All Episodes
Previous Next
March 21, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
59:05
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (20 March 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And welcome back, folks, to Truth Vs. News Incorporated here on the spring, start of the spring equinox in time.
And we're right in the middle of a big topic and it's been a pretty heavy first hour.
You got to hear Laura Logan at the end.
It was just tremendous.
But now let's just go on to rainbows and unicorns, Jim.
Let's go a little lighter now.
Well, it's interesting you mention that.
We have a retiring House Democrat, Stephanie Murphy, unloading on the party.
You can't keep promising rainbows and unicorns.
This is very nice, very honest.
Retiring representative of Democrat from Florida unloaded on Biden and the Democrat Congressional Campaign Committee, blaming them for steering the Democrat Party into oblivion come the November midterms.
I can't tell you the number of times I said, you can't keep promising rainbows and unicorns when your political reality is such narrow margins in the House and a dead even Senate.
They took the difference between rainbows and unicorns and political reality, which is anger and disappointment, and turned that anger and disappointment against their own members.
Hardball tactics are consistently used by Democrats to push members to take one for the team, to satisfy the Democrat leadership.
Some of those would come to me and say, I can't afford to tick off the DCCC and put my money at risk, or I can't afford to have my base attacking me.
I can't afford to have the millions of dollars ads I'm watching running your district against me.
It's unfortunate that that's where we have come.
Murphy Slam, representative Sean Patrick Maloney, Democrat of New York, the DCCC chief, is having a self-interest in pushing members to vote for radical policies if it means a promotion for himself from party leaders in the future.
I believe the DCCC exists for one reason and one reason alone, that is incumbent protection and expanding.
The majority said, I don't believe that the person who runs the DCCC should be a member who is elected.
Because inevitably that member has further aspirations.
To ascend to Democrat leadership, you have to secure the progressive vote.
Securing the progressive votes make it difficult for you also then protect moderates and create space for them to do what they need to do to win and hold seats.
I think that's just a structure misaligned to do what ought to be the sole purpose, incumbent retention and expanding the majority.
Indeed, it's a recipe for the destruction of the Democratic Party from within.
Not everyone agrees.
Anthony Sabatini, Republican of Florida, running in the district from which she is retiring, said Murphy is just whining about party politics because the Democratic Party lost control of Florida.
In recent months, voter registration has tipped Republican for the first time in history.
Noting Murphy voted with Pelosi the vast majority of the time, Sabatini suggests he has no right to complain about the radical left.
Despite her rhetoric, Stephanie Murphy was very left-wing and voted with Pelosi 98% of the time, voted against the entire mega-agenda.
The truth is, the radical Communist-Democrat party has gone so far left that even hardened liberals like Murphy aren't extreme enough to gain leadership positions.
Here's Anthony Sabatini tweeting, Joe Biden is officially the worst president in American history, with which I believe 90% of Americans, even Democrats who wouldn't say it out loud, would agree.
Murphy's among 31 House Dems who have decided not to run again, with motives such as retiring from the public for personal reasons, or to run for a different office, or to avoid being dumped out flat on their ass.
This amounts to the largest mass exodus in three decades.
The retirements greatly favor Republicans due to the incumbent advantage.
Republicans are heading into the midterm, leading Democrats on the nation's top issues.
Among them favoring the Republicans, the economy, 48 to 35 percent.
Jobs, 46 to 37.
Immigration, 45 to 38.
Energy, 42 to 39.
jobs, 46 to 37, immigration, 45 to 38, energy, 42 to 39.
They're going to go down hard.
Meanwhile, we have Patrick Byrne reporting, there's enough evidence that he's certified three or more states.
At the risk of becoming a target of DHS on suspicion of being a domestic terrorist, here's an update on investigation into the 2020 election.
Michael Gableman, a retired justice from the Supreme Court of Wisconsin, acting as a special counsel, has investigated the Wisconsin election, written an official report saying it should never have been certified and should be decertified.
Garland Favorito's report on Fulton County, Georgia found hundreds of thousands of votes that were out of whack.
They either had no providence, no ballot, no image, whatever.
The investigation of the election in Arizona, 740,000 ballots with improper chain of title, hundreds of thousands of votes clearly illegal, no providence, appearing on the Dominion machines, but nowhere else.
Patrick said Wisconsin has 10, Georgia has 16, Arizona has 11 for a total of 37.
Biden won with 306.
If you subtract 37, that's down to 269.
Biden won with 306.
If you subtract 37, that's down to 269.
He no longer has a 270 he needs.
And that's only talking about these three states and not three others we're not talking about.
If we look at the Gableman Report, the Fabarito Report, the work of Dr. Shiva, Jovan Pulitzer, Ben Cotton, Doug Lewin, Logan in Arizona, you know it's true and that it's kind of heavy.
But we must not be misled into thinking the situation is hopeless.
There are total ways we can fix this.
Even America's dire financial straits can be fixed.
Here's a report about Gableman right here in Wisconsin.
I'm very proud of this guy.
He's been massively attacked in attempts to discredit him by the Democrats.
Gableman found that the Wisconsin Election Commission, led by major Biden donors and partisans, Democrats Ann Jacobs and Mark Thompson,
Exhibited a pattern of misconduct that rose to new heights during the 2020 election cycle, where new election-related policies were spread throughout the state, such as the expanded use of unlawful drop boxes, fraudulent use of the indefinitely confined status without having been approved either by the administrative rulemaking process, ensuring changes in law are vetted and properly noticed public meetings are by receiving a majority vote of the commission.
They, of course, have denied wrongdoing.
He wrote Gableman to purposely report and catalog the numerous questionable and unlawful action to various actors in a 2020 election.
Absolutely right.
In relation to Georgia, we have another report, how Georgia Secretary of State Ravenberger wrote to Georgia congressional members Pence and others, claiming that false allegations about the general election were being made by the president and his ally.
The contents of his letter dramatically contradicted findings by the Georgia General Assembly based on extensive first-hand testimony from three hearings, December 3rd, Senate Judiciary Subcommittee December 10th, House Government Affairs Committee December 30th, Senate Judiciary Subcommittee
Moreover, the oral testimony of witnesses and subsequently the written testimony provided ample evidence in 2020 Florida general election was so compromised by systemic irregularities and voter fraud that it too should not have been certified.
And we have similar reports bountiful from Arizona again and again and again.
This is truly disgusting.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, this is going to be the litmus test and the Rubicon to see are we going to survive as a republic or are we going to end in a smoldering inferno of chaos and a police state of madness.
Each state is in charge of their own votes and submitting them to the Congress for voting in the president.
In each state, Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin, needs to pull back their votes based on fraud, based on the lies and the corruption that's occurred, and recertify all of this.
Patrick Byrne never voted for Donald Trump the first time.
He sort of stepped into this, you know, Capacity and this has been throwing money at a lot of these problems, but there's a lot of problem with how this whole thing has unfolded, because it should have been stopped.
It should not have taken this long to get where we're at, and it should not be requiring excessive amounts of time or energy to correct this, but yet it is.
And that's the real Civil War, Revolutionary War that we're in, are these agents of corruption that are obsessed with keeping, again, the worst president in the history of the United States into office.
He's a fraud.
And no one on the federal level, you don't see anyone standing up in the federal Congress or in the House or the Senate, talking about this and having a hearing like Ron Johnson had with attorney Tom Rents and others.
They ought to have hearings with these people presenting to the Congress just how criminally revelational all of this evidence is.
So we'll see if it happens.
Jim?
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think it's interesting that that woman, that Democrat, who had seemed to vote along with the majority of Democrats the whole time, even said that she can't handle it anymore.
They have just completely gone off the rails at this point.
So many of those Democrats have had to just.
Leave and you know, it's hard to get into office like that.
They've probably dedicated their whole life to go in there and then they realize that the the Democrats are a bunch of cutthroats.
They stab each other in the back.
There's there's never any sort of camaraderie.
They're always looking for a one-up.
I've I've lived through that personally that it's just seems like the Democrats that have taken over the party.
They, there's no end to the amount of like political correctness, or the amount of the way that they will throw each other under the bus so I think it's probably pretty telling that so many of these people are just stepping out.
They also know that the writings on the wall that Biden was not democratically elected.
mainstream news.
It's so it's still so fascinating to me that Fox and like other platforms still won't even admit that I think, you know, it'll come out eventually.
I mean, everyone knows that that's what happened.
And there's probably a lot of Democrats who would rather anyone who has a conscience left would probably just walk away then continue with the with the voting fraud.
And it's gonna catch up to them.
I don't know if they can continue it in 2024.
I gotta admit, my respect for Fox News has just plummeted.
They've been disgusting about Ukraine and a host of other issues.
Meanwhile, exclusive Dr. Collins blindsided my first question on takedown email.
Dr. Francis Collins, this is the Director of the National Institutes of Health, caught off guard when he was asked for the first time about a report members of Congress issued that revealed new information, including email.
Collins set out urging a takedown of the Great Barrington Declaration.
Collins, head of the National Institutes of Health until December 19, 2021, called for, quote, a quick and devastating published takedown of the declaration, which called for a more balanced approach to combating the COVID-19 pandemic.
In an email he sent in October of 2020, just days after the document was authored by three epidemiologists, In appearance on Fox, hours after the panel's report was released, he was confronted about the email.
Host Neil Cavuto said about the report's claims that White House under Trump made attempts to undermine the COVID response.
Collins said he was trying to stay out of the political side of it, declined to comment, But then Cuvoto specified the takedown email, and Collins said, well, okay, if it's that specific.
Yes, there were people, particularly Dr. Scott Atlas, who said, don't worry about this business of putting on masks or asking people to isolate themselves and stay physically distant.
Just let it rip.
And let the virus run throughout the country until everybody had it.
Then we'll have herd immunity, he added.
Well, the consequence would have been hundreds of thousands of additional deaths.
That didn't make sense to me.
But Scott Atlas, without any question, had it 100% correct, and Francis Collins knew better.
The declaration doesn't contain the R.I.P.S.
letter.
R.I.P., of course, but knowing lockdowns had a devastating impact on the U.S.
and other countries, urged officials to be more focused in their policies to protect the elderly and others who are vulnerable to let everyone else live their lives.
Collins was not expected to question about the email he sent to Tony the Rat, Clifford Lane, and Alex Lawrence Tabak occurring to the missive obtained by the Epoch Times.
Apologies for the ambush, Emma Wotazinsk and NIH spokesman told Collins in the missive.
The producer said the interview would focus on Omicron and your time as director.
She sent a link to the congressional panel report and posted the section relating to Collins.
Renate Miles, another NIH spokeswoman, said that Collins was surprised during the interview that the issue of the Great Barrington Declaration, which arose in 2020, where he's made his position clear on many occasions, had been raised in 2021 as if it were a new issue.
But of course, the fact that he was trying to undermine and destroy it was what was new and deserved to be addressed.
Colin spoke out publicly against it in October 2020, said people who want to learn about why, has described the declaration as dangerous should Wikipedia, which of course is a politically tainted free encyclopedia loaded with propaganda.
Miles didn't respond when asked if Collins were aware it had been made public before the interview.
Atlas, former government advisor, said Collins' comments during his appearance were not factually correct.
I never once advised a president or anyone else to let the infection spread without mitigation.
He advised in various settings to increase protection for high-risk individuals in settings.
I repeatedly say the median in writing to follow recommended mitigations.
At the same time, The more targeted approach advocated by Atlas and the Declaration would have saved a massive number of lives while avoiding the death and destruction that ensued.
In other words, following the Declaration was the right thing to have done.
He further added, The broad lockdowns advised by Colin Fauci and Birx were contrary to science.
They failed to stop the spread, failed to protect the elderly from death, killed and destroyed millions.
Greatest failure of public health policy in modern history.
We know all about Tony the Rat.
Collins has defended support for harsh restrictions imposed during the pandemic, including the forced closure of schools and so-called non-essential businesses.
Other mischiefs obtained by the Epoch Times show Collins, Rynda Fauci, and Greg Gonsalves, a professor at the Yale School of Public Health, who has criticized the Great Barrington Declaration as well.
Gonsalves, Collins, and Fauci was reading the Congressional Report and how people were circulating as proof of a conspiracy against the Great Barrington Declaration.
Which it was.
All I can say is thank you for your service.
The GBD has had a noxious effect on the American response.
It doesn't surprise me you were fighting back behind the scene, which in my opinion is disgraceful.
Collins responded, it's interesting in effort to call out genuinely dangerous recommendations from the GBD is called a conspiracy.
Truth itself seemed to become a conspiracy in many minds.
That's right.
The GBD was representing the truth in a proper spot.
Get this.
Percentage of COVID-19 cases, hospitalization, and death by vaccination status in England, 7 Feb to 6 March of this year.
Look at the red.
Those are the VACs.
Look at the green, the non-VACs.
Overwhelmingly more.
80% of the cases, 80% of the hospitalizations, 92% of the deaths are among the vaccinated.
So here you have Fauci and these other cretins advocating policies that have led to mathy death and devastation.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's also Donald Trump as president.
The man I voted for, the man I supported.
When you look at that graph, Jim, of all the people that have died with the vaccination, is Donald Trump still supporting vaccination?
Is he still supporting, I got the shot, so should you?
Are you still saying that this is a moral and a healthy thing that Americans and the people of this world should do?
If you do, you're a fool or a liar, because obviously now we've got the data that overwhelmingly confirms our predictions, our suspicions, in the very beginning, and that is that this vaccine is a bioweapon.
This vaccine has no ability whatsoever to keep people healthy, and that this vaccine came under Fauci, it came under the CDC, it was developed at What, Wuhan, Fort Detrick possibly, a U.S.
military experiment.
We see now biolabs in Ukraine and all over the place.
This has been coming from a long time.
There's a deluge of evidence and testimony and suspicious material.
Rainer Fulmik has done an excellent job in presenting a lot of this.
Who in their right mind is not going to believe this is a conspiracy?
Who in their right mind is not going to believe that this vaccine and this COVID has been a complete scam to try and reset human society?
To turn them into fearful lemmings that are terrified of leaving their house without wearing a mask?
We have destroyed a whole generation of children psychologically and emotionally with this nonsense, and I mean it goes on and on and on.
This whole nonsense of, you know, trying to stop the spread of a disease by shutting down businesses, shutting down people's ability to gather, All of which are unconstitutional.
This is not a plague like I Am Legend where people fall apart and then turn into zombies.
This is a cold.
This is a flu.
This is some sort of respiratory sickness that is also combated with hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin.
These anti-malarial drugs actually stop people from going into the hospital in the first place.
But the U.S.
government stopped that from getting out, and it was pushed by the media and, you know, half-witch programs like The View with these skiggsy and fat ugly witches that are up there calling hydroxychloroquine somehow some, you know, deadly substance.
It was not.
And we've witnessed this COVID-19 absolutely burn through the society, and now the Democrats are trying to forget it very quickly because of the repercussions, the legal repercussions that it's bringing.
This is probably the darkest episode ever in the history of the United States, because we've allowed the usurpation of our rights, of our powers, of our freedoms, of our liberties, of the constitutional protections that were allowed to us.
We threw all of that overboard.
In exchange for the petty pottage of security and stability.
And we've got the opposite.
And anybody who's gotten this vaccine is a dead man walking.
And your children are dead if they've gotten it.
And your fertility is dead because of it.
These are ugly, hard, sad things to have to say.
But if we don't say them, then we're cowards.
And I will say them, everyone who's gotten this shot is going to be dead in a much shorter time than they would if they didn't get the shot.
Who's to blame for all of that?
Fauci?
Trump?
Biden is pushing it through?
These are unforgivable crimes and, you know, we're at a point where if this country If it doesn't throw overboard its political class and its media class in a Nuremberg sort of hearing, then the next time they're going to pull this sort of thing even worse, and you're going to witness the end of all Western civilization.
This was a pre-ordained, preemptive attack to see just how far they could bend uh the western uh you know hemisphere of of society and the next time they are going to absolutely break it.
I think if we don't stand up and execute and and and raise up leaders that will go to the floor uh wherever they run for political office and say I'm running for office to hunt these bastards down and kill them after due process of law of course and
Unless we have political leaders that are rising up saying that, unless we have media figures that are rising up saying that, then we're not worthy of the freedoms and liberties or the life that our Founding Fathers and God Almighty has given us, because we are destroying our DNA and we're doing it with a smile on our face and an insanity in our brain, Jim.
Wow!
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think it's interesting that individuals like Fauci and Collins are heads of the CDC.
They had every single government, every single local politician, every single news media outlet, every single newspaper, the schools, private businesses, you know, they went after everyone.
They had to have everyone on their side, and they still had to go after a little organization and people talking about the Barrington Declaration.
It's just proof that the truth always comes out.
The truth is so strong that the liars have to fear, and they have to squash, and they have to try to destroy any sort of rationale.
Barrington Declaration wasn't even that radical.
It was just saying, hey, let's look.
Let's actually look at the science.
Let's treat this like we have any sort of Any other outbreak, you know, targeted isolation of people, not shutting down entire economies, not ruining lives, not targeting the children.
We should look at specific cases and specific isolation for specific cases.
And so it was a very rational agreement that was made between several doctors to put this out.
And the fact that they had to go behind closed doors and they tell people, oh, trust the science and we've got science on our side.
Meanwhile, they're going after this one little group of doctors and having the media gang up on these people, had to have their death threats and their lives destroyed and their professional careers destroyed for just saying, hey, hold up.
Maybe we should think about this a little bit more.
Meanwhile, now mainstream news is saying that Fauci is mulling retirement.
I know he's pretty old, he's 81, but I'm thinking the times where he's on television every single day is over and we're starting to wonder where he went and where all of his minions have gone.
I think the Democrats recognize that if there's anyone more to despise than Joe Biden, it's Anthony Fauci, so they better bury him.
Meanwhile, the Democrats are using Civil War-era section to try to disqualify three popular GOP lawmakers because of January 6th.
Clearly, they contrived it with this scheme in mind.
This is completely outrageous.
Once again, citing January 6th as silence opposition, Democrats in Wisconsin aim to invoke Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which states those who participate in seditious or treasonous acts cannot run for public office.
They argue under their own arbitrary definition that what constitutes treason and sedition, which, by the way, does not qualify properly under the law, Senator Rod Johnson from Wisconsin, Representative Tom Tiffany, and Scott Fitzgerald should not be allowed to run for re-election.
Democrats have ignored the summer 2020 riots and relentlessly used January 6th as a political cudgel.
You can see where they contrived that to offset preoccupation with the riots they'd fostered that endured an entire year.
Now they're using January 6th to file a frivolous lawsuit against me, similar to one dismissed by the court last week.
I regard this guy as a great American hero.
The lawsuit claims they use their public position to illegally foment an atmosphere meant to intimidate and pressure Vice President Pence and Congress to take actions inconsistent with the facts Whose actual truth they were disputing and with their duties under the Electoral Count Act and the U.S.
Constitution, where they were actually in the process of hearing evidence that fraud had been committed in the election, which they disrupted by constituting, organizing this incursion.
Clearly, the Democrats know they can't beat these incumbents fair and square, and thus they're resorting to dirty legal trips.
Not the first time they've done this.
A few months ago, they attempted the same with Representative Madison Crawthorne.
The attempt to remove Crawthorne was thrown up by a court.
Presumably, these will as well.
That the Democrats stooped to such desperate and low levels to win elections while simultaneously claiming the unlawful party is the opposition is insane.
They use every trick in the book to remove their opposition while decrying January 6th as an evil and traitorous attack on democracy where, I tell you, it was orchestrated.
Nancy Pelosi with the Capitol Police and the FBI.
Newsflash!
The Confederates, about whom Section 3 was written, were all Democrats.
Meanwhile, Biden's Supreme Court nominee has a child sex crime problem.
Justice Breyer's retirement has handed Biden his first chance to remake the Supreme Court.
But now it may fly off the rails.
She has a child sex crime problem.
He promised to only consider race and gender when picking a justice, followed through on his affirmative action process, and selected Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Judge Katanjah Brown-Jackson as his nominee.
They hoped her race and gender would cower Republicans to vote for her, but it ain't gonna happen.
Missouri Republican Senator Josh Hawley has dug up disturbing academic and judicial writings where Judge Jackson took a soft stance on child sex predators.
I've been researching the record of Judge Katanja Brown Jackson.
Reading her opinions, articles, interviews, and speeches, Hawley wrote, I've noticed an alarming pattern when it comes to Jackson's treatment of sex offenders, especially those preying on children.
This is very disturbing.
He described academic rights where she questioned the idea of registering sex offenders for fear it would stigmatize them.
But they deserve to be stigmatized.
As a member of the U.S.
Sentencing Commission, she pushed for lighter sentences for predators convicted of possessing child porn.
And it gets worse.
As a member of the U.S.
Sentencing Commission, she advocated drastic change in how the law treats sex offenders by eliminating the existing minimum mandatory for child porn.
As a judge, she put her soft on child porn ideology into action, consistently handing out lighter sentences to felons convicted on child porn than the federal guidelines call for on the federal bench.
She put her troubling views into action in every single child porn case for which we can find records.
Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders.
Some rhinos, like Mitt Romney, a particularly discrepable, just disgusting person, have expressed a willingness to vote for her anyway.
It was already a vote for abortion on demand, radical gun control, rewriting the Second Amendment, online censorship, and restricting religious liberty, but now a vote for her puts senators on the record as supporting lighter sentences for child-born predators.
Stunning stuff.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, it's going to be interesting to see how it unfolds, but it's important to always remember that every corrosive, degenerate aspect of modern society has had its origin in progressive, democrat thought and policy.
Every single one.
And I've studied this ad nauseum.
I did my entire dissertation on the social science data showing very clearly
That progressivism and every dimension of sexuality, marriage, and family, which corrodes the foundation of the institution, natural law, it corrodes and perverts and distorts and completely destroys the notions of heterosexual marriage, the complementariness of the sexes, men and women marrying, not fornicating and living together or having children out of wedlock, marrying with the
The community around them and the bedrock of marriage and the refusal to allow divorce and things like that.
Those foundational principles lead to a healthy society and the absence of that, the departure from that, the corrosion, the distortion of that leads inevitably to the degeneration of society out of wedlock births.
Children without fathers.
High criminality.
Then you introduce homosexuality, tolerating it, instead of a mental schizophrenic disease.
Now it's just seen as an alternative lifestyle.
And then you introduce this into society ad nauseum.
And 20 years later, you got transgenderism.
You know, well, I feel like a girl.
I'll be a boy.
I'll flip it in between.
I'll swim in girls races and call myself a girl and beat every other girl swimmer or every other girl race.
And if you call me, you know, anything other than my whatever these pronouns are, you're a bigot.
You're a racist.
You're a homophobe.
This is the end of Western society unless This cancer and this corrosion is cut out and stopped.
That's what Vladimir Putin, that's what the Russian people, that's what their moral values is articulating as national government policy, natural law, conservative principles of family, rewarding people to have children in the context of marriage.
In the absence of that, that the West is championing, is absolutely destroying all of society.
And that's why we're being turned over to this plague of sins that God is allowing that is just totally corroding and destroying our society, totally destroying our young people.
And I'll be amazed If this country is able to last another five years unless there is a major upheaval and social reorganization that, you know, refuses to allow any of this anymore.
We are really on the existential edge of the waterfall and I'm inclined to think the majority of the country is going to go over the cliff.
Jim?
I wish I could give a strong argument against that, Scott, but I'm unable to do so.
Holly, your thoughts?
Right.
Well, we've talked about this before that we've seen the crazy liberals try to pack the Supreme Court.
I mean, they they threatened Justice Breyer just a few months ago to get him off the court because he wasn't against he wasn't for stacking the court.
Apparently, Clarence Thomas has actually been put in the hospital either yesterday or today.
So that could be hopefully he'll come out.
OK, they're saying.
Flu-like symptoms.
I don't always agree with Clarence Thomas, but I don't think he would side with Ketanji Brown on what apparently she's been ruling on.
I think they're trying to put someone in like Ruth Bader Ginsburg, people.
It's mostly been scrubbed from the internet, but she had made some rulings about age of consent being 13 years old.
I think they're trying to restock the court with people with extreme agendas and they want to either do it by expanding the core or, you know, pushing quote unquote conservatives are people who aren't okay with targeting children off the Supreme Court because that's their next.
their next ruling.
And I think that that's part of the jab agenda too, if you will, is that lowering the age of consent, then they can argue, well, we, you know, this 15 year old teenager, or, you know, this 10 year old child wants a sex change, or they want to get the jab, or they want, this 10 year old child wants a sex change, or they want to get the jab, or they want, you know, whatever they're going to market to them next, and basically make the state and the government and private corporations controlling the lives of children and not
Well, I was unenthusiastic when Clarence Thomas was appointed, and it was absurd for G.H.W. Bush to describe him as the best qualified for the position.
He's increasingly impressed me, shown strong credentials as a conservative.
He's opposed to packing the court.
And frankly, he's enthusiastic about porn.
He has an addiction to porn.
So the guy's not going to be going along with the Democrat agenda.
I will surmise, as a film The Pelican Brief so clearly depicted, I wouldn't be surprised if they targeted him for elimination.
They want to get him out.
To get a reliable Democrat on the bench while they still have the chance.
November is going to be too late.
I infer, this is an educated guess, that they've actually set it up.
That Thomas has been somehow infected or poisoned or what have you to maximize the Democrats' opportunity.
And this reveals the disgusting depths of depravity to which the Democratic Party has sunk.
If my surmise is well-founded, as I hate to say, I'm sorry to say, appears to be the case.
USA Today.
Biological man is woman of the year.
Amazing progress.
Just not the chromosome thing.
We don't agree with that one.
We believe in science.
Rachel Levine Bonas-Richard currently is paid by American taxpayers to hold the position of Assistant Secretary of Health at the Department of Health and Human Services under fake President Joe Biden.
Before that, Levine was paid by taxpayers in the state of Pennsylvania to handle public health.
Now Levine, an obese biological man who has long hair and dresses like a woman, is being celebrated by USA Today for being an ideal representation of what it means to be a woman in the United States today.
According to the fake news outlet, Levine holds a top spot among other Strong and resilient women who've been champions of change across the country, leading and inspiring as they promote and fight for equity and give others a place to seek help and find hope.
Suzette Hackney, USA Today's Deputy Opinion Editor and National Columnist, interviewed Levine as part of a profile.
She described Levine as the nation's highest-ranking openly transgender official.
Beyond working as the Assistant Secretary of Health, he leads the U.S.
Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, which Hackney described as a group of 6,000 uniformed public health officials.
HHS also bestowed Honor and Levine as part of a panel entitled, A Conversation with HHS Women Leaders to Celebrate Women's History Month.
A model American woman is apparently a man who cuts off his body parts and dresses in drag.
This is the same Rachel Levine, by the way, who early last year declared that minor children, meaning babies, should be allowed to get a sex change without permission from their parents, who in God's name is going to make the decision.
To Levine, cutting off natural body parts to become the opposite gender or some mix of the two is transgender medicine.
All children and babies should have access on demand.
For this and other accomplishments throughout her career, G.P.
Levine is being praised by U.S.
Today as a model specimen of what it means to be a modern American woman.
While much of USA Today's profile focused on the doctor's career influence and interest, Levine was also asked to provide advice for transgender, non-conforming, or questioning people.
To this, Levine responded, you have to be true to yourself.
I think that you have to be who you are.
You have tremendous worth just for who you are, no matter who you love, no matter who you are.
No matter what your gender identity, sexual orientation, or anything else, and to be true to that.
Fake Vice President Kamala Harris was also included in USA Today's Women of the Year list.
It remains unclear why this laughing hyena, at what she's actually accomplished to deserve inclusion on second thought, she belongs on such a list.
It's not surprising these images of men and women can be so manipulated in our culture when we have done that with other vital ideas we took for granted so long.
Life, marriage, truth, beauty, gender, love, motherhood, and more.
What else is left to overturn, wrote someone at the Christian Post.
In their zealous pursuit of radical feminism, activists define their goal as equality with men, and the means of achieving that end is mimicking and imitating men in all their activities.
This, rather than recovering and sustaining true femininity while seeking fairness in employment and education, for example.
More related news about America's adoration and worship for all things transgender can be found at gender.news.
Meanwhile, an Iowa Governor Reynolds has signed a law banning boys from girls sports.
Iowa's first female Governor, Republican Kim Reynolds, signed into law this week a bill barring biological males from playing women's sports.
French offer delivery of the GOP rebuttal to Biden's State of the Union revels signature means that athletic program must be men's, women's or co-ed and participation is based on the birth gender of the athlete.
Has it gotten to this?
Female athletes surrounded her as she signed the bill and said it's a women's rights issue to keep females from being sidelined in their sports.
The GOP governor said the issue is a reality of human biology, notes that forcing females to compete against males is the opposite of inclusivity.
As a mother of three daughters, grandmother of three others, she does not understand how anyone who cares about women's rights could support anything less.
The law applies to athletic events for public and private schools and colleges and universities on all levels of athletic competition.
Carlisle's track star Anseli Ernst, a state record holder for 800 meters, who has a track scholarship to the University of Arkansas, said girls can pursue records, positions on teams and scholarships now to the best of their ability thanks to the new Iowa law.
The backlash was as predictable as it was scentless.
Iowa Safe Schools Executive Director Becky Smith displayed a transgender flag at the signing ceremony to show solidarity with transgender students.
As she said, their rights are being infringed upon.
Democrat State Senator Janet Peterson.
The law changes how students are treated during the school day and then in athletes afterward declaring a girl is a girl during the day but then at practice is treated like a boy.
The ACLU criticized the legislation as a violation of the civil rights of transgender girls and women and says it passed because of unsupported myths fueled by ignorance and fear.
One Iowa parent said she's extremely disappointed in the new law, calling it gut-wrenching.
Critics say enacting the law comes at a cost to Iowa taxpayers, conveniently ignoring that it's their frivolous lawsuits that create the exact price they breathlessly warn against.
And while transgender girls and women will be forced to play against boys and men, the law does not address transgender boys who are free to compete against male athletes.
Ten other states have enacted similar laws to protect girls' and women's sports.
Holly, I want to toss this to you first.
As a woman, your thoughts?
Well, it just reminds me of for how many years it just spit in the face of Title IX.
I mean, that was a huge, huge day for women when that happened.
And women's sports could be, you know, get similar funding and opportunities for girls and women to have sports, you know, at their schools and their colleges, and then for it to be replaced by By men, I mean, it was just so upsetting to see the the records that were broken by transgender what they called females of sports and, you know.
Rachel Levine, now Woman of the Year, and just really bizarre.
How can we not say that this is an anti-human agenda at this point?
We're dealing with people who hate humanity at this point.
If we have to really make this argument that there are two genders and there are two sexes, That's how humans are made, and that's biology, and the fact that they're denying all of this is just so anti-human at this point.
It brings in the whole transgender and the transhumanist agenda becomes more and more obvious to me the further that they push this.
At first, that's how the floodgates open.
I mean, it's just, they're like, oh, it's just bathrooms.
Oh, it's just sports.
Oh, it's just woman of the year.
Oh, it's just, you know, this or that.
And then next thing you know, everything is completely upside down.
And they've targeted children going after children younger and younger.
And then the horrors of that being permanently mutilated without really any understanding of what they've even Yeah, absolutely.
into.
And then, of course, the agenda, like I had mentioned before, just giving the children to the state and to the corporations and taking them away from the parents.
That's a big part of the agenda, if they can break that up under the guise of inclusivity and, you know, openness and freedom and everything that they said that these people claim that they're for.
Yeah, absolutely.
Scott, your thoughts.
Wow.
Well, you know me, Jim, I I've been following and talking about this, so I'll try and articulate this in a way like Rocky Balboa with a fighter up against the ropes, and I won't pull any punches.
Let me just say, a woman is a woman because God made her as God's greatest gift to mankind.
God made woman from man's side and gave her All of the most beautiful qualities, the music of a voice, the charm of a smile, the glory of her beautiful hair, the softness of her skin and her touch.
The woman that God made for Adam has permeated through all the lines of woman since Eve down to present women today.
And Holly is a great illustration of that, of course.
Natural beauty and charm and charisma and stance.
All women are women because of the grace and the delight that God has empowered them with.
And there's nothing demeaning or less than man or less than human by a woman being natural.
Women are different than men.
Men are different than women.
And God made them that way.
And it is such an abomination and a disgusting revilement For these pathetic, lesbian, homosexual, drag queen, schizophrenic lunatics to chop off their penis or put on a dress and pretend that they can imitate women, that they're somehow women?
They are not.
They're lunatics.
They are mental degenerates.
A woman is a woman and we ought to be rallying around women as men and protecting them from this scum of humanity and going at these people.
I don't care if it's women or lesbians or homosexual men, but anyone that is coming against Natural feminine women and telling them they're less than human unless they are following the liberal dogma or you know if they don't believe that a man can dress up and mutilate himself that he can't be a woman that somehow you're a bigot?
No.
Anyone that is pushing this false artificiality, wokeism, is a sick perverted individual.
Women have been created and they are the reason for the heart of the family and society Men find their identity by wooing and pursuing and elevating themselves up to women.
Women are the heart of the family.
They soften the barbaric warrior instincts of men.
Women, by their very nature, pacify and add a harmony and a tranquility to the natural storminess of men's souls.
Men are aggressive, giant killers, and city builders who are one step away from wolves and lions.
When women come into their world, they calm and pacify and civilize men.
So all of these great virtues of women can never be artificially or cosmetically or biologically replicated by the artificiality of surgery or hormone therapy.
They will never be women.
And it is an abomination and a sign of this country's inevitable death When we create a culture that has the mendacity to claim that men can pretend they're women and women can pretend they're men, it is an absolute abomination.
And the quicker anyone who pushes that, or any country that pushes that, The sooner those people in that country is destroyed, the healthier and the cleaner the overall world and earth will be.
And I hope it's not going to happen to America, but I won't be surprised if it does because of this sort of a culture that we've created.
It is absolutely the sign of the death of Western civilization and perhaps the rise of Russia, China, or any other country That says, no thank you, we don't want your insanity, you have at it, and that's all I have to say.
Go ahead, Jim.
Well, we have yet another story about it.
Spectators scream at record-setting trans swimmers, saying what we're all thinking.
One spectator spoke out as transgender college swimmer Leah Thomas prepared to crush his female competitors doing an NCAA Finals qualifier on Thursday.
One man exclaimed, Cheater!
seconds before the 500-yard race began in a dig at University of Pennsylvania swimmer.
At the beginning, they called out Cheater, which many, many agreed with.
Thomas smoked his second-place swimmer by three seconds, a margin considered a blowout in competitive swimming.
In a development suggesting sympathy with Thomas critics, the audience of parents and swimming fans did not cheer for Thomas when he finished.
Instead, they cheered for the second- and third-place finishers, who actually were women.
A second spectator directly accused Thomas of cheating as she left the room of the meet.
Not even trying.
Just a gentle swim to qualify for the final.
No justice for these female swimmers.
No fairness.
Now ranked number one in women's swimming, Thomas clocked in at a distant number, 462, as a male swimmer.
Get that.
His rise to the top of female collegiate swimming has led some to question the future of women's sports entirely, with a new wave of biologically male transgender athletes increasingly dominating.
Very disturbing.
Meanwhile, let me add, I'm introducing a new online course, Conspiracy 101 on Critical Thinking and Conspiracy Theories.
This is a photograph of me at dinner with Jesse Ventura on the left and Vince Bugliosi in the center.
Amber Vince received an honorary law degree from Hamlin School of Law in St.
Paul.
Here's a brief explanation of what this is all about.
Having offered courses in logic, critical thinking, and scientific reasoning for 35 years from the University of Kentucky to the University of Virginia, North Carolina, Chapel Hill, New College of the University of South Florida,
The Duluth campus, the University of Minnesota, I want to create the opportunity to give you the principles that need to be applied to sort things out in terms of a course online on critical thinking In scientific reasoning, the instructor will be yours truly, Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., philosophy professor emeritus.
Here's the course information.
Course schedule.
Fifteen one-hour seminars, Wednesdays, 8 to 10 p.m.
Central Time, which will begin on 6 April and end on 13 July 2022.
This course may be repeated.
Registration.
$150 for the course or $10 a session.
Course materials provided online without charge.
Course description.
An introduction to critical thinking using conspiracy theories as research illustrations.
For everyone who needs to master the ability to think things through and avoid being played by false narratives.
Course materials provided online and includes blogs, essays, and videos, and even a book or two.
Meanwhile, the syllabus.
6 April.
Introduction to the Nature of Thought, Signs, and Minds.
13 April.
Studying Language, Syntax, Semantics, and Pragmatics.
20 April.
Arguments.
Deductive, Inductive, and Abductive.
27 April.
Informal Fallacies.
Part 1.
Fallacies of Ambiguity.
4 May.
Informal Fallacies Part 2.
Fallacies of Relevance.
11 May.
Applying Scientific Reasoning to Conspiracy Theories.
18 May.
The Assassination of JFK.
The Use of Fabricated Evidence.
25 May, the atrocities of 9-11 violating the laws of physics.
1 June, the moon landings, how we know we didn't go.
8 June, Senator Paul Wellstone of Minnesota accident or assassination.
15 June, Sandy Hook designing events for emotional impact.
22 June, Nice, Orlando, Parkland, Charlottesville, Las Vegas.
27 June.
Pizzagate.
Is it myth or is it real?
Disturbing to the max.
6 July.
The pandemic and the Vax.
The greatest hoax of all?
13 July.
The official history of World War II.
Politics trumps science.
Registration is open.
Go to mixinstream.com slash critical hyphen thinking dot html.
The first hand to register will have direct links through the chat to me and can offer questions and comments as we proceed in real time on behalf of the class as a representative sample.
This may be an opportunity that you do not want to miss.
When I would have my first meeting with a class, I'd explain to them if they come to the university to take only one course, This was a course they ought to take because it would make such a difference in the rest of their lives to avoid being played, taken advantage of, to determine when individuals are using fallacious arguments to deceive, mislead, and cheat.
This is something I think you don't want to miss.
I look forward to seeing you there.
Right.
Scott, your thoughts?
I think it's a wonderful course you're going to be teaching, Jim, and the things that came to my mind when I was reading the syllabus are the manipulation tactics that are being employed against us, the emotional manipulation and bullying and coercion and psychological warfare and playing upon our best character traits and using them against us, recognizing our nature
In order to defend against the manipulation of our nature is very key in today's society and we're witnessing that in the Ukraine theater and the propaganda theater of what they're communicating.
So your syllabus and helping people understand critical thinking and being able to develop defenses and countermeasures against the manipulative tactics of bad actors Is very, very much essential.
It's also an affliction that modern young people suffer so badly from, is that they want to be appealing.
They want to be welcome.
They want to get along with everyone.
They don't want to be offensive.
And that I like to offend everyone who doesn't like the truth.
I want to offend everyone that doesn't like the truth, because I'm only interested in people who love the truth and aren't offended by any truth.
They, in fact, go out and look for opinions from people to add on to themselves.
So, I think your course is going to help further divide the stupid and the imbecilic from those who are thirsting after righteousness and looking for truth, and your class is going to be a beacon for that, Jim.
Holly, your final thoughts?
Well, this is some pretty hardcore topics, Jim.
Sounds pretty fascinating.
Really opening up a can of worms with some of those topics.
And I think for people who might have looked into one or two, this would be a great opportunity for you to really explore your depth of knowledge, all the books that you've written.
Some people could spend years looking into one of those topics and what you're providing is basically a whole lifetime of work that you have done really going into these.
It's so in-depth that I'm always amazed with the amount of information that you have that you can just pull out of your head, the drop of a hat.
I've had the joy of being able to do these shows with you the past year, so it'll be very fascinating to see all the knowledge that you have available for these topics.
Well, I thank all those kind thoughts.
Don, your opportunity to take us out at the end of today.
Of course, I'm going to tell your class, Jim, that they should go every week and listen to our show, Truth vs. News Incorporated, to get the updated facts on things.
But I'm sure, of course, it's going to be super.
And I think this is a super show today.
I rather discuss it about this, the last subject there.
That's just not the way it should be.
So anyway, this is the Equinox.
This is the first day of spring, and I hope it's been a good show for you today, especially the first hour with Laura Logan.
She was terrific.
And so come back next week and share this show, and I know that you're gonna get a lot of truth, probably more than most people can handle, but test it.
See how much truth you can handle.
▲
Export Selection