Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 17, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:16:05

Need to Know News (16 May 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, welcoming Joe Olson from Houston and Carl Hartman from San Ramon, California, to another episode of Need to Know, where we're bringing you the most important information of the day.
	You need to know.
	We begin with a white supremacist who's denying killing 10 people.
	It's a truthful denial because the whole thing was rigged.
	It was fake.
	It was phony.
	The suspect, filmed wearing a military uniform, was taken into custody wearing body armor.
	He had a cam on his hat, on his helmet.
	So I could record the whole damn thing.
	He's described as a suspected white supremacist, but he's just another crisis actor.
	He was barefoot mass and wearing a paper smock when he was telling the judge, but he'd actually appeared in oversized shoes.
	My caller today on the show, The Raw Deal, pointed out he was wearing extra large shoes, clown shoes, just to reveal this whole thing was fake.
	The DA is working with federal authorities to bring terrorism, hate crime, and murder charges, but it's all bullshit.
	No question about it.
	He lived with his dad, Paul, mother, Pamela, both of whom were engineers for New York Transit Department.
	He had to drive for two hours to get to this Grocery store in a black neighborhood.
	It's just ridiculous how he would have even known there was Top's Friendly Supermarket at 1275 Jefferson Avenue.
	It's unbelievable.
	The 11 shops were black.
	The other two were white.
	Looking through people to target, supposedly.
	This is a photograph of the alleged gunman Here's how it all took place.
	According to the numbers, he drove hours to the top supermarket.
	Why in God's name would he do that?
	Why would he even know there was a supermarket?
	He exits the car heavily armed, shoots several persons in the parking lot.
	Three are supposed to have been killed, but you'll see it's totally fake.
	He has a gun that's got the N-word on it.
	This is very like Christchurch, New Zealand, where all kinds of nonsense were written on the gun.
	It was a fake gun.
	They had photoshopped in shell casing ejections.
	They never hit the ground.
	They're not there.
	It's all fake.
	This is very, very similar.
	Protected by armor, continues to work her way through the store, shoots others, and apprehended by cops in a vestibule.
	He's arrested and transported to jail.
	Here's where he's being arrested.
	You can't see the shoes, but I take it that my colleague Paul is right about it.
	New York Governor Hodge blasted the man whose name is supposed to be Gendron.
	Gendron's demented killing called for a crackdown on social media firms who allowed the mass shooters to glorify their crimes live.
	So it's going to be more basis for censorship on media.
	He had an 180-page manifesto online with a paranoid white supremacist theory.
	People of color were replacing whites in America, talking about massive flooding of America, of the illegals, which is a fact, not a theory.
	Talks about Dylann Roof shooting people in a black shirt in South Carolina and the New Zealand loon.
	But all those were fake.
	Absolutely fake.
	Have no doubt about it.
	Watch this.
	You'll see the video and you'll understand what I'm talking about.
	- It's then, right here. - I guarantee you, this was right here. - I guarantee you, this was all rehearsed.
	ball practice.
	Bodies are down with that even shot.
	There's no evidence of any blood.
	There's no splatter.
	Wait until you see them shoot a guy on the ground.
	This is just ridiculous.
	Totally fake.
	Totally fake.
	Here comes the proof.
	If you had any doubt about it, look at this.
	A blast of air.
	Blast of air.
	No brains.
	His head would have been broken open like a melon.
	This is just embarrassingly bad.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Gosh, you'd think that the props department could find an air gun that had red paint balls, so at least it looked like somebody had got a bug blood shot.
	Yeah, amazingly enough, when they went online and started researching this guy before it got swept off the web, he absolutely hated Fox.
	He had a whole list of Fox hosts that he would have loved to have killed, so he's not a conservative, which, oh boy, that's a little bit of a problem for him, so they erase all of that information.
	And then over the weekend, we also had a guy that attacked a church in Orange County.
	Shot five and killed one, supposedly.
	But he was Asian, so that doesn't fit the narrative, so let's don't talk about that.
	And then in Chicago over the weekend, 28 shot, five dead over one weekend in Chicago.
	But that's not mass shootings, because it's blacks doing the shooting.
	So there you go, kids.
	It's just Something else you can ignore.
	Hate the white man.
	You got two minutes to hate, and then we'll do it again tomorrow.
	Nice points, Joe.
	Carl?
	Well, everybody can just go ahead and reject the crime du jour from our Deep State opponents.
	If you take a look at playing with guns, I don't need to go any further than the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK to be able to demonstrate that the People doing this narrative with President Biden virtue signaling their unreliable testimony.
	And therefore, for me, and I'm a professional historian, I don't want anymore.
	I don't want to even look anymore.
	I know it's full of shit.
	Well, at least I've heard that President Biden is going to free up some time on his schedule to attend this racial photo opportunity on, I think he's going on Tuesday, but in Waukesha, which is just, you know, a little bit more than Our to the east of Jim on the way to Milwaukee.
	President Biden didn't have any time to go to that with those grieving families because that was the wrong color narrative for that.
	And then I like how President Biden, his last quote in that article was, we need to end hate-filled domestic terrorism.
	Okay, all right.
	Yeah, and if you want to talk about terrorists, then it's the U.S.
	government led by these presidents with Biden having a big role on this for the 200-plus armed attacks the U.S.
	does since World War II that has killed 30 million people.
	The million kids dying from preventable poverty every month that, you know, these so-called developed nations keep promising to end but never get around to it.
	But, if you have something that apparently has an air puff that's blowing people away, then you can use that to take people's guns away, which, as a historian, I do remind you, that was the straw that broke the camel's back when our own government went after our guns, after blatantly violating the laws, and we gave them every opportunity to turn around, but they wouldn't.
	Air puffs, yeah, to take our guns away.
	You got it right.
	Meanwhile, here we have another story about it.
	This is a rather revealing photograph.
	If you go to Sandy Hook, or you go to Parkland, or you go to Las Vegas, bottled water is ubiquitous.
	These are staged events.
	They give them bottled water.
	People seem to care about bottled water at Parkland, inside a classroom.
	Where they had a training dummy with no head and no arms lying on a pool of fake blood, one of the girls, who was pretending to be screaming.
	She was so scared.
	She was more concerned about her bottled water.
	You got a kid bowling his pot.
	She got another on her iPhone.
	You got images of police going in and out.
	And you think, wow, those Parkland cops are really Johnny on the spot until you understand Parkland gave up his police force.
	Over a decade earlier, they were actors in police uniforms.
	The suspect was heavily harmed, dressed in tactical gear.
	When confronted by police, he held a gun to his neck, but they talked him into dropping the weapon and surrendering.
	A person is pure evil, said the county sheriff, his voice quaking with emotion.
	White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, who's now replaced Jen Psaki, said Biden had been briefed on the horrific shooting.
	We must pass the Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act without delay, said Jerry Nadler, a New York Democrat, less than 30 minutes after they were talking about this.
	The Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act establishes new requirements to explain the availability of information on domestic terrorism, and this guy and every Trump supporter across are examples thereof.
	Meanwhile, the Buffalo suspect is supposed to have embraced the racist conspiracy theory pushed by Tucker.
	They're trying to get two or three out of each of these fake events.
	He was supposed to have been haunted by the Great Replacement Conspiracy Theory, a racist view of the world touted by Tucker Carlson.
	Peyton Gendron, who is white, repeatedly returned to the conspiracy in his 180-page online manifesto that white Americans are at risk of being replaced by people of color through immigration, interracial marriage, and eventual violence.
	And of course, the fact that we're being flooded with millions over the border is something that the mainstream media is simply going to ignore.
	Once considered an extreme right belief, but as they extort the mainstream with reach from politicians and outright supporters on programs like Talkers.
	Just ridiculous!
	Carlson was dubbed in an MSNBC column, which you know is complete propaganda, the number one champion of the racist ideology, who's warning of the invasion of illegals that Biden wants to change the racial mix and demographics of the nation.
	But that's a fact!
	They talk about white nationalists in Charlottesville described as very fine people by then-President Trump.
	Jews will not replace us, marchers chanted.
	I've heard of no such chant.
	But the fact is, he said there were very fine people on both sides.
	The whole matter in Charlottesville was taken over by then-Governor Terry McAuliffe, a buddy of Hillary.
	Yeah, the Virginia State Police channeled the peaceful protesters of the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee into a violent confrontation with BLM and Black Lives Matters who have been bussed in by George Soros.
	Then a few blocks away, they had a staged event of a car crashing into two park vans.
	There were two automobiles, both Dodge Challengers, one with racing state, one with a sunroof, one without.
	Two different drivers.
	One, the 20-year-old, diagnosed schizophrenic, was put on trial, but the real driver was a 32-year-old veteran.
	The man's a battalion of reservists in Ohio.
	When he backed the car out after crashing into the two vans, it would have befitted a NASCAR driver.
	It was so accurate and precise.
	But there were at least two other tanks, one with no vehicles whatsoever in the vicinity, and a third with a black Toyota pickup truck on the side and stunt drivers flying through the air on the cover of the New York Times.
	Conspiracy has been cited as motivation in the racist attacks at El Paso, where the guy walks in wearing one kind of trousers and walks out wearing another.
	I guess while he's in there killing people, he's going to pick up a new pair of trowel.
	In the Tree of Life synagogue in Pittsburgh, another totally fake.
	Miles Mathis did a brilliant job dissecting that.
	This is all rubbish.
	60% of mass extremist murders between 2009 and 2019 are supposed to be by people espousing the white supremacist ideology, according to the ADL.
	But of course, we're hearing about white supremacy.
	We're not hearing about Jewish supremacy, which is very much at the heart of the matter.
	This is just embarrassingly bad.
	Embarrassingly bad.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, well let's just quote Ralph Waldo Emerson.
	So basically what you do is you just keep torturing the people with these little hobgoblins that these little politicians can keep hiding behind them and keep you hiding under your desk.
	The whole thing's just absolutely insane.
	Yeah, I don't have a doubt in my mind at this point, and I think we might have a substitute for Texas Tuesdays tomorrow who can shed some additional investigative forces on this.
	So we'll verify that and hopefully tomorrow we'll have another insight from a professional on this.
	But yeah, it stinks to high heaven along with every other false flag.
	There's not a single conspiracy other than flat earth and nuclear bombs don't exist that I've examined in the last 30 years that hasn't been 99% correct.
	Barack Obama, by the way.
	Legalized all these staged events when he nullified the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948, which precluded the use of the same techniques of paid riots, staged actions like these by the Smith-Mutt modernization of 2012, just in time to bring a Sandy Hook.
	And it's been followed by one after another, Boston bombing, Orlando, Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, Las Vegas, This is one in a long tradition initiated and legalized by Barack Hussein Obama.
	Disgusting!
	Carl, your thoughts?
	These articles are excellent examples of propaganda.
	It's so ham-fisted now, or maybe it's my acuity to these distinctions, but they're really ridiculous strawman arguments in a basic test of intelligence.
	So they're using this immediately to pimp what they're calling the domestic Terrorism Prevention Act.
	And they tied that in.
	They are trying to combine these false flags, as Jim is saying, to attack Tucker Carlson.
	And just the idea of Tucker Carlson saying, hey, you know, you flood our southern border, then you're going to have this increase of percentages of people who are Latino.
	Of course, como no, you're going to get that.
	And so they spin that in propaganda to make you afraid of anybody who is saying anything That can be remotely propagandized as racist.
	And the point of this Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act is to shut people up.
	They'll call us, we're engaged in hate speech, and That's what Biden said, the talking point.
	So all you got to do to deconstruct this stuff is take a look at what these script readers like presidents and majority leaders have to say.
	And they give away, they tell you where they're going, they telegraph their move.
	So Biden, the actor playing Biden said, End hate-filled domestic terrorism.
	Okay, well, then you need to end hate-filled domestic speech, and they'll try to clamp down on people like us.
	And I did like a part of the sloppily played manifesto, so-called, of the alleged white supremacist.
	I read an article saying that a lot of the stuff was just lifted straight from the Christ Church New Zealand manifesto.
	So, you know, the teacher in me, I would mark that paper down.
	And so our opponents at the FBI flying these false flags, they're getting lazy and sloppy.
	Domestic terrorism plagiarism.
	Yes!
	There's a wonderful article about it where I have a link to the New Zealand shooting and you'll see it was equally amateurish.
	Meanwhile, this is a very disturbing development.
	All Russian Black Sea Fleet subs have gone to sea.
	All seaworthy submarines of the Russian Black Sea Fleet, from which the Federation can launch missiles across Ukraine, but also some 7,500 miles in any direction, are now at sea.
	The Russian fleet has a total of six subs.
	There's a seventh that is in dry dock, undergoing.
	In addition to torpedo and mine weapons, the subs can carry cruise missiles such as the Caliber, using various modifications for naval and ground purposes.
	The range is up to 7,500 miles.
	They can go for 45 days with a crew of 52, including 12 officers.
	The Black Sea Fleet also includes a sub that has been under repair, as I mentioned.
	Meanwhile, a large landing ship from Russia's Black Sea Fleet was damaged and sent for repair in Sevastopol.
	Meanwhile, a leading elected Democrat just claimed we can't criticize Biden because we're at war.
	This is embarrassingly bad.
	If you believe the Democrats' own rhetoric just a year into his admin, Biden has managed to bumble his way into the one war America has spent the last seven decades seeking to avoid.
	Seathe Moulton of Marina is an elected Democrat who claimed a little more than a week ago, we are fundamentally at war with Russia.
	Where have all those Code Pink protesters gone now?
	Their team is holding the reins of power.
	For all the lunatic talk we heard attacking Trump's presidency over World War III, he was the first president literally in decades to not embroil America in any new foreign conflicts.
	Ryan Grimm tweets, We're not just at war to support the Ukrainians.
	We're fundamentally at war, though somewhat through a proxy, with Russia.
	Important that we win, said Rembrandt of Massachusetts.
	The White House sought to distance that from the statement by claiming we're not at war and that Biden has been clear U.S.
	forces will not engage in a conflict with Russia.
	Looks like somebody didn't get the White House man-made.
	Maybe a lot of somebodies.
	Nobody told the guy most likely to replace Pelosi as Speaker, for example, when she retires, that we're not actually at war.
	Steny Hoyer casually asserting as though we're a non-contested pact.
	We are at war.
	Let's anyone think it's just a slip of the tongue.
	He said it more than once.
	The thing he got right in the larger context is we do need to produce energy.
	But here you have it.
	House Majority Whip Steny Hoyer.
	It's unfortunate that in a time of war, we spend all the time blaming our own president.
	Embarrassing.
	We are at war.
	Very bad.
	America still has a constitution, doesn't it?
	Doesn't that constitution make things clear about a process whereby America must satisfy certain conditions to enter a war?
	The Congress shall have the power to declare war, grant letters of mark, and make rules concerning capture on Well, I hadn't done water.
	Did Congress hold a vote the rest of us were never informed about?
	Was there a clause hidden in the 10,000 pages of doxy we just overlooked?
	Have our elected official given up on the Constitution altogether as we're blaming our president during times of war?
	Sure.
	No Democrat ever did that during Bush or other Republican presidents' time in office, right?
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, well we've been under a continuing use of authorization of use of force since the Korean War.
	We've not declared a war and yet we've been constantly at war.
	Absolutely insane.
	Yeah, over the weekend we had Finland submit Paperwork for rapid induction into NATO because they're so worried about Russia just stomping across the border that they've had neutralized for 70 years.
	And Sweden's decided, gee, this is a big club.
	We ought to be part of it so that we can waste 5% of our annual budget on buying overpriced NATO weapons that don't work.
	And here's what the the director of NATO had to say.
	Jens Stoltenberg.
	NATO is stronger and more united than ever, yeah, against the as-off Nazis.
	Like this is really going to be something wonderful.
	And apparently all this has got Scott Ritter freaked out because Scott Ritter just recently over the weekend did an interview and it's covered at unz.com and he says that he's revised his calculations.
	Looks like it's going to be a really long war and Russia's not going to be able to win it because they're not taking the proper strategic things.
	Well, apparently he didn't get the memo.
	Over the weekend, Russian cruise missiles took out the final remaining third oil refinery in all of Ukraine.
	So they've got about a two or three day supply of oil and then the whole thing's going to grind to a halt.
	They made a big point about the Ukrainians taking out a pontoon bridge and a bunch of vehicles, but further analysis shows that the vehicles that they took out were amphibious troop movers, which if they weren't subject to attack probably could have moved some troops across the water, but then you have the problem of the pontoon bridge being taken out.
	These were accurately targeted from fixed location artillery that were inside the adjoining cities where the Ukrainians don't have the fuel or the ability to move those weapons.
	So now the Russians know exactly where the weapons are, exactly what the extent of collateral damage is gonna be to the citizens.
	And they're not gonna be able to resupply ammo.
	They're not gonna be able to feed these troops.
	It's collapsing faster than a cheap suit.
	But, you know, that's what we're dealing with.
	We're dealing with this fog-of-war bullshit.
	So, I don't see the Russians... I see them closing the door on this whole thing within the next two weeks at the max.
	I agree with that.
	I'm embarrassed Scott Ritter got it so wrong.
	That's surprising.
	He's a pretty good guy.
	A pontoon bridge is nothing.
	It's a temporary structure easily replaced.
	I mean this is really off the wall.
	They come in sections.
	They're nothing but welded stamped steel floats and you lock them together.
	You have three sections crossing the river and they all get blown up.
	You can put three new sections on one flatbed truck and show up tomorrow and put another one up.
	That's right.
	That's exactly right.
	Yeah, Carl.
	At first, Scott is subject to being attacked as an individual journalist, just threats and blackmail.
	So it's hard to know what's going on with him.
	And that is disappointing.
	So if you consider that we have a spectrum of possibilities and really for people to manage how they approach this, I guess, emotionally, is that on one hand.
	So one end of the spectrum is that the bad guys are in charge.
	And the question is, who's running the show?
	Who's in control here?
	So if the bad guys are in charge, I don't think that's supported by the data because there have been exposed and revealed more than ever before.
	And what the threat is for them is for this to flip into an Emperor's New Clothes moment to flip and get those guys out of power.
	The other end of the spectrum is the White Hats are in control, and all this is a show.
	Everything in the middle is some type of war, and we don't have access to that data, because in the fog of war, all you're going to get from the NATO side is Baghdad, Bob just saying, oh, it's going great, we'll defeat those Russians in, you know, the next day or so, while trying to get all the money and all the weapons they can.
	So who knows what's going on with that.
	For the Democrats, those chicken hawks, they're always going to go ahead and say that they want more war.
	And the House Majority Leader, Steny Hoyer, I remember that guy!
	I started lobbying with results.org about the same time that he entered into Congress in Maryland.
	His district is very close to Washington, D.C., and he's been in there forever.
	He really didn't do anything to help us out for the lobbying that I worked with, with results in ending poverty.
	And the idea for the backdrop of war is war is illegal.
	We've had two world wars.
	After each of those wars, the U.S.
	was a leader And having a treaty, and a treaty under Article 6 is U.S.
	Supreme Law, and the letter and the intent of the treaties, the U.N.
	Charter is the second one, and after the first one, it's a renunciation of war is the official name of the treaty after World War I, but they changed that to the Kellogg-Briand pact to put in the textbooks, because you certainly don't want to tell the students Hey, after that First World War, they had a treaty, they said, renunciation of war.
	So the war is only legal if you're under armed attack from another nation's government to attack their country.
	If you're under attack, you can use whatever defense You need, including lethal defense, to ward off the attack, but you can't go and attack somebody else unless their government is at an imminent threat of attacking you or actually attacking you.
	So all the wars that the U.S.
	has engaged in and is engaging in is Orwellian illegal.
	I agree with all that.
	I also think that the violence constituted a threat to Russia that was imminent, Joe.
	Yes, and then one other little data point that we need to add.
	On Thursday, May 14th, Lloyd Austin, our Raytheon affirmative action hire at the DoD, called his counterpoint in Russia, a guy named Shoigu, S-H-O-I-G-U, And said, uh, can you just please have a ceasefire and let us have all the people out of Azazel and the call supposedly lasted an hour.
	I don't think it took the Russians an hour to tell him go pound sand because I don't think you call and call for a ceasefire if you're kicking Russian butt.
	That's the last thing you do.
	They're getting their ass handed to them.
	150-200 people a day.
	Troops from the Ukrainian forces are being taken out.
	So how much longer they can stand that war of attrition, only their commanders know.
	But the wise thing for them to do would be surrender right now.
	What a humiliating phone call from the Secretary of Defense to ask for a ceasefire so we can get our guys out.
	How awful!
	Meanwhile, Elon Musk says Biden is wrong to think he was elected to transform the country.
	He weighed in on his thoughts about the 2020 election.
	While he believes former President Trump should have his Twitter account reinstated, a less divisive candidate would be a better option.
	I think that's just completely silly.
	Silly!
	He also took aim at Biden, writing the Democrats' mistake as he thinks he was elected to transform the country, that actually everyone just wanted less drama.
	Obviously he's uninformed that the election was stolen on such a massive scale.
	I wonder after watching 2,000 mules, which I've just begun to watch, I'm only 20, 25 minutes in so far, he's going to feel the same way.
	I do think it was not correct to ban Trump, he told the conference.
	It was a mistake because it alienated a large part of the country and did not ultimately result in his not having a voice.
	Trump said he's not going to return to Twitter, however, but stay with his own Truth Social platform.
	Personally, I think that's a mistake.
	He ought to go back to Twitter.
	I do not believe his Truth Social is going to be a success, and it would show humility That he's a humble guy to return to Twitter.
	We had a huge following.
	Musk also said he'd prefer a candidate who's younger than 8,000 years old.
	I believe that was not directed at Trump, but rather at Biden.
	Trump's supposed to be—Musk is supposed to be buying Twitter for $44 a bill, but there's a new discovery that their bots are subtly directing people to what the bots think the people should be watching rather than what they want to watch.
	That's very, very bad.
	Very, very bad.
	Step one, Earl Weber, a Republican candidate, has suggested, give the platform back its former glory, bring back Trump, and give everyone who's been banned a second chance.
	It all forms a political and other censorship.
	I agree.
	Meanwhile, an official has been forced to hand over election evidence to a Soros back This is unbelievable in some ways, but otherwise completely understandable.
	When the fraudulent Secretary of State Jenna Griswold tried to unlawfully wipe info from the computers, a Republican clerk in Colorado handed the hard drives over to authorities.
	Very good.
	Following a court order, a Republican county clerk was charged by Colorado authorities with sharing election data with activists who support former President Trump's stolen election lies, except all the data shows they weren't lies at all.
	According to Reuters, there have been eight efforts to obtain illegal access to voting systems in five states since the 2020 election.
	According to the judge's rule, the hard disks containing the data were not voting system components that permitted him to make the copies.
	Judge Jared Kramer of Ilbert County District Court dismissed the arguments but ordered him to deliver the hardness to the Secretary of State, Jenna Griswold, who appears to be corrupt.
	It's worth noting practically every article written by the far left on the 2020 election says the election was not rigged despite substantial, I would say, massive proof to the contrary.
	The film 2000 Mules released this week, former Wisconsin Supreme Court judges asked the election to be decertified.
	They Evidence from Arizona Audit invalidated the election.
	There are more than sufficient hundreds of thousands of outstanding ballot concerns in Georgia.
	The media's effort to hide the election theft are on a par with its effort to hide Hunter's laptop from hell.
	For four years, the media claimed Trump was Putin's puppet.
	Now we know this is also absurd.
	Fortunately, the clerk made copies of the hard drive before the fraudulent Secretary of State damaged the machine.
	The clerk was seeking to preserve evidence in accordance with federal law.
	Griswold followed the lead of other Democrats in order to local election teams undertake routine maintenance in order to wipe it clean.
	For her conduct, Griswold is being sued.
	Why are Democrats lying and claiming there's no proof of fraud in the 2020 election?
	Even a third grader can see it.
	Why do Democrats not want anyone to look at the voting system used in the 2020 election again?
	A third grader could figure it out.
	Joe, your thoughts.
	Yes, well, like I've mentioned before, I met Katherine Englebright in January of 2011.
	I've followed True the Vote for 11 years now.
	I was active in the Dr. Laura Presley movement to get the voting machines overturned in Texas in 2015 forward, so that's over a seven-year period involvement in that.
	I'm very well aware of this steal, and the steal was a two-part.
	Probably half of the votes that were fake came through the ballot harvesting, which is proven 100% unequivocally by the True the Vote and Dinesh D'Souza movie 2000 Mules.
	But likewise, the electronic ballot theft that was exposed by the Mike Lindell Symposium last summer is equally effective.
	So bottom line is these people had an enormous network.
	And when you get to the final moments of 2,000 mules.
	They reduced, they expanded the number from a minimum of 10 in one night to five drops in one night, and they went all 50 states instead of just six jurisdictions that were the swing jurisdictions, and they had over 54,000.
	So this is a nationwide effort of a bunch of drug dealers and pimps and MS-13 gang types and labor leaders nationwide that organized with the Democratic Party, with the It's really staggering, isn't it?
	from the supposedly NGOs and with the RINOs to steal the election from Trump in 2020.
	And make no doubt about it, this would not have happened without the active participation of 50% of the GOP.
	They're rotten, rotten RINOs.
	It's really staggering, isn't it?
	Carl, your thoughts?
	First, with Elon Musk being in the news, people need to hold this the same as if you hear Bill Gates talking about something.
	Elon, who the fuck cares?
	It's not in anything in his area of expertise, and I don't need to hear a celebrity.
	If I needed to hear a celebrity, I'll find out what Kim Kardashian thinks about this stuff.
	But Musk is a big player with Twitter and if he can expose, so the potentiality of having this $44 billion on the table for Twitter and now finding out that we're getting little leaked reports that, oh, by the way, before you spend that $44 billion, you know,
	It might be that Twitter has defrauded you with the information that they're telling you with the size of its user base, because if five to ten percent of those accounts are just bots, that would be helpful to know.
	Maybe it's much bigger.
	And then you could do some analysis by asking a follow-up question.
	Hey, if they're fake accounts, what were they talking about?
	What political agenda were they pushing?
	That would be important data to get.
	2,000 mules, yep.
	That was, I think Joe said that that was the ground game for our opponents to steal the election.
	It's just one facet of what they're doing and it's definitively proved in the movie.
	You have these people being tracked by their cell phone, visiting these places that collect ballots and then they're caught on the security cameras stuffing the ballot boxes and just the Demonstrable number of votes putting in there is greater than the margin of victory in those states.
	I also, as I've said a few times but not for a long time, I've read the 250 pages of sworn legal affidavits from Sidney Powell of election of expert witnesses giving testimony of the data that demonstrates election fraud
	And for 10 plus years, Stanford University and Princeton University have been at the forefront with professors in their departments, taking a look at these electronic voting machines and and saying what is obvious is that if you do not have.
	a unique thing that can be counted by anyone after the election, then you fail to meet the minimum definition of an election.
	We don't have elections.
	We have not had elections.
	They have to be verified by anybody caring to count.
	Yep, very nice.
	Good points, all.
	Oh, hey, hey, hey, quick update.
	Yeah, Musk has in his contract with Twitter that if there are more than 5% bots, that he gets a billion dollars, or whichever party backs out has to pay a billion dollar fine.
	And so basically, not only is he going to get the first billion that whatever they've got left at Twitter, But all of their advertisers are going to be able to file civil suits against them for false advertising, claiming that they had that many legitimate viewers and that potential ad revenue.
	So Twitter is gone.
	He's absolutely destroyed Twitter, which leaves the ground open for him to create a ground up of his own social that he wants to, that's like Twitter, which would be overnight success.
	Number one.
	Number two, then he can put it on his own servers and have something that could be universal.
	So if the guy actually wants to wear a white hat, that's wonderful.
	But I just got an email from our good friend, Gordon Duff, who's been removed from the leadership at Veterans Today.
	And this is absolutely stunning.
	Admiral Eric Olson.
	This just came across the wire.
	I'll send it to you.
	We'll discuss it in tomorrow's show, but I just wanted to get that out there.
	You mean we got American military just been captured by the Russians?
	Admiral!
	Admiral of the SEALS!
	Admiral of the SEALS captured a special ops commander!
	That's really disgusting!
	A special ops commander!
	Yes!
	You're gonna love it!
	I'm sending it to you right now!
	Do it!
	Put it in!
	I'll put it in tomorrow!
	Meanwhile...
	Here we have the latest.
	U.S.
	Army to revamp Alaska forces to prepare for Arctic conflicts.
	In other words, they're planning to have war with Russia in the Arctic.
	Right now, the purpose of Army forces in Alaska is much more about creating an extreme cold weather capable formations that the Army Secretary Christine Wormuth, whom, as I recall, had no background in military affairs whatsoever.
	The Army currently has a striker brigade using eight heavy vehicles.
	She's considering replacing it with a more mobile infantry unit.
	We're trying to get to a place where we have Arctic-capable forces who can survive and operate in the climate.
	In March, the U.S.
	deployed Patriot missiles and other advanced air defense systems for drills in Alaska for the first time.
	The U.S.
	views the Arctic as an area to confront Russia and China.
	Which has been reflected in strategies from each branch of the U.S.
	military, which, by the way, is dissolving under the impact of the Vax and going to be replaced by these illegal immigrants who are going to have to be trained, but where they are going to count on them being willing to shoot on American citizens.
	This is unbelievable.
	NATO also has its eyes on expanding in the Arctic, which the alliance calls its northern flank.
	Finland, of course, with an over 800-mile border with Russia, announced Thursday it plans to apply to NATO.
	Unbelievable.
	Meanwhile, the Reuters director of data science has been fired Why?
	Because he gave accurate statistics on police shooting and race.
	Reuters director of science was fired for reporting accurately.
	This is stunning.
	Zach Kliegman, fired for reporting facts, not the flawed opinion of today's media.
	So for that sin, he was fired from Reuters.
	Here he reports.
	Until recently, I was director of data science at Thomson Reuters, one of the largest news organizations in the world.
	My job?
	To sift through reams of numbers and figure out what they mean.
	A year later, a year ago, I stumbled on a really big story about Americans being gunned down, black Americans, and the way we report on violence.
	This was a story that could save lives, a story that has to be told.
	When I shared it with my co-workers, my boss chastised me, telling me expressing this opinion would limit my ability to take on leadership roles, meaning I'd never be promoted.
	Then I was maligned by my colleagues and fired.
	This is a story Reuters didn't want to be told.
	I started to witness in 2020 the spread of a new ideology inside the company.
	Our internal collaboration platform, The Hub, had people posting about self-indulgent tears of white women and the danger of white privileged classes.
	They'd share stories with titles like, Seen White, Habits of Whiteness, How to Be a Better White Person.
	There was fervent and vocal support for BLM at every level of the conflict.
	No one challenged a racial essentialism or group thing.
	That concerned me.
	I'd been following academic research on BLM for years.
	Come to the conclusion the claims the whole movement is rested upon, that police more readily shoot blacks, was false.
	The data was unequivocal.
	It showed, if anything, police were slightly less likely to use lethal force against blacks than whites.
	Statistics from the Most Complete Database, compiled by the Washington Post, showed that, over the past five years, police have fatally shot 39% more unarmed whites than blacks.
	more unarmed whites than black.
	39% more unarmed whites than blacks.
	Because there are roughly six times as many whites as blacks, that figure could be closer to 600%.
	BLN activists and their allies in the legacy insist that it should be 600% more.
	The fact is it's not, that there's more than a 500 point percentage gap between reality and expectation is, as they say, evidence of the bias of police departments across the United States.
	But it's more complicated.
	Police are authorized to use lethal force only when they believe a suspect poses grave danger or harm.
	So when it comes to measuring cop racial attitude, it's important we compare apples to apples.
	Black suspects who pose a grave danger and white suspects who pose a grave danger.
	Unfortunately, we don't have reliable data on the racial makeup of dangerous suspects, but we do have a good proxy.
	A number of people in each group who murder police officers.
	According to calculations based on FBI data, black Americans account for 37% of those who murder police officers, 34% of the unarmed suspects killed by police.
	Meanwhile, whites make up 42% of the cop killers and 42% of those shot by police.
	Meaning whites are killed by police at a 7% higher rate than blacks.
	The whole thing, the whole basis for BLM is bullshit.
	The whole reason to defund the police is complete utter nonsense.
	It's false.
	It's phony.
	It's fake.
	Here you see numbers from 2013.
	Blacks killed by whites is minuscule, one-tenth of the percentage of whites killed by blacks, which is roughly comparable to whites killed by whites.
	In fact, blacks killed by blacks is 55 times more frequent than blacks killed by whites.
	We know in criminal offenses by race per capita, every category, save for those involved in alcohol, Which are dominated by Native Americans who have a genetic incapacity to absorb alcohol or dominated by Blacks.
	They're committing most of the crimes in America.
	Here's a nice example of 2014 in New York City.
	Shootings.
	Arrests for violent crime shooting, 75% Black, 22% Latino.
	That's 97% of the shooting, Black or Latino.
	Murder, 62% Black, 32%, 94% for murder, Black or Latino.
	Rape, Latino, 46%, Black, 43%.
	or Latino.
	Murder, 62% black, 32%, 94% for murder, black or Latino.
	Rape, Latino 46, black 43, that's 89%.
	If New York City were all white, rape should be down 83%, murders down 91, shooting down 96.
	And as Dr. Ewan has observed by imposing an electoral map over a murder distribution map, The murders are occurring in areas controlled by the Democrats.
	This is a function of their policies.
	This is a matter of taking guns away from law-abiding citizens and creating free fire zones for killers of an overwhelming majority of whom are black.
	This is insulting beyond belief how the Democrat policies are promoting crime in America disregarding the statistic BLM had no justification nor the Democrats policies on gun control.
	Joke.
	Yes, well it's white privilege that we can be blamed for absolutely everything, and it's black privilege that they can be blamed for absolutely nothing.
	It's amazing that all of the black people that stand up as conservatives are absolutely savage by the white liberals and their black tribal followers.
	Uh, you know, we've got a race going on right now in Pennsylvania where Kathy Barnett, who is a black military officer and is running for senator, is being savaged by a rhino and a guy who served in the Turkish army and, uh,
	But kissed Oprah constantly, and has been involved in all sorts of liberal causes, and now suddenly he's the MAGA man who's endorsed by the Orange Man Bad.
	Absolutely crazy.
	I mean, the whole thing's absolutely crazy.
	If you want to get an idea, I saw a great movie a year ago called Uncle Tom, And it goes through how the blacks have been abused by the Democratic Party and taken for granted for a party that never did anything for them other than deliver Jim Crow and all the other things that they did.
	You have the Republican Party who's treated him with absolute benign neglect, and the people that starred in that was Alan West, Candace Owens, Larry Elders, and Thomas Sewell, and they all had very thoughtful things to say about how blacks are naturally conservative, blacks suffer more from liberal policies, it being
	Uh, perpetrated against them by fellow blacks and that they don't want to have that type of a culture.
	But that's the culture that's being forced by Hollywood and by our government officials.
	Pretty sad.
	I think you're absolutely right.
	I mean, the average black family is very conventional, you know, and their morality standards like I experienced in the 50s and 60s in South Pasadena, California, very similar, very similar.
	Carl, your thoughts.
	First story with military training in Alaska and the link to NATO is that our opponents want to get a one global governance in order to destroy any autonomy and independence and have a dictatorial top-down approach.
	That is what who is attempting to do next week through a treaty that would allow Who to be able to declare health measures above and beyond the U.S.
	government.
	That is treason on its face to attack the integrity of the United States of America.
	My experience as a public school teacher in what was known in LA Unified as hard-to-staff schools at Jefferson High School, which is at 41st and Compton, we averaged a homicide a week within a mile radius of the school.
	I have had in my career, I think it's eight students who have been killed and almost all of them are associated with gangs.
	And from my experience is that the violence, and for my high school students at Jefferson High School, when I would ask, I said, hey, how many of you have been shot at?
	Almost all of them raise their hands.
	And then the follow-up question as you get more and more uncomfortable, it says, hey, how many of you have been shot?
	Half the fucking kids will stand up and the guys will start pulling up their shirt and they got stories all the time.
	So there's just a culture.
	And from my experience, it's associated with poverty.
	It's associated with the gangs, especially with the gangs.
	They are armed.
	The gangs are involved in drug trade competition for income.
	And if you get into drug trade, The people at the top are protected by the cops and the CIA is involved as the supplier of a lot of those drug streams.
	Gary Webb of the San Jose Mercury News, a Pulitzer Prize winner, covered that of what was happening in California with the CIA drug ring.
	But it must have been, you know, a lot of pressure for Gary.
	He ended up committing suicide by shooting himself in the head twice.
	Yeah, it's amazing.
	It's amazing, Carl.
	You've got to be really determined to kill yourself to do it.
	To kill yourself twice, Carl.
	Extra serve.
	Yeah, very good.
	Meanwhile, Bill Maher blasts Biden's Ministry of Truth, warns Democrats the Disinformation Governments Board would add a field day with Obama's big lie.
	Bill Maher issued a warning, hammering home his point, highlighting a lie by Obama as an example.
	He also took a shot at incoming disinformation czar Nina Jankowicz, who's a ditz.
	In late April, DHS created the Disinformation Governance Board to coordinate countering misinformation relating to homeland security, focused specifically on irregular migration in Russia.
	However, a memo erased earlier appears to expand the Disinformation Governance Board's responsibilities and power.
	Disinformation, which is false information that is deliberately spread with the intent to deceive or mislead, can take many forms.
	By the way, that comes right out of my published work on misinformation and disinformation.
	When it comes to DHS work, the department is focused on disinformation that threatens the security of the American people, including disinformation spread by foreign sites such as Russia, China, and Iran.
	And other adversaries such as transnational criminal organization and human smuggling organization.
	Such malicious actors often spread this information to exploit vulnerable individuals in the American public, including during national emergency.
	On Friday's episode of Real Time, the liberal talk show host said he agreed with the newly formed department's role in combating Russian disinformation, since they are our adversary and trying to hurt us.
	However, he's deeply concerned with how it could be politically weaponized.
	Here we have disinformation defined as false information deliberately spread, he quoted, then referenced Obamacare promise to America from former President Obama.
	Well, you could have said that about, if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor.
	Obama's vow to proclaim the lie of the year by PolitiFact in 2013.
	It also said, here's a phrase, can take many forms.
	Now we're going faster down the celebrity slope.
	So government should not be involved in deciding what's true or not true.
	Mayor questioned what would happen if Republicans regain the House.
	Who do you think the truth czar is going to be in the White House in the next election?
	Who do you think the truth czar is going to be in 2025?
	Former Representative Jane Harmon, who sits on the Department of Homeland Security, said during the show if the new department were confined to a few missions it'd be fine, but Something very broad scale would be highly unfortunate.
	Told Mar, I don't think that's where it's going.
	Mar mentioned many people labeling the Ministry of Truth, the Department of Propaganda and Orwell's dystopian 1984.
	Yes, the right to compare this to Orwell and the Ministry of Truth is exactly what it sounds like.
	Numerous Republicans have called Biden's disinformation government board a ministry of truth, including Ron DeSantis, Kevin McCarthy, Lauren Barber, Marco Rubio, and Marjorie Taylor Greene.
	Barr also slammed the incoming director for wanting to enable verified Twitter users to edit other users.
	Edit other users if they feel a tweet is misleading.
	How insane is that?
	During a recent Zoom call, Nina Jankowicz said, verified people can essentially start to edit Twitter in the same sort of way Wikipedia so they can edit.
	And by God, I've had my stuff edited by Wikipedia.
	They've even gutted my whole entry in punishment for exposing the Holocaust as a myth.
	Mayor, note that Twitter users can easily add a reply to tweets which could provide context.
	Oh, you mean like what Twitter is?
	That's what Twitter is?
	Somebody said something and then you add context?
	He snapped back sarcastically?
	These are not bright people in our government.
	The idea we can clean up Twitter to protect you from fake news and disinformation is ridiculous.
	People always lie.
	That's what they do.
	People lie.
	Every age is a misinformation age.
	And whenever a new means of communication comes along, some reach right for the censor button.
	In 1858, the New York Times thought we couldn't handle the transatlantic telegraph.
	They said it was superficial and too fast for the truth.
	Lies are all around you.
	You develop a better bullshit detector, you snarl, that's a better solution than giving up what I'm allowed to read.
	Who decides that?
	Who decides against the no evidence for that sticker slapped on?
	This still is America where people have the right to express what they think, including to be wrong, to lie, and yes, the right to be an a-hole.
	And if you think you know everything and no one else could possibly have some other truth, you should be glad for that protection because you're an a-hole.
	I think he got that pretty close to right.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, we need a ministry of truth with this administration, but we don't need the person that they've got in charge of administrating it.
	The whole thing is absolutely absurd.
	You know, there's so much misinformation.
	I've spent the last 10 years refuting every claim about global warming, green energy, peak oil, Big Bang, the Apollo mission.
	9-1-1, it's like we mentioned earlier, every conspiracy that they talk about is real other than the earth is flat and nuclear bombs don't exist.
	So anytime that one of these self-proclaimed experts wants to debate me on any of those subjects, let's have a free open debate and we'll let the truth rise to the top.
	Just like, you know, like I say, cream rises to the top, but so does scum.
	Carl, your thoughts.
	Red Shoe Club Bill Maher, one of the worst political pimps for disinformation, talking about disinformation, along with Jane Harman, who hasn't found a war she doesn't like.
	So first, this is, it's pretty much the Orwellian opposite of everything.
	You know, I'm glad that he's speaking up on the issue.
	Maybe it's some CYA, who knows what's going on there.
	But if you were to take the top three disinformation that is official from our own government, and you were to rank those in terms of the impact on lives, the quantity and the quality for human lives, and count the money, Then the top three areas of disinformation that are official are all these wars, the 200 plus armed attacks the U.S.
	has engaged in since World War II, that debt is money, because that's the system that we have, that's why you have an exponential growth curve with aggregate debt, and that lying is equal to news.
	Carl B. Herman Blackspot, any of these shows, I have one published paper, and I put all three of those into one published research paper via the Claremont Colleges, because you need all three of those in order to run an empire.
	You need to be able to control war and politics to get the policies that you need.
	You need to control money to pay your minions and to enrich yourself.
	And then you need to have the corporate media lying so that the people believe that this is all good.
	And yeah, Jane Harman, just a few missions, huh, Jane?
	How about to cover those too-big-to-fail banks or how about to cover those wars that definitely support Israel?
	Excellent, excellent, Carl.
	Meanwhile, we have Elon Musk putting Twitter on hold after making a huge discovery I anticipated.
	Just when you thought the Daily Roller Coaster over ownership of Twitter had safely landed and was grounded, new details emerge that it's no longer a resolved issue.
	After two months of ups and downs watching Musk rise to victory, it turns out he may have cold feet or something like it.
	According to Musk's Twitter timeline, he is concerned about technical details that ought to have been settled long since.
	He's calling out the company about its practices in a roundabout way.
	Well, Musk threw cold water in the face of his supporters, and they were hopeful about a positive new direction for the social media giant.
	He seemed to try to keep a grab on the narrative he was indeed the interested owner, and that the deal would be finalized at some point.
	Now the Daily Mail is reporting.
	He's claiming the takeover is temporarily on hold, that he's still committed.
	Musk is still committed.
	Claims he wants further information about the number of spam accounts, leading many to speculate about which high file accounts have really been flaunting a fake following all along.
	Analysts say the move could be intended to lower the price or pull out of the deal.
	Twitter stock Plunged as much as 25% after his first tweet.
	Tesla stock jumped 6%.
	Elon Musk has insisted he's still committed.
	What do we have here?
	Twitter deal temporarily on hold.
	Petty details supporting calculation.
	Spam fake accounts do indeed represent less than 5% of users.
	According to Finances Online, the number of users is confusing.
	Twitter has 300 million monthly active users based on the latest reported data.
	Twitter's monetizable number of daily active users is 166 million, a 24% growth from 2019.
	Meanwhile, in the U.S.
	66 million, a 24% growth from 2019.
	Meanwhile, in the US alone, Twitter has 69.3 million active users as of January of 2021.
	Twitter is especially popular in the US, The microblogging site had 69.3 active users as of January 2021.
	Japan and India were ranked second and third with 50.9 and 17.5, respectively.
	Twitter's user base represents only a fraction of the total social media users in 2020.
	While Twitter's board agreed to the purchase last month, it's yet to be approved by the shareholders, not expected to close for several months.
	Shares of social media company fell as much as 25% in trading.
	It's not clear what the legal effect of this tweet was, still committed to acquisition.
	Some analysts were baffled he announced the move on Twitter rather than a regulatory filing.
	Web Bush analyst Dan Hives called Musk's tweet bizarre, said it says the whole deal into a circus show with many questions but no concrete answers.
	Many will view this as Musk using his Twitter filing spam accounts as a way to get out of the deal in a vastly changing market.
	If Musk does decide to still go down the deal path, a clear renegotiation is likely on the table.
	Maybe he's doing it for business reasons.
	Maybe it's simply a gambit to reduce the price.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yes, well, we have our orange man, Bad, who is going to open up his Truth Social platform.
	And as of the end of March 2022, Truth Social app had fallen from 872,000 during its launch week to about 60,000 per week.
	And that's downloading of the app, a reduction over 90 percent.
	And visits to Truth Social have fallen from 6 million per week to 1.9 million.
	So that's a two thirds loss in his weekly viewership at the former president's social media site.
	So there was a demand for an honest social media site.
	Trump didn't deliver.
	But, you know, if it.
	If Musk can walk away with an extra billion dollars and put Twitter completely out of business, there'll be a great big open field for him to install whatever type of system he wants, and hopefully he can sidestep all of the planned restrictions.
	And using his Starlink system, he can probably get stuff past the censors over in the EU and UK, which have already said that they're going to heavily censor his site.
	One of the joys of Twitter with Trump on it was he was just one more member of Twitter.
	Now he had a fabulous following, but it put him on an equal status with everybody like that.
	It was democratic.
	Him creating his own special social truth is arrogant and presumptuous and puts him in control.
	The appeal is totally the opposite.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	As we talked about the other day, if you do have this cooperative competition of ideas and the best ideas do rise to the top and that becomes fun, it becomes engaging, and it becomes productive because these best ideas do rise.
	To the top for consideration in the 2020 election.
	To the contrast, if we have accurate voting, the 2020 election will show 20% of the vote went to Biden.
	And I wouldn't be surprised if it also shows with a forensic accounting into Twitter that maybe 20% of those accounts are fake.
	It certainly would be revealing to find out who those accounts are and what the content was, and then to dig a little bit further and find out where the source of that information is from.
	When we win, if we win, it'll be the ordinary people will be shocked to believe that everything that they've been told is a massive lie and everything is staged propaganda incidentally.
	It's all fake.
	Anything that matters is fake.
	Carl, you got it right.
	I wouldn't be surprised if 5-10% of Twitter accounts were Intel Ops, you know, PSI Ops, Army, Bass.
	It's disgusting, but I think it's very realistic.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, broercon2, live, needtoknowatgmail.com.
	Live.
	Need to know at gmail.com.
	Here we have from David Barton.
	The statistics this ex-Reuters guy cites comport very well with the one I referred Davidson College President Carol Quinlan noted in my article.
	Vince Foster's college goes full woke.
	You also assert that your difference with Vasco Koldmayer is essentially definitional, meaning I assume you would differ over what is meant by the term systemic racism.
	But that's a problem.
	You and lots of others sling the term around as a sort of weapon without explaining what you mean by it, as though you had no obligation to define it.
	Since you promised your June statement on the George Floyd and Trayvon Martin cases, Colin Mayer's framing of the issue seems to address itself directly to your use of the current systemic racism accusation.
	The most frequently used argument in support of the claim of systemic racism is use of force by police against blacks, which in his claim is disproportional and racially motivated.
	This, it is said, is symptomatic of the intrinsically racist nature of American society, which uses law enforcement to harass and oppress minorities.
	The question when we hear the use of what seems to be the use of excessive force by police against blacks is whether it's representative or anomalous.
	Cole Mayer cites a Wall Street Journal report in 2019, Blacks in the country account for 53% of the homicides and 60% of the robberies, but represent only 25% of those fatally shot by police.
	While the latter number is higher than the 13% of the population that's black, it's very much lower than one should expect in relation to their likely violent encounter with police related to their crime rate.
	Those numbers are in complete accord with a conversation I had a couple of years ago with a local Fairfax County, Virginia cop who's married to the daughter of longtime family friends.
	He said police generally are far less likely to use force against blacks than others because of the high level of political sensitivity of the issue.
	It's really a pretty simple matter of self-preservation and work.
	Like anyone else, white or black, cops prefer to stay out of trouble.
	Meanwhile, tyranny continues.
	Beverly writes, a few judges and attorneys test positive for COVID and now everyone at the courthouse where I work has to go back to wearing masks.
	I could cry.
	This is what happens when you live in a blue check mafia state.
	One of the goddamn judges wears two masks and a face shield and is double, triple jabbed and boozed at.
	She still tested positive last week, and I am sure that's why we're being face shackled again.
	She's a Democrat to the core and also on the courthouse COVID task force.
	God, bring us a red wave in the midterms.
	It won't help me.
	Mecklenburg County is blue state hell, so the Democrats could commit murder and still win.
	But anything to thwart the Dems, even if in a small way.
	Meanwhile, our final thoughts, Joe, yours.
	Yes, well, Jim and I had an interesting discussion last week with a Canadian named Matt Ehert, E-H-R-E-T.
	He's got a site, Canadian Patriot 1776, and he's a historian, and he's got a lot of really useful facts.
	He's got some preconceived cognitive dissonance confirmation bias issues, and one of those is that FDR was a white hat.
	So, I'm just going to run through a real brief little Items just on World War II with FDR, and that is number one, undeclared war in the Atlantic.
	Starting September 4th and going through October 31st, four U.S.
	destroyers engaged German submarines.
	Several of them had returned fire.
	One of them, the Reuben James, was sunk on October 31st by U-boat 552 and killed 100 sailors.
	But you never heard about it in the news because we didn't want to start the war until after we had a really good reason to attack Japan.
	OK, so then the next item would be Pearl Harbor Betrayed.
	This is a book by Michael Gannon.
	We had broken the Japanese code.
	We knew exactly when they were going to hit and exactly why we needed to turn off our radars that Sunday morning and why we needed to have no planes flying that could actually give us a warning.
	Then, December 8, 1941.
	This is MacArthur's Pearl Harbor, where he had 12 hours notice.
	He didn't send up a single plane as a picket, didn't have any boats set out as a picket out to verify that the Japanese were going to be attacking Manila, and he managed to waste half of the U.S.
	aircraft in the Pacific.
	That was B-17 bombers and P-40 fighters.
	And then we have Torpedo Alley, which along the eastern coast of the United States from January 1942 until June of 1942, a six-month period, the United States had no destroyer escorts, no air surveillance from our, you know, sea planes or dirigibles that could have easily spotted submarines.
	The submarines that the Germans had had such an easy time that rather than waste torpedoes, they would surface and use their deck guns and sink our tankers with their deck gun.
	We lost over 400 tankers and 5,000 merchant marine men on our own shores because he wouldn't impose a blackout, which along the coast allowed the ships to be easily sighted by backlighting.
	Fascinating.
	absolutely contributed to the amount of destruction prior to us getting heavily involved in the war.
	Because you can't have a war that lasts for five years if you start off with a whole bunch of extra toys.
	So let's destroy the toys and then we can make more toys.
	Crazy. - Fascinating.
	Carl. - Well, Joe, as a professional historian, I gotta say that FDR did something really good in this campaign trail.
	He coined the term banksters and he vowed to go after them.
	But then shortly after being elected, he just dropped that topic entirely.
	And then he signed that act to confiscate all the gold, to take it away from Americans on penalty of I forget the amount of the fine and the prison sentence, but basically stole all the gold from Americans.
	So the only thing white hat about FDR is, you know, he was rich, so he probably owned a hat of every color, and that's as white as he's going to get in the hat department.
	So need to know news, what we are covering as distinct from corporate media propaganda, those lying sacks of spin, is that we take a look at what are the comprehensive facts?
	What is the data that is Objective, comprehensive, and independently verifiable so that people can see for themselves what's going on.
	And once we get that data, as we've advocated, is to have open debate and conversation and consideration as to the meaning of those facts and for the scrutiny of those facts.
	If there are alleged facts that turn out to be false, they're removed from consideration.
	If you have other data that you want to add, bring it in.
	And then people get a voice over what we're going to do.
	That's policy.
	That's politics.
	That is a democratic system.
	And then once you choose what are you going to do for policy, then that whole process begins again.
	That decision, that choice for policy generates data, and then you have at it with the data, and then you tweak policy, and it goes on and on.
	For what Beverly was talking about, for me, in California, from time to time I get jury summons notices.
	And the last one I got, I communicated with the court via email, saying, You know, I bet you have these health orders there where you have to wear a mask inside the courtroom.
	If that's true, could you please tell me what would happen if I stood for my Title 21 rights to decline a medical experiment?
	Because you would support Title 21 over your state mandates, right?
	And then the replies that I get back is that they claim that I'm avoiding jury duty and I go back and forth just to say, no, no, no, no, no.
	I think you misunderstood the question.
	What would happen if I stand for Title 21 and decline a medical experimental mask?
	So they've dropped me from jury duty.
	I haven't heard from them.
	Again, so Patriots viewers, listeners, just hang in there.
	Stick with the truth.
	The surrender option to these psychopaths is unacceptable.
	And man, I still think that we're in this Emperor's New Clothes scenario, where it just takes enough of us just pointing and asking people to look up, and we'll see.
	That's the only card that I have to play.
	Well, Joe and Carl show again and again why I so enjoy their brilliant commentary here with a lot of historical aspects.
	I believe historically, Barack Obama is going to go down as Bullshit Obama because he promoted all these false flags to deceive and manipulate the American people.
	He is perhaps the most contemptible of presidents because he was elected with the enthusiasm of the American people to have the first black leader and he turned out to be morally corrupt to the core.
	That was a disgrace.
	For which he shall not be forgiven.
	History is going to reflect very badly on his administration and his actions in that capacity.
	Damn him for that.
	He was elected to stand up for the Constitution and he and others who have instead sabotaged it, such as a president administration, deserve to rot in hell.
	Thank you for joining us.
	Spend as much time as you can with your friends and family.
	We don't know how much time we have left, and we want you to benefit from your loved ones, spending as much time with them as you can.

▲