The dog and the sponsors of very briefly, Kathleen Loney is offering the 100 percent beeswax candles
again for you.
Catholics out there.
The price is seven dollars for a set of two eight inch 100 percent beeswax
candles. The purple scaplers are also back in rotation.
Contact her, Kathleen Loney at Gmail dot com.
We've got Jack's Berry dot com, a prolific Catholic outlet.
We've got a wonderful fourth generation farm
called Kunis Market.
You can find their fruits and vegetables.
They've been growing them for the last 90 years.
So great small business, their family business.
They got a full line of produce, Amish, cheese and so much more right here in Ohio,
northwest Ohio.
So check out their full product line today.
Chris Gagne is inviting all Catholics and those like-minded.
Please remember the dead.
You've got Jeff Campos at giftal.com, which is a unique candle company, which you can have your photos wrapped around the entire candle for a 360 view.
And last but not least, Joe Blazak at 247rosary.com, online Catholic radio station playing a traditional rosary every half hour, 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Having said that, as I mentioned, we've got Jim here.
And again, where would you like to begin?
Do you want to start off with the Democrats and what they're up against in 2022?
Absolutely, Eric.
The Republicans have a double-digit lead in the midterm poll for the first time in history, where Democratic pollsters are warning of an unmitigated disaster.
Now, mind you, this poll is coming from CNBC and NBC surveys, which have never before over the past 20 years registered a double-digit Republican advantage on congressional preference.
In the past, the largest lead ever was four points for the GOP.
And what you want to appreciate is this isn't a generic poll.
Meaning voters who would prefer any Republican over any Democrat.
This is absolutely stunning.
It suggests that if the election were held today, it would be an unmitigated disaster for the Democrats.
Biden's approval on handling the economy has declined where he's 19 points underwater with 37% approval, but 56% disapproval.
41% believe the economy is going to get worse.
The news, which is bad, got worse in relation to inflation.
Latest reports show it rose 6.8% in November.
In November alone, that's a single month gain.
The preference of voters has shifted toward a Republican Congress, regardless of what the respondents believe to be the top issue facing the country.
That includes both inflation and the economy, but also even the handling of the coronavirus and climate change.
Think about that.
Even climate change.
Those who thought climate change was the most important issue in October.
Preferred Democrat controlled by a 59 point margin, but that's now fallen to 33.
Another Democrat tasked with performing an autopsy on voting trends observed that following the election massacre in Virginia, he would tell midterm candidates, we have a problem.
If we're in that position again, we're going to lose a ton of races.
We got to do something better.
The problem being they don't really have time to do something better.
Indeed, one Democrat strategist who advises major donors said despite minor victories on infrastructure and spending bills, the writing is on the wall heading into 2022.
It's too late.
We're effed, he said.
And I think he got that exactly right.
Now, Eric.
The Democrats who stole the election in 2020, I mean, using unbelievable techniques, not just voting in mail-in voters.
They had ballots in boxes.
They ran through tabulators over and over again.
So you get 20 votes after a single ballot.
They went into elderly homes.
They were faking ballots.
They had people who were voting when they were 120 years old.
They went all out.
They used every possible technique.
So from what I can surmise, there's no state that was not affected by some degree of Democrat manipulation of the outcome.
Now, Republicans, being very much aware of this being the case, are taking measures to counteract.
It's going to be more difficult to steal the election right here in Wisconsin, for example.
The number of poll watchers has jumped from Something like 80 in 2020 to 320 in 2022.
So they're not going to be able to get away with all the techniques they succeeded in the past.
I look for mega ventures to try to distract the public and to steal the election, at least to attempt to thwart Their defeat, because I've been predicting for some time now, which has been confirmed by these pollster reports, that the Republicans are going to lose up to 100 seats in the House, 100 seats in the House, and even three or four Senate seats.
I mean, this is going to be unprecedented, enormous.
There have only been perhaps two elections in the history of the United States as a constitutional republic where we will see an event, a cataclysmic transformation.
But Biden's failed on every single issue, whether it's the border, the withdrawal from Afghanistan, handling the coronavirus, the mandates, the supply chain problems, you know, bringing in all these immigrants and flying them all over the country in the dead
of night and then rolling out the red carpet and giving them endless benefits at taxpayer
expenses, not going down well, not to mention the idea of denying parents the right to
have a role in what their children are taught in schools.
So I think we should look for mega events.
There are two that appear on the horizon already.
One is a war, most likely in the Ukraine involving Russia, which may the government has historically
used wars to rally the public around an administration since the US is at war.
But this will be a war that the United States provoked where Biden brought in Victoria Nuland,
who was instrumental in fomenting the coup in the Ukraine that took out a pro-Western
democratic oriented, I mean, pro-Russian but democratically oriented president of Ukraine
for a guy who was totally corrupt and pro-West.
It was outrageous.
Russia's been out objecting.
To the fact that we have violated our agreements, which included with the dissolution of the Soviet Union between Mikhail Gorbachev and Ronald Reagan at the time.
That if these Eastern bloc countries were to become sovereign states, that we'd make no effort to encroach upon them, which was reaffirmed by George H. W. Bush with the fall, you know, the unification of Berlin, an agreement that we would not, the West would not encroach one inch when in fact what we've done is move massively into six or seven of these states.
We're even trying to turn Ukraine into a NATO nation.
Just think if there were an effort.
By China, say, for example, to put ballistic missiles on our border with Mexico.
I think a lot of Americans would be upset.
Well, how do you suppose the Russians feel about having all of this?
So we are being deliberately provocative, just as FDR was deliberately provocative with Japan to provoke them into attacking us at Pearl Harbor, which even included cutting off their access to oil in the South Pacific.
We did that deliberately.
FDR thought US isolationism was keeping us out of a war that needed to be fought, and that by allowing Japan to attack the United States at Pearl Harbor, it would be justification for becoming involved in both the European and, of course, the Pacific theater, where we ultimately prevailed.
But don't take for granted the US could prevail in a war with Russia.
They have far better military equipment.
They are better trained, particularly when you have a vaccine taking place of the American military.
The vaccine has all kinds of deleterious effects.
It's a way of wiping out, wiping out our military.
And I believe that's part and parcel of the agenda here to move forward in an aggressive way.
To to damage our military, the other being a collapse of the electrical grid.
If they collapse the electrical grid and we don't even have any Internet, you know, all kinds of modes of communication are curtailed.
They're going to impose some kind of martial law and thereby they'll be able to manipulate the outcome of the election.
I guarantee 100 percent under these circumstances that The Democrats are going to do whatever they can to sabotage the election.
Now, the Jussie Smollett trial and its ramifications is a source of endless fascination.
Jussie, of course, was found guilty of five of six charges where he was lying about what had happened to him, where this was a A staged, fabricated hate crime by Jesse Smollett, which was preposterous on its face.
He claimed that coming out of a subway at 2 a.m.
on a Sunday morning, actually it was then the coldest night of the year in Chicago, he was assaulted by two rednecks who were wearing ski masks, carrying a rope for a noose and a bottle of bleach.
To attack this gay, right, and I'm told even Jewish actor, so he combines all the minority groups who want to plead victimhood.
The very idea that there'd be two guys out there roaming around at 2 a.m.
in the morning carrying a bottle of bleach, which is mostly water, and therefore I'm convinced would have been frozen solid, To be subjected to attack is just preposterous on its face.
I mean, the improbability, the probability of this is zero.
It's just absurd on its face.
But Jesse persisted in spite of the fact that investigation revealed what had truly gone on, that he'd hired two Nigerian bodybuilders, both of whom, and the media never mentioned this, of course, are black.
One of whom is Jussie's personal trainer, the other an extra on the set of Empire, where he was an actor.
He's now been given the boot to attack him.
They even conducted a rehearsal.
He paid them with a personal check for $3,500.
They have closed-circuit TV showing them in a hardware store buying the masks and even a mega hat that they wore when they attacked him.
They claim this is mega country.
Well, Chicago is most definitely not mega country.
Chicago's overwhelmingly democratic.
They have a mayor named Lightfoot who is a complete airhead and a virtual mental zombie.
She's a total moron and incompetent where Chicago, by virtue of its very stringent gun laws, now has the highest gun violence in the United States, which is another tell that the Democrat policies aren't working whatsoever.
Well, this has turned out to be a fiasco for Jussie Smollett and for the Democrats.
The following.
I mean, the jury came in and found him guilty of five of six counts of lying to the police about having been subjected to an assault and battery, having been the victim of a hate crime.
The Chicago cops spent thousands of man hours investigating.
Among the keys that tipped them off that Jussie was making this up was that when they encountered him in his apartment, number one, He still was wearing the noose.
Now, the chief of police in Chicago has observed that any black man who has a noose put around his neck is going to get rid of that noose as rapidly as possible.
But Jesse still had it around his neck.
Which is absurd.
Second of all, the tuna sandwich he obtained from the subway survived intact for Jussie to consume later.
So between the tuna sandwich and still wearing the noose, it was pretty obvious something was wrong.
And then the evidence began to fall into place.
There was an attempt by outside interference from Michelle Obama's former chief of staff to affect the Cook County State's attorney originally handling the case, a woman by the name of Kim Foxx.
To drop the case where it turns out Kim Fox has as her mentor Kamala Harris.
She says she would not be where she is.
We're not for Kamala, where Jesse Smollett turns out to be the nephew or a cousin of Kamala Harris.
He'd been out on the campaign with Kamala Harris.
And here's this whole stunt.
And again, you're not going to read this in the mainstream.
Well, this is all backfiring on the Democrats, and I believe there are really three most significant lessons to be derived here.
Senate no one thought was appropriate and where she claimed immediately upon this event
occurring that it was a modern-day lynching to give further PR for her cause.
Well this is all backfiring on the Democrats and I believe there are really three most
significant lessons to be derived here.
Number one, this was a hoax.
Now most Americans have trouble wrapping their minds around large-scale hoax like the fact
that 9-11 was an inside job, that it wasn't conducted by 19 Islamic terrorists under control
of a guy in a cave off in Afghanistan.
They have a hard time opening their minds to that.
Because it implies, you know, threatening conclusions about the government willing to take measures that are going to kill or harm the interests of Americans, and they resist.
It's known as cognitive dissonance.
It's like a mother who discovers evidence that her husband has been molesting their daughter, but it's so threatening she suppresses.
And years later, when she's asked when the truth comes out why she didn't do something about it, she can't explain it.
Well, in this case, the hoax is so small and it's so blatant that everyone can see this is absurd.
So they know these kinds of hoaxes take place, even in the case of issues like hate crimes and racial attacks, that they are fabricated.
And that's the second element why this is so important, is that the media jumped on this.
They promoted the fake news, the total hoax.
That reinforces the point Trump made so devastatingly with the American people.
in my opinion, one of his major contributions to our society, that the media publishes fake news
all the time. All the time. I mean, truly disgusting the extent to which we are bombarded
with fake news.
So I think that's extremely important and telling.
Not only that, but it contradicts, and this is a third key point, the critical race theory narrative that America is divided into oppressors and the oppressed, and that the oppressors are always the white people, the white men especially, who white supremacists, such as those that allegedly attacked Jussie Smollett, And everyone else is the oppressed, but especially blacks.
So here you have a black that's actually perpetrating a hoax in order to promote his sense of victimhood and to benefit his his aunt politically, though we get no information about that from the mainstream.
So I think this is backfiring massively on the Democratic Party.
And because once The public sees through a hoax, even if it's on a small scale.
They become more open-minded about the possibility that other of these stunts, all of which were legitimized by Barack Obama when he nullified the Smith-Munn Act of 1948, which was intended to preclude the use of the same techniques of propaganda and disinformation within the United States that were being used abroad, which include paid riots, staged events, all kinds of phony nonsense to
affect the public opinion by the Smith Modernization Act so-called of 2012 just in time for
Sandy Hook.
If you can fake an event like this here in Chicago and it gets so much mainstream coverage,
is it possible minds may be open just a jar that something like that has happened before
And if they begin to look at Sandy Hook and study the evidence.
There's just a massive proof that it was a two-day FEMA exercise, technically a mass casualty drill involving children, that was presented as mass murder to promote gun control, where among the tells is there was no surge of EMTs into the building, there was no string of ambulances to rush their little bodies off to hospitals to be determined dead or alive, There was no medevac helicopter call.
There was no bodies either wounded or dead placed on the triage tarps.
The whole thing was fraudulent, for which there's a massive evidence that parents weren't even allowed to see the bodies of their children in the school, but only identified them on the basis of photographs.
Well, I don't think there's any parent in the world would have stood for that if it had been their child.
Most certainly not.
I would not have stood for it.
But in this case, it was appropriate because the victims at Sandy Hook only existed in the form of photographs.
Where I have done extensive studies on this and with my my colleague Mona Alexis Presley, we've not only discovered that they took photographs of older kids when they were younger to be identified by fake names as the decedents at Sandy Hook, but in some cases the parents even use photographs of themselves.
to be their deceased children at Sandy Hook, and they've just experienced a windfall bonanza.
Sympathetic but gullible Americans contributed between $27 and $130 million in donations out
of sympathy. We are divided by the 26 surviving families.
That's between 1 and 5 million payoff for having faked having had a child at Sandy Hook.
It's worse.
I've done so much on this.
Check out, go to BitChute channel Jim Fetzer, for example, look for my latest on Sandy Hook or Even go to the False Flag Conspiracies Conference for 2020, where I had an update on Sandy Hook, which you can access via my blog or by going to falseflagconspiracies2020.com.
If you go to falseflagconspiracies2020.com, You'll have access to the program from last year.
I'll say more about this, but those include presentation by Kelly Watt, who was given a copy of a death certificate by one of the alleged parents, which turns out to be uncertified.
It has no file number, no town certification, no state certification.
We're under Connecticut law.
Not even parents are allowed to have uncertified death certificates.
There's much more to that, but I'll leave it there.
False flag conspiracies 2020.com.
Meanwhile, we've had a new scientific research paper proving that the COVID-19 spike protein
is very similar to that found in HIV.
This, in my opinion, is very powerful objective scientific evidence that Anthony, Tony LaRaffache, Who is an expert on HIV and AIDS who appears to have manipulated that pandemic just as he has manipulated this was the key party responsible for orchestrating this entire fake pandemic.
Well, the virus, the pandemic is fake, but the vaccine, which is a non-vaccine, is real.
It's been described by Sherry Tinpenny as a perfectly designed killing machine.
The whole sequence has several telling aspects to it.
One, when Trump, under an executive order, you know, promoted warp speed to develop these vaccines, I'm very troubled by whether or not that was even constitutional.
Second, That when they moved forward with emergency use authorization, they could only do that if there were no available alternative treatments where HCQ, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin were both available.
And the fact that they launched massive PR attacks on ivermectin and HCQ, which would have saved hundreds of thousands of lives, proves malice in my opinion.
And while Pfizer and Moderna Want to claim immunity from liability for all the death and devastation they are creating in their wake and where they're making massive profits and I want everyone in the world to be vaccinated over and over and over again.
I mean, imagine any company with any product where they could dictate how often it's purchased and by whom the world's largest population.
I mean, this is so corrupt to the core.
It turns out that the CDC has been seeking to redefine the meaning of the word vaccination
or vaccine to grant them liability retroactively because when the law was passed, the definition
of vaccine would have precluded their coverage.
I do not believe that can withstand legal scrutiny.
I believe that Pfizer and Moderna will ultimately be held responsible, but by the time that
happens, it may be too late.
I mean, we're in a terrible situation, a terrible fix, I'm sorry to say.
Let me mention now in relation to the False Flag and Conspiracies Conference of 2020, this weekend, this past weekend, Saturday and Sunday, I moderated the False Flag and Conspiracies Conference for 2021.
Let me give you the lineup.
You can find more about it on my blog at jamesfetzer.org.
I had leading experts in this area, beginning with Nick Kohlerstrom on the gunpowder plot.
Holly Seliger on Bacon's rebellion of false flag at Jamestown.
Next Generation Students, was Pearl Harbor really a surprise attack?
I give an overview based on my collaborative research of what happened to JFK.
Followed by an overview, again based on my collaborative research where I was the founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, a special report about what really happened.
Another student about COVID-19 conspiracy or act of nature.
Kelly Watt, fake news about a pandemic.
David Kenney, J.D., California COVID, swindling the public.
Dina Sax, J.D., the vaccine wars, a legal perspective.
Susan Bradford, Ph.D., politics of business, Abramov and Enron.
Sarah Westall, the COVID conspiracy and mind control.
Then my special featured guest Dr Catherine Horton and William Bill Benny.
Yes, this is the Bill Benny who is a cyber security expert, our leading expert in the world, who blew the whistle on the alleged Russian hacking by showing it was taking place too fast.
To have been from a distant location and in real time in the Eastern time zone.
Then Sunday, we had a reprise by Nick Kohlerstrom on Who Wrote Shakespeare's Plays, Alison Menard on The Undead, cases involving young women with peculiar aspects, me, A Tale of Two Cities, Kenosha and Waukesha, Russ Winter and others taking a closer look at Waukesha, High Strangeness, the Waukesha Psyop, Dina Sachs on the vaccine war as a legal perspective.
Ron Avery on the Posner versus Fetzer lawsuit.
Ron Avney on fake news and fake law in a police state.
Mike Palachuk on freedom of the press.
Actually, that was moved to be available on my blog.
Carl Herman, American Revolution 2.0.
Scott Bennett on The Coming War in Ukraine, Olli Domogard on how my last
name became a verb where Olli, Nick and I are no doubt the three most active in the world
in exposing false flags and conspiracies.
You can check it out and review every one of the presentations on my blog at jamesfetzer.org
where we've set up a ticketing process where for $5 you can access a single video 12 times
over six months, but for $25 you have unlimited access to the entire program for an entire
For $40, unlimited access for an entire year.
So go to jamesfetzer.org and check out False Flags and Conspiracies 2021.
Eric!
It's such a pleasure to join you from month to month with an update on these crucial issues.
Great stuff, Jim.
As always, loaded presentation.
Since you mentioned mRNA vaccines, we're going to have Dr. Robert Malone on the show next.
So I've got a whole load of questions for him.
And I'm right there with you.
A lot happening since the last time we talked.
Go ahead.
Let me just add.
Yes, yes, yes.
In addition, on Sunday we had a presentation by Henry Macko about Jacob Rothschild, Equality is the End Game.
This is profoundly disturbing.
He published a piece of comment on the Truth Seeker, a UK blog.
And it appears that Jacob Rothschild, who's behind the whole Great Reset and the coronavirus pandemic, appears to have responded to him personally.
This is no doubt the single most disturbing conversation I've ever had with anyone.
You can also find my latest blog is all about this.
It's not the conversation with Henry, which is a part of the conference, but it's there.
And in addition, there's a wonderful presentation by Jack Mullen and Stephanie Sledge about where are we heading that everyone likewise needs to consider if they want to get a grip on the situation we find ourselves in today.
Oh, good stuff.
I'm glad to hear Henry's name.
Henry did my show about a year ago, and I know he doesn't do too many interviews these days, and he was a member of my website actually for quite some time, so good to hear Henry back out there and getting his information out there.
I believe he was kicked off Twitter not too long ago, but now he's back, I think, under a different name.
I know he's been having all kinds of censorship issues to himself, so Good stuff, Jim.
Always good to hear from you.
Look for Jim next month.
And folks, listen, we've got to get ready for Dr. Robert Malone now.