All Episodes
Previous Next
June 21, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:07:13
GENOCIDE JUST STARTING?! US Death Spike Intensifies. Mass Die-Off Accelerating in Younger People
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Hey everybody, we've been covering the activities of these genocidal maniac billionaires and their absurd statements about there being too many people and that's the cause of all of our problems and global warming and COVID all because there's too many people in the world and they need to solve the population problem.
We've got to stabilize the population.
When I was born, there were too many people.
That's why we have global warming.
We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff.
If there were less people, they'd be using less stuff.
If we don't get global warming and the nuclear weapons straightened out, we don't have to worry about human rights.
The humans will all be gone.
Okay, do you think we'll do it?
I mean, are you optimistic in the end that the world will come to its senses?
On behalf of my grandchildren and the children all over the world, I absolutely think we've got to do it.
So let's look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to zero.
Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
Now that's back from high school algebra, but let's take a look.
First we've got population.
And we've also been covering the extremely alarming death rates that we've been seeing around the world.
For example, in the United States, 2021 was the most deaths of any year in this country's history.
And so far in 2022, it's off to a worse start with more deaths in Q1 of 2022 than deaths in Q1 of 2021, which again was the most deaths of any year in American history.
I'm sure many people watching, I know for myself this is true, a lot of us have lost people and are in the process of losing more of our loved ones.
It's beyond tragic and we need to get justice for these people if they're being killed off by greedy billionaires who are hogging all the resources to themselves and systematically killing people.
But unfortunately the deaths continue to roll in, and we continue to have to bury our loved ones.
So every few weeks the CDC puts out more mortality data, and the latest data dump is extremely alarming.
Take for example this chart right here.
from usmortality.com.
All cause weekly excess deaths from 0 to 24.
All of this data will be for the United States.
Look at this.
This is a nightmare.
So, starting at 2020, the excess deaths as a percentage break off of 0%.
So deaths were happening right at the baseline until 2020 when they became elevated.
This elevated excess death rate Continued for two years with an extra big spike in 2021.
But look at this.
In the past couple data points that they've put out for excess deaths in 0 to 24 age bracket, we have a colossal spike unlike anything we've seen over the past seven years.
Look at this over here on the right.
This is up around 50%!
50% excess death rate!
So excess death is where you compare the actual observed number of deaths versus the expected number of deaths for that time period.
So how are we hitting 50% excess death rates for under 25?
And also extremely concerning, if not more concerning, is this 52 week moving average, which shows us the trend of the data.
And what we have since 2020 is a near straight line increasing, which kind of plateaued for a second here, but now it's increasing yet again.
Absolutely horrifying what's coming in with this data.
And we'll cover this in more depth in a second, but here's the all age death.
It looks very normal and uniform right at the expected levels.
Until 2020 where it starts bouncing around between 10% and 40%.
And look at the 52 week moving average here.
Takes off like a rocket and stays elevated.
And my question is where is this going to go next?
It's already a mass die-off.
But how massive is the die-off going to ultimately become?
We're seeing monkeypox news now.
And the Ted Turner group, by the way, there's quotes of him talking about there being too many people.
The Nuclear Threat Initiative did this tabletop exercise where 270 million people died from monkeypox.
So I'm concerned that this might just be the beginning of the mother of all nightmares.
All right, so let me give credit to the source on this.
This is Ben at US Mortality on Twitter.
they shared these 14 charts with this caption.
Excess mortality is either getting worse or plateauing at a high level in every age group except 85 plus.
So it was a little bit hard to see these charts What I did is I made a substack article where I made each chart large and put some comments, although I think the data speaks for itself.
And then at the bottom of the article, I linked to some very interesting videos that we will cover some of here.
And I also link and remind people about the PULS data published in the American Heart Association journals.org.
KHA journals.org, which showed a 2.27 times risk of acute coronary syndrome after two of these MRNA shots.
And remember, people keep taking these shots.
Many people are up to four or five.
And does it seem like there's an end in sight for these people?
Or are they going to keep taking these shots?
And if two of these shots increased people's risk of acute coronary syndrome for the next five years by 2.27 times, what's going to happen when people take their sixth, their seventh, their tenth shot?
God.
What's going to happen when the big pharma companies get to do less and less testing and get to roll out their variant-specific boosters with hardly any safety testing?
What do you think is going to happen to the quality of the serum when the regulation goes down?
And also at this point we have to ask, is this a well-funded plan from the oligarchs to genocide our loved ones?
So I'll leave the link to the Substack article if you want any of these resources.
Just click that link.
But the data that was put out from U.S.
Mortality is extremely concerning.
The already tragic trajectory of the excess deaths, measured in 52-week moving average of excess death, is getting worse and worse in all age groups except 85+.
But the mortality data from all groups since 2020 is absolutely gut-wrenching.
Okay, let's look at the charts that U.S.
Mortality shared.
Here's the first one.
All cause weekly deaths.
All ages.
And it shows the last seven years you see this cyclical pattern that is hugely broken through and just goes berserk at the end here.
All over the place.
And in a horrifying direction.
Being well above what we expected in terms of deaths.
Is this a smoking gun of genocide?
Here's the same chart we were looking at just a second ago.
All cause weekly excess deaths for all ages.
Again, we have this pretty normal pattern coming along and then 2020 hits.
And everything goes haywire.
And people start dying at massive rates.
Look at this.
It's bouncing between 10, 20, 30, 40 percent.
That's percentage increase over the estimated expected deaths.
For it to be 40 percent higher on a given week is absolutely horrifying.
So all of these charts on their own and together tell a tale.
A very sad story.
of a mass unexpected die-off over the past two years.
The trends show no signs of slowing down and may actually be getting worse.
Let's look at each of the age brackets starting with less than 25 years.
You can see here the green line I believe is the baseline and again for 2020 on we see a big surge in deaths even in this youngest age bracket.
But what's very concerning is this last little bit here.
It looks like we're seeing a huge peak coming.
A huge spike on its way.
And I imagine the dots mean that these are just preliminary data.
Which one would expect would end up being higher, if anything.
When all the deaths are counted.
Now this, I think, is the most concerning chart of the entire series.
This shows all-cause weekly excess deaths for 0 to 24.
And this 52-week moving average in red shows that this is a problem that's still on our hands.
This is getting worse and worse and worse.
For these youngsters.
Many of whom are facing untimely deaths.
And what is to be made of this last little bit of data?
This is beyond concerning.
All cause excess deaths at 45-50%?
And that's just the last in the series of horrible news.
As you can see by this moving average.
Going up and up and up.
In which way will it ultimately go in the coming years?
So I do think this is one of the most concerning signals from this devastating update.
And if you look here, you can see there's this trend for the blue data.
It's going up and up and up.
It's trending upward for the weekly excess deaths.
And then it kind of goes down a little bit and then rockets off.
We'll have to keep a close eye on this, obviously.
All right, so that's the 0 to 24 age bracket.
Let's move on to the 25 to 44 age bracket.
Let's start with the all-cause weekly deaths.
So keep in mind, this isn't excess deaths, although you can kind of see the excess deaths here.
These are all deaths by week for the past seven years.
And what we see is this baseline green line get totally dwarfed By the surge of deaths.
So the green lines are expected deaths, and then look here, starting in 2020, in the first few weeks, it goes much, much higher.
And look at this trend here.
That doesn't look like that's resolving.
This looks beyond sustained.
It looks like it's increasing.
Now anything could happen, but I'm worried that this is going to turn into something colossal.
I mean, actually, it's already cataclysmic.
But that doesn't mean it couldn't get worse.
So again, before we move on, just the big spike here.
in weekly deaths 25 to 44.
Here are the excess deaths charted and you can see just like before for the less than 25s from 2015 to 2020 it's mostly in line with the predicted estimated number of deaths expected number of deaths but then right around the same point and in much the same fashion the trend is broken through
And the excess 52-week moving average chart shows us how this severe issue is getting worse and worse and worse.
And you can see in the last few data points, it's taking back off again.
And this looks like it's a problem that's getting worse and worse.
So we have a trajectory of excess deaths indicating we are in the midst of a mass unexpected die-off that's getting worse and worse and worse.
Not only is it not resolving, But it's getting worse almost every day to release.
How long will we be killed off like this?
All right, let's move to the next stage bracket.
45 to 64.
Same story.
You have the cyclical pattern from 2015 to 2020.
And then out of nowhere, the blue line skyrockets well above and beyond the expected numbers.
And look at this 10,000 is about where the baseline is.
These peaks are going past 15,000, which is a 50% rise, which is why when we look at it on this chart here, you're seeing the excess death numbers bounce around between 0% and 60 plus percent.
So here's the all-cause weekly excess deaths for 45 to 64 in the US.
Baseline until 2020.
And then a massive surge, a mass die-off of unexpected deaths.
Horrifying.
And this looks like it's increasing.
The 52-week moving average just gets worse and worse and worse as the die-off intensifies.
So here's 65 to 74.
Also extremely concerning numbers in excess of the baseline, which the data was sticking pretty tight to until 2020.
And then everything went berserk.
And then here's the excess chart for 65 to 74.
Again, an extremely concerning 52-week moving average.
And then the underlying data, obviously, as well.
But the trajectory that we're on, this trend line, Is moving in the wrong direction.
And as a species, we've already, in the past few years, witnessed a mass die-off.
But it doesn't show any signs of slowing down.
In fact, it looks like it's accelerating.
Here's the next age bracket, 75 to 84.
Same story.
At baseline, and then 2021, everything goes haywire.
And the mass die-off begins.
But at these levels, we are in deep shit right now.
We are absolutely screwed.
So the best we can hope for at this point is for the genocide to subside.
But if it keeps at these levels at this pace for much longer, we are absolutely screwed.
And if this accelerates, the human species will be dealt with such a severe wound.
So here's the all-cause weekly excess death chart for that same age group 75 to 84.
You can see Very high levels of excess deaths.
And then when you plot the excess 52-week moving average, it shows a very concerning indicator of the trend that we are in the middle of, which looks like it could be getting worse.
Like, what if this chart, after it plateaus here for a while, goes up at a similar pace as this stretch right here?
All right, for the last age group, 85+, we're also seeing a very concerning deviation from the baseline in the wrong direction.
Many, many people are dying in this age group as well.
Now, thankfully, the trend line at the end here isn't as horrifying as the other groups, but that's a low bar.
That's a really low bar.
It's extremely concerning in its own right.
But I think the most concerning and horrifying data Are the middle-aged to younger people in these big spikes that we're seeing in the trend line, even in the 52-week moving average, going really in the wrong direction with no signs of slowing down, just plowing through and setting new and new records of death.
So my heart goes out to everybody affected.
It's probably most people in this country and probably the world experiencing death.
Unexpected death.
And I have to think back about this PULS data.
That was collected and published on AHAjournal.org.
Abstract 10-7-12 Observational Findings of PULS Cardiac Test Findings for Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving mRNA Vaccines.
And it tells how they collected data before and after their vaccines, which they only took two doses, which is, of course, a lot of doses.
But people are moving on to, like, number five, number six, and you have to wonder, what are their plans?
For next year?
The year after?
The year after?
Are they going to keep at this pace of taking these shots?
And that's concerning if after two shots for these 566 patients, aged 28 to 97, detailed in this report, their tests changed in such a fashion that their PULS score that indicates the five-year acute coronary syndrome risk, which is a severe heart syndrome risk, goes up 2.27 times from 11% pre-vax
to a predicted 25% five-year acute coronary syndrome risk, post-vax.
And that's two of the doses.
I also think back about this video from Dr. Michael Yeadon.
Let's remind ourselves what he said.
This system is being put in place using lies, and it's being put in place using lies for some purpose, and I believe that purpose is complete totalitarian control.
And I think the purpose of that is going to be mass depopulation.
I can't think of a single benign interpretation for the simple creation of these top-up vaccines, let alone the lies that surround them.
And I'm absolutely terrified that the combination of vaccine passports and top-up vaccines is going to lead to, you know, mass depopulation, deliberate execution, potentially of billions of people.
And there's different aspects here.
Of course, they could be injecting people with something that accelerates their death, but also these systems of control and the disarming of people and the overabundance of spending from the governments is hurling us towards and off this cliff where tons of people are going to starve to death.
We're already seeing suicides going up, drug overdoses going up.
And then you have all these other unexplained deaths that keep popping up.
And then all these other issues.
So this is multifaceted.
So, over the last three months I've spoken to eight professors at UK universities whose discipline includes immunology and I've discussed with them what I'm going to tell you about virus variants and they've all agreed with my interpretation.
None of them will say anything.
And it's because I won't get a grant from the Wellcome Trust or the Medical Research Council, as suggested.
I won't get grants if I speak about this stuff.
So I want you to know that the academics in your country are easily pushed around, frankly, by both politicians and people with lots of money.
And here's the next video I wanted to play.
Dr. Charles Hoff early on in the vax rollout blowing the whistle about what he was seeing in his clinic when he ran tests called D-dimer tests to see if people were clotting after their vaccines.
Listen to what he found.
In a single dose of a Moderna vaccine, there are 40 trillion messenger RNA molecules.
40 trillion that are injected into your arm.
So three quarters of these are taken, connected by the lymphatics, they go into your bloodstream in these little packages that are designed to be absorbed into the cell.
But obviously when something's in your circulation, The only cells that they're going to get absorbed into is the cells around your blood vessels.
And the place where absorption happens is in the capillary networks.
In other words, these are the tiniest vessels where the blood slows right down.
These are tiny, tiny vessels.
So these little packages of genes are absorbed into the cells around the blood vessels at the vascular endothelium.
The package is open, the genes are released, your body then gets to work reading these genes and manufacturing trillions and trillions of COVID spike proteins.
Because even though you get 40 trillion genes, each gene can produce many, many COVID spike proteins.
So, and the purpose of the spike proteins is that your body recognizes this as a foreign protein and will make antibodies against it so that you're then protected against COVID.
That's the idea, but that's where the problem comes.
In a virus, in a coronavirus, that spike protein becomes part of the viral capsule.
In other words, it's part of like the cell wall around the virus called the viral capsule.
But it's not in a virus.
It's in your cells.
So it therefore becomes part of the cell wall of your vascular endothelium, which means that these cells that line your blood vessels, which are supposed to be smooth, so that your blood flows smoothly, now have these little spiky bits sticking out.
So it is absolutely inevitable that blood clots will form because your blood platelets circulate around in your vessels, and the purpose of blood platelets is to detect a damaged vessel and block that vessel to stop bleeding.
So when the platelet comes through the capillary, it suddenly hits all these little COVID spikes that are jutting into the inside of the vessel, it is absolutely inevitable that a blood clot will form to block that vessel.
Now that's how platelets work.
So just as this could be, is absolutely predicted to cause cancer because it's full of carcinogens, these spike proteins will predictably cause blood clots because of well, they're in your blood vessels.
It is guaranteed.
Dr. Baghdi then said to me, the way to prove this is we need to do a blood test called a D-dimer test to find out if this is really happening.
So, because the problem with the blood clots that we hear about through the media, that they claim are very rare, are the big blood clots.
These are the ones that cause strokes and heart attacks in your brain.
Those are the ones that show up on CT scans and CT angiograms and MRIs.
The clots I'm talking about are microscopic.
These are tiny.
They're literally on a capillary level and they are scattered throughout your capillary network.
So they are not going to show on any scan.
They're just too small and too scattered.
So the only way to find out for sure if this predictable mechanism of clotting was actually happening was to do this blood test called a D-dimer.
And so the D-dimer is a blood test that shows a recent blood clot.
It doesn't show anything else other than a recent blood clot.
It won't show an old blood clot.
It only shows new blood clots.
And so I have been now doing that on my patients, finding people who have recently had their COVID shot within the previous seven days.
It needs to be between four and seven days, and doing a blood test on them called a D-dimer.
And so I'm still trying to accumulate more information, but on the ones I have so far, 62% of them have evidence of clotting, which means that these blood clots are not rare.
It means that the majority of people are getting blood clots that they have no idea that they're even having.
So, Laura Lynn, the most alarming thing about this is that there are some parts of your body, like your heart and your brain and your spinal cord and your lungs, which cannot regenerate.
When those tissues are damaged by blocked vessels, they are permanently damaged.
So I now have six people in my medical practice with what we call reduced effort tolerance, which means that they just get out of breath much more easily than they used to.
I have one fellow that used to walk to my office every week for actually for an arthritis injection who told me that he could walk two miles without any problem and now after a quarter of a mile he is absolutely out of breath and it has been like that for five months.
So on the basis of this D-dimer test, which proves that the majority of people are clotting, these six people who now have reduced effort tolerance, literally what's happened to them is they've plugged up thousands of tiny capillaries in their lungs.
And the terrifying thing about this is not just that these people are now short of breath and can't do what they used to be able to do.
But once you block off a significant number of blood vessels through your lungs, your heart is now pumping against a much greater resistance to try and get the blood through your lungs.
So that causes a condition called pulmonary artery hypertension.
It's literally like high blood pressure in your lungs because the blood can't get through because so many of the vessels are blocked.
And the terrifying thing of this is that people with pulmonary artery hypertension usually die of right-sided heart failure within three years.
So the huge concern about this mechanism of injury is that these shots are causing permanent damage and the worst is yet to come.
There are some tissues in your body like intestine and liver and kidneys that can regenerate to quite a good degree, but brain and spinal cord and heart muscle and lungs do not.
When they're damaged, it's permanent.
Like all these young people who are now getting myocarditis from these shots, they have permanently damaged hearts.
It doesn't matter how mild it is, they will not be able to do what they used to be able to do because heart muscle does not regenerate.
So this is the terrifying concern, and not only is the long-term outlook very grim, but with each successive shot, the damage will add and add and add.
It's going to be cumulative because you're progressively getting more and more damaged capillaries.
Wow.
Let's also check out this video from Dr. Bhakti about autoimmune attack of killer lymphocytes on hearts and lungs.
And he also talks about the re-emergence of diseases in people's shot-up immune systems, which he seems to have predicted 100%.
We're already seeing these stories now of monkeypox, the plague, hepatitis A, on and on and on.
And the facts are damning.
All gene-based vaccines, independent of manufacturers, produce the same result He has looked at 15 in the last four days, the number has been increased to 70 individuals who died after vaccination.
without any connection to vaccination being established by the authorities.
So, these were people who died at home, at work, in the car, doing their sports, etc., etc., etc.
This is very, very important.
They were, post-mortems were performed because the relatives insisted on this.
And nothing was found, so the organs appeared normal.
However, when Anna Burkhardt, professor of pathology, one of the most experienced professors in Germany, who is now pensioned, by the way, like me, proceeded to look at these
organs over the last six months he has spent day after day looking at these organs he discovered something that was so absolutely damning and absolutely you know there's no question now anymore about what is going on and the answer is in the organs of these people
In 90% he found clear evidence for autoimmune self-attack by killer lymphocytes on the tissues.
The main ones being the heart, the heart, the lung, And after that, other tissues such as liver, etc, etc, etc.
And this has been now posted on the website of the Doctors for COVID Ethics and is going viral around the world because these data are so damning that you don't have to start looking for other data to know that these vaccines are killing the young and the old.
are killing the young and the old.
And they are killing our children.
And so I don't know what we're talking about.
Look at these pictures.
Look at these bullets that are being shot into the people who are being vaccinated, the children who are, you know, we, we made this video, and we're going to say, all right, children, stand up against the wall, This is a water pistol, and you're going to be shot with this water pistol, and it's not going to hurt.
The water may get into your eyes, they may burn.
Kati, the eyes may burn, but nothing will happen, and you will be protected, and you will protect your parents and grandparents.
All this bullshit.
So the children are set up against the wall, And they shoot.
These damn people are shooting and they're killing our children.
I can't stand it.
We have a four-year-old son and we're going to flee this damn country because we are not going to let himself be shot.
Now it is now known that autoimmune attack reactions leading to self-destruction are being triggered by these vaccines.
Now, what Arne Buchheit found was that in 90 percent, 90 percent of the deceased aged 28, aged 28 to 90, women and men one to one, who were never
thought to have been killed because of these vaccines, he found the same pathological findings in all of them.
And this proves that the vaccine had killed them.
Now, if the vaccine had killed 90% of these people by causing self-destruction of the heart via autoimmune reactions, which were, we can't prove this, which were, we can't prove this, but the only common denominator was the vaccination with this damn gene-based vaccine that caused the production of this damn spike in the tissues. but the only common
The There is no other reason for them to have died.
There is no other reason.
Now, listen very carefully, all of you.
Four of these 15 were only vaccinated once and they died.
And what Arne Borchardt found, I'll tell you, Arne Borchardt is one of the most experienced pathologists in Europe.
And when he says this is so, it is so.
And he has pictures that are now documented and can never be destroyed.
They're there for everyone in the world to see and view.
When he says that kilolymphocytes have invaded the hearts and the lungs and sometimes other organs of these people, the question arises why the hell do kilolymphocytes invade the organs And the only answer is that these organs are producing the targets that are seen by these killer lymphocytes.
And that target is the viral protein.
Because this is how immunology has worked since the beginning of mankind and is still working now.
Now, you politicians and you authorities, look at these pictures.
Look at these people who have died.
These people who have been killed because of you.
I can't stand it.
How do we continue talking about this?
The proof is there, laid out for the world.
Now let me tell you the next thing.
It is completely clear that The majority of people who are being vaccinated, be it one or two times, after two times of course it gets worse, after three times it gets worse and worse and worse, because your immune system gets more and more aggressive.
Now, the first thing has been that through the first injection, Your blood vessels become leaky.
They become leaky because the tapestry is being scratched and damaged, as we have been saying for one year now.
Then the mRNA leaks into your organs.
And your heart muscles and your liver and your lung begin to produce these damn proteins.
And then your killer lymphocytes, which everyone has, everyone has these killer lymphocytes, go in and destroy themselves, destroy your heart, your lung, your liver, your blah, blah, blah.
Why don't you stop?
Why don't you Force your politicians and your authorities to stop.
Why?
Why are we talking about it?
Now the last thing and then I'm finished.
Listen very carefully.
This is what we've been saying for months now.
Pointing out that these damn vaccines of course get to the lymph nodes.
Of course those lymph node cells are going to start producing these damn spikes.
And of course, those cells that dare to produce the spikes are going to be killed by the kidney lymphocytes that we all have.
What is going to happen?
Question mark?
Your lymphocytes and the cells that are responsible for immune control over your body are dying.
They are dying.
They are dying in those poor children that are being vaccinated.
They are dying in those poor people.
Adults from 20 to 90.
What happens when these sentinel lymphocytes in your lymph nodes die?
They are responsible for controlling first viruses that are in your body.
Like Epstein-Barr virus, in German Epstein-Barr virus, infectious mononucleosis.
That, if you can't control it, will explode.
Okay?
Herpes virus, if you can't control it, explodes and you get your shingles.
My God!
Is this so difficult to understand?
Is it so difficult?
But I will tell you something else.
There are so many more damn dangerous, infectious agents that are sleeping in the bodies of billions of people around the earth.
The first is tuberculosis.
Do you know that I also harbor the tuberculosis bacterium in my body but I keep it under control by my Lymphocytes in my lymph nodes.
If I kill those lymphocytes, because they are going to be killed by their brothers and sisters, because they dare to express this damn protein, my protection against tuberculosis is going to break down.
There's another disease called proxoplasmosis, which is abound around the world.
Especially the Mediterranean.
And if Toxoplasmosis breaks out, God help you.
But God help you if Tuberculosis breaks out.
Tuberculosis once was the major killer of mankind.
So, months ago, We, the doctors of COVID ethics, wrote an essay which you can look up.
Shots and shingles.
What are they telling us?
And we wrote in that essay that we feared that dormant infections with viruses and bacteria like tuberculosis would explode.
Now, when they would explode?
No one knows!
Tuberculosis needs time to explode.
These bacteria are very slow.
So, two days ago I received a mail from my colleagues here in Germany and they said, strange, we have seen a woman with symptoms in her abdomen that we could not explain.
We have never seen anything like this, and we did not know what she had.
She had fever, she had pain, and she was suffering.
Point.
But after about two weeks, we did offensive diagnostics, and we found out that she had tuberculosis.
Reactivation the whole of her abdomen and she's fighting for her life right now as we talk to each other, because tuberculosis is very difficult to treat, especially if they are multi-resistant, which many are.
Now, I predict, we have predicted this, That because of this damn vaccination, there's going to be an upsurge of tuberculosis worldwide, especially in those countries where the tuberculosis bacterium has been lying dormant in the bodies of these people.
And that is India, Africa, all of Asia.
Not, unfortunately, among the politicians of Europe who have been vaccinated, because they then would see what it takes to die of tuberculosis.
Now, you know, I'm getting very emotional, because my people, the Thais, are targeted.
And the people of India, and I also come from India, are targeted.
And I tell you, don't ask about whether it's Short term, or middle term, or long term.
Tuberculosis kills you on a long term basis.
As, by the way, do tumors.
And you all must know that there's an explosion of cancer and tumors now among the vaccinated, which no one understands.
But it is the same principle.
The lymphocytes in your body are responsible for keeping tumor cells under control.
And these tumor cells arise every day, every hour in your body.
And if you don't control them, are going to be the top.
So, stop talking about incidents about deaths.
Start looking for these effects.
Start looking for viruses, herpes, EBV, CMV that kills children in mother's wombs.
All right?
Tuberculosis, toxoplasmosis, cancer.
And I swear to you, you are going to find things that horrify you if you do not stop this vaccination madness.
That's what I wanted to say today.
What a prophetic warning from Dr. Bhakti.
And in closing, I want to play a series of videos from some seemingly genocidal, maniacal billionaires who think there are too many people in the world and they're trying to sell it as if it's scientific and deserving of a solution to reduce the population.
Absolutely sickening.
And we see a lot of very concerning overlap between people who want to depopulate the world and people who are into vaccination.
Could it be they want access to people's bodies and total control over the world with vaccine health passports?
And what would they use that control for?
The End
I was wondering if you think it's a good idea to reduce 90% of the population because we are being overpopulated by a lot of... 90% 80% 80?
Prince Philip said 80, sir.
I'll go with 85.
I think 2 billion is about right.
Right, me too.
Thank you.
One-child policy.
Exactly.
One-child policy.
Can you speak about your population control, saying you want to reduce the population to 95% extermination?
You said you wanted one-child policy, but you have five kids.
It doesn't make any sense.
The youngest one is 40 years old.
But that's what the Nazis did with eugenics, sir.
They wanted to destroy humanity.
- But that's what the Nazis did with eugenics, sir.
- Sir, sir. - They wanted to defeat humanity. - Pay detail. - In 1996, you were quoted as saying that the world should be reduced by 95% ideally. - World population.
But you are the nation's largest private landowner.
population, but I might have said that.
I don't know.
96 was a long time ago.
Yes, it was, sir.
But you are the nation's largest private landowner.
So wouldn't that be a contradiction?
Because they're concerned, not value.
A lot of desert in there.
Yeah, but people, but if the world is too populated, and you're the U.S.' 's largest landowner, isn't that a contradiction to want the world to be de-pipelated by 95%?
No, because I have lots of, about 50,000 bison on that land.
I bought it so we could bring back the bison they were at the verge of extinction.
But sir, what's more important, human race or bison?
About this issue of George Magazine.
Yes!
Yes, and you see on the cover here it says Bill Gates talks to John Kennedy about Murdoch, money, and world domination.
Microsoft just entered into a partnership with NBC for news channel website called MSNBC.
You recently launched Slate.
I know I forgot that it was MSNBC because it's Microsoft NBC.
I completely You know, it's been just so... Wow.
Wow.
You've also recently launched Slate.
As you get deeper into the information business, will your own views color the content of the news you provide?
I have my personal views.
Then there's Microsoft, a company that gets involved in very few political things.
My own views are those you'd expect from somebody who feels like he's been very, very lucky and that the resources under his command are really society's resources.
And I have to, uh, And I have to be clever about how I'm going to funnel those back in.
I fund education projects.
I fund education projects.
I fund population control.
I fund education projects.
I fund population control.
I'm very big on the United Way.
It's true that frightening global epidemics could arise from a new retrovirus, a killer flu, or an Ebola-type pathogen running out of control.
Because our technology and our behavior have sped up microbial evolution, reducing the threat of new plagues will demand thoughtful efforts.
Slowing population growth, keeping our food and water clean, and setting up a global system to monitor infectious diseases and microbial drug resistance, for instance.
That's a trade-off society is making because of very, very high medical costs.
And a lack of willingness to say, you know, is spending a million dollars on that last three months of life for that patient, would it be better not to lay off those 10 teachers and to make that trade-off in medical costs?
But that's called the death panel, and you're not supposed to have that discussion.
Of course we're making... But that's an interesting thing you just said, which is just the last three months in life for one person or something, because we haven't had a discussion of how to allocate that money, it means we lay off three teachers to do so.
I mean, in other words, we haven't had this type of allocation.
We're making that trade-off because of huge medical costs that are not examined to see which ones actually have no benefit whatsoever.
And because of pension generosity, we will be laying off over 100,000 teachers, which, you know, I'm very much against that.
Not doing it will be catastrophic.
We'll have 8 degrees, will be 8 degrees hotter in 10, not 10, but in 30 or 40 years and basically none of the crops will grow.
Most of the people will have died and the rest of us will be cannibals.
Civilization will have broken down.
The few people left will be living in a failed state like Somalia or Sudan and living conditions will be intolerable.
The droughts will be so bad there'll be no more corn growing.
But not doing it is suicide.
Just like dropping bombs on each other, nuclear weapons is suicide.
So we've got to stop doing the two suicidal things, which are hanging on to our nuclear weapons and global warming.
And then after that, we've got to stabilize the population.
When I was born... So what's wrong with the population?
There were too many people.
That's why we have global warming.
We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff.
If there were less people, they'd be using less stuff.
Here's David Rockefeller in 1994 addressing the United Nations.
Ironically, however, the very innovations that are making possible dramatic improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which raise the specter of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in.
And herein lies the dilemma that we all face.
Let me illustrate.
Improved public health has caused the world's infant mortality rate to decline by 60% over the last 40 years.
In the same period, the world's average life expectancy has increased from 46 years in 1950s to 63 years today.
This is a development which, as individuals, we can only applaud.
However, the result of these positive measures is a world population that has risen during the same short period of time geometrically to almost 6 billion people and could easily exceed 6 billion, 8 billion by the year 2020.
The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.
Unless nations will agree to work together to tackle these cross-border challenges posed by population growth, over-consumption of resources, and environmental degradation, the prospects for a decent life on our planet will be threatened.
The recent UN meeting in Cairo is appropriately focused on one of these key issues, population growth.
But the controversies which have erupted at the conference illustrate the problem of coming to grips with issues that are deeply divisive and which have a profound moral dimension.
The United Nations can and should play an essential role in helping the world find a satisfactory way of stabilizing world population And stimulating economic development in a manner that is sensitive to religious and moral considerations.
Economic growth is, of course, an inevitable corollary of a growing population and is essential to improve standards of living.
But without careful coordination, unrestrained economic growth poses further threats to our environment.
This was a major subject of discussion at the conference in Rio de Janeiro on the environment two years ago.
The focus then was on sustainable growth and global development.
It was pointed out at the conference that growth is most efficiently managed by the private sector, but regulation of the process by national governments and international bodies is also needed.
And once again, the United Nations Well, there you have it.
One of the wealthiest, most influential people on this planet from one of the most influential families on this planet, the Rockefellers, openly admitting that he thinks the size of our population is leading to a catastrophic disaster.
Asking the United Nations to lead the charge in finding a solution to this.
While also revealing, with his reference to the UN's International Conference on Population Development in Cairo that took place just a little before that, also in 1994, and the United Nations Agenda 21 Conference in Rio de Janeiro that took place two years earlier, in 1992, that they all, in fact, periodically get together for worldwide conferences about what to do with this problem of overpopulation.
That's David Rockefeller, grandson of oil tycoon and world's first billionaire, John D. Rockefeller, talking about needing to find a solution to population growth.
Now in a combination that you'll find far too common by the end of this video, the Rockefellers are one of the main driving forces behind childhood vaccination.
They started their vaccination crusade in 1985, and by 1990, in a collaborative effort with the United Nations Development Program, UNICEF, the World Health Organization, the World Bank, government agencies, scientists, and vaccine manufacturers, Rockefeller Foundation started the Children's Vaccine Initiative.
Their immediate goals included improving existing vaccines, developing new vaccines, Combining vaccines and enhancing vaccine production and quality control and ensuring vaccine availability worldwide.
Now let me ask you another question.
Why would someone who openly talks about needing to find a way to decrease the number of humans on the planet want to spend a fortune on worldwide free chemical injections?
Sure, their website states that it's part of an effort to save children from potential future ailments.
But does this sound like someone who wants to add to the number of people on this planet?
Improvements in human well-being are also creating new problems which raise the specter of an alarming and possibly catastrophic disaster to the biosphere we live in.
The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.
In fact, it was in that very year, 1952, that John D. Rockefeller III founded the Population Council to spread new methods of birth control and start new programming aimed at convincing parents to have less children.
All of the stuff you don't like, I can speak honestly.
So usually speaking, something which happened in the past could happen again, generally.
So that could happen.
Or epidemics.
I mean, I don't know what it will be.
But in one way or another, we are so far, globally, we are so far above the population and the consumption levels which can be supported by this planet that I know in one way or another it's going to come back down.
So I don't hope to avoid that.
I hope that it can occur in a civil way.
And I mean civil in a special way.
Peaceful.
Peace doesn't mean that everybody's happy.
The planet can support something like a billion people.
Maybe two billion, depending on how much liberty and how much material consumption you want to have.
If you want more liberty and more consumption, you have to have fewer people.
And conversely, you can have more people.
I mean, we could even have Eight or nine billion, probably, if we have a very strong dictatorship, which is smart.
But if you had a smart dictatorship and a low standard of living, but we want to have freedom and we want to have a high sentence.
So we're going to have a billion people.
And we're now at seven.
So we have to get back down.
I hope that this can be slow, relatively slow.
So you've got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero.
equally equal, you know, so that people share the experience.
But that's what lies ahead.
So you've got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero.
And that's going to be based on the number of people, the services each person's using on average, the energy on average for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy.
So let's look at each one of these and see how we can get this down to zero.
Probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero.
That's back from high school algebra.
But let's take a look.
First, we've got population.
The world today has 6.8 billion people.
That's headed up to about 9 billion.
Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.
So that's plain as day.
It says the population is 6.8 billion going to not.
But if we do a really good job on vaccines, that can be lowered by 15%.
Well, 15% of the proposed 2.2 billion person increase is 330 million people.
If you break down what he's saying, he's basically making the claim that with vaccines and, quote, health care, they can prevent the births of 330 million babies.
If that's the case, one's gotta ask, what's the real purpose behind these vaccination programs?
Isn't sterilization?
Is that why so many people have trouble conceiving these days and have to go to fertility doctors?
Who knows?
But one thing that is for sure is that they're pretty out in the open about their desire for less people on this planet.
Here's another member of the good club, Bill Gates friend and also huge supporter of vaccines, Ted Turner, telling us exactly that.
We've got to we've got to stabilize the population.
When I was born.
So what's wrong with the population?
I mean, we're too many people.
That's what that's why we have global warming.
We have global warming because too many people are using too much stuff.
If there were less people, they'd be using less stuff.
If we don't get global warming and the nuclear weapons straightened out, we don't have to worry about human rights.
Humans will all be gone.
Yeah.
Okay.
Do you think we'll do it?
I mean, are you optimistic in the end that the world will come to its senses?
On behalf of my grandchildren and the children all over the world, I absolutely think we've got to do it.
There are too many people using too much stuff.
You know, when someone with the power and influence of billions of dollars starts talking about that there were too many of us, that's a major red flag.
But this is how they feel.
Now, going back to Bill Gates, here's a clip where he reveals that the actual reason the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation started in the first place was population control.
When our foundation first started up, it was focused on reproductive health.
That was the main thing we did because I thought, you know, population growth in poor countries is the biggest problem they face.
We were at one of these meetings Yesterday, and I remember that a lady told you that she had had eight children and four of them had died in childbirth or shortly thereafter.
But if all of them had survived, she'd have eight children.
And what the developing world does not need is more children.
And I think that was the biggest aha to Bill and me when we got into this work is we asked ourselves, of course, the same hard-nosed question you'd ask, which is if you get into this work and you start to save these children, will women just keep overpopulating the world?
And thank goodness the converse is absolutely true.
They don't do that because women say to themselves they want two children to survive into adulthood.
If she knows that two will survive into adulthood, she will naturally bring down her population.
And so as soon as she starts to see that getting them vaccinated or keeping them alive during the birth, she won't have as many children.
That's what we just heard from this group as well, that the older women had had more children, hoping more would survive, but the younger women are starting to plan for smaller families because they know they'll live.
They all said they wanted three.
Yeah, which is fantastic.
That's what you want.
So if you understand that there's a high likelihood that your child is going to survive, you believe they'll have fewer?
Absolutely, and we're seeing that play out in all the population numbers across the globe.
In fact, the population rates are coming down faster than had been predicted 10 years ago.
Of all the things that are out there, What could cause an excess in a single year of 10 million deaths?
Now, clearly a big war could, and a pandemic, natural or created by bioterror.
The natural pandemic, the last gigantic one, was 100 years ago.
We are healthier today, but the speed of travel, and therefore the speed of global spread, that works against us.
A pandemic.
Natural or created by bio-terror.
Interesting subject for someone obsessed with the size of our population to bring up.
Here's a quote from Queen Elizabeth's husband, Prince Philip.
Cannibalism is a radical but realistic solution to the problem of overpopulation.
That's one of the most influential men on this planet.
One, talking about cannibalism.
Creepy.
And two, calling the amount of people on the planet a problem.
He has infinite money and means.
And that's not his only quote on the subject of reducing the number of people on this planet.
For he wrote in the foreword to the 1986 book, People as Animals, that he was in fact tempted to ask for reincarnation as a particular deadly virus, as a way to elicit revenge on overpopulation.
That's some pretty dark stuff right there.
And to just joke about that so nonchalantly, it just goes to show that this is not a taboo topic to the rich and powerful.
Actually, it seems like population control is quite the popular topic in Britain.
Here's Prime Minister Boris Johnson's father, former member of the European Parliament and employee of the World Bank, Stanley Johnson, giving his thoughts on population control.
What is the hope for mankind?
The hope for mankind is to stabilise and preferably reduce population, and above all, not to go hell for leather for economic growth.
In other words, it really questioned the basic model on which, you know, societies have been trading for years.
And I still think those were words well said.
And if you look back at it now, you'll say that in both respects, we have significantly failed to achieve results.
Yes, I mean, basically, if you said to me, who is right in the argument, the no growth people or the let's go for growth people, I would certainly say the no growth people.
But I'd add as a corollary to that, you have to get population under control as well.
Because if you look at it in sheer economic terms, how can you sustain increases in per capita income at a time when you have rising population without rising economic growth?
Whereas if you have a declining population, which is what I would aim for, then, of course, even a stable economic growth situation will give you increases in per capita income.
So that's where I stand.
Do you have a sense of what the carrying capacity of Britain is or of the world as a whole?
Well, Britain, I'd put it at 10 or 15 million.
I think that would be absolutely fine.
I mean, that would do us really splendidly.
At a limit, 2025, I think it's complete nonsense that we are now confronted with an island, would you believe it, of 70 million.
So extremely horrifying news.
We're going to continue to follow this.
If you want more reports like this, check out rockfin.com slash timtruth.
I want to give a big thank you to the people who support this work.
▲
Export Selection