All Episodes
Previous Next
June 19, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:11
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (18 June 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back, folks, to Truth vs. News Incorporated here.
This is Saturday, the 18th evening, hot Saturday night show, and Jim is just really rolling, and we've got reasons to be concerned about what's going on in that first hour.
It's really heavy, folks.
We are a target.
Aren't we, Jim?
Yeah, it's crazy.
We're having some technical glitches tonight.
Meanwhile, here we go.
Here's part of the presentation where Rand Paul is grilling Tony the Rat.
- Check it out. - Senator Paul. - Dr. Fauci, the government recommends everybody take a booster over age five, Are you aware of any studies that show reduction in hospitalization or death for children who take a booster?
Right now, there's not enough data that has been accumulated, Senator Paul, to indicate that that's the case.
I believe that the recommendation that was made was based on the assumption that if you look at the morbidity and mortality, Of children within each of the age groups, you know, 0 to 5, 5 to 11.
So there are no studies, and Americans should all know this, there are no studies on children showing a reduction in hospitalization or death with taking a booster.
The only studies that were permitted, the only studies that were presented, were antibody studies.
So they say, if we give you a booster, you make antibodies.
Now, a lot of scientists would question whether or not that's proof of efficacy of a vaccine.
If I give you 10, or if I give a patient 10 mRNA vaccines, and they make protein each time, or they make antibody each time, is that proof that we should give 10 boosters, Dr. Fauci?
No, I think that is somewhat of an absurd exaggeration.
Well, that is the proof that you use.
Your committees use that.
That's the only proof you have to tell children to take a booster is that they make antibodies.
So it's not an absurdity.
You're already at like five boosters for people.
You've had, you know, two or three boosters.
It's like, where is the proof?
Now I think there is probably some indication for older folks that have some risk factors.
For younger folks, there's not.
But here's the other thing.
There are some risk factors for the vaccine.
So the risk of myocarditis with a second dose for adolescent boys 12 to 24 is about 80 in a million.
This is both from the CDC and from the Israeli study.
It's also in the VAER study.
Remarkably similar.
Four boys.
Much higher from boys than girls and much higher than the background.
The background's about two.
Per million.
So there is risk and there are risks and you're telling everybody in America just blindly go out there because we made antibodies so it is not an absurd corollary to say if you have 10.
In fact, you probably make antibodies if you get a hundred boosters.
Alright?
That's not science.
That's conjecture and we should not be making public policy on it.
So, Senator Paul, if I might respond to that, we just heard in his opening statement, Ranking Member Burr talk about his staff who went to Israel.
And if you look at the data from Israel, the boosts, both the third shot boost and the fourth shot boost, was associated with a clear-cut clinical effect mostly in elderly people but also as they gathered more data even in people in the 40s and the 50s.
So there is clinical data.
But not in children.
Well, see, here's the thing is you're not willing to be honest with the American people.
So, for example, 75% of kids have had the disease.
Why is the CDC not including this in the data?
You can ask the question.
You can do laboratory tests to find out who's had it and who hasn't had the disease.
What is the incidence of hospitalization and death for children who've been infected with COVID?
Subsequently going to the hospital or dying.
What is the possibility, if your kid has had COVID, which is 75% of the country has had COVID, what is the chance that my child is going to the hospital or dying?
If you look at the number of deaths in pediatrics, Senator, you can see that there are more deaths in pediatrics.
Of people who have had it?
Of people who have had the disease?
Senator, we also know from other studies that the optimal degree of protection when you get infection is to get vaccinated after infection and in fact showing reinfection in the era of Omicron and the sub lineages But you can't answer the question I asked.
The question I asked is how many kids are dying and how many kids are going to the hospital who've already had COVID?
The answer may be zero, but you're not even giving us the data because you have so much wanted to protect everybody from all the data because we're not smart enough to look at the data.
When you released data earlier, when the CDC released the data, they left out the category of 18 to 49 on whether or not there was a health benefit for for adults 18 to 49.
Why was it left out?
When critics finally complained, it was finally included because there was no health benefit from taking a booster between the 18 to 49 in the CDC study.
Another question for you.
The NIH continues to refuse to voluntarily divulge the names of scientists who receive royalties and from which companies.
Over the period of time from 2010 to 2016, 27,000 royalty payments were paid to 1,800 NIH employees.
We know that, not because you told us, but because we forced you to tell us through the Freedom of Information Act.
Over $193 million was given to these 1,800 employees.
Can you tell me that you have not received a royalty from any entity that you ever oversaw the distribution of money in research grants?
Well, first of all, let's talk about royalties.
That's the question.
No, that's the question.
Have you ever received a royalty payment from a company that you later oversaw money going to that company?
You know, I don't know is a fact, but I doubt it.
Well, here's the thing is, why don't you let us know?
Why don't you reveal how much you've gotten and from what entities?
The NIH refuses.
Look, we ask them.
We ask them.
The NIH, we ask them whether or not who got it and how much.
They refuse to tell us.
They send it redacted.
Here's what I want to know.
It's not just about you.
Everybody on the Vaccine Committee, have any of them ever received money from the people who make vaccines?
Can you tell me that?
Can you tell me if anybody on the Vaccine Approval Committees ever received any money from people who make the vaccines?
Are you going to let me answer a question?
Soundbite, number one, are you going to let me answer a question?
Okay, so let me give you some information.
First of all, According to the regulations, people who receive royalties are not required to divulge them, even on their financial statement, according to the Bayh-Dole Act.
So let me give you some example.
from 2015 to 2020, the only royalties I have was my lab and I made a monoclonal antibody for use in vitro reagent that had nothing to do with patients.
And during that period of time, my royalties ranged from $21 a year to $1,700 a year.
a year to $700 a year, and the average per year was $191.46.
It's all redacted, and you can't get any information on the 1,800 scientists.
So we want to know whether or not people got money from the people who made the manufactured vaccine.
Senator Paul, your time is long over expired.
I gave you an additional two and a half minutes.
The witness has responded.
We are going to move on.
Well, if that was a response from a witness, you can see what a prevaricator he is.
How invasive.
Get this.
Leftist Brazilian mom kills her kid with a CoronaVax.
She took video of her girl getting the shot while the girl declared she trusted her mom more than Bolsonaro.
Then, more video is taken of the girl at home vomiting.
The video ends with fairly loud audio of the mom crying, girl dead.
Unbelievable.
It's gonna happen here a lot.
Scott, your thoughts?
Yeah, it's the tragic genocide of the United States.
It's the greatest trigger to a revolution that we could ever have.
The murder of our children, the murder of our families, the forced suicide that the government imposes on people using a DNA-altering experimental substance.
I've seen videos of parents with their children and they're crying and they're saying don't do it.
I mean, this is remarkable.
When this explodes, and it is slowly exploding, it's going to cause a lot of deaths.
I could easily see parents, fathers especially, killing doctors, killing nurses, killing people who forced them to get this shot.
You know, I listen to Rand Paul and I give him a B because he asks some good questions, but he doesn't ask some of the most important questions like, what about Ron Johnson's interview with the military scientists who brought in all of the exponentially high degrees of neurological disorder and stillbirths and brain palsy or facial palsy like Justin Bieber just has?
What about all these side effects?
Why isn't Rand Paul talking about that?
I don't give a shit about Fauci's royalties.
I mean, the sooner he's dead, the better.
But I want someone with some passion and with an A-plus personality to go, we are murdering people.
Here are all the facts.
Here's Mayors.
Why isn't Rand Paul bringing Senator Ron Johnson's material in?
And all these doctors.
Why isn't Tenpenny and Mikovits?
Mikovits can expose Fauci in the most foul, clear, truthful way.
I don't see this.
I see song and dance routines.
I see Paul dancing around this thing.
This is all nonsense.
This is all playing a flute to people that are following the Pied Piper to their own oblivion.
This is the existential end of the white Anglo-Saxon race, in particular in America, that they're pushing on every children between 0 and 12.
And we're allowing it to happen.
The only thing I can justify and explain it is it is the spiritual curse upon this country for decades of abortion, decades of homosexuality, decades of war, decades of idolatry, and every foul form of spiritual worship and prostitution that this country has done.
I see this coming back To destroy this country and present company excluded, but I think like you said before, Jim, we're going to witness in the next few years an absolute decimation of this country, but we're not going to be out of the dark ages.
No, we're actually going to be thrust into a dark age with all of the other compounding situational factors and environmental factors.
With the absence of food, you're going to have famine, you're going to have energy supplies low, you may even have war, you may have a Chinese situation developed, This country seems to be being prepared for an absolute fall, and this COVID-19 seems to be the indicator.
And it astounds me the level of stupidity of all these people that are getting it.
It's almost like they are spiritually dead or worshiping death.
And they're running to get this vaccine and people in my own family have gotten it and it just, you know, they're changed as a result of it too.
Their minds are changed and I've never been more sickened and ashamed of this country and its people as a nation of idiots Than I am right now when I see so many people running to get this vaccine.
It's not a vaccine.
And overwhelmingly, you see everybody who gets this is becoming weaker, sickly, stupid, and inevitably gonna die.
Jim?
I wish I could argue with you about this, Scott, but I think you got it exactly right.
Hawley, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think I saw some news today where they either did or they're working on getting the approval for six-month-old babies now for the job, so I think that actually... They voted on it unanimously.
The advisory board, Rand Paul was asking whether they get royalties.
They voted unanimously to authorize it, Holly.
So we knew that they were going to try to add it to like the vaccine schedule because then they can have the immunity and go through the vaccine courts and everything.
That was been a setup for decades where they're talking about SIDS, the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome.
Now I've got Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.
If people can't see how the literally the two acronyms are basically the same at this point.
Gives anyone a heads up as to what we're dealing with here.
People my age and people I see on social media.
People are just suddenly dropping dead and I've complained about this before where it's like I'll see young people die and we're not allowed to discuss like how they died.
Like people They get upset like if you ask like how did this person just die in their sleep or whatever they're like oh it's disrespectful it's rude you know disrespectful to the families and I don't know if they act like it's like an overdose or something like we'll never know with a lot of these people because there's a strange cultural phenomenon that I see now where people don't want to discuss how people die at this point particularly young people which
I would think you'd want to know how people would die to prevent something like that, but we're also seeing as far as just people becoming ill from all this, people being maimed, the insurance companies having to pay out, they're just hemorrhaging money, they're gonna have to figure out some way to block people or raise the premiums for people who have got this.
And folks, she's talking about people getting, what, three or four jabs or something at this point?
God help those people.
I think this is like some sort of Munchausen or masochism or Munchausen by proxy.
Like, there's got to be something psychologically wrong with people that want to get, you know, think that four or five shots in a way it's like they're almost like bug chasers or something.
They want to get sick or they want to get people sick.
I don't even know what to think at this point.
Oh, it's an attempt to kill them, Holly.
If they miss with a first shot, give them a second or third.
I mean, you might as well be talking about the use of a rifle.
They're just as worried, you know, if you're still alive after they've shot you, they're going to have to shoot you again.
I mean, it's as plain as the nose on your face.
It is disgusting.
Meanwhile, Ron Johnson.
U.S.
enemies are taking advantage of Biden's general weakness.
Ron Johnson is doing good.
I agree with you, Scott.
Senator Ron Johnson reported Friday adversaries of the U.S.
are taking advantage of Biden's general weakness with regard to his domestic and foreign policies.
Just about everything Biden has done as president is weak in this country, you said.
Absolutely right.
He went on to list, from the opening of our borders, the massive flood of illegal immigrants, four-year high inflation, record gasoline prices, high energy prices, rising crime, the embarrassing and dangerous surrender in Afghanistan.
Our adversaries see it.
How weak we've been, our inability to respond, and they'll take advantage of it.
Several experts have also touted Johnson's analysis.
Columbia University professor Andrew Notham wrote in Foreign Policy Magazine, China is confident the U.S.
is declining and unwilling to rock the boat.
When your enemy is destroying himself, don't interfere.
Nathan mentioned the catastrophic withdrawal from Afghanistan, the political paralysis and widening polarization of the Biden era, as recent China views the U.S.
as weak.
What President Xi has seen out of Biden is, again, an embarrassing surrender to Afghanistan, not providing Ukraine with lethal defense weaponry, That they need it.
When I asked my host, Greta Von Sostren, if she supports the Taiwan Policy Act of 2022 introduced by Lindsey Graham and Bob Menendez, Johnson said it pans and comes down to spending.
If they can find something that is like real spending to offset it, it would be something I'd consider.
But what we should be doing is providing democracies with a defense of the lethal weaponry to defend themselves.
Scott, your thoughts?
You know, the saddest thing is this country has lost its mind and soul by being stupid enough to export its core military necessities to be manufactured in Taiwan.
You do not manufacture one damn thing in Taiwan that has any relevance or application to our military systems.
You do it in the United States, whether it's Silicon Valley or Colorado or who knows where, you do it in our own country.
The fact that this country even went that and did that and allows this, where now Taiwan manufactures the computer chips, And if they went down or were encircled or were blown up and vaporized, suddenly all the United States would have no capability of its computer chips being manufactured?
We're done!
So, you know, the country is indeed committing suicide.
And you can follow through.
Who did this policy?
Was it Clinton?
Was it before?
But China is recognizing, yes, and it is aggressively engaging in asymmetric warfare against the United States.
That's where the whole push for critical race theory and homosexuality and the breakup of the family, those are all pillars of the Communist Party manifesto.
They want to engage in psychological warfare and divide and conquer techniques.
That's one of the reasons that they mapped out the United States of America and have categorically rated the governors of each state as being pro-friendly to China or not friendly to China.
Meaning, who can we bribe?
Who can we sell little girls to?
Who can we take photographs or pornographic stuff with?
Who can we give money to?
Hunter Biden!
Who can we control?
Gavin Newsom!
So the Chinese are masters At the 100-year analysis and strategic targeting of a country, and they have been the ones who've been inserting the cultural decay by allowance of our own communist left-wing lunatic sympathizers.
That's why the Chinese go on to TikTok, and they measure the sexual degeneracy and mental degeneracy and schizophrenia in this country, particularly its youth, By analyzing the TikTok videos, what region are these videos being made in?
What states are they being made in?
What are the subjects?
What is the psychological profile of the subjects?
They map these out, and they statistically can get a sense of the social psychological currents
Moving in the United States, and they can therefore determine what states, what populations have the most robust patriotic capabilities of fighting versus those that are knuckle-dragging, retard, purple-haired, multiple-piercing, sexually schizophrenic slaves that they don't need even go near, like Chaz, Seattle versus Idaho.
So the Chinese are mapping out this country.
They are constantly engaged in asymmetric warfare.
And if you listen to people like Mike Adams and others, they're talking about the Chinese are going to be doing a military invasion of California before November.
Now, I don't know if that would happen.
I have a hard time digesting that because I know California and other places that have a lot of guns and people can quickly go into Patriot Minuteman mode.
And there's nothing they'd enjoy more than killing Chinese soldiers who had the stupidity and gall to come into San Francisco.
But that may be coming, because again, I wouldn't put it past Joe Biden and Gavin Newsom to purposefully sell the country down the river and destroy the country.
And they've done it by destroying our military with a COVID-19 shot, They've done it by bringing up all these illegal aliens from south of the border that they'll replenish the military with.
They could easily establish a martial law, a foreign military presence using either UN as well, but a foreign military presence to engage in a series of totalitarian activities against our own public.
These days are coming, and that's why I think the only thing that can overthrow it is a complete abandonment of federalism and a complete social revolution in this country that overthrows all federal power and returns it to the states and the communities and the citizens.
Jim?
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think it's become more and more obvious that the election was rigged to put Biden into the sea in order to destroy the United States, I think.
I don't think there's any doubt about that.
At first, maybe I thought maybe it was just put into, you know, weaken the United States, but now I really see this whole thing's meant to just completely destroy the United States and whether they, you know, whether it's some sort of ultimate world war or a reset, a currency reset.
So the federal reserve and like the central banks are saying they need to make things really bad as far as the U S dollar to collapse it so that they can bring in like a crypto currency, basically, where they're going to say, you know, everyone take a, you know, here's a 10,000 digital dollars you know, here's a 10,000 digital dollars or whatever.
Like I do is sign the dotted line, you know, stop using actual cash.
And then from there, they can really control people through like the social credit system.
But so I don't know if it's going to be a hot war or just an economic, not just an economic war.
I mean, people starve to death and freeze to death, uh, and many people can die just as easily as that, so I don't really know in what front.
I think they've, they're juggling multiple projects at this point, and like you said, real-time, uh, strategy and, you know, probably analyzing videos like ours and analyzing, of course, you know, TikTok and All the social media to see what you know, which is most favorable to them using these algorithms.
So we got to remain on our toes.
I recommend people read books like The Art of War and other like things so we can all try to stay like 10 steps ahead of all this because I think they will try to play it out depending on how they think they'll be most successful, you know to try to collapse the United States, unfortunately.
Excellent, excellent, excellent comments, Holly.
Meanwhile, Liz Cheney has a 10% chance of being re-elected according to prediction markets.
Her odds can't be higher than 1% realistically.
10% is a ridiculous estimate.
Even that feels generous, though I suppose we should give her a 1 in 100 chance of prevailing simply on the strength of residual fondness for Dick Cheney among Wyoming Republicans.
These national numbers don't bode well for victory in a Republican primary in the reddest state in the country.
YouGov America tweets?
Nearly 6 in 10 Democrats, 58%, have a favorable view of Lynne Cheney, compared with 18% of Republicans.
Americans overall are split, 35 to 37.
Most Democrats have a favorable view.
Here's a breakdown.
U.S.
adult citizens, very or somewhat favorable, 35.
Very or somewhat unfavorable, 37.
Don't know, 28.
Democrats, 58%.
Somewhat or very favorable, 22%.
Somewhat or very unfavorable, 21%.
don't know 28.
Democrats, 58%, somewhat are very favorable, 22%, somewhat are very unfavorable, 21% don't know.
Independents, 29% favorable, 40% Republicans 18% favorable, 59% unfavorable, 24% don't know.
No, Republicans, 18% favorable, 59% unfavorable, 24% don't know.
A few weeks ago, I might have given her a 3% chance of winning because of the vagaries of primary voting in Wyoming.
Voters there can re-register as members of the other party on primary day and vote in that primary country.
Conceivably, Cheney could eke out a win by combining massive turnout among Democrats in her favor with a solid base of support among centrist Republicans.
But even in the best of circumstances, pulling that off would be the political equivalent of a royal straight flush.
Per NRO, there are 197,868 registered Republicans in the state of Wyoming, 47,643 registered Democrats, and 35,324 registered Independents.
registered Republicans in the state of Wyoming, 47,643 registered Democrats, and 35,324 registered independents.
In other words, the state is so lopsidedly Republican that even if every Democrat or independent turned out in the GOP primary, re-registered, and voted for Cheney, she'd still need a solid 30% of Republicans to win.
A 3% chance is frankly optimistic under these circumstances.
But now that Tom Rice, another pro-impeachment GOP-er, has faced Republican voters in his South Carolina district and been crushed, it's down to 1% of pits.
Rice's district isn't as red as Cheney's, he hasn't antagonized Trump nearly as much as she has, and he still couldn't crack 25% in his own district.
My guess is Cheney is staring at a 50-point margin of defeat in her primary or thereabout.
And as David Axelrod says in a clip, every day there's a televised January 6th committee hearing.
The margin probably grows by a few votes.
Cheney does get a consolation prize, though.
Those watching the January 6 hearings have grown more supportive of what the committee is doing, even Republicans.
You Gov tweets?
By 52 to 34 percent, Americans approve of the House Committee investigating the January 6 Capitol takeover.
No, that's ridiculous.
The fact of the matter is that they're losing viewers.
They're having to cut the golf instead of staying on the January 6th because no one wants to watch it.
This is just ridiculous.
From the moment she decided to vote for impeachment and speak out against Trump, Cheney implicitly made a bargain.
Namely, she'd sacrifice her career in return for ultimately ending Trump's.
Half of that bargain will be fulfilled when Wyoming holds its primary.
Whether the other half is fulfilled depends on voters in 2024.
But she's doing what she can via the January 6th hearing to make sure that it is.
Meanwhile, here is a tweet from the recount.
Senator Ted Cruz claims Representatives Adam Kissinger and Liz Cheney are not Republicans, though there are two on the January 6th committee, of course.
Why would I watch a January 6th hearings?
I don't watch the Democrat National Convention either.
That's a multi-day political campaign ad.
It is designed to be propaganda, about which I agree.
With Ted Cruz, 100%.
We lost Scott.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think I tried for a minute to watch some of the hearings.
Like you said, it's just an opportunity to try to fundraise, try to, like, scare people, try to get them to, you know, get this boogeyman or something.
We've got all these insurrectionists in the United States and Democrats are actually doing something.
So it's they're trying to make it a distraction while, you know, like I said, there's all this pain at the pump and food prices and, you know, people just dropping dead right now for multiple reasons.
So even just the depression of, you know, the recession that we're in at this point, they're going to try anything to make it seem like Democrats are doing something.
And that's why they have this still going on.
Yeah, it's not working.
It's not playing.
It's Marfsville.
Anyone who watches can see it's propaganda.
There isn't a single word of truth coming out of the January 6 hearings.
It's pure, unadulterated bullshit.
I am staggered by the extent and the detail with which they're shoveling shit.
Meanwhile, here we have Well, if you are asking why DeSantis won't get with a program to jab every man, woman, and child in America, the real question is why the 49 other governors have, especially Republicans.
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis may be the only sane governor in the country.
All of the others, whether Republican or Democrat, pre-ordered COVID jabs for kids under the age of five.
Meanwhile, DeSantis is being attacked by corporate media.
According to the Miami Herald, Every state has placed an order with the federal government to ensure coronavirus vaccines for young children are delivered as soon as regulators authorize their use.
They can't wait to kill them.
Except for one.
Florida missed a Tuesday deadline to request delivery of COVID-19 pediatric vaccines for children under five, guaranteeing a delay in access for parents across the state, according to two U.S.
government sources.
Other 49 states placed pre-orders, which will be delivered in two tranches beginning as early as Monday, to thousands of pediatricians' offices, children's hospitals, pharmacies, and health centers across the country.
Those facilities in Florida will not have access during this time and will remain without supply until Florida places an order.
I say thank God for Florida!
Thank God for DeSantis.
He's protecting the children and families of Florida.
Jeremy Redfern, press secretary for the Florida Department of Health, confirmed the department chose not to participate in the vaccination program because the state health department is not following federal public health recommendations.
The Florida Department of Health has made it clear to the federal government that states do not need to be involved in the convoluted vaccine distribution process, especially when the federal government has a track record of developing inconsistent and unsustainable COVID-19 policies.
The Miami Herald is not alone in posting vax-friendly hit pieces against Florida and Desantis.
But a funny thing happened that may have caught corporate media by surprise.
The people of Florida aren't outraged.
In fact, even Democrats, who are actively opposed to DeSantis, haven't made a big fuss about it.
Why?
Because it appears that people aren't nearly as concerned about jabbing little kids as media and government want them to be.
Lest we forget, COVID poses such an infinitesimal risk to young children that it's almost statistically insignificant.
Daniel Horowitz tweets, it's a disgrace that every single governor except DeSantis has put in an order for Pfizer's kill shots for babies.
Rather than be distracted by soap opera news, this is what every red state conservative must be focused on.
These governors must be made to give an account for genocide.
Sadly, responses to the statement that any death of any young child is statistically insignificant will draw predictable responses.
They'll say, if only one child can be saved or no child's death is insignificant, These emotion-driven responses may actually hold some weight if it weren't for two facts.
First, the jabs don't work anywhere near what we're being told, let alone the promise of 100% effective.
That dominated narratives for weeks when the jabs were first rolled out.
Second, and this is a big one, The intentionally blurry statistics surrounding vaccine adverse reactions indicate more kids and young adults die from the jab than from COVID itself.
These safe and effective injections, as the U.S.
government and corporate media call them, are neither safe nor effective, statistically speaking.
Twitchy team tweets.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
Miami Herald's attempt to drag DeSantis over COVID-19 pediatric vaccines only makes him more popular.
Christina Bush uses lame Miami Herald pediatric vaccine hit piece on DeSantis to drag Biden and it's perfect.
Stop trying to make COVID happen again.
It's not happening.
You mad, bro?
DeSantis looks awfully good from this point of view.
Holly, your thoughts.
Yeah, I don't think that they can continue to push this, the jab or like, you know, this disease or anything like that.
I don't even think, like, the monkey pox thing is going to work.
They're trying to rename it because they're concerned it sounds, you know, offensive or something now.
Trying to keep this idea of adult The lockdowns relate to disease.
Now, I could see lockdowns for other reasons.
I think, you know, they were so successful with one round of lockdowns that they might try to come up with another reason to do lockdowns, especially if we're talking about an election coming up or, you know, if they feel like they're going to be losing control.
They probably would want to do lockdowns again just because it was so successful, but I don't think that they could really do something like that again related to, you know, coronavirus again.
Well, God knows they're going to come up with some phony harebrained excuse for lockdowns or shutting down the election.
They're for a certainty going to do it.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk tells Twitter staff he'll allow pretty outrageous tweets in a leaked video.
A portion of billionaire tech entrepreneur Elon Musk's call with Twitter employees was released Thursday, where the Tesla CEO said he believes people should be allowed to say pretty outrageous things as long as it's legal.
Sounds like free speech to me.
So I think people should be allowed to say pretty outrageous things that are in the bounds of the law, but that don't get amplified and don't get a ton of reach, he said in full, according to a video released by Project Veritas.
Musk, who's attempting to purchase Twitter for $44 billion, was speaking during a Twitter all-hands meeting.
Must get it.
I think an important goal for Twitter would really try to include as much of the country, as much of the world as possible, allowing the social media platform to really go to the next level.
I think the potential is there for Twitter to have to be accessible to an order of magnitude more people.
Let's say to the far left 10% and the far right 10% were equally upset on Twitter, then that would probably be a good outcome.
Elaborating further in the short clip released by Veritas, Musk said Twitter should meet a standard to keep Twitter users very entertained and informed above all else, rather than merely employing policies to not offend certain people.
Musk appeared to have been answering a series of questions from employees who work at the San Francisco-based tech company.
There's nothing about freedom of speech that implies you're not supposed to hurt the feelings or disagree with the sentiments of others.
That's the whole point.
Freedom of speech is to protect unpopular speech.
Popular speech doesn't require protection.
In April, Musk and Twitter jointly announced he'd purchase the company and take it private.
Such deals tend to take several weeks or months to complete.
Much of Twitter's top leadership team is still intact, with current CEO Craig Argyle at the top of the helm.
But the deal appeared to hit a snag in May after Musk said Twitter wasn't providing him with enough data on bots or animated and AI-driven accounts.
Musk has alleged that there are far more bot accounts than Twitter has let on, but in June, the company reportedly said it would provide him with spam data as part of the deal.
Musk, the world's richest man, how does he compare with Jeff Bezos, has often criticized Twitter's policies around content moderation, saying recently its staff holds biases against half the country, meaning against conservatives.
A platform cannot be considered inclusive or fair if it's biased against half the country, you said in a June 13th Twitter post.
Its popular account, Libs of TikTok, said it received numerous death threats in recent days.
I've now received about a dozen death threats after radical leftists accused me of being a domestic terrorist extremist.
Twitter user Libs of TikTok wrote, Twitter has not removed any of the accounts of those who sent the threats.
Must respond with, why?
Twitter has not immediately responded for a request for comment on the Veritas League.
Meanwhile, Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I'd like to see the opposite occur, and that is have Musk have a ass-kicking, militarily ruthless team come in and burn out the infection of liberal leftist socialists and
These Indian engineers that seem to be glorifying in their oppression of the freedom of speech, I'd like to see Musk bring in the opposite and do exactly what the leftists have done to the conservatives and Trump.
Burn out and destroy and cut off all of these Twitter accounts for every form and foul leftist Democrat idea, organization, expression, period.
Society, people, families, a country, the world is far healthier and happier and safer when these leftist radical homosexual LGBT environmental fanatics Uh, as well as the warmongering, uh, lunatics and the rhino Lindsey Graham camp.
The better and sooner they are cut off, uh, the healthier and happier all of society will be.
And I don't really care about the, well, you know, we're supposed, we, we, we don't want to stoop to that level or we want to keep it open.
No, this is information war.
And the damage and the sickness and the insanity that this leftist ideology and religion of political correctness and every other despicable thing that they've been doing, this needs to be completely purged out of society.
This is why Russia has passed a law saying there will be no homosexual propagandizing of children anywhere in Russia on any TV channel Or on any street corner or in any school or on any internet.
Not that Russian schools would do that sort of thing.
But Russia is a country and a culture and a people that seem to have a moral sense of sanity among them while everybody else in the West has lobotomized themselves with the magic fairy wand of the purple gay dinosaur and somehow some Star Trek fantasy world in the future of living off of
of uh solar panels and uh spinning uh windmills and uh all sorts of other alternative alternative green energy.
This country is sick because of the trolls and the uh stupidity and the foolish ideas and the aggression that the left Spreads through TikTok and these other mediums, so I would be in favor of completely turning the tables and eradicating every one of these leftist psychopaths from Twitter, and it would be a far better world, Jim.
Scott, I'm having a hard time disagreeing with you on these points.
Really, I mean, our cultural decay, our decadence is so overwhelming.
Russia has taken the lead.
Russia is the moral nation.
Russia is the leader of the world, in my opinion.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think, uh, Musk is, uh, pointing out the obvious, like you said, people should be allowed to say outrageous things.
So that's, that's the first amendment.
Like they said, if you're not committing a crime, you know, yelling fire in a, in a, uh, movie theater or something like that, then.
That should be free speech.
That's the First Amendment.
So I think it's kind of sad that people don't even understand that that's actually, you know, your right as part of, like, the Bill of Rights.
Like, people, especially younger people, as we have discussed before, they have no idea what their quote-unquote rights are, what the Constitution is.
So they actually cheer when these multinational corporations and Silicon Valley controls what people do and think and say online.
And they seem to love censorship.
I don't know if it's like a control or if it's like part of their emotional immaturity or something like that to see other people get punished for like doing and thinking things that are different than their own.
But as we can tell, Twitter is always picked and picks and chooses what type of harassment they allow and what kind they don't.
So it'd be one thing if they were just blanket just banning free speech in general.
But you can see like highly offensive stuff on Twitter all the time.
It's just not the agenda that's being pushed.
Good, good, good. - Yeah.
Well, as I say, freedom of speech never had a hate speech clause that you can't say things that other people hate.
And as I've observed before, they hate the truth.
So, of course, they're going to come down hard on anyone who's espousing it, who's pointing out inconvenient truths they don't want to hear.
Meanwhile, pro-choice activists are protesting in response to the leaked draft decision to overturn Roe v. Wade.
But here we have criminal defense attorneys explaining that the impact of Roe reversal will be absolutely terrifying.
The head of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers said, exposing people to new criminal penalties for abortions opens up the floodgate to over-criminalization and mass incarceration.
With the U.S.
Supreme Court's right-wing majority expected to overturn Roe v. Wade any day now, criminal defense attorneys are preparing to defend a flood of clients facing abortion-related charges and worrying about the looming decision's likely consequences.
That's according to an NPR report, which includes an interview with Elisa Wayne, executive director of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, that aired earlier this week.
Well, NACDL does not take a political position on abortion.
Wayne observed our legal concern is to make sure we are sounding an alarm about the wave of expansive prosecutions we are certain will follow any significant curtailment or reversal of Roe.
Referencing recently enacted laws in states like Texas and Oklahoma targeting people who aid and abet abortions and the potential for similar legislation elsewhere in the country, Wayne Warren were talking about the doctors reforming them, the friends, the parents, the boyfriends, all of them will be exposed to criminal penalties, which opens a floodgate to over-criminalization and mass incarceration.
The NACDL leader explained people who have or assist with abortions could place prison time with mandatory minimum, even life sentences, as she put it.
We're not talking just about fines like a traffic ticket.
We're talking about serious consequences in this country.
Poor people will be left behind.
I don't get a lawyer if I'm poor until I'm actually charged with a crime in this country in most jurisdictions, so I have to wait to that moment until I'm charged.
If I have money, however, if I have access to counsel, I get advice on the front end of being able to perhaps avoid the consequences I would face if I did not have money, no doubt about it.
The future is clear.
Should Roe be overturned, states across the nation are prepared to arrest and prosecute women, their friends, their providers, and all those who assist them to obtain what is presently a legal medical procedure.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, I've said my opinion before, you know, it's not something we're going to exhaust the time on this show with, but I think the left is totally over-exaggerating everything.
There are alternative ways, you know, to deal with this, but the bottom line, as I see it, is this.
If the citizens of a state do not want abortion in their state, and they overwhelmingly vote that way, then that should be the law of the land in that state.
If people want to get an abortion, go to another state that allows it.
But if the people of the state of Texas or Idaho or California or wherever say, no, we will not have abortion because we consider it wrong or murder.
Or whatever the excuse, we will not have it in our state.
No money will be spent on any of the materials relating to abortion.
No Planned Parenthood.
This is what democracy in a Republican form of government is all about.
The citizens of the state make the determination.
You have no right to an abortion in the federal constitution.
Nothing about the Constitution mentions abortion.
So the whole notion of privacy has been spun and twisted.
But I think it's going to come back to the states, and I don't think even states are going to criminalize mothers and people.
I think if they're wise, they'd phase it in and say, no, doctors We'll not perform this or else like a euthanasia doctor.
If a doctor performs euthanasia or kills some old guy because he wants to die early, like I think it was Dr. Kevorkian, he was prosecuted, he was thrown in jail.
So the same principle I could see applying to a doctor that does the same thing only to a baby in the womb.
As Kevorkian killed old people who wanted to die, another doctor could kill babies who don't want to die, and the same penalty could occur.
But I would just leave it at that and say this is for the states to decide, and the federal government is wise to kick it back to the states.
Jim?
Yeah, my opinion has been very clear.
I believe it should be legal, safe, and rare.
Paulie, your thoughts?
Well it sounds like from what I've heard people kind of do like the breakdown of how this would actually work if Roe v. Wade was repealed and I think both you guys are right it probably wouldn't really change that much because where the majority of like abortion availability is like California and New York and like these super liberal states that already would pass it as a state law anyway so and in these
They would probably make it more difficult or perhaps even repeal all together it's already kind of that way it's difficult to attain in those states anyway so I, it probably really wouldn't change things as far as access like they're still not going to stop if anything it's going to improve funding for Planned Parenthood etc.
So this might actually have more to do with the state's rights versus federalism, ultimately.
So this could open the door for other cases where this could be used as a precedent.
So I think in that way it is more important as a case going in front of the Supreme Court.
Well, it's surprising, but it's because of high inflation, gas prices, immigration.
It's relatively low down on the scale.
It's not the burning issue the Democrats would like it to be, because they think it's a winner for them.
But it's very clear they're going down regardless.
Candace Owens.
Parents who bring their kids to drag queen story hours should have them taken away.
Candace has been very outspoken about parents who bring their kids to events like this.
She began suggesting Pride Month should be renamed Shame Month, claiming absolute debauchery stemming from the celebrations is an attempt to program children into thinking some of the wildest of escapades are normal behavior.
She noted seeing images of children putting dollar bills in half-naked men who are dressed up like women—something underscored by the surfacing of disturbing images earlier this month—should not be encouraged.
Here's Andy Ngo tweeting.
Replying, I F him, is he a child?
A transvestite and another man were confronted outside the gay bar, Mr. Mr. in Dallas, that hosted the drag event for children.
The transvestite had performed on the walk away with a child at one point.
The drag event at the Gay Bar in Dallas was called Drag the Kids to Pride.
It was held at the Mr. Gay Bar and Club.
Children and transvestites danced in front of an electronic sign that read, It's Not Gonna Lick Itself.
Meanwhile, Candace pivoted to Drag Queen Story Hour, a phenomenon rising on the left.
She pointed to a recent report that in New York City, over $200,000 has been spent on drag queen shows in schools!
Councilwoman Vicki Palladino twits, I'm quoted in this article and I will reiterate, any school in my district participating in drag queen degeneracy risk losing their funding.
Adult drag performers have no business in our schools and they will not be in my district, period.
Meanwhile, Jason Campbell tweets, Candace Owens says parents who take their children to Drag Queen Story Hour are underqualified to have children.
They should have their children taken away from them.
Meanwhile, Candace is insinuating allowing children to attend is essentially a form of child abuse.
I allowed my child to pick their gender and pick their species, she mocked of certain parents.
And they feel proud of themselves because they can go and say this on Facebook, that they are wonderful, accepting, and loving adults.
In reality, they are underqualified to have children.
Parents like that should have their children taken away because it's child abuse.
It's child abuse to put a half-naked adult in the room with a small child and have them read a book.
It's just child abuse.
That's what it is.
Here you have a woman forcing a child to watch a pride parade.
Unbelievable.
Disgusting.
Scott, your thoughts?
Oh, real quickly, how about if your father takes a shower with his daughter?
How's that one?
I think that's pretty bad.
Well, this is worse than that, though, Don.
This is an agenda to cause sexual schizophrenia.
I've said it before.
That's what homosexuality and lesbianism and an LGDB, you know, QRS and transgenderism.
It's a form of sexual schizophrenia.
Most of these individuals have been traumatized in their past.
They've been raped by a family member and that's caused them to be psychically broken.
And they go down this road of injury and they mask it as a form of identity.
And it just, you know, there's a mental psychosis that occurs.
But this is an organized effort to normalize it and to bring in young children, impressionable children, and expose them to this vile, disgusting, abusive, you know, violent sexual masochism.
Uh is is absolutely uh sick and perverted and should be.
I agree with Candace entirely and of course again Vladimir Putin had called this wokeism and homosexuality and anti-family policy a crime against humanity.
So it's it's fascinating that Russia is the only country that has the moral character to call this perversion and to outlaw it in their country.
And America is doing this to our children.
This is the reason, in my spiritual calculus, why this country is being turned into a nation of zombies, retards, and schizophrenics.
Because they are engaged in this kind of perversion, crime against children.
God says, you offend one of these little ones, it's better for you to have a millstone tied around your neck and cast in the farthermost parts of the sea.
And I wouldn't be surprised if you have a major community backlash against these sort of activities and school boards and clubs and teachers, including violent, deadly reactions by parents and others that are not going to take this anymore, because this is Sodom and Gomorrah becoming normalized, and this country can't survive it, Jim.
Holly, your final thoughts?
Yeah, I just think, uh, well, I think we should be, I agree with Candace.
I would be wary of, you know, the state getting involved in like taking people's kids.
I'm just saying that, but, um, uh, on top of that, I think, uh, kids should not be exposed to that type of stuff, whether it's, uh, in a bar, which is illegal for them to bring children into a bar, first and foremost, no matter what is going on at the bar, you can't have kids in a bar.
And then on top of that, just access to what children can see online, whether it's a computer or a phone.
I think they said like kids like average age that they see something offensive like that is like eight years old.
And that's that's how you destroy a country and a culture and a peoples when children, you know, young children see obscenities like that.
So that's I think people need to be very wary of what kids see online and their access to phones and computers, tablets, etc.
Jim, let me say one thing too.
Billie Eilish, this young girl singer, she's in her early 20s.
I don't listen to her, but I've heard a couple of her songs, and I know of her.
But this very famous young musician, Billie Eilish, I think that's her name, she said, I watched a lot of porn when I was growing up, like 11, 12, 13, 14, and she said it destroyed me.
It harmed me deeply.
So, and she, you could tell there's something, you know, she's almost, her eyes are always dim.
She is the poster girl for how pornography and this kind of sexual degeneracy harms and rots and hollows out the core of a young person's spiritual vitality and joy towards sexual intimacy and marriage and relationships.
Pornography and this kind of derivative perversion Rots out the core of the individual and therefore the society.
Jim?
Well, I think we end on a note of unity.
I think we all agree about this issue and a good thing.
Don, take us out.
You're on mute.
You are muted.
What?
Oh, yes, I agree 100, 1000% that Pornography is a killer of the spirit and body and things, and it's terrible.
And for any president to be a pedophile and profit from it, he should not be a president one more second.
Thanks so much for watching Truth vs. News Incorporated.
This is a hot Saturday night show on the 18th of June.
We thank you for watching, folks, and we hope to see you next week.
You ain't gonna see this kind of stuff anywhere else, and it needs to be seen and clarified and actually applied.
▲
Export Selection