All Episodes
Previous Next
March 24, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
58:10
David Zublick's Dark Outpost (23 March 2022) ft. Brian Davidson, P.I., and Danny Cirrus
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, just head on over to darkoutpost.tv, sign up for that one-year membership, and we will send you the Super Bundle.
Joining us now is Dr. James Fetzer, who joins us every Wednesday at this time, and we're also being joined, hopefully, by Brian Davidson, who's all of a sudden disappeared on us here.
Hopefully, he'll be back in a moment.
There he is.
Let's bring him on in, see if we got him here.
Let's bring him into the mix.
Brian, there you are.
Go ahead.
Welcome back.
Dr. Fetzer, you got more information for us on Sandy Hook, huh?
Well, David, last week we hit it out of the ballpark.
Brian was sensational.
When I first reposted our interview on my BitChute channel, it had 2,000 views within a couple hours, 4,000 the following morning, 6,000, 8,000, approaching 10,000.
When the Deep State caught up with it, it had begun censoring.
A friend of mine who was sharing it on Twitter found that he got out his first tweet and his second was banned.
This is such sensational evidence, and because Brian is continuing his research, I wanted to bring it back for a second installment.
This is something the world needs to understand.
And I've also invited a fellow with expertise, a background in law enforcement, Danny Siras, to join us as well.
So hopefully you'll have Danny standing by as well, David.
All right.
Well, that sounds good.
Don't see him as of yet.
I know that he does not want his image on the screen.
That's no problem.
But he's certainly welcome to join us via voice only or Whatever, as soon as we see him appearing, we'll add him into the mix here.
But let's get started at the beginning here and tell us what has transpired since last week's amazing, and I do mean amazing, revelation about the photograph indicating that this stunt, this false flag, had taken place actually the day before the alleged shooting.
There was an evening sun, which Brian was able to prove, looking at your photograph, showed that the actual events took place the day prior.
Actually, David, his further research substantiated the photograph took place over the day of the shooting, which is even more damning.
Let's go through it and bring in Dave Bryant to explain it.
As everyone knows from the next slide, I do extensive collaborative research on false flags and other events beginning with JFK.
The next slide shows the most important methodological issue here.
Which is that I champion the method of falsificationism.
Next slide, David.
I was bringing Danny here, so go ahead.
Yeah, we got them both here.
This is just a wide call.
You can find all kinds of confirming information for an hypothesis that is nevertheless false.
So the way to test it is to try to disconfirm it, prove that it's false, and then if it resists disconfirmation, Then it might be true, or you haven't figured out yet how to do it.
The very next slide shows my earliest interview with Brian, where he was explaining to me how he'd mastered these investigative tools for the Internet, with which I was extremely impressed.
So I sent him a photograph.
We'll get to the photograph momentarily, and asked him to track it down.
He was brilliant!
Go to the next slide, David.
He did not know where it was taken, when it was taken.
He didn't even know it had anything to do with Sandy Hook.
If you go to the very next, nevertheless, he was able to use those internet tools.
He was able to locate where it was taken in the Sandy Hook parking lot.
And initially, he believed it was the evening of the 13th, the day before the event on the 14th.
Here's a photo I sent, which was originally In a chapter authored by Alan William Powell, who had also, like Brian, penetrated the Connecticut State Police files.
This was a photograph.
Here you can see what he wrote about it, taken from one of the elevated cameras placed around the car park to record the drill.
Leaves in the background, not December.
That turns out to be mistaken.
No portable mortuary can be seen, which means it's early morning before the portable mortuary was delivered.
Now, as I've said, we found actually it was in the evening, which I corrected from the first edition to the second.
Look here, just above the roof of the crime scene vehicle, you can see a string of four windows that are undamaged.
Turn to the next slide.
You can see here how they'd be presented after the fact.
The mortuary tent can now be seen in the reflection of the window, which means it's been set up some time after the windows at Classroom 10.
Featuring three-candle images of his were staged to look as though bullets had passed through some of them.
So you can see this clear difference.
Go to the next slide and you'll find what Brian was able to uncover, which was a far more high-quality version of the photograph.
In fact, yes, go to that very next slide, David, so we can see that more high-quality version of the photograph.
Now look, just above the roof of that crime scene vehicle, you see the string of four windows, David, right there?
And that they are undamaged, and then look at the crime scene tape, go to the flag, down the flag, and there, leaning against the wall with his arm folded, is Wayne Carver, the Connecticut State Medical Examiner, It turns out this was taken the evening of the 14th, David, so the crime has officially taken place at 935 to 940, and yet the windows are not blown out.
That means they were still trying to decide how they were going to stage it.
In other words, this is as damning as it could possibly be, David, and it comes directly from the Connecticut State Police files.
Brian will elaborate.
He further, as the next slide shows, undertook the Google Earth study to orient where, in fact, the photograph had been taken from, where that large orange at the bottom ball represents the sun.
And then in the very next, he again overlay, in terms of a Google map of the area, to make it clear exactly what had happened.
Let's bring Brian in to comment already on this before we turn to new material and get Danny's thoughts about what we've established already, which is, this is, in my opinion, David and I have been doing this for a long time, definitive proof of the complicity of the Connecticut State Police and of the medical examiner Wayne Carver in a scam, a gigantic scam and hoax on the American people to win the Sandy Hook shooting massacre.
Brian, Brian, bring in Brian please, David, and Danny both.
Brian?
Well, I'm here.
Yeah, I mean, the issue was that the image looked funny, and it does.
And Jim was right from the very beginning.
There's a lot that looks funny about this, and you've got to figure it out.
When police establish a crime scene, they establish an inner perimeter and an outer perimeter, and absolutely everybody who enters the inner perimeter needs to be logged in as entering the inner perimeter.
This area would be called the inner perimeter because the bullets had come Theoretically out of the windows into the parking lot, and so everybody there ought to be logged into the crime scene.
And we figured out that this particular video was shot.
We've learned a lot about the photo and a lot about other photos that go with it, but this particular image was taken around 6 o'clock, 536 on the 14th from the top of a Connecticut State Patrol crime scene unit van by Arthur Walkley.
Who is a detective with the state police and all we all we really had to do was establish a time on the photo and then from there once we've established it there's a lot more work that can be done on it but we're getting to the bottom of it and I think we found some very serious anomalies that need to be inspected and we can go through some of those today.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
David, I'd like you to invite Danny to add his thoughts about what we have here so far.
Danny is in the room.
So, Danny, you're welcome to speak.
Your mic is open, sir.
Hello, gentlemen.
Can you guys all hear me this morning?
Yes, go ahead, Danny.
Good to be with you, Dr. Fetzer.
It's nice to meet you, too, Brian.
I saw your work the other day, and David, it's really nice to meet you.
I've been listening to you for quite a long time.
Danny, Danny, Danny, get closer to the mic.
How about now?
Can you guys hear me?
Better.
Yeah, go ahead.
Yeah, what I noticed the other day after I saw Brian's work the other day is... You faded out, Danny.
You gotta stay closer to the mic.
Okay, how about now?
Can you guys hear me?
Yeah, go ahead.
I noticed the other day after he showed his pictures, they were pretty phenomenal when he zoomed in, but when you can see, just to comment on what you said, to see Wayne Carver standing there clear as day, Setting up before the crime even happened.
It's just over the top evidence, as Dr. Fetzer has pointed out, to show that this complete event was staged well ahead of time.
So, I mean, we have already known that, but now we can even tell better with the enhancement of the photograph that it was completely staged.
And as Brian said, this whole place would have been cordoned off as a crime scene completely, and nobody would be allowed Wow, incredible.
Dr. Fetzer?
Yeah, I have a theory and I'm going to roll it out.
sir.
Brian has done more work now.
If we proceed to the next photograph, you got more on the windows here.
Brian, why don't you pick it up from here?
Yeah.
I have a theory and I'm going to roll it out.
Actually, it came to me last night.
They had a problem with their crime scene that forced them to open up the windows.
Because nobody's going to teach a class with a bunch of children in 38 degree weather with the windows open.
And the problem was that the window that you're seeing on the left, or I think it's the center right here in this one, was already broken.
It's not safety glass.
And the window was broken.
So you got to think through this like a detective.
These guys are using this Sandy Hook School as a staged event.
So it's probably been secure for quite a while, while they planned the staged event.
But they had a problem.
The window was broken.
They didn't want to replace it, because that would unsecure the event.
So instead, they had to try to fudge with it.
And this particular area, it's sort of, I entitle the entire area of it, Me Thinks The Lady Thus Protested Too Much.
Because I think I figured out what happened.
They knew the window was broken.
They knew they were going to have to break the window.
They didn't want people to see that, or they knew they were going to have to do something with that problem.
And they had to figure out how to cover it up.
So as we advance, we can sort of talk through it and I'll show you how they did it because they made some very serious flaws with this particular thing.
And I think I know exactly how it progressed now.
So let's just keep going through it.
Let's go to the next slide, David, please.
Sure, absolutely.
So the window was broken.
I believe in advance.
I think that some hero kid six weeks before this threw a baseball or whatever in the parking lot and busted out the window.
It's not safety glass.
Nothing was up to code.
It should have been replaced, but they didn't want to unsecure the scene and I don't think anybody knew how to do it.
So they tried to cover it up by putting some holes in the tin above the window.
They realized that it was going to show that and it was going to be a problem.
So they opened the windows to try to conceal it.
I think it's just it's all early speculation, but it's it's fun to take a look at it because when you take a close look, let's go to the next photo.
You take a close look at this.
You'll see that there are problems with it.
Okay, the first problem being that the bullet hole on the upper right doesn't seem to exist in the earliest and most reliable photos.
It seems to have popped up much, much later.
The second thing is you can see the 10 running straight down the line and like a perfect alignment of three bullets up near where that window was broken by what I consider to be our unspoken hero, some kid that probably broke it with a baseball or something.
And that was the problem with the scene from the very beginning.
You got to look at it from these guys' perspective.
They were pulling up saying, hey, this is our stage.
This is where we're going to set up our false flag.
This is an abandoned school.
This is going to be our event.
But they had a broken window and they needed to deal with it.
So they tried to fix it by putting these three holes and then calling them a bullet hole.
But as you'll see that thing in the center,
is uh showing the angle all three directly in a line and they're showing the angle of the bullets the entry and uh unfortunately i think they they drilled the holes but they made a mistake they drilled the holes why the window was shut and that's going to explain a lot later on i think i oh brian that is so brilliant they drilled the holes when the window was shot when it was supposed to be so those rods would be
Pointing downward, it wouldn't even be possible to open the window now with those rods like that.
Danny, Danny, your thoughts about this?
I think Brian put his finger on something absolutely crucial.
When I first saw the photograph, I thought the rods were, this was all pointing outward.
It was only seeing the higher resolution Brian provided that I realized they were showing rods that were pointing inward, which is even more ridiculous.
Danny?
Okay, well, this particular part is very, very good.
I like the enhanced photo.
The reason why is definitely the... You're fading, Danny.
You're fading.
How about now?
Can you guys hear me?
You've got to stay louder than normal, Danny.
Okay, how about now?
That's about as loud as I can get.
The window is a problem with the hole in the glass.
I agree.
That's not a 5.56 hole.
Uh, some other object definitely broke that glass.
That's not a bullet hole.
But the rods going through the aluminum, the aluminum casing on the window is definitely a problem.
When you zoom in on the photo, you can clearly see the evidence that the holes look to me like they were drilled with a drill.
You can tell that by the way the metal protrudes inside the classroom.
That is not what a 5.56 round would do moving at 32 feet per second when it hits that aluminum.
Also, the fact that all three of those holes are lined up exactly at a zero degree, and that's very important for everybody to understand the degree or the angle of which way the bullet or the projectile came through the aluminum.
You got three, which appears to be almost zero degree bullets coming through from the parking lot.
Okay, and you could tell by the protrusion again from the rods when you zoom in, you can see that something probably a drill bit made made the metal protrude from the outside to the inside.
So, what that suggests is that whoever, you know, made those holes from the outside.
Now, I'd also like to point out something.
I don't know if Brian noticed this, but the elevation in the parking lot, the actual pavement, slopes downward just slightly from the base of the window down as you get out farther into the parking lot.
And if you look at some of the photos from the parking lot, that middle piece of aluminum appears to be well over six foot Six foot in height from the base of the parking lot.
So that would have mean that this guy, Adam, would have been having to hold the rifle up over his head to make these three perfect shots in a row at a zero angle.
If he would have been holding the rifle like a normal person shouldering it or even holding it at his waist haphazardly, those bullets would have been angled in an upward trajectory into the classroom.
To me, sir, this is quite bombshell, his work, and it shows that those three holes were made not only, as he said, when the window was closed, but it shows that the holes were made at a zero degree angle.
But again, lastly, when you zoom in and look at the protrusion that comes through the window, right where the rod comes through, you can actually see the elements from the drill bit.
That is not from a 5.56 bullet.
I'd like to point out that the 556 moves at 3,200 feet per second.
It's moving extremely fast.
It would not make a hole like that perfect on all three of them.
It would blow through that and there would be massive damage through that window.
You'd see a lot of shards.
Those windows were drilled, sir.
That's my opinion.
Joe Adams would have had to be seven feet tall to have fired those shots from outside in.
Yeah, and I've never heard of any report of him having fired any shots from outside into the classroom.
In other words, this whole scenario depicted here is simply absurd.
And I think Brian and Danny have nailed it.
I mean, this is so devastating to the official account.
Would you agree?
Yes, I would agree 100%.
And the idea that he would have had to have been, what, either seven feet tall or hold the gun above his head.
And what kind of accuracy are you going to have with that, right?
None.
Brian, you just exceeded yourself, my friend.
You did great work.
This is brilliant.
Do you want to stay on this image or go to the next?
We can move on.
But listen, this is kind of fun.
I call it me thinks the lady does protest it too much because I think that whoever was staging the event realized they had a problem, tried to fix it.
You know, this is when you practice to deceive, you know, this is one of those things where they had a problem.
The window was broken, they didn't want to replace it, unsecure it, have a window guy come in and do it.
So they just did everything they could to cover it up and they overdid it and over photographed it and overplayed it and you know this is this is to me just uh an example of either these guys were trying to cover it up or they knew they had a problem they didn't know how to deal with it and they just they just overplayed it.
How could the windows have been open when it was a 37 degree day outside?
I mean, you want to have to heat the classroom, opening the windows wouldn't work, so I think they had a problem right there, too.
Well, I think they probably changed how it was going to go down, and I think they were probably initially thinking that The kids were crawling out the windows and, you know, we were gonna play this off like these kids were getting shot at and they were crawling off the windows and then they changed their mind and things just got messy.
And so they couldn't put all the pieces together.
This is just an example.
Look, there are 10,000 anomalies that are difficult to explain in just these photos.
And remember, they redacted the vast majority of them.
Plus, erased all of the metadata on all of the evidence that they released from the public, thereby modifying the actual evidence.
When you pull out the metadata and modify a document, and they did this with the documents as well, so let's just keep going, but... Well, let me get Danny's comment on that.
Danny, I was stunned when Brian discovered that they'd removed all the metadata, which shows a place, a time, the location, the photographer, everything else, Well, I think he's 100% correct, sir.
to make them admissible in a court of law.
So I think by seeking to cover up, they in effect completely compromised all the fake evidence they staged for the sake of not being caught out.
I think they were in a dilemma.
Your thought?
Well, I think he's 100% correct, sir.
I mean, to totally strip all of the metadata, I think what he said the other day with you is that they went out of their way to strip all the metadata, not just some of it, sir.
All of it, a hundred percent.
That goes to show that they did not want those photos used.
They did not want any of that data.
I also think it's important to point out that with those pictures he showed enhanced like that, with the three arrows through the window as you zoom in and you see that protrusion.
Maybe go back, David, to that earlier photograph?
They also, sir, did not show the obvious.
And the obvious is, why can't we see the damage when the bullet went through the aluminum and hit the wall behind it?
They're not showing that.
They only show the arrow damage.
They don't show where the bullet hit on the wall on the inside of the building.
As a matter of fact, they won't show us any of that evidence whatsoever.
Well, that's a great point, Danny.
I mean, the bullet went somewhere, but it hit the wall.
So where the hell is a wall with a pockmark?
This is a reason why they insisted that those involved in the demolition of the building had to sign lifetime gag orders that they could never talk about anything they'd seen or had not seen inside the school building, such as no blood on the floors and no pockmarks in the walls.
I mean, this is...
The fact that they had to sign gag orders at all is an indication that this was a cover-up.
You don't withhold evidence from the public and not allow people to speak about it.
Absolutely!
I love it!
Brian!
Brian!
Continue!
Can you zoom in on that photo by chance real quick?
I'm going to try.
Let me see if I can.
Very good.
Danny, sometimes we can hear you clearly and sometimes not.
The best you can do, get as close as you can.
Okay, right there if you can hear me.
Look, you can see right where the arrow comes through the aluminum.
Look at the protrusion.
That's not what a 5.56 bullet would do when it hits that aluminum.
You can see the drilling marks from the drill right there at the base.
Right at the base of the aluminum where the arrow comes through.
Those are drill marks, sir.
That's not, that's not a 5.56 or 9mm bullet.
You can tell by the residue!
You can tell by the residue!
Yeah, you have the filings!
The filings from the aluminum from the drill!
Yeah, that's filings.
How bad is that?
How bad is that, David?
That's filings from a drill, guys.
That is not a 5.56 or 9mm bullet.
Okay, and the fact is, I don't know if you noticed when we went back out in the parking lot, but you can see the elevation to that piece of aluminum has got to be close to 7 feet, between 6 and 7 feet, as you're standing on the pavement outside.
So again, was this kid standing on a police car when he was firing these bullets at the window?
I'm not sure how he got to this elevation.
Don't trip over the light.
Yeah, yeah.
The lights and all the cords we've set up to do the filming... Once you pull the light bar... I like that.
But this clearly shows that it was staged, sir.
And those are not bullet holes.
And they did make a lot of mistakes.
And this is just one more of the major mistakes that they made, in my opinion, sir.
Yep.
We're hoping Brian can rejoin.
Obviously, there's a tough connection here.
Let's see if he's there.
I'll bring him back on.
He keeps cutting.
There we go.
Sorry.
Okay, let's go to the next.
Brian continues.
Danny's made some excellent observations here.
Go for it.
Well, as you'll see, and I think I'm going to write a blog for you for this, Jim, but I think I can explain everything here with the one flaw or one of the thousands of flaws in the structure, and that was the broken window.
If the broken window wasn't there, they wouldn't have had to go through all this staging to try to cover it up.
They had a problem and they just focused on it too much and made a big deal out of it.
And, you know, to go back to Jim's book, he was right.
There was something wrong.
He just didn't put his finger on it.
So, you know, we came in and did some more research.
Now we're starting to put the pieces together.
A little Sherlock Holmes never hurt, and a little thinking never hurt.
That chapter was authored by William Allen Powell, who's down under, and he did a brilliant work on it.
He didn't get every detail right, but he contributed two chapters, 50 photos from the Adam Lonza residence, which was also staged, and then 50 more photographs from the Sandy Hook crime scene, Okay, yeah, let's move off the windows and move to some of the other flaws that are a little more obvious.
I want to heap praise on William Alwyn Powell, who contributed that chapter to the book.
Brian, continue.
Okay, yeah, let's move off the windows and move to some of the other flaws that are a little more obvious.
Okay, let me say something about this.
If you'll notice, this exhibit here is not marked, okay?
And something I'm going to tell you about the scene is that this is a photo of the shotgun in the back of Adam Lanza's car.
And it's an unlabeled exhibit, and it's dark outside when this photo is taken.
So they still haven't labeled the exhibit.
Now, what I want you to know about the scene is that to the right of the vehicle, as you're looking into the trunk, you'll see two sweatshirts on the ground and one empty cartridge.
And those are labeled 501, 502, and 503.
Now, they're going to pull this shotgun out of the trunk and go process it in the back of a CSU van, and they're going to label the shotgun 505.
So let's go to the next one, okay?
Okay, what did they label that?
Can anybody read that?
I can't see it on my screen.
It says 505.
Okay, so now they've labeled it 505.
So the question is, where is 504?
If 501, 502, and 503 are laying next to the car to the right, where is 504?
And why didn't they label that?
So that's all I'm going to really say about that.
It's just a shotgun.
You can get the serial numbers off it.
It's no big deal.
Let's go to the next one though.
But where is 504?
That's the question.
Okay, this is looking out the windows into the parking lot.
And as you'll see, there's a minivan here and a blue car off to the right.
You see the two sort of bluish and greenish cars that are just to the right of the minivan?
There's something I want to point out about this, okay?
They hastily slapped some crime scene tape on it, but they didn't expand the inner perimeter.
So the parking lot has received, they're saying, has received incoming fire.
Now I want you to look under the minivan.
If you look down below the bottom, you'll see a little green cone and you'll see radiator fluid or water or fluid that has leaked out of the van.
And I'm telling you, because I've seen the photos, the water has leaked out of the radiator and has flowed back toward the parking lot.
Okay, so just notice the positions of the three cars in a row.
Okay, because what they're going to say is that a bullet went into the radiator, leaked all the fluid out and those two cars that you're seeing in the back there also have bullet holes in them so let's let's move on okay this is 509 and as you can see it's wet now fluid dries
So that morning somebody staged this incoming round into the radiator and they focused on this.
Remember we're at 501, 502, 503 and now we're labeled finally with another exhibit 509.
All right?
That's all I want to say about that.
That becomes important for internet investigators to see that that fluid's underneath that radiator.
Okay.
This is 506.
This is the round that's in the back of the trunk of one of the vehicles.
So, I'm trying to put together the pieces as to where's 501, 50... How come they didn't...
Label these pieces of... Now, according to the crime scene manuals, whenever you label something 506, that means it gets its own independent report.
So anything that's 501, 502, 503, 504, they get an independent report on the analysis.
So that said, they fired a bullet into the back of this car, they found the bullet finally after it was dark, They had photographed the incoming round in a different picture, but they labeled this one 506.
Okay, let's go to the next one.
So here's another bullet that hit one of the blue cars that you saw in the background.
Now what I want you to notice about this bullet, we're going to take a closer look at the hole.
That car had a car parked right next to it.
Okay, so you have a very tight space in a tight parking lot and this bullet hole somehow entered this vehicle at a particular angle.
Let's go to the next one and take a look at it.
Oh, yeah.
Does that bullet look like it came from the windows?
No.
Does that bullet hole look like it was at such a steep angle that it drove its way in, or does it look like it was just fired into the car from the side?
It was fired head-on.
I think it's interesting.
I don't know if I'd put all the pieces together on it, but I think it's interesting.
So take a look at the next one.
when you see the space between the cars.
Go ahead.
Thank you.
I'm hearing typing.
Did we lose Brian for a moment here?
Let me see if we got him.
Yeah, I apologize.
I don't know.
There he is.
I'm here.
I'm here.
Okay, so that car looks like it was staged to me.
Yeah, now we see the position of that vehicle.
So how did that bullet come from out of that room with all those kindergartners directly into the side of that car?
Just an interesting point.
There's no way.
We're so sloppy in setting this up.
Danny, I think we want Brian to do one more image out in the parking lot.
Then I want your comments.
Brian, that one more image.
Yes.
Brian, you want to comment on this?
I'm still here.
Go ahead, Brian.
We hear you.
Go ahead.
Okay.
Yeah, let's just move on.
I just think it's interesting.
Let's move on to the next one.
Let's take a bigger picture of what's going on.
Well, I wanted to get Danny's comments on what you've been talking about the cars and the bullet holes.
Danny?
Well, that last one with the blue car is totally staged because the bullet was fired directly head-on and the way the car is parked, there's no way That the bullet came in at that angle from the window and made a right hand turn and went into that car.
That suggests to me that that car had that bullet hole before they pulled it into that parking slot.
They just use that car as a prop.
I don't there's no way that that bullet was created at that angle from the window or from in the parking lot, or they'd be suggesting that there was some sort of a firefight in close quarters.
I've got to say, I think there's an effort to keep Brian off of the air, or interfering with his internet connection.
I've had this experience many, many times in the past, so it does not surprise me.
I think there's an effort to keep Brian off of the air, interfering with his internet connection.
I've had this experience many, many times in the past, so it does not surprise me.
Here's Brian.
Okay.
We'll keep Brian back in.
Yeah, I'm sorry.
I missed a little bit of that.
Anyway, let's move forward.
Let's move forward to 25.
I think Brian wants to go inside the school.
Go, Brian.
Okay.
Nobody crawled out of a room bleeding.
These are the hallways.
Nobody left any blood trail.
I went ahead and went back through some of my old murder crime scene photos.
It just doesn't happen.
So there's only two possibilities here.
Either everybody died instantly or... Without bleeding.
Yeah.
Or, you know, they're just lying.
Or the crime scene cleanup team cleaned it up.
And let me point this out, okay?
I want you to think through this.
If everybody's dead, The medical examiner is going to come in and issue the death certificate.
The whole scene is going to be cordoned off.
This is the inner perimeter.
So, at some point in time, the medical examiner is going to come in and recover the bodies.
Okay?
They're just going to bag them and cart them out and take them down to where they're going to process them.
It isn't until after the lead detective releases the scene that the cleanup crew comes in.
I don't believe they ever released the scene because they intended to tear the building down.
I don't think there was ever a cleanup crew that came in because the place is just filthy.
So let's let's take a couple look at a couple other looks at it.
Okay, this to me is the most devastating photo I have found.
Let me just read you, Trooper Christopher Vangelis, what he's seeing from directly from the other side upon entrance.
He says, Sergeant Bahamonde stated that there were bodies in the hallway near the front door.
I could see the bodies of two women lying in the hallway about 15 feet from the door to the main office.
I saw a large pool of blood was spread from one of the women.
They did not move at all.
Okay, so that's part of his police report.
So, that said, who cleaned up the blood that you ought to be seeing on the floor?
Because the ME just basically picks up the bodies and drags them out and waits for the detective to clear the scene before the cleaners come in and clean up the blood.
You're so spot on about this, Brian.
By the way, Kelly Watt, who's uh, who's uh, David, go ahead.
Didn't you have someone who told you there wasn't any blood?
Kelly, Kelly, Kelly Watt pursued this question.
She has her own commercial and home cleaning service, so she knew blood is a biohazard.
It has to be disposed and fully documented from original source.
It's ultimate disposition.
So naively in the beginning, when she still thought it might be true, she began making inquiries as to who cleaned up the blood.
No one could answer.
One agency after another shuttled her around and eventually she was sent to Lieutenant Paul Vance of the Connecticut State Police, who was in charge, and she asked who cleaned up the blood to which Vance just blurted out, what blood?
And that's because it wasn't any blood.
As Brian is documenting here, he forgot there was supposed to be blood because of all those mix-ups.
How stunning.
Brian.
Oh.
Yeah, I just think it's... Okay, now, I'm just... Let me say this.
I don't know how much time we have.
I'm just going to say one thing really importantly, okay?
There's a reason that they had to deauthenticate every report and everything anybody said.
If I am a defense attorney in Connecticut and my client has been charged with a crime, it may be that this officer that wrote this report is the complaining witness.
So I've got to do my job to get my guy off because I'm a defense attorney.
So I have to prove that he lied so that I can get my guy off.
If anybody lied, everybody lied.
And if everybody lied, then the entire structure will fall because defense attorneys will show that nobody has enough integrity to tell the truth.
So they absolutely have to keep this evidence out.
Everybody has to get out of jail free card.
Everybody.
Because otherwise the entire justice system in the entire area will fall.
Because if it's... Danny, I want your thoughts about the blood and all this.
Danny.
Well, there's no blood in a massive murder scene where we're told that over 150 rounds, I believe you were saying, were fired.
Also, there's a lack of pot marks.
I've never seen a shooting where 150 rifle rounds were discharged and we can't see any pot marks in the walls, and we can't see any blood or any carnage anywhere.
This is the cleanest murder scene I've ever seen.
The cleanest mass murder in history!
It's definitely the cleanest, but again, inside there's no pot marks from the 5.56.
There'd be nice holes in the walls all over the place.
We'd see dust on the ground from the pot marks, from the chest, from the cinder blocks.
That's what we would see.
We don't see that.
It looks like this place was mopped up, cleaned up, and sterilized.
And I don't see any evidence of any bullets whizzing through the air, hitting anything.
And I don't see any evidence of blood anywhere.
It's just ridiculous that they're trying to suggest that all those children died.
In this room, or in this area, and we don't see any blood, and we can't see any pot marks from all the bullets.
We also don't see any of the bullet casings right here.
I'd like to see the five, five, six bullet casings on the floor.
I don't see any.
That's right.
If he fired over 150 rounds, where the hell are the bullet casings?
And of course, in this case, you have the report from the officer that there were bodies in the hallway, and one was bleeding extensively.
No bodies, no blood, no shell casings.
My, and this is a devastating photograph.
I think you got it right.
This is really powerful when you put it together with a testimonial report officially filed.
Continue.
Yeah, let's just look at the next one real quick.
I think it's just another picture of a hall.
And again, I'm going to say Anybody who goes crawling out of a room that's injured is going to be bleeding.
There's going to be a blood trail.
It's not there.
So that's, that's it.
That's it.
Let's take a look at the next one.
Okay.
Quick question for Dr. Fetz or any of you guys.
Did anyone go through all of the interior shots of the school that were taken?
And is there any way that there could have been something spotted in one of those photographs indicating that these photographs were maybe from, or that the, backing Dr. Fetzer's claim that the school had been closed since 2008, like a calendar or something that you could blow up and it would tell, there's a 2008 on the calendar.
Why would they have an old, a four-year-old calendar on a wall in a school?
Any of the classrooms, anything like that?
Yeah, it's funny you say that.
It's funny.
Yeah, it's funny you say that.
They staged two calendars inside the photos and they both haphazardly wrote in December 14th in writing on it.
I mean, it's just there.
You're talking about fake calendars that were added to the scene?
Yeah, they did that.
Look, they tried.
They gave it a shot.
But remember what these guys are working on.
They tried, David!
They tried!
I tried.
Remember what they're working with, okay?
I want you to think about this.
Somebody high up in the government decided that they were going to run this drill.
Somebody decided that this old abandoned school named Sandy Hook would be a good fit for it.
They evaluated the location and they say, hey, let's run the drill here.
They might not have had all the details worked out.
And then they decided that it was going to become a big false flag.
But there was problems.
The school was old.
The roof was bad.
The floors were dirty.
Nobody had cleaned the place up.
It was just getting old and moldy.
And so they sent in a crew to try to stage it up the best they can.
And the crew ran into one major problem, and that was the window.
The window was broken.
Do they fix it?
How do they deal with it?
The second major problem was they probably didn't have a very good script as to how it would all go down until later on in the development process.
So, they basically plugged a scene into a crime that hadn't been committed, and then the staging crew just had to figure it out.
I would suggest that it's likely that the detectives involved with photographing the scene were also involved in deciding how to set it all up.
Oh yeah, I agree.
And let me point out, Brian, The fact that there was a broken window there means this was not an operating school, because obviously the principal would not have allowed a broken window to exist in a school that was operating.
That's why it was so devastating.
It was prima facie proof the school had been closed.
Which is why they opened the windows.
Which is why they opened it and had to fabricate something.
Danny, your thoughts here.
Your thoughts.
Well, I agree with that, sir.
I mean, you know, obviously the school was in disrepair, but we're also forgetting, or maybe we haven't got to it yet, the evidence that came out a few years later about the gentleman that went to the school and purchased the desk two years prior, I believe it was, before the event.
2010, yes.
Yeah, and he walked around the school and was able to go through the classrooms And pick out the desk where he said that stuff was piled by in the middle of the classroom and the school was obviously a disrepair and not being used.
I believe also there was a comment from the janitor, the custodian that let him in to pick out the desk.
I told him that the school was closed and we just use this school for storage.
I mean, it doesn't get much better than that, sir.
That's over the top evidence showing that the school was closed.
Therefore, they used it as a stage.
Yeah, absolutely right.
Absolutely right.
Brian, do continue.
Do continue.
Okay.
This, I think other people have pointed this out, but I saw it myself and then realized that I remembered something from way back.
If you look on the upper right near the door, you'll see a little bit of red writing on the wall.
Let's go ahead and zoom in on that.
Sure.
I can't zoom on it that way, unfortunately.
No, you don't want to.
The next one, David.
The next one.
The next one, I'm sorry.
There you go.
Okay.
Okay.
That says, need breach.
Need breach.
Written in red with an X on it.
Wow!
That's an instruction about a stage.
They're telling them they need to breach the door.
This is like 9-11 at the Pentagon in the C-ring.
There's this big circle that cannot have been apart from a plane which was coming at an angle because it wouldn't have been symmetrical.
And it says in writing, Punch out, they used C4 to blow the hole to make it look as though it'd been an effect of a plane hitting the Pentagon, but it was all manufactured and they forgot to remove the punch out instruction right on the wall.
Here you got, need breach, which they never, it would appear, followed through, right?
You see no evidence of a breach.
Correct, Brian?
Wow.
Isn't it stunning, Danny?
You want to comment?
Yeah, this picture is, I've never seen this picture before.
Sir, the fact that they wrote need to breach on the wall there and left it on there.
I don't know how much worse it can get.
This is over the top.
I've never seen this before.
I hope this photo goes out in many blogs and gets written about.
If we could zoom in on it even a little bit more.
But the fact that it says need breach is over the top.
I've never seen this before.
This is a first for me.
Very good.
Very good.
Great find, Brian.
Great find.
Continue.
Scooby-Doo could have solved this one.
Well, thank you very much, Danny.
I appreciate the compliment.
Okay.
Go for it.
This is supposedly the Bushmaster weapon.
I want you to see that this appears to be my earliest and most reliable image.
Again, it's not labeled.
So they haven't labeled it.
And the second thing is look at the firing pin or the safety position.
Go ahead, keep talking.
The safety position on this photo is on fire.
Okay, so they're saying this one is on fire.
Okay, so let's take a look at the next one.
By the way, by the way, Scott Bennett knows.
Look at the corroded barrel of this weapon.
He says that means that barrel, at least, had been in storage probably for the Vietnam era barrel.
You know, they put together this weapon, Brian.
This is not an authentic weapon.
Even if it's a planted weapon, it's not an authentic weapon.
It's a manufactured weapon with a corroded barrel.
Okay.
So now in the next photo, they finally labeled the exhibit 17.
Somebody put the gun on safe, and then they laid an unspent casing on top of the gun.
Yeah, that's bizarre, isn't it?
That is absolutely stupid.
Yeah, go back to the one before it was labeled, there's no shell casing on it, David, see?
So what they've done is they have planted evidence even in manufacturing this photograph and producing this photograph.
Go back now to the one with his label, that actually, yeah, 31.
And now 32, I think, gives us more of a close-up, or is 32 from the earlier?
Yeah, there it is.
There it is.
There it is.
Brian.
Well, there's no way that bullet fell on that gun.
And the gun has been put on safe.
What are you trying to say when you stick an unspent casing on top of the weapon at the murder scene when you're trying to photograph it?
It's just stupid.
Well, this was the original Amateur Hour, isn't it?
Danny, Danny, your thoughts?
Well, there's no way.
It doesn't make sense that the bullet casing would be sitting there on top of the rifle when they're taking the photo like that.
Why would they do that?
I mean, that makes no sense whatsoever.
And also, the moving of the safety on the weapon from fire to safe also doesn't make any sense either.
None whatsoever.
I don't quite understand what they were thinking when they shot these particular photos.
Well, these guys, you know, they're not professionals at staging crime scenes, and it showed.
They made a lot of amateur blunders that Brian has sorted out here.
I love it!
Brian, continue.
Yeah, it's just an amateur blunder.
This is not how you handle a murder weapon at a crime scene.
I checked with a murder detective and I went through the manuals.
Yes, you have to make the gun safe, but that's like one of the last things you would ever do is pull the magazine, lay a bullet on top of it, an unspent casing, and put the gun on safe.
You just wouldn't even touch it.
I'd like to point out that if you were going to stage it or if you were going to make the weapon safe, you would probably lay it on the other side so the bolt faced up.
Often you would pull the bolt back and the bolt, the bolt hold open button and keep the bolt to the rear.
That way when you look at the weapon, everybody can see the bolt is open and it is clearly not in a battery position to be fired and also the chamber is cleared.
So I think it's very strange that the The weapon is laying down with the bolt facing the ground and then the casing on the opposite side of the gun.
To me, that's very significant.
Let me point this out about the crime scene.
Okay.
Early, early and reliable evidence says that they thought there was 2 shooters.
That's why there's 2 sweaters staged in the parking lot.
So, it would be a real investigation.
It's not the open and shut suicide.
So, whose DNA is on that bullet casing?
Is it Ryan's or Adam's?
Who loaded the casing into the magazine?
Is there an accomplice?
All these questions would be things that real investigators, if you really wanted to solve a crime, that's why they wouldn't touch this stuff.
They wouldn't do this.
It just wouldn't.
It might even be the DNA of Lieutenant Paul Vance.
Might be.
All right, next photo.
This is one that went with the earlier set, and I just put them in order.
Take a close look at the entry wound.
Right, this is what Danny's been commenting on all along, that that's not what you'd have if this were a bona fide shooting with a .223 high-velocity bullet.
Yeah, but it came in from the outside.
They didn't drill it from the inside out.
And it wasn't a bullet anyway, because it would leave such big marks.
Right, right, right, right.
So Brian, how does that add up?
It was supposed to be from the outside.
Are they claiming that Adam Lanza fired shots into the classroom from outside the building?
I mean, this is just incredible.
I've never heard such a story.
No, they put the holes in the window to cover up the fact that the glass was broke.
I know, I know, but allegedly the cause of the hole in the window is not the drilling, of course, but they're claiming from firing shots from outside in?
No, they're not claiming it, but that's what's there in the evidence is that that hole was made from the outside coming in, which again is why they had to do what they did with the windows.
I'll show you later.
That's embarrassingly bad.
Yeah, we don't have a lot of time now, so move our expeditions.
I'm gonna close it out.
This is not where a class was happening.
There's no blood.
This is supposed to be the room where the kids were shot against that wall.
So, that's all there is to that.
There's the blood.
Yeah, no blood anywhere here.
This is...
No bullet pot marks anywhere to be seen.
Over 150, five, five, six rounds and not one pot mark?
Come on.
Nothing?
How's that possible?
No blood and no pot marks.
This is the first shooting I've ever seen with a weapon.
And there's no evidence or no damage anywhere on the walls, no debris anywhere.
That makes no sense at all to me.
Zero.
Well, Dr. Fetzer, we already know the name of your next book, which will be Everybody Lied at Sandy Hook.
You can bring us all together and dispense with the slides, David, if you like, for a few more little comments here.
I just want to congratulate Brian on the brilliance of his work.
Danny's confirming it.
I think we're all on the same page.
This is devastating proof.
The whole thing was staged precisely as claimed I compliment William Allen Powell for being the first to put his finger on this crucial photograph in the window as Akita unraveling all of this.
Brian, do you have a final thought?
No, I mean, I'm just starting.
Look, I don't think I'm going to do an investigation on Sandy Hook.
Right.
My overall point is How much evidence do you need?
What will you accept as evidence?
What is acceptable?
Yeah, when is enough enough?
Danny, your final thoughts?
Well, one of the big problems is the photograph that we dug up of the kids graduating high school.
I'd like to point that out.
That's a big problem.
They're alive and well.
Yes.
And that, you know, that they are alive and we have a photograph of them.
But going back to the school, they made so many mistakes in their evidence, leaving out the blood, the bullet, the pot marks, the drilling of the aluminum with a drill bit from the outside to the inside, leaving the drill marks.
I mean, it just goes on and on, sir, forensically.
You know, I would have loved to walk through the school before they tore it down.
It would have been a treasure trove of evidence, but Of course they tore it down because they don't ever want anybody like us to take a look at it.
Wonderful, Danny.
I'm so glad you could join us today.
David, your final thoughts?
this was like watching an episode of the naked gun police squad with you've got so much evidence.
It is just unbelievable.
I mean, the Supreme Court has to take this up.
You've got to be vindicated.
It was such a sloppy plan that it's unbelievable.
If anyone wants to follow up, yeah, they can go to my crowdfunding source at GiveSinGo.com slash FundingFencer.
I sure welcome this, because the evidence is overwhelming.
The law is on my side, but I need your support.
David.
Thank you so much for your ongoing efforts here to expose this fraud to the American people.
It is my pleasure.
Again, please, please contribute.
You've seen the evidence that Dr. Fetzer and his colleagues have provided indicating this was a false flag.
Please help him win his case.
GiveSendGo.com forward slash funding Fetzer.
Dr. Fetzer, we'll see you again next week.
All of you gentlemen, thank you so much for being here.
Appreciate it very much.
Terrific, David.
▲
Export Selection