All Episodes
Previous Next
June 20, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:16:46
Need to Know News (20 June 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston, Carl Herman in San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you.
All the news you need to know.
We begin with rather positive development.
Russia says 50 senior officers of the Kiev forces were killed in a Kalibr missile strike.
Russian warships destroyed a command center with Kalibr cruise missiles, killing dozens, including generals and members of the high command, which they announced on the 19th.
The pinpoint took place near the village of Shirakoya Dasha in the Dnepropetrovsk Oblast.
The ministry said they hit the command center where commanders of various units had gathered for a meeting.
They've also been used to destroy 10 howitzers and at least 20 armored vehicles recently delivered from the West.
The Russians know exactly where all this weaponry is coming and have the ability to take it out upon arrival.
The missile, we're seeing it being fired here, has a range of 1,500 to 2,500 kilometers.
Its guidance system is built around an inertial navigation system and a satellite glide system.
It has a stop speed of Mach 2.9, can fly as low as 20 meters above the water, 50 meters above the ground.
The Russian military has stepped up its missile strikes on Ukraine in the last few days.
While it's been using precision-guided long-range missiles against high-value targets since the beginning, they've proven highly effective and virtually impossible to intercept.
Meanwhile, very disturbing development.
Russia demands Lithuania lift openly hostile blockade.
The Russian Foreign Ministry has responded to Lithuania's partial blockade of Kaliningrad, writing in a statement they consider the provocative measure to be openly hostile, warning the Kremlin may take action to protect its national interests.
Colin Grant is sandwiched between the EU and NATO members Poland and Lithuania, where supplies from Russia are delivered by rail and gas through Lithuania, which announced last week it was banning the rail transit of goods subject to EU sanctions, including coal, advanced technology, metals, and construction of materials.
This is very bad.
If, in the near future, cargo transit between the Kaliningrad region and the rest of the territory of the Russian Federation through Lithuania is not restored in full, Russia reserves the right to take action to protect its national interests.
Earlier, the Kremlin called Lithuania's announcement unprecedented in a violation of everything there is.
The situation is more than serious and requires a deep analysis before formulating any measures and decisions at the Kremlin's spokesman.
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielas Landsbergas said they were simply complying with sanctions imposed by the EU, taken after consultation with the European Commission and under its guidelines.
Sanctioned goods will no longer be allowed to transit Lithuanian territory.
The Kalingrad governor said the ban, confirmed on Friday, affects roughly 50% of all imports.
Here you see the location of Kalingrad.
The Baltic EU NATO member Lithuania has implemented the ban after transport authorities initially announced a provocative measure on Friday.
This is very, very disturbing.
I can't think of a shorter route to World War III than what's going on here.
Very disturbing.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, I thought we were going to do good news, and then instantly it changed to the other kind of news.
Yeah, there was some other good news.
On Friday, I did a great interview with Jeremy Nell, the guy that operates the Germ Warfare website, an hour-long interview on TNT Radio that's posted at Principia Scientific.
We kind of discovered the roots of my, we discussed the roots of my red pill, which occurred actually in 1972.
And interesting discussion.
He said afterwards he wants me to do an hour-long on his channel on nothing but 9-1-1.
So we're going to go completely in-depth on that.
That'll be able to really expand what people's knowledge of how we got into this mess.
Then also over the weekend there was a GOP conference in Houston.
And they had John Cornyn, who's the red flag Cornyn man, who's going to save us from cowboys having guns.
And when they bowed him up on the virtual display, it was nothing but solid boos all the way through his quote presentation to the whole entire 5,500 people that were there at that convention.
So he's very much hated.
I've been in Dialogue with the people that are in charge of the state GOP.
And I said, we need to have an emergency session of our state legislature and pass a bill.
Number one, no vaccines, no mandates for vaccines.
And we need to have a constitutional amendment in Texas, which we could put on the ballot and vote in November to have a recall petitions and recall elections for senators that misbehave.
And then in the range of other good news, Le Pen ended up getting enough votes from Macron's party that she's now going to be the kingmaker in Paris and France.
And so expect Paris and France to have quite a few differing opinions from what the EU is trying to force down our throats.
And if Lithuania thinks they're going to get away with this for very long, they haven't looked across the border at what's happening in Ukraine because Ukraine's getting their butt kicked.
According to Alex Christophe, for how he pronounces his name, I don't speak Greek.
But anyhow, according to him, they've lost over 50% of the NATO weapons that have been shipped to them.
And it's only getting worse.
Carl, your thoughts?
Absolutely.
Fascinating developments, gentlemen.
Great stories, Jim.
This is so much more interesting than what you're going to get on corporate media.
So the first part with 50 plus generals and military leaders killed, people need to really think of that as that if we were reporting on Star Wars, the Dark Fleet, the Dark Forces had 50 generals killed.
That Would be a good thing.
And the reason why that is accurate is because what we're talking about, the Ukraine was color revolutionized in 14 and 16.
They're the ones who have killed 14,000 people plus in the breakaway Donbass region that don't want to be governed.
By those NATO puppets for good reason.
They don't want to be under their dictates.
So that story, if true, does emphasize in war the vitality of intelligence.
And one of the ways that you get intelligence is through a spy network.
And, you know, live and learn.
And it's usually live and learn with the results because you get a bunch of your guys killed that you learned a lesson in war.
So, this is a war, and blockades are normal.
Now, the response that I recommend that people at least include in their tool belt of responses is just to, as always, flip the script, and that the people telling us the story of the need for war, those are the war criminals.
The NATO, the US, UK, those guys are the most vicious leaders of the most deadly rogue state empire in world history.
Carl B. Herman Blackspot, any of these shows, US Illegal is the documentary series.
And I just want to point out the similarity that I see as a history teacher of a blockade that led to another big war, World War I. My two grandfathers were lied into that war after the sinking of the Lusitania In 16?
And we were told, my two grandfathers were told, that that's somehow a national security threat to the U.S.?
My two grandfathers were promised a war to end all wars.
A war to make the world safe for democracy.
These guys are fucking liars!
And you should take it as personal as your own family members being lied to into war.
And the Lusitania was carrying weapons of war in its haul, which made it a legitimate target for the U2s.
Joe anticipated our story.
Macron shocked as Le Pen's party makes huge gains, going from 8 to 88 seats.
President Macron has lost his majority in the National Assembly.
Le Pen International Rally Party turned eight parliamentary seats into a whopping 88.
His Ensemble Party was reduced to 245, well short of the 289 required for a working majority.
National Rally can now form a parliamentary group for the first time since 1986.
This parliamentary group will be by far the largest in the history of our political family, said Le Pen, and will function as a firm opposition to Macron without connivance and respect for the institutions.
Experts were stunned.
As to how she ended up winning 88 seats given her party's first-round score suggests a considerably lower figure.
Here you see the massive changes.
Minus 99, plus 80, plus 77, minus 68.
Matthew Gallard, Research Director at Ipsos Trans, lamented how blocking the extreme right at all costs no longer works at the local level.
In the context of these face-offs, ensemble voters abstain.
French newspapers reacted to the result by asserting France is now ungovernable after a political earthquake.
Macron's Prime Minister, Elizabeth Warren, reacted badly, saying that the proper functioning democracy was no longer possible, that it represented a risk for France.
This situation represents a risk for our country, given the risk we're facing nationally and internationally.
We'll work as of tomorrow to build a working majority.
Macron will have to also work with the far-left leader, Jean-Luc Monseron, who formed a coalition of leftist parties and wound up with winning 131 seats.
Back in 2020, Le Pen had called for a national referendum to stop what you call the submersion of France via a globalist program of mass immigration.
So, I agree, Joe, this is a welcome development.
Your thoughts?
Oh yes, Le Monde says that according to initial results, French Ensemble only won 234 seats compared with its previous 346 seats, and that in order to have control over the debate, they needed to have 289 seats.
Other results show that Le Pen won 89 seats, so that's the updated current total.
Yeah, this is enough to really upset the apple cart over there in France, and Couldn't happen to a better, nicer bunch of yellow vest denying plutocrats that they end up having to struggle to get every bill passed and have to have public debate on everything and no more of this autocratic micron-macron dictates.
I agree.
This is the most welcome development, Carl.
I offer it as a paradox.
First part of the paradox is exactly what you are saying, that this is a huge signal.
It is a signal that in France, the policies of globalism, of lockdowns, of forced injection of experimental products, that in France now, Macron is merde.
And the other side of the paradox is, is that again, Suggest and what I do is always take a step back and to recognize that in France.
Both political parties, all political parties, the ones who are not calling out these lie-started, obviously illegal wars of aggression led by the US and the UK, but enabled by these politicians in France who vote to support it, who fund it, who offer troops, who don't call out the obvious.
This is a NATO nation that has participated in this color revolution of Ukraine at the source of the entire war.
I don't care who the political parties are in France, if they're lying about this huge war crime in the room, then it's just theater.
Well, I agree this is going to shake the New World Order applecart.
Macron was a fresh world leader right out of the World Economic Forum, and he appears to be suffering defeats.
Meanwhile, a mystery blade engulfed Russia's largest gas field, shedding flames into the inferno.
It's going to cause a further shortage of Europe gas supply.
Here you see some of the effects of what took place.
A friend with good connection suggests it was done by weapons that are satellite-mounted and may have been done by the United States.
And should it turn out the Russians are able to sort this out, don't be surprised if there were a strike, even in the United States.
And I suggest if they're going to take out the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., let's throw Langley into the mix.
That would be doing the world a great – a major benefit.
They shied away from explaining what knock-on effect the blaze would have on gas supplies in Europe.
But meanwhile, Russia has had to cut its natural gas to Germany and Italy already by 40%.
This is ironic.
Russia's state-owned natural gas company has been forced to reduce pumping through the Nord Stream by 40% because Canada will not return a remanufactured gas compressor pump from Montreal because of sanctions.
The remaining pumps cannot continue to handle the full load of 167 million cubic meters of gas per day.
It has to be scaled back.
Siemens Energies said a gas turbine powering a compressor on the Nord Stream had been in service more than 10 years and had to be taken to Montreal for a scheduled overhaul.
Because of economic sanctions imposed by Canada, the company has been unable to return the overhaul turbine.
Thus, Europe will only be able to get 100 million cubic meters instead of its needed 167.
The price for European gas, of course, is surging because of the 40% cut.
Russian gas supply to Europe fell further.
The guts come as Nord Stream 1 is set to undergo annual maintenance on July 11 through 21, when supply will be cut off entirely.
Hal Turner, who is well known for his radio show, offered the following editorial opinion.
Once again, Western economic sanctions imposed against Russia backfired and hurt only the West.
It should be noted, recently, German Chancellor Scholz publicly stated Germany was going to rebuild its army into the largest in Europe, which has not been the case since the time of Hitler and where the Germans have had a free ride since World War II by the U.S.
sustaining the defense of Europe via NATO.
One wonders how Germany plans to build such an army when it doesn't even have enough natural gas to run the country.
Those imposing the economic sanctions against Russia really do seem to me to be some special kind of stupid.
Meanwhile, US oil companies blast Biden for threatening them as though they were responsible when it was Biden who shut down the XL pipeline, rescinded the permits to drill on public land, and brought about this calamity.
Biden, however, wrote a letter to the nation's energy companies claiming they were price gouging and the companies have slapped back.
We're going to make sure everyone knows Exxon profit.
Exxon made more money than God last year, said Biden.
But the fact of the matter is, in 2020, Exxon lost $22.4 billion.
The federal government, by contrast, made $25.8 billion on gas taxes.
Imagine how much Biden and company are raking in right now.
No letter of speech or any form of communication would be complete without blaming Biden.
That's what he did.
A portion of the letter reads, there is no question that Vladimir Putin is principally responsible for the intense financial pain the American people and their families are bearing.
This is just insulting for him to make this claim.
Your companies and others have an opportunity to take immediate action to increase the supply of gasoline, diesel, and other refined products you are producing.
Meanwhile, Yavor Vlas tweets, the more the White House antagonizes the American oil country industry with cheap attacks, like the soundbite Exxon makes more money than God, the worse it will look when Biden travels to Saudi Arabia to kiss her ass and ask for more oil, which he's in the process of doing.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, you know, the smartest thing Putin could do at this point is just to say, all right, I'm washing my hands of you Europeans.
I've tried to Cooperate with you every way possible and just say, why don't you go the rest of the summer without any gas and then we'll talk.
It wouldn't take two weeks of them having no gas at all in Europe before the whole place was marching in the streets in their yellow vests.
But just to show you how stupid the directed narrative is, yeah, two articles at the Conservative Treehouse.
To NBC, NEC Director Brian Ducey explains that the Biden inflation strategy, raise taxes, take over drug prices and subsidize in energy costs.
What Chris Chuck Todd said on MSNBC is that If you adjust the current gas prices to inflation, it really hasn't gone up that much.
It's like, give me a freaking break.
It's causing inflation.
Oh yeah, yeah.
How dumb is that?
That is the whole damn point!
Yeah, no kidding.
And then you have Secretary Yellen, what an idiot!
A Janet Yellen idiot says with a straight face that the U.S.
energy policy, which includes massive amounts of crushing new regulations from Biden, is not responsible for the oil and gas prices.
No, it's probably those fairies and unicorns that we've been so worried about in the past.
These people are idiots and they're evil, so let's just get over it.
Oh, I couldn't agree more.
And she's even talking about a gas tax holiday, which is about 18.9 cents a gallon, which is well over five in some states, six or more, which is just a short term solution.
It's going to be negligible in terms of the expense of the consumer, and it's going to shortchange the highway fund.
that comes from the gas tax.
So these people have no idea which end is up.
This is embarrassingly bad.
It's a clown show at the expense of the American people.
Carl.
Well, with our first story, this is war.
And part of what you do in a war is you destroy the resources of your opponent.
And part of the bigger picture to always keep in mind is what is it we're really seeing here?
Who's in charge?
So are these just black hats who give hopium to patriots to freeze them in this black hat quicksand while they close the deal and shut it down and finish eliminating 90% of us?
Or is there a reason for hope that these are white hats executing the show and what we're seeing is the reason why this has taken so long, because all these deadly plans that would accomplish what our opponents wanted, they wanted to cull about 90% of us and then create GMO modified servants for the other 10%.
For the second story, the Biden actor, so You guys are right.
This is just perfect political, typical bullshit.
Always blame your other... whatever is going on, blame your political opponents, blame foreign actors, and finally blame acts of God or unicorns or fairies.
They'll never take responsibility for anything, but I'll tell you this.
Once we get a critical mass to arrest these lying psychopaths, then we will have very interesting news shows about potential, or perhaps already realized, sources of what is called free energy, which would truly be exciting.
Yes, I don't understand why the Democrats haven't gone in that direction, Carl.
What they're doing is so stupid.
Meanwhile, a very sad story.
A leftist Brazilian mom kills her kid with a CoronaVax.
She took video of a girl getting the shot, while the girl declared she trusts her mom more than the president of Brazil.
Then more video taken of the girl at home vomiting.
The video ends with fairly loud audio of the mom crying and her daughter dead.
Meanwhile, that's not science-esque conjecture, Senator Rand Paul blasts Tony the Rat over COVID boosters for kids, which are 100% unwarranted.
This is grotesque.
Senator Rand Paul and St.
Anthony Fauci, peace be upon him, had another verbal sparring match Thursday, and it was just as amazing as previous.
Dr. Fauci may have tested positive for the China virus Wednesday, but he was still well enough to appear via Zoom at a Senate hearing on the COVID pandemic response.
One of the questions Senator Paul had was about boosters for children age 5 and up.
Senator Paul asked the science himself, Dr. Fauci, if there were any actual proof that boosters for children do anything beneficial.
He even made it absurd by asking if there should be a recommendation for 10 boosters for kids.
Then cited the data, the risk for teenage boys in particular with these shots.
Here's how it went.
Here's the thing.
You're not willing to be honest with the American people, said Rand Paul.
For example, 75% of kids have had the disease.
Why is the CDC not including this in their data?
You could ask the question.
You could do laboratory tests to find out who had it and who hasn't.
What is the incidence of hospitalization and death for children who've been infected Subsequently, going to the hospital or dying.
What is the possibility of your kid having COVID?
75% of the country has had COVID.
The chance of my child going to the hospital or dying.
That is the single relevant question in making a decision of whether or not to subject your child to this shot.
Senator Paul summed up this part of the exchange in a single tweet without the prevaricating authoritarian smurfs obfuscation by citing data regarding 40 and 50 years old, which is completely irrelevant.
This exchange comes just as FDA announced that their vaccine advisory panel unanimously recommended Pfizer and Moderna shots at lower doses for babies, toddlers, and preschoolers.
They want to kill them all.
Pfizer has proposed a three-dose regimen, one-tenth the strength of the adult, with the first two three weeks apart, and the third two months after the second, while the Moderna jabs will be two doses four weeks apart, for kids between six months and six years, at one-quarter the strength of the adult dose, which is much stronger than the adult Pfizer.
Many COVID-terrified co-op parents have been anxiously awaiting the approval of the shots for children under five so they can do for them what the Brazilian mom did for hers.
For some time, despite consistent data showing children at the lowest risk for complications or death from the virus, Another question Senator Paul had was whether or not Fauci had ever received royalty payments.
Look at how he evades that.
Despite his recent diagnosis of the Wuhan wheezer, Fauci was pretty feisty and insisted, according to the regulations, those who receive royalties are not even required to divulge that information on financial statements.
Get this.
Hear it for yourself.
Senator Paul.
Dr. Fauci, the government recommends everybody take a booster over age five.
Are you aware of any studies that show reduction in hospitalization or death for children who take a booster?
Right now, there's not enough data that has been accumulated, Senator Paul, to indicate that that's the case.
I believe that the recommendation that was made was based on the assumption that if you look at the morbidity and mortality So there are no studies, and Americans should all know this, there are no studies on children showing a reduction in hospitalization or death with taking a booster.
The only studies that were permitted, the only studies that were presented, were antibody studies.
So they say if we give you a booster you make antibodies.
Now, a lot of scientists would question whether or not that's proof of efficacy of a vaccine.
If I give you 10, or if I give a patient 10 mRNA vaccines, and they make protein each time, or they make antibody each time, is that proof that we should give 10 boosters, Dr. Fauci?
No, I think that is somewhat of an absurd exaggeration.
Well, that is the proof that you use.
Your committees use that.
That's the only proof you have to tell children to take a booster is that they make antibodies.
So it's not an absurdity.
You're already at like five boosters for people.
You've had, you know, two or three boosters.
It's like, where is the proof?
Now, I think there is probably some indication for older folks that have some risk factors.
For younger folks, there's not.
But here's the other thing.
There are some risk factors for the vaccine.
So, the risk of myocarditis with a second dose for adolescent boys, 12 to 24, is about 80 in a million.
This is both from the CDC and from the Israeli study.
It's also in the VAER study.
Remarkably similar.
Four boys.
Much higher from boys than girls and much higher than the background.
The background's about two.
So there is risk and there are risks and you're telling everybody in America just blindly go out there because we made antibodies.
So it is not an absurd corollary to say if you have 10.
In fact, you probably make antibodies if you get a hundred boosters.
Alright?
That's not science.
That's conjecture and we should not be making public policy on it.
So Senator Paul, if I might respond to that.
We just heard in his opening statement, Ranking Member Burr, talk about his staff who went to Israel.
And if you look at the data from Israel, the boosts, both the third shot boost and the fourth shot boost, was associated with a clear-cut clinical effect, mostly in elderly people, but also as they gathered more data, even in people in the 40s and the 50s.
So there is clinical data.
But not in children.
Well, see, here's the thing is you're not willing to be honest with the American peoples.
So, for example, 75% of kids have had the disease.
Why is the CDC not including this in the data?
You can ask the question.
You can do laboratory tests to find out who's had it and who hasn't had the disease.
What is the incidence of hospitalization and death for children who've been infected with COVID?
If you look at the number of deaths in pediatrics, Senator, you can see that there are more deaths in pediatrics.
Of people who have had it?
COVID, which is 75% of the country said COVID, what is the chance that my child's going to the hospital or dying?
If you look at the number of deaths in pediatrics, Senator, you can see that there are more deaths of people who have had it, of people who have had the disease.
Senator, we also know from other studies that the optimal degree of protection when you get infection is to get vaccinated after infection.
And in fact, showing reinfection in the era of Omicron and the sublineages, But you can't answer the question I asked.
The question I asked is how many kids are dying and how many kids are going to the hospital who've already had COVID?
The answer may be zero, but you're not even giving us the data because you have so much wanted to protect everybody from all the data because we're not smart enough to look at the data.
When you released data earlier, when the CDC released the data, they left out the category of 18 to 49 on whether or not there was a health benefit for for adults 18 to 49.
Why was it left out?
When critics finally complained, it was finally included because there was no health benefit from taking a booster between the 18 to 49 in the CDC study.
Another question for you.
The NIH continues to refuse to voluntarily divulge the names of scientists who receive royalties and from which companies.
Over the period of time from 2010 to 2016, 27,000 royalty payments were paid to 1,800 NIH employees.
We know that, not because you told us, but because we forced you to tell us through the Freedom of Information Act.
Over $193 million was given to these 1,800 employees.
Can you tell me that you have not received a royalty from any entity that you ever oversaw the distribution of money in research grants?
Well, first of all, let's talk about royalties.
That's the question.
No, that's the question.
Have you ever received a royalty payment from a company that you later oversaw money going to that company?
You know, I don't know is a fact, but I doubt it.
Well, here's the thing is, why don't you let us know?
Why don't you reveal how much you've gotten and from what entities?
The NIH refuses.
Look, we ask them.
We ask them.
The NIH, we ask them whether or not who got it and how much.
They refuse to tell us.
They send it redacted.
Here's what I want to know.
It's not just about you.
Everybody on the Vaccine Committee, have any of them ever received money from the people who make vaccines?
Can you tell me that?
Can you tell me if anybody on the vaccine approval committees ever received any money from people like the vaccine?
Soundbite number one, are you going to let me answer a question?
Okay, so let me give you some information.
First of all, According to the regulations, people who receive royalties are not required to divulge them, even on their financial statement, according to the Bayh-Dole Act.
So let me give you some example.
from 2015 to 2020, the only royalties I have was my lab and I made a monoclonal antibody for use in vitro reagent that had nothing to do with patients.
And during that period of time, my royalties ranged from $21 a year to $1,700 a year.
dollars a year to $700 a year, and the average per year was $191.46.
It's all redacted, and you can't get any information on the 1,800 scientists.
So we want to know whether or not people got money from the people who made the manufactured vaccine.
Joe, I ran that because Fauci is such a disgusting cretin and the idea that he is, you know, responsible for health in America is just beyond belief.
Your thoughts?
Oh, he's a genocidal garden gnome and he's aided by a criminal syndicate that covers absolutely every branch of the medical industry.
Uh, had an interesting thing from the American Board of Internal Medicine.
A couple of days ago, they sent a notice to Dr. Peter McCullough, the most published cardiologist in the history of the world, and Oh, you stupid thing.
Why does it want me to send it to Twitter?
And notifying that they were going to investigate him and possibly remove him.
And so here's his response on Twitter.
He says, calling out the A-B-I-M and the A-M-A, Medical Society and the boards.
Come out of the propaganda shadows and face me and my colleagues in the open.
Let's get it on.
In a fair review of pandemic data therapies and the mandated products, I call for these days of yore.
And then, a couple of days later, they just did the same thing.
The same A-B-I-M When after Dr. Pierre Corey threatening to remove his medical license, detailing multiple public statements that he's made about misinformation, whichever they try to investigate me, I have massive evidence to support each one of my statements.
Bring it on!
And then, these were both posted at Steve Kirsch's site, K-I-R-S-C-H, who I highly recommend, but then he had one that's just really bombshell on this kid's stuff.
And it's a doctor.
I'm trying to find her exact post, but I may not be able to.
I took notes on it, so let's see.
Yes, Dr. Claire, C-L-A-R-E, Craig, in a four-minute video, went through an analysis of the, quote, FDA-approved submission for the Jabs Against Children of the Pfizer vaccine.
4,500 children were in these, Three months long trial, 3,000 of them dropped out.
I wonder why, because they probably didn't get placebos, and they probably ended up having reactions, and their mommies didn't want to force them to get another one.
And then, by the time you shake down all the rest of the data from the people that had too many reactions, It turns out that this decision is based on less than a dozen kids total out of their experimental animals that they treated and it's absolutely shocking four minute long video.
I will put it down in the comment section so that other people can share this evidence.
Please, please do Joe.
That's just disgusting.
Carl.
Wow.
Well, going back to stuff Jim had asked, how come the Dems don't say anything about alternative energy research and neither side is ever going to say anything about it?
Because remember, the war is on us.
We're, we're their, their opponent.
So they don't want to, if they, if we broke out to free energy, then they're, we would be outside their control.
So Rand Paul, another paradox, some great points, great questions.
75% apparently have already been exposed, but On the other side too, so that part is great, and the other part is that I hate to say crisis actor, but it's a controlled opposition question, because if he really wanted to have it be go time, as a member of Congress, they can have access to the unredacted emails for their oversight.
He should find out what was in Fauci's Heavily redacted emails, including everything about the origin of the virus.
If he really wanted to go strong, he could call out the fraud in Pfizer's trials.
Karl B. Herman, blogspot any of these shows, my best shot is sufficient documentation of that.
If you really wanted to say something important, he could say, you know, we know the VAERS data represent 1 to 10% of the result.
They're saying 20,000 deaths connected to the vaccine, so that means 200,000 to 2 million.
He could make that statement.
He could talk about the Medicare raw data from Thomas Wren's case.
But instead, he chooses pediatric pericarditis going up to 80 incidences per million.
So he chooses a statistical effect that is only going to be for one in about 12,000 kids.
So he's pulling his punches.
And that's what I see.
Very good.
I like all that, Carl.
Very, very good.
Yes.
Meanwhile, Ron Johnson.
U.S.
enemies are taking advantage of Biden's general weakness.
Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, of whom I'm very proud, said adversaries are taking advantage of Biden's weakness with regard to his domestic and foreign policies.
Just about everything he's done as president has weakened this country, no doubt about it.
He then listed, from the opening of our borders, a massive plot of illegal immigrants for your high inflation, record gas prices, high energy prices, rising crime, the embarrassing and dangerous surrender in Afghanistan.
Our adversaries see it, how weak we've been, our inability to respond, and they'll take advantage of it.
Several experts in international politics have also touted his analysis.
Columbia University professor Andrew Nathan wrote in Foreign Policy Magazine, China is confident in the U.S.
decline and unwilling to rock the boat.
When your enemy is destroying himself, why interfere?
Nathan mentioned the catastrophic U.S.
withdrawal from Afghanistan, the political paralysis and widening polarization of the Biden era, What President Xi has seen out of Biden is again the embarrassing surrender in Afghanistan and that we did not provide Ukraine with the type of lethal defensive weaponry they needed.
Meanwhile, Liz Cheney, this is another positive development, has a 10% chance of being re-elected according to prediction market rights all upon it.
Actually, 10% is a ridiculous estimate.
Her odds couldn't be higher than 1%, realistically.
Even that feels generous, though I suppose we should give her a 1 in 100 chance, simply on the strength of residual fondness for Dick Cheney among Wyoming Republicans.
These national numbers don't bode well for victory in a Republican primary in the reddest state in the country.
Nearly 6 in 10 Democrats—58%—have a favorable view of Liz, compared with only 18% of Republicans.
Americans overall are split 35 to 37.
A week ago, I might have given her a 3% chance because of the vagaries of primary voting in Wyoming, Voters can re-register as members of the other party on primary day and vote in that primary.
Conceivably, she could eke out a win by combining massive voter turnout among Democrats in her favor with a solid base of support among centrist Republicans.
But, even in the best of circumstances, pulling that off would be the political equivalent of a straight flog.
Per NRO, there are 197,868 registered Republicans in Wyoming, 44,643 registered Democrats, and 35,324 registered Independents.
in Wyoming, 44,643 registered Democrats, and 35,324 registered independents.
In other words, even if every Democrat and independent combined it, that's like 80,000.
Turned out for the GOP re-registered, voted for Cheney.
She'd still need a solid 30% of Republicans to win.
A 3% chance is frankly optimistic.
Meanwhile, Ted Cruz says observe Adam Kissinger and Liz Cheney, who are on the January 6th committee, are not Republicans.
Why would I watch a January 6th hearings?
I don't watch the Democrat National Convention.
That is a multi-day political campaign ad.
It's designed to be propaganda.
And that is exactly right.
It was going on with a January 6th committee.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, we have a sad case of Ron Johnson, who's been right on so many things, being completely tone-deaf on this Ukraine issue, along with DJT, the orange man bad.
Yeah, both of them are popping off about, oh, if we'd have got in there earlier with a whole bunch more weapons, well, Russia wouldn't have done this aggression.
No, if we wouldn't have overthrown their government in 2014 and allowed them to have massacres for the last eight years, maybe then we wouldn't have had this problem over in Ukraine.
Wake the hell up, you two idiots!
And as far as Cheney, couldn't happen to a more deserving little witch.
And her chances in Wyoming are absolutely zero.
So yeah, I can't wait for her to be flushed.
And I can't wait for us to flush the rest of the stolen seats from the 2000 mules.
And that was the other great thing that happened in the Houston convention was that they voted unanimously to state that President selected resident of the White House, FJB, had a stolen election and it is a fraudulent usurper.
We had a coup on November 3rd and we had another coup by the same group on January 6th.
And these SOBs are fixing to get caught out every way from Sunday. - Carl, your thoughts? - Yeah, I hope that is true.
So, Ron Johnson, again, a paradox on the one hand.
Awesome!
That is great that he is talking about the borders, that he's talking about inflation, he's talking about Afghanistan.
Strong points.
On the you-could-use-a-stronger-script-pal side is that, you know, I bet that he could articulate crimes that are happening at the borders with the U.S., opening up the floodgates.
I'm sure that there are a lot of crimes that he could call out the FJB administration for.
Inflation?
Man, my colleague Dennis Kucinich from Monetary Reform, he introduced bills to Congress.
So we do have Solutions and to just allow inflation to go on and on and on.
You take a look at this growth rate of inflation over time.
It's tragic comic.
And for Afghanistan to not call out Biden as a war criminal.
I mean, it's such an easy target.
So, you know, again, I see it as interesting theater and we should be talking about it.
But still, the gap is huge from what corporate media are going to say and what we're going to say.
And Liz Cheney, you know, here's what I think corporate media is going to do with her, is that they're going to say something like, you know, We had President Trump instead of President Jeb Bush because of Bush fatigue.
And it seems like Liz Cheney has the same problem.
Cheney fatigue.
And then the two pundits will say, isn't it a shame?
They say, yes, it's a shame.
And America's going in the wrong direction to this disinformation.
And that's why we need the KGB.
I mean, the DGB, the Disinformation Governance Board, to keep good patriots like Liz Cheney Well, well said, Carl.
Well said.
I think you got that exactly right.
Meanwhile, Hillary's ridiculed for attacking Republicans for having the strategy to win the presidential election by virtue of winning the Electoral College.
This is about as absurd as it gets.
She reminds me she won the popular by nearly three million, but lost the electoral by 7%.
Biden won the popular by more than seven but barely scraped the electoral college by 43.
Hillary reacted by saying, that tells you everything you need to know about Republican strategy for 2024.
In terms of Republican strategy for 2024, writes the Financial Times, she believes they will focus on winning the Electoral College, given the size of the Democrats' victory in the popular vote in the past two elections.
On the subject of Roe v. Wade possibly being overturned, Hillary said, The level of insidious rulemaking to further oppress women almost knows no hand, adding that if Roe were overturned, it would make the Handmaid's Tale writer Margaret Atwood a prophet.
Hillary was lampooned for attempting to vilify Republicans for carrying out the alleged crime of trying to win the election by winning the Electoral College.
Numerous online commentators pointed out the basic civic lesson that a presidential candidate who wins the Electoral College, not the popular vote, wins the election as long as he has at least 270 electoral votes.
A financial tab published an interview with Hillary.
Interviewer Edward Luce told this story about how he promised his nine-year-old daughter Hillary would prevail over Trump in 2016.
Hillary responded she'd heard numerous stories.
She claimed the 2016 election is like a work of fiction, set in modern times, and 2016 is a traumatic event.
It's also almost eschatological, meaning A belief concerning death, the end of the world, or the ultimate destiny of mankind.
Just absurd.
The Twitter reaction was outrageous.
Columnist Steve Beckett added, does Hillary still not understand the rules of presidential elections?
It's obviously none of my business, but I'm not sure Republicans are going to try to win the Electoral College's cutting-edge commentary.
And the Democrats, meanwhile, will focus on the popular vote so they can continue to complain about the Electoral College after they lose commentator Jim Treacher.
Yeah, winning the Electoral College is how it works.
Kentucky State Senator Patrick Flannery.
Really bold strategy.
Why didn't I think of that?
Attorney Damon Toll.
So the 2024 strategy is to win the election?
Laura Kay Barr.
Was this not her strategy too?
It all makes sense now.
Twitter user Mark.
In terms of strategy, if the Yankees make the World Series, they're going to focus on winning four games instead of scoring the most runs.
After losing the 2016 to Trump, Hillary called for the Electoral College to be abolished.
I think it needs to be elected, she said in 2017.
I'd like to see us move beyond it.
Yes.
Joe, this is just absurd.
Hillary complaining that the Republicans are going for wins in the Electoral College.
I mean, how dumb is that?
Well, it's only been happening for about 200 years.
They had a really horrible election in 1876 where we elected Rutherford E. Hayes that probably involved 15% vote fraud in that particular election.
History Guy, who's one of the guys I follow on YouTube, has a great channel.
And he does probably about a video every two weeks or so.
But in addition to that, in that same interview, interestingly enough, I saw the name Edward Luce, L-U-C-E, and I thought immediately of Henry Luce, the bones and skull and bones man who was in charge of Time magazine, who co-conspired with William F. the bones and skull and bones man who was in charge of Time magazine, who co-conspired with William F. Buckley to make sure that America had two margins of acceptable political thought, and one of them was the Fabian socialist Buckley as opposed and one of them was
But anyhow, so leaving that aside, the thing that was really amazing in the interview is that she said that the Democratic Party had tried to appeal to too many marginalized communities and that it was affecting their message.
And the two groups that she picked on were trans and BLM.
And like the guy said, you know, I don't think that calling J.K.
Rawlings a Nazi is an effective strategy.
And the funny thing about trans Every trans operation involves two sexes changing from one sex to another, and neither one of them can complete the job because after they're finished, both of the sex changes that are contemplated end up neutering the people involved.
So you don't actually ever change your sex.
The DNA is in every cell of your body.
Good point.
Good point, Joe.
Carl?
Those were funny responses to Clinton.
So what we have going on here is that the The Clinton camp and our opponents, they're creating a narrative that those on the right are insurrectionists.
They have stolen the 2016 election away from Clinton.
So, if they have no fact to support what they're saying, then they're just gonna bullshit.
And they're counting on people not understanding the content of what is said.
They're just creating a mood and a rhythm and a background narrative so that the sheeple seem to remember Hillary saying something like, yeah I think the 2016 was stolen too and they're just cheaters and they're planning to steal it again because Hillary got more votes!
That's the point that they want to keep reminding the people of, that Hillary should have been president, and eschatological.
You know, if the White Hats have won, that would be funny, because in that case, it would be true, and that she would have been arrested behind the scenes, we can only hope.
Well, for Hillary, it was the end of the world when she didn't become president.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk tells Twitter staff he'll allow pretty outrageous tweets in a leaked video.
That's called freedom of speech.
Abortion of billionaire tech interpreters, Musk called when Twitter employees were released Thursday, where he said he believed people should be allowed to say pretty outrageous things as long as it's legal.
I think people should be allowed to say pretty outrageous things that are in the bounds of the law but don't get amplified and don't get a ton of reach.
According to a video released by Project Veritas, Musk, who's attempting to merge his Twitter for $44 billion, was speaking during a Twitter all-hands meeting.
I think an important goal for Twitter would be really try to include as much of the country, as much of the world as possible and go to the next level.
I think the potential is there for Twitter to be accessible to an order of magnitude more people.
Let's say the far left 10%, the far right 10% were equally upset.
That would probably be a good outcome.
Elaborating further, he said Twitter should meet a standard to keep Twitter users very entertained and informed above all else, rather than employ policies that not offend certain people.
Musk was answering a series of questions from employees working at the San Francisco based tech firm.
In April, Musk and Twitter announced he'd be purchasing the country.
The deal would take months to complete.
The top leadership team is still intact, but the deal hit a snag when it turned out that Twitter wasn't providing enough data on bots or automated and AI-driven accounts.
For example, Joe Biden's account was half artificial, not real followers.
Musk alleged there have been far more bought accounts than Twitter has let on.
Musk, the world's richest man, which I don't believe for a second Jeff Bezos has got to be richer and they're not even talking about the Rothschild family, has often criticized Twitter's policies, saying its staff holds biases against half the country, meaning conservatives.
A platform cannot be considered inclusive or fair if it's biased against half the country.
Twitter account Libs of TikTok said it has received numerous death threats, even in recent days.
I now have received about a dozen death threats after radical leftists accused me of being a domestic terrorist extremist.
Twitter user Libs of TikTok wrote, Twitter has not removed any of the accounts of those who sent the threat.
Must ask why?
Why haven't they been removed?
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, there's an amazing number of problems with Twitter.
First of all, it doesn't appear that they've ever been able to successfully have a profitable month, much less a profitable quarter.
And then it appears that maybe 50% of their people registered are bots.
And so you got a little bit of an issue there.
And yeah, it's a dying Industry, what I think is really hilarious is that with the same 44 billion dollars and the tech companies that Elon Musk has already built up, he could just show the books on how horrible Twitter actually is, let it collapse, and then start his own social media company where he has his own servers and he has complete control over it.
So if you want to believe that he's not a world economic forum puppet and that he really wants to do the best for humanity, which is a little bit of a stretch, But if he really wanted to do that, for a fraction of the amount of money, he could start with a clean sheet and people would flock to it.
Look at the way they're flocking to Gab and Truth Social is another phony baloney website that's being sponsored by the Orange Man.
But there's certainly space as Facebook and the other social media platforms are collapsing instantaneously.
So don't care for Twitter.
Carl, your thoughts?
Well, I thought that was a fascinating construction that Musk made.
So he's saying that people can say outrageous stuff that's legal, but that it doesn't get amplified.
So he just made, if you read this text, he made an argument for censorship.
And, you know, down the road, he'll say that, you know, we allow outrageous content here on Twitter, we support the First Amendment, and you know, even though we don't let that stuff get amplified.
They can post it, but we just don't let it get amplified.
And even though these people who make these outrageous, white supremacist, hateful claims, they might not be safe walking down the street, BLM, wink wink.
But they can say it here at Twitter.
So it's, I don't know what to say, except I know what I read and I know what he said, that he just doesn't want bad speech amplified and who's going to be the determiner of bad and good.
I read it differently, Carl.
I thought he was saying those who are right now marginalized and don't have the opportunity for their voice to be amplified are going to have the opportunity to have a platform.
After all, freedom of speech is to protect unpopular speech.
Popular speech doesn't need any defense.
So I thought he's moving in the right direction.
I believe he's a sincere guy, and he really does want to promote freedom of speech.
And I think because Twitter is, you know, a mechanism that we're habitually used to, that if he can make it, reform it, and make it do the job, that's all to the good, as I see it.
Meanwhile, Texas GOP passes resolution declaring Biden not legitimately elected.
Texas Republicans passed a resolution saying Joe Biden was not legitimately elected and that there was substantial election fraud in key metropolitan areas.
We believe the 2020 election violated Articles 1 and 2 of the Constitution that various secretaries of state illegally circumvented their state legislatures in conducting their elections in multiple ways, including by allowing ballots to be received after November 3rd.
Stated the resolution.
We believe substantial election fraud in key metropolitan areas significantly affected the results in five key states in favor of Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.
We reject the certified results of the 2020 election.
We hold that acting President Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.
was not legitimately elected by the people of the United States.
The state's GOP, the largest in the nation, passed a resolution after delegates sat through a screening of 2,000 mu walls.
The movie features the undercover investigative work of David Lora, citizen investigator, Arizona State Senate candidate Gary Snyder, as well as investigation conducted by the election integrity organization Truth of Hope.
Described as an expose of widespread coordinated voter fraud, the movie draws on cell phone location data, paired with video surveillance footage, That not just allegedly, but in fact, shows a cohort of people dropping ballots off at boxes situated outdoors on an average of more than 20 times a piece.
They were dubbed by the investigators as mules.
While some states allow people to gather ballots and drop them off, the volume of ballots inserted in the boxes, the fact that they went to multiple boxes to drop ballots off, show what happened was illegal.
The mules are instructed to do three votes over here, five votes over there, ten votes over there, spread it out, so as not to raise eyebrows and not to raise suspicions.
And D'Souza, Dinesh D'Souza, the scale of the operation was enough to tip the 2020 election, and it was only one way, one of the mechanisms that Democrats used to steal the election of 2020.
The approved platform also recommends numerous measures to bolster election integrity, including by implementing voter photo ID and in-person voting and tightening the voter registration process.
Other issues endorsed in the latest platform include a call to abolish abortion, preserve gun rights, remove Marxist ideology and critical race theory from schools, and ban gender modification for children All of which I agree with, with the exception that I believe a woman should have the right to choose.
James Will Selleck, Communication Director for the Republican Party of Texas, said 5,500 delegates attended, which offers Republicans an opportunity to set priorities for the next legislative session in 2023 and elect party leaders.
Remember, The Republican Party of Texas is a grassroots party.
It doesn't belong to me, the governor, or senators, or congressmen, or any elected official.
This is your party.
According to the National Archives, of course, Biden received 306 electoral votes and Trump only 232.
Trump and conservatives have alleged since then the substantial fraud effect of the outcome.
The Texas GOP called on voting conservatives in the state to work to overwhelm any possibility of voter fraud.
We strongly urge all Republicans to work to ensure election integrity.
Jump to vote on November 2022.
Bring your friends, family, volunteer for your local Republicans to overwhelm any possible fraud.
And by the way, the enormity of the fraud is reflected by what Sidney Powell tweeted at the time.
The actual results of the election Red from coast to coast.
I had been predicting that both California and Minnesota would go for Trump, as indeed they did.
We received 410 votes to Biden, a puny 128.
This will probably get removed, so share as much as possible.
This is what people in Germany saw before the Dominion servers were seized.
The fraud was massive.
Shame on these people.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, I attended my first True the Vote meeting in January of 2011.
The guest speaker was Larry Bell, an architecture instructor at University of Houston who just published a book called Climate of Corruption.
They allowed me to speak for about 10 minutes about the climate fraud, the stuff that Larry Bell didn't understand because he's not a scientist.
But then I also spoke to Kathleen Engelbright and the other co-founder of True the Vote for about an hour afterwards about what really happened at 9-1-1.
And this is back in 2011.
I attended additional meetings with True the Vote.
And then in 2015, I attended, since then, I've attended about a dozen meetings with Dr. Laura Presley, PhD in chemistry from UT, who owned four patents on chemical systems software in refineries.
And she was independently, not wealthy, but she was independently sourced.
So she ran for city council in Austin, where she had her seat stolen by Hart InterCivic machines using Dominion software.
So she was an activist.
I heard her speak at about a dozen different events, including a public hearing at the Secretary of State's office in August 15th of 2016, a public hearing at the Secretary of State's office on August 15th of 2016, where we submitted over 300 pages of evidence to the appointed director of elections, who happened to be a former Rose Law Firm lawyer.
According to Mike Lindell, at least a half dozen U.S. House seats were stolen from Republican candidates in the 2020 election in Texas, and they also stole over a million votes from the MAGUS column in order to make it look like he had and they also stole over a million votes from the MAGUS column in order to make it look
And to think that these clowns are going to solve any of these problems is absolutely ridiculous, because our Uniparney rhinos in Texas enjoy rigged elections because they get to pick who the rhinos are going to be in the primary.
And they're more than happy to split Texas 51% with the rhinos and 49% with the dinos so they can keep this false dichotomy going.
Absolutely a sham.
Well, that's not encouraging.
Carl, your thoughts?
Or best of times and worst of times.
So, first, you know, nice resolution, but, you know, these are a bunch of leaders and they say, they put in the word, we believe.
So, nobody had something better to propose than that?
Like, we provide the following evidence, and they didn't even talk about any evidence of election fraud in the article.
So, they could have passed that to True the Vote, since they saw the documentary, and said, here's the evidence, and then made the important Significant leap to, you know, they said, believe in election fraud, but if you factually assert it, and then you call for arrest, that's really what we need.
And finally, the last paragraph of that article with that GOP leader saying this is your party.
Yeah, okay, but if you leave out the little parts of the history of, like, for example, the Bush family, the war criminals, and the JFK assassin, and you leave that part out, like, this is your party without cleaning that up, it's still...
Very troubling.
And finally, that Sidney Powell communication with that graphic of the United States red and blue.
Yeah, if we can get the truth, then we're going to see that level of a wipeout, the greatest wipeout in presidential election history by a margin of somewhere between 3 to 1 and 4 to 1.
Yeah, this is why they won't let us even talk about it, because they know it's all precarious and ready to crumble, with a least whiff.
We want to hear from you, send fan mail, pro or con, to LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnowAtGmail.com.
Check out the video on Jim Stone regarding food shortage.
Stone is infamous for fear-mongering, but this seems legit and seems to be set for August.
Has it been planned?
I would say yes.
$12 to produce a dozen eggs is beyond outrageous.
With a cattle die-off in Nebraska and Kansas, beef will be skyrocket beyond the ridiculously high price at the moment.
Happy to not eat beef.
A barman's prep would be rice, beans, water, and cheap canned goods.
I do have some powdered milk, eggs, and peanut butter on hand.
Who knows how long it will last?
This could be the demanded one's way to declare martial law.
I doubt they will let Americans starve, but since nothing follows logic any longer, all bets are off.
I would think, considering the last couple of years of madness, the last thing these lowlife vermin want on their hands is a starving population.
I have no doubt, frankly, that's what we're going to get.
Meanwhile, Western financial hallucination crashes into reality with Benjamin Fulford.
No matter how hard you try to avoid reality, it eventually catches up to you.
This is the lesson of the privately owned Western central banks, now learning as their fiat money hallucination crashes into the real world.
The across-the-board collapse in financial markets seen recently is no ordinary market move.
It is a systems collapse.
The Dow Jones Industrial has been down 11 out of the past 12 weeks, something that has never happened before.
The closest was a great crash in 1929 when it fell 10 out of 11 weeks.
Normally, when stocks fall, bonds rise as people rush to safety.
U.S.
treasuries are having their biggest collapse since Nixon took the U.S.
dollar off the gold standard in the early 1970s.
Cryptocurrency markets are, for their part, are down two-thirds from their peak and have evaporated $2 trillion in imaginary money.
The consensus among stock financial industry veterans is stocks are going to fall 90% before this ends.
Today, June 20th, All financial markets in the U.S.
are closed, supposedly, for the Juneteenth holiday.
However, since the summer solstice on June 21st is a key day for satanic sacrifices, CIA sources say they are.
The remainder of this article only available to those who follow.
Meanwhile, Ryan Davidson and I did our Law Enforcement False Flag Stage Event Checklist.
You can find it on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
A checklist for law enforcement guidelines in detecting and exposing stage events and false flags that are being used to deceive and mislead the public.
You can download it from the site.
Please share this as far and wide as you can, beginning with your county, sheriff, and local police departments.
There's a ghost of a chance it just might make a difference.
Time is short.
They want to take our guns.
Act now!
Meanwhile, 1% control the world, 4% are their babas, 90% are asleep, 5% know and try to wake the 90%, 1% use a 4% to prevent a 5% from waking up the 90%.
use a 4% to prevent a 5% from waking up to 90%.
Final thoughts, Joe, yours. - Yes, well, we had a record number of black on black shootings over the Juneteenth weekend.
So that gives you a little idea about how they like to celebrate things.
And then I wrote a great article back at the start of the pandemic lockdowns called Remember the Alamode Review.
It was live from Dealey Plaza.
With Shelly Luther who was thrown in jail for a week because she cut hair two days before Grab It Abbott, our governor, said she could.
Interesting article.
It was published at James Fetzer's website and then surprisingly enough a couple of days later It was posted at the Texas AMA newsletter, and it's really surprising because I was very critical of the national AMA and also the state licensing board for doctors and pharmacists here in Texas, so that was a little bit surprising.
But one of the things that I had linked in there was a This is a video tape that was about a 90 minute long video by Aaron and Melissa Dykes who operate Truthstream Media and it was called Future Wars 2025 and this is a NASA presentation that was four hours long with over a hundred different slides that was
Explaining that in order to have continuation of government, the government was going to have to induce trauma-based mind control on the people.
And when I went to look that up yesterday on Google, I couldn't find it anywhere using the actual title and Truthstream Media or Melissa Dykes.
The only way I could find it is it accidentally popped up under my Remember the Alamode article.
So I'll I'll see if I can get the YouTube link for that.
If it hasn't been taken down, possibly a rumble if that's where we need to go.
But you need to see this because these are the people that are supposedly telling us the honest story about stars and, you know, the history of our planet and global warming and all the rest of this stuff.
And here they are actively being a part of the planning for continuance of government by trauma-based mind control.
And that can't be anything good for any of us.
You got that right.
Carl, your final thoughts.
We are in World War III, and what we're seeing are all of the aspects of our opponents' attacks.
And remember, we are the opponent.
We are one of the objectives to kill about 90% of us and then to alter, genetically modify the rest of them to the rest of the remaining sheeple to best serve as work animals and literal and figurative food.
To the elite.
We're seeing the tools of a pandemic economic lockdown, the forced injections of whatever it is that they say, and then however many boosters you need for public health because it doesn't work unless everyone gets it.
We're seeing the digital pass, we're seeing the DKG, the Disinformation Governance Board, election fraud, the open borders as a flood to the bottom, creating violent gangs that would work for money.
So these are on-call Militia or military paramilitary forces of the Empire that you could just go ahead and pay mercenaries.
You're seeing, yet to see, but probably pretty soon, a crash and then the WEF is going to be touted as the only solution to own nothing and be happy.
We're with Benjamin Fulford.
I've followed his work for probably a decade, and he has fascinating chatter with the prospect that there are white hats working behind the scenes.
But even as Benjamin Fulford says, and I would say too, is believe it when you see it.
And finally, yes, they have to take away our guns because we are their opponent.
And of course, you're going to want to disarm your opponent And we're being attacked indirectly to literally have false flag events about the narrative of killing children, and they for sure, you know, kill real children too, to be able to trick us to have us disarm so that they can more easily conquer us.
Well, excellent comments today from Carl Herman in San Ramon, California, and Joe Olson in Houston, Texas.
I think Carl's got a key point there.
They'd like to take our guns, but I don't think they have a ghost of a chance of doing it.
Americans know too much better what's going on here.
When the governor of Washington State declared he was going to ban guns, there was a huge surge, a run on the stores for every gun and every bullet they could get a hold of.
Bear in mind, they're trying to play us with the false flags and the crisis actors, but Harrison Hanks and I did a really enjoyable interview on Saturday—you can find it on my BitchU channel—about how it's done, and how astutely Harrison has been in outing the crisis actors, including the parents at Uvalde.
This is one you don't want to miss.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your family, your friends, and people you love and care about.
What's going on in Lithuania is a very bad sign.
So while we got a mix of positive, like Le Pen making gains in France, and taking out 50 generals or more by the Russians, Who are doing a great job.
It looks as though we may have to slog our way at home.
We may have to find our own way, and it may be up to the American people to do it.
There aren't any white hats, unless you count we ourselves, responding to the situation as Americans, our forefathers did at Lexington and Concord.
Don't let yourself be played.
▲
Export Selection