All Episodes
March 2, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:05:46
Need to Know News TEXAS TUESDAY (1 March 2022) with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, welcoming you to another Texas Tuesday.
Joe Olson in Houston.
Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, now residing in Nashville, North Carolina.
We're here to bring you all the news you need to know.
We begin with Ukraine's Zelensky to the EU.
Prove that you are with us.
He wants them to establish a no-fly zone.
Not much of a chance.
Do prove you are with us.
Do prove you will not let us go.
Do prove you are indeed Europeans, and then life will win over death and life will win over darkness.
The EU will be much stronger with us.
As he spoke, a Russian armored column estimated some 40 miles in length was buried down on the Ukraine capital of Kiev.
Ukraine is well aware any membership of joining the EU would be long and difficult, even if it manages after the war to avoid falling back under Moscow's domination.
The EU has taken unprecedented steps, including financing weapon deliveries to Ukraine after President Putin launched the war on Russia's neighbor last week.
According to a draft resolution and amendments backed by the Assembly's main parties, lawmakers are going to call for tougher sanctions aimed at strategically weakening the Russian economy and industrial base, in particular the military-industrial complex.
Ironically, I would add, The whole war in Ukraine is intended to bolster the American military-industrial complex by discouraging Germany from moving forward with Nord Stream 2.
Russia's invasion effectively makes Russia a rogue state, the lawmakers were set to say.
The European Parliament will also urge EU leaders to be tougher on oligarchs and officials close to the Russian leadership.
Restrict oil and glass imports from Russia.
Man, Russia and its ally Belarus from the swift banking system and close all EU ports to Russian ships or ships added out to or from Russia.
However, in a preliminary vote on amendments, they rejected calling Russia a rogue state.
Russia has called its actions in Ukraine a special military operation aimed at reading the country of leaders it characterizes as neo-Nazis and drug addicts.
Where the European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said Putin's decision to invade had the effect of uniting countries against Russia.
If Putin was seeking to divide the EU to weaken NATO and break the international community, he has achieved exactly the opposite.
Meanwhile, a Ukrainian member of parliament slipped in an interview and admitted, we're not only fighting for Ukraine, we're fighting for the new world order.
Ukrainian parliament member Akira Rudik said the quiet part out loud when she joined Fox on Sunday.
According to Rudik, the Ukrainian people are not only fighting for their country, but laying their lives on the line for the new world order.
We know we are a shield for Euro.
We know we are protecting not only Ukraine, all the other countries that would be next if we failed.
That's why we cannot fail.
Meanwhile, Tim Young tweets, I'm confused.
I was told this was a conspiracy theory.
We not only fight for Ukraine, we fight for the New World Order?
Wow.
How about that, Joe?
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well Germany gets 40% of their gas, their electrical energy from natural gas and so shutting off the four pipelines that go through Ukraine and then shutting off the Nord Stream 2 which comes through the Baltic Sea is going to have enormous impact and like we mentioned in yesterday's program, I went on the weather.com site and plugged in Berlin with U.S.
measured temperatures in Fahrenheit, and the high for the whole week was going to be 46.
The rest of the week, the high is going to be 40, and the low was 20 degrees overnight.
I'm sorry folks, if it's 20 at night and 40 during the day, that's pretty damn cold, and if you're waiting for a windmill or a solar cell to warm you up, you got a long wait, and they've shut down all their nuclear power plants, which I'm no fan of light water reactors anyway, but they've also dismantled all their coal Uh stream and so basically they've got a huge problem.
There's a great article today at Veterans Today.
It was written by the wife of uh Matt Ehret, E-H-R-E-T, who's a Canadian.
He's got some real weird attitudes about how wonderful Hamilton and Jefferson and Lincoln are.
But his wife wrote an article and it's called EU's Criminal Energy Policy, the Freezing of Nord's Tomb, Mass Sacrifice.
And it's about a 5000 word long article with a bunch of footnotes.
And it's pretty well documented exactly the type of sabotage saboteurs that are working against all of Europe.
And they're just basically trying to cripple Russia and Europe at the same time.
Russia has 2000 tons of gold.
And you can bet these SOBs at the Bank of City of London are anxious to get their hands on that gold because they know their funny baloney Ponzi scheme is getting ready to collapse.
And they don't have any other basis for their next reset currency.
Well, Joe, what you're describing is a Rothschild plan to destroy a white...
Human beings.
I mean, this is a cultural war.
And remember, Klaus Schwab, from the quote I read from his book yesterday, was declaring that they want to annihilate the whites in America and Europe, and they are pursuing their agenda aggressively.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, that's what I was going to say.
The Nord Stream pipeline is just the latest effort.
And not only are they cutting off food and energy, From the whole European Christian world, that applies to the United States as well, as we can see with the policies of the Biden administration.
That story about Zelensky inviting other European nations in to fight the Russians made me think of the old Jewish-Zionist tactic that we kid about, but it's true, of let's him and you fight.
They love to see white Christians fight each other and kill each other, so they try to arrange it at every opportunity.
And the fact that the EU Parliament is getting in on the anti-Russian stuff right now is a total sign that the EU Parliament itself, like the United Nations has always been, is a complete tool of the Zionist generations-long effort to create a one-world government that we now call the New World Order.
With them in charge, of course.
Michael, I think you're exactly right.
And the fact that Putin has made it very clear that he's going to take severe action if any other countries join this effort is something that better cause them to think twice, because he means what he says.
Meanwhile, the Stock Exchange and Nasdaq have halted trading of Russia-based companies.
This is insane, in my opinion.
Meanwhile, Putin's war shames three Democrat lobbying groups into cutting ties with Nord Stream 2.
Only a month ago, appeals for Democrats to do the right thing were not enough.
They held the line supporting Nord Stream 2.
There's a simple explanation.
Why?
Follow the money.
Now Putin has made himself an international pariah by declaring war on Ukraine.
Excuses for continued support of the pipeline have run dry.
Until that point, Democrats had three big reasons to keep backing it.
Ted Cruz, you'll remember, forced a vote in the Senate.
Democrats felt so strongly about blocking the sanctions against Nord Stream, they dung deep into their bag of Jim Crow-era tricks and invoked the filibuster.
His vote to sanction Nord Stream 2 received 55 in favor and 43 against, falling short of the 60-vote hurdle.
But now the facts on the ground have changed.
Three firms, Roberti Global, BGR Government Affairs, and McLarty Inbound, are cutting their lobbying ties with Putin's pipeline.
The three American lobbying firm led the charge to block sanctions and allow completion.
Their chief claim was he was not exploring the pipeline for geopolitical gain and that Germany supported it to meet its energy needs, which have not changed.
The chairman of Roberti Global contributed heavily to his Democrat leaders such as Speaker Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.
Roberti advised Biden during his 2008 presidential campaign lobbyists at McClarty to use their positions at the Atlantic Council to make the case against sanctions.
Meanwhile, a significant majority says Putin would not have invaded Ukraine if Trump were president.
The poll was a Harvard Center for American Political Studies Harris poll.
They show 62% of Americans, 62% don't believe Putin would have invaded Ukraine if Trump were still president.
59% believe Putin invaded because he believes Biden is weak.
I agree with both, writes Trey Karas.
Meanwhile, The Hill reported that 62% believe Putin would not be moving against Ukraine, 85% of Republicans, 38% of Democrats answered this way.
A majority also said they believe Putin views Biden as weak, making the invasion more likely.
59%.
Because Putin sees weakness in Biden.
41% said it was not a factor.
Here's David Atherton tweeting, Putin would not have invaded Ukraine if Donald Trump had been in power, say a majority of Americans.
The opinion of 62% of Americans in the Harvard Center for American Political Studies Harris Poll.
Trump himself has made the same argument.
Last week, he observed, this would never have happened if we were there.
But he did.
Chuck Togg asked that question.
How come there was none of this happening during the Trump administration?
I knew Putin very well.
Got along with him great.
He liked me.
I like him.
I mean, you know, he's a tough cookie.
Got a lot of the great charm and a lot of pride.
But the way he loves his country, you know, he loves his country.
He's acting a little differently, I think, now.
The new survey comes in the wake of numerous polls showing low approval ratings for the Biden administration on every issue imaginable.
COVID-19 pandemic botched Afghanistan.
Withdrawal Democrat infighting.
Now the invasion of Ukraine.
Joe, your thoughts?
Well, just in the last two months of 2021, the Biden administration shipped $600 million of high-end U.S.
weaponry to Ukraine.
So they've been trying to stoke this fire as much as possible.
And they want to bury whatever's available in the way of evidence on Burisma that could come up.
And they also, like we mentioned, want to cut off the energy and energy flow out of Russia and the money flow into it.
So this has been a bottom line event to get rid of one of the few countries on the planet that is not part of the Rothschild-controlled central bank.
That's item number one.
And then item number two.
This has been a long-stage event.
There's a great article at theoccidentalobserver.net.
I'll put the link down in the column section.
But its title is Neocons Ukraine, Russia, and the Western Struggle for Global Hegemony.
It's by Philip Giraldi.
He does a great job of research and stuff, and this is a 2014 article updated with just the amount of material it takes to make it 100% relevant to today's situation.
Maybe we'll find out the big answer tonight during the State of the Union if mumbles can get up and actually mumble something important.
Highly unlikely.
Michael, your thoughts?
I want to go back just a minute to the very last photo that you showed in that last story of this cute blonde babe standing at the window with a Kalashnikov.
That's just the kind of ridiculous propaganda that we're being inundated with right now.
And that even extends to Tucker Carlson last week.
I'm missing the image, Michael, but go ahead.
Keep going.
Okay.
Tucker Carlson last week was talking about the history of Ukraine and Russia, and he even mentioned some of the valid reasons that Russia might have to to go in.
But that was a week ago.
Now he's all about supporting Ukraine.
It's like he's saying, we all hate what Putin has done by invading this innocent, sovereign country.
It's like he did a 180 over the weekend.
So to me, that seems like he must have had his And then moving on to the article that you just showed about Putin wouldn't have invaded if Trump had been president.
Russia invaders idea so bad that they're not letting anybody say anything other than that.
And then moving on to the article that you just showed about Putin wouldn't have invaded if Trump had been president.
Well that's a huge hypothetical of course and it's based on this construct that Trump is strong and Biden is weak.
And whatever you think about that, that leaves the entire evil Russian invasion propaganda point intact.
It really doesn't matter what would have happened.
I think it'd be a better bet to say that the 2014 coup against a democratically elected leader by the Zionist-controlled USA deep state would not have happened in the first place if Trump had been the president.
So there would be no need to invade, and Trump wouldn't have completely squashed all efforts to negotiate from the Russian side.
Oh, Michael, I think those are impeccable points.
And vis-a-vis Fox, I had it on before we came on the show, and I was disgusted by the totally unbalanced war propaganda, unqualified, including Andy Carr just laying out a bunch of disgusting stuff.
It was ridiculous.
Really disappointing, because Fox was not saying anything remotely different from CNN or MSNBC.
Very, very disappointing.
Meanwhile, hours after Russia invades Ukraine, former White House doctor says Biden isn't fit to be our president right now.
With Russia attacking Ukraine, casualties mounting, is Biden going to make a statement?
Of course, he'll do tonight.
There are many who worry that Commander-in-Chief isn't up to the task.
Some claim his foreign policy record isn't exactly sparkling.
Biden naysayers point to numerous examples of embarrassing public gaffes, especially in speeches where bonus appears lost or confused.
Former White House Dr. Ronny Jackson, who served in both the Obama and Trump administrations, has been vocal about his decline.
He's calling for the president to take a cognitive test.
With a world on the verge of another war, Jackson believes it's even more dangerous to have Biden in charge.
He's sad he's not fit to be our president right now.
As Jack had observed during a recent interview, there's no question in most persons' minds that something is going on with him, that we've seen mental cognitive issues for over a year, he added.
Every time he gets up and talks to the American people, it's not just the American people who are watching him speak.
It's the whole world.
And that's part of what the problem is here.
He looks tired.
He looks weak.
He looks confused.
He's incoherent.
It sends a message of weakness all over the world, and they're seizing upon it.
The doctor also observed we can see his decline over the years.
We have 40 years at stake, so it's not like we don't have anything to compare with.
He added that while Biden has always made mistakes and blunders, it's never been this bad.
He cited the Afghanistan debacle as more evidence of his ailing mental state, and now he's worried as president he'll get more Americans killed.
He isn't the only leader concerned Biden isn't prepared to handle a war situation either.
However, it's also important to note a large part of the country believes Biden is impaired, even those who vote Democrats aren't convinced of his stability.
Here's an exchange between a reporter and the president.
Biden says he has no idea why Americans question his cognitive ability.
No idea.
Given wars on the horizon could involve the U.S., now isn't the time to worry about a leader's cognitive capabilities?
And yet that's precisely why most Americans are concerned that Biden isn't fit to lead in difficult situations.
After the border crisis, Afghanistan widespread inflation, the country already wasn't happy, and now they're worried it's going to cause serious problems on an even larger scale.
This is a very disturbing situation.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, Biden has no idea when his Depends are full of poop, either.
Yeah, Russia had another good excuse to invade Ukraine, in addition to the puppet government we set up.
Docs leaked from top-secret Ukraine biolabs show the U.S.
was performing deadly biological experiments on Ukrainian soldiers.
And you can bet it wasn't the 2% of Ukrainians that are Jewish that were getting experimented on.
So you can kind of figure that one out.
And then the next thing is they wanted to bring it into EU and NATO.
And by having NATO being in the Ukraine, they would be just several hundred miles away from Moscow.
in the Ukraine, they would be just several hundred miles away from Moscow.
And with hypersonic missiles, that shortens the window to about two or three minutes maximum of warning before you're hit with whatever kind of weapons they're sending, whether they're biological, chemical, nuclear, whatever.
And with hypersonic missiles, that shortens the window to about two or three minutes maximum of warning before you're hit with whatever kind of weapons they're sending, whether they're biological, chemical, nuclear, whatever.
And so he has a legitimate security concern about them doing that to his country.
And I mentioned before, all the different times that the Rothschild-funded bankers have staged a war against Russia.
And that would be Napoleon, the Crimean War in 1850 with UK, 1905 with Japan and Manchuria, and then the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution, and World War II when they funded Hitler to attack Russia.
But I had forgotten about, uh, we had funded the Mujahideen and, and forced them to attack Afghanistan in 1979.
So, you know, they've got a long history of European bankers, particularly the Rothschild City of London, Yes, great points, Joe.
attacking Russia over and over and over.
Why should they think that this is anything different?
It's the same monsters in charge of the same war machine.
Yes, great points, Joe.
Mike?
Yeah, for some reason, the Rothschild Mafia has had a thing about Russia almost as bad as their thing that's developed against the German population over the last hundred years.
and And I read several causes for that, but I won't get into them right now.
I think it's a brilliant piece of subtle humor for Biden to have answered that question about his cognitive ability by saying, I have no idea.
I mean, that would be good comedy writing right there, but it was real life.
And Biden not mentally fit to be president, doesn't that pretty much fit into the does a bear shit in the woods category?
Yes.
Maybe they'll have Biden double number two walk out there and read the teleprompter of the speech written for him by his Rothschild mafia controllers.
Yes, yes, yes.
All excellent points, Michael.
Meanwhile, Jamie Dimon warns swift sanctions may bring unintended consequences and can be circumvented.
Just hours after Western leaders slapped Russia with unprecedented sanctions, including a targeted swift expulsion of key Russian banks, as well as an asset and transaction freeze, JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon explained not only why the harsh escalation may be futile, but could backfire spectacularly in the years to come.
In an interview with Bloomberg, the CEO of the world's largest bank said, "There are a lot of workarounds for SWIFT, so there are different tools we use for different reasons.
The banks are talking with the government so everyone understands the issues, not because they're for or against any particular thing." While SWIFT sanctions mean companies can't use a messaging system to do business with the Russian entities affected, they can still do business with them.
It's as simple as sending an email with payment, because what SWIFT really is is a messaging remnant from a bygone era, before email, even before the fax machine.
He also said disconnecting Russian banks from SWIFT may bring unintended consequences that include third parties finding ways around the penalty.
What countries do you hurt?
What people are going to do workarounds?
Referring to bad players and others finding workarounds, not his own firm.
Diamond said sanctions, by contrast, are very targeted, very specific, very clean.
J.P.
Morgan was among the Wall Street firms counseling Washington against kicking Russia out of SWIFT, arguing it could have far-reaching fallout that could hurt the global economy and undermine the purpose of the penalties.
Meanwhile, A referendum paves the way for Belarus to potentially host Russian nukes.
This is very appropriate.
On Sunday, a referendum in Belarus approved a new constitution scrapping the country's non-nuclear status, meaning Belarus could potentially host Russian nuclear weapons.
Belarus agreed to give up its nukes to Russia in the 1994 agreement known as the Budapest Memorandum.
Then President Lukashenko, who has led the country since 1994, said if Western powers deploy nukes near Belarus, he would ask Putin to return the weapons he once forfeited.
If America or you France, two nuclear powers, start transferring nukes to Poland or Lithuania on our border, I will go to Putin so he will return to me the nukes that I, without any special conditions, gave to him.
Lukashenko has grown closer to Putin since EU and US have rejected the results of Belarus's 2020 presidential election, giving him another term.
Non-recognition of the election has come with sanctions and Western support for Lukashenko's opposition.
The US and EU attempt to isolate him has led to a growing military ties that allow Russia to attack Ukraine from Belarus territory.
Another sign.
Lukashenko recently promised him an attack on Belarus would be considered an attack on Russia.
Early Monday, USN television said Belarus is expected to send troops into Ukraine, but later they said there are no indications we will join the invasion.
So what?
They just made it up out of whole cloth?
Lukashenko warned Western sanctions on Russia could lead to a new world war.
In a situation like this, we should be aware there are such sanctions.
A great deal is being said about the banking sector.
Gas, oil, swift, it's worse than war.
Russia is being pushed toward a third world war.
Should we be very reserved and steer clear of it?
Because nuclear war is the end of everything.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, there's another... Go ahead.
Oh, of course, man.
It's the same playbook by the same dirty players.
There's another great article at Veterans Today called Broken Arrow.
The most dangerous weapons of all, and it's by Gordon Duff, and it goes through a history of nuclear weapons and the amount of weapons that are out on the black market, especially the ones that were developed.
Ten of them were developed by South Africa and Israel, and those kind of got pilfered.
And then there's a whole bunch of the Davy Crockett grenade launcher nuclear weapons, the weapons that showed up in North Korea.
It's absolutely staggering that we have weapons of this magnitude that are just floating around the planet.
And we have a rogue nation that, by all accounts, has at least 200 nuclear weapons and has never signed the nonproliferation agreement.
And they're the ones that most likely furnish the weapons that nuked the World Trade Center building.
I don't think there's any serious room for doubt.
Michael, your thoughts?
read that article.
It's shocking the actual history of nuclear weapons and what's going on.
I don't think there's any doubt that Israel will nuke the World Trade Center on 9/11.
I don't think there's any serious room for doubt.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, about that Jamie Dimon story warning of unintended consequences, I guess you could say.
I I don't really understand the global economic situation well enough to know or understand what negative consequences that he's implying or referring to, but it does sound to me like whatever those consequences are might be a great excuse for moves that the controllers of the banking world make.
To bring in more chaos and disruption of supply lines and general mayhem, which is what I understand they need for them to crash the current economic system without it being known that it was them doing it all along.
Yes, yes, yes.
Oil was $90 a barrel over the weekend.
It's $105 today, and that's before Russia decides to cut off their flow in the world market, which is about, what, 12-15% of the total world supply.
So, yeah, keep rattling your sabers and find out how long it takes for gas to get $10 a gallon here in America, and then maybe we'll wake up and realize that we've been Hoodwink by the same hoodlums that have been doing it for centuries.
Great, great point, Joe.
I like that.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk says Starlink satellite service is activated in Ukraine where the Russian invasion has caused internet disruptions.
A Ukrainian government official tweeted at SpaceX founder Elon Musk asking for Starlink terminals.
Musk personally responded just hours later saying it's now active in Ukraine.
The Russian invasion has disrupted internet service for some Ukrainians and government agencies.
SpaceX founder Elon Musk tweeted Saturday, the company's Starlet satellite internet service is now active in Ukraine.
It came in direct response to the plea from a Ukrainian government official.
While you try to colonize Mars, Russia try to occupy Ukraine.
While your rockets successfully land from space, Russian rockets attack Ukrainian civil people.
Mikhail Fedorov, the Vice Prime Minister of Ukraine, tweeted to Musk earlier on Saturday.
Here he is, asking for the assistance.
Musk responded just 10 hours later, saying he had granted the request.
It was unclear how widely accessible it would be.
Meanwhile, the official account expressed appreciation.
Internet connectivity has been affected by the invasion, though the extent's not exactly clear.
Connectivity to the main internet provider even briefly plunged by 20% already on Friday, but it wasn't clear how much was caused by Ukrainians who are fleeing their homes.
We currently observe national connectivity at 87% of ordinary, reflecting service disruption as the population flies.
PASAC Starlink is growing network of private satellites hovering in low orbit to provide high-speed internet.
So this is in many ways a promotion, a commercial, for this internet service, Starlink.
Musk similarly offered to send terminals to Tonga where volcanic eruption interrupted internet access.
I think this is an entrepreneur who's making the best of a situation opportunistically.
Joe, your thoughts?
Something I hadn't had a chance to dig into yet, but was the Data Denial Act, which the United States passed, where you could block out entire sections of Google Maps, and probably that's what's happened in the war zone.
The state players would still have access to some of that material, but other folks, especially reporters, would not.
And so the other thing that you would do in an information war, and in any type of war, is you would like to be able to move without having all of your moves televised.
And so By taking out some portions of the internet, you're able to have a little bit of less satellite surveillance, but you still have surveillance of all of your radio communications, and by connecting to the Starlink satellite system, they would be able to upload the TikTok videos, which would give you on-the-ground human source real-time information about what's going on.
So, You know, Musk is not playing the saint that he likes to think of himself.
He's actually enabling a very evil system, but he's so highly funded by the government and every one of his money losing projects that he has to be a state player.
Yes, very good.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, that Elon Musk story is interesting to me.
There are some aspects of the world and the plan that we, the world we live in, and the plan that they're trying to apply to it that we find out about every day.
And just the fact that that system already has 1,500 satellites that are operational flying around the Earth or in stationary orbit is It's quite interesting, and it can just be turned on just by a nod of the head from Elon Musk.
It's very reminiscent of the Skynet scenario from the Terminator movies.
You know, you combine that satellite system blanketing the entire Earth with artificial intelligence control, and the concept called the Internet of Things, and now the Internet of Humans.
Humans are things in the Internet, which might be one of the agenda items behind getting everybody Injected with something that might be interactive with that.
It looks a lot like those Terminator movies, doesn't it?
A lot like those Terminator movies, indeed.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Just at a time when the military issues are becoming prominent.
Look at the United States, turned pink, turned woke, incapable of fighting a fight.
But at least it's going to be representative of the gay and lesbian population of America, thanks to Joe Biden and Lloyd Austin, who are doing to the American military what our foreign enemies could only wish they could do themselves.
They're grateful for the assist.
Meanwhile, The extraordinary story of how governments suppress effective COVID treatments and targeted physicians who prescribe them.
We're talking about HGQ and Ivermectin.
They knew better, but they acted anyway.
In 2020, I compiled a list of more than 50 ways authorities and pharma companies stopped the use of chloroquine drugs for COVID.
This was and is a stunning collection, widely read and reproduced in many places.
When you read it, you're astounded to learn that all the U.S.
and public health agencies took many different actions, leading to increased death and destruction from COVID.
Avoiding the Trump drug served as a great cover story.
Taking hydroxychloroquine with COVID was equated to drinking bleach.
But here's the kicker.
The authorities knew all about chloroquine and other treatments for COVID before there were COVID, because they'd figured it out during the 2003 SARS and the 2012 MERS epidemic, both caused by related coronaviruses, but they hushed it up.
Five Centers for Disease Control and Prevention U.S.
scientists, along with three Canadian government scientists in 2005, published a paper showing chloroquine was an effective drug against SARS.
European scientists showed the same in 2004.
The CDC paper concluded, chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection, suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage.
It was described as a miracle drug.
It would cure it if you had it and prevent it if you didn't.
Clarcoin looked very promising for both prevention and treatment of the first SARS.
After all, it had been used for decades to prevent and treat malaria.
Nine years later, scientists at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, run by Tony the Rat, published a study showing the same thing.
Moreover, their study revealed not only did it work in vitro against MERS coronavirus, but dozens of existing drugs, which could have been tested in patients as soon as the pandemic began, were also effective against SARS and MERS.
This is what the authors wrote.
We have found 66 of the screened drugs were effective at inhibiting either Mars COVID or SARS-CoV-2 in vitro, 27 were effective against both.
The data demonstrate the efficiency of screening approved or clinically developed drugs for identification of potential therapeutic options for emerging viral diseases.
Just in case you think these papers were flukes, two unrelated groups of European science found the same thing, a 2014 European paper published back-to-back.
I've cited the 2004 European paper elsewhere.
They can also be found in Bobby Jr.' 's book, The Real Tony Fauci.
On the other hand, if you're seeking misinformation on COVID, I'd recommend Fauci's book, Expect the Unexpected.
Ivermectin was not identified in the studies I cite, but some knew it was likely to work in early 2020, because the French Medencell Company, working with Monash University and supported then by Bill Gates, was developing an injectable version, which would be patentable.
Mident Cell issued a press release in January 6, 2020, an informational paper shortly thereafter.
There was a brief run on the veterinary drug at the time, but some people knew it might be effective for COVID and were acquiring veterinary version, but there was not a lot of buzz and sales did not take off at that time.
Here's what the FDA said way back when.
FDA is concerned about the health of consumers who may self-medicate by taking ivermectin products intended for animals, thinking they can be a substitute for ivermectin intended for humans, where to my understanding, by the way, they are chemically indistinguishable.
Please help us protect public health by alerting FDA of anyone claiming to have a product to prevent or cure COVID-19 and to help safeguard human and animal health by reporting any of these products.
Notice they don't actually say they don't work.
They're just asking you to report as though implying thereby that they're harmful.
In December 2020, a full eight months later, Senator Ron Johnson, of whom I'm very proud, held a Senate hearing focused on ivermectin's benefits for COVID.
Carrie Pierre, Dr. Perry Corey, original in New York, gave a particularly compelling speech.
People began paying attention.
YouTube then removed Corey's speech, censoring a Senate hearing.
I think the authorities were initially scared to repeat the same trick with ivermectin.
They'd use to break down the chloroquine drugs, and because ivermectin has efficacy late in the disease, As well as at the start, and is not toxic at several times normal dose.
Some of the tricks used against chloroquine, giving it to later overdosing, simply would not work with ivermectin and thus they kept quiet.
South Africa was a trial balloon on Christmas Eve of 2020.
South African authorities banned the importation of Ivermectin.
Local organizations, however, mounted legal actions and won.
Ivermectin was back on the shelf.
Thanks in great measure to frontline COVID critical care alliance, ivermectin's popularity gradually began to explode.
And the CDC published a report in August 2021 showing ivermectin prescriptions had quadrupled in a month, but is now showing at 25 times the pre-COVID rate.
Business Insider Report.
More than 88,000 prescriptions were filled by pharmacies.
Apparently this terrified the powers that be.
What if the pandemic were wiped out with ivermectin?
It worked too well.
Would that be the end of vaccine mandates?
Woosters?
Passports?
Digital IDs?
The end of the Great Reset?
Something had to be done and fast.
It had to be big.
It had to be effective.
Public health officials couldn't simply take the drug off the market.
That would require a long process and leave a paper trail.
What to do?
Scare the pants off of doctors.
Loss of license is the worst thing you can do to a dog.
Threaten their license, they'll immediately fall into line.
You can't get a prescription if there's no doctor to write it.
The powers that be could also scare pharmacies.
This requires stealth, no paper trail, intimidation backed by a one-two punch, actually suspending doctors and maybe pharmacists licenses.
Couple that with the huge media offensive threats from the industry of medical non-profits and misinformation as a medical misdemeanor.
Studiously failing to define it, make people think the legal prescribing of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine is a crime, even though off-label prescribing is entirely legal under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
Did Fauci give the order?
Was it CDC Director Walensky?
Maybe it was FDA Commissioner Janet Woodcock?
It was probably some combination, plus public relations professionals managing the messaging and the media to kill and maim more Americans than the worldwide population.
This is just the most disgraceful history we'll ever have of medicine in the United States, Joe.
Yeah, well, you had two stories there.
The first one's on the LBGT Army, and I'm going to cover that as I address two of the comments I got yesterday's program.
But getting back to the final topic that you were discussing, the alternative treatments, I attended a rally for the release from jail of Shelly Luther in Dallas at Dealey Plaza in May of 2009.
2009, wrote a great article on it called Remember the Alamode Review.
And her salon was called the Salon Alamode Hairstyle Studio.
And so that was kind of poignant.
It was posted at Fetzer's program, also at Principia Scientific.
And surprisingly enough, it was posted at the Texas AMA Journal, which is the state level journal, state-level journal, which I thought was really surprising because I go into the history of the AMA and how they work as a cabal of criminal organization dictating policy to the state licensing board and to the state pharmacy board.
So bottom line is the AMA is a racket that has complete control over doctors being able to get group rates for liability insurance, which is one of their major costs.
And one of the speakers at that rally was Dr. Yvette Lozano, who was a Dallas area doctor, who said that she had treated all of her staff prophylactically with HCQ, and that she had treated 30 patients, and she was one of the ones that was subject to a disciplinary hearing by the state board.
I did a little bit of extra research.
I was already very familiar with the alkaloid chemical family by being an A student in college chemistry, but I went a little bit further on quinine, which is the base drug that That all of those are derived from and it was stabilized in 1935 by a patent as chloroquine by Bayer company in Germany and then during the war they did a better on better stabilization of it as hydroxychloroquine.
It's been over the counter all over the world except the United States and it's on the physician's list of mandatory medicines.
It's been used For treatment of lupus, chronic fatigue syndrome, arthritis, a whole range of things where it's been off-label use and proven effective.
And so I started taking it in August last year.
I got my prescription from Stella Emanuel, who's the doctor here in the Houston area that's been an advocate of HCQ.
And I have had no repercussions from it.
I've also not even had a sniffle.
Yeah, I've taken both HGQ and Ivermectin and I credit it with having benefited me when I was being hit with something very, very hard that endured two weeks.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, that photo of that hot pink tank rolling down the street is certainly a sign of the times.
That's something I could have never guessed that I would see.
A gay pride battle tank.
Um, you know, and they call this clown world.
The fact that literally all the good preventive Early treatment drugs and supplements were crushed in the media and by the medical authorities who were running this phony pandemic constitutes a huge one of the huge tells that this whole thing was being done for an agenda.
I even had a friend here who got sick as a dog last November, and I asked her if she wanted me to bring her some ivermectin, but she had been brainwashed by that point.
So, she was like indignant, saying, No, Michael, I don't need any horse dewormer.
So, it hurt a lot of people and probably killed some people to have those early treatments crushed like they were.
They're backed up on all of those things now, of course, because everybody's learned the truth.
And speaking of that being a tell, there are a lot of people who are like truth telling commentators about this situation that have been making that very point, like that whole A wave of crushing all the early treatments is a big tell.
Lots of people who are testifying before the Reiner Fulmich Group, and that's also in Bobby Kennedy's new book.
So, you know, it hasn't gone unnoticed.
It's just that everybody's wondering whether or not there's anything in place that would bring these criminals to justice.
Yes, yes, yes.
Excellent.
Excellent, Michael.
Spot on.
Oh, and one other thing having to do with the crushing of the early Early treatments was that and I'm sure you know this there.
There is a specific provision that is a requirement for anything to be approved on emergency use authorization.
The EUA status for these vaccines and that requirement is that there are no current good tested alternatives available.
You're absolutely right.
I've made that point many times, but it's worth emphasizing again, Michael.
You're absolutely right.
They could not have got the emergency use for the MRAVACs were hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin available, which they were.
Therefore, they had to undertake a massive propaganda campaign to suppress that information and deceive the CDC and the FDA, which had to know better.
Meanwhile, the pandemic enters its final stage and its real purpose is exposed.
This is from Dr. Joe Mercola, who's a completely brilliant guy.
Story at a glance.
Feb 21, the Canadian Parliament approved Justin Trudeau's motion to invoke the Emergency Act in response to the peaceful trucker protest against vaccine mandates.
Under the Act, Canadian banks can seize personal bank accounts of anyone suspected in participating in or supporting the protest, and those surveillance powers are intended to become permanent.
February 14, Canadian Finance Minister Chris Freeland said the government was using the Emergencies Act to broaden Canada's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing rules to cover crowdfunding platforms and their payment service providers.
The broadened surveillance power requires all digital transactions, including cryptocurrencies, to be reported to the Financial Transaction Reports Analysis Center of Canada.
What's happening in Canada should be a sobering wake-up call for the whole world.
Governments intend to control dissent through financial blackmail, which is why they're also pushing for programmable central bank digital currencies.
Programmable currency is digital cash programmed to ensure it can only be spent on essentials or goods an employer or government deems to be sensible.
In other words, the issuer of the money would have complete control over how you spend your own money and could punish you for undesirable options or behavior by restricting your purchasing ability or seizing your funds altogether.
This is the future.
This is disgusting.
The act was invoked to allow the government to physically disperse a truck or convoy without actually listening to their complaint and to punish anyone who supported the protest.
The broad power requires all forms of digital transactions, including cryptocurrency, to be reported as mentioned.
The trucker convoy which assembled to protest coronavirus restrictions has highlighted the fact that digital assets and funding weren't captured by the Canadian government's pre-existing surveillance powers observed freelance.
As a result, they moved to take care of it.
When he announced his invocation of the Order of Promise, the Canadian people, his expanded authorities would be time-limited, geographically targeted, reasonable and proportional to the threats they were meant to address.
Not a single part of that claim is proven to be true.
Without court order and due process, the government can now freeze bank accounts, cancel insurance policies, revoke driver's licenses.
Victims have no recourse or remedy under the law.
The next step is the implementation of programmable digital currencies worldwide, as reported by The Telegraph in June of 2021.
The Bank of England has already started moving on a programmable central bank digital currency, there's no doubt, this is the plan, for all central banks worldwide.
That programmable currency might restrict freedom is probably the understatement of the century.
It's an absolute given.
Imagine your employer, your government, and the central bank having the privilege to dictate how you spend your own money.
Imagine a third party deciding how you're allowed to spend on rent, kind of food or clothing you're allowed to buy, hobbies you're allowed to spend money on, and when.
That's the power they intend to obtain in current events in Canada.
Prove it!
The socially beneficial outcomes that are supposed to be derived thereby are that an unelected cabal will have the ability to micromanage your personal finances and dictate your behavior in every aspect of your life.
They could determine that, for example, a British activist, Joe Rogan, was playing to appear that someone was going to appear on Joe Rogan's show and simply reprogram his currency with a click of a button so he wouldn't be allowed to purchase a plane ticket.
So much for that plan.
It's disgusting.
It's disgraceful.
And it's what they have in mind.
It's the ultimate realization of the Great Reset.
When you subtract about 7 billion population from the planet, Joe.
Yeah, well, Canada's a beta test for their brand new reset currency and their bank social credit system and their green passport, which they're all trying to force down at the same time.
And Twinkle Toes Trudeau is one of the Schwabettes.
And a perfect example of how this impacts ripples all the way through a system, they shut down the SWIFT system in Russia as one of the sanctions.
And that means that everybody that had an internationally-based credit, debit card, had absolutely no access to any type of transactions at all.
And there's photos online of the subways in Moscow, where there's hundreds of people standing in line and they don't have cash.
And so that caused an immediate draw in the bank the same way it did in Canada.
And then that means all they've got to do is say, well, we've discovered there's germs that are running around all the cash, so we have to remove all the cash from the market, and then that will force you...
Well said, Joe.
social credit score banking system where they can exterminate any segment of the society that's putting up any kind of resistance at all.
If you don't understand what feudalism is and what totalitarianism is, wake up because it's right in front of your eyes, kids.
Well said, Joe.
Michael.
Joe, you just inadvertently tossed out the greatest name for the new popular music group I've ever heard, Twinkle Toes Trudeau and the Schwabettes.
That's great!
Yeah, there was, in that Mercola article, there was a quote from the National Review that must have been written between the time that those economic sanctions against the people of Canada were being announced and the time that he rolled it back.
Because it says that he, Trudeau, said that it would be time limited.
And then the National Review said not a single part of that sentence has proved to be true.
Well, it only lasted through.
Four days, maybe a week.
Yeah, between the spoiler alert that it constituted for governments cutting off your funding as a means of social control and the fact that it created a run on Canadian banks, Justin Castro must have gotten a call from his controllers and told to roll that one back as soon as possible.
There's a nice meme that has Trudeau in a worried position and the meme says, shit, I just jumped the gun by having the bank shut down people's bank accounts.
Now everyone knows how dangerous digital currency and a social credit score is.
Yes, yes, yes, yes.
They didn't want the run on the bank because they want the money to be in the bank so they can control it, so they had them roll it back.
But it was revealing, exactly as you observed, Michael.
Very, very well said.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or contra, live.
Need to know at gmail.com.
Live.
Need to know at gmail.com.
Here in relation to the crisis in Ukraine, it's not about Ukraine, it's about Germany, here are some comments.
Now that makes more sense than anything I've read to date.
I dare say that if Trump were here, negotiation would be primary and war off the table.
But with Brandon there, war is on the table, since a man has no verbal skills and could not negotiate his way out of a bathroom stall.
This is not to say I believe we should have any say in the matter, but geopolitics rule, and nation-states only exist as a distant memory.
What a time to have a virtual imbecile at the helm.
Russia bad, Ukraine good, Germany the pawn.
The puppet show continues.
The corporatose pulls the strings.
Here's another.
That's some intriguing insight.
The confusion grows by the day on what's actually happening.
Separating the wheat from the chaff in the alternative media is a full-time job.
No wonder so many have permanently tuned out.
Perhaps they're better off than mainstream news consumers who think they know what's going on, but actually have no clue.
I heard someone spouting off in the lift line the other day what NATO needs to do about Ukraine, and it was boilerplate news ministry speak.
Biden's eyes get more slipped like every time I see him up here.
Eventually they will be just two little horizontal lines.
Is there anything behind those lines?
Eyes?
Maybe he's been replaced by a Westworld lifelike robot.
Another.
Here's another viewpoint about Russia's soft invasion of Ukraine from an American in Kiev.
I think he's making a boatload of sense.
His take is Russia wants to capture Ukraine intact, along with its military.
So they own the sky and are careful not to destroy civilian infrastructure like water, power, and communication utilities.
The Russians are also being careful not to harm any civilians, and that Russia could have annihilated the Ukrainian military already and have not.
Check him out.
Meanwhile, remember, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep, 5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
I am trying to do something about it.
Amazon banned my book, so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Then they sued to shut me up, and the Wisconsin courts played along.
I have the proof and the law on my side.
What I don't have is the money.
They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
Take guns in post-tyranny.
And it's on the way with Remington's help.
First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
Check it out.
This is for all of the marbles.
And if you go there to GiveSendGo.com slash Funding Fetzer, here's what you'll find.
An explanation of how my suit involves offending the First and the Second Amendment.
I'll be very grateful for your support.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Joe.
Yeah, well, I had two comments that I made in our program yesterday with Carl Herman.
One of them regarded the man who's responsible for training all of our Western Pacific fighting forces against the most horrible enemy of the entire world, World War II, and that was the Japanese.
And his name was Lieutenant Colonel Francosos de Esquilu, and he had a program And I found a Dark Docs video on that, and I posted a gab along with the intro that says, our fairies cannot beat their fairies because they don't have any fairies.
Well, I guarantee you the Japanese didn't have any fairies, and I don't think the Nazis had a whole bunch of them, and we didn't beat them with a bunch of our fairies.
So that's item number one.
And then item number two, I mentioned that Hot Lips Houlihan had passed away.
And somebody got real incensed about that, like you're not supposed to talk about current affairs.
So I did a little bit of research on Hot Lips Houlihan.
The series MASH was...
was based on a 1968 novel by Richard Hooker and W.C.
Hines, and it's gallows humor about how horrible it was in the war zone, and it was a very popular anti-war movie in 1970, starring Sutherland and Elliott and Axley Struthers.
And then it was also turned into a TV series starting in 72 and lasted for 10 years.
So that's a pretty important thing.
And the problem with having LBG as a major focus of your country is that these people are non-reproductive.
They have no genetic investment in any offspring because you can't produce offspring without having opposite sex coupling.
And so what happens is they've They first got allowed to do sodomy, and then orgies, and then they were able to subvert marriage, and then they're working real hard on pedophilia, incest, bestiality, necrophilia, and ultimately cannibalism.
So, bottom line is any taboo that makes civilization a better place for humans is something that these demons are opposed to, and that's why I'm opposed to them.
So, I'm sorry if it offends you, but I'm just not into the Rainbow Gang.
Well said, Joe, Michael.
Well said, indeed.
I'm going to read a statement that was part of her grand jury testimony by former Goldman Sachs manager Leslie Manoukian.
Goes like this.
What they have done is unconscionable to us, to any of us who have a shred of decency in our hearts.
I think that it served their overall agenda for reducing the population.
If you want to rule the world, do you want to have to control 10 billion people, or do you want to have to control 15 billion, or 500 million even?
Another not so sinister possibility is that they're injecting, oh, sorry, I'm going to skip that.
There's no way to explain the tens of thousands of deaths that have been reported to the CDC and the European Medical Agency, and yet these products persist in being marketed to the public.
There's no explanation for that that is innocent.
There's no explanation because obviously there's no way to ever repay the $30 trillion.
It's always been about politics and power with no way of their ever making good on their promises.
So any thinking person has to conclude that what's happening is a global coup.
I'm sure people will lambast me as a conspiracy theorist, but there is no innocent explanation for what's happening around the world right now.
If what's happening was innocent, they wouldn't have silenced all the doctors and scientists.
They wouldn't have given this to innocent children and pregnant women.
They wouldn't have done anything that they've done.
They would have taken these injections off the market.
They wouldn't have changed the definition of pandemic and the definition of a vaccine.
They wouldn't have done all the things that they've done if there was a valid, innocent explanation.
Close quote.
Extremely good.
Spot on.
Another Texas Tuesday with my two brilliant friends, Joe Olson from Houston, Michael Ivey, formerly from Fort Worth.
Let me say, tonight will be the State of the Union.
But the State of the Union is calamitous.
We have open borders, soaring inflation, rising gas prices, supply problems.
We had a calamitous withdrawal from Afghanistan.
Biden, the president, appears to be utterly incompetent.
Kamala, the vice president, has even lower ratings.
They cannot address the state of the union.
So what's going to happen today will be the state of the world.
Russia, bad.
Ukraine, good.
Germany must punish by not going with a Nord Stream 2 pipeline.
That will be the theme tonight.
Watch it, if you will, myself.
I'm going to be watching No.
10 Wisconsin play basketball against Purdue No. 8.
The Big Ten Conference with my family, whom I love.
And I encourage you, like me, to spend as much time as you can with your friends and family and those you love, because we still do not know how much time we have left.
Export Selection