Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 30, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:17:03

Need to Know News (30 March 2022) with Holly Seeliger

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Started.
	This is Jim Fetzer, your host, with Pauli Seliger in an undisclosed station in the East Coast, where we're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	Regrettably, our co-host, David Skorb, he cannot join us today, but there have been some sensational developments.
	I say, God bless Matt Gatz.
	Moments ago, he tweeted, I successfully entered the hard drive of Hunter Biden's laptop into the congressional record.
	Subpoena Hunter Biden.
	Relentless truth tweets.
	This is wild.
	The Assistant Director of FBI Cyber claims to have zero knowledge of the Hunter Biden laptop, no idea where it is or who has it.
	They haven't even made an assessment on the laptop regarding whether or not the contents may compromise the current president, what we know to be a fact that they do overwhelmingly.
	Gates is astonished at the level of incompetence and proceeds to officially enter the contents of Laptop into the Congressional Record to the dismay of Jerry Ladner, who is the head of the committee.
	Hunter Biden Laptop entered into the Congressional Record.
	This is from the New York Post, doing a wonderful job of coverage.
	The New York Times has finally confirmed the existence of the infamous Hunter Biden laptop.
	It's now an official matter of record.
	Material from Hunter's infamous laptop was entered into the Congressional Record Tuesday at the request of Representative Matt Gaetz.
	I seek unanimous consent to enter into the record of this committee consent from files from and copies from the Hunter Biden laptop gets that Natalie responded without objection.
	He actually tried to defeat it, but it was unsuccessful.
	The Florida Republican made the mood during a hearing with the FBI Cyber Division after its assistant director testified didn't have any information about it, which is stunning.
	House Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler initially blocked Gant's request, but relented shortly thereafter.
	It's unclear if the material records the many sexually explicit photos and videos stored in the laptop, which no doubt it does.
	The lurid images include a raunchy 12-minute clip that appears to show Biden's son smoking crack while engaged in a sex act with an unidentified woman.
	Also, may I add, There's video of Hunter comporting with two nubile young women who appear to be the daughters of or alleged to be the daughters of Barack Obama and Michelle Obama, which we know is biologically impossible since two men cannot have children, but they are the young women who are presented to the public as though they were.
	Earlier, Gantz held up what appeared to be a small external hard drive and said, I seek unanimous consent to enter into the record of this committee the contents of Hunter Biden's laptop, which I'm in possession of.
	At that time, Nadler said, I'm not, pausing to confer with an aide.
	While another lawmaker said, there's no objection to that.
	Nadler announced, I will object pending further investigation.
	What's the basis, Gatshot?
	It's a unanimous consent request and I object pending further investigation.
	It may very well be entered into the record after we have a chance to look at it further.
	Gats held up.
	What appeared to be a small external hard drive, and when he made the request, let me just say, that gets celebrated, actually, its admission into the record by posting a video clip.
	Who could believe that such a small entity, this little hard drive, could have such a massive amount of proof of corruption of the American government?
	Gatz, who himself is under investigation for the alleged trafficking of a 17-year-old girl, which he's denied as a witch-hunt, and I have no doubt that Gatz is right, then asked for and received permission to enter into the record a copy of the receipt issued by the repair shop where the MacBook Pro computer was dropped off in April of 2019.
	I use a MacBook Pro as my laptop myself.
	The shop's owner, John Paul McIsaac, who's legally blind, said he couldn't identify who left the water-damaged laptop and never retrieved it.
	No doubt it was Hunter himself.
	McIsaac later turned over the contents to former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, who arranged to share them with a post in October of 2020, leading to a blockbuster series of exclusive reports.
	Here's just one of the photographs.
	This man is such a narcissist.
	He thinks he's the most wonderful person in the world.
	He thinks he is untouchable.
	Well, we shall see.
	In an appearance last year on Sunday morning, Hunter said the laptop Certainly may have been his saying it could be a laptop out there stolen from me.
	Could be I was hacked.
	Could be Russian intelligence, which is some of the nonsense being issued to obfuscate that it has devastating information.
	Earlier Mac Isaac told the Post he's facing bankruptcy since he's received a lot of death threats and harassment, forcing him to close down his shop and flee to Colorado for nearly a year.
	How outrageous is that?
	He was simply performing his duty as an American citizen when a lot of hacks, phony shills for the Biden administration were upset that that should have happened.
	During Tuesday's hearing, Matt's repeatedly grilled the FBI's expert, Vorndaan, about the whereabouts of the lab pod and what the FBI had done with it, which the FBI guy said he didn't know.
	I mean, this is so embarrassing.
	So, will you commit to give us a briefing as the Assistant Director of FBI-Cyber as to where the lab pod is, whether or not it's a point of vulnerability?
	Whether or not the American people should wonder whether or not its contents are significant.
	And he said, sir, I'll be happy to take your request back to our office.
	Yeah, we'll figure out a reason to not comply.
	Meanwhile, Tuesday announced he'll introduce legislation called, get this, the Spook Who Cried Wolf Resolution to indefinitely bar security clearances for 51 former U.S.
	intel officials who signed what he called a letter decrying the content of Hunter's laptop as Russian disinformation.
	In a public statement dated October 19, 2020, the ex-officials, including five former CIA directors or acting directors, said they did not know if material on the laptop were genuine, but said it was released weeks before the president's election and all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.
	Holly, this is so disgusting.
	This is so embarrassing.
	Even the FBI is betraying the trust of the American people.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, Jim, I'm, I'm actually surprised that this, the laptop has been entered into congressional record I didn't really know if it would ever get to this point I was very concerned obviously I was disturbed I believe the contents of the laptop it's It's been out there for four years now.
	The photos, you know, try not to look at them, but people have shown them over the years online.
	The information's out there, the pay to play, the drug use, the underage children photos of him.
	You know, his emails have leaked out.
	He's been notorious since Biden.
	His father was still a rep before he was president.
	He's been known for his drug use for years and his dealings with Ukraine for years before all of this came out.
	So really think that it's amazing that Gates put that out into the record.
	I think perhaps people might have even known that he had plans to do this or this was in the works for a while now because I do think that they did try to smear him and get him out of office through that trafficking accusations.
	And ultimately, like you said, they were not successful.
	If they had one iota of evidence or anything to prosecute him with that, I obviously believe that they would have.
	They would have prosecuted that to the fullest extent of the law.
	For some reason it turned into a nothing burger was not prosecuted probably because they like I said it was a an attempt similar to the Russia hoax to try to get him out of office or to smear him.
	I don't agree with every single thing.
	That Gates has put forward, but as far as he's one of the most pro-gun representatives in Florida, he worked to decriminalize marijuana.
	He mocked the mask policy by wearing a gas mask on the floor several times and was Basically mocking the whole thing over the past couple of years, speaking out against it.
	He refused to condemn the Myanmar coup, which I think does connect into some of these other color revolutions that we've seen over the past couple of years.
	He refused to condemn Trump's handling of Syria, which people were trying to start, as you know, tried to start a war.
	In Syria for many years using false accusations so I think as far as representatives go he has been on the right side of history.
	So if anyone were to put this in.
	Into the record.
	I think he would be a great person to do so.
	I'm really glad that he did.
	Hopefully this starts to open up everything else and the mainstream media has to start admitting that this is true.
	I wish it had been put in to the record and made available during the Biden election because it would have destroyed his credibility with whatever base he actually had.
	I think Democrats would have had to answer for Like you said, the drug use, the human trafficking, the Burisma, Ukraine, it really goes on.
	I mean, there's stuff on there that I haven't even wanted to look into.
	I know it's worse than I can imagine.
	It's worse than you can imagine.
	Yeah.
	Child sex, child rape, all kinds of crimes involving drug sex.
	I mean, it's all there, and massive evidence implicating two-thirds of the federal government is corrupt.
	I mean, it's just absolutely disgusting, Holly.
	So, thank God we have a Matt Gaetz down there.
	I think he's doing a great job, and of course, he's going to pay for it.
	He's going to be harassed and pilloried to the end.
	Jonas Alexis, Veterans Today has published a nice piece, The New World Order Has Come to an End, Coming from Russia.
	Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev has recently made a devastating comment about the so-called unipolar world.
	That world, he said, has come to an end.
	Now, let me make it clear.
	In my opinion, Medved here is talking about United States dominance of foreign affairs.
	He's not talking about the World Economic Forum trying to establish what we think of as a new world order using the coronavirus, the Vax to kill, slaughter most of the world's population.
	So I believe there's an ambiguity here in that Russia hasn't really quite put together The monstrousness of the terrorism that's being perpetrated by the World Economic Forum and the Rothschild banking empire.
	He added, further confirmation of my interpretation, the Americans are no longer the masters of planet Earth.
	He also spoke of the hypocritical, white-toothed smiles of politicians and diplomats who say one thing and do something completely different.
	With respect to Russia being a European country, Medved said, in terms of its geography and history, Russia is a European country.
	Also, we're European in terms of our cultural identity.
	A good part of our population represents European civilization, closely linked to Christian civilization.
	We also have a lot of people belonging to the Muslim faith, as well as to Russia's other major religions, Buddhism and Judaism.
	These questions and answers are from an interview Russia today conducted with him.
	Obviously, we're not talking about geography here.
	Today, many Russians, including the country's top officials, if you listen to what they're saying, feel that we are setting ourselves up against Europe as its opposite.
	No, this is a question that was put to him.
	No, It's they who are saying themselves up against us, trying to distinguish themselves from us.
	They do not have a monopoly on Europeanness.
	The European civilization developed steadily all across the continent.
	Sure, we are not, in that sense, successors of the Roman Empire, unlike a number of other European countries that belong to the Germanic language group.
	We have our own history, but our history is just as European as theirs.
	So, when they say to us that we no longer consider European, that sounds ridiculous.
	That's all I have to say about our identity.
	There's no reason to make any judgment.
	You ask me a question, and I told you we are even more European than they.
	That's all.
	Question.
	The scale of anti-Russian sentiment in this situation is staggering.
	It's like all of Europe, even the countries we believe are our friends and partners, are united in deep hatred for our country, and it's manifested at every level.
	And now Europeans, who always claimed they were so tolerant and committed to the principles of democracy, say such terrible things about Russia and Russians about our leaders, not to mention Biden, I don't think we've ever heard any rhetoric like that coming from a top official of his caliber, really meaning of his position in American society.
	On the other hand, if we take Poland, maybe Biden is not so bad after all.
	And if I may ask a question about Poland, if we could move on for a moment from discussing the main issue.
	What's your assessment of Warsaw's position in this situation?
	Because it feels like Poland is not only aspiring to play a key role here, but also have Lvov and the western part of Ukraine as some kind of protectorate.
	I understand this is two questions in one, so may I ask you both?
	Answer!
	The rhetoric is definitely very sharp.
	It's no doubt defined by current events, and all the political forces in Europe are trying to use this situation to their advantage and achieve their own goals in terms of domestic policy.
	Every country has something to deal with, be it elections or a crisis, or a need to create a coalition.
	So they need a target or an enemy.
	In this case, Russia is a designated enemy, so I'm not surprised by the rhetoric.
	You're right, though, when you say sometimes it defies comprehension, or as they say, goes beyond good and evil.
	At an everyday level, we also see this Russophobic rhetoric manifesting, though I would say it differs case by case.
	It also has to do with new communication methods, such as social media platforms, because of patterns that were less common before can now take root instantly.
	Russophobic rhetoric is nothing new, though.
	Recently, I quoted Russian poet Fyodor Turchyov, who talked about how the West ganged up on Russia 150 years ago and did everything in its power to turn us into outcasts and pariahs.
	Turchyov noted that this witch hunt lasted for 30 years.
	I can't help but see certain similarities between those times and modern Russia.
	Russia in its current form is just over 30 years old.
	And for these 30 years, we've been blamed for everything, especially in the last 20 or so.
	They said we picked up everything from the USSR, including its ideology, even though that's not true.
	They criticize us for this and that.
	So Russophobic rhetoric we're seeing from the West now is nothing new.
	From time to time, we hear absolutely astonishing remarks, but we're polite and we never get personal.
	No one points out that there are some people who exhibit clear signs of dementia or old-age senility.
	No one talks about grandpas who lose their balance while climbing the stairs to board a plane, Biden, or forget which way their office is and go straight into the bushes, Biden, No one points this out because we're polite.
	We refrain from mentioning these things, but all that boils down to ethics and good manners, as for Poland.
	I did have to speak on the subject recently because of the role Poland is trying to take on now.
	Poland is more than just a loyal liege subject of the U.S.
	It seeks to prove its loyalty every step of the way to show it's the U.S.' rock and main ally in Europe.
	In essence, in this way or another, Poland has been trying to win back hundreds of years rather than decades of its failed attempts to restore the former glory of Russia Politica.
	And if it can't do that, then to at least remind the world of the fact that Poland used to be a very serious power both in Europe and globally, almost an empire in the making.
	Today, the country's elite is represented by the Law and Justice Party, with Mr. Krasinski at its helm, and they have moved on to a pro-American and aggressively anti-Russian path for the past 10 years.
	I can recall a different time, when Poland and Russia actively tried to restore their relationship, especially in the wake of the tragic death of the Polish president.
	And it looked quite doable, because there were no impassable obstacles between us.
	But once the opposition party I just mentioned rose to power, the country's vector changed dramatically.
	It became wildly Russophobic.
	I cannot call it anything but political imbecility, since there's nothing more to it.
	They're trying to consolidate the voters who are very anti-Russian, and it's no secret Poland has quite a few of such people, or there are historical reasons, so they're trying to take advantage of that and put their finger in Ukraine's affairs, especially since Poland is now hosting a fairly large number of refugees from Ukraine.
	Poland is trying to use that for its own benefit.
	They are adopting some measures that not only aim to support the refugees, because naturally one can only want to help them, but also to find yet another way to punish Russia.
	They are proposing some new schemes, even amending the Constitution.
	To be able to confiscate Russia's property yesterday, they expelled a large number of Russian diplomats.
	I don't really understand what they're trying to achieve with all of that, because if Russia were to expel a matching number of diplomats, Poland would have to close down its entire embassy.
	Is that good?
	At the end of the day, it's up to each sovereign state to decide whether to maintain diplomatic relations or not.
	But this kind of policy is utterly destructive.
	I'd like to recap that Polish authorities are simply trying to prove their utmost loyalty to the U.S.
	and get more points by way of financial and economic support, as well as get more political support domestically.
	This is all sad, and it's not going to end well.
	Naturally, they can expect a symmetrical reaction to their actions or countermeasure dictated by international law.
	We will simply end up in a situation where we stop talking to each other completely.
	Is that good for Poland?
	I don't know.
	It's Poland's decision at the end of the day.
	When will the Ukraine conflict end?
	Question.
	Of course, we are not the General Staff, and I'm not representative of the Ministry of Defense, but I must tell you honestly, my friends and acquaintances constantly ask how long the offensive will last.
	But as I said, we are not on Fruskaya Embankment, but the Security Council of the Russian Federation is here.
	Can I ask what you personally think?
	About the course of the operation and how much it actually meets the goals that were announced?
	Answer.
	The operation took place primarily because the goals that the Russian state set out for itself was not achieved through diplomacy.
	The president said this at the start, and I recommend everyone look at Vladimir Putin's magisterial statement of February 24th, Empire of Lies, Characterizing the West, on my blog at jamesfetzer.org, and you will understand what's going on from the Russian point of view.
	The course of the operation, he continues, the plans for its implementation are determined by the Supreme Commander-in-Chief.
	According to the Constitution, that is the President.
	The President gave his assessment.
	The operation is progressing according to plan.
	The plan was prepared and approved by the Supreme Commander.
	Therefore, I will not give any additional assessments now.
	It seems to me this is a completely exhaustive assessment given by the President.
	It's obvious the outrage will continue until the goals set by the President of the country are achieved.
	These goals concern the future of Ukraine, the status of Ukraine as a neutral state, a state that does not pursue an anti-Russian policy, a state that is not militarized, and a state that should be our normal neighbor.
	Therefore, Until the results of the demilitarization and denazification of Ukraine are achieved, the operation must continue as it was conceived by president of the country, as it was decided.
	U.S.
	thinks it's above the law.
	Question.
	The U.S.
	has taken similar actions on a number of occasions in the past and in regions that are in no way part of their immediate interests.
	These countries are not their neighbors or threats to the U.S.
	Take Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, I would add Libya.
	But U.S.
	military action has never resulted in such a massive and consolidated response from the West.
	No one responded to a bombed wedding party in Afghanistan by shutting down European clothing stores in the U.S.
	There were no other repercussions either.
	Why?
	Why are we witnessing such a powerful response of Russia's move that you say are fully justified in terms of our security?
	Answer.
	Now, this is not going to sound as an insight, but clearly the U.S.
	believes it is a nation outside of international law above everyone else.
	Following the collapse of the USSR and an end to the bipolar world order based on the standoff between NATO and the Warsaw Pact, the U.S.
	saw itself as a winner And the sole beneficiary of the Soviet Union's demise.
	There is much more you can find in the full interview on my blog.
	Meanwhile, testimony from Mariupol, from many civilians there, about how Ukrainian militants held them hostage, about atrocities Ukrainian Nazis committed against civilians.
	For goodness sake, oh man, everyone's hugging, crying, all the cars have been hit.
	They're crying because they're being emancipated.
	I can say with confidence 85% of the city's destruction was caused by the Azov forces, that's Ukrainian Nazis.
	The testimony of many civilians from Mariupol about how Ukrainian militants held them hostage and about the atrocities Ukrainian Nazis committed against civilians.
	Meanwhile, the Ukrainian side is spreading lies that it has traditionally on the social media, attempting to tarnish those who survived and fled the war-torn city.
	As DPR and Russian Federation units occupy Mariupol, more and more eyewitness accounts of afu war crimes appear this content is deleted from mainstream social media such as facebook instagram twitter and more we continue to provide such video testimony with english subtitles or voiceover narration we encourage our readers and viewers willing and able to translate and voice over videos in english to contact us more on the topic check
	Shocking evidence of Ukrainian regime's essence.
	In video, Ukrainian Nazis torture prisoners of war.
	Update, Ukrainian Nazis torture women in Mariupol.
	All disgusting stuff.
	The Russians have it completely in the right, Holly.
	Your take.
	Well, I never liked any of those images, you know, of Ukrainian women or anyone with women with the guns and whatnot.
	I mean, what do you expect?
	Eventually you're going to start to see people acting like the military, acting like women are fair game.
	So whether you're talking about civilians or people.
	Running around with guns when you start to set that precedence, you know, that anyone's a soldier, then anyone can be an enemy.
	And then, you know, women and children can even be part of this whole gunfire and everything that's going on.
	The criminality of all this, the war crimes are being exposed with people, Ukrainians torturing Russians and others, and then people trying to flee.
	A lot of videos have come out over the past few weeks of Ukrainians saying it's other Ukrainians that are doing, that are torturing the civilians and making things difficult for them.
	As far as polling goes, I think perhaps polling can be kind of roped in by some of the EU rhetoric.
	Poland is also traditionally Catholic, so I think they kind of play off of the religious breakup between Poland and the Orthodox Russia, perhaps, is something that they kind of try to play off of each other.
	And then, well, obviously, Poland and Russia should be trading partners.
	They are for gasoline in a lot of ways, still, and natural resources.
	So pretty similar to what we're seeing with Germany, where we have these countries that are should be natural allies are right next to each other and traditionally have traded using the sort of new world order agenda to try to break up these countries.
	As usual, there's also a concern from the West about reestablishing basically Yugoslavia, that a lot of those countries might want to move back together to reform Yugoslavia.
	And that would be a buffer between Russia and the West.
	As we're seeing, the West is trying to isolate and sanction Russia, but Russia is the one they want this to break up.
	They don't want NATO at their border, rather.
	They said they don't necessarily, at this point, they're saying, we're not demanding the breakup of NATO, but we don't want you at our doorstep anymore.
	We need the buffer zone that we used to have, whether it was Yugoslavia or other nations such as Ukraine, areas that used to be neutral even a few years ago.
	And then finally, to talk about the New World Order agenda that was first mentioned with the Veterans Today article.
	It's funny to see the mainstream news trying to cover for this.
	There's still the Wikipedia page calling New World Order a conspiracy theory, even though Biden a couple of weeks ago was talking about a New World Order agenda.
	Larry Fink, the CEO of BlackRock, was putting out an article.
	He was concerned about Russia standing up to the New World Order agenda.
	And so it should be pretty clear to people what side of history the United States is on, how we're completely in the wrong right now.
	Oh, I couldn't agree more.
	History is going to treat the United States very badly here.
	Meanwhile, the National Center for Public Policy Research has made some astute observations that Biden's nominee would push the Supreme Court well beyond the founders' intent.
	In an interview with Real America with Dan Ball on One America News, Project 21 member Michael Austin warned that Judge Katenya Brown Jackson, if confirmed, would further radicalize the U.S.
	Supreme Court even though she'd be replacing arch-liberal Justice Stephen Breyer.
	Michael explained the left has sought to transform the court into a policymaking instrument.
	Contrary to the founder's intent, he said the judiciary has become the most dangerous branch of government.
	He points out radicals are trying to install radical judges and justices so the courts can be used to approve all of their agenda items they know couldn't be passed by Congress.
	Noting that every type of major issue makes its way to the highest court, Ball condemned the trickle-down impact of decisions on abortion, gun rights, and more that have been and may be imposed by judicial action.
	It still seems the one being hurt by all the problems are out there, of course, the less fortunate in our country.
	Rhetorically asking what the elites are doing about it, he added, not much.
	Remarking that Breyer and Brown were cut from the same cloth, he then asked if a Brown confirmation might have minimal impact on the court.
	Michael replied that she would undoubtedly bring about unwelcome change.
	She has a history of under-sentencing crime being soft on it, a history of supporting race and gender-baiting theories like critical race theory being pushed on our children.
	I think that if she's going to be confirmed to the court, she's going to push that body well beyond what our original framers had intended at America's founding.
	Pushing back, suggesting the bigger concern could be down the road when a conservative justice retires.
	Michael still insisted, however, Brown is deflecting questions that would reveal how she would have a profound impact, for the worse, should she be confirmed.
	At her most recent hearing, I think this was her appellate hearing, she talked about how the cases she had seen were never reason for her to develop any interpretation of the Constitution.
	I mean, how crazy is that?
	Think back to high school civics.
	The job of a U.S.
	judge is to interpret the Constitution.
	And yet this judge says she does nothing of the sort.
	Not a net change of zero.
	The type of person we're putting on the court is such a radical departure from anything we've seen before.
	I, unfortunately, believe we're going to see some changes if she were confirmed.
	Biden said at the outset, as far back as when he was campaigning for president in 2020, his first Supreme Court appointment would be a black woman, with this in mind.
	Ask Michael, is she the right one?
	Michael said the circumstance of Brown being pulled from a pool of candidates simply because of their physical characteristics is particularly demeaning.
	It's so offensive.
	It's just as bad as the 100-year-old racist rhetoric we hear from the Klan.
	Both progressives of yesteryear and progressives of today are both speaking to the bigotry of low expectations.
	That is, minority and women can't get ahead until we lower our expectations to help them up.
	I find it especially appalling that Biden is making an appointment declared in advance based upon race and sex.
	When the Supreme Court in its many decisions against discrimination has ruled you cannot make employment decisions on the basis of race, and I would dare say they imply also sex either.
	So isn't this an egregious violation of the court's own ruling to appoint a woman on the basis of her race and her sex?
	I am appalled.
	It's hard to really rationalize the mental gymnastics here.
	I mean, I never thought we'd get to the point of the insanity, the wokeness on the Supreme Court.
	I mean, the Supreme Court is supposed to be like the last stand, the buffer.
	It's supposed to be, I mean, I know throughout history, we've seen it become political at times, but I don't think I've ever seen it within history where we have the mental gymnastics and the insanity that we Are seeing right now the fact that they're talking about how we need to lower expectations to put a woman on is like super offensive to me I think it should be merit based and based on the Constitution and your interpretation of the law.
	And your qualifications and then on top of that, she is saying, well, I can't even define what a woman is.
	Well, someone someone defined a woman at some point because she's put on there because she's a woman.
	So someone had to be a biologist or something.
	She said she can't even define what a woman is.
	And they're putting her forward as the female representative that everyone needs.
	Meanwhile, we're seeing Justice Thomas trying to they're trying to push him off.
	Apparently, they couldn't get him sick enough to leave the Supreme Court.
	A lot of people have said that they believed he was poisoned recently.
	He was in the hospital.
	He's been kind of mum about his illness while he's out.
	Now they're going after his wife, Ginny.
	They're saying that both of them were trying to overthrow the government on January 6.
	So I guess, you know, his illness wasn't enough to get him to step down.
	And now they're trying to go after him as well.
	It was pretty predictable.
	We knew that Biden was either going to try to flood The Supreme Court put up to 12 justices on there.
	And when someone like Breyer said that's not a good idea that's that's a political maneuver.
	They got him off real quick.
	They're trying to get Thomas out of the Supreme Court.
	I wouldn't be surprised if I were on the Supreme Court right now I'd probably be afraid for my life if I wasn't.
	Completely on the side of these crazy Democrats at this point.
	And that's not lunatic or a conspiracy theory, Holly.
	I'm convinced Scalia was murdered because he was such a staunch proponent of the First and the Second Amendment.
	The liberals couldn't stand for that and arranged for him to be taken out.
	I'm convinced of that.
	Stunning stuff.
	Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
	The U.S.
	had more brains during the Cuban Missile Crisis.
	Russia has the ability to annihilate NATO virtually within 30 minutes and to take out the United States.
	It has the best anti-missile missiles in the world.
	It has the best anti-ship missiles in the world.
	It has the best anti-submarine torpedoes in the world.
	It has the best of all military equipment.
	Which, of course, has never been the motive of the U.S.
	military-industrial complex, which deliberately designs inadequate, malfunctioning equipment to get maintenance contracts that double their profit margin.
	Russia is no one to mess around with, and we have the least competent administration in our history at the most tense moment in world history.
	It's a very bad combination.
	Meanwhile, child COVID cases have dropped by 93 percent since Virginia Governor Youngkin lifted the school mask mandate.
	This is from Edward Hendry, who's a completely brilliant guy.
	The chart below is created by the Virginia Department of Health showing a sudden drop in COVID among schoolchildren once the mask mandate was ended.
	This demonstrates when people wear masks they develop and display flu-like symptoms that result from the hypoxia and hyperkinesia caused by the mask.
	These Virginia school children were being classified as probable COVID cases.
	States can classify someone with COVID even though they've not tested positive.
	They've done that through the contrivance of a new category they've titled a probable case of COVID, To add confusion, the CDC allows for such untested cases to be listed as either probable or presumed, figuring out any way they can to fatten the numbers.
	Under the new probable case definition, the very symptoms that would be typical of the flu and caused by masks would be deemed to be COVID.
	Under the new probable case definition, A person would be listed as COVID if he has a headache, a typical side effect of wearing a mask, and also has a fever or muscle aches or a sore throat or difficulty smelling things or tasting things, and was within the last 14 days in close contact with another who was deemed to be a probable case.
	It's absurd!
	The government authorities order people to wear masks to prevent the spread of COVID.
	When they display blue-like symptoms from wearing a mask, they are classified as probably infected, even though they never tested positive, elevating the COVID infection statistics, resulting in a call by public authorities to maintain the order to wear masks.
	The longer a person wears a mask, the more likely they will display blue-like symptoms caused by hypoxia and hypercapnia.
	The mask wearers who display the blue license are then added to the numbers, even though they don't actually have COVID.
	Here it is.
	Here's the chart.
	School mask mandates ended.
	Look at that.
	How telling.
	How powerful.
	Meanwhile, Anthony Fauci, Tony the Rat, tells Americans should be ready for the possibility of a more rigid type of restriction.
	Good God!
	Tony the Rat over the weekend said Americans need to be flexible enough to pivot back to a world with restrictions and place more rigid restrictions due to the Chinese coronavirus.
	He does not use the word lockdown because it's too controversial, but it's clear that's what he has in mind.
	I don't want to use the word lockdown, because that has charged elements to it, but I believe we must keep our eye on the pattern of what we're seeing with infections right now.
	He added, we must be prepared for the possibility we'd have another variant that would come along and then things change.
	Maybe this is what they have in mind for the midterms.
	They're going to declare a lockdown.
	You won't even be able to go to the voting booth.
	They'll bring in mandatory voting by mail.
	Holly, this is what I smell here.
	Fauci has used recent media appearances to warn Americans that while trends appear to be going in the right direction, They need to be prepared to bring back coronavirus-era restrictions if public health officials deem it necessary.
	I say goddamn those public health officials who are traitors to the United States.
	President Biden's medical advisor made the same remark during an appearance on the BBC Sunday morning, warning people must be prepared for a more rigid type of restriction.
	And if we do get a variance that gives us an uptick in cases and hospitalization, we should be prepared and flexible enough to pivot toward going back, at least temporarily, just over the November midterm elections to a more rigid time, such as mask wearing inside and, mark my words, lockdowns and voting by mail.
	You can go ahead and tiptoe toward normality, which is what we're doing at the main same time.
	You must be aware that you may have to reverse.
	He's planning on it.
	Fauci's remarks come days after Hawaii became the final state in the Union to lift its indoor mask mandate.
	He appeared to make another flip-flop over the weekend as the NIH director told WUSA9 that we have actually gone beyond the pandemic phase and beyond the deceleration stage in the pandemic, despite the fact that he said the world was just in the first phase of the pandemic mere months ago in January of 2022.
	What's more, last week Fauci told George Stephanopoulos, who's a political pawn, just a sockpot, but we have a way to go in the pandemic.
	We have a way to go.
	This guy is among the most disgusting Public servants ever to be in the American government, Holly.
	I repudiate him 100%.
	He needs to be indicted, arrested, tried, and shot in accordance with the law.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, I don't know if you if you said this to me a couple years ago, I might not believe it.
	I might think that this was even too far out as someone that, you know, has looked into all the crazy things that have happened over the past couple of years.
	I can really say I wouldn't put it past them at this point.
	They're desperate.
	The Democrats are fleeing the shift, if you will.
	We've seen at least 31 Democrats are saying they're not going to run for office again.
	A lot of them see the writing on the wall.
	They realize that they just can't get into office through any legal means.
	They're going to do what they can.
	They've had some pushback from a lot of the local courts and state courts as far as gerrymandering, trying to gerrymander their districts in their favor.
	They've had some issues with their Voting Rights Act and their same-day registration and the printout ballots and the mail-in ballots.
	They want to expand that.
	They want to try to expand voting to non-citizen voters.
	They're trying everything that they can and they're getting a lot of pushback from the local courts and from the citizenry, so I think that they would actually be willing to try to do another shutdown at this point.
	I didn't think it would be possible.
	I mean, after I saw what happened when I lived in, in Michigan with Whitmer and shutting down and how Michigan was so rigged against Trump and even rigged locally even the Senate races everything was rigged.
	And what they did to shut down the state and threaten people.
	I think the Democrats will really try anything that they can at this point, including have another round of disease this winter.
	And I really wonder if people will actually fight back this time or if people are just acclimated.
	Oh, I've got my mask in my drawer, you know, I'll just pull it out and put it out again and Get ready for another year of doing this.
	And you're absolutely right.
	You put these things on children all day.
	Guess what?
	They start to have asthma.
	They start to have breathing problems.
	They've got bacterial pneumonia from something covering their nose and mouth all day.
	Of course, you're going to start poisoning children when you have these dirty things over their face.
	You know how often kids touch their face?
	I mean, it gets dirty instantly.
	It makes absolutely no sense to do this to children, except for nefarious reasons.
	You're 100% correct.
	And until Fauci spoke out, it wasn't obvious to me what they're planning for the midterm.
	They're planning another lockdown.
	They can manufacture the case, justify a lockdown, and then insist, for our own good, we must use voting by mail to enable them to steal the election, just as they did in 2020.
	Holly, I see it coming as clear as day.
	That is their master plan.
	Meanwhile, funeral directors and embalmers are alarmed by unusual blood clots in vaccinated bodies.
	Board-certified funeral directors and embalmers are coming forward with horror stories about vaccinated bodies with veins and arteries clogged with strange, rubbery, worm-like clots.
	Richard Hirschman, a funeral director in Embalmer from Alabama with over 20 years experience, said in interviews he'd never seen anything like it until mid-2021, after mass injections of the experimental vaccines began.
	He said his colleagues are seeing the same thing and the numbers are growing.
	Earlier this month, he told Steve Kirsch, Executive Director of the Vaccine Research Center, that in January 2022, 37 of 57 bodies—65 percent—had these suspicious clots.
	Prior to the vaccine, he said blood clots in patients who died of COVID were seen, but they appeared to be more typical and not in the alarming numbers he's seeing now.
	Since Hirschman has gone public, Carrie Watkins, a colleague with over 50 years' experience as a funeral director and embalmer in Alabama, has corroborated his story.
	Anna Foster, an embalmer from Missouri with 11 years, has revealed in an interview, 93% of her last 30 cases died to unusual blood clots completely filling their vascular system.
	My God!
	Funeral director John O'Looney of Milton Keynes, England, is also blowing the whistle.
	He was the first to step forward.
	It's not just a two- or three-fold increase.
	It's around a 500- or 600-percent increase.
	Nine out of 10 were vaccinated.
	I've got doctors and police ringing me, nurses ringing me, all saying the same thing.
	It's a total lie.
	Our media is saying the hospitals are full of the non-vaccinated, total fabrication.
	It's the polar opposite.
	Nine of ten full blood clots are vaccinated.
	I've heard that from so many professionals, I've lost count.
	So whether you believe it or not, it makes it no worse.
	It's a truth.
	It's a reality.
	You can lead a horse to water.
	You can't make him drink, he said in an interview.
	He told The Blaze's Daniel Horowitz that he was hesitant to come forward because information that questions the government's pro-vaccine narrative gets mocked and ridiculed and his reputation could suffer.
	But as Kirsch pointed out, there's no other explanation for what's happening.
	It pretty much has to be a novel injectable product first used in 2021 that results in blood clots injected into well over 50% of the population.
	There's only one drug that fits that bill, the COVID vaccine.
	Since a vast majority have survived the shots, the question of whether a Vax person dies or not is likely a combination of how well they take up and replicate EMRNA, how dangerous the batch is, and other factors.
	He explained why Hirschman's information is explosive.
	So let's say the actual rate of vaccine-killed deaths is 40% of all, less than the 65% he's seen.
	The CDC says around 65,000 die a week, so that would be 26,000 a week killed by the vaccine.
	We started noticing the deaths in May.
	They may have begun sooner.
	Let's say it's only been in the last six months.
	26 weeks times 26,000 deaths a week equals 676,000 vaccine-related deaths.
	Hirschman told Howitz he's discussed the phenomenon with 15 of his colleagues.
	Everyone has seen the same thing, but they're afraid to speak out publicly.
	Hirschman, first interviewed by Jane Ruby in late January, shared photos and videos of the strange fibrous clots extracted from people who reportedly died of heart attacks, strokes, and aneurysms.
	In many cases, the freakishly long cloths start out looking fairly typical on one end, then become white and fibrous and worm-like.
	The specimen below, which bifurcates toward the end, was taken from a person's groin area and was nearly the length of their leg.
	Hirschman washed off the white, fibrous portion of the cloths from one person and put the worm-like material in a bowl.
	That white fiber stuff just isn't normal, he told Dr. Ruby.
	Typically, a blood clot is smooth.
	It's blood that's coagulated.
	If you squeeze or touch or try to pick it up, it falls apart.
	But this white fiber stuff is pretty strong.
	It's not weak at all.
	You can manipulate.
	Very pliable.
	Not hard.
	Not normal.
	I don't know how anyone can live with this inside of him.
	Hirschman says he's seen abnormal blood clots, mostly in older people, but pointed out younger tend to be cremated these days so he doesn't see their bodies.
	He also noted he's only seen the strange clots in one unvaccinated case, a person who had received a blood transfusion, no doubt from someone who was vaxxed, the implications of which are terrifying.
	Update!
	American Greatness reached out to Hirschman to ask if scientific analysis of blood clot material had been done yet.
	He said he's working on finding someone he can trust to do a fair analysis because the situation has such grave implications.
	He said he plans to provide samples to more than one analyst.
	He said doctors have told him the material looked like fibrin, a major component of a blood clot.
	Fibrin is defined as a strong and soluble protein produced by the body in response to bleeding.
	Hirschman sent screenshots of several other embalmers who reached out to him after he went public with seeing the same thing.
	Thank you for not making me think I am crazy, one colleague wrote, who went on to describe the closet as almost alien-like in appearance.
	Another bomber says he's been seeing the same thing and it's mind-boggling.
	Holly, I think that's exactly the case.
	It's mind-boggling.
	There's an effort to murder us on a massive scale.
	This is a genocidal operation.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, I definitely commend the people like Dr. Jane Ruby and others who have worked so hard to try to get this information out there, doing the research, the people who actually have access to the microscopes and scientific equipment to actually look at a lot of this.
	It's absolutely devastating that so much of this has to be done.
	In hindsight, after so many people have been jabbed, perhaps some of the blood clotting could be a way for the body to try to combat the internal bleeding that's happening.
	We don't really know.
	It could also be connected to what people have called Morgellons for years now.
	There have been people, whistleblowers and others, who have talked about this disease, and it was really on the fringe for several years, and now it's becoming More and more obvious as it appears that more people are showing symptoms.
	They can't deny the amount of sports players, professional athletes, etc.
	who have collapsed and died in the field now over the past year since all of this was rolled out.
	The narrative is starting to slip and we're seeing, despite that, they're still trying to put out another booster, hoping more people don't realize the devastation of all of this.
	I think that the article you said, younger people are mostly cremated.
	I don't know if that's because the family wants to do that, or that's like the person's wishes, or they usually don't have money set aside.
	For burial costs or if this is an attempt to just get rid of bodies sooner.
	I thought that was kind of an interesting statistic as well.
	Nice.
	Nice points, Holly.
	Nice points all.
	Very, very disturbing.
	Meanwhile, the state of Washington enacts a ban of non-electric cars by 2030.
	By 2030!
	This is insane!
	Washington state Democrats have enacted a plan that would ban most non-electric vehicles by 2030.
	Governor Jay Inslee, who's a bona fide lunatic, signed a bill last week saying a target for all vehicles of the model year 2030 or later sold, purchased, or registered in the state to be electric.
	On or before December 31st, 2023, the Interagency Electric Vehicle Coordinating Council shall complete a scoping plan for achieving the 2030 target.
	The bill was passed as part of a $16.9 billion move-ahead Washington package signed by Inslee on Friday.
	The governor said the legislation will combat climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, demonstrating his massive ignorance since CO2 has nothing to do with climate change over 600 million years of Earth's history.
	There's no correlation between the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere And the temperature of Earth.
	Moreover, electric cars and batteries and so forth consume more energy to produce than they save.
	This is lunacy just gone wild.
	Transportation is our state's largest source of greenhouse gas emissions.
	There's no way to talk climate change without talking about transportation.
	This package will move us away from the transportation system our grandparents imagined and toward the transportation system our grandchildren dreamed of.
	Actually, it's a nightmare.
	Democrats have frequently criticized transportation as one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions.
	According to the Environmental Protection Agency, there's been a 22.9% increase in fossil fuel emission from transportation between 1990 and 2019, the largest increase in any economic sector.
	The sweeping legislation includes funding for several infrastructure projects to facilitate a larger transition to electric vehicles, building thousands of new electric vehicle charging stations, The transportation package will also fund four new hybrid electric ferries, 25 transit electrification projects, and free fares for riders 18 and younger on public transportation systems.
	The law was endorsed by environmental systems that seek to end the use of fossil fuels in their massive ignorance.
	The war in Ukraine and the burden of high gas prices on families demonstrates the importance of ending our dependence on gasoline and preparing for an all-electric transportation future, said Matthew Merritt, co-executive director of Kultura, a non-profit advocating phasing out the use of gasoline.
	This is lunatic!
	Coltero worked with Washington Democrats to get the bill passed.
	The lawmakers that supported the bill make it clear that it only establishes a target for all electric vehicles by 2030, where the plan is to get rid of any vehicle that uses gasoline in Washington.
	Clean Cars 2030 outlines a clear path forward for the future of the electric vehicle transition in our states, said Mario Illes.
	The part of our Move Ahead Washington plan will create a timeline with data, tools, guidelines from every sector, from governments to business, a plan with confidence.
	Holly, I can't begin to tell you this is just lunatic.
	It's based on ignorance.
	It's science.
	It's based on Fake science, pseudoscientists, it's a lot of people who have no idea what they're talking about.
	It consumes far more energy and is far more destruction to the Earth to produce electric cars than it saves.
	This is a self-defeating proposition, and the Democrats are just exhibiting more of the mass illusions in which they're indulging to the detriment of the United States and even the world at large.
	Your thoughts?
	I think this is probably a massive money laundering operation too because We can't expect all these cars to roll out like this.
	This is absolutely ridiculous.
	They're trying to pressure car companies like in Detroit, Ford, and others saying they're going to promise that they're going to have these cars ready and they're going to be manufacturing them.
	Well, where are we going to get the lithium and the precious metals and the rare earth minerals to produce all of this?
	How are they going to be recharged?
	They're going to have to build charging stations everywhere.
	Oh, the electricity costs are going to go through the roof as you have explained before, you have to burn coal in order to get all this electricity going, the batteries are going to have to be recycled somehow.
	I've heard people talk about how basically their car is useless once they need to replace a battery because Batteries are so expensive if you're talking about price of lithium has shot up.
	It's gone through the roof recently with the meanwhile, gold and silver is still pretty low, but lithium is shot up along a comparative with the price of gasoline right now.
	So percentage wise, so how is this going to be sustainable or affordable to people?
	People, Jim Pisaki and Booty Keg are saying, oh, well, just, you know, if you can't afford the price of gasoline, just get an electric car.
	I think this is going to turn out to be an absolute disaster.
	They might force, you know, through the Green New Deal agenda and executive orders, private businesses and corporations to start manufacturing and mandating their workers use it or make the post office or school buses or a city transportation be electric.
	But all of this money is just going to go right out the window and we're going to have nothing to show for it, other than the fact that it's going to be harder for people to get used cars.
	And gasoline prices are going to continue to go up.
	You're right on every single count, Holly.
	And guess what?
	A lot of those rare metals they need to manufacture electric cars come from Russia.
	And we're now suffering all our connection with Russia.
	The largest lithium deposit outside of Bolivia was in Afghanistan.
	Fat chance we're going to have access again.
	In fact, the reason we were there so long is we were looting the mineral resources of Afghanistan.
	I have no doubt about it.
	It had nothing to do with freedom, democracy, or Osama bin Laden, who was actually our man in Afghanistan and an officer in the CIA.
	Is Will Smith going to lose his Oscar?
	The Academy's Code of Conduct may provide a clue.
	Last night, actor Will Smith violently attacked comedian Chris Rock for making a joke about his wife.
	In 2018, Jada Pickett Smith was diagnosed with alopecia, a condition that causes hair loss.
	He made a joke about her starring in the next G.I.
	Jane movie, a woman who joined the military and shaved her head to serve.
	Will initially appeared to laugh in a preceding joke about his wife's infidelity in their marriage.
	Then he approached Chris Rock on the stage and slapped him hard across the face.
	Here's an uncensored version of it.
	You can find it on YouTube.
	It's up.
	Will Smith is celebrating and dancing to his own hits at the Vanity Fair Oscar party afterward.
	Apologizing on stage when he went up to accept his award, but not mentioning Chris Rock by name, Smith spent most of the night celebrating at the Oscar after-party.
	Video from the Vanity Fair Oscar party showed him dancing with fellow celebrities hours after the now-viral attack on Chris Rock.
	The slap may not last very long, however.
	The victory lap may not last very long, however.
	Some have speculated he could lose his Oscar after the violent outburst.
	Will Smith may be asked to hand back his Best Actor statuette following his live onstage assault at Chris Rock, Industry Insiders told the Post.
	The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, which handed out the awards at the Dolby Theatre, has strict guidelines in its code of conduct.
	One highly placed Hollywood source told the Post after the incident, it's basically assault.
	Actually, it's assault and battery.
	Everyone was just so shocked in the room, it was so uncomfortable.
	I think Will would not want to give his Oscar back, but who knows what will happen now.
	Meanwhile, the Academy cryptically announced from its official Twitter account, the Academy does not condone violence of any form.
	Tonight, we're delighted to celebrate our 94th Academy Award winners who deserve a moment of recognition from their peers and movie lovers around the world.
	Here's Will, taking his Oscar.
	After a 2017 sexual misconduct scandal that rocked Hollywood, the Academy released a statement clarifying its code of conduct that could very well apply to last night's event.
	In addition to achieving excellence in the field of motion picture arts and sciences, members must also behave ethically by upholding the Academy's values of respect for human dignity, inclusion, and a supportive environment that fosters creativity.
	She added, There is no place in the Academy for people who abuse their status, power, or influence in a manner that violates recognized standards of decency.
	The Academy is categorically opposed to any form of abuse, harassment, or discrimination on the basis of gender, sexual orientation, race, ethnicity, disability, age, religion, or nationality.
	The Board of Governors believes these standards are essential to the Academy's mission and reflective of our values.
	We shall see, Holly.
	Will Smith's a big name.
	Can the Academy uphold its own standards?
	I'm not going to take anything for granted.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, I think a lot of people didn't even know that the Oscars were going on until they heard about the slap, so I suppose it was good for ratings in that way.
	It was interesting to see people on Facebook, like friends and family, have been so mum about world events over the past few weeks, particularly those that voted for Biden in the past couple years ago and then suddenly don't want to talk politics.
	They were all over politics and the news when Trump was in office.
	But now it's like, you know, they're back to movies and Will Smith and whatnot.
	And someone got slapped at the Oscars, not talking about the absolute disaster that Biden has caused here in the United States.
	And I heard someone mention that, you know, the Oscars are really trying to push, you know, their agendas for, you know, what's acceptable and what's PC and what's okay.
	But also, so it's, you know, the most woke Oscars ever, but also the most violent Oscars ever at the same time.
	So probably the most mentally unhinged Oscars as well.
	So it's just kind of sad to see this.
	I used to like to watch, you know, some of that when I was a kid, you know, to see the outfit.
	I too, while younger, used to enjoy the Oscars, but don't have time for them now.
	was decent, but Hollywood's gotten really, really weird and trying to appeal to all these strange agendas, especially over the past couple years.
	I couldn't agree more.
	I, too, while younger, used to enjoy the Oscars, but don't have time for them now.
	Meanwhile, Sandy Hook families reject Alex Jones' settlement offer.
	In full wars, Alex Jones offered $120,000 per plaintiff to resolve a lawsuit by relatives of the Sandy Hook shooting victims who say he defamed them by asserting the massacre never happened.
	According to court filings, the offer was quickly rejected.
	A Connecticut judge found Jones liable in November.
	Trial is planned to determine how much he should pay.
	A plaintiff said they have been subjected to harassment and death threats from Jones' followers because of the hoax conspiracy he promoted on his show.
	Frankly, I doubt this very much.
	A court filing posted said, Mr. Jones extends his heartfelt apology for any distress his remotes caused.
	Last week, he filed a court order to attend a deposition near his home in Austin to provide testimony ahead of the trial.
	Jones said he was ill.
	A hearing is scheduled for Wednesday on the request by the plaintiffs to sanction Jones for not cooperating.
	Lawyers for the families rejected the settlement within a few hours, saying in court filings it was a transparent and desperate attempt to escape public reckoning under oath with its deceitful, profit-driven campaign against the plaintiffs in the memory of their loved ones lost at Sandy Hook.
	This is just an incredibly hypocritical statement.
	Twenty first graders and six educators were killed or so they claim in Newtown.
	The families of eight and an FBI agent who responded sued Jones, Infowars and others over the hoax conspiracy.
	He said he believes the shooting did occur, but of course it did not.
	Jones was found liable for damage in similar lawsuits filed in Texas by relatives of Sandy Hook, victims and faces trial later this year.
	The lead plaintiff is one Donna Soto, but check this out.
	The mother of alleged victim Heather Heyer in Charlottesville.
	Have we not seen this woman before?
	Please compare this Sandy Hook mother.
	We let the two images overlap with each other, change the transparency, it's a perfect match.
	So Susan Brough, the mother of Heather Heyer and Donna Soto, the mother of Vicky Soto and Sandy Hook, is the same crisis actor.
	It's just unbelievable.
	Check this out.
	Amazon banned my book so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
	It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	Then they sued to shut me up, and the Wisconsin courts played along.
	I have the proof and the law on my side.
	What I don't have is the money.
	They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
	Take guns, impose tyranny.
	And it's on the way with Remington's help.
	First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
	I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
	GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
	Check it out.
	This is for all of the marbles.
	Meanwhile, you can check out on my blog, Defending the First and Second Amendment, laying out exactly why this case is so important.
	If you're supposed to support me, I would be grateful.
	I'm in a unique position to do something about it.
	We cannot let this opportunity go to waste.
	I need your help.
	Holly, your thoughts?
	Well, Jim, you've done an excellent job really exposing a lot of the events in American history, especially over the past couple of years.
	Alex Jones really should have just stuck with his original statement and not backed down.
	I mean, he's still being sued and they're still going after him and he posted all these retractions and thought it would end and it's not ending.
	I don't know exactly what his role is in all of this.
	Like maybe he thought he misspoke or maybe this is part of a larger script that's playing out.
	I'm not sure what to think about.
	This case, very different from your case, of course.
	And, you know, if he originally started out trying to speak the truth and then he's been silenced, the more that you usually, you know, comply or apologize, especially with certain groups of people, the more that they feel emboldened to act against you and continue to drag it out.
	So I don't know if his case could actually go to trial or something like that.
	And there could be like, Uh, evidence put forward or if this is still just like a civil case and they're just trying to get more money out of him.
	I was kind of wondering what your thoughts are compared to your case.
	Oh yeah, he's not going to get a jury trial any more than I got a jury trial.
	They're sending it to a jury for damages.
	That's just what they did in my case, and my jury came back with $450,000 for Alex.
	Because he has more resources, it will be in the millions, I have no doubt.
	Therefore, it was predictable they'd turn down $120,000 apiece.
	They are just milking this to the max, Holly.
	It's all propaganda.
	Nobody died at Sandy Hook.
	I've proven it.
	I sought to assist Alex Jones.
	He declined my assistance.
	In one of his video dabblers, he even declares he never even read the book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
	How can Anyone who's a public figure take a stance about Sandy Hook without knowing the facts.
	I brought together 13 experts, including six PhDs, and we established the school had been closed by 2008.
	There were no students there.
	That was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
	For God's sake, we even found the exercise manual.
	From Mass Casualty Drill Involving Children, which I published as Appendix A, I had the evidence to support him.
	He didn't want my help.
	Well, good luck, Alex.
	And I'm so glad you're here today, Holly.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
	Live need to know at gmail.com.
	Meanwhile, I'm introducing a course, Conspiracy 101 on Critical Thinking and Conspiracy Theories.
	This is a photo of me in St.
	Paul at dinner with Jesse Ventura and Vince Bugliosi on opposite sides of the JFK case, where Bugliosi, though, in his 1500 Page Attempt to Defend the Warren Commission acknowledges in passing that mine are the only exclusively scientific books ever published about the assassination.
	Here's what I'm proposing.
	Check it out.
	Having offered courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning for 35 years from the University of Kentucky to the University of Virginia, North Carolina, Chapel Hill, New College of the University of South Florida,
	The Duluth campus, the University of Minnesota, I want to create the opportunity to give you the principles that need to be applied to sort things out in terms of a course online on critical thinking In scientific reasoning, the instructor will be yours truly, Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., philosophy professor emeritus.
	Here's the course information.
	Course schedule.
	Fifteen one-hour seminars, Wednesdays, 8 to 10 p.m.
	Central Time, which will begin on 6 April and end on 13 July 2022.
	This course may be repeated.
	Registration.
	$150 for the course or $10 a session.
	Course materials provided online without charge.
	Course description.
	An introduction to critical thinking using conspiracy theories as research illustrations.
	For everyone who needs to master the ability to think things through and avoid being played by false narratives.
	Course materials provided online and includes blogs, essays, and videos, and even a book or two.
	Meanwhile, the syllabus.
	6 April.
	Introduction to the Nature of Thought, Signs, and Minds.
	13 April, Studying Language, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics.
	20 April, Arguments, Deductive, Inductive, and Abductive.
	27 April, Informal Fallacies, Part 1, Fallacies of Ambiguity.
	4 May, Informal Fallacies, Part 2, Fallacies of Relevance.
	11 May, applying scientific reasoning to conspiracy theories.
	18 May, the assassination of JFK, the use of fabricated evidence.
	25 May, the atrocities of 9-11, violating the laws of physics.
	1 June, the moon landings, how we know we didn't go.
	8 June, Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota accident or assassination.
	15 June.
	Sandy Hook.
	Designing events for emotional impact.
	22 June.
	Nice, Orlando, Parkland, Charlottesville, Las Vegas.
	27 June.
	Pizzagate.
	Is it myth or is it real?
	Disturbing to the max.
	6 July.
	The pandemic and the vax.
	The greatest hoax of all.
	13 July.
	The official history of World War II.
	Politics trumps science.
	Registration is open.
	Go to mixinstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html.
	The first hand to register will have direct links through the chat to me and can offer questions and comments as we proceed in real time on behalf of the class as a representative sample.
	This may be an opportunity that you do not want to miss.
	When I would have my first meeting with a class, I'd explain to them if they come to the university to take only one course, This was a course they ought to take because it would make such a difference in the rest of their lives to avoid being played, taken advantage of, to determine when individuals are using fallacious arguments to deceive, mislead, and cheat.
	This is something I think you don't want to miss.
	I look forward to seeing you there.
	Meanwhile, final thoughts, Holly.
	Yours, I'm so delighted to have you here today with me.
	Your thoughts?
	Thanks, Jim.
	I think we did a good job, just the two of us today.
	I think that this would be a perfect, like, Gift or opportunity if you're like a parent or a grandparent of a college student or recent graduate or someone that's interested in history to be able to give something like that to be able to get basically this is a lifetime's worth of research into different history topics And information you obviously would not be learning in college.
	So if you have someone in your family that's interested in history and wants a different viewpoint with some amazing facts, like you said, a whole lifetime really that you've put into all of this.
	I mean, this is I don't know how long it would take for someone just digging around to try to find this information, if you could even ever find all of this.
	I was curious, Jim, which was the first topic for you that really opened up your eyes to all the conspiracies out there?
	Oh, it was JFK, Holly.
	It was JFK.
	My first three books in the area of what we could call conspiracy research were bringing together groups of experts to blow apart the cover-up in the case of JFK.
	Those were the books that Vince Bugliosi referred to as the only exclusively scientific books ever published on the assassination.
	If only he had paid more attention to their content, he couldn't possibly be Attempting to defend the Warren Report.
	Embarrassing.
	I believe, by the way, that he was paid a million bucks to do it.
	That probably sounds about right.
	So I really hope people sign up.
	It's been great to get to know you, Jim, over the past year and do videos with you.
	And it'll be great to see what people think about your class as well.
	I think it's a fantastic idea.
	Well, I appreciate all those endorsements, Holly, and we've been impressed with you from the beginning, only discovering that you had been doing this on your own since 2016 with your own podcast.
	You have an excellent mind.
	Your news analysis is simply excellent, and you bring a whole wealth of experience and perspective that we greatly value.
	You are a tremendous asset.
	Let me just echo Holly's suggestion.
	This would be a terrific gift to give to students, friends, neighbors who may be a little wet behind the ears, who might be able to use a brush up in terms of the ability to think things through.
	It's going to begin next Wednesday, a week from today.
	So if you have the inclination and you want to share it now, don't put it off.
	Sign up if you have the inclination or make it a gift to a friend, neighbor, whatever, relative, grandson, son, whatever.
	Take it to heart.
	This is a unique opportunity.
	Meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with your friends and family.
	We do not know how much time we have left, and many of us are dying from these bizarre effects of the Vax, which was designed to bring about genocide on a global scale.
	Thanks for joining us today.

▲