tomorrow night for the CHD TV premiere of our Funny Razor stand-up comedy special, an hour and a half of non-stop laughs featuring CHD's own Heidi Kidd, Janet McLean, Robbie Rose, as well as professional comedians Ross DeBoss, Alex Stein, and more.
After this show, we could all use a laugh, so there is a reason we call it a Funny Razor.
Not only is it funny, but all donations Do go to supporting our collective critical mission.
So be sure to tune in tomorrow night, get your wallets out and be prepared to laugh, that is.
And so those are for tomorrow.
But stay tuned today, because at 2.30pm ET, 11.30am PT, today's Friday Roundtable will recap The absolutely outrageous FDA decision to approve the COVID vaccine for infants with literally zero data proving that is beneficial to this age group.
Even the infamous Paul Offit voted no and is dumbfounded by this decision.
So we will be unpacking the lunacy As Polly said with Tess Laurie, founding member of the World Council for Health, as well as the usual Meryl Ness, Brian Hooker, Liz Mumper, Polly, Amy, and all of your favorites.
So we hope to see you there.
Thank you for tuning in.
I just wanted to give a shout out to our phenomenal viewers all around the world.
Without you, we would lose this battle, and your support means the world to us.
So thank you for tuning in to CHD TV, and we will see you back here soon.
Hey CHD fam!
I'm Alex Weber, and I'm your newest host for Good Morning CHD.
And I've got one question.
What is going on in the world?
If you're like me, you might not be okay with what you've seen go on the last two years and where the future is looking like if we don't do something.
And that's why I'm here.
I'm an award-winning speaker, author, comedian, and American Ninja Warrior.
Alex Weber, curve athlete.
I like it, okay?
Throughout this series, I'm going to try to navigate as a rational member of society and also full-blown conspiracy mode each and every Saturday.
We're going to call out some of this nonsense, we're going to have a laugh, and we're going to take action together.
Because the politicians, the so-called elites, that's not who's deciding the future.
We are.
I love you and I will see you each and every Saturday right here on Good Morning CHD.
Let's go gather some berries, huh?
Food shortages!
You are worth fighting for.
Your children are worth fighting for.
Our freedom is worth fighting for.
The freedom to determine what happens to your body.
I don't know how censored you're gonna be.
Take out freedom of speech, then deaf and silent will be led like sheep to slaughter.
There is a global awakening that truly is happening.
And this is spiritual warfare at the highest levels.
My new passion now is to educate people about this because it's such an acute challenge and we just, there are millions of lives on the line now.
In the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
Join us for the Informed Dozens series featuring 12 of the most silenced people on this planet.
Why are they so afraid of the truth?
Stream it live for free on July 9th and 10th at unified.tv slash the shift.
▲
Export Selection