All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 17, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
01:02:08
Need to Know News (16 December 2021) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
This is Jim Fetzer of Madison, Wisconsin, joined today by Joel Olson-Houston, where Just Say No continues to say no.
We wish her well.
We look forward to her rejoining us when the occasion is right.
We begin with Liz Cheney releasing stunning text messages about the January 6th riot, but which appear to have backfired.
The texts have been alternatively referred to by The Hill as stunning, The Daily Beast as a bombshell, Twitter as damning.
But what they are is stunning a bombshell and damning of this 6th January investigation, not of those they purport to be investigating.
The panel where Liz Cheney is the token Republican who's lost all credibility as a Republican, by the way,
has released these, which paint a different picture.
One of Fox News personalities, Hannity, Laura, and others, Trump's own son and his chief of staff
being caught off guard by events that day and advising Trump to try to stop it.
Not exactly what you'd expect if this was their orchestrated effort
as the committee is seeking to establish.
The bombshell revealed Trump Jr., along with Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham, begged Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to have Trump make a national address and halt the Capitol riot, as though he were capable of doing that.
Cheney read the text message aloud.
The panel voted to recommend a full House vote on whether to hold Meadows in contempt.
He initially cooperated, but then reversed himself because Trump was asserting executive privilege.
And obviously, for executive privilege to be meaningful, it has to apply after a president is in office, as well as during his tenure.
Indeed, Meadows is now suing the House Committee investigating January 6th and House Speaker Pelosi.
I believe this will not come to a good end for them.
The text messages show Meadows, Trump Jr., caught off guard, which defeats the entire theory to wit that it was pre-planned.
He's got to condemn this shit ASAP, said Trump Jr.
Meadows.
I'm pushing it hard.
I agree.
We need an Oval Office address.
He has to lead now.
It's gone too far and gotten out of hand.
Trump, in fact, did deliver a statement, though criticized for creating an air of sympathy for the protesters and for taking a long time to tell them to go home, which he did, requesting they do so peacefully.
Laura Ingraham texts, Mark, President needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home.
This is hurting all of us.
He's destroying his legacy.
Brian killed me.
Please get him on TV.
Destroying everything you have accomplished.
Liz Cheney, however, doesn't seem to understand what she's actually done.
Did it backfire?
The text messages read also show Fox News anchor Sean Hannity urging Trump to issue a statement.
The Capitol Police tweet is not enough, Trump Jr.
would say to Meadows.
Trump seemed to concur, tweeting, I'm asking for everyone at the U.S.
Capitol to remain peaceful.
Roughly an hour later, releasing a video urging people to go home.
Ironically, for those who claim Trump didn't do enough, he was suspended from Twitter after his video imploring people to go home appeared.
A few days later, permanently banned merely for stating he would not attend Biden's inauguration, which turns out to have been pre-recorded.
I don't believe anyone was there at the time specified.
Meanwhile, Rusty Weiss—aha!
Representative Liz Cheney released email showing nobody was coordinating anything.
I think that's exactly right.
Molly Hemingway.
We claim there was a conspiracy to take over the government, but our evidence shows the opposite.
Mega people urged POTUS to make a statement, and then he did.
Jail them all.
Dems impeachment hoax number three being run by a deranged Liz Cheney who makes Adam Schiff seem competent.
Everything Liz Cheney and the panel have asserted about the conspiracy theory regarding the Capitol riot has gone up in smoke with those text messages.
I think that's right, Joe.
I think Liz Cheney is out of control and doesn't know what she's doing, as this case so well illustrates.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, there's already evidence that Adam Schiff altered the text messages that he released to the public, and the stuff that she put out has been taken out of context and also edited, so you have a little bit of a problem there.
I did a dive on her background.
She got a BA from Colorado College.
Which I don't think is the biggest school in Colorado, but anyhow.
And the BA was unidentified, but from her senior thesis, it looks like it was probably political science.
And she got a law degree from University of Chicago in 1996.
She did a little bit of work, and then next thing you know, daddy got a job in the White House.
So she got a nepotism job as part of the Baby Bush and Senator Shaney And then also, currently, there's an effort by the Republican Party to remove her and Kinzinger from the GOP, force them to be independents, that they will no longer be able to claim that they're Republicans since they never voted that way anyhow.
So, you know, she's getting a little bit of blowback, but you got to realize where these people are coming from.
Her daddy was absolutely one of the ringleaders on 9-1-1, so She's got a family history to kind of, you know, blow smoke and wave mirrors and make people not really realize what's really going on.
Sad that this is what we've got in the way of a country, but that's what we're dealing with at present.
Michael Rupert's book Crossing the Rubicon, based on publicly available sources, established a damning case that Dick Cheney was the executive director on 9-11 from a bunker beneath the White House, which I believe is supported by the evidence.
A very bad guy.
Liz Cheney is despicable.
It's outrageous that she should be given such a prominent role.
Getting her out of the party is a good move.
Given the competition when the Democrats look for someone to run in 2024, could it be Hillary?
Whoa!
An NPR PBS poll shows Democrats want Biden replaced in 2024.
44% want someone else.
36% Biden.
20% unsure.
That's from a Marist poll.
There may be a rematch coming in the 2024 race, but we're not talking God help us Biden-Trump 2.
Instead, the 2016 nominee Hillary Clinton is an interesting prospect looking for a viable candidate when an 80-something Biden decides not to seek a second term.
Why would he?
Only 22%.
Want him to go for it.
It doesn't get much better when polling only Democrats, only 36%.
A juggernaut candidate named someone else comes in ahead of him with 44%.
The Democrat bench is about as deep as the New York Jets these days.
Vice President Harris, she's at 28%.
Former Governor Andrew Cuomo, no longer governor, thoroughly disgraced.
Gavin Newsom, he had to spend major time and resources just to avoid being ousted in a Blue Deep California recall election.
Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, not even 40 years old.
She has a supply chain crisis on his resume.
Bernie Sanders?
Elizabeth Warren?
Cory Booker?
If those are the options, why not Hillary?
She's only 74, like being bathed in the Fountain of Youth compared to Biden.
She's still stunned, five years later, that she lost to Donald Trump.
In fact, she sounds no different than Trump and constantly complaining about all the reasons she lost and that, well, the election was stolen by Trump and the Russians anyway.
Notice, the Democrats are insisting you can't complain about a stolen election, but that's all Hillary has done for the last five years.
So, that type of rhetoric is a no-no for Trump, but a-okay for Hillary or Stacey Abrams if they do it.
After all, rules are rules.
One more possible sign she's dipping her toe in the pool, her bizarre decision to read her 2016 victory speech for something called Master Class, one of the most cringeworthy events you'll ever witness.
Here we have a former First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State, Democratic presidential nominee reading a speech for an election she lost.
Of course, if the New York Times had given me an 85% chance of winning and I nevertheless lost to a guy who'd never run for public office before, I'd have trouble absorbing it, too.
Eventually, one would think Hillary, more than five years later, would show some class, some humility, some maturity.
Not talk about it so often anymore.
Instead, Here she is, a losing candidate, reading a five-year-old victory speech.
And in case you're asking if any losing presidential candidate has done anything like this before, the answer is no.
Since the election, Hillary has blamed her loss on misogyny, sexism, voter ID laws, Bernie Sanders, former FBI Director James Comey, and Matt Lauer, along with dozens of other factors.
She hasn't blamed neglecting to campaign in Wisconsin or deciding I'm with her, was a grabby campaign slogan.
It's a five-year public therapy session in broad daylight, and in a sane world, she would have been laughed out of the room for reading such a speech, but this felt more like a trial balloon in an effort to see if there's an appetite, still an appetite, for the Clinton brand.
And just think of the host of characters that we will have back on the public stage, James Comey, Loretta Litt, Sally, Yates, Andrew McCabe, and the others involved in the Russiagate scandal, all front and center.
Kamala was supposed to be Biden's plan B, the first female president in our nation's history, but it's not working out for the VP, who's already seen staff members jump ship at an alarming rate, presumably because of her poor polling, but also her autocratic manner of Conducting her own office, where she doesn't show up for the most important events, such as at the border.
Hillary always seemed to believe the mantle of first female president was her birthright.
Given how pathetic the field is on the Democrat side, with or without Biden, she may just get a second chance at winning the office her husband so famously made infamous.
I think that's pretty nice, Joe, and if that's the best that Democrats have, I mean, it further confirms a pathetic state of the party which is crumbling every day more and more before our very eyes.
Yours.
Yeah, it couldn't happen to a more deserving band of crooks.
In 2008, Rep.
Hillary won Texas.
But Texas has a funny thing where you vote in the primary, but then you meet after the polls close, and you pick delegates to go to the state convention.
Well, the Democratic polls in Texas were overwhelmed by Black activists who hijacked the vote in Texas, which Hillary won.
And they went to the state convention and they gave the Texas primary nomination to Obama.
And so she knew that that happened in multiple states.
So she had the 2008 election stolen from her by the first If you want to call him black president, I have questions about that.
But anyhow, then in 2016, she used the same Democratic machinery to steal the primary election from Barry Sanders, who had a lot more momentum and a lot more votes than she did.
And then, oh, Brandon turned around and used the same thing in 2020 to steal the primary again
from Bernie Sanders.
And then he turned around and stole the general election from Trump.
So it's undeniable that we have that problem going for us.
But that looks like it's in the process of being resolved and might not repeat in 2022 and probably
can be corrected by 2024.
Now, in addition to that, the Democrats are working against the exorbitant inflation, which
when you just print money for nothing, then absolutely the amount of goods are not increased.
And so you have more money competing for the same goods.
It's, you know, what part of Zaire or Weimar Republic can you not understand?
You have the border issue which is decimating the minority communities with an enormous influx.
You have the supply chain issues which are affecting absolutely everybody.
High gas prices.
You have crime and the crime has gotten so bad that yesterday on Fox News They interviewed the mayor, and her name is, get this, London Breed in San Francisco, and she said, all this bullshit has to stop.
They've destroyed our city, including thefts of high-end stores, Leviathan, rampant vehicle break-ins, potent drug fentanyl being captured on the street, and then they list what they're going to do to stop this.
It's like preventing carjacking.
Keep your windows and doors locked.
Equip your vehicle with an anti-theft device or GPS tracking.
Know your surroundings.
Avoid getting boxed in.
Keep your cell phone in your pocket like the police are ever going to be able to respond.
They're fixing to lose 30% of their police force just because of their mandatory jab policies.
So, you know, the Democrats have screwed up every jurisdiction they're involved in, and the repugnance of the general populace to that particular political philosophy has Gone exponential.
I don't see them being able to anything less than a double-digit loss in the midterms and then certainly in 2024.
So they don't even have the right to look over there.
The estimates of how many seats in the House the Republicans may take has increased to 115, Joe.
We've had 10 Democrats in seats where they were expected to lose now retire early so they not suffer the embarrassment.
But I'm telling you, it's going to be historic.
And notice she's not talking about hiring more police.
I mean, what you do to combat crime is hire more police.
But she couldn't do that because it would be so embarrassing to admit that the Democrats have promoted such a stupid public policy, the consequences of which we're all having to endure.
I think the party is done.
It's done a self-immolation job.
It has totally destroyed its credibility.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, I can't wait for them to just go ahead and impeach Biden for the number of things that he's done wrong.
And that's what could happen in 2022.
And they'll have a veto approved, complete Congress if they can take about eight or 10 seats out of the Senate, too, which looks like a potential.
So all I can say is it's got to get better because it can't keep getting worse.
Yeah, nice point.
Meanwhile, The Vortex with Michael did a wonderful thing on election theft backfire.
This is showing how many states are taking measures to ensure the integrity of the ballot in the future.
This was sent to me by my dear friend John Remington Grant, who's a retired professor of law.
He wrote, This report, though partial to the election theft narrative, is the most accurate portrait I've seen or read of the actual situation at the moment in the United States, despite frantic efforts by the New York Times and associated media to cover up and slant the news.
I urge you to hear this report so you'll be tipped off about what's now happening.
A long time ago, I felt this impression, which is now emerging rapidly in the United States and probably already represents a majority sentiment across the country.
A revolution is brewing on a large scale.
I think it will be a peaceful revolution like the restoration of Charles II, but it could easily get out of hand.
It was bad enough when on election night in several key states voting stopped before midnight when Trump was way ahead, then started again after midnight and the election swayed toward Biden, which can happen, but is extremely unlikely across several states.
And when, on December 10, 2020, the United States Supreme Court refused to hear the suit by Texas against Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, and Wisconsin, alleging failure by those states to abide to their own election integrity laws as constitutionally required, I had the feeling the jig was up.
To me, the current scenario smells like the Hartford Convention of 1814-1815, which caused President Madison to issue a proclamation, called for fasting, prayer, and repentance, and brought the War of 1812 to an end.
Meanwhile, the National Center for Public Policy Research reports Vice President Harris was on hand in the Senate to pass a tie-breaking vote that made a Soros County-backed prosecutor the lead federal lawyer in Massachusetts.
Mr. President is remarkable, said Project 21 co-chair Horace Cooper.
He picks Kamala Harris incompetent.
He picks this person unfit, unsuited for this position.
What's going on?
By 51 to 50, the first roll call vote for a U.S.
attorney confirmation in decades.
Suffolk County, Massachusetts, prosecutor Rachel Rollins was elevated to the position of U.S.
attorney for Massachusetts.
She was heralded in 2019 as the first black woman elected to the county prosecutor position.
Look how rapidly she's been elevated.
We absolutely have a person who wants to say she's the first.
She's a first, all right.
Unhinged.
Having to be brokered.
Having the vice president cast a tie-breaking vote.
And we should be paying attention about this particular confirmation, because it's pretty serious.
Roland's 2019 campaign was backed by radical political financier George Soros.
Surprise, surprise.
After she was elected, she classified 15 crimes in which frontline prosecutors needed approval from their supervisors to pursue, including shoplifting, disorderly conduct, destruction of property, and drug possession, including with intent to distribute.
In other words, Weaking on the enforcement of law to create and invite shoplifting, disorderly conduct, destruction of property, and drug dealing.
Carson remarked that elevating Rollins created an environment in which nobody believes in the justice system anymore.
To that, Horace replied, I think it's definitely worth worrying about.
I don't think it's an accident.
Black women make up about 7% of the population.
How is it we managed to pick one of the most unhinged persons we could for this particular position?
Pointing out how the policies advocated by progressive prosecutors like Rollins cut against the way the American system of justice was designed, he explained, It's the victims that these positions are supposed to be the supporters of.
It's not the attackers.
It's the victims.
If she's worried about the cost of housing these people, why doesn't she put stronger, stricter, more severe punishments?
Our framers understood you're supposed to hold criminal behavior accountable.
Her vision is the exact opposite.
What it's going to do is open it up so people start taking justice for themselves.
That isn't civilization.
That's not progress.
That's headed in the exact opposite direction.
Tucker remarked, I think that's such a wise, insightful thing to say.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, when the local Fox station met her in the parking lot in front of her townhouse, the woman just absolutely unloaded on the female reporter who just happened to be the wrong race, but actually was asking the wrong question.
And so Miss Rollins just berated her completely and I think the most important question to ask at that point is, do you feel comfortable being an assistant attorney general if it took the vice president to come in and tie break a Senate vote?
You don't seem to be that, you know, universally popular.
But she was never even allowed to ask the question.
And the woman kept repeatedly saying, I know who you are.
I know where you work.
I can hurt you.
I can.
I mean, it was just like, Jesus Christ, you want to see what you got for an attorney general in the Boston District?
Watch that about three or four minute clip of her berating this news woman in the parking lot who was just trying to get a comment on her being appointed, you know, the first black radical attorney general assistant in Boston.
Who knows?
You can't imagine how unhinged these people are when you actually catch them on video and you ask them a serious question.
Unbelievable.
Joe, I think you're exactly right, and that of course is part of Soros' plan.
He has asserted many times that before he dies he wants to destroy America, and he seems to be doing a pretty good job of it.
F him!
Trump rips former ally Bibi Netanyahu for disloyalty.
Former President Trump tore into his ousted Israeli counterpart, Benjamin Netanyahu, in a series of interviews, viewing an expletive accusing the former minister of betraying him.
Journalist Barak Ravid conducted several interviews with Trump for his book Trump's Peace, the Abraham Accords, and the Reshaping of the Middle East, during which the 45th president had very strong words for his former ally.
I like Bibi.
I still like Bibi, but I also like loyalty.
The first person to congratulate Biden was Bibi.
Not only did he congratulate him, he did it on tape, noting Bibi was earlier than other world leaders to congratulate Biden's 2020 presidential election while it was still being contested.
I think Bibi could do it on tape in advance because he participated in rigging the election against Trump.
He was very early, like earlier than most.
I haven't spoken to him since.
F him.
Trump complained not only did Bibi congratulate Biden before the ink was dry, but claimed on tape to have a great friendship with Biden, which Trump disputes.
They didn't have a friendship.
If they did, the Obama administration wouldn't have done the Iran deal.
Comparing Netanyahu's congratulatory speech to a person begging for love.
That hurt him badly with the people of Israel.
As you know, I'm very popular there.
I think it hurt him very badly.
Netanyahu was ousted as PM just a few months after Trump's defeat to Biden and replaced by Naftali Bennett.
Bibi now serves as Israel's leader of the opposition.
As president, Trump gave many victories to Israel and Netanyahu, including moving the U.S.
embassy to disputed Jerusalem, pulling the U.S.
out of the Iran deal, and formally recognizing Syria's Golan Heights as part of Israel.
Meanwhile, Israel is pushing the U.S.
into an aggressive posture toward Iran that could spiral into war, but the mainstream is indifferent.
Trump says Netanyahu is willing to fight Iran to the last American soldier.
I think that gets it exactly right.
Exactly right.
You've heard the news that talks to revive the Iran deal are on life support in Vienna.
The U.S.
claims Iran has moved the goalposts, but it's pretty obvious the United States has done that.
The Israelis get unrivaled access to the White House, even as they declare again they're drawing up plans to attack Iran.
It would be good, however, if the U.S.
went first with strategic strikes.
The U.S.
has reportedly restrained Israel on attacking Iran for the umpteenth time.
Frankly, I believe if Israel attacks Iran, Iran will obliterate Israel.
It's an old story.
Trump now confesses he was used by Israel when he ordered the killing of an Iranian general in 2020, a blatant war crime.
This was outrageous, the worst thing Trump did in his entire tenure in office.
Trump reported that Bibi was willing to fight Iran to the last American soldier.
That ought to be big news, but though our press acknowledges Israel is the only country that really objects to the Iran deal, as was the case in 2015 when Obama made it, what is not openly discussed, except in the left-wing press, is that Israel is trying to pressure Washington into an aggressive posture toward Iran that could spiral into war.
A country with dozens, actually hundreds, of nuclear weapons once Iran sequestered from the world, all of Gaza, and has a year of the Biden administration, as does no one else.
The Defense Minister trying to shut down Palestinian human rights is under investigation from the International Criminal Court, but gets a meeting with our Defense Secretary and Secretary of State without a mention of his tyrannical actions.
Here's a roundup of some of the left-wing coverage.
Branko Marcetek writes at Jacobin about Israel's attempt to manipulate U.S.
policy.
The article is headlined, Israel is trying to push war with Iran, and the U.S.
press barely cares.
Look it up when you find next to no coverage in the U.S.
media about top Israeli officials visiting Washington this week to push for military strikes against Iran, raising the risk of sparking war, yet that's exactly what's happened.
Israeli lobbyists persuaded Trump to break the deal in 2018.
If Russia were meddling in our foreign policy like this, it would be an outrage.
Martek hopefully notes that Israel is known to have at least dozens of nukes and has long rejected any regional anti-nuclear agreement.
Media Benjamin and Ariel Gold make similar points.
Israel is hell-bent on sabotaging U.S.
nuclear negotiations with Iran.
Israel is doing everything it can to stoke a war.
Trader Parsi writes a responsible statecraft just allowing Israel in the room, gives a seat at the table to a country working against U.S.
interests.
Biden's efforts to appease Bennett on Iran have failed on all fronts.
Yes.
Why don't we listen to them?
Why can't we just tell them to go away?
Why do even progressive Congress people go on trips to meet Israeli officials sponsored by the Israeli lobby?
Because the lobby is a major force inside the Democratic Party, and Biden is afraid to take it on as Obama did.
Parsi focuses on a Times report Showing Biden's been seeking to appease Israel from the start of his outreach to Iran.
Biden is merely continuing Trump's policies, Parsi writes, concludes by calling on the U.S.
to pursue American interests, not Israel's.
The moral of the story is this.
U.S.
and Israeli interests on Iran diplomacy are irreconcilable.
Biden's efforts to square the circle have predictably failed.
Biden must choose whether he will pursue America's interests or Israel's.
This should not be a difficult choice.
The Times report offers helpful coverage of the facts, showing Biden bending over backward for Israel.
The president has adopted a tougher line aimed at calming increasingly frustrated Israeli officials.
Reporters Julian Barn, David Sanger, Rowan Bergman say the U.S.
has been trying to present a united front with Israel via Iran by threatening war.
The U.S.
has resisted Israel's efforts to sabotage Iranian nuclear facilities, saying we can do better through peaceful means.
But that's not good enough.
And now the Times is reporting a renewed Israeli effort to coerce American terms on the Iran deal.
By threatening repeated bombing of Iran, a tried-and-true Israeli tactic again.
Why is Israel able to give the U.S.
ultimatums face-to-face?
Why is a small crazed country armed with nukes able to push hawkish policies in the U.S.?
Because of domestic politics.
But the democratic, progressive Jewish soul-searching never begins.
And here you see just a simulation of how Israel could launch attacks against Iran.
But frankly, Joe, I believe they're grossly underestimating Iran's ability to retaliate with devastating results and truly wipe Israel off the map.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, Donald Trump surrounded himself with a cabinet full of dual citizenship, Goldman Sachs, CFR puppets.
Then he stocked his White House with two foreign agents, which would be Prince and Princess Cushy.
Who absolutely misled him repeatedly.
I had an enormous letdown in April of 2017 when Princess Cushy went into Daddy's office and said, Daddy, look!
They've killed some babies in Syria with poison gas!
We need to nuke the shit out of them!
Well, he sent 100 Patriot missiles in there, and they ended up getting knocked down partially.
But then Russia said, you know, we're going to stop this cycle of violence over here.
So they installed some S-300 anti-missile.
Uh, batteries, uh, in the next year, and the next year, White Helmets pulled the same trick.
Did a fake gas attack in, in Syria.
Said, oh, we need to bomb these different targets, and so we, again, we sent a hundred missiles in there, and they ended up having cruise missiles, and they ended up having over 70 of them knocked down by the Russian air defense system.
So then, they had the Sul-Manali, uh, Sul-Manani, Assassination in Iraq, Soleimani assassination.
Soleimani actually, a great federal humanitarian diplomat.
He was the best the Middle East has to offer, and this was an outrageous assassination by Trump in violation of international law.
Invited to a peace conference and then assassinated on his way from the airport to the peace conference at the direction of Israel.
So, you know, you can't really count on little allies like that to help you out too much.
And then there's additional evidence, Veterans Today has a lot on it, that Israel in fact has over 400 nuclear weapons.
Jimmy Carter, when he was president, accidentally disclosed that they had 135.
And they haven't stopped.
Getting nuclear material out of Ukraine and Russia and every other place they can get it, stealing it from the United States, and they haven't stopped miniaturizing it.
And you want to know what happened on 9-1-1?
There were Israeli-produced weapons that were placed in the buildings that caused those demolitions.
Go-to veterans today look breathtaking solving nuclear 9-1-1.
But then, like getting back to the original problem they've got, there's a large presence of Hezbollah just directly north of Israel in Lebanon, and it's estimated that they have 30,000 missiles.
So the day that Israel decides they want to light something off, I think they're going to have something in their backyard that's going to be more than Overwhelming for them.
And to be perfectly honest, anybody that's reviewed the history of this group of people, and it's not all Jews, but the fact that the Jews are not the most vocal against the behavior of their leadership tells you something that either they're part of it, or they think, well, we're part of it
and we'll be the ones that survive, wrong.
Look at how bad they're decimating their own population with the vaccines that they got from Pfizer,
which they were told were gonna be saline solutions and would only be effective against genetic strains
that were non-Casarian Jews, but it turns out they're having a real big problem
that Pfizer apparently delivered some active doses to them.
And so, it's gonna be a day of awakening for everybody on the planet,
but these people need to awaken and realize that that government is an evil government
that probably has no right to exist, but certainly has no right to the behavior
that they've practiced for the last 70 years against the rest of the world.
Joe, I couldn't agree more.
I think you got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, get this.
Honest Reporting Canada.
This is an Israeli news site.
Get this.
Radio Canada removes the false claim that Tel Aviv is Israel's capital.
But Tel Aviv is Israel's capital.
It's always been Israel's capital.
According to this source, Jerusalem is the eternal and undivided capital of Israel, not Tel Aviv.
After Honest Reporting Canada notified Radio Canada of its error, corrective action was taken to remove the reference and set an important precedent.
Joe, this is just absurd.
Pure propaganda.
Meanwhile, Fauci calls for Biden to clearly supersede individual choices with a vaccine mandate.
Fauci, I'd prefer we would all prefer people would voluntarily be vaccinated, but if they're not going to do that, sometimes you got to do things that are unpopular, but that clearly supersede individual choices.
We're talking about mandating a vaccination for a problem that has a 99% survival rate unvaccinated.
Foushee.
Quite frankly, you have to mandate vaccination when they're in the middle of what we call a historical experience of the worst pandemic of a respiratory disease in the last 100 years.
Completely false.
Total bullshit.
But notice, we have to put communal responsibility ahead of individual preference.
That means full freedom, get rid of liberty.
That's what he's talking about.
He's imposing tyranny.
I was sent by a follower the following, a circuit court decision in Missouri.
This case is about whether Missouri's Department of Health and Senior Citizens Regulation can abolish representative government in the creation of public health laws and whether it can authorize closure of a school or assembly based on the unfettered opinion of an unelected official.
This court finds it cannot.
And that unelected official would be Tony the Rat Fauci.
Joe, it's getting worse and worse.
It's very clear Fauci is the rat behind the scene, that he's playing the same game with the public over COVID that he did with HIV and AIDS.
It's just disgusting.
Where Bobby's book is doing a great job of exposing it.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, he also pulled the same stunt with a vaccine for RSV, which is Respiratory Syncytial Virus among children.
And he came up with a vaccine for that that was cost 80% hospitalization.
And the funny thing is, they like to put things in your vaccines that will irritate your immune system.
So that's why they've got Trimerosal, the Mercury additive and then they've got aluminum and then they also like to stick in formaldehyde but when people see formaldehyde on the ingredient list label they go wait a minute that's what we used to embalm lab specimens for in high school biology classes and that's what they put in your body at the undertaker's office after they drain all your blood out to keep you from rotting before they have the final service so maybe
Formaldehyde is not something I want to have in my body.
So what did these clowns do?
They said, well, if you dilute formaldehyde with a little bit of deionized water, you can call it formalin.
F-O-R-M-A-L-I-N.
It's an aqueous solution of formaldehyde.
So, you know, bottom line is you can continue to put garbage into your vaccines and tell people it's good for them just by having a change of name, just by, you know, diluting with a little bit of water.
How horrible of a medical system do you have to have before you finally recognize that this system is absolutely horrible?
God is for all the marbles, Joe.
They're all in.
They expect to never be punished for any of it or held liable, even though that depends on several legally questionable moves.
Meanwhile, further files about JFK have been released.
I'm puzzled at the timing.
I think it's because Biden's polls are so pathetic.
They're trying to appeal to different interest groups.
Historians and conspiracy theorists welcome the move to release papers even though it leaves more than 10,000 files either partially reacted or withheld entirely.
Why, we must ask, should any be withheld?
Atrocious!
Almost 1,500 previously classified documents have been released.
Historians welcome the move.
The newly released papers include documents about killer Lee Harvey Oswald's contact with a KGB agent two months before the shooting.
Now there you got the clue as to why they released these.
Biden needs a war in order to gain what he believes will be the support of the American people, which historically has occurred for presidents when wars occur.
But He's trying to plant seeds here that we should—Russia was responsible for the assassination when they had nothing to do with it.
It was a case of all the way with LBJ.
They also include memos detailing anonymous phone calls to the U.S.
Embassy in Canberra a year before the shooting, where a caller said the Soviet government was plotting to kill President Kennedy.
There's another tell.
Here's a third.
Another call was placed November 24th, claiming the Russians were behind it.
Meanwhile, another story about it.
In what's sure to be a developing, Fox News reported that the National Archives released about 1,500 more documents.
Federal authorities charged Lee Oswald with assassinating JFK in Dallas, where he was subsequently shot and killed by Jack Ruby.
The document drop wasn't announced in advance, but highly anticipated.
Concerned citizens, conspiracy theorists, historians, and government leaders have requested the release of all files.
It was supposed to be done long since by the Assassination Records Review Board.
Mounting cries for transparency and full disclosure, in 1992, Congress approved the Presidential Assassination Records Collection Act, authorizing a review board to release records in a timely manner.
There's been a trickle since.
To date, about 5 million pages have been made available.
However, historians complain they still have not disclosed thousands of documents.
Government leaders claim national security concerns.
Let me emphasize, if the Warren Commission report of a lone demented government firing three lucky shots were true, there would be no national security concerns.
The curious note is that JFK Act authorized release of all records, each and every one, by 2017.
C.I.
and defense officials, F.B.I.
officials argue that documents that disclose or compromise military defense intelligence operations such as taking out the president, law enforcement, or conduct of foreign relations can be withheld.
In August, Greg Jarrett said, the government is to blame for growing skepticism about the assassination.
Most Americans do not believe the beloved 35th president was shot and killed by a lone gunman.
Both Biden and Trump have encouraged the release of documents.
A press release from the National Archives in April of 2018 stated, in accordance with President Trump's direction on October 26, 2017, the National Archives today posted 19,045 documents subject to the Records Collection Act.
Leased documents were available here.
You see, Jackie and Bobby attending the casket, which we believe did not actually even contain the body of John F. Kennedy, but a body double.
In 2018, Trump ordered all agencies to re-review and get him out by October 26 of 2021.
But that date passed without the release of any new documents.
Biden issued an order in October requiring the release by December 15.
It'll take some time for historians to review 1,500 documents just released.
Many believe they focus on the CIA's investigation into Oli Oswald's covert work in Mexico.
Let me say, Larry Revere has done brilliant work.
Lee Oswald did not go to Mexico.
It was a fabricated event by the CIA, where among the agency's assets in Mexico were three presidents of Mexico.
Joe, they're continuing to play this game, but of course that's because it all leads back to the government.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, LBJ had a whole lot of problems at that particular time.
Absolutely, the CIA fabricated the Cuban and Russian embassy meetings in Mexico City.
Absolutely, there were four entrance wounds on JFK's body, immediately disproving the three shots from the sixth floor book depository hypothesis.
Jim and I got to meet for the first time in 2018 at the three-day-long JFK conference in Dallas.
And there was about 12 hours of presentation all three days.
It was absolutely stunning amount of information, and it's irrefutable.
There was eight different sniper positions, and there was, what, 10 shots fired?
Something on that order.
Oh, maybe 12.
Maybe 12.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Four hits.
Two from in front, two from behind, and possibly yet another from the side.
Yeah, one hit the windshield of the limo, the windshield post on the top.
Yeah, one of them hit the curb and splattered off of Elm Street.
So that hypothesis is absolutely absurd.
But they had to keep that alive because they had to have the Russian boogeyman to make LBJ the savior in the 64 election where he was running against Goldwater, whose most famous quote is, extremism in defense of liberty is no vice.
And so they managed to smear him as some kind of war hawk that was going to start war with Russia, even though Russia is the one that they were trying to blame and Cuba for shooting JFK.
So, you know, the whole thing is just an absolute mix of insanity.
And you wonder how anybody believed any of this stuff at the time and certainly how anybody could believe it 70 years, 60 years later.
It's like completely absurd, you know.
But certainly this this document release they've had what 55 years now to redact anything that was slightly damaging to the government position.
So whatever he's releasing now is just eyewash to say that You know, he's trying to do the good thing for the history, even though they're also willing to seal the records for 70 years on the initial trial results from the Pfizer jabs, the experimental test results.
So, you know, what kind of government do we have?
The compassionate one they keep telling us about?
We have a RICO, we have a crime organization running the government pretending to be democratically elected, Joe.
And let me just say, having done a massive amount of collaborative research on JFK, you can find my distillation of the research I began in 1992 at my bit shoot channel, Jim Fetzer.
Scroll down to 18 November 2021 for the JFK special.
I wanted to release it in advance of Oliver Stone's new film, JFK Revisited.
If you compare the products, you'll find you learn more in the first 10 or 15 minutes of my film than you do from the whole two hours of Oliver Stone's.
I'll leave it at that for now.
But we're doing a meticulous dissection of This new film from Oliver Stone on the new JFK show with Gary King and Larry Rivera.
Meanwhile, It doesn't seem like the Russians are scared of Joe Biden.
He's elderly, seen a lot of history.
Based on his current judgment, doesn't seem to have internalized any of it.
He has no understanding of history.
Clearly, in dealing with Putin, he hasn't done anything right.
He discussed what he told Putin during a phone call about not invading Ukraine.
By losing part of Czechoslovakia to the Nazis, Helvald Chamberlain felt he'd won peace for our time.
But it was a colossal misinterpretation of Hitler's motives and goals.
Biden said he informed Putin if the country attacked Ukraine, the U.S.
would raise its military presence in NATO nations and support Ukraine with defensive assistance.
He said he believed Putin received the message, but implied they're looking for accommodation for a Russian invasion of Ukraine.
Putin understands he no longer has anything to fear from the United States, Biden's words demonstrate how out of his depth he is in this situation, even stating he would send defense help, which might be understood as non-lethal assistance, could encourage Russia.
What more do they need to say than to withdraw their soldiers and cease threatening their neighbor?
Biden may be planning Chamberlain-style appeasement, oblivious it will strengthen Putin, U.S.
will encourage Ukraine to legally grant eastern Ukrainian territories presently controlled by Russian-backed rebels some autonomy.
In 2015, a dark peace pact established a vague special status for the territories.
But it's unclear that his tough statements are going to have any effect.
If you listen to the Russian military, it doesn't appear Biden shocked or scared them the least.
When will they start wondering if the Russians have anything on Biden?
He's gone over himself or Putin at every point.
So when do they start asking whether the Russians have something on him?
In the Donbass area, moreover, Russia has been attempting to provoke Ukraine into a reaction.
I think that's not an accurate depiction, but here it's claimed.
So don't be shocked if an invasion follows based on Ukraine's provocation, as Putin claims.
Another historical allusion rang warning bells to my thoughts when you saw that, according to Glewitz.
For those who want more information, the Nazis staged a false flag incident at Glewitz, alleging Polish forces had attacked the radio station as grounds for invading Poland.
They actually took prisoners and put them in these uniforms and then shot them.
Meanwhile, the head of Russia's general staff has said that the Russian military is prepared to intervene in the event of a Ukrainian offensive in the Donbass.
Statement coming after the Biden-Putin virtual meeting on Tuesday.
Meanwhile, Russia suspects NATO may deploy previously banned medium-range missiles in Europe.
In my opinion, this could very well provoke Russian action.
Deputy Russian Foreign Minister said Monday Moscow suspects NATO may deploy missiles in Europe that were previously banned.
Under the INF Treaty, and Russia would respond by doing the same.
An indirect indication NATO is thinking of doing this, he observed.
The military alliance has denied the accusation, but Russia no longer has any trust in NATO.
The treaty was signed by the U.S.
and Soviets in 1987 to ban land-based cruise and ballistic missiles with a range of 500
kilometers to 5,500 or 310 to 3,410 miles range.
Since the treaty was scrapped, Russia's offered the U.S.
a mutual moratorium on the deployment of IMF in Europe.
They've asked as part of a package of security guarantees.
Last week, Biden and Putin held talks on the issues.
Besides the IMF moratorium, Russia wants NATO to guarantee Ukraine will not become a member of the military alliance.
They reportedly told Ukraine a NATO membership is unlikely to be approved within the next decade.
No doubt because that would be so extraordinarily provocative.
Joe, your thoughts?
Yeah, well, Soros overthrew the democratically elected government in Ukraine with the Orange Revolution in 2004.
And then when he didn't get the government that he wanted in Ukraine, he overthrew it again in 2014 with the Maiden Revolution.
And his, uh, Brandon's son, And I just can't call him anything other than that.
So, O'Brandon's son was involved in Ukraine with the Burisma Energy Company where the family ended up getting millions of dollars and that was being funneled to Joe at least 10% to the big guy.
So, you know, for him to get on sanctimonious about how wonderful and just Ukraine is and how we're upholding some, you know, moral democracy and how he's, you know, supported truth and honest in the American way all his whole life is just absolutely absurd.
The guy is a cheap.
A thug who's undeserving of any political office and belongs in jail.
So I have no respect for him and anything that he does.
And in the whole world stage of people, I know Putin has his defects, but look at the defective world he's having to deal with.
He's the closest thing to a statesman that I'm aware of on the whole entire planet.
Oh, I've said that many times, Joe, that Vladimir Putin is the only state that's tried the world's stage 100% correct.
Biden's turning the United States into a laughingstock in the eyes of the nations of the world.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, broercontolive, needtoknowatgmail.com.
Live, needtoknowatgmail.com.
Here we have Beverly commenting on Jussie Smollett aka Juicy Smollett, mockingly pronounced Smol-yay.
Juicy is biracial.
The father is white, maybe Jewish, named Joel Smollett.
There have been reports that Juicy and Kamala Mattress-Harris are related, but evidence for such is sketchy to non-existent.
Mattress-Harris' mother is Red Dot Indian.
Her father is Hindu Brahmin.
Juicy Smollett's mother is black and the father is white.
Harris and Smollett have been photographed together at various times.
Smollett has been photographed with one or more of the Obamas.
They probably know each other, and thus the three degrees of separation between them with regard to this farcical hate crime.
One wonders, though, why the hoax was so poorly planned.
I think the Browners wanted to use it as a test to see how absurd a hoax they could pull off and have the public believe it.
Well, now they know they will have to try a bit harder.
Another commentator, when tyranny removes the ability to work and support oneself and family, they believe all is lost and all justice is denied on every front, and people will create their own instant justice in the streets.
In individual extreme and sometimes final acts, as well as extreme collective mob acts, the degree to which tyranny has been oppressing the public will determine how violent these uncontrollable spontaneous uprisings become.
Local police will pull back and go home to protect their own families at that point, will refuse to make law-abiding citizens their deadly enemies.
Much if not all of the military will turn and join the people.
If foreign troops are brought in, they will be slaughtered on every front with no mercy by deferent people who have nothing more to lose in their lives and will consider them already lost.
No Democratic politician will likely ever be safe to go out or leave a safe house ever again.
Remember this.
Whenever people feel they have lost everything and have no hope, they lose it and will go after whoever they think is responsible and available.
Forecaster Gerald Cilente has pointed out this reality for many years, that when folks have lost everything, they will lose it.
The deep state tried to do preemptive strikes to prevent this by staging the Antifa and BLM mercenary armies comprised of immunized, deputized felons and the fake George Floyd.
Choking with 33 pre-planned arson riots.
Whenever they see any storm from We the People coming, the Cabal Deep State will try to pervert it by stating their own similar mini-simulation using dark side entities like Antifa and BLM.
ISIS national Islamic territory is all synthetic used for the same reason due to a preemptive strike to prevent real revolution by the masses when it is actually justified.
This is another reason the deep state has tried to override the second amendment so many times in America using their engineered stage false flag attacks.
Meanwhile, if you want to learn more, how could you do better than the Fallsteigen Conspiracies Conference at 2021, you can track it down on my blog.
Here you see Saturday the 11th we had 12 presentations, Sunday the 12th, 12 more.
Nick Collarston on the Gunpowder Plot, Holly Seidliger on the False Flag at Jamestown, Next Generation Student Was Pearl Harbor Really a Surprise?, Me, What Happened at JFK and 9-11 Special Report, Next Generation Student, COVID, Conspiracy or Act of Nature, Kelly Watt.
Fake News About a Pandemic, David Kenney, J.D., California COVID Swindling the Public, Dina Sax, J.D., The Vaccine Wars, Illegal Perspective, Susan Bradford, Ph.D., The Politics of Business, Abramoff and Enron, Sarah Westall, The COVID Conspiracy and Mind Control, Special Feature Guest, Dr. Katherine Horton and William Bill Binney, Our Nation's Leader, Cyber Security Expert, followed on Sunday by 12 more.
Nick Hollister again, who wrote Shakespeare's plays.
Alison Minard, The Undead, Pretty Young Women, Me, A Tale of Two Cities, Kenosha, and Waukesha.
Russ Winter and others, High Strangeness, The Waukesha Psy-Up, I Learned From Them.
Ron Avery, The Posner vs. Fetzer Lawsuit, Ron Avery, Fake News and Fake Law in a Police State, Joe Olson, The Fall of America, Carl Herman, American Revolution 2.0, Scott Bennett, The Coming War in Ukraine, Henry Macko, Jacob Rothstein, Equality is the End Game, The Most Disturbing Interview I've Ever Done, Jack Mullen and Stephanie Sledge, Where Are We Heading, Ole Damagard, How My Last Name Became a Verb.
If you go to my blog, you'll have the opportunity to pick up a ticket for $5.
You can access a single video 12 times for six months, $25.
Unlimited access to all 24 for a month, $40.
unlimited access to all 24 for a month, $40 unlimited access to all 24 for a year.
Meanwhile, remember 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90%.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
The 90%, the 1% use a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
Final thoughts, Joe.
Yeah, there's still a whole lot of controversy about things that happened towards the end of World War II.
And Veterans Today has done an excellent job on keeping us up to date with nuclear education.
And they had an article by Henry Macow, one of the presenters at your conference,
called, Borman supplied Nazi uranium atomic bombs, and I had done a deep dive on that
Previously, I've written an article called The Vacuum Under the Satoru Sombrero at Canada Free Press, and I'll just read a couple of sentences from it.
The book Battleground Atlantic provides a history of Japanese submarine I-52 on its way to the French port of Laurent to pick up a cargo with a cargo of 228 tons of tin, molybdenum, tungsten, and 54 tons of rubber, two tons of gold.
The gold was to purchase new Messerschmitt Me 262 jets.
And again, this was in 1944.
A new V-2 rocket and some material for the Gensai Bakudan, bomb for now.
Both Germany and Japan had nuclear bomb programs. Both realized that a workable fission bomb would
not be ready in time to prevent defeat. Hitler had tons of radioactive but not bomb usable U-235,
which is uranium, to make a dirty bomb. He was going to sell that to the Japanese, but on
June 24, 1944, I-52 was on the surface exchanging a German harbor pilot
and from German submarine U-530 when they were attacked by bingers from the U.S.
carrier Bogue, and the Japanese sub was sunk.
Okay, then on May 15, 1945, two weeks after Hitler's suicide and 10 days after VE victory in Europe, German submarine U-234 surrendered with 560 kilograms of uranium oxide intended for Japanese dirty bombs.
So here we are three months before we bombed Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
The Japanese were still trying to get 560 kilograms, which they knew they couldn't make a nuclear bomb with, but they were intended to put them on their Submarine aircraft carriers and bomb New York, Washington DC, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and the Panama Canal.
So if you want to know why Harry Truman decided to just go ahead and nuke our dirty bomb enemy, there's your excuse.
Three months before we bombed them, they were still planning on taking German-supplied uranium and doing dirty bomb attacks against the United States.
History that they have kept suppressed, but it's absolutely 100% documented.
Read my article, Vacuum Under the Soturo Sombrero.
I'll put it down in the show notes.
Joe, I learned something from you.
Virtually every show we do together, and we're doing quite a few, I can't thank Joe Olson from Houston enough for the excellence of his contributions.
You need to understand what's going on here.
I do my best to break together the best experts on a whole range of subjects.
I've done it again and again and again.
You can find the books that Amazon has not yet banned.
at moonrockbooks.com, including those they have banned that are still available there, except for Sandy Hook, which is in a legal limbo.
But you can find the books on the Boston bombing, Orlando and Dallas, Charlottesville.
Parkland, even the moon landing, all available at moonrockbooks.com.
But meanwhile, do yourself a favor.
Check out Volkswagen and Conspiracies.
Go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
You can track it down easily.
And take a look at what's available to you for nominal expense.
You can be supporting my efforts to defend the First and the Second Amendment, without which America is utterly lost.
Meanwhile, alas, we do not know how much time we have left.
Spend as much time as you can with your friends and loved ones.
For that very reason, these moments are precious.
▲
Export Selection