All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 18, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:18:08
Need to Know News (17 December 2021) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer in Madison, Wisconsin, where I'm delighted to be joined again today by Jo Olson from Houston, where we only wish Miriam were able to join us.
She's on a special assignment, a bona fide special assignment.
We begin with the California Governor Newsom planning to mirror Texas anti-abortion law to ban assault weapons.
Of course, the weapons he's talking about are not assault weapons.
He's mostly talking about AR-15s, which are semi-automatic.
Assault weapons are fully automatic.
They haven't been legal in the United States since at least 1985.
On Friday, the U.S.
Supreme Court allowed Texas' abortion ban to stay in effect, and the decision so outraged California Governor Newsom.
He announced plans to use Texas' legal mechanism for a ban on assault-style weapons.
We'll discuss why it does not look as though that's going to wash.
SCOTUS is letting private citizens sue to stop abortion.
If that's a precedent, we'll let California sue those who put ghost guns and assault weapons on the street.
I don't know of any assault weapons on the street.
Under Texas anti-abortion law, which bans a procedure around six weeks, that's typically before most women even realize they are pregnant.
Private citizens can sue anyone who aids and abets an abortion, including providers and individuals.
Those who succeed stand to be awarded $10,000.
I find this completely outrageous.
I'm being repulsed by the Supreme Court.
Certain Texas conservative lawmakers shot back at Newsom.
Republican Tyler State Representative Matt Schaefer poked fun at California, which has lost residents who've moved to Texas.
Man, shave her.
Texas Realtor of the Year Award goes to California Governor Gavin Newsom.
Greg Abbott used Newsom's announcement to remind everyone he's up for re-election and warned against candidate Beto O'Rourke, who would also like to ban so-called assault weapons, exactly what Beto would do if elected governor of Texas.
I won't let that happen.
Texas is a pro-amendment state and will stay that way.
This is a dangerous precedent come up with a scheme that encourages neighbors as my neighbors and complete strangers said Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins very appropriately.
Other liberal-led states have proposed legislation that would flip Texas Heartbeat Act on its head.
The Chicago lawmaker suggested the Expanding Abortion Service Act, allowing those who commit sexual or domestic assaults or cause an unblamed pregnancy.
That would be a lot of men to be sued for less than $10,000.
How appropriate.
The New York Times reported that the Supreme Court appears ready to uphold a Mississippi law banning abortions after 15 weeks.
Dangerous precedent.
Texas abortion law absolutely sets a precedent for allowing private citizens to become enforcers of public law, said Dr. Kimmy King, a political science professor at the University of North Texas, and that's what the concern is.
Looking at how Texas and Mississippi have been treated by the Supreme Court, it looks as though they may be looking to do more, possibly even threatening Roe v. Wade.
Of course, liberal lawmakers have been highly critical.
It's interesting to see the response to Newsom's proposal.
I'd add, with the stages of prenatal development, I believe that the Roe v. Wade was among the wisest decisions ever made by the court.
It really depends upon viability or when the fetus has reached a state of development that it could exist, live, apart from the intrauterine environment at the end of the second trimester.
I believe pro-choice is the only American and democratic approach because it allows everyone to act in accordance with their conscience and their circumstances.
No one under pro-choice is forced to undergo an abortion.
However, under pro-life, women who want to terminate a pregnancy are nevertheless required to carry it to term, which makes them, in my opinion, reproductive slaves.
I think that's completely wrong.
Joe, I believe the fundamental difference between them is that the right to a Second Amendment is in the Constitution.
The right to an abortion is not.
I think Newsom has once again demonstrated he's a nitwit and an opportunist and a shallow shill for regressive liberal policies that don't benefit the American people.
Your thoughts?
Well, he can't dig his grave deep enough as far as I'm concerned.
As far as Texas in the Second Amendment, we passed open carry for everybody as long as you're not a convicted felon.
So anybody that can carry can carry.
And we also reduced the age for concealed carry, if you're in military or police, to 18 years old,
which ended retroprosody with about 40 states that we previously had matching concealed carry laws for.
So we've actually gone beyond what most states have.
And so I don't think there's a chance of them pulling any Second Amendment stunts in Texas.
It absolutely would not go down.
As far as the Mississippi ruling, all they're doing is changing it from the Roe versus Wade
decision of 24-week gestation for the limit on abortions Well I'm sorry at 15 weeks you still know you're pregnant.
I mean you've had several months of missed periods and you're starting to have a lump and it's pretty easy to go to the doctor and get an ultrasound and verify that there's a non-viable tissue mass in your uterus.
So you know as far as that being a major destruction of I don't really think it's a big deal.
If you want to have abortions because it's not in the Constitution, any state can do that, and then they wouldn't be challenged.
I don't see that that's such a giant issue personally, and now the FDA's decided that because of this potential ruling, they're going to allow the RU-486, which 46 is 86 is kill you, so RU is RU for killing 86.
So anyhow, they're going to allow that to happen.
Interesting thing, there's a channel that I've followed for years about a young couple that Started off doing a travel log, and they went all the way through the Americas and stopped at different places.
Very good cinematography, you know, lots of drone footage of places that you'd probably never visit, you know, really off-the-wall stuff.
And they got stuck down in Argentina during the start of the COVID thing, and then they moved back to America.
Well, anyhow, they got married.
She got pregnant, And their baby was delivered prematurely, which is a sign, one of the symptoms that they list as a side effect from taking the jab.
And then they brought the baby home and two days later, the baby developed necrotizing intracolitis.
Which means that it's drinking mama's milk and it's eating holes in the intestinal lining.
So the baby went back and spent another 10 days in the hospital and they brought him home.
I don't want to do any more details about them because I don't know for certain that they were jabbed, but just expect this kind of outcome to be a lot more common going forward.
As we have more and more couples that one or both of them have been injected with something that is a biological toxin and it's certainly a toxic to newborns.
So that just in a little word of caution there and we can move on to other subjects.
Well, when you look at the degree of support measured by likelihoods, what's a probability of having those defects if they were not jabbed versus a probability if they were overwhelmingly greater if they were jabbed?
So it's a completely reasonable inference that that's what happened to them.
And as you observe, These vaccines, which are non-vaccines, they're not medicine, really are calculated to bring about depopulation, not only by death, but by inducing sterility, abortions, miscarriages, and seems to be working to a T, Joe.
Very, very disturbing.
Meanwhile, The January 6th committee was already a sham.
It now turns out that Adam Schiff doctored a text message between Meadows and Jim Jordan in order to impugn him.
The House of Representatives committee acknowledged it doctored a text message between former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and Representative Jim Jordan Excluding content about how they wanted former Vice President Pence to handle electoral votes during the joint session of Congress, Adam Schiff, the head of the House Intelligence Committee, showed a graphic during a hearing on newly obtained communications, which was displayed discussing whether to hold Meadows in contempt.
The graphic included the title Lawmaker Text to Meadows.
The message was presented as follows on January 6, 2021.
Vice President Mike Pence, as President of the Senate, should call out all electoral votes that he believes are unconstitutional as no electoral votes at all.
Period.
You can see why this is critical to ask Mr. Meadows about.
A lawmaker suggesting the former vice president simply throw out votes he deemed unconstitutional to overturn the federal election said Schiff.
However, the message was actually a direct quote from former Department of Defense Inspector General Shultz.
The text included an attachment of Schmitt's determination that Pence could object to electoral votes from state.
The text was also altered to cut off the rest of the sentence, which stated, in accordance with guidance from founding father Alexander Hamilton and judicial precedent.
How stunning, but not surprising.
A spokesman for the House panel confirmed the message had been doctored.
In the graphic, the period was added inadvertently, they claim, except they left out the rest of the sentence.
Jordan and Schiff did not respond to requests.
Expect a lot more of this.
Schiff and the contemptible January 6th committee will twist and smear the narrative every chance they get, wrote Representative Andy Biggs.
I think that's wonderful.
Schiff is a Jussie Smollett of Congress.
referring to the former Empire actor who was convicted of conducting a hate crime hoax earlier
this month. I think that's a wonderful shift. Is it just a small at a Congress, Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, he also is the one that elevated the whistleblower inside the White House
to impeach Trump and a suborn perjury in that case.
So he's had a life and same thing with all of the Russia gate information that he altered
and amplified.
So he's definitely a snaky player.
And he has some unusual connections to a hotel out in California where some gay guys have
been repeatedly dying after having meth and sex with one of his big fundraisers.
So I think the guy's name was Buck.
But anyhow, if you're interested, that's not a real hard thing to discover.
So I got no use for that guy at all.
Pence had a constitutional obligation to delay reading of the Electoral College votes because
I know for a fact that Arizona, but I think there was at least two other states that were
issuing multiple sets of electors saying this is the one that appeared to be the electors
as of November.
third, but after we've done recount, we're submitting these other electors. So he had
states where he could have picked two sets of electors. He could have easily sidestepped that
by saying, well, it appears that there are six states in question. We're going to delay reading
this from January 6th for another month until we can. And that would have been perfectly legitimate
because actually the constitution date for changing of office was in March. And it had been
up until after Woodrow Wilson was inaugurated in March of 1616.
So I'm not sure exactly when they changed the date to January 6th, but it wasn't a constitutional amendment that did that.
So he certainly had the moral obligation and the constitutional right to do that.
And it's beyond cowardice.
It's absolute treason.
I don't know what the guy was thinking.
I don't know if they just had a lot of dirt on him.
And they said that, you know, if this goes any further forward, we're going to expose all of the things that we know about you.
And there's a lot of people that have evidence about him, testimonies from children that have been involved with Let's just say nefarious things that appear to be pretty common in the political underworld.
And so I don't want to go any further with statements about him, but you can find him online.
People making actual witness testimonies about the things that Pence has done in his life that he might not have wanted exposed.
And so he was very vulnerable to blackmail from the dark side of the D.C.
swamp.
And can you believe Pence is even floating the idea he might run for president in 2024?
I mean, what a joke.
What a joke, Joe.
But then most of the political figures in America today satisfy that characterization.
Meanwhile, there's a very bothersome op-ed from a professor of law here at the University of Wisconsin School of Law about the Kyle Rittenhouse case.
So before turning to it, I just wanted to review the elements of what happened there.
Kyle was protecting the business of a friend with what they call an assault rifle, but it was not because it's not fully automatic.
It was only an AR-15 semi-automatic.
After months of indiscriminate rioting, looting, and burning, a serious incident took this long to occur was surprising.
He's become the cause celeb, taking the conversation to a different level.
He was defending himself against a charge with first-degree murder when it was clearly in self-defense.
The notion that Antifa are normal protesters is going to be promoted endlessly by the left wing, but it's really outrageous what we had here.
The guy, three persons tried to attack and kill him.
Three of them, count them.
In addition, there was one who kicked him in the face.
You see a photograph of the first assailant, not one shot by Kyle.
Turns out that the two others included this fellow here who was trying to break his neck with a skateboard.
That was a lethal weapon without any doubt about it.
Another approached him with a pistol and it was about to shoot him when Kyle was shot off his bicep.
He reported later his only regret was he hadn't unloaded his weapon on Kyle at the time.
Here's some of the footage from the event.
I'll talk about it.
Kyle's hitting the head here and the back of the head falls to the ground.
It turns out during an interview with Tucker Carlson that Kyle, to my mind a bit surprisingly, explained he supports BLM, emphasizing race had nothing to do with the case but with the right of self-defense.
100% accurate about that.
He insists he's no racist, despite media outlets and activists claiming otherwise.
The jury acquitted him on all charges after he fatally shot two and injured a third.
During the trial, his attorneys argued their client was defending himself, which he clearly was doing.
During the interview with Tucker, Kyle said, I'm not a racist person.
I support the Black Lives Matter movement.
I support peaceful demonstrating.
I believe there needs to be change.
I believe there's a lot of prosecutorial misconduct, not just in my case, but in others.
and it's just amazing to see how much a prosecutor can take advantage of somebody.
I believe he's made a very telling point.
Here are three of the incidents, all that occurred before he was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum
who had boxed him in at the car dealership and lunged at him.
And while the claim is made that he was unarmed, that ignores the fact that most murders in America
are committed by fist, by beating people to death by strangulation with a bare hands.
So no one should be naive enough to claim he was unarmed.
Moreover, he was seeking to take Kyle's weapon from Kyle, which implied, of course, that if he were to seize it, that he would use it on Kyle.
Kyle explained, I told everybody I had to do it.
I was just attacked.
I was dizzy.
I was vomiting.
I couldn't breathe.
This case has nothing to do with race.
It never had anything to do with race.
It had to do with the right to self-defense.
His acquittal was widely panned on social media, many saying it was because Rittenhouse was white that he got off Scott Reed, but the three he shot We're also white, unless you draw a distinction between being Jewish and being white, because all three, interestingly enough, were Jewish.
Civil rights attorney Shavar Jeffries told The Hill that the verdict speaks to the dramatic differences in perspective people have based on racial background and about justice in our country.
For many people of color, the idea they could show up with an assault rifle mistake at the site of a rally, kill people, and find themselves exonerated because the killings were in self-defense, he doesn't add, is something beyond comprehension.
I find that pretty a dubious statement.
Meanwhile, we capture the attitude of the left from the whole summer we had of looting and arson and rioting.
Look, son!
Rioters, arsonists, and looters are here to teach us about peace and equality.
Joe, I think that's got it exactly right.
Your thoughts as a retrospective about Rittenhouse before we turn to this op-ed?
Yeah, well, it's pretty amazing that you had a prosecuting attorney, an ADA in that county, and I'll just call him from now on Bingo Binger.
Because, you know, he's just a lottery game.
Anyhow, he set the bail in Rittenhouse case of $2 million to get out of jail.
And amazingly, the county over in Milwaukee, they set the bail for a career criminal Daryl Brooks at $1,000.
So there's a difference between a suppression of poor minority people as opposed to the privileged white person.
The privileged white person gets a $2 million bail.
The underprivileged career criminal gets a $1,000 bail and then goes out and kills six people and injures another, what, 50?
Yeah, tell me how the system is so stacked against these poor minorities, and it's the same group that was injured in Kenosha, which is the Jewish group, that's in charge of pushing this absolute garbage.
And there's a great article at Veterans Today, APAC is forming a new super PAC for future elections, which you expect it to be able to Start kicking in enormous amount of money in the 2022 primary and general elections and then certainly by 2024.
These people are absolutely maniacal and why AIPAC and ADL are allowed to operate as and not be registered as foreign agents and terrorists is beyond me because they are foreign agents and they are terrorists.
Your points are impeccable, Joe.
And yes, JFK was the last president to insist that the World Jewish Congress, a precursor for AIPAC, register as a foreign agent.
We know what happened to Jack, but there were many other sources, powers behind, who were sponsoring the assassination beyond Israel, including the CIA, the Joint Chiefs, the anti-Castro Cubans, the mob, the Texas oilmen, the Eastern establishment surrounding the Fed.
Or anyone who is curious about it needs to check out my JFK special, which I published in honor of Robert David Steele.
You can find it on my BitChute channel, Jim Fetzer, for 22 November 2021.
Meanwhile, your points about what's going on here are also impeccable.
It turns out, interestingly, Four Jewish women, I'm given the report, actually combined to get Daryl Brooks out on that $1,000 bail where the prosecutor, and I believe he's in Waukesha in Wisconsin, but he could have been in Milwaukee if that has jurisdiction,
Said openly, he believed that bail is racist and he's going to let people out on little or no bail, and while it may bring about some harm to others, he said innocent people may die.
Nevertheless, it's worth it, in his opinion.
I can't see any American agreeing with that, Joe.
I mean, this is despicable.
Yeah, well, Wisconsin has really small counties, and the county seat of Waukesha, Milwaukee, and Kenosha are in those three counties.
So the DA that released him on the $1,000 bail is in Milwaukee, but it's 19.5 miles from the Milwaukee courthouse to the Waukesha courthouse.
So, you know, If you don't live right downtown, it could be a 10-minute drive from his mommy's house in his mommy's car to go smash a bunch of people and then drive back to his mommy's house and say, I don't know what happened to your car, mom.
Yeah, absolutely 100% repugnant.
If we ever get to the point where we're able to actually identify who the enemies of the American government and Christianity are, I'll be happy for that day to get here.
Go to Gab, G-A-B.
Because they don't put up with any of this noise, and you're actually allowed to provide evidence of all the nefarious things that are being done by the people that have 90% control of the news media, 90% control of the entertainment industry, and it appears to be 90% control of Congress.
So you want to know who's misdirecting the United States and has been for over 100 years?
You might want to look into the moneyed group, the Federal Reserve private ownership and all of the other things that they
forced us into, which is every war that we've had, including the Civil War.
Joe, and your point about the white guy being sacked with this fantastic bond and actually incarcerated for months
and months, when he acted in self-defense versus this guy who got out on a thousand dollar bail after driving over
his girlfriend with his car.
I mean, yes, it's black privilege, not white.
They have their colors crossed.
And I think the liberals are going to pay dearly for this at the polls.
Meanwhile, Because I was so stunned by an op-ed written by an assistant professor at the School of Law at the University of Wisconsin, I invited him to come on my radio show today.
Here's what I wrote to him.
Invitation to the Raw Deal, Friday, 17 December 2021.
Wrong.
I'm a retired professor of philosophy with a show on Revolution Radio, Monday, Wednesday, Friday, and having read your op-ed on Kyle Rittenhouse, a case I have followed closely, I would like to feature you on my show this coming Friday, 11 a.m.
to 1 p.m.
CT, where I use the first 30 minutes to update on the latest news, then the next 60 to converse with my guests and take calls the final 30.
Since I take exception to your position as you lay it out, I would like to engage in a cordial discussion of the issues of the Second Amendment, the laws regarding self-defense, Antifa, BLM, and the movement to defund the police, which I suspect you support.
Since I'm a strong proponent of the First Amendment as well as the Second, I think this would make for an excellent exchange.
I have copied my producer.
Let me know.
Thanks.
And then I know something about me.
I added a link to my curriculum vitae.
My identity is McKnight Professor Emeritus from the Duluth campus of the University of Minnesota and to my blog.
I received no response, so that, as I recall, Wednesday, I invited him to call in and gave him the call-in number.
He neglected to do either, chose not to respond.
I explained even on the air I'd give him five unqualified minutes, for example, as openers, to defend his position.
Here's the op-ed that bothered me so much last Sunday.
Verdict emboldens jumpy trigger fingers.
Get the heading.
Rittenhouse case gives those who openly carry guns a license to kill.
I mean, Joe, this is just stunning stuff.
Here's what he wrote.
The Kyle Rittenhouse verdict has deadly implications for states such as Wisconsin that allow the open carrying of firearms.
One might be excused for thinking that the right to carry a gun does not give someone more discretion to kill others.
After all, the Second Amendment's language only confers a right to carry.
A gun can easily be lethal.
But this easy lethality should neither expand the gun owner's privilege to use deadly force nor diminish the safety of others at the other end of the barrel.
Unfortunately, with Rittenhouse acquittal, the open carry community now has an additional license to kill.
A person is privileged to use deadly force if he reasonably believes such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself.
Reasonable belief is a community standard.
We determine how much restraint is necessary before one is privileged to kill another, and in doing so, we place a value on the lives of others.
The Rittenhouse outcome in Kenosha suggests that the value we give a victim's life can depend on whether or not the defendant was armed.
Defense lawyers were permitted to give significance to Rittenhouse's rifle in arguing that deadly force was reasonable.
They argued that Rittenhouse could consider the possibility of another person taking his gun and using it against him.
An encounter between an armed person and an unarmed person suddenly became an encounter between two armed persons.
In the incident between Rittenhouse and Joseph Rosenbaum, the plastic bag in Rosenbaum's hand effectively became an AR-15 under this view of self-defense.
Rittenhouse's choice to put a gun in his hand puts a gun in our hand, too.
This view of self-defense means that by carrying a gun, Rittenhouse was authorized to use deadly force that, if unarmed, he was not privileged to use.
Rittenhouse used a force expert to explain this twisted reality.
Asked if deadly force against Rosenbaum would have been appropriate, would have been reasonable had Rittenhouse been unarmed, the expert opined, no.
Thus, the defense own expert confirmed that it was only reasonable for Rittenhouse to kill Rosenbaum because Rittenhouse carried a firearm.
Put another way, the defense lawyers asked the jury to assume an unarmed person was armed.
Obviously, being chased by a person wielding a plastic bag does not privilege you to kill that person.
What was not obvious, at least until the Rittenhouse acquittal, is that if you carry a gun, you actually can kill a person running at you with a plastic bag.
Rittenhouse was correct when he told Fox News host Tucker Carlson that his case was a win for the Second Amendment.
The Second Amendment now apparently privileges the use of deadly force for an armed person that an unarmed person cannot use in the exact same circumstances.
A civilian with a gun can no longer truthfully claim it's for self-defense.
Under the law, his decision to carry a gun increases your vulnerability as it reduces the value of your life.
A person with a gun can reasonably assume that aggressive movements toward them signal your intent to use their gun.
Against them, the likelihood of violence is increased.
He did not use the word thereby.
In a protest, confrontations between unarmed protesters and armed civilians are common.
If an unarmed protester fails to submit to an armed civilian's order to halt, can he shoot?
It seems so.
What changes to Wisconsin law might help restore sanity?
The state could add a provision to the self-defense statute so that carrying a firearm could not justify a defendant's reasonable belief of imminent harm.
In the courtroom, a defendant could not argue his fear of harm was informed by the possibility that the victim might use the defendant's gun against him.
The jury could consider the relevance of the defendant's gun if, during the encounter, the victim gained control of the defendant's firearm.
Under this approach, Any increased danger caused by the carrying of a gun would be borne by the person who chose to carry it.
So a jumpy trigger finger would not be awarded any special privilege, and the lives of those who are unarmed would not be stripped of value.
This is from a Ron Mein, M-E-Y-N, an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin Law School, to whom I wrote at his email address, mein.wisconsin.edu.
Joe, I want your comments on that, which I found absolutely stunningly incompetent, that his ignorance of the law, of the facts of the case, that Rosenbaum had threatened to kill him not once but twice, the fact that Rosenbaum had his bare hands and was lunging at him, Was a lethal threat under the circumstances where most murders in the United States occur by being beaten to death by fists or being strangled to death.
This is such a grotesque misrepresentation and it's so deficient in respect to the laws of self-defense and the facts of this case that it has to be deliberate.
I call this propaganda.
I have already declared I am writing to the Dean of the School of Law and the President of the University of Wisconsin and even the Chancellor of the system about this case.
I find it so insulting, outrageous, and such a gross abuse of position by a member of the faculty of the School of Law at the University of Wisconsin, where my daughter and son-in-law proudly graduated.
This is just a disgrace.
Yeah, well, it takes a certain amount of pretzel logic to be able to defend any of the left-wing positions on absolutely anything, and we'll get into some of their other ones a little bit later, but John Lott has done expert analysis of crime and murder statistics.
Basically, if you attack somebody that's carrying a gun, you might expect to get bodily injury, because if you're attacking them, they have the right to use deadly force.
If you don't attack them, they don't have the right.
And if they do use deadly force, and you're not attacking them, Then they can be charged, and then they can be imprisoned, then they can have their gun rights removed permanently.
But that's not what happened in this case absolutely at all.
We're facing a mortality rate in this country due to the pharmaceutical industry that will probably exceed a million.
And right now the gun rates, the murder rate in 2020 was up 30% from what it had been before.
It had been dropping for a decade and then because of Black Lives Matter and the lawlessness that they unleashed nationwide, now we've got a murder rate that's increased 30% over what it has been for the last five years in a row.
And so, bottom line is, if you don't have law enforcement, then you've got law enforcement.
You've got laws in Washington, D.C., strictest in the nation.
Laws in Chicago, second strictest in the nation.
Murder rates in Washington, D.C., highest in the nation.
Murder rates in Chicago, second highest in the nation.
So what are we dealing with here?
We're dealing with absolute insanity and we have got people that have this narrative that they're trying to keep forcing and the object of the narrative is to make sure that nobody has a way of protecting themselves and that the thugs that rule from the top will have no resistance from the public at any level for them to be able to finish doing what they have planned for us, which is not a happy ending for the majority of the people on the planet.
Well, and so many liberals believe in this leniency about bail and so forth because they're in the state of false belief that crimes are equally committed by blacks, whites, Indians alike, when blacks overwhelmingly commit a disproportionate number of the criminal offenses in the United States, which explains why There's a disproportionate percentage of blacks.
It's proportional to the commission of crimes, not proportional to the distribution of the race within society.
Liberals seem to have based their whole premise on this category mistake, this colossal intellectual blunder.
Look, for example, at this review of crime per capita by race, you'll see in every single category blacks overwhelmingly commit the vast majority of offenses of these various kinds, with the exception of those related to alcohol, where Native Americans exceed them due to the well-known genetic incapacity of Indians to assimilate alcohol.
But just look at the categories, including forcible rape, vagrancy, sex offenses, forgery and counterfeiting, motor vehicle theft, prostitution and commercialized vice, curfew and loitering, stolen property, buying, receiving, robbery, fraud, weapons carrying, vandalism, burglary, aggravated assault, violent crime, disorderly conduct, Other assaults, larceny, theft, drug abuse, property crime.
Asians commit virtually none of these.
Native Americans, only those in the categories related to alcohol.
Whites, very minor compared to blacks.
Not that whites aren't committing crimes.
It's simply that blacks are committing overwhelmingly more of them.
Look at this comparison from crime statistics in New York City in 2014.
Arrests for violent crime for murder, 62% of those arrested were black, 32% Hispanic.
Shooting, 75% arrested were black, 22% Hispanic.
Rape, 46% were Hispanic, 43% were black.
If New York City worldwide extrapolating from these percentage, rape would be down 83% Murder 91, shooting 96.
But Joe, as we know, with defunding the police, all these categories are going up all over the country.
What did they really expect?
If you're going to take away the police who enforce the law, then you're going to have vastly violations of the law because it's not being enforced.
I mean, the illogic of the Democrat position is simply stunning.
And what worries me, Joe, is Once you let the toothpaste out of the tube, once the criminals know they can carry out these crimes with impunity, they're going to continue to increase and grow.
And I do not see any way to put it back to the civilized state we were in before the Democrats went off the rails with these absurd proposals.
Where my brilliant colleague Dr. Realwood was very interested in how murder related to politics and imposed a 2016 electoral map over a 2014 murder distribution rap and surprise surprise joke.
The overwhelming majority of murders are in areas controlled by Democrats.
Why?
Because their strict gun control means that ordinary civilians aren't able to carry and means the perps know they have a free fire zone to commit crimes and that no nosy civilian is going to interfere.
This is a deliberate Democrat policy.
It's creating chaos across the nation.
Joe, Every American ought to be repulsed by the Democratic Party, which has long trashed any sense of responsibility for upholding the rights of the American people, much less the laws of the land.
They have disgraced themselves.
Well, Jim, you know, if we're going to talk about inequalities, Jesus, let's not just talk about the racial inequalities in the judicial system.
Let's talk about the gender inequalities.
Here's the Bureau of Prison Statistics.
Female prisoners, 10,968.
10,968 male prisoners, 145,639.
Only 7% of the prisoners in the federal prison system are females.
I think we need to go out and find 135,000 women and arrest them for something and put them in jail so we can have the same number of men in jail as we have in women because the population is pretty much 50-50 divided men and women and that way we can have equality in America.
Brilliant, Joe.
That's exactly the blunder they're committing here.
I mean, these Democrats are morons!
Morons!
They don't familiarize themselves with—they don't do any research.
You mentioned John Lott.
He's completely brilliant.
His study shows that the more guns you have, the less crime, the fewer the homicides.
The less guns, the more crime, the more homicides.
It may be counterintuitive, but that's the fact.
That's science.
That's empirical research.
Democrats claim to follow the science, as in the case of the absurd coronavirus mandates and all that, but they're actually not.
They're following quackery, vaccine quackery, pseudoscience, fake authorities, and in this case, no less than that.
It's outrageous, Joe.
I'm going to send you this Bureau of Prison Statistics thing so we can put it up the next time we talk and get a good laugh at it, because that's exactly how stupid these people are.
I'm sorry, you're dumb as a box of rocks, but the good thing is that somebody mentioned that it appears that 19 out of 20 Democrats have lined up and gotten their jabs and their boosters, so hopefully this is going to be a self-extinguishing problem and we'll be able to deal with a more rational population Here in the next short term.
Of course, the tragedy of that is it includes a lot of our friends, our neighbors, our relatives.
My whole family went ahead and got vaccines, not telling me because they knew I'd be so adamantly opposed.
So a lot of us are going to suffer a lot of harm because of this absurd policy that's intended to extinguish the vast majority of the world's population.
Meanwhile, When they come for our guns, the time has come to use them may be my the statement for which I will be most long remembered.
We'll be right back.
Look at this.
Lancet has now published a letter by a professor warning that stigmatizing the unvaxxed is not justified by science and is dangerous.
Well, the Lancet is among the oldest medical publications in the world.
I believe it was actually the first medical journal.
Warning that high-level government officials and scientists need to stop claiming the unvaccinated are a threat to the vaccinated.
The piece entitled COVID-19, Stigmatizing the Unvaccinated Is Not Justified, was written by Professor Gunther Kumpf.
An Associate Professor for Hygiene and Environmental Medicine at the University of Gustwald in Germany.
He warns stigmatizing the unvaccinated is not justified by science and is dangerous.
He claims a belief has been propagated by high-level officials that there's a pandemic of the unvaccinated, which wrongly implies that the vaccinated are not relevant to the spread of COVID.
In his article, he argues, there's increasing evidence that vaccinated individuals continue to have irrelevant bullet transmission.
It is wrong and dangerous to speak of a pandemic of the unvaccinated.
It warns that, historically, both the USA and Germany have engendered negative experiences by stigmatizing parts of the population for their skin color or their religion.
The piece ends with an urgent plea to stop the inappropriate stigmatization of unvaccinated people who include our patients, colleagues, and other fellow citizens, and put extra effort into bringing society together.
Here's a copy of the whole letter.
I think it's sensational that he published this.
It's so obvious that this is all wrong.
And, of course, leads to the observation that the protected need protection from the unprotected by giving the unprotected the same protection that did not protect the protected.
Joe, we're in a situation completely absurd where Anthony Fauci Who will go down as the greatest mass murderer in all of history, claims the government may have to use force to get the NVACs to get a jab, even if it's unpopular.
So here you have this unelected figure, this bureaucrat, is trying to dictate policy in the United States.
Joe, it is disgusting.
Your thoughts, my friend?
Yeah, well we've got an incentivized death program going through the NIH where it's up to $100,000 per person that they can kill under their CV extermination program.
If you live in Texas, I highly recommend you go to SenatorBobHall.com He's got an interview that he did on Wednesday, and it's on his Facebook page and on his Senate homepage, where he explains what your rights are in Texas.
He's talking with a legal expert on it, and the legislature changed some rules effective September 1st, so you need to be up to speed on those.
You need to print those.
You need to have a complete portfolio for you.
And everyone you care about, so that if you end up in a hospital situation, you know what your rights are, and you do not let these administrators at the hospital run over you, and you don't let some jab-happy doctor stab you with a bunch of crap or stick rhodemosphere in a Breathing tube down your throat and kill you because that's exactly what the protocol is in in these hospitals and it's absolutely a death cult and I listen to NPR.
They haven't had a single doctor on there in the last two years that has ever mentioned anything about alternative cures or any facts that that there are issues of safety and efficacy With the jabs.
Everything they do is nothing but a big pharma commercial and it's absolutely insane that we have public funding of this rotten radio station that has absolutely no interest in debating either side of an issue.
They are one way on everything.
And another one they're one way on is this ignorant global warming,
which is the other parallel leg of the capture of the world economy
along with their cryptocurrency and their contact tracing and their QRS code required entrance and passports.
This is the most nefarious, well thought out, centuries long planned domination and totalitarianism
being forced on us from the top.
And we've got a limited amount of time to stop these SOBs and pull the plug on them.
And I can't wait till we get to the latest information on this stupid global warming garbage.
Absolutely unbelievable.
Joe, every point you're making is so telling.
Meanwhile, Fauci has actually admitted the vaccines may make people worse.
He met with a meta CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, who is, in my opinion, a criminal himself, who undermined the integrity of the election in 2020.
By paying out millions upon millions for ballot counters who were going to perpetrate frauds and finally said out loud what many have been warning for over a year about the mRNA vaccines, they may actually make the COVID pandemic worse.
Fauci was commenting on a recent study showing the COVID vaccines, which are mislabeled, injections may actually make a recipient more likely to be reinfected than someone with natural immunity from a prior infection.
This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse, Fauci said.
There was a history of the respiratory Sinovac vaccine in children, which paradoxically made the children worse.
Pause and read that again.
Now consider all the announcements made by public health experts who promise the vaccines are 100% safe and effective, even for children who had nearly zero risk.
Fauci wasn't done yet, though he went on to state another example he was directly involved with where treatment made individuals worse.
One of the HIV vaccines we tested several years ago actually made individuals more likely to get infected, he added.
The RSV vaccine failure was exposed in 2008 by researchers who finally untangled the decades-old mystery where Fauci was deeply involved.
In the late 60s, children in Washington, D.C.
received an RSV vaccine in which the virus was inactivated with formalin.
Eighty percent given the shot were hospitalized with severe respiratory disease, two of whom died.
Many have thought formalin was responsible, but the chemical has been used safely in other vaccines.
The problem, they report, in this month's The issue of journal nature medicine was that the children's antibodies were not binding strongly enough to the inactivated virus to produce a productive immune result.
Instead, the antibodies were dragging the dead virus with them, triggering a massive attack by other arms of the immune system, which may very well be going on here, where it appears these current vaccines are destroying our immune system.
As noted before, the American public has no way of knowing if the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was rigorously tested because the FDA refuses to release the documents for 75 years.
Think about that.
Until everyone alive today now would be dead.
A whistleblower on the inside of Pfizer's trials has documented many serious issues, including falsifying data.
Gee, Joe.
Surprise, surprise.
The phenomenon Fauci is alluding to, leaky vaccines, has been well documented.
A Penn State study showed leaky vaccines can cause viruses to become lethal for the unvaccinated.
Not all vaccines prevent infection, PSU noted.
Some, known as leaky vaccines, prolong host survival or reduce disease symptoms without preventing viral replication and transmission.
Although leaky vaccines provide anti-disease benefits, new research by Andrew Reid, David Kennedy, and colleagues at Avian Oncogenic Virus Group in the United Kingdom and the University of New England in Australia has demonstrated leaky vaccines can make the situation for unvaccinated individuals worse.
Leaky vaccines work by enhancing host immunity to a particular pathogen without necessarily blocking or slowing viral replication.
The result is infected but vaccinated individuals have extended survival, allowing highly virulent pathogen that would normally reach an evolutionary dead end in a dead host can transmit.
The evolutionary consequences of high virulence are just reduced, and these pathogens can be selectively favored as a result of leaky vaccination.
In 2019, an article in Healthline discussed attempts to prevent Marek's disease from spreading among chickens.
After experiments done in a specialized pathogen containment facility in Perbright Institute in the UK, they concluded the vaccine developed to combat Marek's disease were imperfect or leaky.
These vaccines also allow virulent viruses to continue evolving precisely because they allow the vaccinated individuals, and therefore themselves, to survive.
These less-than-perfect vaccines create a leaking barrier.
Our research demonstrates leaking vaccines can promote the evolution of nastier hot viral strain.
A new Harvard study showed the mRNA vaccines endorsed by the FDA and the CDC are worse than useless at stopping the spread of COVID-19.
Let me repeat that.
A new Harvard study recently showed that the mRNA vaccines endorsed by the FDA and CDC are worse than useless at stopping the spread.
A study of 68 nations, 2,947 counties in the United States published in the European Journal
of Epidemiology showed at the county level there appeared to be no discernible relationship
between percentage of population fully vaxxed and new cases.
In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association, such that countries with a higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher cases per million.
That's exactly what Becker News had pointed out.
Meanwhile, a new independent study corroborates a famous Israeli study showing natural immunity is superior to vaccinated immunity.
Confirmed infection rates increased, according to Time Labs, since the last immunity-confirming event in all cohorts.
For unvaccinated, previously infected, they increased 10.5 per 100,000 risk days.
For those previously infected, four to six months ago, to 30.2 for those previously infected.
For individuals receiving a single dose following a prior infection, they increased from 3.7 per 100,000 to 11.6.
The vaccinated and previously uninfected, the rate per 100,000 increased from 21.1 for those vaccinated to 88.9 for those vaccinated more than six months ago.
Thus, the vaccinated and previously uninfected individuals are two to three times more likely to be reinfected after six months.
than vaccinated previously infected individuals. The latest remarks from Fauci suggest that he is
not surprised by the invisible failure of the vaccine to stop the spread. Indeed, one wonders
if it was all a part of the plan. Joe, I don't think there can be any doubt about it being a
part of the plan, where Fauci appears to have been the orchestrator of this calamity of
catastrophe, catastrophic events.
Yeah, well, I've got a great article on that called Right to Try Voodoo.
Absolutely every vaccine is voodoo.
If you study what the philosophy is of those things, it's absolutely preposterous to think that you're going to do the concoctions that they talk about and actually get some health benefit from it.
Absolutely absurd.
The reason that everything fails is that they have to come up with all kinds of fancy little excuses for it, and they... I'm trying to find my Right to try voodoo!
Yeah, excellent history on allopathic medicine, on the smallpox vaccines, the Massachusetts versus It starts with an M. I'll remember it in a second.
Case that they claim to allow the Supreme Court to force vaccines on everybody.
Jacobson, excuse me, Jacobson v. Massachusetts, Decision 1905.
And then also Typhoid Mary, very interesting information about her.
So the reason that none of this stuff works and why they have to say that we have a leaky vaccine or you got a case of long COVID.
Oh yeah, it didn't work for you because long COVID got around it or we got a half dozen variants at this point and probably an endless number of variants before you get finished being jabbed to death.
Absolutely absurd.
As far as Peerbrite Institute in England, absolute Biological warfare war criminals.
Porting down in England, absolute biological warfare criminals.
If you went and opened up the label on your vaccine and you saw the ingredients, mercury, you'd go, gee I'm not supposed to eat tuna fish because I might get a couple of parts per million of mercury in my tuna fish and you're gonna inject this into my body?
Well then let's don't call it mercury, let's call it The Maracil.
Yeah, here's a nice article from PubMed 2005.
The Maracil neurotoxicity is associated with gluten thione depletion.
Well, they've known about it for 15 years.
They've known about it for 50 years.
What they want to do is they want to cause inflammation in your body because they think that stimulates an immune response and then they induce other ingredients and go, well once we got your immune system up and alarmed, Then it will go and pick out this little antibody that we've injected in you, or these little spike proteins, or whatever it is that they think is the working agent that's going to make your body react and create an immunity to it.
It's the absolute alchemy of medicine, and this is absolutely insane.
And just to carry on, one other thing, you mentioned that it has formula in it.
F-O-R-M-A-L-I-N, formalin, and that's listed in your ingredients.
You go, oh, okay, well, it's, you know, it's formalin.
Well, what is formalin?
Formalin is an aqueous solution of formaldehyde.
That's what you use when you want to preserve biological specimens like frogs and guinea pigs and whatever it is that you're dissecting, earthworms that you're dissecting in your high school biology class.
It's also what the Mortician puts in your body after he drains all of your blood out, he puts formaldehyde in there so you don't rot in the coffin while they're getting ready to bury you.
So is that something you really need to be sticking in your arms?
I don't think so.
If you can't understand how nefarious the pharmaceutical industry is and how propagandized and bribed Joe, it's just so disgusting.
and the medical establishment is in this country, then you deserve what they're doing to you
because you need to inform yourself about how evil these people truly are
and how there's no debate allowed anywhere in this country on any of these issues.
Joe, it's just so disgusting.
It's so repulsive and it's gonna have such horrifying and tragic effects for so many Americans,
including our friends, our neighbors, our loved ones.
Meanwhile, RFK Junior.
has emerged as America's number one HIV AIDS denier in the sounds of media silence.
This is from Ron Unz.
This image from video posted on Children's Health Defense on Sunday, December 12th of RFK Jr.
talking about anti-vaccine stickers he's urging supporters to use.
Robert Kennedy Jr.' 's book, Attacking Fauci and the Medical Establishment, has become a publishing sensation.
Now, after nearly a month of stunned silence, the American media is finally taking belated notice.
The AP released a 4,000-word hit piece harshly attacking the most prominent public figure in America's much-vulified anti-vaccine movement, How a Kennedy Built an Anti-Vaccine Juggernaut Amid COVID-19, by Michelle R. Smith.
A great deal of effort has obviously been invested in the attack.
The byline was shared by five additional AP writers and researchers, underscoring the journalistic resources devoting to demolishing the reputation of an individual who's obviously made powerful enemies.
Reading the article, the phrase that struck my mind was the sounds of silence, or perhaps a famous Sherlockian clue of the dog that didn't bark.
Almost half of the entire book under attack, around 200 pages, is devoted to presenting and promoting the astonishing claim that everything we've been told about HIV AIDS for more than 35 years probably amounts to a hoax, as I wrote last week.
According to the information provided by Kennedy's number one Amazon bestseller, this well-known and solidly established picture, which I never seriously questioned, is almost entirely false and fraudulent, amounting to a medical media hoax.
Instead of being responsible for AIDS, the HIV virus is probably harmless and had nothing to do with the disease.
But when individuals were found to be infected with HIV, they were subjected to the early extremely lucrative AIDS drugs, which were actually lethal and often killed them.
The earliest AIDS cases had mostly been caused by very heavy use of particularly illegal drugs, and the HIV virus had been misdiagnosed as being responsible.
But Tsiprashi and the profit-hundred drug companies built enormous empires based upon misdiagnosis.
For more than 35 years, they fought hard to maintain and protect it, suppressing the truth and the media while destroying the careers of honest researchers who challenged the fraud.
Meanwhile, AIDS in Africa was something entirely different, probably caused mostly by malnutrition or other local conditions.
I found his account as shocking as anything I've ever encountered.
By any reasonable standard, RFK Jr.
has established himself as America's number one HIV AIDS denier.
Prior to the COVID outbreak, AIDS had probably spent almost four decades as the world's highest-profile disease, reportedly absorbing some $2 trillion in research and treatment costs.
So for someone to claim the disease didn't actually exist would seem the height of lunacy on a par with flat-earthism.
Yeah, not a single word of this astonishing situation appears in the long AP article attacking Kennedy on almost all other possible grounds fair or unfair.
Did all six of the AP writers somehow skip over those 200 pages in his bestseller?
That large team of journalists seems to have spent at least 10 days working on their lengthy article, mining his record for almost anything controversial they could possibly find, even highlighting a photograph merely showing him standing next to Trump allies Roger Stone and Michael Flynn.
The large team.
Surely these reporters consulted numerous leading figures in the medical establishment on the HIV-AIDS issue, yet not a single word of an incendiary topic was included in their 4,000-word denunciation.
Although ferocious attacks against Kennedy's HIV-AIDS claim might naturally have been expected, Perhaps certain aspects of the book caused the senior editors of the AP to draw back and disguise discretion on this matter was the better part of valor, as I had explained.
The first endorsement on the back cover is Professor Luc Montagnier, a medical researcher won the Nobel for discovering the HIV virus in 1984, who wrote, Tragically for humanity, there are many, many untruths emanating from Fauci and his minions.
R. F. K. Jr.
exposes the decades of lies.
Moreover, we're told that as far back as the San Francisco International AIDS Conference in June of 1990, Montagnier had publicly declared, the HIV virus is harmless and passive, a benign virus.
Perhaps this Nobel laureate endorsed the book for other reasons.
Perhaps the meaning of his striking 1990 statement has been misconstrued, but surely The opinion of the researcher who won a Nobel Prize for discovering HIV should not be totally ignored in assessing its possible role.
I went on to note, and he was hardly alone.
Kennedy explains the following year a top Harvard microbiologist organized a group containing some of the world's most distinguished virologists and immunologists and they issued a public statement endorsed by three additional science Nobel laureates who raised the same question.
It's widely believed by the general public a retrovirus called HIV caused a group of diseases called AIDS.
Many biomedical scientists now question this hypothesis.
We propose a thorough reappraisal of the existing evidence for and against to be conducted by a suitable independent group.
We further propose that the critical epidemiological study be designed and undertaken.
As Kennedy tells a story, by that point age researchers and the mainstream were completely enthralled to the ocean of government funding and pharmaceutical advertising controlled by Fauci and his corporate allies.
So these calls by eminent scientists were virtually entirely ignored and unreported.
According to one journalist, Some $2 trillion has been spent on HIV-AIDS research and treatment over the decades, and with so many research careers and personal livelihoods dependent upon what amounts to an HIV-AIDS industrial complex, few have been willing to critically examine the basic foundations of that empire.
Until a couple of weeks ago, I'd never given any thought to questioning AIDS orthodoxy, but discovering the long-standing scientific skepticism of so many knowledgeable experts, including four Nobel laureates, one of them who actually discovered the HIV virus, has completely shifted my perspective.
I cannot easily ignore or dismiss the theories Kennedy presents, and in basic fairness to the author, he himself also repeatedly emphasizes that he can take no position on the relationship between HIV and AIDS, but is simply disturbed that Fauci has successfully used his government funding and media account to suppress an ongoing and perfectly legitimate scientific debate.
According to Kennedy, his book is intended to give air and daylight to dissenting voices.
So the total silence of the article certainly raises obvious suspicions.
As I previously wrote, RFK Jr.
is a top figure in America's much vilified anti-vax movement.
Book is becoming a major element of that cause.
His strident attacks against pharmaceutical companies Medical Orthodoxy and Fauci have earned him numerous powerful enemies.
If his AIDS claims were really as ridiculous as they might seem, Would they not have already become a lightning rod for attacks against him?
Suppose his anti-fax tome had devoted 200 pages to arguing that our world was secretly controlled by invisible 12-foot tall reptilians from another dimension.
Surely, Kennedy's enemies would have unleashed a huge storm of media ridicule.
For that lunacy, thereby discrediting his predictive vaccination campaigns.
Yet instead, complete silence has greeted his AIDS claims, raising questions in my mind of whether the medical establishment suspects that it has a great deal to hide and that many of Kennedy's accusations might be correct.
As an outside observer with no special expertise in these areas of medicine, I was impressed by much of the material Kennedy marshaled in support of his unorthodox views on vaccines and COVID, but found the evidence he produced on HIV and AIDS was vastly more comprehensive and persuasive, while being backed by more authoritative experts.
But if, as he argues, The truth about HIV and AIDS has been successfully suppressed for decades by the entire medical industry.
We must necessarily become very suspicious about other medical claims, including those relating COVID and vaccinations.
Unless the medical and media establishment swiftly and forthrightly challenge Robert F. Kennedy Jr., On the issue of HIV-AIDS, all fair-minded observers must necessarily conclude they recognize that he is substantially correct.
And if he is correct about AIDS, any shreds of remaining credibility in our public health authorities will surely be destroyed, while the long-standing theories of Berkeley Professor Peter Duesenberg will have been vindicated.
So, as some have suggested, HIV-AIDS might very well become the Achilles heel of our corrupt and incompetent medical establishment.
Well said, Joe.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, we have at least three guys that I can name right off the top of my head, and that would be RFK Jr., John Rapoport and Andy Wakefield who have all been stigmatized for over 25 years because they questioned the efficacy of a number of different vaccines including the MMR vaccines which are absolutely provable to be one of the contributing factors to the alarming autism rates.
I was invited to be a guest on Coast to Coast November last year and the subject was to be body electric, how the electromagnetism works in your body.
So I wrote a preliminary article for this so that I could describe some of the factors and some of the more details on it that when people were listening to our radio program they would have something to refer to with some graphs and diagrams.
I'll read the first sentence of this.
Some physicians are more than robotic pill pushing clinicians.
Some are medical scientists.
One such doctor was Dr. Robert O. Becker, M.D., an orthopedic surgeon at the Veterans Administration Hospital affiliated with Syracuse University.
In 1965, he was able to regrow severed spinal cords in lab rats, and he was able to regrow amputated limbs in lab rats.
When the NIH suddenly decided that they didn't want to fund that line of research.
So why are we in this rotten mess?
Because they don't want anybody to be healed.
They want you to be a lifelong patient.
And they want you to be addicted to their drug system.
And it's absolutely insane.
We absolutely do not deserve this type of behavior from what can only be described as psychopaths.
Oh Joe, you got that exactly right.
Meanwhile, We want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con.
Pro or con to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live needtoknowatgmail.com.
I want to remind the Volkswagen Conspiracies Conference 2021 held last weekend on December 11th and 12th.
You can read about it in detail on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
It will be available for the year to come with three different ticket options.
Let me highlight just two of the presentations as a sampler.
Nick Kohlerstrom on the Gunpowder Plot kicked off the conference, where he's an ex-academic and conspiracy theorist who ran the London 9-11 discussion group for 10 years.
Nick, of course, earns that accolade because he's investigating crimes that the government refuses to investigate, which typically lead back to the government itself.
So the CIA, which itself is conspiracy central, seeks to denigrate those who would expose its shenanigans by trivializing them as conspiracy theorists.
Another on Sunday, where Nick spoke on Saturday, Dina Pollard Sachs addressed the vaccine war as a legal perspective.
She's completely brilliant.
Naomi Wolf is one of her clients.
She began writing a series of books on the godfathers of sex abuse
about which she spoke last year.
Jeffrey Epstein, Harvey Weinstein, and Bill Cosby.
She is sensational.
You can get a five, 12 time access to a single video over six months for five bucks,
unlimited access to the entire conference of 24 presentations for 25,
unlimited access for a year for 40.
Remember, 1% control the world, 4% are the republics, 90% are asleep.
5% no and try to wake the 90%.
1% use a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
Meanwhile, final thoughts from you, Joe.
I got so many final thoughts.
We'll just start with a Channel 26 Fox Houston reporter, Ivory Hecker, who was fired because she kept trying to do series on how certain doctors in Houston were using IV mecan and that was not allowed by the Fox News Channel, even though the guy had like at that point I think 1,200 patients that he treated and had no deaths.
And so she got fired for that, so she went out on her own.
Well, she just released something yesterday on Michael Mann saying that human CO2 is what caused all the tornadoes in Kentucky, folks.
Yeah, well, I've been following this global warming fraud for over a decade, probably about 12 years now, and written 200 articles on it, but I continue to do ongoing research because it's a moving target.
Every time you dig up a Another rock you find another bunch of can of maggots because you can't even call them worms.
So one of the things that they keep pushing us on is this electric vehicle things.
Okay, the average Tesla has 22 pounds of lithium in it.
Well, how do you get lithium?
Well, you have to dig up tons and tons of material, grind it up, put it in a slurry, put it out in ponds, and let it dry out.
And it takes 5,500 gallons of water to produce each ton of, excuse me, 500,000 gallons of water to produce each ton of lithium.
Well, a ton of lithium can produce 90 Teslas, which means each Tesla takes 5,500 gallons of water to produce the battery for that Tesla.
Then I went on to a Norwegian website, which I haven't finished vetting, so I don't have the link number on that, but I'm going to go into it.
It costs more to recycle than it does to dig raw materials and dig it directly out of the earth.
So there's an added cost for the quote green energy on that end of it and absolutely there's no way that you have a problem with Carbon dioxide warming the earth.
The problem with batteries is that you're limited to about a 400 recharge cycle with them.
They have a thing called dendrites, d-e-n-d-r-i-t-e-s, which are like stalactites that form between your cathode and anode because of the mild number of impurities that you cannot afford to refine out of them.
And so those little things end up causing the battery to short out.
And that's what gives you those enormous three-day-long burning Tesla fires and, you know, explosions and everything else that's associated with this supposedly safe green technology.
The whole thing is absolutely insane.
No gas molecule can capture, store, redirect, or amplify radiant energy photons moving at the speed of light.
And it doesn't matter whether those photons are coming from the sun during the day Or if they're being radiated by the Earth at night, no gas in the air is changing the temperature and none of them are having anything to do with the atmosphere.
Amazing Poly did a good run today, and I'll put a link in the show notes on that
about how they absolutely can direct these things using HAARP and geoengineering
and seed in the skies with nanoparticles that are reactive to radioactive waves.
So if you wanna know what's causing major tornado destruction,
you might wanna look at our rotten US government instead of looking at the exhaust pipe of your SUV.
Oh, I think you're 100% correct, yo.
I was immediately suspicious this was an unprecedented, catastrophic effect involving a tornado that we haven't seen ever, ever in history.
Had to be geoengineered, in my opinion, and you're confirming that.
I can't thank Joe Olson from Houston enough for the breadth and depth of his scientific and historical knowledge and perceptive and his capacity to articulate key issues in a precise, well-defined fashion.
I'm very disturbed that there's an assistant professor on the School of Law at the University of Wisconsin who is issuing Unqualified propaganda.
It is so remote from the facts about the case of Kyle Rittenhouse he purports to address, and displays such ignorance about the laws of self-defense that I'm forced to the conclusion that he's either utterly incompetent or wholly corrupt.
The university is in a better position to draw that conclusion, but in neither case ought he to be on the faculty of the Law School of the University of Wisconsin, where he's abused his position to the detriment not only of the university itself, but to the taxpayers who fund it, and the residents of the state, and indeed the nation at large, because op-eds in the Wisconsin State Journal receive a lot of publicity in this case, hopelessly totally unwarranted, He is a disgrace.
Meanwhile, spend all your time with you can with your friends and loved ones, especially your family members, because as I am endlessly repeating, we just don't know how much time we have left.
Back tomorrow with more.
▲
Export Selection