Need to Know News (13 June 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
|
Time
Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston, and Carl Herman in San Ramon, California.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with a January 6th panel having few records on Trump's action during the 187 minutes they're trying to turn into an insurrection, but they're not going to have much luck doing that.
The House has very few records to show what Trump did between calling supporters to peacefully protest and then telling them to leave, where they're not even admitting that he called on them to peacefully protest.
In what members have claimed was 187 minutes on January 6th of 2021, Trump's alleged actions have been pieced together largely on witness testimony rather than documentation reports from Representative Elaine Laurie of Virginia on Meet the Press.
She was asked whether the committee will provide a TikTok to show what he was doing minute by minute.
Well, I think it'd be more clear to describe it as what he was not doing, Lauria told Todd.
It's been reported previously phone logs on that date are missing information.
There's a gap.
We tried, you know, through these witnesses, we've interviewed a thousand and a lot of people who work directly at the White House.
She edited, investigated, and pieced together a very comprehensive TikTok timeline.
It's complex to piece together.
We have 187 minutes, but very few records.
Everyone who's come to speak to the committee has direct evidence of the timeframe and helpful to piece it together.
It includes a time between when Trump, speaking on the ellipse, Which was a mile and a half away from the Capitol, called on supporters to peacefully protest at the Capitol, and the 417 video telling them to leave.
In between, Trump tweeted twice, saying, Please support our Capitol police and law enforcement.
They are truly on the side of our country.
Stay peaceful at 238.
I'm asking for everyone at the Capitol to remain peaceful.
No violence.
Remember, we are the party of law and order.
Respect the law and our great men and women in blue.
Thank you.
At 3.13.
At 4.17, he posted a video telling those involved, you have to go home now.
We have to have peace.
We have to have law and order.
Liz Cheney, a disgusting cretin, one of the two anti-Trump Republicans on the committee, said back in December Trump had refused to act for 187 minutes.
When actions by a president were required, it was essential and compared by his own.
But notice what he's already done.
Cheney accused Trump of dereliction of duty by reading text messages submitted by former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows showing allies asking the president to take action during the attack.
Two key points here.
Jim Jordan says the January 6th committee didn't reveal anything new and Alan Dershowitz, the January 6th panel doctor the tape, edited Trump's own words.
Get this.
This is a Represent Thompson because he's an elderly black guy.
It's kind of a serious way of speaking.
They're using him as an agent of disinformation.
Constitutional law expert Alan Dershowitz told Newsmax that Thursday night was not a fair proceeding, one-sided and unethical.
Take, for example, Trump's speech on January 6th.
He said at the end he wanted people to show their voices patriotically and peacefully.
They doctored the tape.
They edited those words out.
If a prosecutor ever did that, they'd be disbarred.
You can't present part of the tape and deliberately omit the rest of the tape in order to mislead the audience, especially when the other side has no opportunity to cross-examine, no opportunity to present its own evidence.
Signing data from Nielsen, the Post reported more than $20 million turned in Tuesday to the primetime hearing by the House committee, a larger figure than watch this year's Academy Award.
Thursday's hearing was the first of six the committee planned.
But Dershowitz went on to say that if the leader of Black Lives Matter had been arrested for inciting violence because of a speech they made, because a speech they made led to violence, he would defend them on the ground that the First Amendment protects advocacy.
It does not protect incitement.
So President Trump committed no crimes.
Anybody who thinks he did fails to understand the First Amendment.
But of course, this is all political theater.
The Democrats aren't interested in the First Amendment or even the Constitution of the United States.
They just want to smear Trump because they're apprehensive he's going to clean their clock again should he run for president in 2024.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, this is the Hail Mary for the January 6th group.
If they can't make this little touchdown, then it looks like it's game over for them.
If you listen to NPR, what they're saying is that all of the stuff that was presented in that ABC movie special was absolute proof that Trump committed felonies and he's no longer eligible to be able to run for office ever again, and he needs to be in jail.
So that's the Cultural Markets review of this whole thing.
And then A couple of days before it came out, Marjorie Taylor Greene did a great little piece, and she said that in December, they had FBI files that were indicating that there was social networking by people that intended to do violence and to attack the Capitol in December. they had FBI files that were indicating that there was
But then the FBI deleted those files and didn't forward any further information on their 100-plus FBI agents involved in the overthrow to the Capitol Police or to any other law enforcement officers.
But three days prior, the Trump White House offered to send National Guard there, but Nancy Pelosi, back in December when she knew this was happening, and this was Kish Patel's interview, he said that they sent a request over to station he said that they sent a request over to station Abrams tanks and MRAPs that had a four-man crew with .50 caliber machine guns all around the Capitol on the day of the event.
And I think that's a good thing.
According to Patel, Trump said, no, we won't provide that level of offensive force in front of the Capitol, but we will provide National Guard.
And they sent them that offer multiple times, and it went to Pelosi, Schumer, and Bowser.
And you know, the thing that's really starting to trouble me even more is we got a 50-50 split Senate, and one of those senators is not a Democrat or a Republican.
Bernie Sanders is an independent, but they put him in the Democrat Party for counting purposes, and then they turn around and make a deal with Mitch McConnell that if you're 50-50 split, instead of saying, okay, you get half of the chairmanships in the committees and we get the other half, instead McConnell rolls over.
What a rotten uniparty joke this is, and now we got 10 of them saying they're going to approve red flag laws.
Absolutely insane.
Joe, you make some telling points.
Carl?
That, gentlemen, is why the rainbow unicorn is their moniker for the unit party.
So 187 minutes.
You know, 187.
I've heard that before.
My students down in the hood would use 187 as slang for murder or a threat to murder.
So I think that is just an open threat to murder.
Trump, You got to compare it to the 2020 Summer of Love where the Democrats condoned a real insurrection on local government.
See, as an AP U.S.
government teacher, if you wanted me to describe what happened in the Summer of Love of 2020 in these Democrat-run cities where they had arson, looting, murder, and they literally, that's what an insurrection is, you overthrow the government to proclaim Your own, and yet that was condoned.
If you go back to the 2017 inauguration, though that more arson, more violence, not insurrection, but violence for that.
And then compare that to January 6th, where the mall cops opened up the bike gates, all of this is on video.
Escorted the people in through multiple layers.
They opened up the magnetically sealed doors on the orders of somebody who we should find out.
Yeah, and as Joe said, Pelosi was the person in charge, and even though in that summer of love of 2020 when the Capitol was being protected by the National Guard, you had about 200 guys dressed to party on the steps, nobody's going to challenge them, but Pelosi was the one who declined that level of support in order to create that false flag.
Excellent points.
I'm sure it was Pelosi who released the magnetic closing of the doors.
And remember, Trump didn't finish speaking at the Ellipse until 1-11.
It was a mile and a half away from the Capitol.
He not only exhorted his followers to be patriotic and peaceful, But they couldn't have got there anywhere near in time for all this mayhem going on at 12.45.
It began by 12.50.
They were calling for reinforcements.
By 1 o'clock, it was already well underway.
The idea that Trump was responsible, especially after he'd offered to send the National Guard, just shows the gargantuan lies in which the Democrats are engaging.
It is unconscionable.
Meanwhile, Trump slams the House committee hacks for their January 6th spin, as well he should.
President Trump blasted the House 6th committee for its biased negative primetime hearing.
He took to social media after Pelosi's panel held the first public hearing with no cross-examination or contradictory testimony.
In fact, they edited out exculpatory evidence and Dershowitz subverted.
A former president railed against a committee's members, two Democrats and two anti-Trump Republicans, for hiring a former ABC executive, James Goldston, to produce a one-sided show.
This was made for television.
So the Unsought Committee on Political Hacks refuses to play any of the many positive witnesses and statements, refuses to talk of election fraud and irregularities that took place on a massive scale, and decided to use a documentary maker from Fake News ABC to spend only negative footage.
Our country is in such trouble, he very appropriately observed.
He slammed the committee the following morning for suggesting he supported protesters who had chained Hang, then-Vice President Mike Pence.
I never said or even thought of saying Hang Mike Pence.
This is either a made-up story by someone looking to become a star or fake news.
Slot committee members are trying to connect Trump's effort to challenge a 2020 election result to the Capitol attack.
The so-called rush on the Capitol was not caused by me.
It was caused by a rigged and stolen election.
Thursday night hearing included some never-before-seen video footage of the mayhem, as well as witnesses from witnesses.
Fact-checking showed that Representative Liz Cheney was incorrect when she claimed that then-President Trump did not condemn the attack.
Actually, Trump did condemn the violence in a video Twitter quickly blocked Along with an Oval Office address a week later.
Cheney also used Trump's words of love in the air out of context as a committee showed protesters breaching the Capitol.
He spoke those words about the Stop the Steal rally, not to describe people breaching.
Earlier, he said the protests represented the greatest movement in the history of our country to make America great again.
Unselect committee didn't spend one minute studying the reason people went to Washington DC in massive numbers far greater than the fake news media is willing to report or that the unselects are willing to even mention because January 6th was not simply a protest.
It represented the greatest movement in the history of our country to make America great again.
It was about an election that was rigged and stolen in a country that was about to go to hell and Look at our country now.
To my astonishment, Ivanka has turned on her father.
They put her up on a big screen.
Very embarrassing.
I've never thought she was sharp as pencil in the pack, but this displays a level of gullibility that I would not expect from an offspring of Donald Trump.
To Ivanka, writes Reader Supported News, a well-known left-wing outlet that's begging for money.
The writing has been on the wall for a while now, but it seems Ivanka finally did it.
She turned against her father.
Thursday, we learned the former White House advisor told the congressional panel investigating the insurrection at the Capitol, begging the question by claiming it was an insurrection when it clearly was not.
She didn't believe her father's.
Here they're telling us the claim is false when the claim is true, that the 2020 election was stolen from him.
In a video deposition shown during the first hearing of August 8, she accepted the explanation of then Attorney General Bill Barr to Donald Trump.
That there was no evidence of voter fraud, that he'd lost the election fair and square, which is a manifest absurdity and obviously casts grave doubt upon the integrity of Bill Barr.
I respect Attorney General Barr, so I accepted what he was saying, Ivanka said.
That's really bad, Ivanka.
Shame.
Jones.
Yes, well, Prince and Princess Cushy were always the snakes that Trump clutched to his breasts.
They were in charge of his human resources department, and they picked absolutely the worst people possible.
He had the worst cabinet of any president that I've ever imagined, even as bad as Joe Biden's.
And over the weekend, we had Betsy DeVos, the fleecer from the Amway scam family, also come out and attack Donald Trump.
But amazingly enough, the producer of this piece of propaganda was formerly the A producer that spiked three years ago the story on Virginia Roberts and Randy Prince Andy and Dirk Bagowitz going on at the Epstein Island.
She had the whole story.
This guy spiked it.
Somebody at ABC News got the Non-broadcast footage of her being interviewed.
She goes, I can't believe this story's just now breaking.
I had this whole story three years ago, and I had it all ready to go, and this guy wouldn't let us go.
So here's a guy that can stand there and protect the pedophile ring of the largest pimp in the history of the planet, but then he's going to turn around and direct you to, hey, Donald Trump, what a rotten piece of crap you are, Mr. Gold-whatever-flake-your-last-name-is.
That's the right word, Joe.
All these Democrats and the Republicans on the panel are pimps and whores.
These are political whores, the biggest whore of them all, Nancy Pelosi.
It's a disgrace.
Carl.
So, again, January 6th, that false flag took place just as the evidence of election fraud was being introduced.
So you had a national audience who could have been able to evaluate the facts, but instead we get the false flag.
And the 2020 election fraud is absolutely proven by the data.
If you haven't seen the movie 2000 Mules, please go see so.
I read about 250 pages from Sidney Powell for affidavits from expert witnesses.
My favorite, Pennsylvania when they stopped voting and then they started again to count.
Again, you had a batch of votes, 600,000 for Biden, 3,000 for Trump, a 200 to 1 ratio.
The impossibility of that is proven by a number with 60 zeros behind it.
You're more likely to win three consecutive lotteries than for that election to have been honest.
And for Ivanka, you know, Celebrity gossip is what they got as evidence, huh?
Because that's all that it is.
And how do you feel about that?
What's your favorite color?
I think that they should ask Hunter Biden as the celebrity next about what he feels about what happened on 2020.
I mean, that is if Hunter can take a break away from creating his half a million dollar art pieces and, you know, all the research he's got to be doing to be earning a million dollars a year as an expert energy consultant.
He's too busy smoking crack and humping hookers, Carl.
He doesn't have time for such nonsense.
Meanwhile, the likely next House Admin Panel Chair has delivered a demand for document preservation to the January 6th Committee.
This is a very good move.
Representative Rodney Davis of Illinois, likely to become chair of the House Admin Committee in 2023 if Republicans regain the majority in November, demanded in a letter to Bernie Thompson, the chair of the House Select Committee, that the ban will preserve all of its records.
The letter from Davis, a current-ranking GOP member of the Admin Committee, came just hours before the panel's first primetime hearing.
An unnamed aide told journalists earlier that evidence would be presented showing then-President Trump was at the center of an effort to prevent the transfer of power from him to incoming President Joe Biden.
In an unusually detailed and lengthy preservation demand, Davis told Thompson, I write today to demand your cooperation in preserving all records produced by or in the possession of the Select Committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol Select Committee.
Given the ongoing questions concerning the Select Committee's compliance with federal law and House rules, it's vital the Select Committee preserve these records so that effective oversight may be undertaken.
And here you see the specificity.
Please preserve in complete, unredacted form all information in possession of the select committee are reasonably available to the select committee, including, but not limited to, all written correspondence and memoranda, emails, calendar entries, to-do list entries, telephone system records,
logs and transcripts, including for all cell phones, pagers, landlines, logs and transcripts, including for all cell phones, pagers, landlines, and other electronic devices, voicemails, text messages, instant messages, posts on social media, blogs, and other internet sites, message board and chat room transcripts.
Davis continued, demanding that Thompson also preserve audio recordings, including, but not limited to, radio transmissions, video recordings, including, but not limited to, security camera footage, captured still images, electronically accessible or stored files, captured still images, electronically accessible or stored files, documents or other papers containing such information, presentations, such information stored on any and all media or storage devices, including, but not limited to, optical disks, hard drives, solid state
but not limited to, optical disks, hard drives, solid state drives, portable storage, remote or cloud storage, all versions or copies of any record, any other information relating to The January 6th panel has been a center of controversy virtually from the day it was announced.
Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, appointed all the current members after unilaterally barring two Republicans, Jim Jordan of Ohio and Jim Banks of Indiana, from serving despite having been named by House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy.
This was extraordinary and unprecedented.
Banks told reporters during a January 6, 2022 news conference, the Democrats who control the panel are to investigate January 6.
That is already abundantly clear.
They are trying to use this committee as a Trojan horse to abolish the Electoral College, to intimidate President Trump's aides, to block him from ever appearing on the ballot again, and to prevent his supporters from participating in American democracy.
Well said.
Banks also declared Pelosi has yet to explain why she didn't request the National Guard troops made available by Trump two days prior to the protests at the Capitol that resulted in one reported death, which appears to me to have been fake, and hundreds of injuries to law enforcement officers and protesters.
A January 6th panel has issued hundreds of subpoenas and interviewed nearly a thousand in connection with a breach.
Republicans questioned the legitimacy because it was authorized in a House vote to five members appointed by McCarthy.
But after rejecting Banks and Jordan, Pelosi selected Liz Cheney and Adam Kissinger, both of whom voted to impeach Trump.
Long-established congressional procedures require a leader of the minority party to determine which members of his or her caucus serve on committees, not the Speaker of the House.
Davis's preservation demand also directed Thompson to preserve a lengthy list of other documents, including draft and final versions of all committee memoranda, whether completed or not.
All threat assessments or other intel reports given the committee.
All social media posts by members and staff through the committee servers and network and those made through other servers and network.
Memorandum of agreement with all witnesses.
And a complete list of all committee staffers, detailees, interns, contractors, and consultants as of July 1st, 2021, and as of June 22nd, June 8th, 2022.
Copies were delivered to Pelosi, other members of the January 6th panel, Representative Zoe Lofgren, The current head of the House Admin Committee.
He had to be so specific because otherwise they would delete anything not covered and I confidently predict they're going to delete it all anyway.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, there's a lot of stuff they can't delete.
It takes months to put together a 90-minute long documentary, and you can't change midstream where you're going when you start one of those things.
You know, so you can do a little bit of course correction, but at a certain point, you just have to say, you know, put it in the can.
We're going to distribute what we've got.
So, Kathleen Inglebright, as a result of over 20 million views and a 99% upvote on Rotten Tomatoes has gotten a lot of positive feedback from her 2000 Mules movie.
And for those of you who are mathematically impaired, one magnitude is 10 times as much.
Many magnitudes is going to be like a hundred or a thousand or ten thousand.
You're basically just adding zeros.
She says that they have magnitudes now more evidence than they had when they presented 2,000 mules, and a lot of this is first-person witnesses.
A lot of this is whistleblowers.
A lot of this is going to be irrefutable evidence.
There will be no way of holding this crappy narrative together all the way up until the November midterms, which is just going to be that much more damaging for all these crooks.
And all of the methods that they've employed to steal elections in the past, they incorporated every one of them in 2020.
And a lot of them are being systematically blocked, number one.
Number two, a lot of them are going to be under a lot more scrutiny than they've ever been before.
And they're not going to be able to pull off the level of scam ever again that they did in 2020.
And it will be rolled back.
Excellent comments, Carl.
And That gives me hope for the mountains of evidence that are all on our side.
So a call to preserve records.
Yeah, I'm doing a similar thing with drafting a letter to my school district as I'm going to be retiring, but I'm going to request that they keep all records of the investigation they've done since January when they placed me on paid administrative leave as a whistleblower.
They claimed that they had to investigate how and why I was asking questions, not to answer the questions.
So what we're seeing is we're seeing a show that is stripping away all of the obfuscations, all of the corporate media lies and propaganda and distractions, to be able to see the facts that this is the Rainbow Unicorn Uniparty at work.
And it really is an Emperor's New Clothes condition.
And people like us are, like in the fairy tale, the children in the audience, pointing and speaking up about the Naked Empire that is there for anybody who cares to look.
So, I think that is hopeful.
The January 6 Commission Man, I hope that they're not able to finish their work.
If they do, and you can see all along the way that this is going to be similar to the official lies of the Warren Commission to cover up the state assassination of JFK and all the official reports for RFK and MLK, it's just going to be mounds and mounds of evidence claiming to have, we've interviewed over a thousand, it's all going to be bullshit.
Yeah, it's a perfect exemplar of the political decadence of the United States in 2022.
Just profoundly distressing.
Meanwhile, the big network saw a huge rating decline with a January 6th hearing.
CBS, NBC, ABC, which switched their regular prime time to air the House Select Committee on Thursday evening, saw huge ratings decline, according to Nielsen.
ABC, whose fall schedule normally includes Grey's Anatomy at 8, took in the largest haul with 4.8 mil, NBC and CBS 3.5 and 3.3, respectively.
The three outlets typically average $18 million collectively.
So let's add it up.
We got $3.5 and $3.3.
That's $6.8.
So we get a little over $10 million.
They drop from $18 to closer to $10.
That's not quite half, but that is a massive drop.
ABC World News with David Mirabai, 7.5 mil for the week.
NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt, 6.06.
Biden's State of the Union drew 6.3 million viewers for ABC, 4.86 for CBS, and 4.71 for NBC.
The committee asserts, of course, that Trump was the center of a conspiracy.
Notice it's a conspiracy.
I thought we're not supposed to believe in conspiracies to overturn the 2020 election.
January 6th primetime hearing was watched by an estimated 20 million.
Across 12 networks, those in the ages 55 up had the largest participation rate of 15.2 million viewers, an estimated 3.6 in the 35 to 54, less than 1,834,018 to 34.
The figure includes out-of-home viewing and connected TV.
It does not include PBS.
and 834,000, 18 to 34.
The figure includes out-of-home viewing and connected TV.
It does not include PBS.
By contrast, Biden's State of the Union drew about 38 million.
So it's around half of what Biden drew, and that was to see whether the guy could even put together a coherent speech.
But of course, he's reading from a teleprompter, so it turns out, are the members of the committee.
Viewers also were likely exposed to portions during social media clips and news coverage.
Here it is.
They are using teleprompters.
They know exactly what they're supposed to say, who's supposed to say it.
How bad is this?
Meanwhile, CNN's Anna Navarro flips out when confronted with simple facts about gun violence.
That's moral bullying.
This is good from Jonah Goldberg.
During a conversation with Anna Navarro and co-hosts on CNN tonight about the shooting in Uvalde, which is a complete scam, check it out on my video blog at BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, Jonah Goldberg attempted to put America's problems into perspective by citing accurate statistics on gun violence.
This did not go over well.
Goldberg, editor-in-chief of the Dispatch, said while he shares the moral outrage many feel over how horrific and morally repugnant these slaughters are, it's wrong to tell parents they should be paralyzed with fear about their own kids.
If we're going to start telling people they should be scared this is going to happen to them, we should at least put this in perspective.
Noting there are roughly 54 million children in school in America, 170 have been killed in the school shootings in the last 29 years.
in the school shootings in the last 29 years, I repeat, 170 in school shootings in the last 29 years.
He went on to argue, if we're going to tell people they should be terrified about kids being dropped off at school, we might remind them they're more in danger on the drive to school statistically than they are at the school.
Navarro responded, a child's life should not be a statistic.
That's moral bullying, Goldberg argued appropriately.
I'm making a basic point to say you shouldn't tell people they should be terrified.
Moral bullying or not, Navarro is on a roll.
It's been 10 years since Sandy Hook and we haven't done anything as a national shame.
So paralyzed with fear, paralyzed with acceptance and resignation is what we've been for the last 10 years.
It's enough of that.
No more paralysis.
Get your asses in gear and call your senator.
That's fine.
I'm doing analysis.
I'm not doing activism, Goldberg replied.
On the Rubin Report, by the way, Blaze TV host David Rubin shared a video clip of the heated exchange, talked about why liberal gun control advocates like Navarro need to keep people in the dark about the facts.
Very good.
Meanwhile, here's a graph showing how gun violence has diminished over the years.
It reached an apex in 1993, but it's been diminishing ever since.
Look at that.
Cut by around a half, I surmise, since 1993.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, I had a lot of fraternity brothers that were in pre-med and there was always a copy of Grey's Anatomy sitting around the frat house, so when my daughter decided that she wanted to be a doctor, I thought, well, this is a great Christmas gift for her.
I gave her a copy of Grey's Anatomy about five years before it became an ABC series.
And shockingly enough, when they said that that was one of the things that got displaced for the J6 show, it's going to be a re-broadcast because they do fall season and then they re-broadcast it in the spring.
But surprisingly enough, Grey's Anatomy debuted in 2005 and it's had 18 seasons so it's the longest running medical but it's crap and you know I don't watch TV so I had no idea I thought it had probably expired a natural death a long time ago but that just gives you an idea of what the sheeple will sit there and put up with You're absolutely right.
Yes, Joe.
anatomy than to watch these clowns on the J6 committee.
So that's a somewhat of a testament that maybe some of the Americans are not as dumb as we think they are.
You're absolutely right.
Yes, Joe.
Carl.
So ABC, NBC and CBS, they had 11.2 million viewers compared to a usual of 18 million That's less than two-thirds of their usual audience, 62%, to be exact.
So I hope that people are at least feeling, if not articulating, that they're just being bullshit and they're just being lied to.
So our opponents, they construct these false flags and narratives.
And they have to disarm us.
This was the central point in AMREV 1.0 when our government came for the guns.
That's when the war went hot.
They need to construct the most horrific story possible.
So, with their black thinking caps, they think, Who would be the most distressing target to kill?
children.
And so they devise a script to kill children and then use that for their narrative.
And that woman, Ana Navarro, moral bullying Yeah, that's exactly what she is doing.
She's coming up with a story to have emotional sensationalism displace honor and rationality to attack the United States that is defined by our Constitution and just to throw it over to the Rainbow Unicorn Uniparty.
Yes, yes, yes.
And by the way, Uvalde was clearly modeled after Sandy Hook, where the fictional Adam Lanza shot his mother that traveled to the elementary school to kill 20 first graders and six adults.
They had to vary the cadence.
So let's have him shoot his grandmother.
And then instead of 20 first graders, let's make it second, third, and fourth.
19 of them, and just two teachers, where one of the teachers from Sandy Hook even reprised her role in Uvalde for a big box.
It's stunning!
Check it out at my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer.
Meanwhile...
Jim, quick little bit of trivia.
Grey's Anatomy was written in the 1850s by a young doctor named Henry Grey, and it's the most comprehensive and accessible anatomy book of its time.
So, it was still being used as a textbook by medical pre-med students in the 1960s in the United States, but you ask anybody and they would just say it's nothing but a, you know, entertainment program.
No historical context to anything.
Did you think it was a scientific study of anatomy?
I mean, the key figure is named Grey.
They just used the title because it was medical and historic, Joe.
I mean, I've seen enough clips of Grey's Anatomy to tell you it's just a soap op that's set in a medical facility.
But Americans would rather watch that than the horrors, the lies, and the propaganda, the political theater coming from Washington, D.C., which pretends to be authentic.
Grey's Anatomy makes no pretense about being authentic.
So you're absolutely right.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Get this.
Biden's in such terrible shape, they're even putting him on Jimmy Kimmel.
But look at what a disaster, what a disaster it turns out to be.
This guy should be in a long-term care facility, not on network television.
No question about it.
There's a lot of major things we've done.
Such as?
But what we haven't done is we haven't been able to communicate it in a way.
Well, what we have here is a failure to communicate.
That is, um... Let me say it another way.
Well, see, that's kind of perfect.
Yeah, we haven't been able to communicate it.
But look how the press has changed.
I know you get, you overstand it.
You don't just understand it, you overstand it.
But here's the deal.
...is that it's very difficult now to have a, um... The point?
Even with no... Come on, hurry up old man!
...exceptions, even the really good reporters, they have to get the number of clicks on, on the, on the nightly news.
Mm-hmm.
Play the radio, make sure the television, excuse me, make sure you have the record player on it.
So instead of asking a question, anyway, it just, everything gets, gets sensationalized.
And weighs it.
But I'm convinced we can get through this.
We have to get through it.
And one of the things, look... I'm gonna take a break and then we'll talk a little bit more if you don't mind.
I don't blame you.
I'm sorry, we have some of this commercial.
We had anticipated a margin for error.
Everything is fine.
I mean, so embarrassing.
I want your thoughts both about that clip.
What in God's name are they doing putting them on television, Joe?
Oh, well, yeah.
Alex Krasinov said that today that it looks like the Biden administration is going to approve shipping nuclear weapons to Ukraine because there's no other way to stop the Russians.
They're killing at least 200 a day of the Ukrainian forces that are being sacrificed for this New World Order bullshit.
So, yeah, really sad that this is what it's coming to.
But these SOPs think they can start a nuclear war and win one.
Or they think that, you know, that if there's no other way of exterminating all the people on the planet, then this is as good a way to go as any.
These people are... Who's announcing we're going to transfer nuclear weapons?
Today's Alex Kristinov.
Yeah, it was his episode number three on BitChute.
And who is Alex Kristinov?
He's the one that co-hosts the Duran.
With another guy named Alex?
Well, the Duran is a serious source, but I mean, look, that obviously can initiate a nuclear retaliation by Russia.
I mean, that is so far beyond the pale.
Our memberhood was... Putin has been very patient, Joe, but this is totally unacceptable.
The Polish defense minister said that he thinks he can convince NATO to place nuclear weapons inside Ukraine territory.
Insane.
Just insane.
I can't believe anyone would even let those words come out of their mouth.
Carl, your thoughts?
Oh, I can.
I can.
When you don't have any power, then you have to have an illusion of power and they'll just talk shit like that to get people scared and think to make people believe that the story is all so one-sided that even nuclear weapons on the good guy side is a good idea.
But that Jimmy Kimmel clip, that is tragic comic.
And I think it's wonderful.
It's we need to get we already are at the place where the more they talk, the worse it is for them.
But still, we're still on the Emperor's New Clothes, we're still in the crowd, we're still pointing, and it's still 95% of the adults are refusing to look with their own eyes, so we still do need something to break through.
Yeah, it's just, the guy so obviously demanded, he's so obviously cognitively incompetent, even Jimmy Kimmel couldn't save him.
That was just embarrassing beyond words.
Now, today we have an unusual development.
Joe went to a conference here in Texas.
He's going to tell us more.
There's some kind of lawsuit going on and a whole bunch of other events.
Joe, give us your take.
What's going on?
Okay, well, first of all, I like to attend events in person because you get a lot more evidence when you can actually interact with somebody on a one-to-one scale.
So I've been to a hundred of these things, hundreds and hundreds, but since the lockdown, I've been to at least 30 open Texas and, you know, anti-vaccine rallies.
I went to the Crimes Against Humanity Tour in Woodlands, which is just north of Houston, on May 21st, and there was Dr. Judy Makovich, Patrick Wood, Reiner Fulmick, and Richard Fleming, and they all put on excellent presentations, but what stunned me is that there was only 40 people in the room, and I was going, Jesus Christ, all this excellent information
And we get no participation by our lazy couch potatoes, so I wrote an article and had it published at Principia Scientific, Medical Tyranny Checkmate, hoping to promote the May 28th, the June 4th in Atlantic, May 28th in Minneapolis, the June 4th In Atlantic City, the June 11th in Plano, which is just north of Dallas, and the June 18th in Tampa events.
But, prior to the, or right after the Minneapolis event, there was a split among these people, and Judy and Patrick and Reiner all dropped out of the tour, and they all said there was, you know, a conflict of interest.
So then it was like well you know I was already committed to going to Dallas anyway because I had an interview with the Dallas radio station that'll be forthcoming.
So I decided well what the heck uh he's put together a an alternative list of uh speakers and one of those includes Jennifer Bridges who's the RN that's suing Methodist Hospital.
So uh I went just out of loyalty to her and you know the fact that I respect Fleming, even if, you know, technically some of his stuff is incorrect.
So that's what we're going to go through is a detailed analysis of what happened on Saturday, September 11.
First of all, Joe, Joe, Joe, Joe.
Yes.
I thought this whole tour thing was a mistake from the beginning because you can reach more people over the internet effortlessly at less expense and private inconvenience.
So I thought it was misconceived from the beginning.
You are substantiating.
You got 40 people for a sensational group of speakers.
What led to the falling out?
That is crucial.
Yes.
Okay.
Well, according to them, there was a disagreement with Fleming, and according to Fleming, when he explained why these things dropped out, he said that Judy had made a claim of a discovery that he said somebody else had made two years earlier, and that she was putting out misinformation about what was in the vaccines, and he said that
He had gotten an independent laboratory to test two vials of Pfizer vaccine and he said in the vials that they tested there was no nitrogen and you can't have DNA without having nitrogen as part of the sequence.
It's one of the elements that's required for it.
He said so with no nitrogen in the vials then that proves that it's not an mRNA or a DNA vaccine and it was like well wait a minute they've produced 30 million doses of this crap and you test two files and you're ready to make emphatic statements about it based on that random amount of information?
Well then he said there's also no graphene oxide.
He said what appears to be graphene oxide turns out to just be salt crystals so these are just saline solutions and it's like he directly contradicted one of the guys that was the speaker that he had there.
Let me say this, Joe.
I've done enough research on this from independent sources.
Absolutely, the RMRNA, they do have graphene oxide on it.
This guy is either a shill or he's been played.
The independent lab results aren't independent.
They're controlled.
The samples weren't legitimate.
They weren't random.
This is all manufactured.
Fleming is at fault, not the other speakers.
This is open-end shot.
And then his complaint against Reiner is he said that Reiner only wanted to do a civil case because you can get a 30% contingency plus expenses and that he wants to pursue a criminal case and that Reiner was objecting to that.
So, okay, if that's what your excuses are... Shit can flaming.
The others are on the right track.
Shit can flaming.
What he's doing here is utterly irresponsible, Joe.
He ought to be able to see that.
We have independent scientists in Spain, for example, who studied all that.
I've seen the photographs of the content and all that.
Yeah, I understand, too.
Yeah, that's why I can disagree with him on that.
So, I will take whatever he's done in the way of good work.
He is a lawyer, and he does have... Well, he did pass... He does have a J.D.
He didn't pass the bar.
He just said he sabotaged the tour, Joe.
He sabotaged it.
Okay, but he brought on as his first guest a guy named Kevin W. McCarran, M-C-C-A-R-N, who's a neurology specialist, and he works for the Korean Brain Institute, and he brought up an hour of information about Kuru and cannibalism disease and spongiform, and then he said that what's happening is
That people had been getting Epstein-Barr, where you get paralysis of your face, but this is actually what's coming now with these jabs, that the reactions are actually Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, which is Epstein-Barr with shingles.
So it's absolutely horrible and he went through a whole bunch of really good information so I didn't have any problem with his presentation at all and he had some good and I'm gonna be writing a paper on this that I'm gonna submit to multiple sources and we can discuss that later in the week.
This is Fleming's first guest.
His name is what, McDonald?
No, McCarran.
McCarran, go ahead.
Then his second guest was Jennifer Bridges.
And like I said, I mentioned her many times.
I've seen her at over a dozen events.
She is suing Pfizer and excuse me, suing The Texas Methodist Hospital in Houston is Houston-based, and they had 23,000 employees that they forced to get the jab.
So when they filed the suit in state court, the Methodist Hospital appealed it out of state court into a federal court, which is pretty much crooked.
Her attorney is the former chairman of the Harris County GOP, who was booted out when they found out that he was collecting over $200,000 a year for attorneys fees for the county when we have multiple attorneys on the county staff that could be doing work.
So you know basically he was the GOP grifter here in Harris County for 12 years and so we got rid of him but he was the only one she could find that would take the case.
So he files a case and it's an absolutely totally defective case.
You're not allowed to file a case for liable or fraud if it's based on just Empirical, I mean not empirical, anecdotal evidence.
You can't just say, right, yeah, you can't say hearsay.
If you have a case that you want to perfect as far as all of the crimes that are being committed in this case, you need to have an evidentiary hearing.
Which he did not include, and so he couldn't call expert witnesses.
He just made assertions that says, well, these vaccines are dangerous, and well, who's your expert?
You as a lawyer are not an expert, and an RN is probably not enough expert to just make her own testimony.
So the case got dropped, got beat in the district, federal, federal district court.
Well, then they appealed to the Fifth Circuit, which is out of New Orleans, which is the next level of Supreme Court, and they had their hearing on Monday.
And the judge, they heard the hearing, and Fletcher told her, and I told her the same thing, that you and many other attorneys I've talked to have agreed on this.
You're not allowed to introduce additional evidence, you're only allowed to appeal procedural problems.
And there was no procedural problem if you didn't introduce the evidence.
You can't introduce it as part of your appeal.
And you know this from going through the appeal process multiple times yourself now.
So that was a little bit of a problem.
And then the next speaker was a guy named Charles Rixey, R-I-X-E-Y.
He's the one that hosts the ResearchGate.
But another thing that was really odd was at eight o'clock on Friday evening, I get an email saying the venue has been moved from the Plano Event Center to the Fair Park Bible Fellowship in Southeast Dallas.
And I went, man, I might be getting spammed by somebody because I was having problems with my tablet and cell phone anyway.
And so then the next morning at like six o'clock in the morning, I get a text message.
I said, well, if these people are spamming me, they spam me on email and on telephone, and there's no way I can call or email to get verification.
So I will leave early, go to the claim site down in South Dallas at Fair Park Babel Fellowship.
Where I met Pastor Stephen Broden.
B-R-O-D-E-N.
A really great guy.
And he offered the facility to them.
And when it started at 10 o'clock, there was about 50 people in the room.
Another probably 20 dribbled in a little bit, you know, mid-morning.
So, they was fairly well attended.
They videotaped it, so it should be available somewhere.
But anyhow, Charles Rixey was a former Marine, and he's got a master's degree in economics, and he had some really great information, did a lot of statistical analysis on this stuff.
His effort was absolutely spot on.
And then the fourth speaker was Fleming, and Fleming got up and gave Absolute evidence that the Chinese had developed the COVID-19 in 2006 and that he had indictable evidence.
He said proof of MERS and then he brought up the Judy Makovitz and the Interferon thing.
There was $61 million of funding that went to Ralph Baric at University of North Carolina.
And in a speech that he gave at a conference in April of 2018, he explained absolutely everything involved with the gain of function that was going on.
But previously, I had come across a website Which is called PacerMonitor.com, which has all of the filings that were in every court case.
And I pulled up the Brooks Jackson versus Pfizer.
Brooks Jackson was the woman who worked at Ventivia.
The E-N-T-A-V-I-A, which is a subcontractor for Pfizer for doing medical testing here in Texas, and she worked for him for two weeks, found a number of irregularities and outright fraud.
She notified the FDA.
The FDA immediately, instead of saying, here's a whistleblower, we need to go down and investigate her complaint.
Instead, they notified Ventivia, who fired her immediately.
But she had already copied enough records that she submitted them to the British Medical Journal and they published it saying these records are authentic.
They prove 100% that there was fraud.
So she filed a lawsuit which is A special name, et rel, et rel, R-E-L, where you can file as a plaintiff in a case where the government has been cheated by somebody and you get a portion of that.
So she sued Pfizer for $2 billion.
Uh, and then also the FDA, CDC.
Oh, excuse me.
And so, when you look at the filings, this was put in the Texas East District Court, and the judge is Michael Truncale, T-R-U-N-C-A-L-E, and his court is actually in Beaumont.
And he was appointed by Trump in 2019.
And when I first went to Pacer Monitor, it had a listing of all of the pleadings that had been filed in this case.
And the last pleading was like over a week ago.
And that pleading was that Pfizer had said that they couldn't be responsible for fraud because they had submitted their full testing data to the CDC, the FDA, and the DoD, and all of them approved the vaccine, so therefore, there could be no fraud.
Well, I thought that Judge Troncale had made the right decision.
He said, motion denied, we're going to go to discovery.
Well then they turned loose the whole realm of Pfizer attorneys and Ventivia joined the lawsuit along with a whole bunch of other little parties that are all part of this scam and so they had a whole bunch of attorneys show up and then last week at five o'clock on Thursday afternoon the judge ruled that yes we will go ahead and have an evidentiary hearing and that hearing will be March 28, 2024!
Give me a freaking break!
Two years to hear the testimony when we've got 300,000 pages of Pfizer material that will be released in the next two or three months that's going to prove unequivocally that this is fraud, and apparently this judge got the midnight phone call from somebody that said, look, we could put you in the
Circuit Court of Appeals and you can move over to New Orleans or or pick anywhere in the United States where there's a circuit court and you can be the judge there and you'll get a $20,000 a year salary increase and then you get all these extra benefits and yeah well you need to make the right decision.
You need to make this Pfizer thing disappear and how do you do that?
Justice delayed is justice denied.
We are getting no justice out of this rotten system.
But then I also had in contact with somebody else here in Texas, which had some really interesting information.
According to the Texas Code of Criminal Procedures, Article 1509, any citizen can go to any magistrate in the state of Texas, and that includes the justice of the peace.
And you can submit evidence of fraud or damage, and you can demand that the district attorney in that county files a sequesters of grand jury.
Now, there's 254 counties in Texas.
I guarantee you there's somebody that's been injured in every one of those counties.
There's eight different Vantibia offices in Texas.
I guarantee you when they did that testing, there was somebody that was injured at those testing companies.
And I guarantee you there's enough JPs in Texas that know somebody who was injured or killed that they will have enough incentive to make sure that enough district attorneys, and who knows, maybe Lazy Paxton will get off his little skinny ass and do something about this too.
So we might even get action from the Attorney General and rumors are that there's over 20 Attorney Generals who've also signed on to various Uh, groups of evidence that have been produced by David Martin out of Utah, where it's already filed and they've got criminal actions under under procedure and the material that Fleming is putting out.
So, you know, that's where we are on that particular program.
And that's why I want to do it, because you get very little on scene reporting.
And that's why I think it's important that we take a little bit of extra time from, you know, the regular Well, I'm certainly glad you offered this special report.
I'm closing personal, Joe.
First, I'm going to invite Carl's comments, and then we'll have a three-way discussion.
Carl.
No, first with what Jim said, that Fleming is in the wrong.
He is.
So for someone to claim that he has two pieces of evidence, those two files, and that they mean anything is just stupid on its face.
What if he was serious about this, that he would have to take a look at the data generated from the graphene in in the samples and then attempt to refute that data, which he made no attempt to do.
And then for Reiner Flumick, I can't imagine if somebody came up to him and said, "We should do a criminal case," Reiner would probably just say, "Good luck." In order to have a criminal case, you have to have the government on your side to prosecute the criminality of it.
And Reiner, with his background of dealing with Volkswagen in Germany, he knows that that is hard to do.
So, I don't even see the problem with that.
And I can't imagine this causing any type of a spat.
Unless this Fleming guy decided to attack Reiner for going for a civil trial.
So, on its surface, it's just weird.
And, you know, I think that one of the things that we're all trying to do is act as ambassadors for truth, and empower whoever with whatever truth.
But we do need to keep an eye for disruptive agents, because they certainly do want to divide and to conquer us.
Well, Fleming has clearly blown the whole tour apart.
But as I say, Joe, I thought it was a massive waste of time and effort when you could reach a larger audience more effectively and at less expense and trouble anyway through the Internet.
So I thought it was dubious.
You got this great lineup and you got 40 people.
Give me a break.
Why didn't they see that in the beginning?
They should have known better already.
I cannot forgive this Fleming guy, but it seems to me the whole project was misconceived from the beginning.
Your thoughts?
Well, you know, it's kind of hard to tar Reiner with the nothing but a civil lawsuit, you know, contingency fee ambulance chaser when he's been having grand jury hearings with expert witnesses worldwide for criminal prosecution under the crimes of Nuremberg.
So that, on its face, is a little bit of a problem.
So yeah, I have difficulty in some of the stuff that Fleming is pushing.
And, you know, so bottom line is, I just want to tell you that there's two sides of the story.
Now you've heard both sides, supposedly.
And so we can all make our own decisions.
But as far as first person events, I went to MAGA rallies here in Houston, where there was 18,000 people.
And I showed up in the morning at 10 o'clock and stood there in line.
And then I went to the one in Dallas that had 22,000 people at the American Airlines Pavilion.
And I got there at 7 o'clock in the morning and stood in line with people.
And then I went to the MAGA rally in Conroe back in January of this year.
And, you know, I went to the Secret Space Conference where I got to meet John B. Wells and John, I think it's Bertholomew, he's the one that did the nuclear explosions on Mars, really great stuff.
Katherine Austin Fitz, Linda Moulton Howell, and then I went to the JFK conference in 2017 in Dallas where I got to spend three days with my hero, Dr. James Fetzer.
Along with face-to-face time with a whole bunch of other people, and there probably weren't a hundred people at the JFK conference, and you certainly couldn't say that that wasn't a positive event, because for anybody that attended, you got some first-hand evidence from people that were witnesses, and from the woman who dated Lee Harvey Oswald, and people that worked in Dr. Mary's monkey lab with the
Seminal viruses, the SV40 that we know is in all of the polio vaccines.
So it was sometimes you just have to indulge yourself with first-person contact with the people that are the newsmakers.
And so I didn't regret going to either one of these events and I gained a whole lot from both of them.
In addition, you get to meet people that are there and I've printed up business cards with information on my
My website stuff and so you know I'm I'm able to promote the research that I've done independently not that I'm a self-promoter from any economic or social benefit standpoint only that I am a truth teller that I know that the things that I say are true because I've researched them extensively and I just want to make sure everybody is aware of how bad things really are and that's the only way we can correct them.
Well, Joe, I do think you're extolling some of the virtues of having personal interaction.
It had to be financially a disaster.
They've got a tremendous cost involved in transferring these people from city to city.
I can't imagine how it was financed, but you're absolutely right that those who have a special dedication in seeking the truth may turn out and get the benefit of personal interaction, as have you.
Carl, your further reflections?
There is a synergy that's available in person-to-person contact.
If we had the scientific data, there would probably be some energetic synergy of proximity and the resonance of the voice.
There's probably something to that that I agree with, and I, too, enjoy.
Personal interactions, greatly.
And at the same time, we do have a job to do.
So I think that what we're really looking for is hybrid models where people can have face-to-face interaction, should that be available to them, if provided that you have the funding for it, which is also a big question.
Somebody put up the money for this tour.
And then at the same time, to maximize what you can reach out into the public.
Well, Joe, you've made a very powerful report.
Perhaps this is the occasion to draw today's program to a conclusion.
Would you like to add final thoughts of yours, Joe?
Oh, let's see.
What else was it that popped up on my radar recently?
Oh yeah, Steve Bannon.
He's the one that's promoting this quote, Nicole, or what's her name?
The doctor who... Help me out here, Carl.
I'm trying.
I'm trying.
She's the one that's the English major, and she worked in the Obama White House, and now suddenly she's supposedly an expert Why can't I remember her name right this minute?
We're not talking about the press secretary or the...
No, no, no, no, no, no.
She's approved.
Right.
She's...
God.
You should have written it down.
Oh, you know, I do have a few other stories.
We can kick them into the box here and add a few.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Well, yeah, do that while I'm doing the fun stuff.
UK children to be fed bugs to stop climate change.
This is just absurd as it gets.
Scientists will use UK children as guinea pigs having organized workshops where bugs will be served as foods to see their response to eating what they euphemistically called alternative proteins.
We want the children to think about alternative proteins and real things for now rather than just foods for the future.
So trying some of these foods is central to the research, said Cardiff University professor Christopher Baer.
Look at his handful.
Doesn't that look scrumptious?
Though edible insects are now not widely sold in the UK, they're part of the diet of around 2 billion worldwide.
Much of this is in parts of the world where they're part of a long-standing culinary tradition, and they're increasingly popular elsewhere.
Yeah, sure, absolutely.
According to the researchers, the pilot program will see four schools in Wales try to normalize eating bugs and hope to persuade parents to adopt the change of diet in their homes to help promote a greener UK by reducing meat consumption.
This makes you barf.
Additionally, the insect product on the menu, Vexo, is conveniently designed to appear like mincemeat, which will likely play a role in whether kids buy into it.
According to the head teacher of Roach Community Primary School, it should be Roach, R-O-A-C-H, in Pembrokeshire, one of the schools to feed students insects, he believed children share his concerns over sustainable development.
Children share concerns over sustainable development as though it were a concept in their minds?
How absurd!
He further welcomes the opportunity to help his students develop critical thinking to make sense of confusing decisions, including whether to eat bugs or not, and sustainable citizenship.
This is such malarkey.
This is such bullshit.
It's repulsive to even read.
At this school, we recognize the important connection between our local community food production and wider global issues surrounding sustainable development.
You know, we've been sustained for all the years up until now, for hundreds of thousands of years, what in God's name is now changing the situation?
We welcome the opportunity to work with academics from Cardiff and UWE to explore these issues.
If you have any critical thinking, you're probably going to conclude you should not be eating bugs.
As reported by The Counter-Signal, the UK decision to phase out meat consumption and replace it with insects is part of a broader 2030 to 2050 agenda that will see nearly all consumption reduced, including energy, red meat outright banned, as well as air travel and shipping banned by 2050.
Look at that!
Not even air travel, shipping.
They really are trying to re-establish a feudal community.
Meanwhile, the World Economic Forum is right in their pitching, saying free speech must also be changed, meaning reduced or eliminated.
The past week, the global elites gathered in Davos, the annual meeting where wealthy globalists meet to discuss how to better impose their authoritarian rule on the rest of the world.
Established by the globalist Grant Klaus Schwab, who, of course, is a raw child, he declared the future will be built by the evil mastermind wannabes attending the summit.
How about no?
During one discussion, Austria's e-safety commissioner, one Julian Magran, suggested it's time to recalibrate free speech.
A range of human rights that play out online, including freedom of speech, being free from online violence, which no doubt means disputing staged events like the fake shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand, or what's happened in Buffalo or Uvalde here in the U.S.
The E-Safety Commissioner just appointed to a new five-year term is also worried about the right of data protection and the child dignity, no doubt meaning you should have no privacy whatsoever regarding your data.
Inman Grant wasn't the only nutcase to address the World Economic Forum.
The Alibaba Group President J. Michael Evans bragged about the development of an individual carbon footprint tracker for every individual's travel and what they eat.
Bear in mind, U.S.
lawmakers and governors from both parties attended the WEF Summit, as did members of the Biden administration.
Joe, this is just repulsive.
Your thoughts?
Yes.
Well, I'm doing a weekly broadcast with TNT Radio and the founders of Principia Scientific.
And this weekend, we have a special guest, Mark Marano, who is the editor and founder of Climate Dispatch.
And he published several of my articles back in 2010.
I saw him in person at the Heartland Institute Conference in July of 2014, and then he had a booth promoting his new movie at the Heritage Summit, Crossroads Summit in Houston in September of 2014.
So what Jim and I have done on several previous occasions is when we're having a guest and we need to present some stuff that's We've got graphics that require a visual supplement to just the audio that we do for our two-hour radio program.
We do a pre-meeting, a pre-show meeting, and we did that with Matthew Errett, and that was a great interview.
And then we also did another one with Jeremy Nell, who operates Germ Warfare site out of South Africa.
So hopefully one day this week we'll be able to put a little 45-minute video together with me and Mark Murano, who has a degree in political science and doesn't understand some of the real science.
And I also found the name of the lady that I wanted to do my closing comments with, and it's Naomi Wolf.
I thought it was Naomi, I just couldn't remember the last name.
Until I saw it in print, but yeah, we'll finish up on that.
So on to you, Carl.
Well, Naomi is represented by Dina Pollard Sachs, who I know, and who's a dynamic lawyer.
Carl, your thoughts?
Wow, that buggy story.
Well, first, that article, great propaganda piece, very smooth, for them to say that eating bugs is long-standing and popular.
Okay, all right.
Well, that begs the question, hey, what's the history for that?
Why have people been eating bugs?
Were they that desperate?
I mean, if you give people a choice about what food to consume, I don't think bugs will be on the top 10 or the top 100.
So for them to push that as an alternative is just dumb.
For people to respond to this.
Now, this information is coming associated with public schools.
And for public schools, first, they lie.
Okay?
This is propaganda.
This is indoctrination for children.
This is the propaganda news version for the children that goes into the textbooks.
Carl B. Herman blogspot any of these shows.
I have an 11-part series on public education going through the textbooks to point out the major lies.
And I have a whole section in that Of the history, especially in the United States, that typically the food that we serve to our children is just crap.
It's not even close to nutritious.
I mean, think back about your cafeteria days as a kid, or what you may have seen.
I mean, no educated person is going to freely elect the food that is in most schools' cafeteria, and therefore these people are not to be listened to.
In addition, this is a government school.
Ah, they lie too!
They actually kill people by their lies in these wars and the poverty and the debt.
And these are the same people running the government schools who say that you have to be injected with experiments that are deadly, that you have to mask our children, you have to tell them to socially distance.
So they're just the most ridiculous testimony.
And then for that summit, recalibrate free speech.
That's also a great talking point.
That was the winner for the terms given to the focus groups.
That sounds very reasonable because people, what you need to do is you need to blur two ideas together.
So you're going to destroy free speech, but you're going to call it a recalibration.
Just like, you know, a lot of things get out of whack and Need to be recalibrated.
What they're really doing is they're attempting to stop this emperor's new closed discovery.
And they're attempting to stop that all of this pretense of care and of knowledge and of authority through governments and official agencies, as we live in this truly Orwellian world where they are the ministry of truth, they are the ministry of love, and it's on the brink of the breakthrough for them to be seen for what they are.
Excellent, excellent commentary, Carl.
Meanwhile, Biden-Harris proposes new standards for National Electric Vehicle Charging Network.
Today, the Biden-Harris admin is announcing new steps to go to build out the first-ever national network of 500,000 electric vehicle chargers
The Department of Transportation with the Department of Energy is proposing new standards to make charging electric vehicles a convenient, reliable, and affordable for all Americans, including when driving long distances, which means, of course, you're going to have to stop periodically because a car's not going to get you very far and spend hours sitting on your thumb while your vehicle recharges with all these convenient, reliable, and affordable charging stations.
The proposed standards support Biden's priority to lower costs to families, create good-paying jobs, and combat climate change, except that the new standard, which is being promoted, by the way, by hyping the ethanol component of gasoline to 15% from 10, is going to destroy any automobile manufactured before 2001.
Force Americans to either be immobile or to buy a new car they can't afford.
This is all part and parcel of destroying the United States.
They are right on track.
Here it is, Biden quietly raising amount of ethanol.
The three major problems, including as a government mandate, requiring growing volumes of biofuel to be blended.
40% of corn is used for ethanol.
Raising the amount will result in more, up to 60%.
We know the predictable problems.
Less food is more corn is needed for ethanol.
Higher prices for finished and blended gasoline and vehicle engines breaking down at a much higher rate.
This is the worst scenario for the middle class one could possibly devise.
Absolutely incredible.
But here's Biden's attitude.
You will pay, and you will be happy about it.
Joe, this is right up your alley, my friend.
Yeah, well, the problem with rapid charging on those things is that you increase the amount of calcification that happens inside the battery.
I think it's called perscovite.
Unfortunately, one of the things that happened over the weekend is that my tablet got hacked somehow, and I don't have any of my favorites, and I don't have my logons for all of the different sites where I could make comments.
So now I can't even make comments at BitChute.
But it's been in one of the series that we did on global warming.
You end up with impurities in the battery that when you put a high rapid charge through it, end up forming deposits that cause those things to short out.
So if the cycle of use that you have for your quote EV is that you run it hard and put it up wet and you charge it rapid charge for a couple of hours every day to go say across country and you do that several days in a row you've shortened the available maximum recharge cycles of 400 probably by half.
and that's what those are the things that are going to cause those batteries to have spontaneous failure and if you haven't seen electric battery bus fires or a Tesla fire uh why don't you just try googling that and get an idea what you're sitting on top of 400 volts of electricity that's underneath your butt and that if you get hit in a wreck it could actually electrocute you in your car and if you can't get out quick enough you will be barbecued beyond recognition because those things
Store an enormous amount of energy and it doesn't want to be in a battery.
It wants to be somewhere else.
And when you have the slightest failure in that system, it's absolutely fatal.
Your critiques are just sensational, Joe.
It's another case of not informing the public.
They're in special pleading.
They're trying to market this stuff, and it's nonsense.
When you learn the big picture, you realize it's a stupid idea.
And the fact that Biden continues to promote it tells you they're not interested in the well-being of the American people, but rather destroying American economy.
Carl, your thoughts.
That's exactly what they're trying to do.
So you've got to think backwards and deconstruct this about what our opponents want.
They want to be able to have centralized control and then to pretend to care through virtue signaling.
And probably the end result they want is they want to be able to turn off cars at will.
So that if you are a dissident, a truther, a domestic violent extremist, they can turn your car off.
If the cops want to stop you and they just want to be able to pull a switch or call it in and just have your car be turned off.
So that would be the end of you at their will.
These people always come up with stories with virtue signaling, pretense to care.
Yes, yes.
driving us towards an agenda where they will be in such control, such as to be able to inject the population with whatever they say is good for us at will.
They want to be able to invade whatever country that they want at will.
They want to be able to bail out the too big to fail banks at will.
That's all that these people are is they're petty oligarchs.
Yes, yes, you got that exactly right, Carl.
Meanwhile, an explosion at a Texas gas plant spotlights the threat of liquid natural gas, liquefied natural gas.
Explosion at a major liquefied natural gas plant in Texas highlighted fears of pollution and other impacts on nearby communities.
But really, it's just trying to undermine the idea of an alternative source of energy.
The blast at the Freeport Export Terminal at Texas's Quintana Island was reported around noon.
No injuries.
This is terrifying, said Melanie Oldham, founder of Citizens for Clean Air and Clean Water in Berzario County, where the Freeport LNG facility is located.
We've been afraid of a disaster happening ever since Freeport LNG started exporting gas.
We shouldn't have to live in fear just so gas executives like Michael Smith can get rich.
We shouldn't have to live in fear just so gun manufacturing companies like Remington can get rich.
This is just insane!
It's a dangerous business.
What kind of air monitoring are they doing there?
Will they be able to tell us what the explosion released?
Will they even tell us?
Surveillance showed the first moments of the explosion, which shook nearby buildings.
I saw it blow up from my job site.
Biggest fireball I've ever seen is at one Freeport resident.
A facility, one of the largest NLG exports in the U.S., is expected to shut down for at least three weeks, likely take a million tons of liquefied natural gas out of the market.
But Harold Doty, who lives on Quintana Island, warned, there's still no emergency action plan for the plant.
Originally, the plant said people should go to the beach and have the Coast Guard pick them up in boats.
Freeport really doesn't care about us.
Not the first fire.
There are often fire alarms.
The explosion came as US LNG experts in Europe are surging as part of the Biden admin plan to help EU nations wean themselves off of Russian Fossil fuels, which aren't actually fossil fuels.
According to federal data, US LNG exports averaged 11.5 billion cubic feet per day during the first four months of this year, an 18% jump compared to 2021.
While the fossil fuel industry characterized LNG as a more climate-friendly alternative to coal and other dirty energy sources, driving global warming, except there is no global warming for it to drive, environmentalists stress LNG as a major emitter of methane, which is also claimed, like carbon dioxide, to be a problem with global warming, when it is not.
This is just embarrassingly bad.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well I found the notes on the...
AGW series that Jim and I did that covered these particular subjects and that's AGW number eight which we and cover the electric vehicles, hydrogen, liquefied natural gas which is what LNG is and then also gas to liquid conversion where you take LNG or you take natural gas and convert it directly into a liquid 100% pure gasoline which burns without hardly any problem.
Now Methane is the major component.
It's like 98% of natural gas.
And when methane burns, you have one carbon and you have four hydrogen.
So you end up getting two water molecules and one carbon dioxide molecule when you combine that with oxygen as a combustion process.
So as far as there being negative impacts from a health standpoint or this thing causing some kind of pollution, those people are completely uninformed and whoever the reporter is doesn't know any better either.
So that's not the issue.
The issue is the reason that there's an increase in LNG exports from the United States is because we crippled the Nordstrom 2 gas line and Europe has to have gas in order to operate.
So we said, oh yeah, well we'll just ship you.
And in order to get LNG, you take natural gas And you chill it down to minus 261 degrees Fahrenheit and then you ship it in double-walled vacuum pressure vessels across the ocean where you offload it and then there's nothing you can put for a load to bring back so you deadhead load back with nothing on the boat so you can pick up some more LNG and take it back.
If this isn't the most awkward way of solving an easily solvable problem by just buying your damn gas from Putin and rubles and get over this new world It's insane.
I mean, the Europeans, the leaders have to understand that they're in a box.
This is just lunatic, Carl.
And that might be the final destruction of the American empire, these countries and these corporations deciding on their own that they're not going to play by these rules anymore.
So that story, propaganda, they use the term, the first word is terrifying.
Because that is the response that they want from everybody to be scared because what's happening again and again and again is our opponents are constructing narratives.
This is problem, reaction, and solution.
So they cause a problem, they fabricate a narrative to support it, and then they have the political and the corporate media pimps and the celebrities give the talking points so that they can orchestrate another step towards this totalitarian Uniparty, unicorn, rainbow coalition of the one ring to rule them all.
Oh, you got it right, Carl.
You got it right again.
Meanwhile, here's an updated list of U.S.-based destroyed food manufacturing plants.
If anyone had any doubt that there's an effort here to destroy America by starvation, get this list.
4-30-21 Monmouth Smithfield Food and Pork Processing Plant.
7-25-21 Memphis Kellogg Plant.
8-13-21 JBSB Plant.
8-24-21 Patak Meat Company.
Thank you.
11-15-21, Garrick County Food Plant.
11-29-21, Maidwright State Company.
12-13-21, San Antonio Food Processing.
1-7-22, Hamilton Mountain Poultry Processing.
11-29-21, Maid Wright State Company. 12-13-21, San Antonio Food Processing. 1-7-22, Hamilton Mountain Poultry Processing. 1-13-22, Cargo Nutrine Feed Mill. 1-31-22, Winston-Salem Fertilizer Plant.
3-2-22 Wisconsin River Meats.
2-3-22 Percy Dairy Farms.
2-5-22 Wisconsin River Meat Processing Facility.
2-15-22 Bonanza Meat Company goes up in flames.
2-15-22 Shares Food Food processing plant. 216.22 Indiana Lou Dreyfuss soy processing. 218.22 Best Food Farm. 219.22 Lincoln Premier Poultry. 222.22 Shears Food Potato Chip Plant. 222.22 Deli Star Meat Plant. 228.22 Nutrient AG Solution Fertilizer. 228.22 Shadow Brook and Farm Dutch Girl Creamery. 3420.22.
4-13-22, fire destroys East Conway Beef and Pork Meat Market.
700 chickens destroyed.
4-12-22, 1,746,900 chickens destroyed.
4-12-22, 259,000 chickens destroyed.
4-13-22, fire destroys East Conway beef and pork meat market.
4-13-22, plane crashes into gem state processing.
Idaho potato and food processing plant.
413.22.
77,000 turkeys destroyed.
414.22.
Taylor Farm Food Processing Plant burned.
414.22.
Salinas Food Processing Plant destroyed.
414.22.
99,600 turkeys destroyed.
415.22.
1,380,500 chickens destroyed.
419.22.
For $14.22, Salinas food processing plant destroyed.
For $14.22, 99,600 turkeys destroyed.
For $15.22, 1,380,500 chickens destroyed.
For $19.22, as your standard premier independent distributor of organic and healthy food destroyed.
For 1922, 339,000 turkeys destroyed.
For 1922, 58,000 chickens destroyed.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
is destroyed.
For 1922, 58,000 chickens destroyed.
And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
I mean, it's staggering.
Joe, thoughts?
Yeah, well, every bit of that is food that you won't be eating.
And most of it comes from a faulty PCR test of a single bird at those locations.
And it's like, well, you got one positive test from a test that has a 99% false positive rate.
So you got to kill 100,000 Chickens.
You got to kill 100,000 Joe, it's happening.
It is happening.
sit there and let them starve us to death this way, we deserve it.
This there's, where are you Ken Paxton?
Why aren't you putting moratoriums on the FDA being able to do this massacre of the food supply system?
Where the hell are you? - Joe, it's happening.
It is happening.
Carl.
- Yeah, on the surface, it's a very scary.
That said, there may be more going on behind the scenes that we can tell, but from what we can tell, it looks horrific.
So, these are big food, and big food is the same as big pharma, is the same as military-industrial complex.
So, there's a lot that's going on with what we're told is food, which is Orwellian, opposite to the detriment of our health.
Ability to resist this empire.
Now, it did draw to my mind a memory of Hillary Clinton in that leaked email where she said that in respect to an event that she would have her fingers crossed, she would pull the old rabbit's foot out of the attic and sacrifice a chicken to Mullah.
Well, it seems that Hillary has gotten her wish from that wiki-leaked, leaked email of a lot of sacrifices.
Nice.
Nice.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send FanMailProtocol to LiveNeedToKnow at gmail.com.
LiveNeedToKnow at gmail.com.
Brian Davidson and I have put together a law enforcement false flag stage event checklist.
We've prepared a checklist for law enforcement as guidelines in detecting and exposing stage events and false flags that are being used to deceive and manipulate the public.
You can download the PDF from the site here on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
Please share as far and wide as you can, beginning with your county sheriff and local police departments.
There's a ghost of a chance that it just might make a difference.
Time is short.
They want to take our guns.
Act now!
Meanwhile, 1% control the world, 4% of the republics, 90% are asleep.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
use a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
Final thoughts, Joe, yours. - Yes, well, my final thoughts was somebody sent me a five minute long interview with Steve Bannon and a person who calls herself Dr. Naomi Wolf.
And so I did a little bit of search on her.
But first, let's start with Steve Bannon.
Yeah, he was a graduate of a Jesuit high school in Virginia.
And then he went to Virginia Tech and got an urban planning degree.
Then he went to Harvard and got an MBA.
Then he went to Georgetown and got a Master's in National Security, so there's no science at all involved in anything that he took, and when he introduced Mrs. Wolfe, he said that, here's Dr. Wolfe, and he said, I didn't study biology as much as you did, so I'm going to let you go ahead and take the stage now.
Something to that effect.
And so I looked up her record.
Yeah, here's what Wiki has to say.
Wolf was born in San Francisco to a Jewish family.
And then she graduated from Yale, or she attended Yale University, where she got a Bachelor of Arts degree in literature in 1984.
Then she was a Rhodes Scholar, ding, ding, ding, ding, New York College, Oxford, and she got a Oh!
doctor in a doctorate in English literature in 2015.
She worked in the Clinton White House.
She worked for Gore.
She worked for Biden, Obama.
And then she voted for all of them.
And she voted for Biden.
And just the last couple of months, she says, well, I voted for Biden, but I didn't have any idea he was going to do this to our country.
So now I'm like, and she's reading off a teleprompter on stuff with biology that I guarantee you, if you took away her teleprompter and asked her a question, she has no clue what she's talking about.
She's just another one of those sock puppets that's put up in front of you and saying, this is a medical authority.
Quit calling her a doctor, and if you're gonna say doctor, say doctor in English literature.
She writes books.
She doesn't know anything about biology or chemistry.
Joe, you've blown it.
You've blown it so bad with Bannon and Wolf, I cannot believe it.
I'm gonna have to repudiate what you just said emphatically in my closing remarks.
I'm stunned, Carl.
I'm just stunned, Joe.
You don't know what the fuck is going on with Bannon and Naomi Wolf.
You have no idea.
Great!
Let's hear it!
In the big picture is that I do encourage our audience members to have perspective that we have limited self-expression ability for our reach.
In my personal experience with 45 years of civic activism, about 2% of people can really engage in the facts.
So again, as always, do the best that you can with what you think and what you say and what you do.
And for realistically, unless you're retired, like the three of us, then you have limited time to engage with this stuff.
But recognize that we are small pieces on a big playing board, so do the best that you can and then exercise whatever you have for faith or philosophy or religion or spirituality or whatever it is to let go to the broader forces at play as you act well your part.
Although every other remark they've made today has been sensational and appropriate, Joe just blew it here with his condemnation of Naomi Worth and Steve Bannon.
Steve Bannon was a mastermind of Trump's campaign.
He played a brilliant role.
Trump has done a tremendous amount of good for the world.
If we had him still in office, we'd be so much better off than we are now.
Naomi Wolf has been a darling of the left who's come around to repudiate the left.
And because Joe doesn't watch television, he has no effing idea what the hell is going on here.
This idea to trash Steve Bannon and Naomi Wolf is just stupid!
I admire Joe Olson.
I have him on five days a week.
I do the series on climate change with him, but in this case, he blew it big time.
Meanwhile, don't worry about the millions of turkeys and chickens that are being dealt because there are billions, trillions of bugs for us to consume.
Stand by.
That's your future if this all plays out the way it's headed, and I don't see how it's going to be stopped.
Thank you for joining us today.
Spend as much time as you can with the people you love and care about because we do not know how much time we have left.