All Episodes
Previous Next
June 23, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:08:37
Need to Know News (23 June 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston and Carl Herman in San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
Sir, Patrick Sanders, a general in the British Army, declares that the West needs war because the entire financial system is collapsing.
In a video interview with Zelensky's adviser in advance, the Ukrainian war was deliberately instigated.
This is all very serious stuff.
Zelensky suggests Ukraine may pursue nuclear weapons to counter Russia.
Zelensky's an actor, playing his role in the Great Recept to destroy Western civilization so they can create a one-world government and use the United Nations as the great peacemaker.
Vice President Harris back on February 20th asserted Ukraine should join NATO Which was a direct violation of the Belgrade Agreement, where Ukraine, the third largest nuclear power at the time, gave up its nuclear weapons and NATO promised not to invade, as did Russia, provided Ukraine remained neutral.
Three days later, however, Zelensky announced he would pursue nuclear weapons to defend against Russia and Putin the following day, invaded and protected Donbass.
There are any number of world leaders beginning to work up and see the entire war has been a hoax.
Intentionally created for the Great Reset because Europe needs to default on all the debt it can no longer sustain, which will wipe out pensions and millions will be storming the parliaments.
The only escape, thus, is to create a war to conceal the collapse.
Even Pope Francis is beginning to see through the facade, telling a group of European Jesuit editors Perhaps somehow either provoked or not prevented, and he cautioned against oversimplifying the conflict.
Zelensky's a hateful, vindictive, pathological liar, demonizes Russians every chance he has.
The U.S.
has no ability to even verify where the weapons they send to Ukraine wind up.
There are reports of foreign soldiers who volunteered to fight for Ukraine, but departed the scene because their weapons were being stolen and sold on the black market.
Zelensky, as Representative Paul Gosar observes, made $100 billion last year as a public servant.
Where do you think that money—where do you think a sizable chunk of the $40 billion we're sending them is really going?
We shouldn't be sending a dime, especially not until our long list of problems at home are solved.
He's corrupt, evil, ran for office, promising peace and ending corruption.
Reports have he's already diverted up to $850 million to hidden offshore accounts.
He will fine until the last Ukrainian dies and then fly off to live the billionaire's life, drinking port with Klaus Schwab, George Soros, and Bill Gates.
I understand he already has a $16 million mansion in Miami.
The very person who funded Zelensky is the same who brought Hunter Biden and Joe Biden demanding Ukraine fire the prosecutor investigating their corruption.
His Devo speech was unbelievable, demanding the U.S.-led West implement a policy of maximum preemptive sanctions on a false pretext of averting future wars.
According to Zelensky, had the U.S.
cut off Russia completely from the world economy in advance, this would somehow have prevented the intrusion.
He claimed the sanction was not enough, came too late, wants the U.S.
to completely cut off not just Russia but regional security, unilaterally threaten other nations, and impose max on all Russian allies before they can react.
This is all absolutely lunatic on the world stage.
Well, Russia, alas, is becoming convinced it cannot trust the West one iota, and I fear the outcome may be catastrophic.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, they're doing every method of provocation imaginable against the Russians so that we can start World War III with no ability to be able to win it.
So that's where these SOBs have got us on the perp walk to Armageddon.
They provoked Lithuania to block access to Kalinasgrad.
They had provoked Israel into bombing both runways, the commercial and military, both inside Damascus, and threatened to bomb every presidential palace inside Syria.
They've got Finland stating that they're ready to fight Russia any time, that their border is completely secure, and that they've got complete weapons superiority over the Russians.
They are trying to provoke Japan into reclaiming the Karell Islands, which are north of Japan.
The Kalinasgrad is the island.
Ice-free port serving the Baltic.
The Black Sea is blockaded because of the mines that were placed by the Elinsky Group.
And if you listen to the Duran, the guys gave a really great analysis today of the U.S.
military spending on replacement munitions, and it's down 35% from what it was last year.
And so now we've reduced all of our military stock.
He said that if we got into an artillery exchange with Russia, we'd be without ammo in less than three weeks, and that we no longer have the ability to ship ammo into the Ukraine war fronts.
So we're losing on every front and the only graceful way out for these SOBs is to stage a false flag and start a nuclear conflict that they can try somehow to blame on Putin so that they can come out and say, well, it wasn't our fault we nuked the world.
It was that bad Rusty.
Absolutely horrible that we have these psychopaths in charge.
And one little side note, the Veterans Today has an article on the origins of the BSL-4 labs in Ukraine, and guess who did it?
Leon Panetta!
Yes, yes, the little Italian mafia guy that we had in multiple administrations, including Slick Willy and Obambi.
Joe, that's pretty damn disturbing, all of it.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, the Great Reset is kind of the point of all this theater that we're seeing.
What we use for money is created as a debt owed back to the banksters.
Now, that will produce what we're familiar with in graphs of debt over time, of an escalating Exponential growth curve that is unsustainable and it will collapse.
Now what our opponents want to happen is for this collapse to coincide with some other disaster and then they'll blame something else.
And what they really seem to be intent to do is to cull about 90% of humanity so that their empire can run more effectively and then they'll bust out the technology that they have been hiding from the rest of us.
Now, the question really for for me is always, OK, so who's in charge of this thing?
And we operate under presumption that is somehow kind of chaos out there and people, actors taking a look at advantages and jumping in.
We demonstrate that false flag events are Black Hat orchestrated, and I still hold out the possibility that what we're seeing is a White Hat construction to display everything that the Black Hats have in their arsenal.
And the good news is that all of these very scary events, the nuclear ending for this, even a more deadly activation of the injections hasn't happened yet, so that leaves me hopeful.
Yeah, and Zelensky is just an actor.
He is just a puppet.
And he's as honest as Quid Pro Joe's billion dollars in credit withheld from the Ukraine, and as honest as Hunter's one million a year For being an international energy expert and this is just gonna continue as a clown show until we get arrest of the leaders of this ongoing rogue state global empire.
That Hunter, the smartest guy Joe Biden has ever known.
Meanwhile, fear of Trump leads to a fake impeachment and a staged insurrection.
His wife outscared the Democrats into endlessly attacking him.
The fake impeachments were followed by the staged insurrection.
But there was no incitement and no attempt to overthrow the government.
Antifa and other agitators galore, including FBI agents provocateur.
We're getting nothing but endless tripe about January 6th over the mainstream media.
They're losing viewers right and left.
They've lost more than half of their normal viewership because they are reporting the truth.
It's all propaganda.
It's all PR leading up to the midterms, but it isn't working.
We know James, a brother of John Sullivan, a leader of Antifa, actually led 226 Antifa members into the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters.
We know the FBI and provocateurs such as Ray Hefts, who appears to have led the inspired channel.
We have Thomas Massey questioning Attorney General Garland about whether there were federal agents present on January 6th and whether they agitated to go into the Capitol.
Garland reviews the answer, exercising a Fifth Amendment right or the equivalent.
Obviously, the answer was affirmative.
Meanwhile, the feds have finally admitted to running secretive DOJ commandos at the January 6th protest.
They were there in spades.
Ray Epps had the amazing foresight to pry open the one walkway entrance no one could avoid.
Both Pennsylvania Avenue and Constitution Avenue exits from the Trump speech at the Ellipse, which was a mile and a half away, intersect at the Peace Monument barricade targeted by the RAIPS breach team.
If any of the eight other walkway entrances had been toppled instead, tens of thousands of marchers would have been met by police and metal barricades instead of an open gate.
The Federalist is very good on this.
David Marcus has spelled out that there was no incitement.
The Democrats are playing on an obscure aspect of the 14th Amendment that states if anyone had engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies, and they cannot hold any office, civil or military, under the United States,
The Democrats and their media allies, he explains, are trying to convince the American public Trump is guilty of inciting an insurrection, but in both legal terms and the plain meaning of ordinary language that claim is absurd on his face.
Two fundamental reasons.
Trump did not incite the riots, and the riots were not an insurrection.
Legally speaking, it turns out incitement is a very high bar.
None of Trump's actions since the election come close to meeting.
In Brandenburg v. Ohio, the court established that to commit incitement to violence, speech must include intent and specific, not abstract, instructions to act.
It also required it would likely produce imminent lawless action.
Well, he was a mile and a half away.
They didn't get over there until events were well underway.
He spoke until 1-11.
He told them to be peaceful in their protest against the theft of the election.
No imminent lawless action.
No instruction to go to the Capitol and create mayhem.
Quite the opposite.
But the January 6th committee would have you believe something completely different.
Similarly for insurrection, at no point was overthrowing the government even a remotely possible outcome.
Those coast-playing idiots taking selfies and blowsies off and parading around with podia had no intention of forming a new government.
This was an expression of anger, not a realistic organized coup attempt.
Anyone who believed their action would result in overthrowing the government were, if there were any, were delusional to the point of insanity.
So it wasn't incitement, it wasn't insurrection, why the Democrats, the corporate media and big tech tyrants want you to believe it was.
He suggests to create an atmosphere of crisis, an emergency that gives a cover for extreme and illiberal action to publish inside, so with whom they disagree politically.
But it's really more than that.
They've already brought a claim against a representative who is at the Capitol to try to deny him the right to bear on the ballot in Ohio.
But the court overturned it, denied it in Ohio.
And I suspect the Supreme Court would deny any nonsense coming from Congress.
This is all political stunt.
Joe, your thoughts.
Yeah, well, the unfortunate thing for the kangaroos is that kangaroo courts are not very entertaining because they're so ignorantly predictable, number one.
Number two, they start off with a number of false hypotheses that they try to enforce with a bunch of selected editing.
And it's completely transparent to anybody with two brain cells that actually still have synapses working.
So then we, it appears that what they were trying to do was they were staging this street theater so that the DOJ would be able to pick up the ball with all the evidence that they uncovered and prosecute them.
But now it looks like, and I'm going to use my term for the guy, Maryland Garlic.
is uh is the uh appointed uh attorney general of the united states a most corrupt division of the u.s government but anyhow so he turns up now and he's going to be prosecuting the war criminals in ukraine pretty interesting there was a interview with steve bannon on why he's fighting against his subpoena to appear before this kangaroo court And he cited a Supreme Court ruling that the jury pool in Washington, D.C.
is being actively tainted by all of this theater and that they will at least demand a change of venue and probably a dropping of charges because people cannot get a fair trial.
So expect this to blow back on a more ways than just the lousy ratings from these lousy actors.
Oh, I think you're right, Carl.
Your thoughts?
It is the responsibility of our representatives in government to get to the truth and the fact that we were denied an answer to what do we have in January 6th?
How many feds were out there?
How many FBI?
How many mercenaries?
How many Antifa?
And we don't get that, so we have political theater, as always, with the left and right arm of the same fascist, psychopathic political party.
And all of that theater happened just to stop the presentation of overwhelming evidence for election fraud.
2,000 mules, that is sufficient evidence to demonstrate election fraud.
The 250 pages of affidavits from Sidney Powell of expert testimony is enough to be able to demonstrate election fraud.
The work that's been done so far in Arizona is enough.
And the old Latin question of Q Bono, who benefits?
You know, what happened on January 6th absolutely benefited the corrupt Democrats on the left to stop that presentation of evidence on a national theater.
And that article was great.
What you do in the law is you do have, we're very particular about our definitions.
Everybody who is serious in academics and scholarship and real hands-on work, you have to know what you're talking about.
And there wasn't any incitement.
As a matter of fact, you could say that, as usual, it's pretty much who are willing and opposite to that.
That what Trump said, the best that you could describe it is he had asked for peaceful protests of what was going on for election fraud and insurrection.
Yeah, same thing.
What happened was a clown show and this was an orchestrated event led by the Democrats who refused any real protection from the National Guard and then ushered people in.
And the difference from what we do and what patriots are doing in news shows is that we're able to explain, document, and prove what we're talking about with objective and independently verifiable evidence.
And all we get from the psychopathic opponents is they're just going to have propaganda and rhetoric and emotion to back a narrative pushing for their dictatorial domination over sheeple.
Well said, Carl.
Well said.
And Jim.
Yes, Joe.
We have one additional wild card that just dropped today.
WikiLeaks has released all of their files, which means we probably get all of the NASA junk, and all the DOD junk, and all the CIA junk, and all the MI6 junk, and all the bankers junk.
Amazing!
It's going to take a while to sort through this stuff, but expect so many dominoes to be falling so fast that there's no way they can control this any longer.
Good.
Well done.
Well done, WikiLeaks.
Congratulations.
Meanwhile, Fox News anchor cuts off a wild segment over January 6th.
The House is performing for the media what's known as a Soviet-style show trial in their attempt to impeach Donald Trump for the third time to motivate their base to not fall asleep until after the midterm elections.
They're putting the mega-movement on trial for the cameras in a soap opera format.
The real fight is for the soul, for democracy, a radical far-left Marxist said on Fox recently.
But of course, we are a republic.
Using the cover of an insurrection, the Democrats and some rhinos are also persecuting all of their political opponents, otherwise known as the American people.
One especially dramatic thespian on the Hill, Adam Schiff, Democrat from Hollywood, who cloaks his attacks on Americans with his special power of privilege, was taking a victory lap on Twitter.
His campaign manager knew he lost, his attorney general knew he lost, his top advisors knew he lost, his legal team knew he lost, his daughter knew he lost, and Trump knew it too.
Except that was all untrue.
And even for those who sincerely may have believed it, like Ivanka, she simply had been misled by a confidence in an attorney general who himself was part of the plot.
Schiff has defended his corrupt behavior, claiming he's protected and allowed to anyone anywhere because of a clause that protects members of the House when they're in the performance of their duty.
He had assistance in determining that.
Back in 2018, Fox reported Schiff's damaging work against the United States.
Fox News senior judicial analyst Judge Napolitano Arguing a lawmaker can legally leak to the press under the Speech and Freedom Clause.
However, numerous outlets are ignoring the ridiculous fake drama on the Hill, and the left is very, very upset.
They're not getting all the attention and adoration they want.
Fox is both ignoring and talking about them in their programming until this week.
A Fox debate spun off the rails recently was cut off by anchor Mike Emanuel after a guest called out the network for not airing the committee's hearing.
In a wild skirmish on Fox Sunday afternoon, Wisconsin-based progressive radio host Mike Crute took aim at the network for not showing the hearing to its primetime audience.
But it's boring, as Joe has observed, and it's staged, and it's uninteresting in the extreme.
Why Fox is continuing to promote progressive communist leftists is questionable.
Perhaps emotionally exploding progressives is their new format.
Overheard on Fox.
Real bullshit.
Fox News anchor abruptly cuts off Wild Segment after guest calls out network for not airing the January 6th hearing.
I'm trying to get a point in here, Kutcher said.
Slug it out after the break, Emanuel replied.
We should be talking about the Jan 6 hearings that go live again that the network failed to cover, Kutcher says.
Because I'll tell you what, the real fight is for democracy.
The real fight is for the soul of our nation.
The real bullshit is that your network won't cover it.
Whoa, whoa, whoa, Emanuel said.
We covered it plenty.
We just aired it on the Fox Business Network.
Fox Business Network, my butt, my boot, shot back.
Dude, you're going to come on here?
Let me set the record straight, Emanuel said.
I want to be neutral here, but when you attack our network, I've got a problem with that.
Do you run any ads?
At that point, the conservative Louisiana-based radio host Jeff Kutcher, who was also on the panel, sought to interject and steer the conversation toward inflation.
But he and Crute wound up talking over one another.
Fellows, we gotta run, Emanuel said.
Undaunted, Crute ramped up his point.
He tried to get back at him, but his mic was cut off.
See you later, Emanuel said, then pulled the plug on the segment.
The video clip went viral with one radical commenting in response, Philip Kowski tweets, all hell breaks loose on Fox when progressive talk show host Mike Prude invited for a segment on gun control riffs about January 6th.
The real bullshit is your Network won't cover it.
They went nuts.
Enjoy.
The hearings are all the rage on the Hill.
That's all they're talking about, thinking about, all they can do all day.
According to the polls, I see, however, very few Americans care.
They're worried about inflation.
The fake news is even bringing out the grandfather of fake news, Dan Rather, who was humiliated and caused to retire early over lies on the networks, yet who walks around as though he had moral authority over the common man and woman.
Funny what people will say when they're under oath that they didn't say earlier when it could have made a big difference.
Actually, it's not funny at all.
It's outrageous.
A shame that will follow their names into history.
With Cheney, known as Daddy's Girl, in D.C.
to promote the military-industrial complex over the will of the American people, has to show off, too.
Her tweet?
The January 6th Select Committee has not issued a conclusion regarding potential criminal referrals.
We'll announce a decision on that at an appropriate time, as though it were not already predetermined, as though it were not already part of the script.
But since when does the U.S.
House of Representatives make criminal referrals?
That's what's really going on.
Someone should pull the plug on the Democrats in D.C.
and take Liz Cheney with them.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, it's amazing that we have this evidence that's being suppressed when the facts are that the Supreme Court's already ruled on this with the Pentagon Papers in 1968 released by Daniel Ellsberg that allowed publication of, quote, stolen papers that reflected very negatively on all of the U.S.
involvement in Vietnam.
And then in McGovern's race in 1972, his VP candidate had his psychiatrist's office broken into and his records were released and the court ruled that that was okay.
And then we have the A recent incident with Project Veritas and Ashley Biden's diary in which she said some pretty damaging things about their rotten little family, the Maryland crime syndicate, and the
Justice Department goes after all of the Veritas staff and busts them for quote a stolen diary when everything indicates it was not stolen.
So we have an FBI that's more than willing to falsify evidence to get judges to issue subpoenas to prosecute political opponents That have actual facts about how rotten the politics are.
I can't wait for the midterms because in January we're going to have a new different set of judges that are in the legislative session and they're going to be able to start subpoena and start actually impeaching this whole rotten cast of characters that surrounds the dirty laptop people.
Yeah, if we're lucky enough to have elections, if they don't lock down the country, or we're not all decimated by war.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, those are big ifs.
If we only have the truth come forward, then that's all that we're really working for.
That's what motivates the patriots.
So, for Fox, I view Fox, until proven otherwise, that I just hear them as the propaganda of the Bush era.
And although I am encouraged lately by truth, it's got to be generated and pushed to arrest, similar to what we saw with Watergate as a drive to have the facts push somebody out of office.
So, Schiff, what we qualify he's doing is he's giving testimony.
Testimony is the weakest form of evidence, and especially from a known liar like Schiff.
So we know that we have the factless Russiagate now exposed as paid propaganda, you have the crimeless impeachment, and now you have election fraud as proven by the data of what happened when these states Resumed counting after the middle of the night, and my favorite evidence for that, of course, Pennsylvania.
Resumed counting 600,000 votes for Biden, 3,000 votes for Trump, a 200 to 1 ratio that's impossible by the odds of 60 to 70 zeros behind a one.
And this guy, Crute, or whatever his name is, that's all that we get from these people.
Just emotional crisis acting, and there's no facts to back this thing up.
And Dan Rather, you know, he got pushed into retirement early based upon a story that he appropriately questioned W escaping Vietnam duty through the Texas National Guard by getting privileges called in for his behalf.
And the point, yeah, for Liz Cheney, speaking of a criminal referral, you know what?
If you wanted to make a case for incitement to insurrection, I think that Cheney's statement is pretty close.
So if you were to actually call for an unlawful arrest without authority, man, that sounds an awful lot like overthrowing your political party opponents to me.
Actually, Dan Rather got the dirty end of the deal on that.
He verified the report, the fitness report, with a secretary who typed it and the commander who dictated it.
It was authentic in words.
What happened was Karl Roven, another of the underlings, retyped it using a new ball head that IBM didn't have in existence, so they could immediately discredit And just think about how subtle it is.
They somehow knew from the typescript that it was typed on a typewriter with a ball head that wasn't even available at the time.
Who in the hell would ever figure that out?
It was not planned.
Rather, it actually done maybe his most brilliant reporting for which he was smeared.
Sad to say, but that's how politics is played in the USA.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have the Ashley Babbitt.
Supposed to be dead, but she's actually looking pretty fit.
She seemed to be enjoying herself, I have no doubt.
They had a stage of fake shooting in order to claim it had been a deadly insurrection, when it was neither.
Meanwhile, Police report proves plainclothes electronic surveillance unit members were embedded among the January 6th protesters.
This is very damning.
Just out.
While there's growing speculation federal agent and Capitol Police were involved in instigating acts of violence, evidence now proved plainclothes members of a special electronic surveillance unit were embedded among the protesters.
According to a report, First Amendment demonstrations issued January 3rd, 2021 by the Chief of Police Robert Contree of the Metropolitan Police Department Homeland Security Bureau Special Ops Division, obtained by the Epoch Times, which is doing a great job, by the way, the Metropolitan Police Department began activating the Civil Dispense Disturbance Unit platoons on January 4th.
Full activation of 28 platoons was scheduled to occur the following two days, and remember, it was January 6th when these events took place.
They were prepared for it.
They infiltrated the crowd.
They were basically running the op from the inside.
According to the DOJ website, a CDU is composed of law enforcement officers, Who are trained to respond to protests for the purpose of preventing violence.
In this case, however, it was working the other way around.
It's been speculated the federal agents and capital cops were involved in instigating acts of violence, as Red State reported way back when, October 2021.
Multiple surveillance shows masked men opening the doors of the Capitol to allow protesters to enter.
One shows them entering while Capitol cops simply stood around.
On December 7th, episode of Tucker, attorney for several January 6th prisoners, Joseph McGride, identified a man tagged on the internet by so-called sedition hunters as Red Face 45.
Thrust in red from head to toe with his face painted red, he appears in a video engaging in continuous dialogue with universal personal health.
He's clearly a law enforcement officer that involves entrapment.
On January 13th of 2021, Michael Waller, a senior analyst for strategy at the Center for Security Policy, published a firsthand account of his own observation.
He was convinced people were embedded in the crowd to execute an organized operation planned well in advance of the January 6th joint session of Congress.
According to Walter, a covert cadre of people were scattered throughout the crowd, including fake Trump protesters he suspected were Antifa, wearing Trump Omega hats backwards.
That appears to have been the tell how to identify they were wearing the hats backwards.
Epoch Times reported Ray Epps captured on video wearing a Trump hat encouraging people to go into the Capitol.
Chants of Fed, Fed, Fed drowned him out because it was so obvious already to the crowd that he was a fraud.
Here he is doing his thing.
He was whispering into the ear of a protester wearing a Trump hat backwards, therefore a collaborator.
Moments later, he's joined by others tearing down the barricade.
He's then seen rushing the crowd toward the capital.
Epps has not had any charges filed against him, even though he's so prominent.
Why?
Because he's an asset working for the FBI.
Bobby Powell, of the Truth is Viral podcast, has videos exposing two men all in black, whom he believes to be FBI informants, who are breaking windows, attacking the Capitol, and pushing people inside.
He finds it strange these provocateurs have yet to be charged, even though they had a far more active role in the incident than many who were, including some who never even stepped foot on the Capitol itself.
On October 29, 2021, Report by Politico exposed a 17-page strategy report called the Operational Plan with five objectives.
To provide an environment where lawful First Amendment activity can take place.
To prevent any adverse impact to the legislative process.
To effectively mitigate actions associated with civil disorder.
To safeguard and prevent property damage at the Capitol.
To establish and maintain a fixed route while excluding access to counter protesters, but it failed in all five of its objectives, where I believe its actual intention was precisely that, to not allow it to happen peacefully.
According to a 140-page report issued by then-Capitol Police Inspector General Michael Bolton, the Capitol's CDU unit was ordered not to use their most powerful tools like stun guns.
While his report is yet to be released to the public, he observes heavier, less lethal weapons, including stun grenades, were also not used that day.
The CDU has given riot shields, many locked at a bus distance away, that shattered upon impact.
They had expired weapons that didn't work and inadequate training.
It appears to him that Congress itself was the target.
Proof.
Unknown to the public until now, the First Amendment demonstrator report also revealed an undisclosed number of plainclothes Metropolitan Police Department ESU members were embedded into the crowd.
And back in 2016, the NPD purchased 2,800 body-worn cameras.
They were not referred to as officers or police.
They were undercover, but they were wearing wristbands, the multicolor wristband you see there at the time, To identify them.
Why were they issued?
Were there warrants necessary for the type of surveillance they were doing?
A huge amount of questions about an entirely new type of surveillance unit by the Chief of the Nation's Capitol.
Waller also said the reference of members of the unit as opposed to officers as agent is very disturbing.
While the rest sounds very disciplined in its language, it doesn't identify that the officers as members of the electronic surveillance unit is very troubling.
Are they using private contractors?
Are they using political volunteers?
Are they using paid agents of a different type?
We don't know.
Meanwhile, here you have a relatively calm moment at the police.
Meanwhile, report service and acting Sergeant-at-Arms Timothy Blodgett said a member of the lawmakers informing security officials found there does not exist a known credible threat against Congress or a capital complex That warrants temporary security, Francine, or the National Guard, which Donald Trump had offered.
It was denied by Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and Mayor Bowers because they had their own agenda, they had their own plan, and they did not want any interference.
According to the U.S.
Capitol Police timeline, also obtained by the Epoch Times, requests for National Guard support was not forthcoming with the chief of police.
They turned down Trump.
They turned down the chief.
He asked the Senate sergeant at arms for authority to have the National Guard to assist.
The timeline showed it took over three hours and five frantic requests before the Guard was deployed.
During its open remark before two Senate committees back on March 3rd of 2021, Walker told members of Congress he received a frantic call from Sun in the early afternoon, advising that the security parameter was being breached.
However, military leaders informed him deploying troops would not be good optics.
During testimony before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Bearden Flynn denied having made any such comments.
Marjorie Taylor Greene, among the few true speakers in the Congress, informed the committee three persons were involved in turning down repeated requests for the deployment of the National Guard.
Chuck Schumer in the Senate, Nancy Pelosi in the House, and Mayor Muriel Browser.
Also involved are SSAA Stenegger, who answered directly to Schumer, and HSAA Irving, who answered directly to Pelosi.
In June 2021, reports surfaced that DOJ had begun to release its own visual footage, including from body cameras, which showed the deployment of munitions.
Evidence shows that until the deployment of munitions, the crowds were peaceful, that ESU members were embedded into the crowd, that the specialized units were not among them.
The Capitol Police directed the Epoch Times to the Metropolitan Police Department for comment, but it's all the more damning.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well you can add the Electronic Surveillance Unit 100 Provocateurs funded by the U.S.
government to the Hundreds of Antifa people that we already know were under the direction of John Sullivan that day, and he's not being charged with anything.
Matter of fact, he got paid $70,000 for his in the Congress videotapes that he sold to two different news agencies.
$70,000 each for those.
And then we have the Proud Boys, who are obviously involved in this scam.
to a certain extent.
And then just yesterday, we had the sentencing of Dr. Simone Gold.
She was scheduled to speak after Trump at the Ellipse, which like you mentioned, is a mile away from the Congress.
And because of the, quote, breach of Congress, they notified Trump that it was an emergency and that no additional speakers would be allowed to speak at the Ellipse, meaning that portion of the crowd would never have shown up and would have never been incited to riot had the riot not already started.
And so she's been sentenced to 60 days in jail for misdemeanor trespass, and the judge who sentenced her was an Obama appointee, and he said, I realize that this sentence is stiff, but I'm trying to keep it consistent with the other criminals that were prosecuted on January 6th.
So she has an automatic appeal, and she also has an automatic change of venue.
And she also has the right to discovery.
So we're going to get to the bottom of a whole bunch of shit that happened in the swamp that day.
The real insurrection happened on November 3rd.
The second insurrection happened on the part of the government on January 6th.
Had nothing to do with Trump supporters.
Live with it.
You're telling me the judge mucked up by making those statements and reverse a situation from a legal point of view, Joe.
Is that right?
That's what she said, yeah, in her latest letter.
I can send you the letter, you can actually read the post.
I think that's a most welcome development.
Carl, your thoughts?
As is that leaked planning reports.
The first thing in that report that caught my eye is 28 platoons, 28 platoons.
So that's hundreds of people involved.
So who and what were they doing?
Where were they?
When were they deployed?
Because we're going to find out that a lot of those people were in the crowd and what were their actual duties.
So let's go, Brandon, and get to those facts.
Yeah, and of course, this was a stage orchestrated event led by Nancy Pelosi.
She was in charge.
She could have had the National Guard there in the summer.
Previous to that, there were a couple of hundred National Guardsmen on the Capitol steps and that stopped anybody from thinking about doing anything.
The magnetic doors were open from the inside.
The bike racks were moved away.
And again, the timing of this was to stop the presentation of evidence that would have demonstrated election fraud.
So this is a false flag attack.
Yes, yes.
Very good, exactly.
Totally safe.
And Jim?
Yes?
Yes, yes.
When you expand the 2,000 mules from just the six key state major cities nationwide, and you include the mules that made five visits to stash houses and drop boxes, there's 54,000 of these Antifa brown shirt thugs nationwide that have been funded by the Democrats And I guarantee you they wouldn't have had any problem finding several platoons of those clowns to show up and do the damage that they did in Washington D.C.
And they also burned dozens of cars at the inauguration of Trump back in 2017.
And of those 200 defendants that were arrested committing those crimes, only one of them was prosecuted because he actually assaulted a police officer and was arrested by several police officers as witnesses, and they couldn't dismiss the evidence.
So that's exactly how corrupt the DOJ is in this nation.
Absolutely corrupt.
You're absolutely correct, and it's just absolutely stunning to anyone who's believed in American justice.
Meanwhile, it's not working.
Pollster deflates Dem hope that January 6th hearing will persuade voters.
Not doing the damage to the Republican Party that Democrats wanted.
Frank Lutz, who's well-known, predicted Sunday the highly publicized hearings will not help Democrats ahead of the 2022 midterm elections.
He explained, first, voters are not being persuaded to support Democrats because of the one-sided nature of the hearings.
The House Gen Six Committee, in fact, has not called a single witness who counters a committee's narrative to testify publicly.
Not a single member who supports former President Trump.
You should have had counter-testimony.
You should have had people challenging the witnesses, as Luntz said.
But the conclusion some have come to is this is simply the third attempt to impeach Donald Trump.
Second, voters care more about other, more important issues.
Make no mistake, this will have an impact on Trump's candidacy should he run again, but also make no mistake, voters care far more about crime, immigration, and of course, inflation.
Another reason they're not hurting the Republicans going along is because Trump doesn't wield the same level of influence he used to.
This is not driven to the importance that Democrats thought.
It's not doing the damage.
He's no longer the controller.
He's no longer the emperor.
He no longer has that much control.
That's why these opinions aren't changing, why these hearings aren't having an impact the Democrats thought they would.
A recent analysis by Brookings, by the way, discovered most Republican candidates running for election are not even discussing January 6th or the 2020 presidential election.
While Democrats focus on gun control, January 6, and abortion, Republicans are talking about inflation, border security, and crime, which are far higher on the agenda of the American people.
Meanwhile, Bill Barr displays his traitorous character by bursting into laughter, admitting he wouldn't investigate any election fraud.
In recorded testimony played at Monday's hearings of the January 6th Committee, former Attorney General Barr scoffed at the claims made in Dinesh D'Souza's film 2,000 Mules.
During his testimony, he maintained there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud, and he'd seen nothing then to change his mind, including the movie 2,000 Mules, and chuckles at the notion.
Asked about allegation made in the film.
He said the Georgia Bureau of Investigation wasn't impressed with the allegations, and neither was he.
He explained basing the claims on cell phone data is singularly unimpressive.
He noted in a big city like Atlanta, there are millions of cell phones.
There are going to be hundreds of cell phones passing by a ballot drop box, making the premise that people wear mules indefensible.
Ignoring the fact that they were taking selfies of themselves and all this has been done early in the morning hours, 3 a.m., 4 a.m.
This is despicable.
I doubt he even watched it.
He also claimed that even if you could show ballot harvesting, it wasn't clear that it would have changed the outcome of the election.
That the courts aren't going to try and figure out which votes were harvested and throw them out.
The burden of proof, he said, is on those challenging the votes.
They have to prove the illegal ballots were cast.
And indeed, in my opinion, they have over and over again.
In my opinion, this was a disgrace and stained this man's reputation forever.
Joe, your thoughts?
I don't know how you could stain a reputation any worse than Barr already had.
He was the attorney general under Big Bush from 1991 to 1993, where he did everything he could to cover up the crimes of that rotten administration.
And then he followed the crooked Jeff Sessions and did absolutely nothing between 2019 and 2020 as attorney general for the United States to resign the last day of 2020 so he wouldn't be around for all the fireworks.
His grandparents were Eastern European Jews When they came to America, they changed their last name to Barr so that they'd be untraceable.
And then his daddy, Donald, was head of the Dalton School in New York City, one of the elite Huh, if there is such a word.
Schools, and he's the one who hired Jeffrey Epstein without a college degree, only had a couple of years of college, actually, as an instructor, and had to be fired for inappropriate behavior with underage girls.
I wonder how that ever happened.
And, you know, so here we have a dirtbag that, I guarantee you, he's got more dirt on him than anybody you can imagine that's been an AG in this country, as bad as all the rest of them.
I got a whole list of them, so we're going to go into some of those a little bit later.
Carl, your thoughts?
So January 6th is just a show trial, and part of the show is to demonstrate that corporate media is criminally complicit, that the Republican leaders who don't speak out, that it is a show trial.
They're criminally complicit in this, and it's just a basic intelligence test to the American people and to the world to see if The intellectual integrity for actual oppositional questions and testimony will ever make an appearance.
So you get Chuckles Barr when he says, I've seen no evidence.
That is a classification of testimony called denial.
And in criminal Axe denial is usually the first thing that comes out of their mouths, and Chuckles, that's what he said, he has no evidence.
He didn't back it up with anything, just the denial.
And then the strawman argument from Chuckles, saying that, oh, the cell phone evidence of passing by election boxes.
Nah, fuckface, it's not passing by, it's stopping at, and there's video evidence.
So the propaganda would be stopped in its tracks if we had oppositional evidence and questions for comprehensive truth, but we never get that from this propaganda clown show.
No, absolutely right.
And it was Barr who affected Ivanka into believing that the election hadn't been stolen, which is very sad.
She should be smarter than to let herself be played.
Democrat pollster predicts a blowout defeat for the Democrat Party.
We're getting a lot of this.
Democrat pollster Doug Schoen is a warning for the party.
Prepare yourself for historic defeats in November.
He's been around long enough to know what happens to the party when inflation and gas spiral out of hand.
The only uncertainty is the magnitude of the losses, where I've been predicting 100 seats in the House and three to four in the Senate.
Three recent developments imply Democrats' already fragile chances are deteriorating further.
And that the party could be on course for an historic midterm loss worse than 1994 or 2010.
The first development is Biden's approval rating.
Only one-third approve of Biden's overall while a majority disapprove.
35 versus 56, according to Quinnipiac.
A new low for the present popularity, which has historically been a predictor of his party's midterm success.
As is another, is the country headed in the right direction, where the polling is very similar.
Notably, Democrats have lost support among independents and Hispanics, two crucial constituencies of their 2020 co-election, as only 25% approve of Biden, with majorities disapproving.
In favoring party control of Congress, Republicans also hold an advantage, 46 to 41.
Independents, 40 to 38.
Hispanics, 41 to 38.
But it's growing.
Second development is the economy.
Inflation has touched a 41-year high of 8.6% annually, where the average price of gas is $5 a gallon, and the stock market is in freefall, with a recession now imminent.
The way they calculate unemployment, however, and inflation, they exclude the cost of food and the gas and gasoline, which is absurd.
My inference is inflation is closer to 18.6%.
The administration has made a concerted effort to highlight promising macroeconomic factors, like rising earnings and record low unemployment.
But the average American experiencing severe market drops, empty shelves on the food store, and rising costs is not persuaded.
And remember, after you've been unemployed for a long period of time, they no longer count you as unemployed, so the figure is highly artificial.
The third development is the outcome of the California primary, which saw a resounding rejection of progressive politics, especially on criminal justice, in one of the most liberal states in the Union.
The most significant criticism of crime policies of progressives came from San Francisco, where the district attorney, Tulsa Bowdoin, got the boot in a city that is 95% registered Democrats.
When considered collectively, the public's growing discontent with the Biden admin, rising economic pessimism, opposition to progressivism, suggests that Democrats are on course to suffer one of the most significant midterm seat losses of any party in recent memory.
I'll go further, in any party in American history.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, Tucker Carlson calls out the right wing of the Uniparty vulture.
This is at the conservative treehouse, and Tucker does a great job of explaining that we don't have two political parties.
We've got two wings of one party, and they are not on the side of America.
They're private corporations that have their own vested interests, and we are not even stockholders for these people.
They could give a flip-less about it.
And the major thing he was talking about is this new red flag law that they managed to get initially 10 senators, but now they've got 14 RINO senators that are going to sign on to this red flag law, which is a violation of the Constitution.
We'll get to that in just a second.
And that means that they've got a veto-proof ability to pass this bill through the Senate.
So that means it's pretty much going to be hand-delivered to FJB, which means it'll be actively enforced by Maryland Garlic.
Yeah, the Supreme Court last May ruled unanimously that red flag laws were a violation of the Constitution and due process.
So that's what we've got.
And this is just to do some further stage setting for the nuclear Armageddon that these people have as their fallback position.
This just in, they've been accusing Putin of using cluster bombs in violation of international treaties for several weeks.
Now that didn't get enough traction.
So now they're stating that the Russians are using phosphorus bombs.
Like the Russians had these people completely overwhelmed the bomb Duran was mentioning that the Russians are firing 50,000 artillery shells per day against the entrenched positions that are indefensible by the Ilinsky zealots.
And in return, they're only getting 5,000 back.
And the current rate, they will completely run out of ammunition.
And none of the U.S. munitions will be able to be shipped into the front so that Ukraine has already a 100 percent total lost war.
So now they're trying to pull out the last stops, just like Saddam Hussein.
I mean, Assad was winning big time all across Syria, and he starts using gas weapons.
weapon so that we can bomb the hell out of this poor little country.
Absolutely miserable that these same rotten SOBs are using the same rotten tricks for centuries against every human being on the planet.
You got it, Joe.
Carl.
And it is centuries.
He's not overstating the fact.
Carl B. Herman blocks about any of these shows.
The documentary series U.S.
Illegal will go through that history for you.
So the Dems' choices coming up to the midterms is that they can cancel the election or they can try to steal it.
And the aspects of fraud to steal the election is that they're going to have to ramp up the fear of money pox or monkey pox or whatever pox that they need or another variant of COVID in order to discourage voters.
They've actively discussed giving people who are not citizens the right to vote to give the appearance that they're having new voters support them for that.
You need to expand the mail-in ballots and they're working on that and the other option is just to go ahead and double down and I'm sure they're employing all these strategies to own the Republicans So think Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney and Liz Cheney.
They're just part of the rainbow unicorn party of totalitarianism.
And regarding the stats, so economist John Williams of Shadow Stats gives what I think is the most objective view of the manipulation of change definitions for inflation and unemployment.
So if you take a look and you, in good faith professional scholarship, try to compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges, then the unemployment rate is closer to 25%.
And the inflation rate is currently 17 to 18% right now.
So, until we get a breakthrough, we're just going to be reporting on the manipulation and the lies of these psychopaths.
Yes, yes, exactly right.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
My sense—this is from a commentator on my blog—of this January 6 farce of a hearing will be taken so far and no further.
They may threaten to indict Trump, but it will not happen, because taking this to a real court with a real trial and real jurors will expose this ploy to the world.
Up to now, and likely a bit further, they will see this as coming under domestic propaganda via the modernization of the Smith-Mutt Act, although I do not see the permission in the revised Act itself that would allow this to go so far.
Others obviously disagree.
If the evidence presented in the above article were presented in a true court of law, they would lose hands down.
They've made their point and, as with any false flag, it's now embedded in the mind of the average and trans viewers and listeners.
That's all they need for now.
They'll walk away, throw a little congratulatory party for the first gay president, pat themselves on their collective backs.
So between now and November, we'll see more events of this nature that will lead away at the expected Republican landslide.
And with a little more ballot sleight of hand, do not be surprised when they keep control of both houses.
That's not anything of us to wit that we wish to hear, but for me, their strategy is obvious.
Meanwhile, my petition is on the docket of the Supreme Court.
While I originally believed it was a First and Second Amendment case, the summary judgment protocols in Wisconsin allowed the judge to decide Whether or not my facts were reasonable and exclude them, if it is subjective opinion, they were not.
As you will see from my petition, which you can download to your own desktop, the Court of Appeals for the 4th District and the Wisconsin Supreme Court agreed.
Check out givesendgo.com slash fundingfetzer.
If you think it's worth supporting my cause, I would welcome your contribution.
In other states, such as Texas, the case against me would have been tossed or sent to a jury for the determination of the disputed facts.
But in Wisconsin, the court could, in effect, determine the facts regardless of my evidence.
It turns out this is a national problem, and I'm teeing up the case for SCOTUS to make summary judgment protocols uniform throughout the nation.
I believe they are going to do just that and set things right.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yes, you sent me a comment from a reader this morning that I told you we would address on air.
I don't like giving out my email addresses and responding individually to people because I just can't deal with the volume of potential spam that I get.
And so this lady asked a really good question about Dane Wiggington.
And his assertion, he's the one that runs Geoengineering Watch, and he's done some excellent work, but he's also not as scientific, as literate as he should be, and he's also not objective enough to take criticism or actual critiques from somebody that understands what's going on.
He had made the statement that they were releasing nanoparticles that were eating up the ozone, and that next thing you know, we were all going to be dying of rampant skin cancers.
And what he doesn't understand about ozone is a long list of things that he doesn't understand about the atmosphere, but here's some actual facts.
Oxygen absorbs UVC, and in the process it breaks the diatomic to oxygen ...atoms apart, and then they immediately join with another oxygen, which gives them a 3-oxygen, which is what ozone is.
Ozone has a half-life of about 30 minutes.
Ozone absorbs UVB, so we have two things that are working, both associated with oxygen in the atmosphere, that are helping to make the planet habitable by reducing the amount of UVB and C that come into the surface of the Earth.
But to claim that these things are being eaten up, especially by the stupid Montreal Protocol from 1987, which said that human-produced hydrofluorocarbons were causing the problem, that absolutely is false.
The fluorine is the 13th most abundant element on the planet.
It is a halogen.
It actively produces thousands of natural compounds, and it's produced in volumes that are many magnitudes greater than what humans produce.
I recommend that anybody that's interested in that go to Timothy Casey's site geologist-1001.net and read Volcanic Halocarbons.
We can go into a little bit more detail in that at another time, but bottom line is, Dale Waddington, you need to contact me so that we can do an off-record discussion and I can correct you on a whole bunch of things that you keep repeating that are wrong that will decrease your actual effectiveness because you're making a lot of false statements and it really discredits the good work that you're doing.
Thank you for addressing that, Joe, and in such detail.
Carl, your final thoughts?
I appreciate our commenters in our audience for their work for truth and justice.
For that commenter, being in California, we had an attempted recall election of Governor Gavin Newsom, and that went as you would expect with the mail-in voting and the Dominion voting machines.
And with the level of awareness of election fraud of the general public, we need to have a breakthrough event.
Otherwise, we're going to be facing the same calamity.
With Jim's case for a judge to subjectively dismiss evidence, he has a burden of proof that he absolutely failed to do.
And if we had an honest system where that judge's evaluation could be considered and what he wrote, which is pretty much just denial, right?
He says, yeah, I looked at it and I just threw it out because that's what I thought.
That's what I... No, no, no, no, no.
He would have to explain, document and prove that the evidence is somehow irrelevant or inaccurate.
And he absolutely failed that burden of proof.
And finally, in this clown show that we're at, We do have comfort in one, is that all we're doing is we're standing for the truth and the facts and good faith effort.
And if you take a look at the condition that we have, the challenge that we have, based upon your own experience of talking to Friends and family.
I know for me, about 2% of people can actually engage in these issues.
So we have maybe a couple hundred million of us spread out around our planet, but no apparent effect to change policy.
So we're strong enough in our voice where we are heard and considered, But we don't have the strength to be able to cause a breakthrough, or at least so it appears yet.
Yet, this Emperor's New Clothes condition is all we have, so make your voices count and don't take yourself too seriously in this big game where we are small pieces.
Well, thanks, Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, and Joe Olson from Houston, Texas, for excellent commentary, show after show after show.
We're being played.
The American people are being subjected to political theater 24-7, virtually it seems, if you watch Any of those cable networks—MSNBC, to which my wife is addicted, for example—they're replaying again and again the points they claim to be making, virtually every one of which is not just false but provably false and not supportable even remotely by the objective evidence.
They excluded two Republicans who would have made a world of difference here in an unprecedented action by the Speaker of the House.
She, after all, was responsible for orchestrating this whole event, along with Chuck Schumer, whom, by the way, a colleague of mine believes was the actual person who fired the fake shot at Ashley Babbitt, where Ashley, I guarantee you, did not die.
That was simply an element of the stage event so they could talk about a deadly shooter.
And the mayor of the District of Columbia, they were all acting in collusion to disrupt discussion of evidence of voter fraud and election theft.
Not at all exactly what they ordered, because when the American people wake up to the enormity of the theft, they are going to be Blown away.
And the evidence is there.
Just take a look.
The idea that Bill Barr could dismiss Dinesh D'Souza's fantastic 2000 mules is insulting beyond belief.
He turns out, in my opinion, to be a liar, a phony, a fraud, a traitor to the Constitution.
He should never have been put in the position as Attorney General.
And it's disgraceful that he has acted as he has in this context.
We need to destroy democracy, restore democracy, which requires election integrity, get rid of the electronic voting machines, go back to paper ballots and hand counts.
That's the minimal necessity we must have to regain our own influence on the course of our nation, which is the ultimate Justification for democracy.
That everyone should participate in decisions that affect everyone alike.
That's devoutly to be wished.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends, your family.
We do not know how much time we have left, and because of events in Ukraine or so spinning out of control, we may be going sooner than we thought.
Thanks for being here today.
▲
Export Selection