All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 20, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
45:33
Real Deal Climate Change #7 (19 February 2022) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on a Real Deal special devoted to debunking the climate change myth with Joe Olson, who is a founder of Principia Scientific and is a marvelous journal, one of the objectives of which is to expose fraudulent science, fake science, pseudoscience, at which he's doing a marvelous job.
Let me observe this as The seventh episode in our discussion and review of these issues, where I believe that already in episode one, the whole claim that CO2 is responsible for global warming was debunked decisively over 600 million years of of the history of planet Earth.
There is no correlation whatsoever and if there is no correlation there cannot be a causal relationship.
And where it appears the Green Agenda would consume more energy in its implementation than it would save.
In other words, the whole thing is a monstrous hoax that appears dedicated to really tearing down the economy of the United States, which is based on gas, oil, and coal, which, of course, are supposed to be major contributors to CO2.
It's an absurdity any way you cut it.
Joe, your thoughts?
Okay, well, first of all, yeah, episodes one through five, we covered the carbon climate forcing scam, which is, you know, human carbon dioxide is ruining the planet, which is a complete absolute total 100% scientific fraud from every aspect possible.
And like, like we mentioned, five programs at an hour a piece and then last week at chapter six we covered green energy and there's not a whole lot to cover under green energy other than what we discussed last week and the 90 minute video that was prepared by Michael Moore called Planet of the Humans.
You watch those two episodes and you'll understand completely that sustainable energy is a fraud.
But this has been a plan by the same global elites that are doing the vaccine genocide right now, and it's been a centuries-long plan.
And what they had planned to do was to substitute the gold and silver standard as underlying value for currency with something that they thought was going to be a decreasing
A resource and so it would naturally escalate is it with inflation so if you believe the 1955 Hubert Peak oil hypothesis that the planet is all the petroleum is left over dead dinosaur juice and that we're using it faster than it can be Discovered and there's no new oil and so everything is being destroyed and the prices of oil are going to escalate enormously.
Well if you attach the value of your currency to the petrodollar, which they did under Nixon in 72, then obviously you have a big solution for the bankers because everybody's going to end up being bankrupt.
Everything's going to be so expensive.
Exactly what they're trying to force on a smaller scale today.
So bottom line this has been a three-sided Energy kneecapping of all humanity by these same banker elites for over 150 years and we'll start with a little bit of history on that in just a second.
But the object is that using hydrocarbons Destroys the environment.
Lie number one.
That you can do something besides using hydrocarbons with sustainable green energies.
Lie number two.
And lie number three is we got to stop using petroleum because we're going to run out any day now.
So those are the three lies that it takes to support this massive scientific fraud that's gone Through all departments of our education system.
Absolutely amazing that geologists can sit there and buy into this global warming trifecta of lies and the same thing with all of our engineering and the, you know, the petroleum engineers, chemical engineers, mechanical engineers.
Where are you people?
Why don't you exert a little bit of force on the fraud that's going wall to wall at every one of our educational institutions in this whole entire country?
So now let's switch over to hydrocarbons.
Joe, look at the parallel with 9-11 when every structural, mechanical, civil engineer knew that the Twin Towers could not possibly collapse and that they remained silent.
They didn't speak out when the government... Oh, every aeronautical engineer knows they're lying about the jet planes.
It's a Yeah, where are you people?
Do you want to live in a free country with truth as a basis for our reality?
Or do you want to live in a dystopic prisoner planet where they're jabbing your little kids and turning them into space alien freaks?
Get real and get real now because this is the end game, you clowns.
It's ridiculous.
Okay, so now let's get back to the implementation of hydrocarbon I'm just showing the image of Principia Scientific International, Joe, where I think it was sensational.
This is becoming a very important journal.
Meanwhile, here we have your first slide, From Muscle Power to Carbon Empowerment.
I'll just read a few paragraphs.
The development of carbon-based energy systems first with coal or celluloid solid fuels and then petroleum-based liquid fuels and finally natural gas systems were a force multiplier for humans and a quantum leap for civilizations.
There's a current command and control faction that wants to suppress the use of hydrocarbon energy by misrepresenting the origins and provable facts about this most wonderful gift of creation.
Hydrocarbons are ubiquitous in the universe.
The myth that hydrocarbons are a product of sedimentary organic matter, the fossil fuel fable, is not supported by facts.
Hydrocarbons exist throughout the universe and in our solar system.
Methane exists on Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Saturn's moon, Titan.
Joe, more, go!
Yes, okay.
Well, we'll go back a little further than that.
In 1859, the world's first profitable oil well was drilled in Pennsylvania, and it was 200 feet deep, and it was free-flowing.
And once he found out about it, John D. Rockefeller went over and bought up the well, and then he got the USGS to immediately say, well, this is a wonderful replacement for whale oil.
We'll start selling kerosene, but don't count on this existing anywhere else in the world, because this is a limited resource.
And then he went around buying up as many oil fields as he could and buying up anybody that drilled a producing oil well nationwide so that he could create a monopoly for the Standard Oil Company.
So that's in 1859 and we already had the USGS lying about the availability of hydrocarbons when it was obvious they were coming out of the ground absolutely everywhere.
So fast forward a little bit I wrote an article at Canada Free Press called Fossil Fuel is Nuclear Waste on September 26, 2010, and I'm going to read one of the paragraphs from there.
The meaning of Pismo and La Brea, which is familiar to anybody in the Los Angeles area, California is blessed with interesting place names from its multicultural heritage.
Pismo Beach is named after the Chuma Indian word for globs of tar due to the natural hydrocarbon outflow found on the beach.
The Spanish Portola, P-O-R-T-O-L-A expedition in 1769 discovered molten tar geysers at the present-day site of La Brea Tar Pits in downtown Los Angeles.
It ran right down Wilshire Boulevard to Long Beach.
La Brea is Spanish for tar.
Tar still oozes from the ground at La Brea, where there's a museum, and it's down to 10 gallons per day.
Globs of tar still wash up on Pismo Beach, but are now blamed for man's failed drilling and shipping efforts.
Well, in 1892, give or take a year or two, because I don't try to memorize every damn thing in the universe,
A guy named Ed Daughtery drilled the first oil well just a few miles north of La Brea Tar Pits in the Los Angeles Valley and he hit 200 foot high geyser at about 200 foot depth and so that was the first producing oil well in California and within 10 years they had the whole beach at Long Beach lined with drilling rigs and when they did they were able to relieve the pressure of the petroleum that was bubbling up from underneath the ground
And that was what has cleaned up the environment in California and made it where it wasn't just a miserable asphalt pitch for a beach over there.
So, bottom line, fast forward, this is my article on Muscle Power to Carbon Empowerment.
I go through a whole bunch of description, but in Fossil Fuel for Nuclear Waste, I realized that, and this was based on 1950 engineering and petroleum development by the Russians.
What they discovered was that there was oil at increasing depths and there was also oil under high temperature and pressure mixed with water that couldn't possibly have been in those geologic forms from percolation from above.
It had to be coming from below.
So they hypothesized that petroleum was a part of a natural decaying process and the only force that could cause that national decay would be fission.
So let's put up the next slide which is the fission neutron slide.
Sure.
Nuclear fission is the breakup of a large nucleus into two smaller nuclear fragments.
Accompanying the breakup of the large nucleus is the release of energy determined by the mass defect.
A model of how the nucleus breaks apart is called the liquid drop model of the nucleus.
An incoming neutron collides with a large nucleus and causes it to become unstable.
The large nucleus vibrates like a large water drop and can cause the nucleus to split into two smaller fragments.
Joe?
Yeah, in the atomic table, the periodic table of elements, There is.
You can you can see that the atomic number is the number of protons, but then the atomic mass is the number of protons and neutrons.
And as you go up the scale from hydrogen, which has one neutron and one proton, you start adding additional neutrons.
And so when you get up to something like uranium, you've got far more neutrons than you've got protons.
And when a neutron is moving at high speed and it hits a large globula of neutrons and protons, which would be forming the atom, it can either knock off a neutron, and that makes it a lower isotope, or it can hit at a slow enough speed that it gets absorbed, and that adds a neutron, so that makes an increased...
I keep getting email messages from people...
That increases the number of neutrons and that's another isotope.
So you have two various methods of isotopes.
You knock a neutron or two or three or a dozen off of a large atom or you get one that comes in at slow enough speed that it's absorbed by the atom and that increases the neutron ratio.
But the amount of energy that is released by the fission of knocking neutrons and protons off of a Large molecule like that is a magnitude greater than any chemical molecule reaction.
That's why nuclear energy is measured in megatons of TNT because if you had a ton of uranium you could produce a million times which is what the mega six zeros amounts to of the of that amount of TNT.
Well a million tons of TNT is a lot of tons of TNT and you can do that with just several pounds of uranium so you can understand the amount of energy that we're talking about here is enormous but the secondary effect of having Uh, neutron fission is that you end up having daughter cells because matters neither created nor destroyed.
So you don't create or destroy neutrons or protons.
All you do is rearrange them.
And in the process of breaking up a uranium atom, which has 92 protons and like we said, more than 92 neutrons.
You had the ability to create daughter atoms, and so if they broke up into completely individual protons, you'd have 92 hydrogen atoms.
If they broke up into two atom groups, you'd have 46 helium atoms, and this is hypothetical because it doesn't actually happen that way.
In terrestrial fission of uranium, they have 12 known daughter Reactions, which are the reactants, which are the available elements that you get by breaking up uranium at it, and that includes like lead, and it includes all of the inert gases are all fission byproducts, so everything on table eight in the periodic table are all
And that would be helium, neon, argon, krypton, all of those elements that are on the far right hand side have the balanced outer shell number of electrons, and they are inert.
They don't make Molecules are compounds with other elements, and so that's why they're distinct.
But because they can't make elements with other things, if those come out of the ground, that is proof of, in and of itself, of radioactivity underneath our feet.
And one of those gases is radon.
Radon has a half-life of 2.8 days.
If you had a pound of radon in less than a month, you would have an 16th of an ounce.
It's like ridiculous amount of decay.
And so if you have radon coming out of the ground, that's automatic proof that you've got radioactivity.
And they've proven that there's a relationship between variations in radon concentrations and earthquakes.
So that brings up another factor that's proof that volcanism and earthquakes are a function of variable fission in the planet.
And the thing that makes it so important about variable fission is that because 100% of the energy that comes out of nuclear radiation underneath our feet flows through the biosphere, any variations that happen in that amount of energy flow affect the climate.
Where you have a variation in the sun.
Generally, it stays within about a 1% total output range, but we have an astronomical variation based on the square of the distance and since we go between an elliptical orbit between 91 and 93 million Miles away from the sun, there's a two million or three million variance in the distance, and when you square that, that ends up being a nine-time variation in the amount of solar incoming that's based just on the astronomical effect.
But not all of that energy gets absorbed by the surface of the Earth.
The majority of it gets absorbed in the atmosphere and re-radiated out, and that is a function of the amount of cloud cover And then we also get a reflection as a result of the amount of ice cover.
So those two factors are independent of the output from the sun.
Those are those are factors that are influenced ultimately by the fission function in the earth because it produces enough heat and energy and cloud seeding materials like sulfur dioxide to create increased cloudiness.
And if you turn the burner down underneath The pot on the stove, then the pot will start getting colder, and that's what happens with your North Pole.
Some of it is volcanic heat that's coming up underneath the pole, and the other is the thermal hailing, which we discussed in one of the previous chapters on the climate forcing thing.
So, that pretty much covers that.
Now, we'll switch over to Marie Tharp and Henson, and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.
Let me review this.
Marie Thorpe pioneered mapping of the bottom of the ocean six decades ago.
Scientists are still learning about Earth's last frontier.
Despite all the deep-sea expeditions and samples taken from the seabed over the past 100 years, Humans still know very little about the ocean's deepest reaches, and there are good reasons to learn more.
Most tsunamis start with earthquakes under or near the ocean floor.
The seafloor provides habitat for fish, corals, and complex communities of microbes, crustaceans, and other organisms.
Its topography controls currents that distribute heat, helping to regulate Earth's climate.
July 30 marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of Marie Thorpe, a geologist and oceanographer who created maps that changed the way people imagined two-thirds of the world.
Beginning in 1957, Thorpe and her research partner, Bruce Hazin, began publishing the first comprehensive maps, that showed the main features of the ocean bottom: mountains, valleys, and trenches.
As a geoscientist, I believe Sharp should be as famous as Jane Goodall or Neil Armstrong.
Here's why.
Joe, go for it.
Yeah, okay.
Well, basically what she did was she documented an unknown portion of the planet so that we had verification that the previous Alfred Wagner, W-E-G-E-N-E-R, Wagner, had proposed in the 1960s about plate tectonics.
And what you've got is you've got land masses which have a maximum crustal depth of just over 40 miles maximum and then you've got a continental shelf and then you've got the ocean floor where the ocean floor is in some places completely bare down to molten rock but in other places it's only a half mile or a mile thick and under that
You had the lithosphere, which is molten rock, which is in a plastic state.
Now, as the moon comes by every day, it lifts the oceans, which changes the load on the seafloor, and it also lifts the continental crust, and that's what we discussed previously, called earth tide.
It also lifts the atmosphere, which is what they call moon tide, but we'll skip that for right now.
We've covered it in a previous chapter.
So what happens is the moon has a five degree elliptical variance.
So it's either five degrees above or below the equatorial plane of Earth and the sun.
So we don't get an eclipse every time that the Earth passes between the moon and the sun because it's either above or below.
And we also don't get an eclipse every every 28 days when the moon goes between the earth and the sun.
It just ends up passing above the sun or below the sun and because the moon we're looking at the dark side of the moon and the sunlight is so bright it lights up the whole sky so you can't see the moon at the same time you have sun during the day.
Unless it's in one of the waxing or waning phases where you can see it out of phase in the middle of the day, but it's low on the horizon and it's only a partial face of the moon.
So that's what we're dealing with.
This force, because it's Irregular goes down the irregular lines that run down those seafloor rifts and it puts forces to cause those plates to pull apart and then as they pull apart you have the liquid magma immediately rushing up and hitting the cold ocean water and freezing so this forms a ratchet effect and because it's sawtooth it's not uniform As far as the displacement it causes on the main continental plates.
So, we'll now do this five-minute video with Mr. Ballard.
It was done by National Geographic.
It'll give you a little bit of a visual impression of what we're talking about here.
Very good, Joe.
Here we go.
In 1977, two scientists published the most complete picture of the ocean floor that had ever been created, revolutionizing our understanding of the Earth.
Named the Tharphezen Map after its collaborators, this illustration was produced using sonar and measurements of the water's depth.
It revealed, for the first time, a complex network of underwater mountains and ridges.
And provided key evidence that supported the emerging geological theory of plate tectonics.
This theory states that the Earth's solid outer shell, the lithosphere, is broken into plates.
These plates shift and slide over the asthenosphere, the molten upper portion of the mantle.
Oceanic and continental plates meet and interact at boundaries that crisscross our planet.
Because 71% of the Earth is covered with water, the majority of boundaries are found on the seafloor.
When two oceanic plates tear apart from each other at a divergent plate boundary, the space between the divergent plates fills with magma that hardens when exposed to cold seawater.
Over millions of years, this process has built chains of underwater volcanoes and rift valleys called the Mid-Ocean Ridge.
When the plates move apart, they rip open the Earth.
The Mid-Ocean Ridge, which runs around our planet like the seam on a baseball, is where the Earth creates its outer skin.
And as these plates move, they're in a synchronized ballet.
There are few places on Earth where the Mid-Oceanic Ridge rises out of the ocean, giving us a chance to see this phenomenon on dry land.
Iceland is one of them.
The island of Iceland was once an underwater section of the Mid-Ocean Ridge.
Over millions of years, it was pushed up above sea level by a giant volcanic hotspot.
Here we can see a divergent plate boundary, a stretch of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge where the North American and Eurasian plates are spreading, or rifting, apart.
Geologist and oceanographer Dr. Bob Ballard has come to this unique spot where crystal clear glacier water has filled a section of the mid-ocean ridge that has been raised above sea level.
Boy, that's truly amazing.
I'm literally at the boundary of creation in Iceland.
On my left is the North American plate right here.
I can put my hand on North America.
I can reach over here and put my hand on the Eurasian plate.
And this is the very spot where the Earth is spreading open about an inch a year, about your height in your lifetime.
When two plates are spreading apart in one section of the world, other plates are moving toward each other in a different area, forming a convergent plate boundary.
At these kinds of plate boundaries, one plate can slide underneath the other, in a process called subduction.
Or, the two plates can crash into each other, creating a mountain range.
The Himalayan Mountains formed this way when two continental plates collided, On the Mediterranean island of Cyprus, we find an example of a convergent plate boundary that was raised above sea level 90 million years ago as the African and Eurasian plates collided.
Dr. Ballard has come to explore this unique part of the mid-ocean ridge in the light of day.
I'm standing now on what was an ancient ocean floor.
It would have been thousands of feet beneath the sea.
And what we're looking at is an area where the subsequent collision of these great plates, the African plate and the Eurasian plate, then began to force this part of the ocean floor up to where it is today.
This upward movement revealed ancient volcanic activity that had taken place on the ocean floor.
If you look into that upper section, you'll see these round-looking objects.
And those are actually what we call the pillow lavas.
Because as the lava comes out, and no sooner does it come out, it's quenched.
And then it expands and continues to quench and forms these pillow-shaped forms.
And then it'll pop out, form another one, pop out, form another one.
So you can literally see all these different areas in which the molten lava actually expanded out and then cooled.
The study of plate tectonics from the tallest mountains to the bottom of the ocean helps scientists understand the extraordinary processes that continually shape and reshape our planet.
Sculpting majestic landscapes, causing earthquakes and volcanoes, and supplying natural resources.
Joe, that was just a super, super documentary.
I loved it.
Yeah, well, we're going to back up for just a second and review the keel trim birth chart.
Since we don't have this one posted, what we're going to do is we're going to cover this again in a future chapter, but I'll just give you the basics from here.
They vary the numbers on this thing every couple of years to make it look like, oh, we've corrected our numbers because we've got even better science.
This whole thing is total 100 percent keel print birth table garbage.
What they're showing for an incoming solar radiation is 341.3 watts per square meter.
And out of that, they're showing 161 watts per square meter of that energy actually reaching the surface of the Earth.
Okay, yeah, let's continue on that.
But then what they're showing is atmospheric gases, which they say contribute 330 What's per square meter.
So bottom line is they're saying that Earth gets twice as much energy from radiation of gases in the atmosphere as it does from the sun.
And if that's not preposterous enough, here's what they show in the way of outflowing thermal energy from Volcanism, 17 watts per square meter.
And not only do they say that that's trivial, they also say that it's constant.
And anybody that's lived on planet Earth for any length of time knows that earthquakes and volcanoes are neither constant In time or in location, and like I said, 100% of that energy flows through the thermosphere.
Now, the simplest hydrocarbon that comes out of the fission process, and when you have a molecule that's breaking down, like we mentioned a uranium atom, you could have 16 carbon atoms, or you could have Or you could have 12 oxygen, or you could have 92 hydrogen.
And if you've got a source for hydrogen, oxygen, and carbon in gas form that are under high heat and pressure, you're going to form hydrocarbons.
And the symbol of those hydrocarbons is has one carbon atom and four hydrogen.
That's called methane.
Okay, methane bubbles up absolutely everywhere out of the planet.
There's massive amounts of methane frozen in ice crystalline structure along the ocean floor called calthrates, and then there's massive amounts of methane that are in the Arctic and Antarctic tundra that are called hydrates.
And as those things melt, they end up releasing that methane, but methane in the environment, once it gets up into the atmosphere, is a reactive gas, and it reacts with sunlight and also with other gas molecules, and it breaks down.
So, it's got about a four-year half-life in the atmosphere.
Now, what they're claiming is it's 17 times more powerful than carbon dioxide, and while I also don't mention how powerful water vapor is, And how it cools the planet, which we discovered our latent and sensible heat programs that we did before.
But let's revisit the radiation in the atmosphere factors.
And if you look down here on the table, there's only two spikes for absorption for methane gas.
And those two spikes occur in the 2.7 micron range, which according to Wien's law is 800 degrees centigrade.
And the 4.3 micron range, which is 400 degrees centigrade.
And then, excuse me, that's for carbon dioxide.
For methane, excuse me, it's 3.3 microns at 600 degrees centigrade, or it's 7.7 microns, which is 104 degrees centigrade.
Well, 104 is higher than the boiling temperature of water.
There's no place on earth, other than directly over a volcano, Where you could produce 600 degrees centigrade or 104 degrees centigrade heat outflows.
So that means that the only energy that methane is capable of absorbing is incoming solar radiation.
Because it's the only thing that's in a frequency band that methane can absorb.
And so, bottom line is, methane cools the planet, because just like we mentioned previously in our Stokes shift, if you absorb, you also emit, and the process of emitting, you have a kinetic energy transfer to the gas molecule, and because of the laws of conservation of energy, you're going to have a longer wavelength, lower energy Emission, and that happens within a billionth of a second.
So, every methane molecule in the atmosphere cools the Earth from incoming solar radiation, and is outside of the outgoing long-wave radiation, the OLR, that the Earth produces, so it cannot possibly capture any outgoing energy from the Earth.
So that is a gigantic lie that it's 17 times more and that's why we've got to stop our cows from farting.
You got to eat bugs because oh well really yeah well there's more methane released from termites than there is released by human beings.
They produce it and termites produce more methane than cattle do.
What are you going to do?
Wipe out every termite on the planet, too?
Oh, that'll be great.
Then we won't have any way of disposing of all the excess cellulose that's produced through photosynthesis that, thank God, exists on this planet.
There's the biomass that we should be using.
But, you know, that's absolutely absurd.
And then we're going to revisit quickly one of the things that we had talked about previously, and that's Arthur Vetura's work on the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation.
And that's the current that runs in the Atlantic Ocean, which includes the Gulf Stream, goes up and warms northern Europe, but it also reduces the heat flow in the Arctic.
And a result of that Is that because of the thermal haline flow that comes out of the Arctic, there is a melting of the Arctic, but it has absolutely nothing to do with carbon dioxide or methane in the atmosphere.
It has totally to do with the amount of rain and the thermal energy coming off of volcanoes that are underneath that particular mass.
And there again, When you reduce the ice cap, you reduce the reflectivity of the surface, and this is one of the few factors on the whole planet that has an amplifying effect where you can have a minor change in the input and have a greater change in the output.
So here we've got Ice-covered polar cap has a 90% reflection rate.
An open ocean in the Arctic has a 6% reflection rate.
That means the other 94% is absorbed by the water, which warms the water up, which causes more melting.
So you have a cycle that, instead of being buffering, is an amplification cycle.
And that's the only one that we have that's even similar to that.
Now the next thing is, when you're producing hydrogen and oxygen, Due to uranium decay, you also are producing water.
And the thing is, if you've got two gas molecules, they would a lot rather get together and form a liquid water molecule than to stay as gases, because it takes up less space.
And so bottom line is, every bit of the groundwater that comes out of the ground on Earth, and that's like 99.99% of it is not infiltration from rainwater infiltration zones.
Our aquifers are fed from below by what the Russians called elemental water because when they drilled their cola well down to 42,000 foot deep and peninsula up on the arctic they were hitting rock temperatures that were 350 degrees fahrenheit and under Whatever it is that's 16 feet per atmosphere of pressure.
And I've had it written down, but I just didn't write it down for today's lecture.
But I will get that for the next one or put it down in the show notes.
But bottom line is soil and rock is twice the density of water.
So water is freshwater 62.4, ocean water 64.2 pounds per cubic foot.
And dirt and rock and concrete are all about 125 pounds per cubic foot.
So you've got double energy.
And for every 33 feet of depth you go in the ocean, you have a linear increase in the amount of atmospheres of pressure.
So if it's 14.7 at sea level, then you go down 33 feet, then it's You know, 29.4.
And then if you go down another 33 feet, you add another 14.7 to that.
So that's the relationship of pressure in water.
That same relationship exists in land and continental mass.
And so bottom line is, you're under an enormous pressure, 350 degrees hot.
They had to quit drilling their well because it kept filling up with water.
So how did surface water that weighs half as much as rock percolate all the way down through all of those pressures and all of that temperature and turn into liquid water at that particular depth?
So 100% of the groundwater, and let's just say for the people that want to argue, let's just say it's it's not really 100, it's 99.99% of the water that comes out of the ground on this planet is elemental water that is decay
of the fission of uranium and thorium and the other elements that end up being radioactive, or it is the byproduct of the heat that is melting the water out of the other rock formations that are down there.
And the reason why you have an organic signature in petroleum products and the reason we have coal is because of a phenomenon known as hydrophication, where you can take a liquid and you can bubble hydrogen gas through it where you can take a liquid and you can bubble hydrogen gas through it at the right temperature and pressure and you And that was originally done as a petroleum product in a refinery.
And that's where they would take a lightweight petroleum, put it under pressure and temp at the right temperature and then bubble hydrogen gas through it.
And you could make longer chain hydrocarbons.
So you could take methane and make it into propane and propane into butane and you know, or you could actually bubble hydrogen through sediment layers that were organic peat layers and that will give you coal.
It's hydrogenated coal.
Well, about 1902, one of the food processing companies said, gee, we've got all this cotton oil that we're squeezing out of cotton seeds, and we don't have a market for it.
Why don't we bubble some hydrogen through it and make it into a larger molecule, the same way we could bubble Hydrogen through petroleum and make it into waxes and paraffins and plastics and greases.
We can do the same thing and we'll just call it Crisco and that's where your trans fat food substitute came in and the reason why food processors loved it is because it doesn't decay because bacteria won't eat it.
So my question for you if you want to keep eating your Crisco is are you smarter than a bacteria?
So Bottom line is, have we pretty much finished up this hour?
We're getting close.
So anyhow, I had a few more slides that we were going to do, but for some reason we got jinxed by the web and the slides didn't come through.
Do you have any questions at this point, Jim?
We can make this quickie, Joe.
That's not a problem.
Most of them are showy.
But, you know, I do appreciate the idiocy of AOC and the others who believe that cow farts are a major problem for global warming.
And therefore, as you observe, we're supposed to consume insects instead of real food that want to get rid of beef.
I mean, it's just About as insane as it gets, Joe.
It's just lunatic.
And the only reason this persists is because we don't have people that have the educational training to understand it and the moral fiber to stand up against this kind of brainwashing.
There should be a unanimous chorus from every doctor on the planet That the mRNA jabs are toxic and that the graphene oxide and the other things that they're putting in vaccines are absolutely insane and that we need to stop doing the the CDC directed protocols for everything involved in medicine.
Same thing with the Food and Drug Administration.
Why did they approve of Crisco?
Because they were created about the same time as Crisco, and they were there to make sure that people thought that what they were getting in the way of food was actually food, when it's actually a toxin.
And you know, so bottom line is, it's the silence of the people who have the knowledge, but do not have the courage to speak truth.
And that's why we're in the situation that we're in.
But hopefully, you know, if you can educate people, if nothing else, at least you can educate yourself and you can go out and start questioning your professors.
Why are you telling us things that are provably wrong?
Why can't we discuss these things that are alternative?
Viewpoints on absolutely everything.
Why are we being silenced?
Why are we, you know, being listed as disinformation, misinformation and malinformation?
It's absolutely insane that we put up with this level of intellectual Deception and fraud.
Joe, you're doing a masterful job with this series.
I learned something every time we have one of these conversations, and I'm profoundly in your debt for what you're doing here.
It's a tremendous job of educating the public about matters that are in the background but are making a difference to political decisions and policy shaping
Based on false beliefs, pseudoscience, mere propaganda about very serious matters where objective knowledge exists, but the politicians are such flyweights intellectually or so massively ignorant or so corrupt that they're unwilling to speak the truth to the public, mostly out of ignorance because they don't know the difference, but also, I believe, because
Vanity and promoting themselves and their own agenda for reasons that remain rather obscure.
Your final thoughts for today?
Yes, this is a subject that we'll cover more in depth.
I had sent you eight slides, but when I checked this morning, they weren't in my sent box, and they weren't in my draft box, and so I don't know how we ended up missing those, but that's okay.
This is a big enough subject.
Like the green energy, it's not worth doing more than the hour that we did on it, but this particular subject on fossil fuels, And the effect of methane, particularly in the environment, is a subject that we need to cover more in depth.
So we'll do episode number eight, an additional set of data on the nuclear production of hydrocarbons and on methane power to carbon empowerment.
I recommend that you read this article because it covers a lot of the stuff that we weren't able to cover just this.
And it's no sense repeating everything that's already been printed that you could sit there and do your own research on that has its own footnotes so you can verify that what we're saying is actually provable facts.
So this is just an introduction and we'll do a more in-depth analysis of the peak oil fraud in our next episode.
And thank you, James, so much for entertaining me and our fellow students.
Oh, Joe, you're doing a great job.
This is Jim Fetzer, your host on Real Deals with another special in our anti-global warming series, where we're debunking the myths that are promoting the Green New Deal, which would be catastrophic in their effects not only for the United States, but all of humanity, not only dramatically reducing the quality of our lives,
But impoverishing the planet in ways that are unimaginable today, we need to understand that we not commit a colossal blunder based upon ignorance of science and a political agenda that has nothing to do with improving or enhancing the lives of human beings on planet Earth.
Thank you for joining us today.
▲
Export Selection