Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 25, 2022 - Jim Fetzer

01:15:49

Need to Know News (24 March 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joe Olson in Houston, Texas, and Carl Herman in San Ramon, California.
	We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
	We begin with Biden claiming he's never spoken to his son about overseas business dealings, but the confirmed laptop has determined that was a lie.
	We knew this a long time ago.
	How long has it been suppressed?
	New York Post.
	I've never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings, Biden said, before pivoting to President Trump.
	I know Trump deserves to be investigated.
	He's violating every basic norm of a president.
	You should be asking him why he is on the phone with a foreign leader trying to intimidate a foreign leader.
	You should be looking at Trump.
	Wow.
	Talk about projection.
	Smoking gun email reveals how Hunter Biden introduced Ukrainian businessman to his vice presidential father.
	From Vladimir Pozhansky.
	Subject, meeting for coffee.
	Dear Hunter, thank you for inviting me to DC and giving me the opportunity to meet your father and spend time together.
	It's really an honor and pleasure.
	As we spoke yesterday morning, would be great to meet today for a quick coffee.
	What do you think?
	I could come to your office somewhere around noon or so before on my way to the airport.
	Best.
	Biden is a liar.
	He must resign immediately.
	He and his son should be looking at federal indictments.
	All truths, no matter how obscure they seem, are in the dark forever.
	Meanwhile, Madeleine Albright is dead.
	She will forever be remembered for claiming that it was okay that we took the lives of 500,000 Iraqi infants by virtue of imposing a no-fly zone over Iraq.
	Here are the clips from a 1996 interview that have resurfaced where she reluctantly said the price is worth it when asked about the death of Iraqi children, leaving out the staggering number 500,000.
	That's half a million.
	Albright, first female Secretary of State in U.S.
	history, made the remark during a 60-minute interview.
	Leslie Stahl talked with the then United Nations ambassador about how Iraq had been suffering from sanctions following the 1991 Gulf War.
	We have heard half a million Iraqi children have died.
	I mean, that is more children than died in Hiroshima, Leslie said.
	And you know, is the price worth it?
	I think that is a very hard choice, Albright replied, but the price, we think the price is worth it.
	Clips of the segment were shared around social media following the news of her passing.
	The death of 500,000 dead Iraqi children was a very hard choice, but the price, we think the price is worth it.
	That is disgusting, and that's the American Secretary of State, so that unfortunately diminishes us all.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, Carl forwarded me an article at BeforeItsNews.com earlier this week, dated 2022-03.
	Hunter Biden's laptops expose child porn, drugs, corruption, must see.
	This is absolutely horrifying material that was in the possession
	of Chrissy Boy Ray at the FBI and Billy Bagpipe Barr at the DOJ in December of 2019 and they preferred to suppress that evidence and allow 50 of the deep state spooks to say, well, 50 intelligence agents have said that this laptop information is Russian disinformation.
	Well, finally, the New York Times admitted that it's 100 percent authentic.
	And I tell you what, if you look through this thing at the photos and the evidence of financial crimes and the underage children and the incest with his own nieces and stepdaughters.
	And the guy's just an absolute 100 percent scumbag.
	And there's evidence repeatedly in there of him shipping money to the big guy.
	Absolutely disgusting.
	And Albright is not even worth worth the breath.
	I hope she's rotting in hell or burning, whichever it is down there, but she's one of the most despicable.
	I thought Limbaugh had a great description of her as Madame Half-Bright, but she was despicable.
	I'm sorry to say you got it right, Carl.
	Your thoughts?
	Well, the first article is that our political leaders engage in money laundering, plain and simple.
	And you have Biden's income.
	So what they do is they project onto their opponent what they themselves do.
	That's what they always do.
	And for our audience, I want you to begin to consider that maybe that is equal to the definition of evil and satanic.
	It's an inversion of reality.
	And he had Joe Biden's income from 2016, about half a million dollars.
	2017, it went up to $16.5 million.
	I wonder where he got that money from.
	And Secretary of State Albright, so half a million dead children.
	So if you wanted to have a child sacrifice every day, that would be over a thousand years worth of child sacrifices.
	Or let's say that you have ten child sacrifices a day, that's a hundred years.
	It's just gruesome, and these people are evil, and the only thing that Albright was concerned with was the negative PR.
	And finally, yeah, that I'll put in the show notes.
	This article with a photo that I had not seen before released from Hunter Biden's laptop where Hunter was naked in front of a girl who looked maybe I don't know Joe what do you think six or seven years old?
	Oh yeah it was just horrible to look at that stuff absolutely yeah.
	Yeah I hadn't seen that picture before But I did get a second look again at the two alleged Obama daughters, and you can tell Malia was one of the daughters naked with Hunter because of a mole behind her right thigh, I believe it is.
	Plus, Hunter had a picture of Malia Obama's credit card being used to create lines of cocaine.
	Carl, that's just stunning stuff.
	Yeah, I'd seen that photograph with the two nubile young girls who, of course, got to know Hunter when he was vice president under Barack Obama.
	And, you know, it's just disgraceful beyond belief.
	Just disgraceful.
	Meanwhile... What in the world?
	Look, I'm going to pause this moment.
	Meanwhile, we have a Supreme Court nominee, Katinja Brown Jackson, who can't quite remember the basis for the Dred Scott decision.
	Supreme Court nominee Katinja Brown Jackson appeared to admit during her confirmation hearing she could not recall the basis for the landmark 1857 Dred Scott decision.
	Perhaps the most famous of all Supreme Court cases.
	She was being questioned by Senator John Cornyn of Texas regarding the concept of substantive due process.
	Cornell Law School's Law Information Institute defines substantive due process as the notion that due process not only protects certain legal procedures, but also protects certain rights unrelated to procedure.
	In other words, The doctrine says due process doesn't cover only the physical procedures of a case, but other rights in addition to legal procedures that must be carried out by the government as due process.
	Readers may recognize these as having been described as unenumerated rights, such as the right to privacy.
	Drilling down on her legal philosophy, Corden asked her, why isn't substantive due process just another way for judges to hide their policymaking under the guise of interpreting the Constitution?
	He then pointed to the Scott case as having been cited as a product of substantive due process.
	Jackson replied she trusted Corden's interpretation, but, quote, I don't quite remember the basis for the Dred Scott opinion.
	The Dred Scott case that she can't quite recall isn't an obscure ruling only taught at the highest levels of Ivy League law schools, however, but one of a handful of landmark cases even often taught at the high school level, which famously decides slaves were not and could not be citizens of the United States.
	Widely denounced as one of the most deplorable decisions in the history of the Supreme Court.
	It is according to the late Justice Antonin Scalia, and we do miss this guy, very possibly the first application of substantive due process in the Supreme Court.
	But Jackson doesn't remember its basis.
	The Scott case was effectively nullified by the 14th Amendment, whose first section guaranteed citizenship for all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.
	Will this haunt her?
	President Biden, who admitted prior to nominating her that he would seek a candidate based on their gender and color of their skin, sold the American people on her qualifications when making the following announcement.
	I promised the process would be rigorous and I would select a nominee worthy of Justice Breyer's legacy of excellence and decency, someone extremely qualified with a brilliant legal mind.
	Today, I'm pleased to nominate Judge Jackson, who will bring extraordinary qualification, deep experience and intellect, and a rigorous judicial record to the court.
	Here you have a photograph of Biden with his first black nominee, where introducing race as a qualification for hiring is violating the anti-discrimination laws that the Supreme Court itself has upheld.
	Erin Rupert, Kenya.
	Brown Jackson is extremely qualified to serve on SCOTUS, but Tucker Carlson is complaining she hasn't released her LSAT scores.
	Jackson, during her confirmation, also said she could not define what a woman is.
	This is troubling.
	Can you define the word woman?
	Asked Senator Marsha Blackburn herself.
	A woman?
	Can I provide a definition?
	No, I can't, Jackson replied.
	I'm not a biologist.
	I would have thought the answer would be obvious, a female Homo sapien who's capable of reproduction.
	That's not so tough and it doesn't require a biologist to explain.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, not only can she not explain the Dred Scott, she can't explain what a woman is, and she can't explain what a pedophile is, and she can't explain what child pornography is.
	Yeah, this woman will not release her LSAT scores, which is sort of an evidence of actually how intelligent she is.
	She was a public defender Which means that she was not the first-tier graduate from school that was taken in by a prestigious law firm to do her internship, and she wasn't serving as a clerk for some distinguished judge somewhere.
	She worked as a public defender, and then she was appointed, February 2025, to the D.C.
	Circuit Court.
	By Obama.
	I mean, by O'Brandon.
	So bottom line is, she's been a judge for a year in the D.C.
	Circuit Court as a grooming stage to be jettisoned and catapulted into the Supreme Court.
	Absolutely outrageous behavior.
	And if you watched any of her testimony at the Senate hearings, she's absolutely unqualified at this time to be taking that big of a leap into a highly controversial position and one of a court that's already damaged beyond repair.
	So we don't need this woman at this particular time.
	Maybe if she learned to be a little bit more intelligent, a little bit more, a little bit less racist and a little bit less communist.
	Maybe she'd be a little bit more acceptable to a mainstream of America, but she is absolutely a horrible candidate.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Yeah, more inversion of reality here in this clown shit show.
	Maybe I'll combine that into a shitty clown show.
	I think that's the best combination there.
	So this was a nominating process that was both racist and sexist based upon the actor playing Biden saying, oh yeah, we got to have a woman of color.
	So it's a good thing that she didn't have to nominate herself because she wouldn't know if she qualified or not.
	I wonder what she would do if she said, can you define being a person of color?
	I don't know.
	Has she been a mom when she discovered the sex of a baby?
	Did she even ask, is it a boy or a girl?
	Or she felt that was just over her head and you would need a biologist to understand that question.
	So, and one more hit on this so-called Judge Jackson.
	In the hearing as an addition, Senator Cruz asked her, or no, this was revealed in a previous decision, whereby she had been sentencing those in possession of child pornography on average to less than half of the statutory minimum limit of sentencing
	And she had wrote in one of her opinions, and I'll put this in the show notes, that, you know, these people who are into child porn, they can be, and I'm paraphrasing a little bit, but this is what she wrote, they can be in it just for the collection or they're lonely and they just want the status to be part of that community of child pornography.
	She literally wrote that.
	Not exactly, as I said, but she did write that.
	And finally, Dred Scott.
	As a person who has taught high school social science, not only is Dred Scott taught in every 12th grade U.S.
	government class, it's prominent.
	It's probably among the top three or four cases taught in the year.
	It is also often taught in 11th grade U.S.
	history as one of the conditions leading up to the Civil War so that students can see that the Supreme Court decision of Dred Scott literally referred to Dred Scott similarly to a suitcase that, of course, you can take a suitcase from one boundary of one state to another.
	And so for her to have ignorance of that ruling, man, it's a shitty clown show.
	Yeah, I agree about the Dred Scott that's serious not being willing to release her LSAT.
	She was almost certainly an affirmative action admittee.
	I think her failure to be able to deal with the question of what it is to be a woman when she is a woman is appalling.
	And that she's been soft on child porn possessors is troubling as well.
	I think Joe's point about her limited experience on the bench is perhaps the most disqualifying as all.
	Otherwise, if she were superb in every other category, you might make an exception, but I think not under these circumstances.
	However, I will be very surprised if every Democrat doesn't vote to support her anyway.
	This chart shows just how badly inflation is outpacing any supposed wage increases.
	A new report demonstrates rising prices are outpacing wage gains.
	Biden administration has spun the numbers to try to convince the public they're better off now because of wage increases, but it's false.
	Even after accounting for rising prices, a typical American family has more money in their pocket than they did last year and claims Biden to try to make it look as though we're better off with him in office.
	Even fact checkers have scoffed at that statement, with factcheck.com calling the claim mostly malarkey.
	And now a new report from the Urban Institute demonstrates just how false the claim is in reality.
	A post on the Urban Wire blog shows wages aren't even vaguely keeping pace with rising prices due to inflation, focusing on fuel prices and rent.
	For Americans, recent dramatic surges in gas price and rent have increased the cost of daily life at a quicker rate than wages.
	Axios reported on the news and reproduced a chart from the Urban Institute that outlines the true cost of inflation for the American people.
	Look at that!
	The green line at the bottom is hourly earnings, who are going up ever so slightly, but rent is way up beyond that, and gas is out of sight.
	Wages rose by 5%, inflation increased by 7.9%, rents jumped by 15%, gas soared by 40%.
	That puts it all into perspective.
	That is a brutal visualization that hammers home the reality of what's happening to budgets, paychecks, and wallets across the nation.
	Under Biden, inflation has soared to a 40-year high, while real wages have fallen.
	Inflation has outpaced wages every single month since he signed a $1.9 trillion spending bill into law.
	That's the reality facing voters every single day.
	Every time they fill their gas tanks, every time they purchase groceries, they're not going to forget when it comes to the midterm.
	In a remarkable revelation, moreover, the Urban Institute notes that Bidenflation is battering minorities at a higher rate.
	Some might suggest, therefore, the president might have allowed the media to brand the president's predecessor, this guy we named Donald Trump, as a racist.
	But of course they won't say that about Joe Biden.
	Households with low incomes who are disproportionately people of color will likely be particularly affected by these changes.
	Oh, and pivoting to electric vehicles and skyrocketing gas prices?
	Maybe not as feasible as they'd like to suggest.
	The Institute writes, while electric vehicles are gaining in popularity, few Americans currently have them, and those who do are relatively wealthier on the average.
	In other words, the White House can't figure out why you poor boleans can't afford a pricey new vehicle as easily as they can.
	Women, people of color, single parents disproportionately represent low-wage workforce.
	Buttigieg says you don't have to worry about gas if you buy an electric vehicle.
	Joe, this guy is just out of it.
	Real wages aren't rising, but inflation is, and that's on President Biden.
	This is the great American pay cut.
	Nobody in the administration is suffering from it, but Americans across the nation most certainly are.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, Donald Trump had $7.8 trillion in deficit spending during his four years, and so far in the first 15 months of the FJB administration, we've had over $4 trillion of deficit spending, with more to come.
	And that's not counting the inflation factor that's going to be hitting us really hard.
	Veterans Today has a great interview with the guy Russian sanctions the blowback on all of the things that are going to be Priced enormously with inflation due to removing Russia from the market and then also the Russians have already set up a deal with India and China and it looks like they're going to have the rest of the BRICS group follow in on doing trade for everything that they export
	In rubles, which is, you know, a good portion of the world oil supply, also the world palladium supply and wheat supply.
	So Russia's got plenty of good assets.
	And what these folks are trying to do is they're trying to bankrupt the system so that they can bring in the new universal basic income, which says, well, don't worry if prices go up because we're going to keep giving you a whole bunch more money every month so you can continue to live the lifestyle that we allow you to live if you're one of the selected few with our digital currency.
	Don't worry, everything is part of a plan and the plan is absolutely insidious and ugly and demonic and it needs to be destroyed and I don't know exactly how we do it, but we need to mobilize as many people as possible to confront this insanity.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	I thought of another thing with Judge Jackson.
	So in her testimony, she referenced women 14 different times.
	So when it's convenient for her to use the term woman to her advantage, she will.
	difficult or if it becomes inconvenient then she just lies and she is young yeah because so what the evil would do if they get their way is they want to bring in a younger puppet because it's easier you don't have to go through this embarrassing revealing process again And just have somebody be on the court for as long as possible.
	Economist John Williams runs the website ShadowStats, and the definitions of inflation have been politically altered once in 1980 and once in 1990.
	And if you go to ShadowStats.com, And you go to the alternative measure sections on the pull down menu in the columns at the top, then he can give you a rundown of how those definitions were altered and a graph of the annual rate of inflation when it is put back to that 1980 and 1990 definitions.
	then you'll get a report of the numbers, which matches our personal experience that inflation had been running about 10% a year, but now of course that's almost nearly doubled.
	The Federal Reserve is, we have also lost 99% to the value of our dollars since the Fed came into power, if you wanna talk about inflation.
	And the Federal Reserve has three principal jobs, and that is to get the maximum employment, to minimize interest rates, and to minimize inflation.
	And if you go to Carl B. Herman, Blogspot, any of these shows.
	I wrote one published paper through the Claremont Colleges.
	I detail the statistics so that you can take a look at the purpose of the Federal Reserve, those three goals.
	If they really were serious, and if the public were really serious, what are the first observations you would do?
	Well, then get rid of the fucking Fed.
	If you want to minimize the interest rates, then have it be a public lending service that you have, because then all that interest goes back to the government.
	I mean, that is just obvious for anyone caring to take a look.
	And finally, economist Michael Hudson, who has been one of the champions to be able to document and prove The criminality of our financial system.
	I believe he's at the University of St.
	Louis.
	You know, I had a chance to talk with him like, I don't know, probably 10 years ago now.
	We were sitting at the same dinner table and I said, hey, Michael, you know, given that the evil ones control the Fed, Is there anything at all that would prevent them from creating a shell bank and then just entering whatever number of digits they want?
	And then they can buy whatever they want on the slide so that the people who were in charge of evil wouldn't have any restriction to anything that they wanted to do for projects, except for the result of inflation that they would have to hide.
	Is there anything stopping them, Michael?
	And Michael just looked at me clearly and said, Absolutely nothing.
	Carl, I love your comments on economics.
	They're so to the point.
	Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
	Soros-funded DA is sharing tips on how not to get carjacked as crime surges, crime that he has promoted by adopting the policies he has.
	Instead of doing his job and helping prevent crime, LADA, George Gascon, Gascon is now telling the people of L.A.
	the best way they can prevent their cars from being stolen, even while they're in it.
	In a statement about the increase in car thefts in L.A.
	County, Gascon, who was funded by George Soros, offered ideas for how to prevent cars from being stolen.
	There are a few easy steps you can take.
	Telling people to lock their car doors, not to leave a spare key in the vehicle, park in welded areas, and install anti-theft devices.
	Those ideas are all things that people of L.A.
	are presumably already doing.
	Wouldn't people park in a well-lit space if they could already?
	What about those who don't have a well-lit space to park in?
	In his statement, Gascon said auto theft is a costly crime and that his office is working with law enforcement to hold everybody who commits it accountable.
	Well, people of L.A.
	have the right to be mad about Gascon's comments, but only if they didn't vote for him.
	During his campaign, Gascon promised to implement criminal justice reforms, to end the use of the death penalty, to reduce sentences for violent criminals.
	You have, if you voted for him, no one to blame but yourself.
	Meanwhile, Real science.
	779 athlete cardiac arrest.
	Serious issue.
	500 dead after COVID shot.
	Profoundly disturbing.
	It's not normal for so many young athletes to suffer from cardiac arrest or die while playing this sport, but this year it is happening.
	Many of these heart issues and deaths come shortly after receiving a COVID vax.
	While it's possible to happen to those who did not get the COVID Vax, the numbers point to the only obvious cause.
	The so-called health professionals running the Vax programs around the world keep repeating, the COVID Vax is a normal Vax and it's safe and effective, but we know it's bullshit.
	In response to their pronouncement, here's a non-exhaustive and growing list of mainly young athletes who had major medical issues in 21-22 after receiving one or more COVID vaccines.
	Initially, many were not reported.
	We know many were told not to tell anyone about their adverse reaction.
	The media was not reporting them.
	They started happening and rambling up after the first COVID facts.
	The mainstream are still not reporting most of them, but sports news cannot ignore the fact.
	Soccer players and other stars collapsed in the middle of a game due to a sudden cardiac arrest.
	Many of those died, more than 50%.
	We also note many posts on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, forums, and news stories are being removed.
	So now we're receiving some messages saying there's no proof of the event or of vaccination status.
	That's because the information is being hidden.
	Here's a tweet.
	Wasn't professional for nearly 20 years.
	From 1996, played nearly 500 games.
	Club at international level.
	Never was there one cardiac arrest.
	Either the crowd or a player.
	It's actually quite scary.
	Here's a prior year update.
	The International Olympic Committee in Lucerne, Switzerland, studied docs from international databases from 1966 to 2004.
	They indicate 1,101 sudden deaths in athletes under 35 years of age, an average of 29 per year.
	1,101 sudden deaths in athletes under 35 years of age, in average of 29 per year.
	The sports with the highest incidence being soccer and basketball.
	A study by Marin on sudden death of US athletes athletes from 1980 to 2006 in 38 sports, identified 1,866 deaths of athletes with cardiac disease with a prevalence of hypertrophic cardiopathy from 2005 to 2006, 66 average deaths of athletes with cardiac disease with a prevalence of hypertrophic cardiopathy from 2005 to 2006, 66 average Thanks to investigative readers for discovering these reports.
	Thomas Rents, an American lawyer, says the U.S.
	military's Defense Medical Epidemiology Atomase shows that the first 10 months of 2021, all-cause morbidity increased 11 times.
	That's 1,100% against the previous year.
	Rents have information from DoD whistleblowers that the DoD is actively deleting data from the database to cover up the genocide that's being perpetrated on military personnel.
	He said they expect the numbers for 2022 to be up by 5,000%, 50 times the previous year.
	Our ongoing updates to the chart clearly show the growth of adverse events on sports.
	One person said they were hiding things because we're only showing the barest of 2022.
	Sorry about that, but we do not have a crystal ball to see into the future.
	We do expect some will continue to be surprised about the number of athlete deaths in the coming months.
	And although it's February, injuries and deaths that happened in prior months will be continued to be discovered in the future.
	We know we do not have all of the cardiac arrest reports, and we don't have all of the deaths.
	The sports clubs are hiding the cases where the player did not die, but that did not make it into the news.
	We suspect many players suffering from a mysterious illness were told to go home, suffer, and rest in silence.
	The dates for the first available vaccines vary all over the world in different states and cities.
	We have a small collection and a separate story.
	We know there were trials in the month before official rollouts.
	So, because a country started its rollout on a particular day, that does not mean some didn't receive vaccines in the weeks and months earlier.
	If we get definitive proof someone was not vaxxed, we amend the record.
	Officials in the media are now doing a great job of hiding all the useful information.
	They're also calling vaccinated people un-vaxxed.
	If it hasn't been more than two weeks after their vaccination, they are due for their booster and they don't get it.
	If they're labeled, then they're labeled un-vaxxed.
	This is the government and media telling lies.
	A clever scheme that is still a lie.
	A few weak attempts to debunk the data have begun to come out, but they cherry pick a small number of the entries.
	So look what's going on here.
	The red are the deaths, the blue are the collapses.
	This is pretty damn troubling.
	This story will grow over time as new data is added.
	If you have proof, That we don't already have, or have a correction, get it to us.
	Useful information would be a person's name, age, what happened, if they had the vaccine, date of death, link to any news story.
	That's very, very troubling, but unsurprising.
	Joe, yours.
	Yeah, well, there's a British comic named Russell Brand who has, I think, 1.3 million subscribers.
	He's a pretty popular channel.
	He just did a 20-minute video on YouTube today about the latest issue of the British Medical Journal chastising the government regulatory agencies and the pharmaceutical agencies for the absolute horrible protocol that they've installed during this COVID vaccine issue and all of the inequities involved in it.
	It's pretty eye-opening that the British Medical Journal, the oldest and most respected medical journal in the world, has suddenly turned on Big Pharma and all of the worldwide regulatory agencies.
	But then we had another thing that happened this week that I've been trying to figure out, and that's the Air China crash, MU-5735, which crashed on March 1st.
	It was 29,000 feet and then just all of a sudden took a nosedive and drove straight down.
	So I investigated the engines.
	They're made by GE and a French company, so they've got a real good track record.
	The plane is a Boeing 737 NG, which is the most common passenger airplane in the world and has the highest safety record.
	The Chinese have the highest safety record as far as fatalities per passenger mile of any airline, any country in the world's airlines.
	And so, you know, we're left with an anomaly that probably the pilots in China are forced to take the Sinovac, which is an adenovirus vaccine, in order to fly.
	And I'm just speculating at this point because they haven't recovered the flight data recorder and there's questions about whether they got usable data off of the cockpit voice.
	But there was no communications with the tower indicating that there was a problem on board.
	The thing was flying at 29,000 feet, all of a sudden just dove straight down.
	I was talking to the friend of mine, who's a retired commercial pilot.
	And I said, if the pilot got up to go to the bathroom and there was only one guy at the controls and he had a sudden heart attack or a stroke where he had an aneurysm in his brain and collapsed, could he fall forward on the stick and push it forward enough that he could put the plane in a dive like that?
	And he went.
	I didn't think about that, but yeah, and if you're in the bathroom, which is outside of the cockpit door area, and the plane is suddenly taking a dive, you're at multiple G's trying to claw your way back into the cockpit to grab a hold of the stick and pull it back, and it's doubtful that you'd be able to do that.
	There was a little bit of a dip at about 6,000 foot elevation where it rised up just a little bit, which may have been the pilot Trying to alleviate the problem but then it just went back and probably at that point he was pulling against so much force that he broke the hydraulics or cables or whatever it was that controlled the elevators and flaps on the plane and it just went.
	So bottom line is we can expect a whole lot more aviation accidents as time marches on with this absolutely insane use of medical experimentation.
	I watched the footage of the plane coming down.
	It was just horrifying.
	I mean, dropping like a rock.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	I saw that footage, too.
	It was going straight down.
	Now, but this is a good way to confirm.
	I'm sure that when the plane hit, it created just a slight ditch, maybe 40 feet by 20 feet, and the plane just disappeared straight onto the ground, just like in Shakespeare on 9-11, right?
	That's right.
	That's right.
	I'm sure it was exactly the same.
	And Joe, with what you're seeing with publications beginning to do CYA conditions, they're wrapping this up and it'll go to what they always say.
	Oh, I guess mistakes were made, but nobody's going to get paid or they may be promoted for their work.
	Regarding the carjacking article, Yeah, so I grew up in SoCal, I live in NorCal, and the aim of these policies is to create bigger and bigger homeless areas with crime.
	And really, the best depiction of, I think, what our opponent's goal is, is shown to us in, I believe it was the 1987 original RoboCop.
	Movie.
	If you look at that movie of what the cities look like, it's going to be like that.
	Or the Back to the Future series with the dystopian future, that's what the cities are going to be looking at.
	And regarding with the athletes, I've been a competitive athlete for over 50 years now.
	And I have never heard of an athlete collapsing.
	And I've played a lot of basketball and a lot of tennis, some softball.
	There might have been a problem with that because a lot of those guys are, you know, out of shape.
	But I've never heard of that before in my life.
	I read one account about 15 years ago, but that was it.
	And in the world of tennis, so you have Novak Djokovic who refuses the vaccine and Therefore is not allowed to play.
	And he's in an interesting competition for the most career titles of the major tournaments with Rafael Nadal from Spain.
	And Rafa did get the vaccines and he started out the year 2022.
	I believe he won his first 19 matches until the finals at Indian Wells in California, where he lost to American Taylor Fritz.
	And in watching the highlights of the match, Nadal just was not his usual energetic self.
	And Nadal complained that he was having chest pains during the match and was having difficulty breathing, which is what has been going on with this situation.
	So to increase these deaths and these collapses by over 10 times, man, this thing has, you know, we just need to keep moving forward until this comes out and these criminals are exposed, arrested, and these policies are made transparent.
	I'd say it's a virtual certainty that the facts that come out to point that out or acknowledge it.
	I wonder that those are the signs we would expect if he had, and he's lucky to be alive.
	Meanwhile, breaking report, nine in 10 UK COVID deaths were fully vaxxed individuals.
	90% of the COVID deaths in a fully vaxxed.
	The Epoch Times report released by the UK government has confirmed 9 out of every 10 deaths related to COVID-19 are found in those who are fully vaccinated.
	Although the virus variant is the same, and UK have moved only one different vaccine, AstraZeneca, from the US, the data in the US are different.
	It may be due to the CDC definition used to identify who is vaxxed.
	Indeed, the vast majority of COVID-19 deaths were just admitted to be in vaccinated people, despite the common narrative that vaccines save lives.
	So far, only the UK has confirmed that this is not the case.
	Why?
	As the UK analyzes data that identify individuals on the spectrum of having received one of three shots, the US only counts vaccination if you're two weeks after your last dose.
	Since not all patients who are fully vaxxed are identified on admission, analyzing the US number is difficult, if not impossible.
	You must Ask yourself if this is intentional.
	The CDC's narrative that vaccines save lives would be challenged if data were gathered in a more honest and common-sense way.
	And with it, Big Pharma's pocketbook as well.
	Thus, the CDC has elected to continue to collect data in a deliberately unhelpful way to fabricate a narrative in which our vax population is outliving the unvax.
	Common sense dictates that if that's not true in the UK, a country with demographics and technology similar to our own, it won't be true here either.
	As the number of deaths in vax rise, the number of deaths in the unvaxed pop falls.
	What good are these vaccines again?
	Despite vax rates increasing and the U.S.
	death rates are climbing at an even higher rate.
	This further implies that being vaccinated does not decrease the risk of death from COVID in the way the CDC's narrative suggests.
	On the contrary, it suggests it increases your risk.
	Here's a woman who died of a rare brain bleed after getting her COVID-19 vaccine.
	This is disturbing.
	A coroner in the UK has determined a woman died from side effect caused by the AstraZeneca.
	A 34-year-old named Kim Lockwood complained of a headache eight days after taking the shot.
	South Yorkshire coroner Nicola Mundi told the BBC her condition quickly deteriorated.
	She was pronounced dead 17 hours after being admitted, eight days after getting the shot.
	Lockwood was extremely unlucky in developing a sudden and catastrophic bleed on her brain.
	Her death was recorded at Doncaster Coroner's Office as vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia.
	VITT, an article published by the U.S.
	National Center for Biotech Information, says VITT is defined as a clinical syndrome entailing the development of thrombosis at uncommon sites that include cerebral venous sinus thrombosis or splenic venous thrombosis, where thrombosis occurs when blood clots block veins or arteries.
	Blood clots, of course, are a common consequence of the vax, especially AstraZeneca.
	The American Society of Hematology, back in January, stated that VIT is marked by a low platelet count, known as thrombocytopenia, in blood clots that usually occur in splanchnic veins located in the abdomen and stomach or the cerebral veins located in the brain.
	Her husband, Amion, said that his wife, mother of two, had complained her head felt like it was going to explode.
	Her father recalled her last words.
	Her headache was actually killing her.
	She got it right.
	Kim's pain wasn't appropriately abandoned.
	The family should have been listened to.
	The UK government says there have been 438 reported cases of thromboembolic events, blood clotting and 79 deaths to date after getting the AstraZeneca.
	Last year, an Edmonton, Canada woman in her 50s died of VITT after receiving the AstraZeneca vax, which entails two doses and uses hedravenous technology.
	AstraZeneca's vax, common across Europe, has not been approved by the FDA.
	I'm sad to report we've confirmed Alberta's first death from VITT following vax with the AstraZeneca, the chief medical officer wrote on May 4th.
	U.S.
	and U.K.
	officials have repeatedly said the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks for most people.
	COVID-19 is the illness caused by the CCP virus.
	AstraZeneca officials did not respond to requests for comments.
	Joe, this is just a sad story.
	Yours?
	Yeah, well, we're not exempt from the same problems that AstraZeneca has here in the United States, because Johnson & Johnson, the Janssen brand, uses this similar adenovirus technology.
	So that's going to be a problem for all of us going forward.
	And the actual operation mechanism is similar between that and the mRNA.
	It's just, you know, splitting a few hairs to call anything different.
	If you look at the Microscopic analysis of what's inside those samples.
	There's a great one at James Fetzer at Sam Bailey's website with her husband Mark discussing slides down in New Zealand.
	Absolutely horrifying that they've got all these different ingredients that they don't list on the label because they don't have to and that have all kinds of side effects that they don't have to mention because they don't have to.
	So you know when you're looking at the data for UK you got to realize that 49.3 million people, which is 73% of the adult population, are fully vaccinated in the UK.
	So anything that you do looking forward, always remember that there's 25% that are not fully vaxxed, but they may be partially vaxxed.
	They may have had a reaction on the first jab and elected to not get the second.
	They may have had a reaction to the second and elected to not get the third.
	But bottom line is, if you've got 73% of your population that it's been jabbed and there's a wide range of adverse events happening, then you've got to put that factor in along with whatever the side effect factor is, that it's 73.4 and probably then you've got to put that factor in along with whatever the side effect factor is,
	You know, it seems to me when you're talking about an experimental vaccine, it would be even more important that its ingredients should be known because it's experimental.
	I mean, you'd need to know what you're putting in your body.
	The idea they can get experimental use without specifying the ingredients, that seems to me criminal misconduct.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Yeah, it's more of the inversion of what anybody who is actually doing something coordinated for the good of people would do.
	I'll put in the show notes also that 90% of the cases in Canada for COVID, or allegedly COVID, are also among the fully vaccinated.
	And this is, now I don't know how they're counting in Canada, but I'm pretty sure it's the same as with the US, is that if you're If you have some hospitalization or some adverse effect within the first two weeks, it's not counted as a vaccine effect.
	You're counted as unvaccinated still.
	So it is criminal, absolutely.
	And I did see how the UK attempted to spin this fact that 90% of those hospitalizations are Our deaths, whatever it is, are among the fully vaccinated.
	There is a BBC clip with their spin, and they had Boris Johnson, the Prime Minister, at a hospital for a photo and a film op, and Johnson goes to the camera and says, I can't emphasize enough the importance of everyone receiving a booster at hospital here.
	Fully 90% of the cases here have not received their booster!
	Now, probably statistically that's right, but this is how they use data.
	Let's see, what else do we have?
	So, with vaccine injuries among the people that I know in my circle, friends, family, colleagues, I don't know of anybody specifically who has reported an injury, thank God, And again, from what we've covered on this show and many other places, about 5% of the batches were loaded.
	For damages.
	And if you want to get the best data that I've found, Attorney Reiner Fulmic is great data for that.
	And in the US, there's Attorney Thomas Renz, who got the raw Medicare data.
	And I believe that it was that 45,000 Americans were dead from these vaccines within just, I forget the time period, but a short amount of time from receiving those vaccines.
	It's going to get overwhelmingly worse, I have no doubt whatsoever.
	Meanwhile, the NATO head tells Russia it cannot win a nuclear war.
	This is a bizarre statement to be making.
	NATO warned Wednesday against Russia's war in Ukraine sliding into a nuclear confrontation.
	Russia has sought this dangerous, irresponsible nuclear rhetoric, NATO Secretary General Jen Stoltenberg told a news conference.
	Let there be no doubt about our readiness to protect and defend allies against any threat, any time.
	Russia must understand that it can never win a nuclear war.
	He said on the eve of a summit of the Western Military Alliance's national leaders in Brussels, NATO is not part of the conflict.
	It provides support to Ukraine, but isn't part of the conflict.
	I would say Russia would have a greater prospect of prevailing in a nuclear exchange than the West.
	I think that the odds would favor Russia by a rather substantial margin.
	NATO will not send troops into Ukraine.
	It's extremely important to support Ukraine, which we are stepping up, but at the same time, it's extremely important to prevent this conflict from becoming a full-fledged war between NATO and Russia.
	No doubt about that.
	Meanwhile, remember, Klaus Schwab is chairman of the World Economic Forum.
	This is not a conspiracy theory.
	It's completely real.
	This is a best summation of what they're about from a PDF by the John Coleman Book of Conspirators Hierarchy.
	The story of the Committee of 300.
	Bear in mind.
	At least four billion useless eaters shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal, rapid-acting diseases, and starvation.
	Energy, food, and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, starting with the white population of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races.
	The population of Canada, Western Europe and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on the other continents until the world's population reaches a manageable level of a billion.
	Manageable for who?
	Of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and are accustomed to obeying authority without question.
	I think that gets it exactly right.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, there's several disturbing articles today of veterans today.
	One of them is privatization of the nuclear war.
	More dangerous than COVID-19?
	This is an article that was originally published at Global Research.
	And what he refers to is there was a document for preemptive nuclear war, which was authored under the Obama administration, authorized $1.2 trillion to produce this document.
	And what they decided was that we've got these nuclear bombs where we're able to penetrate down below grade level and we could put up to a 50 kiloton bomb under a Russian base with a missile.
	And there would be very minimal amount of fallout, sort of like what they did under the Twin Towers, kids, if you've been following along on that particular subject.
	And so what they're basically saying is that there's since there's no nuclear fallout consequence, that nuclear war would be safe and effective.
	And so now the Russians have hit with their hypersonic missile.
	This is the Kinzhal Bandera dagger, which is hypersonic.
	It moves it.
	And At 20, at Mach 20, and has now a current range of 2,000 kilometers, putting every NATO base east of Germany under immediate peril.
	And like the veterans today mentioned, Germany only has 10 air bases, so it'll only take 10 missiles.
	Once we decide that we want to start sending planes into Uh, Ukraine to enforce the, quote, no-fly zone, then that's going to be the red line that's going to be crossed, and we're going to start losing every base that every one of those NATO planes took off from, and they'll have no place to land, and they'll be shot down by other missile systems that the Russians have.
	And we also have the USS Harry Truman, which is in the Iona Sea, which is, uh, waiting commands from, uh, Biden to, uh, launch a no-fly zone over, Ukraine.
	Apparently these idiots in the Navy think that they're immune to hypersonic missiles too.
	And if all we got protecting us from a worldwide nuclear annihilation is this feeble-minded idiot that cheated on everything included and is highly paid by Ukraine, China, and Russia under bribes as vice president, he's the one that's going to save us. and Russia under bribes as vice president, he's the one God help us.
	I couldn't agree more.
	The idea of introducing a no-fly zone is utter insanity.
	Russia will take that as an act of war and will respond appropriately.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	Well, it's pretty much as bad as you could possibly imagine.
	It can get worse.
	And for whatever reason, these are the trials and tribulations that we face.
	Now, what I would be concerned about next, if the Blackhats were in control, is that, and I was, you know, advising them, I would say, nuke a U.S.
	city.
	Maybe San Francisco.
	And be sure as well, separately blow up the Golden Gate Bridge so that you can have the photo in the film of a twisted, blackened Golden Gate Bridge.
	And then you would have your World War III and just blame Russia.
	And that's all that you would need to do.
	The fact that that hasn't happened yet hasn't been hopeful.
	And for the U.S., The paper that I wrote that Congressman Kucinich leveraged for the impeachment of Bush and Cheney in the U.S.
	has a documented first strike nuclear policy on Iran if the U.S.
	interprets anything that Iran does as potentially harmful to Israel.
	So that's the documented policy for the US.
	And finally, Carl B. Herman Blackspot, any of these shows, I do make the case in, I think, a nine-part series that we really are in World War III, and this is this psychopathic, parasitic, 0.01% Class against we, the people.
	And they are fighting to best cull and preserve a neocolonialized slave race for them.
	And if you actually want the possibility and the potentiality of being human for creative, unleashed brilliance, then we need to, of course, do everything we can to win this war.
	I don't know if the American people would approve of a first strike on Iran if Iran hit Israel.
	I don't think the United States should sacrifice itself for Israel under any circumstances, actually.
	It's just stunning.
	I did a real deal special report with Brian Davidson, who's a PI, who turns out to be a very smart guy.
	He discovered all these tools for doing research on the internet, including analyzing photographs, determining where they were taken, the time they were taken, just based on the photograph itself.
	So I thought I'd try him out.
	I gave him an image without any data about it, certainly not that it had anything to do with Sandy Hook, and he just astonished me.
	Within two days, he came back to show me where it had been taken, when it had been taken.
	Here's my note about this.
	And nobody died at Sandy Hook, 2015, second edition, 2016.
	We published an image of a, it should be CSI, Crime Scene Investigation Vehicle at the elementary school before the purported mass shooting had taken place.
	In the first edition, we reported it as having been taken the morning of the 14th, the day of the event, from one of the elevated cameras placed around the car park to record the drill.
	No portable mortuary can be seen, which means it's early morning before the portable mortuary was delivered.
	In the second, we corrected that to having been taken the night before.
	We knew it was before the event because a string of windows in Classroom 10 had not been shot out as they were presented in the aftermath.
	Here's what we included in the book to make that point on page 149.
	Now the windows have been fixed to simulate the effects of shots.
	A mortuary tent can now be seen in the reflection of the window.
	This means it's been set up some time after the windows at Classroom 10.
	Featuring three candle images, the police were staged to look as though bullets passed through some of them.
	I recently learned that Ryan Davidson, a private investigator who has mastered internet tools for research, Sent him the photo, but without explaining the background or the context.
	He did his thing using the photo I sent, and this is what I have just heard back.
	No wonder they banned the book.
	Now, this is the windows before and after.
	Before on the left, after on the right.
	Lower left, looking at the windows, trying to figure out what to do about them.
	And then a photograph on the right, which heretofore Just not paying sufficient attention.
	I thought those pink rods were sticking outward when they're actually sticking inward, which is bizarre because that suggests they were supposed to represent bullet fire from outside the building.
	So, here's what I heard back from Brian.
	Jim, I'm assuming you sent the photo to try to determine the approximate time it was taken.
	This analysis is a little sloppy.
	I don't vote myself out as a pro.
	I simply claimed it could be done.
	Not that I'm the expert.
	Again, I'm a generalist.
	First thing I did was find the original source here.
	Notice I can read the plates in the original high-res image.
	And he gave the link.
	It was originally published by the Hearst Newspapers, but he followed up and found the original is in the Connecticut State Police files for Sandy Hook.
	In the Connecticut Police files for Sandy Hook.
	Now clearly you can see here the windows are undamaged.
	Therefore, one infers this was before the event occurred, and therefore one might suppose it would have to be on the evening of the 13th.
	Well, surprise, surprise!
	It turns out this was taken the evening of the 14th.
	And let me say why that is even more devastating.
	The event is supposed to have taken place between 9.35 and 9.40, and yet here it is, the evening, and the windows are still undamaged.
	That means the Connecticut State Police had still not figured out how they were going to stage manage the scene.
	And since you have Wayne Carver, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner there, leaning against the wall with his arms folded, not only are the Connecticut State Police involved in setting up the crime, but so is the medical examiner.
	He determined also where it had actually been located in the parking lot at Sandy Hook, where the orange ball in the lower left represents the sun.
	Now here's a close-up of that inside.
	What he discerned, and we've done a subsequent interview about it, is that this crack in the window down here beneath the pink rods, that was already in the window.
	It looks like somebody threw a rock at the window or what but cracked it.
	Now that was a problem for the state police because no principal would allow a window that was cracked in a classroom.
	It Ought to have been previously repaired, but it was not.
	Notice, too, there's a shot here in the upper right-hand corner that doesn't look like a 223 slug, but notice also this is an aluminum window frame, and they have drilled the holes.
	Notice you can even see filaments of the aluminum here from drilling the holes, and they're all parallel at exactly 90 degrees to the window, which means this whole thing is staged.
	Here's a photograph Ryan also found when you juxtapose it with a police detective report that he found two bodies in this vicinity, and there was ample blood bleeding all over the floor.
	Well, not only do you not have the bodies, you have no signs of blood.
	And here you can see how furniture is jammed up against the windows, indicating this school was not in use.
	It was dysfunctional.
	It was being used for storage.
	Joe, your thoughts?
	Yeah, well, people need to go to the Jim Fetzer page on BitChute because he's got today's interview with David Zubrik and private investigator Brian Davidson, but he's also got a great interview, which I watched earlier with Jane Ruby and Mike Adams.
	And then there's another one that he just put up, which I haven't had a chance to watch yet, which is David Martin, who's always really good, and Stu Peters.
	And it says, we are making humans into bioweapons factories.
	So yeah, you need to spend a little bit more time with James Fetzer's website at BitChute, because he's got some great information.
	And I died laughing on the Sandy Hook thing when the guy says, breach door here.
	Painted on the wall.
	They painted the instructions.
	The set crew painted the instructions for the crisis actors.
	It was absolutely hilarious.
	It's just like the Ring C of the Pentagon.
	They had punch-out spray painted on the wall, and you have this perfectly symmetrical blowout from explosives that they'd done to make it look as though it had been from an artifact, maybe a landing wheel from a plane, which would have created an asymmetrical and oddly shaped hole, not a perfectly symmetrical one.
	Punch-out there, breech door here.
	Outrageous.
	Carl, your thoughts?
	And fellow patriots, that's why we're so confident, and you should be too, because we're standing for the facts, and we'll live and die for these facts.
	Jim and Wolfgang Haubig have already made the case, documented in abundance, that this was a false flag event.
	And still, I loved, I watched both those interviews with Brian Davidson.
	It kind of reminded me, like, you know, Brian is, you've already sold the deal, but then Brian comes in and says, wait, there's more!
	So those those bullet, so called bullet holes, those drill holes in that aluminum framing, you know, exactly parallel from the outside.
	So he was magically shooting.
	So maybe this is another magic bullet theory where he fired a gun from the inside and it went out that punch out door through the window and then turned around and came in exactly there.
	I mean, how?
	I don't think I could hit three in a row in that Area standing outside.
	I don't think I could do it from 20 feet.
	I'd have to.
	I'd have to rest a firearm to do that, and maybe not even then.
	A 223 bullet would have made done tremendous damage.
	It would have shattered the window.
	It wouldn't pass through that aluminum frame.
	The whole thing is a farce, a complete farce.
	You know, I don't, I don't know if it's even physically possible for a bullet to leave that, that evidence through aluminum.
	That would be a good point to disprove the idea that that damage was caused by a bullet at all.
	And then, you know, there's the, my favorites are the ordering the porta-potties to the scene, having the electric sign that says everyone has to check in, everyone with the badges, ordering the pizza.
	But the Connecticut Police Department there the evening before, I mean, and the manual for the drill, it's, you know, we just need to have a breakthrough event where we can have people look at this evidence and that's abundant and sufficient for their arrests.
	Yes, yes, absolutely.
	And if anyone wants to support my going to the Supreme Court over my Sandy Hook lawsuit, check out givesandgo.com.
	Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
	Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowitgmail.com.
	Live, need to know at gmail.com.
	Catch this.
	Having offered courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning for 35 years, from the University of Kentucky to the University of Virginia, North Carolina, Chapel Hill, New College of the University of South Florida, Chapel Hill, New College of the University of South Florida,
	The Duluth campus, the University of Minnesota, I want to create the opportunity to give you the principles that need to be applied to sort things out in terms of a course online on critical thinking In scientific reasoning, the instructor will be yours truly, Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., philosophy professor emeritus.
	Here's the course information.
	Course schedule.
	15 one-hour seminars, Wednesdays, 8 to 10 p.m.
	Central Time, which will begin on 6 April and end on 13 July 2022.
	This course may be repeated.
	Registration.
	$150 for the course or $10 a session.
	Course materials provided online without charge.
	Course description.
	An introduction to critical thinking using conspiracy theories as research illustrations.
	For everyone who needs to master the ability to think things through and avoid being played by false narratives.
	Course materials provided online and includes blogs, essays, and videos, and even a book or two.
	Meanwhile, the syllabus.
	6 April, Introduction to the Nature of Thought, Signs and Binds.
	13 April, Studying Language, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics.
	20 April, Arguments.
	Deductive, inductive, and abductive.
	27 April, informal fallacies.
	Part 1, fallacies of ambiguity.
	4 May, informal fallacies.
	Part 2, fallacies of relevance.
	11 May, applying scientific reasoning to conspiracy theories.
	18 May, the assassination of JFK.
	The use of fabricated evidence.
	25 May, the atrocities of 9-11, violating the laws of physics.
	1 June, the moon landings, how we know we didn't go.
	8 June, Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota, accident or assassination?
	15 June, Sandy Hook, designing events for emotional impact.
	22 June, Nice, Orlando, Parkland, Charlottesville, Las Vegas.
	27 June.
	Pizzagate.
	Is it myth or is it real?
	Disturbing to the max.
	6 July.
	The pandemic and the Vax.
	The greatest hopes of all?
	13 July.
	The official history of World War II.
	Politics trumps science.
	Registration is open.
	Go to mixinstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html.
	The first hand to register will have direct links to the chat to me and can offer questions and comments as we proceed in real time on behalf of the class as a representative sample.
	This may be an opportunity that you do not want to miss.
	When I would have my first meeting with a class, I'd explain to them if they come to the university to take only one course, This was a course they ought to take because it would make such a difference in the rest of their lives to avoid being played, taken advantage of, to determine when individuals are using fallacious arguments to deceive, mislead, and cheat.
	This is something I think you don't want to miss.
	I look forward to seeing you there.
	Meanwhile, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep.
	5% know and try to wake the 90%.
	The 1% use a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
	Meanwhile, final thoughts.
	Joe, yours.
	Yeah, seems like we pretty much covered all of the final thoughts.
	Other than, you know, we still have a problem with the Skull and Bones gang.
	I'll put a link down below to a documentary about them.
	But we had Henry Luce, who was Skull and Bones, that was head of Time Magazine.
	And we had William Buckley, who was CIA, that was head of National Review.
	And between them, they managed to keep the margins of the dialogue between Liberal, you know, good and conservative good.
	Very, very narrow so that nobody could actually discuss anything outside of those margins.
	But if you don't understand how these secret societies have been operational since 1832, you need to watch this video.
	It's based on research by Anthony Sutton.
	It's absolutely impeccable.
	It's a really great documentary.
	So get yourself up to speed with who really runs this silly world.
	Excellent.
	Carl, yours?
	First for Jim's course, I'm enrolled.
	I'm looking forward to it.
	It's an honor for me as a professional historian.
	Professor Fetzer will go down in history, I would say, for being the leader in scholarship, both for the importance of the topic and then the quality and the quantity, I think he's going to be regarded as the top person contributing scholarship for the Great Awakening.
	And for everything that we have covered today and ongoing, it just seems to be getting scarier and scarier.
	Which, you know, you could imagine any type of end road to that.
	And what we're standing for is the victory of truth.
	No matter how it goes, that is outside of our control.
	What is always inside our control is to command what you think and what you say and what you do.
	The stakes are as high as you can imagine and likely even higher than your ability to imagine.
	So be proud of your participation.
	And if you want me To hear my case for this American Revolution 2.0 or this Cosmic Revolution 2.0, any of these shows go to, and I lay the case right there in the context section.
	Well, it's just terrific to have Joe Olson from Houston, Carl Herman from San Ramon, California, join me for these reports.
	I think Carl and Joe both have it right.
	We're in as dire a situation as can be.
	At one hand, we have the Vax and the Millions who are going to die.
	We're beginning to see it.
	It's going to increase exponentially, sad to say.
	And the other, the threat by the West to introduce a no-fly zone that would, for a certainty, provoke a nuclear exchange with Russia.
	And while the Secretary General of NATO may want to claim Russia could not win a nuclear war, I guarantee that is true of the West.
	Russia would prevail.
	They have superior weapons.
	They have the best anti-missile missiles.
	They have the best anti-submarine torpedoes.
	They have the best anti-ship missiles.
	I'll tell you, if NATO begins a no-fly zone, Just as Joe was describing, those airports, those are all going to be taken out.
	The planes are going to have no place to land.
	The ships are going to be sunk.
	It's all going to happen in the first 30 minutes.
	And then we'll see if the U.S.
	launches a counterattack.
	And if it does, it's all over.
	America will suffer grievously in a manner that we have never experienced before and from which, alas, we shall never recover.
	Meanwhile, spend all the time you can with friends and loved ones, your family, those you love, because we still do not know how much time we have left.
	Back tomorrow with more of the news you need to know.

▲