All Episodes
Previous Next
May 5, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:19:16
Need to Know News (4 May 2022) with Joe Olson and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin.
Delighted to be joined today by Joe Olson in Houston and Holly Seelinger from an undisclosed location on the East Coast.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know and there's some whoppers.
We have Norman Mineta, who served in the Clinton and Bush cabinet, dead at the age of 90.
Former Representative Norman Mineta, who served in two presidential cabinets, died at the age of 90 at his Edgewater, Maryland home.
It was from heart illness.
He had been a mayor.
Here was a description given of him.
A first-generation Japanese-American Mineta was held in an internment camp as a child during World War II.
He went on to become the first Asian-American elected mayor of a major city, his hometown of San Jose, before serving 11 terms in Congress.
He was a champion of civil rights and led efforts to obtain an official apology for Japanese-Americans forced into internment camps, among other notable achievements.
He was well-respected on both sides of the aisle, leading his appointment to the cabinets of both President Clinton, a Democrat, and Bush, a Republican.
On September 11, 2001, as Transportation Secretary, he made the courageous decision to ground all flights during the chaos following the terrorist attack on our country.
And he would go on to see the creation of the Transportation Security Administration guarding a similar attack.
Interestingly, flights that were not grounded that were allowed to take place flew the Bin Laden family out of the United States and back to Saudi Arabia.
Meanwhile, my dear colleague Kevin Barrett sent me the following.
Minetta's saying, the plane is 10 miles out, Mr. Cheney.
Do the orders still stand?
And Cheney whipped his neck around and said, of course they still stand.
Where Bush, who's giving him a Presidential Medal of Freedom, is saying, want me to strangle you with this thing?
Just to give you a background, what's talked about here is testimony that Norman Mineta gave to the 9-11 Commission about his experience in an underground bunker where Dick Cheney was in charge.
Unknown to Mineta, he was the executive director of the 9-11 attacks.
An aide came up and said to him, sir, it's 50 miles out.
Sir, it's 30 miles out.
Sir, it's 10 miles out.
Do the orders still stand?
And Cheney whipped around and berated him for even asking the question.
What was taking place was that a plane was approaching the Pentagon.
The order Cheney had given was to not shoot it down.
The aid was therefore raising the question because the obvious thing to do, given planes were being used as weapons against targets, would have been to shoot it down.
You lose the passengers and the plane, but not the personnel in the property at the target.
What was going on was the use of a plane to create the deception by having it fly toward and then over the Pentagon at the same time an explosion took place to create the impression that a plane had actually hit the Pentagon.
On June 22nd of 2006, where I'd been invited to give the keynote address at Alex Jones American Scholars Conference on 9-11, I was contacted by Fox News and asked to come on to the Hannity Show to talk about the discoveries of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, which I had founded in December of 2005 and had taken off like a rocket.
When I was waiting in the room, however, to go on the air, I asked for them to bring in a TV.
And when Alan Combs announced, you're not going to believe what your students are learning from their professors about 9-11.
I knew I had them because they didn't know enough to get it right.
Holmes began by asking whether the course I was teaching on 9-11 was required or an elective.
Check this out.
Making their way onto the campuses of some major American universities.
Joining us now, the co-chairman of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota at Duluth, James Fetzer.
Professor, thank you so much for being with us.
First of all, is this a required course?
Can you hear me?
Yeah, go ahead.
Is it a required course?
Well, you got your facts foxed, I'm sorry to say.
In fact, I created an organization of faculty and experts to study 9-11, not to teach in courses, but I must tell you what we have discovered would certainly qualify as material for an important course the university ought to be teaching.
So you're saying you're not teaching this?
I want to be clear here.
You're not teaching a course in this?
No, you're confused, and I hope that Fox usually does a better job on their research than this, but I did create, I created an organization of faculty and scholars to study 9-11, and we discovered that practically everything the government has told us about it is false.
I want to get into that in a moment, I just want to be clear.
So as far as you know, there is no course on 9-11 conspiracy theories being taught at your university or any place else that you know of?
That's right, but it's a great idea.
I would certainly support having such a course because there's a lot of material to work with.
All right, and what evidence do you have that the government was involved, that Cheney knew, that anybody in the chain of command knew ahead of time that this was going to happen on 9-11?
Can you give us any piece of evidence that would substantiate that argument?
Absolutely.
For example, Norman Mineta testified to the 9-11 Commission that he observed Dick Cheney in an underground bunker when a young aide came up to him and repeatedly told him, Sir, it's 50 miles out.
Sir, it's 30 miles out.
Sir, it's 10 miles out.
Sir, do the orders still stand?
Cheney turned around, jumped on him, nearly bit off his head and said, of course the orders still stand.
Have you heard anything different?
The order had to be to not shoot down the plane that was approaching the Pentagon.
After all, the order should have been to shoot it down.
Shooting it down would be the obvious thing to do when you consider that you're going to lose the passengers in the plane if you shoot it down.
But if you don't, you're going to use the passengers in the plane and also, of course, all the personnel and property at the target.
Hey, Prof, let me ask you.
I want to go back to something in an exchange that you and Alan just had a moment ago.
In fairness to our producers, when they talked to you earlier, you said that courses are being taught in which these conspiracy theories are advanced to the students.
Am I correct?
No, you're not correct.
What I said to him was, in courses on critical thinking, sometimes issues related to, for example, tax cuts or global warming or reasons for going to war in Iraq might be discussed as examples, but I know of no courses as such that are being taught that way.
So let me ask, how big is this group of professors that you've put together, this organization you've formed, that gives credence, if you will, to the theory you just advanced about 9-11?
Well, there are over 300 members, Colonel North, including about 200 with advanced research skills, and about 85 that have affiliations, including physicists, mechanical engineers, pilots, aeronautical engineers.
We've discovered that the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolition.
We've discovered that the Osama bin Laden appears to have had nothing to do with it.
Help me out here.
Having been involved in a couple of controversial undertakings over my years in government service, How many people in the government were part of this conspiracy that you envision?
Hundreds?
Thousands?
No, no, Ollie.
I think it's a small number.
You know about classified, controlled operations where everything's compartmentalized.
Do you know, Ollie, that the FBI has confirmed that they have no hard evidence relating Osama bin Laden to the events of 9-11?
Are you aware of that?
Well, Osama bin Laden himself claims that.
I mean, they didn't manufacture those tapes.
This is the FBI, Ollie.
This is the FBI that has affirmed in the last couple of weeks they have no hard evidence tying Osama bin Laden to 9-11.
And so all of these people that died on 9-11, as you're articulating, died as a consequence of what our government did.
We're trying to find out exactly what happened.
Our government has a considerable reputation for telling things that are not true, Wally.
All right, Professor.
We thank you very much for coming on tonight.
Coming up, former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
How ironic that I was followed by Bibi Netanyahu, who together with Ehud Olmert planned 9-11.
I thought that was a fascinating juxtaposition.
And of course, Osama was our man in Afghanistan, instrumental for getting Stinger missiles to the Mujahideen.
They used to shoot down Soviet helicopters and planes.
He was An officer in the CIA, Colonel Tim Osman, and an official for the agency visited him in a hospital in Dubai shortly before his death from his medical maladies in Afghanistan on 15 December 2001, where there were local obituaries at the time, and CNN and Fox both caught up to the fact of his death on December 26, and reports you can still find online reporting Osama bin Laden was dead.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, well, kids, you're in luck because the professor and I have had a series of lectures on exactly what happened on 9-1-1.
I'm a trained structural engineer registered in Texas for 38 years.
In the last 20 years, I've invested over 10,000 hours researching the 9-1-1 events, including 80 articles on nuclear education at Veterans Today.
The source material from the 9-1-1 Commission, FEMA, NIST, UL.
I've studied this more than than almost anybody else in the country.
And for Ali North to sit there and browbeat you, this is the Iran Contra man who was responsible for smuggling cocaine into America and weapons over to Iran in exchange for prisoners.
And, you know, the whole thing, this guy's one of the, he had to be pardoned by Ronnie Reagan, the, you know, ketchup is a vegetable wife president.
What a joke.
This whole government has been a joke for my whole entire lifetime is all I can say.
And everything I've researched, it goes back before Lincoln.
It's been a joke.
But anyhow, yeah, for him to get on his high horse and tell you how sanctimonious he is is just insufferable.
But bottom line is, if you go to Bitshoot and do the James Fetzer channel there, you can put in 9-1-1 search, and I'll put it down in the comments when this show's posted today of our latest one on 9-1-1, but we go through this extensively every way possible.
Joe, your image seems to have disappeared.
Let me say, when the producers notified me Ollie would be sitting in for Sean Hannity, I called my wife and I said, honey, this is just going to be a conversation between two former Marine Corps officers.
And she said, don't kid yourself.
They're going to try to kill you.
And it would be the case they'd bring back Sean months later to try to do the same and he'd have no more success.
But then months later, Bill O'Reilly took a shot at it.
I was sitting in a room with a bright light in my face when he came on and said, I'm going to tell the world you're a nut and you hate your country.
Boom!
I was on the air and he repeated it ad hominem so I could never get back to it.
I thought it had been a bit of a disaster.
In New York, subsequently after I gave a speech on 9-11 at the Great Hall of Cooper Union, my wife and I and a friend went to an Alex Jones event at a nearby theater.
They rolled out the red carpet for me.
I was very touched.
They put me up on a platform with the first responders, and when I sat down, A fellow next to me leaned over and said, it was seeing you on O'Reilly that convinced me 9-11 was an inside job.
And I decided, well, maybe it wasn't worth it at all.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, that was an epic takedown on your part.
I'd never seen that.
When was that clip from?
22 June 2006.
2006?
Oh, wow.
Yeah, that was great.
I couldn't stop laughing at that.
That was great.
I think you're right, though.
Even just having the exposure with the mainstream news, people are not dumb.
I mean, they can see when someone's trying to insult someone and do a hit piece.
You know, even Fox News.
I mean, I just...
I don't know.
It's hard to see them continue to try to push that narrative.
And like you said, I mean, talking about Osama Bin Laden, like a guy in a cave on dialysis with like an early 2000s phone trying to run this operation.
Just on the face of it, anyone that really looks into it at this point, that's why they don't talk about it anymore.
You know, they probably wouldn't have You or someone else on Fox News.
They should.
I think, you know, it'd be great if Tucker would have you on or something because I think people would actually be way more open to this idea of 9-11 truth at this point.
Just the facts.
I mean, you've been steadfast, people like you.
The same questions are always brought up and they've never had an answer to any of it.
In all three of those programs, with Ollie and with Sean and then with Riley, are still available online on YouTube, remarkably enough.
But more importantly, during that event where I'd been invited by Alex Jones to give the keynote speech, On Sunday, they had a panel discussion where Alex moderated.
There were four members of the panel, all from scholars.
Steve Jones, a physicist from BYU.
I've been invited to be my co-chair.
Bob Bowman, who had shot down 101 MiGs in the Korean War.
Can you believe it?
A real Air Force ace, a hero.
But he was there because he had a degree in nuclear engineering from Caltech, and it advised President Reagan and Ford on the Star Wars project.
Webster Tarbly, who'd edited a spectacular book, 9-11 Synthetic Tear, Made in the USA.
And me, as a founder of Scholars, with a top 10 reasons we know the 9-11 hijackers are fake.
C-SPAN recorded, ran an hour and 45.
They broadcast seven or eight times at good time slots.
That's still up too.
We want to put that in our archive.
That's well worth tracking down.
Joe, I'm so pleased to see you visually.
You are back.
Your comments were, of course, excellent.
Meanwhile, the Chief Justice ordered a probe of the egregious leak of the abortion draft.
He's verified that it was authentic, and the Supreme Court appears overturned to-- poised to overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade, as well as a related case known as Casey.
The High Court's first public comment as a draft was published, He said, although the document described in yesterday's report is authentic, it does not represent a decision by the court or the final position of any member on the issues.
He said, to the extent this betrayal of the confidence of the court was intended to undermine the integrity of our operation, it will not succeed.
I've directed the marshal to launch an investigation.
They have.
I have been informed.
Found that it was a law clerk to Justice Sotomayor, an Indian-American who felt the issues were so important he wanted to warn the public what was coming.
And of course, I don't mean a Native American, I mean from India.
Meanwhile, if this devolves on the state, then 26 states may actually ban it entirely, which is stunning and outrageous, but that would be the effect of the decision to return this matter to the states.
Here's a bit about the history.
This is from Wikipedia, which in this instance seems to be pretty good.
A landmark decision of the court where they ruled that the Constitution protects a pregnant woman's liberty to choose to have an abortion without excessive government restriction.
It struck down many U.S.
federal and state abortion laws, fueled an abortion debate about whether and to what extent abortion should be legal, who should decide its legality, and the role of moral and religious views in the political sphere.
The 7-2 decision ruled that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment provides a right to privacy that protects a pregnant woman's right to choose whether to have an abortion.
It ruled the right is not absolute and must be balanced to get government interest in protecting women's health and prenatal line.
They resolved this balancing act, in what I regard as among the wisest of all decisions ever rendered by the court, by tying state regulation to the three trimesters.
During the first, governments could not prohibit abortion at all.
During the second, they could regulate how it's performed.
During the third, it could be prohibited entirely so long as they made exception to save the life of the woman or her health.
They classified the right to choose to have an abortion as fundamental, which required courts to evaluate challenged abortion laws under a strict scrutiny standard.
The ruling was criticized by some, calling it an example of judicial activism.
They revisited and modified Roe and Casey in 1992, abandoning the trimester framework in favor of a standard based on fetal viability, that is, the ability of the fetus to survive outside of the uterine environment, which happens to coincide with the end of the second trimester.
So in terms of the timeline, they actually converge the end of the second trimester, the end of six months of pregnancy, as a moment at which the developing fetus attains a status of personhood.
Under the law, remember, it's only persons who are deliberately killed by those who can be described as having murdered them, and under the law, There are exceptions where the deliberate killing of a person is legal, such as soldiers in combat, police in the performance of their duty, and citizens in self-defense.
The leak by Alito suggests they're going to overturn this.
The history of abortion in the U.S.
is interesting because there was no concern about it until 1821 when Connecticut passed the first law.
Connecticut passed the first law in 1869.
It was not legal before, I think it meant was not illegal before quickening in 27 out of 37 states.
Quickening is when the fetus begins to kick around and the mother is well aware of its presence.
Altogether, 30 of the 37 and 6 of the 10 had codified laws restricting abortion, along with the Kingdom of Hawaii, where abortion had one in common.
Every state had abortion laws by 1900.
Abortion has sometimes been considered to be a common law offense before specific statutes were made about it.
The majority opinion in Roe, authored by a justiciary named, would claim the criminalization of abortion did not have roots in the English common law tradition.
One purpose for banning abortion was to preserve the life of the fetus, another to protect the life of the mother, another to create deterrence to future abortions, another was to avoid injuring the mother's ability to have future children.
Judges did not always distinguish between which purpose was more important or fundamental.
Rather than arresting women, a legal official were more likely to interrogate them to attain evidence against the individual doing the abortion, and that, I think, is a very important point.
What is this?
A prohibition against a medical procedure?
It's telling physicians they cannot practice medical procedures of this kind, even if they believe they are perfectly appropriate and warranted.
In my opinion, this is Congress practicing medicine without a license, and I find it highly objectionable.
Here are some stages in embryogenesis.
There are many Americans, I'm sorry to say, who seem to entertain the fantasy that from the moment of conception, when the sperm fertilizes the ovum to create a zygote, That you have what looks like a little person, but that's ridiculous.
It's just a blob of cells.
By day 36, you can see it starts to look something a bit more like a shrimp, so 39.
And, of course, below you see the first versus the second and the third, where it's only after the second trimester that the fetus has the ability to live independent of the woman body.
And at which point in time, the court in Roe in effect declared it became a person with a first primitive right.
As long as it's not a person, it's a special kind of property of the woman.
It can deserve special protection, but an abortion would not be murder.
In fact, the application of the word murder or calling the developing fetus a baby is contrary to ordinary language.
A baby is typically a fetus born live as a child, about which no one has any doubt that they are persons at that point in time.
Let's talk about this.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, so we discussed this on Texas Tuesday yesterday.
So then rather than repeat all of that stuff, let me just say that if you're unfamiliar with what abortion involves, especially our organ and tissue harvesting abortions, you need to see the interview with Robert F. Kennedy and Sound Choice Pharmaceutical Institute. you need to see the interview with Robert F. Kennedy And that's on BitChute.
I put it on the comments yesterday.
I'll put it up again today.
Also, another hypothesis on why the court is having this issue.
Jim Stone said that we currently have 22 percent of America is unvaxxed, 74 percent.
74% are unboosted.
But that means that most of those people are going to end up male and female, both being infertile.
So we're going to have a dramatic drop in demand for abortions.
So one of the possibilities is that the Supreme Court was put on notice that we're going to have to cut down half of the Planned Parenthood sites anyway in the next year or two.
So why don't we just go ahead and make this a political issue so we can use it as cannon fodder for the fall election and get all the soccer moms out there waving their flags.
That's item number one.
And the other thing is that the only previous instance in the last, well, there was one during the 90s, and I don't remember what it was, but it was very superficial.
The only previous leak that we had was on SCOTUS when John Roberts was leaked that he was going to support the overthrow of Obamacare, and once that leak was made public, there was so much of an outrage that he either was blackmailed because of things that he has in his past that only the senior executive service knows about, along with the CIA and the Obama administration, or
He actually had a change of heart or he was just scared that they would come burn his house down because these people are absolutely fanatics.
So that's enough on that subject.
We can save time for something later.
Well, I tend to disagree.
I think that this is going to supercharge the Democrats.
It's going to give them a real issue in relation to midterm.
I don't think any Republican ought to rejoice.
I've been predicting taking 100 seats in the House.
I'm now revising that to 50.
This is going to really create a turmoil.
If they resort to rioting in the streets, however, as they did in 2020, that could backfire on the Democrats.
But I see this as a huge plus politically for the Democrats, who did not have a single viable issue to run on until this.
And we all agree about brutal forms of abortion that are completely wrong and corrupt and condemnable and people ought to be prosecuted for them, Joe.
So that, to me, is a straw man, a misleading argument.
It's not fundamental to the right of a woman to choose or not to choose.
It seems to me the restrictions on women means you're forcing a woman to carry the term an unwanted fetus as a form of reproductive slavery.
The pro-choice position is democratic and American because it enables every woman to choose.
No one is compelled to have an abortion under pro-choice.
You can if your circumstances dictate and it's in accord with your own conscience and your principles and your circumstance and your position, but no one is compelled.
On the other hand, under the pro-life or the move to restrict abortion, women are being compelled to carry a determined unwanted fetus.
We know that they do not Uh, grow up in a loving, nurturing environment.
They turn into juvenile delinquents more often than not, and criminals that have bear a burden upon society.
So, in my opinion, all the arguments favor the choice position.
I'm very concerned that they have overturned Roe and Casey, if that's how it plays out, and it appears it will be.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I'm kind of blackmailed on the topic here because I think that this is just, it's so convenient that just as we're basically going into the threat of a hot war between Russia and China, and we're seeing the central banks probably raising interest rates next week, so we're going to have even more inflation and just like financial turmoil.
There's so many different global things that are absolutely catastrophic right now.
And the Democrats, of course, as you're mentioning, are just hemorrhaging seats right now.
They need something to fundraise on, so this will be perfect for them.
They can grandstand and fundraise.
Try to take in as much money as they can and say that they're helping people and helping women.
So this will be a big windfall for them.
They can fundraise locally.
They can try to get, you know, abortion rights in each state by fundraising and supporting local Democrats.
So this will be good money for them.
I did hear a theory though that could be interesting as far as Another reason why the Supreme Court could be backing away from this and going to more of a states' rights sort of thought on it was that the idea that the Supreme Court with the decision ruled that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment of the Constitution provides a right to privacy that protects
Someone's right to choose whether or not to have an abortion I'm wondering if that could be expanded to like other bodily privacies as well such as you know the job and whatnot.
And also, it will that there is the this right is not absolute must be balanced against government's interest and protecting.
Women's health and prenatal life.
So they're talking about protecting life, but as more information comes out about the vaccine and mRNA, even mainstream news is talking about, hey, there's unintended consequences of mRNA.
All of this health stuff is going to start to fall apart.
They're not going to have that sort of protection.
And then also the court classified with Roe v. Wade, the right to choose as fundamental, which required courts to evaluate Laws under a district scrutiny standard, the highest level of judicial review.
So I think someone could actually go to the Supreme Court, use Roe v. Wade as a case to say, I have my right to choose to not get this jab.
And that the Supreme Court would have to uphold it because of the strict scrutiny laws.
So I think this could be a back-ended way of trying to address.
There's so many, I mean, there's thousands of vaccine cases going through the courts.
And one of them's going to get to the Supreme Court real soon.
Well, both you and Joe have made extremely interesting points.
I would just say I've been dismayed that the Democrats, who've been so powerful about my body, my choice regarding abortion, haven't said a peep about my body, my choice regarding vaccinations.
So I'm fascinated by your critique here, Holly.
I think you may be exactly right.
And we're six months, Jim, we're six months away from the election.
And prior to Roe, there were a half dozen states in the country where you could get legal abortions.
And there's already 21 states that have laws that make abortion illegal, whether Roe's in place or not.
So and there's more that will go ahead and do that.
So this is an issue that's not going to have enough wind to make it all the way to November, given the other threat vectors that everybody in America is facing right now, which we'll get to in a moment.
Joe, I don't see how you can make that claim.
They nationally legalized.
Those states do not have anti-abortion laws that are viable.
But they are standing by is what they have triggers and if Roe is reversed, then they're banning.
But the fact is it creates all kinds of problems for women.
They have to plan to go to another state.
They have to arrange for their families.
They may lose their jobs because they can't have a kid and also continue working.
Joe, you made a lot of points yesterday.
Well, as you say, we can leave it there for now since we're obviously not going to resolve it right here and now.
Meanwhile, Russia claims the Pentagon and other U.S.
organizations are financing military biolabs in Ukraine.
We knew it.
What we have is Russia documenting it to be the case.
A Russian investigator says bioweapons of mass destruction have been financed by the Pentagon and other U.S.
organizations in Ukraine.
This is very troubling.
Alexander Bastrykin, head of Russia's investigating committee, reported the analysis of obtained documents.
Allows us to clearly identify those involved in military and biological activities in Ukraine, including representatives of the U.S.
DoD and American companies with ties there to, in other words, they have the goods.
The Russian investigator said the U.S.
has spent more than $224 million on bioprograms in Ukraine since 2005.
How shocking!
Four and eight have been used to equip and upgrade around 30 research centers in Ukraine.
The result has been evacuated to Kiev-controlled territory before the start of the special military operation so it wouldn't be uncovered.
President Putin, of course, announced the operation on February 24th.
The Russian Defense Ministry in March claimed it found evidence of U.S.-funded biolabs in Ukraine, which urgently destroyed samples of deadly pathogens when the Russian military offensive began.
They have been closely monitoring the bioweapon program developed by the Pentagon in post-Soviet countries.
Washington and Kyiv, of course, denied the claim.
But here you have the evidence.
They've got the documents.
They've got the goods.
They show the U.S.
The UK and other Western nations have been lying.
It was no surprise, but now they've got, as it were, court-ready documentation and proof.
Meanwhile, there were more than 2,000 Ukrainian servicemen in Russia who voluntarily laid down their arms, including five commanders of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Brigade, who fought against a population of the Donbass region.
Investigator working with them learning a lot of details about the circumstances of crimes committed by the Ukrainian regime.
Their testimony in particular works with foreign instructors as well as participation of citizens of other countries as mercenaries.
And by the way, that steel plant in Mariupol has been taken by the Russians.
Meanwhile, U.S.
hypersonic missile tests continue to fail, meaning the U.S.
is increasingly vulnerable to attacks by Russia or China, whose hypersonic missile program has been a success.
Years later, both Russia and China have not simply tested these wonder weapons but have deployed them, while the U.S.
is still struggling to catch up.
The first U.S.
hypersonic weapon will be delayed for as long as a year under a new schedule.
The goal is to declare an early operational capability for Lockheed Martin missile by September 30th, but it has been moved back to sometime in the next fiscal year.
Bloomberg mentions hypersonic weapons are hard to track and destroy because they fly five times the speed of sound and can be maneuvered.
Last month, Russia debuted a hypersonic air-to-ground missile in its attack on Ukraine, and in July, China hit a demonstration target on Earth with a weapon in orbit.
Adversaries don't have to meet the rigorous standards under the U.S.
defense acquisition system or face public scrutiny over days of failure.
But then again, they also aren't wasting money fighting endless brush fires in faraway lands for decades at a time, or trying to make massive profits by producing substandard military weapons that require maintenance projects that more than double the take by the defense industry.
When a weapon has demonstrated at least some capability, remaining test missiles could theoretically be used in an emergency.
The Army and Navy are also working on hypersonic missile design.
The Air Force, however, was sought to be the furthest along.
With these delays, America remains vulnerable, which Is unacceptable.
But I say nothing surprising here.
This is part of the stupidity of wanting to provoke a war with Russia.
Russia has the ability to wipe us out.
We do not have the opposite equal capability.
Joke.
Yes, well the hypersonic missiles that they're touting right now are the ones that are able of doing Mach 10, which is 10 times the speed of sound, which is 1170 feet per second and about 660 miles per hour.
So multiply that times 10, kids.
That's how fast those missiles will get here.
So they're going to be unstoppable with anything we've got in the way of an anti-missile or any type of air defense system.
But they are offensive weapons, so it's not like you've got hypersonic defensive weapons at this particular point, other than it appears that that's what the Starstrike anti-aircraft missile that the British have deployed to the Ukraine.
And here's the deal.
There's so many weapons floating around right now that Russia has a larger stock of Javelins and shoulder-fired Stinger missiles than NATO has.
And also that there's just as many floating around still in Ukraine that's a very unstable country, so a lot of those are going to end up in a lot of other war regions, and I wouldn't be surprised if the Israelis start finding U.S.
Javelins hitting Israeli tanks and U.S.
Stinger missiles taking down Israeli helicopters, jets, and even passenger jets, because this is what you get when you escalate world war And you think that you can contain it because you are not going to contain it and the people that are in charge of this, the military industrial companies that run NATO and the DoD and our goofy U.S.
Congress are absolutely insane.
We voted 417 to 10 to send 33 billion dollars of Sensational commentary, Joe.
I really like that.
but 8.8 billion of that is to set up a international disinformation group and have asset forfeiture so that they can come around and go, well, you've been spreading lies about COVID or global warming or 9-1-1 or the Ukraine war, so we're going to seize all of your assets. you've been spreading lies about COVID or global warming or That's the wonderful excuse we've got for democracy in our country right now.
Sensational commentary, Joe.
I really like that.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think that, well, I've heard that there's like an underground base or there's something crazy going on at that Mariupol steel plant, and that's why things have been kind of held up there for a while.
Well, I think that, well, I've heard that there's like an underground base or there's something crazy going on at that Mariupol steel plant.
And that's why things have been kind of held up there for a while.
Obviously, there's a lot more going on than we're privy to here in the United States.
Obviously, there's a lot more going on than we're privy to here in the United States.
We're really only getting the mainstream news's opinion of what's going on and all the money that we're sending over there, all the drones.
The fact that our politicians like Nancy Pelosi are just up and going over there and promising more support.
And it's just a quagmire for the United States.
It's a terrible thing to be putting the Ukrainian people through.
This has been going on, as we've discussed before, since 2014.
There's been open Western meddling over there.
I just did a video on the Scythian gold artifacts that were stolen over there.
The Ukrainian government is claiming that Russia stole all the golds.
A lot of it was on loan since 2014 to Amsterdam.
So a lot of this has been taken out of Ukraine by the West for years now.
And now they're saying that the Russians are taking artifacts over there, could be tied in with the gold standard that we're seeing Russia going forward, moving to a sound money system.
I think a lot of this has to do with like a divide between the East and West and are we going to move to keep on printing money and go to like a crazy fiat system?
Are we going to try to go to like a sound money system?
Don't get me wrong.
I think they will go to a World War III in order to fight over how the global reset is going to go forward.
Yes, yes, yes.
I think you both made sensational comments here.
Meanwhile, Russia has four potential killer satellites in orbit, at least that we know about.
This is an early article back in 2018.
This shows how far advanced the Russians are over the West.
2018, we knew already.
Russia has at least four potential killer satellites in orbit.
A senior U.S.
diplomat has accused Russia of deploying another small specialized satellite that could be used as an anti-satellite weapon to take out the U.S.
or the Western or NATO satellites.
Of four such systems the Kremlin has launched since 2013, I think Russia is smart to do it.
This highlights a lack of internationally accepted ground rules for hostile activities in space.
The Russian satellite's behavior on orbit was inconsistent with anything seen before from on-orbit inspection or space situational awareness capabilities, including other Russian inspection satellite activities.
When the mention of other activities, this was likely referring to three additional inspector satellites the Russians launched between 2013 and 2015.
They are known as Cosmos 2491, Cosmos 2499, and Cosmos 2504, which have conducted a number of apparent tests, getting relatively close to various pieces of space debris before going dormant in 2016.
The next year, Russia turned one of them back on and sent it near to a portion of a Chinese weather satellite, which that country had destroyed in a ground-based anti-satellite test in 2007.
It's important to note the concept of a small-inspector satellite isn't new and makes good sense.
Sending manned missions to examine satellites or other space objects and making repairs or modifications has historically been costly and complicated.
Having a semi-autonomous space-based repair crew and sorts on call could simplify the arrangement significantly.
The problem is any satellite that can maneuver itself very close to another and may have small arms or probes to physically interact with a target is inherently capable of being a weapon.
In trials involving controlling the maneuvering defense satellite ground or orbital communication system were tested and methods involving ballistic estimates and new software were employed.
For years, experts and others have pointed out the clear threat these dual-purpose satellites might pose.
The U.S.
and China have and still are both actively exploring advanced space-based inspector-type systems as well, which may set the stage for an even more complex situation involving groups of small satellites attacking and defending each other.
The potential for a serious incident in outer space is being driven by advances in technology that challenge existing rules and norms governing space activity.
More than a decade of international rules and regulations have yet to catch up with these continued developments.
How do we verify what countries say their spacecraft are doing?
What would be enough information to prove what the purpose of an object is?
Joe, your thoughts.
And remember, this is from 2018.
The Russians are far, far advanced of that now.
Your thoughts.
Well, that's four years, yeah.
The unfortunate thing is that virtually every technology is dual-use technology.
Anything that can be developed for the good can easily be turned to the bad, and probably more readily used for the bad than for the good, and especially in the hands of the demonic people we got ruling the world right now.
Russia has enormous inventory of electronic warfare systems, and those would probably be able to take out all the satellite systems necessary to conduct warfare almost instantly.
That would be your communication and navigation satellites, as well as your surveillance satellites.
So I would expect that that particular technology is going to go dark in the very first instances of escalation once we reach that point.
And really interesting thing, when our kids were growing up, there was a song that was pretty popular on the radio by a group called Nina, N-E-N-A.
called 99 Luftballons, and it was sung in German.
It was a big hit over there.
It was an anti-war song, and they did an English version.
It became real big over here, but most of the album was in German.
But a really interesting group, interesting song.
The thesis of the song is that a bunch of kids were out playing, and they released 99 Luftballons, which are flying balloons in German, but what we would call them is helium balloons.
And the enemy radar, because the prevailing winds everywhere on the planet are based on the rotation of the planet, so they're always from the west to the east, and so these German kids released these 99 balloons.
They started floating across the border.
The Russian radar picked them up and said, gee, looks like maybe it's UFOs, so they send up 99 fighters And then next thing you know 99 anti-aircraft crews decide geez these people are getting ready to attack us and so they start shooting the planes and then the planes went oh my god we're you know we're being attacked and so 99 war ministers declare war on each other and we end up destroying the planet.
A beautiful And I've posted it at Gab today, so hopefully some people in Germany that can't remember back to 1983 will be refreshed about how dangerous a worldwide conflict is and how they once stood against that.
And today, there's almost no anti-war voices anywhere in the world.
All we have is the people in India and China that are sitting on the fence and saying, well, we're not going to pick a side.
You know, we don't have anything in the West, certainly, of an anti-war movement.
It's just absolutely disgusting.
That's wonderful commentary.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, I think Joe is right.
There's really no one here in the mainstream news.
I mean, there's really, you know, there's like a few.
Even I was just upset seeing Fox News.
They keep on pushing the story of, you know, Russian aggression and Ukraine, the war in Ukraine and Russia starting the war.
And like, I think we could be very close to like a hot war.
I'm very concerned about that because Oh, we see all the funding that the United States suddenly has to start this all up.
They've been running those cyber attack EMP test drills for so long.
Any of that's being deemed as, you know, a threat and deemed as a provocation of war, if something like that goes down.
So, you know, God willing, there won't be anything like that that could be even deemed as turning into a hot war.
And even something like a false flag, of course, as we all know, you know, There are people who are chomping at the bit to start something like that right now.
Very good.
Very good indeed.
Yes, yes, yes.
We could all be incinerated before we know it.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have Jesus, not a how-to book after all.
Biden's disinformation board, 1984.
We actually do now have a ministry of truth to tell us what's acceptable to believe and what is not.
How bad is that?
Orwell, depicted there, had it right.
Meanwhile, the Goya Foods CEO sounds the alarm on a food crisis coming.
Bob Unain is the CEO of Goya Foods and a conservative.
As president of the largest Hispanic-owned food company in America, he backed Trump.
It wasn't popular.
Liberals tried boycotting his business, but he did not give in.
Goya Food serves primarily lower-income populations, and he's now warning of an impending food crisis in America.
No doubt he's got it right.
He's not referring to caviar.
He's referring to rice, grain, beans, other staples.
His words are as follows.
We are on the precipice of a global food crisis.
God created humanity.
Humanity has created every way to destroy itself, from nuclear to biological to chemical.
But now we've waged a war.
We've feminized food in the Ukraine.
Between the Ukraine and Russia represent 50% of the world's production of fertilizer, 30% of wheat, 20% of corn, 2.5 million acres of sunflower, other food and minerals.
We're going to have to tighten our belts and consume less.
We've gone from oil independence to oil dependence.
We've given up that position to have our oil at cost when we bring in stuff from, let's say, Thailand, coconut water.
We're paying 10 times the freight we usually pay.
The biggest component in food and anything is transportation.
Transportation has skyrocketed because we've given up our energy independence.
When you have an unbalance in food production, in 2008 the price of grains tripled.
Why?
Because we were planting corn for ethanol instead of rice and grains and other things.
Here you have a diagram relating how the availability of fertilizer is plummeting worldwide, how farmers rely on fertilizer, how we can't get the ingredients to make it ourselves.
Things are going to get worse.
When you have an imbalance in world production, 50% of fertilizer.
Farmers are paying double the price.
They're planting less.
Their yields will be less.
Costs are going up.
A tight balance.
If we interrupt food production, we'll have food prices.
Prices will go through the roof.
We've looked at the graph.
As recently now, as Kerry Donovan has reported, 20-plus U.S.
food processing plants that were headquarters have been damaged or destroyed.
It's extraordinary.
Fires all over the country.
There isn't anything our government's concerning itself with.
A General Mills facility was hit by a plane in Georgia.
A plant in Idaho was in the crosshairs.
New reports have another General Mills has been damaged the same way, this time by fire.
That brings a grand total of 22 food processing plants or headquarters that have been destroyed or damaged in the course of a single week.
The orgs of that happening by chance are making everywhere wonder if we're watching the managed decline of the United States, really the destruction of our food ability process.
Absolutely.
Suspicion is growing.
Democrat Biden has been forecasting we'll experience food sorority.
Tucker made sure to take note of a mysterious plane that crashed in the General Mills facility in Georgia.
As Republican Brief has reported lately, we have a significant problem on our hands.
It appears that pain is self-inflicted and that Biden was expecting it all.
When President Trump was around and there was a problem, we would rush to solve it, consulting with industry leaders in the best and brightest to comprehend, create a plan, and act on it.
China's screwing America's over on trade.
We can fix it.
Tariffs, he wrote.
Trump did these things and more, and the country was in far better shape than the dumpster fire it's in now because of Biden and the Socialist Democrats.
According to U.S.
News and World Report, firefighters contained a messy blaze at a California food processing plant that prompted authorities to tell thousands of nearby residents to evacuate.
It started Wednesday at the Taylor Farm packaging salad plant in Salitas.
The flames were under control by late morning.
But the shelter in place and evacuation orders remain.
Authorities said they feared the fire could generate an explosion.
About 2,700 living closest to the plant were told they should evacuate.
Those staying at home were told to shut windows and cut off ventilation.
The flames were under control by late morning.
They were worried the fire could generate an explosion and a plume of hazardous ammonia.
Those staying home were told to shut windows despite this.
The news didn't seem to be concerned.
Joe, you've been talking about this before.
I think it's extremely serious.
Your thoughts?
Yes, well, the president of Goya is really a brave man, and when they threatened to boycott him, he said, go ahead and try.
And immediately, the grocery stores sold out, restocked, his sales went up like 20% just in the first week of this supposed boycott.
So he said, you know, there's a boomerang for you guys.
Yeah, the threat to increase the ethanol percentage and gasoline from 10% which is E10 to 15% right there you're going to burn 50% more corn and corn not only is a human feed but it's also a livestock feed so that's a good percentage of what goes into cattle, sheep and Dairy and chicken feed.
So bottom line is when you increase the cost of that by taking that much off the market, then you're also increasing all of those food prices.
And ethanol has 10% less energy per gallon than gasoline and takes 20% more energy per gallon in order to produce it.
And I think it's actually more than that.
Gasoline is 115,000 BTUs per gallon.
Ethanol is 80,000 BTUs.
So it's more than 20% reduction in energy.
So you get a reduction in gas mileage, and all of the later model cars have been ordered by the EPA to be acceptable for E15.
But if you've got a car that's out of warranty, not only was it not designed for E15, but when you have engine damage, Because it wasn't designed for it, you will not have any warranty protection.
So that'll wipe out a whole bunch of older model cars.
And we're not talking anything more than five years old at this point.
That's an absolute calculated destruction on a multi-vector just like everything else these SOBs do.
How can we come up with the most wicked ways of doing the most damage to everybody possible and make them think that we're doing it because we love them so much?
It's just sinister beyond belief.
Oh Joe, spot on, spot on.
Holly, your thoughts?
Yeah, you're absolutely right, Joe.
So many people can't fathom, you know, the duplicity and, like, how sinister, like, how much time these people spend on just trying to screw people over.
Like, most people can't even fathom that this is what they do all the time.
And it's not about money.
It's, you know, it's basically about depopulation and control at this point.
They can just print money out of thin air.
We've seen that.
So, yeah, they're trying to control the food supply.
I think they can starve people into submission.
Like Joe said, the Ethanol is just absolutely horrible for cars.
It's terrible for the environment.
There's nothing that benefits people, like you said, as far as animal feed and everything like that that's needed for our industrial farming that we have here in the United States.
And then on top of that, yeah, shout out to the guy who runs Goya.
That's basically your beans and rice and stuff like that.
It's one of the few affordable food staples still that's out there right now.
Goya is providing that.
Right now, so in a lot of ways it's a service that people can still find the Goya section, get rice and beans, and get supplies like that because we're already seeing shortages now here in the United States.
In Maine, in Belfast, Maine, a potato processing plant just randomly blew up recently and that didn't make the mainstream news.
It made absolutely no sense.
There was nothing like Flammable or destructive like that, that would make the whole thing just blow up.
They were taking potatoes from northern Maine, which is like a main crop up there, processing it.
So now where are all these potatoes going to go?
That just completely blew up.
All those jobs gone.
Probably will not be rebuilt or be turned into condos or something dumb like that.
So we're facing some serious problems.
It's not a coincidence at this point.
Absolutely not.
It's part of a deliberate plan to starve the world's population, and they're targeting especially the United States.
Meanwhile, Tucker responds to a 20,000-word New York Times story calling him an American nationalist.
If that means standing up for America, we ought to be American nationalists.
Host Tucker Carlson said he won't read, isn't planning to read several New York Times articles about his career and content.
The Times published a lengthy series featuring prominently on the front page of its website, calling him an American nationalist with heavily edited stylized and distorted photos of Tucker.
For his part, he said he won't read it and disputed the paper's claims that he cares about rating.
Even though, during the first quarter, it was the second highest rated cable news program on TV, I've never seen anything showing it wasn't the first.
I've never read the ratings a single day in my life.
I don't even know how, ask anyone at Fox.
Carlson also posted a photo on Twitter of him laughing while holding a physical copy of the Times, which featured American Nationalists as its lead story.
In a statement to news outlets Sunday and Monday, Fox said its editorial content has driven higher viewership.
Fox News has grown through strategic innovation, redirecting investment in journalism to encompass more than 50% of its budget.
We're expanding our footprint beyond one legacy linear network to eight thriving platforms.
We've doubled our audience, achieved unrivaled results, and become the destination that more Democrats and Independents choose for their news coverage.
While our competitors have lost dramatic levels of viewership, all 100% correct.
Last week, he suggested on his show he was aware the Times was going to publish a hit piece.
During the broadcast, he described the paper's writers as obedient little establishment defenders, individuals who would say anything to please their bosses, suck ups, brown nosers, lipstick spittles, lick spittles, not people you'd want to have dinner with.
If you don't obey them, they denounce you as a racist.
Why do they do this?
They do it because it works.
But here's the thing.
It can only work if you play along with it, and we don't plan to.
I'm, of course, a huge fan of Tucker.
Meanwhile, Ford Investment Electric Vehicles leads to its first big first quarter loss.
Ford's investment has led to its reporting a dramatic loss of revenue the first quarter of this year.
Ford reported $34.6 billion in total revenue for the first quarter, 5% less than the first of last, came with a reported net loss for the quarter of $3.1 billion.
The company said if it were not for the $5.4 billion in losses because of a result of an early investment in Rivian, It would have had a net gain of $2.3 billion.
Rivian was founded in 2009, went public in 2021, while Ford and retail giant Amazon were early investors in the electric vehicle startup.
Ford announced it would develop an electric pickup truck with Rivian, but the plans were scrapped.
Ford started its investment in Rivian in April of 2019 at $1.2 billion, now holds 14% of shares.
Ford saw some unrealized gain on its investment of up to $8.2 billion, but Rivian's fate has turned gloomy.
Amazon reported last week it lost $7.6 billion in the first quarter on its Rivian investment.
During the Ford Earnings Conference call Wednesday, Jim Farley said the company remains committed to going all-in on electric vehicles.
He didn't say the company would take a different approach than its industry competitors moving forward.
That they're going to be progressive in design aimed at bringing new customers to the Ford and Lincoln brand.
That the new designs will not simply be electronic versions of the existing vehicle lineup.
CEO said Ford's expecting to sell 2 million electric vehicles every year by 2026.
Wants to have 50% of all sales by electric by 2030.
Those are also mandated by a Biden executive order.
For its part, Rivian blames supply chain issues for its troubles in the first quarter.
The company appeared to suffer huge production problems because of a microchip shortage.
Meanwhile, consumers remain wary of electric vehicles not produced by Elton Musk, Tesla, Joe.
Yes, well you and I did a great series and I think it was AGW, Anthropomorphic Global Warming Section 9 where we discussed, oh that was Section 9 was EPA, I think it was actually Section 8 where we discussed the electric vehicles and hydrogen fuels and all the other little games that they try to pay as far as Yeah, I agree completely.
energy sources.
So I'll put a link to that down in the comments rather than spend a lot of time talking about that today.
But bottom line is electrical vehicles are a absolute dead-end technology at this point.
Yeah, I agree completely.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, we're seeing a big transition, you know, in the Midwest and all these places like Ford that are trying to start up and launch their electric vehicles.
And And it's already really not getting off the ground.
They're getting pricier.
They're already seeing, you know, they are marketing it as, oh, it's going to be cheaper than regular cars.
And Department of Energy is dumping a bunch of money.
They're putting $45 million into developing more efficient cars.
So Biden mandates $3.1 billion that Biden administration is giving to make electric vehicle batteries in the United States.
I know Gavin Newsom said that California is going to be the Saudi Arabia of white gold, but just lithium for all this mining.
So how is that green energy at all if you're talking about strip mining the West for lithium?
I think this could be connected in with all the fires that we saw in California.
I was speculating a few years ago that they were using that, like Chico and Paradise Fires, etc.
to burn people out of those areas for mineral extraction, gold, etc.
Probably more like lithium and stuff like that at this point.
And then on top of that, the Biden administration's investing billions into nuclear energy power plants now.
So how is that a green agenda either?
Nice, nice points.
you know the old school green type people would agree that nuclear power wouldn't be safe or part of their agenda but it's part of the biden agenda nice nice points yes meanwhile we have the rather extraordinary situation that disney seems to be promoting pedophilia Disney built on fairy tales and fantasy confronts the real world.
The entertainment behemoth spent decades avoiding even a whiff of controversy, but it's now been drawn into the partisan political fray.
After publishing a recent piece on the corruption of the Disney empire by the usual suspects, the editorial board of the anti-New York Times had an epiphany about the popular 2001 Disney animated comedy film Monsters Incorporated.
Though clearly recalling the satanic symbolism of the main character, one being a one-eyed New World Order creature, another having demon horns, we never knew what the plot of the movie was all about until now.
Even if the film plot had been understood back then, few in the conspiracy theory community would have been alarmed because only in recent years have we learned about the harvesting and drinking of adrenochrome.
For the benefit of newbies not aware of what it is, the following excerpt comes from Wired, though intended to mock us, sums it up well enough.
The dark virality of a Hollywood blood-harvesting conspiracy.
A centuries-old anti-Semitic myth is spreading freely on far-right corners of social media, suggesting a new digital dark age has arrived.
The dark ages were ripe with plague, fanaticism, and accusation that Jews secretly fed off the blood of children.
In 2020, we too are beset with plague, rampant medical misinformation, and persistent rumor.
Global elites torture children to harvest a chemical adrenochrome from their blood.
Which they then inject in order to stay healthy and young.
Actually, they put fear in the children so the adrenochrome is in their blood, which they then harvest and drink.
It's not a matter of injecting, they drink it.
A favorite topic of interconnected AQ and Pizzagate conspiracy communities, and Pizzagate for a certainty is no theory but a fact.
So-called adrenochrome harvesting long predates these groups.
It has, however, been resurrected.
Google Trends show a significant spike in searches for adrenochrome in March and June of 2020.
It's prevalent on TikTok, YouTube, and Instagram.
Rabbit removed a dedicated anachrome sub-rabbit in July.
On Friday, July 31st, conspiracy theorists plan to hold the first Child Lives Matter protests in Hollywood to expose child trafficking, advertising the event with references to adrenochrome, torture children to harvest adrenochrome from their blood, This is the terrorizing of a screaming child that releases adrenochrome into the bloodstream.
As described by one of the characters in the 1999 film, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, starring the Satanist Johnny Depp, playing the part of a character based on Satanist Hunter Thompson, adrenochrome produces a hallucinogenic so high and intense it makes pure mescaline seem like ginger beer.
It's also said to contain rejuvenating properties.
I'm convinced Hillary Clinton and Nancy Pelosi are both addicted to adrenochrome.
Now about the plot of Monsters, Inc.
To power the city, the monsters have to scare children, so they scream.
However, the children are toxic to the monsters, and after a child gets through, two monsters realize things may not be what they think.
To conceal the actual horror behind the hidden message, the monsters are portrayed as bumbling and lovable characters who don't mean to harm the children.
They're actually as afraid of the kids as the kids are of them.
The monster's task is only to sneak into bedroom closets, collect child screams with a measuring machine, and return the captured scream to the monster factory for energy production in the end.
Monsters Incorporated discovered collecting children's laughter provides more energy than the screams.
How nice!
Meanwhile, you have all kinds of characters.
Top Boy, played by Donnie Depp, gets high on adrenochrome.
In the second, the horned monster and his Illuminati one-eyed partner inadvertently bring a child into the monster factory, where the harvested screams are turned into energy.
Creepy agents from the C.D.A.
Child Detection Agency make sure no traces of contact with children can be found, like a sock that got stuck to the horned monster's back.
Does C.D.A.
equal C.I.A.?
Or here you have, below, the one-eyed symbolism of the monster that's from the New World Order.
In the factory, the children's recorded screams are harvested from the yellow canisters by workers wearing blue helmets.
United Nations?
In the U.S., about 99% of those who go missing are found, usually having been taken by a parent in a custody battle.
According to FBI statistics, an average of 350 under the age of 21 are abducted by strangers in the U.S.
each year.
The ones who don't make it back home have almost always been raped and killed.
At home, stranger abductions are very rare, but occur now and then.
Real monsters in our midst aren't sating themselves on the adrenaline why to kidnap the American and European children.
Way too risky, and hence, not enough supply.
The developed nations, the children are most likely obtained through purchase of babies or foster children.
Mary Cacorra's Modesta, for example, the mother of the infamous Modesta pedo-monsters, had adopted 25 kids in all.
We learn from her son, Tony the Terrible himself.
The original source for that astonishing bit of data was later Memory Hole.
Secondary sources, are we?
But it isn't in the poorest areas of the poorest country where monsters middlemen posing as UN NGO-affiliated aid workers or even as Christian missionaries and their well-paid local trafficking obtain most of their supply.
That'll explain why former President Bill Clinton visited Haiti in 2010 to swing the Clinton-affiliated Christian missionary and accused child kidnapper Laura Silsby out of prison.
Trump hinted at and Q promised us the eventual exposure of the Haitian whore.
Let's wait and see.
Meanwhile, art imitates life.
Fallen Democrat lobby power broker Tony Podesta and his wife collect artwork depicting Satanism and child sex abuse.
Images one and two.
Images two and three.
So similar to the Monsters Incorporated movie or from their favorite artist, Creepy Creepy Stop.
Why was the Clinton Foundation so determined to spring Laura and her demonic gang out of a Haitian prison?
Very troubling stuff.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, there's been a little bit of pushback.
Disney's stock is down 43% over its last 52-week high, and there's been plenty of rumors that Disney himself was a 33-degree mason.
He had real strict codes about morality in his companies, and he had dress codes.
Nobody was allowed to have any facial hair, but surprise, he had a mustache the whole time you ever saw him.
And supposedly he had affairs with multiple women that worked in Disney Corporation and fired multiple people that they had affairs.
So, you know, a little bit of a dual standard there.
Lots of Disney employees have been convicted of pedophilia, so that's an absolute 100% known fact.
Uh, the latest statistics I've seen is that over 18,000 children disappear through Child Protective Services in the United States every year.
And how many are coming across the border out of those million, uh, two million a year that are coming across the border?
How many of them are underage and will be, uh, networked directly into this, uh, satanic, uh, massacre and, and child sacrifice and adrenochrome system?
Uh, pretty disgusting that we have to deal with these cannibals.
I couldn't agree more.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, this is all stuff I, you know, didn't even believe in, you know, a few years ago, but the evidence is overwhelming.
And if you look at the history of, you know, fairy tales and warnings that people would tell to their children, it all involves monsters and staying away from monsters and strangers and If you look at Hansel and Gretel, a lot of that is just very thinly veiled.
This goes back, you know, probably beginning of time.
Just certain people engage in this type of stuff.
That's just how it's always been.
And you'll see, yeah, Disney movies and stuff like that always freaked me out as a kid.
I always had trouble watching them and I don't This might explain why just you know the subliminal stuff that's in there.
There's a great movie called The City of Lost Children that came out that talked about.
It's a French film talking about children who's there's like these people who steal children's dreams and they use it to slow the aging process.
If that needs to be any more obvious to you.
And then there was a great series.
There's a movie called The Dark Crystal, which was a puppet movie.
And then there was a movie series called The Dark Crystal Age of Resistance, where a group of individuals were basically, yeah, turning people, the gelflings like these fairy folk into sludge and stopping the aging process and stuff like that.
And that was on Netflix for one season and they took that down.
And I'm guessing because it just became so obvious what they were literally talking about and describing how what the elites do and have always done so.
I think you know a few years ago it was it was like too fantastical to talk about but I think we've come to the point now where I think in the next couple years it could even happen on Twitter if there's enough like a break from censorship where people could actually talk about this in the mainstream and then from there what do we do about it I guess is the next thing.
Wonderful, just wonderful commentaries from you both.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
We want to hear from you.
Roe v. Wade.
Beverly writes, the Democrats have themselves to blame for the destruction of Roe v. Wade.
During the age of wokeness, Democrats promoted allowing abortion up to nine months.
Really?
At nine months, you have a full-fledged baby.
Few people pro or anti-abortion would support such an extreme measure, yet New York State and Virginia Governor Democrat Ralph Northen, a doctor, We're at the forefront of enacting legislation to allow abortion at nine months.
Why?
The Dems aren't stupid.
They know full well such talk.
Much less legislation would inflame pro-life zealots and relaunch a full-out attack on abortion rights.
As usual, we get evidence that both sides of the political aisle work hand-in-glove and against the people.
The Dem nine-month abortion campaign is more proof.
Rest assured, the rich and powerful from both sides of the aisle, including the most fervent pro-lifers, will always have a doctor they can contact if they need an abortion.
No congressman or Supreme Court justice, male or female, is going to allow their 13-year-old daughter to bear a child if that's the result of incest or rape.
Nor will they have their teenage son or college frat son become a young dad when, not if, but when, they knock up a girlfriend or casual hookup.
If the rich and powerful knock up someone as a result of a casual affair or one-night stand, no baby is going to come to term here.
They will get things taken care of.
This has always been the case.
Before anyone knew what an abortion was or even what contraception was, the rich and powerful had a doctor they could trust to clean up a sticky situation.
Rules for thee, not for me.
I hope all the pro-lifers turning cartwheels over Roe v. Wade's overturn will also support increased spending on social safety net program because a ton of children and their families will need these programs to survive for many.
It will be for a lifetime, not just when the baby is young.
Meanwhile, Conspiracy 101 Critical Thinking and Comparison Theories proceeds unabated.
We have our next class tonight.
Everything you ever want to know about conspiracy theories, we're afraid to ask.
This time, you don't have to be afraid.
You can still register at mixedinstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html.
All the classes are recorded and are accessible to all the members of the class.
Meanwhile, Final thoughts, Joe, yours.
Yes, well, Monday night I went to see the premiere of the 2000 Mules movie, and we discussed this yesterday on Texas Tuesday, but here's what I did when I posted information on that at Gab.
2000 Mules is a documentary to put the 535 mules that are in Congress, the 10,000 mules that are in the Senior Executive Service, and the 10,000 Uniparty mules on notice that we have criminal evidence of their vote-rigging activities.
And at Gab, I had a whole bunch of people post underneath my comments that I'm not going to pay $20 to see a movie.
I wouldn't pay $7 to see Titanic.
I'll just wait till it comes out on Standard and just go sit on my couch and watch it.
And I just put in the comment section, you have self-identified as a lady, lazy, tightwad, couch potato.
You do not deserve freedom.
And today there was a hearing for the position on the Federal Election Commission for a woman named Dara Lindbaum.
And uh there's seven members on the on the commission one position has been expired for a year now and uh so that means that everything's been a democrat three republican three uh gridlock so the election commission has done absolutely nothing in the last year but this woman formerly worked For what's called, she was the lawyer for the Fair Fight Action Group.
This was founded by Stacey Abrams in 2014.
In 2019, they collected 90 million dollars and they were the ones that were primarily responsible for all the goat Uh, vote fraud that went on and described eloquently in 2000 mules in Georgia in 2020 during the general election and in December of 2020 for the runoff election for State Senate, which gave through two seats to the Democrats, which gave a majority in the Senate.
So this is absolutely fundamental material.
We'll go into a little more depth of it.
I've sent Carl some information and And Jim and I'll coordinate on it tomorrow.
Make sure that we get this subject covered a little bit better tomorrow.
Excellent, Holly.
Your final thoughts?
Well, I really hope, like, Fox News and, like, the mainstream type of, like, right conservative news will pick up on this and actually start discussing, you know, the big lie that the mainstream news talks about.
I never saw so much censorship in my life.
Like, anything on YouTube and whatnot, if I put the word vote in the title, all that stuff was immediately taken down.
It was just nuts the way that they censored it.
So obvious that you know we've been talking about this for a couple years now how crazy the election rigging has been and I think I suppose in a way this is a way to wake up some more of the mainstream.
I know Joe said that sometimes it was kind of hard to like listen to some of the people the characters or whoever in the movie but I don't I tried to look up to see they don't have it locally where I'm at but I think if people if you're near a major city or something you should you should try to see it.
Absolutely, absolutely.
Let me say what a pleasure it is to do shows with Joe Olson from Houston and Holly Seeliger from Undisclosed Location on the East Coast.
These guys are as good as they get.
Today, I think, is a sensational example of what we can bring to you.
I dare say this Roe v. Wade decision, if the court is as corrupt and subject to manipulation as both Joe and Holly suggest it may be, It's disillusioning in the extreme to the United States and political system and our adherence to the Constitution because nobody then is playing fair.
Nobody is adhering to the rules.
Nobody is seeking to implement and live by the document our founding fathers created that designed a government that would be responsive to the will of the people.
The United States may be that corrupt.
I'm holding out for the prospect that maybe we're not quite there yet, that there may be a chance, and perhaps a midterm election will be an opportunity to change the direction of the country.
Let it be the case, because otherwise we're in a catastrophic situation for the nation and the world.
We'd like to see it survive, but it's going to be a close call.
Thanks for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection