All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 22, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:24:39
Need to Know News (21 December 2021) TEXAS TUESDAY with Joe Olson and Michael Ivey
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer, Madison, Wisconsin, delighted another Texas Tuesday with Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fork Worth, and now he hangs his hat in North Carolina Asheville, but he has not forgotten his roots.
We're here to give you all the news you need to know.
The revolvers doing a brilliant job of exposing the provocateurs from the FBI who have led the attack on the Capitol on January the 6th.
This is stunning stuff, completely embarrassing.
And get this, if you want confirmation, Representative Thomas Massey questioned Attorney General Garland about whether there were federal agents present on January 6th and whether they agitated to go into the Capitol.
Garland refused to answer.
That tells you all you want to know.
Obviously, the answer is the one he did not want to give, which was yes.
Here we have more details about Epps coming from the Revolver investigation.
I'm very impressed.
Six weeks ago, they published a blockbuster on Ray Epps, who more than any other individual appears to be the key to unlocking the question of active federal involvement at the Capitol siege.
Out of all the thousands of January 6th protesters, And thousands of hours of publicly available footage from that day, Epps has turned out to be perhaps the only person nailed dead to right, confessing on camera to plotting a pre-planned attack on the Capitol on both January 5th and January 6th.
He announced multiple times at multiple locations his upcoming plot to breach the Capitol.
He then spent hours attempting to recruit hundreds of others to join him.
On top of that, he was seen leading key people and managing key aspects of the initial breach.
No wonder the Attorney General wants to keep his mouth shut.
It would be one thing if his repeated calls on January 5th to go into the Capitol simply amounted to bluster, but he followed through to shepherd others.
Clips of 4-6 of the above competition.
We see Epps actively orchestrating elements of the very first breach at 12.50.
When Trump was still speaking, he didn't complete his speech until 1.10.
It's noteworthy that Epps' breach occurs just a minute after the Capitol Police began responding to reports of two pipe bombs located at DNC and GOP headquarters, respectively.
Rather conveniently, the already handicapped Capitol Police had still fewer resources to respond to the barricade breach.
While the pipe bombs turned out to be a dud, and even though they have video footage they've never identified who planted them, the Epps breach proved fateful.
Today, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the Justice Department all depict The apparent re-EPS orchestrated 1250 initial breach as the big bang event.
In large part, the description is hardly an exaggeration.
It was a 1250 breach of the grounds in conjunction with a handful of suspicious individuals ripping down fencing and signing that set motions and conditions to turn it into a riot.
But it's imperative to note that if EPS was just a cog in a much larger federal op, he would not have been deployed alone.
Historically speaking, when feds orchestrate fake events, their own assets commonly comprise between 16 to 25 percent of the participants, at least in its key aspects.
Indeed, get this, the FBI once flew in 1,600 rowdy spooks to infiltrate a single convention with only 10,000 protesters.
infiltrate a single convention with only 10,000 protesters.
In recent times, attacks blamed on right-wing militias have blown past the
16 percent and have been clocking in at a whopping 25 to 50 percent, as Revolver previously
noted.
Students of FBI history should quickly absorb the lesson that infiltrating feds are like roaches.
Whenever you spot one, it's guaranteed there are dozens of others nearby.
Feds simply never, ever operate a role.
This is how you end up with at least 12 FBI informants and a tiny white ring Michigan militia plot.
From October 2020, that was purportedly to kidnap the governor of Michigan.
And that's just informants, not even agents.
Fifteen informants in the right-wing 2016 Mayher plot.
Dozens at the 2014 Bundy Ranch affair, including six.
Undercover agent posing as fake documentarian shooting a fake documentary.
The Epps team had the amazing foresight to pry open the one walkway entrance no one could avoid.
As you see from above, both Pennsylvania Avenue and Constitution Avenue exits from the Trump speech intersect at the exact Peace Monument barricade targeted in advance by the Ray Epps breach team.
If any of the eight other walkway entrances into the Capitol had been toppled instead, tens of thousands of marchers would have been met by police and metal barricades instead of an open gate.
I think this is devastating, Joe.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, that Revolver article goes into detail with photos but no IDs on four additional people besides Ray Epps that were federal agents that were in there doing provocateur acts.
Absolutely 100% coordinated by DNC with Nancy Pelosi as the head of that.
Absolutely insane.
And to show you how totally corrupt the entire system is, they go and subpoena Steve Bannon and Bannon says, you know, I'm not going to show up.
And so they find him in contempt of Congress, which, you know, amazingly enough, Eric the Red Holder was in contempt of Congress for not furnishing information on his 2200 illegal arms that he shipped to Mexico that are responsible for probably 10,000 or more deaths in Mexico of journalists.
Politicians and police officers because he gave the drug to the drug gangs and then also Lewis Lerner was in contempt of Congress but there were no charges against those clowns and so now we've got Marlon Garlick going after uh and I'll just call him Marlon Garlick from now on uh going after Steve Bannon and I mentioned yesterday that the judge that sealed every bit of the evidence in the Bannon case so that it can't be tried in the public media and nobody knows what's going on in their little Star Chamber Kangaroo Court was appointed by Donald Trump?
Well, surprise, surprise.
That man's name is Carl J. Nichols, and he was appointed in June of 2019 by the MAGA man himself.
And here's the deal.
District judges, we've got 670 U.S.
district judges.
We've got 170 US district judges.
They make $218,000 a year.
We've got 179 circuit judges, and those are the clowns that just overturned the mandate.
They make $231,000 per year.
Then we've got associates justice, which are the eight kangaroos we've got on the Supreme Court.
They make $269,000 a year.
And then you've got the chief justice that makes $280,000 a year.
And then you've got the Chief Justice that makes $280,000 a year.
So here you've got a guy that's on the federal dole for $218,000 a year.
If he wants to rise up in the ranks, what he needs to do is suck up to everything the DOJ tells him to do.
And he's right there in D.C.
where he'll have lots of contact with lots of congressmen, and he'll be able to get lots of contacts with lots of DOJ and FBI folks, and he'll be able to get lots of recommendations so that soon he'll be able to move up the slot to the next spot.
He could give a flying flip about the Constitution or Steve Bannon's rights.
This is a giant puppet show.
So you're telling me even though he was appointed by Trump, he turns out to be a clown?
He was vetted and approved by the Federalist Society, which you and I talked about with Carl Herman yesterday.
People need to watch that program yesterday to get some more details on the Federalist Society, because we can't go into the same material day after day.
But bottom line is, this is the grooming and vetting group that makes sure you get nothing but Jews and Jesuits in the federal bench.
Absolutely insane.
Traitors wall to wall.
I'm really disappointed in that.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, after what happened when the Supreme Court would not look at that, what was it, a 23 or 27 state challenge to the 2020 election?
When they decided not to look at that, that's when I knew we could not have confidence in Trump appointees on the bench, whether they're on the district or the Supreme Court.
And what what Joe was saying about these other people who have done egregious things and been in contempt of Congress as well, like Eric Holder in the Fast and Furious arms transfers to the Mexican drug cartels.
And nothing happened there.
You know, it's just terrible.
It's like standard operating procedure for the last 20 years.
The FBI arranges these deceptive events and then relies on the completely controlled media to tell people the lies that they want the people to believe.
And I just don't have any confidence anymore that the whole political gaggle up there on in the District of Criminals.
Even the ones who fire hard questions at Merrick Garland will actually do anything.
You know, these people that appear before congressional committees and get embarrassed in various ways never make any punishments.
They seem to know that they're being protected by the real powers of the world, so all they have to do is take some beating about the Head and shoulders, and then nothing happens.
Yes.
Not what we'd call equal justice under law.
Meanwhile, parents will be furious about provisions in Biden's Socialist Spending Bill, which Joe Manchin appears to have defeated.
Remember when Obama unveiled their Cash for Clunkers program ended up causing the price of used cars to skyrocket?
Well, if buy-ins billed back better were signed into law, parents will be paying a lot more cash for clunker-quality child care.
According to Casey Mulligan, a Trump-era economic advisor, professor at University of Chicago, The provisions in the bill could cause the cost of daycare for middle-class families to skyrocket 122%.
Democrats claim the provisions will make child care more affordable, but it appears to be the opposite.
Mulligan estimates the bill would cost a family with an infant and a four-year-old an additional $27,000 for the same care they're paying for currently.
80% of the increased cost by the bill's living wage provision, which requires child care providers to be paid equivalent to wages for elementary educators with similar credentials and experience.
It also removes financial incentives to offer low-cost care, increases regulations on the child care industry, all of which could end up costing working-class families $20,000 to $30,000 more for child care.
During this time of soaring inflation, even during good economic times like the Trump years, parents can barely afford childcare now, let alone a $20,000 spike.
In fact, our team has already received reports of spouses dropping out of the workforce to watch their children full time because of the already exorbitant cost of daycare.
If Democrats thought parents were angry over critical race theory being taught in the classroom, they haven't seen how angry parents will get when they're paying tens of thousands more for the same daycare they're paying for now.
In light of the potential harm these provisions pose, the Senate should remove them from the bill immediately.
Democrats may have crafted them with the best intentions in mind, but the highway to hell is paved with good intention.
And should the present Build Back Better Act be enacted, Americans can expect at least another mile of that particular highway to be paved.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, yesterday, EPA had a press conference in front of the White House, 30 minutes long.
I'll put the link to that in the comment sections.
And again, my comment name, username is Faux Science Slayer for the people that can't seem to find it.
But anyhow, they're going to just basically outlaw gasoline-powered automobiles.
They had planned on doing it by 2030, but now they've decided that we can go ahead and it's such a giant emergency, we're going to do it by 2025.
So, Already, you get a $2,500 tax credit for buying an electric vehicle.
You get a $1,000 tax credit for putting in a home charging station.
You're not paying any road use tax, which everybody else is paying when they buy gasoline.
And then, you have a system that's highly dependent because there's no reasonable amount of charging stations.
So, included in his Build Back Broke Plan, which is what Merriam's called it, is $16 billion to install 500,000 charging stations across the nation.
And I remember a time we used to be able to go to the filling station and there was a hose with an air fill nozzle on it.
You could refill your tires right there at the gas pump.
Standard item, along with a water fill valve in case your radiator or your Uh, windshield washers were low.
Uh, or you had bugs you wanted to wash off the front of your car.
All of that ended because people would come and steal the hoses.
How long is it going to take before people steal these charging cables?
Because they don't have any current running through them until you hook them up.
And then there's a difference between the different charging connectors for the different cars.
You have to have a separate one for Tesla, you have to have a separate one for the other manufacturers.
Absolutely insane that we're letting them do this to us.
And it's all based on the false carbon climate warming hypothesis, which I've been fighting with the head skeptics for over a decade, and not a single one of them will debate me because They are going with the, well, carbon does warm a little bit, there is a greenhouse gas, because they're all puppets, liars, or fools.
It's absolutely insane that we're stuck with this after 10 years of fighting the people that were claiming to be skeptics.
I'm absolutely fed to the gills with all of this BS, and you should be too.
Wake the hell up!
Well, Joe, we can be grateful to Joe Manchin again for defeating the BBB and the 50,000, did you say, charging station?
Or is it 500?
500.
500,000.
This is just lunatic.
I mean, these people have gone stark raving mad.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I totally agree with that.
I recently saw a nice meme that showed an overhead of a gigantic traffic jam.
And then the meme was speculating about now what would happen if we have a situation like this where there's a bad accident, there's a massive traffic jam, it's 95 to 100 degrees in Houston, and people start losing charge of what would happen if all of those Cars were electric vehicles and it was quite enlightening and the same thing applies to in the in the northern states if there's really serious cold and you're stuck in a traffic jam like that and your your power on your car runs out then the jam just keeps getting worse and worse and people die.
I also heard that Is it not the case that California's already issued an order for a certain date that they're going to stop gasoline powered generators and lawnmowers and other small gasoline engines?
They're outlawing them.
Do y'all know about that?
Yeah, I think it's next year, but yeah, they're definitely outlawing everything.
Leak lowers, trimmers, chainsaws.
It's crazy!
It's gonna destroy the state, I mean, just overnight.
And how do you get rid of gasoline-powered generators?
I mean, you know, when you have a power outage, you're gonna lose everything in your freezer?
You know, it's right because you won't have any electricity and they're turning everything to electricity.
It makes us more vulnerable, not more defensible.
That's the point.
That's the point right there.
That makes us more vulnerable.
That crossed my mind also in that previous story about the cost of daycare going up, because the obvious result is going to be that some parents are going to say, well, it cost me more to have my kids in daycare.
Then it does to work this job.
So I'm not going to work the job.
So the whole family has a lot less income to deal with.
And it's just more and it's part of the progression to bring the Western nations down to the level of the third world.
New York City outlawed the use of natural gas in any new buildings being built.
Absolutely insane.
What are they going to do next?
Come after your Coleman gas camp stove?
These people are beyond insane, and I don't know how you re-educate them.
Yeah, apparently they're just going to have to get jabbed to death, but we'll get to that in a second, too.
I don't think it's insanity.
I think it's all part of a plan to lower energy use, and they're using this stupid climate change pretext to do it.
Yeah, it's clear the climate change is just as phony as the pandemic.
Meanwhile, the Heritage Foundation has unveiled an election integrity scorecard.
This is a good idea.
John Malcolm doesn't recall who asked exactly, but the question stayed with the director of the organization's Legal and Judicial Studies Center.
Not even for too terribly long I thought about it and realized it was a great idea to compare different state election laws and to evaluate who's doing the job and maintaining electoral integrity.
On Tuesday, that I think would be today, we'll unveil the Election Integrity Scorecard.
The goal is simple, assessing the status of state election fairness and security that every citizen vote is sacred.
Heritage, a conservative Capitol Hill think tank founded in 1973, Have some practice handing out scorecards.
They've been grading members of Congress since the Obama administration.
Now, closely, each adheres to conservative orthodoxy.
The new project is similar in scope, includes more than letter grades.
They're going to rank each state by hovering their mouse over an interactive color-coded map.
If they've lit up the entire country with reds, yellows, and greens, indicate which states have done the best to live up to the heritage standard of running an election.
I'll tell you, New York and California are going to be bright red because they're grotesque.
Georgia, Alabama, and Tennessee are forest green ranking first, second, and third.
Hawaii, Nevada, and California are blazing red and bottom out the list.
Surprise, surprise.
Heritage assigned the grades out of a perfect score of 100 weighing different categories in terms of voter ID requirements, maintenance of voter registration rolls, access for election observers.
The colored cubes are just a front end of a year's worth of research.
The think tank hopes users will click and expand to see where individual states excel and underachieve.
Heritage did its own analysis of current election laws in all 50 states as well as the District of Columbia.
States had two opportunities to contribute.
Election officials were forwarded the initial review to check for accuracy and then presented a final summary to correct any potential errors.
That is all by design, that this is not a final product.
As states update their election laws, Heritage will update their scores.
If that changes the ranking, it will change the ranking, which is the whole idea.
Jessica Anderson, Executive Director, The Arby Long, expects its army of grassroots activists to blitz state capitals and push lawmakers to reform their laws according to think tank standards.
Next year, our activists will be able to be using Heritage Election Integrity Scorecard as a roadmap for all 50 states.
Make it harder to cheat.
Voting reform has increasingly become an animating impulse on the right after the 2020 election, which I have no doubt was stolen.
A 20-year study of the issue by the MIT found the level of mail-in ballot fraud five times Less likely than the chances of being struck by lightning.
But that's pretty bizarre.
Democrats have likened Republican efforts to tighten voting laws to Jim Crow-era voting restrictions.
Similar charges will inevitably follow the New Heritage scorecard.
They're just bombed.
Malcolm said a preemptive defense before reciting the hallmarks.
We want to make it easier for every legitimate voter to vote and we want to make it harder to cheat and easier to catch when someone does.
The year-long effort isn't an attempt to placate the former president.
We can't help what happened in 2020 and what Trump has to say about it.
This isn't the first time Heritage has concerned itself with the election system either.
In the aftermath of the Florida recount in 2000, they brought in Bush and Cheney to provide 9-11.
While Heritage admits it's impossible to measure the full extent of voter fraud, this is intended to help to sort it out.
They quote, as a pretext for their effort, the 2005 Bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by former Secretary James Baker and President Jimmy Carter, warning of the potential abuse of absentee ballots, highlighting the fact, if elections are defective, the entire democratic system is at risk.
At risk.
Heritage has provided its answer as to what an ideal electoral system looks like.
It's judged the 50 states according to their standard.
It's all pretty simple.
We want to give every state a roadmap to figure out what they can do to improve their election laws.
I like it.
This looks like a step in the right direction.
Not the only one that ought to be done.
The first is get rid of all electronic voting machines.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I attended the Heritage and Texas Public Policy Institute Climate Summit here in Houston, three-day-long event filled with a bunch of puppets, and then I went out to the Heartland Institute meeting in Las Vegas in 2014 with 600 absolute skeptical clowns.
It was a ridiculous joke, and the same thing with the Hoover Institute.
I've met all these people.
I've followed them pretty closely.
They all seem to be gaslighting pseudo-opposition, and I'm skeptical of how they're going to actually rank these different states as far as voting.
I mean, it'd be nice to have something that was truly objective and scientifically well done, but I just don't have any trust in any of these little front group organizations.
They're all in it for themselves.
Absolutely disgusting.
But we've got bigger fish to fry, so let's...
get on to that. So you think this heritage thing is more appearance than reality,
unlikely to do any serious good, is that right, Joe? Yeah, I just have no trust in any of these
organizations, you know, because I've been heavily involved with them and watched them
on a first-hand basis.
And I know exactly how their leadership operates.
I know exactly how they play the game.
And it is to them.
It's they're just playing a part.
It's a joke, just like the Democrats and Republicans.
It's the rhinos and the dinos playing the uniparty puppet show.
Get over it.
They're not.
None of them are on our side.
Now Joe, let me ask you.
Was Trump better on the economy?
Was Trump better on the border?
Was Trump better on a whole host of issues than Biden?
Or are you saying they're the same?
Well, let's put it this way.
He was in office less than four months before he launched a hundred missile drone cruise missile strikes.
I'm not asking about that, Joe.
You're evading my question.
Now, answer it.
Because I think you're wrong.
I think you're wrong.
They're not the same.
They're real differences.
And people are pissed off with Biden because he's doing so many stupid things that Trump would never have done.
The supply problems, the open borders, the vaccine mandates, and all that shit.
Now, I know some of it goes back to Trump, but a whole lot of it does not.
Michael, your thoughts?
Well, I gotta say, I'm as skeptical as Joe is, not about the difference between the two, but about this particular study by the Heritage Foundation.
I've watched the Heritage Foundation back a lot of Very tyrannical things over the years when their people were in power, when the right conservatives are in power.
So I'm skeptical about that as well.
This this evaluation could be just more theater.
It could be keeping themselves busy.
It seems once or twice removed from any action that would actually restore integrity to the voting system.
But You know, the country's a dead man walking if we can't restore integrity to it, and it's way, way over on the other end of the spectrum right now.
I was curious, just looking through that story, whether, or I know there is, but exactly what the correlation is between the Oh, I think you have made an astute observation, unquestionably.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have, look at this, Trump in Houston on the left, Brandon on the right.
for election integrity.
Something tells me there's gonna be a correlation there.
Oh, I think you have made an astute observation, unquestionably.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Here we have, look at this, Trump in Houston on the left,
Brandon on the right.
I mean, this is pathetic.
The American people are responding to real bonafide differences.
One of these guys is cognitively incompetent and stole the election.
The other was legitimately elected in spite of it being stacked against him and has a good functioning brain.
He's not perfect!
But he's a hell of a lot better, and no one should suggest there's no difference between them.
That's wrong.
Meanwhile, we now return.
Here we have airline CEOs raising questions about the efficacy of masking on airlines.
Politicians, bureaucrats, and health officials have lost all credibility regarding face masks and vaccinations.
They contradict themselves, proving their agendas are rooted in the lust for control rather than a genuine desire to preserve public health.
When COVID vaccines became available, they declared getting everyone vaxxed was the key to ending the virus.
Now vaccine rates climb, but so are new variants, and more and more are getting sick.
Conveniently, politician bureaucrats and health officials have found a way to keep mask mandates alive, despite saying COVID vaccines were the key to taking them off.
There's a difference between actual science and people in power using science as a front to run wild with mandates.
Two different CEOs of airlines had interesting comments.
Speaking during a Senate hearing, both Southwest Americans spoke candidly about the reality of air travelers wearing safe coverings.
Both attested masks don't do much on aircraft.
This is because the air filtration systems on planes ensure the cleanliness of the air.
To be sure, it's made possible by HEPA filters along with a flow of air.
They also confirm that aircraft are among the safest environments where individuals can congregate.
Interestingly, these admissions come as they step down from their posts next year.
Whenever COVID-related mandates face any form of pushback, left-wing bureaucrats like Anthony Fauci and other pro-mandate psychopaths creepily claim you must trust the science.
But there's a distinction between real science and junk science, based on the statements from these outgoing CEOs that science shows amassed little to nothing on aircraft due to their filtration systems.
Democrats won't admit it, though.
Many have lashed out at Southwestern American spokespeople, even though they're their chief executive officer.
Not only did they attack them for speaking out, but said there should be even more restrictions on travel being there, despite what the leftists want people to believe.
They are not the arbiters or hells of science.
Democrats are twisting and manipulating science.
They'll say anything to try and get their way with more mandates and more control.
And Anthony Fauci, by the way, has been interviewed on this and said, oh no, we have to wear masks in airlines.
In fact, Fauci wants us to wear masks forever.
Joe, you're observing that faux science is being exposed increasingly.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, as we are speaking, there's a press conference going on with...
FJB and he's announcing his winter action plan which includes restrictions on cross-state travel and we don't know if that includes airlines or if it's just surface travel and we don't know if it includes business travel or recreational family related travel and then new booster requirements because you know absolutely three boosters is never going to be enough and there's a lot of people that are resistant And he's going to announce quarantine centers because, you know, we all need to be quarantined for our own good.
The airlines have an additional problem with their pilots dying, but international travel is currently required to have a negative test kit within 24 hours of flying, and they're selling those at Walmart and Walgreens and blah blah blah.
And it's 24 bucks for two of them.
And Greg Reese had an interesting little two and a half minute long video on the only kit that's approved currently under emergency youth authorization by the FDA.
And that is Binax, B-I-N-A-X now, which is manufactured by the Abbott Company, which contains sodium azide, which is an absolute poison.
If you go to the CDC website, And put in sodium azide slash basis slash facts.
It's highly toxic, but if you go to Abbott Labs website under their test kit, it says, use of these kits is an act of kindness and love.
Yeah.
Joe, how's he going to enforce interstate travel restrictions?
Are they going to have checkpoints on the interstate highways?
What the fuck?
That's going to cause all kinds of traffic jams, calamities, economic failure.
A lot of pissed off Americans.
A lot of pissed off Americans.
Greg Abbott did it in 2020, right after the thing started.
He restricted interstate travel between Texas and Louisiana because they had a bunch of outbreaks over there.
Absolute insanity.
There's no way to describe this other than absolute insanity.
I don't see how it's enforceable.
Well, we'll find out.
He's having a press conference right now.
I'm sure they'll tell us how wonderful it is by five o'clock this afternoon.
Michael?
In order to enforce interstate travel, that means you're going to have to have checkpoints on literally every border crossing between states.
That sounds like so insane.
Surely that'll wake a lot of people up to tyranny.
I'm not sure they're not going to try to do it, though.
I mean, they've been doing it in Tyrannical measures that bad in Australia, New Zealand, Austria.
So, you know, I have no doubt that that is coming here in one way or another.
I wanted to say I was glad to see these airline CEOs at least questioning the narrative about mask mandates on their plane.
There's been a huge rash of problems, as you all know, we can all read about them, associated with these mask mandates on planes, fights breaking out, people being ejected from planes because they can't keep a face mask on their two-year-old.
Last year here in Asheville, we have a Patriot group that meets every two weeks, and we had an address by a beautiful flight attendant with Delta who had been with them for 16 and 17 years and decided, you know what?
This is bullshit.
I'm not going to enforce this.
And so she quit.
One guy got thrown off because he'd created a face mask out of a woman's thong.
Oh, and one other thing talking about Joe was talking about the testing kits for COVID.
You know, you can buy them over the counter now.
And I won't get into it because it takes somewhat of a deep dive into the general fraud of Yeah, money is very, very important in all this.
All of those test kits are every bit as fraudulent as the PCR tests, and yet somebody by that
fraud and that deception is making millions of dollars.
Yeah, money is very, very important in all this.
Pfizer and Moderna are just enjoying windfall profits.
There's a wonderful new player here on the scene in relation to Sandy Hook.
Mary Maxwell is both a PhD and an LLB.
Bye.
Among her recent publications, and she has a new book, Real Adjudication is Called for in the Sandy Hook Affair, which I published on my blog.
I want to go through it in detail because it's so clear and she makes so many telling points.
It's time now to wrap up nine years as Sandy Hook.
I put quote marks around the name Sandy Hook to imply I'm not talking about the district of Newtown, Connecticut known as Sandy Hook.
I am referring to the Sandy Hook story.
Or, as the actual district, I has no criticism, nor do I think ill of its people.
If anything, I sympathize with the large number of residents there who were ordered to tell lies.
The Hands-E-Hooks story says a massacre occurred there on December 14, 2012.
No such thing happened.
It is all fictional.
It's very important for Americans to grasp this as soon as possible.
It's quite common for the mainstream media to put out stories, some big, some small, that are fictional.
What can we do about it?
In the old days, journalists had a code of ethics.
It required that they not publish as fact an item for which they had only one source.
They needed to find a second source, or go out and personally investigate the allegation to determine its worth.
False flags.
I do not know the solution to today's line by the media.
On four occasions, I've been so annoyed by false-like stories that I've gone out and investigated them myself to the extent of writing a book.
The first three were Port Arthur Massacre of 1996, the Sydney siege of 2014, and the Boston Marathon
bombing of 2013. I hadn't considered the 2012 Sandy Hook story to be false.
I thought it was true and assumed that the hoopla about it on the internet was perhaps a psyop unto itself.
I was particularly disgusted when a Connecticut citizen named William Brandon Shanley sued various newspapers.
That looked to me like a way for those newspapers to mock conspiracy theory.
The judge dismissed the case.
But I later concluded that Shanley knew the truth, too late to apologize to him as he is now deceased.
Here, in a nutshell, is the fall story of Sandy Hook Elementary School.
A guy named Adam Lons, age 20, broke into the school at 9.30 a.m.
on a school day, went into a classroom of first graders, shot dead 16 kids.
Then he went into another classroom, shot four more, plus he shot dead six staff members.
He also shot and wounded a staff member named Natalie Hammond, but she has never appeared in an interview as far as I know.
There's also a wounded child whom we have never seen.
Adam, then, killed himself.
Here in a nutshell is the correct story.
It has been common for over half a century for powerful persons in the U.S.
to arrange for real violence to occur to make us think our neighbors are to be feared.
A possible early example of a shooter killing randomly is that of Charles Whitman in 1966.
He reportedly stabbed to death his mother and his wife, then climbed a tower at the University of Texas to shoot students.
He killed 15 and wounded 21, until a policeman shot him dead.
His motive?
Wikipedia settles the matter by saying, In the months prior to the attack, Whitman had sought professional help for overwhelming violent impulses, including fantasies about shooting people from the tower.
An autopsy conducted after his death revealed a hypothalamic tumor.
To the contrary, I think Charles may have done all of that under hypnosis.
Hole Cloth, Gulf of Tonkin.
At some point, the Vowful realized they could make up a story from Hole Cloth.
This happened in the Gulf of Tonkin episode in 1964.
President Lyndon Johnson told Congress deceitfully that a U.S.
ship in the Vietnam Harbor had been torpedoed by the Viet Cong, the Communist enemy.
It didn't really happen, but the telling of it was enough to make Congress approve LBJ's large escalation of the Vietnam War.
The purpose of a false flag is to blame the enemy for some atrocity that will galvanize the domestic public.
Often, the government itself carries out the atrocity, so a false flag can be hung on the perpetrator.
He'll be labeled a Viet Cong or a Muslim jihadist or whatever.
In that example from 1964, the atrocity was very inexpensive.
No ship was torpedoed at all.
I guess you could say our brain was torpedoed.
Notice.
A German analyst of false flag, Elias Davidson, looks at 9-11 false flag, where 19 Arabs were absurdly credited with hijacking four planes.
He entitles his book, Hijacking America's Minds on 9-11.
I know, Elias.
He's a good man.
So there we are, torpedoed and hijacked.
We had better improve our gaming soon.
Anyone with a working intellect needs to join this effort.
A purpose of Sandy Hook.
To create a fictional story of a school massacre would naturally require a lot of money and a lot of effort.
So why bother?
What was game?
I have heard three purposes suggested.
First is gun control.
Certainly much is made of the shooting by people who don't want the public to easily acquire a gun and the bereaved families, I mean the bereaved in quote families at Sandy Hook, have taken a prominent role in the anti-gun movement.
A helpful book co-edited by James Fetzer and Michael Palachuk is entitled Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
It was a FEMA drill to promote gun control.
The second possible purpose was to use it as a trial for later events, such as the Boston Marathon bombing.
In other words, the powerful were testing the public's gullibility.
It seems we passed with flying colors.
Although there are many critics of Sandy Hook and published comments on the Internet, no official action has taken place in opposition to this false flag.
Note, It took Congress nine years from its gulf of Tonkin gullibility in 1964 to its official opposition in the 1973 War Powers Act.
I go along with the first and second purposes of Sandy Hook, nuking the Second Amendment and prepping for the Marathon Affair, but I'm especially devoted to a third purpose, namely, the powerful want us to stop making any distinction between fact and fiction.
This is the premise of my book, On Reality, Sandy Hook Messes Minds.
I claim that the Sandy Hook issue is meant to expose us to huge lies, while we sort of realize they are lies and finally give up on trying to distinguish between reality and unreality.
Court cases.
I mentioned above that I had, until 2021, believed the massacre was real.
This is partly because I've been a student of both the 1996 Port Arthur Massacre in Australia and the 1996 Dunblane Massacre in Scotland.
Both were real.
Port Arthur had had about 35 adult victims, Dunblane 16 kids and one teacher.
I'm sure both were false flags.
That is, the alleged gunman, Martin Wright, still in prison for Port Arthur, and Thomas Hamilton killed himself at Dunblane were not the real killers.
They were substitutes.
In any case, I got over my intellectual laziness about Sandy Hook when William Sumner Scott, who's an attorney for Jim Fetzer, showed me the case of Soto et al.
v. Remington.
This is a civil lawsuit by Donna Soto and eight others against Remington Arms, the manufacturer of the Bushmaster gun that was allegedly used at the Sandy Hook massacre.
The case is also called Soto v. Bushmaster.
The stunning thing about the lawsuit is the defendant did not ask for a discovery.
That is, Remington did not demand proof that Adam Lanza did the shooting or that he had access to a Bushmaster gun or that the deaths were specifically caused by that gun rather than the Glock pistol Adam had in his pocket.
In other words, Remington took it all lying down.
They have to date proffered $33 million to the plaintiffs.
Note, This case is not yet closed and it is intertwined with a matter in the bankruptcy court, as Remington is now bankrupt.
Shareholders could squawk at the lack of discovery, and creditors who hope to get some of Remington's holdings could squawk that it's not fair to hand $33 million to the Soto folks, so long as Adam and his Bushmaster story are in any doubt.
Also note There is a case still happening in Wisconsin vis Jim Fetzer's attempt to get an appeal with that state Supreme Court over the award of $450,000 that a jury made to Leonard Posner in the defamation suit Posner v. Fetzer.
Mr. Posner claims Fetzer in effect called him a liar by saying that his six-year-old son's death certificate was fake.
When Fetzer attempted to get discovery, he was denied by the Wisconsin Circuit Court for Dane County Judge Frank D. Remington.
This is a wrongful denial, as Fetzer was ready to present two expert witnesses concerning the non-authenticity of the death certificate.
Similar cases for defamation were brought against internet broadcaster Alex Jones in Connecticut and in Texas, where he lived.
Jones is still litigating them, but has withdrawn his assertion that Sandy Hook is a hoax.
My appraisal of the hoax, the four insurmountabilities.
Let me identify four insurmountable obstacles to Sandy Hook being real.
It should have been caught by any court or any competent defense attorney or any careful investigator.
Obstacle one, On the day of the event, December 14, 2012, a photo of eight children escaping from the school was sent to media all around the world.
It is called The Iconic Shot.
The photographer was Ms.
Shannon Hicks of the Newtown Bee.
In the shot, we see a policewoman in the middle of the nine.
She is Rachel Von Ness.
She seems to be helping the kids who are walking with her eyes closed and a hand on the child in front of them.
This piece of evidence in favor of a real massacre is surely compelling.
However, another photo, I'll call it Photo B, reveals the iconic photo to have been taken at a time other than the December 14, 2012 date.
We see the same scene with the same kids in the same position of the parked cars and the same officer, Van Ness, But this photo B reveals five parents standing there watching it.
They would not be standing so casually if they'd been told that many kids were murdered.
I deduce that all these photos were probably taken on a day when the kids were told to act like a drill was in force.
Drills are common.
The reason that critics say Photo B was staged is that Officer Van Ness was trying out various arrangements of line.
Note how in one pose, a girl in a pale-pink jersey is at the front, while in another, a black jersey boy leads the line.
That one must have passed the test for suitability.
It became the iconic photo used by the mainstream media.
Granted, a picture could have been taken by Shannon Hicks and then misused by the media.
This often happens.
But she has said that the iconic shot is a picture she took on the day.
Obstacle 2.
A kill-to-wounded ratio of Adam Lawrence is impossible even for a military marksman.
Adam is said to have killed 26 and wounded only 2.
I suppose one can worm out of the hoax theory by saying several gunmen did the deed.
But no one has ever postulated that to repeat.
The official story contains an impossible kill to wounded ratio.
Obstacle 3.
A policewoman in the iconic shot, Rachel Van Ness, has signed a sworn statement that she helped a few sets of kids to get from the building to the safety of the firehouse down the hill from the school.
Her testimony includes the absurd statement that she walked at the back of the line.
How would first graders with their eyes shut and crying be able to walk without a leader?
Her testimony also includes a bizarre statement that she made sure no parents grabbed their child.
Obstacle 4.
Remington's demurral from demanding discovery itself an insurmountable obstacle to the Sandy Hook Massacre being real.
Any judge would see that something peculiar was afoot.
He or she would suspect that the plaintiff and defendant are in cahoots.
Real adjudication is called for.
The massacre did not happen.
I identify many ways to analyze this in my book, Unreality, Sandy Hook Messes Minds.
Do I really care about the Sandy Hook hoax?
In truth, no, but I care about the messing up of minds.
We need our minds.
I care a lot about the lies in the Marathon bombing story and the judiciary willingness to turn a blind eye to the exculpatory evidence in U.S.
v. Starinoff case.
I am an amicus curiae in that case.
See my book, Boston's Marathon Bombing, What Can Law Do?, for proof that the FBI killed Tamerlan Starinoff and that he was never in a police shootout in Watertown's Laurel Street.
I have filed a RICO suit to no avail.
See Maxwell v. FBI et al.
As stated in the title of this article, we need real adjudication.
Just think, such a huge thing as a disputed mass murder and it's never come to court.
The defamation cases, which should have been a victory for free speech, have been judged summarily for the government.
I call upon courts to man up to this challenge.
I also urge the participants who never really wanted the hoax to occur to speak out and be rewarded.
A heartfelt apology is due to any underage person who was instructed to lie.
There must be thousands of people in Newtown, Connecticut who are sick of the whole damn thing.
If necessary, a citizen-led grand jury can be convened to help in this vital matter.
Vital matter?
Why vital?
Because our countrymen need to find out, pronto, the extent to which governments create unrealities such as the vaccine passport bullshit it's got to stop.
Let's stop it by your clamoring for Sandy Hook Truth.
Send me your ideas, if you wish, to marymaxwellllb at gmail.com.
I think Mary did just a wonderful job there.
Joe, your thoughts?
We live in a world of endless false flags.
It's absolutely insane.
A little bit of housekeeping.
In the comment sections from about a week ago, somebody mentioned something about when... I had said something about the inauguration.
I wasn't sure when it changed from March until January 20th.
But it was actually March in the Constitution.
The election was to be the first Tuesday, and I think the inauguration was the first Tuesday in March.
And they had difficulties traveling to get the Electoral College to gather all their votes, and they had difficulties traveling in the wintertime to get people there for an inauguration.
But in 1933, they passed the 20th Amendment.
Which changed the inauguration date, but it was on the 23rd and 33.
So FDR actually was inaugurated his first term on the first Tuesday in March, but his other terms and every president since has been on January 20th.
So that's that housekeeping item.
Next thing is somebody mentioned something about they'd not heard anything about the 64 LBJ election.
Well that was the one when LBJ was already starting to ramp things up in Vietnam and was starting to get a lot of pushback and there was a lot of suspicions that maybe he was involved in the JFK assassination and he was opposed by Barry Goldwater who was a staunch patriot He said patriotism and defense of liberty is not a vice, and so he had to turn around and paint him as a warmonger, but then the Oktober surprise came early that year.
April 2nd, 1964 was the Gulf of Tonkin fake event, so that LBJ was able to run as a wartime president, and he got 61% of the vote.
So that brings us forward to the LBJ event in 67 with the USS Liberty, where he tried to get us involved in a war with Israel, but that one didn't happen.
But then we have- Egypt!
Egypt!
Oh, excuse me, Egypt.
Yeah, okay.
And then that brings us forward to all of the False flags that happened during the course of the war under Obambi and Reptillery, and sorry, under the golden-haired boy in Syria, but now it looks like they're trying to use the same white helmet staged chemical attacks to set up a war with Russia in the Ukraine.
And I direct people's attention to Russia Today article 543861-US, PMC dash chemical provocation Ukraine.
It looks like they are absolutely got our guys in there setting up to blame Russia for a chemical attack in Ukraine so we can start another war there.
You know, I'm sorry, there used to be an active anti-war movement in this country for many decades, and then it just absolutely disappeared under the Bush administration.
And I consider the silent anti-war movement to be philosophical hypocrites, intellectual idiots, and moral cowards.
Joe, you missed the point.
Nixon abolished the draft.
Obidikson abolished the draft to gut the anti-war movement.
That's why he did it.
And I have asserted that we have to re-establish a draft to get families reconnected with the government to care about issues of war and peace, because right now they do not care.
They believe their sons and daughters aren't at stake, so they're willing to let it go.
And that's all wrong.
That's why it's dead.
There's no wind in their sails, Joe.
As far as Lyndon in 64, he posed as a successor who was going to carry on the policies of our assassinated president when his plan was the opposite.
Jack, of course, was pulling our forces out by the end of 1964.
He'd already declared that to be the case.
Lyndon skillfully played as though he was going to further Jack's programs when he reversed them, in fact, and went in whole hog into Vietnam.
So, you know, Lyndon was actually the brainchild behind the assassination at JFK, where he sent Cliff Carter, his chief administrative assistant, down to Dallas to make sure all the Arrangements were in place for the assassination.
Anyone who wants to get an update, go to my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, and scroll down to my Real Deal JFK special on 18 November 1963.
I wanted to put it out before Oliver Stone's new film, JFK Revisited, so there'd be no doubt about their chronological relationship.
And compare the two.
Compare the two and figure out who actually explains what went on.
I'm sorry to say this new Oliver Stone film is a pitiful, pathetic, inadequate piece.
I'm embarrassed because I've been a big fan of JFK and his research in the past.
This is a failure.
Michael, your thoughts?
Yeah, I agree with that.
I watched that about a week ago, 10 days ago or so, and I was sorely disappointed with that, that new update, whatever he calls it.
But moving back to this article in Sandy Hook, that is a good article by Mary Maxwell.
I'm glad to see another good analyst and truth teller like that writing about Sandy Hook.
I assume she's an attorney.
She mentioned a couple of things that she's filed.
Y'all know?
What is LLB?
She has a law degree.
Whether she's practicing, I do not know.
But she knows the law.
Yeah.
Yeah, I liked her observations about the government's motivation in doing these fake shootings.
Of course, gun control being the primary one.
But she threw in the intentional mixing of that which is real and that which is not.
I found that interesting.
And another one that she did not throw in is the application of psychological principles.
They always have made a big deal about the psychology of the person who is the Patsy and who does these shootings.
So it's reminiscent of The whole totalitarian thing about if you differ from anything that the state wants, then there must be something wrong with you psychologically.
Maybe we need to put you in a mental hospital.
And they're putting some psychologist between the American people and their inherent right to defend themselves.
It's a very communist thing to do.
And when the subject was those Shannon Hicks photos, I remember contacting you, Jim, shortly after Sandy Hook.
It had to be like two or three months after that, and communicating with you about those photos, thinking, I think that whole thing was staged.
I mean, not the whole thing.
I'm talking about the photos themselves.
And of course, you've got now a famous phrase for one of those photos that shows the parents in lawn chairs.
What is it, Jim?
Lounging at the massacre!
Lounging at the massacre!
Yeah, I don't think Mary, when she talked about the five, she's talking about the ones in the foreground.
If you look in the background, there are three more parents just casually looking on, facing the kids.
It's clear this is totally fake, and you were spot on, Michael, when you first noticed that.
Spot on.
Yeah, in that context, I'd like to also give a hat tip to Stephanie Sledge.
Stephanie's nine-year anniversary article, I think you posted that at your blog as well.
Yes, yes, yes.
Was really good, and she started it out with an image of Obama faking crying while he was talking to the American people about Sandy Hook.
He's such a bad actor, it's so obvious.
Let me add that the executive editor of State of the Nation republished both of those, Stephanie Sledge nine years after and Mary Maxwell, on the need for adjudication.
So I'm very proud that State of the Nation is following up.
Jewish Americans don't like Israel.
This may be trying to establish that he's not following Israeli dictates, which many of us have unfortunately concluded he's done in too many cases.
The Jewish people in the U.S.
either don't like Israel or don't care about Israel, said in an interview with Israeli journalist Barak Ravid, author of the recent book, Trump's Peace, Abraham Accords and the Reshaping of the Middle East.
The former U.S.
leader blamed many Jewish Americans for their voting records, saying it used to be Israel had absolute power over Congress.
Today, I think it's the exact opposite, to be wished.
Trump said, His predecessor, Barack Obama, and now President Biden, both Democrats, were responsible for what he claimed is the lack of congressional support for Israel.
Yet in the election, they still get a lot of votes from Jewish people.
Over the past few years, some have said the Democratic Party is tilting against support for Israel.
A position that's been a bedrock of foreign policy in the Middle East for decades.
They point to progressive lawmakers like Ilhan Omar and Rashid Tlaib, who sought to end U.S.
military assistance and emerged as vocal critics of the Israeli government policy toward Palestinians.
In this case, by the way, I agree with Omar and Tlaib, with whom I otherwise have strong disagreements.
Palestine deserves our support.
We've been slavishly obedient to Israel forever, and it was always wrong.
Talib and Omar uploaded legislation in support of the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment, and sanctions movement known as BDS, but have been unable to gain support from their party.
Many say they reflect a small number of the Democratic Party, the vast majority of whom are still committed to U.S.
support for Israel.
Earlier, the Democrat-controlled Congress passed a mammoth defense spending bill, including U.S.
military assistance to Israel replenishing the Iron Dome defense system, among others.
Recent comments for Trump are not the first time he's criticized Jewish Americans for voting Democrat.
In 2019, as president, he said Jews who vote for the party are guilty of ignorance and great disloyalty.
Jewish Americans, who account for just 2.4% of the total U.S.
population, have long been a reliable Democratic voting bloc.
According to a 2021 poll by Pew, about 70% of Jews in the U.S.
identify with or lean toward the Democrat Party.
But the same poll also showed signs of an emerging division between the Orthodox Jews, trending younger in age, and other branches whose followers are aging.
In 2020, 75% of Orthodox Jews identified as Republican, overwhelmingly supported then-President Trump.
In his commentary to Revit, Trump also said evangelical Christians love Israel more than the Jews in this country.
Evangelicals were a key part of Trump's base in his 2016 election and voted overwhelmingly for him as well.
They are seen as reliable supporters of U.S.
support for Israel.
A recent poll shows that may be changing with younger members.
In the interview, he went on to slam the New York Times saying they hate Israel, seemingly pointing out that Jewish people run the paper, referencing the Jewish origins of the family that publishes it.
Of course, it's much more.
As I have observed, the mainstream media is simply dominated by dual U.S.-Israeli citizens.
I think Trump Has been so pro-Israel that he's trying to get Jews who have been voting Democrat to vote Republican for him next time around.
That would be my take.
Joe, your thought?
Yeah, well, who was the first international leader to call and congratulate Let's Go Brandon when he stole the election?
Oh, that would be Nutty Yahoo.
I don't know why the Jewish people are so in love with this particular political party, but they are an enormous influence.
They represent far more than 2.3% of the media.
They represent far more than 2.3% in the government and in the judiciary and in academia.
And so they are actually influencers that probably influence 10 times their actual population, maybe 20 times as much.
And then getting back to the saboteurs, unregistered foreign agents inside the White House, and that would be Prince and Princess Cushy.
Ivanka was given, honored by the World Economic Forum in 2015 as a young global leader.
And then, on January 15th of 2020, Jared and Ivanka went to the World Economic Forum, and she actually spoke and was well-received.
And surprisingly, a month and a half later, the world went into lockdown.
So, you know, you've got to wonder about these people, because the lockdown is exactly what the World Economic Forum had planned for us all along.
and everything they've got planned going forward. Wait till we get to the stuff that Crow House
mentions about graph eel, J-R-A-P-H-E-A-L. We'll get to that in my final comments.
Michael.
Yeah, what to make of this.
When you start tallying the good and bad of Donald Trump, you've got to put his total and continued obeisance to Israel at the top of the bad list.
Here, it just appears that he's trying to Shame all the Jewish Democrat voters, and traditionally they have voted Democrat like 90% or more, and get them to vote Republican because he's saying, I care more about Israel than you do.
I don't think that goes very far.
And the suggestion that the New York Times hates Israel is, to me, that's a completely ridiculous thing to say.
Oh, I couldn't agree more, and I think competing with his deference to Israel is his promotion of the Vax.
I think those two really tell strongly against Donald Trump, notwithstanding the fact that we're always dealing with mixed bags here, and we've got to look for the lesser of two evils.
Meanwhile, two former CIA directors called Biden to threaten Iran militarily.
This is just disgusting.
The military threat the U.S.
poses to Iran is a key reason why the Iranian nuclear program has expanded.
A former U.S.
national security official, a hawkish gaggle of former U.S.
national security officials, lawmakers, and diplomats has launched a campaign to press Biden to threaten Iran, headed by former CIA Chief Leon Panetta and retired General David Petraeus, and former Obama-era Pentagon official Michelle Fortenray, they assert it's vital to restore Iran's fear that its current nuclear path will trigger the use of force against it by the United States.
Frankly, this is completely absurd.
The statement, also signed by former Democrat representatives and diplomats, published by the Washington Institute Urges Biden to take steps that will lead Iran to believe that persisting in its current behavior and rejecting a reasonable diplomatic resolution will put to risk its entire nuclear infrastructure, one built painstakingly over the past three decades, suppressing that it's all for the peaceful use of nuclear energy.
Iranian analyst Samud Maj, author of The Ayatollah Begs to Differ, The Paradox of Modern Iran, said the letter from former U.S.
officials is just plain silly.
He told The Intercept, there's no restoring Iran's fear.
The last time it feared a U.S.
military strike or war was in the immediate aftermath of the Iraq invasion, when it looked like an easy victory there and in Afghanistan.
Might perhaps lead to real men going to Tehran.
He points out despite repeated U.S.
and Israeli threats, Iran has steadily beefed up its military capability.
So I'd say Iran doesn't fear U.S.
military action against it now.
All of the Israeli bluster about preparing for war with Iran hasn't changed their calculus.
And they know Israel is probably more likely to attack their facilities than the U.S., so why would U.S.
bluster preparations for war do so?
Teresa Parse, executive director of the Quincy Institute, blasted the statement, telling the intercept. The exaggerated faith in the
miracles U.S. military threats can deliver are not limited to any one party in the U.S., but intrinsic
to the establishment religion that American security is achieved through global military
hegemony.
The former U.S.
officials argue their strategy is aimed to force Iran to the negotiating table and compel it to reverse any efforts to develop nuclear weapons, meaning the aftermath of Donald Trump's abandonment of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.
But they're not pursuing nuclear weapons.
That means this is complete rubbish.
Parsi and Iranian-American analyst, author of Losing an Enemy, Obama Oran and the Triumph of Diplomacy, added, Rather than being a solution to the crisis, the military threat the U.S.
poses to Iran is a key reason why the Iranian nuclear program has expanded.
The more a country is faced with military threats, the more it will demand a nuclear deterrence.
I have encouraged Iran to develop or acquire nuclear weapons, by the way, to usher in an era of peace and stability in the Middle East.
It's only because Israel has a lopsided arsenal of nukes that we're in this quandary.
If Iran had nukes, stability would return to the Middle East.
Biden, during the 2020 campaign, criticized Trump's abandonment of the Iran deal and his assassination of Major General Qassim Soleimani in Baghdad on January 3rd, which was an atrocity for which I cannot forgive Donald Trump.
That was a disgrace.
During a press gaggle with Israeli Prime Minister Bennett, Biden said, if diplomacy fails, we're ready to turn to other options.
The Biden administration has maintained, and in some cases expanded, economic sanctions against Iran, which has spurred allegations from Tehran, well-founded, that the U.S.
is already waging a non-military war against Iranian civilians.
Iran has every reason to want to restore the J-Cope, at least in terms of getting the more onerous sanctions against it lifted, but it hardly is going to engage because it thinks the U.S.
will go to war with it if it does not.
Trump's military threats and broad sanctions are precisely why we're in this mess now.
To believe Trumpian conduct will break the nuclear deadlock bewilders the mind.
Trump's exit from the deal, the lack of confidence the U.S.
will stay in beyond 2024, has profoundly undermined The value of American promises of sanctions relief.
The Iranians are hesitating largely because they do not believe the economic benefits the U.S.
promises will be forthcoming.
No amount of military threats can change that fundamental weakness in the U.S.
negotiating position.
And look at this.
All the presidents who've dragged us into war.
Only one recent president has not done that, Donald Trump.
And many of us believe, and I think completely appropriately, that Biden may want a war because he believes it'll bolster his support from the American people.
But I'll tell you right now, it ain't gonna happen.
Just as he bloggled the withdrawal from Afghanistan, it would be
viewed as more blunder by Biden. Nobody's going to buy into it. Everyone understand fully now what Barack
Obama said when he observed, never underestimate Joe Biden's ability to F things up. Joe,
your thoughts?
Yeah, well, Israel is one of the few nations that has nuclear weapons that never signed the nuclear
nonproliferation agreement, and they were highly involved in development of South African nuclear
weapons, Pakistani nuclear weapons and North Korean nuclear weapons. So you got to wonder
They were also highly involved in the 2003 Yellow Cake incidents in Iraq to get us drug into that war.
So, you know, here's a group of people that Have absolutely no problem dragging the United States into wars over all kinds of things.
And today, there's an article at Veterans Today on Israeli partnership with Trump on this Soleimani murder.
And the former Israeli Defense Forces Intelligence Chief, Major General Tamir Hyman, has admitted the country's role in assassinating Soleimani, describing the killing as significant and important.
So there you go.
That's our friendly little ally who's done more spying on the United States than every other country in the world combined, has stolen more intellectual property from the United States than every other country in the world combined, and has gotten more foreign aid than every other country in the world combined.
So you tell me, why the hell we let these people dictate our policies to it?
It's absolutely insane, along with everything else we've been discussing today.
Well, it grieves me to say that the U.S.
and Israel are together the greatest rogue nations in the world responsible for more acts of terror worldwide than all the other nations of the world combined.
Michael.
I hear the truth being told over there.
These people who are telling Biden to attack Iran, are they all Jewish?
I'm pretty sure Panetta and Flournoy is, maybe Petraeus is not, but I guess they would all fit into that peanut mold.
Israel's wanted to launch, wanted the USA, not them, they've wanted the USA to launch a war against Iran for 30 years now, and has constantly lied in their Jewish controlled mass media.
about the Iranian nuclear program and the Iranian intentions.
And I assume that the motivation is that they see Iran as their main impediment to establishment of the long desired greater Israel from which to rule the world in the New World Order.
And frankly, I don't think Biden's presidency can be salvaged, even with the start of a war, especially against any of the enemies that are out there right now, Russia, China, Iran, our wussified military will be defeated if we launch any kind of war like that.
We no longer have a conceptual glue.
We no longer have the social belief in the United States that we had 50 years ago.
Michael, that's very good.
The most heartening remark I've heard coming from Trump about foreign policy of late was that Israel has wanted to conduct a war against Iran to the last American soldier.
Yeah.
Maybe, maybe he's catching on.
Let's you and he fight.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail to live need to know at gmail.com.
Live need to know at gmail.com.
Here's a report from Gregory.
Good idea if there was any intention of having fair elections in relation to the proposal for these ratings.
As it is, there's in general no such intention on the part of the masses.
We're simply going to have to deal with the destructive meltdown of our traditional nation.
Something else will take its place.
Madison's erudite, benevolent Constitution and attached Bill of Rights have now vanished, partly due to insufficient numbers who understand them, and even more to insufficient numbers who cherish them.
Madison roomed in Nassau Hall.
His college has now closed down, along with his vision of a constitutional republic modeled on the best lessons from the classical world and Magna Carta.
Profound.
Meanwhile, you can access the Volkswagen Conspiracy Virtual Conference 2021 by going to my blog.
I mentioned two of the speakers here, Susan Bradford on the politics of business, Abramov and Enron.
Really a fascinating presentation that got raves from various of the viewers.
Sarah Westall, herself an investigative journalist on the COVID conspiracy and mind control.
She talks about some of the techniques that are being used to shape our behavior, contrary to our best interests, that are being exploited here to promote a fake pandemic and a deadly vax.
Meanwhile, if you go there and track down the tickets, you've got three options.
You can get a single access video 12 times in six months for $5, unlimited access to it all, 24 presentations for a month for $25, unlimited access for a year for $40.
Meanwhile, final thoughts.
Joe, yours.
Yeah, I highly recommend your False Flag Conference 2021.
It was really good.
Yeah, I've mentioned a guy named Max Egan, who's at this point an expat Australian, and his website is Crow House.
And you can find his videos at a number of places, Odyssey, Rumble, also a lot at BitChute.
And he had a program that he put on this morning that was just posted on the Nano Network.
There's a company in France called Graphiel, G-R-A-H-I-E-L.
P-H-E-A-L, which is the first to market with a digital health test and passport system where it monitors the nanohydrogel graphene oxide that's been injected into your body and tells you whether you're healthy or not, and then it relays that through your smartphone to tell whether you're allowed to be able to get on a plane or go to You know, through your QR code to be able to get in and access any food.
I'll put the link to his article, but it's absolutely fascinating, and one of the other news items that he covers is that DARPA has developed flesh-eating robots, so they're not going to have to dig, you know, massive mass graves anywhere, and they're not going to have to deal with coffins.
Just after the real robots come in and shoot you, they'll just turn loose the flesh-eating robots that use organic matter to power themselves.
So these things will be carnivorous robots roaming around cleaning up all the dead people
that we've created on this planet.
Absolutely shocking.
My God.
Michael.
Absolutely insane.
I wanted to give a hat tip to a statement that just came out from a Catholic Archbishop, whose name is Vigano, Carlo Maria Vigano.
And it's called A Message to the American People.
A beautiful statement.
He's the guy who ought to be the leader of the Catholic Church instead of the New World Order shill, Bergoglio, who's in there right now.
And the other thing is, The great journalist Mike Whitney posted an article about three or four days ago at UNZ.com that is probably the heaviest denunciation and pointed truth-telling about this vaccine regime that I've read to date.
The name of the article is Operation Extermination.
The plan to decimate the human immune system with a lab-generated pathogen.
And I'm going to read a quote from that.
But the people don't know that they're taking a risk to get these vaccines because they haven't been told the truth.
And the reason they haven't been told the truth is because they, we, are the target in a war of extermination that is being waged on us.
Sometimes it's very hard for people to admit to what they know to be the truth, but the truth is plain to see.
Our pandemic managers and their foot soldiers in the media Public health and government want to do us harm, want to inject us with a mysterious substance that will wreak havoc on our immune systems and shorten our lives.
This isn't just a struggle for personal freedom or bodily autonomy.
It's actually a battle for survival.
We are defending our right to live.
So now we know that along with the blood clots, the bleeding, the heart attacks, the strokes, the vascular and neurological diseases, the vaccine is also designed to eviscerate the immune system that protects us from illness and death.
How steeped in denial one must be not to see the evil that is now among us.
End quote.
Very good, Michael, and I believe you sent me a link.
I will republish that on my blog.
Joe Olson from Houston and Michael Ivey, formerly of Fort Worth, have given us another sensational Texas Tuesday here on Need to Know.
We're doing our very best to keep you informed, but you need to respond, process, and act accordingly.
By God, avoid the Vax if you possibly can.
The evil that men are doing to other men using the instrument, the nincompoop, the hollow vessel Joe Biden.
To mislead and deceive and to impose simply lunatic policies on the nation is going to generate a response.
If he tries to establish checkpoints in the various states that travel between them, people are going to die.
The American people are getting pissed off.
And when they're injecting children at schools without the permission of their parents, that is unforgivable.
This is a matter of life and death.
These are, in Sherry Tenpenny's words, perfectly designed killing machines.
They aren't medicine and they're not there to benefit you, but on the contrary, to decimate the world's population, ultimately from 8 billion today to 500 million.
billion today to 500 million.
7.5 billion dead if they have their way, where deagle.com projects the US.
population alone is dropping from 330 million in 2020 to only 65 million in 2025.
That's a loss of 265 million of your fellow citizens, your neighbors, your relatives, your friends, your family.
Pay attention.
This is a matter of life and death.
And, meanwhile, spend as much time as you can with those you love and care most about, because we do not know how much time we have left.
▲
Export Selection