All Episodes
Feb. 14, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
01:00:37
Truth vs. NEW$ Part 2 (13 February 2022) with Don Grahn, Scott Bennett, and Holly Seeliger
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Three, two, one.
And welcome back, folks, to Truth vs. News Incorporated here on Super Bowl Sunday.
And we've got a super second half coming up, although we've got to start off with Biden, whose ratings are really low.
I think even lower than what they're saying, because I can't imagine anybody being for him.
Can you?
Well, Donna, the new average of major polls has hit uncharted territory.
Real clear politics is the most reliable source on polling.
The average of all the most recent national surveys show I'm dropping below 40 percent at 39.8.
An average of 54.4.
Now say they disapprove of what the job Biden is doing.
It comes as he's battling multiple domestic crises, soaring inflation, soaring gas prices, soaring numbers of illegal migrants.
His job approval drop dips below 40% for the first time in real clear politics.
Average of polls.
See, this is an average of average of the polls.
Therefore, highly reliable.
A devastating sign for warning Democrats about the upcoming election.
His approval rating is underwater, as far as the eye can see.
On the economy, only 38% approved, 56% disapproved.
It would seem the White House spin that the administration is creating jobs at record rates is falling on deaf ears, especially when Americans are paying higher gas prices every single day to get their vehicles to the grocery store, while they'll pay even higher prices for their food.
With both the House and Senate narrowly split, the 2022 election, where the president's job approval is at this level, carries catastrophic implications for the Democrats.
Exactly one year ago, Biden's approval rating was nearly a reversal of what he's seeing now.
On Feb 10, 2021, his approval was at about 55% positive, 35% negative.
That's 17.5% to where it is now at 14.6% negative.
That's 17.5% to where it is now at 14.6, negative.
A 32% freefall in just where one year's time.
With headlines like these, it's hard to imagine why Americans just don't appreciate Biden more than they do.
Gas prices hit their highest level in eight years.
Here's what's driving the surge.
Inflation likely accelerated in January to another 40-year high.
Here's why grocery stores are struggling to stock their empty shelves.
Inflation rate hit seven year over year, driving real wages down.
Delving into the numbers, we see approval is even worse on foreign policy.
37.2% approved, 53% disapproved.
to 53% disapproved.
Handling the pandemic, 43.6% approved to 52% disapproved.
And just so we don't forget this is an average of balls so the White House and Psaki can't try to spin it as an outlier.
These numbers have to be nothing short of terrifying based on their implication, not only for the 2024 presidential, but the more immediate upcoming midterms.
In our increasingly polarized and nationalized politics, the single most determinative factor in midterms is a president's job approval, writes Sean Tren, senior election analyst at Real Clear Politics.
So, looking at the most reliable posters, Biden approval 38 to 39 percent, congressional generic ballot, Republicans up six, Biden versus Trump up six, Country headed in the wrong direction.
And by the way, historically, that's been the most reliable indicator for the midterms.
65 to 68 percent headed in the wrong direction.
Meanwhile, just like that poof, only months before the 2022 midterms, Dem leaders, medical experts, CDC have decided to end COVID.
Gee, I wonder why?
The same Democrats who spent the last two years shaming Americans for not wearing masks indoors and outdoors are now announcing mandates are no longer necessary.
Could their sudden about-face have anything to do with a midterm election just nine months away?
In April, CNN analyst Dr. Leana Wen, who appears to be a complete fraud, who frequently appears on the DNC News Network to advise on all things related to the virus, implored the Biden regime to use the vaccine as a way to hold the rights of Americans hostage.
Wen suggested to Chris Cuomo the best way to ensure all people get vaxxed is by restricting the freedom of those who have yet to get the jab.
Yesterday, the first of what appears to be a coordinated plot by Democrats, the DNC corporate media and so-called medical experts to ease COVID before the 2022 midterms.
Several Democrat governors of solidly blue states came out with the same announcement.
After two and a half years of draconian mask mandates in their state, they're all going to start lifting their mandates.
Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont announced he's ending the statewide school mask mandate on February 28th, one day before the you-know-what.
Lamont explains, Connecticut has seen a dramatic decline in cases caused by Omicron.
Children over the age of five now have the ability to be vaxxed.
In a related tweet, Lamont Lake, former FDA commissioner and Pfizer exec Scott Gottlieb, who's been making the rounds lately, peddling the narrative 2.0, saying, I think it's prudent for governors to think about what the off switch looks like.
Yesterday, Dr. Nguyen did an about face.
Tweeted, in the coming days, we'll see many governors and local leaders lift their mask mandates.
This is the right step.
The right step.
Governor Newsom of California announced the Golden Start will end its statewide mask mandate on February 15th.
Also lift test mandates for visiting hospitals and nuisance harms.
Governor Phil Murphy triumphantly announced the Garden State of New Jersey will end its statewide mask mandate March 7th, one week after you-know-who makes his big speech.
Inexplicably, Dr. Wen, the same who only 10 months ago called on the Biden regime to punish actions against non-compliant citizens in place, tweeted support for all the blue governors lifting their mask mandates yesterday, saying restrictions should be lifted as quickly as possible.
SNL comedian and actor Rob Schneider mocked Dr. Wind's appearance with CNN's John Berman, where she told the snarky host, the science has changed.
Schneider, like most Americans who see what's really going on, tweeted, the wind has, and they see which way it's blowing.
Freedom!
Watch CNN's medical expert Dr. Wendt telling CNN host John Berman that wearing a mask should now become a personal choice.
That we need to be intellectually honest that the masks are having a serious effect on our kids.
So why the sudden change of heart?
Could it be polls that show Democrats are in serious trouble going into 2022?
I would say is the Pope Catholic, but I've been told he might not even be Catholic, so there you have it.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, that's exactly right.
They are realizing the writing on the wall that they've destroyed the Democrat Party.
They are hated by all Americans for their fascism and their Instinct to harm and shut down, hurt and terrify people into submission.
When they say things like, we're going to make life really difficult for the unvaccinated, we're not going to give them any freedom, they don't seem to realize that the unvaccinated don't need their permission.
They have no authority to control the freedom of people.
The Constitution recognizes God gave people these rights, but the Democrats, of course,
Have no respect for that, and now it's catching up to them, because not only do they realize that they are headed towards a kamikaze inferno as a political party, and that they have to desperately try and come out of this dive by saying, oh no, now the time's over, now the time of bitterness has ended, now we've got all the sciences indicating a change, and we're going to go into this, all that is lies.
People need to say, do not be fooled by these liars.
The reason they are pulling back all of these mandates is because they have been given legal notice in international complaints, legal actions, civil suits, criminal suits, criminal complaints for Reiner Fulmick, to Tom Renz, to all sorts of other people, Rick Martin and the Constitutional Law Group.
There are so many others that are out there that aren't even publicized.
They are filing complaints for crimes against humanity and all of these mayors and councils and governors who have been participating in this are going to be held to account.
They are going to be charged.
They are going to be prosecuted and most likely they will be found guilty of crimes against humanity and they could be executed for their punishment of their crimes.
That's the inevitable rollout Of the justice that's coming.
So they're trying to get ahead of it.
They're trying to change the narrative, and that'll be the next stage.
They'll say, the reason we're able to get out of this now is because we shut down society before.
It is like a tsunami, Jim.
They are pulling back.
The tide is pulling back.
But what will come next, if people don't go and attack these people in courts and file legal actions, if we don't go and tear the throats out of these people, literally, figuratively, and politically, and legally speaking, Uh, they will come with a second wave of more vicious constrict, uh, constricting, uh, shutdowns and lockdown measures in the future.
They, they're, they're taking one step, you know, two steps forward, one step back.
This is their one step back.
But they are planning to do an even more society-destroying action with some new variant, some new virus, some new invented pathogen.
That's their plan, is to unleash another part of this upon society.
This is just softening them up.
So we have to go after them and tear their guts out and make them a story for children that says that the Democrat Party and all these fascists absolutely were destroyed by their own doing.
Jim?
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I look forward to purchasing the children's book.
That should be pretty interesting.
Yeah, when they're talking about science, And remember a few months ago, or a year ago, they were talking about the science is settled, safe and effective, trust the science.
They had, you know, this whole propaganda campaign everywhere.
And then when people wanted to see the long term studies, when people, God forbid, use the scientific method, which is the basis of science, supposedly, we were conspiracy theorists, we couldn't, we weren't trusting the science and trusting the experts.
And now they can turn around and say, oh, well, science changes.
I'm like, well, isn't that the scientific method?
You have to have long-term studies.
You have to look at the big picture.
You have to have different data sets, not just a propaganda campaign of a bunch of white coats.
And I wanted to talk about, you had mentioned Scott Gottlieb.
Who is on the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration.
I just did a quick search on him because he's on the Board of Directors of Pfizer.
He's also on the board of something called Illumina Inc., which markets, manufactures, and integrated systems for the analysis of genetic variation, biological function, and sequencing, genotyping, basically harvesting, patenting genetic material
And I wonder, I don't know for a fact, but I wonder if he is related to Sidney Gottlieb, who was a chemist, spymaster, head of the CIA in the 50s and 60s with Project MKUltra, because that would make perfect sense if this is all part of a larger system.
It was about, this whole thing's been a big giant mind screw.
This hasn't been about Excellent.
Excellent points, Holly.
Just excellent.
Spot on.
of using the guise of science to create a fuge state over people and use the guise of science to make people do things which they would never, ever consent to under normal circumstances. - Excellent, excellent points, Holly.
Just excellent, spot on.
Meanwhile, CNN medical analyst says mask mandate should go.
The science has changed, just as Hawley was anticipating.
CNN medical analyst Leanna Nguyen said, the science has changed.
The decision to mask should shift from a government mandate to an individual choice.
Glenn represents a startling and sudden shift in the narrative.
As Hill noted yesterday, experts opened the door to lifting last mask mandates.
She initially told Anderson Cooper that people concerned about infection should be aided by the concept of one-way masking, particularly when it comes to children.
I'm not saying no one should ever wear masks, but rather the responsibility should shift from a government mandate imposed from the state or local district of the school to an individual responsibility of the family.
Families are still welcome to decide their child can wear a mask if needed.
Back in mid-December, however, she argued Everyone should have a mask mandate in particular states with high level of COVID.
To quote Bruce Willis in Die Hard, welcome to the party, pal.
CNN Maddox, she didn't have some moment of clarity involving individual rights and the freedom to choose what's best by best.
Rather, claiming the science has changed.
Really, what she means is the political science has changed.
The polls are in and the winds are blowing in a different direction.
Ask whether she agrees with restrictions finally being lifted.
I do.
There was and is a payment tie for pandemic restrictions, but when they were put in, it was always with the understanding they'd be removed as soon as we can.
The science has changed.
We know vaccines protect very well against Omicron, which is the now dominant variant.
Yet in another remarkable pivot in messaging, she also mentioned natural immunity.
So many people were exposed to Omicron and therefore have at least some level of protection, she said, either through vaccination or immunity.
On Twitter, she seems to have an additional calculation for wanting to lift mask mandates, especially when public sentiment is turning and COVID fatigue is settling in.
To preserve the public health authority she believes she and her colleagues currently enjoy, she fears official will lose grip on that authority if the public becomes too turned off by restrictions.
In the coming days, we'll see many governors and local leaders lift mandates the right step, help to preserve public health authority for when it's needed again.
The White House, meanwhile, oddly disagrees.
This, I believe, is to make it Joe Biden's opportunity when he gives his State of the Union on the 1st of March to be the one who lifts the mandates.
White House Press Secretary Basaki relays that the administration's stats mask mandate should remain in place for school despite the science having changed.
We recommend masking in school.
That's a recommendation from the CDC.
Liberal governors from New Jersey, Delaware, and Connecticut have all opted to end mask mandates for school children in their own states.
In fact, Many others now.
We have at least 11 blue states where the governors have changed.
This is a bit of an overlap with our last story, but Scott, perhaps you have additional thoughts to add.
Well, always remember that the highest levels of British psychological warfare, GCHQ, were employed to influence public perception in Britain, and the CIA, and MI6, and MI5, and Mossad, and the Canadian Mounted Police, and their own intelligence services have
Have engaged in treason against their country and their people and their and the rights of their people by, again, inventing this entire false pandemic psychological operation to transform Western society into a communist state.
To achieve something that they thought the people would bow down to and fold into a fetus position and not ask questions and be a forever sheep.
And the truth is you've got some people like that and then you have rams.
And people that rise up and say, oh, hell no, we will die before we allow this.
And that courage is infectious.
So we're watching the infection of courage spread.
We're seeing people again.
You did it brilliantly, Jim, by saying the science has changed, but it's political science.
It's not physical science.
It's not medical biological science.
It's political science.
And let no one be deceived by these liars when they use this science vernacular like a great idol of worship.
They have lost and they are on the run and they're desperately trying to do countermeasures like a submarine being attacked by torpedoes.
They're desperately flinging out countermeasures in the hopes that those torpedoes don't hit their hull.
But the torpedoes are going to find them, and they are going to sink them, and Trudeau is on the plank.
He is a dead man walking.
He will be prosecuted according to law, but make no mistake, these people are going to be hunted down for their crimes against humanity and prosecuted.
I have no doubt.
Because we haven't yet begun to see the physical consequences and damage of this vaccine.
And they are trying now to say, oh we're just having new science that shows COVID is attacking the placenta.
COVID-19, the disease, the virus, is attacking the placenta.
No, that's a lie.
It is the vaccine that attacks the placenta, not this mild flu.
So they're going to... what they're trying to You know, blame on the COVID is actually going to come back and be blamed on them for the vaccine.
And that's also going to impact Donald Trump.
Because if he continues to go down this road by failing to show mea culpa, failing to be in the spirit of the rationale behind the truckers and behind people, He's going to be run over by this too.
You can't be a little pregnant.
You can't be half on the side of vaccines and then half on the side of, you know, vaccine liberation.
The same with Rand Paul.
When Rand Paul stupidly says, well, we know two things work, natural immunity and the vaccine, that is the sign of a stupid person, a liar, or someone that has sold themselves out Uh to to this nonsense and you know I I think people are very quickly uh becoming wise to these shenanigans and they're not they're not gonna they're not gonna entertain or accept any uh any any authority or judgments coming out of them.
I I predict a full civilizational revolution as a result of this because those are great civilization more.
Those are great points, Scott.
And it's really disappointing.
Rand Paul, whom I generally think favorably of, should make such a dumb remark.
But you see, it's going to create such consternation if he says the VAX doesn't work or damages.
Ron Johnson is the guy who's speaking out.
I am in awe of Ron Johnson.
Paulie, further thoughts?
Well, let's not forget Rand was viciously attacked a few times, too.
So maybe he's got to just be careful what he says or, you know, say just there.
It's still upsetting when I see a lot of people who are like, oh, well, you know, some vaccines work and some, you know, under this circumstance or this circumstance, they're not looking at the the larger agenda.
The eugenics program tied in with vaccines have been it's been going on for years.
So this is something they've been Perfecting in, quote, third world countries for a long time.
There's lawsuits in India going back to the early 2000s, I think 2007 or 2008.
The HPV vacs and the polio, some of the polio vaccines, there are lawsuits against the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for basically causing sterility.
They find out that they're sterility injections and not an HPV vaccine.
So this is something they've been working on for a long time.
And I think Scott's right, where we were able to see the instance of us being able to stand back, you know, not being able to absorb and take in the mass hysteria the way that some people can just get so wound up in it.
I heard someone On the radio, a couple of DJs or something laughing about how, Oh, remember when we used to wash all of our food and everything we used to bring into the store, you know, because of COVID I was, I was thinking to myself, I never did that.
I wasn't a moron.
I mean, we need to stop suffering fools at this point because people are going to stand back and laugh and say, Oh yeah.
I remember the mass hysteria and the mass hysteria, what we all did.
Well, we didn't know.
We didn't know the science.
You know, wasn't out there and available.
There are a lot of us who knew and we were telling you that you are under an operation right now and they still fall for it.
I don't know if this is a humanity issue or a psychological issue, a spiritual issue, but it seems like there's always this opportunity when they roll out a mass hysteria event that there's some people who just always fall for it.
Excellent, excellent.
And remember how Rahm Emanuel observed, we don't let a crisis go to waste.
They want to capitalize politically on anything that happens.
Even Fauci, even Tony the Rat hints that all COVID restrictions may finally end in the U.S.
He said the U.S.
has passed the full-blown pandemic, as more and more officials suggest an end to mandates and rules.
Fauci said there's no way to fully eliminate the COVID virus.
We're looking at a time, however, when we have enough vaccinated and enough with protection from past infection.
Tony the Rat acknowledging natural immunity, that the restriction will soon be a thing of the past.
I predict it'll be a thing of the past as of 1 March, when Biden rises to proclaim himself to have vanquished the virus.
Poushey's reference to prior infection, also known as natural immunity, is notable because for months, he and other top officials have pushed vaccines as the only way to defeat the pandemic.
He would often downplay natural immunity in favor of the vax.
Now he's even suggesting booster stops may not be needed for all Americans.
It depends who you are.
If you're a normal, healthy 30-year-old with no underlying conditions, you might need a booster only every four or five years.
Notice that's promoting the grotesque vaccine agenda of Big Pharma, proving once again that he is a complete stooge.
In the near future, the government response will primarily be handed at the local level with a little federal intrusion.
He didn't say when the restrictions such as masks or vaccine would end, but it could be soon.
I say again, one March.
As we get out of the full-blown pandemic phase, We're certainly heading out.
His decision will increasingly be made on a local level rather than centrally decided or mandated.
His remarks come as several Democrat-led states such as California, New Jersey, Delaware, and New York have moved to rescind mass mandates, though some municipalities have opted to keep them.
We continue to endorse masking in schools, said Walensky, adding federal officials will continue to recommend masking in areas of high and substantial transmission.
A recent spike in COVID cases fueled by the Omicron dropped across the United States in recent days.
Hospitalizations have also fallen significantly.
The move to simultaneously use rhetoric on COVID-19 and insert restrictions comes—surprise, surprise—just months before the 2022 midterm election, as Democrats have thin majorities in both houses.
A January 30th Monmouth Powell, that at least 70% of Americans, 70% of Americans agree.
It's time we accept that COVID is here to stay.
Meanwhile, here's a classic.
Put this on your wall.
Why should I care how many people the injections kill?
I mean, what are you going to do about it?
Says Tony the Rat.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, again, all of these individuals that have played a part in the greatest crime against humanity and psychological operation and traumatization of the country are going to be held to account and their damage to children should be a particular injury that warrant a particular
Viciousness by the people in their obtaining of justice, and they are beginning to go into their school board meetings, they're beginning to challenge their supervisors, they are not recognizing any of the threats that Merrick Garland and the Department of Justice tried to unconstitutionally, you know, scare them off with.
You are witnessing really the The rise of America prior to the Revolutionary War.
People are organizing and they are standing up against these tyrannical powers.
The big thing, of course, are the legal declarations of crimes that are being committed and the intention of filing legal action against the indemnity bond Of this school board, of the supervisor, of the mayor, of the sheriff, of any political entity.
They have an indemnity bond, an insurance bond.
Don knows this better than anyone.
And a legal declaration that crimes have been committed.
Cease and desist.
And if you don't, not only are you not going to be recognized as having any constitutional power, but you're going to have your indemnity bond Uh, legally, uh, attacked and you will be, uh, unable to do anything.
That is the, that is the Achilles heel of the tyrants, is the indemnity bond, their insurance, and that's what, uh, again, constitutionallawgroup.com.
Uh, I think it's, uh, dot, dot U.S., Rick Martin's group.
Uh, is doing that people can download the legal documents.
That's right.
It's constitutionallawgroup.us, and people need to be engaged in the fight.
Again, we're all firefighters armed with fire extinguishers.
Go in there and help put out these fires before America is burned to the ground, Jim.
Nice.
Holly, your thought.
Don?
Real quickly, what is it that makes these jabs a real true vaccine?
We know they're not.
This is a joke, right?
Yeah, I'm afraid so.
It jokes on them or on us, but it jokes on the world and we're the losers.
No, we know they don't qualify as medicine.
They're certainly not vaccines.
Holly, your thoughts?
This guy's terrible.
Well, I just I had a conversation with a family member recently, and they worked at a business that told everyone that they had to get the jab.
And so they went and did it.
And, you know, against my advice and suggestions that it was dangerous, etc.
And now this week they're like, well, I guess, you know, the OSHA mandate was repealed or something, or a judge has struck it down.
And there are all these people who refuse to get the shot and they're allowed to go back to work.
And it's like, well, why are they allowed to go back to work?
And I had to get the shot.
And I'm trying to explain to them, you didn't have to, you could have fought in court with these other people.
There was no have to.
These people were just convinced through television and through family members who watch television.
It was just so upsetting to see that this idea of having to do something.
They could have put their name on the lawsuit.
They could have filed an exemption and held out.
That's what I said to people, just hold out.
It's going to end eventually.
But so many people just Decided to give in for whatever reason and perhaps I don't know if they're regretting, you know, or they're just upset that other people can go back to work and not have it.
I'm not exactly sure yet.
Jim, let me say one thing.
Sure, Scott.
Isn't it interesting that it's a Chinese woman on the CNN commentary who's always been about restricting freedoms of Americans?
Isn't it interesting that it's a Chinese girl who is Mark Zuckerberg's wife who shuts down conservatives?
Isn't it interesting The officer in charge of the YouTube's policy of deleting pages on YouTube is another Chinese woman.
And isn't it interesting, the producer of The Walking Dead, which I anticipate is life imitating fiction, all of these people who got the shot are walking dead in a sense.
She is a Chinese American.
Very fascinating.
I'm not racially biased, but there's something there.
When I also hear from Canadians that it was Chinese health officials that were Canadian, but Chinese that were enforcing and trying to shut down a lot of these actions and mandates and shutting down churches, as Arthur Palowski shared with me.
Chinese!
In Canada.
So there is something afoot.
They want to decimate California.
They want to steal the land.
They want to starve people out.
This is a Chinese 100-year project of depopulating California and replacing it with their Chinese empire so that in another 100 years They think they can roll over and take over America because they're all going to be filled with homosexual proclivities and transgenderism, which naturally means they're going to go extinct anyway.
That's in the Chinese mind and their psychological operation.
And let us not forget Eric Swalwell's Fang Fang.
I mean, you know, give us a break.
I think you're making a very astute observation.
These are almost certainly Chinese operatives.
Working at the behest of the Chinese Communist Party to bring down America.
They're very patient about it, and they're very systematic, and obviously it's bearing a lot of fruit.
Meanwhile, Bill Maher defends Whoopi's freedom of speech amid Holocaust suspension.
Bill Maher, host of HBO's Real Time with Bill Maher, defended Whoopi Goldberg over comments that View co-hosts made about the Holocaust not being about rape, saying she should not be canceled.
Whoopi Goldberg, who, by the way, I hope is still a friend, we can disagree with each other, should not be canceled or put off her show as much as I totally disagree with her crazy statement, Maher said Friday night.
During a Monday airing of The View, Goldberg and a co-host entered into a disagreement about the Holocaust in light of another issue regarding a Tennessee school board removing the graphic novel Maus from its eighth grade language arts curriculum, which is about the Holocaust.
If you're going to do this, then let's be truthful about it, Goldberg told her co-hosts at the time, because the Holocaust isn't about race.
No, it's not about race.
Then what was it about, Joy Behar asked?
It's about man's inhumanity to man, Goldberg replied.
That's what it's about.
After Goldberg's comment, co-host Anna Navarro responded, the Holocaust was about white supremacy.
It's about going after Jews and gypsies, Navarro said.
But those are two groups of white people, Goldberg added, but you're missing the point.
The minute you turn it into race, it goes down this alley.
Let's talk about it for what it is.
It's about how people treat each other.
It's a problem.
It doesn't matter if you're black or white, because black, white, Jews, everybody eats each other.
Following the episode, the president of ABC said Goldberg would be suspended two weeks without pay.
Following the incident, Mayor noted both black and white people bring different cultural perspectives to the table.
Can we just understand that part of our sorry racial history in this country is that the point of view from a black person is often going to be very different and sometimes shocking to a white?
Meanwhile, if you want to get an angle on what really happened at the end of the World War II, here's a nice introduction.
The Holocaust Narrative Politics Trump Science.
You can find it on my blog, jamesfetzer.org.
It's also at the government rag.
Well, I explained how if you define the Holocaust specifically in terms of three theses, number one, that six million Jews were put to death, number two, that it was done in gas chambers, and number three, using Zykon B, then it's easy to refute.
The International Committee of the Red Cross, for example, kept meticulous notes and records about every inmate in all of the camps.
Beginning with their age, their sex, their race, their ethnicity, their religion, and their cause of death.
In 1993, they recalibrated the numbers and they found the total was 296,081 had died from all causes put together, none of whom had been put together in a gas chamber using Zyklon B.
It turns out that Zyklon B was being used in the camps to kill body lies because they spread typhus and dysentery in the camps, and they wanted to maintain the health of the inmates because you can't get work out of a corpse.
These were labor camps, not centers for extermination.
Indeed, during the trials of Zundel in Canada, During the first trial in 1985, the prosecution was unable to produce a single witness who could testify on an oath they'd seen anyone put to death in a gas chamber in any of the camps.
During the second trial in 1988, the sensation was caught by Fred Lochter, who was the leading expert on gas chambers, who traveled to the various camps and discovered None of them, none of them had any facility that could have possibly functioned as a gas chamber.
It's a myth, propagated to promote Jewish political clout, which is rooted in a Western sense of guilt over the Holocaust.
Therefore, they defend it vociferously, although there are intermittent exceptions.
Amy Goodman, of all people, interviewed a former minister, I believe of education on her show, This would have been years and years ago who, when Amy asked about the Holocaust, the minister replied, oh, it's a trick.
If we're in Europe, if we're attacked, if Israel is attacked in Europe, then we bring up the Holocaust.
If we're attacked in the United States, we call it anti-Semitism.
It's a trick.
I have her on tape.
If you want to see more, over and beyond my article, which was actually authored as the introduction to a completely brilliant book by Nick Skollerstrom entitled Breaking the Spell, where Nick had the great advantage as a historian of science in the UK by having access to the British death books,
They had cracked the German code and had access to all the meticulous records that Germans were so exceedingly precise about maintaining, and found that British netbooks corroborated the number of the International Committee of the Red Cross, not that of the Holocaust mythology.
If you go to jamesfetzer.org, find the blog on jimtheconspiracyguy.com, the 65 shows, and scroll down to the one about The end of World War II, myth or fiction, and you'll see all the evidence you could possibly want.
Scott, your thoughts?
Well, you know, as Mike Harris has said too, essentially as a result of all of the attacking of white people, white males, white heterosexual males, white Christian heterosexual males who are conservative or Republican or want to maintain The traditions and heritage of decency and character.
Because of the attack on these white people, you're witnessing an entire group of humanity detaching and divorcing itself from these academic institutions and these corporate institutions.
They're forming their own alternative society because the present society, feverishly mad with political correctness and drunk on transgenderism and perversion and lust and all of the degeneracy of modern culture, which I would argue is a form of asymmetric warfare that the Chinese
You're seeing a whole group of society begin to separate itself.
And when Whippy Goldberg and these other morons think that they can just stick pins and needles into white people and not have this sort of repellent pulling back, They're fools.
They're absolutely going to be disintegrated with all of their madness.
You're going to see people pulling out, and that's what's happening with the critical race theory objections.
People are objecting to this.
They're not going to allow their children or grandchildren, who are between zero and ten years of age, To develop a complex, an emotional psychological complex and guilt and self-hating ideology because of the self-hating liberals who are teaching school.
That's when people pull out of the school and they pull out of the entire government that is promoting it and say, we are independent.
We're declaring our independence as the founding fathers did because you are becoming so toxic to our freedom and happiness.
We're divorcing ourselves entirely.
So, the Society of America is going to crumble out of its federal union and you will see independent city-states, republics, and counties, all of them, maybe not necessarily officially on paper, but ideologically, you're going to have a reformation and it's going to be a departure from the left and a reconstituting of tribalism in a conservative political sense.
Jim?
Fascinating.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I think Scott's right.
You know, white people, if we're allowed to call ourselves a group or identify as white or as a group in any sort of positive way, we need to clean house within our own families and rebuild the families, get our kids off of social media, get them away from cell phones.
Get them out of public schools if they're going to mask your kids and teach them.
You know that what everyone does is hateful and start building up communities.
Start making sure people start their own businesses.
Stuff like that to encourage children to have some pride and some respect and work ethic.
All that sort of stuff which which is part of the culture and should be part of anyone's culture and.
It's just sad to see the collapse of, you know, quote unquote, white people in the United States and elsewhere in Europe.
And I think that that conversation was between Amy Goodman, I think it's Golda Meir was the prime minister of Israel.
That's her name, who was talking about that.
As an Israeli Minister of Education, it was a woman.
Oh, okay.
It wasn't Gola Meir.
Okay, I'll have to take a look at that again.
You can find it, it's in that presentation I have on my blog at jamesfetzer.org, toward the end.
I just wanted to say quickly, There was the floodings in Western Germany a year or two ago.
And supposedly, from what I have heard, a lot of bones and artifacts and information, just literally just bones coming out of the ground from the flooding in Germany from some of the Morgenthau camps that were there and just people just being starved to death.
You know, the plan was to just starve people to death in Germany.
So there were a lot of people that died in Europe, and we're still finding bodies over there.
And it's absolutely horrific, and people aren't really talking about what they have found over there.
Just from the flooding, it's almost like God is revealing a lot of it right now.
That's wonderful, Holly, because I certainly don't deny that in some broad, generalized sense, World War II was a holocaust moment.
Millions of people died, including millions of Jews.
I don't have any doubt about it.
But the holocaust narrative specifies very specifically those three theses, which turn out to be false.
And if anyone wants to follow up on the Zondel trials, there's a wonderful article by Robert Forrest-Sohn Entitled the Zondel Trials 1985-1988.
Don's holding up.
What?
You didn't know there was a UK soccer team at Auschwitz?
Just one of many revelations.
Even over a thousand babies were born in the camps.
That's utterly inconsistent with the theory that these were extermination centers.
I mean it still takes nine months to produce one of those.
Check it out.
And as Don says, there's a wonderful selection of essays in that book.
And I suppose we didn't go to the moon either.
Don, you wanted to add a comment?
No, you're muted.
You're muted.
Hello.
One thing about us folks is that I understand that that was really a work camp and that essentially they really starved in there because Americans blew up the rail lines, they can't get any food in there, and it was really our people that caused the death.
It was the Allied bombing of the German cities, which was itself a war crime, that interdicted the railroad lines, and it was impossible to resupply the camps.
Right.
Thank you, John.
Let me say one thing.
let me say one thing what we're what we're doing you don you gotta mute because you got that background noise what we're doing to russia by strangling their new their their petroleum and their gas lines and stuff like that was the same thing that we did to japan that triggered the japanese to attack pearl harbor and to engage it and start world war ii the the
The shutting down of their rubber and their oil by the United States, an economic embargo, that's the same thing as an economic sanction against Russia.
And it's very disturbing that the same action could occur, but Russia would devastate any attempt by NATO or the United States or any country to shut off its life connections.
Jim?
God, that's just a sensational addendum.
If anyone wants more, see Day of Deceit by Stannett, how we knew the Japanese were going to attack because we cut off their access to oil in the South Pacific.
We provoked the action.
It may be, as you are suggesting, we're going to repeat history once again to our enormous detriment.
But we have such incompetent political leadership in the United States today.
Nothing would surprise me, Scott.
I think that's a terribly important point.
I'm so glad you made that.
Meanwhile...
I wrote a request for evaluation of the current state of JFK research to none other than Cyril Wecht, who's a very famous forensic pathologist.
He's the coroner of Allegheny County, has been involved in all kinds of celebrity deaths, who did a recent presentation.
I mean, it was published on February 5th.
JFK assassination expert Lee Harvey Oswald loaned gunman theory as bullshit.
But there's so much more going on here.
I wrote to Cyril and to this group, by the way, you may not know all those names, but I'm telling you, those are the best people, the best students of JFK in the world today.
Cyril, we all agree the single bullet theory is bullshit, but we've known that for over 50 years, so that is not news.
What I and others here, no doubt, would appreciate is your personal assessment of the current state of JFK research.
I, and others, were acutely disappointed by Oliver Stone's JFK Revisited, in which you, David, Doug, and others were featured, even when it featured experts like yourselves, where, even when it featured experts like yourselves, it did not address their more important work on the fabrication of the x-rays, the revision of the Zapruder film, the physical alteration of JFK's cranium by Humes, and Larry's extraordinary work
Complimenting that of Ralph, that Lee was in the doorway of the TSBD when JFK's motorcade passed by.
I cannot imagine how a new film by Oliver Stone would leave out discoveries of such extraordinary importance.
I have supposed that was a result of relying upon D'Eugenio as a script writer, a blunder in my opinion of mind numbing proportions.
I assume you know of these developments and am interested in knowing whether you recommended their inclusion to Oliver, my own JFK special 18 November 2021.
Which I dedicated to Oliver Stone presents some of the new evidence that, in my and others' view, ought to have been included.
Nothing in this 2021 film was not already known by 1980 when Lifton's first book first appeared.
So what is the explanation for these omissions?
Thanks, Jim.
P.S.
I'm also copying Oliver on this message to invite his response as well.
Well, it turns out in my JFK special, I also made the following observations dedicated to Oliver Stone.
Whose new film will be released on 22 November 2021.
His JFK was a masterpiece with three flaws.
He did not know Oswald was in the doorway of the Book Depository at the time the JFK motorcade passed by, or that the Zapruder film had been massively edited.
No doubt because he was relying upon advice from Robert Rodin, who has played the JFK community virtually from the beginning.
And he posited three hit teams when there turned out to have been eight assassins.
My worry is that this sequence, which I have been told was screenwritten by one Jim DiEugenio, may suffer from similar defects.
We shall see.
Scott and I got to tell you, Sarah wrote back and just said he was only featured in the film and wasn't determinative of a scope or content.
But he evaded my question about the evaluation.
And I have other reasons to believe something is not adding up.
Your thoughts?
Well, I think you're right.
I think Oliver Stone has been compromised and bought off in whatever he did 20, 30 years ago.
And AFK was a great film, but he's lost that edge.
Oliver Stone has also been quadruple vaccinated, Jim.
He's got two shots and two boosters.
He is on his way out, if we recognize the inevitability of this vaccine.
And they get mind fog and all this other jazz.
So we're witnessing this vaccine causing irreparable damage on all of society.
Don't be surprised If we see an increase in delusional stupidity and lack of creativity and lack of any artistic, musical, fashionary sense.
All of the sharp, sensitive, and beautiful things that a society and its culture produces is created by highly creative, And sensitive people.
And this vaccine is going to destroy that.
So I would not be surprised to see an extraordinary devolution of society based on this.
We have only to imagine what the ramifications are going to be.
And it's not pretty.
Jim?
Let me add an observation that tends to substantiate what you just observed.
Oliver did an interview with Joe Rogan.
It wasn't very long, 12, maybe 15 minutes.
But here's a guy who could just relax and talk for hours about JFK without any notes.
In this instance, he was constantly referring to notes.
He had a script.
And it was very distressing to watch, suggesting he has been reined in, he has been compromised.
I no longer have any faith in Oliver Stone, whom I used to admire beyond words.
Holly, your thoughts?
Well, I just think it's a side note.
Obviously, I haven't done as much research as Jim, but needless to say, I've heard people get very upset, though, when you talk about President Johnson's collusion for knowledge, planning, all of that involved with the assassination.
It seems like a lot of people want a break from that narrative.
And as we were talking about with the Democrats running the whole United States, it seems like, and the Soros agenda, this idea that perhaps talking about Johnson or any other Democratic Party collusion with the assassination could be just part this idea that perhaps talking about Johnson or any other Democratic Party collusion with the assassination could be just Oh.
Holly, those are nice observations.
Yes, yes, yes.
Oliver in this new film talks a bit about Alan Dulles.
He speaks nearly a word about LBJ, even though LBJ's own personal hitman, Malcolm Mack Wallace, was one of the eight assassins.
He was in the school book depository in the side opposite of the window from which the sixth floor assassins were a window from which no shots were fired whatsoever.
But LBJ was the mastermind behind the assassination.
I've laid out the case so thoroughly in so many places.
It's embarrassing that someone like Oliver Stone should seek to participate in a cover up, but I have no doubt at this point in time, that's where he stands today.
And for Scott to observe, he's been multi-vaxxed.
Well, there's the pity.
But I gotta tell you, he was not carrying water any longer.
He wasn't speaking out for the truth.
He's been co-opted, and I cannot tell you exactly how or why.
Well, when he picked DiEugenio, it was a calamitous blunder.
DiEugenio had launched an attack on me a couple of years before that was absurd.
It was about every aspect of my work.
9-11, JFK, Wellstone, Sandy Hook, Boston bombing, even the moon landing, even the Holocaust, where Jim DiEugenio knew nothing about my work in these other areas.
And it seemed to me it reflected a group project at the time.
And I'm now convinced it was to divert Oliver from going with me and all of those I represent and those fantastic new discoveries that would have made for a fabulous film that would have made him a billion dollars by settling for Jim DiEugenio to run a limited hangout
And I'm now very, very troubled about the role of Cyril Wecht here, because let me say, and I shall return to this point, Cyril was on the medical panel when the HSCA reviewed the case in 1977-78, along with the death of Martin Luther King.
And they concluded in their evaluation of medical evidence that the bullet that hit Jack in the back of the head had hit at the very top at the crown of the head rather than further back.
And they showed a reconstruction of the back of the head that was all solid hair.
It looked perfectly normal.
Now there was a triangular patch of bone called the Harper fragment.
Large piece of bone that was blown out at the back of the head.
The HSCA reconstruction wasn't even consistent with a harbor fragment.
So you have these three enormously different accounts.
You got a fist-sized blowout at Parkland, which is accurate.
Then Humes, as I mentioned, took a craniosaw and enlarged the wound so as the whole back of the head was missing.
This is described in mathematical detail in the Bethesda autopsy report.
You cannot get away from it.
So I wrote Cyril once and I said, Cyril, what happened?
You know, how could you go from the fist size to this huge thing to being reconstructed the back of the head to which he never replied?
And I think he never replied because he knew the jig was up.
He didn't have a response.
And I'm now very, very concerned that this new film, a script written by Jim DiEugenio, represents a complete success of the CIA in managing the story.
Remember, it was they who began attacking critics of the Warren Report, who were blowing holes in it right and left as conspiracy theorists.
When the conspiracy theorists are investigating crimes that the government wants to cover up.
I think that's what happened here.
And it's ridiculous.
Just to substantiate how DiEugenio is totally dishonest here.
It took me seven hours of video to refute the absurd array of charges he made against me, because I went back to all the evidence.
I refuted every single claim.
He did not have one legitimate bona fide criticism.
It took seven hours to do it, and that just reflects how easy it can be to lie, and how complex it can be to expose that what you've been told is a lie.
And I'd like just to have Scott and Holly, both, your final thoughts here before we conclude today.
Let me say this, Jim.
I did an interview with Sean Stone earlier in the week and talked about many things, and Sean's doing some films exposing the Deep State, and right after I did that interview with Sean Stone, the Washington Post Deep State operative John Swain calls to try and set up an interview, no doubt a hit piece, And everyone at American Media Periscope instantly went into, wow, you're over the target, Bennett, because you're doing something to scare the hell out of their operatives.
Now they're reaching out to you.
It was right after the Sean Stone interview.
So you're right.
The dark powers that be recognize the danger of the alternative media and the chemistry that we as truth tellers have with each other.
Jim?
Well, if you contrast JFK, which was a brilliant film, absolutely on the right track with JFK Revisited, you can see how much Oliver Stone has been compromised.
Holly, your final thoughts for today?
Some thoughts about the mainstream news and like the dinosaur media, Washington Post, trying to get their fingers in there.
Good for you, Scott.
Don't ever, just general advice to anyone, don't ever interview with any sort of mainstream news at this point.
They will twist every single word you say.
Just meeting with them gives them legitimacy.
We're creating our own media.
Leave them out in the cold.
If they want to repent and start doing some actual journalism, then they can prove themselves worthy.
But at this point, we need to keep those people far away and just do our own thing.
And we've been doing a great job with alternative media.
We are saving people's lives every day.
I mean, everyone.
I mean, even people who are just sharing memes, getting information out there.
We're really a beautiful time to be alive in in many ways still.
If we can only survive a few more years, let us hope.
Don, I think we're there.
Oh, are we there?
Holly, you are so right.
We have a show.
It's called Truth vs. News Incorporated.
I think we're pools apart.
And I think you'll find the truth here for sure, other places as well, but I think we have got a lock and key on it, so the key to the lock to open up the truth here.
This has been Super Bowl Sunday, and what a day it's been, what a time it has been.
You want to share this, and I think we're going to come back next week if we're still here.
There's even more stuff, so keep it tuned here for the truth.
Export Selection