All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 10, 2021 - Jim Fetzer
53:57
Need to Know News (9 November 2021) with Joe Olson
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Jim Fetzer here in Madison, Wisconsin, joined by Joel Olson in Houston, continues to say no.
We do appreciate her.
Meanwhile, the World Health Organization is using the COVID Omicron variant published for a global pandemic treaty.
Think of that.
What could go wrong?
The WHO on December 1st got global leaders to start negotiating to create a binding international agreement that will supposedly prevent a deal with future pandemics.
This is signing into a new world order dominated by the World Health Organization.
The agreement approved the creation of an intergovernmental negotiating body to draft and negotiate the final wording, no doubt with a meticulous proofing by the Rothschild.
I welcome the decision you've adopted today to establish an intergovernmental negotiating body, said the Hoot Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.
He added, countries committed to negotiate would help to keep future generations safer from the impact of pandemics.
Right.
Yeah, right.
Who?
Member states agreed to create the pandemic treaty.
Some of the issues to be covered include the sharing of research data and genome sequencing.
Mark Morano, writing for Climate Depot, pointed out the treaty will most likely just be a virus version of the UN and the intra-governmental plan on climate change's Paris climate style packs.
The pandemic crisis will become permanent, just like the climate crisis.
Attempts to impose lockdowns for future COVID variants or new viruses may be internationally imposed.
Internationally imposed, instead of national, state, or local.
In other words, subjecting us to another layer of governmental regulation and not in our interest.
He warned if the U.S.
were to ratify a legally binding international treaty, global mandates may be coming your way.
Local elections will cease to matter.
Unelected bureaucrats will be welding the real power over your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.
Creating a legally binding international agreement that will enforce pandemic protocols would make it impossible For those in local or state jurisdictions to hold their elected representatives accountable.
They'll be replaced by unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.
This, therefore, is a catastrophe for any government or nation that aspires to be democratic and to determine its own destiny.
The pandemic treaty is not expected to be completed to the satisfaction of most two member states for several years, but the U.S.
has already expressed support for its drafting.
The U.S.
is committed to working with member states to take forward the recent recommendations, said White House Vice Secretary Jen Psaki.
This is one more way in which a Biden administration is betraying the nation and violating the Constitution of the United States by surrendering power to an extrajudicial, non-national entity.
A block of nations led by the U.S.
initially opposed the inclusion of language in the future pandemic treaty that would have made it legally binding.
But they later came out in support of it.
The international body formed to negotiate will heard its first meeting on or before March 1st of 2022.
In between these official meetings, WHO and treaty negotiators will hold public hearings to inform the public of its decisions, not to solicit input from the public, but to inform the public of its decisions.
Joe, I see a catastrophe on the way if this moves forward.
Yeah, well, it's not going to move forward.
Joe tried to do extrajudicial jab mandates through executive orders,
and he's being constantly slapped down by every court jurisdiction there is
in the country at this point.
So he's consistently lost on this.
So then he decided, well, if I can't do it extrajudicially
as an executive order, then we'll just go through the legislature.
So yesterday, they had a vote on mandatory jabs in the Senate.
Senator Joe Manchin and Senator John Tester voted against it, so it lost 52 to 48.
So even Comello Harris can't even come in there.
Throw the vote and win it for Brandon, the imposter.
So, that's going absolutely nowhere, and the facts are that the extreme reactions to this drug and the number of deaths are absolutely exorbitant, and they can't be hidden for much longer.
Principia Scientific had an article today listing 295 world known athletes
who've died of cardiac arrest just in the last six months and all of them were fully jabbed.
So they're gonna have a hard time hiding all of that evidence.
And then NPR, I listened to them occasionally.
I listen to them occasionally.
They had on one of their apologists today that said the reason that Joe Biden's poll numbers are down in the 20% range is because he's done all these wonderful things and he's never taken credit for them.
So the Democratic Congress has a, um, 45% approval rating and so they're saying well what Joe really needs to do is he needs to take credit for all the wonderful things that the Democrats in the House and Senate are doing so that everybody knows that he's the true leader and we can get his poll numbers back up that way.
It's like absolutely hilarious but then something we'll get to if we don't get to it earlier in the show we'll get to it in the final rants that was on NPR today.
There's a investigative reporter And her name is Lisa Olson, spelled with an E, and she wrote a book called Code of Silence.
It's due out in October 2021.
So I went online and read the first two chapters of that.
It's about the judiciary and the enormous amount of crimes that are committed by federal judges.
There are the Supreme Circuit and District Court judges are appointed by the President, approved by the Senate, and all of them have lifetime appointments.
And they've got a good old boys club like you wouldn't believe and DNAs like you wouldn't believe, which is not the genetic thing.
It's non-disclosure, NDAs.
NDAs that you wouldn't believe that they have against their staff and the crimes that they're allowed to get away because nobody is allowed to be a whistleblower in the federal court system.
Absolutely outrageous.
We'll discuss that more later.
You got it, Joe.
Good points.
Good points.
All profoundly disturbing.
Meanwhile, AOC claims these smash-and-grab robberies aren't happening, in spite of all the videos and records.
I mean, this is absurd.
In an interview, she claimed a lot of these allegations of organized retail theft are not actually panning out.
I believe it's the Walgreens in California citing it, but the data didn't back it up.
She must have her head where the sun does not shine.
Walgreens, after all, announced in October they were closing five stores in San Francisco because of an uptake in organized retail crime.
David Theis tweets, out of touch or just plain denial?
I say both.
GOP businesses slam AOC for doubting existence, a smash and grab.
Just embarrassing.
Walgreens spokesman Phil Caruso made an announcement last month.
Organized retail crime continues to be a challenge facing retailers across San Francisco.
And we are not immune.
It's continued to increase the last few months.
A video surfaced showing retail theft at a San Francisco Walgreens in the course of taking place.
A masked man caught on video stuffing items into a trash bag before cruising out of the store on a bicycle.
Here we have AOC just losing it embarrassingly bad.
The spike in organized theft and subsequent closing come despite the fact that Walgreens increased our investment in security across the city to 46 times our chain average.
But what can you do when you're being robbed blind?
You can't maintain a profitable business.
Thus, it's a sad day for San Francisco.
Videos of more sophisticated robbery attempts have surfaced.
Even CNN just two days ago reported retail stores across the country are dealing with a wave of robberies conducted by large groups of people.
After all, Joe, if each one can go up to 950 with impunity, then let's bring 10, 20, 30,
each getting 950 worth with impunity. The Post even noted there'd been a spike in
flash mob robberies that have shaken the retail industry and traumatized workers.
Walnut Creek, a very exclusive residential area in California, saw smash-and-grab looters stealing around $125,000 in merchandise from a Nordstrom.
leading the city council to approve 2 million in funds to increase police department and security.
This, of course, was an inevitable consequence of defunding the police.
I do not believe the American people are going to forgive the Democrats for that.
A video service showing retail theft at a San Francisco Walgreens.
He stopped.
I've got that one.
Meanwhile, L.A.
Police Chief Michael Moore, not the famous filmmaker and Democrat spokesman, revealed that during one 10-day stretch, the city experienced 11 crimes that would constitute the smash and grab.
Where groups of suspects working in tandem stole from high-end clothing stores, often using weapons and physical force to overwhelm and intimidate score employees and other patrons.
Smash and grab.
Republican lawmakers and business leaders mocked AOC.
I don't know what data she's talking about, said Representative Rodney Davis, something that could be classified as an evergreen comment when it comes to AOC.
Jason Brewer, RILA senior executive, was a little more detailed.
Respectfully, the Congresswoman has no idea what she's talking about.
Both the data and stack of video evidence makes fairly clear this is a growing problem in need of solutions.
If she's not concerned with organized theft and increasingly violent attacks on retail employees, she should just say that.
Even CNN is talking about it.
Walgreens and Nordstrom aren't the others.
Target announced over the summer they were cutting stores in San Francisco to address shoplifting.
With the safety of our guests, team members, and communities as our top priority, we're reducing our operating hours in six stores in San Francisco.
We've been experiencing significant and alarming rise in theft and security incidents, similar to others.
None of this is actually panning out, according to AOC.
Joe, it's just embarrassing.
And, you know, they even had a commentator on CNN said he couldn't imagine what in the world would cause this.
And then he added, of course, there are very minimal punishment for doing these types of crimes, as though he weren't answering his own question.
Yeah, well, maybe we do need more midnight basketball.
Maybe that'll help solve the problem.
Yeah, the one implication of decriminalizing Decriminalization is that you end up having lower statistics.
So I actually saw a talk show yesterday and I didn't write it down, so I don't want to miscredit anything, but somebody said that if you look at the FBI statistics, the crime is actually down in the United States.
And I went, well, and the guy that was reporting this said, well, yeah, if you decriminalize everything, then crime is going to go down because you don't have anything to report.
It's absolutely crazy.
You know, You can't imagine a more upside-down world than what we're forced to deal with right now.
No, I couldn't agree more, Joe.
You got it exactly right.
Meanwhile, Wisconsin may surpass Arizona and be the first state to decertify the 2020 election.
That would make me, as a Wisconsin resident, very, very proud.
The Wisconsin Election Commission knowingly and intentionally violated the state's election laws and instructed subordinate election officials to do the same, according to the Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling.
In a shocking press conference Thursday, law enforcement from Racine County's office laid out the case of election fraud in Racine during the 2020 election, focusing on abusive voters confined in nursing homes and assisted living facilities.
The investigators discovered that Wisconsin election officials expressly discussed that their proposed conduct for the 2020 election would violate state law, and yet decided to do it anyway.
In a letter, they memorialized their decision, which they disseminated to every single county clerk's office in Wisconsin.
Sheriff Schemling stated the officials indicated they needed the flexibility to violate the law and needed to instruct county clerks to break the law.
Despite the blatant absurdity of the statements he expressed, the illegality of their activities, and the fact they were all being recorded on their Zoom meeting, election officials went ahead and violated the law anyway.
The sheriff's office played the video from the Zoom of the commissioners discussing their need to break the law and instruct others to do so.
Coupled with confirmed activities that actually occurred during the 2020 election, Sheriff Shamblin has a compelling case for election fraud.
Specifically, a letter from the WC instructed county officials to not allow special voting deputies into nursing homes.
They are trained professionals responsible for ensuring the rights of the nursing home residents.
They're also responsible to ensure elders are not abused for their voting privileges and that no ballot harvesting or other illegal activity takes place.
WEC decided that due to COVID, It was too dangerous for individuals to enter the facility, despite the fact that Wisconsin state law requires them to be a part of the process.
By requiring county clerks to exclude these deputies, WEC committed election fraud.
State leaders and nursing home administrators thought it was safe enough for the fish tank maintenance worker to enter the facility.
Door dash delivery drivers, vending machine workers, elevator repairmen, birdcage cleaner, and coffee machine vendor But it was too dangerous to allow special voting deputies inside to ensure that no abuse of the rights of the elderly were taking place.
It's a preposterous position to take, but it's a position of the Wisconsin Election Commission.
It's also a violation of Wisconsin Statute 6.875.
The sheriff and his sergeant told multiple horrific stories of victimizing the elderly in order to steal their vote.
Election workers cast ballots on behalf of incapacitated residents of nursing homes.
Those who were not lucid had ballots cast on their behalf as if they were simply capable of pointing to the ballot.
Election workers then interpreted that as an affirmative vote.
Multiple family members and nursing home residents tended the press event to voice their concern that loved ones were manipulated for their vote.
Some of the complaints stated election workers cast ballots on behalf of incapacitated residents in accordance with how they voted last election, despite the fact the resident was not cognizant or capable of consenting to vote.
Sheriff Schmaling stated they believe this happened in most of the nursing homes in the state and that they would enforce the laws that pertain to those in Racine County.
There are 11 nursing homes in Racine, all of which appear to have suffered the same abuse.
72 counties in Wisconsin, making for hundreds of nursing homes subject to this abuse.
Hundreds of ballots were used in each of the nursing homes based on just nursing home abuse and election fraud.
There could be as many as 50 to 100,000 fraudulent ballots cast in Wisconsin, where Biden supposedly won by 20,682, more than enough fraud to have changed the outcome of the election.
The Wisconsin Election Commission orchestrated a criminal and fraudulent election.
The sheriff has said he's referring the crimes to the Racine District Attorney.
Patricia Hanson, an elected Republican, will be called upon to prosecute the crimes.
At the same time, the Wisconsin legislature has more than enough evidence to show that the results certified in 2020 are fraudulent and must be decertified.
It's incumbent upon the Republican state legislatures to stand by the laws they pass and not allow criminal activity.
Joe, I think that's a good question.
the Wisconsin State Legislature is primed to decertify their election.
Will they? Joe, I think that's a good question. Will they?
God, I pray, because if the cheeseheads can get one conviction against one
jurisdiction with voter fraud, the whole nation, then they won't be able to keep
pulling this meme about there's no evidence that there was any voter fraud
at all in 2020.
Thank you.
Texas legislature had to have a special session in order to redistrict because the 2020 census granted us two more U.S.
House Representatives, and so those needed to have their districts created and assigned.
So they did that, and apparently they pissed off Mr. Garlic, which is what I'm going to start calling Merrick Garland from now on.
But anyhow, he filed a lawsuit against Texas because he's saying that they created two districts for Republicans.
So when the state's majority Republican, it's going to be hard to create districts that are nothing but Democrat districts, but that's what this clown had in mind.
So bottom line, it was on Dan Bongino's program yesterday, and I want to give a hat tip to him on that.
Yeah, looks like the 2020 Congress is going to be far different because they've already purged a million ghost voters off of Texas voting rolls from the 2018 election.
So, and excuse me, the 2020 election.
So look for us to have a little bit more of an honest vote, and we're going to keep applying pressure.
And one person that really needs to be unseated in 2022 is Rubio in Florida.
And there's a great lady, one of the best hires in the entire White House is Kathleen McEnany.
And she was interviewed the other day, and I'll put a link to her on the show notes, but
she's an absolutely fabulous person, has a law degree, very articulate, very well, the best.
White House Press Secretary in my entire lifetime.
I've never seen anybody that could handle the press and handle questions and was more on top of things.
And she is underutilized in that role.
She doesn't need to ever repeat that role.
But Florida is in desperate need of getting rid of Rubio.
So I'm supporting Let's Go Kayleigh!
2022.
And, of course, she was a Trump press secretary, not Biden, who has this Psaki person who's just insulting, in my opinion.
Meanwhile, we'll be right back.
Check this out.
Time to roll out more vaccines, say Gates and Fauci, with all the variants are making up as they go along.
The elephant in the room, of course, is that the vaccines don't work.
In fact, they're deadly.
They're causing death and devastation around the world.
So it's not just that they don't work.
They're completely counterproductive.
We now return 666 cases of heart disease in 12 to 17 year olds after COVID shots, less than two cases per year following all vaccines for the past 30.
Now, I don't know if they deliberately chose 666, usually referred to as the sign of the devil, but of course it's appropriate because COVID is performing that function.
This is from Brian Shilhavy, the editor of Health Impact News, who's doing a brilliant job The COVID-19 shots cause heart disease, mainly myocarditis and pericarditis, which is destroying the health of our young people.
It's a fact that is no longer in dispute.
Even the CDC admits, as they've stated, as of November 24, a virus has received 1,949 reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people aged 30 and younger.
Most have been reported after mRNA COVID-19 vaccine of Pfizer or Moderna, particularly male adolescents and young adults.
well realize that's only one percent so add two zeros and get instead of a thousand nine hundred
and forty nine one hundred and ninety four thousand and nine hundred which I have no doubt
is closer to the fact. The only debatable points are one whether or not these cases are rare and
two whether the benefits of the mass vaccination outweighs the risk for heart disease are.
Obviously, it does not.
On these two points, the CDC is lying to the public, as I conclusively prove in this article.
The second is actually easily debunked simply looking at publicly available statistics on COVID-19 tests.
Look, in the different age groups taking place, the number of deaths in 2019 in the U.S.
In 2019 in the US as of December 1st, from 2021, 630 and zero to 17,
4,618 and 18 to 29, 13.3% of the population.
33,168 from 40 to 49.
143,141 from 50 to 64.
176,771 in 65 to 74.
and 28, and 30 to 39, 33,168 from 40 to 49, 143,141 from 50 to 64, 176,771 in 65 to 74,
201,398 from 75 to 84, and 206,038 in 85 and older. Of course, a lot of those folks are just dying
because they've worn out.
Their life expectancy has been exceeded, but it's the numbers.
And remember, again, these are coming from the CDC and probably, therefore, represent a tiny fraction of the real numbers.
As of December 1st, out of 779,402 alleged COVID deaths, only 630 were under the age of 17.
And even though 630 are not necessarily caused by COVID, it just means when they died, they tested positive, or maybe didn't even, but were just said to be COVID.
So there's no benefit to vaccine children under the age of 17 when they have a virtually statistically zero chance of dying.
Their survival is well over 99.9%.
As to the claim that instances of heart disease caused by COVID shots are rare, the factual evidence states otherwise.
Look at this.
He ran a search in aviaries for cardiitis for this age group and found 666 cases.
Where age is 12 or more under 17, vaccine is COVID, and symptom is cardiitis.
Just outrageous.
Just outrageous.
Next, I performed the same search for the same age group excluding COVID, including all other vaccines, and found a total of 40 cases, less than two per year.
Less than two per year.
Keep in mind, the 66 following the COVID shots are for only six months for 12 to 15-year-olds in the U.S.
The Pfizer was only given emergency use authorization for that group in May.
Children between the ages of 5 and 11 were just given emergency use last month, but there are already two cases of heart disease, a 6-year-old and an 8-year-old, both boys.
My God!
Think of it.
Six-year-old and eight-year-old boys having heart conditions.
Reported a couple weeks ago, the American Heart Association Journal Circulation published an abstract from a cardiologist claiming getting COVID shots drastically increases the risk for heart attack.
No doubt about it.
Another cardiologist from the UK, Dr. Ashim Malhotra, confirmed the results of the AHA, American Heart Association, study and shared that British authorities in the field of cardiology confirmed to him this is happening there too, that the COVID shots are leading to increased heart attack, but they're afraid to go public because they'll lose their funding from the drug companies.
He called for an immediate end to vaccine mandates.
Joe, I'm telling you, it looks as though Fauci, who's been controlling funding out of the NIH, billions of dollars for over 30 years, has locked up the peer review process so that it's a complete and total sham.
They're kissing his ass because they're worried about losing their funding.
This is disgraceful when the health of the nation is at stake.
Yes, well, Glenn Beck, who I have a lot of issues with, but he did a great two-hour-long documentary called Crimes or Cover-Up.
Turns out that a whistleblower turned loose a confidential over 100-page long report that was submitted in 2015 by Peter Daszak of
EcoHealth Alliance and the NIAD to DARPA soliciting funds to do gain of function to create a
bioweapon and then to do a mRNA vaccine to fight the weapon that they created. And the response
from DARPA is absolutely, shockingly, eye-opening. They said that there's no need for this and
that there's no way to control the the threat vectors from it.
They questioned why anybody in the world would want to do that.
Well, guess what?
Also in that proposal, it says that NIAID and Moderna would have joint ownership of the patent and share the royalties.
So bottom line is, NIAID is 100% ruled over by Fair Fauci, and Fair Fauci has said that we have to have these jabs, and he has a vested interest in making sure that he sells as many jabs as possible, because him and his cohorts are going to be getting rich off of it, regardless of the amount of collateral damage to the rest of the people on this planet.
Absolutely outrageous!
And then Monday, you and I did a great show with Carl Herman on some lies about World War II, and we covered the stuff, the disgraceful behavior of U.S.
generals in the Philippines the day after Pearl Harbor, but yesterday that same group that had that 13-minute long video posted a 9-minute long video based on the book Day of Deceit.
Which was written by Robert Spinnett.
S-T-I-N-N-E-T-T.
And like I said, it's a nine minute long video.
Absolutely shocking!
We had radio stations in the Alaskan Aleutians, on Hawaii, in the Philippines, and on the West Coast that could pick up radio transmissions.
When the Japanese attack force left Tokyo, they were under radio silence.
So all they were doing was using semaphore light signals and flags to carry correspondence between the various boats.
But they got caught in a mild typhoon and all the ships got separated.
So in order for them to link back up, they had to break radio silence.
We knew two days before Pearl Harbor that there was a Japanese fleet
that was in progress to Hawaii.
We knew exactly where they were.
We monitored them long enough for them to regroup that we knew they were headed towards Hawaii.
We could estimate exactly when they were going to be there.
All of this information was withheld from the commanders on Pearl Harbor.
And that's why we had the enormous disaster that they had planned for months ahead of time.
Absolutely shocking.
Joe, you're absolutely right.
Day of Deceit is a fantastic book and makes a decisive case, in my opinion.
Meanwhile, we have a dying COVID patient who recovered after the court ordered a hospital to administer ivermectin, which they were refusing to do.
An elderly COVID patient has recovered after a court ordered him be treated with ivermectin, despite objections from the hospital in which he was staying.
After an Illinois hospital insisted on administering expensive remdesivir, which is known to be a deadly drug, to the patient and the treatment failed.
His life was saved after a court ordered an outside medical doctor be allowed to use the inexpensive ivermectin to treat him over the hospital's strenuous objections.
Ivermectin had been approved by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration to treat humans with intestinal, strongyloid, dysus, and okinaurocrisis, two conditions caused by parasitic worms.
Some tropical forms of ivermectin have been approved to treat external parasites such as head lice and rosacea.
The drug is also approved for use on animals.
But in India, they've used it to virtually wipe out COVID.
And as I understand, in Japan, too.
Remdesivir has been given emergency use authorization by the FDI for treating certain categories of human patients.
But it's bad for them, without any doubt, where the use of ivermectin to treat humans has become controversial because the FDA hasn't approved its so-called off-label use to treat the disease.
Critics have long accused the FDA of dragging its heels and being dangerously overcautious and indifferent to human suffering.
I think they want to understand what they're doing is protecting the profit motives of Big Pharma.
They don't care.
They could care less about the health and welfare of human beings.
Medical doctors are free to prescribe ivermectin, even though the FDA claims off-label use could be harmful in some circumstances.
They'll try to find some bizarre set of circumstances to claim it could be harmful.
Meanwhile, human clinical trials of the drug are currently in progress, but it's already being used on a very wide scale.
The drug most definitely saved the elderly patient's life because his condition changed right immediately after he took ivermectin.
Some 71.
Visiting the U.S.
from Hong Kong to celebrate his granddaughter's first birthday.
Became ill with COVID within days.
Was close to death.
Hospitalized on October 14th at Edward Hospital in Naperville, Illinois.
Part of the Edward Elmhurst Health System.
His condition worsened dramatically.
He was incubated and placed on a ventilator.
Noon's only child, Man Kwon Nook, who holds a doctoral degree in mechanical engineering, did her own research and decided her father should take ivermectin.
But against the doctor's wishes, the hospital refused to administer it.
The daughter went to court on her father's behalf on November 1st.
Judge Paul M. Fullerton of DuPage County granted a temporary restraining order requiring the hospital to allow ivermectin be given to the patient.
The hospital refused to comply.
At a subsequent court hearing, Fullerton said one physician who testified described Sonig as basically on his deathbed, with a 10-15% of survival.
Ivermectin can have minor side effects, such as dizziness, itchy skin, and diarrhea, at the dosage suggested for Nigg.
But the risks of these side effects are so minimal, Mr. Nigg's current situation outweighs the risk by 100-fold.
The judge issued a preliminary injunction directing the hospital to immediately allow temporary emergency privileges to his physician solely to administer ivermectin.
The hospital resisted the order, still denying Bain access to his patient.
They claimed they couldn't let him in because he wasn't vaccinated and that his chief medical officer wasn't available to proctor the administration.
The daughter's attorneys filed an emergency report with the court.
Fullerton heard from both sides and admonished the hospital, reinstated that he must allow Bain inside over a period of 15 days to do his job.
When the hospital filed a motion to stay the order, he denied it, again directing the facility to comply.
Ivermectin appears to have worked.
He's recovered.
He was discharged on November 27.
My father's recovery is amazing, his daughter said in a statement.
My father's a tough man.
He was working hard to survive, with God holding hands.
He was weaned off oxygen about three days after moving out of the ICU, began oral feeding before hospital discharge, returned home without carrying a bottle of oxygen and a feeding tube.
He now stands with a walker and can practice stepping, meaning walking, after being sedated for a month on a ventilator.
His performance is beyond our expectations.
Our attorney said the happy end result provides hope for the nation.
We get calls from all over the place.
People who want to sue hospitals after someone's passed.
They want to get the medicine and couldn't, obviously.
That's a difficult case because a malpractice is very difficult to prove.
People just want to do what's best for their family members and find ivermectin themselves and have it on hand to use when someone starts to develop symptoms.
Joe!
Look at how the hospital fought tooth and nail against using a drug that saved the man's life!
I mean, this is disgusting!
Beyond words!
Because they are paid by the NIAID and NIH to do certain protocols, and if they don't follow those protocols, they stand a chance of getting all of their funding removed.
Remdesivir was originally created as a chemotherapy drug by Gilead Sciences, but these people are always trying to look for other uses of their drugs.
So in the early 2000s, when they had the first outbreaks of Ebola over in Africa.
Fair Fauci decided that he would put remdesivir as an off-label treatment for Ebola, along with three other drugs.
One of them was ivermectin.
There were zero deaths with ivermectin.
There was about a 10% death rate with the other two drugs.
And there was over a 50% death rate with remdesivir, at which point they said, we're going to have to stop this testing because it's absolutely criminal to continue it.
That's the drug that he is allowing off-label use for, quote, treatment of COVID.
And to make matters even worse, they interviewed the president of BioNTech,
who is a co-owner with Pfizer on their death jabs.
And he said that the Omicron, or as I like to call it, the Oh My Con virus variation,
is requiring at least three additional jabs.
So now you're up to the point where they move the goalposts in order to be fully jabbed within the next month or two.
You're going to have to have six jabs because they said they're already just days away from getting FDA approval for the first Omicron variant vaccine, which is just... if you're dumb enough at this point to follow along with it, you deserve to have six or eight or ten jabs, because we don't deserve to share the planet with people this stupid.
It is beyond ridiculous.
And the other thing that's really shocking They have a medical doctor on the AM radio station, AM 700, here in Houston, that has not found any evidence that there's anything wrong with these vaccines, and he keeps pumping them and pumping them and pumping them.
NPR has daily a dozen different doctors coming on telling you how safe they are, and the only way we're going to get out of this is through the jabs and the blah blah blah blah blah.
Never a single counter voice on this, on AM 700, which is Owned by the Lieutenant Governor of Texas, Danny Boy Patrick.
So you might want to call Danny Boy up and say, why don't you try to do some balanced reporting?
Why don't you have somebody that's knowledgeable debate the ridiculous positions of your urologist that keeps telling everybody they need to get jabs?
And then I don't know what we can do about NPR other than just laugh at them and never send them a dime.
They keep telling you how they're publicly supported.
Don't support these people and don't support political candidates that are going to continue to fund NPR, which is just absolutely shameless commie propaganda.
Oh, I agree 100%, Joe.
You got it exactly right.
And I have a friend who would only listen to NPR in the past.
Meanwhile, the Biden-Putin teleconference that just took place, during that, Putin rejected Biden's demand that the U.S.
take control over negotiations between Ukraine and its former Donbass region.
How absurd.
The two-hour Biden-Putin conversation focused mainly on the conflict between Ukraine and its breakaway former Donbass region in Ukraine's Far East, which borders on Russia.
To understand the conversation, some basic history that produced the current situation needs to be stated.
September 5, 2014, Minsk Protocol and its follow-up February 12, 2015 Minsk II agreement established between Ukraine and the Donbass breakaway ended the intense hot war.
Both of the two Minsk agreements were negotiated directly between the warring sides to stop the hot war in which the Donbassers were defending themselves against the bombs and missiles from Ukraine.
And to peacefully establish a framework called the Normandy Framework for a final settlement between the two sides in that war, that it be peacefully settled.
That Normandy Framework was between the two warring regions, Ukraine versus the breakaway former region of Ukraine, was supported by three nations that were not directly but only indirectly involved, France, Germany, and Russia.
Which wanted the conflict to be settled without full-fledged warfare.
France and Germany were involved because they led the European Union and because the EU wanted Ukraine to become a member of the EU.
Russia involved because both Ukraine and Donbass are on Russia's border and Russia doesn't want U.S.
missiles to be placed less than 10 minutes flight time to hit Moscow.
Obama, however, wanted Ukraine and the EU as a preparation for Ukraine to be admitted to NATO so America can then place its missiles in Ukraine.
Think about this.
What if China wanted to place its missiles in Mexico, for example, or in Canada?
This is insulting beyond the belief.
The U.S.
was not invited to the Normandy Framework because its government wanted restoration of the warfare.
The initial idea had been worked out between Angela Merkel and Francois Hollande in order to enable Ukraine to be restored to peace so all members of the EU could vote favorably on Ukraine's admission into the European Union.
Hollande and Merkel would not have initiated the Minsk agreements unless they were dissatisfied with the way Obama was dealing with the Ukraine issue.
In other words, America was being shut out of the matter entirely by the EU deliberately.
Biden is demanding America now replace the Minsk agreement with one that will be forced upon the Donbass by Russia.
Putin said no.
That the two warring parties need to come to an agreement that he wouldn't allow the U.S.
to nullify the commitments that both sides had signed on to.
America's demand that Ukraine's side be imposed upon Donbass so that Ukraine's violation of Minsk are allowed but Donbass violations in response are prohibited is not acceptable to Vladimir Putin.
He especially emphasizes because only Ukraine side wants a misagreement to be nullified.
The big hang up has always been the refusal by Ukraine to allow the breakaway region to become a special administrative district of Ukraine, as Crimea had been during the 60 years during which it was transferred by the Soviet dictator away from Russia, of which it had been apart since 1783 and forced into Ukraine. 1783.
Because of the resistance by Crimeans, Crimea became allowed to be largely self-ruled within Ukraine.
The U.S.
regime, however, refuses to allow Ukraine to agree to treating the breakaway Donbass region in the same way.
The U.S.
has a full backing of the two Ukrainian racist, fascist, or Nazi-Ukrainian parties' right sector and the Freedom Party, and the two parties have been on the ground forces, whom the CIA trained to perpetuate the U.S.
coup that occurred in Kiev in February of 2014, where Victoria Nuland played a key role.
The coup's preparation began no later than 2011, where an extermination plan was promptly instituted by the new Ukrainian government against the supporters of Donbass autonomy, and the war against Donbass began.
Among the Ukrainian army commanders who admitted were Ruslan Onychashenko, who even admitted their mission, being employees of the Ministry of the Interior, was to clean the cities after the army had worked the territory with aircraft, artillery, and heavy military equipment.
If those people in Donbass were to vote in another Ukrainian presidential election, then the U.S.
control over Ukraine would terminate.
The U.S.
doesn't want that to happen because it wants to place its missiles there.
It also planted Russia's biggest naval base, which was and remains in Crimea, into a U.S.
naval base.
But Russia succeeded in thwarting that aspect of the plan.
Obama wanted the residents eliminated from there because 90% of them had voted for the Ukrainian president, John Yashchenko, that Obama overthrew because the Ukrainian president did not want Ukraine to become a NATO member.
I'm telling you, Joe, the U.S.
machinations and interference in foreign nations is unending, and Ukraine has become quite the hotspot.
Fortunately, Vladimir Putin seems to have the matter in hand.
Your thoughts?
Yeah, well, they've got a couple other hot spots that they're working on, and they're trying to start a hot war with Taiwan and China, and they're also trying to start one with Israel, United States, and Iran.
But getting back to Ukraine, Soros and his lovely little handmaiden, Vicky Newland, overthrew
the democratically elected government in Ukraine in 2004 in what was called the Orange Revolution.
And then because the country insisted on having a democratic government,
they elected another democratic government that Soros and Newland didn't like.
So in 2014, they overthrew him again.
That's the one that occurred under Obambi.
And that was the Maiden Revolution, where they brought in Georgian snipers
and shot police and protesters from both sides so that they could make both sides think it was their fault.
And Veterans Today has great articles that expose all that particular baloney.
But bottom line is, yeah, we've been overthrowing regimes worldwide forever.
And now it looks like we're the next regime to be overthrown.
So it doesn't look good for humanity at this point, other than there's a lot of people that are waking up, and like I've said repeatedly, every epiphany is permanent.
So if you wake up, get somebody else next to you to wake the hell up.
Great.
Points, Joe.
Meanwhile, we want to hear from you.
Send fan mail, pro or con, to liveneedtoknowatgmail.com.
Live needtoknowatgmail.com.
Here's a comment from my blog.
Bill from Australia, we need to remember the apparent phenomenon reported widely of vaccine shedding.
The fact that unvaccinated people are reported to catch something from vaccinated people, the spike protein to be precise, which appears to turn the body against itself.
Although all these complexities, I do not think anyone can prove what an unisolated virus is or that it even exists.
And the protocols surrounding the virus are so dishonest, coercive, and corrupt, one must be naturally suspect.
Why is all the emphasis, for example, on an mRNA non-vaccine vaccine rather than proven treatment such as ivermectin and others?
Why are there no PSAs about vitamins and nutrients to help protect oneself from COVID rather than mandates that you have to take the vaccine and wear a face mask and stay at home and report your whereabouts to the police via your cell phone or else end up in a quarantine camp?
This is clearly not about health.
This is about planetary control, exploitation, and depopulation.
The whole thing is suspect from beginning to end.
An historical precursor.
Study the high death rate to the HIV pharma drug AZT as promoted by Fauci 40 years ago for AIDS, also with no isolated virus.
Very profitable.
Very deadly.
So whether the virus even exists, save as a phony justification for controlling genocide via the Vax, the results are what need to be analyzed and recognized, not just the means.
Cui Bono, who benefits from all this massive genocidal corruption?
They are the ones who need to be investigated and brought to justice.
Meanwhile, a Volkswagen Conspiracy virtual conference for 2021 will occur this weekend, Saturday and Sunday.
If you go to my blog at jamesfetzer.org, right at the top it says it's this weekend.
Track it down to obtain tickets for the conference.
This is a tentative subject to revision.
I'm revising this.
Today and tomorrow we'll have updated There are going to be two taken out and four added in that are going to round it out on Saturday.
Also on Sunday, there are going to be a couple of additions, so it's going to be a full panoply of presentations, probably 12 each day from 9 a.m.
to 9 p.m.
Check it out.
This is something you don't want to miss.
As I say, go to jamesfetzer.org.
Notice in the lower left-hand corner, it's This Weekend, and follow up.
Meanwhile, remember, 1% control the world, 4% are their puppets, 90% are asleep.
5% know and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use the 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
and try to wake the 90%.
The 1% use a 4% to prevent the 5% from waking up the 90%.
Meanwhile, final thoughts, Joe.
Yes, the NPR story that we mentioned earlier, Code of Silence book, which was written by Lisa Olson,
Code of Silence book, which was written by Lisa Olson, O-L-S-E-N, involves a federal judge named Samuel Kent, K-E-N-T,
O-L-S-E-N, involves a federal judge named Samuel Kent, Yes, the NPR story that we mentioned earlier,
who sexually molested many women and was involved in all kinds of criminal activity in his
bench.
But turns out that whenever somebody turns up evidence of crimes on the part of a judge,
that it goes to a private judicial review, and those reviews are never made public,
and they almost never sanction anybody in any way.
She goes into two other cases, one of them a judge named Nixon
from Jackson, Walter Nixon from Jackson, Mississippi, was convicted of perjury.
He was actually charged with taking a bribe.
And then when he was questioned about it, he lied about it.
And he managed to beat the bribe charge, which, you know, is always the result of having a cooperative prosecutor.
But because he had lied to the FBI, he wasn't able to beat the perjury charge, so he ended up going to jail.
He never resigned his office, and he continued to collect full pay while he was in jail.
Another one that she mentions is a guy out in Orange County named Alex Kozinski, K-O-Z-I-N-S-K-I, who, surprisingly enough, is a Holocaust survivor.
And all of the criminal activity that he was involved in.
The first 30 pages of her book are available online, and I sent those to Jim.
Maybe we can talk about it some more tomorrow, because it got a lot of interesting information.
And like I said, it just came up an hour or two ago on NPR, so I haven't had a lot of time to do research on it.
We'll get into it a little bit deeper.
According to her, there were three federal judges that were impeached in the 80s and none have been impeached since then until this Samuel Kent got impeached.
So we have a very defective judicial process.
I'll get the exact count of the number of circuit and district court judges that we're talking about.
And then along with the nine Supreme Court judges, because if we can't clean out the judiciary,
we have absolutely no hope because they've really got enormous amount of power over us.
Joe, I think you got it right.
It's just a joy to do these programs with you, my friend, because of your breadth and depth of knowledge.
Let me add that Joe mentioned three hotspots, Ukraine, Russia, Taiwan, China, Israel, Iran.
Let me explain why two of those, in my opinion, are non-starters.
Number one, the Biden administration is massively in debt to China.
They're not going to provoke a war with China.
So China-Taiwan is most unlikely to be the source of the next war.
Let me emphasize, however, the Biden administration needs a war.
Their poll numbers are catastrophic.
They're dropping.
Kamala Harris has even worse polling numbers than Biden.
They might try to explain, as Joe was suggesting, that they should take credit for Congress accomplishments, but they're few and far between.
They need a war.
That leaves Israel, Iran, and Ukraine, Russia.
Well, I'll tell you, the Iranians have the capacity to devastate Israel, and Israel is in many ways running the shop as a manifestation of the Rothschilds empire, which is the The master controller wants to seize the entirety of planet Earth, an issue to which we shall return tomorrow.
So you can count that out as well.
They're not going to run the risk of Israel being annihilated by Iran.
Even if Iran does not have nuclear weapons, they can do the job.
That leaves Ukraine and Russia.
It appears to me this is all being exaggerated.
We're getting a propaganda blitz.
You go on to television and we get more and more stories.
This is just the kind of buildup that precedes a war.
Biden, Harris need a war.
They're planning on making that happen because they believe, and I think it's a myth, that the country will join together behind the administration to fight a war.
Not this time.
This administration has sold out.
Everyone can see through it.
No one believes in the Democratic Party today.
So I say, I see that as the master plan, and I wish them lots of luck.
▲
Export Selection