All Episodes
Previous Next
April 12, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
55:12
David Zublick's Inner Circle (6 April 2022)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome back to the Dark Outpost.
David Zublik with you.
And joining me right now is the world famous Dr. James Fetzer.
And we call him Jim the Conspiracy Guy.
He is one of the best guys on the planet for news and information that you're not going to get anyplace else, and all very credible.
This man backs up everything he says, and we really love having him on the show.
Dr. Fetzer, welcome back.
Well, I'm just delighted, David, and it's a very special day because my 15-week, one-hour-a-week course on critical thinking and conspiracy theories begins tonight at 8 p.m.
Central Time.
I'm so looking forward to it.
Well, tell us a little bit—I'm sure it's still not too late for people to sign up, so please tell us about that, and let's get some people going there.
Well, that's absolutely true.
I do have a couple of slides about it.
If you go to MixCapitalNStream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html, you can sign up.
The course is $150 for the whole course, and it works out to $10 a day, 15 weeks.
We begin with The Nature of Thought.
That will begin tonight.
That's going to expand your mind.
Then we turn to the nature of language and the different kinds of claims that can be made in language, what we can do with words.
Then we turn to principles of logic and reasoning, types of arguments, deductive, inductive, abductive.
We turn to then the application of scientific reasoning to conspiracy theories, and we go through a whole host of them, David.
We must cover 15 different theories, maybe more, and I explain how you can apply those principles to sort things out so you won't be played.
In other words, in a world of information warfare, and Alex Jones got that exactly right, you need to be Fortified intellectually to enter the kind of combat today's media world represents.
I'm here to provide you just those tools and weapons to defend yourself intellectually and to expose the charades and chicanery by others.
Although I will say that Alex Jones would have done well to listen to Dr. James Fetzer.
Perhaps he, you know, he should have taken some of your advice.
David, I'm really dumbfounded because I reached out to Alex repeatedly, and in one of his video depositions he gave in Connecticut, he actually said he'd never read Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
Well, if he didn't read Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, then he wouldn't have all the massive proof he could need to show what had been a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
I can't imagine what could have done him more good.
I've sought to assist him, but he has not been inclined to receive my offer, which I find very disappointing.
I would be too.
Now, with regard to your course, and again, if you want to send me that link, via email.
We'll make sure that we post it on the show page today so that people can sign up.
I'm assuming, are the classes going to be live?
Yes, oh yes, yes.
I'll be doing each hour class live for 15 weeks.
Will they be online afterwards so that people, if they miss a class, but they spend $150 and they want to come back and listen to a previous lecture, can they go back and... Yes.
Yes, the lecture will all be archived.
Everyone who has signed up for the course will have the opportunity to watch the classes again and again to their heart's content.
And materials for the course are going to be provided free, gratis, complimentary by me.
And they include videos, blogs, even a book or two, David.
I think This will be a tremendous investment.
I have said to students for 35 years, if you came to the university to take just one class, this is a class you ought to take because it'll make a difference throughout your entire life.
Sorting things out, you know, reducing your ability to be cheated, deprived, misled.
This is really what you need to cope with life in the world, especially today when there's so much fake news.
This will help you see through the smoke and mirrors.
Well, folks, I highly recommend it.
Please, please take the class.
And again, Dr. Fetzer, if you will email me after the show, the exact link, we'll put it up on the show page so that people who are watching the show, either now or archived, Later on, can sign up for that today.
Also, givesendgo.com forward slash funding Fetzer if you want to help Dr. Fetzer with his, and of course, the course that he's offering is also going to help him in this fight.
But tell us about what you're up against right now and how people can also contribute by going to givesendgo.com forward slash funding Fetzer.
Well, I'm taking on the Wisconsin Supreme Court before the United States Supreme Court by submitting a writ of certiorari that invites them to consider my case.
They really need to do so.
There are major constitutional issues involved here.
I was deprived of my right to defend myself.
Expert reports supporting me were just set to the side and ignored.
The judge assumed the role of both judge and jury.
This was all outrageous.
If it were to be allowed to stand, not only would our First and Second Amendment rights be compromised, but our Fifth Amendment right not to be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law would be completely vitiated.
So, I say, David, this is really the course you want to take.
cause you want to support.
GiveSendGo.com/fundingfetzer will enable me to cover all the costs, the attorney fees, the filing fees, and the like to get my case before the United States Supreme Court.
And while, yes, they'd only take a small percentage, roughly 5% of those that are submitted, This case represents some important constitutional issues that I believe, in fact, it has a good chance of being accepted by the court.
In which case, while I can submit it initially pro se, remarkably enough, I will have an attorney there to represent me very able, very able, but I have to cover all the costs involved and I need All right, so please folks, either sign up for the course or contribute.
GiveSendGo.com forward slash Funding Fetzer, or if you really want to be a good person, do both.
Contribute and take the course.
All right, we'd appreciate it very much.
All right, let's get to this great presentation on Parkland.
I want to get involved in that right now.
I think it's going to be real good.
I know we're not going to get to all of it today.
It's a long presentation, but there's some specific videos that Dr. Fetzer feels we need to watch, and we'll get into this a little bit.
So please take us away, Dr. Fetzer.
Thank you, David.
Well, the alleged assailant is now being tried, and we have some new developments involving the judge in this case, who's in a very difficult position, in my opinion.
Because she's looking at the evidence being presented, but it's a tiny, tiny portion of all the evidence available.
So we have Parkland Crunch Time punishing for a stage event won Nicholas Cruz.
If you look at the next slide, David, we got the court, the judge.
She's telling the jury they can tour the school building where 17 were ostensibly or reportedly murdered.
But let me give you a little background here, David, and why this is just a ridiculous situation.
This was St.
Valentine's Day.
It was a holiday.
They sent the kids home early at 1 p.m.
So you had a school with 3,500 students, but only a handful, about three dozen, remained behind to serve as crisis actors.
The next slide talks about her allowing them to go to the school.
But as I say, you know, she believes a jury view of the crime scene would be useful and proper, even in light of the current posture of the case, meaning where it stands now before the court.
The purpose of a jury view is to assist the jury in analyzing and applying the evidence presented as trial.
Prosecutors want jurors to see the path Cruz 23 took through the building on February 14, 2018, to understand the carnage he unleashed as he walked methodically floor to floor, firing his semiotic rival as he went.
Shortly after the shooting, the building was fenced off and sealed to dry blood, with Valentine's Day gifts and bullet holes still in place.
Now, I'll tell you, Nicholas Cruz was on his way off campus when shooting was still going on.
We have the most important witness of them all, who was a classmate.
That's one of the three videos we have today.
It was an all-fake event.
They did have A police officer all in a SWAT suit firing an unusual weapon known as a SIM gun using simulated ammunition made out of beeswax and laundry detergent, David.
It won't penetrate the skin.
We'll see several witnesses walking around days later from what they believe Or are asserting that 223 high-velocity wounds, which do tremendous damage, rip up a body, they ought to be dead.
They ought to have their legs completely shattered and they're covering their wounds with band-aids, David.
It's that embarrassing.
Now, the next slide shows that we have the juror, the judge, has actually criticized the Sun-Sentinel, a newspaper in South Florida that, in my judgment, has been completely biased.
They went after James Tracy massively because he was blogging about Sandy Hook.
This is a propaganda organ.
And I think that she had an outburst.
The criticism against the paper was completely appropriate.
So, before she found herself presiding over one of the highest-profile cases in the country, Broward Circuit Judge Elizabeth Scherer did little to draw attention.
Her rulings tended to be non-controversial.
A ballot judge is found fault only with two decisions, an impressively low number for someone who's been on the bench for six years.
But Scherer, 42, David, this is just an embarrassing case.
she was randomly assigned the murder case of Nicholas Cruz, the Parkland teenager who admitted, and he may be under some form of mind control because absolutely to a certainty he did not do it, killing 17 people at Marjory Stonewood Douglas High School killing 17 people at Marjory Stonewood Douglas High School and wounding 17 more.
David, this is just an embarrassing case.
Yes, we can look at the next slide.
She ignited a firestorm on social media when she ripped into the South Florida Sun Sentinel two of its reporters and attorney for publishing sensitive information about the shooter that the Broward School Board had unintentionally released.
Worse, she vowed to restrain what the media reports in the future, a practice found repeatedly to be unconstitutional.
But she may have special reasons here if they're violating the rights of the accused.
Lawyers in Broward were reluctant to discuss her professional reputation because they have cases pending in front of her.
But the outburst did not surprise some of them, who called her temperamental, testy, cranky.
She's known to start her docket an hour or more after hearings are scheduled.
But another, and this guy I tend to believe, said she is consistently courteous, prepared, and polite, and she rules against me every time.
She's considering whether to hold us on settlement two and is reporters in contempt for publishing information after agreeing that the school board was authorized to withhold it from public release.
This is a case of contempt of court, David, that appears to me to be completely justified.
The next slide.
Before she became a judge, she was a prosecutor in the career criminal unit of the Broward State's Attorney's Office.
Her only direct brush with media attention was decidedly negative.
In 2009, her husband of seven years was arrested and charged with dealing cocaine and marijuana.
She filed for divorce the next day, though her husband told police they'd separated three months earlier.
She's the daughter of one of the most politically connected Republican fundraisers in South Florida, William Shearer, co-founder of the prestigious Conrad and Shearer Law Firm, who was an attorney who worked for George W. Bush on the election recount in 2000 when they stole the election in Florida while Jeb Bush was governor.
William Shearer declined to be interviewed, saying he was proud of his daughter, resigned from the commission in 2011, that's a judicial nominating commission, when it became clear she would be seeking an appointment because of the obvious conflict of interest.
That appointment came a year later.
She was elected without opposition in 2014 and faces her next election campaign in 2020.
Next, David, yes.
She's now married to a Hollywood police detective, which became an issue in 2016 when she declined to remove herself in an attempted murder case investigated by her husband's department.
The Fourth District Court of Appeals stepped in and removed her from the case so there would not be an apparent conflict of interest.
She now does not accept cases or sign warrants emanating from Hollywood.
Judge Sherr is a dedicated, hard-working judge who's served the 17th Circuit with distinction since her appointment to the bed since the Chief Administrative Judge, Jack Tudor.
With the Parkland case, Sherr found it necessary to exert her authority after lawyers went to another judge for an emergency hearing when she was unavailable.
She issued an order March, two weeks after the shooting, making it clear she was in charge of the case.
She tries to do the right thing.
Her heart's in the right place, said Bill Gellin, whose JAA blog website doesn't shy from criticizing judges.
But she has a tendency to micromanage.
She needs to get out of the way and let lawyers litigate their cases.
Wednesday, she berated The Sun Sentinel's lawyer, Dana McElroy, for defending the newspaper's right to publish information that had not been properly redacted.
She threatened to personally use a sharpie to indicate whether the paper could or could not publish about a case in the future.
From now on, if I have to specifically write word for word exactly what you are and are not permitted to print, then I have to take the papers myself and redact them with a sharpie, then I'll do that.
Her outburst drew criticism from pre-press advocates, but I think that's wrong.
This is an exception.
The notion that a court can presume to dictate to a paper what it can and cannot print is offensive to the very core of the First Amendment and antithetical to constitutional jurisprudence over the last 100 years, said Jeffrey Robbins.
A Massachusetts attorney is representing the Boston Herald and the New York Post on First Amendment issues.
The Post, by the way, has been really good at exposing a whole lot of stuff that political parties, some, would not like to have.
Meanwhile, there were any number of Parkland anomalies show this whole thing was fake.
They forgot to post the obituaries for the 17 alleged victims.
We have a 47-second video inside a classroom where you'll see a body with no arms lying in a pool of fake blood.
We have a police officer carrying out a girl with no apparent injuries.
Anyone who were injured ought to be left in place for an for the EMTs to deal with it.
The girl with iPod and another, she's worried about her iPod, another about her bottled water, which of course is ridiculous if they were just confronted with a shooting where someone had died. - Yeah. - Take a look at the next slide, David, and you can see, check the date for 14 Feb. and you can see, check the date for 14 Feb.
Alice Levinson, who was an 84-year-old elderly woman who died in natural causes, most certainly was not a student at Marjory Duggan.
So this is already into May and they had forgotten to put up the obituaries because, of course, they weren't actually dead.
Now take a look at the next slide and you'll see the key images from the video you're going to see.
That's a black training dummy with no head and no arms lying in a pool of fake blood.
So if you want decisive proof this is fake, you're going to see it right now in the video that follows, David.
Yes, please play.
all right
oh come on oh
- Now we're gonna play it again, David, with commentary.
I'll make commentary, but you may have noticed all those in police uniforms running in and out.
So you might think, wow, the Parkland cops are really Johnny on the spot.
But Parkland gave up his police force around 2004.
Those were actors in police uniforms, David.
Let's watch it again.
You'll hear the girls do their best.
really this spot.
We got the one on her iPod, another worried about her bottled water, the kid pulling his pots.
Not something you'd be inclined to do if you were in state of fear.
That's where she's talking about her bottled water.
There's an officer carrying out a girl supposed to be wounded, that's improper procedure.
The camera's going to swing around so you can get a brief glimpse of what actually is a training dummy with no head and no horns.
You'll see them going out.
There are lots of what appear to be police officers.
As you can see now, as I observed, when I came up at Salesforce in 2004 These were actors wearing police uniforms.
This whole thing was completely fake, staged, fraudulent, David, embarrassing.
Now here in the next slide we have one of the students who got it right.
Yeah.
Kelsey Friend was asked, you know, about her experience, and she said, this is exactly right, it was like a movie.
It looked so real, but it felt so fake.
She got that exactly right, David.
She wasn't fooled.
Staying beside her, of course, is David Hogg, who is the son of an FBI agent who appears to have transferred to Parkland after actually graduating from Laguna Shoals High School in California because he looks young and he's good as a spokesman, so they wanted him to be out there front and central. who is the son of an FBI agent who appears to Parkland after actually graduating from Laguna Shoals High School in California because he looks young and he's good as a spokesman so they wanted him to be out there front and central.
Turn to the very next slide David and we get more of the anomalies.
How the shooting was staged.
We have students with miraculous recoveries from AR-15 bullet wounds.
This was done using simunition made of beeswax and laundry detergent.
Our deputies held back to not shoot any of the designated players.
In fact, Sheriff Israel held them back because they didn't know it was fake.
So he couldn't have officers who thought a real shooting was taking place go in, lest they might shoot the officer who was faking being the killer, as though this kid, Nicholas Cruz, would have had access to any of this equipment, any of these weapons.
I mean, the whole thing is absurd on its face.
Meanwhile, when there was a Senate hearing on gun violence and school safety, they invited Sheriff Scott Israel, who by the way, David, drives a Lamborghini, he declined to show.
Now take a look at the next slide and you'll see some of the preposterous events.
We have even a fake doctor who says, wounds on, this is Maddie Wilford's chest and abdomen, it already healed.
Young people have a tendency to heal very fast, he said.
Get this, this is just days later, David.
She's supposed to have been shot in the chest and the abdomen and recovered.
If you're hit in the chest or abdomen- I'd still be in a hospital bed.
I'd still be laying in a hospital bed.
Dead.
No, actually, those are not, in my judgment, - Yeah, that too. - A bullet wound on her upper arm, which had injured two tendons would take more time.
Now, just look at the absurdity of that, David.
A bullet wound on her arm that injured two tendons is gonna take more time to heal than a large, he claims large caliber bullets penetrating through the chest and abdomen, which are serious injuries.
Those have already healed.
But this injury to her arm, David, you see how incredibly stupid this is?
She's very, very lucky, Dr. Necha Brinko said.
We're talking about large-caliber bullets.
He believed Ms.
Wilford would be physically able to return to school next week, probably make a full recovery.
I mean, this is just absurd beyond belief, David.
I'm so grateful to be here, Matt, he said.
It wouldn't be possible without those officers and first responders and amazing doctors.
Yeah, amazing doctors.
Fake doctors.
Look how he says large caliber bullets.
Check the next slide.
You'll see the AR-15 he's supposed to have used right at the bottom.
The cartridge is a .223 Remington.
It is a small caliber, only slightly larger than a .22.
Slightly larger than a .22.
To get smaller, you might be looking at a pellet gun or a BB gun.
So it's not, it just is saying that it was large caliber discredits him and shows that the guy's a fake.
He has no idea what he's talking about.
He's just making up these lines as he goes along.
Here's another now of the alleged victims, Samantha Fuentes.
Amazingly, she was released from the hospital as walking and being interviewed by reporters after only one week.
And her two legs now require only band-aids for the AR-15 wounds.
I know, David!
It's just a joke!
She apparently had to wait 30 minutes in her classroom before SWAT officials arrived.
Lucky she didn't bleed out and die.
She's all over the news with her statement regarding a phone call from Trump.
Just google her name for New York Times anti-Trump Samantha Fuentes today.
Check the next.
The New York Times actually published an article about wounds to the leg.
Notice she had those band-aids on her leg.
They are devastating.
They shatter the bones.
Look at the leg damage on the left.
I mean, it's just gruesome.
Yes.
Physicians are unanimous about the bona fide effects of a bona fide use of an AR-15 with its high velocity, two, two, three rounds.
Those band-aids must be a miracle invention, Doctor.
Yes, indeed, David.
It would be a miracle.
So how was it done?
Well, if you check the next slide, they actually were using Simunition.
I mean, I've had the benefit of expertise from many sources.
I might not have figured it out without expert advice.
Simunition, made out of beeswax and laundry detergent, it will not penetrate the skin.
But it will create a welt.
So what Samantha Fuentes had over her legs were band-aids covering the welt.
Nothing even penetrated the skin.
Now the next slide shows... And it will get out the stains in your clothes.
According to the official timeline now, two minutes and 23 seconds after Nicholas Cruz had been dropped off by Uber at the curb.
He began shooting.
Two minutes and thirty-three seconds.
Seen by teacher, Stacey LaPell is dressed in full metal garb, helmet, face mask, bulletproof armor.
So we're supposed to believe that in a space of two minutes and thirty-three seconds, Nicholas Cruz managed to walk from the curb where the Uber driver had dropped him off to the east stairwell, put on full metal garb of helmet, face mask, bulletproof armor, and begin shooting?
If you believe that, you must also believe in the Easter Bunny.
I mean, it's absurd.
And where would this student at Parkland High School come up with all that gear?
I mean, it's just absurd on his face.
Meanwhile, four of Sheriff Scott Israel's deputies waited outside Douglas High during the school shooting at his order and directive, David.
He couldn't let them come in because they might have shot up the guy who was using the sim gun to fire the simunition at the various students to create a brouhaha.
Here you have in the next, Senator Grassley being pretty upset when he turns out to be a no-show.
This is very, very disturbing.
But he didn't want to testify to Congress under oath And thereby be guilty of perjury when the truth eventually came out, assuming the truth will come out in the public domain.
So he simply didn't go.
Here you have, in the next slide then, a report about it.
Broward County Chief Sheriff Scott Israel to face no confidence vote from the union representing his own deputies.
According to a statement from Jeff Bell, the president of the Bowery Sheriff Office Deputies Association, Today, Friday, April 20, 2018, the Broward Sheriff Deputies Association announced its schedule and no-confidence vote on Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel.
Union President and Broward Sheriff Deputy Jeff Bell said the move follows many instances of suspected malfeasance, misfeasance, failure to maintain fiduciary responsibility by the sheriff, failure to properly investigate possible criminal misconduct by members of his senior command staff, and the lack of leadership that has crushed morale throughout the agency.
So he was even being disavowed by his own deputies who no doubt had put together that this whole thing was a fraud.
Check out the very next slide, David.
This wonderful woman, Cindy Alejo, who walked off campus with Nick Cruz, said to him, I'm surprised it wasn't you.
And he said, huh?
They had to get her out of the way.
She might be in witness protection, but frankly, It would not surprise me if they actually took her out, which would be tragic, but as you're going to see, this is a lovely young woman, utterly sincere, speaking the truth as she knows it.
Yes.
Next slide, David.
Thank you.
Cindy Alejo, a survivor of Parkland shooting, dies by suicide.
So we are told.
But remember, we were also told Nicholas Cruz shot 17 students at Parkland and killed them, and we know that was fake.
So there's every reason to believe this may well be fake, too.
Cindy Alejo, who survived the 2018 massacre at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida, has died from suicide.
Her mother, Kara, I don't believe this for a second.
from survivor's guilt after one of the deadliest mass shootings in modern U.S. history and had recently been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.
I don't believe this for a second.
Now look at Sydney here and see if you think this is a woman who's suffering survivor's guilt.
This was the second, by the way, Parkland shooting survivor to take their own life.
Sidney was an eyewitness who on camera stated she was speaking to Nicholas Cruz, the suspect of the shooting, even though shots were still being fired.
You'll see this led Sidney to believe There had to have been at least two shooters because she was being told Nicholas was a shooter.
So if Nicholas was a shooter, since there was shooting still going on when she was talking to Nicholas, there would have had to have been at least two.
What she doesn't understand is Nicholas was just a patsy.
Her mother claimed diagnosed with PTSD, but here's where it gets really strange.
Sheriff Israel's children, who are at least three years older than Sidney, are claiming to be close friends of the family and started a GoFundMe to raise over $70,000 for Sidney's family in three days.
Now here is Sidney.
Now look at this.
The single most important witness bar none.
I actually was in the bathroom at the moment and I came back to my classroom and I knocked on the door and the fire alarm went off and the principal came on the speaker and just said, everyone needs to evacuate right now.
So that's what we did.
As I was going down the stairs, I heard a couple shots fired.
Everyone was freaking out, saying that it was a gun.
And, um, as we were walking the whole class together, I actually was speaking to the suspect, Nicholas Cruz.
And as I was speaking to him, he seemed very angry.
I don't know what the word I want to say was, but, um, he was trouble in middle school.
So I kind of joked to him about it and said, I'm surprised you weren't the one who did it.
And he just gave me a, huh?
So, uh, That's really what happened.
You were walking down the hall.
He had already fired at that time.
Yes, sir.
Wasn't he?
Weren't you scared?
Um, in the moment I wasn't because there was obviously definitely another shooter involved, but... Oh, you think he was not the only one?
No.
Definitely not.
Why do you say that?
Um, because when shots were fired, I saw them after the fact.
That's the first I've heard of that.
were coming from the other part of the building.
So there definitely had to be two shooters involved, I believe. - That's the first I've heard of that.
Did you see any other students who were wounded?
- No, sir. - Wow.
- Now how bad is that, that the reporter wonders why did she think there was two shooters when he has just heard her report she was walking off campus with Nicholas Cruz and shots were still being fired?
What is he, a retard?
I mean, David, this is embarrassingly bad.
This reporter should have gone full-blown with this story.
But look at Sydney.
I think she's just a lovely person.
She's very relaxed.
She's not hyper.
She's very calm.
I think this is about as unlikely a suicide candidate as I can imagine.
So somebody did... David, yeah, say more, yeah.
Yeah, I was just saying, so it looks like somebody took her out because she was, you know, speaking the truth and she was calm and she was not a crisis actor, so they had to eliminate her.
This is a totally inconvenient truth to have here.
Meanwhile, we have a report about it.
Parkland shooting, suicide subpoenas, and shady situations.
The Parkland shooting and everything surrounding it is getting very strange and eerie.
There's an undertone that's like a boulder in the pit of my stomach.
Obfuscation and court orders not being followed.
Fired sheriff and resigning deputies.
Investigations initiated on the principals a year later.
The alleged shooter's attorney not providing discovery.
Now the Florida House and Senate are trying to bury body cam footage, testimony, witness statements.
Oddly timed suicides of survivors who had first instance testified there were multiple shooters, the fact that both, the most recent suicide casualty in Sydney, LA, were subpoenaed by the defense accrues to be interviewed, according to unconfirmed sources.
All within the span of one week, while Cruz's defense complains lack of discovery on Friday and a heated exchange with a judge.
Lastly, stranger than fiction, is GoFundMe, for the family of Sidney Alejo, started by Sheriff Israel's kids.
Maybe they realized that this fake shooting had led her to what they took to be a suicide, so they wanted to compensate by starting the GoFundMe Yeah.
It's pretty odd on its face.
If the story was on the up and up, it makes very little sense.
Meanwhile, key players in the whole event were Hollywood and political pros.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz appears to have been the producer.
Dina Katz, who operates Dancing with the Stars, a director.
Emma Gonzalez was cast in the role of a pseudo version of Joan of Arc.
They had her shave her head.
And make her clothe herself like Renee Falconetti who played the role in a movie about Joan of Arc.
Her parents were played by a couple of lowlifes with criminal histories.
This is past stuff, David!
Check it out.
The next slide.
Who is actually behind the march?
Here we're putting it all together of what really did happen of the March for Our Lives.
Take a look at the next slide, David.
And here we have Dina Katz on the upper left talking about this event that would be produced just weeks later.
Now get this, David.
It was produced just weeks later.
Claiming to have been inspired by the Parkland shooting.
But that turns out to be impossible.
In fact, weeks later, this was a massive event.
They had hundreds of products.
T-shirts, coffee mugs, a whole bit.
They had major acts.
They closed the roadway.
Well, it turns out you can't close the roadway in Washington, D.C.
without submitting a permit application.
180 days.
That's six months in advance, David.
That puts us back in October.
So they actually were submitting the event in October.
Claiming for an event to be produced in May, claiming that it was justified by an April 14 shooting.
That's how bad this was.
You think defense attorneys could dig into this if I've been able to do it with my colleagues?
Why the hell could not they?
Take a look at the very next slide, David.
Emma Gonzalez compared to Joan of Arc as another great actress.
Editors note.
Further proof the Parkland shooting was a Hollywood production emerges from this comparison of Emma Gonzalez with Joan of Arc.
Except there wasn't any massacre because no one appears to have been killed.
Ancestry.com, the most reliable source on genealogies, provides stunning confirmation it was a stage event to promote a political agenda.
We've already looked at the fact that they failed to put up the obituaries, David.
It was an oversight because no one was really killed.
See, for example, the Parkland Puzzle, how the pieces put together, the book I edited, bringing together multiple experts to take it apart.
Emma's role appears to have come straight out of central casting and to represent an elaborate production which appears to have been scripted and produced by Dina Katz for bleeding hearts like Rebecca Mead to write about it in The New Yorker.
They have simply found a better class of crisis actors and false flag producers.
That's what's going on.
David, it's just embarrassing.
Here you have Jonah Park and the Passion of Emma Gonzalez.
I gotta tell you, the New Yorker has just become a trash tabloid.
It's worse than that.
You can get more reliable information from the National Enquirer than you can from the New Yorker.
I believe it.
So here we have Emma at the March for Our Lives in Washington, D.C.
on the left.
And notice how she was chosen and made up to look like René-Maria Falconetti in the film The Passion of Joan of Arc back in 1928.
This is all subliminal, David.
This is all done deliberately.
There's nothing coincidental or circumstantial about this.
Go to the very next slide, David.
And what do we have?
Operation Hogwash.
And by the way, these can be found on my blog.
A strange case of Emma's enigmatic parents updated.
By Dan Comer.
Dan, by the way, is the IT guy who figured out that at Las Vegas they were using a high-quality audio played over the speaker system with the sound of machine guns firing and throwing in some three-shot salvos to implicate American military weapons while they coordinate with visual special effects in the Mandalay.
In other words, Dan It was brilliant in diagnosing why you could hear the same quality production of the soundtrack when it should have been coming directly from the Mandalay Bay fourth floor and other floors above all over Las Vegas.
It was because it was pre-recorded and broadcast over the speaker system.
Editor's note, from scratch, Emma and David seemed to be too perfect for the roles as though they'd been cast in a staged school shooting production.
When I learned of the interview on 60 Minutes, it seemed highly likely to me that her parents had been cast for their roles, too.
And if that were the case, the parents would be lowlifes, willing to scam the public for their own benefit, which could be in the form of payment, expunging the records, or other forms of reward.
That they turned out to have criminal backgrounds, including drug smuggling and child molestation, therefore, came to me as no surprise.
How much did 60 Minutes know?
Thanks to Dan for another brilliant expose.
Now David, yeah, here we have Ivan.
Elizabeth has a criminal record and acting credits too.
This is the parent, Jose Gonzalez, criminal records for possession and child molestation.
It may now be apparent why the media has been concealing the identities of Emma's parents.
Her mother's name is Elizabeth Weigard Gonzalez, and while she currently may be a math tutor, her past reveals many years of work in the television and film industry and a criminal record that includes possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver.
In other words, she was a drug dealer.
According to what appears to be her IMBD, this is her film profile.
She has numerous television and film credits, including director.
Perhaps this is why she was interviewed and not the father.
But what do we have about Jose?
Records for Jose Gonzalez reveal a wider variety of seemingly unrelated careers and an enormously long list of criminal records, including possession of a controlled substance and child molestation while in Dallas, Texas. - Oh, I haven't seen including possession of a controlled substance and child molestation while in Dallas, - Talk about scraping the bottom of the barrel. - Yeah. - Not anticipating, we talk about the course right Let's do it.
I want people to sign up.
This is very important, Dr. Fetzer.
Go ahead.
Excellent.
Conspiracy 101, Critical Thinking and Conspiracy Theories.
Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.
That's me.
Philosophy professor emeritus.
Now, for those who may not know a lot about me, I'm a former Marine Corps officer.
I'm a retired university professor.
I've published 24-plus books in scholarly areas such as the foundations of scientific knowledge, computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, evolution and mentality, and another dozen-plus in the area of conspiracy research.
This is my bio sketch, as you can find it on Amazon.com.
In the first three of my books in this area, Assassination Science, 1998, Murder in Dula Plaza, 2000, and The Great Subruder Film Hoax, 2003, where I brought together the best experts to ever study the case, including a world authority on the human brain, where I brought together the best experts to ever study the case, including a world authority on the human brain, who is also an expert on wound ballistics, having supervised an emergency medical supervising an emergency medical hospital for injured Okinawans and Japanese prisoners of war during the Battle of Okinawa.
A PhD in physics from Wisconsin with an MD from Michigan who's also board certified in radiation oncology, which is treatment of cancer using x-ray therapy.
David W. Mantic, the earlier Bob Livingston, by the way, founded the first department of neuroscience in the world at the University of California, San Diego, and was a scientific director of two of the national instances of high health for neurological diseases and and was a scientific director of two of the national instances of David Manteek, MD, PhD,
...has become the leading expert on the medical evidence in the world, discovered the autopsy x-rays had been altered to conceal a fist-sized blowout at the back of the head, that there was evidence internal to the x-rays they'd been unable to obfuscate of a second shot to the head, Bob Livingston confirmed that the brain shown in diagrams and photographs in the National Archives is not even the brain of JFK,
But a virtually completely intact brain, whereas Jack had half his brains blown out at Dealey Plaza.
In addition, Charles Crenshaw, M.D., who was in trauma room number one when JFK's moribund body was brought in and then two days later was responsible for the care and treatment of his alleged assassin, Lee Oswald.
Jack White, a legendary film and photo analyst who'd done just sensational work on the many faces of Lee Oswald and a host of other issues.
John P. Costello, Ph.D., another Ph.D., this time In physics, this time specialty in electromagnetism, the properties of light and of images of moving objects, where Costella has put up a tutorial that you can find on both my original blog AssassinationScience.com and another AssassinationResearch.com that I co-edit with John Costella.
Where he did a tutorial exposing that the current, the excellent version of the Zapruder film, which is 487 frames long, has been massively edited and revised by mistakes internal to the film, including misplacing the stem and three-way sign when they put it back into the edited version, getting it out of whack, which in and of itself might not sound very striking except it's proof
That the film was massively edited in other indications.
For example, they merged two shots, one to the back of the head, where Jack slumped forward, Jackie eased him back, and then was hit in the right temple by another bullet, where they merged those two in the film to make it look as though there'd been only one shot, and where they edited too many frames out, because after he was hit in the right forehead, he just slumped to the left,
But they took out so many frames, David, it looked like it was a violent back and left motion so that anyone watching the film is convinced he was shot from the right front.
But point being, I have a huge amount of background and experience here to qualify me as well as offering courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning for 35 years.
At the Universities of Kentucky, Virginia twice, North Carolina at Chapel Hill, New College of the University of South Florida, and then for the last 19 years of my 35-year career on the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota.
If you go to the next slide... Before we do that, one quick thing, Dr. Fritz, I just want to remind people, there's one thing in Dr.
Fetzer's CV that he's too modest to mention.
This man is also an American patriot and a hero.
And you served your country both in the public eye and also in the armed forces.
And we appreciate your service.
And we also appreciate the service that you continue to provide for the United States of America.
You are a patriot, sir.
Well, thank you, Dave.
Before we switch, actually, go back to that one.
I wanted to mention something else there.
I also founded Scholars for 9-11 Truth in December of 2005, and we mentioned Alex Jones.
He invited me to be the keynote speaker at his American Scholars Conference held in Los Angeles in June of 2006.
And Hannity and Combs invited me to come on the air the night before.
It turned out that Ollie North was sitting in for Sean Hannity.
They claimed they wanted to interview me about what we discovered about 9-11.
But instead, and I discovered this when I was sitting in the waiting room, I asked for a TV to be brought in.
And I heard Alan Combs say, you won't believe what your students are being taught in their classes by their professors.
And I knew they had it wrong, because I did not have a class on 9-11.
So when Alan Combs opened the show by asking, is this course required or an elective?
I explained, well, I don't have a course.
I said, I do have a course in critical thinking, and I use examples like JFK and 9-11 all the time, and he was bewildered.
He said, you mean you don't actually have a course?
I said, no, but I think it's a great idea because there's so much material.
From that point on, I just took control of the class, of the program, because all he was sitting in, when he began to question me, he said, Dr. Fetzer, didn't you tell our producers that you had a course on 9-11?
I said, no, Ollie.
I said, I do discuss it as an example in courses in critical thinking, but I have no such course.
What I created was a research organization.
Not a class on it.
He was utterly baffled.
And he asked me, do you have any evidence or information that implicates anyone in the administration of George W. Bush?
He asked specifically Dick Cheney.
And I said, I do, Ollie, in fact.
And I started talking about the testimony of Norman Mineta, the Secretary of Transportation.
Yeah.
an underground balker with Dick Cheney, who, by the way, appears to have been running 9-11 from that location, where the 8 came up and said, sir, it's 50 miles out.
Sir, it's 40 miles out.
Sir, it's 30 miles out.
Did the order still stand?
And Cheney got up and whipped his head around and said, of course, the order's still stand.
Have you heard anything to the contrary?
Now, Mineta didn't understand what he was talking about, but they had a plane that was flying toward the Pentagon to simulate Flight 77, which wasn't even in the air that day, David.
It would fly over the building.
At the same time, explosions took place in the building to make it look as though it had crashed into the building.
So Norman Mineta didn't know Ollie North was just dumbfounded.
And he said, well, how can I keep this kind of information quiet?
Well, you know, Ollie, this was a classified, compartmentalized organization on a need-to-know basis.
He was chagrined because I was pointing out to him something he's explained many times about his own covert activities.
David, everyone needs to find that.
It's online.
The image here is from a second.
They brought me back with Sean Hannity to try to do it again better.
And then third, I was brought on by O'Reilly, Bill O'Reilly, who was a very nasty piece of work.
Check those out if you want to see what happened.
Turn to the very next slide, David, and we get a review of the basics about the course.
15 one-hour seminars, Wednesdays 8 to 9 p.m.
Central, beginning tonight, 6 April, ending on 13 July.
This is a course you can repeat.
There's $150 registration for the course.
That's equal to $10 per class session.
Course materials are provided online without charge.
The course description?
An introduction to critical thinking using conspiracy theories as research illustrations for everyone who needs to master the ability to think things through and avoid being played by false narratives.
Course materials provided online include blogs, essays, videos, even a book or two, David.
Finally then, let's look at the syllabus.
6 April, tonight, Introduction to the Nature of Thought, Signs, and Minds.
13 April, Studying Language, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics.
20 April, Arguments, Deductive, Inductive, and Abductive.
27 April.
Informal Fallacies, Part 1, Fallacies of Ambiguity, 4 May.
Informal Fallacies, Part 2, Fallacies of Relevance, 11 May.
Applying Scientific Reasoning to Conspiracy Theories, 18 May.
The Assassination of JFK, The Use of Fabricated Evidence, 25 May.
The Atrocities of 9-11, Violating the Laws of Physics, 1 June.
The Moon Landings, How We Know We Didn't Go, 8 June.
Senator Paul Wellstone, Minnesota, accident or assassination?
15 June, Sandy Hook, designing events for emotional impact.
22 June, Nice, Orlando, Parkland, Shardsville, Las Vegas.
29 June, Pizzagate, is it myth or is it real?
Disturbing to the max.
6 July, the pandemic and the vax.
The greatest hoax of all, 13 July.
The official history of World War II.
Politics, Trump, science.
And there is a register Registration link, David.
All right.
Very good.
Registration is open.
MixedInStream.com slash critical dash thinking dot HTML.
Everyone is welcome to sign up.
You're going to have access to all the classes.
The period is specified there, but it's substantial.
You won't miss a thing.
I want to close, David, with this short video that suggests where we are today and reasons why you don't want to let yourself be played.
Check this out.
Calm down!
Get a hold of yourself!
Calm down!
I'll get back to your seat.
I'll take care of this.
Calm down!
You want to fall?
Everything's falling.
I'm supposed to do it.
I don't know how to do this.
That's a classic.
So, David, if you want to be able to see through the crap that's being thrown at us and the massive amount of fake news, and you can return us now, we can, yeah.
The massive fake news, you, this may be a course you don't want to miss.
It's a unique opportunity.
I'm so eager to get back into the classroom.
It's got a very enthusiastic response, David, and I'm just so grateful to have the chance to talk about it with you here today.
Me too.
Me too.
Very good.
I'm going to save that video, that last one, and show it from time to time.
I'll give you credit.
It's great.
Well, I didn't make it up, but it's terrific.
It is great.
Please sign up for the class.
We will post the link to the sign-up page on our show page today.
And also, please givesendgo.com forward slash fundingfetzer.
Please help Dr. James Fetzer, a tremendous American patriot and excellent researcher for all of his contributions.
Please help him out in his fight to protect your First and Second Amendment rights.
Dr. Fetzer, thanks so much as always, and we look forward to talking to you again next week.
Thanks so much, David, and I hope I see a lot of you there tonight.
All right, thank you very much.
▲
Export Selection