All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 8, 2022 - Jim Fetzer
39:36
Geezy Truth News (7 January 2022)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
To Jeezy Truth News.
It is January 7th, 2022.
Unbelievably so.
Welcome.
It's Jim Fetzer over here and let's hear it at the beginning of the year.
What's going on?
Well, my friend, the Democrats are so terrified of Donald Trump who cleaned their clock in 2016, beating Hillary Clinton, even though that election was massively rigged for Hillary.
He won anyway, principally because of a tremendous outpouring of support from rural counties.
When you manipulate an election, you go where the population is, the big cities.
They didn't anticipate in the huge turnout that made Trump president in 2016.
Then we know in 2020 and apprehension it was going to happen again.
They took extraordinary measures to make sure that this time the theft would succeed, where Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook put up Millions of dollars to buy completely unqualified vote counters who were tearing up Trump ballots and counting Biden ballots repeatedly.
Mike Lindell has exposed it.
Sidney Powell has exposed it.
A host of others.
The evidence is simply overwhelming where it appears that the actual outcome was 410 electoral votes for Trump and only 128 for Biden, if you knew the actual count before the Dominion servers were seized and they changed the vote.
Sydney published a map and you can see the nation is virtually red from coast to coast, where Trump even took California and Minnesota, which I was actually predicting was going to be the case.
So what they are doing now is trying to impeach him again, as it were, preclude him from running for office again, because they know he would trounce once again.
They're endlessly attacking him.
Notice every opportunity Democrats have, they're going after Trump whether or not he's on the ballot.
We're Virginia with Terry McAfee, who is a buddy of Hillary Clinton, went down to defeat After endlessly attacking Trump and allowing Glenn Youngkin to come to defense of parents, who McAfee was also dismissing for their protests over critical race theory being taught to their students.
Well, the outrage is growing more and more, but he sees that tactic, adopted that tactic because he had nothing more going for him.
The Democrats have nothing more going for them than January 6th.
So what's going on here is really a start up political start.
I'm going to review and explain how we know it has no legal foundation.
So the very idea that they're going to be able to.
That preclude him from running for office, which is their objective, is not going to work unless Congress can be so politicized to the extent that it would pass a finding that he'd participated in an insurrection, even though the facts do not support it.
But what what is it with this Democrat Party?
They don't care about the facts.
They don't care about the law.
They don't care about the Constitution.
We know, for example, about January 6th, that Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House, has control of the Capitol Police and that Nancy Pelosi declined the offer of Donald Trump to send, you know, a military component to provide security.
She couldn't have that because they had an orchestrated event in mind.
We know that John Sullivan, who is the head of Antifa, his brother exposed, led 226 Antifa members dressed as Trump supporters into the Capitol.
We know that a fellow by the name of Ray Epps, who was working for the FBI, was an agent provocateur encouraging everyone to go into the Capitol.
In fact, others there Who are peacefully protesting, were so aware what Epps was doing that they were calling out Fed, Fed, Fed, Fed about Ray Epps.
He orchestrated the situation where those who were returning from Trump's speech at the Ellipse, which was a mile and a half away, would have to go by a specific entrance into the Capitol that would give them access, where all the others they might very well have used had been blocked.
This was done by the Ray Epps hit team.
Well, a member of the House by the name of Thomas Massey questioned the Attorney General about whether there were federal agents present on January 6 and whether they were agitating to go into the Capitol.
But Merrick Garland, who is a contemptible cad who should not be in any office of responsibility, refused to answer.
Where his refusal, of course, spoke volumes about what's actually taking place here.
Meanwhile, now you have Biden giving an incendiary speech.
I mean, this was really out of character for the fellow who is not actually the real Joe.
As I've reported before, this is an actor, a body double.
They've been using them for Biden since 2018.
It appears he may actually have died in 2017.
I was calling out that this wasn't the same guy already on the occasion of the first debate with Donald Trump.
Had different ears, shape of skull.
James Woods, the actor who's a political activist, has observed he had brown eyes instead of blue.
We've had further confirmation of pharmacists who's used to comparing signatures to ensure that drugs are not illegally obtained.
Notice that the signature of this new guy is completely different from that of the real Joe Biden.
A further study shows that I was exact right on about the difference in the shape of their skulls.
The real Joe had a much larger cranium, a broader cranium.
This guy has a much narrower cranium.
I mean, they're not the same person, and yet they continue with this fraud, which is all the Democrats can do.
They've turned into the party of liars, cheats, phonies, and frauds, and now tyrants who are subverting the law and the Constitution to promote their political agenda.
So we have Biden delivering a blistering rebuke of Trump for election lies, blaming him for the Capitol riot.
The election fraud claims are not lies.
They are, in fact, the truth.
And it's demonstrable on multiple grounds and for denying responsibility for the Capitol riot.
But he wasn't responsible.
Anyone who paid attention to his speech that day, as did I, I watched the whole speech.
It was very calm, very peaceful.
He was objecting to the theft of the election.
He didn't encourage his followers to Peacefully express their objection to the theft of the election.
He never encouraged them to undertake any act of violence.
He never encouraged them to even enter the Capitol.
It was just outrageous because Biden, given what is supposed to be a defense of democracy, but is actually a cover for tyranny, attack Trump as a defeated liar and an outstanding threat
to the country's founding ideals.
I mean, this is ridiculous beyond belief.
Kamala Harris has gone further and compared the January 6th to Pearl Harbor and to the
9-11, which is a terrorist attack, which is just ludicrous.
More than 2,400 Americans died at Pearl Harbor, nearly 3,000 on 9-11.
Americans died at Pearl Harbor, nearly 3,000 on 9-11.
I mean, it's just incredible.
Now the Federalist has published a very nice piece.
This was already on January 30th, back on 2021.
A year ago, the Federalist nailed this down.
No, Donald Trump did not incite an insurrection.
David Mark has published a piece.
Everyone needs to check it out.
Democrats and their media allies are milking a tragic riot for all it's worth.
Let me share parts of the analysis he provides there already a year ago.
The Democrats and their media allies are trying to convince the American people that President Trump is guilty of inciting an insurrection.
In both legal terms and the plain meaning of the English language, their claim is absurd on its face.
There are two fundamental reasons Trump did not incite the riots and the riots were not an insurrection.
Legally speaking, incitement has an incredibly high bar that none of Trump's actions since the election come close to meeting.
Those standards were set by the Supreme Court in its landmark Brandenburg versus Ohio case.
Among other points, a decision held that to constitute incitement to violence, speech must include intent and specific, not abstract, instructions to act.
It's also required that the speech in question would likely produce imminent lawless action, which went a step further than the previous test for incitement.
Moreover, as to insurrection, at no point was the overthrow of the government of the United States even a remotely possible outcome.
Not even close.
Those cosplaying idiots taking selfies in Speaker Pelosi's office and parading around with Podia had no intention of forming a new government.
This was an expression of anger, not a realistic organized coup attempt.
Anyone among the rioters who believed their actions would result in the overthrow of the government, if there were any at all, were delusional to the point of insanity.
So if it wasn't incitement and it wasn't insurrection, why do the Democrats, the corporate media, and the big tyrants want you to believe it was?
It's quite simple, he's observing here.
The purpose is to create an atmosphere of crisis and emergency that gives cover to extreme and illiberal actions to punish and silence those with whom they disagree politically.
Well, that was very plausible at the time, but we now know a deeper and more searching reason why they're playing this up, why they had to have the January 6 congressional committee, why they wouldn't allow
Republicans there who actually are highly knowledgeable about the case and they could defend Trump
and defeat these arguments, even as the Federalist has already done. We have a
situation compounding now by Attorney General Garland declaring he has no higher priority than prosecuting
the January 6th rioters.
One might have thought, for example, rounding up all the illegal aliens that are flooding into the country.
Or going after the domestic terrorists who were looting and rioting and committing arson.
Those are two examples of higher priority.
Or making measures that clamp down on the massive looting and shoplifting that's now become organized crime in California, for example.
Those might have higher priority, for example.
But not for this attorney general.
The Justice Department, he asserts, remains committed to holding all January 6th perpetrators at any level—I emphasize, at any level—accountable under law, whether they were present that day or were otherwise criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy.
We will follow the facts wherever they lead.
That all sounds, you know, responsible, except it's fraudulent.
When you know there was no incitement and there was no insurrection, then obviously there cannot have been a Donald Trump responsible for inciting an insurrection.
Meanwhile, Biden and Harris are using January 6 to promote a federal takeover of elections.
They know that Trump is such a massive threat that there's a potential here for the Democrats to suffer a bloodbath in 2022, this year during the midterm elections, where I'm predicting That they're going to lose 100 seats in the House and four to six Senate seats in addition.
It's going to be an absolute massacre where many Democrats are seeing the writing on the wall and bailing.
They're hoping that they can do for the nation what Governor Newsom did in California, namely Go to home, mail in ballots, print your own ballot at home so the Democrats can flood the electoral system with untold numbers of illegal, made-up, manufactured ballots to steal elections indefinitely into the future.
Now, there's a very fine piece by Jeff Miller about what's really going on here that I want to explore with you.
Quietly explore barring Trump from office over January 6th.
And this just appeared on the 6th itself yesterday.
The Democratic Party constitutional scholars and pro-democracy advocates have quietly explored the possibility of disqualifying former President Trump from holding office again in the years since the January 6th attack on the Capitol.
After the riots, there was a crescendo of calls to take steps to strip Trump of his eligibility, but since then, they have abated.
Participants in the 14th Amendment discussions say that discussions have continued about applying Section 3 of the Amendment.
Well, what does Section 3 of the 14th Amendment declare?
I'll read it now.
No person shall be a senator or representative in Congress or elector or president and vice president or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States or under any state who, having previously taken an oath as a member of Congress or as an officer of the United States, Or as a member of any state legislature or as an executive or judicial officer of any state to support the Constitution of the United States shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.
But Congress may, by a vote of two-thirds of each house, remove such disability.
This is the game they're playing.
This is the stage they are setting.
You're going to hear unending discussion 24-7 of January 6, Trump inciting an insurrection right up to the midterm election, I have no doubt, and then beyond.
Because that's all the Democrats have.
They have nothing else to support or justify their stance with the public.
And they are, in spite of these efforts, I guarantee, going to go down to defeat.
But it will not be for lack of trying.
The article continues.
If anything, the idea has waxed and waned, said Harvard Law School professor Lawrence Tribe.
I hear it being raised with considerable frequency these days, both by media commentators and by members of Congress and their staff, some of whom have sought my advice on how to implement Section 3.
In a new report, Democratic lawmakers found that around a dozen of them have discussed in public or privately how Section 3 of the 14th Amendment might apply to those who took part in the violence on January 6.
Representative Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland, who's on the January 6th House Select Committee.
Representative Jerry Nadler, Democrat of New York, Chair of the House Judiciary Committee.
And Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Democrat of Florida, among the officers that have spoken with Tribe recently.
Let me remind you a note about Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
She was the head of the DNC when the Iran-Oman scandal took place, where she had a Pakistani tech guy spying on the members of Congress using her office as cover.
It was outrageous.
She ought to have been expelled from Congress at that point in time.
She was also the head of the DNC and worried that Florida alone was going to lose as many as 11 House seats to the Republicans.
So, she participated in the massive deception known as the Parkland shooting on the 14th of February, which was used as a pretext to justify the March for Our Lives in Washington, D.C.
just a few weeks later, which involved closing the roads.
They had large-scale events.
They had all kinds of products, hundreds of t-shirts, coffee mugs, and the whole bit.
For those who had ostensibly died at Parkland, in fact, because it was a holiday, the school, which had 3500 students, actually allowed them to go home early at one o'clock.
It was a common practice in Florida counties.
Only a handful stayed behind.
Even David Hogg admitted in an interview he gave six hours after he spoke at the March for Our Lives on CBS that he was at home and realized he needed to get back to school, so he got on his bike and rode back to school so he could participate in the mock drill that would be presented as a live event alleging 17 students had died, where weeks and weeks later they'd forgotten to even list the obituaries.
I've gone through this in great detail.
Anyone should look, if they want more, at my reviews of the Parkland shooting.
For example, go to jamesfetzer.org and to Jim the Conspiracy Guy, the 65 shows, and you'll find not only my How to spot a false flag, part one, and how to spot a false flag, part two, where I go through a dozen of these false flag events.
But if you scroll down, you'll see a show where Gary Null booted me off of his network in New York City for reporting on Parkland and that it was a fraud.
And there you'll find a nice dissection of what happened at Parkland.
The fact is that it is a policy of the District of Columbia for festive events that involve closing cities that you must submit a permit request.
A hundred and eighty days, that's six months in advance of the event.
And we confirmed with a Metropolitan Police officer that indeed that had happened, that the request for the permit had come in months and months in advance, that there had been months and months of planning.
So the whole thing is a complete scandal and a scam, but just typical of what the Democrats are doing, where Barack Obama Nullified the Smith-Mutt Act of 1948 by means of the Smith-Mutt Modernization Act of 2012, just in time for Sandy Hook to allow the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation, including paid riots, staged events, and the like, within the United States, which heretofore had only been allowed without,
And it's been followed by a veritable flood.
Not only Sandy Hook, but the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville, Parkland, even Las Vegas.
I have done research, collaborative research, with other experts and published the books on all of the above, with the exception of Las Vegas, where I've done very extensive reporting and hope yet to produce a book where I bring together the best qualified experts and that's what's taken place.
And as a consequence, Amazon.com has banned six of the books I published at moonrockbooks.com, not only my book on Sandy Hook, which was banned less than a month after, where the 13 experts who joined me, including six,
Ph.D.
professors established a school that had been closed by 2008, that there were no students or teachers there, and that it was a two-day FEMA exercise.
Technically, a mass casualty drill involving children, which I even included in the book, the manual which we had discovered for the two-day event, which was then prevented as mass murder to promote gun control.
So what we see is the Democrats once again fabricating faking under the auspices provided by Barack Obama, whom history will eventually record as perhaps the most despicable president of the United States of all time, who is not even qualified for office having been born in Kenya, where I've done my own research on this and established that to be the case, where even in Kenya they have a monument to the first A Kenyan president of the United States not realizing there cannot be a Kenyan president of the United States.
Well, this despicable activity continues unabated in relation to January 6, which was another fake fabricated event.
Here we have officeholders who engaged in insurrectionary revolt against the government or disqualified from future office under the 14th Amendment, which they would like to apply to Donald Trump.
This is to slay the dragon.
They know Trump is going to wipe them out once again in 2024.
They're desperately trying everything they can to preclude that from happening.
During the point is the constitutional purpose is clear to keep people exactly like Donald Trump.
This is coming from Raskin.
And other traitors to the Union from holding public office.
But the traitors to the Union aren't Donald Trump.
They're Nancy Pelosi.
They're Jeremy Raskin.
They're Jerry Nadler.
They're Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
They're Joe Biden.
They are Kamala Harris.
Those are the real traitors.
According to the report, most constitutional scholars say that the provision—this is Section 3 of the 14th Amendment—is not self-executing.
Thus, to make the 14th Amendment effective for Trump, Congress would have to take additional steps.
Several scholars believe that Congress, upon a simple majority in both chambers, could find that Trump was engaging in insurrection on its own, thereby implicating the Constitution.
Allowing Trump back into office would then require a supermajority vote under the 14th Amendment.
In the view of other experts, however, such as Jeffrey Tribe, actually Lawrence Tribe of Harvard, Congress needs to go further, either by creating a fact-finding body neutral to the Trump administration or by assigning the fact-finding role to a federal court.
After Trump Senate impeachment last February, Representative Steve Cohen, Democrat of Tennessee, introduced a bill permitting the Attorney General to claim that an officeholder violated the provision and should be barred from holding future office before a three-judge panel.
Besides legislative discussions, other efforts have been focused on pressure on state election officials so that they can be sued privately.
They wrote to the chief election officials in all 50 states—these are the Democrats—in Washington, D.C., urging them to prohibit Trump from appearing on ballots of future elections.
As a result, the group claims Congress doesn't have to take any additional steps.
Justice states are permitted, if not required, to extrude from the presidential ballot a candidate who's not a natural-born citizen who is underage.
You must be at least 35 to run for president, or who has previously been elected twice, since, as we know, we're now limited to only two terms.
So, too, states should exclude from the ballot a candidate such as Mr. Trump, who previously swore to support the Constitution but then engaged in insurrection, read their letter to, for example, Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.
What if the election officials refuse to comply?
We intend to litigate the question, said the group's president, John Bonifaz.
If so, if a Secretary of State does not follow the mandate of Section 3, we will bring this matter to court.
However, other scholars believe such lawsuits would likely face serious hurdles and likely be challenged in the Supreme Court.
If a Secretary of State declines to find Trump ineligible, it's far from clear who would challenge that determination, explained law professor Gerard Magliocca of Indiana University, where I myself earned my Ph.D.
in the history and the philosophy of science in 1970.
States differ in their laws regarding ineligibility.
The outcome of any lawsuit over Trump's eligibility would likely depend on whether a congressional fact finder had already determined that Trump's role in the January 6th attack triggered Section 3.
In the absence of that, a lawsuit brought by Trump to challenge his exclusion would be more likely to succeed.
What the January 6th House panel ultimately reels about Trump's role, therefore, may have an impact, the possibility of pushing for his disqualification under the 14th Amendment.
Once that committee makes clear, as I trust it will, this is coming from Tribe, that what took place was indeed an insurrection that supports criminal prosecution by the DOJ of those responsible, it's difficult to imagine this not becoming a logical next step.
Of course, if Democrats successfully ban Trump from holding federal office again, it remains to be seen how half of the country would react.
An actual insurrection could take place, not a fake one that satanic Democrats equate to as being on the same level as Pearl Harbor and 9-11.
It's completely outrageous what's taking place here, and I damn the Democrats for their abuse of the law, for their political chicanery, for their violation of the Constitution, for their completely unethical efforts to retain power and control, when they legitimately have stolen, illegitimately have stolen the election of 2020.
There's massive proof, and where today, two events for which you will be demonized, Number one, if you challenge the outcome of the election, which virtually every article published by the AP or Reuters insists, there is no evidence to support when in fact there are mountains of it.
Or if you dispute what happened on January 6, and now we can see from the larger point of view, this is a Democrat's desperate gambit.
To try to preclude Donald Trump from cleaning their clock again, which I predict is highly probable, if not a virtual certainty in 2024, if they're unable to carry this out.
And it's so corrupt.
It's so obvious it has no legal foundation.
It's pure politics.
Absolutely an effort to brainwash the American people by endlessly repeating false, provably false claims that have no merit under the law as a political propaganda, but that's all the Democrats have left.
With inflation, with a massive border surge over 2 million, with the failures of the supply chain, with a calamitous withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Democrats really have no basis for arguing that a Joe Biden or a Kamala Harris or the Democratic Party has any business running the nation whatsoever at any level.
So I believe, in fact, it will happen.
Wow.
Quite the fiasco.
22 in the midterms, the Republicans are going to take a huge advantage in the Congress and
the Democratic Party will essentially have self-immolated as effective as a Buddhist
monk protesting the Afghan war, the Vietnam War.
Wow.
Quite the fiasco.
It's amazing what they've been putting us through the past few years.
You know, this January 6th thing obviously was another false flag.
As you're saying, it's like this is all, it's all very ridiculous and it's just one of the
things and people take it.
You know, this is, I don't know if everybody's just paying attention.
A lot of people have just tuned down, tuned out already, which is why we thank you for
all the updates.
Because, you know.
Everybody's just like, you know, we thought years ago this was going to be changed, but the corruption is just running rampant.
I mean, not even just from the politics, not even just the false flag of this fake January 6th insurrection that they keep talking about, all this stuff, all the information, and then not to mention the money printing, the endless money printing, and just the, it's ridiculous.
And then the plandemic, you know, that- Yeah, me, let me get you- Let me give you a thumbnail sketch about the pandemic and the vaccines.
I mean, death rates were virtually non-existent even through the pandemic, which wasn't causing any change in death rates anywhere in the world, not in the United States, not in Europe.
But once the VAX was introduced, it's like a hockey stick on the side.
The death rate has just shot up because of the VAX.
Here's a series of statements that a year ago were regarded as false, as even a hoax, but today are recognized to be true.
Listen to this list.
Vaccinated can spread COVID.
A year ago that was supposed to be a hoax, but we know today it's true.
Vaccinated or susceptible to new variants and reinfection.
A year ago, a hoax.
Today, we know it's true.
Third and fourth shot.
That was thought to be a hoax then, but it's clear that it's true now.
New shots every year or half a year.
That was supposed to be a hoax, but we know it's true now.
COVID vaccines can cause blood clots and other serious side effects.
That was supposed to be a hoax, but we know it's true now.
Total segregation of society.
Thought to be a hoax, but they're dividing us into the vaccinated and the unvaccinated.
Camps for the unvaccinated.
That's being proposed.
Unvaccinated, unable to work.
They're being fired if they don't get the vaccine.
Harder access to medical care for the unvaccinated.
That was supposed to be a hoax too, but we know it's true.
Secret contracts between Pfizer and the government.
That again was thought to be a hoax.
We even have individuals who are supposed to be experts in medical ethics, one in particular at NYU by the name of Arthur Kaplan, whom I knew years ago when we were both on the faculty at the University of Minnesota, he on the Twin Cities, I on the Duluth campus.
Who has recently declared during an interview that those who refuse the vaccination should be ineligible for health care.
Think how monstrous that is.
Once you understand the devastating effects that follow from the vaccine, the death rate and the disabilities, I mean, we're talking about millions dead already.
We're talking about disabilities in the hundreds of millions.
This is outrageous.
It was such an unethical statement to come from a guy who's supposed to be an expert in medical ethics that I've written to the administration.
And copying him on why I believe the NYU must review his action here, because in my opinion, he's unqualified for his position.
If he doesn't know the facts about the vaccine, the death rates, then obviously he doesn't know what he's talking about and is disqualified.
And if he does know the facts and nevertheless is advocating bringing coercive pressure on those who are unvaccinated to be vaxxed, Then he's committing a total lapse of ethics and abusing his position.
Remember, the Biden administration is holding the following stance, which is completely absurd, that the protected, who are vaxxed, need protection from the unprotected, the unvaxxed, by giving the unprotected the same protection that didn't protect the protected.
This is the absurdity of the situation we're in.
And they're going full board, full speed ahead, Biden, Harris, and the rest.
This is an effort to commit genocide on a global scale.
And Anthony Fauci, I assure you, is the tip of the spear.
Incredible.
And to add on to that, I don't know if you mentioned, there's a couple of things, Dr. Robert Malone, He mentioned the same things, also saying that, you know, the VACs are detrimental.
And also, CEO of a life insurance, I forgot what company, but you know, they're all, you know, the top life insurance companies, the CEO said he's never seen anything like it in his life.
It's like 40% people are dying and this and that, and you know.
So things are supposedly happening.
We'll see.
Let me add on.
Robert Malone is particularly authoritative because he invented the mRNA technology that is used in the Pfizer and the Moderna vax.
The company you're alluding to is the CEO of One America based in Indiana.
He said the numbers are staggering, that a 10% increase would be something expected only once every 200 years, that a 40% increase is Just absolutely stunning, unprecedented, and it means huge numbers of people are dying.
And by the way, the reference group here is of working age people between the ages of 18 and 65.
He's never seen anything like it, but this is a clear reflection of the devastating effects of the vaccine.
The Biden administration is endlessly promoting, I say, When the government is promoting our death and devastation, our family members, our fellow citizens, something needs to be done.
They no longer are qualified for office.
They need to be impeached or thrown out or, you know, prosecuted for crimes against humanity, which are occurring here.
But because the Democrats control the Department of Justice, because Merrick Garland is all in with them, because he's a completely contemptible individual who has not exercised in the least effort to uphold the law or the Constitution of the United States, we, the people, are very much boxed in.
John F. Kennedy once observed that those who make peaceful reform impossible make violent revolution inevitable.
I'm terribly worried here that especially parents who are outraged by the fact that there are school systems that are even allowing the inoculation of their children without the parental permission may lead the way.
We may be headed for very treacherous territory, but we're already in the midst of a perfect storm that's calculated to decimate the U.S.
population from 330 million in 2020 to only 65 million in 2025, as Diegel projects, where
the mass are killing us slowly, the vaccine more rapidly, and where the supply problems
which are contrived by the Biden administration are going to cut off our food supply to bring
about the mass of death due to starvation.
They're well on their way to accomplishing that goal.
They sure are.
And, you know, I hate to talk about all this doom and gloom, but thankfully we have some good people on our side, like Dr. Robert Malone and other people that are speaking out against all this, you know, tyranny and all this ridiculous stuff.
So all we can do is just wait and see and, you know, keep preparing, keep being updated, be the patriot that you are.
And what can I say?
I mean, I'd like to think the good guys are winning, but sometimes, you know, They're really trying hard to push down on all their authority, and so we'll see what happens.
We are in dire straits indeed, and therefore I encourage everyone, spend as much time as you can with your friends, your loved ones, your family members, because frankly, we do not know how much time we have left.
Yeah, and let's hope that this year, the year of 2022, is the year of justice served, and let's take back the reins and bring back peace and justice.
Indeed.
Well, thank you very much, Jim.
Thank you for all the updates, and we'll have to continue next time, and thank everybody for tuning in, and we'll be in touch.
My great pleasure.
God bless.
▲
Export Selection