That's, you know, we gotta figure out what to do with this country, what's gonna happen and everything.
We have our very special guest, the one and only Jim Fetzer.
Thank you very much for being on the show.
Lay it on us, Jim.
What's happening?
What's with all these crazy romantics going on, these false flags, these crazy things?
Well, I've done a detailed, even frame-by-frame analysis of the Buffalo shooting.
It was modeled after New Zealand, which was completely fraudulent.
It was like a video game.
You had the driver with a fake gun that was all painted up.
You had no shell casing ejection.
No reaction from any of the parties who are supposed to have been shot.
You got parties on the ground before he's even come in their vicinity.
He fires point blank into the skull of one inside the Buffalo grocery store, but the only effect is a blast of wind.
This is very analogous to new zealand you can check it out on my blog at jamesfetzer.org go to jim the conspiracy guy the 65 shows and check out new zealand you'll be blown away or go to my channel jim fetzer where.
Brian Davidson, who's a private investigator, and I have done very thorough dissections of both Buffalo and Uvalde.
Uvalde was modeled after Sandy Hook, where instead of having the shooter Kill his mother and then go to an elementary school and kill 20 first graders and six adults.
We have him shooting his grandmother and gun going to a school and shooting 19 second, third and fourth graders and two teachers, one of whom, by the way, I was reprising her role from Sandy Hook, Victoria Soto.
She was in both places.
This is a typical scam where they recycle crisis actors to run our nose in it.
Nobody died either place.
And there were many absurd aspects that I detail there.
What we now have is a Highland Park shooting on July 4th.
The 4th of July is a day when Americans reflect on their nation and its values, and they needed to disrupt that, because everything that the Biden administration has been doing since it came into office has been destructive of those values.
I guarantee you what happened here in Highland Park is just as fake as what happened at Uvalde and Sandy Hook before it, or at Buffalo and New Zealand before it.
They have a physician coming out who appears to be their designated hitter, talking about how the dead and wounded had horrific wounds seen in war, but we never see any of the horrific wounds.
We don't see a string of ambulances.
We don't see a surge of EMTs.
In fact, we see the absence of the very indicators that this is a fake.
He claims nevertheless.
All of a sudden, you hear these howitzer-type noises going off.
Pow, pow.
I mean, signs I'd never heard before.
Ten seconds later, you hear people screaming, bodies down, bodies down, and everyone starts scattering.
Let me say right off the bat, I was an artillery officer.
The noise of a rifle is nothing at all like that of a howitzer.
And the idea that people would be calling out, bodies down, bodies down, that's just ridiculous.
Civilians would never use that phrase.
They just run and scream because they were terrified if anyone were actually being shot.
He claims those who were gone, meaning dead, were quickly identified by the paramedics because they had horrific injuries, the kind of injuries you probably see in wartime, the kinds that probably only happen when bullets can blow bodies up.
And by the way, the kinds of bullets we're talking about, which presumably is going to be once again in AR-15, do not blow bodies up.
They cause damage, serious damage, break bones, shatter bones, would blow apart a cranium.
But his description here is grossly exaggerated, totally unrealistic.
And he's citing the paramedics, because I pointed out, in case after case after case, there's no surge of EMTs, no string of ambulances, no medevac call, and they appear to be responding by trying to do better.
And Uvalde was so bad.
They had to use hearses.
Ambulances normally won't participate if they're bona fide because they may be needed for real emergencies and they don't want to risk someone dying from a heart attack or a stroke when they're participating in a drill.
They covered him up immediately.
You see, this is how he's going to explain that you can't see any bodies or even only a token sample of blood, which appears to have been planted.
We tried to help people move to the staging area where the ambulances were coming.
Once again, it was clear to me what they're doing is responding.
He continues.
I think you said you spoke to us.
One of the people you helped was a young child.
There was a young child there that people were, I am doing a little CPR until the paramedics got there.
And he looked horribly injured.
I'm not sure exactly of the injury, but I mean, people were doing anything they could.
It was a mass casualty scene.
Well, this is ridiculous.
Talk about having a little CPR.
And if he had these horrible injuries, there's no point in doing CPR.
Let me contrast this situation with what happened at Parkland.
We had another fake doctor there, this one by the name of Nietzsche Prinko, who claimed that Maddy Wilford's chest and abdomen wounds had already healed.
This is days after being shot in the chest and abdomen by an AR-15.
A bullet wound.
Young people have a tendency to heal very fast, he says.
This is just medically absurd.
She's very, very lucky.
We are talking about large caliber bullets penetrating through the chest and abdomen.
Those are serious injuries.
Indeed, they would be.
If she was shot in the chest or abdomen with an AR-15, she'd be dead.
But it's not large caliber.
It's only slightly larger than a .22 caliber.
It's small caliber, but it's high velocity.
This is simply absurd.
He claimed a bullet wound on her upper arm, which had injured two tendons, would take more time.
This is really silly beyond belief.
Here's another, Samantha Fuentes, released from the hospital, walking and being interviewed after only one week.
Her two legs now only require band-aids for their AR-15 wounds.
This is, again, completely ridiculous.
Even the New York Times run a story about the damage to legs shattering the bones.
There's no way if she had been shot with an AR-15.
It's just showing how phony, how fabricated these events are.
Now take a look and listen to this guy as he's talking and notice.
The woman beside him says she heard the shots and she smelled gunpowder.
Well, he would have been in excess of 100 yards away.
It's not even possible she could have smelled gunpowder.
And look how immediately they're demonizing the use of weapons because the Supreme Court has just ruled that the right to conceal carry is founded in the Second Amendment of the Constitution.
They vitiated.
New York City's special permit requirement.
And they have made other actions in relation to other weapon constrictions in Hawaii and California and other states that are very consequential as an affirmation of the Second Amendment.
So it's clear the Democrats, who think this is a winning issue for them and will help them in November, want to put it back front and center.
I've been predicting That they would be running one of these one a week.
It may even become more frequent than that.
But what's happening now is fulfilling my prediction.
Check this out.
David Baum was at the parade in Highland Park, Illinois.
Well, I'm sorry if we're not going to be able to hear him because it's pretty telling.
David Baum was at the parade in Highland Park, Illinois.
That's the Dr. Baum we're talking about.
Let me mention we do have a video here that was supposed to be during the event, Shades of Waukesha because this is a parade. Shades of Waukesha because this is a parade.
I didn't record it!
I didn't record it!
Oh, my God, it's got shot.
I can't believe I actually recorded that.
I didn't record it.
I didn't record it.
I didn't record that.
I can't believe I actually recorded it.
I can't believe I actually recorded it.
And what you heard there sounded far more like fireworks than it did like a howitzer.
Here's a case where you have some fake bodies.
Look in the upper right.
Fake bodies lying on the ground.
You have some blood here.
That white appears to have been a container that the blood was just poured out.
Notice it's not splattered around.
It does not look real.
Because it isn't real.
We had the same thing in Parkland.
We had a black training dummy with no hands and no arms sitting in a pool of fake blood in one of the classrooms there.
It was totally fraudulent.
That's what we're getting again and again.
And as Russ Winter, who has a sensational website, Winter Watch, has observed, this is the alleged perpetrator.
Straight out of the Aurora James Holmes School of PsyOps.
Wash, rinse, repeat.
Pre-crime interdiction is a core agenda.
And as I predicted, they swing between leftists and white supremacist boogeymen like a cheap suit.
Really?
This guy is supposed to be a rapper, an actor, a director.
I watched a video he had, which has already been taken down.
It was in lieu of a manifesto, but it was ridiculous.
Meanwhile, you have Governor Pritzker is running for re-election with a very well-prepared speech.
Governor Pritzker made a statement about the 4th of July shooting in Highland Park.
He asked everyone to pray for the victims and their families and for the first responders who've called a manhunt to find the man who shot up the parade.
There are no words for the kind of monster who lives in wait and fires into a crowd of families with children celebrating a holiday with their community.
There are no words for the kind of evil that robs our neighbors of their hopes, their dreams, their futures.
There are no words I can offer to lift the pain of those they leave behind.
Please know that our state grieves with you, that MK and I grieve with you.
He also has published a stand with him to stop the gun violence in the United States, stating that prayers alone will not put a stop to the terror of rampant gun violence.
This is all very scripted.
It's a very smooth, very well-crafted speech.
It's nothing he could have cobbled together in a few hours.
Nothing spontaneous about it.
Further confirmation of what's taking place.
Meanwhile, vis-a-vis developments in Europe, it turns out that the CIA has been operating secretly in Ukraine, report current and former officials.
While it's well known the U.S.
had provided billions in economic, humanitarian, and military aid, the Pentagon's been vague on intelligence.
However, current and former officials claim CIA personnel continue to work with Ukraine's borders, primarily in the capital of Kiev.
The government has a standing policy of not confirming CIA activity anywhere in the world.
However, there never seems to be a drought of current former officials willing to talk.
Reports indicate the U.S.
isn't the only one with intel operatives.
British, French, Canadian, and Lithuanian commandos allegedly work to direct intelligence sharing throughout the country.
What's known as intelligence sharing has also been happening outside the borders of Ukraine and appears to be growing dramatically.
The Army's 10th Special Forces Group, for example, built a coalition planning cell when the Russian invasion began, set up with the idea of organizing, directing and disseminating lethal intelligence.
It's now blossomed into a collaborative brain hub of over 20 nations.
And while Biden claims the ruble would become rubble, it appears to have arisen from the ashen.
The Russian ruble is now the best performing currency in the world.
What we're seeing here is the backfiring of all of the sanctions that have been imposed.
Michael Schellenberger tweets, Biden G7 leaders recognize a dangerous game they're playing with their own political future, but refuse to increase production and instead seek gimmicks.
Sanctions on Russia, tax holidays, energy subsidies.
Now they're seeking a price cap on Russian oil.
It too will fail.
Biden in March said the sanctions were crushing the Russian economy and that the ruble is reduced on rubble.
But high energy prices mean Russia's making more money than ever.
The ruble is at a seven-year high against the dollar, and China is benefiting from discounted Russian oil.
I, like most Americans in Europe, support aid to Ukraine, however, not at the expense of our security, both economically and militarily.
Perhaps what causes some wavering is unclear.
In goes.
Nigel Gould Davis, for example, Senior Fellow for Russia and Eurasia at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, highlights the issue.
There are hints of different tensions over what the West's goal should be.
Those have yet to be clearly defined.
With victory of vague vision, it's difficult to convince Americans to sacrifice more, especially as we head to the midterm elections.
The last aid package was set to get Ukraine through the fiscal year, but leaves the next package up for a vote as early as October, right before the midterm.
Beside the fiscal and political implication, there's a threat of Russian escalation.
After hearing from Zelensky, the G7 issued a joint statement that they are seriously concerned after the announcement by Russia that it would transfer missiles with nuclear capability to Belarus.
Well, that's what the Russians are doing.
They're confronting talk from NATO that they're planning to attack Russia.
What should they do?
This past Sunday, a Russian news broadcast, most of the only used 18% of their army.
A former deputy commander hinted at possible nuclear engagement over the Lithuanian blockade of Kaliningrad.
The first to be hit will be London.
While the alleged CIA personnel working in Kiev might be enough to ruffle the feathers of Putin, the biggest unknown is how far can we go until Putin makes good on his threat.
And I believe because of the tensions here, they have actually withdrawn the blockade, and now Russia has access to Kaliningrad.
Interestingly, the Supreme Court, as among its many other actions, reversing rows supporting the Second Amendment and more, has reinstated a Louisiana election map disputed by the Democrats.
The process stayed two lower court rulings, found the redrawn congressional map probably violated the Federal Voting Rights Act, By diluting the power of black voters.
The court said it would hold off considering the merits after it hears a similar dispute from Alabama.
The map was approved by Louisiana lawmakers after they overrode Democrat Governor John Bel Edwards' veto.
According to a CNN summary, the map kept Republicans at advantage in five of the Pelican State's six congressional districts, leaving only the second, Meanwhile, the New York Times reports Biden is irritated by Democrat and the media's lack of respect for him.
Why should he be surprised?
He deserves no support, no respect, only contempt.
Even though Biden has said he wants to run again, it seems not everyone thinks he should or wants him to.
A New York Times article said Biden is confounded when other Democrats and mostly loyal media dare to disagree or even bring up Biden's age.
In the paper, they write, if reelected, President Joe Biden, who's 86 years old, would be the oldest president in U.S.
history.
This, along with his historically low favorability rating and rising inflation and gas prices, is why so many don't want him to run again.
Adam Smith, a Democrat from Washington, D.C., claims to be surprised how many are openly worried about whether or not Biden should run again.
Joe Cunningham, who used to be a congressman from South Carolina running for governor, said Biden should step aside and let someone else fight for the nomination.
Who needs enemies when you have people like them?
Since Biden ran for president in the 2020 primaries as a bridge, nothing more, implying he'd bring back normalcy after Trump would then leave, the Times agrees Biden is mostly too responsible for the mess.
Yahoo poll people in June more than six of ten said he should not run for another term.
A piece in the Times said Biden has been eager for signs of loyalty, but they've been few and far between.
Won't she have red states as Dems are scrambling to find someone to replace him?
This is bad news for his presidential campaign.
One of them is Governor Gavin Newsom of California, who just bought ad space in Florida.
That made it sound as though he wants to join the conversation, even if it's about abortion.
The rumors have started up again, making sense, given how much attention is given to Hillary possibly running again.
Margaret Taleb, a CNN expert, said all the constant talk makes it hard for, and this may be a lapse, Vice President Biden to do his job.
Of course, she meant President Biden.
If Biden can't or won't accept that almost everyone doesn't like the way he's run the government, his policies have had bad results.
He seems to be a bad leader.
He acts as though he were a great president, complaining he doesn't get enough credit for all the good he's done.
Sharks seem to have found blood in the water.
Attacks from his own side will only become worse as 2024 approaches.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court has targeted the real enemy.
This is a significant development.
This has to do with West Virginia versus EPA, where the Supreme Court has reigned in the ever-expanding power of the EPA to regulate pollution and promote the Green New Deal.
The key point is the following.
It is the unelected bureaucracy that rules a country without oversight from voters or legislatures.
For well over a hundred years, most courts have given it a pass, assuming the experts in the bureaucracy are handling things just fine, faithfully interpreting legislation and merely creating rules.
Generations, however, have gone by as this fourth branch of government has grown in size.
You've heard the story.
The car dealer complains how the Department of Labor is driving him crazy.
Machine parts manufacturer Wayne Barker is about letters from Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
Energy can never satisfy the EPA.
What's happened since March of 2020?
The beast has shown its face.
Out of nowhere, these agencies and people for whom no one voted are ruling our lives.
They restrict travel, force us to cover our faces, close our churches, schools, forbid our businesses from operating unless they're big enough to afford a powerful lobbying arm in Washington.
The whole scene was appalling, causing many, including earnest judges, to take notice.
Once you see the problem, you cannot unsee it.
Consider with inflation alone.
It's largely the responsibility of the Fed, among the most terrifying of the deep state agencies.
Founded in 1913 with a promise it would end wildcat banking and contain the expansion of money and credit, so we'd have a more stable economic environment.
Even now, some believe the Fed is going to fix recessions and inflations, even though a deeper analysis reveals the Fed itself is the cause of both.
The Fed cannot be both a problem and the solution.
This is becoming as obvious as the fact that the CDC cannot make a textbook pathogen go away with power and potions.
Take a quick look at the 2% inflation target of the Fed.
It might seem to have long blown past.
It's entirely cosmetic.
But the Fed has a trick up its sleeve.
It doesn't follow conventional inflation indicators like consumer or producer price index.
It's fancier than that.
It's created a new personal consumption expenditures index.
And sure enough, if you look at that, you find the Fed is doing a pretty good job.
Now that the Fed has been revealed to be incompetent, it's not different from the CDC, NIH, DOL, DOE, DOT, HHS, DHS, FTC, SEC, and the rest of the glorified 3 million letter agencies employing nearly 3 million people who cannot be fired or controlled.
So much.
And yet, how is this inflation supposed to be controlled?
We don't vote for them.
The Fed is appointed by the president.
The fancy economists run circles around the political actors with big words and fancy finance.
The political class, too, often acts like absentee landowners of a far-off land.
We have little choice but to trust their hired hand.
With COVID, the whole scam was revealed to absolutely everyone.
The court, however, in its most recent decision was dealing with a technical aspect of how regulations apply to a coal plant, but the implications are far broader.
The EPA was determining policy, even making it, riffing wildly on legislation with a presumption the courts would always and everywhere defer to the agency over industry and even the words of the legislation.
The court said no.
It was EPA that had been operating illegally all along.
This decision is startling.
It shows the Supreme Court doing what it's supposed to do, serving as a legal check on the power ambitions of government itself.
That's what the framers intended.
We have just begun.
However, the court needs to attack the whole machinery of the deep state at its very root.
Coined after Chevron deference of 1984, the Public Health Services Act of 1944, the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and all the way back to the Pendleton Act of 1883, which created a permanent civil service.
A nation ruled by a faceless deep state is not a representative democracy and is not consistent with the U.S.
Constitution.
When you consider the implications of this one decision, they are awesome.
It doesn't just apply to the EPA and its elaborate plan for changing the global climate through command and control.
It also applies to every other agency, including the CDC and the Fed itself.
They should all be accountable to the people through their elected representatives.
If we cannot get back to that system, we will lose everything.
And meanwhile, My petition is on the docket of the United States Supreme Court.
I originally believed it was a First and Second Amendment case.
The summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin allowed the judge to decide whether or not my facts were reasonable and exclude them if, in his subjective opinion, they were not.
As you will see from my petition, which you can download to your own desktop directly from the Supreme Court docket, the Court of Appeals, Fourth District, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
In other states such as Texas, however, the case against me would have been tossed or else sent to a jury for determination of the disputed facts.
But in Wisconsin, the court could in effect determine the facts regardless of my evidence.
It turns out this is a national problem, and I'm teeing up the case for SCOTUS to make summary judgment protocols uniform throughout the nation.
I believe they are going to do just that and set things right.
And let me just add, That I believe anyone who checks this out, visit GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
And if you think my case has merit, I would welcome your support.
I have the law on my side.
I have the evidence on my side.
But what I don't have is the money for the legal bills that I have accumulated in the process of fighting for the rights for every American.
In this case, it turns out, to make summary judgment procedures uniform throughout the states.
Whereas they stand now, we're in violation of the 7th and the 14th Amendment right here in Wisconsin.
A retired professor of law observed to me about my petition after having reviewed it, and he liked the idea of incorporating the 7th Amendment within the 14th, and that the major problem with the American judiciary throughout the land is the abuse of summary judgment.
My case supports an opportunity for the Supreme Court to set that right.
And I really hope it does, Jim.
Can you say that one more time, the link GiveSendGo?
Yes, absolutely.
GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
All right, thank you.
Yeah, let's really hope.
I mean, people are sick and tired of being sick and tired, and it is outrageous what's going on out there.
And people are looking for answers, and you're one of the shining beacons that explains what the hell is going on.
And, you know, we're just shocked and awed of the rampant corruption and ridiculous of where this country is going.
You answered a lot of the questions that listeners had about the, you know, there's some people were asking about the Valdi shooting.
It says, yet another insurance company CEO says people are dying in USA at unprecedented rates.
What's the latest on Vaxidents?
Oh, you're absolutely, you're absolutely correct.
And the problem is that These vaccines, which are not strictly technically qualified as vaccines, so they've gone so far as to even change the definition of a vaccine in order to perpetrate the subterfuge, the deception.
Call it the death vax, and you're getting closer to the mark.
Are doing tremendous damage worldwide.
We have embalmers and fumar directors reporting massive fibrous extractions from the veins and arteries of those are embalming something they've never seen before.
We expect a huge increase in the number of deaths.
Insurance companies are reporting staggering increases that are unprecedented that wouldn't occur once in a hundred years, but are now occurring regularly and increasing in quantity, which is a horrifying prospect.
I must warn, the genocidal globalists are pursuing their agenda ruthlessly.
They have destroyed 65 to 100 food processing plants.
They've had beef cattle slaughtered.
They've had turkeys and chickens in the millions put to death.
It's all a deliberate effort to create a food shortage that's going to bring about mass starvation.
So as I've observed many times in the past, it's a three-stage program.
The mass to kill us slowly, the vax to kill us faster, and then starvation to finish the job.
I encourage everyone to be prepared for a food shortage and to be prepared to defend yourself.
If you're not already armed, get armed, purchase weapons, learn how to shoot, because when the Democrats are pursuing defunding the police, you've got to take the message to heart.
There's no one there to defend yourself if you can't do it.
And as cities become centers of starvation, the occupants are going to work their way out to the suburbs and they're going to threaten everyone there to take whatever you may have.
Mark my words, this is the dystopian future that we have to brace ourselves for in the hope it won't happen, but sad to say the expectation that it probably will.
Thank you for that, Jim.
And what, what is the, uh, you, you briefly mentioned, uh, Ukraine.
What about the Supreme Court?
There's a guy who's asking a question about, uh, what, what are your feelings on the Roe versus Wade thing?
What's the story there?
Is it just a distraction?
Why are they doing that?
Well, they believe that in fact, it was not properly rooted in the constitution and that It is an issue that the states have the obligation to assume.
So, what they have done is sent the issues about abortion back to the various 50 states.
It appears as though 26 are going to impose more severe restrictions on abortion so that women may have to endure the vast inconvenience of taking time off from work, traveling to another state, making arrangements for their family and all that.
Personally, I was taken aback.
Based upon the testimony that the candidates, including Kavanaugh and Amy Comey Bryant, had given during their confirmation hearings, I did not believe they would repudiate Roe.
My personal opinion is Roe is among the wisest decisions ever rendered by the Supreme Court.
It gave unrestricted access to abortion in the first trimester, where the states could regulate how it was done in the second.
But only after viability, which occurs at the end of the second trimester when the developing fetus could survive as an individual apart from the body of the host, does it acquire The social, legal, and moral status of personhood, which entailed a right to life, which could only be overridden by the mother's superior right to life if her life or health were threatened.
I think that was a proper decision.
It meant any abortion after the second trimester, other than to save the life or the health of the mother, would qualify as murder.
And by the way, of course, we've been, you know, I have a history of propaganda claiming that abortion is murder.
But if the aborted entity is not a person, then that's false, because murder is a deliberate and wrongful killing of a person.
We have deliberate killings of persons that are not wrongful, capital punishment, soldiers in combat, police in the performance of their duty, citizens in self-defense.
So the question is, is it wrongful?
With Roe, it was not wrongful, but also it wasn't a person because that status was only acquired at the end of the second trimester.
So I actually favor Roe.
I believe a woman should have the right to choose.
There are innumerable reasons why it might be inadvisable or harmful or Problematic in a vast variety of ways to bring an unwanted child into existence.
For example, a woman might have to give up her job.
She might have no source, couldn't keep a roof over her head, food on the table.
She may have too many children.
She may be unable to cope with a situation.
We know from sociological studies that unwanted children tend to become juvenile delinquents, many of whom tend to become criminals in society and consume more of our nation's resources, which are becoming increasingly scant, especially with Biden abusing, spending more time supporting the borders of Ukraine than he does those of the United States.
Yeah, there's a massive abuse on welfare in this country, and it's getting worse and worse, and I think that, now that I'm thinking about it, it has probably a lot to do with this whole overturning of the Roe versus Wade thing, so they can get more funding for more welfare, for more money and corruption that they can put in their deep pockets, and then, you know, so on and so forth.
Let me leave you with this last question, Jim.
We just celebrated, or didn't celebrate, this country's birthday.
What is the future of the USA?
Well, at this point in time, it's rather bleak, though I'm greatly heartened by the Supreme Court upholding the Constitution, as I believe it will in my case.
And that's all to the good.
The question becomes whether we can have a bona fide midterm election.
All the signs are devastating for the Democrats.
You have even in excess of 80% across all political spectrum, Democrat, Republican, Independent saying the country's on the wrong course.
If we have a legitimate bona fide midterm election, then I believe the new Republican Congress, where I've been predicting the Republicans would take a hundred more seats in the House and three or four in the Senate, would move to set things right.
That would be devoutly to be wished.
I, however, anticipate The Democrats are going to take one or two different alternatives, either a war with Russia, which would have devastating consequences for the United States.
Let me offer a simple example.
Russia has subs off of our eastern coast where it could put up a single dirty bomb over the east coast and make our financial center New York City uninhabitable for 250 years.
Or an EMP that could take out our electrical grip all across the nation and return us to the horse and buggy days.
On the other, There's a prospect of introducing a new pandemic, and I believe that's the choice they're going to make.
Biden has already talked about a new pandemic, and if they have a new pandemic, they're going to impose a new round of lockdowns and require voting by mail.
Anyone who hasn't seen it should realize this is a technique the Democrats used to steal the election in 2020.
Watch Denise D'Souza's 2,000 mules.
And you'll understand precisely what's going on and why the Democrats are so eager to return to voting by mail, which even third countries do not allow because they know it's an opportunity for the massive theft of an election.
But that's exactly what the Democrats have in mind.
Wow.
Well, thank you very much, Jim.
As always, you do the greatest presentations and reports.
You know, please check his website out, JamesFetzer.org and GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
We thank you again, Jim.
Have a great day and take it easy and we'll be in touch.