All Episodes
Previous Next
April 11, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:16
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 1 (10 April 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and David Kenney
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome, folks, to Truth Vs. News, Incorporated.
I'm Donald Reiner, producer, jd.consultants.live.com, and this is April the 10th.
It's Palm Sunday, a time of palms for peace and other things, and certainly we have that in the world today, and on Truth Vs. News, you'd be surprised.
I think this show we have today is going to be the epitome of showing it, truth, And news are poles apart, and I think this would be a show that you're going to want to get your friends and everybody else to sit down and watch as you hold hands and shrug.
Anyway, we've got the great show today, and we have a panel today.
I'll tell you, Jim Fetcher, of course, the most dangerous mind in America, he's just leading on going through all the dangers that are happening in America.
He's their savior.
And we have Scott Bennett, the most articulate military intelligence officer who's been there and done that and knows how to relate it to what's happening today.
And a special appearance by David Kenney, the Will Shire attorney who's down there in California.
And Dave, if you haven't been with us for a couple of months, you've got to say a word about what's up down there.
Give us a little preview.
I've just been busy tracking school bonds.
Coachella Valley, Sweetwater Union High School District, Garvey, El Monte Union High School District, Victor Valley Union High School District, all these high school districts and Okay, so we got a big show today, Jim.
What's happening over there in Ukraine?
and a take of $2.68 billion with no oversight and no control.
So other than that, I've turned it into the SEC, and they're marching along.
Wow.
Sounds heavy, brother.
Big bucks.
Okay, so we got a big show today, Jim.
What's happening over there in Ukraine?
How about Guccia?
Well, Don, there's a whole lot of lying going on.
The Bushehr massacre, so-called, has now become a driving force for propaganda attacking Russia.
The claim this is a Russian war crime is so patently false a rational observer can only be astounded by the bare-faced nerve and slapdash incompetence displayed by the median politician pushing this smear.
The latest effort to deny Russian rebuttals is a claim.
Satellite photos show the bodies were there for weeks.
Far from proving the case, however, it contradicts it because if they'd been there for weeks, they would have been in an advanced state of decay, but they aren't.
Not only that, while they show bodies, they also show no signs of the burned out cars, which were a prominent feature of the ground photos and videos as the Russian departed from the city.
Are we supposed to believe these vehicles were carefully driven in a position between the corpses after the shooting spree?
The dates are also very peculiar.
A Russia massacre entry in Wikipedia, for example, reads, on April 4th, satellite images were provided to the Times by Maxar Technology.
The Times compared images to video evidence and concluded Many of the civilians were killed more than three weeks ago when Russia's military was in control of the town.
Images on Jablonska Street show at least 11 dark objects of similar size to a human body between 9 March and 11.
Wiki also tells us Ukrainian troops re-entered Busha on April 1st.
Maxar Technology, a major contractor for NASA, of course, of course, of course, is an integral part of the NATO military-industrial complex.
Its assertions, therefore, have to be regarded with a certain degree of skepticism.
That said, Their dates of 9 to 11 March are causing concern even in the mainstream media.
They should raise eyebrows.
The idea that bodies could lie in the open air for three weeks without undergoing massive decay is only remotely credible because the average Westerner thinks Ukraine is in some kind of deep freeze in late March.
When you look at the weather for Kiev, however, there hasn't been a single day with temperatures below freezing since March 11th.
How ridiculous.
Not below freezing.
That means the bodies will decay.
Anyone who's walked past a dead animal left on the road will be able to imagine the appalling stench from so many human bodies left in the sunshine for three weeks yet.
Not one of the Ukrainian soldiers or police examining the bodies is wearing a mask, making an expression of revulsion, or mentioning a horrific smell.
As more graphic images have emerged, the freshness of the corpses has prompted a revision of the dates.
By 5 April, for example, the Daily Mail was now claiming the satellite photos were taken on the 19th of March, no explanation for the 10-day change.
Even accepting the revised timeline, there's a problem.
None of the bodies shown has any sign of decay or damage from carrion eaters.
To believe these accounts, therefore, you have to believe Ukraine has no stray dogs, no raps, not a single crow or other carnivorous bird.
Again, the video footage shows you see any carrion eating birds flying up from any of the bodies.
Moreover, Why weren't bodies crushed by Russian tanks as they withdrew?
Do you really believe soldiers brutal enough to slaughter dozens of defenseless civilians would then be considerate enough to slow down and carefully weave their heavy armor around each corpse?
Returning to the weather, there was rain during the three weeks the bodies are supposed to have laid, not rotting in the road.
Looking at cardboard in the green boxes, the food aid packages lying near some of the clearly fresh corpses, it's clear they've not been subject to bad weather.
They're also an important border about the truth because they are Russian.
So here you see, you know, boxes, red squares around many of the food packages for the dead.
To believe the Russian narrative, we have to swallow another ridiculous tall tale.
The analysts have spent the last month repeatedly telling us the Russian army cannot even supply its own troops with food and fuel, but now they'd have us believe Russia went all the trouble of taking vast quantities of emergency food and parcels to the occupied suburbs, handed them out, and then shot them.
Here's a sample.
On top, there are four key facts that have already received considerable attention on Telegram, the last uncensored social media platform of any size in the West, which have, predictably enough, been routinely ignored by the warmongering mainstream first.
A video of the Mayor of Bucharest speaking about how the Russian troops have left and a cleanup is now underway.
As a non-Russian speaker, I cannot judge what the comments by Russian speakers accompanying the video on Telegram say.
He does not mention any bodies of civilians.
Second, Closely related.
Video shows a detachment of paramilitary Ukrainian national police clearing the road of burned out and abandoned vehicles once again.
No sign of the bodies, which are supposed to have been lying there for weeks.
Third, perhaps most devastating, the white armbands on the bodies.
These are clearly shown in the main video of Ukrainian troops driving along the corpse-strewn street, and they're also visible on several victims of torture and murder in cellars.
The fact that the Ukrainians wear blue armbands while Russians wear white is universally accepted.
A number of videos also show civilians wearing white armbands as a sign of sympathy with the Russians or at least neutrality.
Thus, the white armbands on the victims of the Bukhra massacre is overwhelming evidence they were ethnic Russians.
They were murdered, not by Russian troops, who were, of course, sent in with a key to stopping the persecution of Russian speakers by the racist neo-Nazis, but by Ukrainians.
This should come as no surprise.
The whole history of Ukraine and nationalism is based on a mass murder of unclean and subhuman civilians from other ethnic groups, including the Poles of Wulin and Eastern Galicia, Jews, Hungarians, Romanians, and, of course, Russians.
Finally, we come to a video clip from the streets of Bukhra, posted and then removed, of a known Ukrainian neo-Nazi named Batman, who was being asked, "There are guys with blue armbands.
Can we shoot them?" Without blue armbands, can we shoot them?
If yeah, go ahead, shoot them.
The truth is so clear, we can see why Western leaders like Boris Johnson are so adamant there should not be, not be a proper international investigation.
Instead, They're using the most blatant fake news to justify imposing another round of sanctions to excuse sending billions of pounds, dollars, and euros of high-tech weapons to prolong the war.
One has to wonder about the scale of the kickbacks these real war criminals are getting from their military-industrial complex cronies.
Scott, your thoughts. - Well, the forensic audit, the forensic analysis of Bucca is going to yield the evidence that the claims are false, There were no Russian atrocities committed.
It counteracts Russia's military public relations policy strategy, which is to win the hearts and minds of the civilian people and of the Europeans.
The last thing they ever would want to do is antagonize And brand themselves as, you know, human rights abusers of this lecherous degree.
So this is obviously not the Russians.
All of the material evidence is going to confirm that, of course.
You don't see... Scott Ritter did an analysis, too.
You don't see blood pools everywhere.
You just see a bunch of bodies that seem to have been dumped off, probably after being frozen, put in a truck, transported somewhere, and then dumped.
The real atrocity, Jim, is what the Ukrainian army and the Ukrainian Asimov battalions are doing.
These are Hillbilly, inbred, hills have eyes, demoniac, lunatics that really get insult, you know, Nazi, insult the word Nazi, the way they're behaving and looking and speaking.
These are completely mentally deranged individuals.
I've always been somewhat suspicious of the Ukrainian personality.
I've seen them and known them, but this tells me they really are off in their mind.
And this kind of behavior against the ethnic Russians, which is the same thing they've been doing against the people of Lugansk and Donetsk for eight years, this is part of their entire brainwashed capacity.
And now who knows, you know, what other experiments may have been done on these people.
But they are completely brainwashed.
Zelensky is the Nazi Himmler SS leader, and Joe Biden is Hitler.
We have become the Hitlerian Nazi regime of war criminals that, if there's any justice under heaven, will lead to a complete Nuremberg hearing.
Where all of these parties, all of these leaders, whether it's Johnson or Schultz in Germany or Biden in America, all of them will be exposed as the war criminals they are.
And let's never forget the White Helmets and the British are very adept at theatrical fake human shootings and fake events.
They did it with the White Helmets in Syria and they've done it in Libya.
So deception Is there modus operandi, and we're going to see more and more of that as we progress through the stories about the recent revelations about how the West is consciously lying in an attempt to get into Putin's head, as if he listens to the West in the first place.
But this Bucha thing is a complete fraud.
And the sickest and the saddest thing is that the United States has degenerated into such a contemptible shadow of what we knew only a few decades ago.
We have become the monster that we went out hunting for, Jim.
- Oh, wow. - Well, the massacre was real, but it was perpetrated by the Ukrainians.
They were shooting anyone who was, say, with a Russian food package whatsoever, wearing a white armband right there in the street on the spot.
David, your thoughts. - Well, you know, I have no knowledge of who committed the massacre, but I do have some perspective on it.
I, you know, I tend to agree with Scott.
I heard a presentation by Scott Ritter about maybe two weeks ago, and he did what I would call a superb summary of the military planning and the pincer move by the Russians in eastern Ukraine as well as around Kiev and down towards Mariupol and towards Odessa.
And, you know, it was interesting because I've been following the war and I've been following the, you know, the news media and its reports and I don't, quite frankly, I've given up on anything in the news by mainstream media.
It's just all false.
It's most unfortunate that Corporate news in America has just sold itself out.
It's 100% corrupt.
It's as bad as it gets.
And if it wasn't for a few stations, we would just be into this community mind that is so misguided and so misdirected.
It's pitiful.
But there were no rats, no crows, nor carnivores.
A forensic report is absolutely needed, but we're not going to get one from NATO.
We're not going to get one from the United Nations.
We're not going to get one conducted by the United States.
I'd certainly welcome to a certain extent a report that was done by Russia.
But I tend to agree that the chronology, the timing of events, raises to a highly suspicious level whether or not the Ukrainians were actively involved in this rampage through Bucha.
And, you know, I think the, I think they were ethnic Russians that were there.
I think they were protected, and from what I understand, they were received by the Russian people, or the Russian soldiers, and when they left, you know, in comes the Azov battalion, and quite frankly, you know, I have nothing to say in support of that Nazi group, and I'm shocked that Macron
Johnson, Biden, and Zelensky are taking us all to the verge of World War III over the lunacy of Joe Biden and the Democrats.
Let me take one second.
Remember, I have always said that the North American Union is taking place in front of our eyes.
What we don't see is while this game is taking place in Europe, our southern border is just getting wider and wider open.
The North American Union is coming.
Prepare yourselves for it.
Here comes the end of the United States of America.
Yeah, I'm sorry to say you got it exactly right.
And the timeline is such the Russians were gone when these killings took place.
That's why they had a toy with the timeline.
But they're up against the laws of human decomposition of bodies.
So it's unsupportable.
The Ukrainians had the motive, the means, and the opportunity to carry out the slaughter.
I don't think there's really any room for doubt about it.
But the propaganda has been unbelievable.
Caitlin Johnstone has observed, U.S.
officials admit they're literally just lying to the public about Russia.
From spreading no-evidence claims to outright lying, all is fair to get inside Putin's head, apparently.
NBC has a new report out saying multiple anonymous U.S.
officials humorously entitled, in a break with the past, the U.S.
is using Intel to fight an info war with Russia even when the Intel isn't rock solid, meaning even when it's fabricated, even when it's false, even when it's known to be false and complete bullshit.
Biden admin has been pushing out intelligence about Russia's plan in Ukraine that has low confidence, based more on analysis than hard evidence, or even just plain false.
The report says toward this end the government has deliberately circulated false or poorly evidenced claims about impending chemical weapon attacks, Well, this is again thanks to Barack Obama nullifying the Smith Act of 1948.
It's coming home to roost.
"Inclusifying invasion about his advisors, "misinforming him and Russia seeking arms from China." PSYHOP, "In the US targeting the public "used to be illegal, even though the way they got around it "was to blast stories in the foreign press." Well, this is again, thanks to Barack Obama nullifying the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948.
It's coming home to roost.
Excerpt, "It was an attention grabbing assertion "making headlines around the world.
U.S.
officials had indications Russia might be preparing to use chemical agents in Ukraine.
Biden later said it publicly.
But three officials told NBC there's no evidence Russia has brought any chemical weapons near Ukraine.
They said the U.S.
released the information to deter Russia from using the banned munitions, even though Russia had no plan to use them anyway.
It's one in a string of examples of Biden breaking with precedent by deploying unclassified intelligence as part of an info war against Russia.
The administration had done so even when the intelligence wasn't rock solid, even when it was completely fabricated, even when it was bullshit.
This is supposed to keep Vladimir Putin off balance?
They may hold they lie for noble reason, but they're lying.
They knowingly circulate information no one had reason to believe was true, amplified by all the most influential media in the Western world.
Another example.
Releasing a false narrative as part of its information war.
A charge that Russia had turned to China for military help.
Locked hard evidence.
U.S.
said there's no indication China is concerned providing weapons from Russia.
On the Empire's claim last week, Putin's being misled by advisors because they're afraid to tell him the truth?
NBC acknowledged the report wasn't conclusive, based more on analysis than hard evidence.
It was just nonsense.
I'd actually made fun of this ridiculous press release when it was uncritically published disguised as breaking news by the New York Times.
Caitlin Johnstone, breaking news.
The most influential newspaper in the English-speaking world routinely passes off CIA press releases as breaking news.
We also had fun with the State Department at Price's bizarre February impersonation of Alex Jones, wrongly claiming Russia was about to release a false-like video using Price's actors.
Caitlin Johnson.
The U.S.
again tries to pass off government assertions as evidence.
Other U.S.
government lies were less cute.
In another disclosure, U.S.
officials had a reason not to provide Ukraine with MiG fighter jet, was that Russia would view the move as escalatory.
That was true, but it was also true of Stinger missiles, which Biden did provide, adding the admin declassified the MiG information to bolster the argument not to provide them.
So Biden knew it was sending weapons to Ukraine that would be perceived by a nuclear superpower as a provocative escalation, sent them anyway, and then lied about it.
Very cool.
This NBC report confirms rumors we've been hearing for months.
Professional war cheerleader Max Boot said, via the Council on Foreign Relations think tank, that Biden had ushered in a new era of info-ops.
I'm sorry, nothing new here.
That was past.
The update, the button, In 2012, just in time to bring us Sandy Hook, and a host of other false flags have been staged under since having been legalized by Barack Obama with Intel releases designed not to tell the truth but to affect Putin.
Former MI6 chief John Sawyer stole the Atlantic Council think tank.
Biden's Intel releases were based more on a general vibe than actual intelligence designed to manipulate rather than inform.
Glenn Greenwald tweeted, Amazing interview with a former MI6 chief with the Atlantic Council.
And in case you were wondering, no, NBC did not just publish a major leak.
Within the U.S.
government of whistleblowers who are bravely exposing the lies of the powerful with the help of the free press, one of the author's articles is Ken Delaunay, who in 2014 was revealed to have worked as a literal C.I.A.S.
at working for the L.A.
Times.
If you see his name, you can be sure you're reading exactly what the managers want you to read.
So why are they telling us now?
Is the U.S.
government not worried it'll lose their trust by admitting that it's continuously lying about its most high-profile international conflict?
And if this is an information war designed to get inside Putin's head, wouldn't openly reporting it through the mainstream completely defeat that purpose?
The answer to those questions is where it gets really creepy.
I welcome everyone's feedback and theories, but as near as I can figure out, the only reason they're releasing the story is because they want the public to know about it, and the only reason I can think they'd want the public to know about it is they're confident the public will consent to being lied to.
To get a better sense of what I'm getting at, watch the televised version of a report in which DeLeon and NBC anchor Alison Morris enthuse about how brilliant and wonderful it is Biden is employing these psychological warfare tactics to mess with Putin's mind.
The message an indoctrinated Embassy viewer would get while watching is, isn't this awesome?
Our president is pulling off these cool 3D chess moves to beat Putin and we're kind of a part of it.
It's been obvious for long that the U.S.
Empire has been working to shore up narrative control to strengthen its hegemonic domination of the planet via internet censorship, propaganda, algorithmic manipulation, normalization of the persecution of journalists.
We may now simply be at the stage of imperial narrative control, where they can begin openly manufacturing the consent of the public to be lied to for their own good.
Just as the smear campaign against Assange trained mainstream liberals to defend the right of the government to keep dark secrets from the public, we may now be looking at the stage of narrative control advancement, where mainstream liberals are trained to defend the right of the government to lie.
The U.S.
is ramping up Cold War aggression against Russia and China to secure unipolar hegemony in a desperate effort.
Psychological warfare traditionally plays a major role in Cold War maneuverings due to the inability to aggress in more overt ways against nuclear-armed foes.
So now would be the time to get the thinkers of America's two mainstream political factions fanatically cheerleading the government's PSYOP manipulations.
A casual glance around the internet at what mainstream liberals are saying about this shows that is what is happening.
In liberal circles, there does appear to be widespread acceptance of the world's most powerful government using the world's most powerful media to lie to the public for strategic gains.
If this continues to be accepted, it will make things a whole lot easier for the empire managers moving forward.
Let's take a look here.
Listen to this.
We start this hour with the U.S.
using intelligence to fight an information war and doing it to Russia for months now, and it's working.
NBC News National Security Correspondent Ken Delaney and live in Washington.
Ken, I want to start by giving people an example of what this is so they know what we're talking about.
Take a look.
They're also suggesting that Ukraine has biological and chemical weapons in Ukraine.
That's a clear sign he's considering using both of those.
Can you explain to our viewers what was going on there and what NBC News has learned about that claim this week from three different U.S.
officials?
Yeah, that was a great example of what we're talking about.
That was based on declassified intelligence, but we're also told the intelligence wasn't very clear about what exactly was going on.
And they decided to disclose it as a way of deterring Russia from doing that and putting the world on notice that this could happen.
And that's really, that's what's going on here, the big picture.
This is an unprecedented use of declassified intelligence.
We've never seen this level of information warfare before from the U.S.
government.
And what they're doing is they're trying to preempt the Russians, get ahead of Russian disinformation, even mess with Vladimir Putin's brain, as one person put it, leave him off balance to try to show that the United States knows what Russia is up to and is going to get ahead of it.
It's really rather remarkable.
Another example was when they announced that Russia had gone to China to ask for help with getting some weapons.
That hasn't come to pass yet, and it was almost a way of putting China on notice.
Hey, we know what's going on here.
Don't let this happen.
So really interesting and unprecedented use of intelligence here, Alison.
Yeah.
And Ken, as you just said, not just intelligence here, unprecedented use.
One U.S.
official telling you it doesn't even have to be solid intelligence when we talk about it.
It's more important to get out ahead of them, Putin specifically, before they do something.
It's preventative.
What else have you learned about that strategy?
Well, you know, that may have been a little too candid for some folks at the White House.
Their message is basically everything we say is vetted and rock solid.
And there is a process.
It's run by the National Security Council.
It's so robust that the Director of National Intelligence and other intelligence agencies have had to surge staff and resources to this declassification process, because they have to scrub this intelligence to make sure that whatever they're releasing doesn't expose sources and methods.
That source was absolutely correct.
It's clear what the strategy is here, is to get stuff out that is designed to, again, you know, show the Russians, you know, the United States knows what they're doing, put the world on notice that this is happening.
Remember, they talked about that false flag operation that they thought Russia was going to try to do at the start of the invasion.
You know, that never came to pass, but that may have been preempted by the U.S.
releasing that information, Allison.
Ken, these information leaks, as you've said, may have delayed Russia's invasion by weeks, even months.
Which sounds great, that is a good thing, but what are the pros and cons here?
How could something like this backfire?
Well, that was a great example, because by saying to the world that U.S.
intelligence shows that Russia is poised to invade, that was a big risk, because if they had been wrong, we would all be saying, oh, there's another case where U.S.
intelligence blew it, you know, to rock WMD, and now this.
But they were right, and as a matter of fact, for example, France The military intelligence agency there, they predicted that Russia would not invade.
The head of that agency had to resign over that.
So that was a great call.
A risky call, though.
The risk here is if the U.S.
gets something demonstrably wrong, it really would undermine American credibility and plays right into Moscow's hands.
So far that hasn't happened, Alex.
But I think all the lying is taking a toll.
Scott, this is right center in your area.
Tell us your thoughts about all this.
Well, the purpose of psychological operations is to influence the behavior of the target audience, to move their actions, to influence their mind with ideas.
And you cannot do that if your communications are perceived as static noise, devoid of any reason or message or rationality.
It's just That's what the U.S.
has become to the ears of the Russian military and political leadership.
There's no conversation, there's no reason.
The Russians have switched off the receiver and they hear nothing but noise.
And that's extraordinarily significant because that means nothing the U.S.
is saying or doing is having any effect.
It's not influencing behavior.
It's not influencing the mind.
They're deluding themselves to believe that they are.
Like David Kinney has said, and Scott Ritter had explained, Russia is prosecuting a military tactical strategic operation with a professionalism and a cold-blooded, surgical, yet very fascinatingly delicate impact on civilian life.
But they are not listening to the Empire of Lies and the blue monkeys who populate it, the Democrats, and these neocon rhinos.
They have no influence.
We have passed the event horizon, Jim, and are now quickly going down into the black hole.
That article I've read represents an enormous significant shift in the evolution of our country, because now I see the political, the media, these personalities, delusional, gone, wanting to believe a lie.
They want to dip their spoon in the cat shit and pretend it's chocolate pudding.
And they're deluding themselves.
There's no shame.
And they're angry and yelling at anybody that sniffs it and says, no, that's cat shit.
That's not chocolate pudding.
It's almost comical, but this is what our country has devolved into.
Comedians, liars, nonsense, no rationality.
It's having no impact on the Chinese, no impact on the Russians.
That's why Europe and the NATO and European Union are in a frozen moment.
Germany's already saying it's not going to provide any more weapons to Ukraine, making excuses.
Well, we have to protect ourselves.
We don't have enough weapons to go along.
All of these excuses in European countries are going to accelerate and it's going to, you're going to see the U.S.
completely isolated.
Britain is going to abandon us in this because they're closer to this conflict than others.
Europe, France, Germany, they're all looking for a way out.
They know that the Ukrainians who are homicidal maniacs for the most part, there are some good ones but not many judging by what I've seen, They're all getting payback for what they did to the poor Russian people in Donetsk and Lugansk.
They grossly miscalculated Zbigniew Brzezinski's original strategic playbook, which was create an attractive vacuum And bring the Ukrainians into Europe for economic purposes and that suction will pull the Russians into it.
And instead they've went on this path of war and conflict and biochemical labs and all this stuff that provoked Russia to engage.
And they've engaged and destroyed this half-wit retard country with half-wit retard military and Asimov battalion types.
So they're defeated.
They're going to continue to be defeated until they are completely annihilated, if they don't get smart and surrender.
And I'll end it by saying this.
The United States government does not have to tell the American people everything that is operationally being conducted in theaters of war or conflict.
They can keep things top secret.
However, they cannot lie to the American people because that is unconstitutional.
The American people created government for the people, by the people, through the people, to do for themselves that which individuals can't do.
The premise of a government is to appoint a government to protect the rights and the property and the lives of the people.
And that means the people need only truth To be communicated to them by the representatives of the government.
And I am not being Pollyanna-ish here.
I am getting to the raw constitutional reality that the moment the government openly, celebrationally violates and perversely corrupts and lies to the American people over and over and over again about war theaters and conflict and all sorts of other things, The moment it does that is the moment it ceases to be a government of the people and is now a bureaucratic tyranny.
So it's important to recognize this is unconstitutional.
It's not just a violation of the Smith-Month Act.
But it is, since he legalized lying by nullifying the Smith-Munn Act.
It's not lawful, Jim.
It's not lawful.
It's unconstitutional.
It's made it lawful, Scott.
That's what Obama did.
He opened the floodgate to all these lies and staged events.
Obama!
The Russians and the Chinese know this is all bullshit.
The target audience is the American people.
Yes.
David, your thoughts?
Well, you know, I shudder to think of what takes place in the cabinet.
I mean, you've got Lloyd Austin on the left hand of Biden.
You've got Anthony Blinken on the right hand.
You've got Jake Sullivan making his personal appearances.
And I forget the guy from the State Department.
Ed Price.
But you know, you go over a couple steps and you get Pete Buttigieg, or Buttigieg, however you pronounce it.
And while this war is taking place, his husband is out advocating a new pledge of allegiance to homosexual children, apparently.
And next to him is is Mayorkas.
I mean, Department of Homeland Security.
So I just shudder to think what is taking place in the cabinet.
Who's in control of the United States?
None of these guys.
And even worse, you've got Xavier Becerra in Health and Human Services.
And to make matters even worse than that, you've got Kamala Harris sitting as Vice President.
She can't say anything appropriately if it was blurted out for her.
The worst thing that is taking place is that That these conversations that should be of the highest nature, most confidential, secret conversations, should be taking place at the cabinet level.
I have no hope.
I mean, America has lost its moral compass, and the people who've taken it in other directions, you know, it's like the North Star.
The North Star is right there.
It's up in front, and it's supposed to guide us.
Well, it's like Biden's surrounded at 4 o'clock, at 3 o'clock, at 11 o'clock, at 7 o'clock by a bunch of blooming idiots.
And I can't think of what is taking place.
You've got no one of substance, including Biden, you've got no one with substance at that table.
So our country is lost.
I think Putin's well aware of it.
I think she is well aware of it.
And as Scott Ritter said, while we've got this exercise going on in the Ukraine, we're losing sight of the Southeast Asia Sea.
So I'm just shocked because I think China's going to move on Taiwan.
It's imminent.
It's inevitable.
And I think that we're just seeing erosion of the principal core values of Judeo-Christian values that make up the American ideology.
We've seen this This complete reversal take effect.
And it's going on throughout the United States, supported by Attorney General Merrick Garland.
And it's just frightening.
You know, we've got, what's her name in charge of energy?
I forget her name, Jennifer something or other.
Just no clue.
So you've got bio labs, you've got I said early on Russia was going to target the Donbass region and that's where they were going to go and however they got there, that was their objective.
Now you can see where it's taken place.
But I really had to have Scott Ritter explain it before I understood it.
So we see this unfolding series of events that just are taking place and no one, and I say that with great hesitation, No one in the cabinet is in control of what's going on.
And if we have to look to Austin as Secretary of Defense to be the bellwether for where the country's headed, I mean, we're in deep yogurt.
What you're leaving out is it's all by design.
This is all purposeful.
This is the intended destruction of America.
George Soros is the acting president.
Once you understand his lifelong dream was to destroy America, you understand that all the pieces fall together.
This is not by accident.
This is not by circumstance.
This is deliberate, intentional, by design.
Sad to say, because I agree with every lamentation you expressed.
You're 100% correct.
And I say to myself, who the hell is doing anything about any of this?
They're flooding the country with migrants, they're changing the demographics of the nation forever.
This is permanent.
You're absolutely right about him bringing in the North American Union without any deliberation or consent of the public.
This is just a complete calamity, a total disaster.
You're 100% right.
I want to add to that.
I want to add to that.
I had, I had a, I had a meeting last week with a director of nutrition for school district.
And she says, wow, you wouldn't believe what's going on.
We've got a bird flu coming, you know, and all this stuff about bird flu, bird flu, bird flu is now on the horizon.
And I see it in the reports today.
And, you know, so I think sorrows, Bill Gates, the foundation, they all need to be, you know, there's got to be some prosecutorial agency that focuses on them.
Our FBI apparently is corrupt.
Our Department of Justice is apparently corrupt.
I have totally, completely, 100% as an American lost faith in my government.
David, you're 100% correct.
Welcome to my world.
We're all there.
We're on the same page here.
Meanwhile, Obama was slapped with a history lesson after claiming he was tough on Russia and had to drag European allies into action.
Ironically, he was speaking at a disinformation conference where he's been the foremost proponent of disinformation.
Former Obama president was blasted for self-serving revisionist history after claiming he was tough on Russia.
Speaking at Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy, very apt, at the University of Chicago, claimed he was forced to drag European allies to take action for invading and annexing Crimea in 2014.
I will say that.
As someone who grappled with the incursion into Crimea and the eastern portions of Ukraine, I've been encouraged by the European reaction, because in 2014 I often had to drag them kicking and screaming to respond in ways that we wouldn't have wanted to see from those of us who describe ourselves as Western democracies.
Unbelievable.
He makes these kinds of claims.
It was also pointed out, however, Obama refused to arm Ukraine, refused to enforce his infamous red-line doctrine in Syria, that a Pentagon policy stated Russia and the U.S.
are no longer adversaries, that he admitted when discussing Crimea the fact that Ukraine, a non-NATO country, is going to be vulnerable To military domination by Russia, no matter what we do.
He was weak on Russia in the later years because he wanted to pass the Iran nuclear deal.
And of course, Obama dismissed Russia as a serious threat during the 2012 debate with Mick Romney.
Who earlier had said Russia is America's number one geopolitical foe.
Now, the fact is, a lot of what Obama was saying there was actually true, but nevertheless, the claim drew immediate criticism.
Northwest Eastern Professor Max Abrams said, watch Obama's self-serving revisionist history of how his admin responded when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014.
The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because the Cold War has been over for 20 years, Obama had told Romney in the debate.
Even James Clapper, former Director of National Intelligence, admitted he wished the Obama admin had been tougher on Russia.
I wish we as an admin had been more aggressive in 2014.
Actually, that would have been the wrong attitude to take.
Meanwhile, Russia and Ukraine trade blame for missile strike on a train station.
There were absurdities to this.
There was a huge chunk of a missile there that said, written on it in Russian, for the children.
This is such an obvious strike by the Ukrainians to blame on Russia.
It's embarrassing that anyone would take it seriously.
Photos show the remnants of a Soviet-made ballistic missile.
Moscow claims it couldn't have been responsible because it no longer uses this type of missile.
According to Russia's TASS, a mission to the UN said, it should be noted, the Tochka-U tactical missiles are not in service in the Russian Armed Forces.
Russia's military indeed claimed Ukraine fired the missile at the train station from about 28 miles southwest.
I think that's exactly right.
Exactly what happened.
More bullshit.
More false flags.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you know, the evolution of the entire information campaign against Russia for the past 40 years has been one that shows the United States as a cannibalistic maniac that's been bent on trying to dismember Russia, to cannibalize its natural resources, corrupt it with oligarchs and mafia and spies, and that's why Putin was I don't know.
Our predatory practices against Russia and its resources.
It's an amazing display.
The worst foreign policy in the history of humanity has been the American foreign policy towards Russia.
Russia and the United States should have embraced as an alliance, as a cousin sort of relationship, because we reflect back in the founding of the country, Russia was a supporter of the United States.
It is not the current Soviet Union.
It is not a communist empire.
It is not a collectivist democrat police state.
It is a Russian Orthodox Christian country with, as Ritter had said, I agree with him, one foot in czarist Russia for nationalistic reasons, because nationalism is what inspires your people to stand and with Withhold and survive things like 10 years of sanctions and brutality and things of that nature and demonizing Russia.
So nationalism is required and it does have a history in the communist systems and infrastructure that kept the country together.
They're not going back towards the communist party but they're looking to evolve into their new sort of Russian government platform.
But they've been stopped at every point.
And I always boil things down to this, very simply.
Vladimir Putin has said, woke-ism is a crime against humanity, teaching little boys to cut off their penis and pretend they're girls, and encourage men to swim in girls' races.
All of that woke-ism is a crime against humanity.
And I agree with him 100%.
And any man and any people and any government that adopts a policy of traditional family values and religious preservation and family preservation along the classical natural law modalities, that's a person in a country that I have affection and support for.
Not a country that pushes this homosexual, LGBT, transgenderism, Broken families and making the state the supreme world.
We're in that 1984 realm where America has now become what the communists were and Russia has now become what America was a hundred years ago.
So the bell curve has arrived.
America is descending And I think you're going to see the breakup of the federal union, the rise of an anti-federalist America, where you're going to have sovereign states and republics like Florida and Texas and Oklahoma and places like that emerge.
And here's the test, Jim.
When they try and do a draft to make war against Russia, When they try and do a false flag in the United States, maybe a nuclear event or a dirty bomb or assassinate Biden or an EMP attack, when they try and trigger with the faggoty Lindsey Graham and these other neocons pushing a draft, When they try and push that World War II draft Americans to go to fight with Russia, that's when you're going to see the real civil war break out.
That's when you're going to see people like DeSantis saying, hell no, no Floridian will be drafted into your war, Joe Biden, and that's the end of the republic as we knew it.
Jim?
No one's going to join the military with all the injection, the woke military.
Who the hell wants to join a military?
It's a gay organization.
It's just absurd.
And it's all been done deliberately.
And I'm convinced they're going to reconstitute the military with these migrants from other nations who are pouring in.
Give them citizenship and weapons of fire on the American people.
That is the plan.
David.
Well, I shudder to think of that, but I think you may be right.
You know, the truth of the matter is this.
American people have, we've acquiesced to this woke culture, this woke movement.
It's as if we're afraid to speak out against it.
And that brings along with it some condemnation toward us, I believe.
And you have to look at what's taking place, and I'll just say this briefly.
I agree with Scott that Vladimir Putin is at least looking through a moral lens.
The amoral or immoral A wide-ranging scope of what I'll call lasciviousness, infidelity, lack of parental rights, so on and so forth.
That brings upon the United States, to the extent that we acquiesce, it brings upon the United States the fear of God's judgment and the fear of God's retaliation.
So, you know, I mean, I don't want to, I don't know how to say this other than just to say it, you know, the nation really needs to turn and put God first and then let our values be defined after that.
I mean, think about it.
You've had Western culture proceeding for 2,500, 3,000 years.
You've had wonderful expressions of it artistically, philosophically, theatrically, scientifically, you know, just across the board.
We've had this wonderful array of Western civilization.
Now it's under a fundamental attack.
Europe's under attack.
It's a heartbeat away from being under attack.
The United States is under attack, taking place right now with migrant surges at the border.
And you've got people like Mayorkas encouraging it.
So, you know, if we continue to acquiesce in the face of this woke-ism, We're allowing or we're letting God's judgment take place on us.
And quite frankly, there's no excuse for that.
And so I think you have to find the I don't know where you find it in your heart or where you find the courage, but you just got to say this is wrong.
This is wrong.
This is wrong.
This is right.
And that's what I believe in and not be ashamed of it.
So so this this pernicious.
This pernicious, this nefarious, this anti-Christian movement that attacks our nation, it's pulling us apart at the seams.
But even worse, it's ruining families.
I mean, just myself, I can tell you the oppression, the spiritual oppression that I feel every day, You know, in the news, listening to the news, or even walking into the CVS store where it's saying, take your vaccine, take your vaccine, take your vaccine, CDC, Anthony Fauci.
I'm still, you know, I'm paraphrasing Jim Brewer, but it's kind of, you know, it's frightening to me that this overwhelming narrative It's released and encouraged by the United States government is doing nothing but oppressing the average family man, the average family, and it's tearing it apart.
And it's about time that it comes to an end.
But David, look, half the country agrees with every single word you just said.
They have no idea what to do about it.
You have diagnosed the problem.
No one knows what to do about it because there's no authority in Washington, D.C.
or elsewhere who is willing to stand up for the principles of the Constitution and the best interests of the American people.
It's disgusting.
Get this.
Sean Penn is telling Hannity the U.S.
must not be intimidated from using nukes against Russia over Ukraine.
My God!
After Hannity said Ukraine should have never given up their nukes, he responded, even countries that have nuclear weapons can remain intimidated to use them, and we're seeing that now with our own country.
I fear what that legacy is going to be.
He suggests America is too circumspect about deploying its nuclear arsenal.
He wants us to use them!
If one wants to see a nuclear conflict at the same time, if only one bully is going to be able to use them as a threat, we've got to rethink what we're doing.
Well, Hannity concurred and said he doesn't want to see a nuclear conflict.
Less than two weeks ago, he said the U.S.
must be willing to nuke Russia off the face of the earth.
If they use WMDs in Ukraine and mustn't cower in fear over the prospect of a global nuclear holocaust triggered by mutually assured destruction, mind you, in the wake of knowing the government is lying to us to precipitate all this, and we're supposed to act on all these lies?
Both John's statements are supreme idiocy as a threat of nuclear annihilation is a concept for both nations.
Ukraine had every opportunity to make peace and declare itself a neutral company, but instead, Zelensky threatened to acquire nukes, took billions in arms shipments, and insisted on joining NATO.
Sean Penn to Hannity, we mustn't be intimidated.
Meanwhile, NATO member Slovakia announced the transfer of the S-300 anti-air system to Ukraine, which is an early version.
They now have the 400 and the 500, which are far superior.
But how can Russia not view this as a threat, as participation by Slovakia?
The official Slovakian NATO Twitter account confirmed its stepping up support by saying the S-300 defense system to Ukraine so it can defend itself against Russian aggression, or what we are told is Russian aggression.
Slovakia has donated SAS-300 air defense to strengthen their self-defense against illegal, illegitimate aggression.
Thanks to Allied strength and presence, Slovakia's security and defense remain strong.
AP is noting this comes in direct response to Zelensky asking the West to close the skies.
He mentioned S-300 by name when he spoke to lawmakers by video last month to our own Congress, appealing for a defense system that would allow Ukraine to close the skies to Russian warplanes and missiles.
The action also comes after foreign ministers met in Brussels, where they reported agreed to give Ukraine newer and heavier weapons.
Russia has vowed it's ready to attack as legitimate targets any external weapon shipments intercepted from outside powers count on it.
They'll track it and destroy it.
If they come in by plane, they'll be shot down before they hit the ground.
S-300 transfers certainly bring NATO and Russia on a more direct collision course.
It's unclear the degree to which other NATO allies have signed off.
And get this, 3S intel officer tell NBC News the intelligence by and release on Russia and Ukraine was made up.
This is a further confirmation report we have.
Casually admitting on NBC News the intel of a planned false flag was totally made up.
Claims of chemical weapons, all made up.
We saw part of this interview.
It doesn't have to be solid intel when we talk about it.
Truly unbelievable.
Remember, AP reporter Matt Lee called out the State Department at Price over claims Russia was planting a false flag.
Recall, in Feb, the Biden State Department claimed there was intel Russia was going to use crisis actors to carry out a false flag, just what we ourselves have done in Syria.
We have info indicating Russia has also prepositioned a group of ops to conduct a false flag in eastern Ukraine.
Matt Lee wasn't buying it and accused the State Department of fabricating evidence.
You really have shown no evidence to confirm.
I mean, this is like crisis actors, really?
This is like Alex Jones territory you're getting into.
Meanwhile, Russia warns against games around its western enclave.
Moscow has cautioned neighboring European countries against closing their borders with Russia and Belarus, pointing out such a scenario would mean a blockade of Russia's westernmost exclave in Kaliningrad.
Latvian and Lithuanian officials have made statements regarding possibly closing the borders with Russia and Belarus.
Commenting on the matter, the Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Grushenko expressed hope common sense would prevent Europeans from playing with fire.
Such a measure would deprive Kaliningrad residents to reach Russia's main territory by land.
I very much hope common sense would not allow these games to be played around Kaliningrad.
On Tuesday, Latvian Defense Minister Artis Pabriks said that Balkan states could close their land border with Russian Belarus, but only if all three made a collective decision.
He was echoing a statement from the Foreign Minister of neighboring Lithuania, a country which borders only Russia's westernmost exclave, Kaliningrad, and unlike Latvia and Estonia, does not have a common border.
Europe, a regional solution is needed for border closure.
The Ukrainian ambassador revealed his country was involved in ongoing negotiations with Warsaw about closing the border.
I guarantee you with 100% Russia will not let it happen.
Scott, your thoughts?
Oh, no.
Hang on.
We've got to take a break here.
You got it.
You got it, Don.
You got it, Don.
You're on top.
We've got enough information in this hour to last for a long time.
And the comments, we want to come back and get the comments on this.
This is heavy stuff, folks.
Come back for the second hour here on Paul's Sunday.
▲
Export Selection