All Episodes
Previous Next
March 1, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:18:39
Need to Know News (28 February 2022) with Joe Olson and Carl Herman
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, delighted to be joined today by Joe Olson in Houston and Carl Herman in San Ramon, California.
We're here to give you the news you need to know.
Obviously, it begins with Russia, Putin, Ukraine.
Special military operation taking place.
Explosions reported in multiple cities.
Putin said in an emergency address the operation's intended to protect civilians and demilitarize terrain.
A response to threats coming from there.
He said Russia does not plan to occupy Ukraine and that the Ukrainian military should lay down its arms.
Also asserted, and this is very important, any foreign attempt to interfere with Russia's action will trigger an immediate reaction from Russia and will lead to consequences they have not seen before.
Now, in sorting it out, I think Mike Whitney has figured out exactly what's going on, that the crisis in Ukraine is not actually about Ukraine, it's about Germany.
He begins with a quote from George Friedman, Stratfor CEO, speaking to the Chicago Council on Foreign Affairs.
The primordial interest of the United States, over which for centuries we have fought wars, the First, the Second, and Cold Wars, has been the relationship between Germany and Russia, because united there, they're the only force that could threaten us, and to make sure that that doesn't happen.
The Ukrainian crisis, he begins, has nothing to do with Ukraine.
It's about Germany, in particular a pipeline connecting Germany to Russia called Nord Stream 2.
Washington sees a pipeline as a threat to its primacy in Europe, has sought to sabotage the project at every turn.
Even so, Nord Stream is pushed ahead and is now fully operational and ready to go.
Once German regulators provide final certification, gas deliveries will begin.
German homeowners and businesses will have a reliable source of clean and inexpensive energy, while Russia will see a significant boost in its gas revenues.
It's a win-win for both parties.
The U.S.
foreign policy establishment is shitting bricks.
They don't want Germany to become more dependent on Russian gas because commerce builds trust.
Trust leads to expansion of trade.
As relations grow warmer, more trade barriers are lifted, regulations are eased, travel and tourism increase, and a new security architecture evolves.
In a world where Germany and Russia are friends and trading partners, there is no need for U.S.
military bases, no need for expensive U.S.-made weapons and missile systems, no need for NATO.
This is the bottom line.
This is why Biden has been opposed to Nord Stream.
It's not just a pipeline.
It's a window into the future, a future in which Europe and Asia are drawn closer together in a massive free trade zone that increases their mutual power and possibility while leaving the U.S.
on the outside looking in.
Warmer relations signal an end to the unipolar world order the U.S.
has overseen for the last 75 years.
A Russo-German alliance threatens to hasten the decline of the superpower, presently inching closer to the abyss.
That's why Washington is determined to do everything it can to sabotage Nord Stream and keep Germany within its orbit.
It's a matter of survival.
That's where Ukraine comes into play.
This is Washington's weapon of choice to torpedo Nord Stream and create a wedge between Germany and Russia.
The strategy taken from page one of U.S.
foreign policy handbook, Divide and Rule.
They need to create the perception of Russia as a security threat to Europe.
That's the goal.
Portray Putin as a bloodthirsty aggressor with a hair-trigger temper who cannot be trusted.
The media has been given the assignment of reiterating over and over again, Russia is planning to invade, Russia is planning to invade, and now, of course, Russia has.
What's left unsaid is that Russia has not invaded any other country since the dissolution of the Soviet Union, while the U.S.
has invaded or toppled regimes in more than 50 countries in the same period of time, that the U.S.
maintains over 800 bases in countries around the world.
None of this, of course, is reported.
Instead, the focus is on evil Butin, who's amassed troops.
All the hysterical war propaganda is creating the manufacturer crisis to isolate, demonize, and ultimately splinter Russia into smaller units.
The real target is not Russia, but Germany.
Here's an article from Michael Hudson at the UNS Review.
The only way left for US diplomats to block European purchases of gas from Russia is to goad Russia into a military response and then claim that avenging this response outweighs any purely national economic interest.
As Hawking's Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Victoria Nuland explained back on January 27th, If Russia invades Ukraine one way or another, Nord Stream 2 will not move forward.
Notice, one way or another.
Meanwhile, of course, Victoria Nuland had created the coup in 2014 that took out the pro-Russian president of Ukraine and replaced him with a Western stooge.
But there it is, in black and white.
The Biden team wants to goad Russia into a military response to sabotage Nord Stream.
This implies there will be provocation for Putin to send in his troops.
If Putin takes the bait, and he has, the response would be swift and harsh.
The media will excoriate the action as a threat to all of Europe, while leaders around the world would denounce him as the new Hitler.
This is Washington's strategy in a nutshell.
orchestrated with one goal in mind, to make it politically impossible for the German Chancellor to waive Nord Stream through the final approval process.
Given what we know, one may wonder why Biden did not lobby Congress to impose more sanctions on the project.
The answer is domestic politics.
Germany is currently decommissioning its nuclear power plants.
Needs natural gas to make up for the shortfall of energy.
The threat of economic sanctions is a turnoff for Germans.
See them as a sign of foreign meddling.
Why is the U.S.
interfering in our energy decision?
Asks the average German.
Washington should mind its own business and stay out of wars.
Then there's this from Al Jazeera.
Germans in the majority support the project.
It's only parts of the elite and media who are against the pipeline.
The more the U.S.
talks about sanctioning or criticizing, the more it becomes popular in Germany.
So the public is solidly for Nord Stream, which is why Washington has flipped to Plan B.
Create an external threat sufficient, German will be forced to block the opening of the pipeline.
Frankly, the strategy smacks of desperation, but you have to be impressed by Washington's perseverance.
Monday, Biden held his first press conference with German Chancellor Schultz.
The ballyhoo was simply unprecedented.
Everything was orchestrated to manufacture a crisis atmosphere.
Jen Psaki repeatedly said Russian invasion was imminent.
Moreover, this is just before, days after Bloomberg had published its sensational and utterly false headline, Russia Invades Ukraine, before it had come to pass.
Look how these baseless claims are used to apply pressure to the unsuspecting German chancellor.
As one might expect, the final blow is delivered by Biden himself.
He said emphatically, if Russia invades, there will be no North Stream 2.
We will bring an end to it.
So now Washington sets policy for Germany?
What insufferable arrogance!
The German Chancellor was taken aback.
It wasn't part of the script.
Even though if Biden thought he could sandbag the leader of the world's third largest economy by cornering him in a public forum, he guessed wrong.
Germany remains committed to Nord Stream, regardless of potential flare-ups in far-flung Ukraine.
But that could change at any time.
For now, Germany's in the catwood seat.
It's up to Shultz to decide how the matter will be settled.
Will he implement the policy that best serves the interests of the German people?
Or will he cave to Biden's relentless arm-twisting?
Will he chart a new course, strengthening new alliances in the bustling Eurasian corridor?
Or will he throw his support behind Washington's crazed geopolitical impatience?
Will he accept Germany's pivotal role in a new world order in which many emerging centers of power share equally in global governance and where leadership remains unflinchingly committed to multinaturalism, peaceful development, and security for all?
Or will he try to prop up the tattered postwar system that has clearly outlived its shelf life?
One thing is certain, whatever Germany decides is bound to affect us all.
Joe, I think that's the best piece I've seen yet about what's going on here.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, first a little bit of sad news.
Every 60s teenager's wet dream of a cougar has just passed away.
Sally Kellerman, Hot Lips from MASH, passed away, so a moment of sadness for that.
Really miss her.
And she lived out in Los Angeles, so probably she got talked into being jabbed, so she'll never be listed as a jab victim, but You know, you just gotta guess when somebody has a sudden heart attack problem that maybe that has a contributing factor.
Yeah, what we're seeing is predictive programming, and the hyperbole is just absolutely over the top.
Here's people saying this is the biggest conflict in Europe since World War II.
Did everybody forget about Serbia and Bosnia?
That looked like a pretty big conflict.
Did everybody forget about the United States dragging NATO into Afghanistan and then dropping 60,000 bombs on Libya?
You know, NATO has gone long past its expiration date and this is just proving once again that it absolutely doesn't need to exist.
And another bit of sad news, the world's largest airplane An Antonov, A-N-T-O-N-O-V, A-N-2-2-5, six-engine jet cargo plane was inoperational.
It was in a hangar and it was destroyed by a Russian, they claim, by Russian fire on a military airport base.
And they said the plane has just virtually been destroyed.
So a little bit of sad news from people that are aviation buffs.
And, you know, just collateral damage that there's going to be a whole lot of collateral damage before this is over.
But the best collateral damage is going to be to take out these clowns that have been running that cesspool country for a long time.
Carl sent a great video of the current president when he was former playing president on TV, playing the piano with one of his friends without using his hands.
So use your imagination, folks.
We'll put a clip down in the comments.
That's a pretty clever guy.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yes, yes, yes.
Maybe that was his audition tape for being selected president of Ukraine.
So the key context, that is a great article, and it included Michael Hudson, who is a monetary reform colleague of mine, is that the information on need-to-know news that people won't get from corporate media is the context that U.S.
corporate media is just lying, sacks a spin.
You go to Carl B. Herman Blackspot, any of these shows, and there's my published research Documenting how corporate media, those five companies that dominate ordinary media to the sheeple, were lying about everything to start the wars formerly known on terror.
So these NATO leaders, they're just war criminals.
You got to reject their testimony.
Ukraine was color revolutionized.
And then Tulsi Gabbard had a 44 second excellent bit to remind people of that history.
I saw it on BitTube.
That In the Ukraine what they did is now they now have oh yeah they have a democracy yeah the type of democracy that's the authoritarian type of democracy where you accuse your political opponent of crimes and then you have him arrested and then the newspapers that print articles favorable to the political opponent you arrest those guys too and shut down those papers that's what we have in Ukraine.
Being led by the piano playing penis man.
Yes.
They have a voting machine democracy with those Dominion machines.
That's what they have.
And the Ukraine also was the leading contributor to the Clinton Foundation, whose tax records demonstrate only 10 percent of that money went to charities.
And even that 10 percent is suspect.
And that you have the children of John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Biden and Mitt Romney, all as energy experts in the Ukraine.
What we need is we need the Keystone and the Nord Stream pipeline, not Hunter Biden's crack pipe lined pockets with his million dollars a year that he got from Burisma as a natural gas expert.
I think those are great points, Carl.
And what Putin appears to be doing is actually cleaning up a cesspool of corruption in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, you're being played with Ukraine narrative, we're being told.
One day after reporting on the U.S.
biolabs in Ukraine, the U.S.
Embassy scrubs all Ukraine bioweapon lab docs from its website.
They're all over.
What do we have, a dozen or 15 U.S.
biolabs in Ukraine?
The laboratories are located in Odessa, Vinnytsia, Lviv-3, Kiev-3, Kherson, Tbilisi, and near Crimea and Luhansk.
Two other possible locations, Karavik and Mayabov.
On Friday, I provided documentation on the fact the U.S.
has biolabs in Ukraine.
It's possible part of the intervention by Russia is intended to wipe them out.
I also verified the U.S.
government had documentation, but as of Saturday, it had been wiped out.
I verified it.
The U.S.
Embassy in Ukraine had a biological threat reduction program.
It's very curious that they should have wiped the record clean of the existence of this site.
That suggests to me consciousness of guilt.
According to the official description, the U.S.
Department of Defense Biological Threat Reduction Program collaborates with partner countries to counter the threat of outbreaks—deliberate, accidental, or natural—of the world's most dangerous infectious diseases.
The program accomplishes its bioreduction mission through development of a biorisk management culture, international research partnership, and partner capacity for enhanced biosecurity, biosafety, and biosurveillance measures.
The biological threat reduction program's priorities in Ukraine are to consolidate insecure pathogens and toxins of security concern, continue to ensure Ukraine can detect and report outbreaks caused by dangerous pathogens before they pose security or stability threats.
There's a fair amount about it, but it appears that it's all been wiped, which raises the real serious presumption that it may be a threat not just to Russia, but to the whole world has been festering in Ukraine and that Vladimir Putin has had enough and is cleaning it out.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, the immediate impact of this little fiasco over in Ukraine is that there's four gas lines that come from Russian gas fields that pass through Ukraine and feed Western Europe.
And Ukraine had been systematically stealing about 10% of that as well as charging a tax on it as it passed through their country.
And so that's the reason for the Nordstrom line was to provide a more stable supply, number one.
Number two, to be able to provide it a more effective rate.
The immediate impact of the attacks was that there was a 60% increase in the spot market price of natural gas in Western Europe.
And I just pulled up Berlin's weather forecast.
Monday, high of 46 Fahrenheit, low of 26.
And that is the consistent weather all week long.
It doesn't get any higher than 46.
And by the end of the week, it's going to be 40 degree high, 31 degree Fahrenheit low.
So they've still got winter.
And if you take out your main source of alternate power that can work when you don't have wind and solar, and you take out your coal plants and you take out your nuclear plants and all you're left with is natural gas and you take out your natural gas, then you have the perfect scenario for the dark winter then you have the perfect scenario for the dark winter exercise that John D. Rockefeller and Hopkins University did in June of 2001, before the 9-1-1 event.
They were planning on doing this at some point in the near future, and guess what?
We're at the future.
Yeah, I think you're right.
I mean, I think the German people are going to revolt.
I mean, they were going to get extra cheap energy.
They were going to have a wonderful relation with Russia.
I don't think they're going to welcome their leaders deciding for political reasons that the public cannot have cheap energy.
Carl, your thoughts?
Nine, the German people will say that.
Every good rogue state empire, and if you go to Carl B. Herman Blogspot, if you go to any of these shows in the context section, is that we are dealing with the U.S.
as the gangster leader of the international rogue state empire.
Of course, they have research into biological weapons.
That's what they all do.
In 2005, I contributed a 40-page white paper that Congressman Kucinich leveraged for the impeachments of Bush and Cheney.
And part of the Data points in those 200 footnotes I had is that the U.S.
refuses inspections for their nuclear facilities, and I believe in there as well was the treaties associated with biological weapons.
I'm not sure about that, but they probably don't allow inspections for that either, of course.
And the U.S., again, has killed approximately 30 million people around the world since World War II.
In these wars for freedom and democracy.
And Joe, I did see that information for the natural gas prices and the prices.
So apparently the market feels that the pipeline is still in good political water because those gas prices dropped back down when I looked either last night or very early this morning to just a little bit above where they were pre-war.
So hopefully saner voices will prevail, and at the very least, it's an opportunity for the German people to stand up and to speak for what's best for Germans to make Germany first.
Well, what I love about Mike Whitney's article is make it crystal clear why the U.S.
is absolutely opposed to this.
It's going to make the U.S., NATO, all the expensive military equipment no longer relevant to Europe.
It's going to bring in a new era, and the U.S.
is going to be left on the outside looking in.
Meanwhile, the U.S., U.K., Europe, and Canada are blocking Russian access to SWIFT.
This is an international payment system as part of another round of sanctions.
The measure, which will include restriction on the Russian Central Bank's international reserves, will be coming in the next few days.
This is going to encourage Russia and China and Iran, no doubt.
To go forward in developing their own independent financial system.
Meanwhile, in what I believe is a highly unwise move, NATO has activated its response force to deploy thousands of troops near Ukraine.
How often have accidental events initiated world wars?
Friday, NATO announced the alliance was activating part of its response force, sending thousands of troops to countries near Ukraine.
The U.S.
and NATO have reaffirmed they have no plan to send troops into Ukraine, but NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg said the alliance is prepared to defend every inch of NATO territory, including countries that border both Russia and Ukraine.
Reminiscent of Secretary of State James Baker's declaration to Mikhail Gorbachev That the NATO nation would not encroach one inch to the east, which they have grossly violated.
The world has to understand that NATO has struck the blow here, not Russia, which is merely standing up for its own national defense.
Imagine if the Chinese had missile batteries all along our southern border in Mexico or our northern border in Canada.
That is the equivalent Of what the Russians now confront.
Thursday, Biden ordered 7,000 troops deployed to Germany, has bolstered its forces in the Baltics, Poland, and Romania, where US troops are not far from the fighting in Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Putin has ordered Russian nuclear forces to be on the highest state of alert.
Western countries are not only taking unfriendly actions against our country in the economic area.
I'm speaking about the illegitimate sanctions everyone is well aware of.
However, the top officials of the leading NATO countries are also making aggressive statements against our country as well.
As a consequence, he ordered the Minister of Defense and Chief of General Staff to transfer the deterrence force to a special mode of combat duty.
It's not exactly clear what that means, but it does suggest that they're prepared that if other countries intervene, they will face consequences they have never seen before.
Putin's order means Russia's nuclear weapons are prepared for increased readiness to launch.
During a CBS News appearance, U.S.
Ambassador to the U.N.
Linda Thompson-Greenfield replied, President Putin has continued to escalate this war in a manner that is totally unacceptable, and we have to continue to condemn his actions in the most strong, strongest way possible.
Now, there's a lot of talk against the banking sector.
This is now Russian spokesman Lukashenko said, gas, oil, swift, it's worse than war.
This is pushing Russia into a third world war.
The alarming steamy street fighting broke out in Ukraine's second largest city, Kiev.
However, the camera was eerily quiet.
The past night was tough, more shelling, more bombing of residential and civilian infrastructure, which I think is false.
I'm convinced the Russians want to minimize civilian casualties and want the country's infrastructure to remain intact.
But this is the landscape.
Claiming there's not a single facility in the country the occupiers wouldn't consider as admissible targets.
I think that's complete and total bullshit.
Meanwhile, Gregory Hood has tweeted the very appropriate observation.
Russians aren't seizing your bank account, censoring the news, forcing you to take questionable vaccines, getting you fired, attacking you in the street, replacing you with foreigners, and making you second-class citizens.
The people who want war with Russia are doing all that.
Well said.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, Russia is the third largest producer of gold in the world, and they presently have 2,000 tons of gold.
And Omar Khadafi in Libya had 143 tons of gold, and he was a major threat to the banking system.
So you can imagine what a powerful Russia could do to the system.
And we saw what the banking system is capable of doing in the very near future worldwide.
And that's what they did to the truckers in Canada when they seized all their accounts.
Well, now there's an interesting story at the Conservative Treehouse.
Increasingly, people everywhere stopped using cash to pay for simple purchases.
Electronic payments shifted to credit cards and debit cards.
Well, now Visa, MasterCard, Apple Pay, Google Pay and others have shut off banking in Russia.
And so now there's people standing in line in the subways that don't have coins or cash to be able to pay their subway fares.
And so, you know, that's going to be a momentary seizure in their country.
But I guarantee you they will realize the value of cash and they will realize the folly of electronic banking systems and centralized banks.
and being involved in this stupid SWIFT system anyway.
And so who knows?
Maybe we'll be all using a digital currency based in Russia, based on real gold, and based on a stable economy sometime in the near future.
It could happen.
Oh, those are very discerning observations, Joe.
Carl, yours?
Well, these stories are great and increasing in tension with SWIFT.
I think what we're looking at is an attempt to get to the Great Reset, which is kind of connected to this whole scandemic thing.
And the Great Reset is because what we use for money is created by our oligarchs as a debt owed back to them with interest.
This mechanical system of adding negative numbers forever creates an exponential growth curve, which is what we're witnessing, and that'll collapse by its own weight.
But what our opponents will do, of course, is they'll come up with some excuse to artificially collapse it and then blame it on Russia.
So NATO, of course, has to demonize Russia.
They absolutely have to, because NATO are really the leaders of this neocolonial empire led by the U.S., the U.K., and Israel for these wars around the world.
To take natural resources and to keep human resources controlled on the ground to maximize the profits of those natural resources.
And of course Russia is going to put their nuclear weapons on highest alert.
That goes without saying, any nation that would be involved in a military procedure would be prepared with their strongest Defense and deterrent, of course.
Now, I have looked at, I think one of you guys sent it to me, an abundance of fake videos, a couple from video games, one that was an air show.
Let's see, what else do we have?
Oh, one that had a shot out balcony with a woman crying, but the camera pans down, and strangely, Ukraine has tropical plants that are alive and well in the middle of winter there.
I found that hard to believe.
And another one, my favorite, was a shot where they had about a hundred people lined up at night, running and screaming toward a camera, and it was about a 20-second clip, and they said, Action and they all ran and then they got past the camera and cut and that was the screaming scared war people.
So the last part is that we need to know also that Ukraine is being supported and cheered by the leaders of the empire.
We have Maria Abramovich that which Biden, Clinton, Bush, Obama, Pelosi, etc., etc., etc.
are trying to all get people to support Ukraine, that authoritarian non-democracy.
Good points.
Good points, Carl.
Yes, yes.
All the usual suspects are right there pitching.
Meanwhile, Trump at CPAC.
The Ukraine invasion is an assault on humanity and U.S.
borders must be defended.
The 45th president told the conference.
Under Bush, Russia invaded Georgia.
Under Obama, Russia took Crimea.
Under Biden, Russia invaded Ukraine.
I stand as the only president of the 21st century on whose watch Russia did not invade another country.
He said during his administration the world was a peaceful place because America was strong.
I was proud to be the first president in decades who did not get our country into any wars.
I got you out of wars.
He's 100% correct about that.
Go back through Reagan and others up to the present.
Every one of them had anywhere from five to seven to three wars.
Only Trump had none.
Biden is perceived as weak, asserting Putin decided to attack only having witnessed the United States' withdrawal from Afghanistan.
I have no doubt Putin made his decision to ruthlessly attack only after watching the pathetic withdrawal from Afghanistan, where the military was taken out first and our soldiers were killed.
And American hostages, plus $85 billion worth of the finest equipment in the world, was left behind.
Putin is playing Biden like a drum.
The problem is not that Putin is smart, which of course he is.
The real problem is our leaders are dumb, so dumb.
They so far allowed him to get away with his travesty and assault on humanity, and the NATO nations and the rest of the world are not so smart and are looking the opposite of smart.
I think he hasn't fully fathomed exactly what's going on here in the games that are being played.
He does observe that as Putin escalates, oil prices keep climbing higher and higher.
Russia, the second largest exporter of crude oil and the largest natural gas exporter, Accounting for 17% of the world's natural gas, 12% of the oil.
It's impacting oil prices.
When he was president, oil was $36 a barrel.
Now it's $100, and it's heading $150.
It's horrible because it's a disincentive for Putin to disengage.
He noted under his admin, costs of energy and gas were brought to record lows.
With Biden, you get a war on Europe and a war on American energy.
With Republicans, you get energy independence and energy dominance.
Separately, the former President and Democrats have been saying Ukraine's sovereignty must defend it at all costs.
Even while they're destroying our own borders and surrendering our own sovereignty, we have a border that is a catastrophe.
The most important duty of every elected lawmaker is to protect and defend America begins with protecting and defending America's borders.
They care more about Ukraine's borders than they do about those of the United States.
I believe America deserves a president who will stop the invasion of our country.
We had it stopped a year ago.
You can't defend Western civilization if you're not able to defend your own, and that means we need borders that work.
Stop the influx of illegal aliens.
Our country has been poisoned from within.
The Biden administration cares more about helping citizens of a distant foreign nation than it does our own.
If Democrats want to fight for democracy abroad, they should start with Canada, where truckers and other Canadians have been protesting for basic rights against the country's COVID-19 restrictions and mandates.
He called this situation a tyranny that should shock and dismay people all over the world.
Interestingly, Tulsi Gabbard also spoke at CPAC, which I believe, I surmise, is her transition from being a Democrat to being an independent Tulsi rips into the power elite the Biden-Clinton-Neo-Con-Neo-Lib foreign policy.
Well said.
A Hawaiian U.S.
army Iraq war veteran, slammed what she dubbed the Biden-Clinton-Neo-Con-Neo-Lib foreign policy, saying in our ideal world, our leaders would haul James Clapper, former director of national intelligence before a judge, haul him before a judge, or perhaps more appropriately, haul him before a judge, or perhaps more appropriately, keelhaul him.
And they would support the Durham investigation in Clinton, that's Hillary's corruption in 2016.
Gibbard referred to the discovery by John Durham too, that Hillary paid cybersecurity experts to hack into Trump's election campaign, while White House computer servers helped establish a narrative to back her false claim that the Republican former president colluded with Russia to defeat her.
The latest strategy and tactics they're using, she observed, is to try to undermine our free speech by calling it upon themselves to say they have the responsibility to protect us from misinformation.
Thereby, they can censor everyone who's critical of what they do, rather than enter into a debate with those who criticize it.
The investigation opts to adopt cancel culture.
I'm sure you've heard it all before I have today.
Russian asset, white supremacist, bigot, racist, extremist, traitor, pointing to the wording of a Department of Homeland Security bulletin, a summary of terrorist threats to the U.S.
homeland.
If one is thrown into the crosshairs in an envy of the state, if you even question the president, his administration, or his policies, Tulsi had tweeted, Great thank you Hillary Clinton, you the queen of warmongers, embodiment of corruption and personification of the rot that has sickened the Democratic Party for so long, have finally come out from behind the curtain.
From the day I announced my candidacy, she attacked what she slammed as tribalism, warning it's dangerous and emblematic of an erosion of the spiritual foundation of the country.
Concluding on an upbeat note, The future path will be lit by the fire of freedom that burns brightly in the hearts of Americans in every community.
And I must say, it is my opinion that this is laying a foundation for Tulsi to run with Trump in 2024.
It may sound extraordinary, and she must come around on the Second Amendment.
But she will, in relation to defunding the police.
Acknowledge the importance of every American the right to keep and bear arms.
This is my prognostication.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yes, that was one of the best speeches I've heard in the last several years.
Tulsi really knocked it out of the park on absolutely every point.
As far as Trump, I attended three Trump rallies, not as a blind Trumpster, but just to be around other people, to feel the patriotic spirit that we knew existed in this country that you get no other measure of because there's None of it allowed on the mainstream media and there's not any other expressions of it other than small little tea party groups anywhere.
So that was my motivation for going to those.
He can claim that he didn't get us into any additional wars.
That's true.
He can't claim that he got us out of wars because when he left office we still had troops in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Syria.
His first three months in office, he did missile strikes over a false attack by the White Helmets in Syria of over 100 missiles.
And then a year later, in 2018, he did another missile strike.
So I'm not giving him a pass on that.
And as far as the problems he has with Hillary Clinton, those problems extended exactly from the people that he appointed.
Jeff Sessions, Bill Barr, Christopher Wray, all of those people stabbed him in the back and he did nothing about it and he has yet to admit that warp speed is a biological weapon that he approved and has still not stated any opposition to it.
So are we supposed to trash Trump and have no leader whatsoever to stand up against these miscreants who are destroying the nation?
Joe, get real!
We have to deal with this.
Your idealism will defend the fact that this is the only guy who's got the power to save the nation.
I'm convinced of that.
I'm convinced of that.
I had an interview on Saturday night on TNT Radio, and one of the guys said, yeah, you're disagreeing with these people, but you shouldn't throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I said, there's a corollary to that colloquialism, and that is, never wash your baby in dirty bathwater.
This guy's got to come clean.
If he would, then I'd be willing to say, OK, I'll give you a second chance.
Or I'll give you your second chance back.
But at this point, at this point, he hasn't confessed that he made a single mistake.
Everything's somebody else's fault.
And he has yet to apologize for the genocide that's going on for the pharmaceutical companies.
And he's still 100% better, and he's still 100% better than the alternative.
He gave us energy independence.
He restored the economy, shut down the border.
What the hell do you want?
There isn't a goddamn flawless candidate out there, Joe.
There is no flawless candidate out there, Joe.
If you're going to trash Trump, you're making a colossal blunder, my opinion, Carl.
Well, that is a great story.
And with Trump, I think that Trump is PSYOPing us, because the other alternative is that he would have to be controlled by minions of the deep state for that information.
But I think that he has to PSYOP us with this.
You got a couple of choices.
You could do what Joe was saying.
You could be completely honest about everything.
That's one option.
And, you know, personally, honesty and scholastic integrity are really important.
But for whatever reason, In what I'm sure is a psyop, they've chosen this other path because if Trump had said anything, let's say with any of the facts that we're able to document and to demonstrate is true with regarding Ukraine, just imagine for a moment if I'm Don Lamone at CNN, if Trump did anything other than speak against Russia, Don Lamone would say, see, we told you.
We told you for years.
Trump is a Russian asset.
Hillary is right.
Tulsi backed him up at CPAC.
He should have his bank account frozen, called a domestic terrorist, and arrested for treason unless good Americans show him what we do for traitors first.
So this is just part of the fog of war and a psyop and I think that what I just showed was the motivation for Trump not to say anything provocative regarding Russia and Ukraine.
Very nice, Kyle.
Very nice.
And Joe and I overwhelmingly agree on almost all these issues with occasional differences.
And that's the beauty of democracy, my friend.
Meanwhile, back here.
Check this out.
I'm so glad we're doing this.
My favorite restaurant.
Saturday Night Live now.
Let me just pause and explain.
Saturday Night Live actually began talking about COVID.
This is really surprising.
Watch it.
You know what?
This is so fun, dinner is on us.
Oh, wow.
But Keith, you know you can take your mask off the table.
Oh, I'm sorry.
I don't know I'm wearing it half the time.
Well, I heard the CDC is going to lift all mask mandates soon.
Oh, yeah, I know.
It's so weird.
It's like COVID's not over, but it's just gonna stop.
I don't know how I feel about that.
Oh, you know, that reminds me of this article I read.
Oh, honey, no one wants to hear about that.
Well, it was in Bloomberg, and I thought it was interesting.
What article?
Honey.
It was just saying how mask mandates had, I don't know, little to no effect on COVID.
I am sorry.
It's not like I'm anti-mask or anything.
I just sometimes wonder if any of the things we did actually helped.
Gina!
No, no, no.
We can talk about this incredibly complicated and emotional topic.
Yes, yes, of course.
I will start because, um, for instance, while I am so personally relieved that I'm vaccinated... Careful... I sometimes wonder if, um, if other people who are hesitant... Careful...
Might not have, like, a valid... What?
Not valid, but understandable... Not tonight!
Help me.
I think what she means is maybe sometimes we are a little overzealous when we condemn... Oh, no.
I just think that if people are actually losing their jobs...
Careful, girl.
Look, vaccines save lives.
Fact.
Okay?
They stop the hospitals from being overrun.
Fact.
Where are you up to?
but did i have to dump my oldest friend just because he didn't get no no no no no no no no a booster guys guys
this is supposed to be fun Isn't there something happy we can talk about?
No, no, we started this and we need to finish it.
David, go make sense of this, please.
Oh, uh, okay.
Well, I think the biggest mistake the administration made was not providing more testing.
But the UK had done tons of testing and had even more COVID.
Good.
Well, at least Biden finally sent out all those tests over Christmas.
You mean the two tests for a family of eight that froze in the mail?
Okay, well, at least we have the CDC.
I mean, they haven't always been perfect, but the science changed.
How does science change?
When I make a mistake at work, I don't get to say the science changed.
At least we had outdoor dining.
Oh, you mean when they built a smaller restaurant in the street?
How was that outdoor?
Look, I went to a child's birthday party, self-careful, and they did gymnastics in masks.
Don't.
And then they went into another room and took off their masks to eat pizza.
This is the end of me.
So did they really need the mask?
Oh, no.
Did any of us ever need the mask?
No!
I like turtles.
My God.
My God.
I'm so glad I said that out loud.
Of course we needed the mask.
We need it.
We may not know for years the full extent of what we've been through, but we did our best, and we're gonna get through this.
Amen.
When an anti-vaxxer gets it, I feel happy.
Wait, we don't have to wash our hands anymore, do we?
I never did.
Wait, where's my wife?
The very fact that they're talking about it on Saturday night is progress, in my opinion.
It's revealing that the public is very, very unhappy and even the media that would like to reinforce the standard conceptions as having to take a second look.
Meanwhile, Horowitz reports the Israeli data that nukes the Pfizer vaccine.
What did Pfizer know and when did they know it?
Last year, Philip Dormitzer, the chief scientific officer at Pfizer, described Israel as a sort of a laboratory to see the effect of his company's vaccines.
What took over a year of the vaccine drive, injecting most Israelis with three, some with four, to finally publish information on adverse events.
What Israel published this month, however, based on a health ministry survey of 2049 who got booster shots is not only damning, but unmistakably revealing.
There's no way Pfizer did not see these adverse effects during the clinical trials in 2020.
What did they know?
When did they know it?
The Israeli Health Ministry on February 10 published the result of adverse events around roughly 2,000 random Israelis who received a booster.
Shocking it took this long to conduct such a survey and it wasn't done a year ago.
Better late than never.
It should alarm us.
75% of the women, 58% of the men reported experiencing at least one side effect within 21 to 30 days following the interview.
Obviously, the majority were minor, but 51% of the women, 35% of the men will experience side effects reported that meant they had difficulty performing daily tasks.
In other words, it's affecting their quality of life and ability just to perform ordinary tasks of daily life.
Stop right there.
Full.
Even before we get into more serious problems.
The fact the shot knocked out such a massive percentage clearly violates the informed consent to which the shots were marketed and makes any mandate immoral.
It's clear this is not like taking vitamin D. The fact we have zero long-term studies but a massive percentage are getting sick and the short-runs are concerning everyone.
The massive data is simply overwhelming.
A huge percentage for a product ubiquitously marketed, endorsed, distributed, and mandated by global governments as the safest and most effective vaccine of all time has been dramatically contradicted.
And for a virus with most younger would cause roughly the same symptoms anyway, whether they were vaxxed or not.
The fact the shot was even marketed to young and healthier people is insane.
Some, yes, might have willingly taken a shot if they thought they'd get flu-like symptoms, but that confidence that the flu-like symptoms don't portend more severe long-term damage can only work for an established vaccine that already has long-term data, as this does not.
Remember, the 5.5% of experiencing chest pain from just one dose, if you applied that to America, for 551 million doses, that means we'd have 30 million cases of chest pain, angina, possibly incipient heart attacks.
That doesn't necessarily mean it causes short or long-term damage, but again, With a new vaccine, a novel and dangerous mechanism, how can it be applied with no long-term safety studies?
How could it be allowed to continue without further study?
A total of 4.5% of those who received boosters reported neurological side effects.
Assuming they're all relatively the same, that would extrapolate to roughly 25 million neurological side effects in the U.S.
Lending credence to the military whistleblowers who reported seeing more than a tenfold increase in nervous system diagnoses, leaving no doubt the DoD was bluffing when it claimed that its revised data showed not even a modest increase.
Roughly 10% of women under 54 experienced menstrual irregularities, for which 31% sought medical attention.
Delayed menstruation was the most common side effect.
We can say definitively it will cause reproductive issues.
Such a safety signal is not normal.
And in conjunction with a Japanese biodistribution document from Pfizer's animal study showing lipid nanoparticles, which are pro-inflammatory, deposited in the ovaries, it's the job of the government to prove conclusively this is not a problem, which they ought to have done before the VAX was ever authorized.
Remember, This is our survey of the first month following the shot.
There are no long-term effects on microclotting, heart inflammation, neurological inflammation, immune suppression, antibody-dependent disease enhancement, or autoimmune disorders.
We already know the spike protein circulates for months in some people.
Joe, there's just further evidence the whole thing's outrageous.
Israel being a lab, It's fascinating that that's going to happen.
The Israeli population is going to be very severely impacted with such a high percentage of Vax.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, that's what they get for trusting their own Jewish drug peddlers.
Very soon, on March 1st, we're going to have the FJB State of the Union message, and he has to have something to point to as an amazing success.
And so he's going to claim that he single-handedly destroyed the Omicron bug.
And today, California dropped school mask mandate will allow unvaccinated to unmask indoors.
This is from Zero Hedge, yeah.
And somebody mentioned the amazing thing is that while they're going to keep requiring school children to wear masks, the members of Congress, the elderly members of Congress, have said that for the State of the Union, they will not be required to wear masks either. have said that for the State of the Union, they So we can watch them all cheer and smile, and it's going to be hilarious, folks.
Yeah, they're trying to get a psychological edge.
They're suggesting things are so much better under Biden.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, that's crazy.
That's Saturday Night Live skit.
It's disgusting to use your favorite word there, Jim.
This is CYA Damage Control to save the vaccine program, and they slipped in there in the script that, fact, vaccines save lives.
Fact, they keep our hospitals operational.
So that's what they're trying to keep is the vaccines, and they're going to throw Uh, masks under the bus with that.
Now, with that montage of clips at the very end, I did see that they had what appeared to be perhaps a 12-year-old boy with makeup of panda eyes.
I won't trouble the audience with what panda eyes means with children, but you could look that up.
And I did see a pentagram in there as well, so I think that that is, at least I appreciate their truth in advertising.
For the Israeli data!
Whoa, my goodness!
So this again, if you go to Carl B. Herman Blogspot, any of these shows, second paragraph, my best shot, I contribute what?
I have more sufficient documentation that this is a crimes against humanity and criminal statistical manipulation and lies and I believe it was Pfizer who destroyed the human trial control group by giving the humans in the control group the vaccine Halfway through, you know, because that's what you do, because you need an experiment, we know it's a good product.
Scotland has reported that 80% of their hospitalizations and deaths are now for the triple jab.
There is a European soccer team owner, the most, the top team, who went out publicly and he said, you know what, from what I'm seeing, I'm just not going to hire any more vaccinated players because what I'm seeing Out on the field is that they have a tremendous lack of energy and stamina now.
So, interesting stories.
Yeah, very good, very good.
Very nice additions, yes.
Meanwhile, Pfizer steps up advertising for its blockbuster drug to treat heart conditions, including those caused by its own vacs.
I mean, think about it.
How brilliant.
You create a major medical problem and then you market the solution, so you're making money both ways.
Two major pharmaceutical companies show in February the month of love or hearts.
To launch an advertising campaign urging people experiencing heart issues for the first time to visit their doctors.
Pfizer and Bristol-Myers Squibb, BMS, revived the No Time to Wait ad campaign, spending $1.28 million on TV ads alone.
It warns everyone experiencing palpitation and shortness of breath.
They're at an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation, deep vein thrombosis, and other types of blood clots and strokes.
The same types of vascular ailments found among people who have received COVID vaccines.
Isn't that remarkable?
The campaign urges viewers to seek early medical attention to reduce the risks of these complications.
That means prescription gloves like Equus, developed and marketed by none other than Pfizer and DMS.
Could the relaunching of the campaign represent an effort to engage in damage control from the increase in vaccine-induced heart conditions, while benefiting from the sale of a drug used to address those same ailments?
Several objectives they can accomplish with this campaign.
First, by launching warning people they may be at risk, they are in a sense naturalizing heart ailments in young and or healthy bodies.
Second, By naturalizing the prevalence and likelihood of these heart conditions, they're deflecting blame from COVID vaccines.
Third, by referring patients to their doctors, they may directly benefit financially from the increased prevalence of heart ailments and conditions in the vast public as doctors prescribe more Eliquis, the top-selling blood thinner and AF drug, to treat their symptoms.
According to Pfizer and the CDC, even the healthiest athletes are now at risk.
Look at how, in recent months, they've offered multiple explanations for why healthy people are developing blood clots and heart conditions, some of which are simply absurd.
September 2021, the Times of India ran a story on a doctor's reminder that nobody is too young for a heart attack.
Right.
Same month, a study indicated cannabis doubled the race of heart attack in young adults.
That's so absurd, I can't believe it.
It would be the opposite, if anything.
October, New York Post, the little-known heart attack that's striking fit in healthy young women as young as 22.
Right, right, right.
And so that we're normal.
November, The Sun reported the way cold weather can affect your body from winter vagina to blood clots.
Give me a break!
November 2, Times of India asks why heart attacks are becoming common in seemingly fit people.
Gee, I wonder why.
Meanwhile, Healthline reported e-cigarettes can raise the risk of heart disease and stroke.
Everyone knows that.
The following month, December, another British strabloid warned about the healthy diet that may increase your risk of having a heart attack.
The healthy diet?
January 2022.
Norton Health informed us preventing heart disease in children is becoming more urgent as more kids develop heart disease.
This is a medical absurdity in any other era.
January again.
Publishing a warning that sports can break your heart in more ways than one.
Sports!
Jesus Christ, I thought we were supposed to engage in sports to stay healthy and athletic.
A report by a CT insider indicated more people are suffering from heart disease and strokes after COVID.
They really mean after the shot.
Meanwhile, the Daily Mail warns, risk of heart problems could be increased even if you drink less than the National Health Service recommends.
That would be less alcohol if you get the vax.
My God, it won't matter how much you drink.
The Sun also ran a report claiming weather, weather can harm one's health, leading to heart attacks, stroke, or gout.
Another report by The Sun, 300,000 Brits are living with a stealth disease that could kill within five years.
Aortic valve stenosis, a condition where the heart's aortic valve narrows, undoubtedly a consequence of the vax.
Nature Magazine reports the risk of heart disease soars after COVID.
They really mean after COVID shots, even with a mild case.
Meanwhile, a doctor interviewed in the UK warned an increase in energy bills.
Get this, an increase in energy bill amounts can cause heart attacks and stroke.
Give me a break.
Mark Crisman Miller, professor of media culture and communication at NYU, a good guy, compiled a list of reports like those listed above.
He told readers that during the week of 18-14 Feb alone, before we know it, all those whose sudden death made news just this past week, unexpected deaths with no reported cause, or due to heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, cardiac arrest, or swift aggressive cancers, all known to be adverse effects post-vaccination.
Let's review how this unprecedented global spike in son death has been deliberately obscured by our free press.
He highlighted an ABC News report.
Broken heart cases surge during COVID, especially among women.
Science Magazine reporting Janessa found the answer to son unexplained child's death.
All downplaying the connection between the vaccine and the heart conditions, including for athletes.
For example, the 33-year-old soccer star Sergio Aguero of Barcelona Football Club, most famous in the world, forced to announce his retirement after suffering chest pains and dizziness.
His cardiologist claimed the facts had nothing to do with it, but he himself admitted he did not know, admitting, in other words, that he has been vaxxed.
The media, however, continue to promote the story vaccines have nothing to do with a surge in sudden illness or deaths among athletes.
Miller cited a Washington Post article on February 1st describing stories of athletes dying due to COVID vax as a falsehood.
He compared a disgraceful Washington Post with a documented timeline of athletes who suffered heart failure between March 2021 and January 2022.
The string of incidents is further illustrated and detailed by the Real Science Blog, which found 707 such incidents demonstrated in graphical form the sharp increase in heart failure involving athletes As COVID vaccination uptake increased.
Joe, this is just staggering.
We already know, but here's yet another report by a highly reliable source laying it out and how the media is seeking to cover it up.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, the jab pushers are getting like $20 a shot to force that stuff onto you.
And that's being paid by the government.
But then lo and behold, they're going to be getting probably $500 to $1,000 for their cures, which are also patent medicines, which probably won't be covered by the government unless you're on Medicare or Medicaid.
Bottom line is they're just figuring out another way to fleece the public and another way of putting dangerous products on the market, while they also stand in the way of every known cure, which would be chlorine dioxide.
Hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and the use of vitamin D3 and zinc.
So, you know, here's people that are absolutely like a dog in the manger.
They can't eat the hay, but they won't let the horse eat the hay.
They're gonna poison us, and then they're gonna sell us the cure to the poison that they gave us.
These people are demonic and need to be Need to have medieval punishments because these are medieval level crimes.
Joe, I agree with you 100%.
Carl, your thoughts?
Yeah, more big stories.
All right, so Pfizer, to be able to push that drug, what they're doing is that what our opponents always do is they try to control the narrative.
So they're trying to have what they say up front, always and only, and to be able to say that they care about heart conditions and they have an answer that they've been paying attention and the prices that you pay to the drug companies are good investments because here's a product for this problem.
And They do.
They do have the advertising and for that list of the reasons to blame for heart disease.
I did see my favorite one was soccer whistles when you're playing soccer when the ref blows the whistle that can cause a heart attack.
So the number of people just with soccer.
From what I think I read from all that I do take in, I think the average per year of deaths playing soccer at that level was something like three to five a year.
And just with the soccer people, so that's an increase of well over 20 times the The average.
And I did read one article that was an analysis of some expert trying to explain that away.
And he just said, gee, we just don't know.
What could it be?
What would be different?
I would think that if our opponents, if they wanted to hire me as a black hat consultant, blame asymptomatic COVID.
So if people catch COVID and they know it, then they have heart damage.
And if they have heart damage after taking the vaccine, And they don't know what it was from.
Well, it's because they caught asymptomatic COVID and to blame COVID for it.
They're going to have to do that.
For context of Big Pharma, Marcia Angle is the former chief editor of the New England Journal of Medicine, the top medical journal in the United States.
She's at Harvard's Medical School.
She is one of the leaders on fire to be able to document that Big Pharma is nothing but a cartel.
Half of their research, she estimates, is just purchased and fraudulent, and Marcia Angle documents that The top 10 big pharma companies' profits are greater than the next 490 companies in the Fortune 500 list.
That's stunning stuff.
Carl and I don't have any doubt about a single word you just said.
Meanwhile, Mike King, who does the anti-New York Times, suggests we have some lessons from history to draw here.
In the 1930s, Britain urged Poland, today Ukraine, meaning the parallel, to constantly provoke her German neighbors, today that would be Russia.
Promises were made to the British, to the Polish government, and to Ukraine, and in the event of a German military response or a Russian, Britain and her empire would ally itself with Poland to resist the German armed forces.
Assured and encouraged, or some would say goaded, the Polish armed forces, using the militias, constantly carried out cross-border raids.
On September 1st, 1939, the Polish attack, parallel to Ukraine's attack on Donbass, on the German border town of Giswitz, resulted in Hitler's Germany, today that would be Russia, responding by overrunning only that territory occupied illegally by Poland.
Contrary to the terms of the Versailles Treaty.
And of course, we know there are revisionist historians who believe that this was a stage event by Hitler, putting prisoners in Polish uniforms to justify his actions.
Assistance by Britain and France was not forthcoming and would not materialize.
However, Britain had the excuse for a war that the Westminster War Party desired.
This was not to defend Poland, but a necessary excuse to declare war on Britain's main trade rival, which was Germany.
February 1st, 1945, Poland's General Anders reproached Winston Churchill for not adhering to the English guarantees to defend Poland.
He asked the unelected war premier, what shall we say to our soldiers?
Soviet Russia is now confiscating half of our territory and wants the remaining part of Poland to be managed according to its own fashion.
We know from experience where that leads.
The guileful and duplicitous Churchill smiled.
You yourself are to blame for that.
We did not guarantee your eastern frontiers.
Today we have enough soldiers and do not need your aid.
You can remove your divisions.
We are not using them anymore.
You did not say that during the last few years, replied Polish General Anders, Churchill conceded Poland was cynically used to provide Britain with a justification for declaring war on Germany.
History certainly does repeat itself.
And I think we're seeing it today.
Joe, your thoughts, how Ukraine has been used to provoke a war with Russia.
Yours.
Yeah, great video, 45 minutes long by Michael Ribeiro, All Wars for Bankers Wars, and it goes through the history of this stuff.
The British bankers stage set and funded Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1815.
They funded the British attacks against Russia in the Crimea in 1850.
They funded and and developed and trained the Japanese military to attack Russia in the east in 1905.
1905.
They funded the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917 to overthrow Russia.
They stage set World War I with the Milner Roundtable to suck everybody into the World War I.
And then they sabotaged the Versailles Treaty to make sure that they would have a World War II.
And then they stage set all of the opening acts of World War II with false flags.
And they were probably heavily involved in the 9-1-1 events because you can't do anything with just Mossad You got to have MI6 and the CIA involved in it, too.
So, the whole thing is just absolutely absurd.
As soon as the people on this planet wake up to our reality, then maybe we can get out of this reality and start having one where we have a productive, meaningful relationship with all the people on the planet, and that's what we can look forward to.
Nice thought that the public should wake up to reality.
Carl, your thoughts?
And I think that's our job.
I think that we are messengers and we have apparently very little power.
I found that nobody can really hear anything that we're saying, except for maybe about 2% of it and the rest of it, that 98% is just the sheeple response to Defend the corporate media and their belief in their political leaders, at least up to now.
Mike King, anti-New York Times, I very much appreciate his analyses of history.
So to put what our audience, their power to respond to this Ukraine and Russia thing.
So we have the NATO countries, the World War I, the World War II.
Two supposed good guys who are in the support of Ukraine.
World War One was after the Europeans and the Americans and even the Japanese stole all the parts of the world that they possibly could.
They then robbed each other!
They had a war to steal the colonies from each other.
And it wasn't the propaganda to my two grandfathers to make the world safe for democracy and a war to end all wars.
The winners took the losers colonies.
And then exactly the Treaty of Versailles was to have a second world war and now we have a neo-colonial empire and where we are today is the power of the people to say no to World War III by these same psychopaths and to instead demand their arrest for these obvious crimes centered in war, looting, and lying.
Devoutly to be wished.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you, Send fan mail to liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Liveneedtonowatgmail.com.
Meanwhile, an excellent interview.
This is my colleague Scott Bennett talking about Ukraine with one minor but significant correction.
The troublemakers and murderers in Ukraine who are killing the Russian people of Eastern Ukraine have been branded as Nazis, but the entire inspiration and implementation of the U.S.-led coup in Ukraine was Bolshevik-Zionist Jews.
Nuland is a Zionist Jew, and all the post-coup government of Ukraine was Zionist Jew.
Poroshenko, the Chocolate King, is a Zionist Jew.
Poroshenko was the first pro-coup president of Ukraine.
For the last 70 plus years, the Hollywood Zionist Jews have created a Nazi narrative that all evil is caused by Nazis, when it is Zionist Jews who never forget the American genocide was created by Jews, but then blamed on the Turks, are the instigators and implementators of these crimes against humanity.
This may seem a minor issue, but control of language is critical for our success as a free people.
The use of the word Nazi allows his highness Jews to avoid culpability for their crimes, because they still use the so-called Nazi Holocaust as their shield of victimhood to deflect any blame from themselves for their multitude of crimes.
A Nazi flag and a swastika does not make a Zionist into a Nazi.
It's only camouflage to disguise the Zionist Jews from being identified as real criminals and culprits of the crimes against humanity.
It's similar when an Antifa member wears a Trump mega hat to a rally and starts trouble to make the media and the people who watch the media believe it was Trump supporters who caused the problems.
All war has a foundation of deception.
Please do not be duped by their camouflage.
See through it and act accordingly.
Control the language and we will win this war.
As a former PSYOP officer, you already know this.
In solidarity, Mike Harris.
Bear in mind now, I've only 90 days to get to the U.S.
Supreme Court, and I need your help.
Amazon banned my book, so you wouldn't learn what really happened at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill presented as mass murder to promote gun control.
Then they sued to shut me up.
And the Wisconsin courts played along.
I have the proof and the law on my side.
What I don't have is the money.
They want to do to us what they've already done to Canada.
Take guns, impose tyranny.
And it's on the way with Remington's help.
First insurance, then registration, then confiscation.
I'm asking SCOTUS to stop it.
GiveSendGo.com slash FundingFetzer.
Check it out.
This is for all of the marbles.
And if you go there, you'll find I'm seeking to defend the First and the Second Amendment.
I do have the law on my side.
I do have the evidence.
But I need the money to fund it.
I'm asking for your help.
Meanwhile, remember, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
That's what we're trying to do here.
Final thoughts, Joe.
Yours.
Yeah, well, there's an interesting three-minute-long video on BitChute with John Lear talking about a presentation he attended in Hollywood on the future of television.
And they said they had an auditorium full of folks.
A guy came out on the stage.
He stood up there, talked for several minutes about, you know, the history of television.
He said it was just, like, boring as it could be.
And then the guy walked down the stage, walked up one aisle all the way around to the back of the theater and then walk down the other aisle and the whole time he was continuing his narrative and he just kept talking and talking and talking everybody's going god this is boring as shit he walked back up on the stage and he said and now i'm going to show you the future of television and he disappeared because he was a hologram
He said, you did something like that, and you know they had the capability of making jet airliners disappear into buildings, which is exactly what they did to us 20 years ago, and we're still living with that lie.
So let's start attacking these people on every front, because we don't deserve any of this.
Well said, Joe.
Carl, your final thoughts?
I appreciate Mike Harris's contribution.
Yes, yes.
So what we're really looking at in the Ukraine is the same authoritarian government that we see in the U.S., the U.K., and Israel pushing these forever wars for peace and the exponential debt for prosperity and, of course, media censorship for truth.
What we really need to do is to withdraw our consent and belief in anything that these political leaders and corporate media tell us, but instead to demand their arrest.
And yes, Jim Fetzer did receive exactly a show trial where a judge denied him his constitutional right for a jury to consider the evidence.
He denied the expert testimony that Jim brought.
He denied a jury trial and just said, No, no, we're supporting that other guy.
Yeah, that's dictatorship.
And that's exactly what Jim is fighting against.
And hopefully the Supreme Court will, hopefully will get truth in one way or another.
I so appreciate the thoughts of Joel Olson from Houston, Carl Herman from San Ramon.
Carl Herman's got it exactly right.
I am an independent guy, self-reliant.
I don't like to ask for other support, but I'm in a situation where I need your help.
So if you believe in the First and the Second Amendment, I'm in a unique position to potentially do something about it, but I cannot do it on my own.
Check out Give San Go and see if you agree.
Meanwhile, thank you for joining us.
Spend as much time as you can with friends and family, those you love, because we still do not know how much time we have left or when the effects of the vax are going to manifest.
With those we care the most about, our friends, our neighbors, and our loved ones.
▲
Export Selection