All Episodes
April 27, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:29:25
Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (26 April 2022) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, welcoming you to another Texas Tuesday with Joel Olson in Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, now residing in Asheville, North Carolina.
Quite a beautiful locale, by the way.
We begin with a report about Poland refusing to pay for gas in rubles, and Russia has cut them off.
Welcome back folks.
This is breaking news.
I can't find it anywhere.
Let's just get straight into it.
Let's not mess around.
So over on RT, published earlier today, 26th of April, 1254.
So that was about six hours ago my time.
It's six o'clock my time, Moscow Standard Time at the time of recording.
It said EU country rejects ruble gas payments.
Poland says it won't pay for energy imports in Russian currency.
Warsaw will not agree to Moscow's demand to pay for gas in rubles.
And you'll find out why I'm laughing in a minute.
Poland is called for crushing sanctions.
Blah, blah, lots of rhetoric, okay?
And now, it's been reported on Onet, which is one of the Polish web portals, that this is unofficial.
Unofficial?
Russia has suspended gas supplies to Poland.
Russia has suspended gas supplies to Poland under the Yamal contract.
So this is, this is quite specific.
I believe there's the, is it the Yamal pipeline as well?
Maybe that's what it references.
Onet has learned unofficially a crisis team has gathered at the Ministry of Climate.
There is no announcement from Russia as to whether this is the fulfilment of the ultimatum that Vladimir Putin has recently threatened.
Official announcements on this matter are to be released today, so keep your eyes peeled, guys.
Just a quick note, this is a Polish website, this being Google Translated, so there may be some inconsistencies.
with what's stated.
The information first about a significant reduction in gas transmission, then about its suspension today, has been unofficially confirmed by O*NET, both in government sources and in the Polish oil and gas industry.
That's where I'm reading from.
The Russians did not inform the Polish side about the reason for the suspension of deliveries.
Permit me if I just speculate for a short moment...
So as I understood it, and as many of you guys have kind of criticized in the comments, criticized Russia, I mean, that many of you have said you should just switch the taps off.
When Peskov said, you know, like payments for the previous month's gas will be due in the next month.
So, you know, we are going to fulfill our contract.
I am speculating and assuming that a contract is either expiring or a payment date is due whereby they had the notice given and the terms offered and they've not done it, not opened, you know, maybe one of these accounts in Gazprom Bank.
What I find Yeah, I'm suspecting that these are the circumstances with which that Russia are operating.
Or, of course, the other way it could just be that Poland has rattled the sabre so much, Russia's just pissed off and just gone, nah, screw you man.
I've tried to try to find news about this.
I've limited it to the past 24 hours.
I put Onet web portal because I couldn't find anything that was relevant.
Russia gas supply to Poland is not relevant.
Politico 12 hours ago, five hours ago, not relevant.
Six hours ago.
Yeah, not relevant.
And again, we have First News reporting the same article.
as RT, saying that they refused to pay.
Nothing that I could find in the Google news feeds that indicated that the supply had actually been turned off.
So there we go.
O-Net reporting that unofficially, but according to government sources and the Polish oil and gas industry, Russia has switched off, turned off the taps.
That is it.
Finito.
I'm glad to hear it because Russia has to play hardball This is no time to be mamby-pamby about it.
Putin said he would do it.
He's doing it.
I think that's right.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, there's two other parallel arguments that are going on on this.
Over at Veterans Today, they have an article by White Helmets in Ukraine.
And basically that they did not honor the Minsk agreement back in 2014 to protect the Russians in the eastern part of Ukraine.
And so now they've got bonafide members of the White Helmets group that were in Uh, Syria setting up gas attacks that have been moved over to Ukraine and Russia's making statements about those.
And then also, uh, you are involved in the phony chemical attacks, phony chemical attacks.
Yes.
And Russia says they have chemical attacks to Ukraine.
How disgusting Joe.
And Russia said under international supervision, they got rid of all of their biological and chemical weapons 10 years ago, and that they do not have them and they would not use them on their next door neighbor because they consider those immoral.
But they also consider nuclear weapons to be an immoral escalation.
So we've got to deal with NATO that's been preparing since 2014 to use nuclear weapons in every theater they can create.
And then the next thing that's really troubling is an article by Pepe Escobar, an absolute impeccable researcher, Miskovah Riddle, and he's going into the details about how it couldn't possibly have been Ukrainian Neptune missiles that took out the Russian cruiser in the Black Sea, that it was most likely a NATO naval strike missile, And Russia knows all the evidence.
They're just not going to react until they have enough to completely seal the deal on that.
But the other possibility is a guided drone torpedo that was sent by the U.S.
and NATO forces.
So, you know, NATO is continuing to escalate and Poland has taken the role of being the tip of the NATO spear stabbing the Russian bear.
And so I think it's just absolutely wonderful that Poland Might not have a whole lot of electricity and they won't have any heat.
They won't be running their factories and their restaurants and all the other things that make their little police state work there for them in Poland.
Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of folks.
Yes, yes.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I sort of agree with you, Jim, in as much as I For standing ground and saying, doing exactly what he said he was going to do.
But on the other hand, it's just a continual series of escalations, and it's a very dangerous and scary situation.
Another thing that crossed my mind with that story was Poland being involved in this situation is yet another of a series of weird parallels with the series of events that started World War II.
I'll go through those as we go through the show today.
Okay, very good.
Yes, yes, yes.
I think NATO is pushing, pushing, pushing as though they want a world war with Russia.
Meanwhile, Victoria Nuland, who's a rat behind the scene in all things Ukraine, Claims that Ukraine will not be left alone if Russia were to use tactical nukes, which Russia has not implied they're going to do anyway.
So this looks like it's creating a straw man, just like with regard to chemical weapons.
Russia isn't going to use any chemical weapons, but they're going to think of a chemical attack and blame it on Russia.
In an interview with the European Pravda, Nuland was asked on the possibility of Russia using tactical nukes and responded, she couldn't rule it out, but it would be a brutal war crime.
She refused any details, but that it would raise the situation to a fundamentally new level where the price would be simply astronomical.
Moscow's own military doctrines, they can only be used when the very existence of the country is threatened, or if another power-office were a first strike.
That, in this case, would be NATO.
Asked by a journalist if Kiev can rely on its Western partners' support in a worst-case scenario, Stooling assured Ukraine it would not be left alone.
How she believes she can make this declaration is beyond me, but there it is.
She reeled also that D.C., Washington, has become sublime with multiple launch rocket systems and is going to do its best to keep them supplied.
But this is a very bad, very tricky situation because the United States risks thereby becoming a coal belligerent.
Since Putin warned, when he announced the launch of his special military operation, that any nation seeking to interfere could face consequences unlike anything in their history, many interpreted that as a threat to U.S.
nukes.
Russia put its nuclear deterrence on the highest level alert in the early days.
Russia, of course, went into Ukraine, which had failed to adhere to the Minsk agreement signed in 2004.
Germany and France brokered the myth protocol designed to give them a special status, but it's never been implemented.
Kremlin has demanded Ukraine officially declare a nuclear country that will never join the U.S.-NATO military bloc.
Kiev insists the Russian offensive was completely unprovoked, which is nonsense.
Meanwhile, Secretary Lloyd Austin, after a Ukraine visit, promising Zelensky that the U.S.
is going to give more weapons, declares the U.S.
wants to see Russia weaken.
Here's a list of the Department of Defense weapons that have been transferred to Ukraine.
It's rather staggering.
Over 1,400 Stingers, over 5,500 Javelins, over 14,000 other anti-armor systems, over 700 switchblade tactical unmanned aerial systems, 90 155-millimeter howitzers, and 183,155-millimeter 90 155-millimeter howitzers, and 183,155-millimeter artillery rounds.
72 tactical vehicles to tow the howitzer, 16 Mi-17 choppers, hundreds of armored high-mobility multi-purpose wheeled vehicles, 200 Mi-17.
On one, three armored personnel carriers, over 7,000 small arms, over 50,000, I mean million, 50 million rounds of ammo, 75 sets of body armor, 121 Phoenix Ghost Tactical Unmanned Aerial System, Laser Guided Rocket System, Pneuma Unmanned Aerial Systems, Unmanned Coastal Defense Systems, 14 Counter Artillery Raiders, 4 Counter Mortar Raiders, 2 Air Surveillance Raiders,
M1A1 Claymore Anti-Personnel, Munition, C4 Explosives and Demolition Equipment, Tactically Secure, Secure Communications System, Night Vision Devices, Thermal Imagery Optics and Laser Range Finders, Commercial Satellite Imagery Service, Explosively Ordnant, Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear Protective Equipment, Medical Supplies, including First Aid Kits.
What's most interesting here is Russia has declared it has destroyed an Odessa terminal where foreign weapons were stored.
Russia used high-precision missiles to destroy a logistic terminal in Odessa, where a large number of weapons supplied by the United States—no doubt many on the list I just read—and other European nations were being stored.
It also reported Russian forces had killed up to 200 Ukrainian troops, destroyed more than 30 vehicles, some of them armored.
I just point out that saying all that equipment isn't going to do any good if it's destroyed before it reaches the forces, as appears to be taking place.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, surprisingly enough, NATO doesn't produce the calibers of weapons that were in the former Soviet inventory, and so that means that they not only have to ship them new 155mm, replace 152s that were existing, But that means that the current ammo that we're sending won't work in the guns that are there, so we got to send them howitzers and ammo, which is a real supply chain issue.
But getting back to the issue of Russia starting a nuclear war, This is an article that was posted at Global Research, and according to my notes, it was on March 24th, but that may have just been when I found it and put it in my notes.
Privatization of Nuclear War More Dangerous Than COVID-19.
Like I said, that title at Global Research.
of preemptive nuclear war study was approved by Obama for $1.2 trillion in 2012.
So we've had these assholes saying that they could conduct a nuclear war and they can do first strikes and we can get away with it.
And one of the gists in this article was that they've developed some boring underground bunker buster bombs that when you set them off, most of the radiation is absorbed by the ground, but the shockwave comes up through the ground It destroys like a 25 or 50 mile radius.
They're dialable for what you want in the way of input, so you can drop one of those somewhere near an oil refinery or somewhere near a port or somewhere near a military base, and you can knock out everything on the surface of the ground without having a giant mushroom cloud pop up.
And people just go, Oh my God, it just, everything just turned to dust.
We don't know why.
And my considered opinion is that that's what their final result is going to be on the Asim Stall steel plant, is if they can't get those 50 French foreign legions and the 400 other NATO personnel that are in there directing this thing, including a whole bunch of Polish officers, if they can't get them out, then they'll nuke them in place and blame Russia and saying Russia started a nuclear war.
Trust me, these SOBs that run our government and our news media are the most rotten people on the planet.
Reagan came in calling the Soviet Union the evil empire, and the whole time I was choking back tears going, yeah, if you only knew, you dirtbag.
And he did know, because if you ask anybody that was involved in the Operation Monarch thing, like Kathy O'Brien and Fiona Barrett and all the other ones that were victimized.
Virginia Roberts were victimized by these politicians.
Guarantee you, Ronnie was as dirty as anybody else that's ever been in the White House in the last hundred years.
So don't put it past us to do something nasty like that.
We want to start a war, but we just don't want to be the ones that are blamed with starting it the same way with World War I and II.
It's disgusting.
Michael, your thoughts?
Michael, that scenario that I was just talking about is entirely worrisome, especially given the history of NATO and the United States of creating false flags especially given the history of NATO and the United States of creating false flags in order to advance
And this would be one of the biggest ones yet if NATO sets off an atomic bomb somewhere in Ukraine and controls the evil empire, controls all of our media, so you know what everybody's going to be told.
And it's just, it's sad.
It looks like they're doing literally everything they can.
Everything they can think of to demonize and provoke Russia into expanding the war or doing something like they provoked Japan into attacking Pearl Harbor.
When I saw that we had published the list of weapons being sent to Ukraine, I mean that leaves Nothing to the parsing of definitions about the fact that the United States is at war with Russia.
Now, like you said earlier, given the fact that Russia controls the airspace of Ukraine, I don't see how the delivery of such weapons is going to be possible.
So, it's more like a A further provocation, like knocking a chip off your shoulder or something.
They're trying their best to get something very serious started.
Well, Lloyd Austin may think this is going to weaken Russia, but wiping out this massive quantity of military supplies being sent by NATO in the U.S.
isn't going to weaken Russia.
And, you know, Russia holds all the cards when it comes to gas and energy in Europe.
I think the Polish thing is a perfect illustration of how much influence Russia can exert here.
Meanwhile, the CIA has been behind a secret plot to kidnap, torture, and assassinate Ukrainian dissidents for President Zelensky, says a Ukrainian defector.
This is on my blog now.
Jeremy Kuzmirov, techniques of torture and assassination employed by the SBU, Ukraine's CIA, recall the U.S.
brutal Operation Phoenix in Vietnam, where we were assassinating all the village leaders.
I mean, it was completely outrageous.
CIA employees who've been in Kiev since 2014 are residing in clandestine apartments and suburban houses, frequently come to the SBU Central Office for specific meetings to plot secret operations.
Very bad.
They take on ominous implications in light of a new report by the Grayzone Project detailing the SVU's participation in a campaign of assassination, kidnapping, and torture overseen by the Ukrainian president of Western media, darling, Vladimir Zelensky.
The campaign bears comparison with Operation Phoenix in South Vietnam, resulted in the killing, imprisonment, and torture of thousands of South Vietnamese, including civilian officials, accused of being loyal to the left-wing anti-imperialist National Liberation Front.
During Congressional hearings in 1971, for example, Ogden Reed said, if the Union had had a Phoenix program during the Civil War, its target would have been civilians like Jefferson Davis or the mayor of Macon, Georgia.
In the Ukraine case, one of the targets was a mayor of the eastern city of Kramina in the Ukrainian-controlled side of Luhansk.
Vladimir Strzok.
On March 1st, he was kidnapped by men in military uniform and then shot in the heart with his tortured body displayed before the public.
He had reportedly urged his colleagues to compromise and negotiate with pro-Russian officials.
Anton Geraschenko, an advisor to the Ukrainian Minister of Internal Affairs, celebrated the mayor's murder, declaring, there is one less traitor in Ukraine.
Geraschenko has compiled a blacklist of enemies of the state, including journalists who've been murdered by state-backed death squads, such as prominent columnist Oles Berzina, whose name had appeared on the list.
As of today, 11 mayors of Ukrainian towns are missing.
On March 7, the mayor of Gostomel, Yuri Pilipenko, was found murdered.
Pilipenko had reportedly entered into negotiation with the Russian military to organize a humanitarian corridor for the evacuation of his city's residents, a red line for Ukrainian ultranationalists who had long been in conflict with the mayor's office.
The Ukrainians came across that he was killed by the Russian soldiers while distributing food and medicine, which is, of course, ludicrous.
Then there was the murder of Denis Kriev, a top member of the Ukraine negotiating team, killed in broad daylight in Kiev after the first round of talks with Russia.
Kriev was subsequently accused in local Ukrainian media of treason.
Zelinsky stated there would be consequences for collaborators indicating his support for the Phoenix-style operation.
The director of SBU's counterintelligence, Oleksandr Polak, is nicknamed the Strangler.
He has a reputation for the use of torture and dirty tricks to set up his boss's political rivals on treason charges.
In a March 19th executive order, Zelensky invoked martial law to ban 11 opposition parties.
The outline consists of the entire left-wing socialists or anti-NATO spectrum in Ukraine.
They include the Perlai Party, the Left Opposition and Progressive Socialist Party of Ukraine, the Socialist Party of Ukraine, Union of Left Forces, Socialists, the Party of Sherry, Our State, Opposition Bloc, and the Vladimir Saldo Bloc.
Openly fascist and pro-Nazi parties like the Azov National Corps were left untouched.
But our President of the United States assures us that the Ukrainians are our partners and we are going to stand by them, no doubt, because we want to ensure freedom and democracy in Ukraine.
This is just gut-wrenching.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, two great books.
One of them is The Very Best Men by Evan Thomas, which was published in 1995.
It's the early story about the CIA.
But then after more evidence got disclosed, a greater book was written in 2015 by David Talbot called The Devil's Chessboard.
And just to give you a little idea, in those two books, they document over 400 cases of assassinations by the CIA conducted worldwide of political and thought leaders, college professors, news reporters, anybody college professors, news reporters, anybody that got in the CIA's way.
And then they managed to install puppet regimes.
And one of those puppet regimes, History.com, 30,000 people.
30,000 people were disappeared in Argentina's dirty war.
These women never stopped looking for the history.
This is a History Channel documentary that was put out March 7, 2019, so in addition to the 400 original victims of the CIA.
We have collateral damage in almost every other one of those countries, including the war in Vietnam when we assassinated the President of Vietnam two weeks before we assassinated the President of the United States.
So disabuse yourself of American excellence.
What we're excellent at is being a pirate regime worldwide, and it's unforgivable that this is what they're doing in our name.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yep, it doesn't surprise me that such programs are probably being Implemented in Ukraine.
I mean, they've got these Azov battalion guys roaming around the country who've already shown on numerous occasions how totally moral, less and brutal they are shooting prisoners in the legs and crucify people on the street, burning people.
You mentioned Vietnam as having had such a program, and there's some historical precedent that goes way back before that.
I think in the aftermath of World War II, there were death squads all over Germany for a while.
Some, I don't know, 8 to 10 million Germans were murdered after the end of World War II, in that manner.
And then there was the Philippines in the 50s, early 50s, I believe, and there were many, many thousands of dissidents killed and rounded up with the help of the United States CIA at that time.
Because of that, it seemed entirely possible that that's what had happened to that Well, he was probably subjected to torture and brainwashing and told the only way he'd be allowed to live is if he conformed to their expectations.
That would be my surmise.
Meanwhile, first priority, avoid U.S.
war with Russia coming from Pat Buchanan.
He's an astute political commentator.
I'm sorry to say, I think it's already too late.
Neocons and Warhawks are taking a position of visible defeat of the Russian Army and its expulsion from Ukraine, and Putin's humiliation and ouster must be America's goals and that they are non-negotiable.
Asked if the U.S.
should send troops to fight, Senator Chris Coons said Sunday, the time may have come.
President Putin will only stop when we stop him, said Coons.
We're in a very dangerous moment where it's important that we in Congress and the administration come to a common position about when we are willing to go the next step and send not just armed but troops of the aid in defense of Ukraine.
If the answer is never, then we are inviting another level of escalation and brutality by Putin, where he's clearly bought into all the propaganda.
The guy doesn't appear to be a very smart dude.
It's embarrassing!
In response, the White House affirmed Biden's declaration U.S.
troops are not going to be sent to fight Russians in Ukraine.
Biden last month, the idea we're going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks and trains going in with American pilots and American crews, just understand that's called World War III, okay?
Let's get it straight here, guys.
We will not fight the Third World War in Ukraine.
Since Biden made those remarks, the red line against direct U.S.
aid to the military in Ukraine has shifted, though the prohibition against troops and air power has remained.
Our position might thus be summarized as follows.
As U.S.
forces fighting and killing Russians in Ukraine would ignite a U.S.-Russia war, which could escalate to nuclear, we are not going to take that first step and risk the survival and security of our nation, even if it means the defeat of Ukraine.
Call it the Eisenhower position.
In 1956, Ike refused to use U.S.
forces to intervene to halt Russian tanks, crushing the Hungarian Revolution.
Ike was unwilling to cross the Yalta Line dividing Europe and chose to let the Hungarian Revolution fail and ignite a war in which our own soldiers and nation would be at risk.
Ike literally put America first ahead of the Hungarians.
Or does Biden's refusal to follow Kuhn's urging leave the rival belligerents?
Putin has suffered a series of setbacks, so Buchanan believes, but I think it's false, since his invasion.
He has failed to capture the three largest cities in Ukraine, Kiev, Kharkiv, or Odessa.
Putin suffered a humiliating defeat and retreat in the Battle of Kiev and has lost a fourth of the forces with which he began the war.
The flagship of Russian Black Sea Fleet, the cruiser Moskva, has been sunk reportedly by Ukrainian anti-ship missiles, yet Putin has had his successes as well.
If Mariupol, Ukraine's major port on the Sea of Azov, falls as expected, and it has already fallen, Putin will have his land bridge from Russia to Crimea.
North of Crimea and the west of Luhansk and Donetsk, Putin has also added to the lands he's held since 2014.
Russia's capture and annexation of the Donbass could be called a victory too.
Capture of Kharkov or Odessa, the latter of which would put Putin in control of the entire Black Sea coast of Ukraine, making Kiev the capital of a landlocked country, would also constitute a triumph.
Which brings us to the debate here in the U.S.
Neocons and Warhawks are taking the stance that the visible defeat of the Russian Army and expulsion from Ukraine, Putin's humiliation and ouster must be Americans' goals and be non-negotiable.
Failure to achieve these ends would amount to a defeat for NATO in the United States, they claim.
The problem?
Putin has sent many signals that before he accepts the defeat of his army and country and his own removal and trial as a war criminal who engaged in genocide, he will use battlefield nuclear weapons from his arsenal of 6,000 or more to win.
Wednesday, Putin announced Russia's test of a giant new intercontinental ballistic missile.
Dissenters believe Putin may not be bluffing.
And an early and negotiated end to the war may be necessary to avoid a wider conflict.
But as ever, they are being charred with timidity and cowardice and letting pass an historic opportunity to administer to authoritarian Russia the defeat it invited and richly deserved.
Yet recall, To avoid war with Russia, Harry Truman refused to breach Joseph Stalin's Berlin blockade.
Eisenhower let the Hungarian Revolution be drowned in blood and told the Brits, French, and Israelis to get out of Egypt.
Even JFK let the Berlin Wall go up.
LBJ let the Prague Spring be crushed by the Warsaw Pact.
The sooner this war ends, the better for all.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well there's a little bit of selective history involved in there, especially with the Hungarian and the Yugoslavian revolutions.
We have to remember that the Bolshevik Revolution was a The Bolshevik Revolution was a Jewish revolution and they've openly admitted that they were 90% of the Bolsheviks and that the United States intervened and blockaded and invaded and blockaded the eastern portion of Russia along the Pacific to keep the white Russians from being able to get supplies from the West after World War I ended.
Which could have overthrown the Bolsheviks, but they were unsuccessful in doing that because Wilson had us occupying that portion of Russia for two years.
And they can claim whatever they want to about it.
That's the actual historical facts.
There was an article about a month ago at Veterans Today That the Hungarian Revolution in 1956 was not a revolution against communism per se, it was a revolution against the Bolsheviks who were 90% Jewish that had been installed in the government of Hungary.
And they were the ones that people were really upset with.
So yeah, that little issue.
And then they had a problem in Czechoslovakia in 68.
And you got to remember that the rule of the Iron Curtain was that they owned every printing press.
They owned the entire broadcasting media.
They owned All of the communication systems so every telephone could be monitored.
They had every typewriter registered.
And the most you could do with a typewriter was like six carbon copies, but each one of them was unique.
And so if you were trying to do some kind of an underground effort, they could certainly find the typewriter that you typed it on.
And so bottom line is they had complete control of information and media.
Well, what happened in the 80s was that the Eastern Bloc kept falling further and further behind the Western Bloc because we had simple ways of communication that were not allowed over there.
So they started petitioning the government to allow cell phones and Xerox machines and fax machines and satellite uplinks and VHS recorders and then the Strikers in Poland went on strike and they said, you know, we're not going to work on Maggie's Farm no more.
And the Russians showed up at the border with 40,000 tanks and the Poles showed up with a couple of hundred VHS recorders and some satellite uplinks and said, great, you can crush us in the streets the same way you did in Hungary in 56 and Yugoslavia in 68, but the world will watch you do it.
And at that point, the walls began crumbling, and once Poland overthrew the Russians, then all of the rest of the Eastern Bloc fell, and then the wall fell.
So that's what we're dealing with right now.
We have Bolsheviks that are running our country, that are trying to totally control information on our side, and they're trying to paint The other side is the evil empire and they're trying to launch a war which will give them total control over all of the news reports coming out in America so that you will not be able to get any unfiltered news from our oligarchs and then they will turn around and claim that we're only doing this because of bad Russia.
Bad Russia made your gas prices go up.
Bad Russia made your food prices go up.
Bad Russia nuked wonderful little Ukraine Well said, Joe.
next thing you know it's like we had to do this war but we were totally blameless.
So it's the biggest bunch of hogwash since the Iron Curtain fell and it's time for this Iron Curtain to fall and free humanity once and for all.
Thank God for Putin.
Well said Joe.
Michael, your thoughts.
Yeah, yeah, that's a good thought Joe.
And this Iron Curtain is not across one part of the world or the other.
It encompasses the entire world.
Pat Buchanan said in that article that these are things that might lead to World War III, but for quite a while now, I honestly think we're already in World War III.
It just looks different.
This global power mad oligarchy has started a war against the people of the world in the name of public health and vaccines and digital IDs and they're pushing ahead and all these
Say all these, Ukraine being the top of the list right now, these traditional war scenarios seem to me like kind of like subdivisions of the larger global war against humanity.
And this is a good place.
What I was alluded to earlier, it's been occurring to me lately how eerily similar this entire war with Ukraine is to the situation that we saw and was used to World War II.
The annexation of Crimea, which parallels the Anschluss of Austria in 1938, where in both cases over 90% of the population voted to join Germany and Russia respectively.
And then there's the In 1939, there was the ongoing persecution and slaughter of Germans in Poland who had been caught on the other side of the border when the borders were redrawn by the Treaty of Versailles.
And that persecution and slaughter is what forced Hitler to invade Poland to stop that.
Slaughter of German population and that parallels what we've got right now in eastern Ukraine, which is what forced Putin to go in when those people were about to be slaughtered and had been under bombardment and attack on a lower level for eight years.
Then there's even an analog for the German port city of Danzig that was separated altogether from Germany and surrounded by Poland.
And that parallel being this separated coastal city of Kaliningrad.
And then there's all these last-minute treaty maneuvers.
Sweden and Finland talking about joining NATO In a month or two.
It's just, you know, it's that Mark Twain quote about history doesn't repeat, but it certainly rhymes.
All these things are very eerily similar.
Yeah, I think that's excellent.
You and Joe have both contributed important historical dimension of what's going on here that most Americans don't have a clue.
Meanwhile, another stolen election, French edition, major riots against Macron throughout France over the questionable election.
It's difficult to imagine anyone who has a scintilla of intellectual honesty irrespective of political orientation believing A severely compromised, senile career politician won in the latest U.S.S.A.
presidential election, and by the same token, difficult to believe the raw-child puppet Macron won his.
And now, there are major riots in just about every city in France over the validity of the election.
Police are breaking up protests by using tear gas on civilians.
Youth especially are protesting because Macron wants to create an EU army, and that will inevitably lead to drafts.
January 6 is all over again, but now in France.
A fresh new PSYOP is required now.
Another pandemic will cure this unrest à la Hong Kong.
The cult never sleeps.
There's a video I was unable to download, but I'm telling you, it's pretty active there in France.
A lot is going on, and I think the French are far less passive than Americans and are going to be much more troublesome for Macron than the American people have been for the puppet Biden.
Meanwhile, a pandemic treaty will hand the World Health Organization the keys to a global government.
If you thought the threat had subsided, here it is, right up front, close and personal.
The first public hearings on the proposed pandemic treaty are closed.
They're closed.
Gee, I wonder why.
We've been trying to keep the issue on the front page because the mainstream is so keen to ignore it and churn out partisan war porn and propaganda.
An article in UK's Telegram from April 12th headlined, Real Risk of a Pandemic Treaty Could Be Too Watered Down to Stop New Outbreaks.
Right, it's gotta be strong.
Focusing on a report from a panel for a global public health convention, Quoting one of the report's authors, Dame Barbara Stalking, our biggest fear is it's too easy to think that accountability doesn't matter.
To have a treaty that does not have compliance in it, well, frankly, then there's no point in having a treaty.
In other words, if they can't run the world from the World Health Organization, then why bother?
Another, published by London School of Economics, observed, for this treaty to have teeth, the organization governs it needs to have power, either political or legal, to enforce compliance.
And, of course, you've got a numbnut at the head of the WHO who's not even a doctor, not even an MD.
I mean, let's talk about insanity.
In its current form, a UN report from May of 2021 observed, a World Health Organization does not possess such powers to move on with a treaty who therefore needs to be empowered financially and politically.
It recommends involvement of non-state actors like the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organization, and the International Labor Organization in the negotiations.
In the case of a declared health emergency, they suggest, resources need to flow to countries in which the emergency is occurring, triggering response elements such as financing and technical response.
These are especially relevant and could be used to encourage and enhance a timely sharing of information by states, reassuring them they will not be subject to arbitrary trade and travel sanctions for reporting, but instead be provided with the necessary financial and technical resources they require to effectively respond to the outbreak.
It doesn't stop there, however.
They also talk about countries being punished for non-compliance.
Patrice should possess an adaptable incentive regime including sanctions such as public reprimands, economic sanctions, or denial of benefits.
To translate from bureaucrat into English If you report disease outbreaks in a timely manner, you'll get financial resources to deal with them.
If you don't report disease outbreaks, or don't follow WHO directions, you'll lose out on international aid and face trade embargoes and sanctions in combination.
These proposed rules would literally incentivize reporting possible disease outbreaks.
Far from preventing future pandemics, they would actively encourage them.
It's pretty clear what's happening here, isn't it?
Globalists have backed coups and rewarded the perpetrators with international aid.
The proposals The pandemic treaty would simply legitimize the process, moving it from covert back channels to overt official ones.
Let's remind ourselves of the power who already possesses.
It's the only institution empowered in the world to declare a pandemic.
The Director General at Unelected Mercy is the only individual who controls that power.
We've already seen who abused these powers to create a fake pandemic out of thin air, and I'm not talking about COVID.
Prior to 2008, who could only declare an influenza pandemic if there were enormous numbers of deaths and illness and there were a new and distinct subtype.
But in 2008, who loosened the definition of influenza pandemic to remove those two conditions?
As a letter to the British Medical Journal pointed out, these changes meant many seasonal flu viruses could be classified as pandemic now, under the new definition.
If the WHO had not made those changes in 2009, swine flu outbreak would never have been called a pandemic, would likely have passed without notice.
Instead, dozens of countries spent millions upon millions on swine flu vaccines they did not need, which did not work, to fight a pandemic that resulted in fewer than 20,000 deaths.
Despite this historic example of blatant corruption, a proposed clause of the pandemic treater would make it even easier to declare a public health emergency.
According to the May 2021 report, COVID-19 may get the last pandemic.
Future declarations of public health emergencies by the WHO Director General should be based on the precautionary principle.
That means to anticipate.
This is a pre-infection, like a pre-crime unit.
You're supposed to anticipate.
The proposed treaty would allow the DGFO to declare a state of global emergency to prevent a potential pandemic, a kind of pandemic pre-crime.
If you combine this with a proposed financial aid for developing nations reporting potential health emergency, you can see what they're building for, bribing third world governments to give WHO a pre-tax for declaring states of emergency.
We already know other key points to be included.
Introducing international vaccine passports, pouring funding into big pharma pockets to produce vaccines even faster and with even fewer safety tests.
But all that could pale in comparison to the legal powers potentially being handed to the Director General of the WHO or whatever new independent body they decide to create to punish, rebuke, or reward national governments.
A pandemic treaty that overrides or overrules national or local governments would hand supranational powers to an unelected bureaucrat or expert who could exercise them entirely at his own discretion and on completely subjective criteria.
This is the very definition of technocratic globalism.
What a horror story in the works.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, Tedros has a third-world doctorate in economics from some, you know, piss-ant, Cracker Jacks-type operation, so he's an absolute doctor in his own mind.
And he was also a member of, I believe it was called the Tegre?
A group that was listed as a terrorist organization, terrorized Ethiopia for years, was directly involved in the cholera deaths of over 10,000 people that they refused to allow medications to go in and and treat a big cholera epidemic.
So he's a mass murderer.
And he was also the one that negotiated most of the roads for resources and railroads for resources between Ethiopia and China.
So, you know, he comes to you in with a whole lot of Chinese communist baggage that nobody seems to want to unpack for the worthless SOB.
And then the original story that we started off with was on the elections.
Yeah.
Macron absolutely stole it the same way that Trump did.
And that's why the echo chamber media.
Yeah.
The way Biden did.
I'm sorry.
Excuse me.
And here's what the news media has to say on it.
France 24 true or false debunking the claims of electoral fraud.
Euronews false claims of election fraud spread Well, guess what, kids?
say today, "Macron wins, see why Trump and friends continue to spew the lies.
Trump wins shows France, why Trump election lies still persist." Well, guess what, kids?
I did a great interview with Steve Sands that's on the James Fetzer BitChute channel, 30 minutes long with my direct knowledge of the voter fraud that went on in Texas.
I followed all of this stuff on the Lindell Symposium.
I've had my first contact with True the Vote back in 2011.
I know those people and their great work very well, and they have a film that's coming out on Monday, May 2nd, again on May the 4th, and then a world premiere with a live stream on May 8th.
And those tickets are available at 250 theaters nationwide.
It'll be a single showing at 7 p.m.
so check your time and listing.
Go to 2000mules.com and Check on your state for locations of theaters.
And please try to see this in a theater because that makes more of an impact on these people than just showing up online.
But we need to make this an event where they absolutely cannot continue to ignore the reality that's going on out here.
What Kathleen Englebright said is that this is going to be the first of probably a series.
I doubt they'll do theater openings for all of them because that's a real intensive and expensive program, but probably once they break the water on this, it'll be undeniable to anybody.
The extent of massive corruption that involves the rhinos who's approved this and known about it for 20 years and the dinos who perfected it to an absolute science of criminality.
It's insane that we have to deal with this and then turn around and pound our chests about what virtuous democracy we've got.
What an absolute joke.
We've got a criminal syndicate posing as a democracy.
Maybe it'll have the same effect as a daisy commercial.
Lyndon ran against Barry Goldwater with a little girl picking a daisy and a nuclear bomb goes off in the background, which was only shown once.
But then the new media went with it and it got replicated many, many times.
The trouble is in that day, the media were not under control the way they are today.
Michael.
Yeah, we can only hope that a movie like this Gets enough play to actually have an effect of some kind, because my understanding is that it does contain a lot, lot of damning information.
And as we all know, that in the year following the election, continuing really, we use the phrase, every time you turn a stone, you found voter fraud.
So with regard, I'm kind of surprised that the criminal oligarchy that runs this country is going to allow it to be shown at all.
But maybe they think it will further divide people for the sort of a civil war that looks like it's on the horizon when food supplies get rare enough.
That WHO pandemic treaty is a real evil thing.
It's like an obvious and overt power grab by this global oligarchy that's fighting World War III against the people of the world, and they're using public health as a Trojan horse, both for brainwashing people and actual attacks on the people in the form of vaccines.
We all need to do whatever possible to push back on the United States adopting that treaty, and maybe it'll have some effect with other countries if we do.
There's a terrific 38-minute video that just got uploaded to the Jim Fetzer BitChute site by World Health Organization whistleblower Astrid Stuckelberger.
She's interviewed by Alex Newman, and the greater part of it is some of the detail, and she gets into the weeds of exactly the kind of tyranny that that pandemic treaty represents.
Yeah, very good.
It's diabolically clever to play on people's health and, you know, you're actually killing them while you're promising to help them.
And most Americans are too gullible to see through it.
Meanwhile, Democrats have become uneasy about the repeal of Title 42 immigration restrictions for lots of obvious reasons, wanting Biden to hold off.
Impending repeal and an expected surge of illegals crossing the border is appearing to be too much even for Democrats to swallow.
Many have joined Republicans in urging Biden to delay lifting the policy plan for next month.
It will result in a massive surge of illegals flooding across our border.
Catalina Love tweets, I'm the daughter of an immigrant from Central America.
I know the value of a safe and secure border.
The Biden administration plan to end Title 42 is neither safe nor secure.
The border is out of control now.
Attempted border crosses have increased dramatically.
And of course, they're being given all kinds of incentives by Biden They're being encouraged to come over, getting a red carpet ride.
They're being flown all over the country.
They're giving all sorts of benefits.
And now they're not even going to require them to conform to health policies that are being imposed upon Americans.
I think this is going to enrage the American people.
And that's why so many politicians, Democrats, are worried that the fury of the public will be taken out on them, and with good reason.
Title 42, a pandemic-era policy begun under Trump, allows authorities to turn away immigrants on health grounds.
It has excluded over half of those who've sought to come into the country.
Democrats gained fidgety include Mark Kelly of Arizona, Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire, Catherine Cortez Mastro of Nevada, Chris Coons of Delaware, and Gary Peters of Michigan.
Remember, the Senate is 50-50.
This could make a huge difference.
Hassan, for example, told New Hampshire TV, our frontline personnel need significant additional numbers.
People on the ground at the border, they need more technology.
You need access roads, they need physical barriers.
The administration really needs to step up here.
In other words, she can see the threat it poses.
Chris Coons from Delaware said on Face the Nation, in the region where I'm from, we're seeing infections rise.
I think Philly, for example, just returned to a mask mandate.
My hope is that will be reconsidered appropriately.
There are both Republicans and Democrats calling for reconsideration.
The admin just announced a plan for how to deal with a possible surge.
Gary Peters, Unless we have a well-thought-out plan.
I think it is something that should be revisited and perhaps delayed.
I am going to defer judgment on that until I give the administration the opportunity to fully articulate what that plan is.
Meanwhile, Ron Johnson, one of the few sane voices in American politics today, of whom I'm very proud to be my senator, March was the worst month at the southern border in DHS history, yet Biden is ending Title 42, which will only lead to further chaos.
Even with the highest number of monthly illegal border crossings in history, the Democrat border crisis is about to get worse.
If Biden gets his way and Title 42 is lifted on May 23rd as scheduled, border officials say they'll be dealing with an unmanageable number of illegal immigrants at the Texas-Mexico border.
DHS had warned it's preparing for an influx of as many as 18,000 per day.
That's over a half a million per month.
That is six million a year.
Six million a year.
Cartels are already preparing to move massive amounts of illegal migrants to a massive human trafficking network, according to Goliad County Sheriff Roy Boyd.
He's not just warning Texans, but all Americans about what's about to happen, thanks to Joe Biden.
Biden's border crisis isn't limited to the border.
It's heading north to every major city and small town in the United States.
So, we have zero heads tweeting.
Southern border migrant crossings spike to record high in March, way ahead of Biden's plan to lift Title 42, which is going to make it overwhelmingly worse.
Well, thank God, a federal judge is temporarily blocking Biden from lifting Title 42.
This is a welcome development.
A federal judge said he'll temporarily block the Biden admin from ending the Trump-era Title 42 policy.
He has done this.
The CDC announced in April the policy would be rescinded on May 23.
U.S.
District Judge Robert Simmerhase of Louisiana said in a notice Monday he'll grant a temporary restraint or blocking the end of Title 42 in response to a lawsuit brought by 21 Republican-led states.
Summer Hayes was appointed by former President Trump.
A good appointment.
For the reasons stated on the record, the court announced its intent to grant the motion.
The parties will confer regarding specific terms to be contained in the temporary restraint order in an attempt to reach agreement.
I say good for him.
There's at least one journalist in America who has his head screwed on right.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I can bet you there's a bunch of people in the oligarchy and the administration both that are wishing that they had the right diversity group picked to come out and do a lone gunman trick on FJB, or that he would get a sudden illness so we could all sit around and feel sorry for his family.
But it looks like there's just an overwhelming amount of evidence, particularly coming out now on the Hunter Biden thing, Great article at the Conservative Treehouse on filings that were submitted by the Durham investigation on the emails and communications from a number of the players in the Russiagate thing.
So let's not forget, we've been demonizing Russia for a long, long time because we have to have an enemy.
And if there ain't a boogie bear, then, you know, kids might actually have sweet dreams at night.
So we don't want that to happen.
And anyhow, somebody accidentally forgot to redact the emails, so now the emails are out in the public domain.
We can see exactly how nasty Fusion GPS was, and all of the members of the Hillary team, we caught them lock, stock, and barrel on that particular event.
So, you know, it looks like the cards are collapsing from a number of different angles.
And this week we had a Texas National Guardman who was trying to save two illegal aliens that were apparently drowning in the Rio Grande River and he ended up Pushing them to safety, but he slipped himself and then his body disappeared and they found him and he tragically drowned.
But when the Raggedy Ann and the White House Press Corps was asked about it, she said, well, those weren't our people that did that.
That's what the governor did.
So that's not on us.
That's on them.
You know, not the slightest amount of remorse that here's a U.S.
serviceman who happens to be in the National Guard Division of the U.S.
Service who drowns in service of his country that your administration refuses to do.
And so our governor has to do it.
And when that happens, you don't even have a moment of sympathy for that soldier's family at all.
You are the most disgusting bunch of narcissistic sock puppets in the history of this planet, and God, I hope you get quarter, four times jabbed, whatever it takes to take you and the rest of your people out, because you are horrible human beings.
Well said, you know, Michael.
The border situation is an abject disaster, and it's an obvious case in point of how the people in power in this country are working on an agenda that's totally divorced from any kind of goodwill to the American people.
What that agenda is, they don't tell us, but we can certainly put it together from the evidence.
And it looks like the Democrats are seeing their party going off a cliff in the coming midterm.
So there's a lot of antsy talk among them.
Maybe they don't even think they'll be able to pull off the same level of election stealing that they did and they were so successful with in the 2020 election.
And I think they suspect the American people understand who's responsible for this breakdown of border security.
You mentioned that there was a rate, a projected rate of 6 million people coming across the border illegally per year.
That's funny, where have I heard that number before?
Oh, that's interesting, Michael.
That's very interesting.
Six million.
Got my attention.
Whoa, six million.
Except these are six million real people, unlike six million imaginary souls.
Meanwhile, DeSantis could single-handedly bring an end to Pelosi.
Republicans control the state legislature.
Because of this, it could get worse because they're doing redistricting.
DeSantis did not bend to demands of moderate Republicans who wanted to appeal liberal Democrats.
Why the hell should he?
It will become more challenging for Pelosi to maintain her iron grip.
Her speakership will be in jeopardy.
Given the clear probability, I say certainty, Republicans will take the lower chamber in the November midterms.
Democrat strategists are worried Republicans are planning to exploit the state's rapid population growth, especially along the I-4 corridor, in order to eliminate some of the state's congressional seats.
Today, the Florida Legislature finally came to DeSantis' wishes and passed one of his proposed congressional maps, the last major piece in the national redistricting puzzle.
As befitting DeSantis' national reputation and ambitions, it's a dream map for partisan Republicans, single-handedly adding four new Republicans to the U.S.
House of Representatives.
While DeSantis' uncompromising insistence on maximizing Republican power may give him a nice story to tell if he runs for president, it could be the maps undoing in court.
Essentially, the map is a guarantee that Democrat representatives in Florida will lose three of their seats in the House.
The Senate has pledged a veto, insisting only one of his uber-aggressive proposals would do.
His beef was the legislative proposal to preserve Lawson's Blue District, who sold it a ration strap from Tallahassee to Jacksonville.
What's most important is the map that's coming forward is going to apply directly to seats held by Democrat representatives Al Lawson, Charlie Crist, Stephanie Murphy, and possibly Val Demings as well.
Not surprising the Democrats are upset.
It's appalling, but not surprising, that the Republican legislator has abdicated its constitutional duty to draft and pass congressional maps for the governor, said Manny Diaz,
As proven by the proposed maps, DeSantis is hell-bent on eliminating congressional seats where Florida's minority communities have the ability to elect representatives of their choice and imposing his own partisan political preferences.
A number of Democrats have already vowed to file lawsuits challenging the redistricting.
But this guy, I think, knows what the hell he's doing.
And it's my opinion, if Trump is not a candidate in 2024, it will be DeSantis on the Republican ticket.
Joe?
Yeah, well, we have a cowardly governor and a AOL Attorney General here in Texas.
We know for a fact, and Mike Lindell had ample evidence of it in his symposium last summer, that the state of Texas lost at least six congressional seats to the Democrats from voter fraud here in Texas.
And yet we had nothing in the way of investigation, nothing in the way of non-certification on the part of the governor who could have said that we're not certifying all of these seats because they're still in question, and we could have kept Pelosi from being speaker just in Texas.
So when somebody starts promoting our little governor, do not accept him on the national stage.
He's been a horrible puppet I don't think Abbott's going anywhere, Joe.
I would not worry about that.
of damage to the state of Texas, even though we're a strong enough state, we can endure this kind of corrupt leadership.
But absolutely, we do not need to have our governor being raised to a higher level.
He's certainly unworthy of it.
I don't think Abbott's going anywhere, Joe.
I would not worry about that.
Michael.
Yeah, apparently DeSantis is the man at the moment.
He's been making all the right decisions regarding traditional values and freedoms and constitutional principles.
Greg Abbott, a lot of people are flocking to both Florida and Texas.
I think Texas more so because of its reputation as being a bastion of independence And freedom there, much more so than Greg Abbott's actions would warrant.
I think Abbott wants to be perceived as a defender of the Constitution without actually doing much against the big global agenda.
It's telling that many people are actually moving, flocking from the West Coast, especially to Florida and Texas.
It's kind of optimistic in as much as a lot of people are not just sitting back and thinking everything's going to return to normal, and they're feeling like those states are the last strongholds of constitutional principles and individual freedoms.
A very dead depiction of Abbott.
Yes, I think you're right.
He wants to give the impression but not move the heavy water.
Get this.
Here's a very nice depiction of what face masks do to your health.
Catch this.
Hey, good morning everybody in Facebook land.
I have a little public safety announcement for everybody.
Let's talk about The air that we breathe.
This is a little gadget we use here.
I'm a Union electrician and sometimes we have to work in confined spaces.
This gadget here will read whether or not the air that you're breathing is safe.
Okay?
It reads oxygen levels, carbon monoxide, methane.
If the atmosphere you're working in, in a enclosed, you know, in an enclosure, a confined space, It's not safe.
The alarm goes off and it will tell you basically get out before you die.
Alright?
I'm going to hold this up in front of my face here a little bit and it's fine.
Nothing happens.
The oxygen is fine.
Everything is fine.
Okay?
Now, let's do this here.
Let's put on a mask.
Now, we're going to take the oxygen Or the meter again.
We're going to stick it just inside of the mask here.
And let's see what happens.
I'm just breathing normal.
Oh my goodness!
Look at that.
Look at my oxygen levels.
Now they want everybody to wear these masks all day long.
Now, if this was happening on my work site, we would have to get out of the confined space immediately because the air that we're breathing is not safe.
So now you're going to tell me that wearing this mask all day long is safe?
It is not safe for you, it is not safe for your children to wear that mask all day long.
So I'm going to tell you what, stick that up your fact checker people.
They don't work.
They might stop droplets from coming out of my mouth, but to wear these all day long, it is not safe for you.
People, come on.
Wake up.
These things do more harm to your body than anything else.
Alright?
That's all I got to say, people.
Stay safe and live free.
Meanwhile, the largest school district in Wisconsin decides to keep the face mandate indefinitely.
I find this appalling.
Most public school districts have decided to end mask mandates, and frustration with COVID restrictions continues to grow.
They were expressed in a recent election to Wisconsin, where liberal school board members saw crushing defeats at the ballot box.
May they continue.
While most school districts have given up on mask mandates, Wisconsin's largest has decided to keep them.
Not just keep them, but indefinitely.
A school district with over 70,000 students said they're concerned about recent COVID trends in the city of Milwaukee.
They want to keep face mandates because of the relatively low vaccination rate within the school district, demonstrating their complete ignoramuses and have no idea of the facts of the matter.
The district have flip-flopped on masks repeatedly.
They lifted the masks for just a day earlier this week before forcing students to put them on again.
Meanwhile, here we have a report that Elon Musk is a former Klaus Schwab WEF Young Global Leader.
Most of my audience is well aware of the WEF's Young Global Leader Initiative, yielding people like Justin Trudeau, Gavin Newsom, tech giants like Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, disciples of Klaus Schwab, and the New World Order.
What they may not know is that Elon Musk is among them.
I don't hold it against you if you didn't know.
There seems to have been a concerted effort to hide the fact.
Searching on Google for data about just about any other graduate of Schwab School of Globalism reveals tons of data, but a similar set on Musk is slim.
I had to go back to a 2008 Bloomberg article to find it.
The article titled, Young Global Leaders.
Anderson Cooper and Leonardo DiCaprio are in the most exclusive private social network in the world.
By Bruce Neusbaum.
Published March 17, 2008, it's revealed that Elon Musk, the chairman of Tesla Motors, a much-publicized electric sports car company, is a new, young global leader.
As the billionaire pushes to buy Twitter, and he has now done so, the vast majority of conservatives have been cheering him on.
That makes sense, since he's trying to install a free speech mentality here, denouncing censorship, claiming to be a free speech absolutist.
But it must be noted, Musk may not be the conservative hero many want him to be, in fact, He has a history of promoting anti-American ideas like universal basic income, stronger economic ties with communist China, and an outright embrace of a form of socialism that sounds an awful lot like the World Economic Forum push for stakeholder capitalism.
He seems to be making the right enemies in his bid for control of Twitter, as both the U.S.
government and hedge fund Vanguard have been making moves to block or intimidate him.
That only endears him even more to conservatives.
And while I think there's a good chance he's sincere, there's also, alas, a good chance he's a shill for the globalist elites.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, on the mask issue, a lot of these masks are made with polyester, and there's an enormous increase in the amount of microplastics that are in people's lungs from breathing this crap all day long.
So that's enough to say on that story.
We've already covered them.
I think that's very important that this is going to cause lung damage just up the gazelle.
I think it's very important.
I'm very glad you brought it up.
And it'll tie in with the asthma that'll be in my closing comments.
But also, in 2009, China banned Twitter because of uncontrolled, you know, free information on Twitter.
So that's in 2009.
And then Musk goes and buys a place.
Well, guess what?
China is the second largest market for Tesla automobiles, which is about 50% of his sales.
And then China produces 50% of the EV batteries for all the electric vehicles in the United States, including Tesla.
So you gotta wonder, is this guy a world global leader from 2008?
And is he just playing us, or what?
And then surprisingly enough, overnight, as soon as it was announced that he bought it, he got a message from the director of the EU saying he got a message from the director of the EU saying Twitter to make any comments that are in violation of the strict EU laws on defamation.
So he's going to have a hard time having a platform where you can be thrown in jail for six years if you mention that six people, six million people might not have died in a certain little incident or you disagree with global warming or you disagree with COVID restrictions.
Bottom line is, he may have his Starlink system and he may be able to broadcast worldwide and claim that he's not subject to their jurisdictions, but if he's not blocking out content that goes to the EU in particular, and we already know that Russia's got a problem with some of the content that's coming on in Russia, so bottom line is, I think he's got the Like the dog that chased the pickup truck.
He finally caught the pickup truck, but now he doesn't know what to do with it.
That's extremely interesting.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, that Milwaukee, Wisconsin school district is probably just getting too much bribe money from their global controllers to even think about stopping that gravy train.
The fact that school boards all across the country have been receiving billions of dollars to implement these ridiculous and unscientific mask mandates on our children, that's a fact that's now very well established.
We've been embarrassing them with their self-voted pay raises here in Asheville.
And you'll see tons of videos online of people calling them out for the amount of money that they're taking in order to do this.
I learned a couple of weeks ago that the day before the lockdowns were announced, guess who flew to Los Angeles and met with members of the Los Angeles Unified School District?
All right.
That would be Tony the Rat Fauci.
And on the subject of the insanity of wearing these stupid face masks, there's another new interview that we just put up at the Jim Fetzer BitChute site with that great Pfizer whistleblower, Dr. Mike Yaden.
He's being interviewed by Children's Health Defense people in sort of a roundtable, but he he's he's angry and he's pulling no punches and And he, the first probably 15-20 minutes of that interview, he deals specifically with masks and mask mandates and the fact that they're totally useless for viral infections.
Assuming there is such a thing as viral infection in the first place.
Very good.
We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to live need to know at gmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
My course on conspiracy theories and critical thinking is moving apace.
It's not too late to sign up.
Go to mixandstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html.
All the classes are being recorded.
All the course materials are being made available.
So you could actually join at any time, even later on in the year.
You don't have to be present live for each class, the next of which will occur tomorrow night at 8 p.m.
Central Time.
Here we are, beginning our discussion of informal fallacies, fallacies of ambiguity, and next week Informal fallacies of relevance, and then apply the scientific reasoning to conspiracy theories, after which we will examine some of the most important events in recent American history and dispatch, diagnose what we have been told and its proximity to reality or lack thereof.
Final thoughts, Joe, yours.
Yes, well over the weekend, Jim and I finally got around to finishing the next installment in the AGW series.
This is installment number nine, where I tear into the EPA, and just one little portion of the EPA scam is that they have to have a cost-benefit analysis for any of the proposed regulations that they're going to have.
Of course, nobody holds their feet to the fire about how rigorous those studies are, and every one of them is fake, and one of their favorite little grab bags is to claim that something causes asthma.
Well guess what kids?
Asthma has no germ, no bacteria, it's no virus, it's just a group of symptoms.
And so what has the EPA been able to demonize as far as causing asthma?
Oh well that would be ground level ozone, nitrous oxide, Volatile organic compounds, particulates, which includes dust from plowed fields and pollen.
So they're going to eliminate all the pollen on the planet.
That's an interesting concept.
Carbon monoxide.
So bottom line is they've got this whole list of things and because of their regulations they've been able to reduce the air quantities of all of those things but surprisingly enough if you go to asthma in the USA vital signs at CDC and where the BitChute channel is posted this morning.
I went ahead and put a direct link to this.
1 in 12 people have asthma.
It's a lifelong disease that causes wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, and coughing.
So none of that's something that you're going to cure by getting rid of any of the things that they're talking about.
Affects person's quality of life.
There's continuing to rise.
So cases continue to rise even though the causes according to the EPA cost analysis have all been reduced.
So how do you have that as any kind of science at all?
The EPA is just as corrupt as the CDC and the FDA.
Gag me with a spoon.
You're absolutely right.
The EPA is just as corrupt as the CDC.
discussion about asthma, let's have one, but let's include the false science that the FDA, I mean, EPA has been using, so we can reject every bit of it.
It's absolutely horrible overreach.
Watch the interview.
It's a really good interview, Jim and I had on Saturday about the EPA.
Gag me with a spoon.
You're absolutely right.
The EPA just as corrupt as the CDC.
Michael, your final thoughts.
Yes, it has been for 40 years.
The, on On the tail end of my last comment, I said, if there is such a thing as viral infection in the first place, it's a very exciting thing to me to watch long-standing pervasive false beliefs about the world and society coming to an end.
I think that's what is happening.
That's what we're seeing.
You might consider it kind of a silver lining to this viral pandemic disaster scam.
The understanding of what's been happening in the area of medical science called virology is going a lot deeper than just the showing of the fraudulent nature of this particular one.
And as a last comment, there's a lot of high-level doctors that are coming to understand that, and one of them is Dr. Leigh Merritt, one of the best truth-tellers out there right now.
This is a quote from her recent Dr. Leigh Merritt Medical Hour on Brighteon.
It goes like this, This whole idea that we get sick because we breathe out these little molecules that we call viruses and they make everybody sick, you know, there's just not that much evidence for that.
People think there's all this, oh, of course there's influenza, of course it's infectious, when actually that may not be true.
There's a lot of lying that we've accepted because we haven't gone back to the primary evidence and really looked at what we actually know.
It turns out there's no evidence that influenza is communicated the way we think it is.
That's a fact that's easy to show and anybody can look this up.
The WHO claims that deaths from influenza every year is 0.02 to 0.03% of world population.
That's exactly the same death rate that's in Estonia.
The difference is 68% of Americans take the flu vaccine and only 5% take it in Estonia.
So what does that tell you?
It tells you that the flu vaccine does nothing at all.
So why do doctors keep telling people to take it?
Because we've been taught to do that by somebody.
We've been lied to about this whole big thing.
Close quote.
Because it puts a lot of money in the pockets of Big Pharma, I have no doubt about it.
Texas Tuesdays are a delight with Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, now in Asheville, North Carolina.
We're having to learn a lot about science and medicine that maybe we thought we could have done without, but it turns out that, contrary to our beliefs in the past, our lives actually depend upon it.
We're finding the masks not only cut down the amount of oxygen we breathe, they not only kill our brain cells, most of us don't have a whole lot of those to spare that we just as soon go without.
But also, it puts a strain on our cardiovascular systems.
We're finding tremendous effects.
And now it turns out, because the masks that they're designed are actually coating our lungs with a little particulate matter that's going to bring about no end of lung infections, no end of cancer inducements, no end of Asthma production, where, as Joe has implied, asthma is such a loosely defined notion that it can be attributed as a consequence of virtually any environmental factor you like.
It makes it a very convenient scapegoat.
Don't let yourself be played.
Be skeptical about all the horseshit you're getting from your government.
The situation has never been worse.
Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends, family, those you love and care about.
We don't know whether it's going to be the nukes or it's going to be the vaccine that's going to get us first, but the situation is precarious in the extreme.
Meanwhile, we'll be back tomorrow with more of the news you need to know.
Export Selection